Slashdot Mirror


E-Paper Moves Closer

squaretorus sent in this story about electronic paper at the BBC. Seems that everytime any of the e-paper, e-ink, e-whatever companies have a new demo unit they run out and call a press conference. But none of it matters until they have ultra-thin, durable, flexible pages that can be manufactured cheaply...

179 comments

  1. Think of the savings in $$$! by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know tons of businesses and schools (in particular) use piles upon piles of paper every year. If E-paper ever gets really good, then not only could there be substantial savings for mass-paper users (anyone from the policy debate community knows what I'm talking about), but also it could help slow the rate at which land fills grow, and also slow deforestattion (yeah, there are ton of other causes like population growth, acid rain, blah blah blah)... of course the key would be proliferating this kind of technology to less well to do nations.

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    1. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by gnovos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nope, you won't see those (monetary, at least) savings at all. Why not? Because like all "Intellectual Property" these days, your books will be licensed, not bought. How cheap are CD's to make? How much do they cost to buy? The same will be true for books.

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    2. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by Bradee-oh! · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That wasn't his point. His point was the amount of disposable paper used at schools, offices, and other places of business where the paper is used temporarily with non-copyright material and then thrown away.

      Imagine. 3rd grade classrooms that have 20 kids and do a "60 math problem in 60 seconds" worksheet once a week. Instead of throwing away 20 sheets a week, 20 "sheets" could be reused for an entire school year or beyond. Multiply those savings by every 3rd grade classroom and you're talking very little e-paper compared to lots and lots of tree-paper. And that's only one incredibly small application in only one grade...

      The point was also on environmental benefits. True, books won't cost any less, but books aren't disposable and usually aren't just thrown away. The landfill/rain forest savings would, in deed be grand.

      --
      "This is Zombo Com, and welcome to you who have come to Zombo Com" - www.zombo.com
    3. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by Pope · · Score: 2
      I'll assume for the moment that you're talking about music CDs, an Album if you will.
      The first one's the bitch in terms of cost (the Master): it's the replication that's the cheap part.

      This is not to say, of course, that record companies have been screwing with us for a decade or two: how much does your morning coffee "cost," and how much is the price?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've got to be kidding. Did you read my post or just the title? I didn't mention books, nor even make a subtle reference to IP. I'm talking about personal papers for businesses and homework assignments for schools. eBooks may be more expensive, but ePaper in general will be cheaper because of the personal data you can store on it.

      F-bacher

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    5. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by scrytch · · Score: 3

      how much does your morning coffee "cost," and how much is the price?

      At least when I buy my coffee, I own it.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    6. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by Looge+Over+All! · · Score: 0

      Please don't reply to karma whores.

      It just make Slashdot an ever more vacuous and bland place.

    7. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by Pope · · Score: 1
      At least when I buy my coffee, I own it.

      well, not for very long :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    8. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by uchian · · Score: 1

      The point was also on environmental benefits. True, books won't cost any less, but books aren't disposable and usually aren't just thrown away. The landfill/rain forest savings would, in deed be grand.

      Please remember that computers require POWER. This power comes from powerstations, which require coal, gas, or nuclear power. Environmentally these are just as bad as cutting down rainforests (in fact, when you realise that every tree in the rainforest releases EVERYTHING back into the atmosphere when it dies and rots, you realise that books aren't such a bad thing).

      What we really need if we want to be environemental is to look at ways of preserving energy. This includes using renewable sources (such as sunlight and wind power), reducing the amount of power we use (computers are hideously inefficiant), and using the most efficiant sources of energy around. Muscle is good - i.e. writing on blackboards, writing on paper, whatever, pulling a cart along by slaves, etc.

      Incidentally, that last one was a joke.

    9. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by TaoJones · · Score: 1
      scrytch wrote:
      At least when I buy my coffee, I own it.


      Oh sure, right now you do - but wait untill the DMCA (Digital Millenium Coffee Act) gets pushed though by Starbuck's lobbiests and Juan Valdez. Then you'll be buying the right to savor the thick, rich Columbian coffee - but you won't be able to share it with a friend, or add "unapproved" condiments to it. If the EULA (uhm, you did read the fine print on the bottom of the cup, right?) says "no cinnamon" in your latte, then no cinnamon for you!


      "If we took the bones out it wouldn't be crunchy, would it?" Monty Python

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
    10. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by jx100 · · Score: 0

      Actually, I thnk that e-paper requires very little power, especially compared to something like a CRT or LCD. Even if you take the power e-paper uses into consideration, e-paper is still far more environmentally friendly.

    11. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by TummyX · · Score: 1

      You own the coffee - but not the recipe.

      You own the paper the book is printed on, but not the content.

    12. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will release all, but a new tree will grow in the place of the old, taking it back in - neutralizing the effect. But when someone cuts down the whole forest, there won't be any new trees, all is released but this time it is not recycled by all the new trees.

    13. Re:Think of the savings in $$$! by scrytch · · Score: 2

      > You own the coffee - but not the recipe

      Actually, if I ran the coffee through a gas chromatograph, I could do so without fear of being chased down and locked up for twenty five years, or at the very least having my livelihood ruined for life. There is precedent in the soft drink industry regarding this.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  2. Just imagine.. by !recycle · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the day when microsoft has control of all the e-paper and if the more than three words change, it self-destructs.

    --
    my sig sucks.
    1. Re:Just imagine.. by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      At least with only black fluid and white particles, you'll never see the blue screen of death :-)

  3. I believe it when I see it by roguerez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The paperless office is a vision that belongs in the same category as the flying car. Sure, one day it will happen, but it'll take just a little longer than anyone predicted. I suspect we'll be using paper for at least another 50 to 100 years, when electronic paper might be cheaper than the wooden version.

    1. Re:I believe it when I see it by Surak · · Score: 2

      The paperless office is a vision that belongs in the same category as the flying car.

      That's a bad analogy. A flying car actually *was* produced in the 1960's, I believe. I saw the story of it on the History Channel. The problem was not whether it was reproducible cheaply or not, or whether it worked and was viable or anything. The problem was that *consumers* are simply not ready for cars that fly. Most people can barely drive a car that goes in *two* dimensions, let a alone a car that goes in *three*. Take a drive on a freeway in any crowded city in America and you'll see what I mean. :-)

    2. Re:I believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a lot easier to believe if you have good groupware tools. I was filling out 100% electronically routed Lotus Notes expense reports in 1995. Currently, we get a Excel 2000 template that we have to print out and stick into snail mail -- mainly because the standard MS tools are too shitty to handle something like paperless expense reports. (MS employees, feel free to speak up :)

    3. Re:I believe it when I see it by Looge+Over+All! · · Score: 0

      People want to drive a flying car.
      The flying car traffic model cannot possibly work so long as people are driving them.

      Give me a hind and I'll show you aggressive commuting!
      (See, that's the sort of thing you'd have to put up with)

    4. Re:I believe it when I see it by mobets · · Score: 0

      go to http://www.microsoft.com/mswish/
      this is Microsoft's "Send us your wish" website
      or, you can email at mswsh@microsoft.com
      or fax (425) 936-7329
      or snail mail at
      Microsoft Corperation
      Microsoft Wish
      One Microsoft Way
      Readmond, WA 98052-6399

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    5. Re:I believe it when I see it by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Thy're almost here - www.moller.com

    6. Re:I believe it when I see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The paperless office is a vision that belongs in the same category as the flying car. Sure, one day it will happen, but it'll take just a little longer than anyone predicted. I suspect we'll be using paper for at least another 50 to 100 years, when electronic paper might be cheaper than the wooden version.

      There you go, the old joke about the paperless office being as likely as the paperless bathroom...

      Now there's a thought...

      e-toilet paper?!

  4. Re:FIRST POST by Ghoser777 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    For some strange reason I think he used copy and paste. It's not like a bunch of trolls like to start off each new slashdot story with an ascii art masturbation or a flamebait linux sucks story or so and so has died.

    F-bacher

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  5. Etch-A-Sketch by kwishot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't know about you guys, but the way they described how it works reminds me a bit of the good-ol-days with Etch-A-Sketch! =)

    1. Re:Etch-A-Sketch by Soko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cool. I can tell the PHB to turn it upside down and shake to re-boot Windows, right?

      :-P

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  6. It it truely replaces newspaper by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Funny

    It better leave ink on my thumbs, and potty train my puppy!

  7. this doesnt seem to be happening anytime soon by mastorrent · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember seeing an article in a technology magazine a few years ago about electronic books with electronic paper and electronic ink. Apparently, this ink, when charged, would flip from black to white (or something like that). So you could buy the electronic book, download a text from the net for a nominal fee, and have the book automatically typeset itself for the novel. They also touted its ability to do fancy things like animation, font size changes, etc. Never heard anything more about this though (not that I know of at least, but I may have missed something). Sounds like quite the concept, but the technology for some reason hasn't materialized into something mainstream yet.

    --
    http://ryan.buterbaugh.org/
  8. Re:We need it, but not on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Actually about 70% of Slashdot readership uses Windows/IE. Less than you thought, but still a rather high number if you look at the anti-MS mentality around here.

  9. Re:We need it, but not on Linux by smunt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is an interesting piece of text. Writing techniques rule the world.

  10. Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by itsnotme · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll admit that its cool that they're coming up with electronic paper solutions to replace wooden paper, while they'll be a hell of a lot easier to lug around with just one sheet of electronic paper vs 500 sheets of wooden paper in a book, there's still the issue of wether it will have the same rights as the wooden version..

    I for one would like to be able to share my books wooden or electronic.. We've seen the problems that come with the electronic version, for example, the E-Book.. Whats to make it so that the companies dont put more restrictive limitations on the eletronic paper version? Once htey get past those issues and it becomes as common and cheap as the wooden version then heck yeah I'll buy it, but until then, and until they get electronic paper to have the same rights as the wooden version, I'm not going to touch it with a 6 foot stick..

    1. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "killer app" to run on this display technology is a wireless HTML browser; nothing less, nothing more. Already HTML can do much more than any so-called e-book format, simply because it isn't artificially limited by herds of lawyers.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by tessellation · · Score: 1

      Baby, the killer app for e-ink isn't going to be in the realm of computing or mass infodisplay at all if this takes another five years to come to market, thanks to falling LCD prices & new 1" CRTs. It's clothing. How much would you pay for an infinitely and easily redesigned t-shirt? I'd probably go $300, and I doubt I'm alone. And once color comes, even better. Extrapolating from this & the people designing bacteria to live in clothing and eat odor molecules: in ten years we'll all have one or two pairs of clothing in each of the cuts we like, and just pick their color & logo according to the mood or fad of the moment.

      regards, dkl
      the tessellated networks

    3. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by root_dev_X · · Score: 1

      a very slick idea indeed - i can imagine an etch-a-sketch T Shirt would kick a considerable amount of ass.

      BUT - i can also remember seeing all those "visions of the future" film reels, promising everyhing from flying cars to auto-polarizing window glass.

      Sure, it's cool - cool as hell in fact, but i'm not about to start holding my breath.

      Warble://VX

      --
      ===== Warble://VX
    4. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by Sabalon · · Score: 1, Redundant

      And when you get hacked?
      All your shirts are belong to us
      Sorry...couldn't resist.

      It would be cool to have a shirt I could hook up via USB and drag a jpg from my desktop to the shirt "folder" and whammo - there it is on me. Even better, a GIMP plugin that lets you basically design the shirt and then upload it.

    5. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by dlek · · Score: 1
      Judging from the SSSCA and the way such things are going, the e-paper will have to have an embedded fingerprint scanner to enforce copyright restrictions. If you hand the paper to a friend, it will scan his thumbprint, alert the DMCA Police, and blow his hand off.

      So if somebody tries to hand you e-paper, it probably would be a good idea to have a six-foot stick handy.

    6. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, there's more to clothing than just color.

      TEXTURE is the most important factor in many eyes -- and we won't be able to change that dynamically until nanotech arrives.

    7. Re:Would it still have the rights of wooden paper? by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Well, if the "books" (i.e. the content) were sold on little tiny cartridges (chips, ROMs, whatever), then wouldn't that solve the problem?

      You would buy the little chip that had the content of the book, and plug it into your ePaper viewer and read all you want. You could loan the chip out to friends, etc. Wholesale copying of the contents of the chip would still be illegal (just as making a wholesale copy of a book is).

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  11. LCD by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are just two cases when I ever use paper these days, and I'd love to eliminate them:

    1 - Somebody gives me old fashioned bills or credit card receipts on paper.

    2 - I want to see something at >72dpi.

    It's hard to get excited about e-paper... I want to have no-paper, not more-paper, e- or not.

    This technology seems like a giant step backwards from where we're headed with lower cost, larger, and higher-res LCD displays.

    1. Re:LCD by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      When you can fold up an LCD display and put it in your wallet, let me know.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:LCD by smunt · · Score: 1

      You already can, but I doubt its LCD

    3. Re:LCD by FFFish · · Score: 2

      What I'm dying to see are high-resolution, small LCDs.

      The only reason large (12-15") LCDs are necessary at this time is because they've got such a crappy resolution.

      Most of our paperbacks and textbooks columns no more than 4" to 5" wide. That's because they're high-resolution "displays": the smaller text, at 2400+dpi, more legible than what current LCDs offer.

      Now, I'm not expecting 2400dpi LCDs. But I know IBM has demonstrated, several times over the past three years, 200dpi displays.

      It's time to have devices with 5" to 7" width displays, at 200dpi. They'd be so much more legible than today's technology that I'm sure a lot of us hold-outs would start considering them as acceptable for bedtime novel-reading.

      That they'd be truly novel-sized would be a bonus.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    4. Re:LCD by Surak · · Score: 2

      Most of our paperbacks and textbooks columns no more than 4" to 5" wide. That's because they're high-resolution "displays": the smaller text, at 2400+dpi, more legible than what current LCDs offer.

      Actually most novels are lower resolution than that. At tops 300-600 DPI. Cheaper novels are even lower resolution. :)

    5. Re:LCD by Killio · · Score: 0

      True, but my gripe with that sort of system would be the ridiculous amount of scrolling you'd have to do. Books are nice because you only need to turn the page every 45 seconds or so; scrolling would be a PITA.

    6. Re:LCD by uweber · · Score: 1

      I don't think we will would even have to go that far 2400dpi is only necessary for good color reproduction most text is probably in the 300dpi-600dpi since digital photocopies get pretty close to the original and those machines aren't much more than a decent scnner and laserprinter. So I'll be happy with a A4 sized screen in that league (probably same size like you said but im to lazy to figure out how large it is in the metric system ;)

      --
      --Ulrich
      On no accounts allow a Vogon to read poetry at you
  12. paper? office? copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not publish your own e~"paper"? someone might even read it, if it were posted somewhere easy to find. don't forget to enter our big URL giveaway, at ScaredCity(?tm?). have you seen these guise?

  13. Very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap... by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 3, Insightful


    "You can actually think about there being a book now because you can actually put some electronics on the back of this thing and it becomes a display..."

    The speaker is quickly skipping over a very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap, flexible, fast, digital electronics that can address every one of those pixels so that they can be turned off and on.

    Just getting the speed and resolution necessary costs $110 for a Matrox G-450 video card, which is not flexible and doesn't include digital output. The final signal to a monitor is analog.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  14. I'll know by mlknowle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll know that it has arrived when I can watch TV on my wallpaper.

    1. Re:I'll know by jx100 · · Score: 1

      I understand what you mean, but can't you do that already with a projector?

  15. Upon hearing this report... by Faies · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...various makers of those little erasable sketch pads for kids scrambled to modify their products to mimic the "e-paper". One company released a statement saying "We're only switching from simple magnets to electromagnets, but in the end we can translate everything into digital media as a result"

  16. Whats the purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With jobs in the paper industry being on the edge, and pricing being a new lows, that particular industry is in a wave of consolidation.

    E paper sounds fine, unless you're affected (as in part of the paper industry).None the less, e-paper may become a reality, but as Xerox predicted a paperless office 25 years ago, the demand has doubled since then. Paper will continue to be used for a LONG time.

  17. I simply don't like this. by c.r.o.c.o · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I for one will never replace my 50lb *nix manual with an e-paper one. Or for that matter any of my hundreds (if not more) of real paper books that I have collected. And I'm sure that most, if not all, people will agree with me.

    The reason is really simple, imo. The e-paper requires a battery, circuitry, special inks, etc. In the end, it will deccay, break down or I might simply drop it into the bath tub while reading it and zap the hell out of me. I've had many electronic devices fail on me, and in all cases all the information stored on them was lost. Completely. The same is true for e-paper. Sooner or later (most likely really soon) it will break down, no matter how well you take care of it.

    The same does not apply to normal, paper books. They last. And last. My oldest book is from the early 1900s, and by no means is it old. There are parchments that are thousands of years old. Granted, it's just as easy to destroy normal paper as it might be e-paper, but given proper care, normal paper has an almost endless life.

    So if given the choice, I'd rather get an old-fashioned paper book that I can keep for as long as I want rather that a cool e-paper one that will BSOD in a couple of years.

    1. Re:I simply don't like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No. E-paper, as far as I know, needn't any power to keep in order and can be done waterproof.
      In its core, as I heard, it's just black and white-colored balls in oil between two transparent plastic sheets.

    2. Re:I simply don't like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually they do not last and last anymore. Most paper used for books is not acid free anymore since the second world war.

      Still normal books at least come in formats which are not going to be unreadable within years.

    3. Re:I simply don't like this. by mce · · Score: 1

      Non-acid-free paper isn't the only problem hurting traditional books. There's also something called ink corrosion, which will destroy even good old quality paper in the long run.

      But yes, I too prefer the genuine article over any of the modern extremely volatile e-replacements.

      Basically, the stuff that I use to keep track of what is really important to me (some of those things are just memories "attached" to a book or document that anybody else will regard as "just a pile of old paper") should at least be able to outlast me. With the life expectancy of an average European being somewhere near 75 years, that means any technology that hopes to replace paper must reliably last 60 years before I will consider using it exclusively. And of course it needs to be as convenient as real paper as well.

      Franckly, I really don't expect something that satisfies these criteria to show up during my lifefime (and in my family we have a tendency to reach grow very old).

    4. Re:I simply don't like this. by netjeff · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between paper and today's generation of e-paper/ink/whatever, I agree that I choose paper.

      But the future of e-paper has the promise to beat physical paper. For example, if you leave your paper book on the top of your car and drive off, you've lost the book. If you leave a piece of e-paper with a copy of the book on the top of the car, you've only lost the e-paper, not the book itself. You can get a new piece of e-paper and load it up with a copy of the book from your computer's hard drive (or whereever).

      As for power requirements, I think other comments have pointed out that researchers are working on low-power or non-power versions.

      As you point out, a particular technology of e-paper may go out of date, but the book sitting on your harddrive will not. If you get a new generation of e-paper, load up the book on the new generation of e-paper. The important distinction is between the display technology of e-paper and the book reader/rendering software that uses this display.

      As other's have pointed out, there are still concerns over excessive restrictions on the formats of electronic books distinct from the display technologies. If the book is available only in an "encrypted" format that works only with a particular display technology, then I'd stick with paper. But if the book is available in clear-text, I'd rather display it on a future version of e-paper that they keep promising us...

    5. Re:I simply don't like this. by bay43270 · · Score: 2

      So if given the choice, I'd rather get an old-fashioned paper book that I can keep for as long as I want rather that a cool e-paper one that will BSOD in a couple of years. So your worried about loosing your books? Make a copy! The paper is just how you look at the book. All of my pictures over the last few years have been digital. They are all written on media that will be outdated within this decade. Does that mean I will loose all my pictures? No, my pictures are much more safe in digital form. I have backups of several computers and on separate media in multiple locations. When my neighbor's house burned, they lost a lifetime worth of paper photos. Something people won't have to worry about in the near future. BTW, e-paper doesn't require a charge to keep a picture. Dropping it in the bathtub might kill the storage device and the pc that parses the text, but even that should require more than a couple AAA batteries.

    6. Re:I simply don't like this. by FrostyWheaton · · Score: 1

      If the book is available only in an "encrypted" format that works only with a particular display technology, then I'd stick with paper. But if the book is available in clear-text, I'd rather display it on a future version of e-paper that they keep promising us...

      That my little friend is the entire point. Any format that has even the potential to be controlled in such a proprietary manner will be. Do you really think publishers will really sell plain-text binary versions of their novels for people to load onto any e-paper they want? Guess again... If you ask me e-paper will be killed by the same people that kill every other new media innovation, media companies If they cannot control with ironclad certainty the use of e-paper, they will not support it, and may even move to have it rebulated into oblivion.

      Sure, I would love e-paper that I can load with anything I want. I would love to have text copies of all the books I OWN on my computer to do with them as I please. But unfortunately the current corporate establisment is working very hard to make sure that dream never becomes reality.

      --
      Comments should be like skirts. Short enough to keep your attention, but long enough to cover the subject
    7. Re:I simply don't like this. by au3 · · Score: 1

      No way, I'd choose e-paper over regular paper any day.

      While E-ink requires power to write to it, it retains the image even after the power is cut off.

      Simply waterproofing the thing would allow you to read it without getting shocked. Heck, then you could even read it underwater if you wanted, while paper would get wet and start to break-up.

      And plus paper is organic it will definitily decompose faster than my e-paper would; thousands of years in the future they would still be able to read it. Paper needs very specific conditions to last hundreds of years, and even with the most modern preservation technology I doubt anything could last *thousands* of years. Yeah, I'm sure if you play frisbee or archery practice with my e-paper book it will fail, but I have faith that plastic and metal will last longer than paper.

    8. Re:I simply don't like this. by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      ...yet you still read Slashdot, probably in a computer lab or at least in front of a glaring computer monitor. Instead, you could be outside in the shade of a tree with this technology.

      DD

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
    9. Re:I simply don't like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I print out the articles and read them offline

      --PHB

    10. Re:I simply don't like this. by CristianoMonteiro · · Score: 1

      The question is... We'll be allowed to make copies ? Probably someone will crack any copy protection scheme, but I'm talking about making legal backup copies, or borrowing it legaly from a friend (as we do with the printed ones)...

      --
      -------------------------------------------- Se você consegue ler aqui então fala português. Óbvio
    11. Re:I simply don't like this. by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      The question is... We'll be allowed to make copies ? I know everyone seems to be worried about this. Personally, I think when the general public realizes that digital property is a much larger deal than Napster, we will get our full rights back. If not, physical ownership of digital material will be less flexible than the old mediums... and most of us can start looking for new careers.

    12. Re:I simply don't like this. by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

      The technology does require a battery to program it, but I believe you can then remove the power source and the pages will remain static, according to an earlier Slashdot article on this subject, whose location I can't find at the moment. An interesting issue I hadn't considered before is, is this ink affected by magnetism?

  18. Kind of a shame by Hobobo · · Score: 2

    I would consider it a bit of a shame if we simply replaced paper or books with e-Whatevers. Books/paper have been around for centuries and are as useful as ever, if we threw them out we would be throwing a little bit of our heritage.

    1. Re:Kind of a shame by uweber · · Score: 1

      Not just that. Good, acid free paper (not the 19th/early 20th stuff) last a long time while this electronic paper probably will loose its content in a lot shorter time. And in the worst case we can't read it because of some copyright protection shit.

      --
      --Ulrich
      On no accounts allow a Vogon to read poetry at you
    2. Re:Kind of a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c'mon now, unless you wrote that post on a mac classic by candlelight while your wife was scrubbing your shirts on a washboard please reconsider.
      &nbsp I can imagine where you would have stood on the ancient stone tablet vs. papyrus debate.

  19. Naked man in the ditch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, that's just Theo de Raadt having his fun on a weekend.

  20. Paperboy by manon · · Score: 1

    I just hope those e-papers aren't too heavy. Think about all those paperboys carrying them around each morning. ;)

    --
    42 + 1 = 42
    1. Re:Paperboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i a paperboy (yes, yes, so what, only 13 yr old) and this would be very cool, and im thinking that it would be lighter.
      As people have said before, this would be good for stuff like schools and businesses, we waste lots of paper at school, what a shame.
      Like school just started 2 weeks ago, but everyday in spanish we have been getting paper handouts (until the books get issued) but they are pretty much useless after u learn it since they are for the homework only, and tests, there are often little tests, big tests, etc.
      Just do it on the e paper, put the grades in the computer, print a paper copy of the lists of grades, and erase the e-paper, then when the teacher wants another quiz, just put it on the e-paper.

      I say good luck to this, for it would be great for the enviroment, because if it could replace all the paper in schools and businesses that are just like read once throw away things, you would save a lot of paper.

      and the book thing, no no, i dont think they will try this for books, well they will but i dont think that is the main use.

  21. MYSTERIOUS MUFFIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in my study room surfing the Net on my computer and I had started eating a muffin which I had placed on my computer desk when something funny (and out of the ordinary) happened. A piece of my muffin fell off, sort of jumped on the bag on which it was, then landed on my hand and started rolling on my hand and down my arm and jumped again into the basket which was quite far away from the computer desk. I just stared in awe and was completely surprised. It was rather funny. Someone from beyond (a prankster ghost!) wanted to make me laugh. It worked! (I know this sounds ridiculous, but it happened!)

    1. Re:MYSTERIOUS MUFFIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day I was home alone and I the light switched on (I heard the switch flick too).. it really doesn't look like a type that could flip up on its own. That's my crappy ghost story.

  22. Re:Very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap.. by SVDave · · Score: 1

    The speaker is quickly skipping over a very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap, flexible, fast, digital electronics that can address every one of those pixels so that they can be turned off and on.

    Just getting the speed and resolution necessary costs $110 for a Matrox G-450 video card, which is not flexible and doesn't include digital output. The final signal to a monitor is analog.


    The Matrox does a lot more than a video driver for an e-book would need to. 8.5"x11" at 300dpi for e-paper would be a 3300x2550 monochrome display. The G-450 already does 2048x1536 @ 32bpp, so I think Matrox could put together something that did about 2x the resolution with 1/32 fewer bits per pixel without difficulty. Throw out the d-to-a converter, the analog port connectors, most of the memory, the AGP interface, and the 3-D hardware and you'll get something that costs a lot less than $110.

  23. Right to read by borgheron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://www.gnu.ai.mit.edu/philosophy/right-to-read .html

    This short story illustrates the evils which could be put into play if digital paper is ever realized. The technology itself is a wonderful leap forward, but, I suspect, that the companies controlling the content might get a little greedy.

    Although it's doubtful things will get as bad as are described in the story, the technology certainly opens the door for some of it.

    Later, GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  24. Terror in Texas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, I'll start off by saying the town's and house's history. The house was built anywhere between 1918-1922. I don't remember. That would make it about 80 years old. Nevada used to be a booming town. Stores, banks, you name it, they had it. Until the big tornado of 1924. It was an F5 and destroyed pretty much everything in the town. The only thing left was a couple of houses, the school, and the church. It killed hundred's of people and the bodies were kept in the church's basement until they could be properly buried. There are still blood stains in the basement. Anyways, that has nothing to do with it. Now, Nevada is a small farm town with the population of about 400-500. The church, the school, and only a few houses are still standing from the tornado. My house is one of them. It is on a street that used to be full of houses, but now there is only 2. Mine and the one across the street. (The lady who lives across the street used to live in my house) Back to the ghost story. My family was moving from Garland and needed a house. We came across this house and loved it. We were going to rent it from the lady whose family had built it and been passed on from generation to generation. While she was showing us the inside of the house, we came across this one room upstairs. It was so cool, I decided it had to be my room. (of course, I later found out it was used as the sick room back in the 20's or 30's; a sick room is a room where they would keep the sick people of the family so no one else would get sick) When I stated that it had to be my room, the lady said I shouldn't have. I asked why and she said that it wasn't a very pretty room and I should pick another one. I found this strange b/c it was a gorgeous room and why would she care if I wanted this room or not? Well, we decided to rent it out. The first night we were there, my mom and I kept hearing doors opening and shutting. We got freaked out, but that was nothing. It was about two weeks after we moved in and we were all asleep. Everybody's was downstairs except mine was upstairs in the sick room. I was laying there pretty much asleep when I heard this loud noise that kind of sounded like a vacuum cleaner. Then, I heard people screaming (men, women and kids). Then, I heard a women's voice yelling "Get Jordan, where's Jordan?" I thought it could have been the tornado or something. My whole family thought I was crazy. After that incident I moved my room downstairs. All my stuff was still in that room but my bed was downstairs. I remember one night in my new room I was lying there awake and I heard a horse galloping by my window. We don't have any horses but I passed it off as someone else's horse that had gotten loose. Then, I heard someone get off start walking around on the rocks, get back on and ride off. I got scared, covered up my head and went to sleep. I heard it again around 3:00am. Soon, things started to happen to the rest of the family. One night my mom was in the bathtub and she heard a man talk like he was right outside of the window. She couldn't understand him but she heard it. My dad wasn't home and us kids were in the living room. We've all heard this man now. Then, one morning my mom was cleaning the house and only me and her were home. She started hearing this lady hum some sort of song she had never heard before coming from the bathroom. It was the type of hum you sing when you clean house. If she stood by the stairs you couldn't hear it. If you took a step in front of the stairs you'd hear it. One evening I was upstairs in my room and kept hearing someone banging on my side of the house. Everyone denied it. The banging continued and finally my dad agreed to check what was outside. We all started towards the backdoor and were about to open it when some man in a white shirt casually walked right next to the door outside. (it was a screen door so we could see through) My dad furious and ready to kick the trespasser's a$$ ran outside but no one was there. The scariest incident of all happened early one morning before school. I had gotten so scared that I started to sleep on the top bunk of my brother's bunk bed. I was in a deep sleep and I heard a man's voice mumbling. I thought it was my dad b/c he woke me up in the mornings. I slowly opened my eyes and saw a man of about 20 or so just standing there. He was wearing a forest green colored suit and had reddish-brownish hair with a handle bar mustache. I screamed bloody murder and got under the blankets. My parents came in there and asked me what was wrong. I slowly raised my head out of the blankets and the man was gone. I finally talked them into moving. While we were packing, our neighbor came over. (remember she used to live there. We asked her if anything ever happened weird to her. She said the usual doors shutting, lights going on and off by themselves. But then she said one story. She said one day she was cleaning and she saw a man in white at the corner of her eye just standing at the back door. She thought it was her husband until she started talking to him and he never answered back. She looked over and he was gone. She also said that when we were on vacation she would hear children laughing and the creaks of them swinging. She would go over there to greet us thinking we were home and no one would be there. After pretty much everything was moved we decided to have a physcic over and do a seance just for fun. She told us that this house was once used to hide illegal drugs or something. She said that someone was very sick and locked up most of the time in my room. She said the head of the house was mentally unstable and everyone was scared of him. She said a women hid from him in the bathroom. She didn't say anything about the tornado so we didn't know if she was full of crap or what. But in all of the closets were little secret hidden compartments, pretty small and they could have hid things in there. They are hard to see and blend in with the wall. We never told her about that. Finally, we had moved everything and we were checking every room and every closet and we looked in those compartments. We found things that have been missing for years and things that we had just had this morning. Ever since we left that house nothing has happened. Other things have happened like lights going on and off, doors opening and shutting, and even hearing people calling our names, but these are the major incidents. Thanks for your time!

  25. Every pixel must be separately addressable. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    But SVDave, if you throw out the Digital to Analog converter, you must provide some way of hooking every row and every column with a separate wire. Every pixel must be separately addressable. Also, to meet the design goal, this wiring must be thin, flexible, cheap, and reliable.

    Also, the hardware driver could not use a fan, as does the Matrox G-450. Yes, such a hardware driver could be simpler in some ways, but the problems are still mind-boggling. At least they boggle my mind.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:Every pixel must be separately addressable. by SVDave · · Score: 1

      But SVDave, if you throw out the Digital to Analog converter, you must provide some way of hooking every row and every column with a separate wire. Every pixel must be separately addressable.


      And every bit of the main memory of your computer must be separately addressable by the CPU. That doesn't meant that you need to have a wire from the CPU to every bit of memory, nor does it mean that the CPU needs a D-to-A converter to communicate with memory.

      Right now, the preferred way for an external LCD to talk to a video board is through a digital interface. If an LCD doesn't need to see an analog signal, why would e-paper need to?


      Also, the hardware driver could not use a fan, as does the Matrox G-450.


      So what? The reason video boards need fans these days (remember, they didn't always need them), is because of the hardware devoted to 3-D. Take that out, and the display circuitry will run a lot cooler. Take out color support, and things get simpler and cooler still.

  26. It's a small but existing and growing industry by Rademir · · Score: 2, Informative

    Xerox has had this going for a while. It's been demoed at retail stores (flexible hanging banners with changing messages).

    Here's a list of on-line electronic paper resources gathered less than a year ago by Shawn Hellenius.

    --
    ourpla.net is your planet
  27. But what about the ability to obliterate content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and that can be erased cheaply. Don't forget Michael, censorship is vital.

  28. Re:Very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap.. by S.+Allen · · Score: 1

    video cards are more expensive because they output analog. if this requirement were removed, it would reduce complexity and component count.

    in fact, LCD panels are more expensive and complicated because of the need for circuitry that converts analog signal back to digital for display. this constraint would apply to any form of e-paper or other digital display.

    this is a legacy issue dating back to the first PCs.

  29. Re:Very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap.. by pete-classic · · Score: 2

    Someone already address that the fact it is monochrome makes a big difference.

    There is an even bigger factor, though. I could live with a refresh of, like, once per minute. Basically, as long as it can render a line of text faster than I can read it, we're good.

    So, we are talking more like an original Hercules mono display at 100 times the res and 100th the refresh or something. (or whatever) Probably not hard to do that without a fan ;-)

    Oh, and the conversion to analog is an EXTRA step.

    -Peter

  30. Re:We need it, but not on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to IBM.

  31. Re:Very, very difficult problem: Designing cheap.. by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

    Totally different. Todays monitors refresh at 60 Hz or faster, and all of todays graphics technology is built around this refreshing. One would hope e-paper wouldn't need to be refreshed as long as the information displayed doesn't change. To me, e-paper would only be useful if it could display large amounts of static data in a very high-quality manner, while using no power. The ability to change what is displayed is nice, but I don't expect e-paper to show me movies! We've got other display technologies for that. It would be acceptable for e-paper to take several seconds to change the entire page. Thus, much lower-powered, less complex electronics would do the job fine.

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
  32. New Reason for not having homework... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... my sister rubbed it on the carpet, which zapped the memory... :-)

    1. Re:New Reason for not having homework... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about my dog....

      ...nibbled a bit?

      Ba dum ching.

      -MH

  33. Has there been a comment about DMCA? by tenman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Has there already been a slashdot conversation about what the ebook revolution will effect the DMCA or the other way around? Will epaper be useless due to fear that they would only reproduce thing thing that had been done already? Doesn't this whole media come under the same laws as do today's formats?

  34. Every bit is connected with wires. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful


    "That doesn't meant that you need to have a wire from the CPU to every bit of memory..."

    Yes, the CPU uses binary addressing to communicate with the memory module, so few wires are needed. But, inside the memory module, every bit is connected with wires. And those wires don't have to be flexible.

    You are right about the fan.

    The basic point I think is valid is that a cell that can be made black or white with the application of a voltage is interesting and important, but is only a small part of the complexity necessary. Designing flexible wires to every pixel, and flexible transistors to control every pixel, if needed, is the bulk of the complexity.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:Every bit is connected with wires. by SVDave · · Score: 1

      Designing flexible wires to every pixel, and flexible transistors to control every pixel, if needed, is the bulk of the complexity.

      True, but that problem is going to exist whether or not you "throw out the Digital to Analog converter."
    2. Re:Every bit is connected with wires. by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      You know, this whole wireing issue doesn't exist if you use a magnetic laser type mechanism (read -- standard laser printer which creates electrostatic charge).

      The difference is the second time you run it through the paper it can print white as well as black to overwrite what already existed.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    3. Re:Every bit is connected with wires. by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but then one would have to use some sort of epaper printer. The epaper would be reusable, sure, but one couldn't switch what book one is reading without running all the sheets through the printer again. Which means any books made from these have to come apart easy. It would be cheaper than dynamic epaper, and there are likely some niches where such a product would be just right (maybe office memos or newspapers). However, most want the dynamic stuff.

      --

      (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

    4. Re:Every bit is connected with wires. by chromatic · · Score: 2

      Just remove the toner cartridge and fuser, replace the drum with a roll of electronic paper, and that's it. There's a stage at the end of a cycle that applies a uniform charge to the drum in preparation for the laser. That can reset the paper to white.

      Not that I've ever seen anything similar in a prototype, oh no...

  35. Re:We need it, but not on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stephen King was found alive!

  36. doesn't necessarily need to be cheap by Eric+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting
    But none of it matters until they have ultra-thin, durable, flexible pages that can be manufactured cheaply...
    If they are ultra-thin, durable, and flexible, I don't even CARE if they're cheap. I'd pay $1000 or even $2000 for a "book" of such paper, that I could load with new content at any time.

    But I WON'T buy it if it only supports encrypted content.

    1. Re:doesn't necessarily need to be cheap by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      See, I don't care if they're ultra-thin, durable, and flexible. I don't want to make a book, I want a poster-sized computer display!

      The few square feet that monitors provide are just too restricting, and the eyestrain is nasty. If I could have a huge, paper-like display, that would be sweet!

    2. Re:doesn't necessarily need to be cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitachi have had the technology since the early ninety's to produce a flexible coloured e-paper, and one must remember that an e-paper can be loaded directly from a CD - Now I have 1000 books on CD, so I would be able to choose what book I wanted to read today and load it - Something like we used to do with old 8bit computers and software. As for power reliability, they are already using power cells that do not need a recharge in Europe (Checkout a Casio site) - So, now appears to be the time . . .

  37. Re:No More Hippo Shooting at Disneyland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL you gotta admit that shits funny hahaha

  38. Why use e-paper? by kfckernel · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can invision the senario, "Sorry professor, I had my term paper finished but my epaper crashed."

  39. See the post above, # 2269044 by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 1


    You are right that the refresh rate could be slower. I think people would want to change pages in about one-half second.

    The last paragraph of my post above, #2269044 makes the point that there is a lot more complexity than just the pixel that turns black or white.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  40. E-paper has to be perfect by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I read a LOT of books every year. I've also read something like 10 "old" (i.e. non-copyrighted) books from the Gutemberg project on my PalmIII using the Doc reader. I've also tried the Franklin Rocket Ebook and a prototype of the Everybook reader (before they went under).

    I hate reading on the Palm : the screen is too small, the contrast sucks and you have to scroll all the time, but the Palm is small and convenient enough to convince me not to load my suitcase sometimes. The Rocket Ebook was much better, but still not very exciting. The Everybook had that dual A4 color display that was big like an open window, and impressive, but I still was uneasy holding the thing to read.

    So, it brought me to think about it : what do I like so much better in a book that even the near-perfect Everybook reader didn't provide ? well, of course, there is the fact that books don't need batteries, they are not nearly as fragile, they are less heavy than the majority of paperback releases (I'm not talking about Dostoyevsky). But there is more : the texture of the paper is gratifying to touch, the turning of a paper page is part of the pleasure of reading, the letters never have staircase effect, even if the printing is crappy, the white of the paper reflects different color shades with the lighting, one can see the sun dance on the pages at dawn or dusk while reading on the train, etc etc ... Even the back, with its different material (cardboard), its artwork and sometimes embossed or golden letters is part of the reading experience.

    So, to convince conventional "pleasure" readers, E-paper will have to have all of that : round letters, paper-like light reflection, paper-like texture, the exact same text layout than on a regular book. All of that is part of the joy of reading, and E-paper won't provide that for a long time. I, for one, never read for pleasure on any form of computer device. I read a lot of articles, financial reports, tech manuals, online and the cold screen light doesn't bother me because the reading is only pratical, but I would never read Azimov on anything else but a book.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:E-paper has to be perfect by Dh2000 · · Score: 1

      Funny, now that you mentioned it, I'm reading a little Asimov on my PC right now.

      Some people are willing to suffer a little to read a good book they can't get otherwise.

      E-books, e-paper, and PDA's are (or will be) used because, their versatility and compactness far outweighs their drawbacks, such as copy restrictions, slow refresh rate, resolution or small screens. Nothing can be recreated artificially and perfectly with different materials.

      Just watch in a few years as perfectionists complain that e-paper doesn't work right - not as spare toilet paper or backup fire-kindling. :)

    2. Re:E-paper has to be perfect by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      One big thing that I hate about reading on a computer screen is the backlighting. I can only stare at a computer screen for so long before my eyes start to dry up into raisins. (maybe I should blink more) But, the lighting compared to the surroundings is hard on my eyes. Paper print doesn't present this problem for me. The lighting is from an external source. Not to mention, resolution. Even maxed out at 1600x1200, anti-alias fonts and everything, the test on computer screens sucks!

      If E-paper or e-ink (whatever it is) can match paper print quality and not have to be backlit. Then it will probably sell really well.

    3. Re:E-paper has to be perfect by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      I hate reading on the Palm : the screen is too small, the contrast sucks and you have to scroll all the time, but the Palm is small and convenient enough to convince me not to load my suitcase sometimes.

      you can download cspotrun, a great doc reader, and a copy of MakeDoc (to make your own compressed ebooks from text)...i've downloaded all 5 of the books of the HHGTTG trilogy, and read 4 of them on my palm durring math in high school in the past 2 months...it has an auto scroll feature, with easily adjustable scroll speed. check it out. it's GPL'd, too!

      as for the ebook copies of HHGTTG....you'll have to contact me : ), i'm working on scanning Dune in : )

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  41. Eash pixel must be separately connected. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 1


    All true, but each pixel must be separately connected. Those connections must be cheap, durable, and flexible. When I have tried to design something like that, I have thought that it was a very difficult problem.

    My use of a video card as an example in my comment above was unfortunate, because it led readers away from my main point.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:Eash pixel must be separately connected. by tzanger · · Score: 2

      All true, but each pixel must be separately connected. Those connections must be cheap, durable, and flexible. When I have tried to design something like that, I have thought that it was a very difficult problem.

      I think you're still missing the point. LVDS takes care of this problem very easily and in a very proven method: it drives every TFT screen on the planet without a problem.

      Basically you have a serializer which converts your Row/Column accesses to one or more data streams and a clock stream. Each stream is two physical lines. Then you can have the deserializer within the e-paper. So now you provide power and your serial data and clock. Far fewer lines.

  42. You're a hard troll to please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marcie Edwards stood breathlessly in the darkened hallway, one hand on her tits. The large, empty house seemed to press down around her as she listened to the moans coming from behind her cousin's door. "Yesss . . . oh yes, doggie, lick me there . . . right there! ". No one seemed to be home. Aunt Mary was in Bakersfield shopping, while Uncle Jack was somewhere out in the north fields supervising some new plowing. "Ummmm . . . right there . . . ohhhh Pardner, right there . . ." Marcie had thought something was odd about Kathy lately, something she hadn't noticed during her last vacation to her uncle's farm in Central California. Now as she tiptoed down the long corridor, her sandaled feet sinking in the thick, blue carpeting, the teenaged blonde felt she would find the answer to Kathy's mysterious, secretive behavior. "Ohhhh, Pardner, your tongue ... your tongue! " The door was partially open. Marcie stopped, her breathing shallow and raspy. For a second the teenager was afraid Kathy would hear it. But the girl was making far too much noise on her own part to hear anything outside the door. Tentatively stretching out her right hand, Marcie pressed her icy fingertips against the door. Kathy had been careless. The door opened. Marcie held her breath, pressing one side of her face against the molding and peering in. "Ummmmmm . . . it's sooooo good, soooo goooood," Kathy groaned. At first the girl saw nothing. There was the usual paraphernalia about-high school pennants on the wall, several stuffed toys scattered about the brightly painted room. Pushing the door open a little more, Marcie caught sight of the double bed. Kathy's bare feet were shuffling back and forth frantically whil her gasping breaths were becoming increasingly loud. What was more surprising was the occasional swishing of something black and furry between those shuffling feet. The dog's tail! Marcie let out a shuddering breath, her knees growing suddenly very wobbly and weak. A dog! That's what's been going on! Kathy-her own cousin-was doing things with a dog! Marcie wanted to turn and run. But something kept her there, standing in the doorway, clutching her tits as the moans increased in volume. She pushed the door open a few more inches and caught sight of Kathy. There, stretched prettily out on the large bed was the young brunette. Her chestnut-colored hair was fanned out behind her head. Both legs were spread widely apart, one bent at the knee and raised slightly so she could pet the animal on the back with her toes. Long streaks of saliva glittered as the animal licked up and down her slender body. Pardner, the three-year-old German shepherd, was merrily licking the girl's pussy. "Oh yes, yessss," Kathy hissed, closing her eyes and rolling her head from side to side. Marcie thought she'd faint from the horror of the discovery. Once or twice she'd heard about women who did this kind of thing. Marcie remembered overhearing some boys talking about some club in Mexico where women fucked with animals. But her own cousin, her very own cousin was there stretched out on a bed, letting an animal touch her pussy with his tongue. And how she was enjoying it! Her face was a mask of obscene pleasure while her body rocked under the tender licking of the German shepherd. "Your tongue's so hot, Pardner! Oh, it's so very hot and wet," Kathy moaned, raising her other leg, then letting both slip back down to the mattress. In another moment, Marcie realized she was moved by what was happening under her horrified, widened eyes. Standing there in the doorway, the young girl felt a kind of hot, itchy tingle becoming worse and worse with each passing second. It was making her cunt shiver, tighten and get warm and moist as she watched Kathy writhe under Pardner's cuntlicking. Marcie found her knees rubbing together while her panties were growing damp around the crotch panel. Her nipples were getting very stiff and hard against her blouse. Instincitvely the teenager moved one hand up, rubbing her ringers against the itchy nubs. Marcie closed her eyes, sucking in a ragged breath through her flaring nostrils. Why was she feeling this way? Why was she turning on watching Kathy jerk and twitch under her pet's licking tongue? "Mmmmm, Pardner, touch me down there . . . yeah, good boy," Kathy said breathlessly, her hands now holding the dog's proud head. "She's fucking herself!" Marcie whispered as she watched Kathy take the German shepherd's head and grip it tightly, rubbing its nose in and out, in and out of her drooling cunt. It was awful! There was such a strange, wild look in Kathy's eyes as she did this. Her legs moved more widely apart while her brown hair flew in all directions. Marcie was holding tightly onto the molding, her fingernails sinking into the hard white enamel paint. The tips of her tits were so hard she thought they would break off as they rubbed against the smooth material of her white cotton blouse. Her cunt was moving, actually moving, the swelling cuntlips folding over one another while her clit popped out from the surrounding pink pussy flesh. Her knees were knocking together while an odd, comforting glow spread over her flesh. "Oh God, God, it's gonna happen . . . it's . . . it's gonna . . . uhhhhhh!" Marcie put one hand to her mouth, pressing the fingertips to her lips as she watched Kat fling her body back down onto the mattre The girl's face contorted into a wincing expression of pain. Kathy kept crying out, beating her clenched fists against the mattress while screaming out the dog's name again and again. Kathy was making odd, jerky fucking movements, her feet now flat against the bed, her knees bent fully forward. Her thighs were tensi ng, relaxing, then tightening again as she danced her ass off the bed and fed the licking dog her pussy. She was fucking Pardner's mouth, driving her pussy up against his maw while clawing and clutching at the wrinkled coverlet. "Fuck me, fuck me with that tongue!" Kathy cried. Marcie suspected the girl saw nothing. She was staring straight up at the ceiling, her mouth half opened, odd guttural groans coming from deep in her chest. And over it all, there were the slick, smacking sounds of the German shepherd's tongue licking over her cunt! With a good deal of effort, Marcie turned around, leaning heavily against the wall. What she'd seen horrified as well as delighted her. She stumbled down the corridor, one of her sandals slipping from her feet. "No, I've got to be dreaming," she whispered, one hand still against her mouth as she stumbled into the living room and leaned against the overstuffed chair. "Wrong . . . wrong!" She moved around and sat heavily in the chair. It was only then the girl realized just how aroused she was. Watching her cousin Kathy gyrate under the dog's heavy cunt- licking had done something to her, something she couldn't quite understand fully. Kathy had looked so excited, so pleased at the touch of Pardner's tongue. There were no cries of agony or fear as the big black German shepherd mounted her and licked her pussy! Marcie sank back farther into the chair, rubbing her upper arms with both hands. How her flesh was puckered up into goose pimples! And all the while her cunt was still hot, so very wet and slippery down there between her white, shivering legs! It was a feeling she had had more often lately, and one she knew it was best not to have right now! That dog! That beautiful, wonderful dog fucking his tongue right into her cousin's pussy! There was nothing Marcie could do to shake the image from her mind. "Ohhhh . . .", Gripping the armrests, the blonde teenager shook her head from side to side, her long blonde hair splashing over her throat. How could she feel excited over something like this? How could she? Footsteps! Marcie did her best to compose herself, breathing more evenly, more steadily as Kathy entered the living room. "Oh, you're here?" Marcie said, yawning an stretching her arms over her head . She prayed God Kathy wouldn't recognize the fact that she was not actually waking up from a deep sleep. The flush was still on her cheeks while the distinct smell of her aroused cunt hung around her like a heady perfume. "Uh-huh," Kathy said, her eyes narrowing suspiciously as she walked around. Her blouse and skirt were back on although her feet were still bare. And there right behind her was Pardner, his black nose still slick from the pussy juice of her cunt. Marcie looked away, her fingers tightening around the soft armrest. How her cunt burned under the steady gaze of the handsome dog! "I was going to go into town with your mom, but I guess I just fell asleep," Marcie said, pretending to stifle another yawn. "Yeah, it's kinda warm outside and today," Kathy said, her eyes looking a little out of focus. She was probably still sliding down from her sexual high. That would be no surprise, considering the way she'd been acting under the dog's cunt-licking. Closing her eyes, Mar q-e could see her cousin twitching once more under Pardner's tongue. Oh, would she ever get that out of her mind? "So warm I couldn't really sleep. I was a little tired too, Marcie," Kathy said, sliding down onto the sofa opposite the girl. Pardner followed, resting his head on Kathy's right knee. Again Marcie shuddered, lowering er eyes. "I . . . I think maybe I should make dinner or something, you know?" "Mom's gonna be back soon enough," Kathy said airily, waving one hand in the air to dismiss the thought. "Come on back here . . . in my room. I wanna show you something." "No! I mean," Marcie said, aware of the sharp edge in her voice, "I mean maybe I'd better do some chores around here or something. I've been here for nearly a week and I haven't done anything to help out." "Come on, don't be silly," Kathy insisted, slipping one hand under her arm and forcing her to stand. "Oh, all right," Marcie said. There was nothing more she could do. Rising, the young girl glanced down at Pardner who had by this time rested his head on his front paws. Marcie stepped over the dozing animal, saying nothing as they walked down the corridor and into her cousin's room. "You know," Kathy said, shutting the blinds that had been left wide open, "I don't think you really know about a lotta things." She flopped down on the bed, patting an area just to one side. Marcie felt spaced, noticing that at least her cousin had straightened out the coverlet she'd been bouncing on. She wanted to run away from this horrible room. But that would only tip Kathy off as to what she'd been doing the past few minutes. The thought of admitting to spying on her cousin made her checks red with shame. "For instance?" Marcie asked, sitting down on the edge of the bed and watching her cousin start to unbutton her blouse. "About guys . . . you know, fucking and all that," Kathy said frankly. "Kathy!" It was as if she'd been slapped across the face with a wet towel. Fucking! How her mother would have screamed if she'd heard her use that kind of language! "What's wrong about saying it?" Kathy said, shrugging while sliding her blouse off her shoulders. Her full, red-tipped tits jiggled from the movements she made. "And . . . and what are you doing?" Marcie gasped as she watched her cousin unzip her skirt, sliding it down over her thighs. "I'm gonna teach you a few things. Come on, take off your clothes! Come on, I think my big cousin from the city knows all that much about fucking even about her own body." There was something behind this. Marcie could sense it, could see it in the way her cousin was eyeing her. But what could she do? Smiling nervously, she decided to go along with the game, feeling kind of spaced and high as she kicked off her sandals and began undressing. She stopped with her panties at her knees, giving her cousin a questioning look. "Come on . . . I'll show you some things about your body that you probably don't even know about," Kathy said with a smile as she kicked off her briefs. "What if your Mom comes back and . . . and finds us like this?" Marcie asked, slipping her panties off over her feet and noticing how damp the crotch panel was with her cunt juices! "I'll hear the car coming, just like I can hear dad's truck. We'll be okay." Reluctantly Marcie went along, sliding up to the head of the bed stark naked, her blonde bush covering her.simmering cuntal mound. It was the first time she'd been so naked next to another person before! Her body tingled with that thought-that thought and the remembrance of what had gone on in this bed moments ago! "See this?" Kathy said, bending over. She probed around in the brown fur feathering around her pussy. With a sticky little sound, her outer cuntlips came open and the girl beamed up at her cousin. "That's my clit. And, oh wow, does it feel good when something's touching it." Marcie shuddered. That was what Pardner was going after so frantically before. He was nuzzling her, his paws scratching her thighs while he probed deeper and deeper with his furry maw for that clit! "And it gets big when you rub it." Marcie parted her knees so her cunt opened from the resulting tension. Her cunt hairs were finer than Kathy's, and Marcie could see her own cunt slit very easily. Gingerly, the girl brushed her finger over the downy plump cuntlips between her spread thighs. She could see the pussy juice glimmering under the fine matting. How she felt like finger-fucking herself right now in front of Kathy! But that seemed bad. The girl remembered stories her mother told her about girls who did that sort of thing. They began to like doing it and finally wound up as sluts. Marcie couldn't remember the whole thing, just the resulting discomfort she had felt when she thought about finger-fucking. "Touch it, come on," Kathy encouraged. Mrcie did as she was told, feeling a small shock cut through her legs. She inhaled a shuddery breath, licking her bottom lip. "Doesn't that feel wild?" Kathy asked. "Yeah!" Marcie was surprised at the shaky quality of her own voice. "Sometimes I put a little oil on it, you know? Then I work my fingers around in circles. Both hands when I really feel hot. Jesus, just talkin' about it makes me want to do it again." Do it? Again? After what she'd just done with the dog? Marcie didn't know whether to laugh or simply continue to look increduously at her cousin. She sat there cross-legged, watching the brunette fingering her pussy more rhythmically now. "Don't you feel you"re doing something wrong? I mean, it's not right, is it?" "No, nothing's wrong with it. Nothing's wrong if the feeling's so good!" Kathy sighed, sliding down on the bed, digging her heels into the coverlet. Marcie watched, her eyes widening as a hot flush began to radiate out from her cunt up to her tits. Oh, she was turning on! And what would be the outcome of her young lust?

    1. Re:You're a hard troll to please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rolling over, the brunette pulled Pardner back, then began shoving him forward. The dog whined at the touch, then finally seemed to guess what was needed. Marcie was working her ass around in tight, frantic circles, crying through her nose with excited little wheezing cries. It was crazy. It was just crazy to be doing something like this. "Go on, boy, go on and fuck the bitch!" kathy cried. Kathy was panting heavily, rubbing her cunt with one hand while guiding the big dog with the other. Pardner snapped back at the girl, then stood up, wagging his bushy tail slowly from one side to the other. Marcie looked up heavy-lidded, -peering through her long blonde lashes at the beast in front of her. She shivered. He looked like something risen straight from hell! His forelegs were braced to either side of her raised thighs, his head dropped down while his nostrils still quivered as they took in the pungent smell of her juicing cunt. Marcie squinted, forcing her eyes to focus. There between his thick-muscled hindquarters was his cock-yes, a long, knobby red thing glistening with something very slick. Another hot shudder made her body quake as she stared at the dog's prick. He moved forward, more of that red cock extending from his furry sheath. Marcie dropped her head down on the pillow. No, she wouldn't even think about what was happening. Her cunt was burning. Something was going to satisfy her pussy. That was that. She panted heavily, her narrow shoulders pressed hard against the pillow while she edged her knees back farther. Somewhere in the distance she could hear birds singing through the window as the dog slowly mounted her, his breath panting against her tits. She felt his sharp claws against the bottom of her upended thighs. He was nervous padding around in front of her, his snout rubbing up against her left ankle. There was the sudden furry weight of his body pressing down against hers as he settled forward. Something very hot and very stiff was brushing up against her cunt! Again the girl opened her eyes and found herself eye to eye with Pardner. "I . . . uhhhh . . . oh God, Pardner . . . uhhhh . . . fuck me . . ." Marcie jerked her head from left to right, strands of her blonde hair tangling around her throat. She licked her dry lips again. He was settling his narrow ass down, pressing the tip of his cockrod against her swollen cuntlips. Kathy was watching with wild eyes, her fingers fucking in and out of her pussy. "Oh wow, wow!" "Uhhhhhh!" Marcie cried, arching her back while pressing her head into the pillow. "He's doing it! He's doing it!. He's fucking me, Kathy . he . . . he's fucking me!" "Ohhhh, do it, doggie, do it! Fuck her!" Kathy cried, her fingers fucking in and out of her brown-fuzzed cunthole. She was jerking her hips, pumping her plump ass back and forth while watching the dog fuck her cousin. Marcie was groaning, rubbing the bare soles of her feet along the dog's powerful back while keeping her shoulders flat against the mattress. Pardner hunkered down, a growl from his throat sending shivers up and down the blonde's spine. "Oh yes, yes!" Marcie cried, shutting her eyes so tight little yellow spots flashed behind her fluttering lids. "He's doing it, Marcie. Oh wow, Pardner's actually fucking you!" " I . . . uhhh . . . I know . . . and oh, it's so weird," the girl gasped. She was being fucked, really fucked right here in front of her cousin. Time and time again her mother had warned her about boys, about the one thing they always wanted. And here she was letting a dog fuck her! Again the blonde teenager shook her head, trying to drive the image of her mother's frowning face from her mind as she felt Pardner's sharp claws scratch deeper into her thighs. Pardner moved, uncertain of what he was doing at first. She felt his prick poking tentatively at her puffy cuntlips, the pointed cocktip stabbing at the crooked juicy crack, pulling back, then moving n again. The tiny bumps were rubbing deliciously against her red clit. Marcie cried through her tightly clenched teeth. Frantically, the girl rubbed her feet against the dog's sides to encourage him, wiggling her ass so hard the mattress started bouncing. "Let him go for it, Marcie! Oh wow, let him go for it!" "Yessssss!" The big muscles in her ass were cramping from the tension as she waited to get fucked. Spit dripped from Pardner's tongue, wetting down her tits. She could feel his doggie breath against her throat while his fur tickled the backs of her raised thighs. Her cuntal walls spasmed against his probing prick. The movement frightened the dog. Pardner yelped, drawing back. Fighting through the fog of lust, Marcie reached up, smoothing her hands on either side of the German shepherd's sides, feeling his warm hair tickling the sensitive flesh just under her nails. She cooed to the dog, rubbing him with her hands and feet, moving her ass slowly, sexily against him. "Uhhhh, come on, Pardner, come on and fuck me," she whispered. Those terrible words came so automatically to her! Only moments ago she'd been standing there in the corridor, frowning, watching her cousin with the dog. Marcie had rushed into the living room, not believing she'd seen something that horrible taking place under her uncle's roof. And yet . . . and yet here she was, lying naked in bed, letting Pardner fuck her! Her mind was spinning around and around. There didn't seem to be an anchorage for her thoughts as the animal lowered himself down and started fucking. "He's doing it so fast, Marcie!" "Uhhhhh!" Pardner was going wild, moving his doggie hips up and down rapidly, fucking only an inch or two of his cock into the girl's cunt. Marcie wriggled her hips more invitingly, feeling those slick bumps scratching that itch throbbing through her clit. The big animal let out another yip, tossing his hips from side to side, making her feel his fat red fucker'all the better. Marcie arched her back, pitching from left to right on the bed. She bucked her ass against the German shepherd, crying out his name, reaching out with one hand and striking her cousin again and again with her clenched fingers as the sensations in her cunt drove the breath from her lungs. Marcie felt the world crashing down around her. Again and again she fucked her cunt onto the dog's cock, the hairs around his prick tickling her clit maddeningly. The teenager could feel his leathery little balls slapping against her upturned ass as she rocked against him. The acute tickle between her shivering thighs became incredibly intense. Marcie heard her cousin gasping. Turning her head, she saw Kathy watching her while her fingers flicked in and out of her hot cunthole. "Gonna cum, gonna cum, Marcie! Wow, watchin' you and Pardner . . . uhhhh . . . it's . . . so . . . so . . ." Kathy's right leg shot up in the air, then slammed down hard against the bed. The force rocked Marcie and Pardner while the young brunette tossed and whipped her cunt against her fingers. A fine froth bubbled up from her pussy, wetting down her palms and knuckles. "Uhhhhh . . . Pardner . . . " Fires of incredible lust licked up from her thighs, stimulating her clit until it curled from the fiery sexual lust. She bucked her body so wildly the girl nearly knocked Pardner from her cuntal grip. But the dog hung on, fucking his prick in so hard Marcie felt the cocktip pumping up against her cherry. That touch made her tuck her ass away quickly. Pardner lunged forward. But the two of them were too hot to go any further. Marcie exploded, her cumming achingly powerful. She jerked hard, hot cunt juice flooding out onto her ass and wetting down the animal's swinging balls. Finally her movements were too much for the dog. With a howl, Pardner backed away, his prick slipping from the quivering, clenching movements of her pussy muscles. A cry of frustration escaped from Marcie's lips. She sought to get that dog-cock back in her pussy. But the dog was too hot. In a second Marcie felt hot jets of something very warm and thick spurting over her inner thighs. Pardner lowered his belly, rubbing his cum-shooting cock over her crotch again and again. "Oooowwwwwwwwww!" Marcie was jerking her ass off the mattress and swaying from side to side as her cuntal walls buckled in and snapped shut on nothing. The young girl could almost hear her cuntlips slapping wetly together as Pardner kept shooting his greasy doggie-spunk all over her legs and pussy. She threw her arms around his muscular body, hugging him tightly against her tits while her cuntal muscles cramped again and again. This was the biggest, hardest cum of her life! She could hear her cousin Kathy gasping and groaning next to her. At times the girl hit her with her fists. Cumming! Everyone around her was cumming! How beautiful it was, jolts of white heat cutting through her again and again. She felt herself sinking slowly 'through the mattress, the world crashing in around her as she came and came and came. When it was over, Marcie lay on her back, her arms stretched to either side. She could feel the hot doggie-cum cooling against her damp flesh. Pardner had climbed off her and was wheeling around to one side of the bed now, his head bobbing up and down. There was a thud as he jumped off, curled up and start licking his shrinking cock. With some effort the blonde teeanger raised her head from the pillow, watching him lick his prick. She shivered. To think that thing had been inside her pussy! He hadn't really fucked her all the way, not having penetrated her cherry. But she had felt that hard cock poking against her bunched cherry flesh, trying to fuck through. In a few more seconds he would have made it and . . . and . . . Marcie slid her hands around her upper arms, rubbing them briskly as goose bumps broke out all over her body. She wasn't too sure she could handle what had happened today just yet. Shaking her head, Marcie turned toward Kathy. The girl was lying dreamily on her belly, making fucking motions with her plump, full-fleshed ass. Marcie thought Kathy looked pretty stretched out like that-her legs together, her toes pointed, her hands out of sight under her belly as she pumped her ass around in circles and up and down. Kathy's face was still red from the intense pleasure of having fucked herself with her fingers watching the scene next to her.

  43. Coming soon... e-asswipe! by The+Gline · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately it's not compatible with most septic operating systems yet.

    --
    Honorary Member of Jackie Chan's Kung Fu Process Servers
  44. Not the whole story, or not thinking far enough by Genom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the article, they talk about making a "book" of this stuff -- what an incredible waste! If the epaper's contents can be changed electronically, there's no reason to have a whole "book" of it -- one sheet should suffice (with some sort of input device to capture "page turn" requests) for most everything.

    Furthermore, if you view the epaper as simply a medium through which to display information, you wouldn't need a seperate physical volume for each book - they could all fit into something, say, the size of a PDA (compactflash, etc for removable, expandable storage, and a hookup to the epaper to display -- or even a PDA screen made OF this stuff (thin, light, flexible (foldable?) PDA ^_^ ) - would be insanely useful.

    All of this doesn't come with a price, however. If publishing of mainstream works went electronic, there would be no "ownership" of a copy of a work, only a "license". Then, by simply encrypting the contents, by any means, no matter how light, makes it CRIMINAL to build, use and/or distribute a compatible viewer, under the DMCA. So whomever is first to market, wins, and has a larger stranglehold on the publishing industry than M$ has on PC OS's - because noone will *legally* be able to compete in that arena. ("Your honor, our file format, which is used by every major publication, is encrypted, and thus protected under the DMCA. The defendants willfully broke the law when they decrypted the contents of our file format and used it to create their product...")

    There are MANY more issues here than just a superthin, flexible, high-contrast display. The article doesn't really touch on the major issues at all, and instead only glosses over the technology involved.

  45. if it worked, it was here by now. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    if it worked, it was here by now.

    But I still like ye olde paper.

    Example:
    When I buy a program online, all I get is a serial number or a username and password to download it. I always print out a copy of the page. No matter how cool the paperless office might sound, it's damd nice to have it on paper when you just can't find that email where the code was.

    1. Re:if it worked, it was here by now. by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      Or... you become like me and print out a copy of everything. And I mean everything! I've been know to print out copies of /. submitions. I have piles of unfiled paper laying around me right now. I have no idea what half of them are for. But, I have them never-the-less.

      But, I do agree with you, a hard copy is a nice thing to have.

  46. Why the paperless office will always be a myth. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Funny

    Boss: Johnny, we're very happy with these new e-papers that you ordered. At first, I thought they were to expensive to justify, but I know now that they worth every penny.
    Johnny: Thanks boss!
    Boss: You're welcome Johnny. Do you think you'd be able to get the rest of them distributed to the clerks today?
    Johnny: Sure no problem.
    Boss: One other thing, can you set the network up so that each time someone opens a file on an e-paper, that the Laserjet 10,000 will print it out automatically?
    Johnny: I suppose so, but why? *dull look of horro*
    Boss: So that they can have a printout too, of course. *silently to himself* "Why do these computer people have to be so dense?!?"
    Johnny: *silently to himself* "AAAAAAAAAAAAGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHH!!! *sob* AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGHHH!!!"

  47. Unless you care.. by onShore_Jake · · Score: 1

    Michael sed But none of it matters until they have ultra-thin, durable, flexible pages that can be manufactured cheaply...
    What an assanine comment. I happen to care about it just as I cared about computers before they were able to be manufactured cheaply. Sounds like this guy only cares about being a silly little end user who only wants to be fed little news bites to let him know when he can run over to Circuit City and get one.

    Sorry, I'm easily provoked today, move along.

  48. a horrible image... by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

    I have this horrible image...

    ...the year is something like 2012...

    ...the transition between paper based documention and electronic paper is on us...

    ...a child is preparing a project for school...

    ...scissors in one hand...

    ...glue in the other...

    ... ... ...

    ... your electronic newspaper in a zillion pieces pasted to a piece of tagboard!

    8-|

  49. Is the story about digital paper a lie? by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 1


    My original post did not make clear that I think that digital paper is, effectively, a lie.

    The electronics necessary to address the pixels is of the kind used with LCD panels used in laptop computers. This electronics has been available for several years, so it is somewhat mature. It is VERY expensive. A large part of the cost of a laptop is the cost of the LCD panel.

    It is true that electronics to drive a black-and-white display would be less complex. But it is still a very expensive problem to solve, especially if it is expected to be flexible.

    My guess is that the companies are trying to get funding. My guess is that they know that the electronics is very expensive, and not likely to come down in price without a HUGE amount of additional research. To me, this seems to be a cover-up of the kind we have seen so often recently in connection with the dot-coms. The companies seem to me to be taking advantage of the lack of technical knowledge on the part of the investors.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  50. Re:We need it, but not on Linux by darkov · · Score: 1

    Could it be that they read Slashdot from work and have no choice?

  51. new excuse for not doing homework.. by mickeyreznor · · Score: 1

    my dog drooled on it, causing a short circuit.

  52. the point of paper: E-Paper should stay expensive! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    The point of paper, as I use it, besides for drawing and writing things by hand, is to back up things.

    if You've got some important records, you cant just back up everything to disk. What if there's a power short? Oh, go to another computer? What if lightning hits Nearby?
    I guess you could use CD, but that only works so far.
    It's already been pointed out that the digital age will have nothing in it for people to find in a thousand years (or more likely, in a couple million years... damn nuclear wessels) and with E-Paper, what less will we have?
    Thousands of pages of blank, near-blank, or blotchy.. meaningless pages.
    Paper can survive EMP, E-paper cant. No point without regular paper.
    Some people might like books with pages on them, I think these people are just avoiding the point that nobody has made a decent datapad yet. The whole "e-paper" idea will be looked at as a horrible joke in 60 years, at which time I'd hope we'd have an acceptable datapad of some sort, somewhere.
    In two generations, anyone who doesnt like to read off a screen will be very old. Screen technology will also have changed drasticly, for that matter, so it is unlikely that anyone will give a damn. You want something that looks like paper? turn your monitor up to 2^256 colors, and pick it off the desk for a moment.

    in the mean time though, maybe these people can make some money in their meaningless endevor

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  53. Somethings Wrong here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-paper seems to me like the idea of someone who simply thinks it would be cool and hasn't thought past that in any real way. the things that E-paper could replace would be much better replaced with two different medium: hemp paper and a LCD similar to E-books. I'm sure that as soon as you read "hemp" some of you started giggiling uncontrollably, just look on the internet with a simple search for "hemp" and you'll see that not only is hemp the fiber of choice (twice as much per acre as cotton) it also is the second best source of nutrition (only soy is better) in every way the perfect plant, perfect too, for those hardcopy records that some companies will always want to keep (can anyone else see how much better a fully renewable resourse is for this than E-paper made from plastics (i.e oils) is?). the other side of the paper coin: quickly disposed of information media (i.e. newspapers and magazines) can be fixed by three things: solid state electronics, wireless modem, and a LCD. wrapped in a waterproof case and backed with a subscription to a national news service with custimizable/searchable article array, updated hourly. people are already getting almost this online for (nearly) free, how much would they pay for it to be portable?

  54. Eeerr. by Josh+Mast · · Score: 1

    Ugh. Ugh Ugh Ugh Ugh NO.

    I want E-Paper. E-Paper that's almost indistinguishable from actual paper. I want to be able to fold it, write on it, store what I write, dynamically display near anything on it. Something straight out of Neil Stephenson's The Diamond Age. Although something tells me I won't actually have anything like this until nanotechnology actually gets somewhere useful.

  55. De-serializers require lots of transistors. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 1


    Interesting.

    However, serializers and de-serializers require lots of transisters. I don't think they can be reliably embedded in a flexible medium, and I don't think they can be cheap. Also, there are still lots of wires.

    Digital paper is not feasible at present, I think. The display cells are available, but the electronics is a huge challenge. It is the electronics that is the challenge, not the display cells.

    I think the promoters of this technology know that they cannot deliver without a huge amount of expensive additional research. They seem to be hiding that fact from people who are less knowledgeable. It's like the dot-com frauds; people taking advantage of the lesser knowledge of other people.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:De-serializers require lots of transistors. by TummyX · · Score: 1


      However, serializers and de-serializers require lots of transisters. I don't think they can be reliably embedded in a flexible medium.


      Um, that's why they're using flexible plastic transistors in e-paper.

  56. E-Paper vs Books by de+Selby · · Score: 1

    I'm sure some idiot out there will be trying to sell us single page e-paper books. After all, it's all you really need...

    I like the idea of my collection in one nicely bound--yes bound--256 page book. (512 pages also available.) For static text, you want to click 'next' as little as possible. The best interface for books is TURNING THE PAGE.

    The book texts should be stored in the e-book; I don't need to worry about my PC trashing my library and I know that I own it. (This is more than knowing that I just have access to a text--even if it's free access.)

    For any non-static text, moving images, or anything interactive, use some Trekie datapad.

  57. Re:E-paper has to be perfect...and I agree by NickisGod.com · · Score: 0

    But there is more : the texture of the paper is gratifying to touch, the turning of a paper page is part of the pleasure of reading, the letters never have staircase effect, even if the printing is crappy, the white of the paper reflects different color shades with the lighting, one can see the sun dance on the pages at dawn or dusk while reading on the train, etc etc ... Even the back, with its different material (cardboard), its artwork and sometimes embossed or golden letters is part of the reading experience.

    Bullshit! The things i hated most about reading (and the reason I don't read paperbacks anymore) are the very things your sick, tiwsted mind treasures. The feel of the paper? Damn, I hate the texture of most paper backs. It's like...I don't know, but certainly not something I like! Turning the pages? Oh how I disdained turning the pages whist reading the crap they would make us read in high school or even something entertaining like Hunt For Read October. My favorite place to read is in bed. My postures varied, but usually meant my leaning one arm half the time. But to change the page, you need two hands (especially with newer, thicker books) or some extravagant hand motions to turn it. Wouldn't a nice arrow in the lower left and right hand corners of each page make life just a little easier? I treasure the day we all burn our books (much like we trashed our typewriters).

  58. Potential Issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    E-paper sounds slightly scary to me. What if you wanted to photocopy something, and when u tried the paper turned red and started making siren sounds? Or demanded to see your credit card?

  59. Eat meat by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In publishing there are few editions of a manuscript ever printed that contain no errors. When enough errors exist in a given edition the publisher will often times issue a reprint with errors corrected. This used to be a big problem of publishers before the advent of computers when legions of people hand take a handwritten manuscript and pre-press it all by hand. Things in the books also get changed by the author or rights holder of the manuscript. Sometimes the book you read is not the same one the author originally wrote. If you want to do a little homework to see how drastic this can be sometimes, pick up a copy of the original draft of John Locke's Treatise on Government and then read the touched up copy they give you in a US government class. There's several major editions all with several large variances because when Locke originally wrote the treatises he wrote under a pen name with little to no fear of reprisal but later editions left things out because it was figured he was the author, then later after certain revolutions took place those things were re-added. For a second project look into a comparison between old or middle English copies of the Bible and the modern King James edition. A good deal of the passages lose a bit of their meaning when you read the archaic copies. The modern language does not mesh very well contextually with the archaic language though the mechanics are similar.
    Now skip ahead to the modern times when books are often times written on word processors and a single editor reviews the work accepts and suggests changes then finalizes the draft and sends it to an electronic pre-press. There's far fewer human based errors in modern print books so there's fewer editions from the same publisher printed. The only big changes are the one the author or editor decides to make in terms of actual content of the book. This is perfectly legal and fine for them to do. It is fine because most often if there was an original print of the book it ended up in some library or catalog somewhere. A hardcopy exists of the original work. Say someone actually got a copy of Catcher in the Rye printed with fewer profanities and got it out to the public at large. You'd know it was an edited work because you could go find an original print of the book if you really wanted one. As long as a group of extremists went and burned the original copies of the book you couldn't pass the profanity free copy off as the real thing. Hard copies of things can be difficult to get rid of because they are so entirely physical.
    Enter e-books. Ahead fifty years from now, the printing of hard copy paper books is passe so all books are published electronically. Books are are now ethereal constructs. They can be transmitted in less than a fraction of a second to thousands of people and a library of them can be stored in a square inch of physical space. Man how revolutionary! They can also be wiped out by a single keystroke. The ethereal entities that books are can be wiped out or changed with the same whim it takes to transmit or store them in come digital medium. A scratched optical disk or pulled power plug can wipe out an entire strata of contemporary society. Was I the only one who read and understood 1984? Most of the shit you know or think you know is what you've been told. If someone is teeling you bullshit, all you know is bullshit. The books that did exist in Winston Smith's world were rewritten en masse to accord themselves with the contemporary situation at hand. You don't need to be a wild conspiracy theorist to think up some situations where the metaphysical nature of literature is abused. Shit, in computer terms, if a bug exists in code put into a CVS root the rest of the servers pulling from that root will get the same bug. Fouling the source fouls up everything. It's fairly easy to foul up the source if the only source is electronic. How many Gutenburg books have you seen with major typos in them, in fifty years literature students might discuss the poetic use of bad grammar in a work just because the only copy of the book in existance has been a fouled up copy with a typo from some text file that ran afoul of gzip. I'll stick with real paper.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  60. Coming next... by Cerlyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    E-Papercuts. This will be followed by E-Bleeding, as well as the E-Band Aid(tm).

    Ouch. That's going to hurt.

  61. Content Degradation by GospelHead821 · · Score: 1

    I would be very interested in this except for one thing. It almost certainly requires a constant supply of power. Unless the ink will unfailingly hold a pattern after the electronics have been used to imprint them, I'd hate this. I can just imagine that I'd be in the middle of a paragraph when my batteries died and I'd be stuck on the subway with nothing to read. I mean, this is why I bring a book along in the first place - in case the batteries on my Gameboy die. I very much doubt this system is so robust that it would hold the text even without power.

    --
    Virtue finds and chooses the mean.
    Aristotle, Ethica Nichomachea
  62. What excites me about e-paper by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I also like the convienice and feel of real paperbacks.

    What excites me about things like e-paper is that I could have different books for different needs.

    For travel or general fun reading (in the park, on the couch, etc.) I could have an e-book the size of a normal paperback (hopefully with pages that have similar weight and feel to paper) that I could dock, load with content, undock and take with me anywhere.

    For harsher conditions like maps you take out hiking, I could have a more rugged version of the paper that would stand up to wear and weather.

    If I wanted to prop up a table, I could have a hardback version of e-paper that I fill up with something like "War & Peace" or "The Breast" (wierd Kafka ripoff, or at least it seems that way to me!). Ok, someone out there might like the hardback form factor. It is better for tech books, hmm...

    Anyway, I could have a choice of form factors and load what books I liked into whatever size and shape I like.

    As for the person who said a book full of pages of e-paper was a waste, my argument against that is that spatial memory is very powerful, and there are a LOT of times when I've wanted to refer back to some exact spot in the book and the quickest way really is to turn right to the page where you remember it being - you might think some sort of search mechanism could do the same but I think it would be slower. Plus I am in agreement that turning pages is pleasant way to scroll forward through a book.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  63. Spatial Memory & Power needs by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The reason why I personally would much rather have a real book full of pages for most reading needs is that I like to refer back to particular spots - sometimes to look back at an earlier plot point, sometimes to go to a particular page to look up some reference.

    Spatial memory is quite powerful, and I can often turn to the exact page I'm looking for, or I can't quite remember exactly what I'm looking for textually but know where it was spatially. It might seem like you could just runa search for the same thing in a PDA style reader, but I'm dubious that could ever be made as fast as simply turning to a page when you know where it is.

    The great thing about digital books is that for times when a computer-style search is called for, you could use a PDA unit to do that - but when you wanted to read a book in a traditional manner without having to worry about a battery source throughout the period of time you use a book (like while travelling) a book full of e-paper would be amazingly useful.

    Even better if when you get your hotel room or other destination if you could upload a new book into your e-book from the PDA.

    I'm not going to touch the issues you bring up regarding digital books and ownership - all I can say is that companies seem to be too stupid to see an opportunity for tenfold growth in profits to be able to grab on. They could be selling new books in airports for .50c each with no distribution or printing costs, but are too worried about the 1% of people that would hoard the content to grab the gold ring.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  64. Docking station approach by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Even if the electronics to drive a piece of e-paper were somewhat expensive, it wouldn't matter if used ina docking station senario.

    Basically, you'd have a book of e-paper which you would hook to a docking station of some sort - that would render all of the e-paper for the book. It could even take a bit (a few minutes) and people wouldn't mind.

    You could have a rnage of ebooks with different form factors and lengths. Seperate from that you could have a range of e-book docking stations with different capbilities - some could be more customized to render in different point sizes, have better fonts or support diagrams. You'd only have to buy one docking station but you could have a variety of e-books to write to, as long as they are made as cheaply as possible I think it would all work out well and be pretty affordable.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  65. Very good and dandy, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you going to do when the electricity ends? Power it with a potato?

    1. Re:Very good and dandy, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

  66. E-book will never die, neither the real book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as people want the real thing, there will be someone to sell it. And vice-versa.

  67. No. by GregWebb · · Score: 2

    You try placing footnotes on the correct piece of paper with HTML.

    You can do them at the end of a document, sure, but HTML isn't precise enough to guarantee that that matches the end of the physical page on all devices. There's a reason publishers use PDFs instead of HTML, y'know...

    A wireless HTML browser on e-paper would be cool, yes, but it alone won't replace books. Actually, the other problem that screams out at me here is annotations. From what they're talking about I can't see a clean, simple way to annotate your copy, which means you instantly knock it out for academic books and quite a lot of non-academic, too. Or end up with a situation similar to the old joke about tippex on the monitor...

    --

    Greg

    (Inside a nuclear plant)
    Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    1. Re:No. by Kinetix303 · · Score: 1

      Who said it would read only one HTML document? A book be composed of several... even several hundred.

      And where wold one place footnotes in such a document? The electronic form is paper... the user to rollower the footnote, or when the footnote was visible, it would be displayed at the bottom edge...

      Iknow the intent for your post was "Why limit one's self to HTML" but the arguments were used were... well... bad. I agree that a more specialized/simple format wiould be a better idea.... what is HTML anymore, anyway?

  68. Inspector Gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's getting closer and closer to when I'll finally be able to get one of those computer books that Penny used to help her uncle foil Dr. Claw's evil plans!!

    C0MPU73R B00X R0X0R

  69. No by TommyBear · · Score: 1

    The E-Ink/E-Paper concept works on the fact that you run a charge through the circuitry and the pages hold that state once they have been typeset. Removing the charge does not destroy the image.

    The E-Paper is comprised on half white/black beads that spin from white to black.

    Therefore there is no need to refresh the picture unless you are doing an animation.

  70. Try again. by TommyBear · · Score: 1

    E-Paper does not contantly refresh and is not LCD based. If there is no charge the image is not destroyed.

    It would be infact very cheap to produce, seeing that the paper is just inpregnated with beads half black and on the other side white. They just spin from side to side. They then stay that way until a charge is used.

  71. But if I run out of bog roll, by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

    can I wipe my arse with it?

    --
    SURELY NOT!!!!!
  72. Every time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seems that everytime[sic] any of the e-paper, e-ink, e-whatever companies have a new demo unit they run out and call a press conference."

    And every time that happens someone reports on it.

    And every time that happens the report is posted on /.

    /. has control over one part of this boring, repetitive, uninformative process...

  73. The complexity in not in the display cells. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 1


    Yes, but the complexity is in getting the digital information to the display cells, not in the display cells themselves.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:The complexity in not in the display cells. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The expense of the lcd panels is in the manufacturing. LCD screens are very difficult to make because of all the steps involved. It is the panel itself rather than the circuitry.

      E-paper, on the other hand, is a single layer of circuits on plastic. The process of making e-paper is is very different than the highly expensive process of making an lcd screen.

    2. Re:The complexity in not in the display cells. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


      "E-paper, on the other hand, is a single layer of circuits on plastic. The process of making e-paper is is very different than the highly expensive process of making an lcd screen."

      Yes. However, there seems to me to be a lie in this. Actual e-paper display panels will, in practice, be rigid and complicated because of all the transistors and interconnects involved.

      LCD displays are difficult to make, not because laying down layers of liquid crystal is difficult, but because the layers must be integrated with transistors. Addressing pixels separately is a bear of a problem. Having simple display cells reduces the complexity of only the element that was already quite simple.

      It seems to me that attaining flexibility is also a huge problem. Flexible things achieve flexibility by being alloewed to pull themselves apart internally. Only things that are very thin achieve durability while being flexed.

      I don't see how e-paper can be e-paper. I think that, for the forseeable future, "e-paper" will always be "rigid black-and-white display panel in a world that increasingly demands color".

      That's where I see the lie. I think the developers of "e-paper" know what I've said here. A usable product is a lot further away than they are implying. Also, it is likely that, by the time e-paper is reduced in overall cost, color LCD panels will be reduced in cost, also.

      --
      Bush's education improvements were
  74. Embedded OS in the paper? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1

    I have to wonder how this e-paper is going to operate - will it work like a PDA with its own embedded OS, or will there be some sort of seperate device with an "e-paper display driver" that spits out pages to the device? If the first is true, I imagine there will be a small square on the paper where the chips are that cannot display anything. Maybe that's where the paper's logo will go (Intel Inside or something).

    But I really hope it won't run on Microsoft PaperPC.

    Then again, it would be really funny if the person sitting next to me had a page of e-paper that suddenly went all blue - This paper has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down. How do you control-alt-delete a piece of paper?

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  75. nope by Illserve · · Score: 2

    You don't need nearly the power of a matrox card. You're not managing 32 million colors, or 3d effects, texture loading, or any of that. Just black and white, a video card to handle epaper would be very simple , very cheap and very small.

  76. What will happen to our history? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I read an article in Scientific American a while back that made a disturbing point: all through the later half of the twentieth century, and all of the twenty-first, the trend has been towards storing data in electronic media instead of paper. The problem is that computer media become obsolete very quickly, so you end up with data stored on tape drives that don't have players made anymore, for example. The question I have is: qhat will historians of the future do when they don't have 3.5 inch floppy drives, or CD-ROM drives, because they've been replaced with newer technology? How will they access our data?

    The nice thing about paper, from a historian's point of view, is that anyone can obtain data from an actual dead tree or sheepskin.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:What will happen to our history? by aero6dof · · Score: 1

      Historians of the future will have to develop tools to deal with with this. They might pop that 21st century CD-rom into a "digital archaeology" grade optical scanner which might read the the CD-ROM using the resolution of an electron microscope, then they'll have to decode it using some software package written to deal with historical data formats. The same with magnetic media, they'll have SQUID-like devices to sample the magnetic media at higher sensitivites than current equipment does.

      If current archaeologists figured out how to decipher the ancient languages, I'm sure that in the future they'll have digital specialists who will figure how to recover all todays data.

  77. Using a Matrox card as an example was a mistake. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 1


    You are right. Using a Matrox card as an example was a mistake.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  78. Re:E-paper has to be perfect...and I agree by rania1h1 · · Score: 1

    I don't buy the whole "book experience" either. Reading in bed is still possible and I'm totally willing to invest in a laptop to avoid having to buy another damned huge ass bookshelf. Can't wait to see books in museums...

  79. Ummm... silly question by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    But aren't hyperlinks (you know, from the 'H' in HTML) appropriate for footnotes. Just a stupid idea, I suppose.

    You're right in that HTML was never intended to be a layout tool although it has been coerced into being one, but IMO, in and of itself HTML can be a very reasonable way to display information. However, footnotes are placed on the same page to allow the user to see them without flipping around the book. If you are using hyperlinks, you get the same effect.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  80. Re:Just imagine.. Newspeak... by r2ravens · · Score: 2

    Far worse is the level of revisionism that will be possible a la 1984 (everyone read it if you haven't). Already when I go to MS' web site, I have a helluva time finding information on anything earlier than the current product, and we won't go into how they redefine 'innovation'. (I don't theenk that word means what you theenk it does. -- Princess Bride)

    At least paper books can't be changed remotely to display something different than they did last week.

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
  81. My library beats cray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you make a Beowulf cluster of those?

  82. Free e-paper by werg · · Score: 1

    There seem to be alot of issues here that could freedom-relevant.

    Thats why i would ask: Is someone else here interested in developing free-design-e-paper?

    This technology is very close to the cutting edge between content&hardware. That is why we should be wary that the control over content does not get swallowed up by you-know-how.

    Wouldn't it be a good protection if we'd start with the freedom on an early level?

    Besides, i think developing something like that would be fun.
    That's it... no clear ideas how-to....
    anyway...

    --
    --- wSerPg@deAmokratMica.org (remove "SPAM")
  83. Electronic Etch-A-Sketch: True Open-Source Epaper? by Randym · · Score: 2
    IIRC, the Etch-a-sketch toy (EAS) consists of magnetic filings, which are temporarily attached to the surface by a continuous pointer device. Shaking the toy dislodges the filings, thus presenting a "clean" surface.

    Might it be possible to place some kind of electronic grid upon the face of the EAS, so that, by activating any given intersection (similar to a telephone "bar-type" switching network) a "dot" of iron filing might appear? Of course, the resultant picture would be fairly low-res, but it *might* be adequate for print. I think that one could achieve at least 320 * 240 pixels, perhaps similar to an old C64 screen.

    I am presuming that the grid would connect out of a conventional serial or parallel port from a conventional computer. Any thoughts on the feasability of this?

    --
    DNA is a Turing machine. You, however, being dynamic and emergent, are not.