Slashdot Mirror


.biz Open For Biz

Angry Black Man writes: "November 7, 2001 marks a new historic event in domain name suffixes. Neulevel's press release is reporting that the .biz domains went live last night at 12:00." And if you can follow that link, I guess they're live for you too. Anyone going to buy a .biz domain? .info might be used, but .biz just sounds silly/sleazy to me.

72 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. fear.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    scientology.biz!

  2. All domains resolve! by DaSyonic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lookup ANY .biz domain, even random characters. It resolves, to 209.173.53.173, which the web server there says basically: "Hey, want to buy this domain?"

    Now to me, That is just NOT acceptable, and totally is NOT how DNS for a TLD should be done!

    --

    Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
    James Brents
    1. Re:All domains resolve! by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what you're saying is

      All your .biz are resolve to 209.173.53.173?

      Okay, sorry, I couldn't resist! (:

    2. Re:All domains resolve! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The blurry dead eyes of the folks at the top of the screen scare me...

    3. Re:All domains resolve! by Penguin · · Score: 5, Informative

      ... and furthermore, the webserver gives a "200 OK" as a response for a non-existing domain and no expire-date in the HTTP-header. Although no "Last-Modified"-header is supplied and the page might not be at all that cacheable, it is just plain wrong giving such a "correct" answer for a page that shouldn't exist in the first place.

      It seems that the "security", NeuLevel provides, doesn't concern themselves.

      --
      - Peter Brodersen; professional nerd
    4. Re:All domains resolve! by MavEtJu · · Score: 3, Funny

      [~] edwin@k7>telnet blaatblaatblaat.biz smtp
      Trying 209.173.53.173...
      telnet: connect to address 209.173.53.173: Connection refused
      telnet: Unable to connect to remote host


      Oooooh damned damned damned! That would be big spam-fun!

      Edwin

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    5. Re:All domains resolve! by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A much nicer sollution is used by the Danish: go visit dk to register a .dk domain.

      I've heard this may fail in msie though.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    6. Re:All domains resolve! by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 2

      Alright, I was spreading FUD. It does seem to work in msie too.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    7. Re:All domains resolve! by midom · · Score: 5, Informative
      It will have plenty of negative impact.

      • SMTP sender check is no longer valid.
      • Instead of bouncing 'domain not found' messages smtp servers will have to wait until port 25 responds (argh, tons of mail in queues, tons of bounces later)
      • Scripts checking for existing domain (host) names will have to be redone to check the stupid damn undocumented IP address instead of normal NULL answer in resolver libs... Guys, this isn't only domain registration (more banners for registrars page) thing!
      • Rest in peace John, but the organisation you left isn't listening to your advices and design. Your voice is required here.
      • It is not standards conformant. Internet should be based on standards, because without normal common language we won't be able to talk.

      I am working for ISP in .lt, that also focuses on web hosting and mail solutions and in both spheres I really hate what happens right now. As well as unneeded .biz TLD - maybe it has some urgency in USA where guys forgot they've got local TLD (.us) and even classified ones.

      I hated new.net with their new suffixes, but right now I'm really angry about what official institutions (ICANN) are doing - adding banners to non-existing A records. Pals, this is application implementation, how it should display non-existing pages, not network information backend's.

    8. Re:All domains resolve! by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      not for me. I get a page not found... IE 5.5sp2

    9. Re:All domains resolve! by marnanel · · Score: 2

      It's nothing new: .nu has been doing it for a while.

      --
      GROGGS: alive and well and living in
    10. Re:All domains resolve! by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah I went to microsoft.biz and sure enough there was a banner (with a freaky blurred photo of two people with no eyes, shiver) and an offer to buy. Well, shucks, if microsoft doesn't want it, can I buy it??

    11. Re:All domains resolve! by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      IE 6.0 here at work and I get a 404 as well

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  3. Let me be the first to say it: by Nailer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sucks

    Name a business that's not a commercial entity or a not for profit organization. There aren't any. Hence .biz is a redundant domain and a blatant money making scheme for Neulevel.

    If namespace limits are a concern, then fix the registration policies in the US. In Au, a clever fellow called Robery Elz banned the registration of generic words, and limited the amount of domains a single company could use. This would go some way towards solving the problem.

    So would migrating every .com over to .us or another country code over a five year period. Trademarks are register on a country by country basic and domains should be too.

    Or including multipek fields (Apple (computer) as in computer products, Apple (records) as in music) in a new namespace.

    Oh well. I think .biz will die in the ass anyway, so my little rant doesn't do anything much any.

  4. Oh Puh-leez by ajuda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many domains to we really need? This is sooo obviously a marketing ploy to get everyone to spend more money on domains they don't need. Owners of Ford.com will buy Ford.biz, Dell.com will soon have dell.biz. Are they any better off for .biz? Of course not.

    Sure, some new people will take advantage of .biz domains. But now users have to remember even longer addresses for each website. Let's see, did I want to go to Shopping.com, shopping.org, shopping.net, shopping.biz or shopping.info? Enough already!

    1. Re:Oh Puh-leez by smaughster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >. Let's see, did I want to go to Shopping.com, shopping.org, shopping.net, shopping.biz or shopping.info? Enough already!

      Actually, this is a consequence of earlier mess-ups with domain names. I mean, we are currently "blessed" with domain names which are either regionally focussed (.uk etc.) or fall into a few large categories (.com/.org). In my opinion, regional domain names do not really make sense, since the whole point about internet is its global reach. Furthermore, the most well known domain names (.com, .org) are used as collection bins where everyone with a site wants to fall in. It would make much more sense if the rules for domain name categories were held more strict and if these categories were made more clear.

      I mean, the distinction between .gov and .edu is clear, but .com or .biz? But if we keep holding on to the "few different domain names is good" idea, instead of "quite a few easy but understandle domain names is good" then this problem will remain.

      --
      I intend to live forever, so far so good.
    2. Re:Oh Puh-leez by mgv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Regional codes make sense when your business is regional - eg., your local video store, or even the local head office of an international business. Likewise the .gov.au makes alot of sense as compared with .au.gov.

      So, in my opinion, regionalisation makes sense for regional stuff. Which is why you need and have a .us, althogh it is underused.

      I'm hoping that all the dot.com startups that bought out every .com/.net name are running out of money by now and will at least open up the chance everyone getting a more memorable TLD than MyPreferredURLIsAlreadyTaken.com

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    3. Re:Oh Puh-leez by mpe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, this is a consequence of earlier mess-ups with domain names. I mean, we are currently "blessed" with domain names which are either regionally focussed (.uk etc.) or fall into a few large categories (.com/.org)

      Except that .com, .net, .org have in effect been treated as .misc for quite a few years.

      In my opinion, regional domain names do not really make sense, since the whole point about internet is its global reach.

      On the contrary it's non geographic domains which make little sense for a whole set of things. Especially the sale of physical goods, even for non physical goods such as downloadable software or "ebooks" the physical location of the supplier is an important issue both in what currency you use and in the exact contract of sale which is entered into.
      Telephones and "snail mail" also has "global reach", but you don't see demands for everyone to use non geographic telephone numbers and postal addresses (Typically if someone want's a less or even non geographic telephone number or postal address they pay extra for it. Ditto if it has some kind of "vanity content".)

    4. Re:Oh Puh-leez by mpe · · Score: 2

      Regional codes make sense when your business is regional - eg., your local video store, or even the local head office of an international business.

      This is the vast majority of business anyway.

    5. Re:Oh Puh-leez by Roblimo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So true.

      The domain I really wanted when I was still active in the limo business was roblimo.md.us because it would have told people where we were (Maryland, USA) at a glance. The old .us domain pattern of including the town and county (roblimo.elkridge.howard.md.us) added too much granularity and was too cumbersome to remember easily, which is why I never got interested in that one.

      For local businesses I believe city.state/province.country or just state/province.country is best both for the business owner and potential customers.

      I have gotten massive spam urging me to get a .biz domain, but I see no point to having one. I can claim copyright infringement against anyone who uses "Roblimo" in other TLDs if I choose, except perhaps against the Robin Miller in Baltimore, County Cork, Ireland who has a small limo service there, and I think he and I would be more likely to put up a "joint" page than argue, since we're certainly not competing with each other. :)

      - Robin

    6. Re:Oh Puh-leez by mpe · · Score: 2

      As you say, many US commercial sites (those whose products are something physical rather than information) don't really have much usefulness outside the USA.

      There are plenty far more restricted than that, a group of adjacent states, a single state, a city even part of a city.
      Let alone that USA isn't even a single land mass.

    7. Re:Oh Puh-leez by mpe · · Score: 2

      The domain I really wanted when I was still active in the limo business was roblimo.md.us because it would have told people where we were (Maryland, USA) at a glance. The old .us domain pattern of including the town and county (roblimo.elkridge.howard.md.us) added too much granularity and was too cumbersome to remember easily, which is why I never got interested in that one.

      The exact format can be rather subjective. Having a city (even part of a city) can be rather important if the business is located in a large conurbation. But potentially misleading in a non urbanised area.

    8. Re:Oh Puh-leez by imadork · · Score: 2
      In my opinion, regional domain names do not really make sense, since the whole point about internet is its global reach.

      Except that current laws are very country-specific, even if the Internet isn't. Trademark law, in particular. can vary in teeny bits from country to country. Having country-specific domain names (where disputes could be governed under the rules of that country) could lead to easier resolution of disputes. (Of course, it doesn't in practice, and we're back to Square 1).

    9. Re:Oh Puh-leez by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      anybody could register any TLD that they like, but nobody could own it or restrict the second-level domains that are attached to it.

      I'm sure you realize that would totally break DNS. Just imagine the load on the world root servers if they couldn't delegate down? Yeesh..

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    10. Re:Oh Puh-leez by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      I'm sure you realize that would totally break DNS. Just imagine the load on the world root servers if they couldn't delegate down?

      Considering that probably 85-90% of the traffic is for .com, we effectively already have that world.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    11. Re:Oh Puh-leez by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      I mean, the distinction between .gov and .edu is clear, but .com or .biz?

      It's obvious what the difference is!

      .com is used to target people with X10 popups, while .biz is used to target people with... Oh! Nevermind...

      --
      That is all.
    12. Re:Oh Puh-leez by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      Considering that probably 85-90% of the traffic is for .com, we effectively already have that world.

      The world root servers only have to return an IP of another DNS server that's responsible for performing the actual lookup of the final record.

      All the individual ".com" DNS servers only have to perform lookups into typically one to ten domains. Imagine a domain like yahoo.com. They get, what, 20 to 100 million hits a day? For most of those hits, the world root servers only need to return the 10 or so IP addresses of the DNS servers that know more about yahoo.com. You can't possibly say that the world root servers already do most of the work resolving every lookup into yahoo.com. View the html source of a Yahoo page and you'll be blown away by how many different yahoo servers come into play when rendering your page.

      Try managing your own DNS and you'll understand more how it works.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    13. Re:Oh Puh-leez by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      How much worse is that than the load on the root .com servers?

      The world root servers only have to return an IP of another DNS server that's responsible for performing the actual lookup of the final record.

      All the individual ".com" DNS servers only have to perform lookups into typically one to ten domains. Imagine a domain like yahoo.com. They get, what, 20 to 100 million hits a day? For most of those hits, the world root servers only need to return the 10 or so IP addresses of the DNS servers that know more about yahoo.com. You can't possibly say that the world root servers already do most of the work resolving every lookup into yahoo.com. View the html source of a Yahoo page and you'll be blown away by how many different yahoo servers come into play when rendering your page.

      Try managing your own DNS and you'll understand more how it works.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
  5. .biz is booming ... by ninewands · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As registrar for the new TLD Neulevel will undoubtedly make a TON of money as companies with significantly valuable trademarks rush to protect the value of their IP by registering all possible .your_TLD_here preceded by their trademark.

    Or am I just a cynic?

    1. Re:.biz is booming ... by O2n · · Score: 2, Funny

      rush to protect the value of their IP by registering all possible .your_TLD_here preceded by their trademark.

      Why bother? You can wait until someone else buys it, *if* they buy it, then call them cybersqatters etc. and get the domain.
      But probably they'll just rush as you said...

    2. Re:.biz is booming ... by bjtuna · · Score: 2

      I dare you to try. Filing a complaint through ICANN and the WIPO will set you back $2000 in processing fees alone... and thats just to get the WIPO to hear your case; you may not even get the domain back because the squatter can always say he registered it with good intentions.

    3. Re:.biz is booming ... by tmark · · Score: 2

      And if you challenge a cybersquatter by having a lawyer even so much as draft the necessary letters, you will incur a legal fees which almost certainly will cover registration fees for the next decade or two at minimum.

  6. .com is just to prominent for this to work by Pointed+Stick · · Score: 3, Redundant

    I can't imagine this being very successful. .com has become synonymous with the entire internet. Heck, internet startup's are even called "dotcoms" more often then not. I'd be willing to make a sizeable bet that the .com on the back of your address is more important then whatever's in front. Think about all the nonsensical names on the internet. Yahoo! springs to mind, and for that matter what does "Amazon" have to do with selling books? What makes those names successful is the fact that they are easy to remember and easy to spell.

    One other thing .biz will have against it from the very start is the fact that there will always be a more marketable .com version for whatever name you can come up with. What we really need, for obvious reasons, is .xxx

    Cheers!

    -Pointed Stick

    1. Re:.com is just to prominent for this to work by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      "No, Sir, Mr. Investor. We are not one of those worthless dotcoms, we are a dotbiz - see the difference?"

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  7. Oh C'mon! by thesolo · · Score: 2, Informative

    November 7, 2001 marks a new historic event in domain name suffixes.

    Why? Did something important happen?? Because .biz is not important at all.

    In all seriousness, this is going to be the biggest top-level domain FLOP ever. All this amounts to is more spam for me to report to Spamcop. People need to realize that no other domain is going to have the same effect as .com on consumers, nor will it be as profitable.

  8. "Anyone going to buy a .biz" by mirko · · Score: 2, Informative

    They (ICANN ?) actually refused the opening of the .sex level which would have been a good way to just differentiate between pr0n and other websites...
    Now, I guess that sex.biz will be amongst the very first .biz domain names taken...

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:"Anyone going to buy a .biz" by smaughster · · Score: 2

      Or just have all the pr0n servers replace www. with xxx.

      Maybe then legitimate sites like xxx.soton.ac.uk can return to the regular web.

      --
      I intend to live forever, so far so good.
    2. Re:"Anyone going to buy a .biz" by Judg3 · · Score: 2

      Speaking of sex.biz - as of 3:58am CST it's reported as not being taken by register.com. It'll say it is, but do a whois and is listed as "Not taken". Now how do you register a domain with a registar if all of the domains come back as "taken" even though they really arent?

      On a side note, since I was looking up sex.biz, register.com gave me these alternative, untaken domains.
      sleep-with.net
      bedded.org
      lie-with.net
      liewith.net
      adult-material.org
      sex-activity.org
      explicit-material.net
      nude-gif.org
      nudegif.org
      be-intimate.net
      beintimate.net
      nudejpg.org
      jazzing.org
      naked-gif.net
      effing.net
      jazzes.net
      gotosex.org
      sexconnect.org

      Gotta hand it to register.com for trying to make a few bucks on adult domains :)

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    3. Re:"Anyone going to buy a .biz" by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny
      • Maybe then legitimate sites like xxx.soton.ac.uk can return to the regular web

      My company's gifted IS department blocked xxx.soton.ac.uk. I phoned them up to get it unblocked, and the techie on the end of the phone asked me repeatedly if this was a sex site. God damn. I mean God damn. How dumb do you have to be to not just type it into a browser and see, and how dumb would I have to be to phone IS, give my name, and as for a "sex site" to be unblocked.

      Er, sorry, this turned into more of an anti-IS rant. I had a point when I started, but it escapes me. ;-)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:"Anyone going to buy a .biz" by smaughster · · Score: 2

      Lol, I can feel your anguish, since soton is one of my favorite sites. Maybe that tech dude was afraid of goatse alike picture and didn't dare to check....:)

      --
      I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  9. Re:Wait and See by Anders · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now the question is...will the existing commercial .com'ers migrate over to .biz? I think it will be some time yet before I try a .biz tld before a .com.

    Yeah, but when the time comes and .biz gets well-known, you'd better have your company name registered. I think most of the initial registrations will be of the "better safe than sorry" kind than because .biz is thought to be a clever TLD.

    The same goes for other of the new TLDs, of course.

  10. sleezy? not interested? what if.. by peculiarmethod · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It could be almost anything and nay saying it to death will impose a self-f-blahblah.. Think of it- musicians grab their bands name as a biz, get a tax ID and a bank account.. put up a site for small time distribution. Sell CDs, give away MP3s. If enough bands (replace with alternative underdog in the corp. contractual world) use this method of distribution, it could _possibly_ be one of many small rifts needed to shift the power away from those that lobby for all of these dandy property and censorship laws. Take their money away through new channels, it may adapt into something wonderful. Don't kill the chicken before it's crackin man.

    Pego

    --
    ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  11. A nice mail I received from VeriSign... by sl8r · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check it out:

    Dear .biz Requester:

    VeriSign understands the personal and professional significance of having a unique online presence. It's our pledge to keep you completely informed about the status of your .biz domain name applications.

    As you may be aware, the Superior Court of Los Angeles, CA, issued a preliminary injunction on October 11th temporarily preventing the activation of certain .biz domain names. Consequently, the .biz Registry, NeuLevel, has "frozen" any domain names where:

    1) Multiple Domain Name Applications (DNAs) were submitted for the same domain name by one individual.

    2) DNAs were submitted for the same domain name by multiple individuals.

    3) One or more Trademark Notification (TN) claims and at least one DNA were submitted for the same domain name.

    For any "frozen" domain names, the registrant has not been selected and NeuLevel has not yet announced when the random selection of registrants will begin. In addition, NeuLevel has not stated how the frozen names will or will not appear in the .biz WHOis database. The .biz domain names you requested that have been "frozen" are listed at the end of this email.

    VeriSign is committed to giving you everything you need for success on the Web. We'll post any updates we receive from NeuLevel at http://newdomains.networksolutions.com. If you have any specific questions or concerns about NeuLevel's domain "freezing" process, please visit www.neulevel.com or e-mail them at support@neulevel.biz


    For those wondering what domain I registered: It's my last name. Isn't it so that family names win over trademarks in a domain name dispute?

    Here's to hoping it is...

    1. Re:A nice mail I received from VeriSign... by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Isn't it so that family names win over trademarks in a domain name dispute?

      Not when they established .name TLD for just your application. .BIZ is not for names, .name is for names.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  12. I know at least one market for .biz by ShaunC · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...fuckedcompany.com. fucked.biz would be so much easier to type! And so much more appropriate...

    Shaun

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  13. Re:Damned Spammers.......... by PyroMosh · · Score: 5, Informative

    So true... I run a lot of sites among them, some adult sites and what we've all been waiting for is some kind of adult oriented TLD. .sex or .xxx or .whatever. I mean what does it take?

    - The sex industry wants an adult TLD
    - US Congress wants it
    - Keep our kids safe censor the net extreamists want it.

    I havn't heard anyone that DOESN'T want it! When ICANN had their little circle-jerk summit last year to discus something like 30 or so sudgested new TLDs, everyone was CERTAIN which ones they'd pick! And did they pick even one of the obviously most useful ones to giving ORDER to the net? No. It's times like this that I just want to go back to dialup BBSes! I wish that ICANN would handle domains the way that 800 numbers are handled. You CAN'T buy or sell them. If it's available, you can register it, but if you don't want it any more, you can't transfer it to another party, it just goes back into the pool. The only exception is if it's owned by a business and the business changes hands.

    If you asked me, that's the way to do it. It'll take care of the cybersquating problem right there.

  14. Re:www.microsoft.biz by halfstar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    hmm... well i did actually register this through joker.com just to see what would happen.
    heh

    fun and chaos

  15. I've been seeing .biz for a long, long time! by asackett · · Score: 5, Informative
    Open Root Server Confederation has been showing the first, original, REAL .biz for a long time now. I will never see any of Neulevel's colliders.

    I Can Abandon ICANN, So Can You. Use the name servers of the Open Root Server Confederation.

    --

    Warning: This signature may offend some viewers.

    1. Re:I've been seeing .biz for a long, long time! by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      I use OpenNIC's root servers, which also recognize Pacific Root's earlier claim to .biz, so I have the same "problem."

      Maybe I will find it inconvenient, but this problem was created by ICANN's arrogance and defyance of the will of the people. It's their problem, not mine. You can turn it around too: this will be inconvenient for people who are duped into buying .biz domains, because some people will not be able to reach them. Maybe the amount of business they lose won't be enough to matter. Or maybe they will decide it does matter, and sue their registrars for fraud. Whatever; it's their problem.

      I think the Right Thing to do is to keep installing DNS servers that use alternate roots, and go ahead and balkanize .biz so that it's useless to everyone. Scorched earth. Because if ICANN doesn't suffer political damage as a consequence of their defiant act, then they will just repeat such acts. Maybe next time, ICANN will collide with .geek or .parody. It's all about power and their insistence that There Can Be Only One.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:I've been seeing .biz for a long, long time! by Chops · · Score: 2

      You should also check out OpenNIC if you're interested in giving ICANN the finger... they're trying to stitch together the (often colliding) namespaces proposed by various alternative-root organizations into a single, sane, democratically-governed namespace. I haven't heard anything from them in a while, though.

  16. From an Aussie netadmin by laptop006 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I support Elz, but do you have ANY idea of how F***KED the Australian registry are? They are hell to deal with, and unforunatly Elz just makes it worse, if we had a competent resitrar then Elz's rules would be great. However the Australian government has chosen F**ked resistry over reasnoble rules and forcebly removed Elz's control over the .au

    --
    /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
  17. Personally... by dimator · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm waiting for .jiz for all the porn sites I frequent.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  18. Amazon and books (OT) by MosesJones · · Score: 2


    Well the Amazon Rain Forest had a lot of trees, Amazon.com sell a lot of books which means there are now less trees in the Amazon Rain Forest so I guess what they are saying is

    "We transfer the Rain Forests to your bookshelf - Amazon because bio-diversity should be read and not seen"

    :)

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  19. .END for people who don't exist by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Funny


    Yes thats right, aiming at the secret services and terrorist organisations around the world, the TLD for them its...

    .end

    Yes the new "Emperors new Domain" domain has all of the advantages of traditional domain names and so much less.

    No DNS... yes thats right register your .end and noone will be able to find the site. This provides the secrecy required by todays spy and terrorist rings.

    No connection, yes this is the TLD for those organisations that don't connect to the internet. Got a closed loop controlling your nuclear deterent ? No worries now you can hang out with those cool (but sadly unemployed) .com guys with you head held high with your .end address, safe in the knowledge that your so cool because they can't find it.

    "I love the fact that I can't be found" - Mr Bin Ladle

    "Not interested, we like our systems easy to hack" - Mr Cyril Ian Arthur

    "My business was a total flop, it really is impossibly to find" - Mr Peter Orn head of sex.end

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  20. So now i can create new Filters against .biz SPAM. by Quazion · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lets say all SPAM from non .biz domains is illegal and its legal from the .biz domain, meaning i would only need to filter .biz mail out.

    When does life get so simpel ?

    Quazion

  21. The root of the problem by dirtyhippie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The root of the problem is the idea that one level of hierarchization is enough to solve everything down to the institution level. It's the same problem as unix, were you have about 10,000 files in /bin /usr/bin and other choice locales in the namespace.

    I guess people just have trouble thinking in two dimensions. But honest, people, its easier...
    What I'd like to see is at least a two level hierarchy, so you have institutions organized in to logical groups:
    www.ford.cars
    www.gm.cars
    www.dell.comp
    www.gateway.comp
    www.yahoo.portal
    www.go.portal
    www.google.search
    www.lycos.search
    etc. Makes a lot more sense to me, but the trouble is you have a lot more administrative overhead. It also solves the multiple companies with the same name problem.

    DH

    1. Re:The root of the problem by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Nice idea, but you'd forcibly have to remove .com (and maybe even .org) to make it work equitably, other wise apple.comp and apple.music would still fight over apple.com. So, ideas for where we find the money to compensate businesses who have just re-painted their fleet of trucks and paid for a advertising campaign based on their .com name?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  22. Use for french speaking people by sconest · · Score: 2, Informative

    biz is the same, phonetically speaking, as "bise" meaning kiss.

    --
    Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
  23. A suggestion: dot-� by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Funny

    How about the following for TLD's:

    .© - for example, riaa.©, mpaa.©
    .® - for all the corporations to have product domains (kleenex.®, q-tip.®)
    .$ - for all the make-money-quick spammers (they seem to be largly US, but if needed, we can localize them with .£ et. al. )

    Come on fellow /.'s, let's pool our money and set this up!

  24. Sounds sleazy indeed. by IPFreely · · Score: 2
    I've always divided businesses into two categories: Those who promote their products, and those who promote their name.

    Those that promote their product usually have a product worth promoting, support it well and place the value of the business on that product and support.

    Those that promote their name are usually the kind that are just out to get money anyway they can, including all of the practices that we've all grown to know and hate here on Slashdot; strong IP manipulation, questionable anti-competative practices and legislative and judicial buyouts.

    .BIZ sounds like the kind of name the second type of business would like.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  25. Show.BIZ Troubles by SL33Z3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A while ago, I had thought up a domain called "show.com" for a reason I'm not quite ready to release just yet. It was obviously taken. When register.com said I could pre-register show.biz, I was happy as hell. I registered it not even thinking about the fact that I would now own a very popular and much wanted domain for entertainment purposes (showbiz!) It would even appear that there is a copyright on the name "show.biz" for the purposes of entertainment. I have no intentions of using this for entertainment purposes at all, but I already have about 6 Intellectual Property claims against me for the domain. I imagine if I am actually awarded the domain when it is all said and done, I will have lawsuits to contend with.

    Anyone got some advice?

    Thanks.

    Tobin

    --
    SL33ZE - Artificial Intelligence is No Match For Natural Stupidity -
    1. Re:Show.BIZ Troubles by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Bring money, guns and lawyers.

      Slow Down Cowboy!
      Slashdot requires you to wait 20 seconds between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

      It's been 19 seconds since you hit 'reply'!

      If you this error seems to be incorrect, please provide the following in your report to SourceForge.net:

      Browser type
      User ID/Nickname or AC
      What steps caused this error
      Whether or not you know your ISP to be using a proxy or some sort of service that gives you an IP that others are using simultaneously.
      How many posts to this form you successfully submitted during the day
      * Please choose 'formkeys' for the category!
      Thank you.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  26. DNS is not ready for gajillion TLDs by Vortran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is the commercial greed machine putting the cart before the horse, here? DNS was never meant to support a plethora of TLDs. The push for 20, 30.. or 300 new TLDs will require a directory service (which I'm sure M$ will be MORE than happy to provide).

    Don't you think we should hold off on creating new TLDs until AFTER we've created an Internet Directory System (or something) to replace DNS?

    And I should also mention that if you are looking for someone's web site, you really only have a few choices today. What is National Semiconductor's main web site URL? Anyone care to guess? How many guesses will it take if we have 30 more TLDs?

    Needless to say, I really think adding TLDs is not a good idea for DNS.

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
  27. Neulevel.biz by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

    Neulevel.biz has actually resolved for a few months now. Today, all the other .biz domains went live..

  28. Why not... by alumshubby · · Score: 2

    .inc, .llc, .ltd, .gmbh (if they allow more than three bytes), .sa, and so on?

    And maybe .npo for non-profit organizations.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
    1. Re:Why not... by horza · · Score: 2

      inc, .llc, .ltd, .gmbh (if they allow more than three bytes), .sa, and so on?

      Because your average punter knows a brand by their common name, eg Walmart or Ford, and doesn't necessarily know whether the company is a PLC or LTD.

      .us makes sense. Why is the USA, the most prominent country on the net, the only one not to have a country tld? (rhetorical question) I'd plump for .art for artists (music, painters, etc), and .mag for magazines or news sources.

      And maybe .npo for non-profit organizations.

      .org already covers this category.

      Phillip.

  29. dot-bomb to dot-biz, the logic is clear! by Infonaut · · Score: 2
    I predict that soon all of the failing dot-coms that are still alive will convert their business names to .biz. Heck, we may even get some of the old .coms resurrected as .bizes.

    We can go through the entire cycle all over again. The Industry Standard will.. oh, wait.. uhh.. "Smart Company" will tout the virtues of new and innovative .biz companies. Headlines on Forbes will scream: "Making Sense of the Dot-Biz Boom," while the Economist will caution against investment bubbles.

    The fearless among us will leave our cushy, well-paid jobs at established companies (wait, there aren't many cushy jobs left, are there?), to try our luck on the merry-go-wheel of the Dot-Biz economy.

    After a while, Microsoft will gobble up the first few big Dot-Biz companies. The rest will go through all their funding with no profits to show for it. Most will tank. Angry investors will file lawsuits, alleging that they were misled by exorbitant claims of dot.biz companies.

    A few survivors will limp along, and a few will survive. Eventually, someone will come up with the idea of a new top-level domain...

    .hyp, anyone?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  30. Boycott .biz! by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    With all the spam I've received on it, I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole. I hope that no one will buy this sucker due to the crap these loons are trying to pull.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  31. Can we have .bix please? by kindbud · · Score: 2

    I keep mistyping .BIZ as .BIX. Can we get NeuLevel to mirror .biz into .bix for the fumble-fingers crowd? It would sure help allieve a lot of confusion.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  32. Am I going to buy one? Heck no by M.+Silver · · Score: 2

    But mainly because I've got a squajillion spams sitting in my spamtrap telling me I *could* buy one.

    Makes the whole TLD smell bad to me already. And no, I haven't checked to see if the spams are coming from anybody with a legitimate business related to the rollout. It's just an irrational gut feeling; I now associate .biz with "Shy About You're Pacakge?" Feh.

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  33. Re:Carpet bombed by .biz spammers by bani · · Score: 2

    Seriously, you should have a policy where you revoke domains which have bouncing contact emails for more than, say, 30 days.

    Of course if networksolutions did this, 75% of their domains would get deleted...

  34. Re:Damned Spammers.......... by timster · · Score: 2

    Not really. It can be voluntary. Most sex sites would love to be in a .xxx domain.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.