Slashdot Mirror


The Price Of Doing Business

8127972 writes: "It seems that a ton of high tech companies are leaving cities (like San Fran) with high costs of doing business for cheaper cities (Washington DC is mentioned due to new government spending) or even cities in Canada. Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot."

241 of 768 comments (clear)

  1. Move to Oklahoma!!! by TurboRoot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The cost of living here is SUPER low.. plus.. you can hire VBscript monkies to work on ASP sites for $8/hour.

    In Oklahoma, you put an add in the paper, and you will have billions of applications and you can pick who ever is willing to take the least amount of pay.

    That is why companies like AOL like to put call centers in Oklahoma cause they can pay a whole $9/hour and people shit themselves about how much money it is. :)

    Unfortuantly, actually SELLING a product in Oklahoma is kind of bleak.. but if your product is nation wide.. then this is the place.

    1. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by Amarok.Org · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work for a company who did just that... transfered me from San Jose to OKC to work in a call center. That company (and it's call center) is still there. They've systematically eliminated most of the original CA transplants (and their associated CA salaries) after getting local "monkies" (as you call them) trained to do the work at less than half the cost.

      Oklahoma (and similar states) also tend to offer HUGE tax incentives to companies like AOL to open call centers, since it creates lots of jobs for the local populous that would not have otherwise exist.

      Luckily, I escaped the hell that is Oklahoma, and am now living in the hell that is Texas. *grin*

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    2. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by TurboRoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Haha, I so know what you are talking about. Most of my friends, family, and ex-girlfriends have all escaped to Texas!

      The few of us left here in Oklahoma, we refer to ourselves as "refuges", are too lazy to get off our asses and actually move to a state where we can get paid well.

      But! the advantage is, I don't really have to work hard and get a ton of free time. Plus, my true love besides computers is cars (hence my nick of TurboRoot). In Oklahoma, we have no vehicle inspections anymore. That means you can take all that emission crap off your car (all the polution blows northwest and ends up in Denver) and you can't get in trouble. The only restriction is that your car isn't too loud. Other then that, modify your vehicle at will.

      Of course, don't forget the joke "Why is Oklahoma so windy? Because Kansas blows and Texas sucks."

    3. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by yomahz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cost of living here is SUPER low..

      As someone who spent the first 21 years of his life there (OKC), I can tell you that there is a reason for that. I think anyone would be crazy to move there seeing that all I ever wanted to do was get out.

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    4. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pollution!? Shee-yit! You must be one o'those damn Yankee furriners I hear tell about!

      That there pollution is just ev-oh-loo-shun in action! It only kills off the weak alveoli (I watch the Discovery channel -- I know lots o'them big words)! Down here in God's Country we don't hold to pampering the cells in our bodies! Only the strong survive! The weak die in the summer! Remember the Alamo! Go and buy some more guns! Yee-hah!

      (To hopefully deterr some flames: I am a native Dallasite who owns lots of guns. This post is sarcastic).

    5. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by PD · · Score: 2

      Austin isn't like that though. My house is 2200 square feet and for what I paid for it, I could have afforded 5000 square feet in Michigan.

    6. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      . . . and the people were a heck of a lot more pleasant.

      Yeah, I went to Minneapolis/San Jose/New York and said to a gas station clerk, "Can I please have a pack of [brand of cigarettes]?". They all laughed becuase I said "please".

    7. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Just make sure it's in an area where you would feel safe walking through at night. Slums are not merely limited to LA and New York.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:Move to Oklahoma!!! by jayed_99 · · Score: 2

      If you consider the Metroplex (DFW) as one unit (for those of you who haven't been here, we're talking abot an area that is at least 1,200 square miles of connected cities), you're looking at more than 5 million people. DFW considered as a whole (and not individual cities) is probably #2 or #3 in population size.

  2. Going, going, GONE!! by nege · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear there is some cheap real estate in Kabul...

  3. It could be worse... by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 3, Funny

    We Canadian's could end all our sentences with "Dontcha know!".

    =)

    1. Re:It could be worse... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      We Canadian's could end all our sentences with "Dontcha know!".

      Yeah, like, totally.

      The thing that gets me is, most often 'eh' isn't a question, it's a statement, like, consider the following examples:

      We're out of beer, eh?

      Yeah, let's get some Elsinores, eh!

      Oh, and it could be even far worse, everyone could be saying 'Warshington' or 'cawfee'.

      Now I gotta get back to my coding...

      fer ah = 1 to alla_them
      iffen aiks(ah) ain't = not_a_goll_darn_thang thain
      preent furmat(aiks(ah), all_purty_lahk)
      iffen aind
      anuther ah
      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:It could be worse... by ergo98 · · Score: 2

      Well in those instances it sortof is a question, with the question being "dontcha think?". :-) Seriously though, eh in Canadiana is turning a simple statement into a conversation : "It's cold out, eh?" is not just a guy making an observation about the weather, but rather soliciting conversation from the other party in the conversation. Almost every area has a variant that serves the same purpose.

      Of course 95% of "Canadiana" that US media likes to mock is actually Minnesotan traits (I don't think there's anything mockworthy about any local trait, but every now and then you get that inferiority complex monkey that tries to pick on regionalisms as inferior somehow).

  4. Sure, whatever. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2

    First off, Canadian's don't say 'eh', well not much anyway... Second, the dollar is worth a lot more over here than in the states. There are a lot of technology companies in the states paying nearly twice as much in salary for US workers, than what they need to pay their Canadian counterparts, for equal, if not better productivity and performance. But with the same logic, the Australian dollar is even cheaper than the Canadian dollar... So should all high tech workers learn Australian slang? I think not.

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Sure, whatever. by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      "Canadian's don't say 'eh', well not much anyway"


      Depends on the area.. My brother owns a place in La Conception (about 50mins north-west of Montreal) and almost everybody up there says eh, A LOT!

    2. Re:Sure, whatever. by Succa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most people overlook Canada when it comes to being a tech "hotbed", but there are lots of great companies up here. Ottawa (Corel, Alcatel, Nortel [!]), Waterloo (RIM, Open Text), Burnaby BC (Electronic Arts), Toronto (guh...I dunno), and Montreal (Softimage, Discreet, Zero Knowledge) are the cities I'd be choosing to set up shop. Ottawa in particular has a wealth of (struggling) tech companies over in the west end, as well as the Ottawa Linux Symposium. Canada: not just for doughnuts anymore!

    3. Re:Sure, whatever. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      Actually, you *do* say "eh". You just don't notice it when you do, eh?
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    4. Re:Sure, whatever. by willy_me · · Score: 2

      The east says "eh", the west sounds just like Seattle.

    5. Re:Sure, whatever. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      >Not to mention that the tech workforce there is subsidized by the Canadian government

      Depends what industry. Obviously, our social programs which are not privatized are indeed paid by the government. The film industry gets breaks, not in salary subsidizing, but in tax breaks, mostly.

      Other than that, the lower expectations of standards of living, cheaper services (postal, health) has alot to do with lower salary demands. Make no mistake, too much privatization leads to higher costs of living, albeit maybe better products and services.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are a lot of technology companies in the states paying nearly twice as much in salary for US workers

      Canadians are extremely competitive internationally. Americans are simply over-paid; that is why America is an importer nation, because American-made products are also over-priced internationally.

    7. Re:Sure, whatever. by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      You forgot a few: Matrox (Montreal), and ATi (Markham, Ontario), who are (if you ask me), two of the top video card makers there are, and Ballard Power of Burnaby.

      In fact, there are dozens of huge names in Canada that no one knows are Canadian, mostly for the same reason no company lets on that it's a one-man operation: no one would take them seriously. People think 'Canada? They don't have any big companies.' Surprise! ;)

      --Dan

    8. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that the tech workforce there is subsidized by the Canadian government (which is also why a lot of film companies do their filming there).

      This depends on the industry and the equating of tax breaks with "subsidization". The reason that filming gets so many breaks is that it is a government agenda to grow a world-class film industry in Canada. The same model has been applied to the music industry and it has worked quite well, resulting in world-class singers, song writers, and production studios.

      The most damnable thing about Can-Con is that it works. Also, it's not like you can't switch your TV to any of the major American stations and watch them (with Canadian commericals--what a scam!).

    9. Re:Sure, whatever. by csbruce · · Score: 2

      People think 'Canada? They don't have any big companies.' Surprise! ;)

      Other examples might include:

      Ford Motors Canada
      General Motors Canada
      Daimler-Chrysler Canada
      Toyota Canada
      IBM Canada
      Microsoft Canada

      Few people would believe that Canada is one of the world's top exporters of cars. Hypothetically, the profits are sent back to the global headquarters, but on cars anyway, the profit margin is low and the jobs, infrastructure, and subsidiary industries are Canadian. It also makes a lot more sense than using over-paid American unions.

      Stick the word "Canada" in your name and slap a maple leaf on your logo and you're good to go!

    10. Re:Sure, whatever. by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 2
      We produce 80% of the worlds top movies and music

      Nope, you produce 80% of the world's best marketed movies and music. There's a huge difference.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    11. Re:Sure, whatever. by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      I live pretty much due south of Ottawa, so yeah, most of the Canadian I hear would be that way.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  5. Amazing. by BigZaphod · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I find it amazing that they are moving out of large US cities into Canda instead of just moving to the midwest or something. Chicago is quite a lot cheaper than the coastal cities, and it has all the usual big-city perks.

    Of course there are also a lot of small citys that would kill for some high-tech company to move in. Seems like they could get some pretty good deals if they used that option.

    Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?

    1. Re:Amazing. by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Why do so many companies feel the need to be tied to a coast?

      Because the concentrations of population and other companies are on the coasts. Chicken, meet Egg.

    2. Re:Amazing. by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The article doesn't say that a bunch of companies are moving to Canada, only that the cost benefits might be there.

      As for the coasts vs. the world, I think it's more of a media bias, reflected in the graph shown in the article, where almost all the cities mentioned are on or near the East or West coasts. Plus, not *all* of a company has to move; example: Boeing moving their headquarters to Chicago while manufacturing stays in Washington State.

      I *should* stay out of that whole Oklahoma thread at the top, but it calls to mind what college football star (and failed actor) Brian Bosworth once said, that Big 12 towns like Norman, Oklahoma and Lincoln, Nebraska were akin to the worst of what the Soviet Union had to offer.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    3. Re:Amazing. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      Kansas City is a pretty good place too. Sprint World Headquarters is there and they have tons and tons of bandwidth that is cheap compared to most places. Again being in the Midwest the costs are all reduced. Land, utilities, cost of living, cost of workers etc is reduced a lot.

      I love the coast (Miami is great!) but the Midwest is just a cheaper place to live and own a business.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  6. other related news by lemonhed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There has been alot of commentary on this subject. The Gartner group put out this commentary about the "Tech Wreck" coming to the SF Bay area.

    They claim that a city will do well if they install a broadband communications network that connects citizens, local businesses and the global marketplace.

    I think that the obvious solution to this may be Telecomutting See this link for more info

    1. Re:other related news by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you hit the nail on the head with telecomuting. As long as 3 years ago I heard aobut companies looking for places other than Atlanta simply due to poor transportaion with a lack of mass transit. More companies are getting sauvey (sp?) to the fact that 2+ hour commutes to and from work have HUGE hidden costs. As far as cities selling themselves as a good place for businesses, transportation or telecommuting is going to become more and more important.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:other related news by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Don't laugh. My 300 mile monday morning commute takes less time than those of some of my colleagues here in SoCal.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  7. It's always been like this by Jaden42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Bay Area economy has always been like this. Anyone who has been here for more then 10 years will realise that the entire thing is cyclical. Years of boom, then years of bust.

    If you stick around long enough, you'll even see it yourself. Eventually, the next big thing(tm) will make its way back to the Bay Area and everyone will re-locate here again.

  8. Bad news for San Francisco - Bad strategy by Cirrocco · · Score: 5, Insightful
    San Francisco landlords threw out long-term tenants in favor of tenants who could only afford rent for the short-term. Bad strategy. Now that dot-coms have gone to the away place San Francisco is now full of empty building and landlords begging tenants to come back. They aren't lowering the cost of rent, though. They expect that people will continue to pay the outrageous rents that the dot-coms paid. Survey says? BZZZZZT!! Oh, I'm sorry! It looks like you'll have to forgo the new Mercedes this year, Mr. Landlord.

    Bad karma revisits landlords who threw out poor people for those who could handle higher rents! News at 11!

  9. ND by austad · · Score: 3

    I heard that tech companies are planning on moving to North Dakota. Of course, only after the state gets electricity, and Telco. And they'll still have to convince residents not to run them out with pitchforks and torches while yelling charges of witchery.

    Then there's that little issue of finding the road during the winter since the ditches fill with snow and are level with the highway. Wow, I can't believe I actually lived there for over a year and made it out alive. The newest computer that I saw in that state was my apple IIe, which was 13 years old at the time. The only other computer I saw was at a bank, and made in the early 70's.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:ND by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2
      First of all... screw global warming. I have not used my snowmobile at all this year. I was so sad I had to go out and buy a new motorcycle on one of those 50-degree February days.

      Secondly, your winters in North Dakota are worse than ours here in Minneapolis. You're out on the prarie and get all that blowing and drifting. The interstate never gets closed in this part of Minnesota.

      While having more jobs and money is nice, I hate all the idiots from the coast moving here. It ruins all the good things about the midwest. Stay out of "fly-over country"! It's dull and boring... and people are nice and no pollution and lots of open space and nature... I mean it sucks! Stay in LA!

    2. Re:ND by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Yeah, a lot of jerks in Minneapolis. Pavement as far as eye can see though, it only true because all the good places are below eye level. No, not underground, down by the river bank. Cross the stone arch bridge from downtown, (on foot), and go down the steps. They are a little hidden, but you suddenly find yourself in an area where the only signs of civialization are ruins from the late 1800s. (of course walk a few more steps on the dirt path an you can see a modern city again) One of my favorite places, and right downtown.

    3. Re:ND by SirWhoopass · · Score: 2

      Like the other poster said, there's plenty of nature to be found. Along the river is a great place, not just by the Stone Arch Bridge either. There's a trail system along both side of the river through most of the city. Then there's the Fort Snelling State Park, the lakes, and the Minnehaha Parkway. When I lived near downtown I rode by bike through the Grand Rounds nearly every day.

  10. So they're going to Take Off, eh? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, having lived around the Bay Area for the last 5 years, it's no surprise. Evictions were as outrageous as rent increases, making space for tech company offices and then screwing their employees through rent.

    The median cost of rent where I live is the highest in the country. It's a nice place, but I could be buying a house in Ohio every five years, it's that bad. Firemen, police, teachers, gardeners, and others with lower incomes have been leaving the area and are very hard to recruit. The irony is, where tech industries fled to, early on, have become a similar problem. Austin, TX is a great example, seeing insanely rapid growth and the problems it brought, Sacramento, CA went the same route in the mid 80's. However, if you're looking for a decent place out of SF, Sacto isn't a bad place to go. Lots of office space and lower cost of living.

    Canada? Wouldn't the taxes alone make that less appealing? When I think it's expensive in California, all I have to do is remember the GST and PST I paid in Ontario. Gads. Probably lots of available land, but so has most of the midwest.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Informative
      > Canada? Wouldn't the taxes alone make that less appealing? When I think it's expensive in California, all I have to do is remember the GST and PST I paid in Ontario. Gads. Probably lots of available land, but so has most of the midwest.

      According to Ernst & Young Canada Tax Calculator, marginal rates in most provinces top out at around 40-50%.

      If you're in CA (California) and making $US 75K, you're paying a marginal federal rate of 27%, plus 9.3% state taxes (on everything over $30000), plus 6.3% for the SS pyramid scheme (up to $86000 and increasing by 5% per year), plus another 1.5% for medicare taxes. Works out to a marginal rate of about 45%.

      If you're in .ca (Canada) and making $CAD 75K, you've stopped paying into CPP (the Canadian version of the SS pyramid scheme) and EI (unemployment insurance) after C$35K or so. The marginal rates aren't really any different.

      Of course, a $CAD is worth about $0.63 US, so your C$80K is only $50K. But the cost of living is much lower.

      Got investments? Canada taxes capital gains at only half the marginal rates, and has no long-term vs. short-term rate difference. (In the US, you have to hold it for a year to qualify for the 20% "long-term" federal rate, and in CA, you're still paying that 9.3% CA income tax on it. So your long-term capital gains in California are taxed at 29.3%, and your short-term trades are at 40%. In Canada, all trades are taxed at about 20%.)

      GST/PST? OK, compare 15% vs. 8.25%. But how much do you spend, vs. how much do you save? The better-off you are, the less a consumption tax hits you.

      And if you have kids, what do you get for your money? In the US, you pretty much need a private school and university education costs are about double. And you have to pay for your own medical insurance. In Canada, the health care for Bad Stuff (cancer, etc) sucks ass, but for 90% of the population that only has to deal with colds, flu, and the occasional broken bone, it seems pretty good.

      Bottom line - The US may be tax-competitive for an individual, but California sure as fuck ain't.

    2. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 2

      There's still a long, long way to go before house prices are reasonable here. I haven't noticed purchase or rental prices falling much. "Charming shithole: $650,000." In "Noe Valley" of course which means "Bayview" if a realtor says it. The landlords are still kidding themselves, but once residential vacancy gets up around 10%, things will start to crumble. Look at the massive investments in buildings like the "Paramount" at Mission and Third: more than 500 units, almost all empty, with stupid asking prices for an ugly building in a boring neighborhood. That's still the mindset of the landlords around here. Ugh.

    3. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Well I live very comfortably on $50k(US)/year. I paid ~7% national tax rate after deductions and exemptions. Throw in your figure of 6.3% for SS and a couple of % points for Ohio state taxes. Not too bad overall. Plus as one poster pointed out you can get a house here for what a couple years rent in CA costs (an average 3 bedroom house in a very nice middle class suburb where my parents live costs ~120k or 2 1/2 years salery. All of that and I get to have a decent medical plan. All in all the midwest is a great place to live. The last few winters have been super mild and the fall's here can't be beat. I just wish we could get over the rustbelt image and get some high tech companies to move large operations here.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Of course, a $CAD is worth about $0.63 US, so your C$80K is only $50K. But the cost of living is much lower.

      Foreign-exchange rates are fairly meaningless in this context. The purchasing-power parity of a loonie is around $0.79 US (you get more value from buying things within Canada, and that's where you spend most of your money anyway; it includes the cost-of-living factor). So, your C$80K is worth US$63.

      In Canada, the health care for Bad Stuff (cancer, etc) sucks ass

      OTOH, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you.

    5. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      OTOH, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you.

      No, just kill you.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > > OTOH, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you.
      >
      > No, just kill you.

      Well, you've both got good points.

      In Canada, getting a Bad Thing won't bankrupt you, because the quality of care is lower -- but there's no guarantee you'd have gotten that care in the States anyways.

      Why? In the States, unless you're paying through the nose for "anything goes" health coverage, the insurance company will do its damnedest to deny you reimbursement anyways.

      There were many cases of people at HMOs (for Canadians, that's the not-high-end option) that got letters from their insurance companies saying "Holy crap, cancer? That could cost our company a bundle! If you don't get a second opinion from one of our doctors (heh-heh!), we won't pay for your treatment. Our doctor should be able to see you in, oh, 6 months! What, your doc says the cancer will probably be untreatable by then? Gosh, that's just too bad!"

      When pressed for a comparison, I'd say Canadian health care is like a "malice-free" HMO. Because of the profit motive, the HMO wants you to die cheaply, and will work to prevent your doctor from treating you. The Canuck doctor, on the other hand, wants to help, but because of the lack of profit motive, there are fewer Canuck doctors who can help (less profit == fewer MRI machines, etc. at hospitals) and you end up with delayed or second-tier treatment anyways.

      The underlying reasons are completely different, but the results are the same - both systems' doctors end up being hamstrung by their respective systems :(

    7. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Be cautious when comparing sales taxes. The GST (in all provinces) and PST (in BC) are out-in-front: they're calculated during the consumer sale. But for many provinces and states, the federal and state/provincial taxes are hidden: they're calculated before the product hits the shelves. You still pay the tax, but you don't have to calculate it.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Those who are going to argue about health care systems would do themselves justice reading Canada's Burning, an expose on the media lies that are being fed to us all.

      You may well find that what you thought you knew to be true, isn't.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    9. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Those who are going to argue about health care systems would do themselves justice reading Canada's Burning, an expose on the media lies that are being fed to us all.

      Dude, if I had mod points and hadn't posted to this thread, I'd mod you up. That's an excellent article, and covers both sides.

    10. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      I dunno. I have a PPO plan, as do most people I know. It sucks if you don't have insurance, of course, but hospitals can't turn away people requireing immediate, urgent care (this includes women about to give birth despite occasional propaganda to the contrary).

      The thing is, unemployment is generally low, even in a recession (5% is considered high), and most people who work have insurance.

      My father died (in Canada), of a ruptured aortic anurysm. It was discovered a few years earlier during a hernia repair operation and he was not told. By U.S. standards, surgery would have been possible, albeit with a 30-40% mortality rate. By Canadian standards, surgery was not possible, and because of all the taxes he paid during his life to support, among the other things, the Canadian health care system, he couldn't have afforded surgery in the U.S. (though, had I known, I could have afforded to pay for it).

      I think it better that people die for lack of money to save themselves than lack of technology to save them, as undesirable as either option is. If only the very rich can afford something today, more will be able to afford it tomorrow, and everyone within a generation. From my personal experience spending a week in an American hospital in 1998, Canadian health care was barbaric by comparison.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    11. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Medical malpractice occurs in every health care system. Condemning a whole system based on one possible example is unreasonable.

      When the system is run by the state, without recourse to alternatives (it is generally not possible for Canadians to pay for medical care: Canadian doctors who accept payment can not be part of the national health care system, and the taxes are so high that few can afford to go to American hospitals. It is argued, in fact, that it is "unfair" for some to afford "better" care while other's can't. Of course this does not stop Canadian politicians from , often at the Canadian taxpayer's expense.), it is quite appropriate to hold "the system" ultimately accountable for the practices of it's practitioners.

      In my father's case, I found out that he was not informed of the gravity of his illness precisely because the Canadian health care system could not help him, and another one could, if only for enough money, thus perpetuating the lie that Canada has the best health care system in the world. While "available to all" might be one interpretation of "best", it certainly isn't the only one. I'm told that Canada now routinely does send gravely ill people to the U.S. for technologically superior care. I'm sure those people thank their favorite deity that such a place exists.

      The bottom line is that people die in Canada because there isn't enough quality health care to go around, and ultimately the state choses who lives or dies.

      Frankly, I think it better that life and death be decided by chance than by governmental decree. No government has the right to play the part of a deity.

      What's absurd, if not barbaric, is the fact that half of the one million Americans who file for bankruptcy each year do so because of medical bills and other problems arising from serious illness or injury.

      Better broke than dead, no? Bankruptcy in the U.S. isn't the stigma it is in Canada, espescially because of things like medical bills. It isn't pleasant, of course, but better than the alternative. If the Canadian government were to provide health care to everyone, regardless of need, instead of such individual bancruptcies, the state as a whole would incure a heaver debt load to be distributed on the backs of all Canadians. Should the healthy bear the costs of the sick to that degree?

      Americans generally say, "No way! I've got my own expenses to worry about." Canadians, OTOH, seam happy to let the government pick who lives and who dies, hoping that they get to live. Not being one to trust government very much (less is better), I prefer to place my economic well-being at the hand of the charity of my fellows if I find myself in dire need, rather than my life at the hands of the state.

      That's why this Canadian legally works in the U.S.A. and pays taxes to an American government.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    12. Re:So they're going to Take Off, eh? by renehollan · · Score: 2
      The two most basic indicators of health care are the infant mortality rate and life expectancy. In both these stats [cia.gov], Canada is ahead of the United States. Infant mortality in Canada is 5.0/1000 live births vs. 6.7/1000 in the U.S. Life expectancy in Canada is 79.5 years vs 77.3 in the U.S. If the Canadian government is deciding anything, it is that more children should live and live longer.

      These differences do not strike me as statistically different. Furthermore, the U.S. has populations where environmental risks are likely to result in greater mortality rates overall. You could argue, I suppose, that this is due to the same attitudes that make a lack of socialized medicine a bad thing, but I'd consider the correlation much stronger with the higher overall and local population density.

      That's the way insurance works, even in the U.S.

      Except, insurance in the U.S. is voluntary and you can generally chose your carrier (though employers often have preferred carriers at attractive group rates). Unlike a nationalized health care system, insurers have to compete for business. Monopolies are generally bad for the consumer. Involuntary monopolies are worse.

      You can, of course, always come back to Canada and receive treatment as soon as you cross the border.

      No, I can't. Not for six months anyway. If I returned, I'd have to pay into the health insurance system for six months before I could collect any benefits. Of course, I could retain insurance in the U.S. for that period, or indefinately. To be fair, I was entitled to Canadian health insurance benefits for 6 months after I left, but surrendered my rights to them so that I could claim non-residency -- a rather difficult thing to do.

      In fact, I could not claim Canadian health insurance benefits six months after having left Canada even if I elected to continue paying Canadian taxes (dual tax residency is possible, for example, if I continued to own a home in Canada). The residency requirements for taxation are not the same as the residency requirements to collect benefits.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  11. It's about time by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Anyone who's ever been to / lived in San Fran. or San Jose and seen the insane suburban population density there knows that those cities have some major disadvantages despite the wonderful weather. Some people like it, but for many, it's just not their style. Also the cost of living there is downright ridiculous compared to say.. the mid-west or north-east US.

  12. Re:California by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    Well, the exodus makes up for all the people that came here during the dot bomb. Change is a scary scary thing.

  13. What th--?! by daeley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    from the they're-not-even-a-real-country-anyway dept.

    What is this? Editor-troll-and-flamebait day?

    In any case, the movie industry here in sunny SoCal has had this problem for a long time, which is why a lot of productions have been moving up to non-sunny Canada.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:What th--?! by dhamsaic · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's from the movie South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut. More specifically, it's from the song "Blame Canada", which, as the title implies, blames Canada for the problems of the world. It is said between song lines by one of the bystanders in the movie.

      --
      Every once in a while I like to masturbate a new word into my vocabulary, even if I don't know what it means.
    2. Re:What th--?! by pete-classic · · Score: 2

      It's a SouthPark reference.

      -Peter

    3. Re:What th--?! by Glytch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And even more specifically, it's a phrase spouted by a seperatist politician in Quebec, shortly before the South Park movie was finished. I think Matt and Trey did careful research.

    4. Re:What th--?! by jordan_a · · Score: 2

      Well we are a independant member of the British Commonwealth. Yes the Queen is the head of state, but she has now power, and no new law passed in Britian applies to Canada without Canada consenting. More info here

    5. Re:What th--?! by daeley · · Score: 2

      non-sunny??? In the summer months we get 15 hours of daylight. This saves the production crews big bucks.

      Dude, we get 15 hours of daylight in the *winter* months here. ;)

      And anyhow, production companies get to pay in Canadian dollars, which would save any American big bucks.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    6. Re:What th--?! by daeley · · Score: 2

      Should have known some it was some obscure, highly intelligent literary allusion. ;D

      <muttering-to-self>Should I start a South Park is insanely moronic flameware? Should I? Naw, never mind. Substitute allusion to earlier huge story today, instead.</muttering-to-self>

      Hey, if I get a subscription to /. can I block dept. phrases? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    7. Re:What th--?! by Lictor · · Score: 2

      >The top of the governmental food chain is the queen

      Actually, thats not quite correct. H.M. The Queen is our Head of State.

      The Right Honourable J. Chretien is our Head of Government.

      Personally I'd put the head of government at the top of the 'governmental food chain'.

      The Governor General acts in right of Her Majesty the Queen in Canada. And surprisingly has a fairly scary amount of power (e.g. ability to dissolve parlaiment)... though is never able to actually exercise that ability since it would cause an obscene public outrage. It is there though.. just ask Lord Byng ;)

    8. Re:What th--?! by LadyLucky · · Score: 2

      When I went to Toronto, they told us they often did films there, but they needed ot make the streets look like streets in the US. One of the things they did to do this, was throw extra rubbish on the ground, and then clean it up afterwards.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
  14. Rural IT Options by Nameis · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It will be interesting to see if some IT companies will move from the urban meatspace to the more rural areas of the US. The office space is *much* cheaper and it provides a safer environment, especially post 9/11.

    Shameless Plug: rural communities with bandwidth can be found. Two I work in can be found at:

    http://www.bowmannd.com

    http://www.hettingernd.com

    1. Re:Rural IT Options by mr_death · · Score: 3, Funny
      Shameless Plug: rural communities with bandwidth can be found. Two I work in can be found at: http://www.bowmannd.com

      Checking the weather in balmy Bowman, ND, I find a temperature of 8 degrees F, with a wind chill of -4 degrees F.

      You can call me a wimp if you want, but I don't really like freezing my ass off, even if office space goes for $1/sq ft and I get a free DS3 to my house.

      --
      It's Linux, damnit! Pay no attention to renaming attempts by self-aggrandizing blowhards.
    2. Re:Rural IT Options by Pii · · Score: 2
      While I share your sentiment that people need to go about their business, and the world's "threat" level has remained the same (people are simply aware of it now), the previous poster is correct.

      The best way to reduce the threat to any given location is to dilute the target's attractiveness to would-be terrorists.

      If businesses would stop perpetuating the myth that their legitimacy in the marketplace is dependany upon their maintaining a corporate presence [in|on] [Silicon Valley|Madison Avenue|the Technology Corridor|Wall Street], these locations would be less attractive to terrorist organizations.

      Aside from the "security" mindset that has resulted from 9/11/01, it simply makes good business sense for corporations to move, or at least expand into, less populated, less developed areas, as the article points out. (How this "data" could be interpreted as anything other than "obvious," I'll never understand.)

      Gateway figured it out quite a while ago... In this interconnected age of unrestricted communication, corporate web-prescence, on-line ordering, and overnight shipping, does it matter in the slightest where you happen to be in the meat-space? Hell no. It all looks the same through a web browser.

      Build your campus where the land is cheap, bring the bandwidth in, and relish the low cost of living, and the 10 minute commute.

      If anything, this aritcle should be modded "redundant."

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
    3. Re:Rural IT Options by sunhou · · Score: 2

      The cold weather ensures that you will stay inside and get the most out of the afore-mentioned bandwidth.

      I've gotta say, I've been living in a pretty rural area (Cornell) for the past 7 years, and it's great having a 5-minute commute past fields and greenhouses on the way in to campus. Plus Roadrunner internet/cable works great and practically never goes down (it's gone out maybe 1 or 2 hours per year at most, during the past few years). I'm really gonna hate to leave.

    4. Re:Rural IT Options by csbruce · · Score: 2

      Checking the weather in balmy Bowman, ND, I find a temperature of 8 degrees F, with a wind chill of -4 degrees F.

      Interesting, checking the weather in Ottawa, ON, the temperature is -2C (28F) with a wind chill of -7C (19F). Of course, Vancouver has a much milder winter climate than Ottawa.

    5. Re:Rural IT Options by Pii · · Score: 2
      Try to connect the dots, in a figurative, if not literal, sense.

      My point is that we, as a nation (and the same can be said of the rest of the world), are far better served by avoiding these dense pockets of population, or industry.

      Sam Kinison once told a joke about starving Ethiopians... His solution to their plight was for them to "Go Where The Food Is!"

      We, both people and corporations, should "Go Where The Space Is."

      (And to answer your question, yes, I have been to Silicon Valley, and having once been a bay Area resident (I can spell BART), I know full well that San Francisco is not part of it.)

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  15. Columbus, OH....great place..... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Columbus, where I live, is a great place for this. We have a decent bus system, lots of shopping places, and lot's of office space. There are alot of call centers here and lots of 18-20 year old's because of Ohio State, Franklin University, DeVry, Keller Graduate School, Capital, Otterbien and Mount Vernon Nazerene College are here also. Columbus is also one of Ohio's most wired cities with a decent penetration of broadband (available almost city wide I believe.). Rent's for workers can range from cheap to exhorbitant. You can, if you can afford it, even buy a condo downtown in Miranova (starting aroun $300,000). Miranova is for that executive who doesn't like to put a lot of miles on thier Beamer (right downtown). In any case, Ohio in general is a good place for high tech (at least that's my feeling anyway!).

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by jafac · · Score: 2, Troll

      and, as a bonus, Columbus is the only major city in Ohio that does not stink of urine!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:Columbus, OH....great place..... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      Boring huh? We have the Columbus Blue Jacket's in the NHL, The Bengals and Browns in the NFL (Hey never said they were good), the Indian's and Red's in baseball, Cedar Point (coaster capital of the us if not the world), Paramount's Kings Island, Six Flags, Lake Erie(home to many cool islands), Cleveland home of the ROCK AND ROLL hall of fame....boring Ohio is NOT! Just because we DON'T have nice ocean land, lot's of place to gamble(there are some in Cincy area), or a WHOLE LOT OF Tourist Traps like Florida doesn't mean it's boring! Our quarter is being minted now and their are 4 quarter's on the shuttle now two of which will be on display at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Oh and I almost forgot NASA's John Glenn Space Center where if your above 18, you can go stand in a wind tunnel. Ohio is only BORING if all you do is sit on your ass in a hotel room. Sure, we probably aren't all that well known in the world picture, but I don't believe we are boring.

      --

      Gorkman

  16. Interesting by quantaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Recently in Canada one of the hot topics of discussion is about the "brain drain" to the US, where IT grads were moving to California for employment due to low taxes and a stronger US dollar (although supposedly we're doing quite well with educated immigrants). Still it would be interesting to see how many of these workers (or even companies) are Canadian or have strong Canadian connections already.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Interesting by Sakhmet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interestingly, the "Brain Drain" has also been called a hoax. It seems lately that a lot of skilled American workers are moving up here to follow the companies that are moving up here. Especially since Ontario has been named the most cost-effective place in North America to do business.

      And Canada is generally considered (I don't actually support this opinion) a "better" place to live than most other countries.

      Sakhmet.

      --
      Ban the Nukes! Save the Whales! Screw it. Nuke the Whales!
    2. Re:Interesting by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Informative
      > Interestingly, the "Brain Drain" has also been called a hoax. It seems lately that a lot of skilled American workers are moving up here to follow the companies that are moving up here. Especially since Ontario has been named the most cost-effective place in North America to do business.

      At the height of the "Brain Drain" (Canada-to-US migration of skilled workers), Ontario was governed by a socialist party and had marginal tax rates about 10-15% higher than its current rates (umm, and in conjunction with the tax hikes, welfare benefits doubled, and the commie bastards in power were confused as to why they'd gone to record deficits for the duration of their rule). British Columbia was in a similar mess.

      Both parties were swept out of office in landslide elections (Ontario about 6 years ago, BC more recently) and neoconservative governments were put in place with aggressive tax-cutting policies.

      Federally, Canada had a debt-to-GDP ratio of about 70%, and similarly high taxes. (Canadian tax brackets weren't indexed for inflation when inflation was under 3% -- as such, there was tremendous bracket creep). In this case, the party in power didn't change, but its policies did, largely due to the actions of a reasonably-clued Finance Minister.

      Canada appears to have done the right thing - cut taxes, cut spending, foster growth. But 10 years ago, there was no light at the end of the proverbial tunnel, and in a move reminiscent of "Atlas Shrugged", many Canadians simply gave up on their country and came to the States to seek their fortunes in the dot-com boom.

      Of course, the dot-com implosion is the largest factor in people migrating from California to cheaper jurisdictions, but at the rate US legislation is going, a "reverse Brain Drain" may well take place in a few years.

    3. Re:Interesting by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > You know Canada is screwed when people are moving to California to find lower taxes!

      Yeah, but you know California's even more screwed when they all move back home for the same reason!

    4. Re:Interesting by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      But 10 years ago, there was no light at the end of the proverbial tunnel, and in a move reminiscent of "Atlas Shrugged", many Canadians simply gave up on their country and came to the States to seek their fortunes in the dot-com boom.
      Bt then, the dot-com boom went bust...
  17. The high cost of the world's best talent by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2

    Yup, the Bay Area is expensive. You get the world's best array of tech talent in a 100 mile radius. Thats going to cost you.

    1. Re:The high cost of the world's best talent by haus · · Score: 3, Funny

      And on the bright side you can talk to most of them as they wait in line at the unemployment office.

    2. Re:The high cost of the world's best talent by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
      Why bother, when you can get a much larger group of equally talented people in Southern Ontario in a much larger area

      Duh! The whole point of the Bay Area is that they are all in driving distance! The more spread out the talent is, the worse it is, not better. Its the concentration specifically that makes the Bay Area better for business.

      And no, So. Ontario does not have more talent - I grew up there, I know it well. The Canadian brain drain is real - they are all down here.

  18. The burbs by DCram · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live, work and play in a high tech burb. Just outside of Boston but in the tax free state of New Hampshire. When I first moved to this area it was great. Tons of high tech, low rent and tons of people just like me who had just moved into the area. After 4 years I will say that everything has changed. With all the high tech moving in the rent has jumped up 4-800 dollars for a two bedroom and the jump is even higher for a 1 bedroom for some reason.

    I guess the moral to this rant is that no matter where you go to after a while its the exact same as where you left. The small town life doesnt remain the small town life for long as soon as the town fathers realize that they can make tons of cash off the tech industry.

    I cant wait for the days where a high speed access point and a video phone are all you will need and you can work from anywhere.

    --
    If I were only smart enough to accomplish the things I dream about.. Or maybe too dumb to care.
  19. Please move to Indianapolis by charnov · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a tech worker who has (recently) endured lack of jobs in this sector, I plead to come here. The cost of living is very low, we have Purdue, IU, and Rose-Hulman, the NCSA is right down the road, the Internet2 has a main artery here, and God knows we need more tech-savvy people here. We'll even change to daylight savings time for ya...honest.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  20. Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by linux+slacker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's funny that the article mentions Toronto as a viable relocation for high-tech companies - Toronto is generally considered as the most expensive city in Canada, followed by Vancouver.

    Calgary is attractive to employees because unlike most of Canada, there is no provincial sales tax, only federal sales tax (so they end up paying only 7% on everything they buy, as opposed to 15% like Ontario and the eastern provinces).

    One major centre which is not mentioned in Montreal - which is incredibly cheap compared to the other major urban centres in Canada. It's generally cheaper Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Ottawa in almost every category for employees (rent, car insurance, food, beer...) Only problem is that Quebec has a high rate of provincial tax, so maybe it factors out a bit in the end.

    --
    "Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it." -- Thomas Jefferson, 1801
    1. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > One major centre which is not mentioned in Montreal - which is incredibly cheap compared to the other major urban centres in Canada. It's generally cheaper Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Ottawa in almost every category for employees (rent, car insurance, food, beer...) Only problem is that Quebec has a high rate of provincial tax, so maybe it factors out a bit in the end.

      If you have more than 50 employees, and French isn't the official language of your workplace, you're fined.

      If you immigrate and try to have your kids placed in an English school, you can't. Your kids will be educated in French, or not at all.

      If you have a sign on your building that's in English, you get fined. If you have both English and French, you still get fined unless the French print is "predominant" (usually means "at least 50% larger").

      Montreal is part of Quebec, which is governed by a bunch of wannabe ethnic-cleansers. It's off the list of business jurisdictions for good reason.

      Given the choice between setting up business in Montreal and eating a mile my own shit, I'd be straining over a plate, fork and spoon in hand.

    2. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Montreal is part of Quebec, which is governed by a bunch of wannabe ethnic-cleansers. It's off the list of business jurisdictions for good reason.
      The ethnic cleansing is mostly the fact of english canada, who have virtually eliminated the french from outside Québec.

      Québec language laws are there only to insure that immigrants don't get the notion that they can expect to be living in Québec without knowing french.

    3. Re:Must be that USD/CAD $ thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > The ethnic cleansing is mostly the fact of english canada, who have virtually eliminated the french from outside Québec.

      Explain to me what law in English Canada imposed fines and jail time on those who spoke French.

      > Québec language laws are there only to insure that immigrants don't get the notion that they can expect to be living in Québec without knowing french.

      "We don't hate the niggers, we just want to make our communities safe for white people."
      - Actual quote from some KKK goon on a talk show.

      Take your Quebec nationalism and shove it up your pur-laine ass.

  21. Another reason for Wil Wheaton to..... by Lawmeister · · Score: 2

    'Blame Canada'

    he's already knocked us for taking some of the film industry (ok, he's not the only one.... but remember they created Hollywood in California for the good weather - now with the smog in LA they can't shoot much anymore)

    then there is the whole Hockey thumping... (damnit it's our sport anyways! :) but he was gracious enough to put up ar ereally nice post after the fact...

    and lastly there are those damn 'Canadian Cold Fronts' that make it snow in Texas... yes definately BLAME CANADA!

    ah.... all better now
    have a great weekend all!

    :)

  22. To put things in perspective by ffa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just a quick note: I am from Canada (Vancouver) and right now a US dollar gets you Cdn$1.592, which means company A who would pay employee XX US$70,000, can pay the employee Cdn$70,000 which is US$43,970 and save a grand total of $26,030. The employee would be totally happy, as the cost of living here is almost 1:1 when compared to most high tech centres in the States (ala Seattle, etc...) and the standard of living is just the same, if not higher, less traffic, beautiful nature and so on. As for education level, good universities here have the same level of education as good universities anywhere else, and due to the multicultural nature of Vancouver, there is a lot of talent that migrates here from other countries...

    So all in all, it would be a win-win situation for them... and it has the same time-zone as LA, Seattle, San Fran and so on (as opposed to going over seas which makes for a development nightmare! I have been through it, working with UK/Ireland - from Vancouver, and let me tell you it is NOT my idea of fun :)

    peace.

    -farshad

    --
    ...and remember in your brain boggle, wrong starts with a wubble-u.
    1. Re:To put things in perspective by Synn · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but if you think high tech workers are going to migrate to Canada if it means earning 70k Can when they used to earn 70k US, you're off your rocker.

    2. Re:To put things in perspective by jbf · · Score: 2

      By that logic, it'd be even cheaper to move to Russia, where you could pay 70k rubles = $2255.88 USD, and save a grand total of $67,744.12. The employee would be totally happy, since the cost of living in Russia is so low, and the nature there is beautiful too.

      Incidentally, in Canada, how much do you pay for gas? $1? That sounds reasonable. What? It's per LITRE?

      Furthermore, I simply don't buy that Canadian cost of living is 59.2% less, especially after all those taxes.

      Admittedly, with socialized health care, companies might save a bit on fringe, but their employees will pay it directly in GST and PST.

    3. Re:To put things in perspective by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Did you gap out on the 1:1 thing? C$70K puts your purchasing power within Canada at about the same level as U$70K does in the USA.

      In other words, a Canuck with $70K will purchase a home, car, vacation, food, entertainment, and retirement plan that's very much the same as what an American with $70K will purchase.

      But in Canada, he'll get better air quality, less violence, reduced crowding, better beer, and be welcomed by people in other nations.

      Seems like a better deal to me. :-)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  23. Never understoof. by Torinaga-Sama · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I never understood why a business would want to station itself in the Bay Area. If I pay 450k for a 3 bedroom house, it better be on 25 acres, preferably waterfront.

    These guys are MBAs and they can't figure out how to spend less money. It blows my mind.

    --
    (/local/home/curiosity)-#who -u|grep thecat|cut -c 44-49|xargs kill -9
  24. Mass relaocations to/from CA every four years by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    This isn't anything new, Denver is filled with California expats who staffed the telco industry.

    The Bay Area in particular is about the cutting edge industries - there is already a groundswell of biotech. Once an industry becomes mature and doesn't need cutting edge talent, it should leave the area.

  25. Wonder if this has anything to do with .. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    ... US immigration saying enough is enough. It wasn't a totally secretive technique by US companies to fool immigration into saying that the talent wasnt available stateside - it was, but salaries being damanded were too high. So the immigration dept was pressured into giving out more and more B1s (?) .. ie, work visas to immigrants, whether they were Indian or Canadian.

    Old hat tho. It happens (happened) in every industry. As the tech market becomes more 'bricks and mortar', the US will likely outsource much of its labour, although, as usual, not its executive staff. ;)

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  26. Calcualate your new salary by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a neat tool that let's you compare what your income would have to be elsewhere in order to have the same lifestyle.

    $100,000 in Oklahoma City compares to $279,000 in Menlo Park.

    I saw it on the Internet, so it must be true.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    1. Re:Calcualate your new salary by Eppie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Home Fair calculator is wrong. All it does is multiply your salary by a fixed number and then it claims that those salaraies are equivalent in the two cities.

      Homefair does not take into account the fact that many of our costs these days are interstate or not subject to local price limitations. The number for the "cheaper" state thus does not take into account that while local goods might be cheaper, vacations are not cheaper, mail-order computers are no cheaper, etc. In other words, a million dollars worth of caviar in Austin is probably about the same as a million dollars worth of caviar in New York.

      Also, people's spending habits and the mix of luxury vs. normal, local vs. imported vs. domestic goods changes radically as income scales up and down. No single multiple can ever really reflect the difference in how far salary will go for a wide salary range.

    2. Re:Calcualate your new salary by belphegore · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoever created that calculator clearly never tried to buy a house in Menlo Park.

    3. Re:Calcualate your new salary by Watts+Martin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, actually, the HomeFair calculator does take the most important things into account, just not perfectly. It's using what's called a "cost of living index," which compares different categories of costs--rent, utilities, health care, etc.--and making the calculation based on that.

      No, it's not precise--by necessity it's using average COL values, presuming you are paying the median in all its values for everything. But it's not a bad ballpark estimate. Vacations and mail-order computers are not your most significant reoccuring expenses, are they? The most significant expense for nearly anyone is housing, followed (roughly) by utilities, transportation and local taxes. If I moved from Tampa to Santa Clara, the fact that a Titanium PowerBook is the same price in both places is immaterial. The fact that my $650/mo apartment here is an $1800/mo apartment there is very material... and that's the sort of thing that salary calculators do take into account.

  27. North Carolina highest unemployment in 30 years by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Here in the Research Triangle Park, home to Red Hat, IBM, Cisco, Siemens, Motorola, Alcatel, Nortel, GE Aircraft Engines, Glaxo, Bayer, Fujitsu, AstraZeneca, and smaller software and support companies - this is the WORST its been in 30 years. On a national basis our labor costs are not even above average. I tend to think that failing companies relocate regardless of the cost of labor. The bigger problem is the cost of RENT in places like the Bay Area, SF.

  28. Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...the fact that trying to actually get in to Canada "sucks".

    If all the high tech jobs move up that way, most Slashdot readers are gonna be working behind the counters at 7-11, unless Canada loosens its new immigration restrictions a bit.

    1. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Kwil · · Score: 2

      Did you even read the article you link to?

      The points system is based on language skills, education, and work experience.

      Tech people from America can rightfully lay claim to all three.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    2. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Yes; But have you looked at the point system itself? I have, and I've been considering canadian immigration for some time now, until the new laws were passed. Unless you have a job offer already (which often won't happen unless you can get in already...) and/or have family there, you won't qualify

      The current system requires you score at least 80 points on the assessment. I currently score 71, with maximum points for age and for work experience in my job field. Having a bachelor's degree, I get 20/25 possible points, and speaking fluently in one of Canada's official languages (English), but not the other, I get 16/20.

      Now, without a job offer, or family there, the only way I could reach 80 would be if I had a Masters Degree and spoke fluent French as a second language. And even then, 80 points is just a "maybe".

      Basically, the current system is very heavily weighted towards having existing connections in Canada already.

      More information.
      I stand by my claim.

    3. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > ...the fact that trying to actually get in to Canada "sucks [cbc.ca]".

      What could be harder than proving you have a college degree, can speak English, and a job offer? That's most of the "points" you need right then and there!

      Especially compared to the 6-7 years of hoop-jumping with INS -- an agency that seems dedicated to the propostion that terrorists can get in just fine on student visas, but technology professionals have to stick with the same job for the better part of a decade and beg for permission from a state employment agency (3-6 months), the federal department of labor (another month), then back to the INS to ask for permission to apply for a green card (between 3 months to 1 year), and then another year or two after permission's granted, to actually get the green card. Get laid off or company reorgs? Get on the next plane back home and start from scratch.

      If you've got half a brain and a degree, getting into Canada to do high-tech work is trivial.

      INS incompetency has made it clear that high-tech workers are neither wanted nor valued in the States.

    4. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Read my other comment. I have a college degree and speak english, and still don't have enough points to qualify.

      Yes, maybe a few months ago it would have been a cakewalk to get into Canada, but not anymore.

    5. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      Oops, forgot the part regarding the job offer.

      Good luck getting a job offer, right now. Jobs, especially tech jobs, are tight right now, and they have to offer those jobs to qualified canadian residents first, before you get the green light. Nevermind the sponsorship issues.

    6. Re:Well, except for one thing... by DebtAngel · · Score: 2

      He did mention a job offer, which would push you over 80.

      Besides, they knocked the required score back down to 70 this week, because it was deemed 80 was unfair to people who have already applied. Note that you would now be allowed in. They are going to raise it back to 80 at some point in the future.

      --

      Is this post not nifty? Sluggy Freelance. Worshi

    7. Re:Well, except for one thing... by cswiii · · Score: 2

      From a statement made Tuesday:

      The Minister is further proposing that skilled workers and business immigrants who applied before December 17, 2001 who have not received a selection decision prior to January 1, 2003, will be subject to the proposed selection criteria and a proposed transition pass mark of 70 points (reduced from 75).

      It's retroactive, only for those who have already applied, before the current law went into effect. It's true, they say they are going to change things again, in June, but there are no real specifics yet.

    8. Re:Well, except for one thing... by rudedog · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have a bachelors degree in computer science, you are entitled to get a job in Canada on a NAFTA TN visa. Yes, you need a job offer as a systems analyst to get a TN visa, but it's not difficult to do that (I did the reverse job hunting from Canada for jobs in the US and got two offers within a month). Once you have the job offer, you just present your offer letter and your degree at the border and they will issue you a TN visa.

    9. Re:Well, except for one thing... by SamHill · · Score: 2

      Yes, but your degree had better be in computer science, or mathematics, or something that sounds mighty techy to the average guy, or the folks at the border are going to tell you to get screwed on ice, no matter how much experience you have and how enthusiastic your potential employer is.

    10. Re:Well, except for one thing... by rudedog · · Score: 2

      In fact, it has to be in computer science, or you have to demonstrate that you have experience commensurate with a degree in computer science. However, that does not mean that it is difficult to get the visa. The NAFTA visa was deliberately designed to make it easy for Canada and US citizens (in certain occupations) to do cross border job hopping.

    11. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Besides, they knocked the required score back down to 70 this week, because it was deemed 80 was unfair to people who have already applied. Note that you would now be allowed in. They are going to raise it back to 80 at some point in the future.

      The other important distinction is that the points system can be understood by anyone.

      You download a form. You check the boxes. You have a pretty good idea of whether or not you qualify. One form. One organization. And if you're a Canadian Immigration drone, it's pretty easy to sort the "yes" and the "no" piles.

      Contrast this with the INS system.

      Dozens of statuses under which you can get in, dozens of parallel (and contradictory) regimes that say what you can do when you're here, reams of paperwork resulting in 3-6 month delays to hire people or change statuses, a maze of statuses through which one must migrate to get to the green card stage, and a green card process that throws the merit system ("best person for the job") out the window and requires a 2-3 year dance between three or four government agencies (state labor board, DOL, INS, and Department of State), and a maze of regulations that INS itself doesn't even know how to follow.

      The only people whose interests are served by the US immigration system are the bureaucrats at INS, the terrorists who sneak through the cracks, and the immigration lawyers whom companies have to hire to make sure they're in compliance.

      Ashcroft, if you or one of your goons is reading this (and we all know you are ;-), please, during your term of office, eliminate the INS and start from scratch.

    12. Re:Well, except for one thing... by synx · · Score: 2

      Good call, the canadian equivalent to the TN-1 visa... you dont need points, and they are very easy to get... IF you are in one of the designated professions.

      But you can get a TN-1 without a lawyer. Its a cakewalk. I got a TN-1 to move to Seattle, no problem.

    13. Re:Well, except for one thing... by SamHill · · Score: 2

      If you read the NAFTA, it doesn't say your degree has to be in the field. That's an interpretation you'll only find in the official handbook used by the Immigration folk.

      Also, good luck proving to a guy at the border that you're qualified to do the job without a degree in a field they recognize. They're not impressed by resumes, letters of reference or anything else.

      The first answer is always no, and once you get that answer, the chances of getting a yes are very, very slim.

    14. Re:Well, except for one thing... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Ashcroft, if you or one of your goons is reading this (and we all know you are ;-), please, during your term of office, eliminate the INS and start from scratch.
      >
      > Bush, take the same advice, substituting "IRS" for "INS" and dropping the last part.

      With the IRS, if you fuck up (read: "fail to follow one of the tens of thousands of sections of the law that you can't even comprehentd"), at least you can placate them by cutting them a check. With INS, the law is just as incomprehensible, but the consequence for fucking up is that you get detained and beaten for a week (if you're lucky, if you're not lucky, for a lifetime, and that was before 9/11), and then you pack your bags and go home.

      But yeah, we also desperately need to get rid of the Internal Revenue Code. It's the canonical example of making the law so complex that nobody knows if they're in compliance or not, and therefore everybody spends more time and money paying lawyers and CPAs for at least some reassurance.

  29. Just gives me an excuse by tulare · · Score: 2
    "Sounds like American high tech workers are going to have to learn to say the word "eh?" a lot."
    I'd been meaning to leave the states anyhow. Too much willful ignorance here.
    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    1. Re:Just gives me an excuse by tulare · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I do bitch. I also vote, write letters to my reps, letters to the editor, etc. The money owns the hearts and souls of too many in the US. Fuck it.

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  30. Already starting - biotech boom in Bay Area by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    You can see the swell of the next boom industry - biotech, take hold in the Bay Area (and Boston).

    The Bay Area is an expensive market for expensive talent in expensive industries.

    No, you should not manufacture widgets in the Bay Area if you can do so elsewhere. The companies that are here are here becuase they need a high concentration of talent across a set of tech industries that you cannot find elsewhere in quantity.

    R&D is expensive and the Bay Area is the R&D shop for the nation (if not the world).

  31. Availability of talent? by tinrobot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The one problem is - a tech company is composed of talented individuals. Most of the really talented people can find good jobs within their area, so they have less incentive to move to Podunk for just their career.

    You can move the company, but if only the lower half of the talent pool follows, it's not a very good decision.

  32. Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canuck) by feelafel · · Score: 5, Funny
    Advantages:
    • lower fixed costs
    • have to pay less for skilled workers
    • health care is a cost savings for corporations
    • you can boast that you're a citizen of the nation with the greatest male and female hockey players
    • other nations don't have a seething hatred for you (justified or not)
    • better beer
    • funny comedians
    • really good music
    • an abundance of gorgeous people are our best kept secret
    • it's harder to get shot "by accident" here.


    Disadvantages
    • get paid less as a skilled worker;
    • almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan (which will by dry in 10-20 years)
    • only one airline, and man does it suck
    • yeah, ok - it's a little colder
    • the healthcare system is spiralling downwards due to funding shortages passed onto the provinces from a sneaky federal government that wants to report a "surplus"
    • lack of world class cities and attractions


    One thing that I find ironic is that it was only a few years ago that Nortel was threatening to leave Canada because of its taxation rates which hurt corporations trying to compete against those in the USA.
  33. Joke Missed by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    Oh, man, I can't believe you missed this.

    "Canada: it's not just aboot doughnuts anymore, eh?"

    Virg

  34. Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    If you live in the Bay Area you can change jobs twice a year for the next decade and still get off at the same bus stop. No other city in the world offers that density of opportunity.

    How many employees are going to move to JerkWater where their new employer is the only game in town??

    1. Re:Exactly. Its about diversity of the job market by Chris+Parrinello · · Score: 2

      Now I remember the reason I left Silicon Valley. The only maps you could buy in SV had everything east of Sacramento marked as "terra incognito".

      I think you need to actually visit more places than your one bus stop to actually know what the state of the other high tech areas in the country are really like so you won't show your ignorance making incorrect generalizations.

  35. Finally, some sense by BlueMonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...or should I say cents. Supply and demand, folks. What am I missing here? There's no reason whatsoever for most of these high tech companies to hang out in these high cost areas. You're jacking up the price for everyone else to live there just so you can form some geographical "high-tech band" in the US, when no industry could be farther from geocentricity than the high tech industries who've now finally gotten a clue. Take your business anywhere you can find electricity. For the price you're paying to run your company in the "high tech band" you could probably house all your employees and their families in dream homes in Iowa or someplace.

    I'm no authority, but I am just glad to see things finally evening out a bit. A town isn't meant to consist 100% of high tech profitable firms. They need teachers and "sanitation engineers" and whatnot -- the guys who don't make a zillion dollars a year to pay for the housing.

  36. Re:blame canada? by Glytch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh yeah, for sure. We got the curling too, eh? And Tim Horton's. :)

    Trust me, my fellow techies, if you ever move up here, get an apartment or house within two or three minutes walk of a Tim Horton's. You will not regret it.

  37. Baltimore Business Quotes : by RembrandtX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Baltimore Big Business Quotes:

    "When we gonna get us some of that them there health care Hon ?"

    "If we could switch to Solar Panels, we would use a lots less Earl (oil)."

    "Whys that there stadium say PSI-NET? Whoz that Hon ?"

    "Yea, this heres the new business capitals, we're right between Warshington and Napolis."

    [non baltimore residents need not laugh]

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
    1. Re:Baltimore Business Quotes : by blair1q · · Score: 2

      You mean, non-bawmer residents, right?

      --Blair

    2. Re:Baltimore Business Quotes : by Fnord · · Score: 2

      What about former DC residents that were raised to make fun of Baltimorons?

  38. So Let's See... by virg_mattes · · Score: 5, Funny

    > The east says "eh", the west sounds just like Seattle.

    Okay, then, let's get this straight:


    East: "Sure, whatever, eh?"

    West: "Sure, whatever, Seattle?"


    I think I like it the Eastern way better, eh?

    Virg

  39. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    Good. Techies who work for salary alone are going to be the ones I'll hold resposible for implementing the SSSCA .....

    Work for the love, not the money. Techies are overpaid anyhow, although I will admit that they do tend to need to buy expensive toys for the home in order to stay competative in their industry as an exmplouee ....

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  40. Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sorry, as an expat in the Bay Area I can tell you with assurance that KK blows away Tim's by a good margin.

    Once KK enters the Canuck market, you are going to see Tim's get hammered (or vastly improve their donuts in response)

    1. Re:Krispy Kreme blows away Horny Tim's by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Tim Hortons does well, not because of their donuts, but because of their coffee. I dont see too many people buying donuts, but to this day, despite only offering a house blend, they still seem to be everybit as popular a destination for coffee as the million-flavour Stabucks' et all ..

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  41. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by RembrandtX · · Score: 2

    You have obviously not eaten at Shogun Jpn on Charles Street.

    Or seen a film at the Senator Theatre :)

    Charles Street in Baltimore is the (more or less) "alternative-lifestyle-zone(tm)' of Baltimore.

    You want good sushi, great dance clubs, and clothing/furnature shops ? thats the place to go.

    You wanna get mugged ? go over to Security Blvd and stand still for about 30 seconds.

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  42. We moved to Portland, Maine by ChiChiCuervo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's exactly what we did. The whole company up and moved from DC to Portland, Maine last December. Real Estate's ALOT cheaper, the people are ALOT nicer, and the traffic is ALOT better.

  43. food for thought by eracerblue · · Score: 2, Informative

    i like the "even Canada" statement. said as if it were completely outrageous. "even timbucktwo..."

    perhaps the weak Canadian dollar and the dual Canadian olympic hockey golds will be joined with a monumentous reverse brain drain. Canada's been complaining about it for years... maybe the US will get a kick at the can.

    and i see the "baren glacier as soon as you hit the border" misconception is still alive and well. Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and others are massive metropolatin centers with similar climate to many US cities. in Vancouver it rarely freezes and typically has winter temperatures in the mid-high 40's. (that's around 8degC... eh?)

    1. Re:food for thought by csbruce · · Score: 2

      perhaps the weak Canadian dollar and the dual Canadian olympic hockey golds will be joined with a monumentous reverse brain drain.

      Canada doesn't actually have a net brain drain. While it loses home-grown brains to America, it imports more than that number of brains from Asia.

  44. I believe flashy locations are utterly pointless by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

    I never saw the reason for companies to locate their headquarters in the most expensive and trendy place possible. How many companies out there need that much physical proximity to others in the industry? Think of all the small manufacturing shops you see in the most remote places, and they depend on raw materiels and suffer if the freight cost is too high. What excuse does the IT industry have? None, as far as I can see. There are literally countless locations across the country that are ridiculously inexpensive and have the high-quality of life that will attract workers.

    But no, IT corporations say "We need to move to San Franciso!". They are idiotic, and they get what they deserve for making such stupid mistakes, I have about as much sympathy for them as those who are rebuilding for the third time in the same location because putting up a house on a flood plain was a Really Good Idea (tm).

    Is there any compelling reason to be there, other than ego? In most - read: almost all - cases....no.

    Furthermore, what really gets me, is when companies have little or no revenue stream and decide to plop down in the most expensive place they can find and then set to work on maybe, you know....making some money.

    Here is a stunning idea, locate somplace inexpensive - if you think you won't get any employees or business by setting up someplace that isn't flashy you are ignorant or simply unwilling to accept the truth. Then, build your bussiness slowly, spend as little as possible, supply good, but not extravagant workspaces and equipment and do away with most or all luxuries and see what happens. You might actually last more than a year or two. And when your company grows, it might actually be sensible to move to somplace more upscale. You know.....when you can actually afford to.

    People just need to think for a minute, before they go off making dumb and obvious mistakes then crying about it later on.

  45. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    an abundance of gorgeous people are our best kept secret

    Ah, I see you don't live in New Brunswick.

    I swear, all I'm looking for is a woman with less facial hair than me and no kids. Are my standards just too high?

  46. Re:Montreal is doing well (Multimedia City) by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    Salaries are okay, if it wasn't for all the taxes I could've done way more with my salary.

  47. And about time! by banky · · Score: 2

    The near mythic status of SF has to go. The idea that you can't do business without being in Cali or at least having a "west coast office" is bull, and has harmed the industry.

    That being said, I live in Fairfax Virginia and based on the employment section of the Post, it doesn't seem like people are exactly *flocking* to this part of the country. If they are, they aren't hiring. Its still pretty dismal around here, UNLESS you have a security clearance, in which case you have nothing but options... "Will code Perl to help fight the Taliban, please ignore that I'm a slacker misanthrope, that was cool in the dot-com days..."

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
  48. Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wins by jamiefaye · · Score: 4, Insightful

    San Francisco and Silicon Valley has an enormous critical mass of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/Trans people, and Nerds. The counter-culture continues to thrive here.

    For techies - it means that you are respected and accepted everywhere, no matter what you look like.

    It is the opposite of the nightmare world Jon Katz describes in "Voices from the Hellmouth". Nobody who has been dumped-on for being smart or diferent wants to go back out into the cold.

    Attempts to replicate the Bay Area have to replicate this tolerance too - which often requires a massive, slow change in attitude.

    -- Jamie

  49. On a related note by pmz · · Score: 2

    The huge variation in the cost of living among cities is why those "What Programmers Get Paid" surveys are one of my pet peeves.

    I always feel a bit inferior--for a second--when I look at how underpaid I am relative to the statistics in these articles. However, I quickly realize that these statistics are mostly from people in places like Silicon Valley, where a pup tent in someone's back yard costs $150,000.

    The fact is that these articles include naieve and misguided analyses of income. It is much better to just rely on a few real data points, such as those from recent job offers, and use local consumer-price-index numbers to scale the salaries accordingly. It is suprising how $40,000/yr. in a small south-east city can easily equal $60,000/yr. in Chicago, for example.

  50. In the words of the immortal Geddy Lee of Rush... by dstone · · Score: 2

    Take off!
    To the Great White North.
    Take off!
    It's a beauty way to go.

  51. Bad Joke by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Ok, I've got a few karma points to throw away:

    Q. How do Canadians spell Canada?
    A. C, eh? N, eh? D, eh?

    /me bows.

    Ok, now continue with the real conversation.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Bad Joke by Quixote · · Score: 2

      You've got the story wrong, eh? It was like this, eh.
      Three Scots who had just found this huge hunka land, eh, were trying to come up with a name for it, eh? They decided to draw letters from a hat, eh? So the first guy picked "C", and announced "C, eh?". The second guy drew "N" and called out "N, eh?". And the third bloke drew "D" and said "D, eh?". Hence the name, eh.

  52. Canadia by maggard · · Score: 5, Informative
    No, I doubt lots of American high-tech employees will come flooding to Canada. For one thing it's rather difficult for a US'er to get a work permit. Like the US Canada gets lots of applications but has commitments like being a Commonwealth nation, there are different priorities. Furthermore with Nortel, Corel, and the like still hurting there's no employment crunch up here, no need to invite folks from south of the border.

    Next if US'ers moves here they'll be paid in Canadian dollars. While you'll live well in Canada it's a big pay cut from the US, especially when you add taxes on top. Furthermore prices in Canadian cities have started to rise and while they don't compare to NYC, Boston or SF they're still shocking the natives and expensive in local terms.

    Finally there are the cultural differences. While visiting Toronto or Vancouver may feel very familiar to a US'er that changes when you actually live here (Montreal is immediately obvious as being different.) There're the little things like brands being different, everyone being that one notch politer, and Curling being a real sport. There's also a dearth of ghastly evening news (you'd think Canadians are the world's worst drivers from watching TV news until you realize there aren't as many shootings and other violent incidents for the if-it-bleeds-it-leads stories) and lots more interest in international events.

    However there are even more important differences. One is the Quebec issue. This is where I live but it comes up everywhere across the nation: French language laws, government policies, separatism, and the economic shock-waves every time Quebec threatens to leave.

    Other significant differences:

    • Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.
    • However by-and-large Canada is more liberal then the US and does have far fewer of the extreme right-wing biblethumpers.
    • Canada doesn't place individual liberties above all else; the general good is at least as important.
    • The Provinces are stronger politically then US States and there's a lot more Federal/Provincial jostling.
    • Strong social policies often more in line with European models then US.
    • Political parties that don't map at all onto the US model.
    • Socialized Medicine (services are generally good in spite of the horror stories often heard in the States.)
    • Establishing credit across the border can be difficult, sometimes very difficult.
    • Lots of technology comes out later in Canada (wireless Palms) or not at all (TiVo.)
    • While Canadians get US TV & somewhat radio there are lots of programs, acts, and personalities that are big in Canada but unheard of in the US. Some are programs like "This Hour Has 22 Minutes" and others are bands that make Top-10 in Canada but never rise above Top 500 in the US.
    No, I like living in Canada a lot, and US friends love visiting, but ask any US expat. living in Canada and they'll tell you it is different and it's more then the good beer.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Canadia by Kwil · · Score: 2

      Lots of technology comes out later in Canada (wireless Palms) or not at all (TiVo.)

      Yet at the same time, the tech that does come out in Canada tends to get adopted a lot more quickly than it does in the States. The debit card is the classic example. Even our small convenience stores were accepting them almost 10 years ago.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    2. Re:Canadia by tb3 · · Score: 2

      For one thing it's rather difficult for a US'er to get a work permit.

      Not necessarily. The TN-1 (Nafta) visa is relatively easy to obtain and renew. They expire on an annual basis, but can be renewed indefinitely. I worked in the States for three years on a TN-1 and it was a piece of cake. It's the same for americans working in Canada.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    3. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.
      I have to disagree with that. Where i'm from(Quebec), religious lessons are optional and next year they will be eliminated.

      Until three years ago Quebec had Catholic & Protostant school boards. They were turned into French and English boards but the culture remains. Yes, the mandatory classes are being dropped but there's still FAR more of it then in the US. For example EVERY school I know of has large crosses on the outside, in the lobby, etc which is VERY unlike the US.

      Spend some time talking to a US'er who went through those school systems and compare them to your own, I think you'll be amazed at the differences.

      BTW, I'm a US'ers who lives in Montreal (Ahuntsic).

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    4. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      For one thing it's rather difficult for a US'er to get a work permit. Like the US Canada gets lots of applications but has commitments like being a Commonwealth nation, there are different priorities. Furthermore with Nortel, Corel, and the like still hurting there's no employment crunch up here, no need to invite folks from south of the border.
      Any part of the full statement you'd like to take exception with? (I really look down on folks who selectively quote and leave out relevant parts, its so intellectually dishonest.)

      The US was sucking in techies like mad while the boom was on and the economy was strong. Now with the boom over and neither country's economy as strong do you imagine Canada is interested in importing lots of techies or that employers are having trouble filling spots, are interested in jumping through the hoops of bringing in a US'er if they don't need to?

      No, they're not. Canadian high tech has lots of local talent sending in resumes who are already established, won't get homesick halfway through a project, know the score and understand the living and work syles/conditions/situations/payscales, are a bit more invested in staying around.

      Can US'ers move to Canada? Yes. Is there gonna be a flood? No.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    5. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.
      Being a Canadian, I have no idea what your talking about :) While some provinces fund part (or as in Ontario, nearly all) of religious schools (better than the 'classims' of US private schools), there are still an abundance of public schools that are just as secular as anything you'll find in the US.
      Well, I'm directly familier with Nova Scotia, Quebec, and Ontario: That's more then 50% of Canada's population and all have vastly more religion in their schools then even the deepest bible-belt US school. BTW I've lived in California, Texas, Massachusetts, Maryland & New York. Heck, take a look at many of them, see those crosses on the outside and in the lobby - think you'd see that in a US public school?

      I was astonished when I moved to Canada the amount of religion that is institutionialized, I expect Canadians don't see it only because they're so used to it. As noted in another thread only 3 years ago did Montreal change from Catholic & Protastant school boards (PUBLIC school boards) to French & English. My lover used to have to go to religion classes, got a grade for it. That would be unthinkable in the US public schools.

      As to "classisms" of US private schools it is every bit the same in Canada. I'm well familier with US (non-parochial) private schools, many of my friends growing up attended them, went on to prep schools. I can assure you there are no differences.

      However, religion in public schools, it is a big difference. Try talking to a US'er and discussing this topic, I assure you that you'll both will be amazed at the different experiences.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    6. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      ... the tech that does come out in Canada tends to get adopted a lot more quickly than it does in the States. The debit card is the classic example.
      Its the classic example because it is one of the very few examples. By and large Canadian business has been slower to adopt technological change then US ones. Furthermore while there are any number of small differences for the consumers there are few that are significent. Indeed the biggest I can think of offhand is that many Canadian phone companies have offered home-phones-with-text-services for years and that many Canadian pay phones take cards.

      Any big technology-penetration-into-the-Canadian-market stories other then debit cards you can recommend?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    7. Re:Canadia by rudedog · · Score: 2

      Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools.

      I don't know what Quebec was like as far as schools, but in Alberta, I saw very little religion when I attended the public school. It's not enshrined in Canadian law, but it also isn't emphasized like it is in the US (i.e., schools fighting to put up the 10 commandments, or say the lords prayer before class, etc.). An interesting book on this subject is Lois Sweet, God in the Classroom.

      The Provinces are stronger politically then US States and there's a lot more Federal/Provincial jostling.

      I don't think this is true; states have significantly more juristiction over many areas compared to the provinces. There is more jostling, but it's mostly the provinces trying to get more power, a la the states in the United States.

      Establishing credit across the border can be difficult, sometimes very difficult.

      Somewhat true, although it goes both ways, and it's short-term. When I moved to the US, all I could get was a $1000 credit-limit credit card. Three years later, I'm shredding credit card applications every day, and my wife and I have more credit than we can use (not to mention a large mortgage). I think that Canadian creditors are more careful than their US counterparts, partly because the US counterparts have lobbied successfully to make bankruptcy much more difficult, but establishing a good credit record is not too hard, assuming that you have good credit habits.

      I agree with the rest of your points. On the other hand, I also like living in Seattle. But then, Seattle is probably as close as a city can get to being Canadian, and still be American.

    8. Re:Canadia by rudedog · · Score: 2

      My lover used to have to go to religion classes, got a grade for it.

      This is only in the Catholic, or separate, school system. In the public school system, there are no religion classes. I'm speaking from personal experience, because I attended Catholic school from grades 1-8 and public after that, and never got religious instruction after grade 8.

      The separate/public school dichotomy is a throwback to when Canada was becoming a country, and is a bad thing, in my opinion, but nevertheless, is actually in the constitution.

      However, if you don't want your children getting religious education, you can send them to the public school, and they won't.

      All of the above is based on my experience growing up in Alberta. Things may be different in other provinces; especially the further east you go, since it was the eastern provinces that influenced this aspect of the Canadian constitution.

    9. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      My lover used to have to go to religion classes, got a grade for it.
      This is only in the Catholic, or separate, school system. In the public school system, there are no religion classes. I'm speaking from personal experience, because I attended Catholic school from grades 1-8 and public after that, and never got religious instruction after grade 8.
      This may be true in Alberta - it is not universally true. As I noted I'm familier with other Canadian schools systems where this is distictly not true.

      Perhaps along with talking to some US'ers about religion in schools some discussion with folks from other provinces would be in order also.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    10. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      ... because no public (i.e. secular) schools in Canada have such things, that's just insane.
      Really? Insane? Perhaps you weren't paying attention, might want to talk to some of your fellow Canadians. Or perhaps you'd care to read the other threads associated with this one?

      Explain the crosses on all of the schools around me (Montreal) or how until 3 years ago we had Catholic & Protostant school boards? These AREN'T some sort of non-mainstream/parochial/private schools, ALL of the public schools have them here as they do in some other parts of the country.

      Its dark now or I could drive around my neighborhood and photograph *every* school and show you a cross, post them on a website.

      Perhaps you might want to do a biiit more research and doublecheck your statements before you starting calling into question other person's statements because you're being really insulting and I'm gonna expect you to own up to it and apologize.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    11. Re:Canadia by FFFish · · Score: 2

      "Little separation of Church & State with things like religious lessons in schools."

      WTF? Not in any of the Western provinces. I think you must have experience only with Quebec.

      "Canada doesn't place individual liberties above all else; the general good is at least as important."

      Please name an example. I'm fairly certain you're mistaken, but perhaps I've remained ignorant of cases where an individuals rights were subsumed to the "greater good."

      "it's a big pay cut from the US, especially when you add taxes on top"

      I think not. In pursuing some of the ideas in this thread, I've taken a look into this. It seems that when all is said and done, you'll have about as much fun money left over after you take care of the necessities (tax, housing, food, retirement, etc) in either country. Mad-money-wise, it's break-even for the employee.

      "This Hour Has 22 Minutes"

      Truly the best reason to remain in Canada. Man, we eat our politicians alive up here! I eagerly await the next season, when Marge, Warrior Princess, really does begin to smite a few of those bastards.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    12. Re:Canadia by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Well, we were comparing debit card use in Canada to use in the US, so I'll continue that stream of thought.

      Our telco systems have always been many years more advanced than American ones. Indeed, Canada has been a world leader in telco tech.

      Our banks seem to be more advanced. They are, at any rate, buying up American banks at an astonishing rate. All our national banks are players in the global banking market.

      We have a bunch of wireless companies that are tech leaders, too. Research in Motion would be one; Wi-Lan would be another. Both, I think, are spin-offs from the telco stuff, though.

      There's a little startup that's developed a process for completely and safely incinerating (or is it digesting?) hazardous waste. It's got big contracts with the US Army. Canadian grown.

      Oh, speaking of Canadian grown... but, no, let's not go there. The DEA won't like it. :-)

      Our biotech industry is pretty much world-class, too, and always has been. Man, that's a nearly endless list of developments and technologies.

      There's always Bombardier, the makers of everything from Lear(?) jets to snowmobiles and jetskis, to warplane instrumentation.

      CAE is a world-class flight simulation/training company. And they're contracted to do something for the US Navy. Might be the control programs for their new Windows-based destroyer. Shudder. That'd be the project from hell.

      Oil and gas technologies surely must be something we do. Can't name any, though; it's not something I've tried paying attention to. But alternative energy, we've got some great tech there, from fuel cells to thermoelectrical to wind power to hydroelectricity: pretty fine tech all around.

      Hell, this is turning into an endless list. Tech-wise, Canada's near the top. We do it all, and we do it all extremely well.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    13. Re:Canadia by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Why, oh why, would anybody want to use a debit card? If you've got a credit card and even a thimble full of discipline, you get a free loan to the end of the month. For small cash purchases you can carry currency that you know is always going to "work". I never saw a $20 bill fail because of a technical malfunction.

      With a debit card, you have to deposit money in a non interest-bearing account.

      The only reason I can think of why you would want to do this is because you are paranoid about getting robbed of your cash. That's letting the criminals win as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    14. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      I'm not disputing ANY of Canada's products, I'm just pointing out that by and large Canada's businesses overall are slower then the use to adopt new technologies and Canada's consumer products are generally a rev behind the US's. BTW this isn't news, it's been well documented and comes up regularly in Canadian business publications.

      You can point out all of the single examples of Canada having an innovative high-end product (btw whose largest market is generally the US so it's not like they're Canada-only products.) Now show me what I was asking about, consumer products that the average Canadian can use that their US counterpart doesn't (not counting McCains products.) Not flight simulators or CANDU reactors but something one can find in Canada's Futureshop and not US's Circuit City.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    15. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Uh, easy. Broadband. Twice the penetration in the US, 20-30% cheaper, generally available universally within metropolitan areas, will be available in most rural areas soon in Alberta (Calgary is in Alberta).

      Thank you - I'm well aware of where Calgery is. My Mom's Canadian, I've got a half dozen aunts & uncles across the country plus cousins and others, have lived here five years, etc. I've also been to Calgery and was scouted for a job there years ago (I had some unique qualifications.)

      Back to Broadband you failed to note its massively subsidized - not a legitimate comparison. Besides which Broadband is widely (just not as widely) availaible in the States.

      What can I find in FutureShop I can't find in Circuit City? What consumer service is in Canada but not the US?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    16. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      First of all, it's obvious that you haven't actually attended the schools here.
      No, I didn't. My elementary & primary schooling was in four European nations ending up in the US.

      However many of my peers in their 30's and 40's are natives so I hear about it from them and about their children. I expect half of the issue is that most of the Canadians have no idea how absent religion is from US schools (IMHO a very good thing.)

      While there might be a very cautious religion-and-ethics-around-the-world class or why-the-Crusades-happened unit there is never a representative of a religion on staff as such in a US public school. There is never a religious symbol on the school building or inside. There is never any connection between Church & State in public schools however much some may wish otherwise.

      This is not and has not been the case in Canada. While it's not universal it is true for the majority of the population. As noted it is common in Ontario, Quebec and the Maritimes, also historically amongst the First Nations folks (or the residental schools were run by ???)

      Its all very nice that the classes you attended weren't coericive and really irrelevant whatever view you hold now: The point is that to a US'er considering moving to Canada would find any classes, connections, official state religions bizarre in the extreme.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    17. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Really - then all of my friends with kids buying PC and getting online 'cause they get a kid-in-school rebate from the Provincial government aren't subsidized? This is true in several provinces, I don't know if Alberta is one specifically.

      However, I'm not bashing Canada so stop trying to "defend" it. I could get a job in about any country and having lived in quite a few number so I know what I like: I chose to live in Canada.

      However for J. Random High-Techer considering upping and moving to Canada 'bout all of us US expats. will tell you there are significent differences and lots of trade-offs and they're a hell of a lot deeper the zed-or-zero.

      Back to the topic yes there are lots of products one can pick up in a Circuit City that aren't available in Future Shop. Like I noted wireless Palm, TiVos (non-satellite) and generally most anything else just arrived on the market. GSM phones are now working in many US cities, as did metropolitan wireless (Riccochet.) Often times it will eventually make it to Canada (though not always) but often in the second shipment.

      Don't believe my? Go shopping in a big US electronics store, compare it to back home. I'm back and forth nearly every week; trust me if I want the very latest I'll find it South, not North. This isn't a terrible thing but it is of interest to geeks.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    18. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Ummm, I am pretty sure that both the US and Canada cannot just change their minds about giving out these work permits.
      Um - I know (not "pretty sure") each nation keeps control over this; or don't you recall the visa battles a few years ago? Silly Valley was screaming they were starving, Canadians were lining up six deep to move, it was still a tough deal to swing. This is also true in reverse; I can refer you to several dozen other Americans of my acquaintence who can attest it is not trivial (it seems to be a rule at Canadian cocktail parties that all of the US'ers must be introduced to each other, usually as such.)
      Also, I can never stand the nativist sentiment about trying to keep workers from working in one another's countries, especially countries like Canada and the US.
      Thank you for your opinion; I'm sure it is revelatory to someone and I urge you to make it known to your congress-critter at first oppportunity. However your dream is not the one espoused by many folks who see their jobs and standard of living deeply threatened by non-local labor. Again, I can refer you to several very good friends now living in California who had to battle to get in and are now deeply concerned about their positions being cut and their having to scoot back to Canada.

      Tell me, would you extend to Mexicans the same open-border/open-work policies you'd like to extend to Canadians? How about Germans? Koreans? Afghanastani?

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    19. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Show me proof that a community exists in Canada that has Catholic and Protestant school boards, or a secular school that has crosses all over it. Admission and Enrolment of Students for the 1998-99 School Year
      Photos of crosses will have to wait, I'm off in a few hours for 10 days in Florida. However here's a cite proving dual boards did exist a mere three years ago:
      http://www.meq.gouv.qc.ca/REFORME/info_ref/anglais /number3.htm
      The Québec education system is undergoing the most important reform in its history. On July 1, 1998, the existing Catholic and Protestant school boards will be replaced by new French-language and English-language school boards. The Québec education system is undergoing the most important reform in its history. On July 1, 1998, the existing Catholic and Protestant school boards will be replaced by new French-language and English-language school boards.

      Not today, but certianly while you were of appropriate age if you'd been in their jurisdiction.

      Try gravy on the words, helps them go down better.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    20. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Ah - legal documents.

      The Protestant School Board of Greater Montreal,
      the Greater Quebec School Board, the Lakeshore
      School Board and the Quebec Association of
      Protestant School Boards Appellants

      v.

      The Attorney General of Quebec Respondent

      and

      The Attorney General for Ontario and
      the Attorney General of Newfoundland Interveners

      Goes into great detail over which religious officials get to choose what, all with public funds, also don't neglect the Ontario and Newfoundland bits...

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    21. Re:Canadia by Kwil · · Score: 2

      istartedi wrote:
      Why, oh why, would anybody want to use a debit card?

      and in response, istartedi wrote:
      If you've got a credit card ... [emphasis added]

      The other reason is simple convenience. My paycheque goes straight into my bank account. Most of my bills come out automatically, and those that don't I pay via the 'net. When I go to the store I can pay via credit or debit. So I can go for months without even seeing cash. I never worry about whether I have any or not.

      Typically though, if I find I'm short of cash at the store, I'll use debit and ask them to give me an extra twenty or forty dollars on it. They don't mind since they don't have to deal with the credit-card's 3% cut on it, and then I have a bit of cash on me which I can use for vending machines.

      Now once they wire up the dang chocolate bar machine to the net, I probably won't bother getting cash out at all.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    22. Re:Canadia by maggard · · Score: 2
      Never argued that we don't get as many of the gizmos.. argued that what we get we seem to take up pretty quick.
      Some of your countryfolks disagree about the former, and your government about the latter.
      Of course the company's making the newest gizmos don't sell here first.. we're a smaller market. Big pickings are in the states, plus there's less to deal with there in terms of transport, duties, etc.
      Transports, duties, I think those are pretty much a blip for large importers. Rather I think size of the market and wealth of the market as well as visibility of the market are more important The product hasn't shipped in NA until it has shipped in the US where 99% of the reviewers are as well as the vast majority of the customers. That US'ers have more disposable income is also likely an influence (not an opinion but a standard economic fact.)
      Oh.. and you were looking for household services we had first beyond the debit card? I'm not entirely sure about this, but I think that the house-hold voice-mail/multi-line/caller-id packages were in wide usage here before down in the states.
      Thank you. That was the example I used when I asked for you something other then debit cards. So you're stuck on a third eh?
      As for products, oddly, the water-bed.
      Oh, well there's a massive market, thriving, highly relevant. That was a fad of them in the 70's and early 80's and then...? Are they still a big product in Canada? I really do doubt it.
      But you are right about the one thing, for the absolute newest in geek-toys, you're better off shopping in the states..

      ..but real geeks shop on-line anyway. :)

      Actually when we shop online we have the products shipped to my parent's house in the US and pick them up there on trips (I'm down there at least every month on average.) By the time one jumps through the hoops of retailors who aren't set up to ship internatonially or charge absurd amounts for doing so it often isn't a winning proposition to get stuff sent here. For those that do have Canadian branches the prices aren't all that great generally.

      For example we needed a new webcam recently. The few remaining companies on the market with active development, XP drivers, and high quality image are IBM through a remarketed product & Intel. By the time we figured shipping & tariffs from websites (other then www.ibm.ca's own ridiculous listing) the Maison du IBM in a mall downtown offered the same price. The Intel was the same case, it was available in the local screwdriver shoppes for about what it would have cost to buy & get it shipped from online.

      Love Canada, love LOTS of things about it, live here by choice. But there are trade-offs and consumer technology is one of them.

      I usually figure for products a 6 month lag, for services it can be several years or more. Sometimes it's language, labelling & support issues, other times there's constrained production so why bother selling in Canada before the easy-pickings in the US are supplied, and finally there's just the issue that lots of businesses are US-centric and the Canadian market isn't big enough, wealthy enough, or familier enough to make any effort on.

      BTW I've worked for several software firms over the years where we explicitly DIDN'T sell to Canada. For many countries we had licensees through folks who do nothing but support US software in their domestic markets but Canada - we just blew off. It wasn't any slam on Canada (and certianly not my call) but the folks in charge didn't want to do translations or find bilingual support staff, didn't feel the market was worth the bother it entailed for them. In one case they'd regularly get calls from Canada and would service them but if it came in French "we don't sell in Canada." (True as far as it went, they didn't advertise in explicitly Canadian venues and supposedly refused direct sales to Canada.)

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  53. Washington DC -- not cheap by Spoing · · Score: 3
    Just so the rest of the US (and the world for that matter) realizes. Metro DC is congested with traffic (2nd/3rd? worst in nation), and is not cheap.

    That said, send some jobs over here. We need em!

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  54. Sandhill Rd is the only true "prestige" address by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The rest of the Bay Area is about proximity to talent. The VCs get some juice from having a Sand Hill Rd address, but for the rest of the companies here, there are real tangible benefits.

    How many other places in the country can you place an ad for an esoteric vertical technology and reasonably expect 100 good resumes??

    1. Re:Sandhill Rd is the only true "prestige" address by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

      Well, in that case, people should be willing to move. If there is such a glut of talent as there appears to be, and people are miserable as they say they are, those without families or many ties in the area should be willing to relocate. And I believe they are! There is just a terrible fear that many IT companies have of being anywhere other than Sillicon Valley, and they need to get over it and quickly. People who want to work badly enough will move, especially if they are young and without families of their own yet. Over here on the East Coast there is no shortage of expereinced workers - and plenty of IT companies have had no problems finding the people they need. People need to break out of the Bay Area. it just doesn't make much sense to be there anymore. Companies need to take a long, hard look at their other options and I don't believe they are.

  55. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by csbruce · · Score: 3, Informative

    almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan

    You should manage your money a little better. I make over $80K and pay out only 25% for those items.

  56. Re:What smaller cities dont provide by alen · · Score: 2

    Smaller cities have new movies. Columbus in Georgia had a few really nice theaters and the new movies came out the same time as in NYC and LA. Only thing in NYC and LA are the preview showings 1 week prior to opening. But the ticket prices are cheaper in the smaller towns.

  57. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by csbruce · · Score: 2

    Forget about that $100k US (equivalent) coding position in Ottawa

    So what would be the equivalent when you adjust by cost of living and purchasing-power parity? $100k CA? $90k CA?

  58. FINALLY! by blair1q · · Score: 2

    I've been yelling about this for years.

    There's no reason to be in an expensive place to do this sort of business. It adds nothing to productivity. The only thing it adds is cachet, which only impresses VC's. Hence, what happened.

    The scam is over. Time to get back to work.

    --Blair

  59. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    almost 1/2 your paycheck goes to income tax, employment insurance, and the Canada Pension Plan (which will by dry in 10-20 years)

    In short, you'll always live confortably. But you'll never have that extra money you need.

    only one airline, and man does it suck

    And I believe it's got $4 billion in debts thanks to the government who wanted to boost the competition but failed.

    yeah, ok - it's a little colder

    Not to worry the pollution will take care of heating us up.

    the healthcare system is spiralling downwards due to funding shortages passed onto the provinces from a sneaky federal government that wants to report a "surplus"

    Quebec receives $4.79 billion in fundings out of the $10 billion. For some reason they still complain about money. British Columbia receives like $200 million out of those $10 billions.

    Thanks to those great roads, you'll need a new car every few years.

  60. Re:Price of Living in Canada by csbruce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is because Canada has roughly the same affluence as the poorest state in America.

    That is highly doubtful. Canadians have always had a higher standard of living than Americans, and until just this year, the highest standard in the world (displaced by Denmark, I think). America is barely in the top ten.

    Honestly, so many Canadians don't seem to know how well they have it!

  61. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Lictor · · Score: 2

    >BTW No, and we don't pronounce it "a-boot" Who started that myth?

    You're correct in that we don't pronounce it 'a-boot', but we *do* tend to pronounce 'ou' as a dipthong. The trouble is that when an English speaker who is not accustomed to this phoneme hears it... their brain instinctively maps it on to the closest phoneme that they are accustomed to, which is usually 'oo'.

    There is a cute little article on the historical aspects at: http://www.m-w.com/wftw/00may/052200.htm

  62. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    Better Beer
    I only live a few miles from Canada, but California has the better beer. Sierra Nevada and Anchor Brewing make some of the best beers in the world.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  63. One Other Problem With Quebec by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I found that there's one other major problem with relocating to Quebec. They seem to be very intolerant of outsiders, especially Americans. Every time I've been to Quebec, I was treated very badly, to the point where I decided never to return (things like hotel personnel who spoke English to each other, but when I approached they would only speak French to me, and waiters who ignored me after they discovered from my accent that I was American). Several colleagues of mine were confronted with the same issues. I had no such problems in Toronto.

    Virg

    1. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      It's quite circular. They are treated like shit (frogs, frenchies, made fun of for being drunks, terrible drivers, cultural 'extremeists' .. ) by the Anglophone community, and so they vice-versa it. By this point, its pointless to argue who started it, but just be aware that they are treated very poorly by the english speaking communities in Canada.

      It makes sense here. English speaking Canada seems like its in a rush to dump its own heritage and become, for all intents and purposes, culturally American. The French have AMAZING culture, music, art, etc, so they have every right to try and protect it, but it does tend to end up in inter-cultural tension.

      Oh well. I just hope you can appreciate that Canada treats the francophone community in the same way they treated you. I certainly am not condoning your treatment, but the really do get no respect, despite being on the leading edge of many of the cultural movements that eventually get popularized in the english culture. I can understand the source of their frusteration ..

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Our Quebecois only imagine that they're treated like shit.

      Truth is that money flows from other provinces into Quebec's coffers. I just *love* paying to have them treat me like shit.

      Treated poorly by English Canada? Fuck sakes, they have *no* idea just how endlessly patient and tolerant we've been.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:One Other Problem With Quebec by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Quebec periodically holds votes on splitting from Canada. The last few times it has been real close. If this measure would pass it could lead to all kinds of economic problems (currency, import/export regulations) and Canada would be divided into 3 parts with 2 governments (east, west and Quebec). (big negative!).
      The USA is separated in two (the other part being Alaska) by Canada running in the middle, so what is the problem????
      Some people have commented on the freindliness of the French speakers. I think in Montreal, the people are more bilingual and friendly to English speaking tourists (especially if you are respectful). Outside of Montreal, I think they aren't so fond of tourists (but I could be wrong. I feel that a long term resident in any country or city ought to make an attempt to speak the local language. There may be some justification for some irritation over long term residents who refuse to try to speak French. (neutral, maybe slightly negative).
      Perhaps it is the yankee's assumption that everyone in the world speaks english and refusal to recognize that the opposite is true?
      Montreal is one of the most international cities I have ever been to (very diverse range of ethnic groups live there). (could be a big plus! I wonder about racial tensions though). It seems safe, but I went as a tourist. Residents may feel differently.
      As a 40 year resident, I haven't seen racial tensions. Racism just isn't in the french culture like it is in the anglo-saxon.

      And having been in the receiving end of racism for so long (the french in Canada are treated just like the blacks are in the US) does wonder in making sure you're not racist.

      When the klu-klux-klan tried to setup shop in Montréal some 12 years ago, the neighbours routed them out with baseball bats and generous kicks in the ass. They vanished under the rock they crawled from, never to be seen again...

      What few racial tensions there are more likely to come from immigrants who have been told by the federal government that Québec is english and are suddenly surprised, when they arrive, to find out that it is french.

      And other racial tensions come from the ineptness of the federal government immigration policies who will do blatantly stupid things like house a boatload of turkish refugees in a predominantly greek neighbourhood; in that case, the ethnic tensions are strictly constrained within the ethnic communities...

      Otherwise, for the french it is considered good to date someone who is of a different race, but, again, the whites find themselves discriminated against by the immigrants... (It's **HARD** to date orientals!!!!)

      I don't know about the elementary/secondary education system and other important aspects of Montreal. Perhaps someone who has grown up there or lived there could comm
      School is absolutely *free* until college, and then college is dirt-cheap (on the order of $800-$1200 per semester) for top-notch universities (does the name "Mc-Gill" rings a bell?).

      You can become a medical doctor for less than $50,000 (and I'm not talking US dollars)...

  64. IT company vs. employee location paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    one thing that many have noticed is the very large number of employees that are unhappy with many locations of IT companies. While telecommuting has provided a very good solution to some of these, the issue has not been addressed for the company at large, and appears as if many decision makers are afraid of finding out the true number of unhappy employers. (Note that this does include those who want to telecommute but can't because of the company's limit or lack of telecommuting slots, or perhaps a technological issue (connectivity, security, etc))

    The question that needs to be asked is: "Why does an entire company need to be 'near the business'?" I have personally never heard a good answer to this, considering the facts presented. Many 'reasons' too be located in the center of activity are not mutually exclusive with reasons not to be, or perhaps are simply overruled by basic givens of the situation at large and past performance. As an example, take a large IT company that claims that they must be in the center of the business, like in the DC area, more specifically in a dense concrete jungle of bad traffic and long commutes to work (long time, not really distance) because of COL prices in the area. In reality, that IT company most likely does more work outside the area it is housed in (perhaps most of it international). Perhaps even there are other of that company's locations that are distant, yet those distant locations often are the ones with the business that is in the same area as this business location. That makes no sense really, but it does happen quite frequently. When you look at government contracts (the stated reason for a DC location normally) you find that the actual work is done far away and with DoD often overseas. You end up with the realization soon that it apparently does not matter at all where you are located on the actual productivity side of things. However, there is a need for marketing types and liason types to be near the equivelent customer types like that. Yet again, reality is much different then this, as most companies house a significant portion of customer interaction personnel in locations far away from the customer.

    Perhaps it is just another example of an initial good idea not having critical thought applied to it (not thought through) coupled with inefficient processes, incompetent decision makers and confused middle management.

    So the real lessons... the long term lessons should be looked at here in detail. Moving a large company to another location is not cheap by any means. Add to that the initial cost that drove them away, and sprinkle on top the very real possibility that the same situation will happen again in the new location, and you are left with a nice recipe for disaster. No number of degrees, powerpoint slides, meetings, fancy talking, buzz words or that typical management pseudo-busy pacing is going to change that. (pseudo-busy pacing referring to when they think that ANY work, regardless of efficiency and relevancy to the needed work is performed just to say 'yeah we did something', much like a mouse in a wheel)

    A smart business person will not get so wrapped up in desires that they only look at red tape policies and not real results. Company picnics and cool looking golf shirts will not keep employees happy, especially if they feel that their decision makers are more interested in tricking and manipulating their employees (through picnics, shirts and other false moral raisers). Most employees at non management levels I have ever interacted with where indeed interested in moving forward and producing good work. It is only when treated like thieves and criminals that they began to exhibit the complacent and lackadasical attitude that the managers seemed to 'expect'. I am thinking that decision makers need to stop following the crowd so much. If a company decides to make a medium sized campus out in 'the boonies' and it works well, I fully expect that the brainless sheep of many other companies would mimic this, while not trully understanding the real reasons, motivations and desires of the remote location move in the first place. next thing you see will be a very popular trend to open up massive campuses in the middle of farm country, and added to that you will find they stupidly flock together (like sheep) in the same locations, creating more big cities and the same problem that caused the employees to leave in the first place. (thus resulting in the 'new move')

    its not that hard people, you just gotta stop worshiping processes and use your brain.

  65. Re:South Carolina!!! by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    * Detractors:
    * Well, it is South Carolina
    * Convincing your staff to move here


    I've lived in South Carolina for most of my life and I wouldn't say it's a bad place to live and actually right now I'd much rather be there than here in colorado where it's -20 with the wind chill :). The only real detractor I would say is the hurricanes, but california has earthquakes, so pick your poison. However, if you go too far outside of the main cities, you have to deal with hicks and rednecks. Charleston is really pretty and the coast has some nice beaches, and I would say it's a pretty good place to live.

    On a side note, you will have to get used to a few cultural differences: "ya'll damn yankies better no be comin' don her and talk 'bout no 'civil war', ain't been no 'civil war', ya'll must mean da 'war o' nothern agression'!"

  66. But you missed... by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2
    Supply of workers. If you go to Nowheresville because rent is cheap (because there is no existing high-tech to drive up prices), you are going to find that there aren't any high-tech people there to hire. You are going to have to hire them from elsewhere, and you are going to have to pay BIG relocation bonuses. Then you have the problem of hiring people who are going to look at the locale and see that moving there gives them absolutely zero options if they decide they don't like working for you. The result is that you are not going to get many takers unless you spend a lot of money. Poof! go your savings.

    It's probably going to be a lot easier for companies to move a relatively short distance, like SF to Sacramento. This gives the workers a lot more options if they decide to reconsider in the short term, and the influx of high-tech companies means that the deficit of employment options is going down rapidly.

  67. NO!!! by Fnord · · Score: 2

    I just escaped DC last year. I grew up in that pit of a city and last year successfully escaped to a job in Seattle (a really great place to live if anyone is interested). Well, two months ago I got laid off and now I'm watching all the jobs here slowly dissapear and companies are moving away one by one. And where are they moving to? ARGH! I really don't want to go back to DC......

    1. Re:NO!!! by ainsoph · · Score: 2

      Three cheers for being jobless in seattle! woop woop hurrah!

  68. COst of business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You diseased creatures are so obvlivious to the truth, you can't even see the folly of your own unsustainable lifestyle.

    It doesn't matter where you relocate, if all you do once you get there is build build build, grow grow grow. You have the same effect on the local enonomy, no matter what part of the world you are in. An influx of highly paid workers causes the existing local markets to realize they can demand and get higher prices for what they are selling - be it houses, rent, gasoline, groceries, you name it. Yeah I just paid 450 thousand for a house that would sell for 95 thousand tops in Tucumare NM. So what. THe company I work at pays me enough to afford it. The (former) owner of the house knows this, so he asks as much as possible for the place, knowing I have no choice but to pay it. What else is he going to do, give me a break and let me have it for $1.98 just because I'm such a nice guy? That's not the way you creatures operate. It's not in your nature. It's not the way your brains work.

    Meanwhile, there aren't enough existing houses to support the mass migration into the area, so local landowners and developers take advantage of the situation by doing what they do best: raping the land, building condo's and townhouses piled on top of each other so closely you can hear your neighbors chewing their Wheaties at the breakfast table in the morning. But does the expansion of available housing cause prices to fall? Nope! The rest of the community hops on board, riding on the coattails, milking it for all it's worth.

    So where does it end, guys? WHen there is absolutely NO MORE LAND available to build new houses and Big Box malls? When we all make 6 million dollars a year, and cracker-box houses cost 4.5 million each, and cars cost 125 thousand used, and your cable TV/broadband bill is 3000 dollars a month?

    Cost of business, indeed.
    You figure it out.

  69. Re:baltimore city by csbruce · · Score: 2

    The biggest knock against progress in the city is crime, drugs, safety. It is not a safe town with lots of animosity between socio-economic groups in addition to the blind rage associated w/abject poverty. the school system is absolutely horrid.

    But somehow Baltimore is still more attractive than Canada?

  70. I herd of dat lectricity tang, but it be evil! by DarND · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't let go of that attitude and make sure to tell all your friends about how bad it was in ND.
    Make sure you mention the horrible things like wide open plains, warm summers, clean air, stable jobs, low crime rate, friendly people and low cost of living. Qwest provides service including DSL for the Fargo area. If you don't like DSL, go with a cable modem because yes we have those too. Fargo also has wireless access from Monet. Dickinson and the surrounding towns have Consolidated Communications which provides DSL and cable modems as well. I'm not exactly sure where you were, but the things you're describing are a complete opposite of what I've experienced.

    Now after saying that... Stay out cause we don't want no strangers round these parts! Ma fetch me mah shotgun!

  71. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

    And I believe it's got $4 billion in debts thanks to the government who wanted to boost the competition but failed.

    No, it's got $4b in debts because they would rather compete EVERYWHERE than where the money is. They run routes at 10% capaticy just because other airlines run them. They don't realize that not running a plane is cheaper than running it for two people (though it's nice to be able to get seat upgrades when First Class is empty).

    The government allowing competition is great, but Air Canada forgets that it's not the only player in town. It needs to clean up its act, focus more on the profitable routes, and start cutting out waste.

    --Dan

  72. Re:Amazing. Negative putz strikes again. by TurboRoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For all intents and purposes Norman does not exist as a city past E 24th or past W 48th which is exactly 8 miles. Main street itself is only about 6 miles long. Also.. for all intents and purposes Norman does not exist south of Imhoff road, or north past Rock Creek Road.. Which is 4 miles. Keep in mind the city is kind of on a slant going from northwest to southeast... The city is growing fast tho, it used to not exist north of Robinson.

    Just because other areas are labled as a city doesn't mean a lot if no one actually lives out there. Oklahoma City is the second largest city land wise in the nation if you look at that type of figure. (If you actually look at the populated areas of Oklahoma City, it isn't very big).

    I never said it was crowded. I just used to deliver flowers for a flower shop in Norman when I was 17, "The Norman Floral and Gift Gallery" across the street from Norman High.

    The city planners who worked on Norman are total morans. It is insane to try and make deliveries through the city. Seriously, we had to turn down deliveries any time there was a game day. Even on a normal day, it takes HOURS to make a few deliviers mixed in that 8x4 mile city. Most streets are 25mph, traffic lights are placed every 20 feet down lindsey, pedestrian traffic gets in the way (especially down by OU).

    My argument is simple, even tho Norman is small, hardly populated, and not well known. It really feels like you are in a big crowded city due to the lack of planning.

    It took me just as long to travel to my girlfriends house that was 3 miles away from my work in Norman.. as it currently takes me to travel the 10 miles to work I drive in Oklahoma City, no highway just city streets.

    Ohh, and don't call people names when you are logged in as an AC. :)

  73. Montreal by pmancini · · Score: 2

    Actually Montreal is a world class city. It is clean, beautiful and has the best resturants and strip clubs I have ever been to. ;-)

    I highly recommend the city to visit. Also, they party much harder there than say Boston or even Nashville where I currently make my home. Nashville is cheap to live in and has a small but growing high-tech sector. Sprint made the big jump to Kansas City and a small leap to Nashville from Chicago. It's the right thing to do, in my opinion. Spread the wealth I say.

  74. Re:aboot by agallagh42 · · Score: 2

    Maybe if you're in Newfoundland. The maritime provinces are the only places up here where people talk funny. The rest of us talk like news anchors. Every wonder why most of the big network news guys are canadian? No accent, none, we speak like the dictionary.

    --
    Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  75. Supply and Demand by pinkUZI · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Calm down everyone!
    This is an age old cycle. High demand for realestate in SF = higher prices being charged for rent. Now that demand is down the prices are going to fall and new tenants will go there.
    Nothing to worry about so long as the government stays out of it and doesn't do something stupid with rentals like they did with utilities.

    --
    You are receiving this message because your browser supports Slashdot Sigs and you have Slashdot Sigs enabled.
  76. Canada's looking real good by maxpublic · · Score: 2

    Hey, now I can not only retain some of my basic human rights - but I can get a job too! Just how hard is it to become a Canadian citizen, eh?

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  77. Skilled Workers by Rice-Pudding · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They claim that a city will do well if they install a broadband communications network that connects citizens, local businesses and the global marketplace.

    Sure, but there is another factor that is important for high-tech companies that Gartner is missing: skilled workers.

    I work for a company that has one of its offices in Edmonton, AB, Canada. Why Edmonton? Let's see:
    • Canadian dollar paychecks for employees
    • cheaper costs for business infrastructure
    • University of Alberta in Edmonton provides quality engineering talent.
    • And yes, high-speed internet.


    The third point there is very important. Yes, it is possible to attract SV engineers to Edmonton, but it takes a *lot* of effort and incentive. One major problem is that a SV engineer may sell a bungalow for $600,000 USD. In Edmonton, you can get a mansion for $200,000 USD; there are no houses to be bought for $600K. So the SV engineer suddenly has $400K to pay taxes on.

    So, the vast majority of people in R&D are local-area Canadians.
  78. My company did this! by justinstreufert · · Score: 2, Informative
    The company I work for moved from posh, high-tech Northern Virginia to York, PA. York is a sad, sad city. Almost everyone is white, almost no one has an open mind and the main attractions are the Harley Davidson factory and the Hooters. Culinary choices range from Arby's to Old Country Buffet. The local strip mall is almost devoid of actual places to buy anything.

    Needless to say, I live 2 hours away and telecommute!

    The reason they moved there, of course, is that this part of York has extremely poor economics and is being targeted for "growth" by the government. They have established an Official Small Business Bribery Zone and give us tax breaks and free services. Woohoo!

    Justin

    --
    "Why would God give us a waist if we wasn't supposed to rest our pants on it?" - Rev. Roy McDaniels
  79. Northern Iowa by hether · · Score: 2

    My area is trying to promote economic development and the tech sector would do great up here. Take a place that has DSL and T-1s available, plenty of space to build or buildings to take over, a willing community that is eagerly accepting new business and even offering incentives, houses that cost $20-$40k on average, good schools systems, etc. and you have a very alluring place for people to come work. A local sofware company in Bancroft, IA also has a California branch. They offer their employees the choice of which they want to work at. Lately more have chosen Bancroft - especially those with families. Not as good an option for companies that need quick access to airports and major shipping routes, or for people who really need a good nightlife, but for many software or internet cos it would be great.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:Northern Iowa by hether · · Score: 2

      I just looked a few up to make sure my range was right. It depends on which town you choose. The slightly bigger towns are higher. For $18.5K you can get a two bedroom with CA and hardwood floors on a 60 x 132 lot. Only 800 sq. ft. but still very nice. For $35k you can get an acreage (2.5 acres) 3 bedroom property. If you want to spend a little more, for $70k you can get a 1700sq ft on each level, two fire place, two car garage home. I'd give the links to some of the realtors, but I don't want to slashdot any of them. Just do a search.

      --

      Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  80. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

    The better beer generally considers only the mass market beers, as microbrews are an entirely different ballgame.

    Of course, when you're comparing urine to urine, does it really matter which is better? Molson or Bud, they're both fecking close to water.

    Although, I did actually try a Budweiser last month, and I didn't realize how apt the joke was, when applied to Bud. Molson, at least, looks somewhat orangey-yellow. Bud was pale, pale, PALE straw yellow. I was dumbstruck.

    Of course, I'm also a guiness drinker.

  81. San Francisco's "Housing Farce" by cornflux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For anyone interested in San Francisco's rent situation, you might find these two articles, by Thomas Sowell, to be interesting: The Housing Farce and The Housing Farce, Part II.

  82. Dallas Fort Worth Cheap by Mittermeyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of the high-tech growth in the DFW area has been fueled by cheap land and a corresponding cheap workforce. A $300,000 two-bedroom cramped house in CA gets you near mansions here. In addition there are quite a few workers here dumped by the dotcom/telecom bust that drive hiring prices down. Plenty of electrical power here. There is no personal income tax in Texas, a real selling point for a million-plus executive looking to shelter his nest egg. Finally Texas cities often give tax breaks like depressed Southern states to lure business here.

    That's not to say that price is the only factor. For instance until the last fifteen years DFW didn't really have enough of the highly specialized building contractors that make computer room sites. That's something you're not going to get everywhere.

    Also proximity to what counts drives many location moves. DFW probably lost getting the Boeing HQ because it was not as close to Washington DC as Chicago (since Boeing business is largely driven by what happens with the DOD and FAA), and I suspect because of the lack of world-class four-year colleges and cultural opportunities.

    For folks who live for SanFran it will be irreplacable. But for bottom-line folks other locales beckon.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  83. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by csbruce · · Score: 2

    And I believe it's got $4 billion in debts thanks to the government who wanted to boost the competition but failed.

    My understanding is that Air Canada negotiated hefty deals with its unions and suppliers when it thought it would own the sky, but then the industry went into decline and then Sept. 11th happened.

  84. Hawaii! (With Proper Formatting!) by Epsas · · Score: 2, Informative

    Companies are finally feeling the budget pinch caused by doing business in NYC, Seattle or San Fran? Come to your senses and move to Hawaii!

    Hawaii has a warm, beautiful climate and some of the best karma on the planet. Unlike other parts of the USA, the people on the islands are genuinely kind-hearted and friendly to each other. - As long as you pack a sense of common decency along with your swimming trunks you will be treated as Ohana.

    The cost-of-living is not as extreme as popular legend would demand - there are many people who comfortably survive here making less than $30K a year. Think of what your high-caliber IT wage can do here. Think of how much more value your expensive IT employees will find in their paycheck. And yes, there is bandwidth and lots of it.

    A rich social ecology of Native, Asian, Pacific and European culture exists here. Not only is the food great (the best sushi in the US), but the level of cultural diversity is intoxicating to the average Western mind. There's nothing like walking through the park in the morning and passing by a group of Chinese seniors moving through their Tai-Chi exercises, and strolling back through it in the evening to the sounds of a practicing Samoan choir.

    There is a small, but growing, technical community in the islands - which has it's plusses: The technical community that does exist is small, active and very supportive of each other. Most Importantly, people don't yawn when you tell them that you program for a living. :)

    the moment, The Hawaiian economy is economically addicted to the Military and Tourism. Without solid alternative industries, the islands will become stagnant with the transient natures of it's current economic benefactors. - The politicians of Hawaii are slowly coming to their senses about this, and are starting to listen to reason instead of to their campaign contributions.

    Because of this, there has never been a better time to move your venture to Hawaii. The govmn't of the islands are actively seeking Tech Companies to move to the Islands, and provide great financial incentives to businesses wishing to migrate and to the entrepeneurs willing to build here. There has never been a better time to move your venture to "paradise."

    -- Apologies to the Hawaiian Sovereignty People who may be reading this...

  85. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by ari{Dal} · · Score: 2, Informative
    Disadvantages

    lack of world class cities and attractions

    I don't know what Canadian cities you've been visiting...but they're obviously different from where I've been! Have you ever been to Montreal? It's like a bit of Paris (the good bits.. not the seedy nasty non-showering bits) dropped down into the heart of the country. I'd take a walk down St. Denis or Sherbrooke over New York's Fifth avenue any day. Not to mention the world-class dining, shopping, and the fabulous nightlife..the party doesn't even get STARTED here til 1 AM.


    And did I forget to mention the cheap cost of living (I rent a 4 1/2 - that's a two bedroom for the non-Quebecois - for $450 a month in a prime location), amazing public transportation system, and the caché of coming from one of the most recognized places in the world.


    I won't even get into Vancouver, Ottawa, Toronto, St. John's (Party town!), and all the other great spots in this country.


    Other than that, I must say I agree whole-heartedly! Canada rocks as a place to live.. though the taxes do suck (almost half my bonus went to taxes this year...whimper). But I think the public health care system and low costs of just about everything else more than make up for all that.. yes the salaries are lower, but then again, where in NYC or San Fran are you going to find a decent apartment for under $500 CDN?

    --
    Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
  86. If Canada is so cheap... by dark_panda · · Score: 2

    ... maybe slashdot should move here. No more subscriptions!

    Of course I'm kidding. Silly Americans wouldn't be able to handle the beer and the cold.

    J

  87. Calgary? by dghcasp · · Score: 2
    Funny the article mentions Calgary, Alberta as the lowest cost place to do business... I moved from there a year-or-so ago to Silicon Valley when I realized that I was sick of working for Nortel and that there weren't any other high-tech companies in Calgary to change to...

    Plenty of Oil & Gas work, though - Programmers even get their own office at most of them... Of course this is offset by the fact your whole life is spent trying to figure out new ways to interprit seismic data... booo-ring...

  88. Re:Philadelphia by slykens · · Score: 2
    I live in Philly and think about moving every payday.

    This makes a common point about a lot of cities in Pennsylvania. I live in State College, none of the municipalities here have been able to pass consolidation so we're still a bunch of little governments. I live in Patton Township where my wage tax is 1%, but the borough of State College is 1.8%. One local business (Accuweather) moved to Ferguson Township to escape the borough's business taxes. (Along with building a new building a few years ago, but taxes were a factor as I understand it)

    The point is that a lot of cities/municipalities have higher taxes than those nearby. Whatever you do don't move to Maryland. Not only are taxes higher there but your rights mean nothing to the state government.

    The government in PA and in Pittsburgh has been talking a lot about trying to make Pittsburgh into a tech city to help make up for the problems in the steel industry. PA's state income tax is 2.8%, and sales tax is 6% on non-necessity items. No yearly personal property tax on cars and the like, altho your house will be taxed by the local government. Another poster mentioned the "Small Business Bribery Zones" that the gov't has put in place as well. Basically, you move your business into one of the development zones and pay no state taxes for 10 years. Woo.

  89. Buffalo-Niagara is the place to be! by Quixote · · Score: 2

    You get the best of both worlds in the Buffalo Region.
    You are within short driving distance of fine Canadian establishments (Canadian Ballet, anyone? ;-).
    Good skiing country nearby.
    BioInformatics center just established.

  90. Re:blame canada? by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2

    Trust me, my fellow techies, if you ever move up here, get an apartment or house within two or three minutes walk of a Tim Horton's. You will not regret it.

    Are you saying there's apartments and houses in Canada that are more than two or three minutes walk from a Tim Horton's?

    --

    From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

  91. Re:Price of Living in Canada by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
    Proud to live in the best highest rated city in the best country to do business in the world. (as rated by an american based accounting firm :-)

    I make six figures, and the mortgage on my new 3 bedroom home is about $800 a month.

    Probabally why companies like Ford have moved call centers here, and why companies like Bioware and Quicken have their main offices here.

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  92. Sounds good to me! by Vortran · · Score: 2

    I'd much rather say, "eh?" than say: "EARTHQUAKE!!" Ever since I graduated from college, I've lamented that so many of the bleeding edge technology jobs are on the west coast and I am (happily) stuck in the midwest, ultra-conservative as it is.

    The fact that all of San Francisco and the Bay Area WILL be destroyed by earth quakes is a REAL reason that I haven't moved there.

    If you think the destruction of the WTC hurt US economy, wait until Silicon Valley plunges into the Pacific Ocean. Maybe people over there are finally saying to themselves, "Gee.. we're on a fault here. Everything is super expensive - epsecially housing. This sucks. See ya!"

    I know some folks who had a house in San Jose. They sold it for over $800,000. They moved to South Carolina, bought a house just a tad smaller for under $100,000 and are enjoying retirement with the remainder.

    "Surf's up, dude!"

    ...eh?

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
  93. Re:Price of Living in Canada by rudedog · · Score: 2

    Just to pick a nit, Bioware is located in Canada because that's where the founders lived. There was no concious decision to move to Canada.

  94. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    Of course, I'm also a guiness drinker.

    Just to nitpick, drink more before you call yourself a guinness drinker so you can spell it right.

    Another great expression:
    Ni neart go Guinness!
    (Guinness for Strength!)

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  95. Re:Dallas or Houston by jsmith_250 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live in Houston and love it. No state icome tax, and the cost of living is really low.

  96. Re:Bioware by Wintermancer · · Score: 2

    Funny.

    Sure they grew up here. But they didn't have to stay here, especially once they hit it big. Maybe it's something else....nah.

    Please, please don't move here. It's very cold, the residents are more surly than hung-over Texan and the women are large-boned and ugly.

  97. Re:Excellent summary (from an expat) by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    Oh please. Poor you for tying happiness to salary. Cry me a river.

    My stress comes from the stupid requirements that are made and inept management. Actually, it's pretty much because the market asks for the impossible.

    I'll admit that techies move onto management to get salaries and less stress, but hey, no wonder management in the IT industry blows so badly.

    I've worked in this industry for 5 years, and I can tell you that I'd rather be a stressed worker doing what I enjoy rather than put myself in the line-of-fire that is management. I can't think of an easier way to get people to start disliking me.

    >Expensive needs to off-set said Stress?

    Again, sorry you equate the quest for material gain as a means of avoiding stress. Me, at the end of the day, I give the middle finger to the market, recognize that all this shit isn't that important, and abjectly refuse to comprimise my happiness for the sake of a job.

    You'd be amazed at how many managers cant say a freaking thing once you've owned a code base for a year or so, and you put your foot down when your abilities are being abused like some inhuman swiss army knife. Fuck em. If their business plan can't work without me taking it up the ass, it's a lousy business plan, and they were doomed to fail from the beginning.

    It's you who feels that just getting some more DVDS, or skydiving more, or whatever you seem to think is the solution for stress, doesn't seem to be work.

    Money doesn't give me happiness. Doing what I enjoy doing, and not compromising my working conditions is what kicks ass. Working in inhuman conditions does not justify asking for higher wages - it just makes you a sucker for working like that.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  98. Re:Bioware by rudedog · · Score: 2

    Actually, I was born in Edmonton, raised in Fort Saskatchewan, Red Deer, and Rimbey, moved back to Edmonton and and lived there for 15 years before moving to Seattle. As for the women, that's where I met my wife, so you should watch your tongue :-)

    The only reason I wouldn't move back to Edmonton is because of the cold. Here in Seattle, the magnolia tree in our courtyard started to bud yesterday :-)

  99. Re:Bioware by Wintermancer · · Score: 2

    Actually, I was born in Edmonton, raised in Fort Saskatchewan, Red Deer, and Rimbey, moved back to Edmonton and and lived there for 15 years before moving to Seattle. As for the women, that's where I met my wife, so you should watch your tongue :-)

    Born here. Raised here. Met wife here. Live and work here.

    Not complaints here! ;-)

  100. Diversity and Tolerance are in Montreal by maggard · · Score: 2
    San Francisco and Silicon Valley has an enormous critical mass of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/Trans people, and Nerds. The counter-culture continues to thrive here.
    Consider Montreal.

    Great enormous gay community, widespread acceptance, far more liberal in many ways then any US city, arguably more/better nightlife then SF, equally great food, much cheaper cost of living, safer streets. Beautiful people who really appreciate the better things life has to offer. Walk down Rue St. Denis or St. Lauraunt or du Gai Village on Ste. Catherine on a warm summer night and tell me it can be any better (ok - not as great today with the snow.)

    Yes there's the whole French/English issue but that's primarily political and almost never personal. In 5 years of living here in both a samll Francophone farming community and then on the East side of Montreal (Ahuntsic) I've had it brought up twice, both by drunks.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  101. GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3
    Don't underestimate the feeling of abuse you will suffer when you pay the combined GST/PST on most anything you purchase. The above author writes it off, but it really is a bitch. Remember you get this tax on big ticket items as well, and that is where it gets really painful.

    Yes, California is the most expensive state to live in, but moving to Canada is hardly an improvement. You are better off moving to a low-tax/no-tax state.

    1. Re:GST/PST is RAPE, it must be said by FFFish · · Score: 2

      You want to get informed about the real costs of taxation.

      Start with something from the CATO Institute. You can find detailed and accurate accounts of the "hidden" taxation you're subjected to. In particular, the amount the government garnishes off your wages by forcing the employer to cough up money for employing you.

      Then check out this Sales Tax Rate table. There are only five states that don't charge a sales tax. All others do: it may be a hidden tax. And I'm not entirely sure that the five oddballs aren't using some sort of skullduggery to tax the wholesale sale of merchandise; if so, that tax just gets passed on down to you, the consumer.

      In Canada, at least, those taxes are up front and in the open, so that we know what the amount is and whether it gets changed. If the tax were hidden, it could go up and we'd never be told.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  102. ... and the response from The South... by wumingzi · · Score: 2
    i like the "even Canada" statement. said as if it were completely outrageous. "even timbucktwo..."

    Going abroad is a big deal for a company, even if "abroad" just means to Canada. It's like Vincent Vega said in Pulp Fiction. "Everything's just a little different over there". New legal system, new patent regime, different accounting standards, blah blah blah.

    From a worker's point of view, it's hard to say. I live in Seattle. I go to Vancouver pretty frequently. I think it is one of the world's great cities. Unfortunately, there's a pretty big disjoint between the cost of living and the salaries. Take housing. Vancouver property is similar in real dollar costs to Seattle, while salaries are merely similar in that a tech professional who makes US$n per year will probably also be paid C$n in Vancouver. At the same time, you will be taxed rather heavily.

    A techie can make a good living in either place, but even with the quality of services in Canada (health care, education, etc.) it's hard to make the numbers add up.

    and i see the "baren glacier as soon as you hit the border" misconception is still alive and well. Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, and others are massive metropolatin centers with similar climate to many US cities. in Vancouver it rarely freezes and typically has winter temperatures in the mid-high 40's. (that's around 8degC... eh?)

    There isn't a huge glacier at the 49th parallel? How d'y'all keep yer igloos cold all year then?

    Calgary has a climate similar to Chicago I suppose. I never understood folks who lived there either. The salary:cost-of-living ratio is better in Calgary, but the problem is... you're in Calgary.

    j.

    1. Re:... and the response from The South... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Why would Calgary have a climate anything like Chicago? They're separated by a couple thousand miles or so. One's on a gigantic lake; the other is tucked up against the mountain foothills. Chicago gets purely evil winters. Calgary gets chinooks--basically, one-day summers in the middle of winter. Calgary doesn't have the humidity of Chicago, so it never feels as unbearably hot nor unbearably cold as Chicago.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  103. Re:Philadelphia by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    I wholeheartedly agree with you, the wage tax FUCKING SUCKS. It's about a $2000 chunk out of my ass every year. My last employer didn't deduct it automatically, so I had to pay it myself quarterly. Writing a $500 check to the city every three months was like passing a kidney stone.

    If moving wasn't such a huge hassle, and if I didn't already own my current house, I'd move to just outside the city limits in a heartbeat and enjoy the thousands of dollars in wage tax and car insurance savings.

    ~Philly

  104. Why the coast? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

    Why the coast? A colleague just sent me a miserere complaining about the snow and cold in St. Louis. Here on the coast, it's sunny and clear.

    Why the coast? The air is so clean I can see three mountain ranges from my office and one of them is across some 50 miles of ocean.

    Why the coast? If I walk down the street with a woman who isn't the same race as I am, I don't get a second look.

    Why the coast? I was standing in a grocery store checkout line and overheard 7 different languages. With those speakers come different perspectives and that makes for some really interesting dinner conversations.

    Why the coast? Did I mention the physical beauty of the place? This country is unbelievably gorgeous and varied. We've got ocean and mountains right next to each other.

    Why the coast? John Steinbeck called this country Eden and he wasn't too far off the mark.

    That's why the coast.

    1. Re:Why the coast? by C.+Mattix · · Score: 2

      Why not the coast? Rolling blackouts.

      Why not the coast? Cost of 1000ft^2 apt about 1K more then in Indiana.

      Why not the coast? Unless you are from the area, large distance from family.

      Why not the coast? Cost of living.

      Why not the coast? 1.5 hour commutes.

      Why not the coast? Earthquakes.

      I live in Indiana. I like Indiana. I like seasons.

      Oh. .and the 7 different language thing happens here too.

  105. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

    Fair enough, I always seem to typo that.

    The truly ironic thing? I work in the Guinness Tower in Vancouver, BC. I shit you not.

  106. Re:Welcome to Canada, folks ... (written by a Canu by Xerithane · · Score: 2

    That is absolutely hilarious man. Any job openings for a UNIX coder (C preferably, but PHP/Perl will do) -- I would give my last pint to be able to have that on my business card. At least until I went to buy more.

    --
    Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  107. Louisville is GREAT by smagruder · · Score: 2

    I'm also a software developer born-and-raised and currently living in Louisville, KY. Businesses and people across the USA need to stop thinking of Louisville as a "hick town"--I wildly assure you that IT IS NOT. As a former resident of upstate NY, Charlotte, NC and the SF bay area, I attest that Louisville is a modern city with very upstanding people and lots of things to do for a city its size (and it isn't so small -- 1 million in the metro area!).

    Louisville has vibrant arts, sports, architecture, politics, business, attractions and nightspots and a very fun two-week festival in April/May surrounding the Kentucky Derby (including "Thunder Over Louisville", the nation's largest air power and fireworks show). And if that isn't enough, the University of Louisville includes a very good school of engineering.

    Of course, the most important aspect of Louisville is her people, among the friendliest you'll ever run into.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  108. San Francisco is just the beginning by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The exodus from SF is the beginning of a larger trend. India graduates nearly 40,000 highly qualified engineers *every year*. China, probably four times that, and climbing. The Law of Lowest Wages, combined with increasing commodification of technology will drive many companies out of the US entirely within the next dozen years. Roughly 46% of our working population works directly or indirectly with technology. Think about what boardroon executives probably already considering as they make plans for future capital and physical investment. Capital is 'on the wire'. Domestic fealty just doesn't cut it for public corporations; not in a world where profit is king. There will still be strong technology innovation coming out of the U.S. for many years to come. However, much of the implementation of that innovation will not necessarily have to be performed by people here in the States. We're facing the very beginning of a huge social displacement problem. Look at the San Francisco phenomenon as a micro-trend that will soon snowball. Our domestic planners (an oxymoron?) had better start preparing for this and look for ways to either keep people fully employed, or actively interested in a slowed-down version of the 'good life', or we're looking for real trouble down the road.

  109. The Land Where Nobody Leaves or Comes To by piecewise · · Score: 2

    Come, High Tech companies! Move to the land where nobody leaves from or goes to!

    I'm talking about a city with sports teams that *almost* make it, only to screw it all up!

    I'm talking about a city where race crimes are committed almost simply for ole' time's sake!

    I'm talking about a city whose population hasn't moved in some 2,391 years!

    I'm talking about a city who hasn't added a Congressman since the 20's!

    I'm talking about the best damn city in the world -- one that can fool you with its dirty slums and its beautiful million dollar homes, with its crappy neighborhood electronics stores and its massive skyline.

    I'm talking about Philadelphia. City of Brotherly Love. (Well, the brothers sure do love each other, but the white guys are starting to realize how wimpy and nerdy they are... [and I'm one of them;) ])

    Ahh, Philly. A place with state-controlled failing schools and an idiot mayor, who won by .6% (if you include the Buchanan votes from Florida that they threw in and counted as his...).

    Beautiful, Philly. Where the famous Philly Cheese Steak has produced millions upon millions of added dollars... as well as millions upon millions of added pounds for the police.

    Amazing Philly. Featuring one of the most shameless newspapers in the country -- who, during the Republican National Convention, used a dark, low-contrast picture of Philly's skyline that said with text, "It's been great!" -- instead of a beautiful color shot of all the red white and blue balloons falling around the then-governor.

    My city -- Philly.

    On second thought... stay away, High Tech firms. I LIKE my city just the way it is.

    ...Just thank God I live an hour away in the burbs!

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  110. How about Idaho? by HardCase · · Score: 2
    The largest manufacturer of DRAM in the world (according to de Dios) is located in Boise, Idaho. And guess what? The pay is competitive, from operators to engineers.


    Oh yeah, and nobody here speaks with a drawl or says "eh".


    And spuds are tasty!


    -h-

  111. Wow. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I love how Canada is referred to as some rural backwater nation....

    But seriously.

    Isn't this what we always talk about in the tech world? Telecommuting? If a person can work from home, why can't a company work from the boonies?

    The country has benefits over the city.. I once had teh opportunity to work at a high-tech startup in a beautiful small canadian town on a lake in BC.

    Now... THAT was perfect. Sure, eventually the office moved to a major center for more political reasons than anything.... but it was excellent. *especially* for those with families.

    No city hassles. Fishing. Community.. etcetera... and the high tech job you like.

  112. Tax Advantages in Canada by helleman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm surprised no one has given one of the biggest reasons why multinationals have moved their R&D operations from the US to Canada - and that is the huge tax breaks the Canadian government makes to companies that do R&D.
    Up to 40% of an engineers salary is paid by the Canadian government!!
    Check out The Washington Business Journal for just one idea of why a company might want to move expensive R&D sites from the US to the great white north.

  113. Re:Kanata by MSBob · · Score: 2
    With apologies to the people of Bathurst, NB. It must be said we aren't ALL miners, mill workers and "tax leeches". Though I doubt many Bathurstians are /.ers...

    Well how about a Saint Johnner, eh?

    Talk about dull towns in the maritimes... Shit even Fredericton has more entertainment qualities than Saint John. And here you either work for the Irvings or you don't work at all. Sad but true. Can't beat the cost of living though.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  114. sounds like oregon by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

    #50 for economic growth in the country - I can believe it too - especially when a former unix/windows sys admin is applying for a hotel desk job and 20 people show up to apply :(. I'm sure they ended up with the best hotel desk clerk on earth - maybe not.

  115. Re:Dallas or Houston by ScumBiker · · Score: 2

    Just as a comparison, we're buying a newer (4 year old) house just outside of Madison, WI. It's 2200 square feet, the lot is 110'x500' (yep, damn huge lot) 3/4 of which is tree covered. We're paying $199,100 for the house and expect to pay $5000 per year property tax. Did I mention I finally get a 2 car garage? WOOHOO! A place to store motorcycles! Oh yea, there's a house attached to the garage...

    Ya know, Wisconsin is overlooked by a lot of companies. Where do you think Cray is from? Yes, I know Cray is tanking. They made some dumb business moves. That doesn't mean that their tech isnt' any good though. There's a lot of smart people here with decent wages. Outside of Madison and Milwaukee, it's real cheap to live. The house I was talking about before could probably be had in La Crosse for $110k or so.

    --
    --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  116. Re:Diversity and Tolerance are why the Bay Area wi by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    San Francisco and Silicon Valley has an enormous critical mass of Gay/Lesbian/Bi/Trans people, and Nerds. The counter-culture continues to thrive here.
    Ditto for Montréal. After all, that's where MafiaBoy lives...
  117. Hey Now by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    I never said that Americans don't talk funny, or hear funny, for that matter. Being from the Beantown area myself, I am the first to say that we sound odd to those not in the area, and also to say that writing the Canadian "about" is difficualt to do. "Aboot" is as close as the written word can really come without a footnote.

    Also, Bostoners don't say the word "car". They say the word "cah" and the rest of the nation spells it wrong.8)

    Virg

  118. Re:it isn't a union issue.... by csbruce · · Score: 2

    the unemployment rate in Toronto was a "low" 7.5 percent, whereas it peaked at an "outrageous" 6 percent in Silicon Valley.

    I have no specific knowledge about why the unemployment rate is structurally higher in Canada, but I would tend to suspect that it has more to do with Canada being more generous with welfare.

    American techs might be less quick to condemn their northern counterparts if they knew how horribly the economy was managed up here....

    My information is that Canada has probably the best-managed economy in the world. Not that I would expect a Canadian to believe that!