Slashdot Mirror


Google Experiments

gafferted writes "The boffins at google have been experimenting with new toys, such as Keyboard Shortcuts and glossary, but most fun is Google Sets. Try "green, purple, red" to get a set of 40 different colours. Try a set that contains both Richard Stallman and Bill Gates, see what google associates with Slashdot or ask for a set of rude words."

23 of 186 comments (clear)

  1. OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but you've Slashdotted google!#*(@Q$#^$

    wow.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
    1. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by HiQ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can you find Google in the Google cache???

    2. Re:OFMG I thought it could never happen... by Kredal · · Score: 5, Funny
      Actually you can. The funniest thing about it is the standard disclaimer, "Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page, nor responsible for it's content.

      To wit: http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:zsbOtgGsZtYC: www.google.com/+google&hl=en&ie=UTF8

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  2. Don't worry! by ringbarer · · Score: 4, Informative

    It looks like the only machine that's melted is the lab1.google.com one. I'm just dreading what the Slashdot effect is going to do to that poor Voice Search phoneline!

    --
    "Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
  3. How about this set... by doc_traig · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... "Google" and "Jumps the Shark"?

    - DDT

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
  4. Google Blog by nob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're a huge Google fan (and aren't we all) check out Google Weblog. They had this story 2 days ago, plus they keep you up to date on other cool Google happenings.

    And no, it's not my site. I just think it's cool.

    --
    daed si luap
  5. Cuthbert, Dibble, Grubb! by gdav · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am in awe.

    I fed it Hugh, Pugh and Barney Mcgrew - and it gave the right answer.

    It can't be far from becoming self-aware.

    george

  6. Obviously broken by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Funny

    No wonder it is still beta, it associates Rob Malda with RMS and Bill Gates!

    Richard Stallman
    Bill Gates
    Linus Torvalds
    Larry Wall
    Bruce Perens
    Eric Raymond
    Steve Jobs
    Brian Behlendorf
    Chris Dibona
    Larry Augustin
    Rob Malda
    Michael Tiemann
    Randal Schwartz
    Jamie Zawinski

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Obviously broken by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      "One of these things is not like the other..."

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  7. slashdot rude words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    "see what google associates with Slashdot or ask for a set of rude words."

    Google assiciates rude words with Slashdot, but i think the sysadmins were typing them in manually for each query i made while their servers were grinding to a slasdotted halt.

  8. other LABS servers by phunhippy · · Score: 5, Informative

    It seems that in addition to labs1

    there is also labs.google.com
    labs2.google.com
    labs3.google.com

    labs front page works(right now) the rest don't, and links off of labs, try to go to labs1 and crash and burn...

  9. In case it's slashdotted by jweatherley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dilbert Google Doodle

    Web Images Groups Directory
    ______________________
    | | <- Google search
    |______________________|

    o Advanced Search
    o Preferences
    o Language Tools

    New! Advertise with Google's cost-per-click AdWords Select.

    Advertise with Us - Search Solutions - News and Resources - Jobs, Press, Cool Stuff...

    ©2002 Google - Searching 2,073,418,204 web pages

    Damn lameness filter won't let you have a joke so forgive the junk:
    # Important Stuff: Please try to keep posts on topic.
    # Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
    # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

    --

    --
    Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
  10. Very Impressive by nemesisj · · Score: 5, Informative

    I spent a couple hours playing with google labs last night and one of the most impressiev things (to me) was how I put in 3 bands:

    Nirvana
    Alice in Chains
    Pearl Jam

    and received one of the most accurate lists of other grunge and hard rock/heavy bands back that I've seen. To be able to build such a list on something as subjective as music is very impressive, and shows you just how good the quality of google's algorithms are.

    1. Re:Very Impressive by nemesisj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe I should have clarified a little more. Amazon's suggestions never work for me, because I like old school, early nineties grunge and they figure that music sort of falls into "heavy" and "not heavy" categories. So I'm constantly reccomended stuff by Metallica, System of a Down, Primus, etc which are all heavy bands, but which don't fit the particular vein of heavy music I like. Google also made the jump to returning Godsmack, which is a newer hardcore band with a lot of grunge fundamentals (which I like) and Tool, and artsier, more emo-influenced heavy band, but still with grunge influences and ties. I don't think Godsmack would ever refer to themselves as grunge, but the connection exists, and google figured it out. Extremely impressive - after all, this is a highly subjective subject area, but one that still has some overall generalizations to it.

  11. Catalog Search by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also try the beta for Google's Catalog Search

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  12. Goodbye, everything by seanmeister · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the Google Labs FAQ:

    5. What happened to that cool thing I was playing around with last week?

    The prototypes on Google Labs are meant to be low maintenance experiments. If one disappears it may be because no one was interested enough to use it, it wasn't stable enough for users to try it out, or it was so wildly successful that heavy usage brought the server to its knees. While that particular application may not reappear, there should be something equally interesting to replace it shortly.

    So after today's /.ing, are they going to replace the entire lab site?

  13. Try the voice search! by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 5, Informative

    I discovered the voice search yesterday (and submitted it but was rejected... but that's not the point). It was pretty fun - since it's slashdotted, though, I'll mention that it worked for me: when I said "The Simpsons," it gave results for "The Simpsons" and "The Sims," which is understandable. Somebody else did a search for "ISDN" and got results for "ISDN" as well as "ISBN." The last search was for "Corvette," which gave a lot of results that contained "Court of" in the title, but the sidebar on the right (the paid sponsors) had links to Corvette sites.

    So, bookmark that site and someday in the future, when it is not slashdotted, try the voice search! It's not a toll-free number, but the coolness factor is well worth it. I don't know where it would be really useful (you still need a web browser to view the results), except in the case where you know how to pronounce a word but not how to spell it.

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  14. Small set feature failure by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 3, Informative
    When I played with this yesterday, I noticed that the "small set" option has a tendency to turn up no results on certain queries that return a few replies for the "large set" option.

    For example, try entering "Frank Welker", "Don Messick", and "Maurice LaMarche" (all cartoon voice actors). Under "small set", you get back nothing but a failure page that implies you need to change the terms to get results. The failure page doesn't even have the "expand your search" link that successful small set searches have. But if you use "large set", you get back 3 additional items (well under the 15 item set limit of a small set).

  15. Google *do* cach itself, and the result is funny! by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like an easter egg to me. :)

    Google's cache of www.google.com

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  16. amazing by Drath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow I entered Natalie Portman into google sets and i got 'hot grits' back!

  17. Re:Fark-like Not Safe For Work by arkanes · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think you may be the coolest person I ever met, because you used the phrase "grepping for inbound boobies". I need a bumper sticker of that or something.

  18. Ultimate Test by km790816 · · Score: 3, Funny

    The ultimate test: Jenna Jameson, Sylvia Saint, Houston, Chasey Lain, Christy Canyon

    ...and it passes with flying colors.

  19. In Case it Returns from "The Slashdotted Zone" by guttentag · · Score: 3, Funny
    At the moment, http://labs.google.com/ is displaying this:
    Thanks for your interest in Google Labs.

    The lab is temporarily closed as we deal with an experiment that got slightly out of hand. Nothing to be concerned about, really. All of our engineers are perfectly safe and there was never any real danger of it escaping into the wild.

    Please check back in a few hours. Everything should be back to normal then and science will march on once again. We appreciate your patience.

    I assume they've sent someone to fetch Stephen Wolfram so science may continue.

    This makes me wonder what Google will be like 10 years from now. Will they accidentally release a Lawnmower-Man-like entity onto the Internet and then categorically deny everything? Will they have to contribute to a special SuperFund for Internet pollution? Will we see cartoons of Men In Black spray-burning suspicious goo off the Google logo?