Slashdot Mirror


Review: The Rock as a Hard Place

Sorry, but I really love this trash, even as I grasp why more of the world hates us every day. The Scorpion King is as American a film as anything the Duke might have made, an astonishing mish-mash of digital effects, hip-hop, kung fu, Mighty Mouse,Indiana Jones, the Mummy (and his Return -- from which the idea for this enthusiastically stupid movie was spawned), and the World Wrestling Federation, to whom the film owes its star and its theatrical notions of head-butting machismo. If they ever give an Oscar for lacerations, grunts and thumps, this one is a runaway favorite. Or as the Rock says about 100 hundred times in the movie, "Live Free, Die Well." If you need escapist entertainment from your hyper teched-up lives, this is the movie for you. If the Rock can survive tyrants, thieves, traitors, arrows, impalement, knives, spears, swords, sandstorms, fire, poison, snakes and killer ants, you can get through a boring day at work.

It seems oxymoronic to bother with plot lines in a movie like this. The Rock plays an Akkadian assassin named Mathayus who takes 20 blood rubies to go kill the sorceress (Kelly Hu) who advises the barbarian warlord Memnon (Steven Brand) on battle strategy and is thus revered by his vicious marauding armies. Boy, is this Memnon a mean leader. He butchers women and kids, destroys civilizations and plays headgames with his sorceress. Digital effects have conjured up many strands of marauding armies, but all of them look the same, like ants in battle-armor racing across a barren plain with angry clouds swirling overhead.

It's hard to imagine any human, even the Rock, taking the drubbing he takes in this movie. The Duke was a wuss in comparison. He's buried in sandstorms, tossed off of parapets, run over by wagons,and stabbed, sliced, shot (by arrows) and gored countless times. On top of all that, he has to watch helplessly while Memnon butchers his brother. The Sorceress, on the other hand, turns out to be a babe who strolls around in thongs, does kung fu, and relates instantly to the Rock's sophisticated style of combat and international diplomacy. The Sorceress makes it clear that she loses her powers if she ever has sex. You'll never guess what happens.

The hip-hop background in a movie allegedly set in ancient Babylon is pretty neat. And in one of the oddest roles of his or any actor's career, Michael Clarke Duncan (The Green Mile) plays another lummox, the Nubian King/Warrior Balthazar. He's almost as big as Rock, and the early confrontation between the two conjures up those great dinosaur battles in Jurassic Park. This role gives Clarke, who is way too good an actor for this, the chance to wear dreads and spout all sorts of racial jokes at the Rock, whose face seems locked either amusement or anger throughout the entire 88 minute movie.

The digital effects are cheesy, almost throwaways, and the film's makers have no illusions about the Rock's acting skills, so he starts fighting almost from the opening shot and keeps on fighting to the end. I have to say I had fun watching this silliness. It's such an American fusion of different cultural styles, and it's so undemanding a movie, that you leave the theater smiling and relaxed. And the kids who thronged the theater where I saw it loved it, whooping and laughing throughout. The humorless censors loose in the land don't need to worry about the sensitivities of the American adolescent. They can take a movie like this, and see just how silly and cartoonish it is.

56 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. movies and Jon Katz by 56ker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reading this review makes me think of "If you don't want to see it you don't have to go" - then I realised that applied to a Jon Katz review too!

  2. JonKatz needs to go back to html school. by Kredal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Here, I'll fix it from my post down.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  3. I need a lesson in social studies... by Da+Masta · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Rock plays an Acadian assassin

    Correct me if I'm wrong but Acadian would be like french-canadians in the maritimes, right? Unless the Rock does dress up like Anne of Green Gables and shouts "mange de la merde" as insults, this is not the same ethnic background as the Rock's character. So is the a typical JonKatz f*ckup, or is there some other race with the same name? Some background info on them would be nice too...

    1. Re:I need a lesson in social studies... by Accipiter · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's actually Akkadian.

      So yes, it's the typical Jon Katz fuck-up.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    2. Re:I need a lesson in social studies... by jejones · · Score: 2

      OK...now we know what to smell for; the Rock is cookin' crawfish etouffé!

    3. Re:I need a lesson in social studies... by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Da Masta sayeth:

      The Rock plays an Acadian assassin

      Correct me if I'm wrong but Acadian would be like french-canadians in the maritimes, right? Unless the Rock does dress up like Anne of Green Gables and shouts "mange de la merde" as insults, this is not the same ethnic background as the Rock's character. So is the a typical JonKatz f*ckup, or is there some other race with the same name? Some background info on them would be nice too...


      Accipiter sayeth:

      It's actually Akkadian.

      So yes, it's the typical Jon Katz fuck-up.


      Jon Katz actually saideth:

      It seems oxymoronic to bother with plot lines in a movie like this. The Rock plays an Akkadian assassin named Mathayus


      Well, apparently Da Masta and Accipiter, it is actually you who seem to be the fuck-ups. What is this we-hate-Katz thing? What is this, Aint-It-Cool-News? Does he offend your political sensibilities or something?

      Ad hominem, it ain't just for Clinton anymore!
    4. Re:I need a lesson in social studies... by IanA · · Score: 5, Informative

      it was spelled wrong originally; Katz changed it after realizing his mistake

    5. Re:I need a lesson in social studies... by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      Well, apparently Da Masta and Accipiter, it is actually you who seem to be the fuck-ups.

      Hi Jon. Nice to see you finally got a Slashdot ID other than JonKatz.

      In any case, it was originally spelled incorrectly as "Acadian". I also noticed that Katz took the liberty of correcting "rupees" to "blood rubies" as well, based on another comment submitted.

      You have to love writing an article, then changing it when comment-submitters point out flaws and inaccuracies. It seems the Slashdot readership now has the job of "Editor", and fuckwits like Katz can post anything with an "eh-I'll-fix-it-later" attitude.

      Why isn't Slashdot getting my money? There's nothing worth paying for.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  4. What was Katz expecting? by Ryn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Was he expecting a well-written script, historically accurate, with dull brainteasers that would appeal to some british aristocrate?
    I had fun watching the movie. It was a good ass-kicker. Light plot, lots of nice action. However, the director was under influence of G. Lucas, because Jar Jar Binks has made his other appearance in the movie, this time played by a stupid human.

  5. i formatting by Ronin441 · · Score: 4, Funny
    >i>

    And if you screwed up your formatting, well, you should have hit Preview...
    1. Re:i formatting by Ronin441 · · Score: 4, Informative

      OK; I guess my joke is deeply inobvious now, but when the story first went up, there was a tag improperly closed in the first paragraph, with >i> instead of ; meaning that the entire rest of the story was in italics.

      Unlike us plebs, of course, editors have the power to silently fix their typos. :-)

  6. The Movie really sucked by themurray · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunely the reviewer has very low standards on movies and must be easily amused by drivel. It had very few good moments, but nothing that would make me buy the DVD or watch it again. It was better then I expected, but not much.

    This movie was SO lame that I had to fight not fall a sleep. It shows that hollywood should be burned to the ground and salted to prevent them from making more movies. I use to be a monthly movie goer, but if I get to the movies in a six month period is now rare. Spiderman and Lord of the Rings are about the best possible movies I see in the near future....

    I am sick of remakes and reusing much cooler scenes from other movies in an attempt to make a new movie better. They need to break the standard Script mold and allow original ideas to try, since I am getting very sick of them.

  7. My favorite scene from the previews by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is where the two guys in a swordfight break each others blades. Considering that were dealing with nearly stone age level technology, how did the chip the stones to look just like steel?

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  8. Rocky Rocky by WildBeast · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you criticizing the most electrifying man in sports entertainment? Know your role, jabroni :)

  9. The Rock vs. Shakespeare by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The 16th century had Shakespeare as their form of entertainment and we, sadly have WWF and the Rock here in the 21st. About the only incentive I have for seeing SK is Kelly Hu... Mmmmmm... Kelly... But it'll be a slighty frosty day in hell before I acually pay to see it.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:The Rock vs. Shakespeare by John_Booty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love Shakespeare and I loved this movie, too. don't forget the Shakespeare was popular entertainment back in its day, too- it was entertainment for the masses.

      Shakespearian plays were full of sleeping around, romantic mixups, stabbing, and comic mischief. As wonderfully-crafted as most of his tales were, as as witty as the dialogue was they're not exactly the most sophisticated/complex things things in the world.

      So, the gap between Shakespeare and enjoyable trash like this movie isn't as far as you might thing. Personally, having seen many of Shakespeare's plays, I think most people think they're "sophisticated" just because they're in old English.

      Need evidence? Look at any Shakespearian translation set in modern times, performed in modern English....

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    2. Re:The Rock vs. Shakespeare by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      The vocabulary in Shakespeare is about _ten_ times what you'll find in a movie like this...

      (heh, 'insightful'? 'this is kinda like shakespeare for our time' constitutes 'insightful'?)

  10. Katz using the royal "we"? by s1r_m1xalot · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sorry, but I really love this trash, even as I grasp why more of the world hates us every day.

    Either Katz is starting to use the royal we by the end of that sentence or he spelled "me" in a funny way. ;-)

    1. Re:Katz using the royal "we"? by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      I also find it funny that he claims to have a grasp on something. When did that happen?

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    2. Re:Katz using the royal "we"? by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I was going to include a metaphor about how his lack of grasp is as extreme as having one's palms greased, but I caught that one early.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  11. 20 blood rubies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, it was "20 blood rubies" NOT rupies.

    I saw this yesterday, The Rock kicks serious villain butt, he gets the girl, there's an occasionally amusing sidekick. End of plot. But hey, it's a diversion, it's not a movie classic.

    What do you expect, Vince McMahon was the executive producer ;)

  12. So what's the hubbub? by zaren · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This movie is a spin-off of The (Brendan Frasier) Mummy movies, which were an astounding bit of escapism, broken plot lines, unreality, fantasy, and general making-stuff-up-as-you-go-along-ishness... and Rocky was in the Returns movie anyway. I don't recall either of those movies trying too hard to be classics of American cinema. So what's the problem with this one being more of the same?

    -----
    Aww, FCSK!

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    1. Re:So what's the hubbub? by Chasuk · · Score: 2

      Katz didn't actually criticize this movie. The purpose of the review was for Katz to show us all that he was just like us: that he, too, can watch an admittedly crap movie and still like it.

      Evidence:

      Sorry, but I really love this trash,

      I have to say I had fun watching this silliness.

      and it's so undemanding a movie, that you leave the theater smiling and relaxed.

      Katz has been criticized in the past for being out of touch with the rest of us, for being elitist. This was his way of showing us that he is really a regular dude who can watch a cheesy movie and enjoy it.

      Didn't anybody else see that?

      I must admit that I am probably in the minority. I genuinely like Katz. Part of the pleasure is reading all of the predictable Katz lambasting, and part of it is seeing my own opinions expressed by someone else (that person being Katz). I do disagree with Katz about this movie: if a movie is crap, it's crap, no matter how big the quota of special effects. I go to the movies to have my brain turned ON, not turned OFF. Daily life is already so numbing and anti-use-of-intellect that I prefer foreign and art films to mass-culture movies. But that's just my own form of escapism, an embracing of the pretentious so that I can forget how dumb reality actually is, how shallow my existance feels.

      Okay, I do have a short list of dumb movies I adore:

      Army of Darkness
      The Rocky Horror Picture Show
      The Fifth Element


      The Mummy pictures (The Mummy, The Mummy Returns, The Scorpion King) are too dumb to be enjoyed, at least by this viewer. I did see them, out of a sense of social obligation (I can't criticize them without seeing them, after all), but they all sucked beyond the point of amusement.

      Except:

      The scene where Rachel Weisz and Patricia Velazquez kick each others ass. I have a weakness for movies where women kick ass. Oh, that exposes a whole genre that I adore, fully realizing that the genre is cheesy - the Hong Kong action films where evil or strong or vengeful women do lots of butt-kicking. Yes, I even own Charlie's Angels, and it is a very bad movie indeed.

    2. Re:So what's the hubbub? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      The real irony here is that people respond to Katz as if he is a starving college journalist or something- when a bit of research will reveal that he was a television executive! Katz is a _suit_. And not just a suit, but a _TV_ _executive_ suit.

      Shocked, shocked I am that he likes truly idiotic movies ;)

  13. tyrants, thieves, traitors by xlurker · · Score: 4, Funny


    If the Rock can survive tyrants, thieves, traitors, ....

    in Hollywood, the WWF or the movie .... ?

    --
    ______________________________________________
    sigamajig...
  14. Rock vs Larry King Live by deputydink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    from the april 20th edition of larry king live

    notice the subtlety at which larry navigates through the trying events of our time.

    Larry - Do you consider yourself an actor or a wrestler?
    Rock - Uh. Well, i act and i wrestle, so i guess i'd be both.
    Larry - Nice, nice. Were you sad when Owen Hart passed away?
    Rock - Uh. Well, yes i was.
    Larry - Nice, nice. Now tell me about 9-11.
    Rock - Uh. Well, it was really terrible.
    Larry - Yes. That it was. [pause] The movie is the Scorpio King by universal. The man, Dwayne Johnson. We'll be back in a moment.

    This proves Larry King is still in posession of journalisms' most inappropriate (and strangly unconfortable) seugeways.

    The rest of the hour long interview has a slightly confused Rock answering (well, i might add) a string of strange, offtopic questions about race, wrestling, Republicanism and Arnold Schwarzenegger fired off by the perpetually half-asleep larry king.

    Classic.

    The cnn review is here.

  15. Katz & The Rock: Birds of a Feather by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Sorry, but I really love this trash"



    Indeed.



    The sad truth is, in the imposter derby, The Rock is a better at pretending to be an actor than Jon Katz is at pretending to be a writer...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

    1. Re:Katz & The Rock: Birds of a Feather by IHateEverybody · · Score: 2


      The sad truth is, in the imposter derby, The Rock is a better at pretending to be an actor than Jon Katz is at pretending to be a writer...


      What a horrible thing to say. The Rock is much more charismatic than Jon Katz.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    2. Re:Katz & The Rock: Birds of a Feather by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      One thing that I have to say, is that someone (say, Katz) that hated The Mummy AND The Mummy Returns had absolutely no business watching a spin-off and then compl. I think that shows how much of a weenie he is. He shouldn't have thrown his money away on The Scorpion King in the first place. I think he just gets off on whining, like much of the /. crowd.

      I don't see how the world is going to change when people hate things about it yet do absolutely nothing substantive about it. For one, I know a lot of people that don't see what is wrong with throwing away $8 to see garbage that they'll so likely hate.

  16. rather OT, but by Profe55or+Booty · · Score: 2, Funny

    jon, i can't help but notice that you don't have many friends here. i would like to be your friend. e-mail me and we can talk about having some sleep-overs and we can go bowling and stuff.

    i can't wait to hear from you!

    greg clarke

    --
    sig - .
  17. Your homework for tonight... by Mulletproof · · Score: 3, Funny

    And that's the thing that scares me... Will kids be reading WWF as part of their history lessons in 2153? Say it ain't so.... "And today we will be studying the 'Smackdown period', 1995-2004" Uhhggg...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  18. Re:Wait by themurray · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yep, the movie will be on Hell's Metroplex for film critics right next to Battlefield Earth and many other fine films.

  19. You need a lesson in being less of a hypocrite by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Is that sorta of like how we Canadians are incessantly snobbish and arrogant about how much we know about everywhere else? Maybe its because our own history (and current politics) are incredibly boring. "Of course you yanks" is just the kind of disgusting overgeneralization that you are whining about, yet somehow its ok when its a rant about the US? We sit around and stagnate with our high taxes and bitch at the Americans while they grow and prosper and build a military to protect our asses along with theirs in case the unthinkable happens and someone attacks North America. Yet we conveniently and transparently take advantage of the non-obvious benefits of what the US has produced, such as the Internet (yes it started there, no they didn't do it alone, but you'd better give them the credit for it). Why aren't you posting this on a Canadian site, hypocrite?

    WWF is hella lame.

    The Rock is hella lame.

    This review is hella lame.

    The Scorpian King is hella lame.

    But at least its not "Men with Brooms".

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  20. amusing culture by evenprime · · Score: 2

    Think of it as the United Nations:
    Kelly Hu as cute girl with the gift of prophesy (chinese/hawaiian/english ancestry)
    Taiko drummers (japan)
    sword training with shinai (japan)
    Indian elephant (India and southeast asia)
    Monocled Cobra (India)
    Cutting hands off of thieves (Moslem countries of middle east)
    Bamboo laminate crossbows (Hmong people of cambodia/vietnam)

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  21. easily amused by Alien54 · · Score: 2

    Well, there is always The First Church of the Easily Amused, another one of those internet religions with a virtual membership. (with many dead links)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  22. Yeah, I haven't seen it... but... by James+Foster · · Score: 2

    I haven't seen this movie, but I've seen trailers. The trailers I have seen did not have a single legible word except for the voice overs; the "This season, prepare for a ride..." crap.
    Going by the trailers, I expect of this movie the exact same thing that Katz describes in his review.

    If there is a single person who sees a trailer for this, and goes to see it thinking it will be anything but a stupid & shallow movie, I would be very suprised.

    I don't know why this one is even worthy of a review, the trailers make it bleeding obvious what it will be about. So my only question to Katz would be, what were you expecting?!?

  23. Haven't seen the movie, but... by Jerf · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Sorceress, on the other hand, turns out to be a babe who strolls around in thongs, does kung fu, and relates instantly to the Rock's sophisticated style of combat and international diplomacy. The Sorceress makes it clear that she loses her powers if she ever has sex.

    Let's me guess... she has oral sex with the Rock and stains her blue thongs, which is the smoking gun the Authorities of Magic need to bring her up on charges of improper conduct, for which the penalty is the immediate impeachment of her magical powers. But in an emergency highly publicized session before the Gods and Goddesses of Magic, makes an impassioned plea based on questiong what the definition of "is" is, and manages to get off the hook when it is determined that nobody in fact gives a damn what a Sorceress does in her private life, thus letting her have sex AND keep her powers.

    Am I close?

  24. Jon, you had us fooled! by Da+Masta · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Jon Katz actually saideth:

    It seems oxymoronic to bother with plot lines in a movie like this. The Rock plays an Akkadian assassin named Mathayus

    Well, apparently Da Masta and Accipiter, it is actually you who seem to be the fuck-ups. What is this we-hate-Katz thing? What is this, Aint-It-Cool-News? Does he offend your political sensibilities or something?


    Gee you think I wouldn't notice if he had spelt it properly the first time?

    He changed the spelling in the article after I posted it in order to make me look like the fool! That JonKatz fella sure is smarter than the average /. editor.
  25. Re:When... by crumbz · · Score: 2

    yeah, i was crabby when i wrote that....hadn't had my coffee yet.

  26. Is it just me or.... by efuseekay · · Score: 3, Funny

    it is that I look forward to every Jon Katz article just to watch the (much more entertaining) Katz-bashing posts? :)

    Let the feeding frenzy begin!

    --
    Mode (3) smart-aleck mode. Press * to return to main menu.
    1. Re:Is it just me or.... by bartyboy · · Score: 2

      I was actually gonna post the same thing - I never read his stories, only comments attached to them. I figure it's more entertaining.

  27. Katz, idiot by PD · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Katz, the world doesn't hate the United States. You confuse all the rhetoric and jokes and irritation that the world has with the United States for hatred.

    The truth of the matter is no matter what others say about the "ugly American" stereotype, it is just a stereotype. Even in the most unfriendly parts of the world, say North Korea, or Iraq, most of the people there would not lift a finger to hurt an American. They would be friendly, eager to talk, probably even give you part of their dinner. That is not hatred!

    But that attitude extends not only towards individual Americans, but also towards the entire country. The United States is not unversally viewed as a bully or belligerent country. The US is seen more often than not as the only party that can intervene in regional conflicts without taking sides. The US is seen as a country that loves freedom, and has a lot of opportunity for poor people to improve themselves. The US is seen as a country that is very rich, but also very generous with that wealth if another country needs it because of natural disaster. The US is respected for strength, but not feared. For a good example of how power CAN be feared, take a look at the Israelis and the Palistinians who mutually fear each other.

    Some might hate us enough to fly planes into our buildings, but probably 250,000,000 times as many would never do something like that. Now, we can't sit on our asses and say "the world loves us" because if we do that then they will REALLY start to not like us. But we must realize that the world does NOT hate us, and we must not use that as an excuse to either withdraw from the world and all the good we could do in it, or to develop some sort of national neurosis about the rest of the world.

    1. Re:Katz, idiot by PD · · Score: 2

      Well, first of all, this was most likely intended to be a throwaway joke to start the article, not an actual serious commentary on the state of the world, if you really have such an insane need to insult Katz, at least try to insult him for something worthwhile.

      The joke should have been thrown away. It was inane.

      Second of all, where exactly did you learn that the world doesn't hate us?

      Ummmmm. Where someone learned something has no bearing on the truth value of what they learned. The question is irrelevant.

      "The US is seen more often than not as the only party that can intervene in regional conflicts without taking sides."

      Can anyone say Israel? We've been taking sides in their conflicts for quite a while, and when we support their oppositions control of their holy land, yes they will hate us for that.


      And when the shit hits the fan, who does everyone call for to mediate? Where are the French? I don't see any Indian diplomats there. How about the Germans and Italians?

      The reason that the US can possibly help there is that both sides respect the strength and fairness that the US represents. The people yelling in the streets DO NOT MATTER. Most of them would not harm an American. The rest of them don't have representation in government. Even Arafat, who has raised so many doubts in recent weeks, will talk to the United States because he recognizes that we are in a position to help.

      Finally, see the peace that exists between Israel and Egypt. Now, what were you saying about Arabs not trusting us?

      Once again, the US is not respected for wealth in many countries, instead we are hated for the type of wealth driven culture that we create. When we

      No, we are DISLIKED, not hated. As I was saying about Katz, there's a difference. A Frenchman's annoyance at a "Cultural Hiroshima" will never be enough to turn France into a mortal enemy of the US.

      have very good reasons for hating us. Sitting around pretending that everyone appreciates what we do for the world is delusional. Just look at

      Hey, that's exactly what I said.

    2. Re:Katz, idiot by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      Well said. Katz is a confused fool. The USA has done more for a begrudging world than anyone cares to admit. When people gripe and complain the USA listens which unfortunately just encourages the disgruntled of the world to complain all the more. No other country is held up to a higher double standard than the USA. It's becoming all too popular a sport to take pot shots at the USA and blame it for everyone's problems instead of getting off your ass and taking responsibility for your own life. The last thing we need is more misguided fools here promoting the view that the world would be better off without the USA. The USA is unquestionably the single most potent force for freedom and stability in the world today and has been for 3/4 of a century.

      Those who accuse the USA of Imperialism are childern who don't know what real Imperialism is or was. Where would Afghanistan be now without the US intervention, to name just one example? What other nation would have taken as much care in a military campaign, or ever has in the history of the world? Yet these same voices could be heard bleating about the American bully after the attack on the US. This period in history calls for serious thoughts of the REAL consequences of actions, not childish pique over invented slights.

      The world does not foster hatred of the USA because the USA is arrogant. Regimes and anti-capitalist movements foster hatred because there are no negative consequences for espousing that hatred and only gain to be had, whether it's in deflecting domestic opinion or the potential for aid & incentives from the nation they profess to hate or some other hidden agenda such as deliberately undermining US interests through any available means. Unfortunately there will be longer term negative consequences of this and I don't just mean damage to US prestige. The immature who attack the US because of this silly prep school left wing debate over Imperialism will ultimately exact a serious toll from all the peoples of the world.

      One other thing, I am not an American. Just one of the very few grateful beneficiaries.

    3. Re:Katz, idiot by PD · · Score: 2

      That's semantics. Hated, disliked, boring! Where exactly do suppose to draw the line? Does hating imply readiness for action, even violent and/or illegal action? Does dislike not imply such readiness?

      So you are ready to pretend that words have no meaning?

      Hated and disliked are very different things. To hate something is not the same as to not like something. If I don't like something, it doesn't mean that I hate something.

  28. The Rock - Professional Actor. by ralian · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one who finds it incredibly hilarious that a WWF "wrestler" fits perfectly into the role of "professional actor"?

    Right, those fights aren't staged, really ;)

    --

    -raph

  29. IS NOT! by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Any media that displays Kelly Hu cannot, by definition, be 'lame' in any sense of the word (hella or otherwise)

    I feel stronly enough to break the /. boycott to bring this to your attention. Btw, the boycott is on, so you shouldn't even be posting!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  30. Is it just me... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2

    Or does The Rock's head look exactly like one of those clay reconstructions they make from the skulls of murder victims or ancient mummies?

  31. No. Shakespeare is NOT in "Old English" by Chas · · Score: 2

    Shakespeare wrote in Modern English. What you're commenting on is, in part, prose, and in part "slang" contemporary to Old Will's day.

    Now travel back a bit further to Chaucer (another English author). Now THAT is Old English. And pretty much NOBODY nowadays can read the original text without lessons in how to actually read it. While it IS English, it's a form of it that is so different as to nearly comprise a completely separate language.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  32. Comparisons by Chas · · Score: 2

    Oh-Shit situations:

    • Conan: Ah-nuld crucified to a tree and has a buzzard pecking at him.
    • TSK: Dwayne buried up to his neck in sand and has cheesy CGI fire ants loosed upon him.

    Acts of defiance in "Oh Shit" situation:

    • Conan: Ah-nuld rips the throat out of the vulture with his teeth.
    • TSK: Dwayne squishes a few ants with his massively developed chin.

    MUST I go on?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  33. Whatever. by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

    The hip-hop background in a movie allegedly set in ancient Babylon is pretty neat.

    No, really, it's not. Combining genres is nifty when it's original. When it's adding hip-hop to YET ANOTHER MOVIE, it's cliché.

    I used to enjoy JonKatz writings...but now anything by him really strikes me as eternally sophomoric. It's like I went back to high school and got all popular kids' opinions on a movie.

    --
    ± 29 dB
    1. Re:Whatever. by uradu · · Score: 2

      > I used to enjoy JonKatz writings.

      Me too--well, at least I used to take them seriously. But ever since he's playing the highly original game of Two Degrees Of Separation (from 9/11 topics) on anything he touches, I've lost any respect for him. Jon, not EVERYTHING is related to 9/11, and an amazing number of people don't really care all that much anymore, we don't all live in NYC and see Ground Zero every day. Get over it!

  34. Re:Am I the only one... by JohnG · · Score: 2

    No you aren't! I've been saying that all along. Especially when you see early footage of the Rock.

  35. SCAB!! by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    You scab bastard!

    Fuck, thats two already :(

    :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  36. Funny movie review of Scorpion King by tenzig_112 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scorpion King Wows Moviegoers, Closeted Homosexuals

    If you ever thought pro-wrestling was a bit too macho not to be gay, read this article:
    http://www.ridiculopathy.com/news_detail .php?id=55 2
    an older one on the same subject:
    http://www.ridiculopathy.com/news_detail .php?id=4

  37. Unbeleivable by Psmylie · · Score: 2

    Katz bashes all over "Final Fantasy" and then recommends this piece of garbage? Man...

    --

    psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo