Slashdot Mirror


Matt Groening on Futurama, Simpsons and Fox

dipfan writes "Simpsons and Futurama creator Matt Groening, in an interview with the FT, says that the Fox network didn't understand or support Futurama. Groening says: "They haven't really supported it. I think it's a worthy companion to The Simpsons and we're really proud of it. But Fox gave it a bad slot and zero promotion for the last three years." He also accuses the channel of meddling with the show, making complaints that the characters were "too mean". He's hoping to change Fox's mind, and endorses the online petition to try and save the show. The good news is that he's got other ideas for new shows if Futurama really does get canned, and talks about new Simpsons plots involving Enron, and Krusty The Clown running for Congress." His feelings shouldn't be a surprise to anyone who saw the first act of "Homer the Moe", but what I thought was interesting was his comments on Fox and how he's not interested in moving networks over the futurama thing.

122 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. Problems with Fox... by ZiZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fox has a long history of utterly failing to pay attention to the worthwhileness of their shows - giving good shows the boot while bad shows - say, for instance, Greg the Bunny - get prime airtime. The Simpsons just happened to be the right combination of edgy and comfortably marketable to get and keep a prime spot for so long - and any show that doesn't live up to those standards seems to be summarilly dropped, despite the fact that the bar is unreasonably high...

    --
    This flies in the face of science.
    1. Re:Problems with Fox... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Greg the bunny is funny.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Problems with Fox... by RackinFrackin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fox has a long history of utterly failing to pay attention to the worthwhileness of their shows ...

      That's the truth. Married with Children is a prime example. It was one of the shows that helped launch the network, and they showed no respect for that. They repeatedly changed the timeslot, and eventually moved it to Saturday night. The worst, though, was that they didn't produce a final episode. They cancelled it after all the season 11 episodes were taped, so there was never a finale That's a pretty rotten send-off for a show that ran for over a decade.

    3. Re:Problems with Fox... by gnovos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The worst, though, was that they didn't produce a final episode.

      I thought that the "worst" was the fact that most of the actors on that show had to learned that it was cancelled through thier friends or on the news. The press release went out before they even told the actors on the show!

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  2. Too mean?! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    > He also accuses the channel of meddling with [Futurama], making complaints that the characters were "too mean"

    Fuck, that's the reason I gave up on the Simpsons years ago, and love Futurama!

    Hey, FOX, why don't you bite my shiny metal ass? I'm an adult. Now that Bugs Bunny's been censored to hell, I'm left craving cartoons I can enjoy as an adult. If there's a demographic that leaves room in the lineup for Greg The Bunny (who's funny, but is hardly broadly-based social satire), there's gotta be room for Bender and the baby in "Family Guy".

    1. Re:Too mean?! by 56ker · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fox probably got a lot of complaints about Futurama's more adult content. Well to those people I say - 1) it's only a cartoon
      2) well what do you expect when one of the characters is a beer-swilling kleptomaniac robot and 3) The obligatory bite my shiny metal ass. :)

    2. Re:Too mean?! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's it, you chumps and chumpettes can bite my shiny metal daffodil. I'm on the first pimpmobile outta here.

      C'mon. Futurama unlike a lot of Fox's comedy shows is lot more than just ass-jokes. I have found it in the last few seasons to be pretty consistently (but not always) better than the Simpsons. The format of the show allows for a lot more flexibility to spoof current culture and take advantage of the animated medium.

      You can ask my wife what I think of Fox after they consistently pre-empt Futurama for football for 6 months straight. Fox treated that show like crap. I just hope we don't have to wait 12 years or more for a region 1 DVD release of the episodes.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Too mean?! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      You know, some of us hate football. It's hard to get excited over 22 guys fighting over an ovoid ball for 3 hours.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  3. network genius @ Fox by iamjim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fox has had some gold in the past that they gambled on and won, and gambled on and lost. Greg the Bunny is boring, Family Guy is great. Although I did not like them, 90210 and Melrose Place were gold for the network. X-files will be generated only syndication funds, nothing substantial.

    There has got to be something that I missed, I do not understand how they could cancel shows like Futurama and Family Guy.

    What are your thoughts?

    1. Re:network genius @ Fox by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      > Greg the Bunny is boring, Family Guy is great.

      I've seen this comment a few times.

      I think what it comes down to is that GtB is a great sendup of what life is like in Hollyweird. It's a great, biting satire about the kinds of things that TV executives can relate to.

      Greg the Bunny is TV executives what Dilbert is to the IT worker.

      Family Guy (the episode where the Grim Reaper took a holiday was sheer brilliance) and most Futurama episodes are just as biting as Greg the Bunny -- but most of the jokes probably have no real meaning for a TV executive; they're aimed pretty squarely at what life's like for Joe and Jane Sixpack. (Incompetent managers, bad investments, the Internet, Star Trek geeks :)

      Trouble is, most Joe and Jane Sixpacks don't like to see themselves made fun of. It reminds them of how lame they are. Hence the fact that most Simpsons episodes have their funny moments, but they've lost (if indeed, they ever had it) that acerbic, biting cynicism that the original "Life in Hell" comics had.

      That leaves the Slashdot crowd - most of whom loves satire as an art form - for stuff like The Tick, Family Guy, and Futurama. I mean, c'mon, how could we not laugh at the "Napster" episode of Futurama? Or the AOL episode ("My god... it's full of spam!"). We love satire, even when it's directed at us.

      (And yes, I also lament the loss of the Dilbert series, but that was a UPN thing, not a FOX thing, so it's not really on topic here :)

      Bottom line: GtB is being given a chance because TV executives probably think it's riotously funny. I think the gags are "kinda funny", but I can't even tell you when the show airs.

      In contrast, I tuned in to Dilbert (and tune in to Futurama) religiously - the jokes that TV executives think of as "kinda funny" are the ones I find riotous.

      I don't think I've regularly watched the Simpsons in years, though. Yeah, Life in Hell had to be toned down for TV, but that's probably why I never got hooked on the Simpsons.

    2. Re:network genius @ Fox by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're thinking too hard.

      As I've posted above - Greg the Bunny is funny.

      It has nothing to do w/satire or demographics. It's really simple. It's puppets doing crass things. That is way too funny. When the fat bear puppet literally "ripped a new one" I laughed so hard I thought I might hurt myself.

      Have you seen the muppet posts floating around here lately? You've got to be quick to catch them before they are modded down into oblivion. I've read the sex one and the eating muppets one. Anyways-- they are hilarious because it's about puppets and people doing crass things.

      That's all there is to it.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:network genius @ Fox by glwtta · · Score: 2
      how could we not laugh at the "Napster" episode of Futurama?

      I actually didn't like that episode all that much (and I love Futurama), I don't think it's a good example of the satire you've mentioned (which I do see on the show a lot, otherwise): they just indiscriminantly took several "issues" that have come to be recognized in "popular culture" as the very essense of the Internet - IP infringement, celebrity fanaticizm, pale geeks spending their lives in chat rooms, etc - and mixed them into some sort of current issue soup that didn't really say anything except: "hey look, this is all net realted stuff, and it's hip!"

      It was a funny ep though. :)

      Overall I think all that those who like Futurama like it more for the edginess (to be trite) and the geek factor is a secondary, but still iportant factor. And that's probably why it's getting canned - what's not bland, cannot appeal to the "average" viewer.

      btw, I wouldn't think network execs would make decisions based on what they like - they must realize that TV execs are not a very significant demographic, and after all they probably know how to make money in that business.

      Excellent call on The Tick though, best show ever made! :) "La donna e mobile \ qual piuma al vento, \ muta d'accento \ e di pensier!" I loved that show!

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:network genius @ Fox by bughunter · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Greg the Bunny is TV executives what Dilbert is to the IT worker [sic]

      Yeah, like that flies. Remember Action? Even funnier and more biting than GtB, and how long did it last, eh?

      I lost my respect for FOX when they cancelled that show without even trying to find the right time slot for it. C'mon... Thursday night? It took ABC and CBS nearly a decade to break NBC's domination of that schedule.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    5. Re:network genius @ Fox by GungaDan · · Score: 2
      Agreed 100% on G the B. No single sitcom line ever summed up memories of childhood friendships as well as, "We used to hang out... we used to melt stuff!" Now If only I can find out when the damned thing airs.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  4. Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    While I don't agree that The Simpsons has "Jumped the Shark,*" I must confess that there's a downward trend in overall quality. The show has always had its ups and downs, but the ups are not as high as they used to be and the downs are more frequent.

    I wouldn't mind The Simpsons ending its run at this point. Better that than risk something awful happening, like one of the voice actors quitting or getting canned or Fox insisting on some egregious change.

    Anyway, there are so many episodes in syndication that I can watch reruns for weeks without getting bored.

    What WOULD be tragic: Groening not having a shot at another show. Surprise us, Matt!

    Stefan

    * #1 Candidate for overused annoying chic media term.

    1. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by swingkid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Better that than risk something awful happening

      Have you seen the Simpsons at all this season? The whole series has been a train wreck. It's like they're deliberately trying to kill off interest in the show by making the worst possible episodes.

    2. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by tps12 · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Jumped the Shark,*"

      * #1 Candidate for overused annoying chic media term.

      Did I miss something? I feel like I'm in Back to the Future II.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    3. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by blamanj · · Score: 2

      While I agree it's annoying and kind of dumb, I don't think it's a media term, per se. The web site Jump the Shark has been around for about 5 years, and I really think it's a fan term. It may be that the media types have just caught on to it recently though, and the phrase is now in vogue.

    4. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by jonathanjo · · Score: 2

      What WOULD be tragic: Groening not having a shot at another show. Surprise us, Matt!

      How about a TV series version of Life In Hell? That would tota11y r0ck!

    5. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by E-prospero · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Jumped the shark" is a reference to the last episodes of Happy Days, when the studio was so desperate for ratings that they had episodes with topics like "Fonzie jumps a shark on his motorcycle."

      It's now used to describe the episode in a series where long time fans give up watching a long running series because it has just become too much of a joke, too much of a cliche, or so far from the original premise that it doesn't warrant watching anymore.

      Shows can also "Jump back" if they redeem themselves in a later episode.

      Common examples (I don't neccesarily agree with them) are the Mulder and Scully Kiss episode of X-Files, and the Buffy Musical episode.

      My personal Jump the Shark fave is the last episode, series 1 Dark Angel, where [[SPOILER WARNING]] Max's boyfriend/CO tops himself to save Max. I refuse to watch Dark Angel any more after that little travesty of scriptwriting...

      Russ %-)

      --
      ... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
    6. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by tps12 · · Score: 2
      "Jumped the shark" is a reference to the last episodes of Happy Days, when the studio was so desperate for ratings that they had episodes with topics like "Fonzie jumps a shark on his motorcycle."

      Thx 4 th hedz up. Is that a real example, or hypothetical?

      I believe such a thing happened to MASH. And SNL, like 17 times.

      the Buffy Musical episode.

      While I do not watch TV on a regular basis, my mother is an avid Buffy fan. She loved that episode (I have not seen it, but remember her telling me about it multiple times), though she is admittedly not as elitist as the average slashbot.

      Does The Media really use this term? I find it odd that I am so completely out of the loop.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    7. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by greenfly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, it seems like all the jokes are really blunt this season, and the "archaic pop culture references" are just random. Something like "Hi Hank," "Did someone say 'Mel Blanc'?" Stupid stuff like that.

      It just seems like the current writers don't have a sense of subtlety, and so every joke is way overdone, and even sometimes replayed or drawn attention to just in case you missed it.

      Older Simpsons seasons allowed subtlety, if you didn't get it, well, you didn't get it. That also added some rewatchability to episodes.

    8. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by E-prospero · · Score: 2

      Is that a real example, or hypothetical?

      Sadly - yes, it is real. I remember seeing the episode. For the record, it was crap. But then, I hated Happy Days anyway, so I'm not sure that stands for much... :-)

      I believe such a thing happened to MASH. And SNL, like 17 times.

      There is website for shark jumping; you can check out your favourites.

      While I do not watch TV on a regular basis, my mother is an avid Buffy fan. She loved that episode

      As did I. And I hate musicals (as a rule).

      Does The Media really use this term?

      I can't say I've ever seen it used in mainstream media. AFAIK, it's mostly used in/on fan sites.

      I find it odd that I am so completely out of the loop.

      I find it easier to assume that there is always a loop I'm not in. That way it's a pleasant surprise when I find a new loop :-)

      Russ %-)

      --
      ... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
    9. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by nexex · · Score: 2

      here here!
      to me it seems they are relying more and more on sex and body humor than what simpsons is known for. -- I blame it on the death of Phil Hartman aka Troy McClure ;)

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    10. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by mgblst · · Score: 2

      I take it as they are just seeing how stupid the public is, and deliberately making worse episodes. It's like a bet, how shit can they go, and people will still watch them!

      Don't worry, im pretty sure they are close to the bottom now though.

    11. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      "You may remember me from such documentaries as, 'Man vs. Nature -- the Road to Victory!'"

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    12. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      Better that than risk something awful happening, like one of the voice actors quitting or getting canned...

      He also missed Maude Flanders. Gone. Poof. She's dead. Her voice performer quit. Notice you don't see much Helen Lovejoy either - same voice actor.

      ~will

      --
      sig?
    13. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      "My 634 movies have earned over $20 in Springfield alone!"

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    14. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by Hangtime · · Score: 2

      "You may remeber me from such films as 'Today we live...Tomorrow we die!' and 'Glady's the Groovy Mule'.

    15. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by Gulthek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's now used to describe the episode in a series where long time fans give up watching a long running series because it has just become too much of a joke, too much of a cliche, or so far from the original premise that it doesn't warrant watching anymore.

      No no no! The phrase "jump the shark" is used to describe a specific episode in which the series in question peaked, leaving the show nowhere to go but down unless they "jump back."

      Don't just trust me on it: check out the Jump the Shark FAQ.

    16. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by birder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My best example would be Moonlighting when Bruce Willis and Cybil Sheppard finally sleep together. The show lost it's sexual tension that made it fun to watch.

    17. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by gosand · · Score: 2
      I have found that in more recent seasons, I like episodes better on the re-runs. There are a few epoisodes that I really liked in the first run, but the ones that just weren't as good the first time around are a little better the next. Maybe I am just able to pick up on some of those subtleties the second time around.

      Not only that, but Simpsons fans are probably THE most critical fans of any show. The beauty is the Groening knows it - hence Comic Book Guy's now famous phrase "Worst episode ever". They have produced some good episodes recently, such as the one that was the classic stories (Homer, Joan of Arc, etc). But I highly doubt they will even be able to touch their best episode ever, Selma's Choice. (Homer and the sandwich, Bart and Lisa go to Duff Gardens) OMG - I am giggling just thinking about it.

      The Simpsons is THE standard, and Futurama isn't on that level - but it is the closest thing out there. Shame on Fox.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    18. Re:Plenty in Ouvre; Indifferent about plug pulling by Strange_Attractor · · Score: 2
      You may remember me from such Driver's Ed films as "Blood on the Highway", and "Alice Doesn't Live Anymore".

      Damn, we miss you, Phil.

      --

      ----
      WWJD...For a Klondike Bar?
  5. Re:Wow by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Futerama would be good if it had better characters, better animation, better plots, better jokes, better acting, and better flow."

    That's kind of funny, I was just thinking your post'd be good if it had better spelling, better presentation, a better point, better use of grammar, a better style of writing, and better use of commas.

    Wouldn't have been easier to type "I don't like Futurama?". Even so, you picked a bad topic to post that under.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  6. Control of TV series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As some of you are aware, when J. Michael Straczynski attempted to make a sequel to his popular Babylon 5 series, the network in charge (TNT) tried to control the creative direction of his show, Crusade. After only 13 episodes, Straczynski walked away saying that he either does Crusade his way or not at all. TNT had refused to relinquish creative control to the creator. Apparently, a similar showdown occurred between Simpsons creator Matt Groening and the FOX network while developing the Futurama series.

    Groening said in a Playboy interview: "The current atmosphere in television is one of anxiety and fear. And Fox has been worried that Futurama isn't like the Simpsons. And I've said, 'No, it's exactly like the Simpsons: It's new and original.' But that hasn't calmed them down. Also, Fox expected to have our show under its thumb and was quite surprised when I adamantly insisted that we put this show together exactly as we do The Simpsons, with complete autonomy. So that's why you haven't heard anything positive about Futurama from Fox during the past year."

    So, where TNT failed to compromise and save Crusade, the FOX network acquiesed to the creator and now has had a successful show in Futurama.

  7. The 7 pm Sunday death slot by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm amazed Futurama has lasted as long as it has considering that it's not only in the 7 pm Sunday death slot, but that it's preempted continuously during the football season. Add to that the fact that this past season didn't start with regular new episodes until January, and you've got a recipe for lost viewers.

    1. Re:The 7 pm Sunday death slot by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I'm amazed that when they aired Star Wars IV, they cancelled Futurama that night. Funny thing is, normally Futurama would have been right after SW, instead they put on two eps of King of the Hill.

      Why they preempted Futurama from following Star Wars I'll never know.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:The 7 pm Sunday death slot by nexex · · Score: 2

      it seems to me like it is always on a different time, you watch it one week and go back the same time the next, and its simpons THEN futurama...no wonder the ratings are poor, who wants to play scheduling roller coaster?

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
  8. Lifespan of a comedy style? by ZiZ · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Quoth the pigeon:
    Greg the bunny is funny.

    And the recent episodes of the X-Files are deeply conspiracy-laden, heart-wrenching and mind-busting masterpieces.

    Personal preferences aside - Fox has had a history of poor choices where the schedule and programming of their stations is concerned.

    On another subject, quoth the interview:
    But Groening is also pragmatic about the show's shelf-life. "Because animation is such an intensely painstaking process, it wears people out, and audiences are always looking for surprises. When any character is as stupid as Homer Simpson, it's hard to keep surprising the audience."

    Groening has a remarkably mature and insightful view of his own mortality and the limits of a particular genre. While the Simpsons make an excelent foil for poking fun at any cultural situation, economic event, or global personality (and as such, has a much much longer life expectancy than, say, Garfield (no offense to Garfield), who has said just about all there is to say on the subjects of laziness, gluttony, and hatred of dumb-but-cute), at some point, almost certainly, the majority of people watching the show will say "Ho hum, Homer's dumb, headlines, Bart whines, Lisa's smart - who gives a fart? Pass the booze - I'd rather snooze." (Or something, perhaps in slightly less doggerel.) We can only hope that Groening recognizes this point and brings us to a stunning (and satisfying) conclusion before the show becomes bogged down with the dead weight of unfunny seasons.

    --
    This flies in the face of science.
    1. Re:Lifespan of a comedy style? by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Funny

      I liked this quote from the last ep:

      Homer: (sobbing) OOOHH!! I'm a rageholic. I can't live without ragehol!!

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    2. Re:Lifespan of a comedy style? by gnovos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We can only hope that Groening recognizes this point and brings us to a stunning (and satisfying) conclusion before the show becomes bogged down with the dead weight of unfunny seasons.

      I think one of the really neat things about the Simpsons is that it reflects our own cultural insanity. The day when the Simpsons runs out of material will be the day we, as a culture, finally move ourselves out of the wasteland of ignorance and stupidity. It's win-win!

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    3. Re:Lifespan of a comedy style? by ZiZ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      > The day when the Simpsons runs out of material...

      But that's just the point I was making (or trying to make) - the Simpsons won't run out of material anytime in the forseeable future, but the format it is presented in may well get old. How much interesting variation on the theme can Groening continue to come up with? And notice I say "continue" - I think he's done an amazing job thus far.

      > ...move ourselves out of the wasteland of ignorance and stupidity.

      So, you're saying, once we start resembling Futurama more than the Simpsons? *g*

      On a side note, try The Simpsons Archive for way more than you wanted to know about the Simpsons...

      --
      This flies in the face of science.
    4. Re:Lifespan of a comedy style? by ryanvm · · Score: 2

      [...] and as such, has a much much longer life expectancy than, say, Garfield (no offense to Garfield)

      Uh, Garfield is a cartoon cat. You don't have to apologize to him.

  9. Re:I love Futurama but, by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    The Simpsons has wider appeal than Futurama. Futurama is definitely tuned more towards the scifi/geek/even Slashdot audience. That might be part of why Fox is messing with it.

    The humor in Futurama definitely has better bite than the Simpsons. If you don't believe me, watch an episode that has a lot of Bender in it. Some of Bender's robotic anatomy is well.. uh.. more functional than ours. ;)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  10. Re:Wow by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow is right. Someone on /. wreckless enough to spell Futurama as Futerama, yet caring enough to remember to accent the 'e' in Pokémon?

    What kind of God would create a world where such things happen?

  11. Re:Family Guy.. by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    ..was also canceled cause Fox put them on in a bad timeslot and didnt promote them. And im not alone when i say that it was/is the best show EVER.

    Family Guy is awesome. Like a less politically correct Simpsons. Personally, I think it was even funnier than the Simpsons. It pissed me off that they canceled it. When they give a show a bad timeslot and no promotion, why the hell to they expect it to do well? The Family Guy could have been another Simpsons.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  12. Re:Matt Groening is a sellout by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I do feel sorry for the people who think the Simpsons are "clever". I wonder if they've ever read anything by Evan Dorkin [houseoffun.com] or Dan Clowes [fantagraphics.com]."

    Okay... so the Simpsons really isn't funny. I guess all my laughter was an allergic reaction to really bad TV?

    I think it's funny how people use their individualism to try to rise above other people. They never seem to realize that the tip of their nose ends up higher than their forehead when they do that.

    I have no regrets. Both the Simpsons and Futurama are quite amusing to watch, and their style of humor has yet to be replicated by anybody. Hmm... isn't that the definition of clever?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  13. Um.... What? by CurtisRWC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Futerama would be good if it had better characters, better animation, better plots, better jokes, better acting, and better flow.

    Compared to what?

    The animation on Futurama is on-par, if not slightly better than the Simpsons (which is one of the best animated cartoons out there). If you don't like it, I'm guessing it is for purely asthetic reasons. Personally, I don't like how panning and rotation look, since computers give them a smoothness that just seems jarringly out of place to me - but then again, that's just me. The choice of colors is different as well. Where The Simpsons has a more cartoony look - the colors are brighter and have more contrast, Futurama tends to stray away from bright and primary colors, going for a paler and more blended palette.

    The characters, plots, flow, and jokes in Futurama are very different than in The Simpsons. This has everything to do with the universe it is set in being based solely in Science Fiction rather than the mostly realistic universe that The Simpsons has built up over the years. Although most of the "rules" of both the shows are similar, you can easily get away with things in one that you couldn't in the other. Different sets of rules need different characters. Bender wouldn't fit in with The Simpsons just as much as Lisa wouldn't fit in with Futurama.

    That being said, I prefer The Simpsons in its prime (although the Homer/Hulk episode this week was pretty good) to Futurama at its best. Why? Futurama's structure is so open that nearly anything can be done plot-wise. The Simpsons was based somewhat in reality, which gave the writing team a bit of focus. When absolutely anything can happen, it isn't as special when it does.

  14. Someone should tell Matt... by tb3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That online petitions don't work.

    This came out of a report from an anime convention last week. The studio reps said that they would pay attention to petitions for new series, but not online petitions. I suspect that Fox would pay even less attention.

    I don't think there's been a single example of an online petition having an effect. Please provide examples if I'm mistaken.

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    1. Re:Someone should tell Matt... by great+throwdini · · Score: 2

      I don't think there's been a single example of an online petition having an effect. Please provide examples if I'm mistaken.

      Well, there is at least once recent example of FOX responding to letter-writing campaigns. One such campaign rescued Party of Five - the second story on the other side of this link is supportive of that claim.

      I don't believe that online petitions work, but if I recall correctly, online communications did assist in the PoF fight by mobilizing people on PoF-related email lists (yes, this was quite a while ago) to write letters. Likely, this approach would prove more effective. Kill a tree, save a show!

      Not exactly to your point, but close.

    2. Re:Someone should tell Matt... by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      The SSSCA online comment form that drew pretty much only negative response did have an effect, but they were asking for comment, rather than getting an unsolicited list of online petitioners, so there is a difference.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Someone should tell Matt... by chroma · · Score: 2, Informative
      I saw this recently from Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski:

      http://america.net/~judge/jms04-18

      The other thing that needs to be emphasized, in terms of fan letter campaigns, is that the currency of the fan campaign is that it's been in large measure devalued by over-use, at least in terms of how the studios see it (having been told this straight up). These days *any* show that is nominally SF or fantasy, when its time ends, gets a writing camapign to get it back or keep it on the air. Good show, bad show, indifferent...the campaigns come regardless. So it doesn't really carry the same weight it did once.
      --

      Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
    4. Re:Someone should tell Matt... by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      It's not "back on the air", it hasn't left the air, yet. They made enough episodes to keep running, but when they're done, they're not going to make any more.

      Just like The Family Guy, just like Futurama.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    5. Re:Someone should tell Matt... by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 2, Funny

      We had a rather appropriate one in Chicago a while back. The local fox affiliate decided to replace one of the three daily Simpsons repeats with Third Rock (ugh). A web page was created for people to add their names; this list was mailed daily (!) to a number of executives at the station. Not only did they restore the show, but they aired ads for its reinstatement where the executive who made the decision is dragged off bound and gagged. A great day!

  15. Re:I love Futurama but, by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
    > Had a lot of what we like, references to things outside the show that is only funny for thow "who knows".

    "Church of Star Trek: The Sci-Fi Religion that doesn't take all your money!"

    Thanks for the reminder of why I keep watching Futurama. It's a cartoon for adults who actually keep track of what's going on in the world beyond what's reported on the lamestream news.

    (I probably shouldn't have said that - it's such a small demographic as to assure Futurama gets canned :)

    I comfort myself by thinking that for every "in-joke" I spot on Futurama, there are probably a dozen that I miss.

  16. When they do cancel Simpsons by stoolpigeon · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wont even notice. Usually I am busy when the new shows get aired. I watch the Simpsons 3 or 4 times a week but it is all syndication.

    That's part of what makes it so awesome. Each time I watch an episode again it cracks me up as much as the first time. Plus I notice little things I missed the first time around.

    I figure all the new episodes I've missed give me a buffer of at least a few years. And you know that the Simpsons are going to be on for a very long time on some channel.

    Sort of like that 8 minutes of light we get after the sun goes out one day.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:When they do cancel Simpsons by nzhavok · · Score: 3, Interesting

      hi, wtf does your sig mean?

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  17. Speculation by gnovos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have no inside knowledge of FOX or other broadcasting companies, but if they function the same way that other companies that I have worked at do, then I know exactly why you see the really fantsatic shows being canned in thier prime: new blood. Every time managment changes or restructures, there is some subconcious need from the newbies to change things around, if for no other reason than to justify thier existance. The usual route is to attack what was successful before, tear it down, and bring out the solid gold shnazzy New Thing(tm) that will wow everyone. Maybe it works one time out of a hundred, but that doesn't stop people from trying to be the lucky golden boy.

    This is just a guess, but I'll put a tenner down that the reason why Futurama never really got the support that it should have, and why it's being dropped now, is becuase maybe a week after the pilot, the heads of that department in FOX got restructured and the pastic wrap came off a whole new lineup of fresh-faced marketing and programming execs. They couldn't drop the Simpsons (it just has TOO MUCH momentum), so they decided to carve up everything else they could touch and fill the void with the neeto ideas they had during thier training in the frat house.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:Speculation by bskin · · Score: 2

      I just figure the ratings have never been what they hoped. Didn't it start off airing in the slot right after the simpsons, where they liked to nurse new shows to see if they'd pick up an audience? The fact is, most of the time that you get a show that people really fanatically love, the people who don't like it *really* hate it. Trying asking my parents about the family guy sometime. Point is, just because you think a show is the greatest thing on earth, it far from guarantees that anyone else does.

      Besides, I always had a theory on futurama. I saw the question as less 'why did they cancel it?' and more 'why did they keep it around so long?' They obviously haven't really been supporting it in years, with the shitty time slot and frequent preemptions(including one season premiere, at least on the east coast). I figured it was Millenium Syndrome. Remember the show Millenium, by Chris Carter? I never actually watched it, and supposedly not many other people did, either. When it was on, i always heard rumors that it was Chris Carter's 'pet project' and that fox just kept it on to keep him doing the X-Files. So maybe it was the same deal with Futurama, and fox just got sick of it.

      --
      hot foreign sheep.
    2. Re:Speculation by FastT · · Score: 2
      I think what really happened is that Fox felt it needed to follow through on its commitment to Family Guy, which had been promised the slot after the Simpsons as part of the signing deal. Remember, Futurama was brought in after Family Guy flopped the first time. I don't know whether they did this because of contractual reasons, or because they really believed in the show, but it necessitated moving Futurama out of the post-Simpsons timeslot. This was the genesis of the unprecedented 7-8 Pacific/6-7 Central Sunday timeslot, and they moved in King of the Hill to shore up the lead-in.

      Unfortunately, after Family Guy died on the vine the second time, they replaced it with awful Malcolm in the Middle instead of going back to Futurama, by then having built something of an audience at the earlier timeslot (or wanting to use the "incubator" slot for another show).

      --

      The only certainty is entropy.
  18. Simpsons may go soon too by alanjstr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yahoo News carries an interview with Groening. My favorite quote it "Although what happens generally if we win the Emmy for best animation show is that that gives us another couple of years to run it into the ground," he said.

  19. Remember Dilbert? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    There was a Dilbert cartoon on UPN that really wasn't bad. Unfortunately, being UPN and being on at an unusual time (well for me anyway...) made me miss alot of it. So I really didn't notice that it had disappeared. One night, I was inspired to check Kazaa for Dilbert and grabbed a few eps. That show was actually pretty good!

    I think what killed that show was not so much time slot, but rather FOX has a virtual monopoly on prime-time animated shows. Sunday nights are when I watch like a string of cartoons. And ... well damn, if Fox had bought Dilbert from UPN, that would have worked out really well:

    7:00 PM: King of the Hill
    7:30 PM: Family Guy
    8:00 PM: Simpsons
    8:30 PM: Futurama
    9:00 PM: Dilbert
    9:30 PM: X-Files

    Tell me that wouldn't have been a cool night lineup.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Remember Dilbert? by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

      Well... it is the last season of the X-Files...

      This COULD actually work. But since there are some problems with it, I doubt it would ever happen.

    2. Re:Remember Dilbert? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I personally think that if the show starts before 10 it's okay. I guess that's really up to the mass audience to decide, however.

      If not 9:30 on Sundays, put it on after Boston Public on Monday's at 9pm.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Remember Dilbert? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Dilbert is old and tired."

      Just to be clear, I was talking about the animated cartoon show that lasted less than a season. It didn't have time to get old or tired, heh.

      As for your other comments, I disagree, but it's not worth discussing here. A good deal of the fun with Dilbert occurs when you work in a Dilbert-like environment. If you don't work that way, I can't make Dilbert funny to you.

      The animated cartoon is pretty good, though. It's worth a gander if you get bored hanging around Kazaa. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Remember Dilbert? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Hmm.. what I said and what I was thinking was a little different.

      What I was thinking when I made the comment about the cubicle dweller is that Dilbert manages to make a comic that hits close to home pretty regularly. If that's not happening with you, then I certainly understand you not liking it. Everybody in my office, though, finds it amusing.

      Heh maybe Dilbert's not funny at all, and really it's my company that's funny... scary thought! :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  20. Re:Hopefully... by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once they lost Connan, they started steadily going downhill.

    I agree with you except I would replace "steadily" with "rapidly". It was painful enough to watch one of my favorite shows go from brilliant to awful but I finally decided to switch the TV off on the episode where I&S Corp decides to change The Itchy & Scratchy Show (was that the Poochy the Dog episode?). Near the end, Lisa tells the animators that there isn't anything "wrong" with Itchy & Scratchy, the reason their ratings are down is because people have gotten used to such great programming or some such nonesense. She goes on to say that the fans should be thankful that Itchy & Scratchy has been great for so many years. That speech was obviously directed towards fans of the Simpsons who were posting negative comments about the shows on the Internet. Rather than listening to the feedback from their most loyal fans, the people running The Simpsons decided to have Lisa berate the viewers! I thought that was too offensive and decided that there was no longer any hope that The Simpsons would realize they were making a mistake with their new direction.

    So I gave up hope that the Simpsons would return to greatness a long time ago...

    GMD

  21. re: Simpsons Jumping the Shark by freeweed · · Score: 2

    Funny you should mention this. A LOT of otherwise knowledgable people I know completely missed it too - on the recent "clipshow" (Homer Gump or some such title), watch towards the end credits where they start making jokes about future Simpsons episodes.

    They quickly show a picture of Homer waterskiing - and he happens to be taking a jump, right overtop a shark.

    I think milk came out of my nose when I saw that.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  22. Re:Krusty for Kongress! by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Help support the Krusty for Kongress Kampaign!

    Send checks to:

    KKK
    17 Charles St.
    Montomery, AL 30220

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  23. it is a shame... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

    FOX Broadcasting has a nasty habit of cancelling good shows and keeping bad shows. One such show was the Critic, from where it lept from FOX to ABC. Due to that leap, the show only lasted two seasons (One on FOX, one on ABC).

    Now FOX is treading on both Family Guy and Futurama...

    Tis a shame...

    1. Re:it is a shame... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2

      Wasn't "Freaks and Geeks" on NBC, not FOX?

    2. Re:it is a shame... by Pope · · Score: 2

      First of all, Freaks and Geek aired on NBC, not Fox.

      Second, Undeclared was not cancelled. Their first season had a short number of episodes. It's been renewed.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  24. Re:Hopefully... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you sure your nick shouldn't be "Comic Book Guy"?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  25. Re:Matt Groening is a sellout by benedict · · Score: 2

    Aren't you cool.

    There are people who are familiar with Dan Clowes
    and still like the Simpsons, you know.

    But we're probably not as cool as you.

    --
    Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  26. No Futurama? Watch SeaLab ! by napa1m · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If FOX takes Futurama away from us or (as recently) simply decides to pre-empt or randomly move it then do yourself and your sense of humor a favor and stay up later (usually about 11:15) to watch Sealab 2021 on Cartoon Network's Adult Swim block.

    It's Sci-Fi (Robots, Time Travel, Black Debbie), it's got great characters (Stormy, Hesh, Chubby Cox), and some of the best comedy writing and voice talent (Erik Estrada!) on tv EVER.

  27. Secular Thinking by John+Paul+Jones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems to me that the Simpsons has reached the point of being a minor religion...

    As folks will quote scripture, so folks will quote the Simpsons.

    It's on Sunday, and plans are made around it. Those that watch think those that don't are wierd.

    You can also attend throughout the week, but the sermons seem a bit canned and dated.

    The characters consistently show reality through a fun-house mirror and have representation from most ethnic groups/stereotypes.

    Why not? I'm sure someone somewhere hates the Simpsons with passion enough to start a small war, and that's all the qualification I need.

    -JPJ

    --
    Feh.
  28. Why move networks? by elmegil · · Score: 2
    what I thought was interesting was his comments on Fox and how he's not interested in moving networks over the futurama thing.

    The devil you know is frequently better than the devil you don't.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  29. Re:Wow by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny
    n. pl. parodies
    1. A literary or artistic work that imitates the characteristic style of an author or a work for comic effect or
      ridicule. See Synonyms at caricature.

    2. The genre of literature comprising such works.

    Something so bad as to be equivalent to intentional mockery; a travesty: The trial was a parody of justice.

    Music. The practice of reworking an already established composition, especially the incorporation into the Mass of material borrowed from other works, such as motets or
    madrigals.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  30. "Too mean" by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    That is a really strange complaint comming from TV executives.

    My favourite sitcom "News Radio" was always in trouble and was cancelled because the characters were too mean to each other.

    And now my favourite animation show (yes i think the current futurama shows are a bit better than the current simpsons shows) is getting cancelled because the characters are too mean.

    Thats really bizarre. First of all the characters werent really mean in either one of those show (ok maybe except bender but even he was showed goodness of heart in the godfellas episode).

    Second of all it makes you wonder do TV stations consider it their duty to build up the morals of their audience trough tv shows? And if so why is that coming from FOX that brought us numerous car chase shows, police reality shows, accident and disasters where people die shows, one (or two was it?) numerous women begging to be married to some millionare schnuck shows, and lets not forget the trivia show where the host is famous for insulting the contestants.

    1. Re:"Too mean" by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      The "too mean" comment makes me wonder which network these FOX executives think they're "running."

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    2. Re:"Too mean" by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      born that way... they are leftovers from the Hitler Youth Program

  31. Thanks for nothing by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Funny

    I appreciate being modded up but I'm at the cap and just made some other posts that will very likely get modded down. So this doesn't do me a lot of good in my quest for 50 points for 50 days.

    If youd've waited until after the others got modded down this would have really come in handy.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  32. Letter Writing by finny · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, it's probably true that online petitions aren't worth the server space their stored on which is why Futurama fans might want to consider writing a good old USPS letter. Rumor has it that big-wig studio execs are greatly swayed by your willingness to waste paper, time, and tax dollars. Here's their addresses at the Fox network:

    Ms. Gail Berman
    President
    Building 100 Room 4450
    10201 W. Pico Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90035
    United States of America

    Mr. Sandy Grushow
    Chairman
    Building 100 Room 5110
    10201 W. Pico Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90035
    United States of America

    I don't want to give you a script but you might want to focus on Futurama's poor and frequently changing time slot and it's abundance of critical praise.

    Telling a studio exec to bite any part of your anatomy (shiny or otherwise) is generally a bad idea.

  33. Simpsons Post 911? by istartedi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've been wondering what they are going to do with the war on terror and a lot of other post 911 stuff.

    I thought that all the episodes this season were made before 911, but they had "Bin Laden in a blender" last Sunday, so what's the deal? Was that spliced in later?

    On one hand, there is a lot of way to spin humor on some of this stuff, but on the other hand it's hard to do it without addressing "important social issues" or having a "very special episode", which was what used to signal the end of a sitcom before everyone started to say "jumping the shark".

    Let's see:

    They fly someplace. Lisa gets wanded and taken into a special room. Bart's slingshot gets ignored. Homer beeps in the detector, but nobody wants to touch him. Marge is asked to stick her hair in the X-ray machine, and it comes all the way out the other side. Maggie has a gun in her diaper, but nobody notices. This stuff practicly writes itself.

    Or how about... Bart decides to become a Moslem. Do all the Lisa Budist stuff--Bart style. Hurl pork chops out the window, etc. End Moslem conversion when Bart finds out he has to get circumcised.

    Then again... maybe having the Simpsons come to an end without ever riffing on that stuff would be better. It would fix the Simpsons permanently as part of the "pre-911" world, allowing us to watch it in sindicated re-runs knowing that stuff would never intrude, save for that one little reference to Bin Laden.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Simpsons Post 911? by or_smth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To answer question 1...

      FYI: Generally (and this is true for a lot of shows), that while the actually production process starts 9 months before showing, that doesn't mean that everything is finished 9 months before. Things can be spliced in almost up to the point of showing. The Bin Laden bit was probably an add-in, but either way, I sure as hell don't agree with it. It cheapens a truely "evil" person, and makes it feel like people died in vain.

    2. Re:Simpsons Post 911? by lkaos · · Score: 2

      I sure as hell don't agree with it. It cheapens a truely "evil" person, and makes it feel like people died in vain.

      Lighten up a little. "Taste" is so subjective, it is entirely self-destructive to worry about it.

      If you don't like it, don't watch it. While it offends you, it may comfort others. If you are right, and lots of people agree, then it will be removed. Otherwise, if your wrong, and people don't agree with you, you'll just cause more harm than good.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
  34. online petitions are stupid by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

    Remember what Roswell did? Bottles of tabasco sauce sent to the producers or something? Mailbomb them with lots of alcohol (Bender likes to drink) and maybe they'll notice and not cancel Futurama. They'll definitely notice it more than some stupid online petition.

    --
    [o]_O
  35. Whatever became of frcr.com? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The one that that I find most upsetting about the whole Futurama/Simpsons rivalry is that Simpsons seems to be treated as FOX's little darling and Futurama is the bastard child they want to pretend they never had.

    Case in point? The Simpsons Archive (snpp.com) perhaps the single greatest authoritative Simpsons information source. Mostly culled I'm sure from countless USENET postings but the information contained there is priceless to the average Simpsons fan. Someone at work will utter a butchered version of some famous quote and in seconds we will have the exact wording, the episode it came from and (with a little step 2 magic) soon be watching the hilarious moment.

    But is there such a resource for Futurama? Well there was...The Futurama Cronicles (frcr.com). Had much of the same kind of information, with upcoming episode dirt and all sorts of little factoids. I can't read the alien language, but those guys had it pretty much deciphered. I always wonder what the little clips during the intro came from and they always seemed to know.

    But what was it, two years ago? the site got the Cease & Desist kiss of death. How can a site like snpp.com flourish and frcr.com disappear when both are basically cataloging and organizing USENET content? And what happened to the other Futurama sites like FuturamaOutlet and so on?

    Honestly, it's like FOX is trying to deny Futurama even exists. The FOX website for the show is a flash-laden piece of crap that hasn't been updated since the show premiered (same with the Family Guy show site).

    Bleah. Matt Groening must has some change in his pocket. He knows about the massive following his shows have on the Internet (he has been asked about ANiVCD and the whole VCD scene at every convention he's ever attended). In this post dot-com world, I think his projects would be the only ones that have a chance at working over the Internet. Produce the show straight to video and offer streaming downloads over the Internet. Hell, I see channel after channel on IRC doing exactly that.

    So he's not interested in leaving FOX. Fine. But for god's sake...don't cast pearls before swine. How many musicians say that given the choice between languishing in a corporate vault and being enjoyed and shared by fans they would much rather give their work to the fans? Why can't Matt be the same way?

    - JoeShmoe

    .

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
    1. Re:Whatever became of frcr.com? by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2

      Notice I didn't say "streaming" I said "downloading" as in "download the whole video file locally then watch it.

      Streaming video blows. I have one of the fastest consumer Internet connections around and I still can't watch video from most overloaded sites without it skipping.

      If it wasn't for programs like StreamBox and ASFRecorder I would go bonkers. But thankfully with those programs I can download them locally and then convert them to good old open MPEG file format.

      I think a site would be better off giving customers access to MPEG and/or DivX versions of these file in two or three different resolutions. Perhaps a small 40-50MB DivX version for dial-up users and a nice big VCD version for broadband customers.

      That's what I'm saying exists already on the Internet (actuallly, now groups are releasing SVCD copies of the newly released DVDs).

      - JoeShmoe

      .

      --
      -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  36. Re:Hopefully... by l810c · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Once they lost Connan, they started steadily going downhill

    I seen this statement several times here and other places. I still like the Simpsons and didn't have any idea where the GoodEpisodes/BadEpisodes line was drawn. So I did a little investigating and it seems Conan wrote 4 episodes.

    Conan Episodes

    So these 4 are the only good ones?

  37. Fox becoming 70s TV by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think the current heads at Fox want angry characters or self-referential satire. For some reason television has climbed that hump and has moved back to Spelling-like plain-jane sitcoms.

    The mid to late nineties TV landscape was covered with amusing shows that took pot-shots at everything, including themselves and especially the sitcom formula. Mr. Show, Upright Citizens, Simpsons, Family Guy, The Daily Show, etc were groundbreaking shows. They didn't take anything as above-criticism and developed an intelligent edge through insightful comedy.

    Now look at the popular comedies on Fox. Bernie Mac, King of the Hill, Malcolm in the Middle, etc. They're more based in the Love Boat tradition of wacky sitcom than in the Simpsons tradition of satire and irony. This is what people want. The Neilsons have spoken and Fox isn't listening to the raves, but only to the complaints about shows being too brainy, mean, or smartassed.

    Cable seems to be picking up the slack with shows like the Man Show, Sealab 2021, etc. Hopefully the Simpsons spirit will live on in the minds of writers willing to take a small risk.

    1. Re:Fox becoming 70s TV by jmauro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mr. Show, Upright Citizens, Simpsons, Family Guy, The Daily Show

      They can only take credit for two of these shows. The simpsons and the Family Guy. The others were made and more importantly shown by HBO or comedy central. And they've tried everying possible to kill off the family guy. Give up being edgy on Fox. They needed to be edgy when they were a start up. Now their one of the big networks and need to keep the viewer tuned in with predictable stuff, rather than steal them with the edgy stuff.

  38. Leave 9-11 out of it... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    I understand your point, but I respectfully disagree about it's humor. I appreciated South Park's take on the War on Terror, but I really think the joy of it came from the episode's focus on showing the US kick Bin Laden's ass.

    I don't see the Simpsons being able to lift my spirits that way. Jokes about airport screenings may be funny, but when you put them in the terrorism context, it loses it's humor.

    Bin Laden in a blender is a spoof of stuff we've already seen on the net. It's the lighter side of what happened. But to tackle the attacks directly without turning it into a drama... well I'd be very impressed if they pulled it off. As I said, South Park did, but I'm not sure Simpsons is quite up to it.

    *would love to see Groenig prove him wrong.*

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Leave 9-11 out of it... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      That south park episode was lame. I'd been waiting LITERALLY months to see a south park/bin laden episode. I was so psyched up, expecting maybe even a guest appearance of Saddam, both of them with the canadian style heads, yapping away, mistreating Satan even...

      AND WHAT DO I GET?

      I get some "not all muslims are our enemies" (not that they all are, but I watch this show to be entertained, not listen to a public service announcement) bullshit. I get a script that is so far from the first 2 season's quality, that I want to cry. I get a horribly unwatchable spoof of Bugs Bunny, which is unforgiveable. I get YET ANOTHER episode where Chef fails to sing.

      I get a really really really lame new character, invented for the sake of a bad pun. Every other joke was either as bad as that, or worse. Nothing like the humor I'd expect from South Park. I get a rehash of the Sally Struthers/Jaba the Hut gag, only done really poorly. And the pain goes on and on. I get cold chills, remembering how bad that episode is.

      But that wasn't bad enough, the entire season has been as bad, with only the occassional joke anything like they had been. I get a Kenny that stays dead.

      If this is what South Park has turned into, then Simpsons (which I haven't watched in year) or Futurama (I've only seen it once or twice) definitely kicks its ass.

  39. The Simpsons dating itself into oblivion by hyacinthus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the reasons that the early Simpsons episodes were so funny, and continue to remain funny, is that they were not topical, but universal. There were episodes about Bart and Lisa in school, Homer's troubles with his job, strains in Homer's and Marge's marriage--all standard if not hackneyed sitcom plots, you may say, but stories of general appeal, that are still funny more than a decade later. And that's true of nearly _all_ of the classic comedy that's still funny even fifty years later. Watch I Love Lucy or listen to the Jack Benny program and you're not likely to hear any joke or gag about some 40's or 50's political or social event. Both shows _do_ make use of cameos, and those "date" the show to an extent, especially when the star or bigwig has since become rather obscure (hands up everyone who's heard of Dore Schary or Ronald Colman!) But those classic shows, and classic Simpsons, because they avoid topical humor, have aged remarkably well.

    Groening's talk of making an Enron episode reminds me of how low the Simpsons have sunk. Who, five years from now, is going to remember Enron? Hell, who cares _now_ about Enron? But the Simpsons went down that primrose way a long time ago, ever since they started cracking jokes about the Internet, and making episodes featuring George Bush and Bill Clinton (I'm reminded that the Simpsons' funniest political episode, the one where Lisa goes to Washington, makes hardly any specific reference to the politics of the day), and running cameos from every two-bit celebrity or band who had their fifteen minutes, from Mark McGwire to N-Sync.

    hyacinthus.

    1. Re:The Simpsons dating itself into oblivion by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can see where you're coming from, but I'm not sure "The Simpsons" is written with the idea that it needs to be "timeless entertainment". As many episodes as they've done, it's much more like a late-night talk show.... You count on it being there every time you turn on the TV, and it's meant to enjoy that one time, and then sort of "throw away".

      Oh, sure - there will always be re-runs, but there's enough generic humor in it to keep people watching them far into the future. I don't see any reason why they should pass over chances to poke fun at current events, simply because they're worried people won't "get it" 10 years from now.

      Cameo appearances have always dated shows, but I don't think it really harms the production. Even today, the "outdated" celebrities appearing on Scooby Doo adds to the charm to those of us old enough to remember those people. The kids might not know who Don Knotts is, but they still like the episode anyway.

    2. Re:The Simpsons dating itself into oblivion by cjpez · · Score: 2
      Hm, good point. Although I disagree with your criticism of the celebrity cameos. Without N-Sync, we never would have been graced with the line, "Those wack invertebrates'll sting you OLD SCHOOL!" Brilliance.

      But otherwise, yeah, right on. :)

    3. Re:The Simpsons dating itself into oblivion by Combuchan · · Score: 2

      Groening's talk of making an Enron episode reminds me of how low the Simpsons have sunk. Who, five years from now, is going to remember Enron?

      Homer: Oh, little Lisa. I've already started you a college fund at Lincoln Savings and Loan.

      But seriously, how long have the Simpsons been on? 10 years now? How many episodes are out? 200? 250? Does anybody even know, my Krusty-brand Kalkulator doesn't even go that high. :> But you try keeping a show on for ten years and manage to have a unique episode on each week. They're looking for ideas, and I quite frankly think it's a darn good avenue to look at that whole debacle.

      The idiocy of everyone involved in that clusterfuck who really made jackasses of themselves is incredible, and starving employees aside, I think that's funny.

      If you disagree, reply.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    4. Re:The Simpsons dating itself into oblivion by ChuckleBug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Groening's talk of making an Enron episode reminds me of how low the Simpsons have sunk. Who, five years from now, is going to remember Enron? Hell, who cares _now_ about Enron?

      Believe me, Enron will be remembered, along with words and phrases like "Watergate," "Whitewater," "S&L Collapse," "Teapot Dome," "Iran-Contra," and so on. I know it isn't good to admit it when straining to maintain a disaffected, too-cool-to-care, above politics Generation Z-ster posture, but people *do* care about Enron.

      But the Simpsons went down that primrose way a long time ago, ever since they started cracking jokes about the Internet, and making episodes featuring George Bush and Bill Clinton [...]

      Oh, no shit, man, who remembers US presidents? How obscure!

      "John F. Who????"

    5. Re:The Simpsons dating itself into oblivion by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
      I see your point but don't agree. You see, some cameos work better than others, and some really are "timeless" (for example: Leonard Nimoy, Paul McCartney, Stephen Hawking). It's true that it's a bad idea to make the humor in the cameo episodes rely on the audience knowing the guest. However, I know nothing about NSych other than that they are a boy band, and I still found the episode with them hilarious.

      I also don't agree that the best political episode was "Lisa Goes to Washington." I think it was "Citizen Kang", a part of the seventh halloween special. This one centers around the Clinton/Dole election of '96, but contains some of the fiercest and funniest political satire I've ever seen on TV, and ages remarkably well.

      Where I do agree with you is in that it seems all the episodes are now focused around gimmicks rather than developing the characters. Maybe the characters are already developed too well. However, I think there may be another problem: the Simpsons now has the feel of a committee project without any coherent direction. Playing back the last episode (which was actually very good) these are the credits:

      Co-Executive Producer: Ian Maxtone-Graham

      Co-Executive Producer: Matt Selman

      Co-Executive Producer: Dan Greaney

      Co-Executive Producer: Josh Lieb

      Supervising Producer: Larina Jean Adams

      Supervising Producer: Carolyn Omine

      Supervising Producer: Tim Long

      Supervising Producers: John Frank, Don Payne

      Supervising Producer: Dana Gould

      Supervising Producer: Kevin Curran

      Supervising Producer: Brian Kelley

      Producer: George Meyer

      Producer: Ron Hauge

      Producers: Tom Gammill, Max Pross

      Producer: David Mirkin

      Producer: Mark Reiss

      Producer: John Vitti

      Co-Producer: Marc Willmore

      Consultant: John Schwartzwelder

      Supervising Director: Jim Reardon

      Produced by: Richard Raynis

      Produced by: Bonita Pietila

      Produced by: David Silverman

      Produced by: Denise Sirkot

      Produced by: Richard Sakai

      Written by: John Schwartzwelder

      Directed by: Chuck Sheetz

      So, these are the people who have their fingers in the content of this particular episode but are neither animators nor voice actors. It's no wonder, then, that the recent episodes seem to have no direction, and come off as nothing more than a series of gags (many of which are terrible). This might just be the inevitable result of eveybody feeling like they're out of ideas. Because the show must go on, maybe they think that 30 people can cobble enough ideas together to make a 22-minute show. Like I said, it's better than nothing, but incoherence really shows.

  40. Meet the Feebles by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    If you like crass puppets, you definitely should check out Meet the Feebles by Peter Jackson (yes, that Peter Jackson). The Feebles are the Muppets on drugs.

  41. 24, Andy Richter & Undeclared... by bje2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fox has done an excellent job this year bringing 24 to their schedule...that show is fantastic, Keifer Sutherland is awesome, and Dennis Hoppers' addition to the cast in the past few episodes has been outstanding too...to me, this was the best new show on any newtork this season...of course, it sounds like their gonna ruin it next season when, according to articles i've read, the shows switch from 24 episodes each covering one hour of time...to each episode covering 1 24-hour block of time...it just won't be the same..please FOX, try to bring it back in the original format...

    also...

    Andy Richter Controls the Universe and Undeclared are, in my opinion, two of the funniest new shows this season...yet, Undeclared has been conspicously absent from the spring schedule, and there are rumours that Andy Richter will not be picked up for next season...these two shows are great...and if you haven't checked out Andy Richter consider watching..it's on Tuesday's at 8:30 (although not this tuesday) as a lead in to "24"...it's damn funny...and the office humour in it is great...

    i do think Fox's lineup does have some potential over all....these 3 shows i mentioned....plus Simpsons, Malcom in the Middle, King of the Hill and That 70's show give them a nice core group of programming...albeit one that doesn't really appeal to older viewers....but it should appeal to the all important 18-25 year old male demographic...

    just my opinion...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  42. This stuff writes itself... by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Scene one: Itchy, Scratchy and Bin Ladin in a barber shop...

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  43. What Greg the Bunny was BEFORE Fox: by RyanFenton · · Score: 2


    Most people here that have seen Greg the Bunny on Fox were underwhelmed. I was too.

    To see what it was before Fox, check out this - it's from the Independant Film Channel, where they introduced and made fun of movies, then slowly built up characters as they went.

    There, Greg was a simple sock puppet, and his personality shined with unrehersed enthusiasm at having just having a job. There's great stuff in those clips, like Greg going to a real rave, getting killed by zombies, meeting childhood heroes, etc.

    The stuff we see on Fox though, is definetly not the same - though it might grow back into what it was eventually. If I never saw those clips, I would think the exact same as the rest here about the show - but now it seems that much worse because of how much it has lost it's appeal.

    Ryan Fenton

  44. Perfect solution... by weave · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Futurama gets canceled, have Bender get sent back into time and end up in Springfield. Let's face it, Bender is what makes Futurama. Well, then there's Lela. I haven't gotten excited by a cartoon character since Jose and the Pussycats in the 70s...

  45. Re:Hopefully... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2


    I'm not sure about the whole deal with Conan completely writing/mostly writing/having minor involvement with certain Simpsons episodes... However, I have noticed lately that episodes in this latest season, the 13th season, and specifically the later half of this season, have not been up to par with previous episodes. At the same time I have also noticed a major change in the credits. The list of executives, producers, etc have been changed around. Whereas Matt Groening used to be the executive producer previously, Al Jean now holds the position (or at least that is what the credits reflect). And I have found these episodes to be only mildly humorous - not funny, hilarious, or anything else. I'm hardly laughing at any of the jokes, am able to predict quite a few of the pokes and jabs that are meant to be jokes, and am even finding myself mildly annoyed at the stupidity and predictability of some of the spoofs and setups. This is not good.

    On the other hand, I watch re-runs of the Simpsons regularly (UPN runs re-runs every weekday at 5:00 pm and 5:30 pm eastern currently, and have run 2 re-runs per day at different times in previous years). And these re-runs hardly ever cease to amuse me. I usually end up cracking up and laughing out loud at them, and finding most of the episodes absolutely hilarious. This is despite the fact that I've seen most (prolly all) of them several times over (at least 5 to 10 times each) to the point of being able to memorize portions of them unintentionally.

    All of these episodes have classic qualities that seem to be lacking in the most recent episodes. Hopefully the Simpsons will be able to recognize this and change accordingly, or if not - at least go out with a bang and not drag it out like the X-Files or other shows have done. Since Groening seems to want to move on with Futurama, perhaps he can cary some of the classic qualities of the Simpsons there.

  46. Re:Matt Groening is a sellout by GooseKirk · · Score: 2

    OK, I'm enough of a pathetic geek to admit that I've read all of Clowes' stuff and damn near all of Dorkin's, and I disagree. The Conan O'Brien episodes were way better than, say, Hectic Planet or Velvet Glove.

    And lighten up a bit - the Simpsons is a different product for a different market than Dork! or Eightball. It's chalk and cheese (and a real comics geek would remember which comic that phrase played prominently in, neener neener). You couldn't convince me that the target demographic for Dork! or Eightball is inherently superior in some way than the Simpsons' demographic. I hang out in a comics shop quite a bit more than is probably healthy, and even though it's a good comics shop with some amazing people around it, the pseudo-hipster cultural elitism shtick is tired. It'd be great if Dork! and Eightball were exposed to a wider audience, but sniffing down your nose at the Simpsons isn't the way to build that audience.

  47. Good shows don't have to last forever by Goonie · · Score: 2
    IMHO, we might get better TV if writers and actors produced a relatively few shows in a series, and after they've milked the idea for its natural life, go and do something else. That way, they have the creative freedom to go and try new ideas without having to religiously follow the conventions of a particular format.

    The Simpsons was brilliant in the past, and occasionally still is. But don't you think the creative talent behind it could probably produce better things if they were freed from what is a pretty tired format?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  48. Re:Krusty for Kongress! by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Cool. I pulled that ZIP code out of my posterior, based on nothing more than 2 facts: 1. ZIP codes in the Northeast are lowest, ZIP codes in the Southwest are highest. and 2. My ZIP code is in Virginia and it's 22***. I'm pleased that I actually hit the deep South, and a bordering state no less. If I'd actually hit the right state, that would have been uber cool, and yeah, I coulda looked it up but it was a joke, not my SAT test.

    As for your other point, Krusty was oblivious enough to do that at the Apollo theatre (which is where I got the idea) so he might be oblivious enough not to check the work of his kampaign manager either. I guess I could have put the office in Springfield Missouri though. :)

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  49. Re:Krusty for Kongress! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

    Announcer: "It's the Krusty Komedy Klassic!"
    Krusty: "Hey, hey! It's great to be back at the Apollo Theater, and... [notices the letters behind him] K-K-K? That's not good..."

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  50. Re:Matt Groening is a sellout by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    but I do feel sorry for the people who think the Simpsons are "clever". I wonder if they've ever read anything by Evan Dorkin [houseoffun.com] or Dan Clowes [fantagraphics.com].

    Man, do I feel sorry for the people who think Evan Dorkin and Dan Clowes are "clever." I wonder if they've read anything by Charles Dickens, Raymond Carver, or Vladimir Nabokov.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  51. Re:Hopefully... by ByteHog · · Score: 2

    I wonder how Conan feels about all this talk about the show going downhill after he left...

    --
    - This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along, move along..
  52. Re:Matt Groening is a sellout by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2
    My point exactly. Have these people opened a book lately? Been to the symphony? Perhaps supported their local community theater by viewing Checkov's Under the Cherry Moon?

    Alas, I fear not. Guys, seriously, you shouldn't run from an inoculation of culture. Think of it as your intellectual booster shot. You'll be glad you did!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  53. Re:Wow by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Wow. Someone who spells 'reckless' incorrectly.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  54. Re:Matt Groening on Futurama, Simpsons and Fox by rmohr02 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...but what I thought was interesting was his comments on Fox and how he's not interested in moving networks over the futurama thing.
    That's the beauty of FOX. Groening's shows don't have a chance on other networks--too politically incorrect. For instance, when NBC came out with God, the Devil, and Bob, they gave it up after a few episodes because people complained about how it portrayed religion (though I believe it kept showing in the UK). The Simpsons and Futurama have both had episodes that portray religion differently than the norm, along with many other shows, but FOX keeps them.

    It kinda makes me think of how Bob & Tom deal with complaints--if they get a complaint about one song they played, they play it again.
  55. Re:Vote for me by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

    OK what gimp voted the above offtopic?

    *sigh*

  56. If it's not Football, it's something else by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    The last few minutes of 11/26/00 episode of Futurama, "War is the H Word", was cut (in the East) for the certification of the Florida Electoral Votes. Then again, if they had to cut in, the timing couldn't have been better.

    ** SPOILER ALERT **

    Bender had a bomb planted in him when he would say his favorite word, 'ass'. The gang got to him in time, and just as he said 'ass', he screamed the TV screen went blank for a few seconds, and they cut to the Fox News Alert.

    Hmmm. Bender says 'ass' and Katherine Harris appears. I liked that doomsday ending best.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  57. Re:Matt Groening is a sellout by gowen · · Score: 2
    Checkov's Under the Cherry Moon?
    "The Cherry Orchard" perhaps. "Under the Cherry Moon" is an astonishingly bad Prince movie/album.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  58. More Chekov masterpieces by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    (sorry, had to do it)

    When Seagulls Cry
    The Threesome Sisters
    Uncle Vanya's Raspberry Beret
    Ivanov Would Die 4 U

    --

    c-hack.com |
  59. Incidentally... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    In the UK, the biggest cable/satellite/digital channel, Sky 1, runs Futurama side by side with the Simpsons, at between 6 and 8pm weeknights (plus a Saturday repeat). It promotes it heavily, and doesn't screw around with the timeslots.

    In other words: they get it, and we get it, and I'll be deeply, deeply saddened to see it go because some jumped up MBA prick in an expensive suit feels it doesn't target a common enough demographic, or that it might offend the Neurotic Mothers of America. Sad, sad day.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  60. Re:Is this better? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    'How about this, "Futurama sucks" Is that better? '

    Not really. When somebody says something 'sucks' but does nothing to back that up... well, frankly you sound like somebody who doesn't have a well formed opinion. In other words, ya saw the show once and never really gave it a chance.

    Seeing as how this thread is about saving Futurama, I'd say you're just looking to piss people off, a la flamebait.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  61. Worst... Review... EVER. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

    You sound just like most of the posters from alt.tv.simpsons in the past 5 years, just repeating "It was good a few seasons ago, but this season has just SUCKED" over and over again, every season.

    Now allow me to mimic the other posters in a.t.s. by saying, if you think the show sucks now, stop watching it. Why waste your time on something you don't like?