Slashdot Mirror
Quarter-sized CD's?
Anonymous Coward writes: "The Denver Post is running an interesting story about Dataplay, Inc. This Boulder, Colorado based company aims to supplant the 20-year-old CD with a quarter-sized (1.5" x 1.25") optical disc that can hold 500 Mb of data. Players and media (already supported by 4 major record labels) are scheduled to launched 'the latter part of first quarter 2002'." They're cute, but considering that Sony's minidiscs never took off and this format is heavily restricted, my guess is that this will fail.
Steve Volk founded DataPlay in November 1998 out of his frustration with the multiple storage formats used in consumer electronics.
So his solution? Invent another storage format!
HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
Make them smaller so they are easier to lose.
And somehow I just can't justify paying 20$ for something that is the size of a quarter.
For some reason, MD didn't take off in a big way in the US, but in Japan and Europe, they are a huge success. In the UK you can buy pre-recorded minidiscs in the music stores, like CD's or vinyl.
Almost every 2nd person on the public transport in London is listening to a MD player. They have totally replaced tapes and the walkman over here.
Just because the US seems to have ignored them for the last 5 years does not make them a failure...
Damn. If they remove the restrictions, there's a *TON* of applications they can use. You can even make a drive out of a PCMCIA Type III card. If you can shove one drive natively in a system, all you need to do is slap part of the Linux distro on it and free up half a gig of HD space! That's a whole HD for me on my laptop!
--
# Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
$Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
I guess this means I'm gonna have to buy the White Album again...
This sig is umop apisdn.
Sony MiniDiscs didn't take off because they had shit fidelity. You might recall that it was the high end of the audio market which paved the way for the current CD market, i.e. I paid $650 for my first CD player, equal of which today costs ~$100. MP3, though popular is still far from mainstream, probably because the cost is too high for personal MP3 players (when you consider what it costs to buy a cheap portable cassette or CD player), besides, MP3 has low res. audio, too. CDs aren't necessarily here to stay, but they still work very well. (Of course, quality is also heavily determined by who issues the recording and how good a production job they did.)
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
I disagree. Minidiscs took off. It took a long time, but nowadays, many people own a minidisc. Pre-recorded MD never took off. Ok. Probably because they were as expensive as CDs, and because record dealers didn't want to have every record on a new support. But blank MDs are nice. Excellent quality, all features of a CD (direct access to tracks), plus song and disk titles. Plus they are small. The only bad thing about MD is that recorders are still a bit expensive. But I only use MDs to record music I want to hear while traveling. I don't want of CDs and MP3/OGG gadgets that need a computer to be recorded.
{{.sig}}
DataPlay - Flash Killer or Copy-Control Nightmare? [slashdot.org] (From Feb 21/01)
NZ
The only big wins I see with this technology are
- Portable players. Imagine a matchbox sized unit that holds a full album worth of music. Portable CD players long ago reached the point where the size of the CD is the limiting factor in how small they can be made.
- Massive storage units. If you could put these CDs in "rolls" or some other method, you can store a whole lot of them in a standard sized consumer audio unit, as opposed to the 5 or 10 CD changers that are common now.
And that's about it. For just about everything else a regular CD is just better. The consumer-hostile content control is just the icing on the cake IMHO.I read the internet for the articles.
Huh? what do you mean not sell licenses?
Sony learnt their lesson from the Betamax debacle - I can buy a MD player from any number of audio equipment manufacturers including Kenwood, Pioneer, JVC, Denon, Sony, Sharp and a bunch of others, and MD recordable disks from TDK, Victor, Maxell or a bunch of others.
How would they do this if the tech was not licensed?
Sony is NOT the only company making MD machines and recordables...
And we all know the cost of the media is what keeps CD prices at $17.99
Quarter sized? Whose quarters are they using? Mine are about 0.94". I might believe silver dollar-sized. :)
Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
Beta lost to VHS for a number of reasons, over-simplifying it to licensing is so innacurate as to be incorrect.
Licensing and single-sourcing was just one more problem.
I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
Sony's minidiscs never took off
Wrong. Sony's minidiscs never took off for the intended audience.
Minidiscs are the defacto standard medium for amateur bootleggers (for concerts, etc), since they're cheap, small, and have good quality. The best are DAT recorders, but they're expensive and big.
Just some FYI.
I still have 100+ LPs and a few 45s, and a rather nice turntable, because some stuff didn't move well to CD, some stuff didn't come out on CD and some stuff lost tracks when it was re-thought and moved to CD (i.e. ELO Out of the Blue)
I'm probably getting a DVD player in the next month, but deciding factor isn't so much that it's better or more convenient, it's actually that my NEC VCR is dying (after 16 years. Hey, it was and still is a great model, I hope I can get it fixed.), but I'll still need a VCR to play the prerecorded tapes I have (many, too many...)
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Any new format, to succeed needs to add value to the user to overcome the cost of changing over. With CDs, there was a marked increase of quality over vinyl. Some might argue it was a decrease, but Joe Sixpack is still glad his CDs dont pop and scratch. Further, the CD allowed instant track access at the push of a button. It was these two features which pushed the changeover to CDs, along with the gradually decreasing price of players and concurrent larger selection of CDs in stores.
That said, where are the additional values of this medium over CDs? It's small. neat. But if I have to give up my CD burner, small dont mean much.
The next medium is most likely to be some flavor of mp3 or ogg device, be it solid state or magnetic disc based. Give me the ability to carry all the music I've bought over the last 15 years in my pocket, and the ability to navigate easily among all the songs, and I'll be all over it.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan
Is DataPlay the next big thing, or something to avoid?
Something to avoid, due to the SDMI restrictions at file system level and 500 MB being 150 to 300 MB less data than a 1980's technology CD-ROM can hold. This is 2001. A breakthrough is having a regular size CD hold 10x the data of a DVD, or a 3-inch CD hold 4x a DVD. Quarter size means losing them regularly. Mini CD size is about as small as you want to go.
Don't forget that Porn makers decided to produce VHS exlusivly. Don't laugh, this was a major reson. Imagin that in 85 there were 2 internets of comparable quality and qunaity and price. One had porn, the other didn't. Which one would the early adapters (the same people who would buy VCRs when they came out) use?
Sleep is for the weak!
They're cute, but considering that Sony's minidiscs never took off and this format is heavily restricted, my guess is that this will fail.
Sony's minidisc failed because Sony wanted royalties from everyone for the technology. This technology will probably be subsidized by the RIAA in order to get people to migrate. For the average Joe Consumer, this would be an ideal technology so I would expect this to take off if executed properly. However, I would not expect the protection mechanisms to last very long.
Life is the leading cause of death in America.
I was just reading the "Big Breakthrough" infographic, and this thing sure looks impressive. At long last, thanks to modern technology, I can finally have inexpensive, universal, portable optical media that stores 500 MB of any kind of data I want and can be written 10 times faster than a 1X CD burner!
I've had minidisc players for over a year and I see people carrying them everywhere. Over here they seem to be going from strength to strength.
There's still not much selection available prerecorded, but I don't think most people want to use them to replace CDs, just for replacing tapes and replacing CDs for on-the-move purposes.
Um, this is *so* OT but I'm kicking myself trying to remember what that reference is from... Care to enlighten me, "rsteele19"?
Freedom: "I won't!"
It's From Men in Black.
WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
Instead of trying to ban CD-R/CD-RW RIAA should support new technologies like this. I bet CD-RW drives are full incompatible with this kind of quater-CD, it would solve their problem (I agree that CD-RW drives are a problem for RIAA) without being intrusive like they are trying to do.
They could also increase music quality, increasing frequency range (in a way vinyl lovers would accept use these quater-CDs) so mp3 would never be as good as a original quarter-CD.
There are so many productive ways to avoid piracy, they might consider to adapt to the new reality (just like everybody else does), instead of fight agains it.
I hope this is the light that shows RIAA the right way.
-=-=-=-=
I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
"I like the technology, but it's just not a slam dunk," Levitas said. "The copyright protection that they've been able to embed is wonderful."
It's not just a slam dunk, it's a smack down. It's not "wonderful", and any embedded hardware to enforce copy protection is reason enough to never accept this format. Thankfully, record companies are having at least some trouble as it is to copy protect audio compact discs. To give them a 1-up with technology like this would be disasterous. Of course, there's always the possibility of ripping the data, wiping the disc, then re-writing it as whatever format you choose... but that's just plain absurd.
Why do these damn corporations incist on selling products to the consumers under lock to which we do not have the key? We have to stop supporting this. Even though this format looks like it has incredible promise, we should never buy into it. It should never be accepted so long as copy protection is built in. I will make the choice whether or not I want to obey copyright law.
Why bother.
We all know there are lots of things that add to the cost of the disk, but that got me thinking...
The breakdown of a $15 CD is:
$5 to the store
$5 record company
$3 artist
$2 manufacturers and distributors
Who does this type of key purchase leave out? The store (since the samples do their own promotion), the manufacuturers and distributors (since these people have already gotten the physical product to you).
So, basically, record companies just have to pay artist $3 and get to keep the rest. If they pay themselves the same amount as a CD, the key should cost $8. Any bets on if they get greedy?
HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
Early adopters for a new audio format would be primarily
1) Audiophiles
2) Techtoy-loving geeks (thats us)
3) Music freaks
Group 1 is *never* going to embrace a technology that uses lossy compression - and there's no way a 500MB disk is going to hold even a single album without it. Group #1 is looking for 96/24 and increased fidelity and longevity, size be damned.
Group 2 is going to run away at high speed from anything that incorporates rights management to such a crazy degree.
Group 3 is just fine with CDs and CDRs - why pay $10 for a 500MB blank when that same $10 gets you 20 or 30 blank 650MB CDRs that work in every CD player you have, with your choice of lossy (MP3) or lossless (traditional redbook CD audio) formats, and no rights management?
How can this possibly succeed? I don't get it.
-- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
Porn makers decided to produce VHS exlusivly
I thought that was because Sony refused to license Beta to them
Reboot macht Frei.
I have seen Dataplay prototypes and played with an actual disk. It's cute. The actual disk is encapsulated in a sleeve that looks like a 3-inch floppy, only a bit smaller. Critical in its favor is the metal shutter door. You do not scratch these on the tabletop or in the car. They're proteted. That's good. That's what's wrong with CDs -- even after error correction, they can easily fail, because they're so exposed. Stinkin' jewel cases are far more cumbersome than the cardboard sleeves that old LPs came in, but DataPlay solves this with a hard shuttered enclosure. (Anybody remember CD caddies?) And it still fits into a shirt pocket or Walk-creature-sized machine.
Now the DRM is an option that, of course, all of the prerecorded music companies will invoke. And I can't comment on its crackability. But if you take a drive by itself, and some blanks, then you can ignore the DRM, because it's your own drive. And it fits into a laptop, or a desktop, and can replace a floppy, while being a whole lot nicer than Zip or LS-120.
It's a tiny bit smaller in capacity than CD-RW, and I wonder if that's its weakness. Just a tiny bit more diameter on the disk would give it a lot more area, and it could have been 1-2 GB and still smaller than a floppy.
It'll be interesting to see how they spin this, and how the public responds.
Why would consumers want to replace the cd technology to begin with. It offers very high quality sound on consumer systems, is easy to maintain, has no restrictions on its use in its current specification and is practically universal now.
The only think I see replacing CDs would be some sort of DVD. Ultimately I don't think consumers will latch on to any replacement technology unless it offers the same flexibility that they've come to expect from cds.
As hinted at before, if the capacity is 500M total, then imagine a dual function device that reads cd and these disks.
For instance ad DVD-RAM uses 2 lasers (I know, I took one apart to clean them) on for the DVD-RAM the other for the CD's. Remember those adapters for the 3 and 1/2 inch cd's?
It's be neat to put in a cd sized adapter for a "5 disk changer" kind of setup. Granted unless a really good engineer devises the "holder" it will be another PITA to use/implement.
But storage will be a breeze, just use a left over toilet/hand wipe paper tube, especially if they are light/heat sensitive like most cd/dvd's are.
Maybe I am being overly optimistic/pessimistic but I think the success or failure of this will be based on how well it can be put into a multifunction device that can read/burn/shift whatever data is put on it in addition to all the other specs of DVD/CD -r -rw +r +rw etc.
Like "mini-disc" a single function device is ok, but I'd want more capability, personally.
YOMV (your opinion may vary)
Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
This is a great idea, but in practice it doesn't work well. Take all those CDs that came out in the mid 90's using the TestDrive technology, such as the Quake shareware CD. It had the shareware version of Quake on it, and if you liked it, you could call a toll free number, give them a code number it generated, they'd give you a complimentary code number, and the CD would unlock Quake for you, and copy it to your HD. You could also choose to purchase many older id games like Wolf3D, several Doom packages, Hexen, etc. But, it was a very short time later that a tiny little program was widely available that would allow you to generate complimentary keys to the Test Drive program's code. This will happen with records on this disc, and the RIAA will keep prices artificially higher than they should be to "counteract" the "losses" via people cracking the disc.
Further, the paragraph goes on to say this:
But we have proof that record companies do not pass on saving in material costs to the comsumer. A cassette tape is much more costly to produce than a compact disc, yet you can buy new cassettes for about $10 while the same album on CD costs about $15. The CD is the much more popular format, so they charge more for it, and make a killing. If they can afford to sell cassettes at $10, then they should be able to sell the CD for $9 and make the same profit, but they do not. And they won't, unless we PRESSURE them to. They backed off the crap they tried to pull piggybacking their ideas on anti-terror bills because of public pressure.
jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
Guess I'll have to buy the White album again.
Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
If we're going to move towards a format that's supposedly going to dethrone the CD, size and 50 more megs will not cut it. I'd rather have all my music on one CD-sized 10 gig disc than a bunch of little quarters. Preferably a disc that's sheathed like a floppy disk. No more scratches.
The guy says "We're in discussions with everybody" and their target market is 'everything'. That's a really, really bad sign. The reason you haven't seen ANY of these yet, is because they're still waiting to hear the technical specifications from refrigerator manufacturers before finalizing the design ;)
Secondly- so he thinks he has the support of most of the record labels? I'd looooove to see those contracts ;) plenty of musicians think the same thing and stay confused for a long time why they're not getting paid. I'm picturing a situation in which the record companies 'found him a lawyer' to help understand the agreements they themselves drew up. He may have no idea what kind of sharks he was dealing with, or who his lawyer was REALLY working for. I have a hard time picturing this guy as sharp and paranoid enough to conduct negotiations with record companies without being utterly screwed.
So, don't even worry about this supplanting CDs with copy-prevented media.
The record companies have a huge amount of infrastructure in replicating houses etc. and even the ability to pressure replicators not to work with indies such as Negativland. They're going to move ahead with CD, non-Red-Book-compliant CD, DVD-A and SACD.
This is about taking this technology off the market so that it never becomes a 'piracy-friendly' techology, like a CD-R that's more easily transported. That's what this is about and why we won't ever see it come out.
While it's true that blank cassettes cost the same as blank MDs, and the MDs provide better quality in a smallest package, answer me this: where can I get an MD recorder for $30 brand-new?
The day cassettes die for recording is the day when MD recording equipment is cheap enough. CD players cost $30-40 brand-new for inexpensive models, so they have long since passed cassettes for playback. $200 for an MD recorder is simply too much for the vast majority of (non-gadget-freak) Americans.
For more information, click here.
Agreed. As you pointed out, there is no driving reason for consumers to move to this new format (we've already got random access, etc.). What if the RIAA members "pushed" this format change because it helped them instead?
Consumers already have CDs and are happy with them (and the fact that they are easy to rip helps too). But, the RIAA is probably kicking themselves now for ever supporting such a "loose" format. Don't you think the RIAA would love to be able to take back all CDs ever sold and promote this format (or another with limited copying for Joe Sixpaxk)?
What if the RIAA offered a deal where they will exchange your "old" CDs and vinyl for "new" DataPlay discs? In this way they have dropped the cost of switching to the new format for consumers and they (the RIAA) gets what they want, no more CDs. This might sound expensive (and thus counter RIAA), but consider that the production cost is the lowest chunk of $ in the cost of a CD. A dollar hit on all CDs ever sold might be worth ridding themselves of CDs forever, and thus staving off their (the RIAA) obsolecence in light of digital file swapping.
There has to be a reason why the RIAA members would pour money into YAMF (yet another music format)...
GRH
This has implications well beyond music. A tiny disc like this with a decent capacity can fit into the little devices we've all come to know and love: PDAs, digital stillcams, those little voice recorders for saving interviews and lectures for later transcription or transfer to parent Big Iron (and whoever thought that a PC would one day represent "Big Iron" in our portable lives?) and on and on and on.
So let's set aside "dethroning the CD" for a bit and talk about dethroning the other storage technologies: Compact Flash, Memory Stick, Smart Media, MicroDrive, and whatever else is floating around out there. For now, I own a couple of iPaqs with CF jackets, a stillcam with CF, and a camcorder which can save stills onto MemStick were I so inclined (I'm not). To integrate DataPlay's technology into _that_ aspect of my digital life would require the purchase of replacement technology or of adapters that add bulk and subtract convenience. Why change from my effective standardization on CF?
These disks have moving parts. That's Bad for mobile devices -- just the kind of thing where a small, high-data-density gizmo is most valuable. At the moment, DataPlay's storage capacity is reported to be 500MB for $10. I took a quick look at B&H's website and found a 512 MB CF for $800. Definitely a price win for DataPlay even given that a little time with a search engine would undoubtedly turn up a lower price. Same place, 128 MB of Smart Media can be had for $100. 128MB MemStick is $120. So the current market leaders in solid-state are not price competitive with DataPlay right now. The key differences are that they are here, now, in the market and that as with all computer-y doodads, their price is plunging.
We'll see if DataPlay ever releases an actual product or just manages to use press releases to get newspaper stories written. If they _do_ get something out there, we'll see if it costs what they claim it will, whether it's easy to come by, and whether the medium comes so crippled with hardware-level DRM that pictures I take in a digital camera can only be dumped to a single computer using a special program (a la the Media Manager that MS uses to get music from CD-in-PC onto an iPaq). If it's easy-to-use and recognizes that I the buyer am to be the determiner of what is done with the stored content, if it can be written on a bajillion times before giving out, if it has a price-per-convenience that undercuts the other folks then it could be a winning tech despite the moving parts. If, on the other hand, they focus so hard on uncopyable recorded music that it loses its usefulness in other technologies then it'll likely die and good riddance. (Of course, with built-in DRM it could be the first medium approved by Sen. Hollings (D-Disney).)
Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
As a music medium, these will fail. Music CDs are becoming a read-once-or-twice before storing as a compressed, more convenient data format. Size does not matter when you just stick the CDs in your closet or put on display in your living room. When you can put your music collection into an unscratchable format that be copied from car to house to portable, there is no reason for a permanent physical medium except for backup.
As a computer format these will fail. For archival and distribution you need lots of data space. DVD tech will supplant CDs for this, possibly at a smaller size, but still capable of gigabytes of storage. For temporary storage and transportation, flash technology works fine, is more reliable, and is getting cheaper and larger capacities over time, and is poised to replace floppies permanently.
So I think the trends are against this medium, but time will tell.
Yes.. because it's actually compressing the audio data before writing it to disk. IT's deisgned to work at a set speed.
Certainly.. had it not been such a proprietary format, there would have been ways to write faster. Too bad they never sold en-masse a generic computer drive. minidisc holds what.. 256MB? Hell.. they used them for geek data props in the Matrix even..
.
Soon after we got CD-R, we got mini CD-R, small disks that can be read and written in most normal CD-R drives. I would expect the same to happen with DVD-R and DVD-RW. That would probably give you similar storage capacities to DataPlay in a similar format.
oh yeah... like I want to go out and replace THOSE in the near future...
records I can understand, large, bulky, easy to ruin
tapes I can understand, tape hiss, eventually wear out, tape deack eat them
cds? perfect audio, rugged, wont wear out... ummm, no thanks
Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
What I found more interesting was later in the same report, where it listed the major record companies and their market share and labels. To save effort, I've excerpted (fair use) this information below:
Concentration of Ownership
Today, many recording artists and studios earn a great deal of money, pushing industry sales to about $40 billion. Nevertheless, sales of all recordings have leveled off, except for a few superstars.
As in other media, a few corporations dominate the recording industry. It is interesting to note that only one, AOL Time Warner, has its corporate headquarters in the United States. In the 1990s, here's how the major labels stacked up.
WEA, which is owned by AOL Time Warner, controlled more than 25 percent of the market through Atlantic, Elektra, Giant, Reprise, Rhino, Sire, and Warner Brothers. Sony held about 14 percent of the market share through Columbia and Epic.
Polygram, which is owned by Philips Electronics, captured just over 13 percent of the market with A&M, Def Jam, Deutsche Gramophone, Island, Motown, and Polydor. BMG, which is owned by Bertelsman, held just over 12 percent through Arista, BMG Classics, Private Music, RCA, Windham Hill, and Zoo.
Other major companies, which control about 10 percent of the market, include CEMA through its labels Capitol, Chrysalis, EMI, IRS, Liberty, and SBK; and French-owned Vivendi through Geffen, GRP, MCA Records, and Uptown.
We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
Ya know, I thought this looked familiar. Like damn near a year old familiar. It wasn't a good idea- and barely newsworthy- then, and isn't any better now.
With stuff that isn't news (crap), and stuff that isn't news (old), I'd say today's a slow news day on slashdot. If there ever were a day that it wasn't, anyway.
And that cheap shot at minidiscs is just inexcusable.
MD is not very popular in (at least) Switzerland, Germany and Holland.
They got some market share, but compete with (more widespread) portable CD-players and now the MP3 players (solid state, HDD-based and CD-based) are taking over fast.
In one or two years, MD shall be gone (rightly so).
Moderators... that's +1 funny, not insightful.
It might work for a Toonie here in canada, btw.
over-simplifying it to licensing is so innacurate as to be incorrect.
Actually I likened it to VHS being first out of the door. BetaMax was superior quality, I had all of my tapes in Beta, no problem. The price difference wasn't that much at all, however VHS beat Beta to the punch by getting out to market a good 6 months or so in advance, and since it was "good enough" for most people, the Beta didn't stand much of a chance.
If God gave us curiosity
The article claims that the disks hold 500MB, or enough for 11 CD-quality albums.
Uh, right.
A CD-quality album is 600MB. Compressing it down to fit in 45MB results in casette-tape quality music: good enough for portable devices or computer speakers, but lousy for a good stereo system. For that, you need significantly more storage space.
Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
Such short memories people have ...
DataPlay - Flash Killer or Copy-Control Nightmare?
Posted 21 Feb 2001.
You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
There is a lot of hype here.
I don't agree with changing the form factor -- yeah, being able to fit "about" the same amount of data as a CD onto something one-twenty-fifth the
size is cool and all, but can you imagine having to sort through a pile of these while you're driving?
I think the CD's size has become a pretty de facto form factor -- I'm convinced that part of DVD's success has been because people feel comfortable picking up a 5" disc (certainly laserdiscs were too bulky to become popular) *AND*, you can build players that accept both media without having to hack any additional logic into it.
I say keep trying to pack more and more information into the same size. It'll sell better because people have already accepted that size, whether they even realize it or not.
I'd say this is doomed to failure, primarily because they've wrapped it up in a silly plastic 'caddy'.
There are certain instances where caddies are a necessity (i.e. tape applications - reel to reel doesn't count!!) but for optical media, what is the point of the caddy? It does nothing except increase the media cost significantly.
I daresay part of the wonderful things about CD is the fact that it doesn't have caddies. Remember in the early 90s when many CD-ROM drives required you to put your CDs in expensive caddies? Where are those caddies now? In the trash. We learned how to handle discs directly.
A far better idea would be for them to make some double sided mini CDs that aren't in caddies.. that way they'd still play in regular CD players and CDROM drives.. and they could make a mint from patenting the idea for double-sided mini CDs.
mogorific carpentry experiments
I've got records, cassette tapes, CD's, DVD's (just bought Blazing Saddles, Young Frankenstein and EP1, today), video cassettes, at what point will all this merge? Or will RIAA/MPAA fight the battle (against their own best interests) discouraging moving my old recordings onto one unified format? It'd be nice to have DVD/CD and move all my junk to it so I only have one recorder/player and one cabinet to store things. Right now it's getting a bit out of hand.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
No, I was careful in my wording. Beta products were intrinsically more complex to manufacture then VHS. More components were required, higher quality materials. Economies of scale don't change if it's 1 manufacturer making 100,000 units or 10 manufacturers making 10,000 units - indeed they get worse.
What I believe you were attempting to describe is incremental improvement brought about by a widely used design being iteratively refined by numerous and diverse engineering teams. With only one company producing a product or a highly dominant reference design being used a product tends not to evolve very quickly.
You're implying this was Polaroid's problem - it wasn't. Their habit of doing everything in-house likely didn't help but this certainly wasn't the cause of their downfall.
I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
Well Gee, how many decades did it take for CDs to get popular? MiniDisc is a great format (and a PC MiniDisc-Drive would be nice) but it hasn't been around long enough to see if it will eventually take a serious hold. After all, right now very few companies are producing MiniDisc systems, which is keeping the price fairly high.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
I can walk to both major UK record chain stores here in Cheltenham, UK and prove you wrong, if you like.
MD was popular for about three hours on Wednesday tea-time a few years back. Almost all stores have stopped selling pre-recorded MDs now. You can still get MD blanks everywhere, mind.
Some of the bigger stores like Tower Records in major cities such as London and Birmingham sell pre-recorded MDs, but if your concept is that you can just pop into any high street record store in an average UK town, you're wrong.
Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
Is have only one standard format ... and change it every couple of years!!!
They've made millions out of people that bought CDs when they already had the same in LP.
Last values i had (about 2 years ago) for the cost of manufacturing a CD was 20 pesetas (from a Spanish manufacturer) per CD, minimum order 1000, cd-case included. That's about 8-10 (US$) cents.
>In the 10 years since MD's first appeared, no->one's come up with a better portable format
>(MP3's fail on the expense of the players, the >lack of removable media and the sound quality). >I *dare* you to challenge this statement !
I'll make a couple comments on this last part... CD mp3 players (~$149-179) cost an almost equal amount as a MD player ($179+). The difference between them is size... Sound quality between a MD ATRAC3 & a 192-156 bit MP3 is very similiar...
we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise