Slashdot Mirror


Sandia Builds Micromechanical 'Device Driver'

DanielRavenNest writes: "Sandia Labs has built a tiny bicycle chain type drive out of silicon. This allows one micromechanical motor to drive multiple devices scattered about a chip."

43 of 159 comments (clear)

  1. How are these made? by PoiBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Other than that this stuff is made out of silicon, I don't know much about these devices. Are they etched like integrated circuits? And here's what baffles me...If they're etched, how in the heck can they actually make gears and stuff spin and move around?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:How are these made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is actualy quite easy, the gears that you see in the pictures are made out of poly silicon. So what you do it grow a thick (several micron) sacrificial oxide, pattern the oxide using standard lithography. Etch out the pattern of the gears, creating essentaly a mold of the gear. Then you backfill the area with poly silicon. You then preform a oxide etch with a HF acid solution and remove the oxide, leaving just the poly silicon gears. You grow the oxide, etch, fill, and repeat. This process is done several times to created diffrent levels. So as an example, the bottom of the chain would be layer 1. The Drive gear and the vertical post that connect the top and bottom of the chain are layer 2. Then the top of the chain is layer 3.

    2. Re:How are these made? by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Funny

      AC's are strictly forbidden from making informing posts. Don't you know that? ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    3. Re:How are these made? by Arjuna+Theban · · Score: 3, Informative

      They can be actuated with a bunch of different methods. The easiest is a comb drive. I'll let you read up on it. As for how they are made: Most gear-like structures are built with "surface micromachining" ie: building up on silicon with SiO2, polysilicon, metal, various epoxies like SU-8 etc. There is, however, another way to build many structures too, it is bulk micromachining. In bulk micromachining, the device is built on a single crystal silicon, that is, by etching into the silicon and having the body of your machine be the silicon you started with (and of course the other various materials I said before). For all of you who wonder how bulk micromachining works, I suggest you check out Berkeley's "Single Crystal Reactive Etching and Metallization" (SCREAM) process.

      ---

  2. flap, flap, flap by BrianGa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I stick a baseball card on it, and hear the racket? All the neighborhood geeks will be so jealous...Hey, this Mickey Mantle isn't worth anything, is it?

  3. There are using for nano-motors by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    Not every task will be suited to a solid state solution. Some will require mechanistic activity or (another alternative to solid state) biological activity. In the case of things like nanites that are going to navigate throughout the body and do stuff, this kind of thing could be useful (or a springboard to something useful).

    But my first thought was "once they have the chain, then they can build the nano-cycle... but where will they find all those itsy-bitsy Clowns? And how many can dance on the head of a pin?"

    All right, I probably do need therapy :)

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:There are using for nano-motors by ImaLamer · · Score: 2
      but where will they find all those itsy-bitsy Clowns?

      Silly, it's not for clowns... it's for the flea circus.

  4. [mirror] Google's Mirror by BrianGa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's Google's mirror, since it looks like this site was /.'ed.

  5. Before you get too excited... by Thagg · · Score: 4, Funny

    The application that Sandia has given, at least in the past, for their micromachine efforts is better locks for nuclear warheads. So, the analogy that the article makes to sewing machine factories only makes sense if they were nuclear sewing machines.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    1. Re:Before you get too excited... by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Being made out of silicon, these devices are themselves prone to dangerous silicon explosions.

  6. Article on MEMS research by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 4, Informative

    here (free regblah.)
    AND for cut and pasters: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/10/technology/circu its/10NEXT.html

    --


    Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
  7. finally by Gavitron_zero · · Score: 4, Funny

    this is great news for the little computer elves that do all the calculations in my computer. They've been slaving away on their abicii for years, now i can buy them bicycles with nano-chains and stuff!

    1. Re:finally by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

      And they won't have to ride that bus back and forth all the time anymore.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  8. Cool stuff by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    This is just cool. One can think of all kinds of applications for this. Even dumb ones. I do agree it could have uses in military technology as well.

    Could they use this to build motors in the top of chips and come up with some sort of package that allows the nano (and hopefully silent) fans to cool a CPU? Just a thought.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Cool stuff by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Well a nano-sized fan is gonna move nano-sized amounts of air... I can't imagine that "fans" on this scale will do anything noticable. You could probably do something with liquid cooling of some sort, tho... keep a constant stream of mineral oil or something moving over the surface of the CPU and a heatsink.

  9. Reliability? by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2, Troll

    I'm not terribly well informed on how these things work on chips currently. How much smaller will chips really become if you were to put several shafts to such a chain? And just how reliable would would of these chains be when hooked to multiple shafts? A friend of mine told me once that the chains weren't currently put on multiple shafts because they wouldn't handle the stress, so is this smaller chain really going to make chips smaller?

    Disclaimer. I could be completely wrong on everything here. I am ignorant of circuitry.

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Reliability? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      I don't know about chain-driven micromachines, but there's lots of instances where chains drive multiple shafts in macromachinery. Timing chains in engines for example, where the crank shaft drives perhaps two or three driven shafts through a chain.

      In the case of diesel engines with a mechanical injection pump, the torque load on the pump drive is very high and "pulsed" at the top of each compression stroke (tightest just before the injector opens). The chain will also be driving the camshaft (possibly two), maybe an oil pump drive, and occasionally you see the airbrake compressor driven off the chain.

      I should point out that the timing chains on big diesel engines like this are really horrible to tension correctly.

  10. Problem with microscale locks for nuclear warheads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you need to do is lithograph a 2-micron long hairpin, and that sucker's yours!!!

  11. Possible Use... by alfredw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider hooking this thing up to a Brownian Ratchet, such as discribed by Feynman in his lectures. (For those not familiar with a Brownian Ratchet, this page give a good introduction and a cool Java thingy to play with. See also R.D. Astumian: Thermodynamics and Kinetics of a Brownian Motor, Science 276, p. 917-922 (1997). Essentially, it works like a very small, normal ratchet. Molecules in the atmosphere hit the system randomly. Sometimes it goes "forward," but it cannot go against the ratcheting mechanism - "backwards" is locked out. So you get a net forward motion on the ratchet essentially for free from the atmosphere.)

    Connect the Brownian Ratchet to this little chain thingy. Have it wind something up. User presses button, and thingy unwinds. Basically a free recharging system.

    Not all that practical, but pretty cool. I'm sure there are better applications... (anyone?)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    1. Re:Possible Use... by wsherman · · Score: 2, Informative
      This particular chain is probably too big to see much brownian motion. Something like the ion channels that control the movement of ions across cell membranes might be more the right size.

      If one could design an ion channel that allowed ions to diffuse in one and only one direction one would have a battery that never needed charging. Of course, if that were possible evolution would probably have done it already. On the other hand, as I understand it, Boltzmann's H-Theorem only applies to dilute gasses so it remains to be proved that such a thing is impossible.

      Maybe the reason that humans are smarter than animals is that the neural ion channels in human brains have evolved to overcome the Second Law of Thermodynamics. It would be interesting to know if anyone has ever looked at whether ion channels obey the Second Law.

    2. Re:Possible Use... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      I don't see how it'd be "free" energy in the technical sense, cause it's not. It's just "free" for all intents and purposes. Has one of these dohickeys actually been made and tested, and they KNOW that theres "exactly enough heat (random motion of molecules) that hits the central pivot", or is it just more conjecture?

  12. Coming soon by SaturnTim · · Score: 3, Funny


    The Ultra-micro-featherweight class of robot wars! (Or battlebots, or robotica, or whatever)

    --T

    --
    http://www.theMediaBunker.com
  13. Is anyone else reminded of the planiverse? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    This looks a whole lot like devices from the Planiverse...makes sense, since they are essentially dealing multiple two-dimensional layers. If you haven't read "The Planiverse", I suggest you do so...fascinating book.

  14. Oval gear? by Sludge · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or should they work on rectifying the oval gear problem next?

  15. Now, a teeeny tiny WD-40 can by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny

    will be necessary to keep it from gunking up.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  16. Applications by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I don't know. I have these visions of incredibly tiny bicycle messengers pedalling around the CPU delivery urgeant page fault messages.

    or going in circles shouting "Kernel Panic" or something.

    Just an image. Tron with bicyles ;-)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  17. new toy of the future by British · · Score: 2

    Micro-Lego Mindstorms

  18. Cool! by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2, Informative
    Although this kind of stuff is not exactly new, it's still damn interesting.

    My mom is an engineer at SNL, and I try to go once a year when they have their open house for families. The place is packed with stuff just as cool as this - supercomputers, particle colliders, nanotech, rockets and sattelites, I could go on and on. Really an amazing place - reading about it doesn't compare to seeing it in person. I highly recommend visiting if you get the chance.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  19. Ceiling fans? by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    This reminds me of the last time I went to have dinner at the Old Spaghetti Factory in Toronto. Their lounge has about six old ceiling fans, all driven by the same motor, connected by chains.

    We all know what happened to that technology.

    This might prove to be a good stepping-stone, but I think the end result will be a motor on everything that moves.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  20. New computer fans! by nizo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now instead of one big honkin noisy fan, we can have the same noisy motor drive zillions of lil itty bitty fans (imagine if every little vent hole in your computer had a fan in it wheeeeee). Or maybe a huge wall full of these, would be safer to stick your finger into that then a big cut-your-finger-off fan.

  21. Re:Moving parts bad by FrostedChaos · · Score: 2, Insightful
    MEMS has many applications, not all of which are obvious. For example, you can make a pretty nice accelerometer that fits inside a small chip.



    Research isn't always about solving problems. But it's always about coming up with new ideas.

    --
    "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  22. Sewing machines? by ScoobyDoo-heh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Computer, knit me a jersey, bit two perl one :-) How do you oil the chain? If the chain breaks do you bend a valve?

  23. Forget the chains... by AJWM · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just look at those gears. Man, with technology like that we can finally reduce Babbage's Analytical Engine to something that'll fit on a chip.

    Now that's a microcomputer!

    --
    -- Alastair
  24. The second law stops you hot by MarkusQ · · Score: 3, Informative
    Consider hooking this thing up to a Brownian Ratchet, such as discribed by Feynman in his lectures

    The Brownian Ratchet you describe won't work, because of the second law of thermodynamics. The second law is potent enough that even evoking Feynman's name won't make it go away. Besides, what Feynman described was why this won't work.

    See Chapter 46 of the Lectures if you want the details, but in short, it would quickly get hot enough that its own shaking (heat=random motion remember?) would drown out the Brownian motion.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:The second law stops you hot by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
      Sheesh. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

      I agree.

      I suppose you think windmills don't work, either.

      They only work if the air has net motion relative to the windmill. You can't run one off of still air just because the air is hot.

      -- MarkusQ

  25. Chainbreaker by obi-1-kenobi · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is going to use one tiny chainbreaker :P

    --
    "You win again Gravity!" -Futurama (Zapp)
  26. Re:like what? by Drake42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microscopic device that you eat. It swims around in you like a submarine, communicates by tiny radio waves, can even take grainy, tech looking pictures to show doctors whats going on in side you.

    Tiny little bot with one of those chem detectors. Attach it to a tiny bit of iron. It floats around in a solution and when it finds a molecule of the type you're looking for it grabs ahold. Now you can seperate two things that were presumably not seperable before.

    Tiny machine that traces around circuits that have gone defective and actually repairs them through some magic. The little devices follow the paths until they come to a problem they can repair.

    My personal goal device actually has nothing to do with chains, but is a microscopic audio recorder that becomes permanently attached to your ear. It records everything you hear giving you perfect memory! Powered by body heat so you don't switch batteries, no bulky tapes, saves the data to disk at the end of the day. Suddenly my bad memory is no longer a handicap!

  27. Reliability is different for small things by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A lot of the fatigue and wear problems we see on macroscopic devices are not problems with the bulk material, but problems with faults, inclusions, grain boundaries, and things like that. Every time you turn a real bike chain, the teeth will scrape off a few atoms, a dislocation may move by a small amount, a fatigue crack may get one atom deeper.

    These little gadgets are so small that it is possible to make them out of a single, faultless piece of material. Okay, if you had a dislocation or an inclusion in your bike chain, then it would fail pretty quickly, if it worked at all; but if you get a good one, then it will seem almost immortal when compared to macroscopic objects. So, you make a few spares, and throw away the duds.

    We are used to seeing silicon and silicon dioxide as crystalline. However, if you take out the small features that allow a crack to propagate through a crystal, then these materials can seem very tough and flexible. Think of glass fibres and glass. The Sandia site used to have a downloadable video of a minature moving mirror getting trodden on by a flea: it bends but does not crumple, and springs back unharmed.

    There are other changes as you get to submicron sizes. Surface tension and other chemical effects seem huge. Water drops seem to have a tough skin on them at this scale, and drops will sit on a surface rather than wet it. This is just as well: a water drop could glue the chain together if it could wet. As things are, these gadgets seem to survive in the open atmosphere just fine.

    If you think that is weird, the nanoscale stuff is much weirder. Interesting times, or what?

  28. The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    The Brownian Ratchet you describe won't work, because of the second law of thermodynamics.

    Not really. Energy is taken from the motion of the atmosphere. It is free in economic, not physical, terms, and is therefor not a violation of the 2nd law.

    In other words, it is not a closed system he is describing, but an open system where energy is introduced (from the molecular motion of the atmosphere, which in turn is powered by the sun).

    Furthermore, heating issues can be handled in the way they are handled in any electrical or mechanical system (in this case decoupling the ratchet, using active cooling, or whatever). Besides, chances are something like this is being used to charge a more mundane battery (converting mechanical energy to electical, which involves loss of energy, then converting the stored energy back to electricity, which involves another loss, and so on).

    All well within the laws of thermodynamics. Innovative, and "free" in the sense that atmospheric motion, powered by the cost-free energy of the sun, is free. Not at all free in terms of thermodynamics or entropy, as energy is being introduced from outside and then simply stored in some fashion, at a net loss in terms of total energy ... something we do with batteries all the time.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
      In other words, it is not a closed system he is describing, but an open system where energy is introduced (from the molecular motion of the atmosphere, which in turn is powered by the sun).

      Furthermore, heating issues can be handled in the way they are handled in any electrical or mechanical system (in this case decoupling the ratchet, using active cooling, or whatever).

      And how to you propose to power this "active cooling" system? If it and your ratchet are both 100% efficient you can break even; otherwise, you'll be operating at a net loss.

      Before anyone else (the poster to whom I'm responding seems to understand this point) suggests passive cooling, that won't work either; your device is surrounded on all sides by the heat bath, otherwise you wouldn't be seeing the Brownian motion, remember?

      -- MarkusQ

    2. Re:The Earth (atmosphere) is not a closed system by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      And how to you propose to power this "active cooling" system? If it and your ratchet are both 100% efficient you can break even; otherwise, you'll be operating at a net loss.

      Of course, they won't be 100% effecient (2nd law), so it would be a net loss to use active cooling. However, if your system is overheating, then using some of that stored energy to actively cool the components down to an acceptable level may be a reasonable option. Decoupling the ratchet before it reaches such a state would IMHO probably be preferable, though (ie. stop introducing energy into an overheating system).

      Such a system can probably be made to work and yield useful results (energy storage and dispensation as required), but you are correct in saying you do not get something for nothing. What we would be doing is tapping into energy which is currently "wasted" (the motion of our atmosphere as it is heated by the sun and cooled by the planet's shadow) and storing it for later use. As with any storage system, there would be operating limits on how much energy can be stored, what its tolerances for waste heat, etc. would be, and so on.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  29. I say again, "the earth is not a closed system by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    ... it is powered by the sun. So fuck the damn creationists, doomsday get my gun" (to borrow a phrase from MC Hawking).

    There is nothing mystical about the physical infrastructure of human intelligence. We derive our energy from the food we eat (in a very ineffecient manner), much of which in turn (at some point) derives its energy from photosynthesis, which in turn derives its energy from the sun, an energy source external to the earth (and one which will, some day, run out).

    We are powered by the sun, in other words, not some mystical force violating Thermodynamic's second law. Our intelligence may have other implications, but a mystical violation of the basic laws of physics isn't one of them.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  30. If you look really, really close... by funwithBSD · · Score: 2, Funny

    You can see the Campagnolo Micro-Record markings.
    Each bearing hand polished by buxom Italian babes.

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra