Slashdot Mirror


Warcraft III: The Single Player Experience

Disoriented writes "Cool interview about the Warcraft 3 single-player campaigns. Has me drooling for a June release." Hopefully Blizzard will drop their attack against Bnetd before the release.

18 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Priest character? by svferris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if I can choose to control a priest in the single player game?

    I could go around clicking on people until they say "Why do you keep touching me?"

    *Ducks the barrage of Troll moderations*

  2. Yeah, but... by Lazyhound · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...who wants to tickle the orc single player?

  3. What's that stuff about storyline? by SIGFPE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who wants a storyline? I want gameplay. I skipped over the stupid cut sequences in WCII and got down to playing the actual game. Who wants tighter integration of cinematic sequences? I thought those sequences were just for screenshots for sales purposes. I don't want to have to watch them. Gameplay is what made WCII great! Not storyline, not cut sequences. Strategy and action!

    --
    -- SIGFPE
    1. Re:What's that stuff about storyline? by Moofie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      *raises hand* Me. Good writing in a game improves the feeling of immersion, which is very important to my enjoyment of the game.

      Sure, there are people who skip cut-scenes and don't read the docs, but I'm not one of them. When I pay $50 for a game, I want the whole kit and caboodle...good story, good art, good gameplay, good documentation, good UI...everything.

      Gameplay and UI are what made Total Annihilation great. Storyline and memorable characters are what set Warcraft (and Starcraft) above the pack.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:What's that stuff about storyline? by SIGFPE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well they say the big studios like movies to catch the interest of at least two major ethnographic groups: geeks, Lifetime TV watchers, jocks etc. I guess Blizzard were smart enough to catch more than one group with their game too...

      --
      -- SIGFPE
    3. Re:What's that stuff about storyline? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      • When I pay $50 for a game, I want the whole kit and caboodle

      What if you could pay $30 for just the gameplay and none of the cinematics or voice "talent"?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. Re:Makes it all better by tankefugl · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Uh.

    Yeah right.

    So Blizzard should release source code to satisfy programmers, who Slashrants(tm) how evil Blizzard is anyway? What good would that do Blizzard?

    1. Paving the way for pirating coming and existing Blizzard titles.
    2. Limit Blizzards posibilites to launch controlled betas.
    3. Satisfy a group of idealistic users who DON'T believe in a commercial model after all, so that they would .. eh .. buy it?


    I really don't believe, nor hope, this will happen.
  5. This story shouldn't have been posted by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This isn't important news, and Slashdot would be no worse if this particular article wasn't posted.

    People are talking about sending in letters say, "I will not buy your products". That's nice, that's good even, but we all know Blizzard won't pay a huge amount of attention to a few of these. They would pay much more attention to Slashdot editors forwarding this post to them and saying they would have posted it, except that Blizzard is violating basic standards of conduct in the treatment of bnetd. Bad corporations don't deserve free advertising, and putting in a small note about bnetd does not make this any less of an advertisement.

  6. Neverwinter Nights by Maul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just a reminder to those of you who are boycotting Blizzard, but still want your fantasy gaming fix.
    Neverwinter Nights will be coming out this summer, and while it is an RPG (rather than RTS), it should do a good job of filling the void left.

    Though, personally, I was more excited about NWN than WC3 even before the lawsuit.

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  7. bnetd by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hopefully Blizzard will drop their attack against Bnetd before the release

    And if they choose not to drop it, I hope the community speaks out by choosing not to support them by buying it. It is really easy to bitch about companies and their policies but how many of us actually do something about it?

    I for one will not be buying it and will send them a letter explaining why I have passed up Warcraft III, and possibly future titles by Blizard.

    How many though will say they were wrong to shut down bnetd as they hand them $50?

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  8. Re:bnetd by jeffehobbs · · Score: 5, Funny


    How many though will say they were wrong to shut down bnetd as they hand them $50?

    Not me; I'll simply be handing them 50$.

    I'm not generally apathetic, but over this particular issue, I couldn't care less. If it turned out that Blizzard executives needed to drink the blood of open source programmers daily to ensure the continued high quality of their excellent titles, I would consider it blood well drank.

    ~jeff

  9. It won't matter... by Moridineas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bnetd won't matter when Warcraft3 comes out because then people can buy it to play instead, of pirating the beta--which is like 99% of the interesting in bnetd at the moment.

  10. Re:Makes it all better by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

    4. Give Blizzard an instant online community and pave way for larger acceptence of their game by the number of servers (which they don't have to run or maintain!) available.

    This is what Valve has done with Half Life. Why is this such a hard concept? Sell the game, but make the server freely available.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  11. Re:Unbiased by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Slashdot is primarily a news site, which should try to be as unbiased as possible in that which it reports to the world, they shouldn't ignore something just because some people might not like it. That's censorship - which the news is supposed to oppose above all else.
    I agree that it is a sticky issue to not spread a bit of news because of its associations. OTOH, this article is just an ad... Gaming News is hardly real news, by even the most forgiving definition of news. The gaming publishing industry also has close to no journalistic integrity, so places that link to them have every reason to discriminate when the original sources choose not to. I'm not saying such not-really-news shouldn't be posted at all... but because of the entirely superfluous nature of the article, there's no journalistic requirement to post it. It's fluff, and it's an outright promotion of Blizzard's product. And again, that would still be fine, except that Blizzard is a bad company.
  12. Re:Blizzard, BnetD and Software the Saga Continues by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    WarCraft II Battle Chest, $60.
    Diablo, $55.
    Diablo expansion pack, $25
    Starcraft, $45

    I remember paying close to top dollar, no bargain bin copies for me. At the time, I remembered thinking it was worth every cent. Hope no belittles me for reconsidering that sentiment.

    Also, I find it unlikely that not playing their games will have any effect on their future actions. Not that I will play, just the principle of the thing. But I harbor zero illusions that I can somehow punish them.

  13. Re:bnetd by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Informative

    No, "bnetd" isn't one of their trademarks. They aren't accusing the bnetd developers of trademark dilution.

    Why is it, that everyone that defends them is a complete moron with very little understanding of the actual situation? And it does no good to point this out, because next week, your vapid little brain will have forgotten all this, and you'll latch onto yet another intellectual property term that you're incapable of understanding.

    Is Bnetd a trademark violation? No, nor does vivendi claim that...
    Is Bnetd a copyright violation? No, they didn't copy Blizzard's code...
    Is Bnetd a patent violation? Again, no, neither the games nor the network protocol are patented.
    Is Bnetd guilty of contributory copyright infringement? No, it isn't used to disable copy protection or trade games ala a p2p net, and all piracy occurs well before using bnetd
    Is Bnetd a trade secret? Not any more, and no bnetd authors have worked for Blizzard, this doesn't apply.
    Is Bnetd a military secret? Well, the pentagon hasn't lodged any complaints, though I sometimes suspect those 2 star generals like to play a quick game of starcraft from time to time.
    Is Bnetd guilty of pissing off a big corp with nasty lowlife lawyers? Yes.
    Is Bnetd safe, even though they've broken no laws? No. $$$= laws, $$$=favorable judgements. They might as well bend over, lube up, and spread their cheeks now.

    Are stupid fucking dimwits who claim bnetd is a piracy tool actually causing problems for the authors of bnetd? Well, yes, if indirectly. Every time a Sen. Hollings wants to pretend he has support for the latest consumer rape law, he can point to a retard like yourself, jacquio, and claim that he has the support of enlightened citizens. Your stupid voice is much louder, than my halfway intelligent protest.

  14. Re:Remind me never to read comments on this site by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The question wasn't whether Blizzard has a right to make what they want. The question is why they think they have the right to keep others from doing the same.

    Some of you retards need to have some sense beat into you.

  15. Reality check by BelDion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hopefully Blizzard will drop their attack against Bnetd before the release.

    They won't, but let's face it: it doesn't matter. Has the MPAA stopped shoving css & other protection down our throats? Nope. Is everybody still buying DVDs and going to see movies? Yep. Has RIAA stopped acting like complete strongarm jerks? Nope. Is everybody still buying music? Yep. Is Microsoft still bullying the crap out of small corps & OEMs? Yep. Is everybody still booting to Windows to play games? (I'm looking at you Taco) Yep.

    We all get angry around here whenever some article is posted about evil corporation X, destroying small guy Y and screwing over populace Z. We're all up in arms about how we are boycotting them, and everyone should do the same. But we don't. We're just talk. Most of us anyway.

    So don't hold any pretentions. We're all buying Warcraft 3 when it comes out, bnetd or no bnetd. We're gonna buy it, play it on our windows partition while listening a cd and playing a dvd in the background.

    I'm getting modded down to flamebait aren't I? Crap.

    --

    I am BelDion's .Sig; Who the hell is Jack?