Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

RISC OS Select 1st Release Out

Posted by timothy on from the be-the-first-on-your-block dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes: "RISC OS Select, *the* OS for ARM powered computers has seen its first release. RISC OS started back in 1994, by Acorn computers, but when they went down, RISC OS Ltd purchased the rights, and released RISC OS 4 in 1999. In 2000 the Select program was started, and a rolling program of OS updates was initiated. Now, the first real release (after several pre-releases) is there: ROS Select 4.29 It features multi-user logon, DHCP, SVG graphics support, over 100 enhancements over the old ROS 4 more info at http://select.riscos.com and http://www.riscos.org."

135 comments

  1. this long? by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That many releases went w/o multi-user logins and DHCP?

    *the* OS for RISC?

    Come on.

    1. Re:this long? by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

      If you mean Linux then that's not much use in an embedded environment.

  2. Rebranding RISC OS as KDE? by yerricde · · Score: 2

    http://www.riscos.org/

    I followed that link to Rebranding RISC OS. Apparently, RISCOS Ltd is moving to a cogwheel for a logo. But isn't the cogwheel taken?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Rebranding RISC OS as KDE? by Gid1 · · Score: 2

      From the page you refer to:

      Acorn Nut device: As should be clear from the preceding text, I consider this to be one of the very best corporate logos ever seen.

      Acorn seemed to be pretty bad at branding, IMHO... the true Acorn Green wasn't in the usual phosphor or LCD gamuts, and so wasn't accurately displayable on *any* of their computers. Even the Archimedes logo's blue wasn't in the gamut and ended up looking washed out.

      RISCOS Ltd don't seem much better at good brand design...

    2. Re:Rebranding RISC OS as KDE? by pohl · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting link. I'm left thinking that anything would make a better logo than something called a Nut Device, though.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  3. I used to develop for RISCOS... by b.foster · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In fact, I was one of the contributors to the Linux RISCOS emulation package. This package is an excellent way to get your hands dirty developing for an embedded platform, without having to shell out for expensive hardware or proprietary dev tools. I highly recommend that your consider the possible use of RISCOS for your next embedded MP3 player or DiVX ripper appliance.

    Some of the more useful software available for RISCOS is online here, in a searchable directory. More information is also up on my friend Dr. Pearson's page.

    1. Re:I used to develop for RISCOS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I used to develop for RISCOS...
      Oh come on - that's it? You liked the software? Where is the inside scope? Who was sleeping with who? Why did you leave - was it because of a huge flamewar over toolkits?

      But oh no - you left and you're still friends with people. You're a disgrace.

  4. Re:Senor Fecal Troll Matter by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM · · Score: 0

    Acaricie mis bolas saladas.

  5. Correction by BigBadaboom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    RISCOS started it's life considerably earlier than 1994. The first official release was 1988 I believe. Back then it was ahead of it's time. Those first versions had anti-aliased fonts and many other user-friendly features that are still missing from other modern GUIs today.

    If you look at the screenshots the interface may look a bit primitive by todays standards (Acorn never bothered to hire proper designers to make things look pretty ;), but it is still hanging around today because it is such a nice a GUI to use - for beginner and advanced users alike.

  6. Compete with Windows? by Kaypro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Taken from rscos.org frontpage:

    If you're wondering what RISC OS is, you've come to the right place. This site is one of many such sites dedicated to sharing information, news and tutorials on using RISC OS.

    RISC OS is a windows and mouse based operating system to compete with Microsoft Windows, Mac OS and Linux in an increasingly computer-orientated world. The beauty of RISC OS though, is its sheer productivity and intuitiveness - making it rise above the alternatives.

    Beginners and experts alike can immediately start to use RISC OS, even with little or no previous experience of computers. Soon users are finding out what all the excitement and enthusiasm is about. RISC OS is not just hype. It's the productive future of desktop computing.

    Once you've used RISC OS for a few weeks you'll never want to go back to using alternative systems. Why not make a little effort to find out more? You'll be impressed.

    How can an OS like this compete with OS's designed for a different architecture? Will I be able to walk into CompUSA and buy a PC with an ARM CPU in it? Will I be able to purchase a word processor for it? Or are we gonna have to start porting over our GNU GPL'd software over?

    I'm being genuine, do they have some sort of game plan for this?

    --

    Eddy.WriteLinux.Com

    1. Re:Compete with Windows? by rjw57 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Will I be able to walk into CompUSA and buy a PC with an ARM CPU in it?

      Probably not but ARM based computers have been available in the UK for as long as the ARM existed (the lamented Acorn Computers invented it after all). You can still get Risc PCs and even older Acorn machines on eBay and you will be able to get The Omega soon. These machines have a small but fanatical following here in the UK, mostly due to their large presence in educational institutions.

      --
      Rich
    2. Re:Compete with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ARM based computers have been available in the UK for as long as the ARM existed

      Which came first, the ARM or the ARM-based computer...?

    3. Re:Compete with Windows? by rainer_d · · Score: 2
      Will I be able to purchase a word processor for it?

      Actually, yes.
      There is TechWriter Pro. I used to use this a lot, but nowadays, the RISC-PC (my Acorn machine) is at my parents house, and I don't get to use it too often.
      Theres the ROX-Filer project, but it's no real replacement. There is, till today, no GUI out there that can compete with RISC-OS in

      • Speed
      • Usability
      • Intuitivity
      ah-well. Those were the times....
      BTW: porting GNU-software over was not easy, last time I looked, because RISC-OS is not a POSIX-system, in no way. Coupled with the fact that is also more or less, CLI/Shell-less, and had a weird directory-separator (. - dot) made it pretty hard to port the usual tool-chain over to it.
      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    4. Re:Compete with Windows? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 5, Informative
      Acorn, the people who designed the ARM chip (ARM originally stood for 'Acorn RISC Machine', were the company which had previously built the BBC Micro, and were by a long way the best of the British micro computer makers. In 1988 or 89 they brought out their first RISC powered machines, the Acorn Archimedes, initially with an operating system called Arthur. In about 1990 RISC-OS was launched. It had co-operative rather than pre-emptive multi-tasking, but was extremely lightweight and high-performancs - font anti-aliasing was a standard feature from day one, and the user interface design was cleaner and more intuitive even than the Macintosh.

      These were extremely high performance machines for their day - when I bought my first Archimedes, it could outperform every computer that the University where I then worked owned, and could run MS-DOS in a window under software emulation faster than many contemporary PCs. The architecture was entirely proprietary, with non PC compatible bus and expansion cards. The machines were moderately successful in the UK and Europe during the nineties - expensive, but you got a lot of bang for your buck. Towards the end, the 'RISC PC' was introduced which had PC-style components and had both Pentium and ARM processors.

      Ultimately Acorn found they could no longer compete with the Microsoft hegemony and gave up manufacturing general purpose computers. A number of smaller UK companies are still manucaturing clones.

      So, quick answers:

      • No, you can't walk into CompUSA and buy a machine that will run this stuff - and you probably never will be able to.
      • Sadly, the ARM as a mass market personal computer is now probably history.
      • The RISC-OS GUI was one of the best ever, certainly more intuitive that anything from Apple and than any X Window Manager; a project called ROX to build a RISC-OS like window manager is out there.
      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    5. Re:Compete with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give more detail? Not to sound harsh, but it sounds a bit vague (like a usability/intuitivity BeOS post), what usability/intuitivity guff does RiscOS have?

    6. Re:Compete with Windows? by rainer_d · · Score: 2

      That's actually hard to describe, though I even had
      a usability-class during my higher education ;-)
      Seriously, though, it was
      - fast
      - consistent
      - but not to the point where it becomes insane
      (like OS/2)
      - more things (like the antialias fonts, that made the desktop and wordprocessor look like a piece of paper - so crisp, so clear.)

      I dunno - it's just that I miss it a lot ;-)

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    7. Re:Compete with Windows? by doorbot.com · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      The beauty of RISC OS though, is its sheer productivity and intuitiveness

      Neither of which can be measured reliably, and both of which are abitrary to begin with...

      But it does sound good -- I'll bet the marketing chaps wrote that one.

    8. Re:Compete with Windows? by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      Yes, you can go into CompUSA and this Arm-powered windows PC. OK, it's a pocket PC, but it's in direct competition with Risc OS. It comes preinstalled/bundled with "Pocket Word", so, no you can't purchase a word processor for it (damn monopoly!).

      Here are all the varieties of ARM processors supported under Windows CE and .NET

      --
      HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
    9. Re:Compete with Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could run MS-DOS in a window under software emulation faster than many contemporary PCs. Bull fucking shit. I saw that software - in fact I had a demonstration of it and ran it for a while - it was *nowhere* near as fast as the low-end PC I had sitting on my desktop at the time (I used to work at a place that sold and evangelised Archimedes). So many lies and so much hype surrounded the Archi - and apparently, it still does.

      As for RISCOS itself - I had to write software for it for two years. It had one or two nice ideas (the idea of saving by dragging an icon from the apps... even to another app making a kind of pipe), but overall it was a real piece of shit to use and develop for. And no, it wasn't easier than the Mac

      But by far the worst thing about the Archi was the fans. Amiganuts were obnoxious. Archi fans were unbearable former BBC Micro advocates who lived in dreamland.

  7. RISC OS on the GBA? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the blurb:

    RISC OS Select, *the* OS for ARM powered computers

    Has RISC OS been ported to the ARM-powered Game Boy Advance?

    Or would it take too much memory? GBA has 288 KiB of RAM and up to 32 MiB of ROM (though the biggest current games are 8 MiB).

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 3, Informative

      RISC OS 2 could run in 512K with a fair bit to spare, but it would be a push to fit it in 288K.

    2. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

      RISC OS 2 could run in 512K with a fair bit to spare, but it would be a push to fit it in 288K.

      How much of that 512 KiB was .text (code and const data), and how much was .data, .bss, heap, and stack? On the GBA, .text is placed in ROM on the program cartridge.

      However, all discussions of memory use must take into account that GBA has no rotating-media storage ergo no swapping to virtual memory.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, RISC OS has some of the micest DTP, word processing, and repro software around.

      It used to have quite a niche in video editing too.

    4. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      * RISC OS 2 could run in 512K with a fair bit to spare, but it would be a push to fit it in 288K.

      By killing all non-essential modules taking up RAM I just managed to get a desktop under RISC OS 3.11 using only 128KB of module space. It suffers from fragmentation but claimed there was 95KB free with a biggest free block of 74KB. Also, 32KB is used for system heap/stack and 32KB for cursor/system/sound. My page size is 32KB so I can't give more accurate figures.

      Of course it wasn't a very useful desktop ;) Maybe programs with very low RAM requirements could mostly run from ROM... Some memory is also used for the screen but this would come out of the GBA's VRAM.

      So it is theoretically possible memory-wise. I think the biggest problem is the ARM7TDMI doesn't support the 26-bit ARM mode RISC OS is written to use but I'm half asleep so I may be wrong. Oh, also the likelihood of RISC OS Ltd. releasing source or doing a port is very very small.

      How much of that 512 KiB was .text (code and const data), and how much was .data, .bss, heap, and stack? On the GBA, .text is placed in ROM on the program cartridge.

      Much of RISC OS (at least the earlier versions) was stored in and run from ROM.

      Enjoy.
      --
      dooby

    5. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by call · · Score: 1

      RISC OS might seem like a natural fit for the GameBoy since it is already a ROM-based system. Most of RISC OS 2 actually ran from (512K?) ROM, which was part of how it managed to have such a small RAM profile.

      I'd have to go reinsert the old RISC OS 2 ROMs in my old A3000 to be sure, but I suspect you might *just* be able to squeeze the runtime data into 288k.

      Which is irrelevant anyway, of course, since RISC OS 2 only supports Archimedes hardware, and runs entirely in 26-bit addressing mode, which the core in the GBA does not support. Bugger. I was so looking forward to going back to managing my life with !Alarm...

      Excuse me, I must now wallow in nostalgia for a short while....

      --
      -- call
    6. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by -douggy · · Score: 2

      It also had the most friendly GUI for a good 5-6 years. Yes there were macs but I had a 3 button gui wtih ANTIALIASED fonts in 1990 on an 8mhz Arm based risc machine (archi 420/1) took windows 5 years to get a start bar. Linux 10 years to get the fonts right. I am not trolling but riscos was an amazing os with a commoand line support structure as well.
      The sound facilities were also really cool Sibelius started on the acorn machines....

    7. Re:RISC OS on the GBA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good chunk of that is VRAM, so you can't mess with that without messing with the screen.

      Incidentally, you could potentially use the battery backup on a cartridge as virtualmemory, and if your cartridge is a flashrom, you can integrate a flashwriter into the rom and rewrite chunks of the cartridge (albeit slowly). People have already written GBA flashrom writer software.

  8. Lots of Articles by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Lots of articles for those hackerish of mind:

    http://www.riscos.org/cgi-bin/artcls

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  9. Good to hear it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to do some development for the RISC back in the day. Without getting into platform wars, I really found it to be easier to work with than Intel, and certainly much nicer than getting my arm cut off with a lightsaber and later replaced with a golden arm as happens to our dark hero in a fight with a particular sith apprentice called count dokoo. I'm looking at setting up a homebrew kit with a RISC chip as well, and this sounds like it'll be an excellent step in that direction.

    1. Re:Good to hear it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This must be the first comment I've ever seen that should have been headed "Risc Development (Spoilers)".

  10. Linux-like commands? by Damek · · Score: 1

    In amongst their screenshots of RISC OS features, they proclaim that you can, at any time, open a terminal window and have access to "Linux-like commands" ... erm, shouldn't that really be UNIX-like commands? Since that's where Linux pretty much gets them...

    1. Re:Linux-like commands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it say that? RISC OS' command line is nothing like Unix. It's even worse than DOS.

    2. Re:Linux-like commands? by The_Dougster · · Score: 1

      Hehe ever try to use "real UNIX" after you are accustomed to GNU/Linux? You'll find that most of the useful switches to the commands are either absent or do something else. It's like going from a luxury car to a junkyard truck. I would much rather have "Linux-like" commands than "UNIX-like" commands.

      --
      Clickety Click ...
    3. Re:Linux-like commands? by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      "
      "Linux-like commands" ... erm,
      shouldn't that really be UNIX-like commands
      "

      Go in as the admin account and type killall

      If nothing happens then it's Linux-like, and if everything shuts down, it's Unix-like.

      Things that are Linux-like are almost by always GNU-like. GNU ain't Unix, and the killall command is a great way to tell which one you're on!

      YAWIAR

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  11. Pre Slashdot Effect post by l810c · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This site has not been Slashdotted yet, but it sure will be funny when it does.

  12. No problem... by Teutates · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, the KDE logo is the gear with the K in it. If KDE wanted to brand their name with the gear only they wouldn't have the K in it.

    I can take the smiley face of the MacOS and instead of the standard square look and the split face (the nose) I can put a cirlce around it or something...Apple can't sue me for that.

    RiscOS can use the gear as long as they don't utilize the K and continue not getting away without getting in trouble.

  13. "Linux-like" == GNU by yerricde · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Linux-like commands" ... erm, shouldn't that really be UNIX-like commands? Since that's where Linux pretty much gets them...

    I take "Linux-like commands" to mean the standard POSIX command set (available in all UNIX systems) plus the GNU extensions.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:"Linux-like" == GNU by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      So wouldn't that be "GNU/Linux-like commands"?

      Ow! *Ow!* Stop it!

      Tim

  14. Embedded Linux by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If you mean Linux then that's not much use in an embedded environment.

    The Linux® kernel is used in several embedded systems. (Read More...)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  15. Long time by 1155 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    This seems like a long amount of time for a update, especially with the multi-user environment update in mind. Who has actually used this os before?

    1. Re:Long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's witten in assembler.

  16. Interesting... by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 1

    Wonder if anyone will be able to get it to run on the upcomming Palm devices, they are supposed to use ARM procs if im not mistaken.

    --
    "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
  17. RISCOS was released 1988 by joshsnow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Riscos started well before 1994. I remember the launch of the original Acorn Archimedes back in 1987. It launched with an OS called Arthur. RISCOS was released in 1988/89 and brought multi-tasking, Anti-Aliased fonts to the platform. The coolest feature was being able to reallocate the amount of memory allocated to applications as those applications were executing. Another highlight was the release of Elite in 1992 - by far the best version of Elite I've seen on any platform. Acorn was ahead of it's time and ahead of the game. The only problem was that the Arc was marketed as a computer for schools meaning that it was never taken seriously. Competitors at the time were; Atari 1040ST, Commodore Amiga, 286 PC-ATs.

  18. What a shitty UGLY OS by SensitiveMale · · Score: 0
    And it wants to compete with OS X?


    Give me a fucking break.

    1. Re:What a shitty UGLY OS by jmcarey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well for people who like their OS to look like something similar to those pretty mobiles that you stare at as kids then fair enough. I mean that's what an OS is for isn't it, to look nice but to be about as functional as a rat's arse.

      One can of course "prettify" RISC OS if you wish but with little or no impact on the functionality of the OS and the software running on it.

      http://www.warwick.ac.uk/~esvmd/screen1.jpg
      htt p://www.warwick.ac.uk/~esvmd/screen2.jpg

      The above links being just examples.

    2. Re:What a shitty UGLY OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to know. RiscOS derives a lot from AmigaOS (though unintentionally; it seems that much of RiscOS was independently invented, leading to seeming backwards Britishisms like the 'Font Cache' instead of RAM:/RD0:, etc, but maybe also the memory protection that Amiga still lacks?), and they both suffer the same 'l33tness syndrome'- just because you can put a texture behind every widget and gadget, doesn't mean you should. If the Amiga wins on any ground, it's that Commodore nicely minimalized the look for OS2.x (which appeared around the time RiscOS came into being).

      It's kind of sad that Hyperion is meeting 'consumer demand' with the RiscOS-derived:

      http://www.os4.hyperion-software.com/Screenshots /N ew_Intuition/Screen_2/screen_2.html

      ...as default for the new AmigaOS (though they do keep telling us Amigans that it'll be totally skinnable)... That's not going to help recognition/individualization of either platform.

    3. Re:What a shitty UGLY OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its only ugly if you make it ugly,
      i agree, those screen shots are butt ugly, their also not anywhere near default tho, thats one of the nice things about RISC OS from v3 on you've been able to theme just about everything in the OS. problem is just like winamp on windows, this does let people create the most horrifically ugly OS themes you can think of. (the irony of the screens you picked out is that it appears to be trying to be an XP theme)

    4. Re:What a shitty UGLY OS by jmcarey · · Score: 1

      Indeed but then I didn't say it was my desktop.

      http://www.maat.clara.co.uk/images/desktop.jpeg

      Sorry for the large jpeg but that's what you get for running in 1600x1200

    5. Re:What a shitty UGLY OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i didnt say it was your desktop either, and i wasnt implying it was, i was just pointing out that the examples you gave were using about the worst looking riscos desktop theme I've ever seen.

      btw, if you think its so shitty why do you use it?
      just curious.

    6. Re:What a shitty UGLY OS by karmawarrior · · Score: 2

      Nice AOS4 screenshots. No, honestly. They had a whole range of looks, and it's pretty clear what you can customise. And to my eyes at least, they've done a good job - they've gone in the opposite direction to the trend at present, which is a good thing, because the current trend is to disguise buttons as background and hide critical user interface functionality in order to "prettify" it.

      The Hyperion people seem to have gone for colour and textures instead, as subtle or unsubtle as the user wishes. So the GUI stays user friendly.

      If only they'd port AOS to the PC...

      --
      KMSMA (WWBD?)
  19. Newton Port by reidab · · Score: 1

    Short of manually rewriting the ROM in the unit, would there be any way to port this OS to the ARM-based Newton platform? Does anyone know about the feasibility or of any current development?

  20. Lets itself down by Rev.+Rudolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a bit of a fan of the Acorn/ARM lineage - it's what I cut my teeth on. After unsuccessful forays at Z80 and 6502 coding, ARM was a dream to code for. When the machines first came out in 1988 (ish), they were talked about as being fast - which of course, they were (compared to the old BBC model B).

    Alas, the first version of the OS, "Arthur", was a dreadful letdown, IMHO - considering that, just a year or two later, on the same hardware, RISC OS 2 was released, with proper GUI and multitasking etc. So anyway, then I used RISC OS 2, and then RISC OS 3 when *it* was released. Life was great.

    My old A440 machine still sits here beside me, and when I fire it up every so often, there's one thing above all others which strikes me about it - it's so dependent upon the mouse. Typically most of the functions of any RISC OS application were accessed via a menu (keyboard shortcuts were only sparingly provided), and there was no way to invoke/operate the menu without the mouse. Nor switch applications. Nor all sorts of other stuff.

    Does anybody know if, now we're at RISC OS 4 (and more), that particular shortcoming has been addressed?

    P.S. looking at the screenshot, can I submit a bug report for the typo in "SysLog workspce" ?

    1. Re:Lets itself down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when your mouse breaks? Can you get a new one? Is it
      industry standard (serial, ps/2, etc) or is it some proprietary thing?

    2. Re:Lets itself down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bug already has been fixed. ;-)

    3. Re:Lets itself down by Rev.+Rudolf · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, this isn't authoritative, but up until I stopped working with Acorn hardware (mid 1995, A5000 or so) the situation was this:

      • proprietary hardware (the mouse plugged into the back of the keyboard using some 9-pin connector)
      • or, you could get software to enable you to use a standard serial mouse.

      If I remember I'll try to post a pic or two on http://rudolf.org.uk/acorn.html (but I'll have to create the page first) - give me an hour or so... :-)

    4. Re:Lets itself down by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      IIRC Arthur was only intended as a stop-gap until Acorn could finish their ARX project (Their very own Unix). I believe Arthur got its name because they needed "A Risc os by THURsday", and hence wasn't exactly all that powerful.

    5. Re:Lets itself down by mirko · · Score: 2

      I personally use the device made by Stewart Tyrell on my RiscPC.
      http://www.stdevel.demon.co.uk/
      I can then plug an optical logitech mouse...

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    6. Re:Lets itself down by Echemus · · Score: 1
      Mmmmm, this isn't authoritative, but up until I stopped working with Acorn hardware (mid 1995, A5000 or so) the situation was this:
      • proprietary hardware (the mouse plugged into the back of the keyboard using some 9-pin connector)
      • or, you could get software to enable you to use a standard serial mouse.
      The keyboard and mouse connectors were the same as those used on Sun Sparc Stations, so not totally proprietary. The beauty of RISC OS is the fact it is small and fast. The whole thing fits into 4MB of ROM, so what is a relatively slow peice of hardware by latest x86 standards, can have an OS that loads extremely quickly. I still use my RISC OS machine for the odd task or two it is just more comfortable than Linux or Windows.
    7. Re:Lets itself down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the first non-acorn beta release of RiscOS4 (about 1 - 2 years ago) keyboard shortcuts were provided for most OS functions. However, when the final version came out, the short cuts were removed for some compatablity reason. However, I am sure there is a utility to provide keyboard shortcuts for the RiscOS desktop.

    8. Re:Lets itself down by Paul+Vigay · · Score: 1

      Try visiting http://www.riscos.org/cgi-bin/ROlinks?q=shortcuts for some links to utilities which will provide short cuts for popular functions. Paul (editor, www.riscos.org)

  21. Re:Prist Fost by TheGonzoKid · · Score: 1

    If I wasn't hung over, I'd mod you down.

    --
    "when the going get's wierd the wierd turn pro." -hst
  22. Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im porting linux to my old Acorn A410/1.

    Or rather, repairing the old port...

  23. Re:Butt Ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you mind posting the link to the screen shots please? I was unable to find them myself on their site.

  24. For those who want the RISC OS effect in KDE... by rjw57 · · Score: 1

    KDE 2+ users will note the presence of a RISC OS theme in their control panel. It doesn't completely relfect the niceties of RISC OS but its functional.

    --
    Rich
    1. Re:For those who want the RISC OS effect in KDE... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      It only really emulates the look, not the feel. There are things such as when you right click on a "scroll down" button, the window actually scrolls up, which is far more elegant than having up and down arrows on the top and bottom of the window IMHO.

    2. Re:For those who want the RISC OS effect in KDE... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it only really emulates the look, not the feel.

      That's because whatever you make KDE look like, it still *feels* like the crap copy of Windows that it is - or at least Qt is.

  25. Re:Butt Ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screenshots

  26. Re:Butt Ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you, I did find them. Actually I first tried the second link http://www.riscos.org.

  27. It looks cool, but.... by bankman · · Score: 1

    ...to beat Windows on the desktop it needs to have Office....wait...wrong discussion. Sorry :-)

    --
    I feel so sig.
    1. Re:It looks cool, but.... by jmcarey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think Office is anything to cheer about but then I have a high IQ.

      If it's just word/document processing you are doing then EasiWriter or TechWriter are almost certainly the software that you could only dream about. http://www.iconsupport.demon.co.uk/

  28. thats great by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    All 6 of us are happy.

    --
    http://saveie6.com/
  29. PC Emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, Just this morning I received an mailshot from a company selling a piece of software for a windows PC that emulates an Acorn A5000. It is shipped with RISC-OS3 and is available for 30UKP from Virtual Acorn

    I think it's a real shame that Acorn didn't market their systems better, they were so ahead of their time, and would probably have prevented all the microsoft anti-trust BS that dominates the tech news these days (Imagine cries of 'Micro-who?'). Acorn even released a UNIX (BSD) version of the Archimedes in 1989. These machines even had X windows.

    1. Re:PC Emulator by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, Just this morning I received an mailshot from a company selling a piece of software for a windows PC that emulates an Acorn A5000. It is shipped with RISC-OS3 and is available for 30UKP from Virtual Acorn [virtualacorn.co.uk] Hey, looks nice! Maybe I can finally try out ArcElite... Aw, boo. Only runs on something called 'Windows'. Sorry, but I really don't fancy installing one kooky OS in order to run another kooky OS in order to run *one game*...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:PC Emulator by runnyhunny · · Score: 1
      Woah!

      Virtual A5000 certainly is Windows-only.

      However, try this on Unix, Windows or RISC OS itself (!)... http://arcem.sourceforge.net

      It's pretty cool.

    3. Re:PC Emulator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1988, there was an IBM PC Emulator (including MSDOS 6 on a diskette) for the Archimedes on RISC OS, which worked very well. The ARM2 was fast enough to emulate a PC at XT speed!

      Koen, Brussels -- koenlefever at netscape.net

  30. but it would be nice if Windows by acid_andy · · Score: 0

    had the drag and drop saving like RISCOS - I miss that every time I have to click Browse

    --
    Your ad here.
    1. Re:but it would be nice if Windows by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Amigaos had something similar, you could drag and drop a file/dir into a file requester or a dialog box and it would insert the path to that file.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  31. RiscOS is great for client-side apps by horza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It certainly has the most intuitive and productive GUI in existance, and has done since 1989. Certainly better than Windows or Mac. It had the foresight to use co-operative multi-tasking instead of pre-emptive which leads to blazing speeds. The apps were well thought out. Its innovative use of drag and drop makes a mockery of the 'Finder' type widget you have to use *every* time you save. It would make an excellent model for KDE to aspire to. In fact a copy of the RiscOS Filer is available for Linux called ROX which has been raved about in many Linux circles. It would also be nice to copy the way every app is self-contained within its own directory. Uninstall app? Simply delete directory - no dependency hell. RiscOS front-end with Linux underneath? Mmmmmm

    Phillip.

    --
    Property for sale in Nice, France
    1. Re:RiscOS is great for client-side apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that, for most cases, this can describe the Amiga- but for the full drag'n'drop, which falls under OS/2's ("System Object Model") territory. (1987?)

      Usable often in the eye of the beholder. It's fair to say that a *lot* of platforms had useful ideas that never found their way into Windows or MacOS. However, RiscOS does have the same entrenched error seen in Win32 and MacOS; *icons should not represent actions.*

      As to drag'n'drop, I find it a mixed blessing. Measure the time it takes you to realign your windows/complete a window->desktop->folder drag operation vs. using the keyboard to type a path and filename. What I, as a visually-oriented keyboard fan would like to see, is something like the Ion window manager:

      http://www.students.tut.fi/~tuomov/ion/

      ...but with the addition of drag'n'drop (and drag'n'droppable pane reorganization) for those times you have your hand on the mouse. Chuck in a floating 'finder' taskbar/start menu/whatnot, perhaps, and make it one big dynamically-sized 2D plane that you can zoom in and out on (numeric +/- or mouse scrollwheel). Find a way to make drag'n'drop (basically runtime redirection) keyboard-accessible.

      It wouldn't be perfect, but none of our modern UIs are.

    2. Re:RiscOS is great for client-side apps by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      The co-operative multitasking wasn't really a design choice; it was just that the Arthur operating system was hacked together in a hurry and didn't have multitasking (in many ways it was like a port of the BBC Micro operating system to 32-bit hardware). Then RISC OS 2, based on Arthur, used co-operative multitasking with a polling loop *probably* because this was the easiest thing to do without starting from scratch and building a new OS. It did give good performance though - provided apps didn't hang. There was some memory protection so it wasn't a completely braindead system - but still, I believe later RISC OS versions (4.x?) added true multitasking.

      A few random links: Riscose, kind of the equivalent of Wine, except it isn't nearly as finished (it does include an ARM CPU emulator though). Riscose ties in somehow with the 'RISC OS emulator' package somebody mentioned at the top of this article's comments. Although I very much doubt that such a system is ready for any real work, even as a testbed for embedded code. RISC OS included an interpreter for the BBC Basic language (again essentially a port from the BBC Micro with some improvements), and Brandy is a free interpreter for that language. Finally, Arcem is an emulator (a la Bochs) of the original Archimedes hardware. It will run RISC OS 2.0 and 3.x well enough, if you can get hold of the ROM images. On a 1GHz machine, arcem should be just about fast enough to emulate the original 8MHz Archimedes in real time.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:RiscOS is great for client-side apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Using cooperative multitasking wasn't foresight, just lack of development. It has no advantages whatsoever. Linux is faster on the same hardware.

    4. Re:RiscOS is great for client-side apps by runnyhunny · · Score: 1
      Even the latest versions of RISC OS (that are available from RISCOS Ltd.) still use co-operative multi-tasking.

      RISC OS is indeed a 'quick ARM port' of the BBC Micro (a 2 MHz 6502 machine!) OS. It was intended as a stop gap, until Acorn released or replaced ARX (their own brand-new OS, described as 'Unix-like', which never saw the light of day).

    5. Re:RiscOS is great for client-side apps by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      It would also be nice to copy the way every app is self-contained within its own directory. Uninstall app? Simply delete directory - no dependency hell.

      Yeah, it would sure be nice if someone had thought of that before - if they'd had that kind of ingenuity back in 1984, who knows what the world would be like now! We might even have a choice of operating systems with these features!

      And I hate to disappoint you, but cooperative multitasking, while providing 'blazing speeds' when you're only doing one thing at once, it's right up there with unprotected memory as soon as you want to do more than one thing at once (like burn a CD and browse the web), and most people don't want to buy a separate computer just for CD burning.

      --Dan

  32. Re:Too soon to comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what would be funny, is if you actually DID post a comment about this in 5 years

  33. Cambridge CompScis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I imagine at least half of you are involved with this or have used it or grew up on a diet of RISCos. nice.

  34. Open Source by Grip3n · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lets make this open source

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
  35. Ok.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... Like when can I toss this OS on my iPaq?

  36. Blazing speed.....right into a brick wall. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    The problem with co-operative multitasking is that if an app hangs and doesn't hand control back to the kernel or the next app in line then the whole system freezes. Windows 3.x was badly affected by it to an obnoxious degree. And it could bite Win9x systems running 16-bit code. And its still a problem with MacOS 10.x. The woes of co-operative multitasking were my second biggest bitch with the old style MacOSen (lack of protected memory was the first). I'll gladly trade some speed for the ability to kill offending apps.

    Now it may be that those Acorns had a higher code quality in general to mitigate that problem but it can still be a problem. For that matter, higher priority processes can be reniced on most pre-emptive systems to make the processes that matter snappy.

    There is only one way a co-operative system can be tolerable. If the number of apps is restricted to a limited set that is highly polished and bug free then it might be okay. But forget just chucking any ole program into that environment unless you like looking at hourglasses, busy bees and ticking watches.

    1. Re:Blazing speed.....right into a brick wall. by robbieduncan · · Score: 2

      Mac OS X does not have cooperative multi tasking. The only section where this might be a problem is if you are running multiple apps under Classic, as this is still OS 9.

    2. Re:Blazing speed.....right into a brick wall. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I meant to say (less than) OS X. I think I just got bit by the so-called lameness filter. Sucker wacked off that "less than" looking character.

  37. StrongARM Netwinder? Zaurus? iPaq? ... ? by The_Dougster · · Score: 1
    I have _two_ of these Netwinder DM machines. One acts as my router/firewall/webserver for my home LAN, the other is for playing with. I have replaced the original Netwinder RedHat Linux with Debian 3.0 for Arm and it works extremely well.


    Wonder if I could add a RiscOS partition and run it on one of these? They have 275MHz StrongARM cpu's. Nah, probably not. The bootloader is made for linux, now that I think about it. Unless RiscOS has a bootable kernel I doubt it would work. It might run on a Zaurus/iPaq/Jornada though...

    --
    Clickety Click ...
    1. Re:StrongARM Netwinder? Zaurus? iPaq? ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be able to run RISC OS on the Psion netBook. See http://www.riscos.com/news/news_items/PR201001.htm

  38. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks like the most useless and ugliest OS ever made, what insane company bothers to code such 80's junk and then try to make people use it?

    How is this supposed to be useful or even usable?

    The interface is so poorly designed I want to cry, my grandma could have designed a better interface.

    I just don't understand the designers of this junk.

    1. Re:Wow! by spir0 · · Score: 1

      don't judge the OS by it's look. it is THE MOST functional gui by far that I have ever used. all 3 mouse buttons have their specific uses and this works seamlessly with all the apps.

      all coders stick to strict design guidelines to make sure everything works the same.

      and the memory management is 2nd to none.

      imagine a window of slider bars so that you can adjust how much memory goes into an app. may not be so important now on PCs which have half a gig of RAM, but in the days of a couple of megs, being able to temporarily drop the font cache by a few kilobytes so that you could run another app was VERY handy.

      then when the other app finishes, simply slide the little bar for the font cache back up. if you want to do mega FTP work and needed more fonts, bump the font cache up.

      once you use it _properly_, then you can decide whether you love or hate it.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    2. Re:Wow! by Homburg · · Score: 1

      > then when the other app finishes, simply slide
      > the little bar for the font cache back up.

      Cause, you know, that's so much easier than than the operating system adjusting memory use for you. Seriously - back in the day (i.e., when Windows 3.0 was the height of PC invention), RiscOS was a damn fine piece of software (although probably not as good as the Amiga). But the things that made it cool then are of little relevance now. I regret to say all the Archimedes die-hards I know have been using ArmLinux for years.

    3. Re:Wow! by spir0 · · Score: 1

      hmmm... that takes me back. I was a diehard amiga nut until I saw an arch boot quicker than the monitor took to warm up.. I vowed from that day I would own one and I ended up with a 4000 which I still have to this day. that, my riscpc, and my amigas, are all rotting at the moment.

      after seeing the joy that is OS-X, I'm buying a powerbook today.

      still working on towering my amiga 3000 after all this time too :)

      but I must say that RiscOS is an even better GUI IMO than OS-X, but OS-X is a very close 2nd.

      OS-X wins hands down in the looks dept, but RiscOS beats everything for functionality and useability.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
  39. Save dialog... :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you mean the one where you needed to unhide the window of the directory where you wanted to save the file?

    This drove me nuts. Drag and dropping to a location you couldn't see? worst GUI design ever!

    1. Re:Save dialog... :( by runnyhunny · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect. It was always possible to enter a fully-qualified pathname into the 'save as' filename field. e.g. 'ADFS::MyDisk.$.Work.foo' Even simpler, the keyboard shortcut 'F3' always opens the 'save as' dialogue. Drag and drop saving is EXCELLENT. I can't understand why other major systems are so backward (in that they don't use it).

  40. pretty good machines (at the time...) by vic20beta · · Score: 1

    I think it was back in 1995 when I saw a acorn PC. It was pretty amazing of the machine capabilities compared to what a intel PC had to offer. I think that the machine was targeted to multimedia developpers, but their sales never took off

  41. I miss... by MattBurke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    being able to knock up a full gui application in just a couple of lines of basic...

    basic too slow? simply code the bits that need speed in arm code :) piss easy :)

    1. Re:I miss... by Peter+Harris · · Score: 2

      I don't. I thought I would, but no.

      If I had to go back to BBC Basic now after using Python, I'd vomit. Likewise if I had to go back to 11-character filenames, a toy CLI and cooperative multitasking.

      The consistent use of the 3-button mouse was good, and some of the clever stuff to do with xxx$PATH variables. And OK, the anti-aliased fonts. That's about it. The rest is just nostalgia.

      The ARM has a beautiful instruction set, though. If I ever do any more embedded work that's what I'd like to use.

      --

      -- What do you need?
      -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
  42. Any more comments from a technical perspective? by runnyhunny · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Folks,

    (first ever post, so please be kind!)

    I'm a sort-of RISC OS user. I have a 1994 Acorn Risc PC (with a 1996 processor upgrade - a StrongARM running at 200 MHz!) with RISC OS 4 (not 'Select') that I use from time to time.

    I'd like to hear what you all think about RISC OS from a technical perspective. Does it sound like a good OS? What interests you? What makes you puke?!

    Also, what do you make of the currently available (and 'soon to be available') RISC OS hardware? Now that Acorn are no more (effectively bought up by Pace and Broadcom) it's all down to a bunch of small companies to provide for us. What are your thoughts on reading the product descriptions from the following URLs:

    http://www.riscos.com
    http://www.castle.uk.co (not a typo!)
    http://www.riscstation.co.uk
    http://www.microdigital.co.uk

    ???

    For those that have wondered about RISC OS being ported to other ARM platforms... basically, it can't happen. RISC OS is *very* tightly bound to the Acorn-designed hardware that goes along with the ARM CPU in their systems. No-one seems to care about that. Oh, and RISC OS uses the ARM's 26-bit addressing mode, which was killed off ages ago. :-(

    Ah well. At least some good stonkingly good stuff came out of Acorn. Sophie Wilson, the mega-genius, co-created the ARM chip (starting back in 1983!) and created 'Acorn Replay', a full-motion video subsystem for RISC OS (round about 1991), which was streets ahead of Apple's QuickTime.

    1. Re:Any more comments from a technical perspective? by horza · · Score: 2

      "For those that have wondered about RISC OS being ported to other ARM platforms... basically, it can't happen. RISC OS is *very* tightly bound to the Acorn-designed hardware that goes along with the ARM CPU in their systems."

      That was needed to obtain the amazing speed at the time. Now hardware speed has outstripped software requirements on the desktop you can rewrite it on Intel or PPC if you wanted to. It's the look and feel, the way the 3 mouse buttons are used, the consistent context menus everywhere, drag-and-drop paradigm, etc. If you gave me RiscOS I could install on my PC...

      "No-one seems to care about that. Oh, and RISC OS uses the ARM's 26-bit addressing mode, which was killed off ages ago. :-("

      Wasn't that eliminated in RiscOS 4?

      "At least some good stonkingly good stuff came out of Acorn. Sophie Wilson, the mega-genius, co-created the ARM chip (starting back in 1983!) and created 'Acorn Replay', a full-motion video subsystem for RISC OS (round about 1991), which was streets ahead of Apple's QuickTime."

      She is also on the board of Eidos. Acorns could do full-screen FMV when PCs had trouble running a postage-stamp size AVI. This is why (correct me if I'm wrong) all the Eidos games such as Tomb Raider ran the video inserts in Replay format.

      Phillip.

      --
      Property for sale in Nice, France
    2. Re:Any more comments from a technical perspective? by runnyhunny · · Score: 1
      About the 26-bit addressing: No. RISC OS 4 (and 4+, which is part of the 'Select' scheme) is firmly tied to the 26-bit addressing mode.

      RISCOS Ltd. (the developers of RISC OS 4.0 and 4+) don't seem to think that this is a problem, despite ARM phasing out 26-bit support a long time ago.

      And yes. Eidos did use some kind of Replay technology in their Tomb Raider game, and one or two other things... but I'm not exactly sure what that technology was.

    3. Re:Any more comments from a technical perspective? by rjw57 · · Score: 1
      Sophie Wilson, the mega-genius, co-created the ARM chip (starting back in 1983!)

      Of course back then 'she' was called Roger Wilson.

      --
      Rich
  43. Sharp Zaurus by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

    How about the Sharp Zaurus? Doesn't that have some form of ARM processor?

    Chris

  44. missing point... by mirko · · Score: 2

    I have been using RiscOS from 1995.
    People who commented it here actually posted either their disgust for the UI look or their reluctancy to use an OS which only happenned to get DHCP/multi-user.
    There's however a point that shouldreally be taken into account :
    RiscOS is modular.
    Totally modular.
    This means whatever you don't like, including the filer access modes, the RiscOS core or whatever can be replaced without even rebooting the machine.
    I saw many patched RiscOS which looked like other OSses, like NeXTstep, AmigaOS, or even some Mondrian-on-crack GUI.
    I also saw friends patching their OS to get pre-emptive multi-tasking or background printing.
    Some even coded a DHCP module yars ago but got threatened by major RiscOS investor not to release these publicly because of some legal issue.
    What actually killed Acorn was its investors who wanted to turn this closed but financially perfomant market into some raw R&D company.
    Most of you benefit from whatever came from around Acorn during the 80's and the 90's : The ATM network protocol that is Internet essence (originally the Cambridge Ring, used by the BBC Micro computers), the ARM processor (the most successful processor ever, with much more units sold every year than Intel could dream of), TopModel, the best 3D modelling program ever that is used by Nintendo's designers to create their games...
    Now, here's my point :
    RiscOS is a Geek's dream.
    Denying this fact is just proving one's laziness.
    There nothing that can't be done easilly with this system.
    Despite the lack of Math Copro or OpenGL facilities of RiscOS-aware hardware, I saw some unique stuff on these, like the only MP3 player that can run on a 20MHz-copro-less ARM processor (http://www.eqrd.net/english/riscos.html)... A Quake1 port that run in 25fps minimum on a 200MHz machine (still no copro), some pseudo GL programs rendering fractal landscape in real time(Iron Dignity)...
    Coding for RiscOS is not only a dream but is also a step closer to developping for embedded ARM devices.
    Developping podules (hardware) for RiscOS is also as pleasant.
    Back in 1997, there was as much free software for RiscOS than for Linux, it was simply ported than 10-100 less people.
    You may want to check riscos level of activity by visiting comp.sys.acorn.* newsgroups.
    So, yes, RiscOS still rules, it is not as widespread as Linux or any other commercial OS but I can bet most of the RiscOS coders I know will keep their machines until they are dead.
    It's simply a matter of opportunity : either you choose a widespread shit which software suite are either obfuscated, unoptimal or expensive... or you choose to prototype efficient solutions on such simple machines...
    I think Leo Brodie had a similar argument in his "Thinking Forth" book : get to learn to do it simply...

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:missing point... by runnyhunny · · Score: 1
      No way.

      What killed Acorn was their own stupid self-belief that their products were *so* oh-so-cool that they could forget about 'little' things like:

      decent development tools

      Internet connectivity out-of-the-box

      a web browser

      printer drivers

      basic proven technology like multithreading and/or pre-emptive multi-tasking

      hardware accelerated graphics

      32-bit only ARM processors (26-bit mode is dead)

      PCI, USB, FireWire etc.

      With problems like this (and many more), it's not easy to see why the platform is effectively dead.

      Most of the developers seem to have left. Computer Concepts? Sibelius? Eidos? Millipede? They left for Windows.

      Quite frankly, Linux, even though it's very weak in some respects, is a much better 'Geek's dream' than RISC OS ever was.

      There have been, and are still a few, amazing software packages for RISC OS. ArtWorks and Sibelius have since been ported to Windows/Mac. (Easi/Tech)Writer and Ovation Pro are on their way to Windows/Mac. Is there any reason to use RISC OS these days?

    2. Re:missing point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because people want to. and who are you to tell them otherwise?

      Have a nice day.

    3. Re:missing point... by runnyhunny · · Score: 1
      If people want to - that's fine.

      According to RISCOS Ltd., they have approx. 700 subscribers for Select. I have no problem with these people using such a system (plus those who are still using RISC OS 4.0 and 3.7 etc.).

      However, I can't see how the RISC OS platform is supposed to attrack new customers.

      Or do you think that the size of the current RISC OS market is absolutely fine?

    4. Re:missing point... by horza · · Score: 2

      "People who commented it here actually posted either their disgust for the UI look or their reluctancy to use an OS which only happenned to get DHCP/multi-user."

      They don't realise that you have to allocate limited resources to where they are needed. Until recently the only reason for DHCP is to plug a machine into a LAN. I don't know of any LAN that doesn't split its 192 block into static and dynamic range. DHCP really isn't needed, you just ask the admin for a static IP. It's only the advent of broadband which allocates via DHCP which pushed the DHCP module into being developed.

      "Developping podules (hardware) for RiscOS is also as pleasant."

      Podules have the drivers built into the hardware, making all RiscOS peripherals truly plug-and-play instead of plug-and-pray. Truly a godsend.

      Phillip.

      --
      Property for sale in Nice, France
  45. RISC OS is '80s - way before 1994! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an Acorn Archimedes 305 (ARM2 with 512Kbytes RAM - I was pretty impressed by this amount of core memory because my previous computer had only 48K but I IMMEDIATLY upgraded to 1 meg and later to 4 megs of RAM) back in 1987 with the original Arthur 0.2 Operating system in EEPROM. In 1988 I upgraded to Arthur 1.2 in ROM and later the same year or possibly 1989 I upgraded to RISC OS 1.2 (512 Kbytes in ROM).

    Koen, Brussels -- koenlefever at netscape.net

    1. Re:RISC OS is '80s - way before 1994! by kidpaddle · · Score: 1

      Yep, I guess I was wrong.. but I think ROS in its current form is from 94? somewhere I picked up that year :)
      Oh well, PORN!! (Promote RiscOs Now!)

  46. All ARM based computers? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    So when is it available on my Game Boy Advance?

  47. Why I use RISC OS... by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    Tis easy to use, it has many many faults, but for ease of use from wordprocessing throw email to programing, it is very easy to use, if only my machine was a bit faster than 56MHz :/

  48. RISC OS on the Psion netBook by acid_andy · · Score: 0

    I found this article on riscos.com a while back saying they had a project ongoing to get RISC OS working on the Psion netBook PDA. "The SA1100 processor used in the netBook offers 26 bit operational modes that will allow the use of all the current Acorn / RISC OS software". It looks here like Psion are still making the netbook.

    --
    Your ad here.
  49. Acorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alright, let's make something clear now:

    Acorn developed its first 32-BIT ARM chip with minimal staff in 1985, the ARM1. It was to be a 2nd processor expansion for the BBC. In 1987 Acorn launched the world's first RISC PC; the Archimedes A305. It ran an OS called Arthur (RISC OS 1) on 8 Mhz. In 1989 Acorn released RISC OS 2 and in 1992 RISC OS 3 was released. In those times there was nothing in the PC market to beat it in terms of GUI, speed, durability and usability/intuitiveness. In 1994 the RiscPC was introduced with 256MB RAM capability, extremely fast 1/2MB video chip (VIDC20 with 1600*1200*256c capability) and 2nd processor slot as standard. I remember my old computer science teacher ridiculing me...I showed him! Even in the early nineties software availbility was more than adequate, with Sibelius the flagship music notation program in the World. In those early days this computer system was the definitive choice in classrooms all over the UK and the Netherlands. It was used in very specific tasks, such as science research, factories, where stability is essential, and facilities for the mentally disabled. Sibelius was/is used in the London Symphony Orchestra and Hollywood (GIJane).
    This system DESERVED to be the forerunner in the PC market today, but due to Microsoft's (Bill Gates visited Acorn in 1985 to persuade them to invest in his OS, but was startled to see Acorn technologies and Acorn's company Network) bloody marketing techniques this wasn't to be.
    I suggest people on this site do their homework regarding this, before making statements.

    thanks,
    Paul