Slashdot Mirror


Conductive Concrete Offers Building Security

zdburke writes: "In a slightly different spin on the electromagnet-protected server room in Stephenson's Cryptonomicon, the folks at the National Research Council have developed concrete that conducts electricity, or 'percolates,' allowing it to serve as an electromagnetic shield. Current uses lean toward heated loading docks, non-freezing bridges, and grounding large-scale electrical equipment, but the counter-espionage idea is cool. The NYTimes has a brief story, and the folks at UN Omaha have some great pictures. It's not exactly new (it won a Popular Science prize in 1997) but it's still cool stuff."

162 comments

  1. Wow... by Ooblek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone remember the name of that psychologist that put dogs in a room with an electrified floor? I wonder if they'll start putting this stuff into jail cells and mental hospitals. You know, the prisoner/patient/subject mouths off they can give them a jolt. All in the name of science, of course.

    1. Re:Wow... by Dead+Penis+Bird · · Score: 0

      Actually the application causes the surfaces to heat up, so rather than a shock, the floor turns into a giant grill.

      Being a bird myself, this frightens me.

      --

      If I weren't nailed to the penis, I'd be pushing up the daisies!

    2. Re:Wow... by quantaman · · Score: 2

      And you thought a cat on a HOT sidewalk was funny!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Wow... by Gandorf · · Score: 1

      I wonder if I could use this to power my surface mount speakers behind my drywall?

    4. Re:Wow... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Boss - "Smith, I want that report on my desk in 20 minutes. Or I press the button."

      ...19 minutes later...

      Smith - "Hey pimply-faced-youth intern! Can you just sit at my desk for a moment while I run downstairs? I have an important call coming in, thanks."

      Tsk tsk. Smith should know better than to fuck with the PFY.

  2. HERF hacks ;-) by GMontag · · Score: 2

    So, does this mean that in the future, demolition companies could just HERF a building down instead of going inside and setting explosives?

  3. Blocks Cell Phones? by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder what kind of cell phone signal I would get in a conductive-concrete building? Probably next to none...

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by crow · · Score: 3, Funny

      It looks like we may have found the perfect material for building theaters!

    2. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by jgerry · · Score: 1

      This is an excellent point. What cell phone, radio, 802.11b signals, will this interfere with?

      I'm already having issue with my 802.11b network at home that won't go through 2 freakin' walls. I imagine this stuff will wreak havoc with all sorts of electronic communications.

      -jason

    3. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by sourcehunter · · Score: 2

      None (or, very very limited). I think that is the point - when the article talks of the counter-intelligence uses for this material, cell phone signals would fall under the same category as other EM signals.

      --

      quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
    4. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by IsaacW · · Score: 2, Informative

      Assuming that the conductive concrete formed a single, closed shell around the cell phone, none.

      Basic physics will tell you that a closed conductive surface subject to an external electromagnetic field will exhibit no such field inside it's perimeter. I believe that the derivation is related to Guass's and Maxwell's laws of electromagnetics.

    5. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK - mad idea - is there any way that this could give rise to radio wave firewalling? You basically choose what frequencies are allowed in by having a device with a big aerial stuck on the outside, some whizzy hardware, and an antenna on the inside that re-broadcasts it?

      Cool!

    6. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by DrMegaVolt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its called a Farady cage. The field leakage would be related to the frequency of oscillation of that field - wavelengths on the order of and smaller than the largest hole in the cage would leak out ( or in )

    7. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by billscarwasher · · Score: 1

      Which is kind of the point... Cell phone, bug, doesn't really matter.

    8. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm. I wonder if there could be some sort of authentication system for allowed cell phones within a building. You sign in your cellphone, and the entire building acts as an antenna.

    9. Re:Blocks Cell Phones? by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      Class rooms and lecture halls, as well.

      --
      -kidlinux.
  4. Cool stuff? by Vic · · Score: 2

    "...but it's still cool stuff."

    Wouldn't "hot stuff" be more appropriate? :)

    1. Re:Cool stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No....no it would not.

  5. Cost and Uses by Digitalia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is the cost per cubic foot much greater than standard concrete? If not, then I'd be interested in the implications for using it as a residential flooring substrate. Rather than going for a standard radiant heating system, would it be more efficient to employ this?

    --
    Pax Digitalia
    1. Re:Cost and Uses by jd142 · · Score: 2

      I believe the article said it was 2-3 times the cost of regular concrete.

    2. Re:Cost and Uses by CanadaDave · · Score: 1

      I think the website also said that this type of concrete would be just a "thin" coating on the top of regular concrete. I am not sure how "thin" but I think it says on the website. (I don't want to go back to that horribly designed website because it is so ugly). So for the icy-bridge example, the cost increase wouldn't be huge compared to the cost of the entire bridge-deck slab. I'm sure the same thing applies for walls in buildings.

    3. Re:Cost and Uses by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 1

      I found an article on New-Technologies which was a good read on the subject. It had people to contact, other related links on the subect. It also said that it wouldn't cost much more to produce than regular concrete. It used some stuff like left over by-products from steel production.

      --

      ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
    4. Re:Cost and Uses by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      I'd love to know the cost of this relative to standard concrete as well... imagine being able to flip a switch when it starts snowing, to heat your driveway, steps and sidewalk so nothing accumulated on them. Now THAT would be something.

      ~Philly

    5. Re:Cost and Uses by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      Well it's probably still less expensive than radiant flooring, in which pipes or hoses are run before the flooring is poured, through which hot water runs. You won't have to hire people with extensive skill at setting up the piping, and it might be more efficient.

      --
      Photos.
    6. Re:Cost and Uses by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Electric heat costs 2-3 times as much as gas. Ok if you make 2-3 times as much money and like walking barefoot to the kitchen at night to munch Oreos without waking your wife wit "Ooh, ooh, ahh, cold floor! cold floor!"

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  6. A great big Faraday cage by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not a huge expert in the realm of physics (dammit, Jim, I'm a computer scientist!), but is this anything like a massive Faraday cage, which would prevent electromagnetic waves for entering and exiting?

    I shudder to think of the day when we will work in protective buildings like these, keeping company secdrets safe from Van Eck phreakers and war drivers, but also keeping out the mellow, smooth sounds of Office Light Jazz 94.7. :-)

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:A great big Faraday cage by CanadaDave · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is exactly the same concept. The conducting electrons in the conductor material in the concrete "shield" are all mobile, and arrange themselves with respect to the stationary atomic cores so as to set up electric fields which will cancel out the electromagnetic fields which impinge upon it. So no electric field escapes, or at least some of it will, some of it won't. The amount of attenuation is all a function of frequency. Cell phones in the GHz range are especially supceptable, whereas very long radio waves aren't attenuated as much.

      BTW, you could always just get whatever radio station you want through the internet (land-line).

    2. Re:A great big Faraday cage by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      I shudder to think of the day when we will work in protective buildings like these, keeping company secdrets safe from Van Eck phreakers and war drivers, but also keeping out the mellow, smooth sounds of Office Light Jazz 94.7. :-)

      Some people already work in such buildings. When I interviewed at the NSA back in the late 80s, they were putting up a Tempest-protected office building.

    3. Re:A great big Faraday cage by Yohahn · · Score: 1

      Ok.. taking this idea for a stretch
      will this make our buildings vulnerable to a
      EM Pulse (like the one from a nuke).

      EM Pulse comes through.. generates large amounts of voltage in building.. building melts.

      Hrm...

    4. Re:A great big Faraday cage by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      This could be instrumental in clearing up some of the rampant wireless network security problems that have hit the net lately. Build the exterior of the building out of this stuff, and conventional materials inside. No more drive-bys.

      I mean, hey, at least you'd have to walk in the door before phreaking the signal...
      GMFTatsujin

    5. Re:A great big Faraday cage by bigsteve@dstc · · Score: 1

      This could be instrumental in clearing up some of the rampant wireless network security problems that have hit the net lately. Build
      the exterior of the building out of this stuff, and conventional materials inside. No more drive-bys.


      I think you'd need to do more than just use conductive concrete. Wouldn't you also need to put RF screens on all external windows and doors? What about the roof / roof cavity?

      I worked in a screened building once, and I remember it had windows you couldn't open and ugly mesh screens on all of them.

    6. Re:A great big Faraday cage by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      Except that foil backed insulation will make big capacitive coupling areas. I'll take a liquid tight room submersed in mercury for my secure comm room :-) Besides, you can listen to some real good Jazz on the 'Net at the expense of a little bandwidth through the firewall.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    7. Re:A great big Faraday cage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have no understanding of such things, aside from the mindless drivel the mass media spoon feeds the public.

    8. Re:A great big Faraday cage by 56ker · · Score: 1

      I bet it'd be expensive though - and there are plenty of ways of getting information out even through electrically conductive concrete. I mean just off the top of my head there's tape recorders for a start which wouldn't be affected.

  7. Lightning by gatoresque · · Score: 1

    Cool! Built in lightning rods, too?

  8. Pavlov by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Anyone remember the name of that psychologist that put dogs in a room with an electrified floor?

    Pavlov. That was one of several experiments involving behaviour modification.

    1. Re:Pavlov by Ooblek · · Score: 2

      Are you sure? I thought he did bells at feeding time and it was someone else that jolted the dogs into submission. Whatever.

    2. Re:Pavlov by GMontag · · Score: 2

      The bells at feeding time was one of the other experiments. He also did the showing of shapes to mean different upcoming events. One was an oval, the other a circle. Then he gradually rounded the oval until the dog could not distinguish between them.

      At that point the dog would go nuts!

    3. Re:Pavlov by Legion · · Score: 1

      Nope, you're thinking of BF Skinner. The researcher, not the FBI guy from the X-files. And I think he mainly used mice.

    4. Re:Pavlov by GMontag · · Score: 2

      Not so fast...

      (yes, bad for quoting myself)
      The bells at feeding time was one of the other experiments. He also did the showing of shapes to mean different upcoming events. One was an oval, the other a circle. Then he gradually rounded the oval until the dog could not distinguish between them.

      At that point the dog would go nuts!


      Shapes and Tones experiments by Pavlov

      Ref to just the bell experiments

      Pavlov shock experiments

      I do remember Skinner doing various things AFTER Pavlov, like teaching pidgeons to bowl(?) and such.

  9. Floating concrete structures?!? by MonkeyBot · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this stuff can conduct electricity, meaning it could generate a magnetic field, right? So you could theoretically generate a magnetic field to hold a concrete structure made from this stuff in the air. Does this mean that my goal of making a floating castle like all the bad guys in RPG video games have is finally within reach?

    1. Re:Floating concrete structures?!? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      So this stuff can conduct electricity, meaning it could generate a magnetic field, right? So you could theoretically generate a magnetic field to hold a concrete structure made from this stuff in the air. Does this mean that my goal of making a floating castle like all the bad guys in RPG video games have is finally within reach?

      Certainly, until the rebels cut power to or carve up the plate on the ground you're pushing against, or until your castle melts to slag from resistive heating due to the vast currents required ;).

      Thought about the same thing a while back, and concluded that the Koopa Ship method is more practical ;).

    2. Re:Floating concrete structures?!? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      I guess this is a case where life imitates art? ;)

    3. Re:Floating concrete structures?!? by voronoi++ · · Score: 1

      You can only have a floating castle if you have three or more of:

      * A white cat
      * Barrels of explosives in your secret lair
      * A huge satellite tracking map
      * Incompetent side kicks with guns
      * Nightly dream of ruling the world and are called 'The Brain'

  10. Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by z00r · · Score: 0

    In the post for this article, the author writes like an enthused teenager, not like a professional. I don't know if these clowns who post articles are actual teenagers, or people trying to write "down" to teenage level, but it's irritating. And no, it's not "slightly" interesting, this isn't a "spin" on someone else's idea, and I am not "leaning" toward an opinion. The writing simply sucks. Fix it.

    1. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 4, Funny

      First day here, huh?

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    2. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by thelizman · · Score: 1

      Do you not have anything better to do with your time than bitch and moan about an informative article because it doesn't use your lexis?

      Kindly grab both of your ears tightly, one in each hand, and pull firmly until your head is extricated from your ass.

    3. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by haedesch · · Score: 1

      In the post for this article, the author writes like an enthused teenager, not like a professional.

      plz point me to a certain 'rule' which requires people posting articles to use 'professional' terms

    4. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by z00r · · Score: 0

      "please point me to a rule"

      That's not the point. Just as one doesn't spit
      in public or drink beer in a church, one shouldn't
      post crap writing on a regular basis
      simply to appeal to teenagers. And yet it's
      worse than just that. I've seen better writing
      at gaming sites. No other high-tech site is this
      badly edited.

    5. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by z00r · · Score: 0

      "Do you not have anything better to do with your time than bitch and moan " By the same token, don't you have anything better to do than bitch and moan and people who demand better quality? Typical american conservative.... You may now grow up, please

    6. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by zdburke · · Score: 1

      De gustibus non est disputandem.

      The fact that you don't fancy somebody's writing style style doesn't make it crap; it just means you don't like it. Lighten up a little. Sheesh.

    7. Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write by thelizman · · Score: 1

      By the same token, don't you have anything better to do than bitch and moan and people who demand better quality?

      When you consider that they expect that "better quality" to come about by having the government forcefully take it from others and give it them for no better reason than they want it, then I indeed reserve the balance of my time for said purpose of bitching and moaning.

      Typical american conservative.... You may now grow up, please

      Typical commie euro-trash....you may actually try working for a living now.

  11. Wow! by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 3, Funny

    That unomaha site has one of the worst web designs I'ver ever seen. I guess it's not that important that scientist be designers, but readability would be a good thing to strive for. I don't need every paragraph to be a different color. Is this a side effect of too much exposure to conductive concrete?

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even get it to load on the Macs here at school. Crashes IE immediately. . .

  12. Now by Daveman692 · · Score: 1

    to get out my multimeter, or even better, hook a big ass battery up to it and see what I can shock!

  13. music studio by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember when a friend was recording a radio theatre show, the studio had chicken wire on all the walls (behind accoustic foam in most places) to minimize inteferrence from outside signals. You don't want your microphone cable picking up radio signals when recording a performance. This material could be ideal for construction in applications like that where you want to block out outside signals.

    1. Re:music studio by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      Sure. Use it in movie theatres and performance halls to neuter those dumbass, suit-wearing, cellphone talking, consult-the-business-model, Viper driving, 30-something, "Hey, Bob, look at us: we're executives!" weenies who cannot be bothered to turn off their cell phones long enough for the others around them to enjoy a whole movie without an interruption from a phone beeping the tone sequence from Close Encounters.

      (Can't remember where I get the first part of that rant - somewhere/sometime off a previous slashdot post. My apologies to the original author...)

    2. Re:music studio by swb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are they related to those dumbass, cargo-pants weaing, PDA using, Slashdot-reading, Honda-driving, 30-something, "Hey, Raj, look at us! We're geeks!" weenies who can't be bothered to turn off their cell phones, pagers, PDAs and notebooks in the movies?

    3. Re:music studio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like for small applications (such as a music studio or individual rooms of a movie theater) that it would be cheaper to use a chicken-wire embedded in concrete method.

    4. Re:music studio by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate fact of the matter is that 'Raj' probably reports to 'Bob'.

    5. Re:music studio by http101 · · Score: 0

      Has anyone considered the two terms, "Legal" and "Tazer"? Believe it or not, but I was at the opening night of Star Wars - The Phantom Menace and some huge, fat, black (Not that overly-glorified term, "African-American") woman picks up a call on her brand new Nokia with that ear-splitting ring that wakes up the neighbors two houses down. All I could think was, "Gee, I'm glad we're stuck in the stone age and light sabres haven't been invented yet, but if they were..." Needless to say, it took buying the movie to find out what happened in the pod racer sequence. Is there a possibility we could implement the chicken wire-concrete method to build new walls and to also encase those who fail to abide by the courtesy rules? :-)

      --
      -- Game Developers: Stop porting badly-textured games from crappy console systems!
    6. Re:music studio by swb · · Score: 2

      Raj was brought over on a H1B visa by Bob, who knew that he could buy a better BMW if he helped keep wages down. This also enabled Bob to drive out the now unemployed families living in the apartments he wanted to convert into his 4000 sq ft luxury city apartment.

  14. Concrete circuitry? by indole · · Score: 4, Funny


    How about drywall transistors and logic-gate carpets?

    I wont be happy till my split-level serves pr0n.

    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
  15. Heated loading docks by suso · · Score: 2

    Now there is what every trucker needs for those cold winter days.
    Brought to you by science.

    1. Re:Heated loading docks by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good For The Truckers- Bad For the Homeless.

      I worked in a grocery store and there was a vent down at the bottom of our dock. Hot air came out of it so a homeless guy started sleeping down there.

      One night a truck backed down in to make a delivery while he slept....

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  16. Nevermind the espionage angle.. by chuckgrosvenor · · Score: 1

    the heating properties alone look great to me.. I live on a hill, and my sidewalk is always a nightmare in the winter.. how much do these concrete pavers the article mentions run and where can I buy them? I'm sick of using a sled to get to the bottom of my sidewalk!

  17. No more salt by CanadaDave · · Score: 1
    The best problem this solves (besides saving people's lives by reducing ice-related car accidents) is that it would eliminate the need for salt on bridges. I don't know exactly what salt does to the environment, but I'm sure that dumping a lot of salt on the roads/bridges and letting it seep in to the ground can't be good for the ecosystem.

    It kills slugs too. Who knows what good slugs do for our environment? Haha

    1. Re:No more salt by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      Ever notice around bridges, along the edge of the roadway that there is no grass, only dirt? Even from a bridge that's been there 20 years. That's what salt does to the environment.

      Most places only put as much salt as is necessary (Edmonton for example puts 6-12% salt in sand for the roads) as it's expensive and doesn't work below a certain temp.

      As for slugs - I don't know what they do for the environment, but they sure are tasty!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  18. Submitted to Web Pages That Suck by mikosullivan · · Score: 1

    I just sent an email alerting Vincent Flanders. I'm sure he'll love this one.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  19. Non-freezing bridges? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sounds like these guys have never studied thermodynamics. It takes 333kJ to melt a single kilogram of ice. To melt it in, say, 10 minutes (= 600 seconds) would require 555 watts. Not so bad? Consider the following: Conservatively estimate a bridge to be 10 meters wide by 250 meters long and having 2 centimeters of ice. That's 50 m^3 = 50,000 kg of ice. A mere 28 MegaWatts. Per ice storm. Per bridge. Assuming 100% efficiency. Oh yeah, no problem.

    Please study a little science before you post stories from similarly unclued "visionaries".

    1. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by tkrabec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But if you can keep the ice from forming the water could run off the bridge and not freeze.

      -- Tim

      --
      TKrabec Pahh
    2. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Mad+Bad+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is: resistively-heated concrete could maintain the bridge deck temperature above freezing, so that no ice needs to be melted in the first place.

      --
      >;k
    3. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've assumed that full 2cm of ice has already accumulated before the deck heater's turned on; what numbers do you get for leaving the heater on all the time, at a lower setting, so the ice doesn't start forming in the first place?

    4. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just curious, what if the system is switched on before the water accumulates as ice? Surely this would require less energy than attempting to melt an already iced over bridge. They did say "non-freezing" not "de-icing".

    5. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well for one thing where on earth is there going to be a road & highway department (in a country that can afford heatable concrete) that's going to let an inch of ICE fully form before they decide to do something about it?

      For another thing two CM of ice is 12-40 CM of snow (depending on humidity). That's an awfully big dump for the majority of the world the majority of the time; most of the time in most of the world you'll be dealing with small fractions of this.

      For another thing, why would you possibly need to melt all the ice that quickly (even assuming you were stupid enough to let that much form in the first place)? Why not just let the thing run at lower wattage 24x7 (when it is snowing, or at night)? It only needs to keep the snow that is there from refreezing, and to melt any new accumulation.

      Finally, "assuming 100% efficiency" ?? So what? What if it's not 100% efficient? What else is the waste product going to be besides heat?

    6. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by PantyChewer · · Score: 1

      Yep, and this doesn't take into account that it could be -30 when the snow starts, and you haven't kept the bridge heated since it hasn't snowed for the last 3 weeks, so you have to heat up the bridge a whole lot in -30 weather while the wind (from the snowstorm) is sucking almost all that thermal energy away (and the cold wind will be hitting the big bridge surface you want to heat from both above and below). How much you think its gonna cost now?

    7. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are greatly overestimating precipitation if you think you will need to melt 2 cm of solid ice every 10 minutes.

    8. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by rehannan · · Score: 2
      Well for one thing where on earth is there going to be a road & highway department (in a country that can afford heatable concrete) that's going to let an inch of ICE fully form before they decide to do something about it?
      Fortunatly, where I live in Alaska the DOT is not obsessed with keeping the roads bare. It is quite common to have an inch or two snow/ice pack on the roads in the winter. The snow plows use grooved blades, which in turn grooves the ice in the direction of travel. Your tires grip the ice grooves quite well.

      Salt isn't used because it doesn't work when it gets really cold. I think the magic temperature is 0F, since Mr. Fahrenheit used a salt & ice mixture to define 0F. (I'm not entirely sure about this.)

    9. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by gorilla · · Score: 2

      That's what Mr F tried to do, with a scale from freezing salt water to body temperature. Unfortunatly he messed up, so 100F ended up slightly above body temperature, and the temperateure of salt water depends on the concentration of salt, and also the type of salt - sodium chloride having a different point to say potassium chloride.

    10. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by szquirrel · · Score: 1

      Sounds like these guys have never studied thermodynamics.

      If by "these guys" you mean "The University of Omaha", I think you'll lose that bet. Their "Conductive Concrete for Bridge Deicing" experiement indicates that the average power generated by the conductive concrete was about 591 W/m^2, consistant with successful past efforts at electrical bridge deicing. Their estimated energy cost for this amount of power is $0.70 to $1.00 /m^2 per storm, which sounds perfectly reasonable.

      Please read the links before trying to make yourself sound smarter than everyone else.

      --
      Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
    11. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      I was told that the temperature of the salt ice mixture was the coldest temperature that Fahrenheit could find. As such, 0 degrees Fahrenheit is an overwhelmingly crude approximation of absolute 0.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    12. Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Super_Frosty · · Score: 1

      No kidding! Of course it would take a lot of energy to melt 50,000 kg of ice in ten minutes!

      And, did you see that his nickname was "PhysicsGenius"! It's kind of sad.

      And don't forget his juicy quote:

      "Please study a little science before you post stories from similarly unclued 'visionaries'. "

      Mr. PhysicsGenius, forgive me, but I think that the fellows building the bridge have outsmarted you.

      Further investigation reveals that Mr. "PhysicsGenius" has repeatedly trolled using his "supreme physics knowledge."

      --
      No comment at this time
  20. heating by DragonWyatt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The most obvious use is heating.

    But wouldn't it be cheaper and simpler to embed, say, a PVC 2-inch pipe in the concrete, and run warm water through that? Note that you can use this method with just about anything (dirt, asphalt, etc) and keep it from freezing.

    If you want a method to directly heat it using electricity, run stainless steel pipe instead, and use it as a load.

    I've frequently wondered why civil engineers haven't implemented either of the above techniques before. Chalked it up to "roads don't freeze enough".

    Thoughts?

    --
    Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:heating by tkrabec · · Score: 1

      but that pipe could impare the structual integrety of the span. The hover dam had pipes rin thru it to cool the concrete while it was being poored, when they were done they filled the pipes with concrete.

      -- Tim

      --
      TKrabec Pahh
    2. Re:heating by tkrabec · · Score: 1

      The pipes could compromise the structual integrety.

      The hoover dam had pipes layed in for cooling purposes, the pipes were then filled with concrete.

      -- tim

      --
      TKrabec Pahh
    3. Re:heating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a very cold climate, where icing on bridges etc is enough of a problem to warrant the cost of the new concrete, you'd wind up with frozen/thawed strips; using the conductive concrete keeps the entire surface clear.

    4. Re:heating by markmoss · · Score: 2

      The article did mention the buried pipe method, but notes that it's expensive to put the pipes in to start with, and then when they split, corrode through, or plug up, you've got to jackhammer through the concrete to fix them. The point about repairs is good, but I do wonder how a grid of buried pipes could be more costly than paying two or three times as much for conductive concrete.

      But the real reason heated pavement isn't used much is because electricity costs too much. You don't want to pay the power bill for trying to heat up the freaking outdoors! Conductive concrete won't change that. With buried pipes, you can also heat with a gas or oil furnace, which costs quite a lot less (90% efficient, compared to about 30% overall in the electric system), but it still costs too much in northern climates. And in southern climates where you'd only have to turn on the heat a few days a year, few people think snow is a big enough problem to add thousands to their initial construction cost.

    5. Re:heating by AkkarAnadyr · · Score: 1
      In Northern CA we have neighborhoods full of '60s houses dubbed "Eichlers". They use this method of heating.


      When the pipes leak, you have a jackhammering road crew in your living room to fix them.


      They also have huge glass windows all around most of the outer walls. Lets in a lot of light, lets out a lot of IR and heated air. Obviously designed when gas and oil were 3 cents/ton.

      --

      I bought this house and you know I'm boss
      Ain't no h'aint gonna run me off

    6. Re:heating by afidel · · Score: 2

      Actually one of the Universities here in Ohio has quite a few of their main walkways kept clean from snow and ice using the burried pipe method. They use excess heat from the electric plant so it is basically free. They are pretty far south so they are in the transitional area where they get enough snow to bother with it but not enough that it overworks the plant.

      p.s.
      the school is Miami of Ohio, the best public school in Ohio .

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:heating by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      College of Wooster does it too, except that the sidewalks are the roofs of the steam conduits from the power plant to the building. I was always under the impression that this kind of thing was common in North-Central Ohio.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    8. Re:heating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, like radiant floor heating, which has been around for a long time?

    9. Re:heating by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Do they alwo use the waste heat from the electric plant to heat the buildings? Just how much electricity does this power plant produce? I know of Michigan colleges that heat their buildings from an electric plant, but there sure isn't enough extra heat to clear the sidewalks when it stays around 10 F for weeks...

      Anyhow, note that the conductive concrete won't allow you to use the co-generated "free" heat, but requires the expensive electricity.

    10. Re:heating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In New York City, where the fear of a lawsuit hovers ominously over every landlord's head, most buildings (even cheap tenements well outside of mid town Manhattan) do have heating pipes underneath the sidewalks that surround the building. If you look at any reconstruction project you'll see new pipes being put down beneath the sidewalks. They tend to use regular steam fittings: wrought steel would be my guess. It does not look like stainless (which would be expensive to hire a union pipe fitter to put together). The hot water heat source is the usual: mostly oil, but occasionally natural gas.

  21. Finally! by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    Now even the underprivileged will be able to afford to stop the MLB from reading their minds. No more tinfoil hats!

    1. Re:Finally! by r00tyroot · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Major League Baseball conspiracy has been quite a problem lately.

  22. just don't use Russian contractors... by trix_e · · Score: 1

    The Soviets pioneered innovative uses of concrete way back in the '80s... though I don't think they were that interested in *counter*-espionage...

    --
    No man is an island, but Gary is a city in Indiana.
  23. Question for a Civ Eng: by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    Would having conducting concrete make it easier or harder to prevent electrochemical corrosion in reinforced concrete?

    Intuition is telling me "yes to both", but I'm not a Civ...

    1. Re:Question for a Civ Eng: by big+tex · · Score: 3, Informative

      Harder.

      I am a field engineer on a bridge construction project. I do concrete and overlays.

      In most areas of bridges near water epoxy coated or galvanized rebar is used instead of black (bare) steel. The problem is that when steel rusts, it expands, popping the concrete around it.
      When you build reinforced concrete the term 'cover' refers to the minimum distance the rebar must be from the outside faces of the concrete - basically the distance between the steel and the corrosion. This 'cover' is typically between 2 - 5 inches.
      Overlay concrete (of which this conductive concrete is a type) is the riding course, or the top layer you actually ride on. It is poured seperately due in part to the large effort required to get the nice arched surface that rides so well. Overlays are typically 1 1/2 to 3 inches thick.
      So, a "thin" layer, thiner than the typical cover, with metal particles spread uniformely enough to conduct electricity is bound to corrode like a bastard.

      There are ways that you could combat this, though. Galvanize the parts, imbed a wire mesh that is plastic coated and electrficy that, apply one hell of a sealant, or put an ungodly amount of DCI (corrosion inhibiter) in the mix. DCI has a number of side effects that make it hard to place, displaces a fair amount of water, and it is really hard to finish smoothly.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
  24. Check this out... by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 1

    If your intrested in kind of stuff New-Technologies has a good article about it. They also have a bunch of links to related sites reguarding concrete advancements.

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
  25. Warning: professors at work by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 1
    "The initial development evolved from a discussion I had with a graduate student,"
    Isn't that how everything starts off in academia?
    --
    No I'm not trolling.
  26. Same as ionized concrete? by G.+Waters · · Score: 1

    Awhile ago there was talk about a government agency that ionized their concrete walls to attract airborn particles, which could then be swept away with a sponge-mop. The result was very clean air in the building (assuming the walls were cleaned frequently).

    It sempt like a good idea but I haven't heard anything else about it for quite awhile. Perhaps someday this tech will be common in homes, as people are becoming more conscious of home and workplace health in our increasingly estrogenic society.

  27. What about... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

    Radient heating. If they can use this to heat loading docks et. al. then how about my bathroom floor? Those stone tiles are so dang cold on the tootsies...

    --


    Do a google search before posting.
    1. Re:What about... by AlexDeGruven · · Score: 1

      Or even the toilet seat. Low level current should be enough to keep it nice and toasty. Really would only need a few degrees above room temp to be MUCH more comfortable

      --
      Randal Graves says: I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class... Especially since I rule.
    2. Re:What about... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      Or even the toilet seat. Low level current should be enough to keep it nice and toasty. Really would only need a few degrees above room temp to be MUCH more comfortable

      There are heated toilet seats purchasable.

      The problem, as with all great inventions, is the idiot factor. Joe Schmoe cracks the toilet seat or busts the wires with wear. One dark night he stumbles into the bathroom, whizzes on the seat, salty urine hits electric current, and it's "Don't Whizz on the Electric Fence" time. And then we get another lawyer-flinging spurious lawsuit or Darwin Awards candidate.

      Don't underestimate the Idiot Factor. $cientogi$t$ would be a long extinct class of vicious nutball without it.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  28. A New Option for the Tinfoil Hat Wearing Crowd by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    You can now go beyond wearing the tinfoil cap and build bunkers out of this (you want to be physically secure, too, don't you?) where you can run about naked telepathically communing with the trusted few you allow to enter, as well as your 26 cats of course.

    Of course, remember, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  29. for those that are not registered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Concrete That Percolates, Keeping Snow and Spies at Bay

    By IAN AUSTEN

    S ECURITY experts looking to prevent spies from eavesdropping on computers by intercepting the electromagnetic waves they throw off don't turn to Martha Stewart for interior-design inspiration. The solutions they employ are often unattractive and well beyond even her budget. For example, one involves building a room within a room out of welded thick steel plates.

    But a new concrete that can conduct electricity may make it possible to construct buildings in which the basic structure does double duty as an electromagnetic shield.

    Not that the scientists who developed conductive concrete at the National Research Council of Canada were looking to play a role in the world of counterespionage.

    "The initial development evolved from a discussion I had with a graduate student," said James J. Beaudoin, the lead researcher and a concrete expert at the research council's Institute for Research in Construction, based in Ottawa. "We were trying to come up with projects to address the needs of people in cold climates, such as snow and ice melting." Concrete that could conduct electricity would also create heat through resistive heating.

    Of course, electrical elements and pipes carrying heated liquids have long been embedded in concrete to create ice-free garage ramps and walkways. But such installations are expensive and difficult to repair.

    Mary Ann Smith

    Topics
    Alerts
    National Research Council
    Engineering and Engineers
    Create Your Own | Manage Alerts
    Take a Tour
    Sign Up for Newsletters
    Other Resources
    Newsletters
    Subscribe to Circuits
    Sign up to receive a free weekly Circuits newsletter by e-mail, with technology news and tips and exclusive commentary by David Pogue, the State of the Art columnist.

    Nor, Dr. Beaudoin acknowledges, is the idea of a concrete that can carry electricity a particularly novel one. "But most of the concepts developed in the past wouldn't be useful because you couldn't build anything with them," he said. "They didn't have structural integrity."

    Early on, Dr. Beaudoin and other researchers at the research council looked into using carbon fibers similar to those that are woven into special fabrics and covered with resins to create lightweight but strong parts for aircraft and sports equipment.

    Less exotic fibers have long been used in concrete for a variety of purposes, like increasing its ability to deform without shattering. The lab did eventually come up with a concrete mix that retained its strength after the addition of the carbon fibers and gained the ability to conduct electricity evenly -- a property that Dr. Beaudoin calls percolation.

    But as anyone who has seen the price tag of a carbon-fiber-composite bicycle knows, carbon fibers are expensive. "You have to remember we are dealing with a construction material here," Dr. Beaudoin said.

    The group found a much cheaper substitute in coke breeze. Coke is essentially coal that has been reduced mostly to carbon by high-temperature baking. Most of the time it is added to blast furnaces at steel mills. Coke breeze is the leftover material that is too small for the steel industry. With coke breeze, the lab was able to create a conductive concrete that is only two to three times more expensive than ready-mix concrete.

    Finding a suitable additive proved to be only half the problem. Mark Arnott, the conductive concrete project manager, said that a far bigger issue was developing special mixing, handling and curing processes that ensure consistent electrical conductivity between different batches of the concrete. "We could give you the recipe but you would most likely not be able to produce the material," he said. (The recipe would not make light reading in any case. The manual on making and using the conductive concrete runs about 400 pages.)

    Because of the complexity of creating this concrete, St. Lawrence Cement, a Swiss-owned company based in Montreal that has licensed the technology, initially plans to offer it only in precast pieces.

    Except for the positive and negative leads embedded in them, St. Lawrence's conductive concrete slabs look much like those sold at The Home Depot (news/quote ). At the offices of a construction company in Oakville, Ontario, owned by St. Lawrence, the concrete company built a sidewalk and a loading ramp to test the material late last year.

    The winter has been unusually mild, so the system has not been overwhelmed by snow. But Peter J. Tumidajski, the manager of new product development for St. Lawrence, said that the eight times it did snow, the self- heating ramp was never more than slushy. "You never actually get a buildup of snow," he said. "It always keeps up." A 20-by-80- foot pad at the National Research Council's far more wintry grounds in Ottawa melted the snow and ice without fail for three years.

    Although a relatively high voltage is used, the actual current flowing through it is small because of the high resistance of the concrete. So it is safe to touch the concrete.

    St. Lawrence is dreaming of bigger things than loading ramps, however. Dr. Tumidajski hopes that the material, encased in two layers of conventional concrete, will be laid on the decks of highway bridges. The system would have two functions. When relatively high-voltage electricity was sent through it, it would melt ice and snow. But a much lower voltage could be sent through the concrete to inhibit the electrochemical corrosion of the steel reinforcing bars that are buried in it.

    Several Canadian and United States government agencies, including the United States Army Corps of Engineers, have approached the research council about using conductive concrete to trap computer signals. While a variety of technologies are used within computers and monitors to limit the amount of electromagnetic radiation they throw off, high-security facilities are generally housed within something called a Faraday cage. In effect, this involves surrounding the room with metal, ranging from aluminum or copper mesh for less-secure facilities to one-quarter-inch-thick steel plate in more high-security applications.

    Whatever their proportions, all Faraday cages work on the principle that a room made of a grounded, electrical conducting material will block electromagnetic waves from escaping.

    Dr. Beaudoin and Mr. Arnott said there was no doubt that the conductive concrete could block emissions. "But we don't have any hard data on how such a system will react," Mr. Arnott added. Research is now under way to come up with precise measurements of the concrete's efficiency.

    There is one immediate use for conductive concrete. But it makes the prototype loading ramp -- not to mention the counterespionage applications -- seem positively glamorous. In rocky areas, it is often difficult to ground radio towers so that energy will dissipate when lightning strikes. One solution, Mr. Arnott said, is "to just pour a trough of conductive concrete at the base."

  30. Civ Eng vs. Mechanical Eng by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mechanical: builds weapons
    Civ: builds targets

  31. Power consumption? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    How much juice will a cubic meter of the stuff use per degree celsius? Would widespread use of this concrete create a major spike in energy consumption or would it be more efficient than current heating methods. I, for one, am sick of seeing power being wasted and never ending power generator construction.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  32. Conductive Roads... by brad3378 · · Score: 1

    .....Could give new meaning to the words Information Superhighway

    :-)

    --

  33. Interesting ideas by glasslemur · · Score: 1

    Wow. Could you image transparant conducting concrete. I think it could lead to some very interesting lighting effects.

  34. Gosh yer smart! by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1

    Lemme 'splain something to ya. When you have a process removing heat you've got to add heat at the same rate to keep the temperature the same. It doesn't matter if the water is already frozen or not if the temperature is below 0C the energy requirements are the same (modulo a little runoff, but in that case it must be raining so it isn't 0C anyway, not to mention 2 cm is an understatement).

    1. Re:Gosh yer smart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think that's true.

      The latent heat of fusion is where all the heat cost in melting ice lies. That is to say, you're paying to change the phase, not so much the temperature.

      So while you're completely right about the ridiculous costs of melting snow, sleet, hail, or any other pre-frozen precipitation you could name, he's got a point when it comes to, er, ice storms.

      Ice storms are typically cold rain that freezes on contact. If you can get it while it's still mainly liquid, you could concievably heat it pretty easily, since it's almost guaranteed to be right at the freezing mark.

      Of course, ice storms aren't all that frequent, and you're completely right about the prohibitive costs of pre-frozen precipitation melting.

  35. Not melt, explode! by MonkeyBot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Certainly, until the rebels cut power to or carve up the plate on the ground you're pushing against, or until your castle melts to slag from resistive heating due to the vast currents required ;).

    Actually, the concrete, if it is like normal concrete, would probably explode instead of melting...the little air pockets inside it expand until they break the structure. It's neat. Hold a blowtorch to some concrete sometime---it crackles!

    1. Re:Not melt, explode! by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      If it is sufficiently finely divided (pure cement works best, i.e., no sand or aggregate added) then you can zap it with ultrasonics as it sets and reduce the entrenched air to nil.

      Popular Science in the seventies (I think) had an article on concrete springs. I think they showed one cast as a coil spring and put in place in a vehicle under load. Couldn't find it on line but I am sure someone with access to a well equipped err... paper based library, can find a reference in an archive or on microfiche.

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  36. internet radio by raistlinne · · Score: 1

    Don't worry. You'll just connect to officelightjazz.com and listen to the streaming radio. Heck, some people do this already. :-)

    --
    They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
  37. (OT) Re:Floating concrete structures?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of Chocobo powered airships (like in FF10) ;-)

  38. Static Control by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

    It sounds like the concrete still has a pretty high resistance, so I wouldn't count on a reasonable thickness forming a good Faraday cage. With the conductive stuff costing At 2 or 3 times as much, you could likely get a better cage for less by just hanging metal mesh inside the forms and pouring regular concrete. (The mesh is part of your reinforcement, too.)

    And the suggested use of electrically heated payment leaves me wondering where they plan to get free electricity.

    But there is one good application for this. Electronics manufacturers need to control static throughout their facilities. Fixed objects are grounded by hooking up wires, but people walk around, circuit boards and parts are carried around on carts, etc., and the only way to ground these while in motion is through the floor. So we paid plenty for conductive tile, and some sort of conductive underlay. If we could have put a conductive layer in the concrete slab itself, it would have saved a bunch (even at 3x the price of regular concrete), and it would be more reliable and lower maintenance.

    1. Re:Static Control by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      The ultimate in static control is managing lightning strikes. The US Army, which stores a lot of ammunition, got keenly interested in this very subject.

      What they wound up with was the Ufer ground, named after the physics PhD who invented it. Essentially you electrically bond all your rebar and use that as the building ground.

      Conductive concrete would be a nice complement, since it would distribute current through something thicker than the rebar.

    2. Re:Static Control by unitron · · Score: 2
      Regular concrete is already so conductive that electrical codes require it to be tied into the grounding system of the building of which it is a part, and one of the acceptable ways to construct a building's main grounding point is to embed a length of metal pipe in the concrete of the building's foundation (assuming direct contact between the concrete and the actual planet Earth.

      If you're standing barefoot on a damp concrete floor and come into contact with a "hot" or "live" wire, you'll learn very quickly (within one/one hundred twentieth of a second, or one/one hundredth for 50Hz locations) how conductive concrete can be, assuming, of course, that you survive the lesson.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  39. thank god for EM shielding concrete... by r00tyroot · · Score: 1

    now maybe those alien abductions will stop and I can get on with my life. :)

  40. Doesn't matter by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1
    I gave a concrete example but "quickly" doesn't really factor in. P = E x t. Therefore E = P/t. In other words, if you take longer it will use the same amount of energy at a lower power. Still mighty expensive.

    Keeping something from freezing requires exactly the same amount of energy as melting it. Exactly. This is obvious to anyone who has studied science or used an ice cube.p. The waste produce is always heat. But it isn't always released near any ice. What about the sides and bottom of this road? What about patches of ice? What about transmission issues?

  41. Negligible by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 1

    For people who talk all geeky, this site sure is scientifically illiterate. The heat of fusion (esp of water) vastly overpowers the specific heat of even something as large as a bridge. Wind could be a problem, though.

  42. Re:Non-freezing bridges? (why not) by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    they already have heated parts of road in midtown here.(finland). it's supposedly just about the same price as it would be to use conventional salt and/or machines to keep the ice/snow out. AFAIK they turn it off at -15C or so.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  43. Geez I should get out of my office more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Figures I don't even know what the guy's are working on downstairs. I work at the IRC as a coop student. Geez they have some strange projects here.

  44. NYT Random Login Generator by majcher · · Score: 1

    Again, the URL is: http://www.majcher.com/nytview.html

    It's a simple HTML/javascripty thing to automatically generate a random NYTimes login every time you want to view a story. Just cut and paste the nytimes.com url you want to view, and hit the button.

    If you could, please try to save the page locally and use it from your server or desktop, to keep the traffic to my server reasonable. Distribute at will.

    1. Re:NYT Random Login Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I've never seen their site before lol

    2. Re:NYT Random Login Generator by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      I love you.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  45. Cell Phone Proof? by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    Would be great for movie theaters and the like...

    --
    -- Adam
  46. Wireless Guitars by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    SpinalTap could have really used this technology when Niles was wielding his wireless guitar...

    "These go to eleven."

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  47. Heated Runways by MikeyNg · · Score: 2

    I thought a big use for these were going to be for heated runways - so you don't have to worry about de-icing them anymore. (I just hope they don't heat them too much and then you have a bunch of lizards just hanging out on the runway warming themselves.)

    --
    Where the wind blows, the tumbleweed goes.
  48. Don't throw your wood stoves out yet by Bollux · · Score: 2, Informative

    This conductive concrete has some interesting properties. The number one use that leaps to mind is EMI protection.

    But for heating? Forget it! Two replies to this article mentioned something about how much energy it would require to melt ice. Now add the energy required to heat up the concrete. And know, that while electricity works quickly, it is just about the most expensive way to heat your home/whatever.

    You might consider also, that while an abode of conductive material might be a great way to absorb stray radio signals coming your way, what are is your dwelling going to be emitting if you are hooking up AC voltage to it? If a micro-watt cell phone freaks you out, consider thousands of watts pumping through your house :) (I don't think anyone has proven that non-ionizing radiation causes cancer yet, so no worries...)

    Radiant heating systems are the way to imbed a heat source in concrete. The technology is gaining in popularity all the time, as it deserves.

    Read more about it for yourself at: http://www.radiantcompany.com/ They are for profit, but the prices seem reasonable. They advocate do-it-yourself and lots of good info on the website.

    It would be great to hear from an HVAC engineer on this, but I don't think they will tell you much different.

    Bollux (a BSME)

    1. Re:Don't throw your wood stoves out yet by gordguide · · Score: 2

      You use one or the other depending on what you want. A key point with conductive concrete is it's best used as an outdoor slab (not heating an enclosed space) and it only has to keep the thermal mass at about 33 degrees F when it's snowing (and never warmer). When your temp differential is high (ie it's -10F or colder) it rarely snows (atmosphere can't hold much moisture, so the weather system dumps it's snow somewhere warmer before it got to you. Remember the Arctic is technically a desert), so it's OK if the slab is only +20F or colder, with a simple non-feedback system. So you're only trying to heat at about 30 degrees above ambient you can incorporate feedback (temperature measuring and control) to reduce input energy even more.

      Radiant heating works best when you're trying to heat an enclosed space. Consider the envornment and pick the appropriate technology. Where I live, radiant (hot water in concrete) is pretty common, but you wouldn't try to heat the driveway that way, because you would have to maintain probably about +40F even when it's -40F outdoors (an 80 degree differential). You need some amount of overheating as a way of preventing failure, if you heating system freezes it is totally useless and needs almost complete rebuilding. Certain antifreeze systems can be employed but they have other problems; in general you should build it with enough BTUs and backups to keep it above freezing at all envisioned temperatures and power outages. Electic hot water boilers are common but natural gas is readily available here so most people use a gas over electric (for backup) system.

      Since radiant can be electically heated and it's slightly less efficent than thermal (electricity to water to concrete to objects vs electricity to concrete) it's not a given that it would be more efficent.

  49. i haven't gotten to that part yet! you bastard! by mkbz · · Score: 1

    geesh, slogging my way through this enormous book - i haven't read about any 'electromagnet protected server room' yet - thanks for giving it away.

  50. fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this renders my cool van-eck equipment i've been using to monitor nearby governments obsolete. well thank you very much.

  51. RF Nightmare - buildings as antennas by Vortran · · Score: 2

    If large structures are made with conductive concrete, it could create a broad spectrum RF nightmare in cities.

    Today, large buildings reflect radio signals, creating interference for many signals in the shorter wavelength (6m to 30cm) bands. Imagine how much worse this would be if the buildings them selves had strong electromagnetic fields, or worse yet, emitted AC fields?

    Also, these structures will convert radio signals and other EMF into electric current. Theoretically, it is possible that such current could be in the tens of milliamps or even higher, making for passive RF radiators.

    I know we already use a lot of steel in buildings, but this is usually grounded and steel is a really poor conductor compared to something like copper or silver. I'm assuming this conductive concrete has much better electric conductivity than steel.

    Vortran out

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
    1. Re:RF Nightmare - buildings as antennas by unitron · · Score: 2

      In addition imagine how much charge would be induced by any lightning in the general area.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  52. voltage by ocie · · Score: 3

    Something I discovered with a neon transformer is that most things are conductive to some degree if you apply enough voltage :) concrete included.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:voltage by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Let me show some of my ignorance, but when high voltage makes a path through a solid with high resistance, does it ionize a plasma path like it does through air, or does it do something different?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  53. Power _cost_ will be irrelevant.... by Rev.Jonhan · · Score: 1

    ... when we start applying the Seebeck Effect. In fact, we would want the largest possible temperature differential possible, since this would maximize our power gains. Bridges and large buildings would be a fun way to generate power.
    So why melt the ice when we can use the temperature difference between an ice-forming-bridge and the temperature stable ground (or even the body of water the bridge crosses) to generate power for pr0n serving apartment complexes?
    And we can drive our new electric vehicles slot car style, by drawing power from the road itself.

  54. Troll was Re:Non-freezing bridges? by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    For anyone caring to post a reply to PhysicsGenius' post, I suggest you read through some of his previous posts. http://slashdot.org/~PhysicsGenius/ Well trolled. :)

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Troll was Re:Non-freezing bridges? by Super_Frosty · · Score: 1

      I noticed that too. It's a genre of troll that's relatively new, and it really caught everyone off guard.

      --
      No comment at this time
  55. but What when the whole enchilada cracks? by cybercomm · · Score: 1

    I have read this, and i understand most of these conceps, but what bugs me is what will you do when the cincrete slab starts cracking? Then we'll end up with uneven disrtibution, crews will have to be called in to make repairs (if possible, nobody mentioned the method of repair) and finally let's not forget the bridges (the hottest topic of 'em all) the article (or someone) said that the conductive concrete will be "sandwiched" between the layers of "standard" concrete, which means that if any cracks are to occur crews will have to be called in to repair anyway (as they would with PVC pipes or stainless tubes) so i wonder if the whole thing will still work in about 15 years down the road... :)

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  56. cool! by Khopesh · · Score: 2

    *throws snowshovel out window*

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  57. Cryptonomicon again?! by andfarm · · Score: 1
    Sometime earlier this week, I noted that anything can be linked to Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon.

    Again, I am proved right. Where can I get my copy of Finux?

    --

    TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  58. that's National Research Council of Canada, moron by Hellraisr · · Score: 0

    http://www.nrc.ca/

    get it right next time you open your yap and post stupid crap

  59. The "Physics Genius" Troll by Super_Frosty · · Score: 1

    Oohhh.. I just went and looked at the rest of his posts. Here are some of the best parts:

    "Yes, the CPU produces heat but keep in mind that a server room is a closed environment--no energy (e.g. thermal energy) is actually created. The heat produced is given off by the entropy reversal of information being created. When that information is destroyed, in practical terms just deleting a file, some of that heat is sucked back up and it cools the room back down."

    "I am a prime physical specimen. "

    "I love science. I love big science. But science is more than pretty pictures. It is a process of creating, testing and destroying hypotheses to push our knowledge to the edge of the envelope. The Hubble telescope does none of these things. Of course, neither does an electron microscope or a hammer--because they are merely tools. But when wielded by a trained, creative and insightful scientist they can help produce startling new theories that make our life better. But the Hubble telescope isn't in the hands of trained, creative and insightful scientists. It is in the hands of bureaucrats and politicians who dole out a minute here and a minute there on whatever pet projects they happen to favor. When Scientist A creates a theory based on an observation made with Hubble, these chairwarmers refuse to let Scientist B use the 'scope to attempt demolish that theory for fear it will make Hubble look bad. We obviously can't afford to make enough for everyone, so the only solution is to let no one have it. Decommission the Hubble! "

    Here he gives dangerous advice:

    "Some may say that "putting a magnet next to a HD is a bad idea" but think about the magnetic fields that already exist in the case from the power supply, nearby speakers/fans and even interference from the magnetic charge already on the disk. Putting a magnet, even one strong enough to pull a metal pin like these, near your HD presents no danger whatsoever. "

    "make sure you insulate your T1 connection well to keep this heat gain to a mimimum."

    --
    No comment at this time
  60. The web site by Animats · · Score: 2
    Agreed. Somebody went to a lot of trouble to make it suck that much. Take a look at the HTML; some pages were authored with Microsoft Word 9, others with Microsoft PowerPoint.

    The bridge-deicing idea isn't unreasonable. From their numbers, for $500 per storm, you could de-ice a bridge 200' long and 4 lanes wide. That compares favorably with sending out snowplows, salt trucks, and such.

  61. Limited use for corporate buildings by ModelX · · Score: 1
    Who wants to work in a Faraday cage where your cell phone doesn't work, your pager doesn't work, you cannot listen to radio, and wireless internet doesn't even reach next floor?

    Obviously the usage will be limited to high security buildings, but hey, if you want to do that, you can just put metal panels in or on the walls.

    1. Re:Limited use for corporate buildings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your cell phone work inside a car?

      Why, yes it does!

      Thus, your cell phone will work inside said building as well.

  62. Re:Concrete... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From user's profile:
    I am never moderated down!