Slashdot Mirror


Used ICBM Silo For Sale, "Cheap"

sprzepiora writes "An Atlas ICBM silo is for sale on E-Bay. Place your bids now, because it's only $1.5E6! Includes such amenities as: 1100 gallon hot tub, sauna,3 finished baths, 47 ton garage door, 66,000 lb. bank of batteries, chemical and bioligical air filtration, and more!" This is cool just to lust after. Of course its in Kansas (yeah I know, I'm in michigan, whats the difference, right?)

80 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by czardonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    A big hole in the ground! Sweet.

    --
    Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    1. Re:Wow by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      A big hole in the ground! Sweet.

      I want to be the first to play with the asbestos.

      please?

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  2. The one time... by ekrout · · Score: 4, Funny

    that a reply of ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US might actually apply. Schweet ;-)

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  3. Userfriendly.org? by Ksop · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thats the one all the geeks from Columbia Internet were living in right?

    1. Re:Userfriendly.org? by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      Start here and flip through them, the series ended after 9-11, as if you can't guess why.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. Somewhere in the former Soviet Union... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is a silo in the ground, complete with a missile dialed in to your new home! This is one thing the Real Estate agent will conveniently forget to mention.

    On the other hand, I guess that's the purpose for the 47-ton garage door.

    1. Re:Somewhere in the former Soviet Union... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      why would somwone target a missle silo? there won't be a missle there by the time there missile gets here.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. One of our base... by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...can belong to YOU, yes you, for the low, low price of $1.5 megabucks!

    (Considering what the owner probably paid for it, and the improvements made, any handymen might seriously want to consider purchasing old silos and reconditioning them. Fun and profitable!)

  6. Kansas? Who Cares? by torpor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dude, it's underground. It could be in Iceland for all I care - that is some *private* mad-scientist lab space...

    The only problem with the place is that it's not nearly as secret as it once was. I'd pay twice what the going price for this thing is, if only it *wasn't* plastered all over EBay. It's a bit hard to make plans to rule the known universe when everyone and their dog is coming by just to see "that mad rocket guy that lives in a bunker in Kansas".

    Of course, there's always price-of-admission revenue for signed photo's. Oh, and I suppose there'd be a plentiful supply of fresh human brain matter to plunder for the "MegaBrain Computer" experiment.

    Well, off to feed the kitty ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  7. Jeez... by meckardt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would just jump all over this deal, except that right now, my stock options aren't worth as much as they used to be...

  8. Is it just me... by gusnz · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...or is CmdrTaco going down the tubes again? ;)

    OTOH, I can see the benefits: "Target acquired: Redmond is onscreen..."

  9. Who's djblue42? by rkent · · Score: 2

    I can only assume the current high (only) bid is a joke. It's made by a guy named djblue42 ( feedback profile ) who, true to his handle, has purchased mostly musical equipment in the past. nothing more than a few hundred bucks.

    Damn! Can they leave him a zillion negative feedbacks at once for backing out of such an expensive auction?!

    1. Re:Who's djblue42? by klund · · Score: 2

      Damn! Can they leave him a zillion negative feedbacks at once for backing out of such an expensive auction?!

      Actually, real estate auctions on Ebay aren't binding... You need to read the polices and conduct page, buddy:
      http://pages.ebay.com/help/community/png-estate.ht ml

      So bid away! Bid a billion! Offers to buy real estate aren't binding until you sign a Purchase and Sale Agreement, no matter what your feedback rating is.

      --
      My word processor was written by Stanford Professor Donald Knuth. Who wrote yours?
  10. Maybe Saddam Hussein, also... by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 3, Funny


    Osama bin Laden will surely bid on this.


    ABC News article: "Abu Sayyaf ... train[ed] terrorists in the methods taught by the CIA ..." What should be the Response to Violence?

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  11. Other dream homes.... by nellardo · · Score: 3

    Loompanics Unlimited, that sterling source of all that They don't want you to know, has a section of books on these kinds of things. My favorite is this one. I want a decommissioned nuclear submarine I can berth at Manhattan! Then I can live "in" the East Village (where I live now - been interesting) and get away from it all.

    --
    -----
    Klactovedestene!
  12. Sounds like a secure web server / data site to me by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You could set up a nice web hosting business there, with guaranteed security, excellent UPS setup, and most likely a pre-installed fat data pipe (probably laying dormant though).

    Did you say nuke-proof? Well, maybe, unless as someone pointed out earlier, the Russians have your home address locked directly into one of their nukes...

    MadCow

    --
    I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
  13. Good secure hosting site by gbnewby · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was in the Netherlands for HAL2001 this summer, and got to visit a NAP right across the street from the U. Twente campus (where HAL was held). A NAP is where different networks peer, and in this case is also where at least one ISP provided co-lo space and other ameneties.

    The cool part: it was in a retired federal bank. Literally a fortress: fully bulletproof, tempest-shielded, multiple sub-basements, iron gates and fully enclosed by fences or walls, the works.

    The ICBM silo gets me thinking about the same thing. They have on-site power generation and battery backup and an obviously pretty damn secure setup. So, why not open a secure hosting facility? It's not HavenCo/Sealand, but it's not bad.

    The main problem is it's in the middle of nowhere (Mapquest link ), about 50 miles from Topeka. Paying the local loop charges for dedicated (and redundant) Internet access is probably going to cost a fortune.

    • Greg
    1. Re:Good secure hosting site by JoeShmoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The main problem is it's in the middle of nowhere (Mapquest link [mapquest.com] ), about 50 miles from Topeka. Paying the local loop charges for dedicated (and redundant) Internet access is probably going to cost a fortune

      And it doesn't for HavenCo/Sealand? Which is easier...running a line on dry (flat) land or over a body of water?

      Besides, this type of situtation is what wireless is for. Come to think of it, HavenCo/Sealand uses wireless for a couple of their links (IIRC).

      The real question...when the FBI comes knocking...will they be able to get in? I don't know if they have the equipment to take out a 47-ton door...but you better fill that silo with food and supplies because the second you step out you are theirs.

      - JoeShmoe

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    2. Re:Good secure hosting site by gbnewby · · Score: 2

      Sealand has a line of sight wireless link, I understand (microwave or a similar frequency). They're about 12 miles off the coast, right? They need to pay for their upstream provider(s), of course, but don't need to pay the phone company for the local loop. (They are in the UK, so the telephone industry is quite different, as are regulations for things like ground-based microwave relays). (OK, they're not in the UK, they're an independent country, the Principality of Sealand. But their upstream link is in the UK. Geesh, you people are soooooo picky!)

      In the silo, you'd want at least two independent pipes coming in; the specifics depend on what's available, good and cost-effective. But at least one would probably involve a local loop charge by the phone company, and would be a significant monthly expense in addition to whatever else is paid for the upstream Internet link. As an example, the U. where I work pays $2000/month for a single pair of dark fiber totalling less than 1 kilometer.

      Anyway, I agree that whoever has $1.5M for the silo can afford the cost of the Internet service. The question is whether they can make any money running a secure ISP or co-lo that way!

      In case you haven't noticed, all the big ISP/hosting/co-lo/outsourcing providers seem to be located in or near phone company buildings, NAPs or MAEs. Apart from providing a reasonably secure facility with good network access, these offer the benefit of not needing to pay for distance from the telco building.

    3. Re:Good secure hosting site by gbnewby · · Score: 2

      "You're a pussy, pussy." (E.Cartman).

      You lease dark fiber when you want to connect your own equipment to it at either end. The fiber is lit, but the U. doesn't need to pay for it (any more than they do to connect any other buildings or locations; that is, it's internal, part of the campus network). The U. lights it itself, but doesn't need to pay the phone company (Bell South) except to lease the fiber.

      This is very typical at big universities, school districts, and other organizations that have multiple locations in a metropolitan area. It's used to connect off-campus offices etc. to the campus backbone. I'm sure some companies do it, too, if they have multiple offices in a relatively small area.

      BTW, you're right that only phone companies and cable companies (and maybe a few other lucky players) own dark fiber. But, like any good whore, they're happy to sell it to you....for a little while.

  14. Good commute, excellent schools. by KFury · · Score: 2

    If they throw in a missile, the commute's only 40 minutes to anywhere on the planet.

    This looks like just the kind of compound a cult or cell would love. Easily defensible, low visibility.

    Anyone else thinking this is a gov't honeypot?

  15. Alternative uses for the silo by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 4, Funny
    • Install a *huge* fan (with a steel grate above the blade...) near the bottom for indoor acrobatic action. Whee!
    • Grow a lot of pot! As if any sheriff can kick in a 47-ton door.
    • Fill the silo with H2O & get out the ol' scuba gear.
    • Vertical artificial rock climbing. The bonus is that once you climb to the top, you're done.
    • Buy 50,000+ old boxen & make the Beowulf Cluster from hell!

    This silo is screaming for an entrepreneur. Now if I can only get in the Corporate Welfare line for some of that $70 Billion action...

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Alternative uses for the silo by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lease it out as a private space launch facility!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Could User Friendly guys be the seller... by L-Train8 · · Score: 2

    User Friendly has been doing a storyline about this all summer. It all started when they needed some more office space...

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
  17. Call me a Karma whore! by srvivn21 · · Score: 2

    http://www.missilebases.com/todd/index.html for more info on this particular property. Floor plans and all.

    Woot!

  18. nice by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Funny

    has 47 ton drive-in door that operates electrically
    Phew - I was worried for a second.

    Unique, historic, functional property. .
    That's good, because I've good, because with this and a few more items, our rocket will be ready to move in!

    note: this is meant to be funny!

  19. Of course its for sale... by Quizme2000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The previous occupants moved out a couple weeks ago!

    --
    "Get them before they get....
  20. Survivor 4: ICBM Silo by ChrisBennett · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmmm.... this could be a great site for "reality TV" shows like Survivor or The Mole. Besides, we already know it makes a great plot for UserFriendly. Producers? Anyone?

  21. Re:Kansas? Who Cares? by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Dude, its perfect:br.
    tourist step in, Brain washed hypno-drones step out.!MUahahaha

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Other missile silos available for less money by jms · · Score: 3, Informative

    The main link to their website is here.

    Sure, this one is super expensive, but if you look at their web site, what's really intriguing is that they have other properties for sale that are much cheaper -- because they're in, ahem, rough condition. Probably saturated with rocket fuel and dioxins, but what the hell. You're young. You're immortal. Why not go for it!

    For instance, you can pick up a 16 acre missile base in Winters, TX for $199,000. The web site mentions that the silo is "stripped of structure with app. 100' water depth. Seller eager."

    Now THAT's a big hot-tub. Anyone know the diameter of one of those launch silos? Care to figure out how many gallons that comes to? You'd have the biggest hot tub in the world, if you could afford to heat it.

    Another 11 acre missile base is available in Shep, TX for only $169,000, and, I love this, the missile silo is described as "used for scuba diving adventures." Woo hoo!

    Still another 22 acre site is available in Creta, OK, for $133,000. Now that's almost affordable!

    Even if you don't have a cool million to spend, the possibility of owning your own missile silo lies tantalizingly in reach to the eager geek ... That's a lot of land, and you could easily sell some of it off and keep the silo goodies for yourself. Anyone got some money left over from the Redhat IPO? Yeah. Right.

    Lotsa fun to dream, isn't it :-)

    1. Re:Other missile silos available for less money by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2, Informative


      In missle silos the presence of water typically means that the silo door leaks when it rains. The sealing of the door is typically the first step in turning it into a residence.

      maru
      www.mp3.com/pixal

    2. Re:Other missile silos available for less money by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > stripped of structure with app. 100' water depth. Seller eager."
      >
      > Now THAT's a big hot-tub. Anyone know the diameter of one of those launch silos? Care to figure out how many gallons that comes to? You'd have the biggest hot tub in the world, if you could afford to heat it.

      Easy. That's what the missile's for. ;-)

  23. Re:Kansas? Who Cares? by MarkusQ · · Score: 4, Funny
    The only problem with the place is that it's not nearly as secret as it once was. I'd pay twice what the going price for this thing is, if only it *wasn't* plastered all over EBay.

    I, on the other hand, would pay extra to make sure that everyone knew which silo it was that no longer held an ICBM.

    Especially the people who might have loaded silos of their own.

    -- MarkusQ

  24. Not just One Hole in the Ground by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    But one of many! From the seller's aboutme:

    We have now sold 27 of these properties to excited owners



    I wonder if there's any in my neck of the woods? Probably not, since most of California is laced with fault lines and was probably all primary target anyway. I bet there's some in Michigan, in da U.P., eh?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Not just One Hole in the Ground by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 2

      Nah, go down a few feet you hit rock, most places. I'm sure there's a played-out iron mine or three you could get there though.

      Down in lower Michigan though, there are the old Minuteman silos at the Grosse Ile airport, but I think those are all sealed up. And probably full of water seeped in from Lake Erie/Detroit River.

  25. Re:Sounds like a secure web server / data site to by geekoid · · Score: 2

    The russians have better things to target, then I missle silo. It taks approx 32 minutes for an icbm to get from russia launch, to a US target. Do you really think our missles will still be in the ground?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  26. Re:We know where are tax dollars went. by Sawbones · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you check out the sellers home page (missilebases.com) You'll see that this is one has had quite a bit of work done to it to make it worth the 1.5 mil. They normally go for about $200,000 and then usually just have a few hangers on the surface and maybe some of the interior structure still intact.

    I do like the idea of using the silo as a scuba diving tank though (they did that at one site).

    --

    Ad in classifieds: Pandora's Box (no box) $5
  27. First Strike Target by StaticLimit · · Score: 2

    Sure it's built to withstand a nuclear attack (generally that means anything other than a direct hit)... but it's also probably a first tier target for... direct nuclear strikes. Of course, I'm SURE Russia has updated their target list over the years to remove this silo ;).

    - StaticLimit

    1. Re:First Strike Target by Ektanoor · · Score: 2

      No matter who's the attacker, the site may become again a first target... War is a trick thing:

      -Commander, we just checked up the new pics. They are a bit blurred due to those high altitude blasts but still we can discern some activity in Kansas...

      -Oh, oh, oooooh... What's that object over there?

      - Well it's a nuclear silo but, according to our data, it was decomissioned several years ago...

      -And the tracks? What about those pickups over there? And that shiny swimming pool is also 20 years old? Damn how americans live... Blasting everything around and having a 5 star hotel in a military zone...

      -Well, our agents didn't informed about any revitalization of old bases... Maybe it's...

      -Soldier ARE YOU BLIND? DON'T YOU SEE WHAT YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOURS EYES????? THEY ALREADY REVITALIZED IT!!!! BLOW THEM UP!!!!

  28. The price is right. by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    I can only assume the current high (only) bid [$1.5M] is a joke.

    Maybe he's using bay area apartments for price comparison. If you take the NPV of the cash flow stream, it comes out about right, and I'll bet it's much better per square foot.

    -- MarkusQ

  29. Silo or base? Previous Owners by KernelHappy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone else noticed that there is no mention of launch tubes anywhere? I think that makes this just a missile base, not a silo.

    Also, I believe this property was seized as part of a drug bust. Story goes that the previous owner/occupants were producing pounds of acid. I can't find the article to confirm if this is infact the site.

    --
    -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
  30. Who's missilebases? by fm6 · · Score: 2

    More to the point, who's "missilebases"? Why is his English so flaky? Why did he reject a bid from "fatihsenel" (who actually has quite a good record, despite the cancellation notice)?

  31. Formerly a drug factory. by dox · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here is a story about it.


    There is also an article in Rolling Stong from July 5th, 2001 titled "The Acid King" about Leonard Pickard. The missle silo was owned by Todd Skinner, a shady bussinessman(drug dealer) who laundered money, trafficed drugs, and who knows what else. He made deals with the DEA to save his own ass many times, getting many of if friends imprisoned for life. Another example of America's idiotic war on drugs.

  32. With a little spit and polish... by motherhead · · Score: 2

    You know, these are tense times... people are fraught with the notions of impending cataclysm at the hands of bio/chemical terror... or worse...
    What can be done about this?

    Exploitation!

    "The Hotel Sanctuary"

    Yes that's right, throw in with seed money, renovate the hell out of the place, add rooms, a five star chief... a nice club... "spa"... and then book the hell out of it and horrifically inflated prices! No... seriously out of line prices... I mean Macaulay Caulkin (the home alone kid) levels of exploitation here...

    Tag line: "Your Own little Camp David!"

    A shining beacon of capitalism during our nation's darkest hours. This is why we enjoy twenty-four hour grocery stores and a nation of connected roads damnit, this my friends, is the American way.

    1. Re:With a little spit and polish... by motherhead · · Score: 2

      Not quite, this thing was started september 5th, when only a handful of survivalist nuts were too terribly concerned about an impending cataclysm. I guess he just happened to be selling at the right time.

      damn damn damn... always a day late and a dollar short. i blame my parents for sending me to a state college.

  33. FBI-proof? Good for a Church! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Much better than Waco.

  34. What one looks like before it's all dressed up by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is a pretty interesting photo tour that was made by some guys who, by their own admission, "violated federal law" to get inside and tour around one of these silos, when it was just a bunch of abandoned cold war concrete. It's nice to compare the this with the eBay photos...makes that 1.5 million opening bid seem a bit more reasonable. Oh, and you'd better hurry...there's only an hour left to bid on it.

    Incidentally, I lived in Topeka for some time, and I got to go to one of these abandoned silos, back around 92 or 93...there was a freaky survivalist dude living there, surrounded by all his guns and barrels of water...and I got to go stand where, at one time, there was a ICBM, ready to go...remembering the cold war dominated world that I grew up in, it was very, very surreal.

  35. simple first strike by rebelcool · · Score: 2
    Since it takes a matter of minutes for the missiles to reach each other's continent, the hope is that the other person wont have time to launch their missiles at you, thus your missiles aimed at their silos destroy their silos and keep them from destroying you.

    Of course it all depends on how fast the other guy's warning system and missile commanders are. This is where all that trillion dollar hardware and design comes into play.

    --

    -

    1. Re:simple first strike by geekoid · · Score: 2

      it take approx. 32 minutes for a Russian missle to achieve a US target. When there missle hit Apex our missle would be launched. We know and track every rocket launch from Russia.

      FYI I was SAC at FE Warren AFB, Wy.

      Out response is incredible fast.
      If you have ever seen WarGames then you know exactly how a missle base isn't.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:simple first strike by mangu · · Score: 2
      it take approx. 32 minutes for a Russian missle to achieve a US target


      How many minutes does it take to decide if you are going to destroy the world or not, based solely on a preliminary evaluation of missile trajectories?

    3. Re:simple first strike by ktakki · · Score: 2
      it take approx. 32 minutes for a Russian missle to achieve a US target. When there missle hit Apex our missle would be launched. We know and track every rocket launch from Russia.


      Only if you're talking about an ICBM launched from Russian (or former Soviet) territory at the continental United States (or vice versa).

      If it's a depressed-trajectory shot launched from a ballistic missile submarine parked off the East or West coast, it's all over in seven minutes.

      Seven minutes. Enough time for a last cigarette.

      k., proud member of the "Duck 'n' Cover Generation".
      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    4. Re:simple first strike by mangu · · Score: 2
      I just hope the US and Russian generals have consultants who know better than the elementary physics you need to calculate a theoretical orbit.


      I happen to work in the commercial satellite business, and our spacecraft are designed to be easy to track, exactly the opposite of nuclear warheads. We "range" (that is, track the satellite position) for about 15 minutes every two hours in order to determine the satellite orbit precisely (about 10 meters error). And those are satellites whose approximate orbits we have calculated beforehand.


      With five minutes of ranging an enemy warhead, you have enough data to know the missile will hit somewhere between Chicago and Denver.

    5. Re:simple first strike by mangu · · Score: 2
      Okay, but if you look at how this thread started, the question was: do they have a missile pointed at this silo? The answer: probably yes.


      The nuclear stalemate started with MAD - Mutual Assured Destruction - when each side had enough warheads to destroy each other's country many times over.

      Then one general, I don't know in which side, thought, why destroy their cities; if we destroy their missiles they won't have anything to fire at us. And they started targeting missiles at silos, based on the rationale that an attack would be so fast that the other side (maybe) wouldn't have enough time to decide if they should fire their missiles before they were hit or not.

      Fortunately for everyone, there was enough slack in the calculations that no one ever felt safe enough to start a full-scale nuclear attack based on that rationale.

    6. Re:simple first strike by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2

      "Besides, it's pretty obvious that World War III has started when NORAD picks up 500+ separate launches in the space of a few minutes."

      Except when it is a training tape put in the computer accidentally. This is something that supposedly has happened in both the U.S. and U.S.S.R. Notice that civilization still exists, which suggests that both countries were not so "hair trigger" that they can't deal with such glitches. From what I hear, though, the Ruskies came close. (Geekoid, I don't suppose you have any info and can discuss our "close call"?)

      That is why you don't necessarily want to "launch on warning". That is why the Ruskies would target our missile silos even when they KNOW that we could empty them by the time their missiles impact... it doesn't necessarily mean that we would do so. Launch on warning is more accident prone than "launch on verification." Twenty to Thirty minutes still isn't a long time to decide whether to destroy civilization or not when there are unknowns that have to be tracked down (like in the aforementioned "training accident" problem). You can't call back those ICBMs if you find out that the launch was a mistake a few seconds after they leave the silos. In theory the first strike attacker could hope that the defending nation would mistakenly conclude the attack wasn't real, or would at least not be sure enough that it was real that they would be willing to authorize ending society as we know it. The fact that we did not accidentally incinerate ourselves during the Cold War suggests that we were not on such a "hair trigger" and that this first strike theory did have a chance of working. Fortunately the Soviets never felt it had a good enough chance to pull it off and they were willing to collapse as a society before they were willing to "roll the dice and take their chances."* But then again, we did have a triad of deterence instead of one system.

      Targeting "empty silos" also forces the attacked nation to "use them or lose them" in the first strike. RVs in the first strike have a better chance of fratriciding ea. other due to all the nukes going off in a short period of time. Such ICBMs also will not be available (because they were either launched or destroyed) for "cleaning up" targets that might have been missed in the 1st strike and needed to be attacked again, forcing the use of less survivable or less accurate delivery systems like bombers or boomers.

      Yeah, they targeted our silos. Yeah, we could have emptied them before their RVs hit. Yeah, they presumably knew that. It was still a descent targeting strategy anyway. What scares me is the recent revelations that they also planned to finish off our population centers with smallpox laden RVs as well. You should never underestimate those Commies.

      * Which means that the rest of us owe Geekoid and the other people who were at SAC a word of thanks that we arrived at the 21st century neither dead or Red (unless you live in Cuba or the PRC... sorry guys, we'll free you when we can). Thanks.

    7. Re:simple first strike by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      With five minutes of ranging an enemy warhead, you have enough data to know the missile will hit somewhere between Chicago and Denver.

      Last time I checked, the area between Chicago and Denver was US territory. I don't really care which hamlet is the target.

  36. Re:hmm... was $250,000 before it went on E-bay by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, you must have stopped using your fingers to count in Grade 12, because you would realize that most of the upgrading they did is what gives it the price it has. And if you would do more digging, you would realize that even on their website, it is advertised at a cool mil. How would you expect a business pair to do 700-800k in renovations, and try to sell it for $200k? Please crawl into one of these. I will telegraph Osama Bin laden your co-ordiantes and tell him its the new location of Camp David.

    --
    Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
  37. Only on Slashdot... by Nate+Fox · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..would this be labeled as 'News' and not 'Its funny. Laugh'.

  38. Re:You think that's impressive? by Col.+Panic · · Score: 2, Funny

    That must be one big pussy :)

  39. Re:Sounds like a secure web server / data site to by FFFish · · Score: 2

    I dunno... seems to me it took frigging forever to scramble a fighter to deal with the incoming terrorist jets. Hesitate to guess what kind of hold-ups and hitches there'd be for launching an ICBM.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  40. Re:Net? by Junta · · Score: 2

    Half a T1 should be possible :)

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  41. The Auction Ended.. by Ikari+Gendou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    High bid djblue42 (20)

    Sure hope this was a gag auction after all, or else djblue42 is gonna have hell to pay...

    --

    Call on God, but row AWAY from the rocks!

  42. Re:Conspiracy theory by xmedar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah I can see it now-

    GWB: No Mr Putin, we didnt fire the missile, we sold that silo back in 2001, it was sold to a Miss Chech Nya, I can fax you the bill of sale if you like..

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  43. Hey this is better then.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    When UserFriendly WORKED in a ICBM silo! :) That was a good series. I tell ya one thing....you won't have to worry much about Chemical or Nuclear Warfare....

    --

    Gorkman

  44. Wamego, Kansas - now strategic deterrant free! by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Welcome to scenic Wamego, Kansas, the *former* ground zero for the greater Wamego, Kansas area. Feel free to enjoy the open fields, crystalline night sky, and fresh air with only a taint of pollutants from our former friendly neighbors in the SAC! Wamego - now there really is nothing here worth shooting at!

    -This message brought to your by the Wamego Chamber of Commerce.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  45. Re:Grow a lot of pot! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

    That article is trucated.

    Here's a link to the original SF Gate / SF Chronicle article. It's an interesting article...

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ ch ronicle/archive/2000/12/07/MN154990.DTL

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  46. You silly by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

    The RE agent isn't ALLOWED to mention that, because it's redlining.

  47. diff(Michigan, Kansas) by yellowstone · · Score: 2
    yeah I know, I'm in michigan, whats the difference

    There's a lot less beach-front property in Kansas ;-)


    (Score: -1, Not funny; Moderator is a Huskers fan)

    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
  48. Huge fan to fly around in -- I did that! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

    Believe it or not, there was a place in Las Vegas in the mid 80s that did that. They turned a jet engine up in the air and you could fly around in this chamber. I think the place was called "Fly Away" (?).

    They would put several people in at a time, and everyone wore these "flying suits" which had pockets for the air to catch in. Only one person would fly around at time, because they had to adjust the air flow to match your weight. There was a cricle of cushions that lined the chamber that everyone waited on.

    Smaller people seemed to do better than bigger people. My buddy who was maybe 5'6", weighing 130 tops flew around easily. My being 6' 2" about 200 pounds required a lot more air power. :) When you have that much wind power, any small adjustment that you make in your "control surfaces" (i.e., arms and legs) makes a huge difference in how fast you move around. I made the mistake of cocking one leg slightly out and the other leg slightly in, and caused myself to spin around at great speed. :)

    It was a lot of fun, but it was very expensive. It eventually died. Probably cost too much, and I'm sure the insurance was insane, even though they made you sign a monster disclaimer that you understood that you might die from the experience.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Huge fan to fly around in -- I did that! by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      Whoa -- I guess I spoke too soon about them being dead. Here they are.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  49. Re:Prop engine, not jet by r2ravens · · Score: 2

    IIRC, the engine was from a DC-3 and turned a horizontal prop that provided the upward air motion. Of course I never actually flew there, but did go in a check out the facility. (I lived there when it was operational in the early 80's.)

    Also, the baggy suit was what made all the difference. You had to wear a pair of coveralls (you can see them in the link in Reality Masters additional post) that had vent holes to fill up with air and help your total surface area and therefore lift.

    (Please don't flame me if I don't have the science of the aerodynamics right. :)

    --
    War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. - George Orwell or George Bush?
  50. So cool by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    I know exactly where this is! This is so cool. Wamego is on the east side of Manhattan, KS, better known for Kansas State University where I used to work and school at. This is so cool! I never even knew it was there. There was a big drug bust right around that area a while back IIRC. A buddy of mine said it was in the paper up there.

  51. Re: Pot by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    What you don't know is that there was supposedly a big drug bust very near to that area (ie, within a mile) a while back. I used to live in Manhattan and Wamego is on the edge of Manhattan. I used to drive to the middle of Wamego and north a mile and back west 1/2 mile to my boss's nursery when I did some landscaping work. Pot indeed.

  52. Re:PCBs and asbestos by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2

    That's ok. Odds are it is not amphible asbestos, the only type known to be hazardous. Unfortunately in the rush to ban asbestos, non one bothered to try and differentiate between the different types, and chrysotile (a.k.a. soft white) asbestos which was used for over 95% of asbestos applications was banned along with the more hazardous amphible types. For those of you in San Fransisco, there are supposedly extensive outcroppings of chrysotile around the Bay area; so if you live in SF, you're probably already exposed.

    PCBs and dioxin aren't as safe, but neither is it as bad as most people think. In 1976 an explosion scattered huge amounts of PCBs over Seveso, Italy. No fatalities or cancer cases are known to have come from this incident. A NIOSH study of U.S. workers exposed to high (a couple of orders of magnitude higher than the U.S. exposure maximum exposure) quantities of dioxin showed no increase in cancer or other fatal conditions. Unfortunately it is not harmless. In high quantities it does cause a severe skin rash called chloracne. If you value your complextion you will want to avoid large amouonts of PCBs and dioxin.

    On the other hand, if you are a techie from San Fransisco with acne, then you probably don't have much to lose... Just kidding. Even if you don't get killed by the contamination you may still be responsible for its clean up costs. Congratulations, you just bought a Superfund site.

  53. Shipping and handling? by FTL · · Score: 2

    Does the buyer have to pay for the postage?

    --
    Slashdot monitor for your Mozilla sidebar or Active Desktop.
  54. They're all in the middle of nowhere... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    That way if someone was going to nuke the silos for the silo's sake it'd be less likely to nuke major population centers.

    There's two properties available in Texas (Near Abilene...), two good ones in NY around the Adirondaks, another site in Central, KS, and one in Oklahoma near Altus. These are more for eccentrics than just rich people. They're for people that want to be left alone at all costs or want a nice integrated space for their business (which is what it looks like the Wamego site was being used for...) albeit underground.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  55. Open Source Game? by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 2

    I always wanted to get or write a nuclear war game. I don't mean something like Missile Command. I mean a strategy game. Start the game at the beginning of the nuclear arms race, with the player being the leader of one of the nations (like in Civ). He would get to make decisions about how much money to spend on weapons, training, R&D, espionage, civil defense, missile defense, etc. He could make decisions about things like signing treaties, research priorities, picking targeting strategies, picking civil defense strategies, swapping or giving away tech, etc. He could change readiness states, evacuate cities, order recon flights, attempt espionage or sabotage, launch attacks (of course), etc. Along the way different problems would arise depending on how wisely the player spent his money and the "world situation." A player who didn't invest much in training and who didn't develop good weapon control procedures would have a higher chance that one of his units would unexpectedly "release" their weapons during high states of alert. Too strict of weapons control would slow down response time and might encourage The Enemy to think they could succeed in a decapitating first strike. A war might stay "cold" for decades, and then suddenly heat up when one side gets enough strategic advantage that they think they can win a nuclear exchange. A well played game might never go "hot."

    'Things are going well and tensions are declining, and all of a sudden the game drops into "real time mode" the alarms go off. The Enemy calls up on the hotline (you did develop and implement The Hotline didn't you?) and says that one of their units has gone rogue (maybe you should have given or leaked Advanced Weapons Control Methods to them) and launched a nuclear tipped ICBM at one of your cities, "It isn't a deliberate attack, please, PLEASE, don't retaliate against our innocent civilians for the crimes of one madman." What do you do? Or everything looks fine, tensions are low, although sunspot activity is running high. Then your Air Defense Command reports a sudden first strike. Only some of the sensors are giving confusing or conflicting data. It could be a computer or sensor glitch; The Enemy has no reason to launch now. If you don't launch before the RVs hit (perhaps you should have invested in Mobile Launchers) then most of your ICBMs will be wiped out in their silos. What do you do?'

    To get a really good sim of nuclear brinksmanship you'd need to have other countries that could have alliances, critical resources, their own nukes (of course), etc. 'Tensions are running high between you and Nuclear Power A, when all of a sudden atomic explosions start lighting up your cities (Suitcase Nukes? Stealth?) and sabotage takes out several of your units. Nuclear Power A is the obvious culprit... except that it could also be Nuclear Power B that is trying to use current tensions to get you and A to wipe ea. other out. Do you launch against A, against B, against everybody*?'

    You'd also want to simulate some basic level of internal economics and politics so that nations could change attitude and power, The Senate could overrule your decisions if your position wasn't "secure" enough, or leaders could get deposed without a shot being fired (the ultimate victory... or loss). That would mean adding non-state actors (like terrorists, revolutionaries, legitimate and "faked" protest groups) and some level of psychological warfare. "Are you sure you want to order all the major cities evacuated, Mr. President? That could hurt your approval rating and our economy considerably. If you are wrong..."

    Oh, and to make the most of it you'd want to add non-nuclear weapons, so you could have Chemical, Biological, and Conventional, arms races and wars along with Nuclear. Although non-nuclear "hot" wars would need great simplification in order to keep the interface manageable. 'You are losing a very important conventional war involving several major allies with critical resources and bases. Releasing the use of tactical nuclear weapons would turn the tide. Doing so could also escalate to a strategic nuclear exchange. Without your allies resources you will not be able to maintain your current weapon parity with The Enemy. What do you do?'

    If done properly and OBJECTIVELY then it could also be a useful teaching tool on Grand Strategy, Games Theory, and The Cold War. Maybe you could even have it so you could alter physics or human nature or add "exotic" weapons to the game to experiment with hypothetical scenarios. A player could try to emulate Stalin or Kennedy, they could try arms reduction talks (trust but verify) with peaceful co-existence or sneak attacks, they could wage "limited" wars or test out that Nuclear Winter theory (something else that might could be customized). Of course, you'd want a multiplayer version. You can see why I have never even bothered to write it... it is a HUGE project. Quite beyond my abilities and free time.

    But, perhaps The Bazaar could do it. I have put the idea in the public domain, is anyone willing and capable of pursuing it?

    * A wargasm as they say, and my likely response.

  56. Here's the missles to complete your collection by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    Right here.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  57. Wamego, Kansas--LSD lab by plastik55 · · Score: 2
    This base has been pretty extravagantly decked out by previous occupants, and being outside Wamego, I suspect that this is the same same silo that was being used as a large scale LSD synthesis lab a few years back. Which brings up the question, how did it make its way onto EBay?


    Here's an article originally from the San Francisco Chronicle about the LSD missile silo situation. IIRC, there was also a big article about it in Rolling Stone a while ago, but I don't have the issue around to check.

    --

    I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  58. Re:Great Colo Site by spudnic · · Score: 2

    All of our servers are 48V DC. You just need to specify the type of power supply when you order a case.

    --
    load "linux",8,1
  59. Re:Kansas? Who Cares? by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2
    damn, that's a lot of bad trips mannn...

    It's always so easy to identify people who have never taken LSD--they're the ones who speak of "bad trips" and "flashbacks" and all that COINTELPRO fiction. Maybe you can leave the world of the naïve and join the world of John F. Kennedy, Cary Grant, Carl Sagan, Huston Smith, and other examples of highly effective people who have tripped on LSD.

    it could have supplied 15 million doses of the drug, or about a third of the world's supply

    You must have gotten these statistics from the Dealers of Ecstacy Agency, who must be the ones selling all the drugs, since they seem to know so much about the quantities, prices, etc. Have you noticed that their shingle reads "Drug Enforcement Administration" rather than "Drug Law Enforcement Administration"? It appears they are forcing everyone to take drugs, since per capita consumption of illegal drugs has increased even though over 1,000,000 people are currently jailed on drug charges and over $17,000,000,000 has been stolen from drug users/sellers to finance the police state.

    If all the bad things they said about illegal drugs were true, the ground would be piled about three feet deep with all the bodies of people who jump from buildings in anticipation of flying, and 50% of men would have to wear B- or C-cup bras to hold their enlarged breasts. Alas, the voices of science and reason have been drowned by the baseless rhetoric of politicians. Thank you, Mister Gunnery Sergeant, for serving as such a fine example of the effectiveness of semantic programming.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"