Slashdot Mirror


How To Profit From Telemarketing

jsprat writes: "From the Seattle PI: A man gets an automated message from a telemarketer. He complains. Two weeks later, he gets a check and an apology! In the article, another man is mentioned who claims to have collected $2650 dollars over the last year for illegal spam, faxes and automated calls. Another weapon to fight these clowns?" What's your personal cash-won record?

110 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Ironically.... by qurob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Telemarketers call YOU so THEY can make money....

  2. 045Ax 65384... CORE DUMP..... by The_Fire_Horse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi there - this is a note to the reader of slashdot. If you are reading this message, then the software has cored and the experiment is over.

    In case you aren't aware there aren't really any people posting on slashdot - this is all one gigantic IRC bot specifically designed to make you believe that you are part of a community. You (yes - *you* ) are talking to a very clever computer program.

    Well, sorry if we confused you, and hey thanks anyway. (Oh, yes and because you are the only reader our logs show that you have several 'karma accounts' and a number of 'troll' accounts - you never fooled anyone.

    Even your emails to Taco were ironic - you didnt know, but Taco is actually a QuickBasic program on an old XT!

    Thanks for reading and posting.
    Over, and out.

    Woah! Hey relax - its a joke (I've seen the Matrix too many times)

  3. Ben Livingston's success by Jerky+McNaughty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ben Livingston has a web page with a lot of good hints for anyone interested in suing these people. He also has a complete list of everyone he's sued, the outcomes, and in some cases, even a scanned image of the check they sent him.

  4. My personal cash-won record? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    No way am I pissing off these guys...I'm gonna make MILLIONS by selling those penis-enlargement pills! And it's not even MLM!

    I hate to brag, Timothy, but I think you're being just a little short-sighted about this.

  5. I�m gonna be rich by fabiolrs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If a get 1 buck from ever spammer that sends me unwanted messages Im gonna get rich soon! :))

    Is there a law in US that obligates spammers to give people money or that makes spam a crime? Here in Brazil we have no such law neither any law that makes spam a crime. I believe obligating these stupid people to pay some money to people they send spam would descrease A LOT the amount of unwanted messages we get everday...

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
    1. Re:I�m gonna be rich by morcego · · Score: 2

      Actually, I too live in Brazil. And receives a lot of spam.
      From my personal experience, most Brazilians ISP do act agains spammers. I for myself have managed to have dozens of spammers have thier accounts closed, and even a few that got charged by their ISPs. The most sensible exception is UOL (one of the largest ISPs, but which fortunately generated very little spam). SPAMs from Brazil accounts for about 15% of all the SPAM I get.
      In any case, if I had the time, I think I could sue the spammers here, for taking advantage of a service which I pay for (my internet connection), and I think I could win.
      So, don't think everything is helpless here. Just get a good lawyer, and talk to him about the things you can do.

      --
      morcego
  6. Never underestimate . . . by div_2n · · Score: 2, Funny

    the power of noisemakers. When you know it is a telemarketer, just set the phone next to any of the following for an extended period of time. Say . . . 5 minutes. -A blender -A garbage disposal -A TV/Radio speaker -You ass after eating beans -etc. Remember, they pay for those calls. Make them earn em!

    1. Re:Never underestimate . . . by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      That is simply not true, and a very shallow, foolish way to look at the 'human interface' that is talking to you on the phone.

      Sure, the job might seem unpleasant and immoral to you. However, they are indeed people, and have lives just like you do, outside of work. It's a huge emotional strain on some people to do it - the constant rejection, people yelling at you, swearing at you, being very poor human specimens.

      I know this from personal experience. I was in dire financial straights this past summer, and there were absolutely no other jobs available (small retirement town). I lasted for less than 2 weeks. It was depressing, and I lost a lot of faith in the human race. People are selfish bastards; when I say 'people', I mean you. Just say, "I'm not interested, but I appreciate your call. Goodbye." It's not that difficult. Stop being so carnal by finding glee in harassing telemarketers (unless, of course, they're rude... then give 'em bloody hell!)

      Personally, there were many times that I'd hang up from a downright hostile call, and think to myself, "I have their address (newspaper marketing) and number in front of me, and I know where to find a gun," due to the anguish of being constantly insulted, rejected, and verbally injured (being an emotional person and depressed at the time, didn't help, I'm sure...)

      And saying that telemarketers are worse than drug dealers is completely off the wall, too. Drug dealers sell, well, drugs. They harm people, destroy lives, and break up relationships. They steal entire lives, never mind the few seconds it takes to give a polite "no thank you, goodbye". I doubt you, or most other people, get irrate about commercial breaks on TV.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  7. I get about 9 to 10 spam emails a day by 412-613-8636 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried unsubscribing and sending complaints via email. Next day I received some more email from them, so I actually openned and read some of them and they all offered me GREAT deals on cool merchandise.

  8. Gotta try this: by colonelteddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello friends, how would you like to make some easy money?

    human: Sure!

    It's simple, all you have to do is listen to this message, follow a simple procedure and BOOM! its money in your pocket

    human: ... (hmm... accentuated silence!)

    Simply send 10 dollars to the following address, or leave us your credit card details, and we'll send you all the information you need to complain about us! Yes, it is that simple!

    --
    c - a blessed +5 grain of salt
  9. Would you like to be as happy as me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Send one dollar to:
    "HAPPY DUDE"
    742 Evergreen Terrace
    Springfield, USA
    You have the power!
    1. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by demaria · · Score: 2

      They never say the full name, but the state's postal abbreviation is "NT". It's been shown on Homer's drivers license at least once.

    2. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by curunir · · Score: 2

      Hmmm...I think I'd rather have the dollar.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  10. stat 101. by QualityWithAKei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Schroeter, who already works at home and consequently hates telemarketing calls more than the average person...

    right...
    he hates telemarketers more on average then i do, just like i'm smarter then the average person and drive better then the average driver.

    --
    --------------------------------------------
    Customers are taking to many free napkins...
  11. So far, about $3250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    And counting. Not bad for a poor grad student. I make sure I post to Usenet quite a lot and surf random porn sites. This seems to be the way they get hold of your address. Once they have it on one list it will soon migrate.


    The key here is persistance. Its amazing how almost anyone will crumble when faced with a legal threat. Think about the way Scientologists went after slashdot, thats how I go after spammers. I may even be on thin legal ice so to speak, but the mere threat of the law usually sees these guys settle. At the moment, its cheaper for them to do this.


    Its also worth noting that I am Canadian which makes it a whole lot more complicated (and therefore expensive) from a legal perspective.


    I would urge slashdotters to take up my hobby, it takes about 1hr/week and can be very lucrative.

    1. Re:So far, about $3250 by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Uh huh. Yeah, I'm just going to porn sites to get on spammers mailing lists so I can sue them.

      At least you've created an original excuse ;)

    2. Re:So far, about $3250 by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Not only that; he uses Lynx.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  12. Well, I work for RIAA by prisoner · · Score: 5, Funny

    and we just got (pinky in mouth) One Million...oh wait, this is enemy territory....never mind...

  13. $500 by Blue23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, $500 is not a lot. Especially compared to the actual cost of a lawsuit. The number of people who know their rights, and properly preserve the evidice is low. It might just be part of business-as-usual for YourHomeCareer.com to pay those who know the law.

    They get PR (and all PR is good PR), come across as "ok, we did something wrong but we're good upstanding people who are willing to be good members of the community and make amends." They come out smelling like roses for a fairly paltry sum. It's a wonderful thought.

    =Blue(23)

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  14. Telemarketers have evolved... by Gruneun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (I was on the fence about putting this out as someone may start doing it, but...)

    I received a phone call a few months ago. The call rang once and ended before I could pick it up. When I checked the Caller ID (never go home without it) it had a number outside of my area code with a label, "Prize Claim Dept" attached.

    When I checked the area code it was somewhere in the Carribean. I have seen more than a few jobs listed in the classifieds that had similar numbers, charging $20 a minute (legally) without warning.

    This was pretty crafty, though. First, they get you to initiate the call, making it much easier for them to get your money. Second, if there ever was a problem, they could easily argue that they dialed the wrong number, realized it, then hung up. They didn't expect you to call them.

    Ethically lacking, but pretty crafty.

    1. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't really call that telemarketing, but it does remind me of a scam that was going on when pagers were becoming popular.

      There was a 'company' that somehow got a hold of large lists of pager number and would page them with their toll number. I think they were charging $90 a minute or something obsurd. I don't remember the outcome, but they were heavily sued by several large parties.

      ~LoudMusic

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    2. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I saw this warning a while ago, in an email. I figured it was about as realistic as the warnings about my kidneys, but before I told the person that it wasn't true, I called my operator and asked. It turns out, this may be legal, but while I was on the phone, I found something else out. My phone company, PennTelecom will not a.) pass along any third party bills, (except for a long distance provider specified by me), and b.) will not give out any personal information on me. The effect is that if I dial any number that is supposed to collect money from me, the company that is supposed to collect the money has to send me a bill themselves, they can't just add it onto my phone bill. However, they also can't send me a bill because my phone company adheres to their privacy policy and won't give them my name or address.


      I used one of the 10-10 numbers once, and I got a bill from AT&T mailled to me, addressed to one of my aliases. Obviously they'd pulled the name from some marketting database and managed to match up my phone number that way, but they obviously didn't have any actual evidence to force me to pay that bill, or ruin my aliases credit.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    3. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by zbuffered · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you're a troll?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    4. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 2

      True, But my phone company doesn't even pass along other carrier's bills to me. I don't have a long distance carrier selected, so if I dial and do get connected at all, then I can presume it's on my local plan. Anything else it's up to who ever I call to set up an account and bill me on their own. Most numbers that expect to get money when I call them expect to get it from my phone company, so they don't bother with me. When my phone company doesn't give it to them, they're at a loss, all they have is my phone number.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    5. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 2

      10-10 Numbers are third party calls, so they patch through. They aren't expected to be my long distance carrier.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    6. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 2
      I promise, it's true. An also, I've noticed that the long distance carriers *have* stopped patching through calls. Occasionally, it seems like I can slip through, but for the most part, 10-10-321 or 220 will give me a message that I need to contact their billing office (with no information on how to do that, FYI.)


      I also think it's an odd circumstance. I'm guessing I asked for extra privacy somewhere along the line, and the two policies clashed.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
  15. How about $10000? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, you wouldn't necessarily get $10000, but the telemarketing firm would have to pay that in fines if you request that you take your name off their list and they do not do that.

    I've worked for a telemarketer before (yes, I have been to hell and back), and I k now for a fact that we were required to immediately, upon request, take a person or business' name and information off our list without any questions asked. If we did not, the firm was risking a $10000 fine. This is federal law. If a telemarketer continues to bug you after requesting that your name be taken off this list, just remind them if this little law.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:How about $10000? by amunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      If we did not, the firm was risking a $10000 fine. This is federal law.

      I think the federal law you are talking about is the Telephone Consumers Protection Act. The relevant law and complications with using it are analyzed pretty well at Junkbusters U.S. Laws on Telemarketing.

      The amount is not $10000, but $500.

    2. Re:How about $10000? by dirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The hard part is proving you requested to be taken off their list. You usually need to at the least send a letter before it is "official" that you requested to be removed. You can request it when they call, and a lot of them will remove you, but if they don't there is no way for you to prove you requested it. It comes down to your word against theirs, and the burden of proof is on you. So yes, by law they have to remove you if you request it, but if they don't it's up to you to prove you requested it.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    3. Re:How about $10000? by denzo · · Score: 2

      I don't think, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, that they could just take you off their list, per se. Otherwise, your name could pop back on their list since they couldn't track if you were previously on the list. Instead, Telemarketers must put you on their "do-not-call" list when you ask them to, and they have to keep your name on that list for 10 years. Then if you still get a call from them, you can sue for $500.

    4. Re:How about $10000? by Aexia · · Score: 2

      There's not much excuse for not being able to record phone calls as evidence.

      Aside from it being illegal most places in the United States.

    5. Re:How about $10000? by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Aside from it being illegal most places in the United States.

      Not quite true.

      The Federal law is one-party. That means that a call can be recorded at the consent of any one party. Most of the states are also one-party, including my home state of Colorado.

      Check your own state law to be sure, but you're usually pretty safe taping incoming calls.

    6. Re:How about $10000? by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I thought that it was more effective to request to be placed on the "Do Not Call" list. If you simply request to be removed, your number is taken off but can be added again later since they don't have any record of it existing. If you explicitly ask to be placed on "Do Not Call", they must keep a record of your number for X years and they must not call to it in that time.

    7. Re:How about $10000? by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      Many states require only "one-party" consent (which means that you may unilaterally record a conversation). For interstate calls, the federal law (which is also "one-party" consent) applies.

      This issue came up in the Linda Tripp saga -- since her phone conversations with Monica Lewinsky crossed a state line (Maryland to DC), she was able to legally record them.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    8. Re:How about $10000? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      That must be why Maryland was going to (or did, I don't recall) prosecute Linda Tripp for recording her calls with Monica Lewinski. It absolutely does depend on state law. I don't think I've lived in one yet where you could record calls without consent and notification, although in at least one notification could consist of playing a beep every n seconds and consent the other party not hanging up. As always, accepting legal advice from random people on the net is a horrifically bad idea. As a rule, they don't really know the law and presume too much. Notably, that the law is the way the law should be.

    9. Re:How about $10000? by inburito · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you also have to bear the cost of small claims court. Sending one of those corporate lawyers over there is not going to be cheap..

      Business class flights, stay at a nice hotel, reimbursement for full time. Even if the consumer in the end gets only 500usd the company has spent a lot more by then.. overall 10kusd might not be a figure far off.

    10. Re:How about $10000? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Course it's not illegal. Why do you think your bank, ISP, etc. write "all calls may be recorded for training and quality assurance purposes" on their literature.

      As the guy says, it's your conversation, you can record it. You don't even need to tell the person you're recording the call.

      Of course, it doesn't really affect me much what's illegal in America, but here in the UK it seems that BT have backed down (or been legislated down) against their "thou shalt not connect unapproved equipment to our phone lines" stance, and there's been a flurry of new recording kit for phones on the market.

      In my standard electronics catalog, there's everything from simple phone-jack-to-3.5mm adapters to recording kits, inductive couplers, digital voice recorders, and even sticky microphones to record mobile phone conversations.

      Personally, I just use an old tape recorder, and find it a great help when my landlord claims not to have agreed something.

  16. PS by ndogg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This also explains why some telemarketers would be sending people money. They'd rather pay $500 to $2500 instead of $10000. This is just a way to keep people from saying anything.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  17. Re:Money for nothing? by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

    What's so hard about writing down what time they called and if they call when they're not suppose to to send a letter?

  18. Small claims by pogen · · Score: 2

    A local telemarketer has ignored my do-not-call requests seven times in the past two years. At $500 a pop, that's quite a bit of money, especially when you consider the possibility of treble damages (it's obvious that they are willfully and knowingly ignoring their do-not-call list, since we've reminded them every time). I've written a letter demanding payment for damages, but how should I proceed if they ignore it? The damages are too high for small claims court. Is it worth the trouble of going for the full amount, or would it be better to lower my sights and stick with small claims? Have any of you ever (successfully) sued a telemarketer for more than $3000?

    1. Re:Small claims by viking099 · · Score: 2

      shoot, just make sure that the part of the suit against them that details damages (punitive and real) includes lawyer's fees...
      that's not uncommon in many suits, just ask any public (city, county, etc) attorney.
      that way, you get the benefit of your money, and your lawyer is paid for by your opponent!

    2. Re:Small claims by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Record it - they are required to put you on their do not call list right on the spot (I've been told by telemarketers before that it can take up to 30 days, though the law says immediatly) and keep you on for 10 years.

  19. Well I'm no lawyer, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    so I wouldn't know about using the law to get back at spammers (as in the article), but here in redneck country we have much more effective methods.

    For example, just last Tuesday I got $574 dollars and a $200 Rolex from a salesman who failed to notice the "no solicitors" sign on my front gate. He said he'd sue for excessive force and I said he's welcome to have his other eye blacked out too, and to get the fuck out of my house before I take that spiffy suit to go with my new rolex.

    Must be new to the area.

  20. Telemarketing Calls by karnal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't receive any telephone calls from telemarketers (that block their ID), since I've got this nifty little "privacy manager" service.

    Basically, it just asks the caller for their name, and then prompts me whether I wanna accept or deny (similar to collect calls). I notice that nowadays I have 0 messages on my answering machine, whereas before, I'd get 2-3 junk calls a day.

    Also, whenever I sign up for "advertising" promotions (kroger plus card, big bear card, etc) I use my modem line. I've actually heard someone call it, probably to the tune of once a month. I can imagine their suprise when they hear the modem on the other end..... :)

    --
    Karnal
  21. Destroying the telemarketing industry. by defile · · Score: 5, Funny

    See this page for a method that would surely destroy the telemarketing industry if enough companies did it.

    1. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by behrman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose we're starting to mildly drift off topic, here, but I've actually been doing this sort of thing (at home) for some time now. While I can't exactly transfer the telemarketers around, I do find great entertainment in keeping them on the phone for quite a while (once I managed to hold one captive for about a half hour), feigning interest, passing the phone around to various members of the household (works best when I'm visiting my parents, and I have half a dozen or more bored people at my disposal), or just acting(?) very stupid and making them explain things over and over. Naturally, when get bored with them, I'll cheerfully wish them a good (day|evening|weekend) and remind them to put me on their do not call list.

      I even managed to get some form of sweet revenge with the Lexington, KY newspaper. I was called one evening, at home, and told about some special weekend offer for home-delivery. Understand that ordinarily I would refuse, simply on principle. The irony is that I had *just* finished looking up the number for home-delivery, so that I could take it with me to work the next day and order home-delivery. I figured that in this ONE case, they actually had good timing, and a service that I was going to buy *anyway*, so... fine: I'd order the paper. One problem: the woman that called me could *ONLY* sell me their weekend package, and I wanted the full-blown, 7-day-a-week, normal-price service. I was dumbfounded.

      So, the next day, I gave the paper a telephone call and asked to be connected to new subscriptions. I was connected to a very helpful gentleman who explained the whole subscription plan to me about seven or eight times and then I told him the story that I just related. I explained to him that I was a customer that was ready to buy -- all they had to do was take my money. I then told him that because of that experience I was no longer interested in receiving the paper, and that I would be buying the Cincinnati newspaper at my local Kroger instead. He got rather offended at this, and accused me of calling just to waste their valuable time. I somehow supressed a laugh and told him that I knew *EXACTLY* how he felt, since that's the feeling I had after their telemarketing call.

      All in all, I doubt that anyone there will ever notice, or even know how I felt about the whole thing... but, still, making an unsolicited call to a telemarketer (yeah, I know, it was just to the company that contracted a telemarketer, but, still) just seemed to drip with delicious irony.

    2. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Croaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm... imagine what could be done with this technique given:

      1. A reserved phone extension someplace.
      2. A phone sound card connection for this phone.
      3. A PC with voice recognition/voice synthesis software. Voice synthesis would have to be very convincing... perhaps just using canned voice samples. For voice recognition, you might only have to catch a phrase here or there, or maybe just detect silence.
      4. Faux "AI" software, such as Eliza or Racter. Perhaps seeded with marketspeak phrases ("yes, but what's the ROI?", "How do you address the currently shifting business paradigms?") The longer the conversation gets, the more surreal and random the AI should get ("Is it effective on monkeys? Our server room is full of monkeys. Flying ones. They glow blue. And they are tiny.") The AI should also throw out bones form time to time, to keep the marketeer on the hook ("Excellent!" "I can see a need for this in our organization, RIGHT NOW!").
      5. An MP3 server to let everyone else listen to the precious sounds of a telemarketer slowly going insane.
    3. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by swb · · Score: 2

      This won't work universally.

      Most legitimate sales people with any experience will see through this ruse in a minute. They'll quickly stop wasting time on your company and move on. They won't sell this "contact" information to anyone. Sales leads that produce sales are valuable and can be sold. Sales leads that don't produce sales are junk and only tar the seller.

      Many businesses, especially those that have sales forces, will not pursue this strategy because they value sales contacts, even if they don't buy anything. Some sales people are interesting to talk to and can provide valuable information, even stuff they're not selling.

      Sure, there are some sleazy sales people but they're easy to hang up on. But there's a lot of legitimate people trying to do business.

    4. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Great idea, one problem though.
      Mr. Feynman doesn't exist!

      He doesn't? He's one of the worlds leading physicists, I'm reading one of his books right now! Now research will be slowed to a crawl because he will be eternaly tormented by telemarketers!!
      Damn you! Damn you all to hell!!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      The AI should also throw out bones form time to time, to keep the marketeer on the hook ("Excellent!" "I can see a need for this in our organization, RIGHT NOW!").

      Er, no, and that's the problem with this suggestion. If the AI says anything that can be plausibly represented as consent, the telemarketer can use the "bone" on you (e.g. "slam" your long-distance service to the carrier he's selling).

      Pity -- your idea sounds like it would have great entertainment value.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    6. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by BarefootClown · · Score: 3, Funny

      What ever happened to the good ol' days, before all of this digital switching crap, when the lines were directly connected by copper running from my phone to his? The days when telemarketers could be dealt with by liberal application of a 25-kV spark coil? Never did have a return call from those companies...

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    7. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Not if they don't have authorization. Here, if the phone isn't billed in your name, you can't change any of the plans. Otherwise, they could phone up your four-year-old, tell her they'll give her a popsicle if she switches carriers, and slam you. Obviously, your AI phone machine can't commit to any financial plans without your approval. It's not that smart.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    8. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Well then it's an even better name to use, since he's dead.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    9. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Well, then you can sue them, and buy an even better AI to do all your work, and retire to your winter home on the coast of Spain!

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  22. Do you have somewhere we can read this law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it would be nice if we could get a copy of this law. Print it out, set it by the phone, wait for the telies and the start reading....

  23. Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is more information on the state of Indiana's anti-telemarketing law that was recently passed, and everything that goes along with it.

    We might not have daylight savings time, but at least we are trying to keep out telemarketers. I suggest you look over the text of the law before making any comments, since it provides many ways for people to legally call you, such as not-for-profit orgs using their own volunteers, etc. Anyway, I think it has helped tremendously, and I'm still waiting for a business to get sued over it to really enforce it. (That will be the true test of the law.)

    I also believe it is being challenged by a number of groups right now. At least it is a step in the right direction. Heck, the attorney general based his entire last campaign on this issue alone.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      DST makes sense. Since we all are set in rigid schedules with school and work, we can simply adjust our clocks to provide more time awake with the sun in the sky. Before we all had to be at work or school at 7 or 8, people went to sleep and woke up with the sun, since it made sense to be awake when the sun was out. They followed daylight savings time without realizing it =] (Although, they adjusting in small amounts throughout the year.)

      Anyway, there are numerous businesses who have avoided our state due to the lack of DST. It makes international business difficult, and is a pain in the ass when the 4 corners of the state are all on different time zones, while the rest is on EST. There's significant debate on this issue each year in the statehouse, nothing ever gets done; but something might soon.

      The only arguments I've seen against it are 'Farmers will spend more time in the fields', 'Kids will wait for buses in the dark', etc. I don't understand most of these arguments, since a farmer will only spend as much time in the field as necessary, and if DST is done properly, kids are less likely to be waiting for the bus in the dark.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by ruvreve · · Score: 2
      We might not have daylight savings time

      Parts of Indiana DO have daylight savings time. I like to think of Northwest Indiana as the more advanced portion of the state that is ranked 50th in technology related jobs. I mean we didn't even beat Rhode Island...RHODE ISLAND...geez....

      *turns and pouts*

    3. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yeah, NW, SW, SE all have DST, because they are close to major metropolitan areas that are on a different time zone, so the only way to really effectively get business done is to adopt the timezone of the big city near by, otherwise you're going to be on the same time or an hour off half the year, which is a big problem. If the whole state went one way or the other it'd solve many problems. Northwest Indiana would be more advanced if Gary wasn't there to give us that prestigious Murder Capitol of the World title or whatever it is.

      Indiana: Top Ranked in: Syphilis, Obesity, Smoking, Murder (in Gary at least).
      Bottom Ranked in: Education (K-12), Jobs, and right now competent politicians who can't pass a friggin budget for crap but have no problem trying to pass a law to indemnify themselves of all past wrongdoings!

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      The thing with DST is that Indiana can either try to make the rest of the world get off DST, or can adopt it to allow ease of interstate and international commerce. Which one is more plausible? It's not even a matter of whether or DST itself is a good thing, it'd be like not having trains, and forcing everyone who wants to do business with us to fly stuff in, guess what's going to happen? The places will go somewhere else, because there is no way we'll get everyone else to drop rail transport in favor of airplanes (hazardous waste?). It would make more sense for us to adobt rail transport than to make everyone else drop it. Same thing with DST.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      The thing with DST is that Indiana can either try to make the rest of the world get off DST, or can adopt it to allow ease of interstate and international commerce.

      I don't get why non-universality of DST is a problem for interstate and international commerce. In those situations, don't you have to deal with different times anyway, due to different timezones?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2
      I've included an excerpt from here. That will provide some insight into it. Also, I know that at least Paine Webber downtown has to come into work an hour earlier half the year so that they are open when the market is. It's a pain in the neck for airlines and travelers. It's not that it's a different time, it's that the time difference changes depending on what time of year it is, thus making it confusing as to what the time in Indiana (or elsewhere if you live in Indiana) is.



      Business, Economic & Sales Opportunities:
      "Time uniformity is critically important to consumer convenience and to the complicated task of flight scheduling. Obviously, if states exempt themselves from uniform time standards, various arrival and departure times would change, necessitating a revamping of schedules and possible elimination of flights."
      William J. Burhop, Senior V.P. Air Transport Assoc. of America
      Testimony before US Congress, April 24, 1985

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      woops, actually, right now we are on the same time as Illinois. Proof that this is too stinkin' confusing. =]

      --
      What?
  24. Do you have a local spam law? by bmongar · · Score: 2

    Checkout Spamcon to see if there is a local law allowing you to sue spammers.

    --
    As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    1. Re:Do you have a local spam law? by bmongar · · Score: 2

      Oops I meant this link the other one was just for missouri.

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
  25. Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by ProfBooty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw an ad last night for some device which I believe was sold by the sharper image which you hook up to your phoneline. The device then dectects if an autodialer has been used and then claims to delete you from their database.

    As I recall it was called the telezapper. And costs around 50 bucks.

    http://www.telezapper.com/

    From their website:
    The TeleZapper is designed to "zap" calls made by predictive dialer computers by doing two things: first, by disconnecting predictive-dialed calls before you can be connected to a live telemarketer and second, by deleting your phone number from telemarketing computer lists. Whether the TeleZapper will affect computer-dialed calls from other sources depends on the type of computer equipment and how that equipment is being used. Therefore, it may also "zap" calls from other organizations that use predictive dialer computers, such as charitable organizations, blood banks, public safety and service organizations, market researchers, opinion and political pollsters, and academic institutions.

    They "delete" you from the database by sending a line disconect signal. I don't know of anyone who has used this device so I can't attest to how well it works.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      we had an askslashdot on that device a several months ago, asking similar questions and also how it actually worked.

      but as for how well it works -- my local news did a test of it sometime in the past few months. they had someone (who works from home) record day&time of calls for two weeks, noting who from, etc, and not requesting removal. then they plugged in the telezapper. after two weeks, the number of calls dropped drastically.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by dbitter1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      My girlfriend has one. It makes a short beep sound whenever someone picks up the phone (any in the house.) Someday I might go over there with an o-scope and see what frequency it is and post it somewhere...

      In theory, these also work to various degrees if sent down the line:
      NC - No Circuit Found: 985.2 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1428.5 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms
      IC - Operator Intercept: 913.8 Hz, 274.0 ms; 1370.6 Hz, 274.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms
      VC - Vacant Circuit: 985.2 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1370.6 Hz, 274.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms
      RO - Reorder (system busy): 913.8 Hz, 274.0 ms;1428.5 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms

      --
      For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
  26. Working from home by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
    A home page testimonial says that "Anthony P., a former corporate employee, now works from home and earns over $35,000 per month!"

    Yeah, work from home by just picking up telemarketers' calls, and then collect the loot...

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  27. Telemarketers by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 4, Funny

    When ever telemarketers call me, i usually play songs on the keypad. mary had a little lamb usually goes over well

    --
    --JonnyBlog
  28. What about Canada? by kawaichan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does Canada have a similar law regarding to this as well?

    --

    kawai
  29. File separately. by TheMCP · · Score: 3, Informative

    File a separate suit over each incident in which they called you illegally. I would guess that the small claims court's limit would allow for a $500 suit. (Wouldn't it?)

    It'll be slightly more of a pain in the ass for you, and you'll have to pay the seven filing fees, but it's probably easier and cheaper than hiring a lawyer and going to a full regular court over it.

  30. Maybe not.... by truesaer · · Score: 2

    Most telemarketing systems call a bunch of people (say 4) at a time, then connect the first person who picks up to the available operator. That way they don't waste time on people who aren't home, etc. This is why you get so many hangups when you answer your phone....they don't need you anymore.

  31. META Spam anyone? by sluggie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Hey, asdasd!

    Do you want to get rid of all those spammers? You can earn BIG MONEY by suing them.. bla bla bla...

    Just click here to buy the unique 'How to sue the bad guys' whitepaper for just 9.99!

    This is a one time opportunity! Request it now and get instant access to our pr0n affiliates for free!"

  32. pennsylvania law by mach-5 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pennsylvania just passed a law that could make telemarketers liable for up to $3000 for each call. The new law allows residents to be placed on a "Do Not Call" list. The list will be made publicly available to telemarkets, and if they make the call then they get zapped with the fine. Here is the press release.

    1. Re:pennsylvania law by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's $10,000 and a federal law. There is a federal DNC list that you should be registering at. You won't be seeing that 10k though, because the FCC steals about 9k of it.

      You can also tell the telemarketer (calmly) "please place me on the do not call list" and they will stop calling you (trust me, it works. They aern't idoits and they will put you on a DNC list). If you don't say the word list they are NOT legally required to stop calling you, so "please stop calling me" or "don't call here again" or "I dont take these kind of calls" will all be ignored, and you will probably be laughed at for being an idoit.

      If you spaz on a telemarketer, they probably mute you and start laughing at your idocy. It requires no effort to get off of all telemarketing lists, forever, yet people like you seem to think that its a huge thing.

      TCPA was passed in '92, why don't you learn a little more about it if you hate telemarketers so much. It's the law you should be worried about, and it only requires a quick call to the FCC to get everything rolling.

      If you think I'm just making stuff up, I used to work at a telemarketing house in college, with alot of other college kids who were trying to make money. In general, there are some fuckups (I know one kid who lied to about everyone he called) but most telemarketers are just doing thier job. If you don't want them to, just say "Put me on the do not call list please", wait for them to say "goodbye" after rattling a little speech, and hang up. It's not hard, and it's idoits like you who give telemarkters a bad name, because your too stupid to learn your own rights.

      (It's also interesting that the same people who hate telemarketers are the ones who think that telephone CSR's owe them something, the amusing part is most often they work for the same outsourcing company -- and often will call one day and take calls the next)

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    2. Re:pennsylvania law by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      If I'm not mistaken the federal "Do Not Call" list is still a proposal. Plenty of state-level ones, though; I'm looking at the one for Florida right now.

      Still, a 10-grand fine for the telemarketer and I _only_ get to keep 10% of it? Fine by me!

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  33. I won 3500 and am suing a few others for 5x that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here in NJ, when most of these companies are located out west or south, it's easy. I sue for 499 a pop, they never show, auto judgement for me, and if they refuse to pay I can fill out and file for free an asset seizure on their bank accounts.

    The deal is that anything sent to my business domain name is for business (in or out). I clearly have a statement at the bottom of the site that states that unsolicited email will result in an hourly charge, with a two hour minimum for my services and time. The judges here crack up when they see that, but they have yet to rule against me. I just don't do it enough to be annoying to them.

    Specifically, I have filters with auto responders in place stating that the email was unsolicited and that I reserve the right to bill them for time and expenses per my companies standard policy. My email details that they should remove me from their list and immediately disclose the source from which they acquired my private email (which is NOT listed on the site or given out freely on the net). If they don't respond, fine, if they respond negatively or I recieve email from them again unsolicited, I sue. If they actually hand over their source for the mail address (a few have), I sue that company for disclosing my private email and information without permission (that suit is automatic by the way in NJ).

    Most just remove me and don't send any more mail, a few are irate and spam me some more or repsond directly in a derisive way (they get sued), a couple have given me their sources and remove me from the list, and a few even apologize (usually the larger, more legitimate outfits).

    So far I have spent about four hours in court (I only make 175-200 an hour, so I profited here) and about six hours on the net or working towards filtering and responding. I laugh my ass off at the ireate repsonses, and even more when I have their bank acount frozen until they pay their legal obligation to me settled by default in small claims court.

  34. Useful links if you are in the UK by aunitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you live in the UK here's how to stop unwanted telephone marketing and fax spam, just go to these wonderful web sites and sign up. It really is as simple as that.

    http://www.tps-online.org.uk/

    http://www.fps-online.org.uk/

    These are the links to the telephone preference service and fax preference service.

    Telemarketeers are not allowed to call you by law if you are signed up to these services. And any half decent telemarketeer with respect them (I know that's an oxymoron) otherwise they won't be in business for long.

  35. heh by sinserve · · Score: 4, Funny

    > What's your personal cash-won record?

    Telemarketing his highly profitable. I *can* make 2000 dollars
    a week, working from home, and being my own boss.

    Even a wyoming highschool dropout can do this

    If things go as planned, I will retire at the tender age of 35, married to a russian
    woman, and grow my penis upto 25".

    --

  36. Wasting their time is easy by neophase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Answer the phone politely. Determine that it's a telemarketer.
    2. Say "One moment please."
    3. Put the phone down and go about your business for 5-10 minutes.
    4. Pick up the phone, say cheerfully "Hello!", (telemarketer reminds you), say cheerfully "Sorry, of course! Just a sec."
    5. GOTO 3.

    I watched a friend's mother waste someone's time for close to an hour this way...

    --
    ==================================
    neophase
  37. Boring! Try having more fun with 'em :-) by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 3, Funny

    When you know it is a telemarketer, just set the phone next to any of the following for an extended period of time.

    Nahhh.... too easy
    You should piss about with them insted. eg

    Them: Selling double-glassing (very common in UK)
    You: Sorry mate, my house dosnt have any windows (over time, tell em you live in a nuclear bunker or something)

    Them: "I'm carrying out a survay for..."
    You: HAHA.... so am I !!! What are the chances of that!!!

    Just keep 'em on the line and wind them up for as long as possable until they tell you to fuck off and slam the phone down!
    The other alternative is yor very own free porn chatline. Just talk dirty for a bit and see how long it takes 'em to hang up :-)

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  38. War-Dialers by rosewood · · Score: 2

    I have been doing work in a lot of Insurance Agency offices and a lot of them have war-dialers. THey start @ 9am CST and stop @ 5pm CST and start @ XXX-0000 and dial to XXX-9999. They generate reports and call back those that get machines at a different time of the day.

    I HATE FUCKERS THAT CALL ME WITH THAT SHIT. It fucking drives me NUTS. Everyone I know hates that automated calling shit.

    One office set it up 2 weeks ago and last week they had 4 appointments based off the calls and 2 new accounts created.

    The other office I know that uses it averages 5 new accounts per month from that machine

    We hate them - yet they are suprisingly effective and cheap to own/use

  39. Yes, but what happens if... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2

    ... two month after such a stunt, you hire a new guy whose name happens to be Feynman. The poor rookie will get all those cranky telemarketers' calls...

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  40. Yes, there's a US code against this by operagost · · Score: 4, Informative
    US Code 47, sec 227 prohibits the use of automated systems to call residential customers. This includes automatical dialers (you know, the kind where you say 'hello' and it takes the salesperson several seconds to answer) along with recorded messages.

    Unfortunately, most people don't know this, and are buying devices that quietly send a signal that sounds like the 'number disconnected' tone when you pick up the line, just to cut down on the problem. Make the telemarketers shell out the cash, not yourself!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Yes, there's a US code against this by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      This includes automatical dialers (you know, the kind where you say 'hello' and it takes the salesperson several seconds to answer) along with recorded messages.

      No it doesn't. The rule reads (in relevant part, emphasis mine) "It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States to initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes or is exempted by rule or order by the Commission under paragraph (2)(B)"

    2. Re:Yes, there's a US code against this by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      You cut out the end of that sentence...

      (i) to any emergency telephone line (including any ''911'' line and any emergency line of a hospital, medical physician or service office, health care facility, poison control center, or fire protection or law enforcement agency);
      (ii) to the telephone line of any guest room or patient room of a hospital, health care facility, elderly home, or similar establishment; or
      (iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call;
  41. Use your cell phone by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    I always use my cell phone number whenever I give out my number to anyone. In fact, since my non-cell phone belongs to my roomate, I don't really have any other number to give. In any case, while I used to get phone solicitations on a regular basis, I've gotten exactly 3 since I got the cell phone almost a year ago. Yes, I could have sued for $1500 (3x$500), and I may have won, but it wasn't worth it for me, because they stopped.

    It's really nice getting zero telephone solicitations. Unfortunately, I can't sign up for USPS payment services (can't give them a cell phone number, has to be your home number), and had to fudge the truth when I signed up for Netbank (can't give them a cell phone number, so I gave them my efax voice-mail). I probably would have given the USPS my efax voice-mail number, but then they started asking for my SSN and my driver's license number, and I thought that was a little too ridiculous.

  42. Christ! by grytpype · · Score: 2

    There have to be five articles a week on Slashdot about some schlub who got some money from a spammer or telemarketer! Give it a rest already!

    --

    - Have a picture

  43. Do that and we'll call back. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    If you participate in that kind of infantile behavoir, telemarketers will put you down as 'not home' and you'll be called again and again and again until you bother to act like an adult.

    Okay, I've been a telemarketer, and let me tell you that the job sucked enough as it was, without clowns like you thinking they where being cute by attempting to screw with us. (There where plenty of people who tried to screw with us, by the way, so the telemarketer you talk to has probably heard it all already.)

    Look, for a while, working as a telemarketer paid the bills pretty well, compared to other jobs you can get as an undergrad student. If you don't want telemarketing calls, just ask to be put on the company's do not call list, which every company must have by law. And be nice to the HUMAN on the other side of the phone. They're just trying to make a living.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think I speak for all the people just trying to spend a pleasant evening at home when I say,

      We don't care how telemarketers feel.

      They don't mind interupting our evenings, we don't mind being rude in return.

      Especially the auto-dialers!

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by catfood · · Score: 2
      If you participate in that kind of infantile behavoir, telemarketers will put you down as 'not home' and you'll be called again and again and again until you bother to act like an adult.

      It's infantile to make funny noises when the telemarketer interrupts your life, but it's not infantile to keep calling back where you know you're not wanted?

      Earn your living any way you like, but please don't get all high and mighty when you're going out of your way to annoy people who won't buy your product anyway.

    3. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

      I'm sure your job pisses someone off. Keep that in mind.

      Telemarketers get more than enough positive answers to make the activity profitable, so even if it pisses you off, the next person is just waiting for a call about our wonderful point-back credit card, or whatever it is.

      The means and the end of behaving civily are the same. If you take 30 seconds to be polite and ask to be put on the do not call list, YOU WILL ULTIMATELY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF INTERUPTS in your 'pleasent evening.'

      If you enjoy being an ass to a complete stranger more than you enjoy an uninterupted plesant evening, by all means, go ahead with your infantile behavoir. Otherwise, behave like an adult, and you'll curtail the calls you get.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    4. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      I'm not an ass, I'm not infantile, I'm just firm with them. The rudest I get is to re-iterate "No thank you, please do not call again" and hang up on them.

      Telemarketers are not actually very good about not calling back when I instruct them not to, except for the few times (with repeat offenders) that I've threatened to sue them.

      If you enjoy being an ass to a complete stranger more than you enjoy an uninterupted plesant evening, by all means, go ahead with your infantile behavoir. Otherwise, behave like an adult, and you'll curtail the calls you get.

      Now that you're done being insulting, please explain why a 7:30 pm sales pitch should be treated with the same repesct and courtesy as a call from my mother.

      I think it would be nice to require caller-ID info be available on marketing calls.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    5. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One more this. This statement: "behave like an adult, and you'll curtail the calls you get" is absolutely not true.

      I've had much better success being unfriendly and threatening than I have when I've tried to be engaging and nice about it.

      Also, Mr. Offended Telemarketer, telling your target market to "act like adults" is pretty arrogant. Perhaps your industry should try acting like adults, rather that making crank calls for a living.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    6. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Your home page sums it up:

      http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    7. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Pentagram · · Score: 2

      If you participate in that kind of infantile behavoir, telemarketers will put you down as 'not home' and you'll be called again and again and again until you bother to act like an adult.

      And that's adult behaviour?

      Nope, sorry, I'm just bloody-minded. If someone tries to inconvenience me I'm going to try and piss them off as much as possible. Same principle as stopping a cheque if someone is trying to steal from you even if it costs you more to stop it than you would lose otherwise.

      And be nice to the HUMAN on the other side of the phone. They're just trying to make a living.

      Trying to make a living by stealing my time, not by providing a service or creating a product. They're parasites. They contribute as much to society as fleas. And I'll make their job as difficult as possible.

    8. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by maxpublic · · Score: 2

      Fuck the telemarketing swine. They called my house; they're intruding on my time and my life without my permission. I don't give a rat's ass that there's a human being on the other end, nor do I need to. As far as I'm concerned, you trespass on my property (and that's what calling my house without permission is, the laws be damned) then you deserve whatever I decide to dish out.

      Hazards of the job, son. Deal with it.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  44. MAKE MONEY FA$$$T!!!! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2


    Here's how! Get your name and number on everyone's telemarketing list, and then sue them when they call.

    For more information, send your (certified) check for $500 to [ADDRESS CENSORED]!!!!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  45. I bought one... by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    ...for my mother at X-mas. It emits a tone everytime the line is picked up. Last I heard, the number of crap calls had noticeably dropped. I don't know if telemarketers will be able to work around it either. They'd be fools to not program their auto-dialers to listen for those tones and remove the "bad" numbers from their list. Someone will probably think of something though.

  46. ugh. by macsox · · Score: 2

    um, any way to to block stories from the 'please-kiss-this-man' department? it's not really my lifestyle choice.

  47. Irony by freeweed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone else find it extremely funny that someone called 'prisoner' also works for the RIAA? :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  48. Don't waste $50 on the "telezapper"... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    One of our local TV stations did a feature on it. They determined that it doesn't work very well at all.
    Article is here

  49. Faxes are the worse! by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 2

    My problem is worse then spam and soliciters, it's faxes. The kicker is I don't even have a fax machine. I finally borrowed one from a friend so I could get the number to call back and cancel but it takes time, and fax spamers don't seem to care what time it is, I get calls at 2am with no regard for the fact I am sleeping.

    Most of them marketing faxes, some are from large companies who say they can't figure out were the fax is comming from (I haven't gotten any since my last call so I hope they figured it out), one is from the Nigeria scam. This is crazy, there needs to be a law regarding caller ID on faxes, If I hadn't borrowed a fax machine I would still be unable to call them. It's illigal to fax unsolicited, but I have to pay for the fax machine to find out who it is?

    I would change phone numbers but I've had this one for about 6 months now, at first it was not bad but it got 100 times worse since then. Based on some of the faxes I am quessing my number used to belong to a realestate agency.

  50. Putting liens on bank accounts costs $$$... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Collecting money is not that easy, and not that cheap. I had a service business for many years, and had to deal with a lot of deadbeats. Getting judgements was not the problem. Collecting the money was. Even if you already have the bank account info, and even if there's money in it, it costs a lot to collect it. At the very least, you have to get an abstract of judgement, then there's a fee to file the lien. Last time I did this, the courthouse fees alone were almost $200. On top of that, there's another fee to actually get the money from the offender's account. You have to pay this up front- the marshalls won't just take a commission, like lawyers will.

    1. Re:Putting liens on bank accounts costs $$$... by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can always just turn it over to a collection agency. I don't know exactly how that works, but I think they just take a percentage.

      And they have all the right connections and lawyers to get the money. About the only time it doesn't work is when you aren't exactly sure who the person is, as is the case with some spammers.

      But if they have an actual business, instead of just calling themselves one, it should work.

      And I don't think it costs very much if they don't get the money. Certainly less than it would cost you wasting time looking for them, and they have a lot more resources and know the laws.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  51. Telemarketers suck. by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    I know I'm just preaching to the choir here, but...

    Telemarketing should be outlawed. Seriously. All it does is annoy people and invade their privacy, and for what? So someone can get an easy paycheck? Come on. Get off your you-know-what, find a real job, and stop supporting an industry that does NOTHING but piss people off.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  52. Simple Solution and you don't have to sue by Satanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Put your phone number in a newspaper, make it cheap, do it once and advertise you will "rate the telemarketers expertise for $1000 a call"

    Simply answer the phone, get the pitch, request the address and phone number of the company.

    Then, mail them a bill.

    Once the bill is mailed, wait two weeks and file a lawsuit suing the company for not meeting a contractual agreement. Keep a copy of the ad handy and you will win in court.

    I actually heard about a friend who did this and won. He did it quite often, he got quite a bit of money the first year. Now, he rarely ever gets calls.

    Might be worth a try.

  53. Ahem by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Larry Parker got me, 2.1 Million....

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  54. Irony (their website was featured in the article) by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, the company might actually be happy about the whole thing.

    Many people read their website name in that article.

    Sometimes even negative publicity is good publicity. Unfortunate but true, they are likely to get some sales as a result of that.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!