Slashdot Mirror


Grand Theft Auto Still Banned Down Under

SicariusMan sent us a CNN story that talks about australia upholding the ban on GTA3. It's been mentioned here before, but its interesting that its gonna stick. GTA3 really is perhaps the best PS2 game out in recent memory. I'm having a PS2 resurgance of late, beating Klonoa2, MGS2, Baldur's Gate: Dark Alliance, and getting hooked on Jak and Daxter and Frequency. And GTA3 is easily among the best of PS2 games. Sorry .au! At least they probably won't ban FFX!

99 of 421 comments (clear)

  1. What? by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I to understand that stealing cars is illegal in Australia? How... weird.

    --
    -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    1. Re:What? by AugstWest · · Score: 5, Funny

      I tell you what, tho....

      I was speeding down the interstate the other night, passing people on the right, when i spotted a speed trap too late. I saw the cop's lights go on, and watched him looking for a space to pull onto the highway to pull me over.

      I jumped into the middle lane, then the right lane, hid behind a trailer truck, then shot off the offramp, and wandered off and hid.

      At that point, I realized I'd been playing WAY too much GTA3. It was my first reaction.

    2. Re:What? by JPS · · Score: 2

      Err, you probably mean risking your very life saving severely wounded people in the street by driving your ambulance among the gun shots?
      (And you didn't really steal the ambulance... it just happened to be there ;) )

    3. Re:What? by Flavio · · Score: 2

      Heh, I can relate.

      Once I was at the mall and saw a surveillance camera. Suddenly I had the impulse to pull out a pistol and shoot it.

      At that point I realized I'd been playing way too much System Shock II =)

      Flavio

    4. Re:What? by telstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still haven't found my opponent's flag. The good news is, they haven't found mine either, so the score is still 0/0.

    5. Re:What? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Are you implying by playing GTA people will be encouraged to steal cars?"

      No. Read the article headline. "Grand Theft Auto Still Banned Down Under." The previous poster was making a joke by delibrately choosing to confuse the name of the video game "Grand Theft Auto" with the name of the actual crime "Grand Theft Auto". The joke utilizes the confusion to paint the absurd image of a news headline about the banning of something that's widely accepted as an outright criminal offense -- unlike, say, P2P filesharing, guns, or abortion, you don't have people arguing over whether or not the government should try to stop it.

    6. Re:What? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Us Metal Gear Solid fans of course have an urge to slide along the wall underneath the camera.

      graspee

    7. Re:What? by derrickh · · Score: 2
      I was behind a slower car on the road when I floored the gas and speed by. I moved to the left lane and made a right turn at the light, hitting the apex perfectly. I expected the car to drift a couple more feet to the outside but instead the rear wheels broke traction and I almost lost control.

      Thats when I realized I was driving a Chrysler and not the Skyline GTR from GranTurismo.

      D

  2. Gov'mint knows best by Sobrique · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what we like to see.
    Governments protecting us from playing things that are naughty.
    Thought police strike again. Anyone think that .au has seen the draconian legislation that the US and the EU have started trying to bring about and want to join in the party?

    Well, as long as you can still buy pr0n, I guess that's ok :)

  3. Wrong side of the road. by billnad · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe that I can clear this up. Any single video game can integrate itself into a countrys culture. Perhaps the Aussie authoritys are worried that this will cause people to drive on the "wrong" side of the road

    1. Re:Wrong side of the road. by oddjob · · Score: 5, Funny

      You drive on the road in GTA3? I much prefer the sidewalk.

  4. Odd thing to complain about. by Kanon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember from the earlier article that Australia was concerned about being able to hire prostitutes. Do your thing and then beat them up for the money.

    It's probably a good thing they didn't realise you can wander around, beat someone up for their money, kill the paramedic when he arrives, steal the ambulance and then mow down prostitutes by the dozen. All in the privacy of your own home!

    1. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by mekkab · · Score: 5, Funny

      So I sez to my wife "Wife, this game is great! You pick up prostitutes, have them 'do there thing', and then beat 'em up to get your money back!"

      So she sez "okay, show me!"

      So I do... and to say the least she was rather unimpressed. Millions of polygons, more ram, more space on the dvd-roms, and a creaky car is the best they could come up with?

      Wife was not offended. THIS GAME SUCKS!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by tommut · · Score: 2, Funny

      So she sez "okay, show me!"

      Was I the only one expecting the storyline to continue as such:
      So I went downtown, picked up some prostitutes, had them 'do their thing', and then beat 'em up and got my money back.

      Wife was not offended.

    3. Re:Odd thing to complain about. by banuaba · · Score: 2

      My fav thing to do is to pick up a hooker, get a hummer up to 125%, let the hooker out and then kill her and get my money back.

      It's a win-win situation. Of course, now I try to do the same thing when I pick up hookers in real life.. Quite sad, really.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
  5. Are Aussies expected to return the game? by Dimensio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider this from the CNN article (And I've seen it before):

    The OFLC was firm on the point that the game would not allowed in Australia, saying "if you have already purchased a game you will need to contact your retailer about return procedures."

    Are people who purchased the game before the ban now expected to return it? Exactly how many Aussies are going to return what is essentially a collector's item in their country?

  6. I'd be more sympathetic... by Byteme · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...if Australia didn't export beer that has already been through the kidney!

    1. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Howie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Assuming you live where your whois records say, you aren't qualified to comment on other nation's beer output, I'm afraid ;-)

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    2. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Thornae · · Score: 2

      ..if Australia didn't export beer that has already been through the kidney!

      Heh heh heh. Silly international person. We export that stuff because only people overseas are foolish enough to drink it. We keep our best beer for ourselves.

      Anyway, (to stay vaguely on topic) maybe this game actually got banned because you couldn't buy a decent beer in it...

      --
      |>
      Here be Dragons
    3. Re:I'd be more sympathetic... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      You know what shagging in a boat and an american beer have in common....They are both Farking close to water :)

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  7. It's not really that bad by rnb · · Score: 3, Informative

    After having played GTA3 for many hours straight, I'm surprised to hear of this (I missed the original article.) Sure, there's some swearing and violence, but it's not really any worse than a lot of other games that are already readily available. Does Australia have a long list of games that are banned, or is this one being set up to make an example, so to speak?

    1. Re:It's not really that bad by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You can do all sorts of depraved things in Nethack, but they probably aren't banning that. They can't!

      You can kill shopkeepers, kill succubi for their money after you finish with them, eat little kittens, and do all sorts of Unaustralian things.

      They can't censor life. So they will fail.

    2. Re:It's not really that bad by kilgore_47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, you can pick up a prostitute. Yes, you can kill (and rob) her or anyone else. Yes, if you push R2-R2-L1-R2-Left-Down-Right-Up-Left-Down-Right-Up you'll get every weapon possible, including a rocket launcher you can use to take down the police helicopter(s) that will eventually arrive. Yes, you can light people on fire with a flamethrower. Yes, when the national guard comes it is possible to steal their tank and drive around the city crushing things.

      By the fact that the game is selling, it's pretty clear that people WANT to play this kind of game. The government is supposedly there to serve the people (according to Jefferson, governments are created to protect our inalienable rights). How does taking something away serve them? The few people who are unable to tell a game from reality, and who go on GTA-style killing sprees in the real world as a result of this game, are probably lunatics anyway who would've eventually snapped anyway. Why shouldn't I (and my reality-and-games distinguishing friends) be allowed to play this game now?

      A side note, however: Lets not just focus on .AU here; this game was pulled from stores in America too and it's only back now because they've been forced to tone it down a bit.

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    3. Re:It's not really that bad by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      Sure, there's some swearing and violence, but it's not really any worse than a lot of other games that are already readily available

      Violence-wise and sex-wise, there's nothing really new. I think the main thing about the game is the completely open-ended world the game provides... there's literally no limit to the mayhem. If you want to do nothing but slaughter whores all day, the game will let you do that. It's completely amoral and will basically let you play whatever kind of character you like.

      After playing this game for a few weeks, I can tell you that it's a) one of the best games Iv'e ever played and b) it definitely taes depravity to a new level. :)

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    4. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Where did you get this rumor re: GTA3 in America being "toned down"? It hasn't. "Family friendly" stores such as Wal Mart, K Mart, Target, Toys Backwards R Us briefly flirted with the idea of pulling the game from shelves. When confronted with sales figures, most of the stores changed their tune.

      My local Wal Mart and Toys Backwards R Us both have considerable stocks of GTA3. My Best Buy can hardly keep the bloody game in stock.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    5. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 4, Funny

      Re: open-endedness. Why not ban the Sims too? I mean, I can wall people in in my bathroom and chuckle gleefully over their cries for help as they slowly starve to death.

      Or pause the game when a Sim is swimming, remove the ladder from the pool and then watch as they tire and drown.

      Seems to me that this sort of mayhem is much more within the reach of the average consumer (vs. obtaining rocket-propelled grenades and high-powered sniper rifles).

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    6. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      I actually meant "it's easier to acquire the tools to wall someone in than to obtain a PSG1".

      And you can "pause" by going into "Buy Mode". I belive striking the 'p' key also results in a pause of the game in its entirety.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    7. Re:It's not really that bad by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Or, I could have watched one too many Brit-coms. There's your answer!

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  8. Interesting Cycle... by Uttles · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean isn't Australia just a big island full of convicts? Funny how now they seem to be so strict. I wonder if someone gets arrested for having that game, are they going to ship them to the UK?

    --

    ~ now you know
  9. Support your Aussie gamer! by LordNimon · · Score: 3, Informative

    If anyone has any friends in Australia, I recommend that you ask them if they want a copy of GTA3. If so, you should offer to buy it and mail it to them. With the surge of Christmas packages, I doubt Customs would search every package, especially if it were sent in an innocent-looking envelope.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Support your Aussie gamer! by nocent · · Score: 3, Funny
      If anyone has any friends in Australia, I recommend that you ask them if they want a copy of GTA3. If so, you should offer to buy it and mail it to them. With the surge of Christmas packages, I doubt Customs would search every package, especially if it were sent in an innocent-looking envelope.

      You should buy them a new PS2 too while you're at it. Region coding for PS2 games means that they won't be able to play your US GTA3 on their Australian PS2.

    2. Re:Support your Aussie gamer! by psxndc · · Score: 2
      Aside from region encoding issues, Australia uses PAL TVs, not NTSC. So even if they could decode the disc, they couldn't watch it.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  10. The best and Worst Game this year! by Quizme2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ture the gamplay and replay value are pretty damn good, even a descent storyline. But, copkilling games and those with other criminal content will always attract publicity and bans. Remember "Postal". It was the same thing, at the time it had great graphics and a high replay value (especially the marching band level). Anyway, don't think for a second that this will be a negitive for the game publisher, its just an added plus to help sell the game in the US and UK. Hey, I played through GTA, Max Payne, and Spycraft. I can't say that I'm a better person for playing them. I would never want my child to come in contact with that shit just for someone else's entertainment.

    --
    "Get them before they get....
    1. Re:The best and Worst Game this year! by el_nino · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I would never want my child to come in contact with that shit just for someone else's entertainment.

      Er... Just for whom's entertainment do you play games for? I play them for my own entertainment, and I'd imagine your child would do the same.

  11. Wow by crumbz · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Talk about a great game. I still haven't heard all of the talk show segments in the game. It is great to go on a rampage and then part the car overlooking the bay and listen to the Chatterbox FM. All we can hope for is for GTA4 to have broadband multiplay and the game would be perfect.

    As for the Aussies, they are down the path of giving up personal liberties for the "greater good". Since they banned guns thei crime rate has steadily risen. Good job!

    1. Re:Wow by crumbz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yikes.
      Hey I like Australians, man.

      I like to think that I know what really happens in the world. Unarmed civilians are slaughtered by others. Governments look the other way while minorities are persecurted. Serbia, Croatia, Turkey, Iraq, Columbia, Uganda, Ethiopia.

      On the other hand, we have some 10,000 gun deaths a year in this country. Wonderful things such as little kids finding daddy's gun and shooting brother Jimmy, nutsos shooting up a KFC and the like.

      And by the way, you can check out the below listed sites for the "evidence". Granted they are a bit one-sided but that seems to be the nature of gun issues.

      http://members.ozemail.com.au/~confiles/

      http://www.nrawinningteam.com/auresult.html

      http://www.gunsandcrime.org/aussiegc.html

      I have as much freedom as I choose to have. That is why I vote at the polls, with my pocketbook and engage in civic activities. Just because I rag on Australians for pussing out on gun rights doesn't mean I don't know what is going on in the world. Both of our countries fought off the yoke of British colonialism. How do you think that was accomplished? Diplomacy with Her Majesty?

      But it is your country so do what you want with it....

    2. Re:Wow by zbuffered · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yap yap yap, at least we can play GTA. And as for guns, I don't know any numbers, but I was there earlier this year, and my hotel sat right across the street from a gun shop. So I don't know what that's about. But my theory on guns is this: if everybody had guns, there would be no crime. If nobody had guns, there would be no crime. But once you let the cat out of the bag, it's tough to stuff it back in. In the US, we have a saying, "Outlaw guns, and only outlaws will have guns." That's the gist of it anyway. But it makes sense to us.
      That being said, you guys do what you want, make up your own crazy laws, censor stuff you don't like, whatever. If I don't like it, I'll just not move there, and to hell with the great weather and beaches and all the BBQing and what not. If they did that here, I'd move somewhere else. I really would. Really.
      But your definition of freedom mustn't include freedom from censorship, because if it did, you wouldn't be able to say that US citizens have no more freedom than you. I'm not saying we're perfect, but GTA is a great game, and you aren't free to play it.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    3. Re:Wow by DragonPup · · Score: 2

      Speaking of banning guns, here's a quote from the Chatterbox radio station in GTA3

      Caller: ... and countries that don't have guns are unamerican.
      Lazlo(the host): I think you touch upon a good point there sir. Countries that don't have guns not American.

      Chatterbox Rocks, I pray in GTA4 they have even more Lazlo Oh, according to one of his callers, there was a Austrialian-American war, where the Aussies wired kangeroo's with explosives. :-)

      -Henry

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
  12. Memories by Mac+Nazgul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    of Carmageddon spring to mind...

    Why does it seem automobile related destruction of life and limb garners so much censorship?
    We kill 50,000+ people a year on the streets as it is!

    For those who have seen the classic Sean Connery James Bond film "Goldfinger" there is a quote I always found amusing...

    JB: Incidently, Delta-9 nerve gas is fatal- you'll kill 45,000 people.
    GF: Ha! American motorists kill that many every 2 years!"

    Now we hit that mark in under a year...

    1. Re:Memories by inburito · · Score: 2

      Nope.. official traffic related deaths are at around 35-38 thousand / year.. definetly less than 45. But yes, your point is still valid. I checked this up recently somewhere us-gov pages but can't recall the exact location..

  13. They *mean* well, but... by b.foster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'd just like to start out by saying that banning a freakin video game is not going to solve the world's problems, and is completely absurd.

    However, I do see where their government is going with this. It has been a disturbing trend for several decades in this country that criminals feed on the public's attention, and when the public gives much attention to criminals, it encourages people with self esteem issues to become criminals.

    That, then, is the problem with GTA: it encourages car theft. Not in the sense that a GTA player is likely to go out and steal a car, but rather that it allows a culture to slip steadily closer to a hellish society in which crime is tolerated in order to entertain the public. This is not unlike the Colosseum in ancient Rome, in which murders took place between god-fearing christians for the sake of the public's amusement. Compare this to the instant notoriety of serial killers like John Wayne Gacy, who make a killing selling paintings from prison, and you can see why the government wants to stop glorifying crime now.

    Something must be done about this morbid situation. But it doesn't involve banning games. Perhaps it is a media problem; if the government owned a few media outlets, it would be able to put writers and producers with old fashioned values back on the TV, replacing the ratings whores we have today. That is a bit closer to socialism than we should be, but it might be better for society in the long run.

    Bill

    1. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Oztun · · Score: 2

      People are animals and will continue to act as such. Logic will never prevail over emotions because they are our instict as animals. People will continue to prey on others self esteem and exploit their fears. Unless we do enter an age of aquaris where intellect prevails, I've accepted it isn't happening in my lifetime. I hope man doesn't kill himself off before it ever happens.

      There is nothing morbid about this. It's life and it's my entertainment. Watching all the idiots of the world bounce off each other is more fun than reading slashdot. If you want to be happy adjust your own mental attitude and forget about changing things on this planet. Man will just have to evolve for himself over time and try not to make his home uninhabitable.

    2. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Sobrique · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not a government thing, its a society thing.
      If there is a demand for 'blood, carnage and violence' then people will make games/films about it. Even if it become illegal, all you succeed in doing is creating a black market.
      Then again, maybe we should look at what makes us enjoy such things. Could it be that the human race find such things 'exciting' because at heart, many of us are still cave men? (Or women)
      Legislation is not the way forward. Legislation should be to enforce the will of the public - if they want violence, then legislating against it will simply cause them to ignore the legislation (consider the prohibition).
      I have noticed a decline in smoking recently though. Not because of laws, but because social tolerance of it has decreased. Maybe that's the way it should go.
      Perhaps we _should_ bring back the colosseum... Least then it'd be 'honest' violence.

    3. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This only causes a problem if you can't tell the difference between reality and a game. I love killing CTs in Counter-Strike, but I know it's only a game, it's not real and if I were to go and head-shot an SAS officer, he wouldn't respawn in a few minutes.

      Computer games are great because they let you do things you wouldn't do in real life. If you have trouble differentiating, go seek help now.

    4. Re:They *mean* well, but... by zbuffered · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have noticed a decline in smoking recently though. Not because of laws, but because social tolerance of it has decreased. Maybe that's the way it should go.
      This is why I like Apple's iPod commercial. At the bottom of the TV it says in really small letters, "Don't steal music."
      If my friends found out I downloaded an mp3 illegaly last night, and my stature decreased with them as a result, that would be the last MP3 I EVER download. Social acceptance is the biggest influence on culture anywhere. Bigger than laws, by a long shot. Now, you have to realize that for criminals, a lot of them are social deviants. They do things not for society's attention, but...
      Well, I honestly don't know why they do these things. Murder, Grand Theft, and what not. But I really don't think it's for social acceptance. And if the law says they shouldn't, that's not too great a deterrent either. No more so, anyway. So why do they do these things? What's their reward? Because if we know what their reward is, we might be able to take it away. Maybe it's just money, which means that we can only take it away if we can catch them, which doesn't change anything.
      Sorry for rambling.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    5. Re:They *mean* well, but... by Grunschev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >writers and producers with old fashioned values back on the TV, replacing the ratings whores we have today

      Yeah, we've got to get back to things like Gunsmoke, where Marshall Dillon can kill one or two bad guys every week and hang out in the bar at the local whore house.

      Igor

  14. Steering Wheel wrong side... by toupsie · · Score: 5, Funny
    All they need to do is move the steering wheel from the left side of the car to the right side of the car and mirror all the scenes so players are driving on the correct side of the road in Australia. This is completely understandable. The last thing the nation of Australia needs is a bunch of teens taught to drive on the wrong side of the road.

    On a serious note, I lived in Australia (Newtown, NSW) in 1992 for about 7 months. When watching TV, I started to notice you really didn't see violence but man 'o man did you see breasts! While I was there, the movie "Ten" w/ Bo Derek was shown on their equivilent of NBC. In America, they cut out all the nudity scenes. In Australia, they actually had more than the original movie had! Special Director's Cut for Australia. What a great country! Great beer, beautiful women and those cool, lickable toads.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Steering Wheel wrong side... by toupsie · · Score: 2
      Is this another euphemism for breasts or have we moved past that part of your post? Sorry, I get distracted.

      No, I am talking about these toads

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  15. Seen it all before by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Duke3D was banned in Australia until 3DRealms patched it so the Adult lock couldn't be deactivated; it took a few hours at least before it was cracked, if memory serves.

    We'll ban anything you like over here, it seems...

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
  16. Secret code for GTA3 by Hougaard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ofcause they need to ban a game where you can do the following:

    Urinate:
    Walk up to a wall and press Up, Down, Up, Down, L2, R1, R2(2), Up, Down, Up, Down, Up.
    Your character will urinate on the wall. The cops will chase since it counts as vandalizing.

    Funny!

  17. From a known fellon: by cavemanf16 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Hello slashdot!

    I found that GTA and GTA2, while not as graphically pleasing as GTA3 looks to be, were a wonderful addition to my skill set. Not only do I now know how to go on a "Kiiiiillll FRENZY!", but I also know how to hotwire most major makes of car, from the unimposing Ford Fiesta, to the ever-popular Tank!

    These sorts of skills are very important to an aspiring criminal mastermind, such as me. And why work so hard for a Cisco or MSCE certification? They cost so much more! For only $49.95 (before tax), you too can learn the same skill sets I now have.

    I'm just wondering if GTA3, with all it's new-fangled '3D' graphics is really worth the investment in my future. I mean, I already know how to highjack cars and kill random people. Do I really need to know how to interact with the mob? Please help me decide slashdot!

  18. Bad logic by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "First they ban the guns. Then it's open season on everyone and everything."

    Oh you mean like in Europe and practically in every other western democracy?

    Besides that's a "Slippery Slope" logical fallacy.

    1. Re:Bad logic by sqlrob · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, like the CCD monitoring on every corner, key turnover requirment, ISP record keeping...

    2. Re:Bad logic by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's not quite a "slippery-slope" fallacy. The implication is that, if the citizens of a country have no way to form a revolution, their government will be more likely to be tyrannical.

      If the link guns->threat-of-revolution->keeping-the-gove rnment-in-line weren't implied, I'd agree with you. (Of course, the idea makes some of its own assumptions that may be argued, but that's a discussion for another day...)

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  19. UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    USA and UK ban stuff too, not just australia. Its just that its gov pressure on publishers that does it rather than pre-emptive laws.

    The Playstation had an awesome game I played a lot using a MOD chip called Thrill Kill.

    Unfortunately for the developers and fans, before that game was released Electronic Arts acquired the rights to the game by purchasing Virgin Interactive's titles, and due to the publisher's "moral obligations," the game never saw the light of day. At least, legitimately. Ebay sales of Illegal CDRs were heavy for a while. and it traded swiftly , especially after EA placed full size ads for it in trade mags, and stickers.

    And dont forget that the Movie Clockwork Orange was not played in Britain for almost 20 years in a theater! Kubrick was threatened with jail time if he allowed it by threatening to assosiate teen crime with him as the inciting party.

    The USA almost banned "Custers Last Stand" for the Atari 2600, which featured a cowboy raping a Squaw tied to a stake.

    Germany successfully banned Castle Wolfenstein 3D by ID when Compuserve tried to have it online. It got deleted off CIS.

    Australia is screwed in other ways regarding porn though.

    At least in the US I can say "Jesus is a Lie" in a video game, or depict cops having their heads blown off to score extra points.

  20. Why this doesn't immediately bother me... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Okay, what you have is a society whose government has decided that it doesn't want video games that make carjacking and other violent mayhem seem like a fun idea.

    From a moral standpoint, that's actually kind of healthy.

    Where it starts to get iffy is when this sort of ban is actually symptomatic of a bigger problem, in which the government is trying to make their entire population goosestep and a commercial ban on violent games is only one such restriction imposed, in parallel with other restrictions like clampdowns on information or restricted free political speech.

    For instance, if the US were to ban counterstrike servers that didn't automatically put bots on the terrorist team, I'd be pretty freaked out. And you can bet this is something that will come further down the line if Ashcroft et al. don't get their powers checked.

    But I've never heard of Australia being a society with a reputation of doing this sort of thing to its population. Now, I'm not saying that this isn't happening there per se, I may just be ignorant of it, and an Aussie contribution on this issue would definitely be valuable.

    But what I'm thinking is that we shouldn't necessarily be taking this in the same vein as if a North American government were imposing such a restriction. You might disagree, but I think that the censorship is only a problem when it comes close to stifling dissent against the powers that be, as opposed to just trying to promote a little bit of morality and decency. Yes, I know that the line is easily blurred, but is it blurred here?

    Just my two cents.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Why this doesn't immediately bother me... by Oztun · · Score: 2

      Why it should bother you. Seeing as how you are showing intelligence it is my guess playing this game would not cause you to murder and steal cars. You seem to be able to identify the difference between a video game and reality.

      So it is only healthy in that it protects us from the uneducated or deranged products of society. What bothers me is that society wants to ban things rather than promote things such as education and family. I say give people personal freedoms to take their aggresions out killing fake people in a video game. Then promote education, family, and morals such as not killing people or stealing cars.

  21. Re:(OT) Re:Well well well, imagine that by Oztun · · Score: 2

    And all because he played GTA. It not only makes you steal cars, it makes you drive to fast too.

  22. New Autralian version to come in Jan 2002 by substruo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article says that the maker of the game is trying to make a new version of the game for distribution in Australia in Jan 2002.

    How are they gonna pull that off??? Remove the guns, prostituts, organized crime, etc.... what are you left with??? Crazy Taxi????

  23. Re:Boycott Australia by Xenex · · Score: 5, Informative

    "We should all (I mean, the Western World) boycott Australia for all the censorship and banning."

    Now, should I make a comment about how the (stereo)typical American that knows nothing about the rest of the world, or point out that Australia is generally considered as part of the west, at least in a political sense?

    "I mean, how many millions of dollars do we leave there through tourism? If we stopped going, then they would feel a drop in their income."

    Do you really think that international tourism hasn't dropped already? This little thing happened, something to do with planes. About 3 months ago. You may have heard about it on the TV.

    Besides, tourism may be a large industry, but it's hardly the be all and end all. And since September 11, domestic tourism has grown quite a bit...

    "And of course, we should also stop going to the theatres or renting movies like Cocodrile Dundee."

    We? The USA collective again?

    Believe me, as an Australia, I would love nothing more then for people like you to stop watching bullshit like Crocodile Dundee. That movie shows less about the 'average' Australian as a old west movie does about the 'average' American.

    While i'm at it: I have never seen a koala. I have never seen a crocodile. I have could probably count the amount of times I've seen a kangaroo with one hand.

    Yes, videogame censorship sucks. But this won't stick anyway. It hasn't before, and it won't now. The censoring of TV, movies, and games is getting overhauled now. GTA will probably get a harsh rating under the new system. Whatever. I'd prefer to have to download a copy of some game off the internet to having a government body like the FBI installing spyware and destroying my privacy.

    All well, you've read all this now. Go back to thinking that everyone in Australia is like that pathetic Crocodile Hunter show. I guess your fantasies are more fun then the real world.

  24. Re:you have to admit... by John_Booty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but just too desensitizing for most people to handle.

    Oh, for most people it's desensitizing, but not you? Seriously, fuck you for telling people what they can't handle. Who the hell do you think you are?

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  25. Inner human by mavericknet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's true, but consider this, people generally look to games and movies as an expression of fantasy or an outlet. Most humans have core interests to do illegal things. I'd prefer that people vent these interests into video games then letting them bottle up until they "snap". I've played many violent and gruesome video games and I thoroughly enjoyed the Die Hard movies, and things of the like. But I'm just a normal working guy, I don't blow things up, don't steal cars, and I pay my taxes. So I think the problem is that the people that go out of line either have chemical imbalances (natural or recreationally induced) or are in need of support from responsible people at stages in their development. Your thoughts?

  26. sooo by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    If the ban is justified, then an abnormally high percentage of people who bought the game and don't return it will steal real cars, right?

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  27. Re:Boycott Australia by sketerpot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now, should I make a comment about how the (stereo)typical American that knows nothing about the rest of the world, or point out that Australia is generally considered as part of the west, at least in a political sense?

    I believe you are describing the typical American. The kind that thinks we're better than the rest of the world just because we have more nukes, or something. (I'm American).

    Do you really think that international tourism hasn't dropped already? This little thing happened, something to do with planes. About 3 months ago. You may have heard about it on the TV.

    This is practically a psychosis. There are a lot of people who think you'd have to be crazy to get on a plane. Now, how many planes were there that weren't hijacked? Besides, Australia doesn't have *that* many terrorists....

    Yes, videogame censorship sucks. But this won't stick anyway. It hasn't before, and it won't now. The censoring of TV, movies, and games is getting overhauled now. GTA will probably get a harsh rating under the new system. Whatever. I'd prefer to have to download a copy of some game off the internet to having a government body like the FBI installing spyware and destroying my privacy.

    Yes, spyware sucks. But how did this censorship get in place in the first place if it's sure to go away eventually?

    BTW, It's far more fun to pretend that you're the Crocodile Hunter than to actually watch the show. This view is popular even in America!

  28. Re:Boycott Australia by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Erm, if you're going to boycott countries for having Draconian laws, you're going to be boycotting every single country ever.

  29. I'll be moderated straight to hell for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, I must confess to playing, as well as enjoying, such violent games as GTA3.

    But, I must commend, yes commend, the Australian government for this latest action. I can definitely see their point in not wanting to promote such violence or desensitize anyone of the horific nature of such violence. The government will take a lot of heat for this and I admire their strength to face this heat.

    Let's face it. Society and certainly the entertainment industry has increasingly glorified this type of violence. I don't believe that people, except for a very sick few, commit such violence because of movies of video games but, I do think that they are desensitized by the constant onslaught of such violent entertainment.

    The Australian government is, contrary to the usual posts here, not significantly restricting freedom of speech or movement. They are simply restricting a single excessively violent video game that portrays socially abhorent behavior.

    The social and moral values of the free world have degraded dramatically over the years and I don't think that it is a good thing. Would your parents or grandparents have discuused killing someone as we freely and easily do on a daily basis? When last did you say, "I'm gonna kill you!"? Think about what that statement means and then tell me that you have not been desensitized? So, why then do we take amusement from beating up or killing old people?

    The people of Australia and the freeworld, for that matter, can definitely make and play higly enjoyable video games without such antisocial violence.

    Your Grandmother just got killed in a car jacking. How funny and entertaining is that?

  30. Have I got a link for you! by theantix · · Score: 2, Funny
    Not in the sense that a GTA player is likely to go out and steal a car, but rather that it allows a culture to slip steadily closer to a hellish society in which crime is tolerated in order to entertain the public. This is not unlike the Colosseum in ancient Rome, in which murders took place between god-fearing christians for the sake of the public's amusement.

    [...]

    Perhaps it is a media problem; if the government owned a few media outlets, it would be able to put writers and producers with old fashioned values back on the TV, replacing the ratings whores we have today.
    Ever heard of adequacy.org? Judging from your posting you could be a valuable contributer there. Just a thought.
    --
    501 Not Implemented
  31. Better idea... by Dimensio · · Score: 4, Informative

    Offer to buy the UK version for them and mail that. The game has not been banned in the UK, the UK version is PAL and thus compatable with most Aussie TVs and the regional encoding system (for PS2 games) is set so that the UK and Australia are the same region, so people in Australia can play the UK version without problem.

    Of course, if you live in the UK then its less hassle. Or New Zealand -- I understand that many Aussies are importing from NZ.

  32. Most significant aspect... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    • The OFLC was firm on the point that the game would not allowed in Australia, saying "if you have already purchased a game you will need to contact your retailer about return procedures."

    Holy fuck. That's a lovely precedent.

    And hey, we were watching that Australian cut of "Last Tango in Paris", and actually, we not think that we didn't cut enough depravity. Hand it over, you sickos.

    And that "Clockwork Orange" book, holy shit, have you seen it? I can't believe we let that through. Burn it, burn it now.

    Anyone got the National Geographic that shows the Yanomamo using drugs in a religious ceremony? Turn them in. We're thinking of the children.

    Anyone got more details on this retroactive censorship crap?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  33. Be patient by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    If you want to commit vehicular mayhem Down Unda, you'll just 'ave to wait until after the Pocksaclypse.

    ~Philly

  34. Re:Boycott Australia by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 2

    All well, you've read all this now. Go back to thinking that everyone in Australia is like that pathetic Crocodile Hunter show. I guess your fantasies are more fun then the real world.


    Crike!

    (Oh, and I agree. How pathetic -- a show that teaches kids to respect nature and urges them to explore the world around them rather than sitting and playing video games. Silly!)

    --
    Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
  35. Re:Boycott Australia by Xenex · · Score: 2

    "Dude, that is a shame. Maybe you should try to get away from the monitor a little more and experience the great outdoors and all the Austrialia has to offer."

    I was expecting something like that. I was almost going to write something addressing that in my first post...

    But basically, I'm saying that these animals aren't exactly commonplace.

    Yes, I'm sure I could "go bush" all over the country to see all the wildlife, but to be blunt, it doesn't interest me all that much. And what difference does that make? I get outside, I go for walks all the time. That doesn't mean I should start driving over the countryside looking for native animals.

  36. LOL by afxgrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since they banned guns thei crime rate has steadily risen. Good job!

    Sorry, I can't help but laugh at that statement.

    I'm also VERY interested in seeing those statistics ... I'm sure crimes related to guns have dropped dramatically. And eventhough there are less murders/deaths in a crime, the crime rate can still go up due to increases in theft, fraud, and smaller forms of crime. It all depends on how you measure crime.

    But to me that comment screams of a bullshit stat., at least you did not write a number as well...

  37. personal liberties by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >As for the Aussies, they are down the path of
    >giving up personal liberties for the "greater
    >good". Since they banned guns theircrime rate
    >has steadily risen. Good job!

    I understand that censorship is bad and that deciding what constitutes reasonable entertainment is not the governments job. But i entirely disagree with your use of term "personal liberties" especially when referring to guns and when putting down Australia.

    The idea of civil liberties is basically that all those actions which do not cause direct harm to others should be permitted and the government does not have the right to intrude into the personal life of it's citizens. In this field the U.S. is perhaps the worse offender among democratic nations. I would draw your attention particularily to the Anti-Terrorist Bill which has been pushed through in the past few months which basically signs away the rights and liberties of every American in the name of national security.

    The right to own a video game is an issue of civil liberties. It involves deciding what you want to do in the privacy of your own home to entertain yourself.

    The right to own a handgun is not an issue of civil liberties. A handgun, unlike a videogame, is a machine made to kill human beings, it serves no other purpose. This is not a machine that anyone should be permitted to carry around with them, and you can shout about personal freedom all you want. The "right to bear arms" is a freak of American Legislation born from the fact that America is a nation founded upon a violent revolution. It is NOT a basic human right.

    And as for your figures about Australia's crime rate: The crime rate has only increased because of the number of people who have been arrested for illegally owning handguns. The number of handgun related murders has steadily decreased since the ban was instated.

    1. Re:personal liberties by x0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right to own a handgun is not an issue of civil liberties.
      Of course it is. The US Constitition makes it so. If you want to change that, petition a representative for an amendment.

      A handgun, unlike a videogame, is a machine made to kill human beings, it serves no other purpose.
      So hunting, plinking, and more formalized competition are mis-use of a firearm? Please, just because you have an aversion to guns, spouting polemics doesn't make your viewpoint more valid.

      This is not a machine that anyone should be permitted to carry around with them, and you can shout about personal freedom all you want.
      s/personal freedom/personal defense. I have no desire to become a potential victim because of anyones perceived 'higher morals'. Being unable to run from criminals shouldn't limit my ability to go where I want, when I want. Life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness means that I am morally entitled to defend myself. If that means carrying a weapon, then I choose to do so. If you want to cower in your home 24/7 or avoid areas of your home town or city, then I pity you.

      The "right to bear arms" is a freak of American Legislation born from the fact that America is a nation founded upon a violent revolution. It is NOT a basic human right.
      That you choose to ignore that the US would not exist without that violent revolution speaks volumes. What was the alternative, asking nicely? You also choose to ignore that the English government, at that time, was opressive as well as generally bleeding the American colonies dry of both money and resources.
      You should perhaps attempt to leave the nice, warm, and fuzzy cocoon you have built for yourself and look at how other peoples live from their viewpoint.

      I suppose I should maybe have a bit of the topic in here somewhere. :)
      While I am unsure if denying the populace access to a (violent) computer game is really a civil liberties violation, it is an indicator that the government has 'Nanny State' written all over it. My personal opinion is that no government needs to step into my life and decide for me what I am capable of dealing with WRT mainstream commercial entertainmnet. I choose not to play computer games, especially games like GTAx, but I also strongly believe that it should be a personal choice, not a mandate from politicians.

      --
      In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    2. Re:personal liberties by cthugha · · Score: 2

      Of course it is. The US Constitition makes it so. If you want to change that, petition a representative for an amendment.

      Okay, for a start, you seem to suffer the delusion that the US Constitution has authority in Australia. I realize that a lot of Americans seem to think they have the God-given right to enforce their own values on the rest of the world (at least, that's the pretext used when using military force to protect essentially economic interests), but this is going just a tad too far.

      Secondly, your implied assertion that the US Constitution Is Always Right is just plain absurd. The US Constitution is a document drafted by human beings over two centures ago. It suffers the same drawbacks as any other document drafted by human beings: it may contain mistakes and go out of date. That's why there exists (as you point out) a mechanism to change it. Please don't make blind appeals to authority, it impresses no-one.

  38. Re:you have to admit... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    "Oh, for most people it's desensitizing, but not you? Seriously, fuck you for telling people what they can't handle. Who the hell do you think you are? "

    And who the fuck are you to bitch at someone for giving his opinion? He didn't give a commandment that "all shall not play this game", he suggested something.

    I guess they don't allow opinions in your town?

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  39. Re:UK "Bans" Clockwork Orange, USA "Bans" , others by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Exactly. The only person to ban Clockwork Orange was Stanley Kubrick himself. This is why it only got an official release here after his death.
    Kubrick had taken cinemas to court for showing it, and was instrumental in closing down the Scala in London.

    The film was NEVER banned by HM Government, and anyone who says that it was is a know-nothing bozo.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  40. Before the opening credits... by Toliaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This game has been modified from its original version. It has been edited for content and formatted to fit your legal system."

    --
    Cheers, Toliaro
  41. Re:Boycott Australia by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, videogame censorship sucks. But this won't stick anyway. It hasn't before, and it won't now. The censoring of TV, movies, and games is getting overhauled now.

    Yeah whatever. That's why the Aussie government has already banned damn near the whole Internet by trying to make it safe for kiddies, putting the damn thing through a country-wide proxy, and countless other horror stories.

    Tell me how it's getting "overhauled" again.

  42. OT: Coopers (was Re:I'd be more sympathetic...) by MeerCat · · Score: 2

    We keep our best beer for ourselves.

    I get my Coopers in the UK from Oddbins, and it's sometimes cheaper than the stubby price I used to pay in Australia !!

    Oh, and you can get VB too (if you're desperate) but the cans are re-printed "Victoria Beer" as they can't call it "Bitter" in the UK (it's a lager). Fosters in the UK is nothing like Aussie Fosters (well, almost nothing like - it's still piss, but different piss), but is brewed in London by Courage.

    I'm off for a hoegaarden which I can get on tap and tastes surprisingly like Coopers - now if only it was 35 degrees outside rather than 3 degrees...

    T

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    1. Re:OT: Coopers (was Re:I'd be more sympathetic...) by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      The majority of "imported" beers are brewed locally.

      Except in Europe where you can't call it "Imported" unless it really is, and the country of origin must be clearly labelled. So whilst "Guinness" is brewed in London, you can also get "Guinness Export" which is the real thing, and most of the bottled beers are the real thing too. But yes, a lot of "budweiser" over here is UK brewed, but the Budvar is still the Czech original !

      even though it is made exactly the same way

      The example I gave of Fosters is interesting as UK Fosters is not even like Oz Fosters - the only thing thats supposed to be the same is the name and logo - the UK Fosters is a british lager made for the UK market and conditions, not a "copy" of the original.

      T

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
  43. See, I live in Georgia... by Uttles · · Score: 2, Funny

    and we are a bunch of convicts. I love it. It's fun. That's why I'm sad to see Australia take this stance.

    --

    ~ now you know
  44. GTA3 Paramedics and prostitutes by sheetsda · · Score: 2

    I don't think you can kill the paramedics, you can knock them down but not out. I've run over them 5 times and they just keep getting up after a few seconds. I guess I need to try shooting them. You can get health back by stealing the ambulence too, if you're not at full from the prostitutes, who can raise you up to 125% (pun intended).

  45. Re:Boycott Australia by TheViffer · · Score: 2, Funny

    That doesn't mean I should start driving over the countryside looking for native animals.

    Well .. maybe your should!

    What? No money .. no problem. I saw this in a game and thought that it was the best idea ever. First go steal a car and then for money ....

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  46. On a related note... by pdferguson · · Score: 2, Funny

    On a related note, GTA3 was finally released in Afghanistan, after Rockstar Games agreed to make a few minor modifications. The only vehicle you can choose is a beat up Toyota pickup truck with fourteen armed men in the back...

  47. OMG by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I actually started laughing so hard people came to my cube to ask what was so funny. You deserve most of the funny mod points given to responses in this article.

    (+10, Callbacks are the best humor)

    Virg

  48. Re:GTA: Different perspective. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

    Hardly. I actually rented this one and played it at night when the wifey had gone to bed (she gives me dirty looks whenever I so much as suggest we get the game). I found myself trying (unsuccessfully) not to burst out in laughter repeatedly. Every 20 minutes or so, I would think to myself "I've seen car chases like this on TV!" Or "Wow, that one would have made 'Cops' or 'America's Most Deadly Police Chases Part IX'.

    Case in point: I made the mistake of jacking a cargo van in the plain view of a police cruiser. As I fled in my (not-so-quick) new wheels, the cruiser gave chase. Attempting to pull me over, the cruiser rammed me up onto the sidewalk, where I promptly ran over a patrolman on foot. Instant second star rating. More cruisers joined the chase and, as I whipped around a corner (the doors in the rear ajar from the repeated rammings), a cruiser screeched to a halt in front of me, causing my van to ramp up over its hood and complete a barrel roll. Hood now aflame, I ditched the van and fled on foot. The four cruisers behind me disgorged their officers, who began to fire at me. However, they failed to flee the scene of my flaming wreck, which exploded, killing around 10 officers. *BAM* Three star rating.

    After that, well, it's a bit hard to flee the cops' helicopter on foot...

    It is to laugh.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  49. Re:you have to admit... by John_Booty · · Score: 2

    And who the fuck are you to bitch at someone for giving his opinion? He didn't give a commandment that "all shall not play this game", he suggested something.

    You must not understand what either of us said. He said (paraphrase) "this game is too desensitizing for most people" and I took issue with him taking upon himself what is and isn't okay for others. I didn't say he shouldn't have an opinion as you are stupidly implying, displaying a complete lack of reading comprehension.

    There's a difference between criticizing someone's opinion (which I did) and trying to judge what is appropriate for other people (which he did).

    There's a big difference between criticizing someone else's opinion (which I certainly did) and trying to say they shouldn't be allowed to express their opinion (which I certainly did not do). People such as yourself don't understand the distinction. You've got the right to express your opinion, and I've got the right to think you opinion is idiotic.

    As the famous quote goes, paraphrased loosely... "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  50. Re:Boycott Australia by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 2

    That's supposed to be Australian slang? *shrug* To me, it's just a wacky guy being wacky. I think the Subaru outback commercials have done more lasting damage to Australia by keeping Dundee around than anything the Croc hunter has done.

    And yes, he jumps on top of animals. Often to save their lives.

    Sure, it's over the top and silly melodrama. But I'd wager a bunch of kids watch nature shows now who weren't before, and you can't say that's bad.

    --
    Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
  51. Banned Guns? No! by DonalGraeme · · Score: 2, Informative
    Since they banned guns


    Uhhh, hate to spoil your rant, but guns haven't been banned in Australia. Just certain semiautomatic types. Please explain ([1]) to me how being able to have a semiautomatic weapon as opposed to a regular gun is going to make any difference in the crime rate?


    [1] A little private joke that only Australians are going to get

  52. Re:you have to admit... by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    Well, I don't take the same stance as you did on his post and your response. I read it differently. Your explanation is much clearer than your first response, and I also agree with it.

    And yes, I will defend your right to call me idiotic any day.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  53. To bring full circle, Death Race 2600 (c) MMII by mactari · · Score: 2

    Just to show how wild we can go with this thread, just this year somebody started trying to make Death Race for the 2600. No kidding.

    Post to Stellalist:
    http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/200 10 8/msg00510.html

    From that post...
    Screengrab of 2600 mock-up:
    http://www.gamedevelopers.net/deathderby/images/ sc reen1_color2.gif

    Screenshot of original (again, from above post):
    http://www.gamedevelopers.net/deathderby/images/ DE ATHRACESCREEN.GIF

    Ah, the boons of the internet.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  54. Custer's Last Stand by DoorFrame · · Score: 2

    Custer's Last Stand deserves to be banned. That game was AWFUL. I mean, I know atari games were all pretty repetitive with silly graphics and even sillier plotlines, but this thing made no sense.

    You played a naked Custer, and there was a naked woman on the other side of the screen. Also, there were things which I can only assume were arrows falling diagonally towards you. If they hit you, you had to go back to your side of the screen.

    Eventually you would dance your way across to the lady, and have sex with her (it wasn't clear to me that it was rape, I always thought she approving the whole transaction... I mean seriously, why was she naked to begin with?).

    Anyway, that was it. The longer you could have sex with the woman before getting show with the arrow, the higher your score.

    As I recall.

    Man, that was a stupid game. I hope nobody actually paid for that.

  55. Re:you have to admit... by John_Booty · · Score: 2

    Stop agreeing! We're trying to have an argument here! :)

    --

    OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
  56. Each country has its own "bans" by renoX · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In France, you can't buy nazy items, cannot say things pro-racism..
    I'm french so I'm problably LESS aware of the things forbidden in France which are legal elsewhere..

    Is oral and anal sex still "banned" in some states of the USA?
    I've always found funny than the "land of freedom" would ban those things..

    Australia is banning a videogame ??
    What is "big news" here??

  57. Re:Only on /. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

    Moral community? The guy is allowed to express his view. Furthermore, he wasn't even saying he believes that Jesus is a lie. He just said it was in a videogame, and made absolutely no statement about his faith or lack thereof. The Slashdot community has a lot of people of a lot of faiths in it. Our common thread is that we mostly view faith as private and personal, and that we are very tolerant of the other people on /. who have a variety of wacky views. If you can't tolerate that and insist that everybody accept Jesus, then bugger off to adequacy.org.

  58. /. knows its banned, but do the shops? by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 2
    I live in Sydney, Australia. I've seen GTA3 at the shops, its advertised in the brochures.

    Has anyone told the storeds that GTA3 is banned, has the signal traveled from the head to the feet?

  59. Wow, that's scary. by Uttles · · Score: 2

    You use a bunch of big words and a tone that conveys absolute knowledge, but you're completely wrong. Amazing.

    I'm not absolutely sure of which war you speak, but I'm assuming you're referring to the war for Southern Independance (commonly referred to, and incorrectly so, as the "Civil War".) In that case, you are all wrong. As you may or may not know, owning a slave back in the 17 and 18 hundreds was the equivalent to owning a mansion or a luxury boat today. Therefore, and this is an educated estimation, about 1 to 3 percent of Southerners actually owned slaves. The war was fought by poor tenant farmers for their freedom from economic oppresion of the Union. Additionally, given the plain numbers of soldiers in each army, it was the Union who's asses were kicked, as the only way they won the war was by presenting the confederate army with more bodies than they had ammunition (which interestingly was caused by lack of support from an ungrateful nation of France in penetrating the Union's blockade.)

    As a final thought, I take back what I said about the Union not kicking the CSA's ass because in reality they did, only it wasn't on the battlfield. See, in the "war to free the slaves" the Union army burnt the major Southern cities to the ground in a terrorist act that rivals anything we've ever seen out of the Middle East, more commonly referred to as "Sherman's March." The Confederate army was very civilized and proper in thier way of waging war, in fact they neglected to use their secret submarine weapon until the war was almost over because they thought it was an unfair instrument. Therefore, I recant, the Union did kick the CSA's ass, only rather than soldier deaths, these were the deaths of hundreds of thousands of completely innocent women, children, slaves, men... normal civilians. United we stand, divided we fall... the "we" referred only to the North. My great grandparents used to tell me the story of how their parents were killed in Atlanta by the fires. Call me ignorant, call me a redneck, call me close-minded, but I think I'll stay right here South of that line, thank you very much.

    --

    ~ now you know