Slashdot Mirror


Your Own Luxury Submarine!

cheapo writes "Not exactly computer related, but fun none-the-less. Someone on my boating mailing list turned me onto this website for your own personal luxury submarine. For a mere $78 million, you can make all the other folks at the marina jealous with a 213 foot toy." That 78 million dollar price tag might seem steep until you discover that it comes with its own docking mini sub. Now thats a bargain!

27 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. I think not... by MarvinIsANerd · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Does GPS work on board when it is submerged?

    1. Re:I think not... by Maj.+Kong · · Score: 4, Informative
      Does GPS work on board when it is submerged?


      Nope. Only ELF (extremely low frequency) signals can penetrate the murky depths.

      Subs take a GPS fix when they're surfaced or close enough to the surface to extend an antenna. In between fixes they rely on inertial navigation systems (and the quartermaster's grease pencil) to determine location.

      --

      Shoot, a fella' could have a pretty good weekend in Vegas with all that stuff.
  2. Gates needs it... by tinrobot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bill Gates should buy it so he can torpedo Larry Ellison's yacht.

  3. And the visions of torpedoes abound by Rosonowski · · Score: 3, Funny

    A3, F5

    You sunk my battleship!!

    --
    01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
  4. Well, thank goodness for /that/ by devphil · · Score: 5, Funny
    Given the significant waterplane area and ample internal volume, which allows for greater battery storage, the Phoenix will out-perform smaller counterparts in surface speed, submerged speed and submerged endurance.

    I can't express how embarassing it is to be lounging around the marina, get challenged to a submarine drag-race, and lose to some other 100-foot submersible because I didn't hook up enough batteries. Finally, with the Phoenix 1000, I'll never have to endure their laughter again!

    (Okay, okay, it's not funny... I'm just bored.)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  5. About time by Foxman98 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to be the founding member of the "Mile-low club"....

    --
    S.t.e.v.e.
    1. Re:About time by Alsee · · Score: 4, Informative

      I want to be the founding member of the "Mile-low club"

      Sorry, no can do.

      You need some serious hardware to reach that depth. The pressure is over a ton per square inch at a mile down. The specs on the website state 1000 feet for the main sub and 2000 feet for the mini-sub.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:About time by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hah, the thing won't dive lower than 1000 feet, anyway. Plus, it doesn't even have a deck gun. What kind of crappy submarine doesn't even have a deck gun?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:About time by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want to be the founding member of the "Mile-low club"

      Sorry, no can do.

      It figures a fellow slashdotter doesn't understand the obvious reference to sexual conquest 20,000 leagues below sea level!

      You need some serious hardware to reach that depth.

      No pun intended?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  6. Steve Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw this on the discovery channel. Supposedly they are all custom made. Steve Jobs has one that will dock in his 200ft yacht, and a Japanese customer wanted one with a laser cannon mounted on it so he could shoot fish. Sounds like Dr. Evil!!

  7. Signifigant Transport Device? by fliplap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As proposed, the submarine would constitute the single largest private undersea vehicle ever built, and arguably, the most significant personal transportation device of the 20th century.

    Besides say...oh...THE AIRPLANE?

    The problem with this statement is actually 2 fold, there's no way a personal luxury sub is the most signifigant personal trasport device of the 20th century. On top of that fact, the thing hasn't been built yet, so it should be of the 21st century. And considering the 20th century brought us the modern automobile, the airplane, and the space shuttle, I highly doubt that anyone would call anything the most signifigant anything of the century...only 2 years into it.

  8. Interesting factoid. by Apuleius · · Score: 3, Informative

    One of the measures of how dangerous a device
    is is the amount of time from the second
    you fsck up to the moment it's too late
    to save you. By that measure, subs are more
    dangerous than the space shuttles.
    Thought I'd share.

    1. Re:Interesting factoid. by susano_otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You might want to qualify that. Remeber Challenger? The time from "catastrophic O-ring failure" to "tragic loss of life" was pretty damn short. I'd imagine you'd have more time than that to save your ass if a submarine bulkhead failed.

      I suppose you meant that once in orbit the space shuttle crew has more time from fuckup to fucked than does the crew of a submerged ocean-going vessel.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:Interesting factoid. by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of note, during the initial two and a half minutes of SRB boost, there is no method of aborting the flight or taking actions to save yourself (such as bailing out, etc).

      For instance, if 30 seconds after launch or so (when the shuttle passes Max-Q) the Hydrazine tank in the nose ruptures and begins to fill the shuttle with toxic fumes or fire, the crew would not be able to do anything until two minutes later when the SRBs seperated. During this time, they could die, even as they stared at flames burning towards them over a period of a minute or two.

      Additionally, if one of the high pressure SSMEs (the main engines) ruptured explosively during boost, shearing the retaining frame that holds the orbiter to the external tank, the tank would detach improperly, potentially knocking the shuttle into the airstream where, like with the Challenger, the aerodynamic forces would tear it apart. This could happen within less then a second, so once again, your analogy is in error.

  9. pheonix? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    how come its not called the nautulis (sp)?

    phoenix is a fiery bird... this is a _sub_

  10. Oh great. by e1en0r · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have enough trouble avoiding all the rich folk in their massive SUVs and now we have to watch out for them in submarines too? All those fishermen better keep an eye out for a submarine with a "My child is Citizen of the Month" bumper sticker on it.

  11. Hagbard Celine by SWroclawski · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's right, for only 78 million you too can pretend to be the leader of the Discordians.

    Green apples not included.

    - Serge

  12. some problems by oo7tushar · · Score: 5, Funny

    there's a lot of problems associated with being underwater...

    First off, there's a limited range where you could use it.

    Second: You'd have to make sure you didn't collide with anything (I'm sure you'd hire a formet sub captain or something).

    Third: it's not all that clear underwater. It's only clear in the shallow areas like tropical and what not. But in the deeper areas it's not all that clear and so you wouldn't see much.

    Fourth: the upkeep on submarines runs millions a year, so the cost is gigantic.

    Now the pros:
    First: you can bring illicit drugs into the country and nobody is gonna stop you (how do you stop a submarine without blowing it up?) and if they do stop you, then you just flush the stuff down the drain.

    Second: It's the mile deep club.

    Finally: If the submarines a rocking don't come a knocking

  13. Quick! Somebody give Kentucky a call! by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 5, Funny
  14. That's nothing by lkaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just get 9 of your rich fellow executives together and you can purchase your very own DD(x) Land Attack Destroyer.

    Comes complete with 5-inch/62 extended range guided munitions and 155mm Howitzers, land attack missiles and of course, Tactical Tomahawk missiles.

    No need to worry about the wife catching you fishing with your buddies either as it use stealth technology to give it almost no radar signature.

    By the way, this ship has a fully robotic mini-sub to allow scouting in unfriendly water ways.

    With a price tag of $750 million, they are just as affordable as these silly luxury 'subs.' Besides, you know what they say about submarine people don't ya?

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
  15. Somebody tell Kentucky! They WANT one.. by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some things you can't make up. From the Kentucky Legislature site.. "Encourage the purchase of a submarine to patrol the waters of the Commonwealth and search and destroy all casino riverboats".

    You can see it at the Kentucky Legislature site HR 256 Maybe they can take the casino high rollers for rides in it after destroying the casino riverboats.

  16. My favorite item from their FAQ page by ckd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have some Luxury Submarine FAQs that people may find interesting. My favorite:

    What type of people buy luxury submarines?

    Interested buyers tend to share one trait, they are all wealthy.

    My comment: well, yeah, people living paycheck to paycheck generally don't buy $78 million dollar items.

  17. Have you heard about the Apple iSub? by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 5, Funny


    Apple iSub. Sink different.

  18. Your Own Luxury Submarine! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    I gotta quit hanging out here and/or get more sleep. The first time around, I read that headline as:

    Your Own Linux Submarine!

  19. i think its real by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if you download their pdf file you will see some pics of some of their smaller subs.

    As far as the largest one it seem they have not made it yet.

    The reason they kind of hide their picuters of submarines, is because the actual boats look kind of ugly.

    They are made to look like an yacht when surfaced, but the part thats underwater looks like a tube and breaks the continuity.

    When they draw pictures they cheat, so they draw the bottom to look like the bottom of an yacht with large windows.

  20. Re:Doubt it by rtaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm impressed. I don't know of anyone capable of walking nine miles in an hour -- they exist, but are pretty rare.

    That said, these boats have about the same speed as a dolphin or penguin.

    http://www.seaworld.org/Physics/key.html

    --
    Rod Taylor
  21. Re:Doubt it by daviddennis · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Most boat buyers, as it happens.

    It costs serious bucks in fuel and maintenance costs to get a 200-odd foot object the size of a modest mansion up to, say, 30mph. There are a few that do it, but, again, costs are fantastic.

    The 143' Octopussy is one of the more famous yachts capable of this kind of speed. According to this page, she has a cruising speed (optimal efficiency) of 22knots, which is about 25mph. At this dizzying speed, she burns up 343 US gallons of diesel per hour. So if you bought your diesel at the bulk rate of around $1/gallon, each hour of operation would cost $343. If you're going to cruise at that speed for a day, we're talking about $8,232 a day. Charter cost is $90,000 per week on season.

    If you look at the picture on the link, you will note that the Octopussy is not level; it's actually moving over the surface of the water. This means a less comfortable ride, and it also means everything you own is pretty much continuously at an angle. Slower yachts glide through the water at lower speeds and are generally more comfortable.

    I know someone who chartered his 120' yacht on an informal basis for $45,000 per week with all expenses included. If my memory serves, his yacht could go about 15 knots, or about the same as the submarine. That should give you an idea of how much speed costs, and why truly fast yachts are relatively rare.

    You have to have - literally! - money to burn to run one of those things.

    D