Slashdot Mirror


SuperK Neutrino Detector Severely Damaged.

Eric Sharkey writes "The Super-Kamiokande neutrino detector, which announced the discovery of neutrino oscillation and mass in 1998 (covered by Slashdot at the time), has been severely damaged. The NY Times (free reg, blah blah) has an article here. Most of the phototubes have been destroyed. Repair estimates top $30M, leaving the world far less capable of observing the next supernova neutrino burst, should it arrive before repairs or a replacement could be completed." CD: I called the lead of the project and he was in the tank checking out the damage. The webpage for the Super-Kamiokande is here. There are pictures for you to peruse.

191 comments

  1. could be the end... by astrophysics · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course this is just wild speculation, but...

    A couple of Japanese colleges say that SuperK was previously being targeted for budget cuts, and was fighting to maintain funding. They were concerned that if it would indeed take tens of millions of USDs to fix, then it may be cut. That would be a real dissappiontment.

    Let's hope SuperK comes back on line, and that we don't have a galactic supernova go off while SuperK is being fixed.

    1. Re:could be the end... by Brontosaurus+Jim · · Score: 1

      It's really a shame then, that this damage happened now. Far too often these days we see science fall before profit, and I really think that down the road the effects of this short sighted thinking will become evident.

      I'm now pondering evident in what way, and I realize then that it will not be obvious, but far more insidious. The world will simply be worse off, and we'll know in no certain terms by how much.

      How truly terrible indeed...

    2. Re:could be the end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If supernovas are a memoryless process, one going off while SuperK is under repair would not reduce the chance of observing one after it is done... who knows, maybe it would encourage people to fund science better.

      Of course if it did happen, I must admit I would feel bad, as well as being compelled to shout "Doh!"

  2. You'd think they could say why by hackman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems strange that the article was so sketchy on why the damage was done. They sort of implied that the tank got overfilled, but then again they really avoided saying anything.

    Why would a research instution hide the reason for the damage, afraid that they are going to cripple someone's career? It certainly is a tragedy, but the fact that they are not disclosing the real reason for the damage makes it more interesting somehow.

    Thumbs up for cool Neutrino detectors though, it has been an unexplained scientific phenomena for a long time now. I hope they can fix it (and have the $$ too).

    Brett

    --
    __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    1. Re:You'd think they could say why by Joe+Decker · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Seems strange that the article was so sketchy on why the damage was done.

      Doesn't to me. Premature guessing as to the cause before investigation could be potentially damaging to any funding sources. The funding politics of large science projects can be quite complex. Completely normal.

    2. Re:You'd think they could say why by jmtpi · · Score: 1
      Seems strange that the article was so sketchy on why the damage was done. They sort of implied that the tank got overfilled, but then again they really avoided saying anything.

      To concur with the fellow who already replied, it doesn't seem strange to me. It's likely that there is a combination of a) the cause is not really known and b) the NYT reporter didn't really know how to report it.


      I don't think the comment about it having to do with "pressure" implies that the tank was overfull. It was simply a scientist confirming that the pressure of the water, and not some other factor, was the immediate cause of the failure. That doesn't imply that the pressure was greater than was designed for.


      I don't think they're hiding anything, and if you give them a little time, I'm sure there will be a lot of discussion in the scientific community aimed at getting to the root of the problem.

    3. Re:You'd think they could say why by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      Yeah, maybe they can make all 30 million by selling GPL software!

    4. Re:You'd think they could say why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's a cultural thing. When something goes wrong, Americans look for someone to blame while the Japanese look for a solution to the problem.

    5. Re:You'd think they could say why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:You'd think they could say why by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      That comment isn't offtopic at all. I think you moderators meant (-1, Too Damn Close to the Truth). The agressive witchhunt for scapegoats immediately after any sort of problem arises is very much an American phenomenon.

  3. Well, this sucks... by achurch · · Score: 0

    I don't claim to be a physicist, but I do have a passing knowledge of the subject and a huge interest in just what those little buggers do. This is very unfortunate, and I wish the team the best of luck in getting things back in working order.

  4. Can anyone stop... by geomcbay · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Godzilla? FLEE! FLEE!

  5. First reaction: Horrible! by jmtpi · · Score: 0
    I don't really have any information, but what crappy news! One of the professors at my lab (Kate Scholberg) has done extensive work at Super K, and one of my undergrad friends spent her summer there.

    I knew that they were filling the tanks for more data collection. I guess it's good my friend already has the data she needs to write her senior thesis.

    :-(

    1. Re:First reaction: Horrible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second reaction: begin drinking heavily.

  6. Supernovae by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...leaving the world far less capable of observing the next supernova neutrino burst, should it arrive before repairs or a replacement could be completed.

    While the accident is a tragic blow to some valid and interesting research, no one should lose any sleep over the possibility of being unable to analyze the next big supernova before it can be repaired. After all, supernovae on the scale of SN1987A occur once every few hundred years (the last two occurred in 1054 and 1572.) I suspect repairing Super-K will take significantly faster than that.

    Even in the minuscule chance that a big supernova will occur in the meantime, Super-K isn't the only neutrino observatory around. The Sudsbury Neutrino Observatory, a similar experiment, is online and producing some very good results.

    1. Re:Supernovae by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, and in case anyone is misled... the neutrino observatories are assuredly NOT there to catch supernovae. They mostly detect neutrinos coming from the Sun, which are produced during the solar fusion process. The data from Super-K and SNO is shedding light on some problems in solar physics and elementary particle physics.

      I doubt any grad student is patient enough to work on an experiment that gets one event every five hundred years.

    2. Re:Supernovae by cloudturtle · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you look at the frequency between the two dates (more would be usefull) we can expect another supernova around 2090. Seeing as how things like this don't follow a schedule, it is quite possible that a supernova could be missed by the time Super-K is repaired, or a replacement built.

    3. Re:Supernovae by astrophysics · · Score: 4, Informative

      While it's true there are multiple observatories, they aren't merely copies or bigger versions of each other. The different observatories are senstive to neutrions of different energies.

      SuperK used ordinary (but pure) water. SNO used pure "heavy water", that is water where the hydrogen has a neutron. SNO has recently added salt to their heavy water, since comparing the reaction rates with and without the salt will provide a very interesting ratio for understanding the mass heirarchy of neutrinos. Other detectors have used other media for detecting neutrinos, such as gallium.

    4. Re:Supernovae by isaac_akira · · Score: 2

      What makes you think supernovae follow any kind of cyclic schedule? Only two dates were mentioned.

      As an example, say you know I ate a burrito yesterday and I ate a burrito today. That doesn't mean that I eat a burrito every... oh wait. But that's TOTALLY different!

    5. Re:Supernovae by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Three dates, actually - the last big (naked-eye) supernova was in 1987. That was what made these neutrino observatories famous. IIRC, teams working at two different sites each detected a big burst of neutrinos, almost three hours before the supernova was sighted.

      (No, neutrinos can't travel faster than the speed of light, just very close to it. The neutrinos produced by the core of the collapsing star escape easily through the stellar atmosphere since they interact weakly with matter, whereas the light took significantly longer to escape - think of how light travels more slowly in a block of glass. So the neutrinos reached us first.)

      It was all tremendously exciting stuff, as you might imagine. Unbelievable serendipity.

    6. Re:Supernovae by wedg · · Score: 1

      After all, supernovae on the scale of SN1987A occur once every few hundred years

      Yes, but you have to consider the time that it takes for the particles to travel the distance between their source and earth (speed of light... light years, you get it - same past-events sort of astronomy). It's possible that two supernovas occured 500, or even 500,000 years apart, but due to their relative distances from earth, say one being 100,000ly away, and one being 600,000ly away, if the further star's supernova occured 500,000 years earlier, it would arrive at relatively the same time as the 100k star. Given enough stars, and enough supernovas, this becomes as likely a possibility as the supernovas being evenly spaced around 500 years. Statistically speaking, it has the exact same probability as it taking 1000 years for the next one, (without further statistical knowledge).

      At any rate, the miniscule chance isn't any more miniscule than the chance that a supernova will occur *at all*. So best to get the S-K up and running, so we have that rare opportunity to peer into a unique quantum event without our lifetime, and possibily unravel further the questions of the Universe.

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    7. Re:Supernovae by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Although the thesis sometimes feels like it takes 500 years...

      -Paul Komarek

    8. Re:Supernovae by dierdorf · · Score: 1
      Actually, the neutrino detectors weren't built to study the "Solar Neutrino Problem" either, although that has been a pleasant side effect. (Neutrino mass and oscillation was originally postulated to explain why the sun seemed to emit 1/3 the number of neutrinos that it should. If they oscillate, as hinted by current data, then 2/3 of them changed into forms undetectable by earlier neutrino observatories by the time they traveled from Sun to Earth.)


      The REAL thing Super-K, Sudbury, et al. want to catch is a decaying proton. QCD theories say that a proton SHOULD be slightly unstable, with a half-life of something god-awful like 10^40 years. Therefore if you get 10^41 protons in one place and watch closely, you should get a hit per month. Unfortunately for the theories, nobody has seen one yet.

      --
      -- John Dierdorf, Austin TX
    9. Re:Supernovae by crumley · · Score: 2
      Actually, the neutrino detectors weren't built to study the "Solar Neutrino Problem" either, although that has been a pleasant side effect.
      I'm pretty sure that Super-K and the current generation of neutrino detectors were designed to study neutrinos. Earlier detector such as Kamiokande and Soudan were designed to look for proton decay.
      --
      Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
    10. Re:Supernovae by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While the accident is a tragic blow to some valid and interesting research, no one should lose any sleep over the possibility of being unable to analyze the next big supernova before it can be repaired. After all, supernovae on the scale of SN1987A occur once every few hundred years (the last two occurred in 1054 and 1572.) I suspect repairing Super-K will take significantly faster than that.

      Two things:

      Deterministic probability doesn't work. A rate of 1/500 years means that in any given year, there's a 0.2% chance of a near-by supernova. The fact that there was one recently doesn't rule out that the next one could happen tomorrow. If you're going to watch for a SN, it's better to be ready for it as much of the time as possible. The fact that it's so rare makes it more important to be ready for it, not less. If one happened every day, no one would care about missing one.

      SuperK was much more sensitive than the detectors used to detect the 1987A supernova. In other words, it doesn't need a "big" (nearby) supernova in order to be able to see it. A supernova which is further away, and not visible to the naked eye, would still produce a detectable neutrino pulse which would provide more scientific information than the 1987A observation with comparatively crude equipment. SuperK was even sensitive enough to detect extragalactic supernovae in the neighboring Andromeda galaxy. The ability to increase the volume of space you're observing means that you've greatly increased the observation rate as well. It's still a rare event, but it's no longer miniscule.

    11. Re:Supernovae by efuseekay · · Score: 2

      The neutrinos produced by the core of the collapsing star escape easily through the stellar atmosphere since they interact weakly with matter, whereas the light took significantly longer to escape - think of how light travels more slowly in a block of glass. So the neutrinos reached us first.)

      Good try, but not quite right either.

      Neutrinos have very low crossectional area, so interact weakly with other stuff. Photons, however, interact strongly with electrons and protons and what have you. So during a SN collapse neutrinos escape first, while the other stuff begins to fall into the core of the dying star. Photons are generated during the collapse, but their escape from the SN is blocked by the collapsing matter. So photons have to "work" themselves via random scattering, which takes a lot more time, i.e. a few hours.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    12. Re:Supernovae by Decimal · · Score: 1

      Oh, and in case anyone is misled... the neutrino observatories are assuredly NOT there to catch supernovae.

      Well I hope not! You'd need one hella-big containter to catch an entire supernova...

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    13. Re:Supernovae by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 2

      So photons have to "work" themselves via random scattering.

      In other words, by interacting with matter. Forgive me, but I don't quite see what you're correcting.

    14. Re:Supernovae by ScottBob · · Score: 1

      SNO has recently added salt to their heavy water, since comparing the reaction rates with and without the salt will provide a very interesting ratio for understanding the mass heirarchy of neutrinos.

      Interesting. I seem to remember reading somewhere that the stable isotope of chlorine-37, which makes up about 24% of the total amount of available chlorine (the rest being the stable isotope Cl-35), is what is of interest in neutrino detection. Although Cl-37 is stable, it is just enough on the edge of stability that a neutrino with the right amount of energy will knock the electron out of a neutron in the Cl-37 atom, which then produces the tiny Cherenkov effect wink of light that the photomultiplier tubes detects. The neutrino now occupies the place inside the neutron that the electron did, and lack of the negative charge makes the neutron into a proton. The Cl-37 atom is thus converted to Ar-37, which will decay back into Cl-37, by electron capture (which, of course, kicks the neutrino back out.)

      Top! Bottom! Up! Down! Strange! Charmed! Leptons, muons, tachyons, bosons! Antimatter! Isn't subatomic particle physics fun! Let's build an atom smasher! (Isn't it ironic that the largest structures in the world are used to investigate the tiniest?) But then again, I'm an electrical engineer... What if neutrinos were the carriers of charge? Then we'd be neutrinoical engineers. I think the left half of my brain annihilated the right half. Maybe the SuperK accident was caused by a neutrino being annihilated by an anti-neutrino?

    15. Re:Supernovae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm

      That is the SUDBURY Neutrino Observatory.

      Just because the like their beer is no reason to incorporate it into the url name.

    16. Re:Supernovae by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      The "sort-off" time-dilation effects of a photon zapping through glass is not a random process. Zap a photon towards a piece of glass, you can compute when and where you will receive it at the end (ok, ignoring quantum stuff here, but you get the idea). This has something to with the fact that a glass is a lattice of ordered potentials.

      But the random-walking of photon through matter
      is. Zap a photon through a bunch of matter, it will random-scatter through the stuff, but you have no idea where or when it will end up in. That's because stuff is not ordered and not a lattice.

      This is the same reason that a photon generated in the center of the sun takes about a million years to random walk from the center to the surface. (I.e. the light you see from the sun is a million yeards old).

      A better analogy would be Brownian motion, not light zapping through glass.

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    17. Re:Supernovae by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      I think I see that my analogy was imprecise. I'm obviously not an astrophysicist.

      However, I'm not entirely clear about the difference between the two processes. By "scattering" I assume you are referring to the interaction of the photons and the electrons in the atoms. Is this right? If I shine some photons into a jar of air (where the molecules are not ordered) these interactions manifest as a classical index of refraction. Which of the two phenomena would this correspond to?

    18. Re:Supernovae by efuseekay · · Score: 1

      At the fundamental level, both processes are quantum electrodynamics processes, so they are essentially the same.

      Your glass of water example is excellent. The phenomenon you would call it refraction. However, if you have a huge enough volume of water, shining a light on it, the light will eventually scatter so often that it will become defused and eventually loses its coherence.

      SHine light into a body of water/mass that is stellar in size...you get the idea.

      The thing I pick on in your OP is that you claim that the delay in photons getting to us is due to defraction. That's not quite true. The slowness is due to random walk of photon through a large enough body of mass.

      But, of course, you can always say that they are both QED scattering effects.......

      --
      Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    19. Re:Supernovae by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Drumlin: Why can't science be practical? Do something for the people who, after all, are footing the bill?

      Tom: Not unlike my L-band globular clusters...

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  7. The answer is obvious by donglekey · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should have used a surge protector, not just a power strip. Too late now!

    1. Re:The answer is obvious by donglekey · · Score: 0, Troll

      You better buy me dinner first.

    2. Re:The answer is obvious by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      Just found this, x weeks later...hilarious, both the comment and the .sig. My hat is off to you, sir or madam.

  8. Maybe the damage was caused by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... a gigantic neutrino? I mean, you know how they've been going on about whether neutrinos have mass and all that. Well, now they've got their answer, I guess...

    (shamelessly borrowed from Slashdot Japan)

  9. Re:almost slashdoted by eclectro · · Score: 1

    The website is gone now. 7000 tubes broken and now their website kicked in the pants - makes sure that the whole facility is offline.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  10. Just speculation, but... by sting3r · · Score: 5, Informative

    One of my colleagues used to work at Fermi Lab and he mentioned once that the light sensors that were damaged are extremely sensitive to saline solutions (such as water that has any appreciable amount of non-neutral-pH molecules). His speculation was that the deionized water that they were using had developed impurities in it, possibly from rusting pipes or failed filters, and those impurities set off the chain reaction in question.

    Naturally this is all speculation, but it sounded plausible to me. Does anyone with a stronger chemistry background than mine know if this is a likely cause?

    -sting3r

    1. Re:Just speculation, but... by dragons_flight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know about physically damaging the detectors, but I do know that the machine is extermely sensitive to ionization with regards to it's being able to function properly.

      The photocollectors measure Cerenkov radiation given off by high energy electrons and muons travelling through or being created in the tank. The mountain blocks the majority of external particles, so most are created when nuetrinos interact with Hydrogen nuclei. You don't get a lot of Cerenkov light from an event, and ionized impurities dissipate the light, so in order to work effectively, the water needs to be very pure.

      I've never heard that detectors can be physically damaged by impure water, but I've never heard that they can't either. At the very least you already need pure water to gather data effectively regardless of any actual damage to equipment that impurities might cause.

    2. Re:Just speculation, but... by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      speculation on slashdot?! That'll be the day!

      --

      ________________________________________________

    3. Re:Just speculation, but... by Paul+Johnson · · Score: 2
      More likely I think is a chain reaction from the shockwave of implosion. These photomultipliers are basically big vacuum tubes. If one breaks under water then the water is going to accelerate rapidly inwards, then stop suddenly when it meets other water coming the other way. This will generate a pressure pulse which would break nearby tubes, causing a chain reaction to spread across the entire system.


      Paul.

      --
      You are lost in a twisty maze of little standards, all different.
    4. Re:Just speculation, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for putting your name on the bottom of your post.

    5. Re:Just speculation, but... by markmoss · · Score: 2

      According to the article, they were refilling the tank after draining it when the glass bulbs started imploding in a chain reaction. The materials for neutrino detectors have to be _extremely_ pure, so I don't see any chance of having unintended impurities in sufficient concentration to react with glass.

      On the other hand, extremely pure water is itself a strong solvent for many things. That may be why they had to periodically change the water in the first place, that it gradually picked up impurities from the tank. But dissolving glass doesn't seem likely unless they really had the wrong kind of glass to start with.

      The one thing that's clear is the "chain reaction." The photomultipliers are glass vacuum turbes 20 inches long. In air, one of these breaking would be like a cherry bomb or maybe even a hand-grenade. Deep under water it would be much more violent due to the higher pressure, also water transmits shock waves better than air. So unless the bulbs were well protected, any accident or defective bulb that broke one would start a shock wave that might break more, etc.

      I have two theories about why the researchers are reportedly closed mouthed about two simple questions: What broke the first one, and why weren't they protected against a foreseeable chain reaction implosion. Perhaps "Yoshi dropped a wrench, and we didn't think of that" is just too embarrassing. Or, if Japanese scientists are anything like the American ones I've known, more likely they said just what happened, in jargon that is utterly incomprehensible to the reporter, repeated until he gave up. And they weren't even trying to obfuscate!

    6. Re:Just speculation, but... by dmforcier · · Score: 1

      De-ionized water can be troublesome. I worked at a TI fab development plant back in the early 70s. They used DI water for many processes and supplied large amounts of it throughout the plant in pipes. These pipes were tough to maintain. DI water (lacking chlorine) is a great environment for some flora and fauna. They had to flush the pipes periodically with formaldehyde.

      DI water tastes good. We used it in the coffee maker. One day the handle on the glass coffee carafe started to melt. The coffee smelled and tasted weird, too. Turns out they did an (unannounced?) formaldehyde flush of the lines and someone charged the maker with a formaldehyde and water solution. (Higher boiling point??)

      Maybe the same thing happened to detector... No wonder they'd want it kept quiet.

      --
      You can't take the sky from me!
  11. Neutrinos by Thaidog · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...have no charge and no mass... are very fast and pass through the planet so fast most detection has to be done underground... Damn I watch too much public TV...

    --

    ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

    1. Re:Neutrinos by mmontour · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...have no charge and no mass...

      No charge - correct. However, as the article mentions, recent experiments indicate that neutrinos have some mass. They also have spin 1/2, like electrons.

      are very fast

      This is related to mass. If they had zero mass, they would travel at the speed of light (like photons, which have no rest mass). However, if they do have mass, then they have to travel at slightly less than the speed of light.

      Supernova observations can be used to estimate neutrino mass, by measuring the time difference between the arrival of visible light from the supernova, and the arrival of a neutrino pulse. Over those vast distances, even a very small difference in speed could lead to a significant difference in arrival times.

      and pass through the planet so fast most detection has to be done underground...

      This is a bit off. The interesting item is that most neutrinos pass right through the planet without interacting with any atoms. Because they interact so weakly with matter, a detector will only see a very small number of events caused by neutrinos, even though there are bazillions of neutrinos passing through it every second.

      However, a detector on the surface of the earth would also see events not from neutrinos, but from other cosmic radiation like muons (actually, muons generated in the upper atmosphere by cosmic radiation). Going deep underground blocks out all particles except neutrinos, enabling the experimenters to get accurate measurements.

    2. Re:Neutrinos by Thaidog · · Score: 0

      The underground part I remebered from a show on TV around 10 years ago... no wonder it's a bit off. The problem I have noticed with the psyc's of physics teachers is they try to simplify the data to the students in an attempt to be hip... my high school professor called g 9.8m/s^2 where as my party school ECU professor in phys1000 called g 10m/s^2... this kind of thing bugs me a little. I looked up neutrino last night online and the def was short: a particle that has no mass and who's charge is neutral. Well whatever... what it the truth? of subatomic particle (and yes, if you got the pun, you might be watching public TV as much as me)

      --

      ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

    3. Re:Neutrinos by mmontour · · Score: 1

      The problem I have noticed with the psyc's of physics teachers is they try to simplify the data to the students in an attempt to be hip... my high school professor called g 9.8m/s^2 where as my party school ECU professor in phys1000 called g 10m/s^2... this kind of thing bugs me a little.

      10 m/s^2 is close enough for rough calculations. Often it's more important to illustrate some general principle, rather than to come up with an "exact" number. Even 9.8 is an approximation (the 1986 CODATA recommended value is 9.80665), and 'g' isn't even a constant - it depends where you are on the earth (and on other factors).

      I looked up neutrino last night online and the def was short: a particle that has no mass and who's charge is neutral.

      Find a better reference. There's some material here that looks like it might be decent. I've seen better pages, but I don't have the bookmarks handy.

    4. Re:Neutrinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > The interesting item is that most neutrinos pass right through the planet without
      > interacting with any atoms.
      That is only the moderately interesting item. Now the really spectacular item is that these particles come to us in real time straight out of the core of a collapsing star, nary even noticing the star's outer layers ;-)

    5. Re:Neutrinos by Thaidog · · Score: 0

      once again, I would have to agree with you on constants... even the speed of light is not a constant in the most liberal of constraints. Light through anything but a vacuum.

      --

      ||| I still can't believe Parkay's not butter.

  12. Pick A Punchline... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Funny

    Allrighty, step right up and pick the punchline that best matches this story:

    #1: These photos are fake!! Theyre from the inside of Studio 54!! Look up in the balcony in the 4th image, you can see Liza Minelli smokin a bong!

    #2: It should be easy to build another Super K detector. Just look for trailer parks...Super K's tend to spring up in low-income areas where Wal-Mart hasn't already established a commercial presence..

    #3: So SuperK is handicapped...Does that make it "Special K" ?

    hee hee

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:Pick A Punchline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you suck. Your graphics are crappy to.

    2. Re:Pick A Punchline... by NatePWIII · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm not sure what you see is funny in this, I mean how many people laughed when the Hubble was found to be near sighted, or we lost our last major probe to Mars, come on this stuff cost us and countless other tax payers millions of dollars. I don't see what there is to laugh about...

      --

      Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
      www.haidacarver.com
    3. Re:Pick A Punchline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPL'd?

    4. Re:Pick A Punchline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ability to see humour in a tragic situation like this is a gift which should be treasured like a beautiful, but delicate flower.

      It should not be trampled underfoot by heavy footed mourners.

      Anyway, what is $30m in the context of half the world's population living on less than $2 a day ? I am sure that they discuss neutrino physics daily at their dining table, as a substitute for food.

      In short - get a life and get some perspective. This is a broken machine - we work with them every day. Some PhD theses may be fscked up as a consequence - but in the scheme of things it doesn't matter jack s**t. It represents knowledge we can do nothing of real importance with as yet, and there are more pressing issues at hand - like preventing the world from going to hell in a hand basket, for instance.

    5. Re:Pick A Punchline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddammit, where's that option to hide all comments moderated up as "funny"? These are getting about as useful and entertaining as fritz pr0zts.

    6. Re:Pick A Punchline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have the nerve to be outraged by humor at special k - when you sell biz and info domains.

      that's simply too rich.

  13. Didn't they have somehting like this in Canada? by surajrai · · Score: 1

    I watched on TV (Discovery I think) sometime ago where they were doing something similar with pure water in Canada. Basically they were using an abandoned mine shaft to trap these particles and the bottom was lined with pure water...or something like that..

    1. Re:Didn't they have somehting like this in Canada? by surajrai · · Score: 1

      Here is the link to the site in Canada...

      http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca

  14. In other news... by c_jonescc · · Score: 3, Funny

    1,800 Japanese Grad students are looking for a new advisor, citing "extended duration of research project" as the reason. Each potential particle-physicist has a co-authorship of several papers, all shared with the other 1,799 students and their advisors. It is expected that many will go into theory soon, as the resulting projects can be finished this decade. One student was overheard saying "first I was put as 234th author on our last paper, and now the experiment is gone. I've had it, I'm going into astronomy, man! Or maybe condensed matter theory, but not this! Not anymore!"

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
    1. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. Would be funny, except for the grain of truth in it.
      Something like this (e.g. antenna not unfurling, rocket exploding with a satellite on it, etc.) really does have a big negative impact on several grad student's theses and their careers.

  15. Future Nytimes by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Funny
    In other news:

    Nov 12, 2050,

    Scientists working with Japan's Super-Duper-Kamiokande anounce that they have lost containment on a micro black hole.

    Apparently, an undergrad triped over the power cable.

    Officials tell us that there is no need to panic. The mini black hole plunged straight to the center of the earth.

    Happily, it will feed on the other mini black hole that was created when the first copy of Windows 2047 was burned onto CD and collapsed on its own data mass -- it was thought at the time that the universe was acting to protect both itself and the second law of Thermodynamics from Windows 2047's immense entropic mass.

    There is some speculation that the black hole could actually provide enough energy to run Windows 2047, but Physicists are highly dubious.

  16. Slashdot checked a story?? by Gorimek · · Score: 4, Funny

    The apocalypse is near, and chrisd is it's harbinger. Calling the place the story is about is a dead giveaway. A real slashdot editor would never do that.

    1. Re:Slashdot checked a story?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he also religiously puts periods at the end of every story title. i'm not clear on why this occurs.

    2. Re:Slashdot checked a story?? by wholesomegrits · · Score: 1

      The use of periods at the end of titles depends on which style of headline writing one subscribes too. Often in advertising copywriting, you will notice periods at the end of headlines and important statements.

      In newspaper headline writing, at least in the US, it is common to omit the period.

      Traditional styled newspapers, such as the International Hearld Tribune, and the Washington Post, capitalize each word in the headline and put a period at the end of the headline.

      Generally, when the initial article of each word is capitalized, there is a period at the end of the sentence.

      Look at these photos of the print editions of the IHT and the Washington Post. They follow the more traditional method for the lead story, but omit the period for all others:
      http://www.iht.com/pdf/ihtfrontpage.pdf
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/print/image /

      --
      No sig is worth reading.
    3. Re:Slashdot checked a story?? by dragons_flight · · Score: 3, Funny

      Calling the place the story is about is a dead giveaway.

      Not only is it entirely atypical behavior for slashdot, one has to wonder why it is that chrisd didn't trust the New York Times? Did he think SuperK would give him more details than were already in the story?

    4. Re:Slashdot checked a story?? by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      very insightful even if it is offtopic..

    5. Re:Slashdot checked a story?? by Strepsil · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and recently another editor criticised a submission's spelling. Incorrectly, of course - but still, it's the thought that counts.

      This place is going to hell. I don't think I'll read it any more if they're going to check facts and spell correctly. The amount of discussion will plummet.

  17. I believe you're mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no such lab in Canada. In fact, the only things in Canada are polar bears, snow, and alcoholics.

    1. Re:I believe you're mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that they have catsup flavoured chips, as well as steak and onion chips. Can anyone confirm this abhorrent use of potatoes?

    2. Re:I believe you're mistaken by ozbon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, it's true, they do have these abhorrences to nature.

      Mind you, so does the UK.

      And they all taste horrendous. (Allegedly)

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    3. Re:I believe you're mistaken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget "fags" and "Nazis".

      Doh! I invoke the "Nazi" law and hereby proclaim this story closed!

  18. Reports of its demise have been.... by wholesomegrits · · Score: 3, Informative

    Premature at best.

    It's a real shame, the loss the Japan lab, but I can't help but think that the lab being built in Western South Dakota will be even more important. I cannot find a decent date on completion, but this page explains a newer, better neutrino detection lab being constructed right now.

    The location even better (8,000 feet deep, insulated from nearly every form of interference) and the site has fanstastic support from the state and federal government. The Japan lab isn't the only one in existance -- there are others in Ontario and the South Dakota lab has had facilities in operation since 1967.

    The articles, both the Slashdot commentary and the NYTimes article, predict a savage demise. But other labs, especially the South Dakota lab, offer a huge potential to pickup the slack.

    --
    No sig is worth reading.
    1. Re:Reports of its demise have been.... by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 1

      Super-K is not just a hole in the ground (a "lab") but it a detector. These things are not so easily built, and each one is unique.

      SNO (Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Ontario, Canada) and the Homestake mine (SD) are both interesting and useful experiments. You are referring to a recent proposal to keep Homestake operating with various new experiments and upgrades.. but these things are not replacements for SK. Each experiment is designed to look at different things. SK has done world-quality work to advance neutrino physics, and their detector is not easily replaced.

      Homestake is NOT a replacement.

      --Nathaniel, Neutrino Astrophysicist by day, ./ and geek by lunch break

    2. Re:Reports of its demise have been.... by uberdood · · Score: 1

      "8,000 feet deep"

      Unless my memories of touring old mines in Nevada are faulty, it is going to be a royal bitch to keep the site cool. Read this as being very expensive to run given the blurb on the Super-K site about keeping water at 14C to prevent organic growth.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
  19. Bin Laden lauds neutrino detector blast by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bakhrubabad, Afghanistan - Speaking from his hidden mountain stronghold, Osama bin Laden praised the destruction of the Super-Kamiokande neutrino detector Tuesday. The terrorist leader said neutrinos are "...an abomination on the face of God," and termed the search for neutrinos "...idolatry, which will be smashed beneath the fist of righteousness." Bin Laden, who once called neutrinos "little messengers of Allah" abruptly reversed his stand upon learning that a steady stream of neutrinos was constantly penetrating every cell in his body. He now vows "not to rest until the last neutrino has been obliterated from the face of the earth."

  20. Next Supernova by vikool · · Score: 1

    does any one know hen the next supernova is estimated. Hopefully not for a year..until the superk is restored. Technology has been put back by a year

    1. Re:Next Supernova by tomknight · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why isn't there a moderation category "-1, unbelievebly stupid"?


      Tom.

      --
      Oh arse
    2. Re:Next Supernova by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, I happen to be employed in the star demolition business as a implosion-explosion engineer and if everything goes as scheduled, blue supergiant Sher 25 will be destroyed in just a matter of minutes. I've confirmed with my people on the ground at Sher 25 and they've told me that all the charges are in place and they're just clearing the area to avoid unnessary damage to neighboring stars. Once they do their final check and wire the detonator, I'll begin the countdown.

    3. Re:Next Supernova by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Why isn't there a moderation category "-1, unbelievebly stupid"?

      No, it should be "+1, unbelievably stupid". Seriously.

      No, really, it'd get modded up so high EVERYONE would get to see it and have a good laugh. It's been a long time since something I read on slashdot caused me to burst out laughing like that.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  21. Gordon? by ctar · · Score: 1
    Whoah, this thing's cool...Straight outta Half Life...

  22. Intergalactic, planetary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the photo album; clearly their costume designer has been influenced by the Beastie Boys video few years back. :)

  23. Re:Wait a minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It means a diversion of news coverage for 15 seconds to report on the nips instead of reporting on "American Fights Back".

    But that is all. Nothing more.

  24. Ashcroft: Supernova could explode this week by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    The FBI is warning again that a supernova may explode and send a massive number of energetic neutrinos toward U.S. interests worldwide, possibly this week, and that the world's neutrino telescopes should be on the highest alert.

    Attorney General John Ashcroft said the warning -- the second this month -- was based on credible information, described by others as coming from sources outside the solar system. The information did not specify the type of supernova or whether the progenitor star would have a binary companion, Ashcroft said.

    Ashcroft tried to walk a fine line between giving the public prompt and necessary warnings and not causing panic.

    The alert "gives people a basis for continuing to live their lives the way they would otherwise live them, with this elevated sense of alertness or vigilance that comes from knowing that the planet could be vaporized any second," Ashcroft told a news conference.

    FBI Director Robert Mueller said the previous supernova warning may have helped avert an explosion. Ashcroft said the absence of a supernova should not lull people "into a false sense of indifference."

    "It's important for the American people to understand that these (alerts) are to be taken seriously," said Ashcroft, who canceled plans to travel Monday to Toronto to address a conference of near-earth asteroid experts.

    Officials said the warning was based in part on intelligence that terrorists may set off a supernova within 1000 light years of the earth, in the aftermath of the Afghan bombings by U.S. and British forces.

    "There certainly is intelligence that causes you to be concerned, and possibly that al-Qaida may be behind it," said one senior U.S. official, speaking only on condition of anonymity.

    Ashcroft said that all neutrino observatories were advised to go on the highest alert. Federal agencies, meanwhile, were increasing security and authorities were boosting their efforts to keep suspected neutrinos from entering U.S. airspace- either by coming down from above or by emerging from the ground after a trip through the center of the earth.

    1. Re:Ashcroft: Supernova could explode this week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. The original post was quite funny. Your is rather lame.

    2. Re:Ashcroft: Supernova could explode this week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree... I find this post quite amusing...

    3. Re:Ashcroft: Supernova could explode this week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. But then, I'm a shit-sucking AC.

  25. Here's why (a guess) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Right, pressure: a bulb imploding under a significant depth of water (say, at the bottom of the tank, I doubt it is artificially pressurised in any way, the volume would be too large for that to be an economically feasible structure) will create a shockwave within the water - which may have enough energy in turn to cause a neighbouring bulb to implode, etc, etc, bringing about a cascade failure of the bulbs.

    Which is why deep water divers have to be carefull with their lights while working under pressure - if one implodes, the shockwave is like a small bomb going off. Remember, water is much more dense than air, any shockwaves will have significantly more energy, particularly at a depth of 40 meters.

    All it would take is for one bulb to be broken somewhere in the depths of the tank (through physical impact or corrosion, etc) to set off a large number of them. Despite it's size, these are delicate instruments.

    Just a rational, educated guess.

    1. Re:Here's why (a guess) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cute theory, but there weren't any light bulbs in the tank. Many, many photomultiplier tubes, but no light bulbs. What the heck would they need light bulbs down there for? To see where the neutrinos are going?

    2. Re:Here's why (a guess) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cute theory, but there weren't any light bulbs in the tank. Many, many photomultiplier tubes, but no light bulbs.

      You are right, there are no light bulbs inside, BTW, do you know how a photomultiplier tube works? The impact of a single photon releases an electron, this electron is attracted (by a big voltage difference) to an electrode. At the impact of this electron some more electrons are released, again attracted by a big voltage difference to the next electrode and so on. At each impact the number of electrons is multiplied, so that at the end you can measure a significant current from the impact of a single photon. Conditions to make this work are a vacuum inside a transparant enclosure (= a glass bulb).

    3. Re:Here's why (a guess) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check this description of the photomultiplier tubes

    4. Re:Here's why (a guess) by hackman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, ok you guys got me. Scientifically speaking if the news was really new then they may not have actually known yet what the cause was. It's hard to tell on some of these /. stories when they actually occurred, sometimes it's way later that it gets posted. I guess I could have checked.

      And that light-bulb idea sounds pretty plausible actually, although a bit beyond common reason. I'm an engineer but I have absolutely no idea how those things are constructed...

      B

      --
      __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
    5. Re:Here's why (a guess) by radtea · · Score: 2, Insightful


      PMTs are remarkably robust. When we were building SNO, we tested a bunch of PMTs. Amongst other tests, we pressurized a tank to over 80 PSI and tried to smash the tubes inside using a rod that pushed through a pressure fitting.

      The outcome of this test was that mostly the PMTs did not implode. There was a strong tendency for the rod to simply punch a rod-sized (about 1 cm) hole in the target tube. Putting a blunt block on the end of the rod did eventually produce an instance where the target tube smashed. The adjacent tubes, which were mounted in closer proximity to the target tube than they are in the real detector (and much closer than the tubes are in SuperK) were not damaged, despite being visibly twisted in their mountings.

      Caveate: the tubes used in SuperK are about twice the size of those used in SNO, and therefore correspondingly more fragile. But having handled these tubes a good deal, I can say that it takes more than a small bang to break them. Whatever happened at SuperK (the NYT story is weirdly uninformative, to the extent that I wonder if they don't have all the major facts wrong) it is unlikely to be as simple as a chain reaction of imploding tubes.

      --Tom

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    6. Re:Here's why (a guess) by Peter+Harris · · Score: 2, Funny
      Nah. They just detected a 50kg "Bastardino". These hardly ever interact with matter, but when they do you want to get out of the f**king way. Creating a sensitive and expensive instrument to detect such exotic particles is just asking for trouble in my opinion ;)

      Just an irrational and uneducated guess.

      --

      -- What do you need?
      -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
    7. Re:Here's why (a guess) by SharpNose · · Score: 1

      [rolling eyes] You missed the POINT! Photomultiplier tubes are a class of VACUUM TUBES, and the ones that they use are HUGE. That's WORSE than a light bulb, which at least holds some gas - inert gas at less than 1 atm, I believe.

      This fellow's explanation makes as much sense as any - implosion of one tube causing failure of nearby tubes. It isn't so much that water is denser than air as the fact that water is a liquid and liquids aren't compressible (appreciably). Knowing that the tubes they use in these detectors are on the order of 18"-24" across, I wouldn't have wanted to be in the water anywhere near one of those things when it goes crunch.

    8. Re:Here's why (a guess) by Pooua · · Score: 1
      It's hard to tell on some of these /. stories when they actually occurred, sometimes it's way later that it gets posted.

      The news release is dated November 14 (tomorrow, from my time zone, but the news came from Japan), and says the event occurred November 12.

      --
      Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
    9. Re:Here's why (a guess) by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Any child who cracks his knuckles under water knows how well sharp sounds go thru water. It sounds like the nuclear explosion analogy with a bunch of mouse traps, each with a rubber ball on it, and you throw a rubber ball in...

      BTW, unlike Hollywood movies, in reality, I wouldn't wanna be underwater within miles of a gun, bomb, or dynamite going off.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  26. Nobel prize?!? by ronys · · Score: 1

    "Thank goodness we got our Nobel already cooking," he said.

    Am I the only one who finds this distasteful? I that what's really important here???

    --
    Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
    1. Re:Nobel prize?!? by iainl · · Score: 1

      I sort of agree with you that "Thank goodness we got our Nobel already cooking" is a bit dodgy, but it is a consequence of the fact that some really good, important work was done with it before the damage occurred. If this happened before we got any data out it would be even worse.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Nobel prize?!? by ronys · · Score: 1
      Violent agreement here. What's important is the work - stating this fact in terms of the Nobel prize does Science an injustice.

      --
      Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom.
    3. Re:Nobel prize?!? by ordinarius · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Distasteful, yes. But strangely comforting for those of us with plain old day jobs.

      - ordinarius

    4. Re:Nobel prize?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Although not an actual physicist (yet), I've completed my undergraduate degree, and that comment really jars against my fledgling professional ethics. It's arrogant, selfish and completely against the attitude that we all *wish* was prevalent in the physics community.

  27. Insurance by trenton · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My $10k motorcycle has full insurance because it's borrowed against; my crap 87 Chevy has comprehensive and liabilty because it's a good idea; my apartment has renters.

    If this thing costs $30 million to fix, don'tcha think someone should have it insured against everything? Poor planning.

    *trenton

    --
    Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    1. Re:Insurance by cperciva · · Score: 2

      Who exactly is going to sell insurance on a neutrino detector? As a general rule, insurance companies want to have some understanding of the likely risk involved in whatever they are insuring; neutrino detectors (and interplanetary probes) don't satisfy this criterion, so any insurance policy you could get would come at a very high cost.

    2. Re:Insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally, a big enough insurance company, or odd enough one (Lloyd's of London claims they'll at least make an offer of a policy for anything), will take a look at something like this, talk to people, come up with their best guess at the risk, figure a cost, and offer something. Insurance companies insure hard-to-guess about stuff all the time, like that model's legs. It might be a high cost, but...the expected cost over all experiments is zero, right? (Insurance companies don't make money off the premium, they make it off investing the money they take as payment for the policy before they have to pay out, what they call "float" Good normal-person info about this at this site).

    3. Re:Insurance by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 2

      In some countries (including the one I'm living in), the parliament has passed laws that forbid any insurance on state property. I'm not sure if Japan is one of those, but this might be the reason.

    4. Re:Insurance by yooHoo202 · · Score: 1

      Hey, if they'll insure an '87 Chevy, then why not a Neutrino detector? My bet would have been on the Chevy to kick off first.

      Did you hear the one about the guy who bought fire insurance for his cigar, and then smoked it? It's true.

    5. Re:Insurance by andyt · · Score: 1

      Apparently he was then sued by the insurance company for arson. And no it isn't.

    6. Re:Insurance by CrazySailor · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the US, the government is considered "self-insured" and is not permitted to purchase policies from commercial providers. Any adequately large business may do this as well. It comes into play when I'm on travel and not permitted to purchase the various damage waivers on rental cars. The travel office refuses to reimburse them.

      --
      -- Improve Windows - Buy a Mac!
    7. Re:Insurance by dattaway · · Score: 2

      From what I read, the insurance company paid the guy with a check, but he was arrested for arson after he cashed it.

      It would seem insurance companies not only make their business covering risks, but providing a service of advice and checks to make sure what you have is secure. For example, the company I work at has fire insurance. The insurance company works closely with us to make sure we have safe procedures when we need to work with welders, contractors, what happens if we need to service the fire system, etc. They make rules to help us have safer procedures so accidents are much less likely to happen. If we don't follow those rules, they will take steps to terminate our contract. Same with bad drivers. Traffic tickets are their check to make sure drivers are following customary procedures.

      I'd imagine with a neutrino detector, an insurance company would consult with the researchers on proper procedures for enforcing safe conditions when working around the system. Insurance can be a win-win situation for both sides. They consult for a more reliable business and when things don't work out, they help get you going again for the next round.

    8. Re:Insurance by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Did you hear the one about the guy who bought fire insurance for his cigar, and then smoked it? It's true.

      Two words: Urban legend.

      The story goes that he was arrested for arson.

      Seriously, though. I used to work for a large American insurance company, and there's no way in hell they'd write a policy on something like this.

      There's also the matter that in many countries (not sure about Japan), the government is "self-insured"... Many private companies are also "self-insured" as well. This basically means that you have or can get the cash to pay for any damages you are liable for. Moreover, in many states, including Oregon, if you have a certain amount of money in a bank account that meets certain requirements ($100,000, no withdrawals for the last year in Oregon's case), you can even become "self-insured" with regards to your automobile.

      But, this isn't damage where someone other entity has "liability," so insurance wasn't mandatory, and more than likely it was assumed that the entity in charge would pay for anything that went wrong.

      So, chances are, nobody has any kind of contracted damage insurance on that thing with any insurance company.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  28. More wild speculation by Tsar · · Score: 4, Funny
    A few random thoughts:

    I don't know how much their missions overlap, but does this put any more urgency on getting the Ice Cube neutrino scope up and running?

    Whilst I'm here, I've been mulling over some possible reasons for the accident:
    • SuperK Technicians ignored the pump signs warning not to "top off"
    • They accidentally filled it with heavy water
    • Water level was correct, but wash cycle was accidentally bumped from "Delicates" to "Heavy Duty"
    • Weekend Sumo Bellyflop contest got a bit too rowdy this week
    • Detector tubes? We thought you ordered defective tubes!
    • Drunken revelry, celebrating yet another discovery of the Higgs boson
  29. Probably related to this... by Sheridan · · Score: 1
    ...story in yesterday's /. (can't find the link right now, but I save the text...)

    World's biggest webserver!

    From the any-port-in-a-storm-dept

    Scientists at SuperKamiokande have ported Linux to run on the array of photomultiplier tubes in their huge underground neutrino detector.

    What's more, they have even got Apache running! Check out their site being served direct from the detector here

    CT: I wonder if it'll stand up to the slashdotting it's about to get!

  30. another detector by firebat162 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the school i'm at (UBC) is co-sponsoring a neutrino detector in sudbury: http://www.physics.ubc.ca/~kutter/

  31. this may sound really strange... by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 1

    But wouldn't they have insurance for something like this?

  32. Overclocking Woes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I told them not to overclock the AthlonXP 1900 in that baby, no matter what toms hardware says!

  33. Just curious by SweenyTod · · Score: 2

    Pardon my lack of scientific knowledge and enthusiam, but what exactly will finding one of these suckers do or, besides cost a ton of cash?

    How will knowing they're out there and finding one will benefit people, besides in the science for science's sake sort of reasoning (not that I'm automatically opposed to that).

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
    1. Re:Just curious by frithioff · · Score: 0

      Firstly, they saw lots of 'these suckers' quite a few years ago and ,well, you have surely noticed the benefits. There are many uses to the detectors themselves, amongst them finding out if protons are stable or not (which has big ramifications), but in terms of cosmic neutrino spotting and establishing that they are massive, they provide candidates for Dark Matter ( which would explain why the universe hangs together) and also
      would offer for new physics beyond the laws of particle physics established today.

    2. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're pardoned but what would you have said to JJ Thomson when he was trying to discover the electron with cathode ray tubes? That was in the late 1800s. Would he have told you that finding electrons will benefit ordinary people? Would he tell you that with the understanding of electrons cathode ray tubes will be used for computer displays and for televisions one hundred years later?

    3. Re:Just curious by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A quote for you:

      "Science is like sex. Sometimes something useful comes out, but that's not why we're doing it."
      --Richard Feynman

      We never know exactly what good will come of some obscure avenue of research. It may not produce anything truly significant or profitable. Still, curiosity about the world around us is a core element of our humanity. Would you take that away from us?

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    4. Re:Just curious by kindbud · · Score: 2

      (not that I'm automatically opposed to that)

      Of course you are, why else would you ask this question in the first place?

      If you try to measure benefit in dollars, you will surely be disappointed. Try asking a better question.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    5. Re:Just curious by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      Mostly indirect, but most of the effort to confirm or dispute parts of the rag-tag-whole that is known as the Standard Model hangs around neutrino research. Mostly because neutrinos are still quite a big question mark for EXACTLY this reason (they are hard and expensive to find and detect).


      Nobody is going to be building "neutrino guns" or "neutrino death rays" any time soon, and this is basic research, not applied research. But if inconsistencies or discrepancies in the Standard Model are discovered that relate to neutrino behavior it is possible that will eventually lead us to a Grand High Pooba Ultimate Theory of Everything. Or at least get us a couple of steps closer.


      Such understanding may allow us to make big spaceships that cross the galaxy in months rather than millenia or smash planets with large pseudo-scientific beam weapons. Err.. well, maybe not, but I'm quite sure we haven't seen an end to the totally inconceivable but infinitely useful devices that come out of better scientific understanding, and basic research comes into the picture somewhere. My point is that rather being some weird peripheral piece of basic research, neutrino detection work is hot on the trail of figuring stuff out that WILL change our understanding of the universe and therefore will likely result in very cool devices and gadgets 50 years from now that we can't even imagine today.

  34. Whoa, dude... by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill: "I'm Bill S. Preston, Esquire."
    Ted: "And I'm Ted "Theodore" Logan."
    Bill, Ted: "And together, we're WYLD PHYSICISTS!"
    Bill: "Ok, the maintenance dudes are done. I'm gonna refill the water tank."

    <cacophony of pops as the light detectors implode>

    Ted: "Strange things are afoot at the Super-K."
    Rufus: [reassuringly to the camera]: "They do get better."

    ~Philly

  35. What did they expect? by sysadmn · · Score: 2, Funny

    It serves them right for adding that big red "SELF DESTRUCT" button. Of course, it didn't help that the Mad Scientist (er, Project Director) just stood there boasting about taking over the world instead of firing the dang thing.

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    1. Re:What did they expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep teling you I'm not a Mad Scientist. I'm angry. I'm an Angry Scientist, but I'm not MAD!

      Dr P.T. Gangreen - Attack of The Killer Tomatos

  36. LimeWire is playing a dangerous game here. by BlackGriffen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When RIAA sued Napster, Gnutella argued invincibility because it was decentralized, and derived no benefit from the file swapping. They were playing a game of chicken when they activated central servers at all. Now, they are adding ads to the software, meaning that they gain a direct monetary benefit from the file swapping. My prediction is that we'll hear about a RIAA Limewire suit before December.

    BlackGriffen

  37. poser astrophysicists make me grindge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or some other event that we have never seen
    yet (be cause it happens sooooo very rarely)
    might occur.

    Can we really say we know, yet, enough
    about what is really going on in space?
    I find the lack of attention to scepticism
    to be a troubling reminder that
    every major discovery in physics always
    leaves most physicists dumbfounded.
    And then they shut up for a few years
    because they suddenly realize that they
    haven't been doing science at all, but
    just getting funded and posing.

  38. Incorrect by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Neutrino observatories ARE there to catch supernovae, although this is not their primary reason for existance.

    SNO is indeed on the case for supernovae explosions, but the fact of the matter is that one observatory simply isn't enough; because of unvavoidable detector downtimes (maintanence, calibration, equipment failures, instrumental problems, etc etc) you can't run 24/7/365 with these guys. Also important is that one really wants both detectors live: you want verification that there really IS a supernova in progress before you swing the Hubble around to look for it.

    Add to that the complimentary advantages of the detectors (angular resolution and high statistics in SK, antineutrino detection and energy resolution in SNO) and you really really don't want SK going down if you're a neutrino astrophysicsist interested in supernovae.

    --Nathaniel, recent PhD with SNO

  39. This sounds suspiciously like.... by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds suspiciously like the plot of Half-Life.

    --
    m00.
  40. They probably can't say why. Yet. by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This thing collapsed just hours ago. Remember that work was being done in an underground lab. There are probably no more than 2 dozen people on site (a remote part of Japan) at one time, and they just had their detector implode. Give them some time to figure out what's going on down there. Heck, they might not really understand it for a few weeks. Science is like that.

    The chain-reaction-implosion mechanism is a plausable one, but it still requires something to make it happen.. these tubes have been sitting under a lot of hydrostatic pressure (more than during the accident) for years now. Other phototube experiments have been doing similar things, none of which have ever seen this happen.

    The failure mode for the tubes is likely to be leackage at the base (the back) which slowly degrades the vacuum inside... no implosion.

    There was likely a large pressure change that happened all at once. I'd be looking for a rockburst: a small seizmic event in which the external rock pressure (which is very large) caused the wall to buckle and throw debris.

    ---Nathaniel, glad it didn't happen to HIS neutrino experiment.

    1. Re:They probably can't say why. Yet. by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 2

      The chain-reaction-implosion mechanism is a plausable one, but it still requires something to make it happen.. these tubes have been sitting under a lot of hydrostatic pressure (more than during the accident) for years now.

      This isn't quite true. Most of the tubes have been underwater for years, but this summer the tank was drained, dead tubes were replaced with new ones, and the tank was in the process of being refilled when the accident occurred. It was only about 2/3 full when it happened. I don't know yet if the first tube to go was brand new or not, but it's conceivable that as the water level was rising, pressure was increasing on a new tube that had a manufacturing defect and it imploded.

      Although the most common failure mode is slow leakage, it only takes 1 / 11000 to implode and cause this kind of chain reaction.

      (Loved your egg sandwhich paper, BTW.)

    2. Re:They probably can't say why. Yet. by habig · · Score: 1
      Although the most common failure mode is slow leakage, it only takes 1 / 11000 to implode and cause this kind of chain reaction.

      A note though - the possibility of a chain reaction implosion has been tested before (we're not idiots), and the tubes came through those tests ok. So it takes 1/11000 to implode in a particularly forceful way, compared to those tested.

    3. Re:They probably can't say why. Yet. by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 1

      the possibility of a chain reaction implosion has been tested before (we're not idiots), and the tubes came through those tests ok.

      Of course, but at what depth/pressure was this test conducted? (I honestly don't remember. Brett suggested it was maybe 10 meters.) If the same test were conducted at 30 or 40 meters it might have made a difference.

      Also, it may be statistical in nature. The test was not performed sufficiently often to rule out chain reactions at 95%.

      And those tests weren't performed with 6 year old tubes, either. There are so many unknowns here it isn't funny.

    4. Re:They probably can't say why. Yet. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      And those tests weren't performed with 6 year old tubes, either. There are so many unknowns here it isn't funny.

      What the fuck could happen to a stationary glass tube in pure watter in 6 years?

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    5. Re:They probably can't say why. Yet. by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Ok, so test, phase II: How many (theoretically defective) tubes must simultaneously implode before all the rest go.

      In computer science, we call this a "bug".

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    6. Re:They probably can't say why. Yet. by ppanon · · Score: 1

      I remember reading in Scientific American many years ago that water really helps crack propagation in glass. If you take a glass fibre, lightly scratch it (rub it with something), and then bend it, it will break more easily than if it didn't have the score, but it will still take a certain amount of work. However if you wet the glass fibre first, much less stress needs to be applied. So over 6 years under high pressure, hairline cracks from open air handling or even manufacturing could have slowly become much more significant.

      I suppose the dry/wet cycle of draining the tank may also have had an effect.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  41. Strange! Neutrino detector destruction NHK TV! by takochan · · Score: 1

    I just saw the video on NHK (Japanese state television) of the interior of the neutrino detector after the "accident".

    I dont understand it, it looks like a bomb was set off in it or something. The reporting was very sparse, but the video shows broken glass and electronic bits scattered everywhere in the water, and smashed parts and wires floating in the chamber, like a bomb (or a student going
    nuts with a baseball bat in the tank or
    something) hit it or something. It is very wierd
    type of "accident" if that is what it was...

    Any one know what *really* happened here?
    It makes no sense..

    1. Re:Strange! Neutrino detector destruction NHK TV! by zorgon · · Score: 2

      Damn! It's those aliens. Again. You'd thought they would have been satisfied after replacing those Senators with zombies and ensuring cancellation of the SSC (not to mention Apollo 18-20) and destroying all those Mars probes, but no, now they have to destroy innocent neutrino detectors in order to conceal the signatures of their fusion reactors in orbit while they are carrying out their surveillance. What a nuisance.

      --

      I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

  42. Doh! by dayL8 · · Score: 1

    Next time we had better check that "neutrino safe" box on the detector order form...

    --
    The real problem is entropy.
  43. Will it come back up? I hope so. But it's hard. by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although news has been sketchy, I am hopeful that they had the phototubes insured. (Any other financial cost will be small compared to the PMTs.) Even if they didn't, I think it's not too unlikely that Japan and the US will re-fund the experiment. SK has done some really amazing work, and is committed to a long-term project with KEK (the K2K long-baseline experiment). I can't imagine that they would simply dump this very productive and valuable resource. But then, who am I to predict the whims of politicians?

    However, even if money is no object, timeline could be. These 20-inch PMTs are not exactly off-the-shelf items, and Hamamatsu(the company that provides them for SK and many other experiments around the world) has substantial lead times in getting their production lines up. All told, even under the best of conditions, the process could take 2 years, by which time SK will be in severe competition with a lot of other experiments: Borexino, KamLand, MINOS, etc. etc.

    They MIGHT use the time to build super-duper-K.. putting a magnet in the water to look for lepton charge sign from atmospheric neutrinos, but that seems a bit farfetched and difficult.

    ---Nathaniel, messenger of doom

    P.S. I call dibs on the SK linac when it gets scraped!

  44. Ice Cube by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, I forgot to mention: IceCube (and AMANDA) are not really in the same buisiness as Super-K. The really big ice experiments are looking for cosmogenic neutrinos, and very-high energy atmospheric neutrinos, not the same energy band as SK. SK in addition does a lot of work on solar neutrinos and other physics besides; the ice cube is not really in competition... although it is extremely cool. Not to say cold.

    --- Nathaniel
    Who has worked in Sudbury (SNO) and Minnesota (MINOS) and wants no part of AMANDA (south pole)

    1. Re:Ice Cube by Barahir · · Score: 1

      Actually, SuperK is in the business of looking at high energy neutrinos as well. The result that is SuperK's major claim to fame is the detection of neutrino osscillations made by looking at atmospheric neutrinos.

  45. Free link? by scorcherer · · Score: 1

    Anyone have a no-reg-req link for nytimes? channel/archive[s]/partners prefix seems not to work. As a matter of principle, I'm not going to register, or use any of the publicly known usernames. Information like that should be free, dammit.

    --

    --
    The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    1. Re:Free link? by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      Should they also provide the bandwidth for free? Should the server ops run the servers for free?

      --

      -Bucky
    2. Re:Free link? by scorcherer · · Score: 1

      The money is not the issue - the site is available via free-beer registration. But why should we give them all our confidential information 1984-wise? The level of suction on that idea is pretty high, approaching pure vacuum pretty well.

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

    3. Re:Free link? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      As a matter of principle, I'm not going to register,

      Then "as a matter of principle" don't read the fucking story! You're too principled to fill out a web-form with some fake information, but you're willing to use a back door to get in and 'steal' it?

      It takes 10 seconds to fill out that form, and you never have to do it again (if you've got cookies enabled)

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  46. Neutrinos are a .... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    form of radiation, right? This happened in water in Japan, right? It must've been Godzilla! 8-)

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  47. ph=7 by Brett+Viren · · Score: 1

    SK water is (was) about as ph balanced as you can get.

    1. Re:ph=7 by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      And they don't check it for impurities from time to time, either, presumably.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    2. Re:ph=7 by Brett+Viren · · Score: 1
      And they don't check it for impurities from time to time, either, presumably.

      s/don't/do/

  48. Anonymous physicists, sheesh. by Brett+Viren · · Score: 1
    Ignore the rube blathering to the press.


    SK is/was the far detector for the K2K long baseline neutrino experiment which is/was still running. With out SK, there isn't much point. SK was also planned to be used in another future lbl experiment, JHF-SK, which could pin down some of the mixing parameters (theta_13) and possibly put a limit on CP violation in the neutrino system.


    So, this short sighted crass statement by this anonymous physicist really annoys me.

  49. +1 Funny on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    Nah. They just detected a 50kg "Bastardino".

    *laugh* Good thing it wasn't the Basterdino's super-sym partner (the Basterdon). Last I heard, it was suspected to mass about as much as a Mastodon (within a factor of Pi times some magic number).

    -- Markus

  50. SNO? by AndyMan! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is midly off-topic, but I'd love to hear an answer if anyone's got one.

    Has anything come out of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory? Net resources seem to be over my head.

    The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory put 1000 tons of heavy water into a geodesic dome two miles deep in an abandoned nickel mine, up in Northern Ontario.

    I last heard news about SNO about 6 years ago when they were building it, but haven't heard a thing since.

    Anyone got any updates?

    <a href=http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/>SNO</a>

  51. Sounds like... by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    Super Kamiokande sounds like one sweet Nintendo game! Hook me up!

  52. Re:Will it come back up? I hope so. But it's hard. by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

    They MIGHT use the time to build super-duper-K..

    Actually, its successor will be Super Kamiokande Turbo Hyper Fighting Championship Edition.

  53. bzzz! regional joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Circle K's are a regional store. Not everyone has them.

    Karma: -10 for a bad joke no one will get.

  54. Next generation Kamiokande by ErfC · · Score: 2
    Actually, the next neutrino detector at the Kamioka site will be called "Hyper-Kamiokande".

    I'm not kidding. See, for example, this article.

    --

    -Erf C.
    Cthulu always calls collect...

    1. Re:Next generation Kamiokande by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      Darn, I was pushing for "Kamiokande-Z".

  55. The SuperK is dying! by Erris · · Score: 1

    It should be obvious that the international physics community has joined fucked company. What were they thinking? There is absolutly no way to expect a neutron detector company will be proffitable. I mean, you can't see, hear, touch or eat neutrinos, what market share could they ever have? It never worked very well and it's just broken. Now that billions of dollars and a perfectly good lead mine has been wasted, only dedicated hobiest, terrorists and other inverts will ever reap the rewards of learning and intellectual achievement. Let this be a lesson to all you hippie scientists.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  56. Cigar insurance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's what Snopes has to say about this. It is an urban legend.

  57. Why I left Super-K this summer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting


    When our group got to Japan, they had just drained the tank, and external hydrostatic pressures caused the floor and walls of the tank to start bulging in, and while we were inside the tank on Tuesday, August 27, 2001, our second day of work, we heard huge CRACK and reverberation sounds, which we later learned were the bolts holding the concrete liner to the rock breaking. it was unreal.
    People started looking around to see who was making the noise. I followed a sharp guy out of the tank, while a lot of other people waited around the exit, I guess waiting for official word to leave. I sat in the jeep in a dark, radioheadish mine tunnel, continuing to hear loud, ominous crashes and bangs.
    The next day everyone said "IT'S FINE, they FIXED IT, IT'S PERFECTLY SAFE, the Japanese engineers said I'TS PERFECTLY SAFE," and even "Don't you trust me?" but after asking many different people, I couldn't get a real explanation of what had happened, or even a feeling that anyone
    knew what had happened. A friend's father, a mining engineer, was unimpressed with their solution to the problem (drilling holes in the
    bottom of the tank to relieve the pressure) saying it would allow greater
    pressures to build up elsewhere, later, and unexpectedly, and that unless the source of the water was found and pumped, there was no reason to think the situation was stabilized. He said it at least would need monitoring for a few days before people went in the tank again, which made sense to
    me. My mom, who drills oil wells, was also concerned and wondered why they didn't have instrumentation to monitor what was going on outside the tank. at one point the japanese engineering company responsible for the
    tank determined that there were 2m of water built up around the outside walls, and they determined this by hitting the wall with sticks and listening to the sounds.

    When the bolts started breaking and it was scary as hell I realized I had never been shown an evacuation procedure ("getting the hell out" is what it is, I later learned, and that involves changing boots into slippers, crawling out of a slippery tunnel, getting out of a tyvek clean
    suit, climbing down a ladder and putting on normal shoes, then sitting in
    the car waiting for someone to come drive us out.)
    I realized I had never been shown the location of a first aid kit, fire extinguisher, emergency breathing apparatus, emergency food and water (we
    were 2km into a mine, after all)

    So, a friend and I decided to take responsibility for our safety and we flew
    home the next day.
    The End.

  58. SK incident by lightray · · Score: 1

    This arrived in my mailbox:

    ``Many have heard by now of the SK disaster. Here is what I have learned:
    Apparently an ID tube, most likely on the bottom of the detector,
    imploded and set off a chain reaction destroying much of the detector to
    about a depth of 2 meters or so below the current water level.
    Apparently the top 7 supermodules and the top are intact.

    The destruction is reported to be extensive with about 7000 ID and 1000
    OD tubes destroyed. The various layers between the ID and OD are
    shredded. There appears to be huge piles of glass and other debris on
    the tank bottom. Waveshifter plates are shattered, cables perhaps
    shredded, etc. The water is full of antimony and other hazardous
    chemicals.

    ICRR is shortly holding a press conference along with Monbushio (Sp?).
    Reporters are milling about outside the mine entrance.
    ''

    Also, Reuters has the story.

    1. Re:SK incident by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      It's also being reported in this http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20011113_ 172.html">ABC News story, although this is an early report without analysis.

  59. Here's what *really* happened... by 3Cats · · Score: 1

    The supervisor probably told them, "Remember, you can't have too much water..." before he took off for lunch.

    It went downhill from there.

    3C

  60. Re:Devastating.... by Enoch+Root · · Score: 2

    Yeah. If they keep this up, they'll need to undiscover the atom.

  61. stuff about neutrinos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For me it seems to be that most of the /. readers do not have a clue what neutrino is so here is a link

    neutrino

    So make some studies before posting.

  62. Reminds me of a Phillip K. Dick story by sideshow · · Score: 1

    I think it was the one where the traveling gambling spaceships would land on a planet, take all the money from the planet, then leave. Someone had a mini-black hole and dropped it and it get falling through the planet and then when it go back to the other side it would come back and so and so forth.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  63. I gave up when by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Clinton snowballed the texas 11 billion dollar super collider...

    If that thing was in place, humanity would be closer to understanding the secrets of the universe... I liked Clinton for all his economic policy, but fuck, to kick science in the balls is uncalled for.

  64. Article dated tomorrow... by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Alright, I confess, I was the one that caused the rip in space and time... I was overclocking my CPU to incredible speeds, when I got to the point that the instructions were being executed before they reached the processor. Now the two universes are coliding, now is not now, it's next week, and yesterday will be here tomorrow. Surprisingly, people honestly believe that lotter numbers for next week's game are showing up early simply because of time zones... And no body suspects a thing (except for those Unix people who get an error when the source files are than the current date-it's obvious that the early Unix developers had the forsight to impliment this feature purely to detect just such a rip in the fabric of time).

    Appologies to bbspot.com

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant