Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: Nemesis Gets the Go Signal

PatJensen writes "Star Trek TNG: Nemesis, the 10th Star Trek movie gets the green light from Paramount today. It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider. Looks to be pretty action packed. Digital Domain (LOTR, Titanic) will be doing the SFX. The movie seems to be based around Romulan conflict with the Federation. " Can't be as bad as Insurrection. At least, I hope not. BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

132 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Directing... by Raleel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that Jonathon Frakes is actually a pretty solid director, as is LeVar Burton. I look back on my favorite episodes and those guys did most of them...

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:Directing... by nettdata · · Score: 3, Interesting

      LeVar Burton also seems to be directing his fair share of the new Enterprise series as well.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  2. it's an even number trek by jmahler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    so it CAN'T be too bad. :)

    besides, the romulans are, as they say, bad ass. Could actually be good!

    (fingers seriously crossed)

    1. Re:it's an even number trek by sam@caveman.org · · Score: 5, Interesting

      let's run them down, shall we? plot writeups and ratings by leonard maltin, quoted from IMDB.

      1. star trek: the motion picture. "The crew of the Enterprise is reunited to combat a lethal force field headed toward Earth. Slow, talky, and derivative, somewhat redeemed by terrific special effects and majestic Jerry Goldsmith score; still, mainly for purists." RATING: 2.5 stars.
      2. star trek: the wrath of khan. "Kirk and the Enterprise crew must do battle with the nefarious villain of 1967's ``Space Seed'' episode. A bit hokey and pretentious at times, but a likable adventure overall, with nice touches of warmth and humor." RATING: 3 stars.
      3. star trek iii: the search for spock. "Picking up where #2 left off, Kirk reassembles his crew and shanghais the Enterprise to try and rescue Spock--in whatever form he may still be alive--while both he and the rapidly destructing Genesis Planet are endangered by a Klingon warship (led by Lloyd, in an ineffectual performance). Subdued sci-fi outing very much in keeping with tone of the original TV series... and therefore, recommended most heartily to Star Trek fans." RATING: 3 stars.
      4. star trek iv: the voyage home. "The Enterprise crew takes a sharp left turn toward comedy in this uncharacteristic--and very entertaining--movie. Story has the familiar characters time-traveling back to the 20th century in order to save the Earth of the future, with the help of some humpback whales. Sheer novelty of the comic tone excuses some forays into the obvious; it's all in fun." RATING: 3.5 stars.
      5. star trek v: the final frontier. "The Enterprise crew takes off on an emergency mission when an apparent madman takes over a distant planet and holds its interstellar ambassadors hostage; his motives, however, turn out to be anything but terroristic. Dramatically shaky trek starts off with a case of the cutes, and gets worse before it (finally) gets better. A weak entry in the series. Shatner's feature-film directing debut; he also shares story credit." RATING: 2 stars.
      6. star trek vi: the undiscovered country. "The Enterprise crew is assigned to negotiate truce with Klingon leader, only to fall prey to a trap set by one of his renegade cohorts (Plummer, in a deliciously flamboyant performance). Entertaining saga cowritten by director Meyer. Nimoy helped concoct the story and also executive produced." RATING: 3 stars.
      7. star trek: generations. "The old guard gives way to the new, as Capt. Kirk (Shatner) passes the baton to a new Starfleet commander, Capt. Picard (Stewart). Episodic adventure yarn plays like an elongated segment of the Next Generation TV series; not inspired, perhaps, but entertaining just the same, with some impressive special effects. Oddly enough, the weakest segment is the climactic teaming of Picard and Kirk, which seems like a leftover from an old Saturday matinee serial. Whoopi Goldberg appears unbilled as Guinan." RATING: 3 stars.
      8. star trek: first contact. "Capt. Picard lives his worst nightmare as the villainous Borg (who almost overtook him in a two-part TV episode) land on earth with domination their goal. The solution: the crew travels back in time to 2063 to make sure a cockeyed scientist (Cromwell) fulfills his role in history with a precedent-setting rocket flight. Story goes on a bit, following two concurrent threads, but series fans will have no complaints. Krige is a standout as the seductive Borg Queen. Feature directing debut for Frakes, better known as Riker." RATING: 3 stars.
      9. star trek: insurrection. "Good entry in the long-running series has the crew befriending the eternally youthful residents of a Shangri-La-like planet whose existence is threatened by the vengeful Ru'afo (Abraham). Picard (Stewart) even has a dalliance with one of the women there (Murphy). Reliably entertaining for Star Trek fans." RATING: 3 stars.
      10. star trek: nemesis - ?

      looks pretty random to me.

      -sam
      --
      burn the computers. go back to the abacus.
    2. Re:it's an even number trek by jgalun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it's random if you listen to Leonard Maltin (a particularly poor movie critic). But if you ask the average Star Trek fan, they'll tell you that the Wrath of Khan was a LOT better than The Motion Picture (most of my friends can't sit through ST:1, but we all love ST:2), that The Voyage Home was MUCH more fun to watch than The Search for Spock, and that the Undiscovered Country was a heads and shoulders above The Final Frontier. I don't even understand how Maltin can put these movies so close together in their ratings - 2, 4, and 6 really captured the feel of the original series, with camraderie and action, while 1, 3, and 5, were like stupid versions of the Next Generation, trying to be intelligent but completely failing.

    3. Re:it's an even number trek by hardburn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Capt. Kirk (Shatner) passes the baton to a new Starfleet commander, Capt. Picard (Stewart).

      That scene sucked. In Star Trek V, he said he knew he would die alone. Checking "Generations" again . . . nope, Picard was standing right there when he died.

      Then Shatner has to go and write some stupid books about it, bring Kirk back to life after "Generations" took place, then "die alone" (as he was supposed to) while having the arrogance to destroy the entire Borg collective, then writing another book after "Insurrection", bring back Kirk AGAIN, and saying "no, I didn't destroy the Borg, that was just a small section of the collective". Uggg.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    4. Re:it's an even number trek by LWolenczak · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is very true, if your a true trekie, you know that the odd numbered movies sucked!!

      so, it CAN'T be TOOOOO bad

    5. Re:it's an even number trek by denzo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Generally based on Maltin's ratings, here is the empirical formula to a successful new Star Trek movie:

      • Directed by Frakes.
      • Story and executive production by Nimoy.
      • Keep Shatner the heck away from the set.
      • Keep it fast and not too much dialog.
      • Bring in Whoopi again.
      • Throw in some Klingons and Borg.
      • Music by Jerry Goldsmith.
      • What about Q?
      • And at last but not least, for the last half of the movie, turn it into a comedy where the crew goes back to the 20th Century with the help of dolphins and Lassie to help save Wil Wheaton's career by coercing him not to accept the role in the series. Suddenly, a disruption in the time-space continuoum causes Richard Simmons to suddenly replace Wil Wheaton in all the series and movies, and the whole thing was just an aerobic workout video to begin with.
      What do you think? ;)
    6. Re:it's an even number trek by zericm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      plot writeups and ratings by leonard maltin, quoted from IMDB.

      More proof that Maltin's reviews are worthless. My ranking of the Star Trek movies:
      • ST2:TWoK
      • ST4:TVH
      • ST8:FC
      • ST1:TMP
      • ST3:TSFS
      • ST6:UC
      • ST9:I
      • ST7:G
      • ST5:TFF

      My TOS bias really comes out here, although I found FC to be a very entertaining film. It was the most accessable of the TNG based films for non-TNG fans.

      Generations was a rotten TV episode translated to the big screen. The plot was weak, the script was worse (coudln't they rewrite the opening scene after Nimoy and Kelly took a pass on this piece of shit), assumed the audience had seen every episode of TNG (who were the Klingon chicks with the tits?), and killed Kirk off in a rather lame manner. I had no problem with the man dying, but he desrved better.

      I would have ranked Generations dead last, but
      Shatner did his best to do his worst.

      eric
      --
      The welfare of the people has always been the alibi of tyrants. - Albert Camus
    7. Re:it's an even number trek by bay43270 · · Score: 2

      I know these are just books, but I really think this is the same thing Star Trek has always suffered from - lack of continuity. On the rare occasion things don't wrap themselves up perfectly within 60 minutes, any attempt at a story arc seems forced.

      On the up side, you can watch the episodes (or the movies) in any order... you don't have to worry about back-story.

    8. Re:it's an even number trek by hurst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not incorporate any of the Voyager or DS9 cast?
      I think the Voyager cast is best used in an odd-numbered episode.

    9. Re:it's an even number trek by Evro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, as I (think I) said, I haven't read any of his books myself. But that does sound like a really dumb thing for him to do. Taking out the entire collective? That's so dumb. Makes it difficult for anyone to take that book seriously, I'd guess. Taking out all the borg in the sector, ok, that's perfectly legit in star trek land. But to attempt to remove a major galactic player from the Star Trek world is a mistake.

      --
      rooooar
    10. Re:it's an even number trek by jafac · · Score: 2

      Star Trek 4, 3.5 stars? You're sick man, get help.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  3. Stuart Baird did *not* direct "Tomb Raider" by imac.usr · · Score: 5, Informative

    That film was made by Simon "I haven't got a fucking clue as to how to edit a close-in action scene" West, the luminary genius behind "Con Air".

    Note that he's scheduled to direct the feature-film adaptation of "The Prisoner" as well. God help fans of the original series.

    He, Akiva Goldsman, and Nora Ephron should all be made part of the cast of the next "Survivor" series so that they can't do any more damage in Hollywood for at least a year or so.

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  4. Romulans by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Finally.. we had to wait til the 10th movie to finally arrive at the one with the Romulans. They've been saving them as a plot for... forever. And, its an even numbered flick, so its probably inevitable that this movie is going to be very, very good.

    "Captain Picard and Commander Data. Oh, and those other guys too."

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:Romulans by evil_one · · Score: 2

      It has been said that this will be the last "The Next Generation" movie, so I'm not surprised that they kept this one in the bag.

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
  5. Insurrection was BAD? by Zigg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I beg to differ. Insurrection was very good. It made sense. It was entertaining. And watching Data's head float around was cool :-)

    If you want a bad recent ST movie, try First Contact. Absolutely destroyed the Borg mythos in one fell swoop.

    1. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      first contact was a good movie, and it did not destroy anything about the borg...they still exist you know...each cube is a hive and each hive has a "Queen" this just so happened to be the hive that Picard was captured and assimilated into before the entire federation fleet was destroyed at the battle of "wolf(can't remember the name)"

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    2. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      yeah and wasn't that one writen and directed by Shatner?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      I don't think so.........of cource that "queen had omnipresence so she could have had a few hives

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Sort of. The only misconception you've got is that *all* of the borg is one singular hive, with a single queen as the "avatar" of that hive mind.

      I've got to wonder what makes Humans so facinating for the Borg, though... maybe it's that "evolve into higher beings" thing...

    5. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      actualy, in TNG no one knew what the borg were like, only that you could walk around on the ship until you were percived as a threat and that they could adapt to your Phaser.other than that they were pretty mysterious. even now there internal dynamics are a little foggy......pluse look at wht Data's brother had proven, along with the Hugh experiment, that borg can become independant and command themselfs in small groups independant of the central mind. Just because the Queen died does not mean that the borg Die, it just means now the universe will be filled with billions of rouge borg.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by erc · · Score: 2, Funny
      Insurrection was a hyped up episode of TNG. To me if I'm going to go see a movie and shell out $10, I expect it to be better than the re-runs I can catch at 3am.


      You must be either female or gay ;) Personally, drooling after Donna Murphy for almost 2 hours made my day...

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    7. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by meepzorb · · Score: 2

      Not a big ST-V fan, but I must admit it contains my all-time favorite ST quote (from Kirk):

      "Excuse me... but why would GOD need a STARSHIP...?"

      :M

    8. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by Legion303 · · Score: 2
      Of course good movies can be rated PG. Great movies, on the other hand, tend to deal with life, and life is frequently R-rated. Could Schindler's List have been a PG movie? The network that aired it on television didn't think so.

      -Legion

    9. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by dswensen · · Score: 3, Funny

      -1, Opinion Differs From Collective

    10. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by talesout · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, considering the attention span of the typical Trekky, they probably forgot that the first 2/3 of the film existed by the time they were watching the last 1/3. You always remember your last impression the most anyway.

      --


      Bite my yammer.
    11. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by Monte · · Score: 3, Funny

      V however was by far, the worst ST movie of em all.

      I have to agree. "V" was pretty bad - none of the old crew, no Federation ships, Klingons, phasers or anything, just these dumb aliens running around dressed as humans. Spock coulda whupped the whole fleet of'em in ten minutes.

      It was really hard to see how it even was a Trek movie, but at least it was on TV and I didn't have to pay for a ticket.

    12. Re:Insurrection was BAD? by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

      wolf 359.

      i do believe thats correct. if it is need to get out into the big blue room more often.

      as i recall wolf359 was near jupiter.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  6. Stuart Baird did not direct Tomb Raider by gorsh · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although he was a producer and uncredited editor on the film.

  7. Fisrt movie DVD? by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    "BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release."

    You mean now the WHOLE 2 hour jouney of spock flying through V'Ger is in there? COOL!

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  8. Bring back Wil Wheaton! by nocent · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Someone should start a petition to bring back Wil Wheaton for this ST:TNG movie. Reading this interview gave me a much better impression of him.

    Plus, he played for EFF on The Weakest Link!

    1. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by merlin_jim · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think I saw a blurb on wilwheaton.net mentioning that he was talking with them about being in it...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    2. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by Foochar · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to a statement made by Wil Wheaton at www.wilwheaton.nethe will have at least a small role in the movie. wilwheaton.net is down at the moment so here is what I can recal from his comments. When they taped The Weakest Link episdoe Wil made a comment to Levar Burton about wanting to come back and give the character some closure, but that he didn't feel like Rick Berman and the other producers liked him. Apparently Levar went to bat for Wil because they decided to give him at least a small role. According to Wil he has been fitted for a uniform and has possesion of a script with the confidential stamped in red on the top every page. I would provide links to wil's site, but for some reason Wil has had to put the moose back out front again.

      --
      "You can't fight in here! This is the war room" --Dr. Stra
    3. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      Why a uniform, he would be returning from his experiences with the traveler...I would think he should be a guest not a crew member

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by Foochar · · Score: 2

      I think his comment was uniform. Like I said wil has the moose out front so I can't check. He may have said costume or outfit or something like that and not uniform, I can't be 100% sure though. One RUMOR that I have heard bandied about is that there is going to be a wedding and that he may be a guest at the wedding... Like I said before the whole thing is very confidential so at this point a lot of this is just conjecture.

      --
      "You can't fight in here! This is the war room" --Dr. Stra
    5. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      When last we saw Wesley Crusher, he was on the verge of becoming a full-fledged superhero. He had the ability to freeze time with his mind, and act independent of it. Before that he was able to move the ship across the universe with his mind. Now, if we're going to see a whole Q movie, where Wesley completes his evolution into Q, fine. There's plenty of back story to play with (explaining Q's interest in the Enterprise, Picard as Wesley's father-figure, etc.) but I can't see how Wesley could make a cameo. Now, wrap Will in Romulan makeup, and there you have something. Of course, Tom Paris will have to make an appearance to punch Will for hitting on Roxanne...oops, there I go confusing reality and TV again.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      just a 5 minute shot? that would be realy disapointing since he has the power to save another crew member simple by stoping time and such....to much cool power to play with to just make a cameo.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Bring back Wil Wheaton! by fobbman · · Score: 2

      Yeah! Get that CleverNickName guy to get the petition rolling. He seems to know a lot about Wil, and would probably be all for it.

      He has mentioned recently that he was looking for something to do so this should fit nicely! /irony>

  9. good lord by linuxpng · · Score: 2

    Could *anyone* stay awake with Star Trek the Motion Picture? Bad as insurrection? I think not. Granted there hasn't been any pal bald chicks in the new flicks, but that may be a little harsh.

    1. Re:good lord by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is, indeed, much better. What Robert Wise was forced to release in the 70s was infact a rough cut. Now he's had a chance to go back and finish it, and it really shows. And what other movie these days has the guts to have a several minute musical overture before even the title card comes up?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  10. settin' myself up by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know I'll get clobbered for this, but I think Insurrection was great. Saw it several times. Bought the DVD and the soundtrack CD. I don't understand the Insurrection-bashing, but it seems to be quite popular. Oh well. Guess I fail that section of the geek-test.

  11. They're all out on DVD... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 4, Informative

    BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

    All of the films are out on DVD (and have been for a while), they're just not worth buying because they contain no bonus features to speak of. Strange, considering Trek is a franchise that specifically caters to a crowd/fanbase that would love to see behind the scenes, technical, and "making of" documentaries.

    1. Re:They're all out on DVD... by trash+eighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      well the first film does

      i think they're going to re-release all the films with special features and all that other crap. so all the fans will shell out for the same film twice. now thats what i call a franchise!

    2. Re:They're all out on DVD... by shymog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, they're all out now. However, ST: The Motion Picture was released about 3 weeks ago.

      It can't be totally devoid of bonus features, being that it has a whole second disc of them.

      --
      "I wasn't sniffing your spicy brains."
    3. Re:They're all out on DVD... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      However, ST: The Motion Picture was released about 3 weeks ago.

      I'm dumb, and forgot to mention this in my original post. All the films came a couple years ago, without a big deal release or anything special. Interestingly enough, the new version of ST:TMP hasn't been available at many standard locations like Target, K-mart or Walmart (at least around here in Souther California).

    4. Re:They're all out on DVD... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      they are also fans that will by anything with ST stamped on it.
      So why do a lot of bonus features when there going to buy it ANYWAYS? of course after you've made a few million, then release it again with "specialy add-ins",
      then again with "new digitized scenes", then again with "new sound quality".

      Have you learned nothing from Lucas? ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:They're all out on DVD... by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      they're just not worth buying because they contain no bonus features to speak of.

      Being able to watch the whole movie instead of just a chunk of the middle of the screen is a pretty compelling bonus feature.

      Being able to watch the movie several times without it looking worse every time is a nice bonus feature.

      Being able to fit all the movies into the space half of them would consume on VHS is a nice bonus feature.

      Hell, just the difference in picture quality is nice, if you've got a 50" TV.

  12. All the latest rumors and spoilers here.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 5, Informative

    Visit Corona for the latest movie info..

    Coming Attractions - Star Trek 10: Nemesis

    Just a warning, spoilers are present..

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  13. Rumored to be last TNG movie... by Masem · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've heard rumors to the effect that this is the last planned TNG movie, at least based on the fact that Patrick Stewart no longer wants to be in that role (not that he doesn't dislike it, but he wants to return to stage work). Same rumors suggest that this isn't necessarily the end of the Trek series of movies, and future movies may either take place in the mid-series of DS9 or Voyager, or possibly an aglomeration of plots that would occur after Voyager returns.

    Anyone else heard similar? They *are* just internet rumors, after all...

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie... by GreyyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had read on Wil Wheaton's site that Lavar Burton had mentioned that this was the last one.

      I think it would be cool to have the next film with the DS9 crew. Thee were a lot of stories left open. Sisko coming back. A whole new relationship with the Changlings. The whole Gamma quadrant. Lots of material.

      I don't know what Voyager could do. They got home. End of story. Thank goodness. 7 of 9 aside, I didn't like the show.

    2. Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Patrick Stewart no longer wants to be in that role (not that he doesn't dislike it, but he wants to return to stage work).

      Where is Data when you need him (for translations)?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Rumored to be last TNG movie... by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2

      Sisko didn't die in the tv show. In the series finale, he did throw himself and Gul Dukat off a cliff but the Prophets saved him and took him ack to their realm to learn.

      I agree that the concept of death has been trivialized in comics and many tv shows, but I don't think this is one of those.

  14. Director? by NineNine · · Score: 2

    It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider.

    And this is supposed to be a good thing? If anything, it sounds like this'll be the last Star Trek movie.

  15. Patrick Stewart gets cloned! by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The plot, I read somewhere, is about a Picard clone trying to gain control of the Romulan Empire. No word on whether or not the stem cells will be used to help treat the obvious brain damage of the screenwriters of Insurrection.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  16. I hope that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that if they're bringing Janeway and Wesley in (now, if the rumours are true, why did they make her an admiral so soon?), and considering TPTB apparently want to do something to permit the Data character to exit, why not bring in some other characters for further closure and whatnot?

    Like, why not bring back Chief O'Brien? He was part of TNG, too, like Wesley. And then, if this is really the last TNG-cast movie and if TPTB want to keep a Trek movie franchise, why not bring back, say, Lt. Nog, and some other cast members from DS9 and/or VOY?

    (Yes, Nog made it to Lt. Watch the DS9 finale again.)

    For future movies, why not create a composite cast, like "the best of" from DS9, VOY, even the ones from TNG that want to stick around?

    As long as they don't turn the franchise into "The crazy adventures of Grand Negas Rom", I'll be happy.

  17. I never thought I'd live to see the day! by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    Someone should start a petition to bring back Wil Wheaton for this ST:TNG movie...

    God! Nobody will ever accuse trekkies of not being fickle!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  18. It's not strange...It's marketing by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This way they will sell 2 of each movie..one as soon as it comes out and one when it is rereleased with extended footage

  19. Enterprise movie? by Merlynnus · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they release a movie based on Enterprise, will they have to use negative numbers? Star Trek -1: The Klingon Wars

    1. Re:Enterprise movie? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      Uh. SPOILER!

      Some of us don't have UPN, so we have to wait a week or so for it to get to the network. Be nice and mark stuff as spoiler :)

    2. Re:Enterprise movie? by SEE · · Score: 2

      Well, according to the Chronology, the Romulan Wars are due in 2156 -- almost exactly five TV seasons after Enterprise started its mission. How's that for convenient timing?

  20. ILM? by Fatal0E · · Score: 2

    Since when did Paramount stop handing the SFX over to ILM?

    1. Re:ILM? by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Since when did Paramount stop handing the SFX over to ILM?
      Long ago in a galaxy far...um, waitaminit...

      IIRC, it was either TVH or TUC...probably TVH, as I know they didn't do the FX for TFF (and that was one of the complaints I remember hearing leveled against that movie).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:ILM? by malducin · · Score: 2

      They didn't do Insurrection. ILM also didn't work on the first one or number 5 (Final Frontier).

      Yes Rick Berman made that comment among another stupid remark. He said that since ILM was working on Episode 1 he didn't want ST to be done by the unit B. Of course that's totally ridiculous, there is no A and B team. Not that Insurrection had terrible FX but the production went screwy, like changing the ending at the last possible minute and of course the great effort to create the FX for it.

  21. Hey, I liked Insurrection! by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was a Star Trek Episode, just like ST II-IV were. I actually felt that it was *more* of a Star Trek flick than First Contact, and right up there with Generations.

    Of course, Star Trek alternates between "movies that are Star Trek" and "Star Trek that happens to be a movie." And that means that X will be like "First Contact", "The Undiscoveredy Coutnry", "The Wrath of Khan", and all the other even-numbered movies.

    I look foward to it.

    1. Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection! by Cutriss · · Score: 3

      I liked Insurrection a lot too...but I think that the popularity of a Star Trek is determined by space battles (Though even Space Battles couldn't save ST5, or "Star Trek V: The Wrath of God". Think about it.

      Everyone loves ST2, ST6, ST7 (kinda), and ST8. I don't know how the even number rule even TRIES to apply to ST4...

      Personally? I rank them this way: ST2,ST3,ST6,ST9,ST7,ST1,ST4,ST8,ST5. What can I say? It seems like everyone seems to forget Star Trek III when they say "This movie sucks!" or "This movie rocks!". It's got your space battles, cocky Kirk, fistfights with Christopher Lloyd as a Klingon, subterfuge at Starfleet HQ, and even Yellow Alerts in Space Dock!

      "Bridge, this is the captain...How do you have a yellow alert in space dock?" "Sir! Someone is stealing the Enterprise!"

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:Hey, I liked Insurrection! by hearingaid · · Score: 2

      Trek IV was the most commercially successful of the entire series. It's still the movie with the most mainstream popularity.

      Watching it now... it's so eighties, yes. It's like a cross between Ferris Bueller and Star Trek. :)

      All the trekkies whined when Trek III came out, because Trek II's ending was Poignant and III ruined it, or something. :) (I disliked II, mostly because of its horrendously contrived storyline. Drunks in space. That's all I can say.)

      --

      my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  22. Just some more info by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

    As always, don't forget to check out the plot on IMDb

    ... and here's something for the trekkies out there to wet their appetite. :-)

    The dialogue below should be considered a spoiler !

    GEORDI
    He just likes things the way he likes them..... (he looks at her, smiles) ..... Of course, so do I.

    He kisses her gently as Worf comes to them. Poor Worf is still suffering a bit from the bachelor party. He plops down beside them.

    WORF
    Romulan Ale should be illegal.

    GEORDI
    It is.

    WORF
    Then it should be more illegal.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  23. Save Wil Wheaton's Career! by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    The last thing in the world we could want to see is Wil Wheaton's career suffer. We need a petition to urge the producers of this future flop not to hire Wil Wheaton. After reading his website and responses to questions on Slashdot, I started to really like this guy and learned that he is not the dweeb I once imagined. We all know this movie will be a boring morality play where the Prime Directive will be violated during a temporal distortion caused by Data's emotion chip malfunctioning after having a "human" moment with Jorde's visor in the privacy of the holodeck.

    However, I hope every scene is filled with Brent Spinner. After that "Ol' Yellow Eyes is Back" album, he deserves to spend the rest of his life having to listen to plot flaws while signing autographs for socially-retarded Acne cream test subjects. Also, I hope that they make Marina Sirtis cover up. At her present age, they must be bouncing off her knees now.

    Captain Archer owns Captain Picard!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career! by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Personally, I think Wil Wheaton's best work was on Family Ties, as Jennifer's jock boyfriend.

      Wil Wheaton and Tina Yothers were a winning combination, if ever there was one.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
    2. Re:Save Wil Wheaton's Career! by drwiii · · Score: 2, Funny
      The sign on the front of http://www.wilwheaton.net/ says:
      WIL WHEATON DOT NET
      is temporarily closed, due to massive technical difficulties.
      The moose out front should have told you.
      Please check back later today.
      Guess Wesley couldn't save the day this time, eh?!?
  24. Woohoo! by glowingspleen · · Score: 2

    Man, I can't wait for the 13th movie in which Patrick Stewart's corpse will play a decaying equestrian-mutated Picard.

    The tentative title is "Beating a Dead Horse Captain"

  25. I love Star Trek, but I'm skeptical by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 2
    It will be directed by Stuart Baird, who did Executive Decision, US Marshals and Tomb Raider.

    Were any of these movies worth watching? TNG was amazing, but so far the movies have been pretty sad.

  26. Re:TPTB? What's that? by nigelc · · Score: 2, Informative
    "The Powers That Be"

    Sometimes refers to the suits at Paramount, who tend to make decisions based on their view of economic reality or business sense.

    --


    Cthulhu Barata Nikto
  27. Re:Insurrection WAS bad by hardburn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Speaking of Hugh, what ever happened to that borg computer virus that was created when they captured Hugh? That's just the sort of thing I would think Star Fleet would put somewhere in the datastores of every federation ship. "Just in case you're trapped 70,000 light years in the Delta quadrant and surrounded by a few hundred Borg cubes, use this."

    --
    Not a typewriter
  28. Re:trekkies are too optimistic by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 2

    > Can't be as bad as Insurrection.

    Famous last words!


    Hmm I tend to concur. Remember once saying, "it can't be as bad as Star Trek V!" At least 5 had one funny line: "What does God need with a Starship?" There was nothing funny about Insurrection (OK, DATA going nuts was actually really cool, but otherwise it was excessively lame).

    And with respect to another crappy odd-numbered trek, I found it interesting that, in an interview on John Stewart's short lived late-night talk show immediately prior to the release of Generations and Tank Girl, Malcom McDowell would only allow Stewart to talk about Tank Girl, not "the other movie."

    We can only hope that the odd-even thing continues to play out.

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  29. Stuart Baird's movies have been terrible. by idealego · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to imdb.com
    6.4 Executive Decision
    5.5 US Marshals
    6.2 Tomb Raider

    So it looks like we can't expect much from the next Star Trek unfortunately.

  30. ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie: by cosmo7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    i'd have something go wrong on the holodeck that would keep the ship in a time loop. the bad aliens would turn out to be good guys and vice versa. everyone would get really old very quickly because of a space phenomenon and would then go mad. and turn into lizards. and then meet god. in the end it would all turn out to be a romulan plot. new uniforms please!

    1. Re:ok, here's my idea for a star trek movie: by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you remember that ST, where some thing tries to take over he ship...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. Re:The secret by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    I was SO pissed when they shitcanned that game, it's not funny.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  32. Insurrection wasn't bad... by irishmikev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    C'mon...let's not beat up on Insurrection. First of all, most people who go to see Star Trek films are a self-selected audience. We'll go see any Star Trek movie because it's as obligatory as filing your taxes every year. Anything after First Contact that didn't have as much action was bound to get criticized, and Insurrection centered around a theme that has produced some of the best episodes of TNG, "something rotten in the federation". Just my opinion.

  33. Nudity... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Offtopic

    Since the next Bond movie is supposed to have a scene with female nudity, I'll boycott this one if it don't have a shower scene with Seven of Nine. Regardless if it fits in the story or not!

    But seriously, what do you feel about nudity in ST movies? Does it belong there? Or does it make the movie anti-ST and/or lower the quality?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Nudity... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      The hot tub scene didn't do anything for Insurrection, if that's what you meant.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    2. Re:Nudity... by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I thought Uhura's nude scene was handled pretty nicely. I was just laughing my ass off once these stupid horny guards realized that not only is it a blatently obvious trap, but they were lusting after someone old enough to be their grandmother...

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  34. BTW, I'm Taco the entertainment whore... by TZA14a · · Score: 2, Insightful
    BTW the first movie is out on DVD now and they did a pretty good job with the re-release.

    Well, we might HATE the MPAA and their way of doing business, but of course that doesn't mean we shouldn't buy all the shiny new DVDs they release...

    I hate to repeat myself, but people who complain about the MPAA and RIAA all the time, but still rush out to buy every new CD or DVD they think they could like need some serious attitude adjustment.

  35. Even Good, Odd Bad by uslinux.net · · Score: 2

    I'm sure this will result in a flame war and several Troll mods, but here it goes...

    As someone who likes Sci-Fi and Star Trek, but is NOT a trekkie, I'd like to note that the even numbered Trek movies are good, and the odd ones are not that good (I won't say "bad", but they could be better).

    1: Long, too detailed
    2: Khan was sooo evil. Coolness
    3: A lame excuse to bring Spock back
    4: Whales. Time Travel. Spock using colorful metaphors. Cool
    5: Great Barrier? Lame
    6: Klingons and Federation make peace. Cool
    7: Generations. 10 minutes of the Enterprise crashing. Twice. Need I say more.
    8: Star Trek "history". Nifty plot, cool movie
    9: Insurrection was just bad. 'Nuff Said.

    That said, Star Trek X will rock. Flame away.

  36. The Data Mythos by resonator · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're going to have to go through extensive effort to maintain Brent Spiner's appearance as the immortal android Data and not some dude in his 50's with crows feet and a middle aged gut.

  37. Tie-in with Enterprise and Suliban? by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or does it seem like the Future Dude directing the Suliban on Enterprise is a Romulan? Maybe we'll get to see the 24th Century theater of the "temporal cold war".

    Also, it wouldn't be a Star Trek movie without time travel. *sigh*

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Tie-in with Enterprise and Suliban? by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2

      The thing about a temporal cold war is that it can be fought in many difference centuries at once. The guy may be from the 29th century, but that doesn't mean he's not operating in the 24th century, as well as Ancient Byzantium.

      Still, the two best Trek movies (II and VI) had no time travel whatsoever, and I hope X follows that example.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
  38. Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even number! by sterno · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's look at the brief history:

    Star Trek I - Rather cheezy looking and overall not that good of a movie

    Star Trek II - KHAAAAAAAAAN! Still one of the best Start Trek movies

    Star Trek III - The search for spock. It had some good moments but overall kinda dull. Not bad, but not great

    Star Trek IV - Okay, the environmentalism was layed on thick, but overall a very different style from the other movies (much more humor), and quite a bit of fun

    Star Trek V - Today red shirted ensigns we are going to go find God on some funky planet in the middle of nowhere. Set phasers on CRAP!

    Start Trek VI - My personal favorite. Lots of good drama between Federation and the Klingons. The big fairwell for most of the original cast.

    Star Trek VII - a crossover between the old and new, and the movie clearly suffered for trying to force that.

    Star Trek VIII - We get to see the old federation, a borg trying to seduce Data, and overall a fun and action packed movie.

    Star Trek VIX - Ummmm.. what was this movie again. I know I saw it, but I don't recall it having anything worth remembering. Something about somebody rebelling I think but I forget.

    So, back to an even number and so we can reasonably assume it will be good. It seems like they screw up, and then work hard to get the next one right. Then they rest on their laurels and screw up again.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  39. Re:Question: by lysurgon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wouldn't be surprised. Even though Mr Stuart has gotten faim and acclaim for bringing back Star Trek (he basically launched an entire industry with that classically-trained voice: "engage"), he is a rather serious actor, and serious actors like to take on diverse, challenging, creatively envigorating roles.

    Unfortunitely for the rest of us, playing the same space captain for 10+ years kind of takes the "diverse, challenging, creatively envigorating" out of it.

    BTW: I caught his Prospero (that's from Shakespeare's Tempest) a couple years back in NYC. Brilliant. If anyone ever has a chance to see Patric Stuart perform anything live (esp Shakespeare), take it. His stage presence is unreal. I really hope he finds more projects to work on in the future.

  40. Digital Domain should not be listed for LOTR by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know you have a boner for SFX companies that use Linux, but Digital Domain only did a few FX shots for LOTR. To list LOTR as one of "their" SFX films is a bit much. Here's a quote directly from lordoftherings.net:

    Peter Jackson and his team not only created a physical Middle-earth, they also designed an entirely digital universe for The Lord of The Rings trilogy. This staggeringly intensive, behind-the-scenes work was carried out by WETA Digital. The New Zealand based F/X company assembled a crack team of computer artists, key frame animators, modelers, digital paint artists, motion editors, compositors and software engineers, among others, to devote years of their lives to creating never-before-seen effects.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:Digital Domain should not be listed for LOTR by JPerler · · Score: 3, Informative

      One might note, to those not famaliar with Peter Jackson or Weta FX, that Weta is Peter Jacksons company.

      Weta was established to do the CG for Heavenly Creatures, arguably Jackson's first non-low-budget gore movie. Next was The Frighteners, which heavily used CG and Weta was awarded for its skills.

      Anyway. I kinda know coming from NZ and having Weta FX (and for that matter, Jackson) 5 minutes down the road.

      JP

  41. Take the Dr Who approach... by Tassach · · Score: 2
    You could always have Data involved in some horrible, disfiguring accident (Say, getting shot in the face with a Romulan disruptor), necessitating that he be repaired. This could be used either to give Spiner a different look, or allow another actor to play the role.


    They could also pick up the thread from Insurrection, where the Borg queen gave him human skin. They could have Data re-create this procedure and give himself a new skin, which is then subject to aging.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    1. Re:Take the Dr Who approach... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      This will be the last movie, according to several sources.

  42. Re:Question: by ncc74656 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I read somewhere that Patrick Stewart doesn't want to do the Trek series anymore, and has had his hands in writing his death into the next movie.
    ...as if a small detail like death has ever kept a Star Trek character from returning...
    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  43. It's going to suck. Big time. by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Troll

    But don't take my word for it. Here, read this script review.

    -----

    1. Re:It's going to suck. Big time. by artemis67 · · Score: 2

      Yeah? Who cares? You'll see it anyway.

      That's the sad part. If only it weren't for this damn Geek Code that says I must watch every Star Trek movie and TV show that comes out... sigh

      -----

    2. Re:It's going to suck. Big time. by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      what are you talking about? I don't think that site is real... or at least its reviews are subject to question.

      If you look right below the ST 'review' you'll see one for 13 Ghosts, (which claims its good - as if that wasn't enough evidence to show its full of it)... but also it claims that:

      "a Great finale where Maggie, Rafkin, and Kalina try to save Bobby from a glass elevator that is rigged to explode and destroy the house."

      Well... after seeing the movie, I must have missed that part. Especially since "Kalina" died....

      So anyways... disregard the above as a troll.

      Bill

  44. At least the titles of Star Trek films aren't bad. by weave · · Score: 5, Funny
    Can you imagine The Attack of the Klingons or The Romulan Menace.

    And as annoying as Wesley might have been, he's no C3P0....

  45. Good/Bad Even/Odd Star Trek movies by MythosTraecer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, the correct formula for determining whether a Star Trek movie is good or bad was flushed out by Brunching Shuttlecocks in their review of Insurrection. Obviously, it's too long to repost here, but is highly accurate (or at least will at least make you smile).

    --

    --Mythos
  46. Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

    There I was thinking that one bought them in order to be able to watch the film at will, with surround sound and a high-resolution picture. Silly me.

    I hope you're trolling. The appeal of the DVD is not only in the quality of the film, but in the scene access and ability to pack on extras that couldn't be easily integrated with a VHS copy, such as director/actor commentary, multiple angles (for you porn fans out there) and language selection.

  47. give him an EVIL role by mr.ska · · Score: 2, Funny
    To hell with the goody-two-shoes know-it-all Wesley Crusher. Slap some forehead makup on Wil and give him an EVIL role. I'll bet, properly motivated, he could make a helluva Romulan Sub-Commander, or Klingon Lieutenant.

    After all, if he can hold his own with Queen Ice Bitch Anne (WL), he should have NO trouble stirring it up with the pissant Federation.

    Whaddya say, Wil?

    --

    Mr. Ska

  48. Statement from wilwheaton.net: by artemis67 · · Score: 4, Redundant

    "When I did Weakest Link, I stood next to LeVar," Wheaton said on his website, in a post earlier this evening. "We were talking during the commercials, and I said to him that I really missed them. He said to me that I should be in the movie, especially since it's going to be the last TNG movie. I told him that I would love to be in it, but I really thought that Berman and company really didn't like me. He seemed surprised, and he told me that he was going to call Rick the next morning, and suggest to him that I be in the movie, at least as a cameo. I thought that would be really cool, and told him so.

    "Last week, on Friday, my agent called me to let me know that there was an offer from Paramount to reprise the role of Wesley Crusher in Star Trek X. We just needed to work out the details.

    "So we spent some time negotiating it, and --get this-- Rick Berman told my agent that he was 'very pleased' that I was going to be in the movie!

    "I am really excited about this for three reasons:

    * I am going to get to work with my friends again.
    * Wesley Crusher will have some real closure, finally.
    * For the last 5 years, at least, everywhere I go, fans ask me if I'm going to be in a movie, and what happened to Wesley, and I can honestly say that I'm doing this for the fans, because it will be so damn cool to see all of us together again.

    "WHEEE!"

    -----

    1. Re:Statement from wilwheaton.net: by toupsie · · Score: 2
      Wesley Crusher in Star Trek X

      Has everyone jumped on the 'X' bandwagon now that Apple has labeled their next generation operating system, OS X? First it was Microsoft, now its Wesley Crusher!

      Then again, the Nation of Islam might state Apple stole it from Malcom X.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    2. Re:Statement from wilwheaton.net: by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 2

      >Has everyone jumped on the 'X' bandwagon now

      I've wondered that m'self. Seems Microsoft and Apple are both trying to identify themselves with the letter X. I can understand Apple beings as it is their 10'th iteration of OS but Microsoft X-Box? Hmm...

      And another thing, I've noticed alot of references and appearances of penguins lately. Many of them have nothing to do with Linux but... there sure are alot of penguins in the media these days.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  49. OOOOOO, Got a great Theory by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

    The romulans and the federation get into some conflict and wesly jumps in and stops time, like he did when the Cheroky(sp?) started to fight with the Cardasians, and some how resolves there diffrences

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:OOOOOO, Got a great Theory by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      yeah but if he has been following the traveler for the last 9 years then he should be well trained in his ability to control his powers. he knows when and when not to use them....which acording to the traveler is noeve use them let them fight it out. but it would be interesting to se what would happen if his mom was under threat....would be break and use the power he has?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  50. Will they be a few centuries older? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    As I recall from Insurrection, the Enterprise had to eject its warp core. Without that, the Neutral Zone is a loooooong way off...

  51. Re:trekkies are too optimistic by gowen · · Score: 2
    Malcom McDowell would only allow Stewart to talk about Tank Girl, not "the other movie."

    Holy Mother Of Fuck. A movie worse the "Tank Girl"? Boy, an I glad I've never seen Insurrection...
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  52. Re:Question: by OmegaDan · · Score: 2

    hahah mod this man up!

    I had an accident where I was legally dead for 5 minutes ... since I saw ST3 when people say "your gonna get yourself killed doing that!" I always reply "I've been dead before."

    but nobody gets it :)

  53. The heck with ST X, we want GQ II!!!! by hughk · · Score: 4, Insightful
    After watching Galaxy Quest, I realised how much ST films sucked. I am sorry, but the acting/direction isn't really there. GQ was just a satire on the whole ST idea.

    Sorry I am spoiled, I want to have better action and more fun with this sort of movie and ST lacked in both departments. We all have got a little blase about SFX, they are good for spectacle but don't exactly help the movie develop. Some of the ST story lines were just plane lame, some showed promise, but were not well developed.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  54. David Gerrold said it best... by yndrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He wrote, "Star Trek is the McDonalds of science fiction." Sometimes filling, sometimes good in a pinch, sometimes what you're looking for, but never quite good.My guess is that this new Star Trek will suck, not because of the director or the tired old franchise, but because even the best Star Trek tends to be marginal.I think it is interesting that we now live in a world where the original themes of Star Trek are considered so obvious that they are cliches: we should all get along, maybe we shouldn't screw around with other cultures, 'stun' is better than 'kill,' etc. Back during the original run, these were revolutionary concepts. Now, they're commonplace. Star Trek lost any sort of social relevance decades ago and now solely exists to validate pathetic fan fantasies. It's about hardware and in-jokes.Q says in the final episode of the Next Generation: "That's the exploration that awaits you. . .not mapping stars and studying nebulae. . .but charting the unknowable possibilities of existence." Good mission statement for a real science fiction series. Too bad Star Trek rarely lives up to it. Too busy selling toys, I guess.Star Trek to me is like giving a child a toy and watching as he plays with the box.

  55. Do they still make these? by WillSeattle · · Score: 2

    I guess I missed some of the latest ST films, which doesn't say much about them being good, since I'm a cinefile on a grand scale.

    My first reaction to the script review and other details is: How Last Century.

    I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that this probably won't be as good as some of the current Enterprise episodes are, which is a shame, cause I quite like the Enterprise series.

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  56. I'm mad as hell! by msm1th · · Score: 3, Funny

    Boycott the MPAA fascists! Fight for your rights! Don't give these freedom-hating bastards any more of your money! Don't give in to --- OOH! CANDY!

  57. Rescue in the ST universe by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    As I recall from Insurrection, the Enterprise had to eject its warp core. Without that, the Neutral Zone is a loooooong way off...

    Maybe so but they probably still had FTL comms. Starfleet would send a tow truck by soon enough, I'm sure. While they waited they could kick back and enjoy not saving the unuverse for a while.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  58. Has anyone watched the documentary "Trekkies" ? by feed_me_cereal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a documentary about star trtek fans. Anyone who has seen it will remember and recognize a particular trekkie who was creating his own star trek movie called "Nemisis". This was quite a while ago, and the movie, I believe, was supposed to be about a star station, but what impressed me was the detail he and his crew put into designing their movie. Now, I would have written this incident off as coincidence if not for the information I just recently aquired, which is that this particular trekkie was seen on an episode of drew carrey. Now, this isn't exactly a "big holywood break", but I can't help but wonder if they're using any of his ideas in this new movie. Does anyone have any information about this?

    --
    "Question with boldness even the existence of a god." - Thomas Jefferson
  59. Re:Question: by xTK-421x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Patrick Stewart will be reprising his one man "A Christmas Carol" in LA and NYC for two weeks in December. All proceeds from the 12/28 performance will be going to a September 11th charity.

    Star Trek Captains in Solo Shows

    Ticketmaster link for NYC shows

    I missed this the last time he did it, so I'm glad to get another opportunity to see him perform.

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  60. Re:Don't worry, it will be good, it's an even numb by mshomphe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Trek VIX - " The Vapo Rub"

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  61. Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

    ...the sole reason I own them is so that I can watch those movies whenever I want. The extras mean nothing to me. You should not be shocked by this.

    I'm not shocked, really, but surprised. You've been able to watch a movie whenever you want for the last 20 years with VHS. That's nothing new. While I understand that some people don't care about features, it really is one of the main reasons DVD is popular.

  62. Star Trek Topic by IdocsMiko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why does /. give Star Wars its own topic but not STar Trek? Slashdotters probably waste^B^B^B^B^B spend far more person-hours watching Star Trek than watching Star Wars. Don't get me wrong... I love them both. It just seems to me that there is more discussion here about Star Trek than about many topics that get their own, um, topic.

  63. You got it right, that's how Hollywood works by tekrat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You wrote:
    ------------
    Directed by Frakes.
    Story and executive production by Nimoy.
    Keep Shatner the heck away from the set.
    Keep it fast and not too much dialog.
    etc..
    -------------
    This is exactly how Hollywood works. Early in the series of movies, Paramount called in Harlan Ellison and said to him "listen, we make $10 million of a Star Trek movie, and we make $10 Million on a Eddie Murphy movie. So write us a Star Trek Movie with Eddie Murphy in it and we'll make $20 miilion!"

    No joke.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  64. Re:Insurrection was BAD! by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 2

    I guess I should say there are spoilers here for anyone who hasn't seen Insurrection and actually wants to, but I won't recomend it.

    It made sense. It was entertaining.

    It made sense and was entertaining only in the way that Armageddon made sense and was entertaining. It made sense because it did not require anyone to think. The good guys were beautiful suburban white people. The bad guys were ugly, puss ridden freaks, so it was easy to keep track of who was who. Then, there was twenty minutes of running away from baddies through caves. Who didn't see that they were going to have to go back for that kiddie's pocket baby-seal and get trapped by a cave-in at least five minutes before it happened? For me, it was entertaining in the same way as Armageddon, which is to say it was not.

    And then there's the lame transporter save. If they could save Picard from the thing before it blew up, why not the baddie, too? If they neglect to save him when all they have to do is beam up two people instead of just one, isn't that just murder? If not, its at least sloppy writing.

    As for First Contact, I thought there were some great moments of real internal conflict where data is being tempted. And they made Troi tolerable. All you had to do was get her drunk. Who knew?

    I do agree that the (only) cool thing in Insurrection was Data going nuts at the begining. That was fun, and unexpected.

    --
    if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  65. Paging CleverNickName... by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    I do hope Wil will keep us posted. Will you, Wil?

  66. Will Sela Return? by meldroc · · Score: 2

    How much do you want to bet that Paramount has negotiated or is negotiating a contract with Denise Crosby to play Sela? She's one of the more interesting Romulans on TNG.

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  67. Re:Worst director ever by hearingaid · · Score: 2

    Fortunately (perhaps), directors don't have that much power on a Trek movie set. The big-name actors are the real stars, know it, and throw their weight around accordingly.

    The real powers are the writers and the actors. Oh yeah, and Rick Berman. :)

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore

  68. Look at your own numbers! by ShieldWolf · · Score: 3, Informative

    1=2.5
    2=3
    3=3
    4=3.5
    5=2
    6=3
    7=3

    So the average for ODD movies is 2.6 and EVEN movies it is 3.2

    The WORST movie was an ODD (2) one and the best was an EVEN (3.5).

    To top it all off there is NEVER the case that a ODD movie is followed by and EVEN movie with a LOWER score, nor an EVEN movie followed by an ODD movie with a higher score, so the curse exists. ;)

    -Shieldwolf

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
  69. Data's aging by ansible · · Score: 2

    Actually, they talked about that when they found his "mother". He's supposed to appear to age as well, even though his body will last for millenia.

  70. Unintentionally funny.... by kaladorn · · Score: 2, Funny

    it just means now the universe will be filled with billions of rouge borg.

    I assume you mean rogue, though a bunch of rouge borg raging around does have a certain scary aesthetic quality.

    This leads to the obvious question:
    Would this make them Red Shirts?

    And although moderators moderating the parent poster as overrated may in fact be jealous of the intelligence of the comments, they certainly aren't jealous of the spelling. (Last time I checked, statement had a letter between the second t and the m....).

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  71. Date by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

    Anyone notice the date on that article? September 24, 2001. This isn't news, yada yada yada, you know the drill.

  72. Re:You buy DVDs for the bonus features? by reverius · · Score: 2

    I own about ten DVD's, and have never seen the extras. I have absolutely no interest in how the movie was made, or some stupid little "game" they can put on a DVD about it... I only want to watch the movie. And I want it to look and sound great, which it does. :)

  73. The "end" of Star Trek. by Maul · · Score: 2
    A long while ago a friend and I were discussing how the Star Trek franchise was going down the tubes, and that Star Trek 10 ought to be some sort of movie that will "end" Star Trek entirely. In other words, it wouldd somehow close the open holes in TNG, and DS9 story lines all at once. I know that this won't happen, and I'm sure that the hardcore Trekkies would probably dislike it.


    I think one of the rather off the wall ideas we thought of was a scenario in which Sisko returns, but returns "evil" somehow. He forges an alliance with the Romulans, and in the end the crew of the Enterprise must sacrifice their ship and themselves to save the galaxy. This could be an interesting way to end the whole franchise, would intermingle the TNG and DS9 cast (as well as providing a GOOD excuse for Worf to rejoin the Enterprise Crew).


    It might seem rediculous, but I find that solution more appealing than the direction the franchise appears to be heading: more series that suck even worse than Voyager / Soft core porn.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah