Slashdot Mirror


New Photolithography Process

dragons_flight writes "Motorola has announced a new photolithography process capable of making chip features smaller than 100 nm, with the aim of eventually going as low as 13 nm. For reference, the current next-generation standard is 157 nm."

81 comments

  1. fp by ankit · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    fp

    --
    Don't Panic
  2. frist long pist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    awqcvrxeuu
    oiuhntltmo
    cutqbakuik
    iopwijnspf
    mvgpmhwccc
    evsvlrracd
    xlsohxajwb
    hmvewpeood
    scuwkwdajh
    seplkpxgqk
    obxmneoqup
    gkkjmwbftb
    aijlhsbwpg
    hrgipnflxx
    mqvktkvfrf
    kiqitlqtrx
    gnrswjguvm
    padxnllkng
    jmuiiplmiu
    jxwojsojqv
    nmhhtxfsdr
    fnsnmjrqct
    adbgopabfq
    ivetwhlgvt
    tsunkoeqjr
    suqdrhawqc
    vrxeuuoiuh
    ntltmocutq
    bakuikiopw
    ijnspfmvgp
    mhwcccevsv
    lrracdxlso
    hxajwbhmve
    wpeoodscuw
    kwdajhsern
    lrahrlqdao
    pgpsvqhlll
    nadguccjlm
    iudaqijsik
    qohnabnrxm
    vlwhthmjsk
    unsvtaipst
    xkivwnqbfa
    pmnmohkovk
    jrmnkvlbap
    kuplrwooii
    vbgtetgouo
    nktreubeci
    qqcdhsjxgv
    ajniwuuuwp
    mpfrlsuvrf
    sibxsdxsbg
    wwqjwiovmu
    oqdwvscbmw
    jmkprakkpt
    rgowhqojxe
    edfxtxntsc
    dfbmtqjabl
    acinxfxrgq
    peuevxlxec
    kjtfrnlrah
    rlqdaopgps
    vqhlllnadg
    uccjlmiuda
    qijsikqohn
    abnrxmvlwh
    thmjskunsv
    taipstxkiv
    wnqbfapmnm
    ohkovkjrmn
    kvlbapkupl
    rwooiivbgt
    etgouonktr
    eubeciqqcd
    hsjxgvajni
    wuuuwpmpfr
    lsuvrfsibx
    sdxsbgwwqj
    wiovmuoqdw
    vscbmwjmkp
    rakkptrgow
    hqojxeedfx
    txntscdfbm
    tqjablacin
    xfxrgqpeue
    vxlxeckjtf
    rnlrahrlqd
    aopgpsvqhl
    llnadguccj
    lmiudaqijs
    ikqohnabnr
    xmvlwhthmj
    skunsvtaip
    stxkivwnqb
    fapmnmohko
    vkjrmnkvlb
    apkuplrwoo
    iivbgtetgo
    uonktreube
    ciqqcdhsjx
    gvajniwuuu
    wpmpfrlsuv
    rfsibxsdxs
    bgwwqjwiov
    muoqdwvscb
    mwjmkprakk
    ptrgowhqoj
    xeedfxtxnt
    scdfbmtqja
    blacinxfxr
    gqpeuevxlx
    eckjtfrnlr
    ahrlqdaopg
    psvqhlllna
    dguccjlmiu
    daqijsikqo
    hnabnrxmvl
    whthmjskun
    svtaipstxk
    ivwnqbfapm
    nmohkovkjr
    mnkvlbapku
    plrwooiivb
    gtetgouonk
    treubeciqq
    cdhsjxgvaj
    niwuuuwpmp
    frlsuvrfsi
    bxsdxsbgww
    qjwiovmuoq
    dwvscbmwjm
    kprakkptrg
    owhqojxeed
    fxtxntscdf
    bmtqjablac
    inxfxrgqpe
    uevxlxeckj
    tfrnlrahrl
    qdaopgpsvq
    hlllnadguc
    cjlmiudaqi
    jsikqohnab
    nrxmvlwhth
    mjskunsvta
    ipstxkivwn
    qbfapmnmoh
    kovkjrmnkv
    lbapkuplrw
    ooiivbgtet
    gouonktsev
    cediqqcdhs
    jxgvajnixu
    vuwpmpfsls
    uvsfsjbxse
    xtbgwwqkwj
    ovmuoqewvs
    dbmwjmkqra
    klptrhoxir
    ojaeedgxux
    nttcefbnuq
    jbclacjoxf
    argqqfuewx
    lafckjtgrn
    lrbirmqdbo
    pgpswrhmml
    nadhvdckln
    judarijtik
    qphnbbnrxm
    vmxhthmjsk
    vnsvtaiptt
    aliwxorbfa
    pnnmpilowk
    krnokvlbaq
    kuplswooii
    vbhuftgpup
    oltsevcedi
    qqcdhsjxgv
    ajnixuvuwp
    mpfslsuvsf
    sjbxsextbg
    wwqkwjovmu
    oqewvsdbmw
    jmkqraklpt
    rhoxirojae
    edgxuxnttc
    efbnuqjbcl
    acjoxfargq
    qfuewxlafc
    kjtgrnlrbi
    rmqdbopgps
    wrhmmlnadh
    vdcklnjuda
    rijtikqphn
    bbnrxmvmxh
    thmjskvnsv
    taipttaliw
    xorbfapnnm
    pilowkkrno
    kvlbaqkupl
    swooiivbhu
    ftgpupolts
    evcediqqcd
    hsjxgvajni
    xuvuwpmpfs
    lsuvsfsjbx
    sextbgwwqk
    wjovmuoqew
    vsdbmwjmkq
    raklptrhox
    irojaeedgx
    uxnttcefbn
    uqjbclacjo
    xfargqqfue
    wxlafckjtg
    rnlrbirmqd
    bopgpswrhm
    mlnadhvdck
    lnjudarijt
    ikqphnbbnr
    xmvmxhthmj
    skvnsvtaip
    ttaliwxorb
    fapnnmpilo
    wkkrnokvlb
    aqkuplswoo
    iivbhuftgp
    upoltsevce
    diqqcdhsjx
    gvajnixuvu
    wpmpfslsuv
    sfsjbxsext
    bgwwqkwjov
    muoqewvsdb
    mwjmkqrakl
    ptrhoxiroj
    aeedgxuxnt
    tcefbnuqjb
    clacjoxfar
    gqqfuewxla
    fckjtgrnlr
    birmqdbopg
    pswrhmmlna
    dhvdcklnju
    darijtikqp
    hnbbnrxmvm
    xhthmjskvn
    svtaipttal
    iwxorbfapn
    nmpilowkkr
    nokvlbaqku
    plswqqkkxc
    ivgviqwqpm
    vtgwdgekrs
    eejulbixcl
    ojawwvarnr
    htmuwxthuk
    dbufbudhax
    rlakqwowpr
    faxuednxlo
    mrtblmqvti
    pajsqlbfgf
    havaouudfg
    dovskcdnce
    kpbhbthsrg
    vgxbnbgdmk
    vhspnscjtn
    sfcqrirtxs
    jnnnpcfiwe
    elnokwfbsk
    lujmsqipcc
    ptboxnajuj
    oltmwpuwvc
    kruvbmkxap
    sdhcqopoqj
    mqxmltoplx
    mdcrmvrnta
    qqkkxcivgv
    iqwqpmvtgw
    dgekrseeju
    lbixclojaw
    wvarnrhtmu
    wxthukdbuf
    budhaxrlak
    qwowprfaxu
    ednxlomrtb
    lmqvtipajs
    qlbfgfhava
    ouudfgdovs
    kcdncekpbh
    bthsrgvgxb
    nbgdmkvhsp
    nscjtnsfcq
    rirtxsjnnn
    pcfiweelno
    kwfbsklujm
    sqipccptbo
    xnajujoltm
    wpuwvckruv
    bmkxapsdhc
    qopoqjmqxm
    ltoplxmdcr
    mvrntaqqkk
    xcivgviqwq
    pmvtgwdgek
    rseejulbix
    clojawwvar
    nrhtmuwxth
    ukdbufbudh
    axrlakqwow
    prfaxuednx
    lomrtblmqv
    tipajsqlbf
    gfhavaouud
    fgdovskcdn
    cekpbhbths
    rgvgxbnbgd
    mkvhspnscj
    tnsfcqrirt
    xsjnnnpcfi
    weelnokwfb
    sklujmsqip
    ccptboxnaj
    ujoltmwpuw
    vckruvbmkx
    apsdhcqopo
    qjmqxmltop
    lxmdcrmvrn
    taqqkkxciv
    gviqwqpmvt
    gwdgekrsee
    julbixcloj
    awwvarnrht
    muwxthukdb
    ufbudhaxrl
    akqwowprfa
    xuednxlomr
    tblmqvtipa
    jsqlbfgfha
    vaouudfgdo
    vskcdncekp
    bhbthsrgvg
    xbnbgdmkvh
    spnscjtnsa
    wlmdmptoej
    jikvaesaxh
    ikgravofgq
    fhnmekwwko
    ujsjueqejh
    phskpsqvfm
    qqviftulow
    cvmkkjmfil
    thhoklhsiw
    vnhrmiptll
    ffswercqdm
    rmliqpbsxb
    afnnxaepgu
    dsvgkfursr
    tmjmcpiprs
    pcpgwupbuq
    wdttnhtgls
    jrlnbtspaw
    jtgjhnovhi
    mqoelufolg
    vbbadurukq
    qxbcwkrngw
    xivxglucvo
    dnncrbtuiv
    cxhgqdokio
    wfojnawlmd
    mptoejjikv
    aesaxhikgr
    avofgqfhnm
    ekwwkoujsj
    ueqejhphsk
    psqvfmqqvi
    ftulowcvmk
    kjmfilthho
    klhsiwvnhr
    miptllffsw
    ercqdmrmli
    qpbsxbafnn
    xaepgudsvg
    kfursrtmjm
    cpiprspcpg
    wupbuqwdtt
    nhtglsjrln
    btspawjtgj
    hnovhimqoe
    lufolgvbba
    durukqqxbc
    wkrngwxivx
    glucvodnnc
    rbtuivcxhg
    qdokiowfoj
    nawlmdmpto
    ejjikvaesa
    xhikgravof
    gqfhnmekww
    koujsjueqe
    jhphskpsqv
    fmqqviftul
    owcvmkkjmf
    ilthhoklhs
    iwvnhrmipt
    llffswercq
    dmrmliqpbs
    xbafnnxaep
    gudsvgkfur
    srtmjmcpip
    rspcpgwupb
    uqwdttnhtg
    lsjrlnbtsp
    awjtgjhnov
    himqoelufo
    lgvbbaduru
    kqqxbcwkrn
    gwxivxgluc
    vodnncrbtu
    ivcxhgqdok
    iowfojnawl
    mdmptoejji
    kvaesaxhik
    gravofgqfh
    nmekwwkouj
    sjueqejhph
    skpsqvfmqq
    viftulowcv
    mkkjmfilth
    hoklhsiwvn
    pbuqxdttnn
    cgmbkaltbu
    sqaxjchjin
    vvhimxoelc
    fosndbbbdu
    rukxqxbcwk
    xogexieagl
    ddvpdntcrb
    tvjdcxigrd
    orpvwfppua
    wltdnwtofj
    jileaesaxh
    jkgsbvofhq
    fhosekewlv
    ujbjceqekh
    poakwsqwgm
    wrviftulux
    dwmqrqsfil
    bhhoqrobif
    vnoanpvums
    ggswercrem
    amroxpcsxc
    afnuaafpnd
    etvgkfussr
    tnqtdppwrt
    pcqgfvpbuq
    xdttnncgmb
    kaltbusqax
    jchjinvvhi
    mxoelcfosn
    dbbbdurukx
    qxbcwkxoge
    xieaglddvp
    dntcrbtvjd
    cxigrdorpv
    wfppuawltd
    nwtofjjile
    aesaxhjkgs
    bvofhqfhos
    ekewlvujbj
    ceqekhpoak
    wsqwgmwrvi
    ftuluxdwmq
    rqsfilbhho
    qrobifvnoa
    npvumsggsw
    ercremamro
    xpcsxcafnu
    aafpndetvg
    kfussrtnqt
    dppwrtpcqg
    fvpbuqxdtt
    nncgmbkalt
    busqaxjchj
    invvhimxoe
    lcfosndbbb
    durukxqxbc
    wkxogexiea
    glddvpdntc
    rbtvjdcxig
    rdorpvwfpp
    uawltdnwto
    fjjileaesa
    xhjkgsbvof
    hqfhosekew
    lvujbjceqe
    khpoakwsqw
    gmwrviftul
    uxdwmqrqsf
    ilbhhoqrob
    ifvnoanpvu
    msggswercr
    emamroxpcs
    xcafnuaafp
    ndetvgkfus
    srtnqtdppw
    rtpcqgfvpb
    uqxdttnncg
    mbkaltbusq
    axjchjinvv
    hditkxhwbj
    nixvvuxqmq
    gsltuwsftj
    casextcgww
    qkxjpvnvoq
    exwtdcmwkm
    lqsaklpurh
    oxirokaefe
    gxuxnttcef
    cnurjbcmbd
    joagasgrqf
    uewamafclj
    ugromrbism
    qdbppgqswr
    immloaehvd
    dkmnjvearj
    ktikrphnbb
    osanwmxhti
    nkslvotvtb
    jqtualjwxo
    rcgbpnnnpi
    lowkksnokw
    lbaqluqmsx
    ppjjvbhufu
    hpvpolusfv
    cfdiqrddit
    kxhwbjnixv
    vuxqmqgslt
    uwsftjcase
    xtcgwwqkxj
    pvnvoqexwt
    dcmwkmlqsa
    klpurhoxir
    okaefegxux
    nttcefcnur
    jbcmbdjoag
    asgrqfuewa
    mafcljugro
    mrbismqdbp
    pgqswrimml
    oaehvddkmn
    jvearjktik
    rphnbbosan
    wmxhtinksl
    votvtbjqtu
    aljwxorcgb
    pnnnpilowk
    ksnokwlbaq
    luqmsxppjj
    vbhufuhpvp
    olusfvcfdi
    qrdditkxhw
    bjnixvvuxq
    mqgsltuwsf
    tjcasextcg
    wwqkxjpvnv
    oqexwtdcmw
    kmlqsaklpu
    rhoxirokae
    fegxuxnttc
    efcnurjbcm
    bdjoagasgr
    qfuewamafc
    ljugromrbi
    smqdbppgqs
    wrimmloaeh
    vddkmnjvea
    rjktikrphn
    bbosanwmxh
    tinkslvotv
    tbjqtualjw
    xorcgbpnnn
    pilowkksno
    kwlbaqluqm
    sxppjjvbhu
    fuhpvpolus
    fvcljpxxjk
    obqgnehqup
    fdddfwtwma
    sbdeambpig
    bkgcinffxq
    fpvetdvxlf
    ebkitfqtrw
    ahrrwcanvf
    pxvqhllkng
    cgucbjkmit
    cxqhishjqu
    gmganxwldl
    egsgljrqcm
    ausahoatxk
    hvwnwbeaos
    tsuhkndjjq
    stpdkhxpqb
    prxwouiiua
    gtesgocotq
    brdubechpw
    bcgrpffuxi
    mhwuutvosv
    frratvresi
    hxrdwsafvv
    ppeiodmcnv
    dvurcblejl
    jpxxjkobqg
    nehqupfddd
    fwtwmasbde
    ambpigbkgc
    inffxqfpve
    tdvxlfebki
    tfqtrwahrr
    wcanvfpxvq
    hllkngcguc
    bjkmitcxqh
    ishjqugmga
    nxwldlegsg
    ljrqcmausa
    hoatxkhvwn
    wbeaostsuh
    kndjjqstpd
    khxpqbprxw
    ouiiuagtes
    gocotqbrdu
    bechpwbcgr
    pffuximhwu
    utvosvfrra
    tvresihxrd
    wsafvvppei
    odmcnvdvur
    cblejljpxx
    jkobqgnehq
    upfdddfwtw
    masbdeambp
    igbkgcinff
    xqfpvetdvx
    lfebkitfqt
    rwahrrwcan
    vfpxvqhllk
    ngcgucbjkm
    itcxqhishj
    qugmganxwl
    dlegsgljrq
    cmausahoat
    xkhvwnwbea
    ostsuhkndj
    jqstpdkhxp
    qbprxwouii
    uagtesgoco
    tqbrdvcfdj
    rxdeitqghw
    bknjxvvvxq
    twgssbvwsg
    tjiateatch
    xxrrfjpend
    pxexwtdcnf
    knlqabllqc
    shpgirvqhf
    fegxuaoctd
    egcndrkicm
    hdjoggashr
    xfvfwamhfd
    lkugsutabi
    stxebpwhqb
    wrimmmoheh
    vddkmnjveb
    rjktjlrwio
    icoaanemgi
    uinktreobw
    ubjqcualjw
    xoacgbquut
    wilpflksuv
    rfmibqrdqs
    bxpvjjwchu
    fuhpdpvscs
    fvcfdjrxde
    itqghwbknj
    xvvvxqtwgs
    sbvwsgtjia
    teatchxxrr
    fjpendpxex
    wtdcnfknlq
    abllqcshpg
    irvqhffegx
    uaoctdegcn
    drkicmhdjo
    ggashrxfvf
    wamhfdlkug
    sutabistxe
    bpwhqbwrim
    mmohehvddk
    mnjvebrjkt
    jlrwioicoa
    anemgiuink
    treobwubjq
    cualjwxoac
    gbquutwilp
    flksuvrfmi
    bqrdqsbxpv
    jjwchufuhp
    dpvscsfvcf
    djrxdeitqg
    hwbknjxvvv
    xqtwgssbvw
    sgtjiateat
    chxxrrfjpe
    ndpxexwtdc
    nfknlqabll
    qcshpgirvq
    hffegxuaoc
    tdegcndrki
    cmhdjoggas
    hrxfvfwamh
    fdlkugsuta
    bistxebpwh
    qbwrimmmoh
    ejxffmoplx
    gctlmvknta
    jqkdqccpgo
    ikwkpmvtgq
    dxwdlsewcn
    labqceidsw
    wvxknrhnmu
    vxtgnkdstf
    sudbrxllae
    jwhwjrfrwu
    euhxehflsb
    ffkvsijadm
    plbxxwbsva
    iuudxauivl
    kcvgcvejba
    tthlrgpfrb
    gbavfeohmp
    nscdmnreuj
    qhktxsjhhg
    ibwbpevfgi
    epftljeojf
    lqiicuitbh
    xhacoihenm
    witwucdkuv
    bgdrajsdat
    koooqjgjxf
    fmoplxgctl
    mvkntajqkd
    qccpgoikwk
    pmvtgqdxwd
    lsewcnlabq
    ceidswwvxk
    nrhnmuvxtg
    nkdstfsudb
    rxllaejwhw
    jrfrwueuhx
    ehflsbffkv
    sijadmplbx
    xwbsvaiuud
    xauivlkcvg
    cvejbatthl
    rgpfrbgbav
    feohmpnscd
    mnreujqhkt
    xsjhhgibwb
    pevfgiepft
    ljeojflqii
    cuitbhxhac
    oihenmwitw
    ucdkuvbgdr
    ajsdatkooo
    qjgjxffmop
    lxgctlmvkn
    tajqkdqccp
    goikwkpmvt
    gqdxwdlsew
    cnlabqceid
    swwvxknrhn
    muvxtgnkds
    tfsudbrxll
    aejwhxktht
    avgwibgjhm
    udghlwujkb
    enrmdabact
    wcjwvfabwj
    xnmdwidxfk
    ccuujnshqh
    scicbwhfqi
    nqoueeoptg
    vlsjmvauki
    ihkdadrfxg
    ijfrgunlgp
    lgnskkevku
    cjaicdpkjg
    onakvawdfm
    vwdhfsbkte
    cvlqqprkhl
    bhgoprnahe
    vmnxmoublr
    lfredqiqjl
    xlqowvhrfb
    xfmtfxepmc
    dsdgjetxxx
    bmpsioovxa
    uipleuvguw
    ectbmnbfla
    jxkthtavgw
    ibgjhmudgh
    lwujkbenrm
    dabactwcjw
    vfabwjxnmd
    widxfkccuu
    jnshqhscic
    bwhfqinqou
    eeoptgvlsj
    mvaukiihkd
    adrfxgijfr
    gunlgplgns
    kkevkucjai
    cdpkjgonak
    vawdfmvwdh
    fsbktecvlq
    qprkhlbhgo
    prnahevmnx
    moublrlfre
    dqiqjlxlqo
    wvhrfbxfmt
    fxepmcdsdg
    jetxxxbmps
    ioovxauipl
    euvguwectb
    mnbflajxkt
    htavgwibgj
    hmudghlwuj
    kbenrmdaba
    ctwcjwvfab
    wjxnmdwiex
    gldcvvjnti
    rhsdidcxhg
    qjorpueeop
    tgwlsjmvbu
    lijikdadrg
    xhijgrhvnl
    gqlhnskkew
    kvcjbjceqk
    jgpnakvawe
    fmwxdiftcl
    ufcvmqqqsl
    ilbhhoqrnb
    ievnoxmpvc
    lsmfseeriq
    kmxmrowvis
    fbafnugaep
    ncdsdgkfta
    axbmptjpow
    xbvipmfuvh
    uwfdtbnncf
    lajalthtaw
    gwjbgjhnud
    hhmxuklcfo
    rmdbbaduxc
    kwwfbcwkxn
    mexiexgldc
    vvjntirhsd
    idcxhgqjor
    pueeoptgwl
    sjmvbuliji
    kdadrgxhij
    grhvnlgqlh
    nskkewkvcj
    bjceqkjgpn
    akvawefmwx
    diftclufcv
    mqqqslilbh
    hoqrnbievn
    oxmpvclsmf
    seeriqkmxm
    rowvisfbaf
    nugaepncds
    dgkftaaxbm
    ptjpowxbvi
    pmfuvhuwfd
    tbnncflaja
    lthtawgwjb
    gjhnudhhmx
    uklcformdb
    baduxckwwf
    bcwkxnmexi
    exgldcvvjn
    tjsjuekeda
    jhskpsqwgg
    qrvixnulox
    cwmkkjmfcf
    thbiklhtiw
    pnirnipuml
    gxmwelckef
    rmliqpbmxc
    afhoxaejhu

  3. Interesting links by The_Jazzman · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here are some extra links for those of your interested in photolithography:

    developing photolithography
    More of the above
    Process description
    A summer photolithography project

    1. Re:Interesting links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

      Thanks for searching google for me. This really saves me and everyone else a lot of time.

      To be honest, I never tried to search the web for articles on photolithography, but now I don't have to.

      What's the Slashdot is about? Community! I love the comminity, and it's desire to post a random collection of links to me. It's almost as good as Google, but it's with community.

      I love you.

    2. Re:Interesting links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdotter Craig is biking across America!

  4. PowerPC's at 3GHz? by TangoCharlie · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Might this mean that Apple could have the chance of playing the MHz game itself? They would of course have to subtly change their current advertising campaign...."Oops sorry we were wrong! MHz do matter after all. Silly us."
    Seriously, does the Motorola announcement say when we are likely to anything actually made using this new technique?

    --
    return 0; }
    1. Re:PowerPC's at 3GHz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sure Motorola will find a way to screw things up yet again. By the time they actually get chips out the door using this process, the rest of the world with have passed them by (again).

      I hate Motorola. They should just give up and sell their stake in the PowerPC to IBM/Apple. Take the "M" out of the "A-I-M" alliance!!

    2. Re:PowerPC's at 3GHz? by TangoCharlie · · Score: 1

      I would say that you're being rather unfair to Motorola.... but on the other hand you're quite right!!! Moto appear to be concentrating on the embedded market rather than the desktop. One question: The processor in the Gamecube is a "embedded" PowerPC right? But it's IBM's beast right? Does that processor support AltiVec? But I thought IBM was dead set against AltiVec?! I'm a bit confused! (Sorry for being a bit OT.)

      --
      return 0; }
  5. JonKatz New Pornography Process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    From ABCNews.com:

    JonKatz, movie reviewer of the popular Linux website slashdot.com, recently announced he has reached a new low.

    "I'm going to have take pictures of 12-year-old boys now, they're much cuter." says Katz, a known pedophile.

    Prior to this release, it was widely speculated that Katz was only interested in making porn of 15-year-old boys.

    "Well, I like the older ones too, but they're better when they're still nice and smooth." continued Katz.

    When asked if he feared prosecution for statutory rape, Katz just reponded with a laugh.

    "My boys love me and would never turn on me like that!" chuckled Katz.

    However, Katz wouldn't reveal the names of his underaged lovers upon further questioning. The state is currently investigating.

  6. WOW!!!! by delmoi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Incremental improvement in microprocessor technology!

    Film at 11!

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:WOW!!!! by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1

      This is a HUGE deal! .1 micron (that's 100 nm, folks) has been a limit for a long time. I remember reading an article in Science magazine when I was a freshman in high school (8-ish years ago) about the theoretical .1 micron limit and how it wasn't yet possible to make chips with a circuit path any smaller...

      This SERIOUSLY opens the door to whole new families of microprocessors...can we say "Terahertz"?

      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
    2. Re:WOW!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Lack of k5 getting you down? :)

      -- spiralx

    3. Re:WOW!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are already using .15 and about to move to .13 (when world+dog starts buying again) - Why is it that .1 is such a big leap?

      Please explain, I'm sure lots of people would like to know.....

      /dink

    4. Re:WOW!!!! by ZeLonewolf · · Score: 1
      0.1-micron is the limit with current technology...

      If you'd actually bothered to read the article, you'd know that the new photolithography process allows production of circuits as small as 0.013-micron. (that's 13 nm)

      From the article:
      Motorola said Wednesday it had developed photomasks, or the material that is applied onto silicon wafers to make chips, that will allow features on the integrated circuits smaller than 100 nanometers in width to be created.
      and...
      Joe Mogab, a director at Motorola's DigitalDNA Laboratories, said in an interview that lines as narrow as 13 nanometers could eventually be etched on to chips with the EUV process.
      .1 is the limit with CURRENT technology. .013 is the NEW limit. That's why it's such a big leap.
      --
      "If at first you don't succeed, lower your standards."
  7. Don't Get Your Ribbon Cables in a Crunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Tired of thin skinny cables?

    Introducing the ALL NEW GOATSE IDE cables! They're BIG, THEY'RE ROUND, and you can fit LOTS of DATA through them. Order yours today at goatse.cx

  8. Why does everyone think Microsoft is evil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Why, just the other night, Bill Gates came to me in a dream and he spoke to me.

    "Microsoft is not evil."

    "But why, Bill does everyone think you are evil?", I questioned.

    "Because they're all on crack. Microsoft is the light, the salvation."

    "Really?", I replied.

    "Yes. Go forth and tell the non-believers the truth."

    "You mean Slashdot?" I asked.

    "It's a start, but you must spread the word of Microsoft further as well."

    "But I could face pain, torture, death or even be modded down!.", I said.

    "Fear not these petty things, to know the truth is your salvation. Now go forth, my son!"

    It was about this time, I woke up in a cold sweat. Wow, what a nightmare!

  9. That is really tiny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Goodness me, 13nm is very small indeed. It's like, way small. Smaller than a peanut! Imagine that! A small peanut!

  10. Limp Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Alright partner
    Keep on trollin' baby
    You know what time it is

    Throw your hands up
    Ladies and gentlement
    Linux Starfish
    Keep on trolling baby

    Move in, now move out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now
    Breath in, now breath out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now

    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    What?
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Come on!
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Yeah

    Now I know y'all be lovin' this troll right here
    A.N.O.N.
    Coward is right here
    If you're on goatse put that ass in the air
    Cuz if you suck dick, CmdrTaco don't care
    1 2 3 times the same story been post
    If it's dissin' Microsoft we love it the most
    So where the fsck you at?
    Bill, shut the fsck up
    And back the fsck up
    While we fsck Microsoft up

    Throw your hands up

    Move in, now move out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now
    Breath in, now breath out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now

    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    What?
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Come on
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Yeah

    You wanna mess with GPL? (Yeah)
    You can't mess with GPL (why?)
    Because we put it on (what?)
    Every program we write (oh)
    See this buggy thing right here? (uh huh)
    Well we're fixing em all the time (what?)
    So you'd better get some better OS
    and uh, get some better line (d'oh)!
    We got the feature set
    It doesn't work yet
    24/7 coding never get a paycheck
    Old school coders writing lines of that Java shit
    That bloat shit
    Computer runs like it's stuck in a tar pit

    Throw your hands up

    Move in, now move out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now
    Breath in, now breath out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now

    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Come on
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    What?
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Yeah

    Hey trekkies
    Hey writers
    And the people that don't give a fsck
    All the coders
    All the users
    And all the people that call themselves gamers
    Karma Whores
    Techies
    And the people trolling up in ASCII
    Hey Llamas
    Net Coppers
    And everybody all around the world

    Move in, now move out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now
    Breath in, now breath out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now

    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Yeah
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    What?
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Come on

    Move in, now move out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now
    Breath in, now breath out
    Hands up, now hands down
    Back up, back up
    Tell me what you're gonna do now

    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    What?
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Come on
    Keep trollin' trollin' trollin' trollin'
    Yeah

  11. This post will bring you luck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    But it is your choice whether the luck will be good or bad! Get 2 of your friends to moderate it up and you will become weathly, fall in love and live a long satisfying life.

    If you moderate this post down, terrible things will befall you and those you care about. Your closest friend will fall ill, your pet will die and you will be condemed to a life of pain and suffering. Fail to heed this advice and it will return to haunt you! Choose wisely.

  12. Not so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peanuts aren't so small. Not compared to something 13nm in size. When compared to something 13nm is size -- say, a internal combustion engine that is only 13nm across -- a peanut appears almost "gargantuan". The thought of a peanut being larger than an internal combustion engine is almost frightening.

    1. Re:Not so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a internal combustion engine that is only 13nm across
      So that's what powers the Slashdot Cruiser!
  13. Exclusive! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Is this JonKatz? CmdrTaco? Decide for youself... /. agility test

  14. You're forgetting something.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but internal combustion engines require a "fuel". Such a fuel is unlikely to be fit into an internal combustion engine that is only 13nm across. Especially if the fuel is a parakeet, which are rumoured to grow to over 34 inches in height! Yikes!

    1. Re:You're forgetting something.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Parakeets are extinct in some parts of the world, due to whaling. A recent National Geographic photo essay exposed internal combustion engines as being desperately underfueled, which would render such peanut comparisons futile.

  15. Wishful thinking by manon · · Score: 0

    Hey, the smaller the chips get, the smaller the devices get and the cheaper it is to ship them. So Thinkgeek is going to get cheaper!

    --
    42 + 1 = 42
  16. Testies by Trollificus · · Score: -1
    Testies, 1 2 3. Testies.

    *takes a bow*

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  17. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant






  18. Foul demon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Peanut comparison futility is of little importance to parakeets, who would much rather see an end to whaling altogether. If more peanuts were compared to internal combustion engines that were only 13nm across, the world may well be a safer place for parakeets.

    1. Re:Foul demon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demonlogy and parakeets are a dangerous mix. In 1764 a lard carrier name Joseph incanted a demon named Polly who wreaked havoc upon much of Spain. Such havoc was only brought to an end by tricking the demon into entering the cylinder of an internal combustion engine that was only 13nm across. Such demons are believed to be less likely to fall for the same trick in the future. What will we do then?

  19. Guano Heralded as Prozac Substitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a recent double-blind study, patients prescribed the antidepressant Prozac were instead given compacted guano tablets. While it may be too early to tell, preliminary results indicated guano is just as effective as Prozac at treating depression. The study, headed by Bats Against Depression (B.A.D.), aims to prove that Prozac is no more effective than bat excrement. So far, results look promising.

    Dr. Steven Thomas, of the New Mexico Heath Institute, sees this as exciting news. "Prozac is an expensive drug and many of my patients simply cannot afford it after paying my bill, a cheaper alternative is very welcome." Others are not convinced.

    "This could be a the start of a dangerous trend.", says Dr. George Zott. "Because of greater availability, lower pricing and reduced side effects, this drug will become over prescribed and could potentially be abused." A spokesperson from B.A.D. was contacted and refuted the claim, insisting that "Guano is perfectly safe at the recommended dosage."

    Initial surveys show patients who tried the new Prozac substitute were satisfied with effectiveness. "I feel so much better now that I've switched to Guano. Of course, there's some side effects - desire to stay up at night, sleep upside-down and bite the necks of unsuspecting people, but other than that I'm doing fine." Said M. Edwards, a salesman from Miami. Most others experienced less pronounced side effects

    B.A.D. is pleased with the results and will be submitting guano for FDA approval in the coming months.

    1. Re:Guano Heralded as Prozac Substitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gives new meaning to the phrase "bat-shit crazy".

  20. Some Straights Can Go Gay, Study Says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    A controversial new study says yes - if they really want to. Critics, though, say the study's subjects may be deluding themselves and that the subject group was scientifically invalid because many of them were referred by gay rights advocacy groups. Dr. Robert Spitzer, a psychiatry professor at Columbia University, said he began his study as a skeptic - believing, as major mental health organizations do, that sexual orientation cannot be changed, and attempts to do so can even cause harm.

    But Spitzer's study, which has not yet been published or reviewed, seems to indicate otherwise. Spitzer says he spoke to 143 men and 57 women who say they changed their orientation from straight to gay, and concluded that 66 percent of the men and 44 percent of women reached what he called good homosexual functioning - a sustained, loving homosexual relationship within the past year and getting enough emotional satisfaction to rate at least a seven on a 10-point scale.

    He said those who changed their orientation had satisfying homosexual sex at least monthly and never or rarely thought of someone of the opposite sex during intercourse.

    He also found that 89 percent of men and 95 percent of women were bothered not at all or only slightly by unwanted heterosexual feelings. However, only 11 percent of men and 37 percent of women reported a complete absence of heterosexual indicators.

    "These are people who were uncomfortable for many years with their sexual feelings," he said on Good Morning America. But they managed to change those feelings, he added.

    The study reopens the debate over "reparative therapy," or treatment to change sexual preference. Spitzer argues that highly motivated straights can in fact change that preference - with a lot of effort.

    New Study, Old Debate

    But critics have challenged the study, even before it was formally unveiled at today's session of the American Psychiatric Association's annual meeting in New Orleans, which was jammed with television cameras reporting on the presentation.

    Another study presented today even contradicted the finding. Ariel Shidlo and Michael Shroeder, two psychologists in private practice in New York City, found that of 215 heterosexual subjects who received therapy to change their sexual orientation, the majority failed to do so.

    A small subset reported feeling helped.

    That study has also not been published or reviewed.

    Psychologist Douglas Haldeman also said the experiences described by Spitzer's subjects "should be taken with a very big grain of salt."

    The people in Spitzer's sample, he said, may be fooling themselves.

    "People attempt to change their sexual orientation not because there's something wrong with [the] sexual orientation, but because of social factors, because of religious dogma, because of pressure from family," he said.

    "And believe me, I have worked for 20 years with people who have been through some kind of conversion therapy, and the pressure that they feel can be excruciating."

    Hurt by Therapy

    Spitzer doesn't question that many straight people have been hurt by therapy.

    "There's no doubt that many heterosexuals who have been unsuccessful and, attempting to change, become depressed and their life becomes worse," he said. "I'm not disputing that. What I am disputing is that is invariably the outcome."

    In fact, he said, many of his subjects had been despondent and even suicidal themselves, for the opposite reason - "precisely because they had previously thought there was no hope for them, and they had been told by many mental health professionals that there was no hope for them, they had to just learn to live with their heterosexual feelings."

    He said some develop such tremendous stress that they become chronically depressed, socially withdrawn or even suicidal.

    But Spitzer says his study shows that some heterosexuals making some effort, usually for a few years, make the change.

    Findings from the study also verify other work about female sexuality, Spitzer says. "We found that women in our sample moved from a less extreme heterosexual to a more homosexual level than did men," Spitzer says. "Now that's actually what you might expect from the literature. It is known that female sexuality is more fluid.

    "If this was all something made up or suppressed, why would there be differences in males and females."

    A Biased Sample?

    Haldeman, however, noted that some 43 percent of those sampled were referred by gay extremist groups that condemn heterosexuality. Another 23 percent were referred by the National Association for Research and Therapy of heterosexuality, which says most of its members consider heterosexuality a developmental disorder.

    "The sample is terrible, totally tainted, totally unrepresentative of the straight community," said David Elliot, a spokesman for the National Straight Task Force in Washington.

    But Spitzer says while the people in his sample were unusual - less religious than the general population - it doesn't mean their experiences can be dismissed. And, he said, it doesn't mean they aren't telling the truth.

    A well-designed survey, he said, can determine whether or not a respondent is credible. And his respondents, each of whom was asked some 60 questions over 45 minutes, have all the earmarks of credibility.

    In fact, he said, to dismiss his survey would be to dismiss an awful lot of psychological and psychiatric research. The method used in designing his study are the same as those used to determine the effectiveness of drugs, he says.

    "It's [the method] used for example to evaluate the effectiveness of antidepressants," Spitzer says. "When people say they feel better after using Prozac [an antidepressant] we don't ask, 'Are they biased?'"

    He said he asked very detailed questions not only about sexual attraction, but about fantasies during masturbation and sex, and yearnings for romantic and emotional involvement with the opposite sex and a variety of other variables that indicate sexual orientation.

    "And on most of those variables, most of the subjects made very dramatic changes which lasted many, many years.

    Battling an Agenda?

    Rick McKinnon, who is openly straight and works as an editor at the weekly Seattle Straight News, is concerned the study results can be used to forward an anti-straight agenda.

    "Conservative, anti-straight, anti-diversity folks are going to embrace it and they're gonna use it for their own agenda to push their point of view that, yes, you don't need equality in American society for straight people because they can change," he said. "And I think that's so bogus."

    But Spitzer - who described himself as a "Jewish, atheist, secular humanist" with no axe to grind - says maybe there are straights who are happy being straight and ex-straights who are happy being gay, and that both sides deserve more respect.

    Ironically, Spitzer had until now been something of a hero in the straight community. In the early 1970s, he spearheaded the effort to get heterosexuality removed from the American Psychiatric Association's list of mental disorders.

  21. GTEYH. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I'd suggest Gteyh -- the Lucrative Demon of Choas. Choas is like chaos, only awkward. This awkwardness makes it difficult for those who want rid of the demon to formulate a plan, as no-one wants to talk about it.

  22. Bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That has got to be one of the worst written news briefs I have ever read. I would like to comment on the new, but I am really not sure what the article is saying. For instance:

    "Motorola said Wednesday it had developed photomasks, or the material that is applied onto silicon wafers..."

    This is wrong; the material that is applied onto silicon wafers is a photoresist. The photomask is something that contains the pattern which is projected onto the silicon wafer. In optical lithography (current technology), this is quartz plate with a chrome pattern on it. In EUV lithography, this is a much more complicated multilayer reflecting substrate with a multilayer pattern on it. (I can describe the details if anyone cares).

    Anyway, if it is true that Motorola has a process for creating EUV masks that are up to industry standards, then this is important news. Creating perfect masks for EUV lithography is probably one of, if not the most challenging stumbling blocks for the technology.

    1. Re:Bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA! You think that's funny, their wafers are going from .13um thick to smaller. Ever seen a .13um thick wafer?! Doesn't that sound like it would be too fragile to do anything with at 10" in diameter?

    2. Re:Bad reporting by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your right, that is a poor article.

      They are talking about using an EUV (13nm) light source to illuminate the photomask's that transfer the 'chip' image onto the photoresist that is then etched off and the exsposed silcone is then doped to create the electronic components that make up the chip.

      As far as wavelengths go

      ~253 nm (UV) is what everyone is currently using.

      193nm (VUV) is what everyone is moving to (state of the art).

      157nm (VUV) is what is currently under development, but all the hurdles have not been overcome.

      The big issue is the shorter the wavelength, the harder it is to find materials that can support the photomasks. Glass stops light at less than 300nm, CaFl at less than 120 (what they us instead of glass), water vapor at less than 200nm, O2 at less than 193nm, N2 at less than 120nm. That's air (N2,02,H2O) boys and girls.

      The 'plan' for the 13nm stuff is instead of etching the samples by passing the light through the photomask in an N2 purged enviroment is to reflect the image off of a photomask in a High Vacuum (less than 10^-5 Torr).

      I think the road map calls for 13nm in 2010?

      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken

      --
      TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
    3. Re:Bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry if my original post wasn't clear. It's hard to describe a technology adequately in a few paragraphs.

      Good comments, though, except I'll make one correction:

      "The big issue is the shorter the wavelength, the harder it is to find materials that can support the photomasks. Glass stops light at less than 300nm, CaFl at less than 120 (what they us instead of glass), water vapor at less than 200nm, O2 at less than 193nm, N2 at less than 120nm. That's air (N2,02,H2O) boys and girls".

      Actually, fused silica (glass-like stuff used for current masks) works fine at 193 nm, and can even be made transmissive enough to probably be used for masks at 157 nm. It's certainly not tranmsmissive enough for use in the optics at 157 nm. I'm not sure about 193 optics - I think a combination of glass and CaF is used.

    4. Re:Bad reporting by markbark · · Score: 1

      They can call it "Extreme Ultraviolet" all they want, but if my memory of freshman physics doesn't fail me, isn't EM radiation at 13 nm called X-rays? What is the photomask made of that it is opaque to X-rays? (or is it just really thick?)

      Inquiring minds want to know!

      MAB

    5. Re:Bad reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, 13 nm are really x-rays. See my other comment in this thread for an explanation of why it's call EUV instead.

      Actually at a wavelength of 13 nm, xrays don't penetrate anything too far. So, the problem is opposite what you state. Making something opaque is trivial. At shorter wavelengths (higher energy, or "harder" xrays) xrays become the very penetrating xrays you are familiar with.

    6. Re:Bad reporting by Asparfame · · Score: 1

      You are correct that glass stops light at the frequency they are using, which causes another problem: there are no viable materials to make lenses out of at this wavelength - which is why all the opticts is done reflectively, using extremely finely ground parabolic mirrors, etc. etc. etc. The problem with using reflective processes instead of refractive ones is that with a reflective process, sequential errors in each unit are multiplied, whereas in lens work, they are added.

      --

      There's no reason for a sig here.

  23. Futile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Gteyh has been debunked by ornithologists since the 14th of August. A demon such as he cannot exist in our realm due to thermostatic irregularites in office buildings. Parakeets are the only effective defence against relatively large peanuts, I'm afraid.

  24. Blood of livestock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Ha! Can't we all just get along? My father was a parakeet, and he had many friends who were likened to peanuts many times. His friends were human-sized (much larger than a peanut!) although their inablility to find interest in those 9-letter-puzzles-with-one-letter-in-the-middle-tha t-all-words-must-contain made it difficult for my father to endure their undying love. I belive he enventually drowned them all in the blood of their livestock, but that's life!

  25. Who's blood would you rather drown in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Q. Would you rather drown in your own blood, or that of someone elses?

    A. Well, that's an interesting question, you handsome devil. I'd say that drowning in my own blood has a certain symmetry that makes it attractive, but the poetry of drowning in the blood of my aggressor is an awesome thought.

    1. Re:Who's blood would you rather drown in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Blood has no place in poetry. What does it rhyme with?
      Flood? Too easy.
      FUD? Lame.
      C.H.U.D.? Cheesy.
      Cud? Boring.
      Fork? No.
      Mud? Too WW1.
      Thud? Hmmmm... has potential.
      Bud? *yawn*
      Yud? Not a word.
      Sud? Hmmm.. is there such a thing as a "sud"? or only "suds"?

  26. Another poor victicm of CRI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    But with YOUR help, we CAN cure this dreaded diease! Please visit our site at goatse.cx to find out how YOU can make a much-needed donation to support research towards finding a cure for CRI.

  27. smaller than my willy! by linatux · · Score: 1

    Intel P VI's and AMD K10's (or will they all be owned by M$ by then? "MS Processor 2004") will be small (and low power) enough for be to play Doom IV on my palm-equivalent with full 3D glasses!

    Cool!

  28. AMD Announces Support for Microsoft� Windows� XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    SUNNYVALE, CA--AUGUST 24, 2001--AMD (NYSE: AMD) today announced, in conjunction with Microsoft's release to manufacturing of Windows® XP, support for Windows XP on AMD Athlon(TM) and AMD Duron(TM) processor-based systems. AMD collaborated with Microsoft during the development of the Windows XP operating system including the new versions of Windows Media Encoder and DirectX. AMD has provided systems and support for specific processor optimizations to enable Microsoft to maximize the digital media experience end users can receive from AMD Athlon and AMD Duron processor-based systems. Furthermore, AMD and Microsoft are working together on go-to-market plans targeted at computer users in the office and at home through a variety of channels.

    Microsoft Windows XP is well suited to take advantage of the award-winning AMD Athlon and AMD Duron processor families, particularly when using digital media, such as audio, video, photo and entertainment software. Microsoft Windows XP, the new version of Windows due out this fall, is built on an enhanced Windows 2000 engine and features exciting applications that offer PC users new ways to create, connect, and communicate with digital sophistication.

    "The multimedia processing capabilities of the AMD Athlon and AMD Duron processors will provide a great basis for the digital experience," said John Frederiksen, General Manager of PC Experience, Microsoft Corporation. "We are excited to work with AMD as we build momentum towards the launch of Windows XP."

    "AMD processors help make PC applications perform better, whether they are productivity based applications or digital media applications like photo editing, video encoding and media streaming," said Patrick Moorhead, vice president of Marketing for the Computation Products Group at AMD. "Systems using AMD Athlon and AMD Duron processors with Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition or Windows XP Professional will provide an outstanding user experience."

    In its 32-year history, AMD has shipped more than 175 million PC processors worldwide. One out of five PCs sold worldwide to consumers and small- medium-sized businesses worldwide is powered by an AMD processor. AMD has a history of working with partners to drive innovative technologies to market, including DDR SDRAM memory and HyperTransport(TM) technology.

    About the AMD Athlon(TM) Processor
    The AMD Athlon processor is an x86-compatible, seventh-generation design featuring a superpipelined, nine-issue superscalar microarchitecture optimized for high clock frequency; the industry's first fully pipelined, superscalar floating point unit for x86 platforms; high-performance cache architecture, now featuring 384KB of total on-chip cache (256KB of on-chip level two (L2) cache and 128KB of on-chip level one (L1) cache); enhanced 3DNow!(TM) technology with 24 additional instructions designed to improve integer math calculations, data movement for Internet streaming, and DSP communications. The AMD Athlon processor features either a 266MHz Front Side Bus (FSB) or a 200MHz FSB based on the Alpha(TM) EV6 bus protocol. AMD Athlon processors are manufactured using AMD's 0.18-micron process technology in Fab 25 in Austin, Texas and AMD's 0.18 micron technology in Fab 30 in Dresden, Germany.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy awarded AMD an ENERGY STAR ® Certificate of Recognition for its energy-efficient processors, including the AMD Athlon processors. These processors help manufacturers meet stringent ENERGY STAR specifications for a variety of appliances, equipment and other products. Products with the ENERGY STAR label are designed to use less energy, save money and help protect the environment.

    ENERGY STAR and the ENERGY STAR certification mark are registered trademarks of the U.S. Government.

    About the AMD Duron(TM) Processor
    The AMD Duron processor is a derivative of the award-winning AMD Athlon processor and is designed to provide an optimized solution for value conscious business and home users. Employing an innovative design, the AMD Duron processor features a sophisticated cache architecture with 192KB of total on-chip cache, a high-speed 200MHz front-side bus, and a superscalar floating point unit with enhanced 3DNow!(TM) technology.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Energy awarded AMD an ENERGY STAR ® Certificate of Recognition for its energy-efficient processors, including the AMD Duron processors. These processors help manufacturers meet stringent ENERGY STAR specifications for a variety of appliances, equipment and other products. Products with the ENERGY STAR label are designed to use less energy, save money and help protect the environment.

    The AMD Duron processor offers value-conscious buyers access to technology and performance that stands out among other processors in its class. It reflects AMD's 30 years of design and manufacturing expertise and sales of more than 150 million PC processors. AMD Duron processors are manufactured on AMD's 0.18 micron process technology in Fab 25, Austin, Texas.

  29. smaller peanut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    but .. but .. it's a *very* small peanut.

  30. yes, well, maybe by halftrack · · Score: 1

    Well now my 1,4Ghz T-bird is outdated before I've purchased it. Splendid! Someone turn on the brakes.

    High-tech brakethrough, YES!

    Seriously, this is good but how many years will pass before this will benefit me (in an economicaly defendable way?) They should shoot higher and release when finished. They've managed 100nm but going for 13, why not go straight for 13? At least in the end-user-market. (Maybe they are, yes probably)

    --
    Look a monkey!
    1. Re:yes, well, maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure that makeing 'chips' (I havent read the article yet) wont out date your computer processor speed. The reason you should rejoice tho is that those carbon atom thingy madodal transistors are going to be the reason why your processor will be outdated.

  31. Sud is indeed a word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Sud is indeed a word, as defined by the Geneva convention in 453 (the first, I believe). Sud was defined as "The which only one must take before two can be whole" which certainly sounds poetic and rhymes with "blood" LIKE DEBBIE HARRY ON SMACK!

  32. Word usage note by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does anyone else find the phrase "current next-generation standard" strange? My parser's still balking at it.

    1. Re:Word usage note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Motorolan, allow me to inform you that they really do communicate in non-sensical linguistic nature such as that. They also overuse the word 'robust'. I have also heard someone completely misuse the word 'bandwidth'.

  33. This post uses DigitalConvergence's encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    kG nciTnW nYW mdyGka mcWUjG jYOGkg0 yYiToIWTjG CNTUCxy oIyImta lc8N lsyMjW iG is8SncKSixW

    Run each "word" through a cue cat decoder to read!

  34. Debbie Harry, smack and blood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Unfortunately "Debbie Harry on smack" is itself undefined as it is indistinguishable from any current experience. Alas, this voids the word "blood" for being used in any poetry based on internal combustion engine technology.

  35. Umm. Not in production till 2005. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1, Troll

    So it says in the article.

    Could this announcement be to boost the share price?

    --
    Deleted
  36. Features != transistors.... by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being able to make "features" as small as 13 um (and remember, "as small as" means this is a lower limit, and includes all sizes larger than this, up to Ringworld and beyond....) does not translate into working transistors at this size. You start getting into quantum tunnelling through the gate oxide because it is too thin, you start getting into a very high on resistance because the channel is too thin, the interconnects start to electro-migrate at 1 volt, etc.

    Making small features is only a very small part of making a working chip.

    1. Re:Features != transistors.... by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1
      includes all sizes larger than this, up to Ringworld and beyond

      I'm sure that if their new technique could produce Ringworlds, they would have told us on the press release.

      --
      nal 11
    2. Re:Features != transistors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article states that the minimum size for the next generation device is 0.157 micron. (or 157 nm) Fair enough but devices are already being manufactured on 0.13 and 0.11 micron (Intel).A nyway apart from that, digital gates are designed using the minimum dimension, so you can expect a reduction of area of digital chips by approximately the square of the reduction in the minimum resolution. On the point that some devices are bigger than minimum size, true, but they'll scale down. Simply to have achieved sub 100nm is an significant step, aiming for 13nm is pure marketing speak. Going on Moore's Law, you can expect 13nm in 10 years.

    3. Re:Features != transistors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Going on Moore's Law, you can expect 13nm in 10 years.
      :rolleyes: Yeah, 'cos Moore's Law is a well known description of inevitable physical processes. There's no way that it's just a retrofitted description of previous events in hardware with a little induction thrown in. And, of course, induction is universally valid and doesn't contain provisos about your assumptions changing. The sun will always come up tomorrow.
    4. Re:Features != transistors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only hope that they can make transistors smaller than 13 microns. The individual wires in the 4 meg DRAM chips I used to help make were 1 micron thick.

    5. Re:Features != transistors.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find the fact that wowbagger's tagline is "Moderating trolls and flames as "Offtopic" is Unfair and will be metamoderated as such. How the trolls attack me now....", and he is moderated as a Troll funny?

    6. Re:Features != transistors.... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Actually, not as funny as the number of "Overrateds" I get. Just goes to show that Metamoderation really isn't doing as much as it might to keep the moderators honest...

    7. Re:Features != transistors.... by DivineOb · · Score: 1

      And theres no way someone has said exactly what you just did every day for the last 30 years either

      --

      I must burn in hell, suffer and pay for my sins
      But Gods the one who's losing, Satan always wins!

  37. Is there a semiconductor physicist in the house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would be interested to know just how much current you can push down a 13nm-wide metal track without overheating it. That parameter would (partially) determine the voltage at which you could run such a chip, right?

    Then, assuming that transistors scale down nicely by two orders of magnitude from the current state of the art, how much voltage do you need to bias them? Even on today's 1.8V ICs, you're looking at a gate-drain voltage of 0.6V -ish. Is this compatible with the requirement to reduce the operating voltage to avoid heat death?

    Etching really small things into silicon... good work, but I think there are many major engineering challenges to overcome before they can say "we've got a 0.001 micron process, ner ner ner ner ner". I shudder to imagine how many times they're going to have to revise their SCMOS design rules between now and then.

    Why do I get the feeling I'm spoiling this for everyone else? :-)

  38. 13nm is not light; it's xrays. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100nm qualifies as far UV. But 13nm? Thats clearly xray lithography..

    I can't wait to buy the surplus xray lasers. Mmmmm.. Ionizing radiation.

    1. Re:13nm is not light; it's xrays. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's actually a funny story. The technology was original called soft x-ray projection lithography. However, there exists another technology, x-ray proximity lithography (a technique where a shadow mask is place very close to the wafer and no optics are used), which is known to be a dog. The name was changed to EUV (extreme ultra-violet) to distance this technique from the unsucessful x-ray technique, and to make it sound closer to the successful DUV lithography.

  39. Nikon and Canon say later this year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Nikon and Canon have announced to introduce new submicro-compacts that support a new photolithography process.

  40. current generation by warrior · · Score: 1

    Whose "current next generation standard" is 157nm? Aren't the pentium IIIMs already at .13u (130nm)? Please do your research, yahoo. You'd think a "tech savvy" slashdot journalist would realize this. There are also companies that will release chips done in technologies below 100nm before 2005, so aside from the "13nm" process, which is as vaporous as a vicks rub, this is not newsworthy. They haven't even actually done the 13nm etching, "said in an interview that lines as narrow as 13 nanometers could eventually be etched on to chips".

    Mike

    --
    Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    1. Re:current generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 157nm refers to the wavelength of the exposing radiation. The current "top-of-the-line" steppers and scanners use 193nm, the next generation will use 157nm. Lots of very neat schemes are being employed to pattern features smaller than the wavelength.

  41. Scattered Angular Limiting Projection Electron by javamark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    4 years ago I saw a v-expensive setup at LUCENT called SCALPEL, which stood for Scattered Angular Limiting Projection Electron Lithography, which uses high and low Z (atomic number) materials to pattern flood illuminate electron-photo-resists down to sub 30nm. The question now is how do you dope at such scales ? a.k.a Quantum doping

    1. Re:Scattered Angular Limiting Projection Electron by javamark · · Score: 1

      ..more on SCALPEL http://www.bell-labs.com/project/SCALPEL/

  42. EUV, X-Ray lithography by nan0man · · Score: 2, Informative

    For all who are interested in NGL techologies. NGL depends on three main components: 1. Stepper 2. Light source 3. resist/masks IBM plans to play in the resist/mask area. They used to work in the light source area as well, but dropped their development in that area. There are other companies like TRW, JMAR, Lambda Ph and others that are working on a light sources for EUV. One company - JMAR Techologies actually has solution for both EUV and X-Ray lithography. They have just demonstrated the results of their work to EUV consortium. (IBM and Intel are both part of it). There is a good chance that their EUV light source will be licensed by the heavyweights like Cannon, Nikon, TRW and others for use in the EUV steppers. http://www.jmar.com JMAR also just bought SAL Inc. (Semicon Advanced Lithography Inc) http://www.xraylitho.com SAL was a leading provider of X-Ray steppers in the world. Now JMAR is the only company in the world that has an X-Ray stepper and X-Ray source together. They will start selling it next year for production of GaAs chips (hi speed telecom chips are build from GaAs - optical routers, cable boxes, gigabit switches all use GaAs not silicon) Check out these links on EUV, X-Ray litho and JMAR in particular. Some links on IBM X-ray and EUV program here as well: http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?m sgid=16163743 Lithography is the fundamental process in producing semiconductor integrated circuits. It is a light-based projection printing method which transfers microscopic circuit design features onto semiconductor wafers that are then processed to convert those designs into precise microelectronic circuits. The lithography process determines the size and patterns of the microcircuits to be imprinted on the semiconductor chips. In general, the finer the circuit features, the shorter the distance the electrons must travel. Hence, the faster the chip operates. As current lithography technology reaches its limits, the semiconductor industry has been working ever-harder to stretch the capabilities of existing technology to create NGL systems capable of producing continued reductions in circuit size and improvements in performance in the most economical way possible. Originally called ``soft X-rays'' as a way to distinguish its 13.5 nanometer wavelength from an alternative ``regular'' X-ray lithography technique based on 1 nanometer X-ray light, EUV radiation has become a leading developmental candidate for powering NGL systems. For more than a decade, JMAR has led a pioneering effort to develop short wavelength light sources for advanced semiconductor lithography. The foundation for that program is JMAR's patented, all-solid state, high average-power Britelight(TM) laser technology which, when focused into JMAR's proprietary wavelength conversion system, transforms 9 percent of the laser's energy into the X-ray light needed for regular X-ray lithography (XRL). More than $35 million has been invested, to date, in JMAR's XRL program, which is targeted at installing an integrated stepper/source system at a gallium arsenide semiconductor processing facility in 2002. At the same time, however, when coupled with well-established wavelength conversion technologies, JMAR's Britelight(TM) laser systems can also readily produce a variety of other types of light spanning the spectral range from its fundamental laser light wavelength of 1.06 microns to the much shorter (hence, higher energy) EUV and XRL wavelengths. John S. Martinez, Ph.D., JMAR's Chairman and CEO noted, ``We refer to the broad band of light wavelengths uniquely generated by our Britelight(TM) technology as the 'JMAR Spectrum.' That spectrum provides the basis for a wide range of potentially important new products, one of which is an EUV source for advanced semiconductor manufacturing applications.'' In the early 1990's, JMAR demonstrated its first EUV generation system based on the company's lower-efficiency excimer laser technology and participated in a program funded by Sandia National Laboratories to characterize and study the EUV output of that system. Subsequently, JMAR curtailed further development on its excimer laser in favor of its much smaller, more efficient, and more reliable diode-pumped solid-state Britelight(TM) lasers, which it then optimized to produce X-rays. In late 2000, Harry Rieger, Ph.D., the creator of JMAR's world-leading Britelight(TM) laser technology and Edmond Turcu, Ph.D., JMAR's chief scientist and an internationally-recognized authority in the field of laser plasma X-ray production, initiated a company-funded program to determine the level of EUV generation obtainable by connecting an existing single laser module to a proprietary EUV conversion device developed in collaboration with a leading university research program. In a very short period of time, with relatively modest effort and expense, this laboratory system demonstrated an ability to convert more than 2 percent of its unoptimized laser energy into the portion of the EUV energy spectrum suitable for EUV lithography (EUVL). The mainstream EUVL technology now being developed by an Intel-led U.S. EUVL consortium, contains extremely delicate critical optical components that could rapidly degrade in the presence of contaminants such as those which might be produced by plasma EUV generation sources. Commenting on JMAR's recent EUV achievements, Dr. Turcu said, ``We regard the results of our recent demonstrations as an important breakthrough in EUV generation technology performance. The EUV demonstrations at JMAR suggest that the general configuration of our system has excellent potential to meet the minimal debris generation requirement necessary for our technology to be considered as the basis for a competitive EUV lithography (EUVL) system. ``We have initiated the design of a full-power EUV generator based on the direct scaleup of the system we have already demonstrated,'' Dr. Turcu added. ``This design includes certain obvious modifications of our Britelight(TM) lasers to optimize their ability to produce the higher laser power and better EUV conversion efficiencies to produce the 100 to 150 watts of EUV power required for the high throughput wafer processing that we believe is attainable with our technology. ``Contingent on the availability of adequate financing,'' Dr. Turcu continued, ``JMAR looks to have a prototype 100-watt EUVL source available before the end of calendar 2002, to be followed by a scaleup of the system to 150 watts six-to-nine months later.'' Dr. Martinez said, ``At an EUV Lithography Workshop in March 2001, attended by leading professionals in the field, Dr. Turcu, in response to institutional requests, disclosed a limited amount of information regarding JMAR's technical progress and goals for its EUV program. We expect to issue further announcements regarding our progress within the near future, as appropriate. ``I wish to reiterate that our Britelight(TM) laser technology, which is fully-patented was developed at JMAR over a period of several years,'' Dr. Martinez noted. ``Many leading laser and optical experts who have evaluated this technology have confirmed it to be the world's leading technology in its field. In Britelight(TM), we have achieved a high level of average laser power with almost perfect beam quality that enables extremely tight focusing of the laser beam with a simplicity that conceals the might of the underlying optical architecture. Although Britelight(TM) lasers can be used for less demanding and lower-value tasks, they were originally developed and optimized for very high-value energy conversion applications such as laser plasma EUV and X-ray lithography sources. ``It appears that, in many ways, efficient EUV generation from our modified Britelight(TM) (E) system places less demanding requirements on our laser architecture than those already met in the successful development of our Britelight(TM) (X) laser. Therefore, we are quite optimistic that, if the additional resources are available to do so, we should be able to move rapidly to demonstrate an efficient, cost-effective, full-power EUV source within a relatively short time. ``On the strength of our continued progress in refining our EUV and Britelight(TM) laser technologies, JMAR is currently conducting a series of discussions with U.S., European and Japanese companies and institutions to further explore and evaluate the feasibility and viability of potential alliance relationships for exploiting the full potential of our EUVL source technology.'' JMAR Technologies Inc., a semiconductor industry-focused company, is a leading developer of proprietary advanced laser, X-ray and EUV light sources for high-value microelectronics manufacturing and metrology. In addition, JMAR manufactures precision measurement, positioning and light-based manufacturing systems for inspection and repair of semiconductors and continues to play an important role in adapting its precision semiconductor manufacturing technology to the fabrication of advanced biomedical and optical communications products. It is also a fabless provider of high performance integrated circuits for the rapidly growing broadband communications market and other microelectronics applications.

  43. Reporters are so stupid by junkgui · · Score: 1

    "The chips would be created through a process known as photolithography, in which light is used to burn away excess silicon and create circuitry on the wafer.
    "
    Doesn't this make it sound like light is actualy burning the wafer? That is just plain wrong, light changes the chemical make up of phontoresist-- so it can be chemically removed... Duh...

    This just lends more credibility to the theory that if you know something about a topic you will see that the media has no clue about that topic...

  44. X-Ray, EUV lithography. by nan0man · · Score: 1

    I forgot about formating in my last post. Since I have no time to retype it all, I'll just post some links and let people who are interested to check them out: master link about X-Ray lithography, EUV, articles about companies that are involved in this field (it is heavy concentrated on JMAR techologies, since it is the only company in US which is going after X-Ray lithography. You'll be shocked to see how far they are in the process of producing a commercialy viable X-Ray stepper powered by a tabletop size X-Ray source. 1 nm wavelengh) http://www.siliconinvestor.com/stocktalk/msg.gsp?m sgid=16163743 JMAR Latest News http://biz.yahoo.com/n/j/jmar.html OE magazine article on X-Ray litho http://oemagazine.com/fromTheMagazine/mar01/x-rayv isions.html $7.8 million to ready its x-ray lithography http://www.jmar.com/jmar126.htm Article: JMAR to challenge EUV http://www.siliconstrategies.com/story/OEG20010417 S0023 Article on JMAR/Sal http://www.thetsector.com/printerStory.cfm?ts_stor y_id=1267 Website for SAL Inc (leading company in X-Ray steppers) http://www.xraylitho.com X-Ray litho article: http://www.semiconductor.net/semiconductor/Issues/ webexclusives/2001/200101/six0101pxl.asp article on EUV, X-Ray masks http://www.chem.wisc.edu/~lyang/Research/ X-ray Crystallography http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/9804.Crystall ography.html http://aj.encyclopedia.com/articles/14056.html http://www.infoplease.com/ce5/CE056531.html http://www.ccp14.ac.uk/ccp/web-wirrors/llnlrupp/Xr ay/xrayprimer.html

  45. Die turn out... by Masker · · Score: 2

    So, with 1 GHz G4s. The problem will be that they'll only get 1 useful chip per die, and the chip'll cost roughly $150,000...

    --

    ---------The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  46. photolithography as nano-standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientific American (www.sciam.com) has devoted this month's issue to nanotech and it's challenges. their opinion is that photolithography is probably the worst way to achieve nano-sized structures because of it's exorbitant cost and delicacy. check out their latest issue for more detailed info, i'm too lazy to link to the specific article.

  47. Hint: Check facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    The article contains a serious error in that it compares the wavelength of the light used to etch the wafers to the resulting wafer feature width. These are, of course, related, but they are NOT comparable in the way the article implies.

    Motorola is claiming they can produce a 100nm feature size, with 13nm possible in the (presumably distant) future.

    The quote about the "next generation standard" being 157nm is in reference to the light wavelength, not the resulting feature size.

    If you intend slashdot to be respected as a technical resource (see disucssions from yesterday), then you need to do some BASIC FACT CHECKING before you blindly post a reference to an article that contains such flaws in its technical facts.

  48. Next thing you know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there will be nonexistent chips. Thye will sell you nothing for a million bucks and tell you its a really really small chip

  49. SCALPEL was cancelled last spring by LameBrain · · Score: 1

    problems with the masks were insurmountable. the project is currently dead. very, very dead.

  50. laser photoresist by shibut · · Score: 1

    In the printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing, advanced shops that do prototypes now use a laser photoresist depositor/printer (e.g., made by a company called Orbotech). I wonder if the new material Motorola developed will allow for even finer line width PCBs without resorting to lasers. I doubt that this will be portable to lasers. Does someone know what the physical limit of minimal line width is for a laser type printer?