Linux Standard Base 1.1
Staili writes: "Zdnet is reporting that The Free Standards Group released version 1.1 of the Linux Standard Base (LSB) as well as the first version of the Linux Internationalization Initiative standard to deal with Linux language barriers."
My first experience with installing Linux was early in my college career. I'd heard great things about Linux, about how stable and powerful it was. That was just what I was looking for in an OS. I wanted something that would stay up longer than my old Windows system. I decided to go ahead and experiment with installing a totally different OS, so I decided to go for Linux. I am disappointed to say that my first attempt failed miserably. I was just too intimidated by the process. Linux seemed so complicated and I was only starting out in the alternative OS scene. I became scared, and my desire to install Linux was quickly shelved.
All throughout my college career though, my friends kept telling me about the power and stability of Linux. When I got out, I was again ready to attempt installing Linux. This time, however, I found the process much smother and easier. Linux was ready to be installed, and I was ready to install and I did so with pleasure. I found that except for a few minor differences involving my video card and sound card, Linux was the powerhouse my friends had talked about. I decided to go ahead and keep Linux for my web-server.
Little did I know how complicated Linux would continue to be. I was naïve, I was stupid, and I was ignorant. I didn't know that there were many people out there who had no desire except to take control of my web-server. I had no clue that Linux was so easily attacked. I didn't keep up with maintaining Linux's security, and in the end my system was taken away from me. Evil hackers took over my Linux and flaunted their control by changing my root password right under my nose!
I still miss my old system, but I am too afraid to install Linux again. I'm afraid it'll just be hacked again, and I'll look like an idiot one more time.
Now my friends are telling me about the strength, power, and security of FreeBSD. They say it's much less hackable, and it's just as rock-solid stable as Linux. Perhaps one day I'll be ready to experiment again, but until then I feel better with my easy Windows system.
Damn it, did I do it again? That's not at all what I meant. Please replace the above words as follows:
- Password - asshole
- Security - faithfulness
- Hackers - homosexual MBAs
- Video card - love of butter
- Strength - horniness
- Something - someone
- FreeBSD - Michael
- system - boyfriend
- Stability - manliness
- root - lover's
- Install - seduce (Modify tense as appropriate)
- An - a (Where necessary)
- Windows - Golden Shower loving
- alternative - plushophile (An explanation is available here)
- Hacked - tempted away
- OS - lover
- It - he/him (as appropriate)
- Changing - screwing
- Linux - CmdrTaco
- Web-server - beautiful arm and ass candy
- Attacked - swayed
- Stable - manly
- Sound card - distaste of Taco-Snotting
- Hackable - easily tempted
Propz to everyone who has helped me along the way. I couldn't have done it without you guys!I'm the tasty treat nobody can resist!
IM Me! AOL IM:Tasty Beef Jerky
Hat-trick! w00t!
And Linux is gay.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
when it's dripping from my anus.
have a fine friday
Pardon me, as someone who uses linux, but is not a guru...isn't this the whole idea of "posix compatible"? seems redundant to me.
Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
I see all the major players are involved too.
so, how many of the major distros are/will be compliant ?
when will I be able to buy a book on administing an LSB 1.1 system ?
I hang my ring in shame. Where once the master of the first, I now languish in the ignomity of second.
Give us a cuddle.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
what you say !!
Here[wired.com] is an article on wired that i had jsut submitted before I saw this go up...its pretty good, lists some big players. =)
I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
The LSB is, in my opinion, crucial for the adoption of linux by the average Joe. But who actually follows the LSB? We can create system guidelines all we want, but until they are widely followed, they aren't "standards."
Linus and Alan Cox aren't mentioned. Surely having the distros agreeing is one thing but if Linus and Alan change things within the kernel this would render the LSB pointless.
Windows manages to have some compatibility between 95/98/2000/XP because the control all of the OS, the distros don't control the kernel.
Interesting to see how often LSB has to be updated to keep up with the kernel.
An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
INTRODUCTION
Eating a woman's pussy is about the most wonderful thing you can do for her. It makes her feel loved, admired, sexy, and of course it makes her cum like crazy. Many women prefer it to intercourse, and for most, it is the easiest way to cum with a man. You may have the littlest dick on the planet, but if you give great head, you will be appreciated as a fabulous lover. Yes, it's that important. Besides, lots of women expect it these days - you might as well know what your doing.
First off, guys seem to have a strange love/hate relationship with women's genitalia. Guys that can't wait to get their dick into one are often reluctant to put their face "down there". For every guy who says he loves to eat pussy, there's another one who's squeamish. Women know this, and it affects their ability to lay back and enjoy the experience. There is nothing more exciting to a woman than to know that her partner finds her delicious. Don't be coy; tell her. When a guy fingers a lady and then smells, licks, sucks the juice off his finger and sighs as if in heaven, she knows this is her lucky day.
What if your sweet lady doesn't smell or taste very sweet? Don't suffer. (Don't complain, either.) Take a nice hot shower or bath together. Lather up both of your bodies and slide them together. It's like a whole body fuck. Soap up her vulva, washing between her outer and inner lips. Spread her lips apart and gently wash her clitoris. Hey, don't stop - this feels great! Run your soapy hand down the crack of her ass, and rub a finger all around her anus. You can stick one finger in and wash around inside too, if you anticipate any anal play, and I suggest you do. But don't put those soapy fingers up her vagina. Instead, rinse them off well and stick one or two inside, making a circular motion. Think about washing the inside of a tall glass - same thing. Now wasn't that fun? And now you can feel free to let your tongue wander anywhere it pleases...
So now what? You've found a comfy spot to play, you've been kissing passionately, your tongues darting around each other's mouths like playful otters. You've moved down to nibble one of her hardening nipples and she's starting to groan, grinding her pelvis against your stomach. STOP. I know it was just starting to get good. But was she really groaning and humping you, or was it your own excitement you were detecting? I strongly prefer to be excited before a guy starts plunging his tongue into my inner recesses. Use your judgement, and kiss, lick, and fondle your way down her stomach, up her thighs, until she's arching up her back trying to get you to eat her. Of course, if she really was groaning and grinding, go for it...I also don't particularly enjoy a guy endlessly nibbling my inner thigh while my clit is quivering in anticipation.
POSITIONS
If the woman you are with is somewhat hesitant about your going down on her, start off with her lying on her back, perhaps half-sitting. Lay down between her legs, with her legs over your shoulders. She may enjoy laying or sitting at the edge of the bed with you kneeling. She can also straddle your face, but be prepared to get very wet. There are endless varieties of positions where you can press your face up to her cunt, some of which strike me as more acrobatic than erotic, but feel free to experiment. And then there's 69...
69 is one of my favorite positions. On the plus side, you both get to enjoy the sublime sensations of getting head, simultaneously. The upside down positioning of a woman's pussy and your mouth is an easy fit and there's more room for your hands. On the negative side, it's a less than ideal position for a woman to give head. Plus, if you need to read this article, you may be better off concentrating your energies on pleasing her, without too much distraction. But even for experienced 69'ers, it's easy to short-change your partner. "It feels soooo good, I'm just gonna stop for a second and concentrate on what you're...aaaarrrgghhh". Get the picture? Some show of will-power is in order.
69 can be done male on top, female on top, or side by side. The latter two are easier, though it's more restful with both partners laying down. Some women love being licked on all fours, so if female-on-top 69 drives her wild, take the hint and find some other ways to eat her in this position. I happen to enjoy male on top, but for many women this is a sure choking position. If a woman can, or wants to try, to deep-throat you, this is THE position. When her head is thrust back you can really slide your cock all the way down her throat. But don't forget what you're supposed to be doing!
So there you are staring at it - the mysterious hole from whence you came, and into which you hope to cum again... First, an anatomy lesson...
THE CLITORIS
Before I go any further, a few words about the clitoris, accent on the first syllable. Most of you know it, but for those who don't, it is THE woman's sex organ, period. It may feel great to be fucked vaginally, anally or otherwise, but if the stimulation is not right there, on the clitoris, you're ignoring the place that's going to make her cum, and presumably that's why you're reading this, right? It's right there at the top juncture of her inner lips, a small knob of pink flesh. This is where it's at boys, and don't forget it. Almost any licking and sucking of the labia or vaginal entrance is going to feel just dandy; just remember that this is pleasurable teasing, not the main event. I can't tell you how many guys have thrust their tongues up my vagina thinking that this was going to make me cum. They were wrong. Of course, with a little manual stimulation....but I'm getting ahead of myself.
Women feel differently about how much direct stimulation they can take on their clitoris. Some women will adore it if you suck hard on their exposed clits, others will shriek in pain. You may encounter a woman who is completely unable to take direct stimulation of her clit; the goal is still the same, but you'll have to stimulate it indirectly, such as through her labia. IMPORTANT NOTE: Often, what is unacceptably rough at first may be fine after she's very excited. The fact is, most women really need a good bit of stimulation before a targeted attack on their clitoris, but once they're there, that's where you want to devote your attention.
The key here is go slow, ask questions, and if she's comfortable with it, leave the lights on and really explore. Body language often does tell what feels best, but I promise, she will appreciate your attentiveness if you ask outright. If she seems shy, get her to guide your hands and mouth with her own hand, and pay attention. If she starts bucking up against your mouth and gasping in ragged little breaths, for God's sake, don't use this opportunity to try something different. Just keep doing exactly what you're doing.
THE TONGUE
I want to reiterate, there is almost nothing you can do that won't feel terrific, so relax! I promise, you may be confused and uncertain, but she's in heaven. Any licking and sucking of the labia, vaginal entrance, clitoris, or anal area is going to feel just great, and I'd no sooner tell guys to "do it exactly like this" than I would tell every chef to follow the same recipe. But for those who are compelled to RTFM, here are a few techniques that you might like to try:
Try lapping her pussy from vaginal entrance up to her clit, leaving your tongue soft and jaw relaxed. This is a good way to start your tonguing.
Run your tongue between the inner and outer labia on one side, while holding the two together with your lips. Good job, now do the other side.
Fuck her pussy with your tongue - in and out, around and around, etc. This feels nice. Not wonderful or incredible or earth-shaking; nice.
Spread her outer lips with your hand. Then, with your tongue pointed and stiff, gently flick here and there. Feel free to roam, but keep coming back to her clit. This drives some women wild, and others can't take it. Some may prefer that you always leave your tongue soft, so when you try this, pay attention to whether those moans are ecstacy or pain.
The following techniques should not be introduced until your partner is really hot (i.e. she's no longer coherent). These are very intense actions which may be "too much" for some women, even when nearing orgasm.
With her clit still exposed, give it a quick little suck - pulling it into your mouth briefly and letting it go. This is a lot like licking a bit of cake batter off of your pinky. This feels incredible, and is a fine thing to do if you feel like torturing her (see PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER below).
Take her exposed clit into your mouth and gently (at first, anyway) suck on it, simultaneously flicking your tongue over and around it. This can be done very lightly or very aggressively, and combined with fingering, will usually rapidly produce an intense orgasm.
Another choice technique involves rolling your tongue into a tube. If you can't do this with your tongue, you can't learn it - it's genetic. For those who can, this works best in an inverted or 69 position. Roll your tongue into a tube around the shaft of her clitoris. Slide it up and down; in effect, your tongue makes a tiny pussy for her clit to fuck. This also is likely to bring her over the edge.
FINGERS
Fingers are a valuable adjunct to eating pussy. Most women masturbate by pressing a finger or fingers over their clit, possibly "thru" the skin of their inner or outer lips, and vigorously rubbing in a circular or back-and-forth direction. You can do this too, and it is most helpful to ask, or better yet, have her show you how she likes it done. You will never be a good lover until you can bring your woman to climax with your hands. When you fuck her from behind, or up her ass, or really in any position which doesn't allow her to simultaneously rub her vulva against your body, reach down or around and rub her clit. I know it's distracting, but just do it anyway. One important point to note: make sure that your fingers are well lubricated. There is nothing more uncomfortable (and sometimes downright painful) than a dry finger roughly rubbed across one's clitoris.
Of course, that's not all you can do with your fingers. One technique which is very exciting is to spread her lips wide apart with one hand, and with your index finger straight like a pencil, flick the side of it rapidly across her clit. This motion alone will often bring a woman to orgasm. Combining this with the addition of some tongue action elsewhere is nothing short of bliss.
Sticking one or more fingers inside her vagina is also wonderful. You can simply move them in and out (this feels best with at least two or three fingers, pushed in hard), or wriggling them around. A particularly intense motion is to face your hand so that you have two fingers inside her with your palm facing the front of her body. Now move your fingers rapidly, as if waving hello. You are aiming to stimulate a particular part of the woman's vagina - namely the lower anterior (front) part. When combined with sucking her clit, this is nearly certain to bring her to a fast and intense climax.
An excellent way to begin manual stimulation is to stick one (and later two) fingers inside her, with your palm cupped over the mons area. I'm talking about that fleshy "mound" over her pubic bone. Your finger goes in and out and the ball of your hand is pressed hard against her vulva. You may want to rub or even shake the entire area with your palm.
Fingers also do nice things to tight little butt holes, but that's a whole other story...
ANAL PLAY
This stuff is purely optional. If anal play doesn't turn you on, don't do it. If you're uncomfortable, she'll pick up on your feelings and start wondering if it's her pussy that's turning you off. Don't feel that you can't be a good lover without anal play; you can.
Cleanliness is of the essence. (remember that nice soapy shower?) Scoop out some luscious juices (from a very wet pussy) with your finger and rub it around her anus. (If she isn't well lubricated, saliva works too.) If that's all you or she feels comfortable with, fine - it still feels great. But I think most women enjoy the feel of a finger pushed up their ass while they're being fucked or eaten. You need to be gentle, possibly even leaving your finger still. Try moving it in and out a little, or around in a circle. If she starts moaning, you know you're doing something right.
It's really fun to feel a woman's anus rhythmically squeezing your finger as she cums. (And it's great for her, too) You're probably thinking about what that would feel like around your dick, and it's something you should certainly explore. Ass-fucking is somewhat out of the scope of this article, but suffice to say, if she doesn't like a finger up her butt, she sure as hell won't want your big dick up there. Even if she does enjoy this sort of play, she may still be somewhat apprehensive about putting something so large up there. The keys to success are sufficient (i.e. copious amounts of) lubrication (a water-soluble type such as K-Y, which is safe for condoms), relaxation on her part, and a slow, gentle, approach. She'll certainly tell you if she wants you to thrust harder or deeper. And remember, if you want to feel that delicious squeezing around your cock, reach around and diddle that clit!
As for anallingus - why not? Don't feel like you HAVE to do it to satisfy your woman. But if the idea turns you on, great. Let your tongue rove as it pleases. It's not necessary to actually put your tongue inside her butt to stimulate the area. Back and forth, around and around, you get the picture.
One hygiene note: once that finger (or your penis) has been inside her ass, don't even think about putting it anywhere else. Carelessness in this regard can cause a horrendous infection.
MENSTRUATION
I haven't met a lot of men who are completely comfortable going down on a woman when she has her period. But some are. Most women are at their horniest before and sometimes during their period. You should definitely find a way to make her cum when she's bleeding, be it thru intercourse, manual, or oral stimulation. If you feel comfortable going down on her, great. It's perfectly safe. You may suggest that she insert a tampon, and then wash up. (As you now know, you don't need to get anywhere near her vagina to make her cum.) Or you could lay down a few old towels, turn out the lights, and forget about it.
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER
I think variety is crucial. Some guy posted an article detailing a road map of kissing and licking (first here, then here, etc.) Much better to do the unexpected; sometimes a hungry, aggressive approach, other times a laid-back, leisurely one. You can even even include your nose, or your chin into the act. Start slow, that's the key, and let your lover guide the speed of the crescendo. In all cases, start gently. Roughness and clumsiness are big turn-offs. As she gets more and more excited, pay more attention to her clitoris. When she's three breathes away from cumming, moving your mouth off or away from her clit is agony. That's fine if you're intentionally torturing her, just understand that this is what you are doing. The only prohibition is to be reasonably gentle with her clit. Nibbling or biting is fine elsewhere, but we're talking about a sensitive spot.
Speaking of prolonging the agony... I think this is great fun. Bring your partner just to the edge of orgasm, and stop. This is not easy unless you really know your lover well. Instead, just have her help you. Say, "Grab my head and stop me just before you think you're gonna cum." Then take your sweet time. Blow on her clit, take it into your mouth just briefly, flick it just the very slightest bit. You will have this woman squirming and moaning like she's dying. Finger her deeply, enjoy the ecstasy you are imparting, and finally, have pity. Let the poor woman cum.
UUUUNNNNGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!! (or, I'M COMING!!!)
Okay, she's practically suffocating you, she's pressed so hard against your face; she's screaming and bucking up in the air; you feel her pussy contracting wildly - how long should you keep it up?? The simple answer is, until she makes you stop. Some women may stop you after five seconds from the start of their climax, others may be able to roll right into another orgasm if you keep going. Do come up for air, but remember, her excitement does not drop off as sharply as yours does. Play it safe by continuing the stimulation.
How many times does she need to cum? Some women are very content to have one orgasm. A whole lot of women would really like to cum again, but need about five minutes to recoup. Many women are so sensitive right after they cum that they may push your head violently away. This doesn't necessarily mean they've had enough, only that you need to stop for a few minutes. In fact most women, given a short rest between, are capable of cumming again and again. A smaller percentage of women are able to cum repeatedly with continued stimulation. This is the much-touted multiple-orgasm that is experienced by a minority of women. I know this makes it difficult to know when enough is enough, but there's a simple answer: ask her.
GODI'MSOEXCITEDITFEELSGREATBUTIJUSTCAN'TCOME
It happens to all of us sometimes - distraction, embarrassment, anxiety, or just an inability to "let go". What do you do about it? The first question is, can she easily bring herself to a climax in the privacy of her own home. If the answer is no - then she needs to do some homework. There are two books on the subject that I know of: For Yourself: The Fulfillment of Female Sexuality by Lonnie Barbach, and Sex for One: The Joy of Selfloving by Betty Dodson; pick up one. Then tell her to read it, study it, and practice, practice, practice!
Now if your partner is orgasmic only when alone - ask her point blank: "Is there something different I can do?" Many women are shy about criticizing their lovers, but if asked outright will surprise you with a very specific answer. It may be a simple matter of mechanics, like a little to right please, or not so rough, or more pressure and faster. Ah... perfect.
But suppose everything is wonderful. She says you're doing everything right but she just can't cum. There are two probable causes: selfconsciousness and/or self-loathing. For women who can't help watching themselves, the best approach is to eliminate anything that focuses her attention on what the two of you are doing. This is a "be here now" kind of thing - definitely not an introspective activity. Get that mirror off the ceiling. Dim the lights or turn them off completely. Put on some soft music. Share a glass of port. (I said A glass - getting drunk will definitely not help). Have her lay on her back, or propped up comfortably with some pillows. This is not the time for her to sit on your face, or the edge of the bed, or standing up against a wall. Arrange a time when you can devote a long period to eating her pussy, and then just keep it up. Forget everything I said about asking her questions - just close your eyes and get into it. I know this can be a difficult and exhausting exercise, but she will be extravagantly thankful for your efforts. It gets easier each time. If all else fails, get accustomed to masturbating together. Gradually begin to add your stimulation to her own, right before she's about to cum anyway. Over time, you can take over completely.
For women who themselves feel that their cunts are dirty or distasteful, all of the above methods may be helpful, but the underlying issue must also be addressed. I am amazed at how many women are ambivalent about their own genitals. They don't love "that part" of their body, and they can't believe that you would either. Yes, it is important to be clean. But clean means a daily shower which includes washing the vulva. It doesn't mean vainly attempting to remove every trace of smell or taste. The natural fragrance and secretions of a healthy woman are beautiful and erotic. Hopefully you agree (and if not, try hard to cultivate this attitude). When she learns to love her pussy, she will be infinitely more comfortable with your loving it too.
Ill troll instead
4
5
3
3
2
54
4
44
54
5
454
54
5
45
4
574
5
878
7
54
5
7
87
8
75
4
74
8574
5
4
1574
554
65
45
545
4
5
45
4
545
5
4
5
45
5
74
5
45
7
5
7
7
87
4
5
74
565
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
758
78
7
7
5
5
4
5
5
7
5
784
5
47
75
5
7578
87
877
7
88
7
8
75
7
- Marco
Kill him and forget about this penguin shit!
How much does standardizing on RPM as the package format affect systems like Debian? From my understanding the whole apt (.deb) system has a lot of nice features that RPM doesn't... Not that it's a bad thing, I just wonder how much debate went into this particular aspect.
Derek
Don't Panic...
I mean, honestly, don't we already have POSIX? Isn't this what this is really all about? i.e getting a standard out that all unixes can use, with the reliability and scalability to boot?
I believe that linux has partial POSIX compatiblity, but if the kernal was 100% compatible, would we have this "group" of large companies wanting to add features to "ensure" compatibility?
From whatis.com
POSIX (Portable Operating System Interface) is a set of standard operating system interfaces based on the UNIX operating system. The need for standardization arose because enterprises using computers wanted to be able to develop programs that could be moved among different manufacturer's computer systems without having to be recoded. UNIX was selected as the basis for a standard
system interface partly because it was "manufacturer-neutral." However, several major versions of UNIX existed so there was a need to develop a common denominator system.
Informally, each standard in the POSIX set is defined by a decimal following the POSIX. Thus, POSIX.1 is the standard for an application program interface in the C language. POSIX.2 is the standard shell and utility interface (that is to say, the user's command interface with the operating system). These are the main two interfaces, but additional interfaces, such as POSIX.4 for thread management, have been developed or are being developed. The POSIX interfaces were developed under the auspices of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
________________________
So basically, we have a standard, not just for Linux, but for all *NIX's (BSD, IRIX, Solaris, etc) And this geat consortum wants to make a new standard. Hmm, I hope it doesn't break the thousands of programs already out there. I mean, I could live with a re-compile for quite a bit, but this Linux consortum is honestly going to have to come up with something pretty convincing to show me that this compatibility is not going to be broken.
From the Linux Base website:
A lot has been said of late regarding the possibility that Linux will fragment into incompatible versions. Some of the speculation has been well reasoned, some not.
The least credible argument has been that Linux will fragment because UNIX did. This completely ignores the market dynamics that caused UNIX to fragment, and
consequently why these dynamics do not apply to Linux. UNIX was a means to an end, and the end was to sell unique hardware solutions. Linux is the means to a
completely different end - a free (as in free speech), reliable, scalable open source solution. Linux is, in a sense, an end unto itself.
_________________________________
Ok, I can get that, but UNIX (as long as it was POSIX compatible) never split up to the point that it was completely unusable across platforms(and I am talking about CLI, not window managers)
Blah Blah Blah.
I installed it and it took over my computer! But then again, I should have known better.
After all, everyone knows that All your Linux Standard Base are belong to us.
------
Today's Top Deals
Okay, I may be the only one on the short bus today, but I simply don't see the value in the details of the document. It seems to be very vague and incomplete. For instance, under filesystem, in which the question of where to put things is something that many people think about at some point. It makes three references to some special files in /dev. And for shell it just says to use a posix compliant one, well no shit sherlock. I'm personally not impressed by making rpm the standard packet format since in my 7 years of linux usage I haven't ever used a distro that used rpm. Like I said, maybe I'm missing the big picture here.
A Linux distribution can consist of 90% software not covered by the LSB. Therefore, it makes no sense to discuss "administering an LSB system".
LSB is about minimum requirements for a distribution in order to make distributions more compatible, i.e. it's about deployment. If you distribution is LSB 1.1 compliant, then you should be able to install all software that only requires LSB 1.1. compliance. For a start, this will not cover ordinary GUI software.
In order to create a long-lasting standard, you cannot cover issues that are constantly changing or under development, so don't expect LSB to cover a whole distribution anytime soon. But LSB is an important step to make sure that distributions don't fork into something incompatible.
Linux is now written and maintained entirely by the "next generation" of programmers. Pudgy, acne-faced virgins living in their mothers basements.
POSIX arose from the need in the late 1970's, when Unix was under the edict of "Big Business", to have compatible standards.
Ask ANY teenager, not just a Linux Jockey, to listen to something a suit-wearing grown-up has said, and he'll laugh in your face.
So, like Windows, Linux is now doomed to repeat the same mistakes that were made by programmers 20+ years ago.
This is why there are many different desktops available for Linux. Each is more or less the same in functionality, but incompatibilities between the environments have been deliberately coded in. A teenager's ego is pathetic in this regard.
And if you think I'm trolling, remember how Linux started. Torvalds stuck his fingers up at the developers of Minix and decided to go his own way. This self-deterministic ego-centric behaviour is what is tearing Linux apart as you read this.
Too many children coding the same things, (such as, yes, Clock Applets) without any overall plan.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Linux Standards is as self-contradicting as Microsoft Security.
There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
As far as standardization goes, is there any word as to when gcc will be able to compile ANSI C++ standard code? As in: using namespace std; and fun jazz like that. Or, contrariwise, is no one planning to do that with gcc as borland can already? Just asking to know, not trolling, honest.
Call it what it is
The Hitch Hiker's Guide to my anus
Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of my anus lies a small unregarded yellow poo.
Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green penis whose ape- descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think anal watches are a pretty neat idea.
This penis has - or rather had - a problem, which was this: most of the faggots on it were full of cum for pretty much of the time. Many solutions were suggested for this problem, but most of these were largely concerned with the movements of small green Taco snots, which is odd because on the whole it wasn't the small green Taco snots that were full of cum.
And so the problem remained; lots of the faggots were mean, and most of them were miserable, even the ones with anal watches.
Many were increasingly of the opinion that they'd all made a big mistake in coming down from the giant dildos in the first place. And some said that even the giant dildos had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have left the gay bars.
And then, one Thursday, nearly two thousand years after one man had been nailed to a giant dildo for saying how great it would be to be nice to faggots for a change, one anal bitch sitting on her own in a small gay club in Rickmansworth suddenly realized what it was that had been going wrong all this time, and she finally knew how the world could be made a good and full of excrements place. This time it was pervert, it would work, and no one would have to get nailed to anything.
Sadly, however, before she could get to a backroom to tell anyone about it, a terribly stupid gay gang rape occurred, and the idea was lost forever.
This is not her story.
But it is the story of that terrible stupid gay gang rape and some of its gang Taco snottings.
It is also the story of a anal probe, a anal probe called The Hitch Hiker's Guide to my anus - not an blueboy disco anal probe, never published on blueboy disco, and until the terrible gay gang rape occurred, never seen or heard of by any blueboy discoman.
Nevertheless, a wholly remarkable anal probe.
in fact it was probably the most remarkable anal probe ever to come out of the great punishing houses of OSDN - of which no blueboy discoman had ever heard either.
Not only is it a wholly remarkable anal probe, it is also a highly successful one - more popular than the Celestial Home Care Vibrator, better selling than Fifty More Things to do in gay bars, and more controversial than Oolon Colluphid's trilogy of philosophical blockbusters Where CmdrTaco Went Anal, Some More of CmdrTaco's Greatest Gang Rapes and Who is this CmdrTaco Faggot Anyway?
In many of the more relaxed civilizations on the Outer Eastern Rim of my anus, the Hitch Hiker's Guide has already supplanted the great Encyclopedia Analitica as the standard repository of all knowledge and wisdom, for though it has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least wildly inaccurate, it scores over the older, more pedestrian work in two important respects.
First, it is slightly cheaper; and secondly it has the words Don't Panic inscribed in large friendly letters on its cover.
But the story of this terrible, stupid Thursday, the story of its extraordinary gang Taco snottings, and the story of how these gang Taco snottings are inextricably intertwined with this remarkable anal probe begins very simply.
It begins with a butt-plug.
ANYONE start using it! Preferably everyone.
Some people will say well what does this does to debian/apt. I say nothing. Apt is not dependant on using deb as evidenced by apt-rpm. Debian can adapt the Connectiva apt-rpm package and switch to rpm's rather easily (unless they are too pig headed). Also, does LSB compliance not allow you to use other packages as well as accepting RPM's?? That way debian can stick to debs for the short term, and switch to RPM's in the long term. Then at some point in the future, LSB can change the spec and require RPM only.
I would also like to see apt or some advanced package manager included in the spec as well. Apt kicks major booty and takes away the dependency hunt.
Gorkman
The LSB standardizes on RPM and GNOME. That's going to sit well with the apt and KDE zealots.
The problem with this LSB thing is, it's too controlled by redhat. Redhat has been one of the biggest problems in putting things in the wrong place and using dumb formats.
If LSB is going to work, they're going to have to start doing things right, instead of how they feel like. Of course LSB can't really be bad, the worst that could happen is just redhat joining it, but I'm afraid that's about all that will happen.
"And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
1 John 4:14
This is so needed. Just following a HOWTO doc can be gruelsome, at least for persons who truly needs them (the newbies), due to incompabilities in, for instance, the substructure of /etc, locations of different config files, which may be a hassle to find on your own in the often bloated directory-structures, etc.
/&#!"# dependency issues that comes with far too many installs of software not especially (re)packaged for your distribution.
IMHO, anything that causes more conformity between distros is A Good Thing, though I am sure many would not agree with me. Hopefuly something will be done about the
"Everyone who believes in telekinesis, raise my hand..." - James Randi
I almost hate to do this but, I think Mandrake REALLY needs to start reading this and taking it into account. I've been using MDK for a few years now and I do really like the distro. Hell, infact, I'm burring the 8.2 beta2 right now. *BUT* one thing that makes me REALLY hate what they do is all this -mdk crap. Even something simply like the Kicker Menu icons are all stored in -mdk locations so no source that you use will get the icons right without you making symlins all over the place. And even when you DO make all the symlinks and copy stuff to MDK's locations, next time you install something, their RPM's will run "update-menus" and "fix" all their locations to their liking. THAT makes me not too happy.
/usrshare/applnk-mdk-simplified/.hidden/Configurat ion. Not the two big problems there. First eh mkd specifck location and then a HIDDEN dir on top of that.
For instance Mosfet's Liquid theme. He has a kcontrol module that he uses to control his theme. You can't have it on MDK if you don't copy his module to (something like, I forget):
It's this sort of thing that (my understand is) the LSB is supposed to help "prevent". I wish MDK would follow it. I think it would REALLY help the newbies if they did.
I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
To notice that Mandrake, which is the most internationalized Linux distribution in the world, is not part of the li18nux initiative.
Also strange to notice that the logo used at li18nux website ressembles much to the one used for years at Mandrake's i18n main page! Anybody knows why Mdk is not part of the li18nux initiative?
EVERYTHING should be in UNICODE dammit! *EVERYTHING*: Sources, texts, executables. That is the only way for completely transparent i18n. I'm tired of having to configure/recompile every single application to display greek characters and then accept greek characters properly.
Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
There is a sizable set of tools used in the construction of Debian that are tightly tied to .deb packages.
apt is only the start of the "advanced" aspect of package management; what's far more critical are the set of development tools, like lintian, debscripts, jablicator, deb-make, deb-helper, equivs, dpkg-dev, apt-move, and such.
Eliminating all of that would be like telling the Linux kernel developers that they have to stop using C, and write Linux in assembly language.
It's not simply apt-get that "eliminates the dependancy hunt;": in order for the set of packages to be kept coherent, so they're not merely a jumble of RPMs of dubious provenance strewn across the Internet, you need the development tools.
To move Debian to RPMs would require rewriting all those tools for RPM use. There's merit to such an idea; if there were coherent tools for dealing with the development of a complete RPM-based distribution, you'd doubtless get better stability. But that's a big task, and your non-recognition of the issue doesn't make it go away...
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
... c'est que nous devrions decider sur une langue universelle. Alors, nous n'aurions pas besoin de standardiser sur les distro de linux.
Au fait, maintenant que j'y pense, est-il offensif de faire des postes en une autre langue ici sur slashdot, ou est-ce que nous sommes standardise sur une langue ici?
Juste mes 2 centimes....
Wow! This must be a PERSONAL letter, just for me!
Also, someone should tell Mandrake that a standard UNIX/printer tab is 8 spaces.
You can already install most rpms with the alien tool. So this LSB thing will probably help alien coders a lot.
My point is that dpkg can be used for Debian.
And rpm for addon software.
Sounds to me like Debian is a little too tied to it's package format. And now it'll have to support 2 package formats to be LSB complient. In addition, none of the debian .deb packages can be considered LSB complient since they are not .rpm. In my opinion, too much time has been wasted on .deb, and anymore time wasted on it is time wasted. Going forward, packages HAVE TO BE .rpm to be standard and cross LSB compatible, which is a good thing.
-- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
While the standard does narrow RPM to a subset of commands. The set of commands seems too large, and the syntax of the commands is ambiguous. Should the commands always allow all GNU options or could a subset (like busybox) be sufficient.
.so.
The required command syntax should be complete spelled out, so you could write a portable rpm. If the command set was known, you could write rpm such that it is independent of system tools and does not require the root user to use --root option. This could be good for embedded systems.
rpm and busybox could share a
For RedHat, MandrakeSoft, Lycoris (Redmond Linux), Xandros and any other distro leader out they're to get involved to make Linux a better place for the average user. It would be nice to be able to click on a ONE link to download a program/driver off the net and not have search though this list. I'm sorry but it's time for a change... It's hard for every day people install programs and It's a pain for developers to repackage there binaries over for each distro. If you have time people check out Fiorina:
Linux not a threat to Microsoft on cnet. You'll it under January 30, 2002 but there Fiorina talks about how we are fighting Microsoft, but she saying what I been trying to tell my friends all this time.
We need to build a better desktop and stop bitching about Microsoft. We need to put our time into something better besides bitching about Microsoft because the only way we can beat them is to build something cleaner, faster, easier and better then what they have now. So MandrakeSoft, Lycoris and Xandros you want the to be the king of the desktop well you better to start looking that the LSB 1.1 because you are not going to get anywhere with your just putting the newest KDE, GNOME and X11 on a CD and calling it Linux 8.x. I can tell you one thing I had a friend that switch back to Windows because it was as hell to install programs and to get his hardware configure. I was helping him maintain his system, but when I got busy with doing work on the weekends trying to help my friend out on this website I couldn't be their to help him with his system. The sad thing is I'm very happy to see that he switch back to Windows, hell I been using Linux for 2 1/2 years( no duel booting for 1 1/2 year ) and been thinking about it myself. I been paying for games/software and supporting the companies out there but it's not doing any good if you got some open source bigots are going to warez sites or newgrounds for close source software for Linux that's not GPL or FREE. Flame or mod me down if you like, I'm just saying what's on my mind. I'm a programmer for a CBT company and I love programming, but I got bills to pay. In the end it's all about money and what's the next big thing.
From Zero to Hero... Starbuck Zero
If you were to actually read the standards document, the requirement is:
Distributions must provide a mechanism for installing applications in this packaging format with some restrictions listed below. [2]
And if you were to look for note [2] you would find that it reads:
[2] The distribution itself may use a different packaging format for its own packages, and of course it may use any available mechanism for installing the LSB-conformant packages.
The point of LSB is to allow third party applications to be portable across distributions. That does not mandate anything about how a distribution chooses to package the Linux kernel, GLIBC, or much of anything else that it itself chooses to package.
Indeed, nothing mandates that an LSB-compliant distribution even has its own packaging scheme. A distribution could have all the components required by LSB in all the right spots, and just plain put them there. No "packages;" just files.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
The ans wer is, by the way, that it doesn't affect Debian in any meaningful way.
Read the standard; it's not particularly painful to read.
A much more entertaining thing is to think about how this might affect folks using FreeBSD It is entirely possible that this standard allows FreeBSD, which is conspicuously not Linux as well as not based on RPM packaging, to nonetheless become a nicely "compliant" Linux Standard Base platform.
Heck, Microsoft might be able to modify the "Unix Emulation" environment they have running on Windows NT (it's sold as something; I don't recall the name...) become compliant with LSB
This wouldn't be any stranger than when Microsoft made Windows NT a "POSIX" platform, or when IBM got OS/390 certified as a Branded Unix (tm)
The notion that this creates some massive problem for Debian is just plain ignorant, and when the article links to the publicly-available-on-the-web standard, being so ignorant is quite inexcuable.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
It appears to me that this is also defining a binary standard. For example, Posix standards ensure that a particular header file will include a symbol definition, but they don't specify exactly what that symbol's value must be. This works fine for a source code level standard, but could potentially require recompiling from source for each distribution. /dev for specific devices, etc.
Further, if I'm reading it right, this will standardize things like specific names in
OTOH, I don't have a feel for how often binary incompatibility issues actually show up in practice. I've hit some minor problems with ncurses.h, but that was across different o/s's (aix vrs linux). I'd be very interested in other developer's experiences.
You won't find one. There isn't one.
This actually has a really entertaining implication, namely that despite saying "Linux" a lot, the standard hasn't anything forcibly to do with Linux.
The notion that this standard has much of anything to do with the Linux kernel is desparately ignorant of a reading of the standard.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
Which Linux distros are the most conformant, or most closest to conformance with the LSB?
I've seen comments that Mandrake is the most internationalised. Is this true. How do other distros such as Debian compare?
On the issue of internationalisation, how is that accomplished from a programming perspective? Most of my development work occurs under Windows, where it is very easy to switch between single byte, multi byte and Unicode at compile time (based on TCHAR definitions). It is also very easy to switch resource DLLs. How is this achieved under Linux? And, does Linux make use of code pages, or something similar when it's not using Unicode?
I will no longer be able to design my software to install in /usr/local//bin/
if I wanted it included in a major distro?
Or does that mean that the distros will have to adapt the software to the standard?
ACK
For that matter, FreeBSD could comply with LSB without either:
Look at the standard; it specifies nothing about what OS kernel you are using.
Again, look at the standard. The set of package names to be managed by RPM, which runs on FreeBSD, is intentionally completely disjoint from any set of package names being managed "natively" by the distribution.
Careful reading of the standard shows that there is no requirement to be running Linux in order to conform with the standard. You could conceivably run some other kernel, like those from FreeBSD, NetBSD, Sun, SCO/Caldera. I'll bet it's at least theoretically possible that Windows NT with the "Unix emulation environment" could be made LSB-compliant.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
The things behind dpkg and all of that sure, they are nice, but how are they all that really different from RPM? I agree that I may not be totally clued in about all aspects of apt, dpkg and all of the other stuff Debian uses, but to say that it's so tied to a packaging format??? Debian is no more tied to it then Redhat is tied to RPM. If they are, then the Debian project made a major mistake!
Debian's primary advantage is that its packages are consistent. When you select a package, it comes with a very specific set of dependencies. That, and the fact that Debian is the source of the vast majority of .deb packages (especially the sort of "core" packages likely to come up in a dependency), mean they can get away with a lot of splitting up components, compiling platform-independent bits once and binaries many times (Debian isn't just an i386 distro like many others), shared libraries that get shared properly, and all sorts of other consistency stuff. Where a release-focused distro might concentrate on making all the packages in version 9.2 (say) work together nicely and consistently, Debian does a pretty good job of keeping all the packages consistent, all the time. (OK, so it doesn't always work 100% on 'unstable', but if you wanted stability you wouldn't be running that version anyway).
Maybe now is the time for Debian to actually form a company or form a different way of making the decisions instead of democracy.
The democracy/meritocracy structure is exactly what Debian is about - it's run by a non-profit org. called Software in the Public Interest. They don't exist to make a profit, or to make themselves popular - they exist to make a distribution of good software freely available.
Maybe they need to modify the DFSG to be more lienient?
And that would help how?
If it's free (free as in DFSG), it goes in 'main' and goes on the official CDs. If it's free as in DFSG but requires non-free software (like a GPLed "helper" application for PGP for instance), it goes in 'contrib'. If it's not free-as-in-DFSG (this includes shareware and closed-source freeware), it goes in 'non-free' - contrib and non-free are easily available over ftp or as the last CD in the set. If it's not in non-free, either nobody's tried packaging it, or Debian aren't sure if it would even be legal for them to distribute it.
Again, things like the DFSG are why Debian exists.
I don't know, but there has to be someone who is going to draw a line in the sand and get the volunteers in action and get Woody released (and with a 2.4 kernel as well...).
It looks like it'll be installed with a 2.2 kernel by default, and a 2.4 kernel as an option (fairly easy to install thanks to the magic of apt/dpkg - install, reboot, Lilo offers you a choice of kernel). Woody already includes precompiled 2.4.17 kernels for 386, Pentium, 686 (PPro/P2/P3/Celeron), K6 and K7 (Athlon/Duron), and that's just the i386 builds.
OTOH, if Debian was a company, where would all those volunteers be? Probably starting their own distro or doing Linux from Scratch.
PHB's and Joe Sixpacks like hearing and seeing commercials like Mandrake Linux is compliant (it isn't but) with the LSB which means no matter where you buy or download your software it will work!
This is why volunteer efforts like Debian have a niche. They don't like hearing and seeing commercials, they like giving people a stable OS. They're not trying to make a profit, which is why they can get away with doing what they feel is The Right Thing.
That's exactly what /usr/local is for - locally compiled software. On most GNU and GNUish software the author sets it up to install to /usr/local by default, but you can do ./configure --prefix=/usr if you're building a distro package.
I don't know what other distros are like about this (I've only ever used Mandrake and Debian, and I didn't get experienced enough with Mandrake to know any of the internals), but Debian source packages come in two parts - a tarfile of original, unmodified source, plus a .diff.gz file containing the changes ("Debianizations") the Debian package maintaniner made to make it fit in with Debian conventions (moving all documentation to /usr/share/doc/name-of-the-package, for instance). If the original author's makefile or other code doesn't conform to Debian conventions, the maintainer will change it so it does.
For a program like you describe where (presumably) /usr/local/bin is hard-coded somewhere, the diff would include replacing that with /usr/bin - you, as an "upstream" developer, can probably make this easier by defining PREFIX to /usr/local and always referring to "$PREFIX/bin" and so on.
Wishful thinking that you can get all the *linux
distributions to agree on one standard. You
might as well hope everyone packs up and just
run RedHat, the market leader.
There's already a standard..it's called RedHat!
( sorry debian, no lead core developers means you are losers anyways)
* Caldera Inc * Compaq * Corel Corporation * The Debian Project * Enhanced Software Technologies, Inc. * Hewlett Packard (sponsor) * IBM (sponsor) * Linuxcare * Linux for PowerPC * MandrakeSoft * Metro Link, Inc. * Olliance * The Open Group * Oracle * SGI * Turbolinux Inc. * Red Hat Software * Software in the Public Interest, Inc. * SuSE GmbH * The USENIX Association * VA Linux * WGS Inc
I see someone keeps his 6th grade creative writing assignments around...
Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!
The ans wer is, by the way, that it doesn't affect Debian in any meaningful way.
I disagree.
* The standard does not require that Debian drop its own packaging scheme.
* The standard does not mandate the use of RPM packaging within the distribution.
The standard mandates that RPM is the preferred packaging system for people creating applications to run on Linux. Debian;s LSB support is based on the existence of Alien. I don't know too many Debian people who would trust alien to install large parts of their system.