Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: Nemesis Gets the Go Signal

PatJensen writes "Star Trek TNG: Nemesis, the 10th Star Trek movie gets the green light from Paramount today. It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider. Looks to be pretty action packed. Digital Domain (LOTR, Titanic) will be doing the SFX. The movie seems to be based around Romulan conflict with the Federation. " Can't be as bad as Insurrection. At least, I hope not. BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

43 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Directing... by Raleel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that Jonathon Frakes is actually a pretty solid director, as is LeVar Burton. I look back on my favorite episodes and those guys did most of them...

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:Directing... by nettdata · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LeVar Burton also seems to be directing his fair share of the new Enterprise series as well.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  2. it's an even number trek by jmahler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    so it CAN'T be too bad. :)

    besides, the romulans are, as they say, bad ass. Could actually be good!

    (fingers seriously crossed)

    1. Re:it's an even number trek by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 5, Interesting

      let's run them down, shall we? plot writeups and ratings by leonard maltin, quoted from IMDB.

      1. star trek: the motion picture. "The crew of the Enterprise is reunited to combat a lethal force field headed toward Earth. Slow, talky, and derivative, somewhat redeemed by terrific special effects and majestic Jerry Goldsmith score; still, mainly for purists." RATING: 2.5 stars.
      2. star trek: the wrath of khan. "Kirk and the Enterprise crew must do battle with the nefarious villain of 1967's ``Space Seed'' episode. A bit hokey and pretentious at times, but a likable adventure overall, with nice touches of warmth and humor." RATING: 3 stars.
      3. star trek iii: the search for spock. "Picking up where #2 left off, Kirk reassembles his crew and shanghais the Enterprise to try and rescue Spock--in whatever form he may still be alive--while both he and the rapidly destructing Genesis Planet are endangered by a Klingon warship (led by Lloyd, in an ineffectual performance). Subdued sci-fi outing very much in keeping with tone of the original TV series... and therefore, recommended most heartily to Star Trek fans." RATING: 3 stars.
      4. star trek iv: the voyage home. "The Enterprise crew takes a sharp left turn toward comedy in this uncharacteristic--and very entertaining--movie. Story has the familiar characters time-traveling back to the 20th century in order to save the Earth of the future, with the help of some humpback whales. Sheer novelty of the comic tone excuses some forays into the obvious; it's all in fun." RATING: 3.5 stars.
      5. star trek v: the final frontier. "The Enterprise crew takes off on an emergency mission when an apparent madman takes over a distant planet and holds its interstellar ambassadors hostage; his motives, however, turn out to be anything but terroristic. Dramatically shaky trek starts off with a case of the cutes, and gets worse before it (finally) gets better. A weak entry in the series. Shatner's feature-film directing debut; he also shares story credit." RATING: 2 stars.
      6. star trek vi: the undiscovered country. "The Enterprise crew is assigned to negotiate truce with Klingon leader, only to fall prey to a trap set by one of his renegade cohorts (Plummer, in a deliciously flamboyant performance). Entertaining saga cowritten by director Meyer. Nimoy helped concoct the story and also executive produced." RATING: 3 stars.
      7. star trek: generations. "The old guard gives way to the new, as Capt. Kirk (Shatner) passes the baton to a new Starfleet commander, Capt. Picard (Stewart). Episodic adventure yarn plays like an elongated segment of the Next Generation TV series; not inspired, perhaps, but entertaining just the same, with some impressive special effects. Oddly enough, the weakest segment is the climactic teaming of Picard and Kirk, which seems like a leftover from an old Saturday matinee serial. Whoopi Goldberg appears unbilled as Guinan." RATING: 3 stars.
      8. star trek: first contact. "Capt. Picard lives his worst nightmare as the villainous Borg (who almost overtook him in a two-part TV episode) land on earth with domination their goal. The solution: the crew travels back in time to 2063 to make sure a cockeyed scientist (Cromwell) fulfills his role in history with a precedent-setting rocket flight. Story goes on a bit, following two concurrent threads, but series fans will have no complaints. Krige is a standout as the seductive Borg Queen. Feature directing debut for Frakes, better known as Riker." RATING: 3 stars.
      9. star trek: insurrection. "Good entry in the long-running series has the crew befriending the eternally youthful residents of a Shangri-La-like planet whose existence is threatened by the vengeful Ru'afo (Abraham). Picard (Stewart) even has a dalliance with one of the women there (Murphy). Reliably entertaining for Star Trek fans." RATING: 3 stars.
      10. star trek: nemesis - ?

      looks pretty random to me.

      -sam
      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    2. Re:it's an even number trek by hardburn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Capt. Kirk (Shatner) passes the baton to a new Starfleet commander, Capt. Picard (Stewart).

      That scene sucked. In Star Trek V, he said he knew he would die alone. Checking "Generations" again . . . nope, Picard was standing right there when he died.

      Then Shatner has to go and write some stupid books about it, bring Kirk back to life after "Generations" took place, then "die alone" (as he was supposed to) while having the arrogance to destroy the entire Borg collective, then writing another book after "Insurrection", bring back Kirk AGAIN, and saying "no, I didn't destroy the Borg, that was just a small section of the collective". Uggg.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:it's an even number trek by denzo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Generally based on Maltin's ratings, here is the empirical formula to a successful new Star Trek movie:

      • Directed by Frakes.
      • Story and executive production by Nimoy.
      • Keep Shatner the heck away from the set.
      • Keep it fast and not too much dialog.
      • Bring in Whoopi again.
      • Throw in some Klingons and Borg.
      • Music by Jerry Goldsmith.
      • What about Q?
      • And at last but not least, for the last half of the movie, turn it into a comedy where the crew goes back to the 20th Century with the help of dolphins and Lassie to help save Wil Wheaton's career by coercing him not to accept the role in the series. Suddenly, a disruption in the time-space continuoum causes Richard Simmons to suddenly replace Wil Wheaton in all the series and movies, and the whole thing was just an aerobic workout video to begin with.
      What do you think? ;)
  3. Stuart Baird did *not* direct "Tomb Raider" by imac.usr · · Score: 5, Informative

    That film was made by Simon "I haven't got a fucking clue as to how to edit a close-in action scene" West, the luminary genius behind "Con Air".

    Note that he's scheduled to direct the feature-film adaptation of "The Prisoner" as well. God help fans of the original series.

    He, Akiva Goldsman, and Nora Ephron should all be made part of the cast of the next "Survivor" series so that they can't do any more damage in Hollywood for at least a year or so.

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  4. Romulans by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally.. we had to wait til the 10th movie to finally arrive at the one with the Romulans. They've been saving them as a plot for... forever. And, its an even numbered flick, so its probably inevitable that this movie is going to be very, very good.

    "Captain Picard and Commander Data. Oh, and those other guys too."

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  5. Insurrection was BAD? by Zigg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I beg to differ. Insurrection was very good. It made sense. It was entertaining. And watching Data's head float around was cool :-)

    If you want a bad recent ST movie, try First Contact. Absolutely destroyed the Borg mythos in one fell swoop.

    1. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by dswensen · · Score: 3, Funny

      -1, Opinion Differs From Collective

    2. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by Monte · · Score: 3, Funny

      V however was by far, the worst ST movie of em all.

      I have to agree. "V" was pretty bad - none of the old crew, no Federation ships, Klingons, phasers or anything, just these dumb aliens running around dressed as humans. Spock coulda whupped the whole fleet of'em in ten minutes.

      It was really hard to see how it even was a Trek movie, but at least it was on TV and I didn't have to pay for a ticket.

  6. Stuart Baird did not direct Tomb Raider by gorsh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although he was a producer and uncredited editor on the film.

  7. Fisrt movie DVD? by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    "BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release."

    You mean now the WHOLE 2 hour jouney of spock flying through V'Ger is in there? COOL!

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  8. They're all out on DVD... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 4, Informative

    BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

    All of the films are out on DVD (and have been for a while), they're just not worth buying because they contain no bonus features to speak of. Strange, considering Trek is a franchise that specifically caters to a crowd/fanbase that would love to see behind the scenes, technical, and "making of" documentaries.

    1. Re:They're all out on DVD... by shymog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, they're all out now. However, ST: The Motion Picture was released about 3 weeks ago.

      It can't be totally devoid of bonus features, being that it has a whole second disc of them.

      --
      "I wasn't sniffing your spicy brains."
  9. All the latest rumors and spoilers here.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 5, Informative

    Visit Corona for the latest movie info..

    Coming Attractions - Star Trek 10: Nemesis

    Just a warning, spoilers are present..

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  10. Rumored to be last TNG movie... by Masem · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've heard rumors to the effect that this is the last planned TNG movie, at least based on the fact that Patrick Stewart no longer wants to be in that role (not that he doesn't dislike it, but he wants to return to stage work). Same rumors suggest that this isn't necessarily the end of the Trek series of movies, and future movies may either take place in the mid-series of DS9 or Voyager, or possibly an aglomeration of plots that would occur after Voyager returns.

    Anyone else heard similar? They *are* just internet rumors, after all...

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie... by GreyyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had read on Wil Wheaton's site that Lavar Burton had mentioned that this was the last one.

      I think it would be cool to have the next film with the DS9 crew. Thee were a lot of stories left open. Sisko coming back. A whole new relationship with the Changlings. The whole Gamma quadrant. Lots of material.

      I don't know what Voyager could do. They got home. End of story. Thank goodness. 7 of 9 aside, I didn't like the show.

  11. Patrick Stewart gets cloned! by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The plot, I read somewhere, is about a Picard clone trying to gain control of the Romulan Empire. No word on whether or not the stem cells will be used to help treat the obvious brain damage of the screenwriters of Insurrection.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  12. Enterprise movie? by Merlynnus · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they release a movie based on Enterprise, will they have to use negative numbers? Star Trek -1: The Klingon Wars

  13. Hey, I liked Insurrection! by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was a Star Trek Episode, just like ST II-IV were. I actually felt that it was *more* of a Star Trek flick than First Contact, and right up there with Generations.

    Of course, Star Trek alternates between "movies that are Star Trek" and "Star Trek that happens to be a movie." And that means that X will be like "First Contact", "The Undiscoveredy Coutnry", "The Wrath of Khan", and all the other even-numbered movies.

    I look foward to it.

    1. Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection! by Cutriss · · Score: 3

      I liked Insurrection a lot too...but I think that the popularity of a Star Trek is determined by space battles (Though even Space Battles couldn't save ST5, or "Star Trek V: The Wrath of God". Think about it.

      Everyone loves ST2, ST6, ST7 (kinda), and ST8. I don't know how the even number rule even TRIES to apply to ST4...

      Personally? I rank them this way: ST2,ST3,ST6,ST9,ST7,ST1,ST4,ST8,ST5. What can I say? It seems like everyone seems to forget Star Trek III when they say "This movie sucks!" or "This movie rocks!". It's got your space battles, cocky Kirk, fistfights with Christopher Lloyd as a Klingon, subterfuge at Starfleet HQ, and even Yellow Alerts in Space Dock!

      "Bridge, this is the captain...How do you have a yellow alert in space dock?" "Sir! Someone is stealing the Enterprise!"

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  14. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by Foochar · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to a statement made by Wil Wheaton at www.wilwheaton.nethe will have at least a small role in the movie. wilwheaton.net is down at the moment so here is what I can recal from his comments. When they taped The Weakest Link episdoe Wil made a comment to Levar Burton about wanting to come back and give the character some closure, but that he didn't feel like Rick Berman and the other producers liked him. Apparently Levar went to bat for Wil because they decided to give him at least a small role. According to Wil he has been fitted for a uniform and has possesion of a script with the confidential stamped in red on the top every page. I would provide links to wil's site, but for some reason Wil has had to put the moose back out front again.

    --
    "You can't fight in here! This is the war room" --Dr. Stra
  15. Just some more info by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

    As always, don't forget to check out the plot on IMDb

    ... and here's something for the trekkies out there to wet their appetite. :-)

    The dialogue below should be considered a spoiler !

    GEORDI
    He just likes things the way he likes them..... (he looks at her, smiles) ..... Of course, so do I.

    He kisses her gently as Worf comes to them. Poor Worf is still suffering a bit from the bachelor party. He plops down beside them.

    WORF
    Romulan Ale should be illegal.

    GEORDI
    It is.

    WORF
    Then it should be more illegal.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  16. Save Wil Wheaton's Career! by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    The last thing in the world we could want to see is Wil Wheaton's career suffer. We need a petition to urge the producers of this future flop not to hire Wil Wheaton. After reading his website and responses to questions on Slashdot, I started to really like this guy and learned that he is not the dweeb I once imagined. We all know this movie will be a boring morality play where the Prime Directive will be violated during a temporal distortion caused by Data's emotion chip malfunctioning after having a "human" moment with Jorde's visor in the privacy of the holodeck.

    However, I hope every scene is filled with Brent Spinner. After that "Ol' Yellow Eyes is Back" album, he deserves to spend the rest of his life having to listen to plot flaws while signing autographs for socially-retarded Acne cream test subjects. Also, I hope that they make Marina Sirtis cover up. At her present age, they must be bouncing off her knees now.

    Captain Archer owns Captain Picard!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career! by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I think Wil Wheaton's best work was on Family Ties, as Jennifer's jock boyfriend.

      Wil Wheaton and Tina Yothers were a winning combination, if ever there was one.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
  17. Stuart Baird's movies have been terrible. by idealego · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to imdb.com
    6.4 Executive Decision
    5.5 US Marshals
    6.2 Tomb Raider

    So it looks like we can't expect much from the next Star Trek unfortunately.

  18. Nudity... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Offtopic

    Since the next Bond movie is supposed to have a scene with female nudity, I'll boycott this one if it don't have a shower scene with Seven of Nine. Regardless if it fits in the story or not!

    But seriously, what do you feel about nudity in ST movies? Does it belong there? Or does it make the movie anti-ST and/or lower the quality?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  19. Re:good lord by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is, indeed, much better. What Robert Wise was forced to release in the 70s was infact a rough cut. Now he's had a chance to go back and finish it, and it really shows. And what other movie these days has the guts to have a several minute musical overture before even the title card comes up?

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  20. Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even number! by sterno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's look at the brief history:

    Star Trek I - Rather cheezy looking and overall not that good of a movie

    Star Trek II - KHAAAAAAAAAN! Still one of the best Start Trek movies

    Star Trek III - The search for spock. It had some good moments but overall kinda dull. Not bad, but not great

    Star Trek IV - Okay, the environmentalism was layed on thick, but overall a very different style from the other movies (much more humor), and quite a bit of fun

    Star Trek V - Today red shirted ensigns we are going to go find God on some funky planet in the middle of nowhere. Set phasers on CRAP!

    Start Trek VI - My personal favorite. Lots of good drama between Federation and the Klingons. The big fairwell for most of the original cast.

    Star Trek VII - a crossover between the old and new, and the movie clearly suffered for trying to force that.

    Star Trek VIII - We get to see the old federation, a borg trying to seduce Data, and overall a fun and action packed movie.

    Star Trek VIX - Ummmm.. what was this movie again. I know I saw it, but I don't recall it having anything worth remembering. Something about somebody rebelling I think but I forget.

    So, back to an even number and so we can reasonably assume it will be good. It seems like they screw up, and then work hard to get the next one right. Then they rest on their laurels and screw up again.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  21. Digital Domain should not be listed for LOTR by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know you have a boner for SFX companies that use Linux, but Digital Domain only did a few FX shots for LOTR. To list LOTR as one of "their" SFX films is a bit much. Here's a quote directly from lordoftherings.net:

    Peter Jackson and his team not only created a physical Middle-earth, they also designed an entirely digital universe for The Lord of The Rings trilogy. This staggeringly intensive, behind-the-scenes work was carried out by WETA Digital. The New Zealand based F/X company assembled a crack team of computer artists, key frame animators, modelers, digital paint artists, motion editors, compositors and software engineers, among others, to devote years of their lives to creating never-before-seen effects.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:Digital Domain should not be listed for LOTR by JPerler · · Score: 3, Informative

      One might note, to those not famaliar with Peter Jackson or Weta FX, that Weta is Peter Jacksons company.

      Weta was established to do the CG for Heavenly Creatures, arguably Jackson's first non-low-budget gore movie. Next was The Frighteners, which heavily used CG and Weta was awarded for its skills.

      Anyway. I kinda know coming from NZ and having Weta FX (and for that matter, Jackson) 5 minutes down the road.

      JP

  22. Re:Question: by ncc74656 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I read somewhere that Patrick Stewart doesn't want to do the Trek series anymore, and has had his hands in writing his death into the next movie.
    ...as if a small detail like death has ever kept a Star Trek character from returning...
    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  23. At least the titles of Star Trek films aren't bad. by weave · · Score: 5, Funny
    Can you imagine The Attack of the Klingons or The Romulan Menace.

    And as annoying as Wesley might have been, he's no C3P0....

  24. Good/Bad Even/Odd Star Trek movies by MythosTraecer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, the correct formula for determining whether a Star Trek movie is good or bad was flushed out by Brunching Shuttlecocks in their review of Insurrection. Obviously, it's too long to repost here, but is highly accurate (or at least will at least make you smile).

    --

    --Mythos
  25. Statement from wilwheaton.net: by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Redundant

    "When I did Weakest Link, I stood next to LeVar," Wheaton said on his website, in a post earlier this evening. "We were talking during the commercials, and I said to him that I really missed them. He said to me that I should be in the movie, especially since it's going to be the last TNG movie. I told him that I would love to be in it, but I really thought that Berman and company really didn't like me. He seemed surprised, and he told me that he was going to call Rick the next morning, and suggest to him that I be in the movie, at least as a cameo. I thought that would be really cool, and told him so.

    "Last week, on Friday, my agent called me to let me know that there was an offer from Paramount to reprise the role of Wesley Crusher in Star Trek X. We just needed to work out the details.

    "So we spent some time negotiating it, and --get this-- Rick Berman told my agent that he was 'very pleased' that I was going to be in the movie!

    "I am really excited about this for three reasons:

    * I am going to get to work with my friends again.
    * Wesley Crusher will have some real closure, finally.
    * For the last 5 years, at least, everywhere I go, fans ask me if I'm going to be in a movie, and what happened to Wesley, and I can honestly say that I'm doing this for the fans, because it will be so damn cool to see all of us together again.

    "WHEEE!"

    -----

  26. The heck with ST X, we want GQ II!!!! by hughk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    After watching Galaxy Quest, I realised how much ST films sucked. I am sorry, but the acting/direction isn't really there. GQ was just a satire on the whole ST idea.

    Sorry I am spoiled, I want to have better action and more fun with this sort of movie and ST lacked in both departments. We all have got a little blase about SFX, they are good for spectacle but don't exactly help the movie develop. Some of the ST story lines were just plane lame, some showed promise, but were not well developed.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  27. Re:ILM? by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Since when did Paramount stop handing the SFX over to ILM?
    Long ago in a galaxy far...um, waitaminit...

    IIRC, it was either TVH or TUC...probably TVH, as I know they didn't do the FX for TFF (and that was one of the complaints I remember hearing leveled against that movie).

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  28. I'm mad as hell! by msm1th · · Score: 3, Funny

    Boycott the MPAA fascists! Fight for your rights! Don't give these freedom-hating bastards any more of your money! Don't give in to --- OOH! CANDY!

  29. Has anyone watched the documentary "Trekkies" ? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a documentary about star trtek fans. Anyone who has seen it will remember and recognize a particular trekkie who was creating his own star trek movie called "Nemisis". This was quite a while ago, and the movie, I believe, was supposed to be about a star station, but what impressed me was the detail he and his crew put into designing their movie. Now, I would have written this incident off as coincidence if not for the information I just recently aquired, which is that this particular trekkie was seen on an episode of drew carrey. Now, this isn't exactly a "big holywood break", but I can't help but wonder if they're using any of his ideas in this new movie. Does anyone have any information about this?

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  30. Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb by mshomphe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Trek VIX - " The Vapo Rub"

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  31. Star Trek Topic by IdocsMiko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why does /. give Star Wars its own topic but not STar Trek? Slashdotters probably waste^B^B^B^B^B spend far more person-hours watching Star Trek than watching Star Wars. Don't get me wrong... I love them both. It just seems to me that there is more discussion here about Star Trek than about many topics that get their own, um, topic.

  32. Look at your own numbers! by ShieldWolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    1=2.5
    2=3
    3=3
    4=3.5
    5=2
    6=3
    7=3

    So the average for ODD movies is 2.6 and EVEN movies it is 3.2

    The WORST movie was an ODD (2) one and the best was an EVEN (3.5).

    To top it all off there is NEVER the case that a ODD movie is followed by and EVEN movie with a LOWER score, nor an EVEN movie followed by an ODD movie with a higher score, so the curse exists. ;)

    -Shieldwolf

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();