Slashdot Mirror


Sizing Up StarOffice 6.0

Over on NewsForge, Roblimo has taken a look at Sun's new StarOffice 6.0 (due out in April for retail purchase), and comparing it to OpenOffice build 641C. I installed StarOffice on a new Toshiba laptop, and since my Mandrake 8.2 ISOs are still trickling in, have StarOffice 6.0 running instead under Windows XP. (I have just a few additional notes on this, below.)

The installation was dead simple, and therefore better than most software: I popped in the CD, and with about 10 minutes of point-click-whirrring, the software was installed. The only notable aspect of this process is that the CD included (and popped onto my hard drive, with prompting) a new Java runtime environment (Sun's standard JRE, version 1.3.1). The helpful timer that accompanies the install is conservative, which is nice -- it started out estimating 14 minutes for the "transferring files" portion, but quickly dropped down to less than five.

Having not touched StarOffice for a while, it's nice to see the features in OpenOffice trickle in -- most importantly, getting rid of the monolithic desktop makes it actually usable to those of us who hate screen-hijacking software. And at least on this 1 GHz, 256MB laptop, even "bloatware" features like auto-correction are snappy enough not to be bothersome.

Two small notes on Roblimo's review for anyone curious about using SO under Windows: The Windows version does claim to open "WordPerfect (Win) 6.0-7.0" documents, which is at least a start toward WordPerfect compatibility. And under Windows, the nice X-Window style one-click text transfer isn't an option. One more note for 6.0 Beta testers: you can download a patch from Sun to extend the life of the beta from March 31 to June 3 2002.

17 of 335 comments (clear)

  1. StarOffice 6.0 *is* available... by joestar · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's just been announced at Mandrake Linux website:



    "The much anticipated StarOffice 6.0 for Linux is now available for download to Mandrake Linux Club Members. We are proud to announce that Club members will be among the first Linux users to have the privilege of using the newest version of this premiere Linux Office Sui
    te. Since StarOffice 6.0 has a new licensing model (it is no longer free as were previous versions), MandrakeSoft is currently offering the download service to MandrakeClub "Silver" members (and above). To provide Mandrake Club members the opportunity to reach Silver status, MandrakeSoft has set up a simple upgrade procedure.

    StarOffice 6.0 is comprised of five distinct components:
    StarOffice Writer is a professional wordprocessor; StarOffice Calc is a spreadsheet application; StarOffice Impress is a multimedia presentation tool; StarOffice Draw is a 3D graphics and special effects designer; StarOffice Adabas is a user-friendly database.

    The new features include a new XML-based document format that results in dramatically reduced filesizes (compared to StarOffice 5.2), improved file filters and support for OLE objects that provides excellent compatibility with Microsoft Office documents, new font rendering, an improved user interface that makes StarOffice 6.0 more intuitive and friendly than ever, better system integration with other applications that allows, for instance, the ability to send office documents with an email client directly from StarOffice, and more!

    StarOffice 6.0 is supported under the following Mandrake Linux versions (x86 only): Mandrake Linux 8.0, Mandrake Linux 8.1 and Mandrake Linux 8.2."


    There should be a story on Slashdot soon since it mentions the recent controversy about the Mandrake Club Silver membership...

  2. 641C is nice by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been running OO 641C since it was released. My machine is a PII-266 with 224 MB of RAM, so it tends to lag at times. However, SO 5.2 was never usable on this box. OO has replaced 5.1a.

    I'll add my voice to those cheering the death of the SO 'desktop'. What a worthless feature, a waste of everyone's time. Now I get right to the good stuff... after about 20 seconds of startup.

    MS document compatibility seems much improved. Strangely, I recently had more trouble with Word users opening a 95-formatted file as opposed to a 2000/XP-formatted .doc. I don't know if this is a good thing, a bad thing, and whether it's a reflection on the OO programmers or MS and its moving-target document formats.

    Font detection seems *greatly* improved under X. OO appears to use X's own fonts as well as its internal fonts, meaning no more headaches and hacks to install TrueType fonts under SO. Printing hasn't been a problem at all, although North American users (guilty) may want to make sure the page size is set to "Letter" before printing; A4 seems to be the default.

    Spell-checking is a bit loosy-goosy in detecting misspelled words, as it will sometimes stop at words with double quotes on one side or the other, but it works.

    I still tend to warn people when I send them .docs in case things look screwy, but I hear fewer complaints than in the past.

    I'm eagerly awaiting the next release of OO. I'm not sure if I'll buy Sun's StarOffice 6.0, since I'm not sure the value-add will be there, but I'm satisfied with the program the OO team has produced.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:641C is nice by cavemanf16 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I too like the Open Office 641 release very much. Although I have seen some really goofy conversion between OO and MSWord2k when using tables in a Word document.

      OO runs nearly as quickly on Windows once you get it up and going, although because it's Java, some of the menu's and other 'buttons' are sluggish to respond.

      But Mandrake 8.2 - WOW! Open Office 641 is included as an installable component in the 3 CD ISO set that you can download for free, and it is quick! Once loaded in KDE 2.2.2, it just seems to fly - faster than MS Word on my particular machine (dual-boot Win2k/Mandrake8.2 AMD Duron @986MHz and 256MB 133SDRAM). Given the cross-platform compatibility, I'm going to be using OO at home from here on out for all of my 'Office' needs.

      Now I know not all of you have a good broadband connection to download Mandrake 8.2, but it's definitely a stable improvement upon the 8.1 release.

      Now the only hurdle left is convincing people that don't play complex DirectX video games that Linux does everything for them and more when properly configured (which took me only 2 hours - Win2k took 4hrs BTW, and I've been using it longer than Linux).

      I hate to sound like a buzzworthy press release, but I've been messing around with Linux long enough to see how annoying it can be. Fortunately, I finally have found a Linux desktop I can recommend to my non-computer literate friends. (And if I buy the gaming version, maybe I can convert my fiancee to Linux, OO, and The Sims on Linux ;) ).

  3. This is not a review. by stuce · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is an anecdote about installing it. There was no mention of how it handles Office200/XP document importing and exporting. There was no mention on how stable it was. There was no mention of how well it integrates with the KDE or Gnome desktops, cut and paste, drag and drop. There was no mention on how it's usability has evolved.

    There are MUCH bigger issues with Start Office than does it install quickly or does it hog the screen. How about, can it gracefully replace MS Office for a MS Office user and if not why not?

    The big three apps are Outlook, IE, and Office. We have Evolution, Mozilla and ???? A contender for the missing piece of the desktop puzzle deserves a better review than this.

    1. Re:This is not a review. by moeman · · Score: 4, Informative

      You need to read the actual review. The little blurp here on slashdot is worthless.

      --
      Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy.
    2. Re:This is not a review. by Ravagin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Okay, I agree with you.

      Maybe two months ago, my laptop's win2k partition started getting scuzzy, and I decided it was time to reformat and reinstall (needed to repartition for WinMe (only for ie6, i swear) anyway). Before, I had had MS office, installed on a workplace license from the summer. but I didn't have access to that any more, so I decided to go with some form of StarOffice.

      5.2 was not desirable, so i ended up with the latest OpenOffice. I haven't looked back. The word processor is slick and responsive (128MB, 833mHz piii) and uses the formats I need. The powerpoint analog (forget the name; i use it rarely) served very well when a family member needed a laptop for a powerpoint (as in a .ppt file) presentation.

      I don't usually use many Office apps these days besides word processing, but when it comes to word processing, the latest OO is excellent. The only problem I've encountered- and I remember this from MS Word - is when pasting content from MS IE. OO makes it a bizarre formatted content block, but i'm used to filtering clipboard text through notepad. Heh, it's even replicated the ms word annoyances.

      So. OO word processing rocks. Nothing missing, that I've found.

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    3. Re:This is not a review. by emf · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Maybe two months ago, my laptop's win2k partition started getting scuzzy"

      Hey, your drive is either SCSI or not, it doesn't change.

      :)

  4. What about this bug? by Da+Schmiz · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As near as I can tell, the latest public build of OpenOffice still doesn't have this bug fixed. Since I need to be able to edit MSWord files fairly often, this makes it more or less unusable for me.

    So, for the time being, I'm using MSWord2k in VMware. If SO/OO can reproduce most of the functionality I need (which, for the most part, it does... I was using SO6b happily until I discovered articles going to print with typos because Word's spellchecker ignored them) then I'll happily switch.

    For me, the only substantial difference between SO6 and OO641C (last time I checked) was fonts... SO6 came bundled with a few extra fonts that made it easier to interact with MSWord users. If that's the only major difference, I'm happy to use OO and rip my own fonts...

    --

    "Anything is better than IE, and you can quote me on that." -- Wil Wheaton.

  5. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a stunning upset, a Linux user that never uses MS Office thinks that OpenOffice is perfectly adequate.

    That never happens. Certainly not on Slashdot.

    Gimme some reviews from people whose opinions actually matter and you'll start changing mindshare. Articles like this are just preaching to the choir.

    (And if you're going to compare StarOffice and OpenOffice, at least a rudimentary review of the additional features that come with StarOffice would be beneficial. Like, instead of just mentioning the database features are there, how about saying if they're any good?)

  6. New OpenOffice versioning scheme by abischof · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those not aware, OpenOffice has adopted a new versioning scheme:

    But for purposes of general intelligibility, and to accommodate a general expectation of how an Open Source project should number its public releases, an "X.Y.Z" numbering scheme will be adopted around the time of the release of StarOffice 6.0 this spring. Instead of referring to OpenOffice.org by its internal number (e.g., 64x), people will be able to refer to it by the new numeration.

    [...]

    The first version number will be "1.0.0".

    --

    Alex Bischoff
    HTML/CSS coder for hire

  7. Re:Office and Photoshop by fruey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A) GIMP is not supposed to be a drop-in replacement for Photoshop, although it can do some stuff Photoshop can do without taking up huge amounts of memory.

    B) StarOffice is not supposed to be 100% compatible. The actual shift which needs to take place is towards an open document format which everybody supports. RTF bloats a little bit too much to fit in there, there are loads of others, but anyway, progress is being made. If only I could make corporate policy force RTF or something, anything instead of MS .doc format (which changes with every bloody office release anyway).

    I too am gutted that StarOffice 6 will be a pay-for app, but Sun have to justify development costs sooner or later. At the end of the day, most companies do not object to paying for Office software, and it has to be good. You don't get rid of Microsoft forced Office dominance overnight. Most of my clients think Office comes with Windows, and are shocked to find out they don't have Word when they boot a brand new machine. Wankers.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  8. Cost of Mandrake Club & StarOffice 6 when in s by gdyas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cost to Join Mandrake Club at Silver Level to download StarOffice 6: $120.00

    Cost to upgrade initial membership to Silver Level to get StarOffice 6: $60.00

    Cost of a copy of StarOffice 6, Deluxe Version with documentation from local retailer: $40.00

    And I should join or upgrade my membership why?

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

  9. Sarcasm?? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:
    Sorry, there are no Smart Tags in StarOffice. If your company decides to use StarOffice instead of Microsoft Office, this is a feature you'll have to learn to live without.

    Is this sarcasm, or is Roblimo actually implying that Smart Tags are a good thing??

    In a comparison between MS Office, this should be a huge +5 for Sun. Smart tags are idiotic and intrusive, and should not be supported in Open/Star Office ever!
  10. Re:Office and Photoshop by sheldon · · Score: 4, Informative

    "anything instead of MS .doc format (which changes with every bloody office release anyway). "

    Actually the .doc format has now gone through three releases(97, 2000, XP) without any substantial format changes. Yes, the newer versions do support new features, but the format itself is backwards compatible such that I can create a document in XP and load it in Word 97.

    It depends on what you are looking for, if you just want to be able to read a document... no problem... the substance is there. If you want to colloborate on the creation, well then you have to limit yourself on features and not worry too much about complex layout, etc.

    As far as RTF... That is a Microsoft standard, but a good one for interoperability because it's reasonably well documented. I don't understand your comment about bloat. Do you want support for word processing, or are you just looking for a fancy text file?

    As solid of a product as Office XP has turned out to be, Sun has an uphill battle with regards to StarOffice. I also think XP will probably be the last release of Office that Microsoft is able to sell because it has hit maturity and does just about anything and everything one could want.

  11. Re:Office and Photoshop by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This guy is probably a troll but I will take the bait anyway.

    "Linux is not totally mainstream yet, because:

    A) No adobe photoshop yet. GIMP is inferior, don't even try..
    B) StarOffice is very slow, and not 100% compatible with MSOffice. Microsoft word is still the preferred word processor and such.

    "


    With A.) I have to say that adobe photoshop is not a mainstream app. Its expensive and only photo designers and a few web site designers use it. Not on pc's but mainly macs.


    B) StarOffice is very slow,...

    Star office 6 is alot faster and much of the bloat has been removed. I have never ran it but one of my friends has. He told me its alot better and almost 3 times as fast and is comparable to office97 and has better file compatibility. Version 5.2 on my pentiumIII700 runs ok anyway.
    "and not 100% compatible with MSOffice". Well about an hour ago a just imported some old excel spreadsheets into Starcalc and I had no problems at all with the imports. Not to mention my resume which was originally written in word2000 went through fine in staroffice 5.2. I only had one document which ever exhibbited some errors.

    "Microsoft word is still the preferred word processor and such" This is mostly true in regards to mindshare until microsoft began heavily doubling and even trippling the licensing costs of Office and now is also trying to monthy charge the usage of Office with its upcomming .net my services and hailstorm. I expect a real change in the consumer market for star office if ms ever tries anything like this in the consumer market. I hope their stupid enough to do it. The corporate market will follow if they don't have to ms office to read office documents anymore. This is the reason why word is prefered and not because its better. People use it out of fear there boss would email a word doc and expect an anwser from them right away. If they know they use star office they might use an alternative format and then microsofts arguement could be lost.



    Linux is not totally mainstream yet. Your right. That was never quite the goal of linux and it probably never will be. Linus himself admitted he would quit out of principal if it ever caught more then a third of the market.

  12. I would pay for a grammar check by Paul+the+Bold · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My biggest complaint about this product is the lack of a grammar check. This is the one thing that distinguishes MS Office from most other software. From what I have seen, only WordPerfect has a grammar checking routine.


    Why is this important? My wife depends upon a grammar checking program. On average, it brings up her score on term papers by a letter grade. The only product with a grammar checker for Linux is WordPerfect. I purchased a copy of Corel Office 2000 and installed it under Mandrake 8.1, but it is extremely unstable (sometimes it silently crashes, allowing her to enter text but saving only empty files). Since Corel sold their Linux OS division, they also nuked their online Linux help for Corel Office (which seems to be a violation of their EULA, since they still own the Office for Linux division, but that's another story). The only place this help exists is in Google's cached pages. I would purchase Star Office if it had a grammar checking program.


    Has anybody heard a rumor about plans for a grammar checking program in the next version of Star Office? Does anybody have any hints on making WordPerfect 9 more stable under Mandrake 8.x? Is it worth the money to upgrade to WordPerfect 10? Does anybody know of a stable word processor with a grammar checker for Linux?

  13. Making PDFs : not perfect, but... by twilight30 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Both StarOffice and OpenOffice *can* create PDFs in both Windows and Linux: I've been using this method for about eight months with no major difficulty.

    In a nutshell, the applications rely on farming out the task to Ghostscript. It's not perfect -- TrueType fonts will sometimes result in uncorrectable errors (most often with apostrophes), and of course you may lack the ability to generate indexes and searchable documents, but for the most part, it's more than workable. It's been a godsend for me.

    Finally, both Star/OpenOffices include (on the Linux side, anyway) instructions on how to do this yourself. Use the HTML reference above as a guide, and you should have no difficulties.

    As far as I can tell using this solution is not an option for commercial services, but I am no legal expert, so use this at your own risk if this is the case.

    Good luck.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese