Slashdot Mirror


Solar Sail to be Launched This Year

mad_goldfish writes: "Spaceflight Now is reporting that the Russians are preparing a Solar Sail for launch sometime after September aboard a Cosmos 1 rocket. Apparently most of the components have now been tested and they are getting ready to integrate all the flight components. Just the camera, S-band radio and main computer are yet to be completed."

55 of 161 comments (clear)

  1. cool by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Funny

    so can we sail from here to Cardasia using one of those Sails? I mean the Bejorins did it.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  2. More info by edwilli · · Score: 3, Informative

    This site is a great one for more info about solar sails. Exciting technology, I remember watching Cosmos and Segan talking about it.

  3. I wish them luck by jhines0042 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what, I first heard of this and I thought, "Geez, America is getting behind in the Space Race", but you know what? I wish them the best of luck because ultimately the quest for Space Knowledge with benefit the whole planet.

    Good Luck!

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:I wish them luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it's not so much "them." The Plenetary Society is the driving force behind the project, and they're a U.S.-based non-profit. The cool thing about this project is that it's non-governmental. The Russians are launching it bacuase they're the ones with the cheap launch vehicles.

    2. Re:I wish them luck by ch-chuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, the US started out behind, and IS losing Edge. Was thinking how to phrase it, but the Russians appear more willing to take risks (you know, in science, EXPERIMENT and risk failure but learn something anyway?) - w/ NASA's ever shrinking budget and risk aversion due to sensitivity to public criticism it sometimes seems like they can't try out anything (like space tourism) w/o knowing before hand that it's going to be successful. The typical US attitude to almost anything these days is how the lawyers are going to react and who is liable for damages; slowly turning into paralysis thru analysis, unable to accomplish anything.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    3. Re:I wish them luck by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I remember a science fiction story about an annual race in which eight vessels raced from the earth to the moon using a solar sail - unfortunately the race had to be abandonded because of a solar flare (these were manned spacecraft) - but it was a great story! It's good to see science catching up with the sci-fi writers!

    4. Re:I wish them luck by crotherm · · Score: 2

      OK, what have the Russian's done lately other than this?

      The US has tested ion drives, beach balls on Mars, landed on asteroids and... uh, ok.. so maybe we don't have much more on the plate, but those are substantial achievements and risky.

      The real thing is to see what is being planned right now. I don't know... and I am too lazy to check.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
  4. Great News!! by JJ · · Score: 2

    This is the cheapest, simplest form of probe there is. It rides a fundamental law of quantum mechanics that reflected photons transmit more force than absorbed ones. Unfortunately, it will take quite awhile to go anywhere significant.

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
    1. Re:Great News!! by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, it will take quite awhile to go anywhere significant.

      Actually these will travel many times faster that current probes.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    2. Re:Great News!! by lkaos · · Score: 2

      There is a quasi-quantum idea to it though. Light isn't a part of classical mechanics technically.

      Quantum mechanics encapsulates the old mechanics and the mechanics of sub-atomic particles. At any rate, I don't think this would have been thought of without quantum mechanics but then again, I was a little puzzled too when he said it was quantum mechanics (remember, classical mechanics is a special case of quantum mechanics).

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
  5. The project website by Gibbys+Box+of+Trix · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the co-organisers (Planetary Society) website (deeplinked to avoid crappy flash front page). It's done in conjunction with Cosmos Studios.

    There is much more in-depth information and some pictures on both of those sites.

  6. more info by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Informative
    You can buy a plastic model of the space craft here.

    There is more info on the Spacecraft here on the Planetary Society Website.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  7. Wont work by qurk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Talk about Crazy Eddie.

    1. Re:Wont work by freeweed · · Score: 2

      I dunno, considering this *is* the Russians we're talking about, I was thinking more of "Crazy Ivan".

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Wont work by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Talk about Crazy Eddie.

      Show of hands: how many people actually got this joke? I can think of four: myself, the guy who posted it, and the two guys who moderated it up.

      The obscure ones are the best ones.

    3. Re:Wont work by glitch! · · Score: 2

      Talk about Crazy Eddie.

      Show of hands: how many people actually got this joke?


      Who didn't? I suppose you could say it has a double meaning, since it could be refering to THE Crazy Eddie probe, or it could be just a general purpose crazy eddie idea. Now where did my fyunch go?

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
  8. why? by garver · · Score: 2

    I don't mean to be obnoxious, but what are their goals here? I read the article and all it talked about was the mission, not about what the Russians hope to gain out of solar sail. I know in general what solar sails in general would theoretically enable, but what specifically are the Russians preparing?

    1. Re:why? by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      To quote the website:


      WHY: To conduct the first solar sail flight and demonstrate the technique for traveling between planets -- and someday, to the stars.

      The purpose is proof-of-concept. Which is a fairly standard thing to do. NASA has done some proof-of-concept on space tethers in the past few years, but I'm not aware of any solar sail testing (but I also don't read the various space websites religiously).

      Note that this seems like a really small sail (30m diameter) for such a heavy payload (40 kg). But it is, after all, just proof-of-concept.

      Get a sufficiently light sail with a large enough coverage area and you can get to a reasonable percentage of C in a pretty short time. It works better if you have a space-based microwave power station that you test by launching this super-light sail (this is proposed/popularized by Robert Forward in a number of different science fiction/fact books).

      The issue with any space exploration is cost. To do exploration in a reasonable amount of time (100 years) you have to go a significant percentage of C. That's a LOT of speed and costs a LOT of money. You have to bankroll the project somehow, and in this case compound interest is working against you. If you can somehow bankroll a space-based power station (and it's the most cost-effective space construction I've heard of yet, but still requires something on the order of $1 TRILLION to build initially), then the cost of a super-light probe is pretty minor. Especially since you can start recouping costs immediately.
    2. Re:why? by JimPooley · · Score: 5, Informative

      Basically, what they're hoping to get out of it is space travel on the cheap. If you want to send a probe to the outer parts of the solar system, you can't carry enough fuel to constantly thrust. So you have to slingshot around other planets eking out a small supply of fuel for correctional purposes.
      Ion drive, as in Deep Space 1, is a way to lower the amount of fuel needed. This gives a very low level of thrust, but at a constant rate, so cumulative acceleration allows you to reach high speeds. This still needs some fuel, but less fuel than chemical rockets.
      A solar sail also gives low thrust which slowly builds acceleration over a period of time. And you don't need any fuel at all! So if you wanted to reach the outer solar system using a solar sail powered probe, then you wouldn't need lots of chemical rocket fuel, or ion drive propellant (Xenon was used by DS1, if I remember correctly) to get you there. You'd perhaps need a small amount for course correction, but your main source of thrust would be the sun.
      Less fuel = less weight = cheaper launches.

      This is just a prototype. If it works, it could lead to bigger and better solar sails which would make for cheaper spaceprobes to explore the outer reaches of the solar system.

      Hmmm. Sounds like this could be another Russian first in space to me...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:why? by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wonder how they slow down

      Either they don't, which means you do fly-bys of everything, or they slow down the same way they speed up. By using the solar wind.

      I won't even begin to say I understand all the physics involved here, but apparantly you can essentially tack against the solar wind by using concentric circles and reflecting light from one circle to the other, thus giving the sail facing away from the star (or other power source) the "push".

      Like I said, I don't really understand the physics.

      It's discussed in Robert Forward's Indistinguisable from Magic science fact/fiction novel (discusses futuristic science from a factual standpoint, then has a related SF story after each chapter).

      I suspect some sites on solar sails online would have info too.

  9. Green Team In Space by Chucow · · Score: 2, Interesting
    That's very cool, very interesting. Glad to see that at least one space program is finally getting smart, creating a way to save energy and resources in space as well as to reduce space clutter.

    My only question is whether the "kick rocket" will enter orbit with the spacecraft.

  10. Will the madness never end. by EReidJ · · Score: 4, Funny
    Oh great, just what I needed, the sereneness of outer space being polluted by tourists with Solar Sailboats.

    You know it's just the first step, next there'll be...

    Solar Surfboards ("Dude, killer photon streams today!")..,

    Solar Beach Parties ("Hey, wicked tan in only 2 seconds!")...

    and of course, the ultimate insult, Solar Jet Skis (but at least you can't hear the noise from the engine).

    1. Re:Will the madness never end. by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      I was thinking more, "Arrrr, mateys, let's take the Solar Main!" Jolly Roger solar sails, charged-particle cutlasses, and of course wenches and rum ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  11. WOW! by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

    September is going to rock! Solar sailing space craft AND new Dragonball Z on cartoon network. Yup, that's my life, space and cartoons...

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  12. Get your facts straight by IAmSancho · · Score: 2, Informative

    "aboard a Cosmos 1 rocket." No, the name of the mission and the solar sail craft itself is "Cosmos 1," not the rocket.

    --
    -------------------------

    Stupid people suck.

    1. Re:Get your facts straight by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the name of the mission is "Cosmos 1", the solar sail craft itself isn't named yet.

      http://www.planetary.org/solarsail/index2.html

      Imagine that....people on Slashdot not getting the facts straight...

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  13. The Economic Viability of Mars Colonization by bihoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's an abstract from a paper that discusses colonizing Mars in some detail. Very interesting.

    "The economic viability of colonizing Mars is examined. It is shown, that of all bodies in the solar system other than Earth, Mars is unique in that it has the resources required to support a population of sufficient size to create locally a new branch of human civilization. It is also shown that while Mars may lack any cash material directly exportable to Earth, Mars' orbital elements and other physical parameters gives a unique positional advantage that will allow it to act as a keystone supporting extractive activities in the asteroid belt and elsewhere in the solar system. The potential of relatively near-term types of interplanetary transportation systems is examined, and it is shown that with very modest advances on a historical scale, systems can be put in place that will allow individuals and families to emigrate to Mars at their own discretion. Their motives for doing so will parallel in many ways the historical motives for Europeans and others to come to America, including higher pay rates in a labor-short economy, escape from tradition and oppression, as well as freedom to exercise their drive to create in an untamed and undefined world. Under conditions of such large scale immigration, sale of real-estate will add a significant source of income to the planet's economy. Potential increases in real-estate values after terraforming will provide a sufficient financial incentive to do so. In analogy to frontier America, social conditions on Mars will make it a pressure cooker for invention. These inventions, licensed on Earth, will raise both Terrestrial and Martian living standards and contribute large amounts of income to support the development of the colony."

  14. Re:Deep Space 1? by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

    DS1 is the name of the ion-drive probe that was launched in 1999 (I think). It's real and is now the fastest moving man-made object in space.

    It's only science fiction to you due to ignorance.

  15. Magnetic Bubbles by wyldeling · · Score: 5, Informative

    NASA has been working on an alternative to the Solar Sail. The Solar Sail has one major draw back in its design (other than being technically difficult to implement), and that is the farther out in space it goes, the less force is transmitted to it by the solar wind. (Inverse square law.) A geophysicist is currently working on the idea of using a magnetic bubble as a solar sail. The advantage of this approach is that the mag bubble grows as the solar wind decreases. This creates a force that would be relatively constant until the heliopause (the end of the solar winds effective range) is reached.

    1. Re:Magnetic Bubbles by jsse · · Score: 2

      and that is the farther out in space it goes, the less force is transmitted to it by the solar wind.

      As far as I know the inital plan is to launch it toward the Sun, and have it gain enough photon-thrust for the initial acceleration, so that it could fly toward a destination in high(and constant) speed, until it crashes or is crashed.(with well-engineered steering, crash could be avoid)

      It would be a dangerous task, as you can imagine - if it gets too near the Sun, it'll melt; if it doesn't get near enough, then the solar sail would not gain enough initial thrust for the perpetual voyage.

    2. Re:Magnetic Bubbles by shren · · Score: 2

      Anyone got any recent information?

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    3. Re:Magnetic Bubbles by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      Solar sails use photons primarily for propulsion, not the solar wind, tho it is indeed a factor. I know, I'm quibbling, but it's fun.

    4. Re:Magnetic Bubbles by j09824 · · Score: 2

      Here is the research group's web site. No update since 2000...

  16. The equator by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    You can park a submarine at the equator, which makes it easier to launch. It doesn't require a special facility, and it gives the Russian Navy something to do.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  17. Re:Volna rocket! by jonerik · · Score: 2

    It's really interesting that they'll launch it from a submarine. I wonder if a submarine launch is in any way better than a regular one, or if they do it just because they have some spare ballistic missiles to use.

    The Volnas (demilitarized SS-N-19s) are launched from late '80s/early '90s-vintage Delta IV subs, all of which operate with Russia's northern fleet. I suspect that they're using subs as a launch platform because they're very, very mobile and probably cheaper to use than land-based facilities.

  18. Thank you - mod parent up by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    The magnetic bubble approach uses less mass, is possibly more energy efficient, has a more flexible design, has a much greater operating range, and offers the wonderful bonus of sheilding the craft from the solar wind. Although since it can't capture the energy from photons, only ionized particles, the motive force is fundamentally different.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  19. But Can we See it? by pythorlh · · Score: 2

    Any of you astronomer types out there able to give a rough guess as to the intinsic brightness of this thing? Will it be a naked-eye object? Perhaps only at certain times of the year, when Earth crosses it's reflection path. Inquiring minds (and lazy slashdotters) want to know.

    --
    Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
  20. Re:costs by hyperturbopete · · Score: 2, Informative

    well.... the way things are now, the biggest hardware cost for space flight is the launch vehicle. you need like 7.5 kilometers/second to get into Low Earth Orbit, this generally sets you back $5K to $10K per kg into LEO (or like a factor of 3 or 4 higher for Geosynchronous Transfer Orbit, which is used for comm sats).


    http://www.faqs.org/faqs/space/launchers/


    then you need like another 3 or 4 kilometers/second to get to the rest of the solar system (and you can do tricks like gravity assist etc once away from earth)

    so the problem isnt using a chem. rocket to go to mars, jupiter, etc but hauling that rocket's fuel up into LEO...

    solar sails require zero fuel. other futuristic space propulsion types all consume LOTS of power, which means bigger launch vehicle, bigger costs

  21. Re:what i find most impressive... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    They just got about $20 Million off Mark Shuttleworth, to fill an empty seat. If they can do this often enough, it'll go some way towards funding stuff.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  22. Great books on Mars Colonization by laetus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Kim Stanley Robinson wrote some kickbutt books on the whole colonization of Mars:

    Red Mars

    Green Mars

    Blue Mars


    I found Red Mars to be the best, followed by Green Mars. These two gave the best presentation of what it would be really like to colonize Mars that I've ever read. Cool books.

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
  23. Check Space Weather when sailing by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    right here - current conditions:
    Solar Wind speed: 512.9 km/s
    density:3.5 protons/cm3

    plus more.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  24. What is most impressive is by marcus · · Score: 2, Informative

    That the Russian economy is definitely on the upside. Just read a bit about their new tax laws and the results. Should be required reading for all taxpayers.

    http://www.theglobalist.com/nor/gdiary/2000/05-3 1- 00.shtml
    http://www.russiaeconomy.org/comments/02 2102.html
    http://www.heritage.org/views/2002/ed03 2102.html
    http://www.nationalreview.com/nrof_comm ent/comment -mitchell032202.shtml

    For more, just hit google.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  25. Just like the ancient Bajorans by Wise+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reminds me of Deep Space 9, Season 3, Episode 22, "Explorers", which I just watched this morning. Sisko and his son pilot a reconstruction of an ancient Bajoran solar-sail spacecraft to Cardassia. They run ino some difficulties with "tachyon eddies" ripping their sails off.

    Wonder if there really are some kind of particle eddies which would damage the sails?

  26. Re:costs by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, it's not so much that solar sails require zero fuel, it's just that the fuel they need isn't being provided by us.

    And yes, that's a big advantage.

    The big disadvantage, of course, is that solar sails are freaking slow. And freaking big. Freaking big means there's a lot more things to go wrong. Freaking slow means that you have to be able to wait a long, long time for any data from the sail. The other problem with freaking slow is that if it's too slow then it's likely to be passed in transit by some newer technology that isn't freaking slow.

    Using solar sails for in-system transit would take years to go places (which may be ok for unmanned ships). Using them for interstellar voyages without some kind of powered assist (e.g. - space based microwave power station) makes it so slow that you'll either get passed or whatever agenda sent you is long gone by the time you get to your objective.

    Solar sails are definitely neat, but they aren't a panacea to space travel problems.

  27. Re:Volna rocket! by JesseL · · Score: 2

    But the name would have been so much more appropriate for a launch platform if they had used Delta V subs.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  28. Previous solar sail discussions on Slashdot by pomakis · · Score: 4, Informative
    FYI, here are some previous solar sail discussions on Slashdot:

  29. Re:Solar Power by GungaDan · · Score: 2
    "And before you ask: public transportation and my own two feet."

    C'mon, be realistic. How far are you really gonna get burning those?

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  30. Starlight? by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    So here's a question for you - if a solar sail is reflective on one side, and absorptive (black) on the other, shouldn't it be possible to sail on ambient light (including starlight, slowly) alone? If I'm not mistaken that's the same principle as those little whirling light bulb toys.

    Does the russian design exploit this property?

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  31. Re:what i find most impressive... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sigh...the spacecraft is NOT repeat NOT Russian. It is a creation of the Planetary Society, a non-profit NGO founded by Carl Sagan. The Russians are merely providing an inexpensive launch vehicle, no more.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  32. Re:what i find most impressive... by jfengel · · Score: 2

    "Inexpensive" is relative. I'm sure the cost is at least hundreds of thousands of dollars. Any idea how much the Russians are charging for this? And is the Planetary Society paying for it?

  33. hope it succeeds. by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    very very excited by this launch but I hope it works in ways I don't normally worry about launches. whats the chance that NASA would try a solar sail if the russians fail? and the russians don't strike me as being pioneers anymore. ok this is pioneering but they don't strike me as being successful pioneers of late. good luck ruskies.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  34. hehe by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    "whats the chance that NASA would try a solar sail if the russians fail? " - almost certain.

    Having good american engineering succeed where the Russians failed should be just the kind of story that NASA could use to get funding from politicians.

    Now if the Russians were succesful ... i doubt NASA will touch solar sails in a loong time. No politician wants to pay for the honor of trailing the russians.

  35. Re:Solar Power by Jeremi · · Score: 2
    You need electricity to make hydrogen.


    Not true. You can also derive hydrogen from natural gas, fossil fuels, bacteria, or mine it from the Earth's crust. There are probably other ways as well that haven't been discovered yet.


    Since solar and wind are too expensive for the forseeable future


    Says who? Tcost of wind power has been dropping dramatically over the last few years. Currently it's only a little bit more expensive than the going rate. Given some more refinements of the technology and economies of scale, it will quite likely become the cheapest form of power generation. Besides, once you've factored in the cost of nuclear waste disposal, guarding against terrorists, mining uranium, environmental cleanup, etc, nuclear power isn't all that cheap either.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  36. Re:How does this work? by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    Um, yes you can sail towards the sun, by tacking against the sunlight to reduce orbital velocity around the sun, thus dropping steadily towards the sun. Um, think of a shrinking spiral.

    Reverse the process by tacking to increase orbital speed, and you move away in an increasingly large spiral.

  37. Re:competition is good by shogun · · Score: 2

    but it sure would be nice if it regenerated a little interest in the general public.

    I dont think the general public is particularily interesting or worth generating interest in myself.