Slashdot Mirror


Mitch Kapor Joins Ximian Board of Directors

miguel writes: "Today we announced that Mitch Kapor has joined our Board of Directors. He is one of the co-founders of the EFF and Lotus (You can learn more about Mitch here.) In other news, I want to point out guys to our Latest Evolution beta which comes with SSL support (IMAP and SMTP), Pilot syncing and LDAP in the default build. The team at Ximian has been busy fixing every bug you guys have reported (feature requests will have to wait until 1.0 ships, we are in feature freeze now) and we are closing bugs faster that you can report them. What are you guys going to do about this huh? HUH?"

220 comments

  1. What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by n3rd · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...and we are closing bugs faster that you can report them. What are you guys going to do about this huh? HUH?

    Use KDE of course. ;)

    1. Re:What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by pivo · · Score: 1

      I disagree on both accounts, KDE's license is GPL and it's no slower than GNOME. In fact, I recently swtiched from GNOME to KDE (2.1.x) and I now regretting that it took me so long to try it. KDE is better.

    2. Re:What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What am *I* gonna do? Ignore them. Why?

      ftp of /pub/ximian-gnome has 11 linux and one Solaris version
      looking in /usr/ports, no FreeBSD port.
      And, isn't Miguel de Icaza a flaming Linux advocate who spends time trashing BSD?

      They offer nothing worth my time to care about.

    3. Re:What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I use KDE, and I still use Evolution. Even in beta it is by far the best GUI email program for Linux.

    4. Re:What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by mali_kurac · · Score: 1

      Pijemo, pijemo, pijemo, pijemo pivo! :)

    5. Re:What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but GNOME is a company controlled desktop environment.

    6. Re:What Am I Gonna Do About it Tough Guy? by mikewhittaker · · Score: 1

      Well, for a start I would suggest you improve your design/code reviewing and testing, if there really are that many bugs getting out into the field in the first place.

      Don't fix them - avoid them in the first place.

      ;-)

  2. Evolution progress is crucial! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2

    It is very satisfying to see Evolution getting the amount of attention it needs. Ximian has been critized on here for half-assing major projects. If this is their response, we're in for some high quality desktop environment! Way to prioritize, fellas.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  3. The beginning of a long potracted war by philipkd · · Score: 1

    Glad to know that we have a man who has a vengance against Microsoft (Excel) ready for round two. However, maybe it's not so strategic to have on board somebody whose already lost to M$, but rather somebody who beat them at something and continues to do so, like somebody from Adobe.

    1. Re:The beginning of a long potracted war by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Lotus smartsuite wasn't that bad really. LotusScript was a huge buggy mess though, and the stupid startup file cabinet thing sucked... but in all it was pretty ok.

      I don't know what my point was anymore. :)

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:The beginning of a long potracted war by floop · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about Jesus? He's been battling evil for years and I hear he's available.

      What kind of idiot are you?

    3. Re:The beginning of a long potracted war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this was a guy who was forced out of lotus (I used to work with wingz when he was, which was a company that was bought by lotus). he probably harbors more feelings against lotus than microsoft. not good.

  4. Ximian is great by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 1

    You guys are doing a great job, keep up the good work Miguel et al.!!!

    Who can resist the mascot stuffed Rupert either?

    --
    ------
    Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
  5. Deja Vu by czardonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    A company called Microsoft makes a product just like this. I think they call it Office or something. Actually, it might have come out a little earlier than this Ximian thing.

    Check it on on their site.

    --
    Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    1. Re:Deja Vu by Chakat · · Score: 1
      I looked into that software. It's really hard to find a stable version for my operating system, it's more expensive than my word processor, and it was just extremely bloated. Plus I've heard that one of the owners has a
      criminal record.

      Naw, I prefer the alternatives.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    2. Re:Deja Vu by czardonic · · Score: 1

      I looked into that software. It's really hard to find a stable version for my operating system [kernel.org]

      Well that's a shame. Problem is, there appears to be no Ximian support for MY operating system. Too bad these Ximian folks are copying the idea AND making the same mistake of ignoring alternative operating systems!

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    3. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh Wait, are you talking about Microsoft Office?

    4. Re:Deja Vu by Chakat · · Score: 2, Funny
      Problem is, there appears to be no Ximian support for MY operating system


      Perhaps you didn't look hard enough? I mean the answer is as clear as the nose on my face Yeah you need to compile it right now, but its still beta, give it a couple months.
      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

    5. Re:Deja Vu by czardonic · · Score: 0

      These products are made by Ximian?

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
  6. Previous Doubts... Lifted? by Brontosaurus+Jim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always been a little wary of Ximian... they seemed mostly talk and not enough action. Sure they had _some_ stuff, but it was never really up my alley.

    I have to say though, this time I think I might just start to like them. They seem, from reading the link, like they really care about what we have to say (even if it's not so nice some times ;) and are willing to listen.

    I guess this is YABOOS (Yet Another Benefit Of Open Source): The corporations that help out are by default less evil.

  7. OverHyped Press Releases by UltraBot2K1 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    From the press release:

    "Ximian, Inc., the leading open source desktop company"


    Hmmmm, I wonder if TrollTech would take issue with that claim. I don't think throwing another computer industry has-been (VisiCalc? Will that even run on Win98?) on the board is going to give Gnome any edge over KDE.

    --

    Slashdot: Open Source, Closed Minds.

    1. Re:OverHyped Press Releases by benjj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      errr... but trolltech are not a desktop company?

    2. Re:OverHyped Press Releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolltech sells QT. QT is not a desktop environment.

      Trolltech does not sell KDE. KDE is a desktop environment.

      Understand now?

    3. Re:OverHyped Press Releases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... dude... you must be a student or something.

      Lemme give u a clue: _ALL_ Corporations are the premier/ leading whatever in their chosen market. :)

      No it makes no sense... so?

      Cheers

      Andy

  8. Okay... by MaxVlast · · Score: 0

    But why the hostility?

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  9. Looks Great by XBL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can it import messages and addresses from Mozilla mail?

    1. Re:Looks Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, it can.
      Mozilla Mail uses a standard mbox format and evolution has had an imported for as long as they've had evolution packages.

  10. Where is this going? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    KDE has long been the superior desktop. And, it's been "free" for more than a year now. I don't see why Slashdot keeps reporting on Gnome/Ximian at this point. KDE has reached the point where I honestly believe that it can do no wrong. It is the best looking Open Source desktop by far. Anything Gnome/Ximian does at this point is pure catch up.

    Except they can't catch up. It is a losing battle. For every feature Miguel adds to Gnome, the KDE developpers are ten steps ahead. Just look how long it took for Gnome to get support for Anti-Aliased fonts. Well after KDE had them, and only then because the motif-like (read ugly) gtk widget library decided to support them.

    The only good thing to come from GTK was the Gimp. Stop trying to use a widget library that was created for one app for everything under the sun people. It just doesn't work, and it makes yor apps look like crap!

    1. Re:Where is this going? by ewilts · · Score: 1

      Except they can't catch up. It is a losing battle. For every feature Miguel adds to Gnome, the KDE developpers are ten steps ahead.

      Look at the IMAP support in Evolution, and compare that to IMAP in Kmail. It's not catchup at all - Evolution is months ahead. For further evidence, look at the statements from the Kmail IMAP author (see http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde/2001-August/0002 53.html) - he feels that he's got a useful implementation already.

      No flames, but KMail isn't going to have a suitable (for me) IMAP implementation anytime soon - the author just has different priorities. Showing you the unread message counts on your multitude of folders isn't one of them.

      --
      .../Ed
  11. I wish my bug was fixed. by The+Slashdolt · · Score: 1

    The team at Ximian has been busy fixing every bug you guys have reported (feature requests will have to wait until 1.0 ships, we are in feature freeze now) and we are closing bugs faster that you can report them.

    I've been hoping to get this bug fixed for a while now. What are you going to do about that? Huh? Huh?

    --
    mp3's are only for those with bad memories
    1. Re:I wish my bug was fixed. by VP · · Score: 1

      Well, they are asking for more info. Are you sure the SMTP server at earthlink is not at fault? Can you do a tcpdump on the connection (both when sending and receiving?

    2. Re:I wish my bug was fixed. by KidSock · · Score: 2

      Cripes. A lotta talk when all you need to figure out who the culprit is is download Ethereal and run it with a filter of 'port 25'.

    3. Re:I wish my bug was fixed. by z0om · · Score: 1

      It could be earthlink's smtp server. For example, with sendmail, you can set MaxMessageSize. I saw with a user once who was sending some larger attachment where it'd get "truncated", I increased MaxMessageSize and had them send it again...problem fixed.

    4. Re:I wish my bug was fixed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am no longer an EarthLink employee.

      However, when I was an EarthLink employee, the maximum message size was several MB. It has been more than a year though, so take that info for what it's worth.

      scottwimer

  12. impressive work by johnycanal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nice work. Evolution is turning out to be a sweet piece of software. Any idea when we can start building our own iCal servers? I haven't seen much open source iCal server activity out there.

    I can't wait to boot the exchange box out the door.

    --
    http://metamuscle.com - Better Bodies Through Hypertext
    1. Re:impressive work by po_boy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The reefknot folks are building tools to allow you (and others) to do that kind of work and more. Their work is coming along pretty well. Keep an eye on them and perhaps help them out.

  13. What are you guys going to do about this huh? HUH? by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    ROFOL
    I'm probably going to download it and USE it!

    Great work, keep it up!

  14. This is what I'm gonna do by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Redundant
    What are you guys going to do about this huh? HUH?"


    Go use KDE and play with the adults. Or at least the people who don't make it difficult to install on non-RH based 56k dial-up modems.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  15. Xim-dev by Renraku · · Score: 1

    Most Linux projects WILL be half-assed unless started by a company or someone who is otherwise funded. People with just spare time to work with but still hold a seperate job would find it hard as hell to code something for themselves (more likely to be half-assed) than to code something for everyone (pride reduces half-assedness). Be thankful we get what we get, unless you all want to code it by yourselves. Point is, don't complain if you didn't make it and can get it for free.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Xim-dev by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh? and that's why KDE, with no company makes a great desktop envionment while GNOME, with XIMIAN, makes a half-assed environment.

      Get a clue dude, and moke that iggarette!@!#

  16. does it work under KDE by jchristopher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably a dumb question, but does Evolution run under KDE or only under Gnome? I guess you could extend that question a bit... what determines whether or not certain apps are dependent on a specific window manager?

    1. Re:does it work under KDE by JabXVI · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will work under any window manager (or at least it did the last time I tried it). Applications that use KDE or GNOME rarely need to be running under KDE or GNOME, they just need you to have the KDE/GNOME libraries installed.

    2. Re:does it work under KDE by miguel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Evolution works with X, so it will run on KDE, CDE, GNOME, E, WindowMaker, and pretty much anything else

    3. Re:does it work under KDE by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      AFAIK you can run KDE and GNOME apps under one another as long as you have all the proper underlying api libs installed. The window manager is can be from either KDE, GNOME or something else like WM or Blackbox. I prefer KDE apps + WindowMaker.

    4. Re:does it work under KDE by ewilts · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does work. You need a bunch of Gnome libraries, but it does work fine under KDE when you're done. Run the installer from ximian, but don't have it change your desktop whe it's done. I did this and it added all the apps properly to the K menu, and they work just fine.

      --
      .../Ed
    5. Re:does it work under KDE by rgmoore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a window manager issue. Evolution (and any other GNOME app) should run under KDE as long as you have all of the necessary libraries present. Despite all of the trolling between advocates of one desktop over the other, they actually interoperate pretty well. A GNOME app will still look like a GNOME app when run under KDE (and vice versa) which offends some people's aesthetic sense, but they should operate just fine.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    6. Re:does it work under KDE by paulo_schreiner5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does work under kde. As with almost every app that exists, it depends only on the libraries of the window manager (gnome, in this case).
      An app wouldnt work in a specific WM only if it did weird things, or if it where something like an applet, that depended on some "visual" part of the WM, wich, by definition is actually NOT the WM, it is a Panel, part of a Desktop Environment...
      A WM just manages windows, and if it does it in the correct way, ANY program would work under it.

    7. Re:does it work under KDE by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but a native KDE interface would be nice :>

      I don't think most people like having kdelibs and gnome-libs both installed. It'd be cool if you guys could port it to KDE. It's sorta like Microsoft porting IE or office Mac. It doesn't really hurt them (windows), just increases their user share. I think that evolution could be THE linux email client, but I don't see that happening with it being gnome only. I don't see any kde users switching to gnome just for evolution, or going to the trouble of installing all of the gnome libs and cruft.

    8. Re:does it work under KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish all you lazy assholes would quit telling people who do real work to port X program to *YOUR* current desktop of choice. If you don't like the way Evolution is written, well, the code is there and all you have to do is download the sources and fix it yourself. It should be obvious that the Gnome camp doesn't care about people like you, b/c your an idiot. You don't want Evo ported to QT b/c it will make the world better, you want it ported b/c you hate Gnome and you don't want to install Gnome libs. And let me guess: you have no interest in taking on this porting to QT/KDE, right?

    9. Re:does it work under KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh. he just made a suggestion. no need to fucking overreact, slut.

      anyways, you are probably a ximian nigger

      in which you are going to be "fuckde" rapidly in the asshole by large Gorillaz.

      ICEYHOTSTUNTAZ AND KDE 4EVER DUDEZ.

      we all know that you XIMIAN niggers just posted this story to draw attention from all the KDE/QT stories in the last few days

    10. Re:does it work under KDE by jilles · · Score: 2

      The question is not whether it will run but whether it will integrate. Can I drag and drop between konqueror and evolution? Can I drag an url to a new message? What about Koffice (cut and paste without losing layout)? What about themes? The better it integrates the more useful it is.

      --

      Jilles
    11. Re:does it work under KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And there is no way in hell I would even install kdelibs and all that bloat.

    12. Re:does it work under KDE by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Yah, but most people have kdelibs installed not gnome-libs so...

  17. Re:What are you guys going to do about this huh? H by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    But I can't It won't install on Mandrake 8.1! :(

  18. Cross-platform support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evolution looks great! I've used it on Linux a couple of times, just feeling it out and seeing what it can do. BUT, I've never managed to get it to compile under Solaris 8 x86. One of the main reasons I love KDE is the fact that it compiles with no problem on any platform I've ever tested it. What about Evolution? Has the build process been modified to make it more cross-platform compatible? Or is it still a Linux only product? I must admit, unless it will run on Solaris, IRIX, et al I will have to stick with KDE/KMail rather than GNOME/Evolution.

  19. Evolution and IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why does every IMAP implementation for linux try to retrieve EVERY message when checking for mail, instead of messages with ID numbers above where it last left off?

    I have a huge mailbox, and Evolution, Aethera, Kmail, TradeClient, Bynari Insight, and every other IMAP client all do the same damn thing. It takes 20 minutes to check for mail everytime I do it. And Kmail was the only client I've used that was able to find all of my folders. Argh!

    1. Re:Evolution and IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Becuase they're probably all based around the same shitty IMAP lib...

      Either the exact same one or such an exact imitation that the bugs got copied...

      Won't be the first time something like that happened and shittified a whole genre of apps...

    2. Re:Evolution and IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried the radical concept of using folders? There is really no excuse for having one huge monolithic mailbox. This is like the user who keeps ALL of his files in his home directory and complains how long it takes to do an ls.

    3. Re:Evolution and IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      report it as a bug you dumbass. if they dont know about it they cant fix it.

    4. Re:Evolution and IMAP by iamsure · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because that is what the standard requires. Imap doesnt lock the mailbox, so you can have two IMAP clients accessing the mailbox simultaneously. As such, you could easily use say, Outlook, and its wonderful rules for filtering, while viewing in something simple like pine.

      Since it is doing so, it needs to verify the mails against one another.

      Sadly, the IMAP standard does not outline a use of things like md5sums and order lists.

      In other words, its easy, and it fits the standard.

    5. Re:Evolution and IMAP by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Try Sylpheed

      The best IMAP implementation I have seen thus far.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Evolution and IMAP by rudedog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Evolution doesn't do that for me. With a mailbox with 1200 messages, it took about 10 minutes over a DSL link to get the headers. The next time I ran Evolution, it only took a couple of seconds to open that folder. I can't say the same for kmail, which does download the headers every time. Evolution also lets me see all of the folders on the server if I check the "override server's namespace" option and set the namespace to be empty.

      This is all against a Cyrus 2.0.16 imap server.

    7. Re:Evolution and IMAP by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1
      Sadly, the IMAP standard does not outline a use of things like md5sums and order lists.

      Not true. The IMAP standard says the server has to assign each mail message a unique ID number (UID) that is presistant accross sessions. I well-behaved client can detect any new or deleted messages by requesting a UID list from the server (a very quick operation). Since messages cannot be altered through the IMAP protocol (only deleted and re-appended), a UID list would even catch messages that were edited and resaved (ie. the unsent or drafts folder).

    8. Re:Evolution and IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you read the code, that's exactly what Evolution IMAP seems to do...

    9. Re:Evolution and IMAP by earlytime · · Score: 2

      I can't speak on evolution vs kmail, but I use netscape communicator, and the IMAP performance i get has improved dramatically by migrating from uw-imap with mbox folders to courier imap with maildir folders.

      This was primarily a change to accomodate move to qmail from sendmail, but the performance increase is tremendous. I routinely open mailboxes with hundreds of messages (over a variety of lines, from 128K to 100Mbit) and i've had no problems with speed. You might consider changing your mail server file format (if you run the mail server) to increase your performance. Otherwise, my general experience is that IMAP (header listing) performance should be equivalent or better to that on a NNTP server.

      -earl

      --

  20. It can do wrong in this way: by mr_don't · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Umm, the "KDE desktop" is ugly and it looks like it has Apple IISE icons on it or something

    1. Re:It can do wrong in this way: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE's icons aren't pretty. Unfortunately the default KDE response seems to be that what isn't ugly must be wise and smart. The fact of the matter is that KDE's icons are ugly and confusing.

    2. Re:It can do wrong in this way: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kde's icons are not ugly and very usable.

      are you blind or something? wtf.

      and you are not supposed to say anything against KDE. remember that you are an anonymous coward at slashdot, so you must be pro-KDE since cmdrtaco love KDE. if you do not obey, Hemos will lock you in the same room as Jon Katz for 20 seconds. that should set you straight.

      GNOME sucks, um kay?

    3. Re:It can do wrong in this way: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the 'home' icon in Konqueror. Notice the shininess at the top of the door as if it's protruding and catching light... kde icon idiocy at its' greatest.

  21. ximolution by layyze · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I personally think that Ximian has been doing a great job with Evolution. I first used it early in the beta stages. It was a promising piece of crap. Now it is just about the finest piece of graphical mail and organizing applications out there for *nix. Granted, I don't really use it, but it is nice to know that something with that many features is now available. If we want to convert over desktop users we need apps like this - friendly, easy to use...etc...etc. Either that or we could all be whiny elitists running Debian and KDE.
    Of course I'm a whiny elitist running Slackware and Blackbox (but Galeon over all other browsers) so bite me.

    --
    -dr. layyze f. tooth PhD
  22. KDE integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Seems like most corporations are using KDE these days. Is Ximian working on KDE integration, for business clients? Seems like they would otherwise miss out on the vast majority of Linux installs in the workplace.

    1. Re:KDE integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF are you smoking?

      The corporate world currently runs Solaris, which means people are using CDE. Mind you, when Gnome is ready, the corporate world will replace CDE with Gnome, and your post will still be false.

    2. Re:KDE integration by Skeezix · · Score: 2

      What do you mean by "KDE integration, for business clients"? What would that look like? Evolution will run fine under KDE, but Ximian doesn't just sell a groupware suite. They also are pushing Ximian GNOME to their business clients. That's sort of the point of their company, in addition to serving individual GNOME users.

  23. Re:Big Deal... by Pengo · · Score: 2

    Not too many deals that anybody was involved in was a real success.

  24. Evolution Progressing Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Been using evolution for email for about two months now, and it's been very good. I would recommend it to anyone as the best email client available for Linux.

    As far as what we'll do about it...use it. I've two complaints: 1.) You can't set what font to use in html email messages, and 2.) No calendar server. If you could achieve MS Outlook scheduling/calendaring functionality or better, you would have the potential 'Killer' application for Linux that would allow offices to migrate away from MS...

    1. Re:Evolution Progressing Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To set the font you want in the display start the gnome control center and open the HTML Viewer capplet and choose the font you want.

    2. Re:Evolution Progressing Well by JanneM · · Score: 1

      You set the fonts in the Gnome Control Center (Evolution uses gtkhtml, which in turn is configured from there, as there are a number of programs that tuse it for html rendering).

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Evolution Progressing Well by Wdomburg · · Score: 2

      >1.) You can't set what font to use in html email
      >messages

      If you go to the control center there is an applet for configuring gtkhtml. Set the font there.

      (I'd really like for there to be an Evolution menu option for overriding the default here, or a shortcut to the control center at the very least.)

      Matt

    4. Re:Evolution Progressing Well by dfelznic · · Score: 2, Funny

      there is an easy fix to this. Don't send html mail...

  25. Re: Who is Mitch Kapor? by Patrick+McRotch · · Score: 2, Redundant
    . . . So, should I know this guy? . . .


    Sure, you should. Don't you know anything about the history of the Personal Computer? Don't you remember VisiCalc?


    The 1978 release of VisiCalc, an electronic spreadsheet and the first personal productivity application, changed software development from a hobbyist's pursuit to a burgeoning industry. Personal Software, the publisher of VisiCalc, bought Tiny Troll from Mr. Kapor as a companion product to VisiCalc and hired him to be a product manager in Silicon Valley. Wanting more autonomy, he left Personal after only six months to found his own company.


    Although users loved the concept of the VisiCalc spreadsheet, they were bumping their heads against its limitations. Realizing this, Mr. Kapor cofounded Lotus Development in 1982 with Jonathan Sachs, a programmer from Data General, and came up with Lotus 1-2-3, a second-generation spreadsheet that better addressed the needs of business users.



    To get the new company off the ground, Mr. Kapor convinced the former Morgan Stanley analyst andthen-novice venture capitalist Ben Rosen (who had cofounded Sevin Rosen Funds theprevious year) to put $1 million into the startup. Mr. Kapor admits that he in fact knew very little then about running a business; nevertheless, as an executive at Lotus until 1987, he developed what are now considered standard business practices for software companies. Lotus executed the first big advertising campaign for 1-2-3 in the business press and was the first to train computer dealers on a large scale. In 1983, the year it was released, 1-2-3 generated staggering revenues of $53 million and propelled Lotus through its initial public offering. In 1984 the company tripled its revenues, to $156 million. But when Lotus became a big business, Mr. Kapor jumped ship. "Because of Lotus's hypergrowth, the company was soon dominated by the details of day-to-day management," he says. "But I wanted to think long term and bring big ideas to market."


    After Lotus, Mr. Kapor rediscovered his interest in the future of technology. He became enamored of the precommercial Internet and the social possibilities of virtual communities. But he was equally horrified by some of the government's early attempts to sanitize Internet content. In 1990, to protect the organic and unregulated potential of the Net, Mr. Kapor and the social activist John Perry Barlow cofounded the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), thefirst grassroots coalition to call attention to both the social andpolitical dimensions of networked communications. (For more on Mr. Barlow,see "What Does John Perry Barlow Do?,"March 1998.)


    In 1994, once the EFF was going strong, Mr. Kapor decided to turn his full attention to financing and advising technology startups. Although as an entrepreneur he had been suspicious of venture capitalists, he became a limited partner in VC funds and also made direct investments in startups, working closely with Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and AccelPartners. Mr. Kapor believes he is finally using his strengths --identifying ideas with staying power and getting them off the ground -- andnot getting bogged down in the politics of large organizations. Hecurrently sits on the boards of RealNetworks, which develops real-timestreaming audio and video software; Allaire, which makes Web applicationdevelopment software; and several younger startups he declines to name.


    Looking back at his 20-year involvement in the technology industry, Mr. Kapor says that "the days of the Apple II and Tiny Troll feel like Jurassic Park, especially if you count in Internet years." Speaking like a former teacher of meditation, he adds, "I try to send the message that business does not have to be ruthless and self-interested -- that even in the frenzied pace of the technology market, a fundamentally long-term approach still matters."

  26. Because by ctimes2 · · Score: 1

    ... Well, gnome looks better than kde. No, it really does. I'm not talking functionality, environment, or anything like that... I'm talking about color, smooth lines, layout, icons (if you use them). It looks better. Two machines, side by side, gnome is 'pretty' while kde is just like everything else. Aqua comes to mind. And gnome made evolution of which there is no real equivilant for kde.

    my 2, like your 2, only make half the price.

    Ctimes2

    --
    My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
  27. so they have a client What about a SERVER by johnjones · · Score: 2

    one of the great things about lotus NOTES was the SERVER

    you had revision control and ACLs + logging for documents/databases which could be exported as basic HTML

    keys and directory's(phone books) stored in a nice central place

    Plus SYNCing of documents/databases/email/directory's

    That was really nice

    yes there are products that do this now but you have to kludge them all toghthter and admin is still a bit of a nightmare (OpenLDAP, procmail and zope)

    what they should do is use and XML backend (publishing becomes easy) and LDAP (phone books + auth through a PAM module) combined with a IMAP server which understands OpenPGP that can sync to other servers set up around the world

    lots of documents are placed on the corp intranet but they are spread all over the place geographically speaking what would be cool is of it could figure out you are in say France and pull over a copy of that dept intranet who is in US and then next time someone asks for it when they are in France they get a response straight away

    anyway hope their client (eventually) will work with lotus notes

    regards

    john jones

    1. Re:so they have a client What about a SERVER by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      one of the great things about lotus NOTES was the SERVER

      One of the great things about Lotus Notes STILL IS the server - (now called Domino) - it serves up everything you mentioned via the web.

    2. Re:so they have a client What about a SERVER by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1
      what they should do is use and XML backend (publishing becomes easy) and LDAP (phone books + auth through a PAM module) combined with

      What exactly is so great about LDAP? I've always found it cumbersome to work with, compared to a traditional-style RDBMS. You can throw together a PGSQL, MySQL, or hell, even a SQL Server database and put phone numbers in it, why use a strange, flaky thing like LDAP? Unless you're stuck in Java and have to use JNDI or something, but here LDAP is a conscious choice. I don't get it...
    3. Re:so they have a client What about a SERVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, about every mail client on the planet supports LDAP address lookups, but not SQL, and there is no standardized schema for that sort of thing that I know of. The backend could certainly be relational.

    4. Re:so they have a client What about a SERVER by cymen · · Score: 2

      But the built in DOM and scripting choices are pretty bad. The server can do wonderful things but I never want to have to develop for Lotus Notes/Domino again (ever!).

    5. Re:so they have a client What about a SERVER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only is John Jones a deltic, he's also a fucking moron!

  28. you know maybe our friend at the physchic hotline- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe our friend Eric at the physchic hotline can help us with this KDE situation. 1-877-251-5558 toll free!!!!!

  29. Why Use Ximian? by idonotexist · · Score: 2

    My understanding is that Ximian is merely a 'distro' of GNOME. So, why would I use Ximian instead of GNOME? The way I see it, I can use all the same applications on GNOME. In fact, I hear from others I can use many applications on GNOME that I cannot use of Ximian because of Ximian libraries. For instance, a newly released Mozilla version or Galeon may not work on Ximian. If this is not true, please let me know. I just don't see the point of Ximian.

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom"
    1. Re:Why Use Ximian? by Xiphoid+Process · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ximian Gnome = Gnome, you are right about that. What Ximian offers is a super slick installer (Red Carpet) and you can buy support. About certain things like Galeon having issues, this is true, but has nothing to do with Ximian. Basically, many of the up and coming applications like Evolution and Galeon are using developing libraries (like Mozilla, GAL, GConf) and so there is to be expected some incompatabilities. Each piece may have "stable" releases along the way, but as a system, unless you are running raw GNOME 1.4.1, you are running a developing system. Though, if you stick with what's in RedCarpet's channels, you should have few or no issues and you will get a chance to use all this cool software before it is all realeased together.

      --
      got drum'n'bass?

      http://mp3.com/vitriolix
    2. Re:Why Use Ximian? by steveha · · Score: 5, Interesting
      My understanding is that Ximian is merely a 'distro' of GNOME.

      More or less correct.

      So, why would I use Ximian instead of GNOME?

      Um, this is like asking why you would use Red Hat instead of Linux. Ximian is a distro of GNOME. When you use Ximian you are using GNOME.

      To answer the question of why you would use Ximian, let's consider how you can get GNOME:

      You can get GNOME from your Linux distribution, and then get updates only when your Linux distro provides an update.

      You can get GNOME stuff as sources, and build on your own machine.

      You can get the Ximian GNOME packages, and get updates from Ximian.
      If there is a fourth option, I cannot think of it right now.

      So, if your Linux distro provides you with updates as often as you wish, just stick with that. If you like building from source, go ahead and do that. If you want updates more often than your distro gives them to you, and you want someone else to build the packages for you, go with Ximian.

      As for me, I use the "unstable" branch of Debian; and I get updates within a few days of any new release. Debian had Gnumeric 0.71 within two days of when it was released. So I have no interest in getting Ximian packages. But I think many people find it convenient to get updates from Ximian.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    3. Re:Why Use Ximian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I pledge fatwa on all GNOME users and their leader Josh Steiner (who uses satanic words like Yoshi!!!!!!!!). I also will kill any Ximian monkeys in the country of Afghanistan!

      You must submit to the will of Al KDEua.
      - Yomama Bin Laden

  30. getting there by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I have been following Evolution for some time now. I have tried every release since beta 1, which was more like pre-alpha quality IMO. But, it's really starting to shape up quickly now. Beta 5 (the latest) fixes SO many bugs I could never name them all.

    For anyone looking for an Outlook/Eudora replacement, this is it.

    Personally, I use the Mozilla mail client because it's got mail and news together with the same interface, and I really don't need a Calendar, Contact list, etc.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  31. Re: Who is Mitch Kapor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop astroturfing. You're not fooling anyone.

  32. Evolution by TV-SET · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being currently responsible for migrating a large enterprise to Linux, I was plesently surprised by Evolution. It kicks butt off all my boss's arguments :) I am currently running it in a test environment, and yes, I was too lazy to rebuild the rpm and I actually installed all those 150 megs of complementary libraries and software :) I know it could be easily skipped, but I sooo lazy and I have almost complete Ximian desktop now :)

    Anyway, keep the good work you guys@Ximian!

    I am wating for 1.0 release to get rid of Yet Another Microsoft Application (YAMA) :)

    --
    Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
  33. Maybe this is good. by dinotrac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, the bug squasing part is definitely good.
    No maybe about that .

    I guess Mitch Kapor can't hurt. He certainly is a bright and experienced software businessman.

    Still, I hope he's learned a thing or two in the last ten years.

    When Windows 3.0 came out, Lotus 1-2-3 was the biggest spreadsheet. Period. Win 3.0 would have gone nowhere if it couldn't run (and multitask) major DOS programs like 1-2-3.

    Mitch Kapor didn't pay any attention to Windows. He was more concerned with 1-2-3 for OS/2 and -- believe it or not -- something called 1-2-3/M, a 1-2-3 spreadsheet for IBM mainframes.

    I wonder if Microsoft would have its present monopoly if Lotus and WordPerfect had ventured into Windows Land in the pre-3.0 days, when Gates was still trying to get ports to run on his platform.

    People didn't start using Word for Windows and Excel because they were so wonderful.
    Back before Office software got pre-loaded, and back before Microsoft was the 800 pound software gorilla, people started using them because the other guys didn't have Windows software. Microsoft made competitive upgrades cheap, and hand-held new-to-Microsoft users.

    Of course, once they got 'em in their clutches...

    1. Re:Maybe this is good. by franimal · · Score: 1
      Kind of neat that Mitch finds himself on the other side of the fence now. (Trying to break an established systems strangle hold). And that Bill is also on the other side of the fence. (Refusing to port Office to Linux). I guess we'll see whether it was teh men or the side.

      Personally, the lack of a nice suite of productivity applications has kept me a windose freak. I'm looking forward to giving Mozilla, Evolution, Gnome, and StarOffice a go. Until recently, IMHO, such a transition was not in my best interests. (No, Mozilla, Evolution, or StarOffice 6).

    2. Re:Maybe this is good. by dinotrac · · Score: 2

      It's amazing how fast things are moving in free software land.

      I spent a year using Microsoft Office at work, and two years using StarOffice 5.x everywhere else.

      I now use the SO 6.0 beta.
      Doesn't have all the changes I'd like, but it is nice software and the file exchange (now covering revision marks and hidden fields) will let you live with your Office-using friends.

      Sure -- you probably want to keep a copy of Office around where you can get at it if somebody sends you a really perverted file. OTOH, it is only betaware at the moment.
      Hmmm. I guess Office is the same.
      Always.

  34. Love it! by Starky · · Score: 5, Insightful
    While there are strong sentiments about the desktop choices, it is important to the Linux community that there is a choice. I think in the long run, it will be a positive thing.


    I think KDE is fantastic, but I simply prefer GNOME. I've been watching GNOME make incredible strides in the time that it's been around, and I think as a GNOME user I have alot to look forward to.


    I have also been using the Ximian desktop at home, and I think they've put out a great product. (I actually forked over $29.95 to Ximian because I valued their product so much I thought it worthwhile to purchase it.) Red Carpet has worked flawlessly for me so far. While I still like to build certain things (Apache, Perl, etc.) myself, it saves me a good deal of time not having to worry about keeping my packages up to date. Evolution still has some bugs, but it's getting more solid literally every day. I was happy to fork over some money to Ximian and I'll continue to do so as they improve their product.


    I know that there are going to be Debian users telling me I can get Red Carpet for free via apt-get, and they are right. I know there are folks who consider KDE the superior desktop, and they've got alot of good points.


    However, I prefer Red Hat, Ximian, and GNOME, and Ximian has put out the right product for my preferences, and I am happy to pay for it confident that they will use the money not only to enhance their product, but to create things that will give back to the community as well.


    So I say keep up the good work, Ximian, from a very satisfied user.

    --
    -- My choice of computing platform is a symbol of my individuality and belief in personal freedom.
    1. Re:Love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE depends on qt, which is not truly free, as GTK is. Now fuck off.

    2. Re:Love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      redhat and ximian are not evil, but they are easier to use then debian+kde, and are more appropriate for novices or people who don't want to spend a bunch of time configuring their system (but we still have the option).

      If you don't want to use them, at least you still have the choice.

    3. Re:Love it! by life+Acolyte · · Score: 1

      Great statement!

      I'm a Debian user. I respect RedHat for what they have/are doing to Linux. I especially like the fact that they stick to opensource.

      I use KDE. But I prefer Galeon as browser (tabs and such).

      Choice is good.

      --
      Danie Roux *shuffle* Adore Unix
  35. why I used ximian gnome by Tonytheloony · · Score: 2, Informative

    For me, the main reason for using ximian gnome is that they make it really simple to install gnome with an automated installer, and they include an updater, red-carpet, which makes updating the desktop easier.

    --
    The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
  36. what about GroupWise? by maddogsparky · · Score: 1
    I have to admit that despite all its security problems, MS did pretty well with the Outlook interface. It worked great syncing up to my Visor.

    Then my company got bought out and the new HQ forced GroupWise on us. If I could get a client that had an interface closer to Outlook, interfaced to GroupWise, synced up to my Visor and had the stability of Linux (well, as close as it could get running on Win2k), that would Be Great.

    --
    science is a religion
    1. Re:what about GroupWise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about using Outlook with GroupWise? Check out

      http://support.novell.com/cgi-bin/search/patlstf in d.cgi?2957005

      This doesn't take care of your stability problem, of course.

  37. Re:KDE integration -- INTERESTING?? HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh... could you tell us some of these corporations that are opting to use KDE?

  38. Credit where it is due by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pretty much word for word from this article.

    1. Re:Credit where it is due by ryantate · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Pretty much word for word from this article.

      Thanks. Would only that the author of the original post had seen fit to credit, with a simple link or even simpler "lifted from Red Herring" attribution, the original work by Deborah Claymon.

      Not that the post author was trying to pass off the article as his own -- the line (For more on Mr. Barlow,see "What Does John Perry Barlow Do?,"March 1998) would surely have been deleted were that the case -- but it would be nice to show some appreciation for the person who researched this piece and for the site that provides it completely free of charge.

  39. I'd Love to be able to use Ximian by Bluecoat93 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately, I can't, because Mandrake 8.1 isn't supported yet. Any idea when it might be? Seems like I recall Mandrake 8.0 support taking a while after the final release of the OS.

    1. Re:I'd Love to be able to use Ximian by Nat+Friedman · · Score: 3, Informative

      We'll have Mandrake 8.1 support out this month.

  40. one word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    liquid!

    nothing like that exists for gnome. so stfu.

    1. Re:one word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, don't even compare that KDE theme to OSX. If I licked that KDE theme I think I might gash my tongue on the excessive beveled lines ;)

    2. Re:one word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, I'm not. I'm comparing it to GNOME. Duh.

      The fact of it remains, there is nothing like that for GNOME (i think that's probably why most of the GNOME 1.2.x users are now using KDE, I know I did).

  41. Re:KDE integration -- INTERESTING?? HAHA by fault0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that he was trying to say that most _users_ use KDE, which is probably true(increasingly true).

    but then again, everyone stop bringing up KDE, this story is bout evolution =P

  42. Don't hang 1-2-3 for OS/2 on Mitch by RetiredMidn · · Score: 1

    Mitch was not involved in operational decisions when Lotus 1-2-3 initially took the OS/2 path instead of Windoze.

    Although Lotus management can't avoid the bulk of the blame, Microsoft did have a hand in encouraging ISVs like Lotus to embrace OS/2; in fact, once upon a time OS/2 was referred to in Microsoft/IBM technical briefings as DOS 5.

  43. Re:KDE users just can't keep there mouth shut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's probably because all of the slashdot editors use/support KDE.

    It's quite weird when you have CmdrTaco going into #kde on OPN with a wishlist.

    the GNOME world has the FSF people and Alan Cocks, therefore they are doomed to failure.

  44. Features & Extensibility of Evolution? by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    I'm almost ready to jump over Evolution to handle my email.

    Currently, I use exmh, which I've found to be a great GUI interface to my email. It uses tcl and tk for the GUI and MH for folders, but has all kinds of extensions to support PGP, address books, in-line HTML display, etc.

    Is anyone, familiar with both exmh and Evolution, able to point out their relative merits and detractions?

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Features & Extensibility of Evolution? by Skeezix · · Score: 2

      I'm not familiar with exmh, but one thing I can suggest is that you consider trying both at once. I'm not sure what sort of mail setup you have, but you can probably send copies of your email somewhere else and use both for a while to see if you like Evolution. This is what I do with on my box. I use pine and Evolution. I retrieve my mail using fetchmail. Then my mail is processed by a procmail script which in addition to filtering out some spam, copies every mail I get to another spool for evolution to pick up. It's a great way to play around with both. Also I'm not ready to give up either client. I love using pine to check my mail when I'm not at home, and I mostly use Evolution when I'm at my desktop at home. At any rate, I highly recommend at least playing with Evolution. I personally love the vFolders as a way of searching for mail.

    2. Re:Features & Extensibility of Evolution? by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      ...but you can probably send copies of your email somewhere else and use both for a while to see if you like Evolution.

      An excellent idea - thanks!

      Once I get my Linux box up, then I'll use my procmail recipe to divert copies of my email over there just to see how Evolution works for me.

      In the future, my current simple SMTP to mbox file environment will change to a corporate Exchange server. I'm thinking of slurping the contents of the Exchange server using fetchmail, then procmail, to a file, then MUA (Evolution). I'm hoping that will provide me with a good solution, that there aren't any strange side effects with getting LDAP info (addresses) from the Exchange server, but reading local boxes.

      I've used fetchmail at home to extract mail from my ISP, but I haven't had to use it at work much because the 24x7 services of the LAN have made SMTP to mbox file route painless.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  45. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by Furd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mitch Kapor didn't pay any attention to Windows. He was more concerned with 1-2-3 for OS/2 and -- believe it or not -- something called 1-2-3/M, a 1-2-3 spreadsheet for IBM mainframes.

    Although the facts are accurate, you have to remember that, at the time, Microsoft was telling everyone to develop for OS/2 - Windows was supposed to be a mere "bridging" application

    Then, Microsoft changed their internal strategies, but told none of their targeted competitors (Lotus and others) that all their development was going to Windows instead. When Windows 3.0 came out, Lotus, Borland, Ashton-Tate, et al found that they had been fooled into developing for a platform that Microsoft was never going to make mainstream - and the differences were enough that they were always going to be a step behind.

    So, I'm sure that he learned that important lesson; the real question is why the rest of the Windows developer base didn't learn it!

    FWIW

  46. Monolithic by fossa · · Score: 1

    Last time I used Evolution was a few months ago when I was trying to set up a decent email environment for my mother on our linux box. I was (and still am really) looking for a mail client that is basically a graphical mutt. I don't need it downloading mail, and I don't need it sending mail to my ISP. I use fetchmail to get my family's email whenever someone goes online (dialup). I do not want to have to be online to read email. Now supporting pop3/imap/whatever is fine but when editing the preferences of Evolution they seem extremely slanted toward the "this mail proggie does *everything*; screw your fetchmail, procmail, and local mail server".

    Also, I'd like a way to configure where Evolution keeps its mailboxes. I hate that stupid "evolution" dir in my home. What's wrong with Mail/? Is this possible in versions I haven't seen?

    With my mail setup, I compose offline and send to my local mailserver. I don't need seventeen mailboxes like "Outbox", "Drafts", "Useless Box", "Trash". I can't recall for Evolution, but with Balsa, you cannot delete your Outbox or Drafts. And they must begin with a capital letter, in aesthetic conflic with my other mailboxes. I also want my "Drafts" box to be named "postponed". And I don't want a "Trash", I want to simply delete stuff... and on and on.

    So, how configurable is Evolution (or any decent gui mail client)? Every one I've tried goes to great lengths to act like a monolith. Not that that's necessarily bad, but I want to configure that extra crap I don't use out of my life

    One last thing, does Evolution support PGP (surely...?).

    1. Re:Monolithic by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      try editing the source maybe? i dunno, i use a sensible mail client (pine or kmail).

    2. Re:Monolithic by fejjie · · Score: 1

      In the most recent versions, you are able to read folders (maildir and mbox) outside of ~/evolution

      Also, for Drafts, Sent, etc - you are able to specify whichever folder you want to act as a Draft or Sent folder. And they don't need to begin with a capital letter...

      and yes, Evolution supports PGP...much better than any other clients that I've seen - linux or win32 (including mutt).

    3. Re:Monolithic by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I think your desire to fully customize the app is good, but miss directed (possibly). Is Evolution specifically designed for the programmer? It seems to be designed for the Outlook user. That means it closely mirrors the look / feel of Outlook. That it doesn't provide a manager to customize the appearance is probably somethign to fit into later versions (after functionality complete has been reached).

      It is (hopefully) going to be the app to drop in place of Outlook on many corporate PCs whos IS team is fed up with M$ pricing. So I don't expect it to differ much from Outlook on the outside (inside is a different world).

      robi

    4. Re:Monolithic by JoeBuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want to run Evolution in a fetchmail environment, it's no problem: when you set up your account, set "server type" to "Standard Unix mbox spools". You can then use Evolution in the same way that you use elm or mutt. For "Sending Email" choose "Sendmail". You can then read and send mail offline and it will queue.

      One nuisance, though: I use procmail to sort my mail into separate mailboxes. It seems the only way to get Evolution to work smoothly with this setup is to pretend that each of these mailboxes is a separate account. I'd rather have better support for this mode of operation (which lets me continue to use either Evolution or elm).

    5. Re:Monolithic by fossa · · Score: 1
      In the most recent versions, you are able to read folders (maildir and mbox) outside of ~/evolution

      Yes but ~/evolution still exists, marring my pristine home... Seriously though, I wish it could confine itself to ~/.evolution and ~/Mail (or whatever).

      Also, for Drafts, Sent, etc - you are able to specify whichever folder you want to act as a Draft or Sent folder. And they don't need to begin with a capital letter...

      Excellent

      and yes, Evolution supports PGP...much better than any other clients that I've seen - linux or win32 (including mutt).

      I'll have to verify this alleged superiority to mutt myself ;-)

    6. Re:Monolithic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it looks like it supports PGP, but does that mean it supports GPG also ?

      Have a look at sylpheed its a good email client

    7. Re:Monolithic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if this is being designed for the end user, wouldn't you say that ~/.evolution is better than /Evolution ?

      (not having used the product myself -- maybe there's something worthwhile for the user in there...)

  47. Help....Ximian stole my menus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The one thing I did not like about ximian is it completely took over my redhat 7.1 desktop. I have no problem with its look or feel, its just that I was not too happy to have all the links to my redhat programs removed and replaced by a few apps I probably won't ever use.
    Is there a way around this besides memorizing and then rebuilding the stock redhat menu, which I prefer? Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:Help....Ximian stole my menus! by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 2

      If you're running sawfish, they're all still in the root window middle-click menu. If you want them in your panel menus, try the following:

      Go into the control center > panel > menu and set Programs (GNOME) to appear in a menu or submenu. Then run the following, as root:

      for dir in `ls /etc/X11/applnk` ; do ln -s /etc/X11/applnk/$dir /usr/share/gnome/apps/$dir/Red\ Hat\ Menus; done

      They'll then appear in the menus under Program > [category] > Red Hat Menus

  48. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2

    Mitch Kapor didn't pay any attention to Windows. He was more concerned with 1-2-3 for OS/2

    Although the facts are accurate, you have to remember that, at the time, Microsoft was telling everyone to develop for OS/2 - Windows was supposed to be a mere "bridging" application


    All true -- but Guess What? 1-2-3 for OS/2 SUCKED! Excel was far better. (And there was a beta release of GUI Excel for OS/2).

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  49. Re:KDE users just can't keep there mouth shut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you'd have CmdrTaco instead of Alan?

    ...

  50. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2

    I should also point out that Lotus didn't take the Macintosh market seriously at all, unlike Microsoft. In 1985 (the same year MS Excel shipped), they introduced a Mac-based Office Suite called "Jazz", only to drop it after a year.

    At that point, they stopped GUI work until it was restarted for OS/2 some years later. Meanwhile, Microsoft was banging out features for MS Office over on the Mac side. When Lotus finally figured out that a suite was a good idea, they had to fumble around and find a word processor.

    Ironically, the thing that saved the company was an OS/2 GUI program called Notes.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  51. We're going to ask for by MarkoNo5 · · Score: 1

    an option to set the port of the pop server, as is possible in any self-respecting e-mail client.



    Marko No. 5
    1. Re:We're going to ask for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try entering servername:port in the servername entry. Anything else?

  52. How does one actually install evolution? by Nailer · · Score: 2

    It seems like a basic question. Ximian obviously produced packages and makes them avaliable through Red Carpet.

    But on my system the `Evolution Snapshot' channel is filled with Evolution *support* packages but not Evolution itself. I have no binaries or packages containing the word Eolution in my system evven though I've downloading everything avaliable via Red Carpet, including everything in the Evolution Snapshot channel.

    1. Re:How does one actually install evolution? by praxim · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this is too basic (sorry if it is), but did you click on the "Install" icon in the upper right hand corner while in the channel?: If it's not installed, then it should be in that section- those other packages are upgrades to ones that you already have.

    2. Re:How does one actually install evolution? by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Click "install." By default, you see only updates in RC.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    3. Re:How does one actually install evolution? by Nailer · · Score: 1, Redundant

      THanks to you both. I simply didn't realize the Install button listed more packages. Scary I know ho to configure Apache, Postfix, Samba and the like but I'm not that great with a pretty GTK GUI installer.

  53. show me da money by nlh · · Score: 2

    So they've now acquired a high-profile guy to add to their board (which is generally a good thing), which means that Mitch probably invested some money in them (and which also means they're blazing through their $15M at a nice clip).

    So my question is, now that they've got some more brains, more cash, and more product, how are they planning to actually make some money again?

    nlh

  54. Evolution on Darwin? by DrRobin · · Score: 1

    (seems like a natural given the names ;^)

    Seriously, though, I run a macOS&ppclinux based HIV research lab and fight a running battle with MS-centric hospital IS who keep trying to ram Windows down everyone's throats. I run my own mail server but am required as a matter of institutional policy to maintain (and read) e-mail and announcements on their Exchange/Outlook sytem. I am moving the macs to OS X and would love an Outlook replacement that interoperates with the hospital's Exhange servers but doesn't get infected with outlook viruses (bad form for a virologist).

  55. Re:KDE integration -- INTERESTING?? HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not even that's true. The only KDE users are spastic newbies who are fooled by all the "YEAH KDE ROOLZ" shite posted on slashdot.

    clue: KDE is for fuckwits who don't know any better. It's a pretty face slapped over a mass of rotten, bloated, badly designed and thought-out C++.

  56. Kapor not perfect by maggard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Not to throw any cold water but Mitch Kapor's record is not perfect. He was pretty much pushed out of Lotus. He then went on to found On Technology which was going to revolutionize the world.

    The On Platform was developed with much money and some very big names. It was basically reusable software components - they lasted a few years in a couple of products, the company continued to blow through money and was sold off and now has nothing in common with the original. The breakthrough tech has long since dissapeared.

    Since then he's had mixed success mostly trading in on his old-man-of-the-industry status. It's great that he's joining Ximian but this guy has had his share of misses along with a spectacular hit a generation ago.

    Disclusure: I was hired the day On was bought from Kapor but never worked for him and his former staff seemed genuinely fond of him

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  57. So what? Everybody does that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All KDE press releases claim that KDE is the best desktop. All other companies' press releases claim that they are the leader in whatever. So why can't Ximian do that?

    1. Re:So what? Everybody does that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because when kde says it, it's actually true.

      ximian on the other hand, releases press releases that never amount to anything.

      it already has a bad track record.

  58. What bugs me about Evolution by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    My biggest gripe with Evolution is that there didn't seem to be a way not to get HTML E-mail messages. I don't like HTML in my E-Mail for a variety of reasons, not the least of which being that I don't like giving spammers free hits on their web pages (Which can also be used to track which E-mail addresses are valid.) E-Mail should remain passive and until that's an option I will continue to use mutt.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:What bugs me about Evolution by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Evolution will not load images in HTML email unless you want for it to load them. If it doesn't load the externally-referenced files, then there are no "free hits on spammer's web pages." You can set it to load all images, never load images except by request, or to load images if the sender is in your address book.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:What bugs me about Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize there's more to html than the img tag, dont you? And that none of it is acceptable for email messaging.

  59. Re:I'd use Evolution BUT.. by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    I hope that folks remember this sort of flamage when the KDE Kids next komplain about Gnome people dissing their work.

    Can't we all grow up?

  60. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
    ...they had to fumble around and find a word processor.


    It's not like Lotus was scraping the bottom of the barrel when they picked up Samna. They were building from the ground up on Windows, so they were able to get ahead of Word in many key areas. Ami Pro 2, crude as it was, felt like a Windows word processor. It wasn't until WinWord 4 that Word didn't act like a port from DOS. Meanwhile, WordPerfect was still deeply entrenched in the DOS world, and WordStar and XyWrite were hoping their eventual Windows ports would save their respective companies. They didn't.

    So Lotus certainly made the best of the situation. In the short term, they got the excellent Ami Pro word processor. In the long term, they got the framework for proper Windows versions of 123 and Freelance, and eventually, once they acquired Approach, SmartSuite. Which was, byte for byte, a better suite than MS Office. At least in the days before Microsoft stifled all the competition. <sigh />
    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  61. Re:Boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try Rsync, Berlin, want more?

  62. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I wasn't meaning to bash Ami by any means.

    Only that Lotus didn't put it in the box until years after MS Office was shipping, and then it took more time to integrate the look-n-feel between the apps. Having the thing change names 3 times couldn't have helped either.

    --
    Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  63. Re:We're going to ask for pop server port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    put :portname
    in the server name entry of the pop config page.

  64. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Informative

    . It wasn't until WinWord 4 that Word didn't act like a port from DOS.

    Only one problem.... WinWord versions were 1, 2 and 6, before they went to the year numbering.

    Why the jump? Because MS wanted version numbers in sync with the DOS version.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  65. Re:KDE integration -- INTERESTING?? HAHA by fault0 · · Score: 1

    This may have been partially true a few years ago, but is certainly not true today.

  66. Re:KDE integration -- INTERESTING?? HAHA by fault0 · · Score: 1

    to clarify, I meant:

    all of the gnome 1.2 users who switched to kde 2.x (i did, and so did practically everyone I knew that used gnome 1.2, most of us hated kde 1.x)

  67. Re:KDE users just can't keep there mouth shut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, alan cocks is sux. linus (who rules, btw) is an kde'r.

    at least cmdrtaco can help with pr and shit by putting disclamers after every gnome article and putting "konqueror r0x" after every kde article.

  68. Re:KDE users just can't keep there mouth shut. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's probably because there are more users of kde, but I think there is less of a percentage of the KDE community being fanatic.

  69. Ximian. by BrodeCo · · Score: 1

    (A small ape-descended man walks onstage, and
    begins to read from his laptop window.)

    (The audience is unsure of his identity.)

    (He clears his throat, and begins to speak aloud.)

    "I know several people who work for Ximian."

    A poem by Loffen@FIX.no

    (http://www.fix.no/login for hot gay teen Christian cybersex)

    Ximian is good,
    Ximian is great.
    We surrender our wills
    as of this date.

    (Repeat.)

    Everyone loves Simpsons references.
    Ximian just needs better "Imagineering".

    I need a job, I haven't got one.
    http://www.brodeco.com/questionmark
    to read the latest report on Echelon.
    Because Your Rights Online doesn't really work these days.

    (He begins to think aloud.)
    What other Slashdot cliches can I utilize?

    Hmmmm...

    23 is better than 42.
    Kirk could beat up Picard.
    Gandalf the Orange is really where it's at.
    All your Katz are belong to us.
    Brunching.com is like the USAma Bush Laden!

    Stop making sense.

    Off topic, minus 400000000 points.

    Natalie Portman is dada.
    Grits, grits, slashgrits.
    Grits.

    Microsoft is profitable! They must be destroyed!

    Thank you.

    (He bows, leaves the stage amidst thunderous
    applesauce.)

    Peace out, yo!

  70. Re:I'd use Evolution BUT.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the gnome users acted a bit more grown up and used kde, then yes.

    but we have to teach little monkeys (ximian, inc.) some manners.

  71. Re:Maybe this is good. - A History Lesson by maggard · · Score: 2
    You mean MS Excel - the Mac program that got ported to Windows?

    Yep kids, Excel started out as a Mac application. Developing MS Word & MS Excel gave Bill lots of access deep inside Apple. This came in handy when MS reinvented Apple's UI and put - what else - the Mac applications on it.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  72. evolution doesnt even support GPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why would i both to use a program that doesnt support verification of signed messages.

    Last time i used evolution it was a contest between it and mozilla to see which program could waste the most ram.

    Q. Why do high profile GUI apps not give a shit about system requirements they use ?
    A. because they are tyring to imitate windows

    Sylpheed for me

    1. Re:evolution doesnt even support GPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after a 2nd look it supports PGP, but imap is broken to the point that i cant use it (doesnt uspport subfolders) and for that it uses 160MB to run

    2. Re:evolution doesnt even support GPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use kmail fudgepacker!@#^&

      sylpheed is POS gtk+ shit.

      gtk+ is for lamers, young children, and small fuzzy monkeys (A.K.A XIMIAN MONKEY NIGGERZ).

  73. Evolution resource hog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    60MB just to start it up.

    46 mb just to start their email client.

  74. score -100 plagarism by scrytch · · Score: 2

    If you're going to paste an entire article verbatim, you could at least have the decency to post a link to the original

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  75. NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE and GNOME are not window managers!


  76. 2. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    WTF is a "calendar server?"


    You want /usr/bin/cal daemonized? Seems a waste, but I'm sure it's trivial.

  77. Mod parent down, lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you get this "most corporations" crap?

  78. In other news. by miguel · · Score: 2

    You might want to check out www.nat.org which contains nice updates on Nat's life.

  79. Re: Who is Mitch Kapor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was it , adamtrowe@hotmail.com ?

    I lost your damn email .