Slashdot Mirror


PC Prices to Rise?

guinan writes "The Economist is running a story about how now that PC makers think the worst is over, it's high time to raise prices. In particular, the focus is on the steady price of flat-panels and a possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory. Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes, but if you want to buy a computer from a major brand better go for one soon while you can still get all the perks."

88 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. um, ya right. by AA0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    "possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory."

    What is this person smoking? Memory price is almost triple what it used to be.

  2. Decline in price of memory?! by oyenstikker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Memory prices have doubled in six months. What decline?

    --
    The masses are the crack whores of religion.
  3. Major brands: by joshjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    if you want to buy a computer from a major brand better go for one soon while you can still get all the perks

    Perks?

    1. Re:Major brands: by simetra · · Score: 2, Funny

      30 Years of MSN at $21.00/month in exchange for a $100 discount! Yeah Baby!

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:Major brands: by perky · · Score: 2

      Perks?
      single point of contact warranty and support.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    3. Re:Major brands: by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      The Window tax may well be more than offset by the discount of an economy of scale.

  4. Prices Are Up by Dak+RIT · · Score: 2, Informative
    Apple announced it was increasing its prices on the iMac $100 each in March, and ended a promotion on its LCDs. Since then IBM, Dell, Sony, Compaq and Gateway (that I know of, probably others too) have announced they're rising prices 10% to 30%.

    Memory has already doubled to tripled in price, and LCDs are up 25%.

    The time for bargains was over a month ago, if you buy today or wait 2 weeks not much is going to change.

    1. Re:Prices Are Up by stripes · · Score: 2
      Apple announced it was increasing its prices on the iMac $100 each in March, and ended a promotion on its LCDs.

      Yeah, but then they started another LCD promo almost the same as the first (and since both LCD promos were "buy a G4 and LCD and we give you stuff" it could be a G4 promo...)

      The time for bargains was over a month ago, if you buy today or wait 2 weeks not much is going to change.

      Maybe...or maybe you will wait 2 weeks and find the prices have gone up more.

  5. Price is a weird deal by clion999 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many people actively want to spend more. One of my relatively clueless neighbors asked me to bless his decision to spend $2700 on a new Dell. It was top of the line. I knew he did a bit of word processing and spent the rest of the time at home playing flight simulator games. He's not an avid, fast-twitch gamer. I tried to talk him into a $700 system. He wouldn't budge. He wanted to spend that much. He wanted to make sure it was "upwardly compatible" and "expandable", even though he would just spend another $2700 in a few years. There are plenty of suckers who have too much money. It's fine by me if the computer companies take it. The only thing that worries me is that they'll increase the cost of low-end systems that I like. It's been a long time since I did anything but basic coding and editing.

    1. Re:Price is a weird deal by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that a lot of people grossly overpay, however you mentioned that he plays flight sims: These are among the most hardware intensive games available (i.e. A machine that can kick ass in Quake 3 might slog and churn playing Flight Sim 2002). Sure you can turn down the features, but he if he spends lots of time playing then he might be exactly the sort of person to appreciate having every slider near the max, with extensive ground traffic, clouds, weather, etc.

    2. Re:Price is a weird deal by Fweeky · · Score: 2

      > Yeah, but what does that say about Flight Sim 2002?

      That flight sims are damn complex things to render when you have all the detail sliders set to Max. At least Q3 doesn't have a mindnumbing view depth, complex physics, dynamic weather systems across hundreds of square miles which can be viewed from any angle, and LOD stuff that needs to scale from 500km to 5'.

  6. Economy coming back? by th3walrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So because one or two companies show slight gains from last quarter, the entire tech economy is rebounding? Bah... I wonder when media sources would like to give some proof as to recovery, rather than jumping on the optimistic bandwagon in their articles.

    Even so, raising prices at the beginning of a rebound might serve to shove us back in the gutter again. People are tighter with money now, especially tech workers, who are the #1 customers for these technologies. I don't think they're willing to give up the money so easily now.

  7. nooooooo by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Funny

    doo you know what this will do to the "over priced Mac" argument!!!!

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  8. Building your own by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always build my own, stopping by Pricewatch to find the best prices.

    But everywhere I look, places are building custom PCs now. BestBuy was even building pcs to order. They had many vendors, Alienware, hp, compaq, etc.... You could order a custom PC, or build your own with off the shelf items. CompUSA started to carry OEM products awhile back, funny to see those white boxed oem products on sale at a retail store.

    1. Re:Building your own by wesmills · · Score: 2
      CompUSA started to carry OEM products awhile back, funny to see those white boxed oem products on sale at a retail store.

      So you mean they're returning to what they used to do. I doubt many other people do, but I remember the day when CompUSA was actually "Soft Warehouse," and was on Belt Line and Josey in Carrollton, Texas. There was also the original store in Addison down near the Tollway, but anyway .. (You do know that CompUSA, before being bought out by Groupo Sancho (I believe) is/was based in Dallas, right? Corporate HQ is at Beltline and Dallas Pkwy)

      Soft Warehouse, and later CompUSA, used to be great for buying all kinds of OEM/whitebox parts, kind of like what Fry's is these days (but with generally better quality). Between CompUSA and MSC Computers (a local shop), I could find everything I needed for a custom-built machine.

  9. Usual rumour tactics by Baki · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These are just usual rumours to get the people buy now, and not postpone. We've seen such manipulation over and over again (e.g. with memory prices, causing huge price fluctuations; there is always a group earning lots of money on price fluctuations).

    Over time PC prices shall come down inevitably, there is no fundamental reason why progress of technology (enabling more power for same price or equal power for lower price) should stop any time soon.

    Example: LCD prices are bound to fall sharply in the second half of the year. New production capacity comes available in big quantities in july/august (new generation plants, higher efficiency, less shortages etc). I guess some stakeholders want to push people into buying now (out of fear for price increases) to get rid of their old inventories.

    1. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. Cashing in on propaganda. Short term profits perhaps but at the cost of credibility. I still vividly remember all the hew and cry in the press about the shortage of tech workers. Will be a long time before I regain much faith in the press. No longer an information source but a crowbar made of lies.

    2. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      all the hew and cry in the press about the shortage of tech workers

      Some of that (esp. regarding not-so-highly-educated "high tech" workers) was certainly just lemming-see-lemming-write hype mongering... but it's different in that there wasn't really anyone selling their product (except perhaps some of techies wanting even more inflated salaries... but they have less influence on press than companies)

      And shortage for actually qualified and competent tech people is still true, and will be true in near future. Big headlines for tech slump hide the fact that even now it is often difficult to find good enough people, esp. programmers (and related, system architects etc). There are lots of people who claim they have the skills, but who shouldn't have been hired in the first place... and their crying is now obfuscating the scenery.

      I'm not saying it's easy to find a job, even if you are qualified right now, but it's often more of a problem of supply and demand meeting, not least because of floood of "fake" candidates, 20 year old dotcom CEOs, "programmers" who self-taught javascript in 2 days etc. etc..

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    3. Re:Usual rumour tactics by jafac · · Score: 2

      Apple is also playing this game.

      I have opted to upgrade my old system, rather than to buy a new one. I wanted to add the capabilities of putting my home movies on DVDs. I figured that all I had to do was get a DVD burner, bigger faster hard drive, CPU upgrade, some more memory, etc. I spent a fair chunk of change on the hardware, but less than if I had bought a new iMac, and MUCH less than if I had bought a G4 desktop.

      Turns out I was wrong - one crucial step in the DVD process is authoring. And on the Mac there are really two choices. DVD Studio Pro, which is $1k, or iDVD, which is free*. *Disclaimer: if you buy a new Mac with the built in DVD burner. In other words, if you want to burn DVD's you either have to take it up the ass for a new machine, or REALLY take it up the ass for the Pro software package. Granted, DVD Studio Pro is awesome, but after spending $1k on hardware, I'm not sure if I want to spend that much again on software to do something that another program will do for free (if you buy a new Mac).

      And before you call me a whiner, I'm not in the market for an iMac. I want a machine that's upgradable - and I want to preserve my investment in my legacy hardware (SCSI scanner, ext. HD array, ext. CD-R burner, ADB graphics tablet, etc. etc. etc.) - and I don't believe that the current Pro machines are worth what Apple is charging, especially at the high end with the DVD burner and iDVD software.

      The computer industry thrives on sales of new machines. And as sales decline, we'll see pressure like this increase to get people to upgrade. And we'll continue to see stubborn hold-outs like myself. I think it's worse in the Apple market, because Macs in general (not iMacs) are VERY upgradable. Nobody wants to just toss their legacy hardware. OS X, USB, all these new technologies are really putting the pressure on. I'm just glad I'm not one of those poor schmucks stuck with a 9600. It was an awesome platform in it's day, and can still be upgraded - I think you can put dual 500MHz G4's on it, but it's not supported by OS X.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Well, that's the standard stereotypical H1B image. Perhaps there are companies abusing it that way, I have no idea. All I know is there are enough H1B people earning 6-figure salaries to pay neat welfare for lots of unfortunate 8-bucks-or-less working poors, and that many of those H1B workers are actually cream of the crop from their home country.

      H1B program is bigger loss for originating countries than for USA...

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    5. Re:Usual rumour tactics by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      I know, I shouldn't be too generalizing, and should have rephrased that. The fact that someone is able to learn new things fast and without too much external pressure is a plus, not a minus. I should have said something like "'programmers' who 'learnt' javascript by stealing scripts from web pages their friends showed them" or "people who think that even thought only programming language they know is VB, learnt in two-week mail correspondence class" to descibe applicants that were overvalued. And this, btw, doesn't mean I frown upon scripting languages... just that anyone who learns C without any previous programming experience, in a week, is likely to be something special. :-)

      I myself learnt Javascript in a week reading JavaScript bible. And after a month I wrote my first spreadsheet app in javascript (I kid you not)... and although I don't consider myself guru in JS, at least I can create my own stuff, not just cut'n paste existing scripts.

      What I am saying is that genuine skills (no matter how they are obtained) should be valued. Usually people who learn new things fast have strong foundation, wide set of skills that allow them to learn new things easily. I wouldn't be surprised if that was true in your case.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  10. Prove it by Lord+Puppet · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes..."



    I highly doubt the accuracy of this statement.



    1. Re:Prove it by Lord+Puppet · · Score: 4, Funny

      B) I smell a poll!

      Then we'll find out for sure that CowboyNeal built most of our computers.

    2. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since about 1987, I have always built my own boxes, but recently I've wavered... and it's purely on account of the cost issue. Now my time is becoming more and more valuable (higher pay, family) and PC prices [have been] getting lower and lower. It's getting harder for me to justify (especially to my wife) the time it takes to roll my own when the difference between parts and off-the-shelf is only a 100 to 200 bucks (or perhaps even less).

      Used to be, I'd do it just for the love of it (and to save some dough). Now, it's usually just a pain in the ass. And I don't believe hardware prices are going to increase to point where I'll change my mind.

    3. Re:Prove it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You would admit that you don't build all your own systems?

      Hey everyone! Look at the luser! Haha!

      At one time I suspect that most slashdot viewers were the type that built their own systems. Perhaps that is no longer the case. But the reason one builds their own computer system is primarily because no one else can be expected to build it to your spec, if you know anything about computers at all. There's so much crappy PC hardware out there I'm amazed more people aren't building their own. Then again I'm amazed more people aren't running Linux. I guess this would explain the decline of intelligent commentary in the last few years.

    4. Re:Prove it by Spoing · · Score: 2
      Agreed; only my first PC (a lugable) and a laptop weren't home built. The reason used to be price and control, but now it's only control.

      IDE chipsets, video cards, and built-in sound support problems in systems I maintain are enough for me to continue to insist on paying for good parts that aren't bleeding edge when I suggest a computer to anyone else. A friend who, dispite my advice, chose a packaged computer only because of it's price ended up throwing the same computer away reciently...after over a year of odd problems with it. Yet, he's still looking for 'a deal' or a name brand and can't be bothered to investigate what he's actually buying.

      In recient years, though, I've been bitten a few times on parts that should have worked without much fuss but instead required firmware upgrades and special handling such as putting cards in specific slots and BIOS tweaking. With a pre-packaged PC, much of that should not be an issue. In the future, I don't know if I'll start recommending brand-name packaged systems. It is entirely likely, though.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    5. Re:Prove it by stripes · · Score: 2
      Since about 1987, I have always built my own boxes, but recently I've wavered...

      Me too, in fact I bought my first pre-built Intel box (er, unless you count i860 boxes) recently. It was cheaper then I would built it myself. For the most part even decent componants.

      They skimped on the case, it is kind of cheasy. They skimped big time on the power supply, it is monster loud. My machines all have PC Power and Cooling supplies, and are all quiet. This new machine has a normal supply, and it reminded me why I buy my own quiet ones. Plus the keyboard and mouse really suck.

      I think next time I'll build my own since I can get all the parts I really want, not an ethernet that is decent, but one I like, not drives that are decent, but ones I like, not power supplies that suck, but ones that rule.

      For now I just bought a new power supply, keyboard, and mouse to replace the ones it came with.

    6. Re:Prove it by dstone · · Score: 2

      Used to be, I'd do it just for the love of it (and to save some dough). Now, it's usually just a pain in the ass.

      Congratulations. You're no longer a hacker. You're a consumer. Enjoy your appliances. ;-)

    7. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 2

      "You're no longer a hacker."

      Ouch, that hurt. Actually, my daily job involves system integration, software and (sometimes) hardware development, so I kinda get my fill of it at work. Getting married... well that changed things a lot. Way back when (while single), I spent a week of evenings hacking an 8 channel [radio] scanner from Radio Trash. Interfaced the PLL tuner IC to the parallel port on my PC and wrote a C [DOS] program to control the tuning. Wound up with a 400 channel scanner when under PC control. Me very busy now; all I can do is look back on that stuff as "the Good ol' Days"

    8. Re:Prove it by RatOmeter · · Score: 2

      I'm the CEO of my household, and the chairman of the board and majority stockholder is my wife and she don't put up with no shit :~/

      Some people call it 'whipped, but it's really just married.

      Oh, and the VP of R&D is a 2 year old.

    9. Re:Prove it by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. It's easier to go to Home Depot, Lowes, etc and buy a box. That way, you don't have to mess with cutting the cardboard prescisely, folding cleanly or getting the glue spread evenly without making your $HOUSE/$TABLE/$SELF a sticky mess. Plus, you are more likely to find reliable, heavy-duty boxes made by a box company that knows what it is doing.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    10. Re:Prove it by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Yeah, if I had a wife that wouldn't let me spend the time to build a computer (or pursue one of my many other hobbies), it'd be time for a new wife. Relationships are supposed to *enhance* your life, not make you a slave to your family, forcing you to abandon all that you enjoy in life.

    11. Re:Prove it by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      So if getting married forces you to give up everything that's fun in life, why bother? Maybe you picked the wrong spouse.

    12. Re:Prove it by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Wow. And even worse, you've become brainwashed about what you enjoy. That's really scary. I better hang onto bachelorhood as long as possible.

  11. Not according to the article by FaithAndReason · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The phrase "decline in the price of memory" comes from the submitter, not the article. According to the article (and the market), "the cost of some chips has been steadily increasing."

    Oddly enough, the article points out that steadily rising component prices may actually encourage some companies (e.g. Hynix) to get back into a market they had recently abandoned, despite shrinking margins. It also mentions that since Dell tends to pass changes in component prices quickly on to customers (for better or, in this case, worse), that it may actually be a competitive disadvantage WRT Compaq or HP, since those companies sell to retail at somewhat fixed prices.

    What a strange business - when technical innovation is the driving force in a market, the usual business laws don't seem to apply...

    1. Re:Not according to the article by MindStalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well I know from personal experience, that I have a hard time latly making any money building systems for people. With complete systems available from gateway for 600 its really hard to compete, I've got to be able to sell the same system for maybe 450 to be able to sell as I can't provide the same level of warrenty, putting together a complete system with monitor and a legal copy of windows at that price leaves me with no profit.

    2. Re:Not according to the article by mach-5 · · Score: 2

      You are preaching to the choir...it seems like the only money you can make in the PC business comes from fixing/upgrading PC's from Dell, Compaq, Gateway and the like. It would be great if all the little PC builders could somehow pull resources to compete against the big guys rather than run each other out of business.

      My business deals in such low quantity that it is difficult to even buy parts at less than retail...maybe that is part of the problem.

  12. ram prices by kidlinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    "and a possible end to the decline we've seen in the price of memory."

    A possible end?
    The ram I'm using in my system, which I bought late August/early Septemer, has nearly tripled in price since then! At the time I bought it, I thought it was a reasonable price, but now it's just way too expensive.
    Keep in mind that memory prices have a great deal to do with supply and demand (or so they say.) Here's a price FAQ I found at crucial.com when wondering why my ram had become so expensvie.

    --
    -kidlinux.
    1. Re:ram prices by josquint · · Score: 2

      ditto!!!
      I deal with a CEO of a mem distributor.. it has tripled in the last 2 months.. we were gettin about 30 for a stick of 256pc100, now its well over 88

  13. It's called "snob appeal" by FaithAndReason · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What your "clueless" neighbor wanted to you to "bless" was his decision to spend a huge amount of money on a computer merely to demonstrate his commitment to being on the cutting edge. In other words, he wanted you to let him know how L33T he is.

    Normally, I wouldn't be so condescending about a newbie, but the fact that he asked you about it, specifically telling you the price, indicates that he was just showing off. It would be kind of like him showing you his brand new Porsche, as he rubs his chin thoughtfully saying, "hmm, do you think I paid too much??"

    Meanwhile, I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper, especially since you don't have to pay the Microsoft Tax... ;#)

    1. Re:It's called "snob appeal" by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2

      It's like saying "My joystick is bigger than yours :P"

      Most non-computer literate folks rate PC's on PRICE or SIZE of the monitor) not the capabilities.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  14. What do you want to bet by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    The author owns stock in Memory and Processor companies? And probably at least one of the big brand name PC vendors...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  15. they won't go up that much by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really don't think prices will go up too much and if they do go up it will probably be a temporary increase. Look how much competition there is amongst the PC makers. The reason why PC prices are so low is because of the ease of entry in to the marketplace coupled with rapidly changing technology and a reduced consumer demand for the latest and greatest PC. Ten years ago, you had to buy a new computer every two years in order to run the latest and greatest software. Not so anymore, a Pentium II will run just about everything the non-gamer needs to run, plus I've seen some thrifty gamers running P-II's with not too much of a problem, besides a little wait.

  16. Re:Who cares? by rob-fu · · Score: 2, Funny

    As of about 5 months ago, a Sony VAIO RX550 went for $1000. P4 @ 1.5GHz, 256MB RAM, 60GB HD, DVD-ROM, CD-RW. This was the last brandname I ever bought. One box that I built died on me and I didn't have time (or the parts) to screw around building one. Mind you, this was _without_ a monitor.

    The specifications could be found here.

    Now they're selling about $750 refurbished. But what do i love most? That blue light in the front. It just looks cool.

  17. Re:Who cares? by SirKron · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, a "Good enough" system can be had for $200, and the "I'll never need another" system can be had for $700.

    Wow, I take it you do not plan on installing any MS products on your computer.

  18. Re:Who cares? by psavo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only the losers buy systems at DELL, Compaq, IBM, HP or whatever the brands are.

    And BIG companies. Like.. umh.. Those that matter. And consumers, those who really pay manuf.'s bill.
    Those who can build their own system are not a big market, they're more like marginal. Maybe a PR market, but really, really small.

    --
    fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  19. hand built vs. off the shelf by TeaDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    t's only a personal thing, but as far as my own personal machines go, hand built is the only option. The advantages from having carefully chosen each and every component, exactly as required to do the job in hand are worth the few hours (good components/knowledge/luck permitting) it takes to build the thing. Even if I buy a system, the first thing I do is wipe the disks and start from scratch.

    Also, I'm probably not alone in being a serial upgrader, I replace something in one of my machines about once a month, funds permitting. So, I haven't actually built a whole new machine for myself in 4 years, though the only original parts left from that machine are the keyboard and case (currently home to my Linux dev box).

    However, I'd always go the way of prebuilt machines, preferably from one of a few big firms (I'm not going to plug ANYBODY) if I were putting a network together for people (something I do regularly), it's more for tech support and a good warranty than anything else.

    1. Re:hand built vs. off the shelf by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

      This is me currently. I have some parts form my original, but have added a CD-RW, swapped MB's (cuz the original died), changed out a power supply, upgraded soundcards (to get rid of the revolting Aureal card I had and replace it with a Live), upgraded graphics cards (not to a GeForce 3 or a Geforce 4, but to a 2 MX400.....replacing a Permedia 2....it's all I need..I don't play twitch games), upgraded hard drives (40 GB replacing a 12 GB....12 GB was full...one day I wil add it back), changed cases and that's about it. Eventually, I will upgrade CD-RW and the DVD drives (maybe with a combo drive), upgrade the MB to a DDR board (not very likely yet), upgrade memory to 256 or 512 mb ram (very likely), upgrade monitors when my current one dies (to a 15 inch or larger LCD depending on funds). Replacing or upgrading parts is almost always the way to go, unless you need to add a PC. Then, if I were to choose, I would choose a place that built their own machines (Micro Center Power spec machines). When you choose a place that does BTO, not only do you get the parts you want (or at least the specs you want), you get a case that's upgradeable, and not proprietary. A case that can take new upgrades as the come.

      The only time I would buy a whole new machine is if I was adding a machine or getting a laptop. If I am just wanting to upgrade one piece, I can do that myself, and save the bucks. The same way that if something goes out in our car or if you want a new upgraded set of tires it's much cheaper to replace the part then buy a whole new car to replace it. Of course that's until the cars "case" rots (rusts). After that, you buy a new car.

      --

      Gorkman

  20. You have to haggle by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2

    I look more to the used market for bargins in HD's , Memory , Monitors etc when I build a PC.

    I have a greater chance to HAGGLE :D
    Some great bargins there when you haggle them down.

    Even if it isn't used products, you can still haggle. No harm in trying. I always do.

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  21. Re:Why? by um...+Lucas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because there was a huge glut of it on the market. Memory manufacturers had increased capacity immensly during the boom times. Then the slump happened, and they were left with a huge amount of excess inventory and capacity. The only real way for them to alleviate that was to basically dump it into the market at whatever price people would pay... Since there was sooo much, the price was extremely low. Now that inventory and production are nearing demand levels, the price is rising back up again...

  22. Ironic Comment by irn_bru · · Score: 2

    Typical...

    Yet again, where Apple lead, the others follow.

  23. Mod it up! by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

    Yeah maybe its a little rude, but the dude is right...

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  24. Jeeze... by OverDrive33 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought that time travel guy said he'd have his device ready by fall! Now he's already been here and back telling about the rise in computer prices!!

  25. Compromise solution by Doomdark · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I am in a similar position, but for me there is a compromise that I like. Buy PC from a small independent vendor that can customize the system, ie use exactly the components you want. There are some limitations on components, but you can pretty much always choose from at least a couple of decent alternatives.

    What this means is that first of all I save time on not having to assemble the thing and test individual components, plus if something breaks, I can get it replaced more easily. But I still get to choose the exact configuration, and don't have to pay the Microsoft tax if I choose not to (if I choose to, however, I can still get OEM pricing for Windows).

    I may end up paying that 100 - 200 bucks for their work; but usually it's not even that much, since they still get volume discount for components. That is, if I bought components from them, the price would be about equal to what they charge for the whole system.

    --
    I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  26. The timing may advance open source by mikosullivan · · Score: 2

    If PC prices do rise, the timing may be fortuitous for open source. Although Linux still does not seem to be gaining ground on the corporate desktop, it is at least gaining mindshare: it's no longer a wild idea to suggest that a business should entirely migrate to Linux. If businesses do perceive that new hardware is more expensive, they may realize that Linux is like a low-cost hardware upgrade.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:The timing may advance open source by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      If anything, i'd think that i'd more stand to nulify the advantages of a free OS. The rise in hardware prices makes the % spent on software per PC lessen...

  27. What prices will go up (not the economy) by funkman · · Score: 2

    Toxi waste - computers have a very short life and lots of toxic materials.

  28. Re:Who cares? by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not to mention people who want support. Or rack mount servers.

    By the time you buy a rack chassis and the compatable parts, you might as well have purchased it from Dell.

    Or, if computers is your business, i.e. webhosting, you want something with a warranty, because if it breaks, as far as the clients are concerned, it's *your* problem to fix.

    Plus you have to look at: If you can get a system from dell for $500 with a celeron 1.1 Ghz, 256 MB ram, and a 20 gigabyte hard drive, you have to think, by the time you get all that from pricewatch, you're going to spend about $400 by the time you include shipping, they send the parts class R mail, and they're not quality pieces anyway, then you have to pay your employees $10/hr to put it together and test it? Not only do you lose time, but you lose money cause the time could have been spent doing something else.

    Even walmart sells computers with no windows. Honestly, its hard to save money building your own low end system anymore.

    --
    sig?
  29. Too early... by software_non_olet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... the economy is still not really growing - only able to level even.

    Rising is never as fast as falling. And the mergers are not going to reduce the over-capacities. OK the memory was really too cheap, I think. But the rest? Flatscreens are not _that_ cheap.

    So all comes down to wishfull thinking for my opinion. We have ample time to compare prices and bargain. I don't need a Dell or HP - on the inside they are pretty much the same anyway.

  30. Re:Yeah right... by perky · · Score: 2

    In the past you could buy a C64 (when they were popular) for $400 and the disk drive for $200, making a system price $600 (IIRC). That can be tough to find with a PC nowadays (not impossible, just tough).

    hmmm. you haven't really grasped the concept of inflation have you. Now inflation at 2.5% (UK trend) compounded over 12 years runs to a 35% increase. In 1990 you could get yourself an Amiga 500 and a disc for about £500 sterling. factor inflation and you have £675 in today's money. I'm sure I could buy/build a pretty decent machine for that money.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  31. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by SlashChick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You know, I used to think building my own box was the way to go. I'd get on Pricewatch and find the best motherboards, CPUs, etc. and build the whole thing. It used to be cheaper.

    Then my parents needed three new computers at once, and I decided to check out Dell Refurbished.

    For $580 shipped (each), I got 2 computers with a 1.1GHz Celeron processor and one with a 1.6GHz Pentium IV. All had at least 128MB RAM and one had 256MB (I bought extra memory from Crucial.com to bring them all up to 256MB.) All had at least a 20GB hard drive, which was all my parents needed for the office. All came preinstalled with Windows XP Home (fine for office work.) And one came with a Firewire card; one came with a kick-ass video card. All had either Ethernet or a 56K modem (in card format, even, not built on to the motherboard.) All of this also came with free one-year ON-SITE hardware tech support from Dell.

    I was a bit worried about the quality, since I've seen how Dell shafts its low-end users with shoddy parts. But the computers performed flawlessly upon arrival and have since, with no system crashes. Then, when it came time to swap out a CD-ROM for a CD-RW, I was truly impressed. Swapping out of a drive consisted of the following:

    1. Unplugging the computer.
    2. Pulling a thumb-tab at the top of the computer.
    3. Pulling a latch that released the CD-ROM drive.
    4. Unplugging the CD-ROM drive's cables.
    5. Pulling out the CD-ROM drive and putting the drive brackets on the new drive (which just snapped on.)
    6. Sliding in the new drive, plugging in cables, snapping case back together.
    7. Plug in.

    Done! No screws, no screwdriver, no nasty cheap ATX case with a hood you have to struggle with getting in the right place. Check out this picture to see what I'm talking about.

    There was no way I could have built these computers, bought Windows XP, and had any money left over to profit at $580 a computer. Plus, I would have had to put them in an ugly case that would have caused hassle for me later.

    I don't think it's economical any more to build your own computer. This is a GOOD thing -- it shows that computers have become a commodity. Do you build your own TV? Probably not. Microwave? Heck no. The quality to price ratio of pre-built computers is now such that even geeks are starting to buy pre-built computers. I, for one, am glad. Let Dell take over the hassle of being called when the computer has a problem. I'll spend more time doing things that I'd rather be doing. :)

  32. Re:Who cares? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wallmart sells computers without an operating system, but with a winmodem?

    Hmmm. No wonder microsoft has antitrust problems

  33. Re:they won't go up: Period by bstadil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Prices will not go up. The main reason is Dell that is using this downturn to clobber their competitors. Notably Compaq.

    Dell as the lowcost producer only needs to keep the level and the rest will try and fail. Then go back the old pricing.

    This is being done in the Airline industry all the time. One of the major airlines sends a signal of higher prices waiting for reaction. If nobody follows they go down again, usually within days.

    Dell wil not follow as they have publicly stated they will use this trough to gain share.
    The PC price elasticity is such that pretty much price is the only thing that will spur market growth short-term. A hike will kill short term demand as no compelling reason for upgrading now rather than in 6 month time can be articulated.
    There is no new "must haves" in the newer boxes and it will be a while. Dell is the major culprit here as well since they have less than half of the R&D than other majors. Around 2.5% if I remember.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  34. Memory prices just DROPPED by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 2

    See here. 256meg PC2100 DIMMs back down to $70 apiece. Kudos to amdmb.com for the heads-up.

  35. Sony: need I remind you? by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Member of both the RIAA and MPAA. Real Intellectual Property nazis. They love picking on people who hack their products, like mod chip builders and AIBO programmers. They pretty much ran the Dreamcast out of business.

    I will never buy anything Sony. Ever. No matter how kawaii their stuff looks.

    Sony makes Microsoft look like choirboys.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  36. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always been a big fan of "build your own clone!" too - but it almost doesn't make sense anymore. Oh sure, from a "coolness" standpoint - there's really no substitute. That's only because LAN gamers and the computer "3lit3" turn up their noses at anything that isn't overclocked, hacked up with extra cooling fans, and has neon lighting inside of it.

    If you're a regular or "power user", however, and want value for your dollar, the home-built clone is looking less and less viable.

    In recent years, I've built several home-built clones for use at home, as well as used a couple of Dell systems. Neither Dell has given me *any* reliability problems, but all of the home-built PCs have. Conventional "wisdom" of the self-proclaimed PC gurus says "Oh, you need to use better quality parts!" Well, Adaptec SCSI controllers, Muskin memory and Asus motherboards haven't been the magic answer for me - so I'm not sure what they expect I should be buying instead?

    Fact is, most clone cases use crappy quality power supplies. I had one literally go up in smoke while the machine was plugged in but powered off! (Before that, it worked fine for about a year - but 1 year before burning up isn't what I call quality.) Cases with *good* power supplies in them cost big $'s, making the system cost uncompetitive with companies like Dell or HP.

    Then, you struggle with warranty issues. If I buy a name brand PC, at least I can buy an extended warranty that pretty much guarantees me free replacement of any parts that die for 3 years. Try that with a generic clone! You might get a manufacturer 3 year warranty on the hard drives, but that's probably about it.

    One of my Asus motherboards constantly freezes up running Win '9x. With Linux, 2000, or XP however, it's fine. (I wanted Win '98 on it because I used it for MIDI and hard disk audio recording, and had some older software.) No amount of driver updating ever got it stable, even with the latest BIOS updates.

    Of course, now, if you ask the same people that praised that board when I bought it, most will simply tell you "Oh, yeah - that chipset is screwed up. You need the new Asus model XXXX!" Whatever.... This kind of thing only happens to people building clone PCs. The name brand systems get returned as defective when they can't run a popular OS properly, so that's usually weeded out before they go on sale.

  37. Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
    Meanwhile, I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper, especially since you don't have to pay the Microsoft Tax...

    Would that that were true. :-(

    I'm looking at buying a new PC in the UK just now, not quite state-of-the-art, just behind the huge price jump to the absolute top of the line kit. I've looked at several well-reputed suppliers of individual parts, and several manufacturers' made-to-order systems as reviewed in recent PC magazines. There's no question that buying a made-for-you system is around 30% cheaper. For the best prices I found for a basic setup (mobo, proc, RAM, HDD, gfx card), I could get a whole, award-winning system, with almost identical spec + monitor + CD-RW + DVD-ROM + lots more + legal WinXP (even if I'd immediately replace it). Building your own system is definitely not a financially sound move in these parts. :-(

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Cheaper to build it yourself? Not here :-( by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I don't try to compete with low end systems. Without a tax number (or tax-free number... this in the US where buisnesses can avoid taxes) I can't compete. However when I build my own systems I get UW-SCSI, and other such things not found in your low end systems. I can beat the price of a similear high end system.

      I prefer Matrox cards (I don't care about 3-d, and for 2-d they are the best). I get several hard drives so I can keep swap and /usr on differnt drives. (This isn't an issue now that memory was cheap, but on my first system 16 meg was all the ram than I could afford) I can choose my motherboard, getting something that works, whatever is cheap

  38. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by LennyDotCom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    hmm I didn't realize till now that Dell was resorting to advertising in posts on /.

    And to think an AD got a +5

    --
    http://Lenny.com
  39. Couldn't agree more by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    You're so right. I've built a few machines of my own over time. The last was about three years ago (and is still going, though about due for replacement now). It took four major part swaps before I got it all working. Fortunately, I'd bought everything from the same place, and I used them because they had good customer service, so that caused no problems beyond a little frustration. We agreed that next time, I'd let them put it all together for me... :-)

    And you're right about the myth of upgrading bit-by-bit as well, IMHO. You can add new hard drive space, but mobo, processor, RAM and gfx card often go together. If you're replacing that lot, you're really down to "I can reuse the monitor, printer, KB and mouse" rather than "I could just upgrade the mobo, processor, RAM and gfx card" anyway.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  40. Re:Most? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2
    In reality, if you've got an ATA66/AGP4X (for example) mobo and ATA66 drives and AGP4X vid card that are of good quality, you shouldn't have any problems.

    Sorry, my experience is markedly different. Simple things like combining the wrong mainstream motherboard chipset with the wrong mainstream sound card can screw a whole system, as recent experience on several systems with the same combination has demonstrated. (It was a KT7A and SoundBlaster kit, BTW, and in case anyone else is in the same boat, it's worth looking in the alternative KT7A FAQ...)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  41. Re:Who cares? by psavo · · Score: 2

    I look more for what I Want.
    Let's consider my first system. An IBM PS/1 (486sx/25,4Mb/170Mb,14"). I paid my ass off for that almost $2000 (1994 something..).
    Next computer I had, I paid for it with my summerjob, it was about $1500, and it was almost top-of-the-line one (PPro180 when most you could get was PPro200).
    I paid much, much less than any corporation for that one. At that time I already got some connections and I bought it in parts.
    Most of that joy was to get it assembled ;)

    Don't know about you, but I ain't gonna get some dell-dimwit computer full of already b0rken parts (i740..). I'm gonna build mine from ground up. And I will not get any support for that.

    I know only one single reason (for consumer, not prosumer) to get a 'branded' computer: Support. 1-3 years will be almost enough for everyone.

    --
    fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  42. I agree!! by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    If you have a system that uses at least the Intel 440BX chipset, you can run most current software pretty easily, even Windows XP Professional.

    The big bottleneck nowadays is not the CPU, it's not enough memory and too-slow hard drives. Fortunately, memory prices for PC-100/133 DIMM's aren't really that bad, and most 440BX chipset motherboards with a BIOS upgrade will support modern 7200 RPM ATA-100 hard drive (they are backward-compatible with ATA-33).

    I'll almost bet that once you get 256 MB of RAM and a 7200 RPM ATA-100 hard drive, your computer's performance could increase as much as 60%.

    I'm running a Celeron A 466 MHz system using an Abit AB-BM6 motherboard, 256 MB of RAM, and a 10 GB ATA-66 hard drive; most everything I throw at it runs pretty reasonably quick. :-)

  43. Re:Most? by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    Simple things like combining the wrong mainstream motherboard chipset with the wrong mainstream sound card can screw a whole system

    Christ, I'm glad I only deal with Apple and Sun gear these days... I haven't had to deal with any of these cock-ups in years.

    --saint

  44. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

    >> Granted, most of the /. crowd build their own boxes

    This should be the next /. poll. Perhaps something like:

    I often build supercomputers
    I've build my own home machine
    My friend helped me build a machine once
    I plugged in my machine and connected all the cables correctly
    I can put batteries in a flashlight correctly
    Generic CowboyNeal choice

  45. That's EXPENSIVE! by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2

    You can get 256MB PC2100 (CL2.5) in good old Europe for under 70 Euros including (local) sales tax. And the Euros are pretty cheap at the moment, too :-/. DDR prices.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  46. Re:Who cares? by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

    agreed definately.

    Ohhh, if only i had $4000 to spend on a computer. I'd rule the world. I'd start with an apple cinema display and the adapter kit for the PC, a dual athlon 1900+, 1 gig of ram, 100 gig western digital ata100 hard drives, special edition w/ 8 megs of cache, 2 of em, in raid 0, ohhhhhh.... I'm getting excited just thinking of it.

    --
    sig?
  47. Price not the only consideration by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2
    While it's all well and good to say that it's now cheaper to buy pre-built computers than to build, there are a couple of other reasons why you might still consider building.
    • Environmentalism. I always upgrade because I don't like the idea of an entire computer going into a landfill. I kept the full-size AT case I bought in 1990 for as long as possible -- the only reason I eventually ditched it was because of the switch to ATX form factor. I had the same case, the same power supply, etc. running nonstop for over a decade. I plan to keep my ATX case(s) for at least that long. Hey, it's the only planet we've got; we might as well take care of it!
    • Microsoft boycott. I'm willing to pay more for a PC that doesn't have Windows pre-installed, just on principle. I promise to go to the grave having shelled out exactly $0.00 to Mr. Gates in my lifetime.
    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  48. Re: "most of the /. crowd build their own boxes" by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I am a software guy. I spend my nerd thots on trying to figure out things like why some people like fricken OOP, and not on hardware.

    I never really had that much interest in the hardware beyond a basic understanding. My hands are too clumsy and large, and I cracked the &@#$ motherboard the last time I put in extra memory because the doggone things wouldn't lock into place. Fortunately, it still worked miraculously. If I paid somebody, then I could demand a replacement if it cracked on them.

    I might add a new drive and try to add memory, but I decided not to try to learn hardware by trial and error because I don't wanna deal with flakey hardware problems. It if does not work the first time and 40 minutes with the manual does not uncover it, to the shop i go.

  49. Re:Most? by colmore · · Score: 2

    yeah, after the first two systems i built, i was gung ho, and advised all my friends to do the same.

    then the one i built last summer...
    bad motherboard, returned for (payed shipping twice more)
    bad processor, no response from vendor, had to buy a new one
    bad harddrive, returned (paid shipping twice more
    bizarre conflict with soundcard + motherboard

    all in all it took nearly an extra month of troubleshooting and dealing with online vendors, and an extra $150, killing any price advantage i had.

    in the future, i'm going to a local shop, one that's been around for a while, and getting a custom built box. i may pay an extra $100 or so for it, but i'll know what goes in, and if i need tech support, i'll have a warranty, and only need to drive it over to the shop.

    building your own system is fun. i suggest everyone try it once. but there are risks, especially when dealing with the kind of companies that give you the best prices. (www.pricewatch.com)

    the tech support you get from the OEMs is aweful, and they use second rate components.

    local shops are the way to go. i like a place where 3 years warranty actually means "if at any time in the next 3 years, something breaks, drive it in, and we'll fix it as fast as possible."

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  50. I wouldn't build it for others, but for myself... by Kjella · · Score: 2

    I hardluy ever need a completely new computer. With prices dropping all the time (with some exceptions but mostly unpredictable ones), buying for the future is a joke. Every part of my machine has been replaced at some time or the other, most if not all multiple times, but it's never been completely replaced with something brand new. I'm on my 6th CPU, 5th(?) GFX card, 3rd case (small to large to ATX) and kazillionth HDD, and the idea is to upgrade when needed, and not before. Sending it in to some shop to do every little thing costs some in the long run, so I'd rather do that myself.

    For a complete PC I know a nice shop that'll put together whatever pieces I want for a brand new PC for 35$ if I want to. After all the trouble I had getting the @#%$@#% fan to snap on last time, it'll be worth it.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  51. Bah, just purchase it by FallLine · · Score: 2
    Meanwhile, I don't think you need to worry too much about the cost of low-end systems being affected, since we l33t coders "know" that building it yourself will always be cheaper, especially since you don't have to pay the Microsoft Tax... ;#)
    I disagree. I am plenty capable of building my own system, but I haven't done so in years. Put simply, the level of competition amongst PC OEMs is so high that it is extremely unlikely that you, as an individual, can even hope to purchase the parts (or software, depending your your needs), assemble, service (e.g., replacing defective parts), and purchase the software as cost effectively as the OEM can. Yes, they enjoy some profits, but their margins are almost certainly less than your increased costs due to your relative inefficiencies. This is especially true if you take into account that your time is, hopefully, worth more than the people that normally handle the grunt work. Anyways, I think the mistake that many people make, ignoring the ego factor, is they compare apples and oranges. They'll assemble an overclocked system from a variety of less reputable vendors and compare it a similar performing Dell system, but they ignore the poorer reliability, trouble in replacing/returning parts, the cost of their time (less an issue when you're young I guess), etc. It may be true that you don't need or want things like technical support or the bundled software, but it's not as if you can't purchase a PC without these options at the appropriate price. Sigh
  52. Re:Why? by ahfoo · · Score: 2

    Reporting from Taiwan ahfoo sez:
    That last quake cracked a lot of ferrocement buildings in Taipei, and the cranes falling from the 55th floor of the building down the street sounded like all hell breaking loose, but the power didn't even blink and that's what caused the chip productiong problems during the big one a few years ago. There was no influence on production in the science parks where the fabs are according to the local news.
    AND Taiwan isn't the major source of RAM. Korea and Japan produce more RAM than Taiwan. Taiwan's got some too, and so does the US and probably some of those companies use the Taiwan fabs, but from what I've read most of it is from overseas.
    For Taiwan think motherboard chipsets, video chips, sound chips, DSPs and some early CPU action that should pick up over time but not so much RAM. Of course it's all going to mainland soon. So, as far as price increases go. . . uhm, you been to mainland China lately? I think prices are going down long term.

  53. $2700? wimp! by hawk · · Score: 2
    My news system is about $5300, not counting the compilers . . . and, YES, I *do* need that much, thank you . . .


    And for those who have asked in the past, yes, it's still the same system, and it actually, finallly, and supposedly arrives tomorrorow--so it will sit for a week while I'm off at a conference.


    hawk, who *Really* wishes his number-smasher had been here to use for the last week while getting ready for the conference.

  54. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by bartle · · Score: 2
    Conventional "wisdom" of the self-proclaimed PC gurus says "Oh, you need to use better quality parts!" Well, Adaptec SCSI controllers, Muskin memory and Asus motherboards haven't been the magic answer for me - so I'm not sure what they expect I should be buying instead?

    Hey, I'm in the same boat. I built a completely new machine a few months ago, spared no cost and used the best components I could find. I wound up with a machine that was about as stable as something I could pick up at Best Buy and had only marginal performance gains. My theory is that QA in the component market no longer exists while the big name companies spend quite a few dollars making sure their machines can do 95% of what they expect the customers to want. If this trend continues, building your own computer will be a fool's endevour in just a few years.

  55. one purpose v multi purpose by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    A microwave only has one purpose. A computer has several. In fact, if there were microwave parts out there that would let you cook different foods better (a 'cordon bleu' style microwave, or a 'fast food only' microwave) people would probably go for those.

    Most people don't build their own TV, but they do assemble their own entertainment systems (DVD, CD, speakers, etc).

  56. Re: system building *is* a pain, nowdays! by jelle · · Score: 2

    In many cases, it's not brand names of the components that give you quality (anymore). All mainboard manufacturers fluke every once in a while, all drive manufacturers do, a bunch of cdrw manufacturers did, etc. But also, many lower-budget manufacturers make excellent high quality and long-term stable products every once in a while.

    In any case, motherboard manufacturers such as Abit are fair in their warranty service, if you don't mind waiting two months for your repaired item. Drive manufacturers also are good at sending replacement items for broken drives.

    But you don't want to be without PC for weeks waiting for warranty repair, so lesson number one: When you build PCs yourself, build multiple PCs so you can keep spare components laying around.

    A problem here is also that it's getting harder to identify which components are of good quality. Review websites will give you some information, but of course nobody has long-term stability tests for those brand-new chipset mainboards.

    BUT, neither does HP, or Compaq, or Dell. The last Athlon-carrying HP I've examined contained a mainboard based on the lobu KL133 SDRAM(!) chipset (further rant deleted). Bringing your broken PC back to the retailer 9 months after you bought it also doesn't give to an instant fix or replacement, they might send it to the manufacturer for you though, saving you some shipping cost.

    What I'm trying to say is that 'whiteboxing' your own PC is not as simple as going onto pricewatch and finding the cheapes supplier for the latest and hottest hardware reviewed by tom on the web.

    Succesfull whiteboxing requires keeping good track of all review websites (and top magazines such as the german "CT magazine"), and paying special attention to stability issues. Even then, don't go whiteboxing just for one PC, because you'll have much more trouble diagnosing which part is broken or unstable in case you have problems. When you have multiple PCs that you are 'whiteboxing', you can often quickly identify problem components by swapping them around.

    For succesfull whiteboxing, you will want to run your own stability tests (memtest86, cpu+disk loads, benchmarks, etc), and you will want to have alternate (varying brand or model) components to swap in and out to find the optimal combination.

    You will want to do all testing while you don't have to wait for it, so it will have to be at least your second PC, so you can keep surfing the web for example while a 48hour test runs.

    Then, you want to deal with suppliers that you can simply send low quality components back to with not much more than a quoted reason like 'unstable', 'unreliable', or 'incompatible'. If you can't find such a supplier, you want one that is 20+% cheaper than the rest so you can simply stoss one in every 5 components you buy in the bin if they are pieces of junk.

    For most people, that means that they can only be succesfull whiteboxers if they build computers for themselves, and their family, and maybe the aunts friends, the neighbours daughter, their pets outdour house and that cute girl in the bar.

    But that's the way it has always been, and nothing is changing there at all. Whiteboxing is not for the amateur, if you want the perfect system and you're not ready to go all the way, then buy your stuff at the dealer and buy the expensive extended warranty, and forget about whiteboxing. If you don't mind messing with the stuff, reading and learing about the stuff, and doing it for others too (including fixing it when they bring it back broken (which they will!)), then go ahead you've found yourself a more interesting alternative to fishing or stamp collecting.

    That's what whiteboxing is all about, it's not about spending a couple of evenings at pricewatch and toms web site after watching a technet show and then flushing the cash for the 'perfect' system that you will love for years to come.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  57. Re:Who cares? by jelle · · Score: 2

    If your budget is $/Eur 2500, and stability is very important, than use that budget to build two simpler and each slightly different systems. You'll love it, especially when for example you think the video drives of that top-of-the-line video card you bought are causing those hard-to-reproduce problems. You'll have a PC right next to it with a different brand videocard that doesn't hav the problem, and a 20-minute swap-diagnostic will show you if the problem is related to the video card.

    Plus then when that harddisk goes, or powersupply gives up right before that deadline, you'll have a working spare computer on which you made that backup of your files yesterday!

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.