Slashdot Mirror


Project Copycat Clones A Cat

texchanchan writes: "'Copying' is not limited to other people's proprietary files. Soon you'll be able to 'share' their prize Siamese. From Yahoo news: "A domestic cat was cloned late last year in a Texas A&M University research program called CopyCat....Cloning research at the university has been funded with more than $3.5 million in investments from John Sperling, an 81-year-old financier who formed Genetic Savings & Clone Inc." (These Texans know how to name things, too.)"

67 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Marketing At Work by InfinityWpi · · Score: 2

    Anyone who can raise that much funding for a feline cloning program called 'CopyCat' has a real future in marketing or political fundraising.

    1. Re:Marketing At Work by GTRacer · · Score: 3, Funny
      Do you remember the :CueCat? That thing had over $10 mil in funding and it was doomed from the start.

      Could that same guy be behind the scenes?

      GTRacer
      - Has a :CueCat but never installed CRQ...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  2. Price Is Right. by clinko · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet Bob Barker is furious.

    1. Re:Price Is Right. by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 2

      Unless they find a way to clone spading or neutering, too.

      -Paul Komarek

    2. Re:Price Is Right. by Stickerboy · · Score: 2

      Nope... Bob Barker was the first secret test subject.

      How do you think he's still around?

      ;)

      --
      Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Price Is Right. by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      I hate to nitpick, because I agree completely with your statement, but there's a factual error in there...you said:

      If you take anything other than a kitten or a puppy, you are almost certainly condeming that animal to death by explosive decompression.

      This is one of the greatest unchallenged urban myths: exposure to vacuum leads to explosive decompression. It's simply not true - the kind of pressure forces need to "pop" an animal cannot be generated before the animal breathes and equibrilates with the environmental pressure. What does happen is even worse, in my opinion: while slowly suffocating from lack of oxygen, the animal suffers from severe decompression sickness - dissolved N2/O2/etc. in the blood expands, and can due horrible tissue damage. Divers call this the "bends" and it's a horrible, horrible way to die. But the animal does not die from "explosive" decompression. It's a subtle, but important difference. Important because the use of sensational words like "explosive" will turn more people away from your argument - if I heard somebody say that the local Humane Society were blowing up dogs and cats, I'd dismiss that person as frankly, kind of looney. The point gets across better with accuracy, you see?

      sorry about that offtopic ranting - just to stay OT, it seems ludicrous that with all the benefits controlled cloning could give us, one of the first things we do is find some way to succour rich pet owners. Never mind that people are dying on organ wait-lists, let's bring back Muffy the Sheepdog. Sheesh. :)

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    4. Re:Price Is Right. by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      Maybe not in Santa Cruz, but high-altitude used to be a common means of euthanasia. See:

      http://www.ccac.ca/guides/english/V1_93/chap/chxii .htm

      for details. FWIW, the practice is now "discouraged" but it wouldn't surprise me if it still happens in lower-income pounds and such...

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
    5. Re:Price Is Right. by Mr_Matt · · Score: 2

      Shit... s/"high-altitude"/"high-altitude decompression"/g

      Man, I gotta start using the "Preview" key and actually previewing the stuff I write. :)

      --


      But what does my opinion matter, I just vote here. It's not like I have any money or anything.
  3. No problems yet by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dancing with the Devil leads you to obesity and liver problems.

    Procreate, don't recreate. Of course, for humans Procreation is recreation. :-)

    BTW, the cat doesn't look like its adult version because womb conditions dictate the formatting of the fur.

    Dancin Santa

  4. Question by PowerTroll+5000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why is it wrong to copy a CD, but not a living creature?

    There are much bigger ramifications in the latter type of "copying" than the former.

    --

    I'm not afraid of falling, it's the sudden stop at the end that frightens me.

    1. Re:Question by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2
      Usually talent and effort went into creating the CD's content.

      Talent and effort huh? Then why's it still illegal to copy britney or nsync?

      Anyhow, your theory is bunk.. there's months, perhaps a year of effort in putting out a CD? Several million years for the 'development' of the cat..

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    2. Re:Question by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      And what if you encoded, say, a CD's worth of information into the "junk" DNA of a clone? (It wouldn't be an exact clone with the extra info, of course, but close enough.)

    3. Re:Question by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 2

      cause the original cat (or it's creator/inventor) isn't likely to sue for copyright infringement.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  5. Does this mean.... by lumpenprole · · Score: 3, Funny


    The clone wars are going to be fought with a spray bottle and a rolled up newspaper?

    Bad Lord of the Sith! Bad, Bad!

    --
    Disclaimer: MINAA (Mummy! I'm Not An Animal!)
  6. Justification ? by hexa00 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are they going to justify this by saying that it's essential for cat parents who can't have a baby the traditional way ?

    --
    Do what you wilt shall be the whole of the law Love is the law, love under will Capital drives the will of mankind
  7. Where are your priorities? by Eharley · · Score: 3, Funny

    Posted by CmdrTaco on Thursday February 14, @2:45PM

    Sr. Taco,

    You have just been engaged. For God's sake, man, why are you not taking the rest of the day off to reflect upon this life-altering decision that has been wrought?

  8. Somewhere, horny geeks are disappointed by typical+geek · · Score: 2

    Clone your favorite pussy,click here!

  9. The other project by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
    Texas A&M announced that a similar project, CopyCmdr has commenced today with the agreement of one Kathleen Hent to consent to marry CmdrTaco of Slashdot fame.

    Congratulations, CmdrTaco!

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  10. Not the first "companion animal clone" by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2

    Oh, how quickly we forget Alba, the first cloned pet. Of course, the Alba story was much more interesting because he was an albino rabbit with jellyfish genes to make him glow.

    1. Re:Not the first "companion animal clone" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      I don't give a shit if it wasn't a clone! A rabbit that glowed in UV light would be the -coolest- fucking thing ever! The only way that could possibly be better is if it had laser-vision.

      And that's the real challenge for genetic engineers, as far as I'm concerned. Who cares if we can clone a person, or make a replacement liver for alcoholics. Stop working on that crap and answer this -- Can we make a bunny with laser eyes?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  11. cheese with my wine please? by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    "John Sperling, an 81-year-old financier who formed Genetic Savings & Clone Inc."

    Good grief. Talk about lame ass naming pun.

    At least he didn't name it CowboyNeal

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  12. BBC Story + Pics by Pilferer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a link to the BBC story, with a picture of the cat (named "Cc:").

    MEoW.

  13. It's always good to have a backup by MonkeyInTree · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are times when frustration gets the better of you and you just need to kick the cat. It's comforting to know that in the future we can make backups first ;)

  14. Easy by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doguerreotype

    Dancin Santa

  15. This just in from Reuters - God files lawsuit. by immanis · · Score: 4, Funny

    God files suit in Texas court, cites numbers copyright violations on the part of Texas A&M University.

    The Almighty God (Yaweh, The Big Guy, Jehovah) filed a suit in a Texas court today, seeking to block further progress on the CopyCat project, a cloning experiment out of Texas A&M University.

    "I'm PISSED!" God was quoted as saying. "It took me days, well a day, to come up with the design of the Cat. It's mine Dammnit! My Cat profits are going to plummet!"

    A representative from Texas A&M could not be reached for comment.

  16. What are the odds? by EllisDees · · Score: 2

    Both John Sperling and George Soros on the same Slashdot page and neither article is about their involvement in Medical Marijuana. Give me a Peter Lewis and we'll have the complete set.

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    1. Re:What are the odds? by EllisDees · · Score: 2

      Please. Try not to be so stupid in the future. The link I posted was just the first that came up in a search engine that talked about him and his support for the MMJ initiatives. I am neither right-wind nor anti-drug (as anyone with a half-brain could see from my sig). Also, there are just as many people on the conservative side of the fence that are for decriminilization as there are on the liberal.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  17. Re:And the first cloned domestic dog? by Ledge · · Score: 2

    mimeomutt

    --
    If it ain't a Model M, it's a piece of crap.
  18. Usual cloning caveats apply by maggard · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. This is a genetic clone, the same as an "identical twin"
    2. Even "identical twins" are often not actually identical; for example hair and pigment patterns often differ. The same is true for clones.
    3. While temperament and other characteristics are likely somewhat inherited prenatal nutrition and womb environment have significant if poorly-understood effects
    4. Furthermore how the animal is raised (nurture) also has a profound influence on the temperament and behaviors of an animal
    So, while this critter may indeed may be a clone it is not the original reincarnated and will differ in any number of ways.

    Finally, contrary to any number of unimaginatively-written SF& Horror stories clones haven't shown any special abilities or to be any more susceptible to demonic possession (though with Siamese cats this may be moot - who could tell if they're being unnaturally evil?) However there is a high rate of failure and the produced animals have shown a greater susceptibility to illness and abnormalities (again, with Siamese cats this is also about par for the course already.)

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Usual cloning caveats apply by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 2

      Ok for the temper of the little beast. It will probably not be the same as the original one's.

      But what about its talents? Like having an exceptional sharp ear? Or being able to walk on a rope? Walk on a ball? I can imagine that a Circus, for one, would be extremely interested in cloning an animal that turns out to be exceptionally skilled in being trained.

  19. Great more FAT cats ....next cloning cockroaches by CDWert · · Score: 2

    This will be funny, the errors that are appearing in genetic replication that lead to obesity,

    Ever notice the more dysfunctional someone is the fatter their cat ?

    This will be hilarious, first a genetic predisposition to obesity, followed by some loon that just cant let go of "Fluffy" I can see it now CAT-KONG (Its a funny childrens book)

    An 80 lb cat, a shortened life span and an already neruotic owner that couldnt let go thie first time around, watch this become a really sad vicious cycle, copies of copies, getting fat and dying yet faster than the last time around. Maybe I should go after a Vet Liscence.....

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  20. RePet by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sperling plans to offer the technology first to wealthy individuals seeking to replace beloved pets

    Great...so there really is going to be a "RePet."

    I just hope they don't also actually invent that creepy doll.

  21. Big Mistake!!! by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny

    They cloned the wrong Pussy!!!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  22. Humane Society Objection?!? by jchawk · · Score: 2

    From the article "The Humane Society of the United States opposes pet cloning, the Journal said, because of the danger of overpopulation."

    I don't understand why they are really worried about this. It is quite apparent that a person who is willing to spend big bucks on having their pet cloned obviously loved the animal in the first place.

    I could however understand an objection to say a pet breeder having prize animals cloned, but they never made any distinctions and this technology does have practical applications for grieving pet lovers. :-)

    I know I would love to have a copy of my dog Mookie who died a few years ago. ;-(

    - I'll bash you in the face.

  23. Did they change it's name? by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The 2-month-old kitten called "Cc:" is the first successful product of a program..."

    So was it a "Bcc:" when it was born?

    - Freed

    --
    "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
  24. This just in!! by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Said to be a member of yet another Jesus-freak-christian-cult, an unidentified man has destroyed the cloned kitty in the name of God. Authorities have already begun their investigation and until the man is identified, he will be known as ...

    Gawd? Do I have to finish it?

  25. Better Link... by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... is here as per my journal.

    Also has a pic of the cat. Its named "Cc:" (seriously).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  26. Re:Intel has better batch yield by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cripes, here I'm joking about it, but then I find this at the end of the article, "The Humane Society of the United States opposes pet cloning, the Journal said, because of the danger of overpopulation." Yeah, cloning is going to cause cat populations to go all out of control.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  27. I have a real problem with this by LordNimon · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There are an estimated 6 to 8 million cats and dogs killed every year because they are not adopted. That's right, every year, millions of cats are purposely killed because no one will adopt them. So if your cat dies, the right thing to do would be to adopt another cat. Save the life of another animal, please!

    People who would clone their cat rather than adopt another one disgust me. According the article, the new cat probably won't look the same anyway! And whether it will behave the same is also questionable. So in other words, it is both unethical and pointless to clone your cat.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:I have a real problem with this by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Do you also oppose regular pet breeding, then? Should we stop producing domestic animals by any deliberate method until all the strays are adopted?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:I have a real problem with this by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Your summary suggests that the ethical considerations involved here have to do with the availability of other cats, not anything to do with the actual cloning process. That said, do you support human cloning since the pool of adoptable babies is so small?

      You don't get it. The poster's comment didn't oppose cloning qua cloning, but rather the questionable ethics of going to a lot of trouble to create a creature when so many others of that same sort are destroyed for lack of owners.

      Of course, I don't think the point of the CopyCat project was to develop a revolutionary method of cat production. IDNRTA* but I'm guessing it had more to do with biology than somebody's dream of a chain of cat factories.

      * I Did Not Read The Article.

    3. Re:I have a real problem with this by Amarok.Org · · Score: 2
      You don't get it.

      No, I get it. The point I was making (in a roundabout way) was that if you're going to make an argument, at least do it clearly and not muddy the waters will irrelevant data.

      Of course, I don't think the point of the CopyCat project was to develop a revolutionary method of cat production.

      Precisely. If you're going to question the morals of cloning in general, fine, argue that... but arguing that it's bad BECAUSE that species is already plentiful is just plain silly.

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    4. Re:I have a real problem with this by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      [A]rguing that it's bad BECAUSE that species is already plentiful is just plain silly.

      Of course it isn't. It's humane. The poster believes that destroying cats because we can't find owners for them is bad. Widespread cloning of cats would exacerbate that problem. Therefore widespread cloning of cats would be bad.

      The math is pretty simple.

      As I said before, the CopyCat project isn't about the widespread cloning of cats (I think) so this argument is at best inapplicable. But it's not silly.

      In fact, I think it raises a pretty interesting question. Let's assume that cloning is here; the genie is out of the bottle and we're going to have to deal with it. In some situations cloning might be justified, while in others it might not be, not because it's cloning qua cloning, but rather because of the effects that that particular application of cloning technology has on other aspects of society.

      At that point, we're moving beyond "cloning is bad" into "cloning in certain situations is bad."

      In other words, we've gone from "What can we eat?" to "Where shall we have lunch?"

    5. Re:I have a real problem with this by hether · · Score: 2

      I agree completely that people should adopt pets whenever possible (I suggest using petfinder.com - free for non-profits like shelters and rescue groups around the US), but your argument is not sound.

      There are plenty of sheep in the world too. Yet why did they clone Dolly? I'm sure the reason behind that project and this one - has nothing to do with overpopulation. It has to do with research. We learn how something works, not necessarily so we can reproduce the effect.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    6. Re:I have a real problem with this by hether · · Score: 2

      I should have waited to post. Now that I've read this particular article (the other ones I read on this topic didn't mention that the U was going to capitalize on their discovery - just that they had suceeded in cloning a cat) I agree that the University is taken advantage of the situation, probably just for monetary gain by agreeing to clone pets for rich owners. I don't agree with that. I still however agree that this is an excellent research opportunity. Sorry for the misunderstanding of your intent

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    7. Re:I have a real problem with this by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      This is where you are wrong.

      Oh, okay. Perils of not reading the article. In that case, there certainly are problems with that business plan. Like you said, at that point cloning becomes a very expensive form of breeding.

      Bad CopyCat! Go lay down!

    8. Re:I have a real problem with this by hether · · Score: 2

      Here is an example:

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid _1 820000/1820749.stm

      This article mentions nothing at all about them cloning the cat so that they could profit from it. This one suggests its good because they can study feline aids in comparison to human aids.

      Why aren't more stories mentioning the fact they want to clone rich people's pets?

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  28. Someone had to say it... by brogdon · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's just no end to the lengths geeks will go to get a little pussy... :)

    --


    This tagline is umop apisdn.
  29. Cat got your tongue? by Zigurd · · Score: 2

    Jack Valente announced today that the MPOA will sue the cat cloners to fore them to include Digital Right's Management technology in all cloning equipment: "Breeders put a lot of work into those cats. If anyone can make copies, who will breed cats?" Microsoft announced that code in Windows Media Player is not to blame for mysteriously well-targeted banner ads for cat food aimed at people who play more than the usual amount of soft rock.

  30. Sounds like... by Stickerboy · · Score: 2

    we just got a preview of the script for Cats & Dogs 2. ;)

    --
    Light a fire for a man and he'll be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  31. Available on Napser? by guttentag · · Score: 2
    Soon you'll be able to 'share' their prize Siamese.
    Are they going to make the cat available on Napster? That would explain the mysterious cat logo... the music-sharing service was just a clever stealth cover for their impending pet-sharing business. (insert assorted "nine lives" and "landing on their feet" jokes)
  32. Re: Cc: by don_carnage · · Score: 3, Funny

    What, they cloned the ::::CueCat? Isn't that illegal? :^)

  33. Not that tough by uslinux.net · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, cats practically clone themselves if left outdoors. Just look around my neighborhood

  34. Human Society v. Cloning by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

    "The human society is against closing pets because of the dangers of overpopulation."

    Why? This is the smartest idea for pets ever. Think about it -- the Human Society encourages everybody to spay or neuter their pets to discourage overpopulation. Now what if we engineered pets that are genetically incapable of breeding? There's no danger of "accidents," no need to be cruel to unwanted pets. There's a much better means of discovering the nature of a pet. Want a dog that's good with children? Don't pay for a "breed" that's good with children, only to get a monster like my parents adopted(a stubborn 95 pound Airedale terrier). Pay for exactly the dog you want. Get exactly the size and colour animal that will fit your lifestyle, and don't worry about "cloned" personalities as personalities are developed through training.

    Sound sickening? It shouldn't. Cloned pets are a direct extension of breeding. It's not the orwellian nightmare that cloning humans is. And if all the cloned pets are cloned sterile (which, I might add, is a great deal for both the cloners and the pet loving public), there's no danger of overpopulation. It's not like a cloning machine can meet another cloning machine under the hedge and make whoopy.

    Think of it like seedless watermelons.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  35. Cat Sues Texas A&M by Oink.NET · · Score: 3, Funny

    The cat recently cloned by Texas A&M University filed a lawsuit against the university, claiming its DNA was illegally reverse-engineered. When asked for his opinion, the cat said, "I did not give my consent for those scientists to use my DNA, which has been a carefully guarded family secret for generations. How am I supposed to produce unique offspring now? Those gene sequences are MINE, dammit! I demand that the copycat be destroyed immediately. If I find out my gene sequences are available on Morpheus, I'm gonna be REALLY ticked. I'll fight this one all the way to the supreme court if I have to, if it takes me all nine of my lives."

  36. Vacuum Chamber... You *better* beleive it. by Bonker · · Score: 2

    Vacuum chamber? You're kidding, right? Please tell me you don't actually believe that.

    I wish I was wrong. I really do. Please remember that the SPCA is not necessarily related to the City-funded Animal Shelter. They may work closely together, for obvious reasons, but animals who are placed in SPCA shelters have a longer 'save' time and a better chance of being adopted.

    In my city, the two are actually in the same building, and when you take an animal to the pound, you can opt to pay an additional fee so that they are housed in the SPCA side of the shelter. They get 'lethal injection' rather than decompression when their time is up.

    Animals who are left in the city pound or are picked up off the streets don't have nearly such an easy time. They are given days, rather than a weeks or more, and when their time is up, they are placed in the vacuum chamber.

    God, I wish it wasn't true. I wish the donations I made to the SPCA would make it not true.

    Scarily enough, a common science project for high-schoolers interested in biology in my town is to take an animal carcas from the pound, render the flesh, and then reassemble the skeleton. When I was in high-school, my biology teacher had instructions on how to repair rib bones that had been broken when the animal's chest cavity exploded in the near-vacuum.

    This is in Texas, a big state, but the same state that is giving you 'CopyCat'.

    Yes, the research is important, and will be useful. But it should *never* be used to create pets or service animals when such an overpopulation of those domestic animals exist.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  37. Activation Key by dcocos · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard that the scientists were in trouble with the BSA, because the "mother" cat was clearly labeled with "Do not make illegal copies of this cat"

    I also heard that the cat won't work until it's activation key has been received from Microsoft.

  38. Re:This had to happen by Aexia · · Score: 2

    >>Hatchbacks to take care of the rottweilers, SUV's to take care of the Hatchback, Semis...

    and the beauty of it is that the Semis freeze to death come winter!

  39. I wonder by MsWillow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Given the problems already showing up with Dolly the sheep, already having problems associated with old age, why not try cloning from a stem cell?

    I'd think that, by using the nucleus of an adult stem cell, you'd get all the DNA needed. Every strand of the DNA would then still have the telomers on it that gradually get "used up" when a normal cell divides. Perhaps that way, all the cells in the cloned animal would start out eactly the same as a normal embryo's cells.

    Perhaps that's the way to go, not by taking the nucleus out of just any old cell, but by using an adult stem cell. They seem to have found these in several sites on the adult body - in fat removed by liposuction, and in the fat behind the kneecap in humans. I'm sure they can find them in analogous places on animals.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  40. control group by Deanasc · · Score: 2
    The one thing I'm surprised that more cloning advocates don't bring up is the use of cloned organisms in research. Clones should have the same DNA, the same genome. That's a given. Feed one clone a bunch of crap. Don't feed the control clone said crap. See who gets cancer if at all.

    Finally be able to say you controlled the experiment fully. None of those pesky but group x got cancer and group y didn't but group x was more prone to cancer kind of issues. Both the experimental group and control have the exact same predisposition. So feeding clones crap causes cancer end of story.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  41. Scientists Clone Cat; God Files Suit by Skirwan · · Score: 4, Funny
    MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN - In a brief press conference outside his part-time home in downtown Milwaukee, God, known to his devotees as the Lord Almighty, announced he was filing suit against a group of researchers at Texas A&M University. God alleges that the domestic cat is his unique creation and that the recent duplication of one of these common animals is a "serious infringement of [his] intellectual property rights". God went on to say that the his research laboratories, Scientology Labs, are hard at work on designing 'uncopyable' creatures which cannot be duplicated outside of the strict guidelines God has set down.

    "Ripping and sharing DNA is a crime, and it hurts Me on both a financial and a personal level," intoned the Deity, "and while it pains Me that I must file suit against My children, I must protect My intellectual property from drifting into the public domain, where it could be used by My competitors." God refused to specify which competitors he feared, or what they might do with the genetic algorithms.

    "God is simply trying to hold on to an illegally-gained monopoly," stated longtime competitor Satan at a press conference held shortly after in Redmond, Washington. "He's afraid that if genetic protocols are opened for public use, the market would be flooded with non-God organisms, which would of course detract from his brand," added Satan, better known by his stage name, "Prince of Darkness", or by his ubiquitous online handle, "PrttyKtty666". Satan claimed that numerous studies had shown great demand for a wider variety of animals, and that this is the scientific breakthrough that could eventually lead to world populated by Elves, Unicorns, and Dragons. "People love dragons. People love Unicorns. Hell, people even love dinosaurs! Did you ever see Jurassic Park?", opined the source of all evil.

    Other major figures in this field have yet to make their voices heard; Religious leaders Buddha, Krishna, Jesus of Nazareth, the Dalai Lama, and Oprah refused to take a stance one way or the other.
    The darkness drops again; but now I know
    That twenty centuries of stony sleep
    Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
    And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
    Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
  42. Biggest potential growth industry by Orangedog_on_crack · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Granted, there are going to be people that will have serious issues with the idea of cloning pets. But once the process is perfected for dogs and cats, pet cloning will be one of the biggest industries in the country.

    Think about this. How many people out there would pay serious money to have a chance to "hit the reset button" if something happens to a cherished pet. I've had a dog that died, like all dogs do. Nothing could replace her because she was unique and there are some things that even cloning can't copy. But I would have moved heaven and earth to have a chance to start over again with a puppy that would have at least grown up to look like her. Dare I say that my parents would have even taken out a 2nd mortgage on the house for the money if cloning was an option.

    This is more than just the "gee-whiz" factor of having the fastest PC or a TIVO with 2 Terabyte RAID storage. This is dealing with people's emotions and people with money will spend it like drunken sailors if they know that a few thousand dollars can get them an exact living, breathing, physical copy of their pet after they die.

  43. Re:Hate to break the news to everyone... by Dahan · · Score: 2

    Yes, well, as the BBC article says, "Cc: is a copy of her genetic mother, not of the surrogate cat which actually gave birth to her." So she is a clone.

  44. Fire up those gene sequencers! by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    In other related news..

    The Free Software Foundation announced Thursday the beginning of a new 'software' project known as "gnuCat' and a related project 'CatGNiP'. From RMS's announcement, "Building the perfect feline companion through a collaborative community effort will ensure that the species' genetic code remains free of restrictive licensing and that users will be able to modify and extend their cats to suit their needs.' For example, users of gnuCat will be able to configure the cat's color, size, obesity, and proclivity to scratch furniture, using a simple ncurses menu system. gnuCat developers are already discussing a new way to automatically configure the cat's code based on the user's personality. One group is already working on a branch of the CVS tree for a cat that has no claws or teeth and eats only an inexpensive paste made from common household ingredients. Another developer is working on a pre-emptive patch for gnuCat which allows it to be more responsive in deciding whether it wants to go outside or stay in. Project leader Felinus Hairballs says, "We're hoping to have gnuCat litter trained out-of-the-"box" by version 2.0"

  45. Yeah but.. by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    don't we already have enough Katz?

  46. Re:Answer by radja · · Score: 2

    unless it's several hundred clones that are all released in Universal's headoffice..

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  47. Re:What about the other 80+ that failed? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Man created god(s) in his own image...

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"