Slashdot Mirror
Scientific American on Television Addiction
Etcetera writes: "The Drudge Report had an interesting link to a Scientific American article on Television Addiction. Talks about some of the quantifiable effects TV watching can have on the body. Very interesting read. There's also a paragraph or two at the end about game/computer use and why that might be a *little* bit different. But, similar to Jon Katz's essay Browsing Alone, they conclude that when a habit interferes with a growing, active life, it should be taken seriously."
blah blah blah.
This is similar in nature to reports that Elvis's gyrating hips are the undoing of young Americans.
Just because somebody has a PhD in back of their name doesn't give them any special insight.
"They conclude that when a habit interferes with a growing, active life, it should be taken seriously."
Sleeping really interferes with my active life (because i sleep inactively), so drawing on their conclusion, i should take my sleep seriously!
What do they mean by that, should i be careful about how/when/why i sleep, could sleeping be bad for me ?
Maybe they mean lack of sleep could be bad for me, likewise lack of computer time could be bad for me, cause ill be in a foul mood and ill take it out on others.
In short A STUPID CONCLUSION THAT IS MEANINGLESS
E.M. Forster was writing about people isolated by technology in "The Machine Stops", 90 years ago. So it's not a new concept that our machines are isolating us from one another, and that we get addicted to connecting with our gadgets, not with each other.
I can stop watching it whenever I want to... I just like to watch it constantly and become a massive blob of unfit human waste.
C'mon, who still watches TV? I'm too busy refreshing Slashdot.
-- Dan
I'm glad I kicked the habit of watching TV. I only surf the net and read Slashdot nowadays.
Television adiction does indeed suck. I used to be addicted until about 4 years ago, when I finally said "enough" and sold my TV set. Now that I don't watch TV any more I have lots and lots of free time to spend on my web browsing addiction. :)
I know that tossing my TV was one of the best things I've ever done. No more mind-numbing hours in front of the tube soaking up ads from corporations I really don't like, no more seeing fake images of how I should like and behave and waste money. And best of all, spending more real *quality* time with my girlfriend, getting outside, even posting to slahdot.
"...when a habit interferes with a growing, active life, it should be taken seriously."
I take my masturbation very seriously.
Yeah, but what about mine?
And do they take into account the unbridled joy of finding the whole "Rat Patrol" series on tape? Hmmm?
I thought not.
The revolution will NOT be televised.
THE MOST BEAUTIFUL JAPANESE GO CHESS PLAYER
http://www.yukari.gr.jp
http://www.yukari.gr.jp/movie.html
Scientists have discovered the shocking truth of yet another new generation X addiction that is becoming a huge phenomenal. Submitting, posting, replying, moderating, meta-moderating are just some of the elements that /. community are known to be addicted to.
/. community. Every effort to remedy /. addict resulted with disappointments -- even Free Sex (as in free bear) was hopeless.
What is even worse is that the study did not see any end in sight to this new trend as more addicts keep purring into the
Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
Disinformation did a similar article in May... Check it out -/
http://www.disinfo.com/pages/article/id1149/pg1
Isn't this story available on the Discovery Channel or some TV show?
I was a tv addict. Even though we didn't get cable back just a few years I would sit down and watch whatever was on and when it was done I would watch what was on next. It didn't have too be good, just on (ok, maybe not football, but that is about it). Out of the 5 channels I would find the "best" show and watch it. I was distructive and time wasting. When someone else was watching tv I would sit down and watch. The tv would just draw me over. It really stinked. When I went off to RIT I didn't bring a tv, life was good and I learned a lot and worked on projects. When moving into a new home with a few other guys for the year I found one of them bringing a tv, but not only a tv, but a tivo! I thought I was in for it, but to my surprise found just the other way around. With tivo I rarely ever view actual tv when it is on. When I had some free time I would turn it on and see what was in the lineup. These 10 shows that we all liked and only these 10 shows would be listed. I would watch 1 and when the show was over it didn't continue over to the next show on that station, but brought you back to the menu. There I was able to asses what I had to do and if something was more important I would turn off the tv knowing it would all be there for me later. There are two factors to this that halped me. First being when the show was over it was _over_. Second being that I didn't have to stay around and watch the 10 oclock news to see the top story of xyz sense I knew that tivo would record it and if I could see it when I had the time (and only the 2 minute story that I wanted to see, deleting it after that).
To sum up I moved out of that house and recently found a store shelf tivo as the local circut city for $50. You can guess that I walked out the door with a grin that day.
-Benjamin Meyer
Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
Quite an interesting article - for me, my family was never much into TV, but I always had friends whose families were. I still have memories of seeing an entire family gathered around a TV, staring blankly into it as Jeopardy or The Price Is Right would blare into their skulls... zero conversation, dinner plates on their laps... yikes.
I routinely go without TV - I just moved to a new country in August and only plugged my TV in Sept. 11th at the urgent insisting of a friend's IM.
Wondering if anyone else has comments or similar preferences, for I never thought about it before I read this article - I have zero interest in "pre-produced" TV shows. Virtually everything I watch is either live, (ie the news), or more commonly what I would call non-produced or underproduced footage: auto and bike racing on Speedvision, Cops, America's most Inbred Drunk Drivers, When Ex-Girlfriends Attack, TLC / Disco channel etc etc...
Of course for the amount of time I spent online... I'm almost tempted to read that Katz article... no wait somebody slap me.
.
-- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
Personally, I feel that the greater problem is that people tend to objectilfy stuff which they see on TV with their own personal life, I think due to the nature of the medium. For example it is not uncommon today to see parents watching their childen playing, a situation unheard of years ago, the only reason for the emergence of this pattern is that such people have become scared of the peadofile, or kidnapper, becasue of news reports or whatever. However the chances of any misadventure are so small, that it is not worth depriveing childen of some freedom in their childhood and the resulting psycological damage. If you don't like that example imagine all the people who stopped reading all their mail with that Antrax scare a few months back. None of this is helped by the people who report the news.
This has greater context if you consider question's like, "would America pulled out of WWII if CNN had been on omenha beach"
I would love to chuck out all the tv's tomorrow if only to prevent this nation becoming a land of hysterics unable to walk down the street lest the sky fall on their head. Or worst, Apathic to any change in their life.
To me TV represents, what Sartre called bad faith, being a force of objectification with the final aim being the disinfrancement of the human sprite. Without the pretension: A mild form of conditioning, and this is the far greater harm then any concerns of health.
Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
It's H-E-I-D-E-G-G-E-R you moron. Martin Heidegger. And he was a German philosopher who supported the Nazis. You are insulting Sartre by quoting him while logged in as such a UID.
For instance: This post by an AC is just too damn funny. At first it looks like: "Oh wow, good for you, now shutup." But then you notice it's by an AC and you think, "Haha! Non-TV owning elitists who brag about it ARE about as useful as an Anonymous Coward post."
Or take this post for example. Barely has anything to do with the article topic, but since the topic is so -1 Redundant anyways, this just makes me laugh!
Lastly, we've got this scathing comment that bashes on the whole premise of this article and consequential discussion on slashdot.
The point is, who cares? You don't own a TV, great for you! Now quit wasting your time telling everyone and go back to reading the newspaper. I don't care. The last comment was probably the best. Just insert "Slashdot, sex, alcohol, or your favorite 'no-no' in all the places they have the appreviation 'TV' in the article, and resubmit this about a month later. This isn't news, it's not for nerds, geeks, or trolls, and it certainly hasn't benefitted my life, as it is common sense to everyone and their grandmother that any addiction taken too far is negative.
I rate this slashdot discussion: -1 Redundant.
I tend to watch more TV in the winter, depending on what is happening "in Town"
I think TV addiction is a pretty clear problem in Suburbs, ever drove through one in the early evening? There is nothing going on there, you don't see anyone on the street, nothing.
For me, TV becomes less and less " a problem" great, so i have some time to watch Enterprise? I watch it, I am out ? Oh well, sometime they show a re-run.
I think TV addiction exists, but I am not so sure that the TV alone is at fault. There are some interresting books out there relating certain behaviour to where you live, and quite frankly after reading this I cannot see myself ever move away from a big city into the suburbs. (And yes, I HATE suburbia, maybe because I moved from Europe to North America).
If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
Sometimes the memory of the product is very subtle. Many ads today are deliberately oblique: they have an engaging story line, but it is hard to tell what they are trying to sell. Afterward you may not remember the product consciously. Yet advertisers believe that if they have gotten your attention, when you later go to the store you will feel better or more comfortable with a given product because you have a vague recollection of having heard of it.
This is interesting. Has anyone else noticed the trend lately of commercials doing this? Advertisers will pay gobs and gobs of money for a 30 second spot, and then only mention the name of the product in the last few seconds of the spot. After viewing some of these commercials, I find myself thinking, "Wow, that was neat. What was being advertised?"
I only spend an hour or two a week watching television, but I tend to find the commercials at least as interesting as the "content." There's almost certainly more money spent on them...
^L
^L
^L
Hmm... didn't work.
What constitutes a "growing, active life" is up to society. Likewise, habit is defined the same way. I spend 8 hours a day in front of a flickering box myself--but it's called work, and by society's definition, is probably part of a growing, active life. TV addiction? Yeah, whatever. Defined by people addicted to their own intellectualism--how much credit can you give it? It's not that I don't agree--I do. I'm sure some people watch more TV than they should. But addiction in general? It's human nature--we just put a friendly face on the vice that we like. TV, internet, pornography, drugs, religion, jobs, morality--eventually we'll have a disorder for everything.
I think I've once and for all found the secret to breaking TV addiction, and it is...
Ooh, The Simpsons is on! bbl.
Want Linux games? HERE.
Usually, whenever Matt Drudge is mentioned, Taco has to chime in about how Drudge is *soooo* inaccurate (as if Taco has any fucking room to talk).
You're a chick (or at least pretending to be one), and you haven't said anything particularly offensive, so +5 for you!
man, RSI really catches up with you, ill try to improve my typing just for you guys
Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
sea subjekt
Even if you weren't a fan of his shady accounting practices, you have to acknowledge the impact he had on the US economy. Truly an American icon.
chess addiction is a major problem too. We must stop
chess addiction!
Ridiculous. Heidegger was a nazi, that is beyond all doubt. He was, for Christ's sake, even one of the few nazis who did never admit being mistaken. He stood firm till his death in 1974. Nietzsche, on the other hand, was everything but a nazi. His ideas about the ubermensch are among the most misunderstood in the history of philosophy. Besides it was his sister who suited his philosophy to nazism long after his death.
Besides, I don't buy your crap about taking "Heideggier" as "Heidegger" was already taken. Why not? You obviously couln't spell N-I-E-T-Z-S-C-H-E either.
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok
He also played a little black kid on "Webster"
No, the sky is not falling... as I sit here with my 500+ channels of digital cable (and still usually end up watching Law & Order or the History Channel [have you seen all that new color WWII footage?]) while surfing on DSL.
I think the real issue is that people today have too much control over their stimuli- channel surfing and web surfing.... if you don't like what you see, change is only one click away. Unfortunately reality doesn't exactly work that way.
I look at the number of kids today who are diagnosed with Oppositional Defiant Disorder, and aside from the toxic parenting these kids endured, the kids' poor coping skills are arguable reinforced by the infinite options they are given when "surfing" whatever they are viewing. Most parents end up NOT giving the kid an "option" whether to "clean their rooms" or whatever simple task, and the entire household explodes for an evening of a police visit, a possible fifth degree domestic assault, and a trip to a shelter for some kid. This happens all the time in surburbs all over the place. (I moonlight in emergency social services with the County- so this is first hand info.).
I haven't even mentioned ADD or ADHD- two diagnoses that I feel are more or less environmentally conditioned- but that would take us way off-topic. But both "attention" disorders could as easily be characterized as involving kids who have the ability to pay close attention to what they "choose" to pay attention to- they simply lack skills to pay attention to what they are "required" to (such as authority, teachers, etc.).
I really believe technology changes the way the mind operates. On a grand scale, we certainly feel more connected to the world at large with air travel, international long-distance, email, cable TV, etc... vs. living on a "flat world" with an ocean that extends infinitely filled with sea monsters. On a smaller level, I've lost my capacity to easily remember phone numbers in the days of speed dial, my cell phone that holds hundreds of numbers, and five times as many local area codes to keep track of.
Getting back to TV- watch some old movie on TCM... it is like watching a play. Each scene can last for several minutes before there is a cut, and shadows are often projected on the wall behind the actors. These movies really stand out as being "staged" compared to an MTV video where I'm lucky to catch a camera shot that lasts more then two seconds- even though many videos are literally shot on a stage. It seriously would not surprise me if this affects how we think and process the world- it is almost digital vs. analog- that we receive the world in a billion still images vs. drawn out and linear. Movies use jumbled time... beginnings/middles/ends have lost their meaning. In personal relationships, people often start out in what would once be considered the middle of a relationship.... courtship is either redefined or non-existent, depending on your definitions. I could go on and on.
Whether there is any causality here is open to debate- but if you believe at the very least that TV/media gives people what they want, it definitely has changed over the last 40 years.
Those that suggest you "dance like no one is watching" really want to see you make a complete fool of yourself.
They glossed over this in just one paragraph... although they declare they argue that the former is generally the case, the article insists heavily upon the second alternative; I do not find their reasoning very convincing. Even the experiments on "TV deprivation" are inconclusive: people needing a distraction from their daily toil are likely to be uncomfortable and maybe even violent when this is taken from them. In this sense, we are all addicted to entertainment, but not necessarily to a specific entertainment.
The second part, concerning video games and computers, seems to me even more questionable. For instance, I fail to see the connection between "addiction" and the cases of "optically stimulated epileptic seizures". It is common knowledge that such seizures can be triggered by intermittent light (for instant when driving by a row of trees) but they have nothing to do with addiction.
This paragraph makes sense for any single player game, but I question it's validity for multiplayer games like counter-strike, the quake-based multiplayers like q3a and rtcw and even diablo2 and everquest.
The difficulty level is set by your peers and is not a "minute" increase. LAN Partys, OGL and like present a ceaseless range of new challengers.
Honesty. Loyalty. Kindness. Laughter. Generosity. Magic!
What's the definition of interferring with a growing active life? Instead of hitting the pub after work, I usually go straight home and work on one of my many silly projects. On weekends I take a break from my projects and play video games. I hang out with my friends maybe once a week, maybe less. My hobbies are programming (silly projects) and video games. I'm happy. Does that mean I'm addicted and should be weaned off? Says who?
[o]_O
It causes overweight not only because you don't move around, but it slows down metabolism while it makes you feel hungry and lets you eat tons of snacks while not beeing aware of it (->fat)
While your body goes into a sleep-like state, you feel very exhausted after long TV sessions; this really wrecks havoc on your immune system(->sick)
Watching TV before sleep forces your brain's nightly garbage collection to work on what you have seen on TV instead on your real life experiences, with negative effects on decision making and dealing with real life problems, up to causing serious mental diseases(->mad)
Watching TV makes the parts of you brain responsible for controlling your motion wither, which is known to negatively affect your intellectual capabilities (->stupid)
And finally the incredible amount of trash transmitted over U.S. TV can not have any positive effects on the spectator, and all this is regularily interrupted with a mixture of ads, many of them using sophisticated techniques to manipulate your mind. (I can not stand a U.S. TV program for more than a couple of minutes because among other things I am not used to these frequent breaks; it makes me so agressive that I have to switch it off)
I hope that one day the people responsible for this lunacy will have to pay for it.
p.
Without order, nothing can exist. Without chaos, nothing can be created.
I did a little math just before new years. I watched about 4 - 5 hours a day (That's 3 - 4 on a weeknight and about 6-7 on Saturday and Sunday).
I've been doing this since I was about 10. (My parents never stopped me) And now I'm 28.
So that's 4.5 Hours x 7 days x 52 weeks x 18 years.
That's 29484 Hours or 3.36 Years of my life. An entire 12% of my entire life!
So I decided that I would cut it out till June. And give it a rest. Man it's hard. The first thing I realized was the reflex that I had developed. Come home sit and watch. Wake up sit and watch.
But the biggest thing was the amount of time I had. I always wondered how people find the time to keep there place sparkling clean, stay in shape, pack a lunch for work, and become good at sports.
Another thing that I think TV does, when TV is you primary source of entertainment and social interaction it warps the mind. TV lets you hand out with hot chicks, go on a thrilling adventure, and fall in love. You begin to believe (subconsciously) that you really do have a relationship to these people. It tricks the mind into believing that you are a smart, good looking, intelligent person with a ton of interesting friends and stories.
As soon as I pulled the plug I was clear that I was an awkward, quite, unkempt person, with no girlfriend and few friends. But now I can take the new time I have and focus on becoming the person I want to be.
Well I'd like to end on a positive not, but I would be lying if all you had to do was pull the plug to fix your life. No all pulling the plug does is show you how much work lies ahead of you. Its going to be a long time before I can change my life so that I don't miss TV.
Okay, suppose Joe is in an poor famine-ridden country where food is extremely scarce. Let's go through the above definition:
Is Joe a food addict? By that definition he is. Let's bring Joe to a bountiful country where food is the easiest thing possible to get. Joe doesn't spend much time thinking about food, has a rich social life, and can control what he eats better than most of his neighbours. Is Joe and addict here? By that definition he definitely isn't.
What changed? The environment. Was Joe *really* a food addict in the famine-ridden country?
Some very important things are missing from this definition.
Kill your TV.
Maybe I'm just getting old and aware of the passage of time, but I've wound up whittling down the number of TV shows I watch to a select few and getting nearly all my news from online, my local newspaper, and a magazine. This despite the fact that I have a very nice satellite dish and HDTV PCI card. There's just too many other things I want to do. The TV stays off for many days of the week, and I don't miss it. (Darn the WB and UPN for making decent shows! Even Enterprise has gotten good lately.) What's disturbing is the contrast with the rest of my family, who despite lacking the technotoys I have spend far more time in front of the tube. It's unbelievable how much crap my brother watches.
This from a guy who's not very sociable.
Now, take my Internet feed away and I'm going to hurt somebody...
by Godfrey Reggio, one of the genii behind Koyaanisqatsi. It's a 8 min film watching kids watching television!
I saw part of this without remembering what it was: I was initially disturbed that a movie would make fun of retarded kids! The groups of 3-10 four year olds stared blankly at the camera, mouths often open, swaying gently. Watching children watching television was unnerving, seeing them be still and quiet for many seconds just didnt seem right.
Evidence is chilling, and quite moving -- go see it.
talking about tv and online addiction ONLINE, thats like holding an AA meeting at a BAR.
Personally I don't see much TV, I work +12 hours a day, with a computer and internet.
When I go home normally I connect to see email, journals, etc. Can we see when this as an addiction or have we changed our TV/newspapers habbits to internet habbits? In this
article
(Scientific American-"The Network in Every Room") and in this ("Setting up an All-Linux Wireless LAN
") we can see the future of computer connection in every room of our house.
Will this bring a new generation of Computer addiction, people connected 24 hours, to work, play, to socialize, etc?
Not so off-topic: I submitted this story a couple of days, and it was rejected a few monutes later, why? There is a editorial position of slashdot or it is the personal taste of the "editor du jour"?
------I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either.------
For some reason, it just doesn't do much for me. I'll watch TV at the gym while exercising, but that's about it. The stuff is so boring. And there are so many commercials.
His arguments for the elimination of TV are grouped under 4 headings:
The citation is:
Mander, Jerry. Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television, 1978, Quill.
ISBN 0-688-03274-5 (hbk)
ISBN 0-688-08274-2 (pbk)
Soon our assimilation will be complete.
... they cause other equally bad issues.
Seriously, the people I know who have the biggest problems in life are people who thrive on social activities. These are the ones who play the "keep up with the jonses" game, and are also more involved with our friends: alchohol, tobacco and other Fine Drugs. Financial problems from what I've seen seem to cause people to literally go crazy under stress. Chemicals gone to excess
The people who sit and home and watch TV after work, play video games, read, etc. tend to be boring yes, but I've never known them to break under stress quite the same way.
Yeah it's probably bad if you skip work to watch Oprah, although if you've got the vacation time and choose to use it this way, it's not hurting anyone. It seems to me psychobabblists these days are all EverQuest junkies: it's all about having friends and talking.
Pahtooey. Friends are OK, but I'd rather have my PS2.
One point in the article was right on. Managing your media time is hard at times. Particularly bad times. Escape is easy. This problem is not totally the viewers fault though. A lot of it has to do with how television is structured today.
Recently I got rid of the Dish Network system in my home. For about 2 months, the family went basically nuts. More fights, and more sleep. After a while, things changed. The kids began to use the computer more for reading, chatting, and of course, games.
After about a year or so of this, I have noted some real changes. The family in general does more things together, homework is actually getting done, and the kids enjoy sports more and they actually read! (both online and books) We all still like our television, but now everyone has focused on the thing or two that they really want to watch, rather than watching everything all the time. The perception about television has changed for the better.
As a kid, I did not have cable. Just broadcast television. Watched everything of interest, but also was outdoors a lot, and in front of the computer a lot. A lot like the family is now. Later on when cable became avaliable, I noticed the demands on my time. There was so much to relate to! My viewing went way up, but my enjoyment did not in general. Sure there are good things on cable, but a whole lot of time is spent either choosing, or waiting not actually watching with real interest.
So there is something to the large number of channels that changes TV for people. You go from the perception that there may be something good on tonght, to a feeling that you are always missing something good. I now know the truth in this. 150 channels means 148 channels full of crap at any one time. Not really any different from broadcast television in the practical sense, but the perception is very different, and that perception changes habits. Hey! it's the syndication tax!
So to wind this up and go a shade off topic, I miss premium television, but am annoyed by the fact that it is not offered without all the crap. Kind of like a PC without windows. Hard to find.
Most people here really don't like the idea of pay per view, but in the context of television, it would be a very good thing provided that one would be able to actually choose what they want to view. Producers would have to compete on the merits of what they produce without the filler programming filling in the dead time. I would easily pay the same dollars for some choice as to what comes in and what does not.
The media companies know this so, pay per view will be added to the endless wave of junket media being pimped right now as the "best in quality home entertainment" or some other equally mind numbing crap, when it could be a vehicle to make TV enjoyable and manageable again.
Tv is addictive by its very nature. Problem is that the producers exploit this feature rather than actually produce quality programming.
So for now, I will remain a jaded television consumer looking the TiVo over closely while finding other interesting things to do.
Blogging because I can...
Fortunately, I watch a lot of porn, does that mean I'm OK?
dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
And what about the effects long-term heavy use of the computer and monitor have on our bodies! Pulse rate quickens, eyes get fixated, mental stimulation, dizziness, improper breathing, etc, etc.
The ESM method of gathering data (paging people at random times during the day) is one of the most inaccurate measurements psychology uses. Having recently done a study using this technique I can tell you that it produces the laziest, most inconsistant responces of any psychological sampling method I've ever encountered. Take this as your grain of salt.
----------
The Mind is a Terrible Thing to Taste.
The best move I made was to put the TV in a room that was just for watching the TV. It's at the top of the house, and I have to make a conscious decision to go and watch it. In the winter its pretty cold up there too which is another reason not to stay too long.
With a TV in your main living area, the temptation to check out what's on is overwhelming. Switch it on - and suddenly its like your brain has been sucked out...and you've been sitting there for hours. This article indicates that there is a bit of science in this process. We are conditioned to switch it on (it makes us feel good), and then we are captivated by rapid movement (because we are hardwired to associate movement to indicate "prey"...or "predator").
Another thing. Don't get satellite. It takes an hour to work out there is nothing worth watching. With 5 channels in here in the UK, I can work this out in about 20 seconds.
Imagine if aliens took over the planet disquised as these things like TV that we would use for everything from work, watching movies, phone, Internet, and turn us all into screen zombies. And take over the world!!!
;-D
It could happen.
Once Virtual Reality is here, we will either have to think about any bad symptoms in the terms of natural development of mankind, or make it regulated by law (impossible, imho, because WE will do, what WE want).
"Don't you ever, ever say anything bad about TV again!!" -- Homer Simpson
Hahahah somebody actually modded this post up!
There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
I personally found the article not quite up to SciAm's usual snuff. Typically there is a lot of science and you come away with some stuff to think about... this one just grazed on a couple interesting habits and mentioned a couple studies without really posing any dramatic questions.
Krispy Cream is people
Back to my point, I find that I can be very productive while the tv is on in the background and if you need to take a break when a good show comes on you can relax while still keeping your mind somewhat stimulated.
Bobuhabu
do you people realize that when you link to drudge, you're helping advertise the fact that internet "news sites" are complete and utter garbage. since slashdot is included in this group (and probably one of the better examples of one) you probably shouldn't expect people to take you seriously if you link to drudge.
... is cellular telephony. Just come over to Europe and see how it works. It's just great -- if nearly everybody has a cellphone and the coverage is 100%, and there are no airtime charges (the case in most of Europe), then you don't have to arrange meetings and worry about being on time. All you have to do is to drop an SMS (text message) to a friend of yours who you suspect to be in vicinity, and wait for the incoming phonecall to arrange a meeting in-person.
GSM is COOOOL!
Personally, I suffer from somewhat minor (read: ignorable) ADD and was told (though I have no facts or links to back this information up) that children with ADD demonstrate a sudden absence of blood in the frontal lobe when concentrating on certain (generally repetitive) tasks. This is unfortunately only diagnosable with an MRI, which is too costly to be of much use to most alleged sufferers of AD(H)D.
Just thought I'd throw that out there.
. .
Strobing lights of many different kinds, (TV included), puts the viewer into a semi-hypnotic state which allows for messages of all sorts to be more easily absorbed by the mind.
Music videos are particularly nasty in this regard;
The messages in most pop music are moronic: Love is the most important thing in the world. You are not having enough sex. You must have low self esteem without love or sex. --Not to mention the host of responses you are 'supposed' to have to all manner of stimuli.
Charming.
TV doesn't need to have subliminal messages to brain-wash its audience. The programming itself is more than enough to do the job.
And here's the scary part: The effects on society are invisible, because society has already been formed into the shape TV wants it to be. --That is, the end result is considered normal because the condition is ubiquitous.
But TV is just a small part of the whole. Every little jab adds up.
Fluoride
Cell phone EM
Asparatame
Advertising
Air pollutants
Too-many work hours
Pre-natal sonic scans
Unhealthy food combinations
Propaganda and corporate agendas in: News & educational programming
Zero-exercise car culture
Recreational drugs
Non-recreational drugs, (anti-depressants, antihistamines. .
To name just a few of the bigger stabs. There are many more subtle attacks. Any one or two of them by themselves are not enough to completely deplete the bulk of humanity, but they quickly add up.
The end result?
A populace which is soft, dumb & easy to manipulate. Ripe for. . .
Hm.
Well, we'll just have to wait and see, won't we?
-Fantastic Lad --"All your base are belong to us"
why not Scientific American on Slashdot Addiction.. maby they can cure me..
Nietzsche hated anti-Semitism pretty violently. He also suggested that European culture would be nothing without Jewish culture. He also had a lot of contempt for Germany. He did suggest that 19th century European Judaism was then the most prominent form of ressentiment, which might annoy some people, but was probably true. (Today I'd say that feminism held that slot. For him to make that claim about European Judaism doesn't make him hate Jews any more than making such a claim about feminism makes me hate women.)
However, his sister Elizabeth was a German nationalist. She heavily edited and controlled the publication of his later works, when he was pretty much a helpless invalid. She also got an imprimatur on releases of some of his earlier works. I once saw an edition of Zarathustra from the teens in which she had an "explanatory" preface, most of which was nonsense. Nietzsche himself didn't publish part 4 of Zarathustra, except in a very limited edition for his friends, for fear that he would be tried for blasphemy.
The best example of this is The Will to Power. Nietzsche never wrote a book with that title. He wanted to write one with that title and wrote down a whole lot of notes. After madness or tertiaty syphilis or whatever took hold, Elizabeth essentially assembled an original work cut-and-pasted from the notes.
By the way, what's Ecce Humo? "Behold the Smoke" or "Behold the Chick Pea Dip"?
I've wondered for a quite a while if the 60 hz strobing (isn't it 60 frames per second on TV) does not have an addictive effect? And when you do not receive the stimulus, you do not feel well.
Imagine when you ride in a truck/bus that has lots of vibration. You eventually get used to it, and if you ride long enough, you feel kind of funny when you get off the bus and stand on "solid" non-vibrating ground.
Could the nervous system be picking up the strobing from the vertical refresh, to the point you "get used it" and you feel funny when it's not around.
I found it striking, that when I used to watch TV that the first thing I would do when I got up, or came home, was to turn on the TV. I didn't feel right if I didn't.
That was particularly interesting to me, because after graduating college and moving back in with my parents (until grad school starts!) I've suddenly for the first time in three years had a TV set. And I have noticed that I'm more restless and listless than I used to be, and that I seem to gain less satisfaction from reading.
One thing the article doesn't talk about, though, is those people who leave the TV on and do other things. I leave the TV on while I program, and while I cook, and I find that it helps me do those things longer. I wonder if it's having the same effect as when I sit and watch, or whether it simply staves off boredom, like the radio used to do.
I'm not convinced that cocaine is really addictive though. When I have access to cocaine, I snort it way too much. When I don't, I don't miss it at all, and I've gone as much as a year without snorting any measurable amount of cocaine, and with no side effects due to withdrawal.
Well said, and you should have been modded higher.
I think you'll find the TiVo (or similar device) gives you the "pay for only what I want to see" experience you are looking for. It'll help cut out all the chaff. Even a VCR is better than nothing.
Mindless channel surfing for something and watching junk just because you can't get yourself to turn it off is a big part of the problem. You wouldn't eat anything put in front of you (unless you were starving) so why watch anything on TV just because it is there?
It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
You need food, you can die of starvation. No one has ever died or even been harmed from lack of TV. There is a biological need for food. The comparison is bogus.
I've met some pretty dumb people with a PhD.