Slashdot Mirror


Running A Web Server On An Apple Lisa 2

pinqkandi writes: "Saw this come along the MacHTTP discussion list; some one got an Apple Lisa 2 running a web server. Quite an impressive feat. Be quick to check it out - they expect to shut it down about 8am CST on 1/2/02."

29 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. Down Already by Super_Frosty · · Score: 5, Informative

    No comments yet, and the server is already down.

    How many more times do we have to /. some poor fool's web server?

    --
    No comment at this time
    1. Re:Down Already by An+IPv6+obsessed+guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon, it's a Lisa! It should be able to handle the load of a slashdotting. ...And for the next trick, Slashdot will knock down a small child and run away with her candy.

  2. Slashdotted by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Not if we can't shut it down first!

    Too late. I thought this would be pretty interesting, too.

    1. Re:Slashdotted by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, can't you imagine that it worked? The more successful of an implementation it has, the more transparent and the least interesting it really should be: HTTP & TCP/IP are standards, and whether it's a Liza or a big piece of ratcrap with some neural nets going in it, the goal of web standards is that it's absolutely, postively irrelevant.

  3. does that mean.. by lowtekneq · · Score: 4, Funny

    does that mean that there is some chance of getting my atari 1400ST running apache?

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
    1. Re:does that mean.. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not if you let Slashdot know about it!

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  4. Oh really? by awallgren · · Score: 4, Funny

    Netcraft says it's running Solaris...

    1. Re:Oh really? by Inthewire · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Netcraft says it's running Solaris."

      From the Netcraft FAQ:
      Why do you report impossible operating system/server combinations ?

      Webservers that operate behind a caching system, load balancer, reverse proxy server or a firewall may sometimes report the operating system of the intermediate machine. Hence reports of 'Microsoft/IIS on Linux' may indicate that either the web server is behind a Linux server that is acting as a reverse proxy, or has configured the Akamai caching system such that the first request to the site goes to one of Akamai's servers [which run Linux], or as in the case of www.walmart.com has been configured to send a misleading signature.


      I don't know that this is necessarily the case, but it may have bearing on the matter.
      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:Oh really? by evilviper · · Score: 4, Funny

      I once had netcraft tell me a server was a FreeBSD box running IIS... Now I'm not saying it was wrong but...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  5. Slashdot overdrive by MadCamel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most older IP stacks for Apples have a low amount of available sockets, such as 16 or 32. Once those are all being used, the machine can no longer accept connections.. Thus this link suffered instant slashdot. Good job!

  6. Did you hear that? by tunah · · Score: 5, Funny

    That was the sound of a lisa 2 exploding.

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  7. Nice. by Matt2000 · · Score: 5, Funny


    This has got to be one of the best slashdot linkages in recent memory. How do you expect anyone to see this reeking Lisa 2 thing if people with pretty major servers go under when slashdot links to them?

    "Hey guys, check this out, some guy has managed to wire up an ethernet cable to his parrot's brain, they say if they get over 200 hits/hour his legs will explode. Anyway, here's the link."

    NICE.

    --

    1. Re:Nice. by darkov · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly. Apple bashing has reached a new low here at Slashdot when the editors take to slashdotting a poor, defenceless Lisa 2. After this trauma it may never serve a page again. It probably won't even boot up. Poor thing.

  8. Here's the original message by cshotton · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is the original message as posted to the MacHTTP discussion list for those interested in the Lisa's details:

    Hello All,
    Due to the many requests, I just put on-line my Apple Lisa2 web
    server.
    Since I am not finished with my site content I am only going leave her
    up till about 8:00am on 1/2/2002 US Central Time. Check it out at:

    http://www.lisa2.com

    Let me know what you think. As far as I know, She is the only Apple
    Lisa2
    based web server in the world, and she may be one of the oldest PC's
    on the net!

    My current config is:
    Apple Lisa2
    Lisa Screen Mod.
    800K disk Mod.
    1 Meg slot RAM
    MacWorks+II Ver 2.5.5
    XLerator 18 with 8 meg Fast RAM
    Sun SCSI with QuickBoot ROM
    500 Meg SCSI Drive with Apple ROM
    Mac System 7.01?
    MacTCP 2.06
    MacHTTP 2.2.2

    TCP/IP via MacIP to my RevB iMac running IPnetrouter.
    iMac Modem @ 50K to net.

    Thanks,
    R

    --

    Shut up and eat your vegetables!!!
    1. Re:Here's the original message by x136 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ah, this is no ordinary Lisa... This one's running at 18MHz with 9MB of RAM.
      This is one hot-rodded Lisa... (A stock Lisa has a 5MHz chip and either 512k or 1MB of RAM)

      --
      SIGFEH
    2. Re:Here's the original message by aberkvam · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also it's running the MacWorks+II software which pretty much turns the Lisa into a Mac Plus. This thing really isn't a Lisa anymore. Of course I don't think a TCP/IP stack was ever implemented for the Lisa so it would be pretty much impossible to get a real Lisa up and running as a web server....

  9. It was a matter of time. by x136 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen a server or two running on Mac Pluses (8MHz 68000 vs. the Lisa/Lisa2/MacXL's 5MHz 68000), some Classics (8MHz 68000), LCs (16MHz 68020) and SE/30s (16MHz 68030), but never a Lisa.

    Good show to whoever got it set up. Too bad it could never hope to handle a slashdotting...

    Believe it or not, Mac Pluses and other 68k Macs (running either MacHTTP or some form of 68k BSD) seem to make pretty good servers for sites with fairly low traffic (Not to mention cheap!). Of course, you'll never see Slashdot running on a Quadra. :)

    --
    SIGFEH
  10. Cruel Joke... by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Putting up a link to a lisa2 webserver on slasdot is like tickeling the old lady's feet who is holding up your car with her bare hands while you change your oil... Nice going... it's crashed.. I bet you're very proud:)

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
  11. A new slashdot record by nick_burns · · Score: 4, Redundant

    I'd like to congratulate the readers of slashdot for a new slashdot record of 2.8 seconds for shutdown. It'll probably be broken when I finish my webserver on a NES.

    1. Re:A new slashdot record by PenguinX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does:

      NES = Nintendo Entertainment System

      -or-

      NES = Netscape Enterprise Server

      Either way, it could be quick ^_^;;

      -Brian

  12. Impressive, but... by darkov · · Score: 5, Funny

    I won't be truly impressed until I see an a site being served with a turing machine, run manually by a guy drawing dots on a paper looking at a T1 line terminating in a green LED.

    The only danger of this is that is may be the first recorded death due to slashdotting.

  13. "they expect to shut it down 8AM CST on 1/2/02" by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Funny

    You heartless bastards. Couldn't you have given it 'till 7:55 AM?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  14. I weep for this machine.... by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny

    Poor little Lisa. She was just serving up pages to a few hundred or so of the Mac faithful when the Penguin known as Slashdot set it's lustful eyes upon it. Now, it's bandwidth stuffed to overflowing, the Lisa sits in a corner, weeping openly.

    Slashdot: When bashing Apple and beatifying Linux is a way of life!

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
  15. No longer a Lisa! by freshmkr · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Mod the parent up! aberkvam's right, it's pretty much been modified to the point of not being a Lisa anymore. The square pixel screen modification alone is enough to keep it from running 7/7 (aka the Lisa Office System, the Lisa's groundbreaking OS), nevermind the CPU and memory modifications.

    This aside, it might not be impossible to get a stock Lisa 2 (or even a Lisa 1!) on the net. Microsoft (if you can believe it) had a version of Xenix for both Lisa models. One could potentially program some "http server" that operates over one of the serial lines or perhaps do something more baroque than that (e.g. implement serial line PPP+web server in user mode).

    If someone can find me a copy of Xenix on 5.25" Twiggy media and a spare ProFile external HD (5 megabytes!), I'll put my Lisa 1 on the net. Yes, I own one.

    I used to have a webpage about the Lisa. The server that held it (a 386) suffered an untimely demise after another administrator ran rm -rf /. Fortunately, you can still view the old content online with the help of the Internet Archive. Go here and here to see some of the old content.

    The Apple Lisa Web Page will return someday, I promise...

    --Tom

  16. It's been done before. by sakusha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to sell Lisas back when they were new. A fair percentage of them went to government research offices. Some of them were wiped of LisaOS and they put SCO Xenix on them, and went straight onto the net. I also used to sell the old original Apple Portable (you know, the huge one with the lead-acid batteries) with AIX and they went on the net too.

    So this bozo is going about it entirely the wrong way. It's not like its the first time anyone used a Lisa on the net. It's just that there was no HTTP back when the Lisa was new. Most people used UUCP and FTP.

  17. Re:Apple is rewriting history by sakusha · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, YOU are rewriting history, buying into BillG's revision of the GUI, to make it look like Apple was no innovator.

    Apple was working on the GUI long before they ever saw Xerox PARC's demo, and before PARC even started their initial GUI work. This was all documented on slashdot ages ago, when Apple released some early GUI interface docs to Stanford. Go hunt it up.

    And to put to rest that OTHER stupid rumor, Apple did not copy Xerox's GUI. Xerox licensed certain aspects of their GUI to Apple. Apple needed only a couple of pieces to finish the job, and Xerox made good royalties from Apple, more than they ever made from their own products. Apple did not copy Xerox, the Apple GUI was substantially superior to Xerox's. Xerox and had almost nothing in common with LisaOS or anything else.

  18. It's not running as a Lisa by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Sadly, it's a Lisa 2 running as a Mac. MacOS System 7, no less.

    The Lisa, unlike Macs until the 68030 machines, had an MMU, and hence could support a protected-mode operating system, which it did. So running a server on an original Lisa with the original software wouldn't be unreasonable. (You'd have to implement a TCP stack, probably in Lisa Pascal, but so be it.)

    Unfortunately, Motorola was years late with MMU support for the 680x0 line, and Apple had to homebrew their own MMU. This didn't work very well due to limitations of the M68000 (fixed in the M68010, years too late), and added considerably to the parts count and cost. It also required that all Lisa programs be compiled without using register incrementation on instructions that accessed memory, because the 68000 couldn't back those out on a page fault.

    Motorola was so close. If only they hadn't been late with the 68K support chips, we might have avoided the whole x86 era.

  19. i tried a webserver on my vic-20 by scrytch · · Score: 5, Funny

    but it just took ages every time there was a hit having to PRESS PLAY ON TAPE

    --
    I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  20. Commodore 64 web server by adadun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you think this is cool, you might want to check out this. It is a Commodore 64 that is running as a web server, and has been up 24/7 since november 2001. It is connected to the Internet via a 38400 bps SLIP link so it is quite slow.

    For those of you who doesn't remember the Commodore 64, it was a very popular home computer in the 80's and early 90's. It has 64k RAM and an 8-bit 1 MHz 6502 CPU.

    The C64 web server is running the small uIP TCP/IP stack that is less than 4k large and uses only a few hundred bytes of dynamic RAM. Since it is written in C, it has been ported to numerous other systems such as the 8-bit Ataris and a number of embedded processors such as the Hitachi H8S.