Loki Goes Postal
xwred1 writes: "Loki has announced a new port today, up to now known as "Secret Project Q": They are going Postal! Press release is here, and the game product page/overview is here. Seems to be a healthy sign of life from Loki, they are obviously still getting good things done despite the chapter 11."
Many of us don't have 3D accelerators that work under Linux. While I'd like to have my hardware working under Linux, I realize that it's probably not going to happen any time this millenium.
So instead, I have a suggestion. Mesa currently has only one mode for software rendering--high quality. Is there any way that a low-quality software rendering mode could be introduced into Mesa? How difficult would it be to add this to the libraries, maybe have it switched on/off by an environment variable? How much of a slow-down would it introduce into the libraries, by having forked logic like this?
Because honestly, if I were to buy a copy of Quake III right now (this example would work the same with Postal once it comes out), I'd have to buy the Windows version because I haven't the "right" hardware 3D-accelerator. A sped-up, but much less visually correct, version of Mesa might make it easier for someone like me to bite the bullet and buy the Linux version, so that when I upgrade/if I upgrade to a 3D accelerated card, I'll have it under the OS I prefer.
(I realize this is pretty selfish, but it's also one of the reasons why you're not going to see many Windows users switching over to Linux any time soon. If I can't install Linux on someone else's 600Mhz Athalon, and be able to show them a kick-ass 3D game with a frame rate higher than 1.5/s...)
as much as i love loki and all they've done, this is not a good sign. i'd love to see loki become as successful as any of the really big game houses. porting old, mediocre (at best) games is not how it's going to happen. even i have a limit to the number of games i'll buy that i have no intention of playing just to support the company.
loki should be porting diablo 2, planescape torment, total annihilation, warcraft 3, etc. big, mainstream games that lots of people want to play. the question is, why aren't they? that's almost certainly due to the original authors not being interested in a linux version.
as much as i hate to admit it, i think linux's chances as a game platform have gone down the drain. the linux hype has gotten considerably less prevelant, and i'm willing to bet there are fewer people running it as their main home OS than in recent memory and that number is only going down.
there have not been any major improvements in this area which would draw people to it recently.. ease of installation hit the point where anyone able to install windows could do it a while ago. however, once the system is up and running, it's not so easy to get new things (like Mesa) set up. this has not improved.
and as i said, it's been a while since a big game was ported to linux.
all in all i don't see any light at the end of this tunnell. it pains me to say so because i've been using linux as my main desktop OS for years and years and always was really optimistic about it.
...dave
Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
A port of a three year old game does not look healthy to me. Perhaps we can soon expect a port of Commander Keen?
Yea. I couldn't faind any screenshots anywhere...
I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
It clearly says on Loki's web site that Tribes2 and Deus Ex are in the works. How much more mainstream can you get? I've been playing Heavy Gear II for the past few days and think that it is very impressive under linux.
It's basically a catch-22 -- game developers want to make games using the latest and greatest hardware support - hardware manufacturers release windows-only drivers, and refuse to release either a linux driver, or the specs by which a third party could release a linux driver.
So the hardware doen't perform to it's full potential under linux. Game developers see that there's no support for the hardware - and don't develop the software.
Places like Loki are doing what they can with the games they can. I'll agree, though, that they could have better choices of games. IMHO the concentration should be on successful, long-lasting games - games that a year after release still have a large following. Games like Diablo II, the Baldur's Gate games, Starcraft, Everquest, etc... Those are the kinds of games that will sell well. Those are the kinds of games a lot of people are still playing - and quite a few of those people dual-boot to linux. I'd gladly pay for a linux version of Diablo II or Baldur's Gate II -- right now they're the only reasons I boot back to Windows.
There *is* a market out there - they're just hitting it with the wrong games.
It's great and all, but why is there a "Five Star Adult Dating - Amour - Sexy Chat" banner on that page?
Hrm..
...with a lack of capital. At least part of the enduring games don't use 3D accel or can use what's already there- Diablo II is an example of one that doesn't use much in the way of 3D acceleration.
As for Mesa being non-trivial, every distribution installs it for XFree86 4.0 and usually pre-configures it (it's actually rather trivial to configure for a DRI driver that's not in alpha...) and at least Mandrake makes it easy to install for Mesa with Utah-GLX. It's non-trivial if you're installing completely from scratch (Which, if you're doing that, you're skilled enough to manage it anyhow!)
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
Postal rode off of the hype from day 1. There was the hope that it was still a good game regardless, but no, it turned out to be poor to mediocre.
:)
Since those days, there has been a realization that releasing intentionally over-the-top games could severely hurt the game industry. You know how DOOM and Mortal Kombat keep getting brought up as examples of violent games, even though they are each at least 8 years old? Just be glad the much worse examples aren't noticed by bored senators, like Kingpin, Soldier of Fortune, and Postal. No one, and I mean no one, wants a PC running Postal to show up on the floor of the senate. We'd immediately get hit with all sorts of regulations.
But in any case, Postal is still a poor to mediocre game
1. Postal is good, but not THAT good.
2. Postal is 20 minutes of fun, after that you switch to the expansion pack, which is another 20 minutes of fun.
3. Postal is even older that Loki itself.
4. Postal has an interresting engine that runs on pentium 166, meaning it's worthless. Nobody ever re-used that crap. Or somebody did and he's an idiot.
5. Tribes 2 is a lot more interresting and it still doesn't fuckin work on Linux + Matrox G450.
Conclusion: Loki makes games and 5 minutes later, they don't care about what they made. So you know what, maybe i don't really care Loki anymore or maybe i don't really care about playing games under Linux.
Linux = 'For Workin'.
Ouindoze = 'For Playin'.
"Part of Loki's problem is the intentional segregation. It was originally impossible to patch Quake 3 Windows to the Linux version, and the Linux and Mac versions were sold separately. Loki's tactics were intended to get them the money they were due and to gauge Linux support. However, it didn't work - Linux copies sold a tiny fraction of the number sold. Loki blamed it on most Linux users also being Windows dual-booters and that they settled on the Windows version and could wait for the patch. "
Originally impossible? Yes and no. The Q3A Windows versions weren't patchable until the Linux version shipped. When it shipped, Id offered the downloads- and it was all she wrote for the Linux version. Had they NOT offered a "patch" (or delayed it even further...), while it was not in keeping with their philosophy with prior games, it would have helped the sales of the game on the Linux front.
Also, as an attempt to gauge Linux gaming support, it was a failure, less due to there not being support and more due to the patch being out and a severe lack of physical avaialability of the game in the storefronts. When it shipped, I tried to purchase the game- in one of the largest software markets in the country and one of the largest Linux userbases in the country and in the world (Dallas, TX). I couldn't- at least not off of a store shelf. Why? Because the retailers that were supposed to stock it on the shelves didn't. The ones that did deliberately choked off sales by not stocking anywhere near enough (6-10 copies on the shelf of a release such as this doesn't cut it and insisting on taking pre-paid orders for more isn't any better) and by the time one of the stores had enough in stock (Fry's) the damage was already done.
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
Millions of people run windows.........
I run linux, and something tells me the types of games people like me like to play is different than the types of games all the M$ sheep like to play.
Billions of people live in China......
Doesn't mean there isn't money to be made selling american flags to americans.
Should Loki be trying to market the popular windows games to Linux users...I don't think so.
I think, porting games well suited for linux and linux users is what Loki needs to do. There are a lot of chinese people, but you'd have a hard time making a lot of money selling chinese flags to americans. Better to sell american flags to US citizens even though they are not the majority of the world's population.
Loki needs to pick a good product for the Linux market...Loki doesn't need to try to emulate the success of the most popular games of the windows market...it just won't work. Taking older less popular games in windows that would make sense in Linux (ie network and customizable games with a community base) makes a lot more sense.
-jef
I would like to see Loki create new games instead of porting older windows based games to Linux.
Let the porting to be done by the original creators... give them some incentive to do their own ports.
Why not try to create that one blockbuster we need ? The people at Loki should be inventive enough. At least they had alot of examples of great games.
Loki announced the pending availability of Pong for Linux. "We just wanted to give something back to the community", said the CEO of Loki. "With support for the latest 2-D cards, Pong will be the killer app for Linux."
"It was just so lifelike, I had tears in my eyes", says 51-year old Pong creator Nolan Bushnell. "I never thought I would be able to play Pong at home, let alone on a Free operating system."
Just noticed that CivIII went gold today (press release [Firaxis]).
Personally I think that this title would be very popular on the Linux platform, a 3D accelerator is not even required. I don't know how well SMAC did on Linux, but this title would be a logical step for turn-based strategy fans.
The slated platforms are WIndows and Mac, I hope Loki will consider a port for this title.
These days I take out my stress with a different method of going Postal, by getting off my chair and hitting the road for a few dozen miles. The USPS has put a significant amount of money into sponsoring pro cycling and I think the efforts of Lance Armstrong, George Hincapie, Levi Leipheimer and team have gone a long way to boost moral and paint a more positive image of the Postal Service.
Kind of a bummer that Loki didn't redo the art and make it something more appropriate for today, such as Catching Up With Bin Laden, but I suppose being in a Ch. 11 pickle they didn't have the bucks to cover the time and logistics.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
One of the few Loki games I won't buy. I have no problems with its being produced, but everything I've heard about the game tells me that it will disgust me. I don't need a game like that.
Need a Python, C++, Unix, Linux develop
If it's Utah-GLX, not everybody handles it for you and, yes, it's difficult because it's a hack on top of XFree86 3.3.X to begin with. If it's DRI, I don't know what your issues are because it's just pretty much dropping in the drivers in the appropriate places, creating a /dev/dri/video0 entry and running X.
:-)
(By the way, before you comment further, you might want to know that I'm the maintainer of Utah-GLX and a DRI developer...
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
Check their products page and purchase it if you've got the cash...
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
Execute gears from a command line and wait, it'll tell you which framerate.
On a PIII 600, a G400 should be clocking nearly a 1000fps with gears at it's default size, etc.
Also of note is that you've got to cripple the game back pretty heavily because the G400 and other cards don't have enough silicon muscle to do what the game asks for so it falls back to software in a LOT of places if you don't cripple the game's renderer.
I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
That being said, I would like to see some original game development on Linux. If you look at the Linux Game Tome, there's a lot of promising stuff out there. Hell, why not add GL interfaces to some existing games like Nethack and Angband? Those games are still engaging despite their interfaces. There's a lot that could be one. Whether it'll work in an open source (or even Commercial on Linux) remains to be seen.
I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?
porting games well suited for linux and linux users is what Loki needs to do.
I defy you to name games that are 'well suited for linux and linux users'. Since presumably linux users are such because of the superiority of the product, rather than some feature/quirk/defect of their personality, what do you propose defines Linux users ? Is it our ability to read source code and unpack tar files ? Is it our interest in arguing about distributions and editors ? Our fervor in arguing that some forms of intellectual property are wrong while others inviolable ?
Get real, Linux users are as heterogeous as any other group of computer enthusiasts and hobbyists; Chinese nationals are unified in their culture and language and history. The only kind of game that I can imagine appealing "Linux users" as a group would involve shooting/killing/maiming/ridiculing Bill Gates in effigy. Which, I believe at least one of which has already largely been done and ships with some distributions.
Counterstrike is the major reason I will always have a Windows installation. Though if old classics are order of the day then Command&Conquor:Red Alert (and series) would win a lot of converts.
Phillip.
Property for sale in Nice, France
I have little problem, myself, with violence in games (hey, I actually think the characters in Heretic II, for example, are kind of funny as they run around with their arms cut off as if puzzled about why their weapons aren't working...), but I played the demo of Postal for about 10-15 minutes long, long ago when it first came out...
The problem, as I see it anyway, is that the violence in Postal is...tasteless. The focus isn't on pretty graphics or gameplay, but on 'realistic' suffering and dying of the wounded. This is the ONLY game I can recall ever playing that actually somewhat digusted me (and I've been playing for a while - I still vaguely recall a driving game on my old C-64 where you scored points by running over puppies and little old ladies...)
And, somehow, I just can't imagine that in the current anti-terrorism frenzy the world is in that this game is going to do anything but (ahem) bomb completely in the market when Loki re-releases it, unless maybe they replace all of the original levels with "shoot the terrorists, spare the civilians" levels set in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc...and even then it'll only sell until the frenzy dies down...
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
Not a flame (nor even my actual opinion) - it's just that I just looked at the press release. A choice quote from it:
"There's something just plain sick and wrong about Linux users," said Vince Desi, Running With Scissors' tetanus-tempered edge. "That's why we`re so excited to be able to bring these gaming misfits a Linux version of POSTAL - They're our kind of people!"Gee, thanks. I'm sure this'll do WONDERS for the image of Linux users. We've been fighting against this "fringe whacko lawbreaking rebel misfit" image, all this time I guess that's what we were anyway...
No, I don't actually think the game should be banned, nor should Loki be forbidden from porting it, nor should Running With Scissors be forbidden to SAY such things, nor should Loki be forbidden to agree with it and reprint it...but I DO think it's a BAD decision...
(The implication that a game where the main character is, effectively, a "terrorist without a cause" is perfect for "our kind of people" downright disturbs me...)
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
I run linux, and something tells me the types of games people like me like to play is different than the types of games all the M$ sheep like to play.
Funny you should say that.
Most of the people I know who are most fanatical about Diablo II are Linux users who cuss because they have to keep Windows around just to play it.
If anything, Diablo II is MORE the type of game that a Linux user would like than the 1st person shooters of the minute...
Just because something is popular doesn't mean it's good. But just because it's good doesn't mean it can't be popular.
The "Sheep" who use Microsoft, as you put it, are sometimes Wolves who violently refuse to compromise their gaming experience.
"Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"
Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
My personal theory is that they (Loki) are desperate for a game with "guaranteed" sales. Their marketing on the press release and website seems to imply that the whole reason for buying the game would be to support freedom of speech, or if you just like "realistic" violence with plenty of suffering while dying. I suspect there's a small hard core of people who will definitely buy this port based on one or both of these two reasons. There won't be many of them (at least, I don't THINK there will be), but there would seem to be a definite guarantee that there will be SOME sales. If Loki didn't pay too much to license this, then this is a very low risk investment (though with only a small return compared to what they MIGHT get on a less certain, better [and more tasteful] game that would cost them more to port.)
It may be that they just NEED to be able to say to the next prospect "See, we said it'd sell, and it did, and now we're saying YOUR game will sell, so let us port it please."
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
Where does the name come from? There isn't any obvious reason why a game that appears to be about urban terrorism is called 'Postal'. Can anyone explain it?
AFAIK the only major 3D card unsupported on Linux is the Kyro, for whom drivers are coming. All the other people who produce cards fast enough to play current 3D games on any platform, thats:
* NVIDIA
* ATI
* Matrox
* Crusty old 3DFX
has drivers. Laptops can be a problem there, buit massive headway has been made into this area in the last six months.
What card do you actually own?