Slashdot Mirror


Extreme Cooling

hakkikt writes "Icrontic brings us a review about a CPU-cooling device every self-respecting overclocker and cpu-speed freak must get. The device is called MX-EVA3. With a price of US$500, it's not for the faint of wallet, but the performance is awesome."

38 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. Horay for Server administration by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 2, Troll

    Go mysql, one comment and already overloaded!

    On the other hand, I do like mysql, but it seems nobody configures it to have a load on it. Oh well, a good /.ing will teach them different!

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    1. Re:Horay for Server administration by sheriff_p · · Score: 2, Informative

      I couldn't get on to the pages after the first, due to MySQL being screwed, *but*, you can view the printable version on their site to read the whole thing.

      --
      Score:-1, Funny
  2. What, 10 posts in... by testrake · · Score: 2, Funny

    and it's completely hosed already?

    Sheesh.

    Perhaps they should've used the $500 dollar heat sink on their server and kicked it up a notch.

  3. Overclocking cost? by neksys · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why pay $500 for a cooling device when the next-step high mHz CPU can be purchased for less than that? I mean, the appeal of overclocking is that it allows people to extend their hardware far beyond the intended lifetimes. So say you've got an Intel 900, and with this device, you can overclock it to 1.4 gHz. So what have you gained? An unstable, extremely expensive CPU. The equivalient "real" 1.4 ghz chip could have been purchased for less than the cooling device.

    And nevermind those, "I have my Celeron 300 running at 2.3 gigahertz!" folks. CPU speed is so overrated - remember, fast RAM, and lots of it, is the best thing you can do to increase system performance. Don't fall victim to the overclocking madness - spend that $500 on a gig of RAM.

    1. Re:Overclocking cost? by Kelerain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dont underestimate overclockers fanaticism for these things. And there are ALWAYS higher numbers that arent on sale. 3GHZ chips out? they want to be the first to overclock to 4GHZ. and some people have money to burn (or cool), but hey its helping the economy right? Im with you on the gig of ram thing.. *drools* but what do you use to cool your overclocked gig of ram? ;)

    2. Re:Overclocking cost? by Gaccm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      1) spend $500 on a gig of RAM

      I never use more than 256megs of ram, so buying more ram wont help.

      2) Its not all about cpu speed.

      You are completely right, thats why, if you read the site and looked at the screenies, the guy overclocked his System Bus (thus affecting ram and all) to 181Mhz (from a default 133). THAT IS A LOT. That is a very noticable speed difference.

      3) use the money for something else

      call this an investment. If this thing lasts for 3 computers, then you have probably "saved" more money by not having to pay for permium speed. Your example was having a 900mhz and going to 1.4ghz. Thats pretty sweet, but what about going from 2ghz to 3.4ghz. 3.4ghz is beyond any chip in production right now, but i've seen shots from a person who has been able to get that speed. This device isn't for people with a p3 900, it is for the extreme people and for them the benefits outweigh the costs.

      --

      Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    3. Re:Overclocking cost? by binaryDigit · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually something like this is for the person who just purchased the latest/greatest/fastest thing out there, and now they want more. They want the fastest Athlon out there bar none. When a faster one comes out, out goes the old "slow" chip and in goes the new one. "Look ma, a 3GHZ Athlon".

      One other thing to consider is that with something with such massive cooling capacity, and the fact that it uses templates to attach to the cpu, you have a fairly future proof cooling solution. Even the 64bit monster that AMD is coming out with should be effectively cooled by this thing, assuming you can get it to fit on the cpu.

    4. Re:Overclocking cost? by digitalunity · · Score: 2

      I for one understand the need and importance of this bell curve. What I don't understand is everyone thinking this is a problem. Every civilization since the dawn of time has had this socioeconomic distribution.

      It is necessary.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    5. Re:Overclocking cost? by indiigo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Besides the points already brought up, the product can be re-used over and over again, making it quite the investment that could pay for itself in 2-3 upgrades.

      --
      fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
    6. Re:Overclocking cost? by mr3038 · · Score: 2
      I never use more than 256megs of ram, so buying more ram wont help.

      Really? How about getting a gig or two of memory and copying the whole system to ramdrive during startup? The copying will take something like 30s so it even boots faster than that above mentioned cooler setup. Guess if loading an application from memory is faster than loading it from disk? Of couse, if all you do is scientific calculations and you're CPU bound then it doesn't help, but in that case you probably would need more than 256MB to boot and money is better spent in SMP box anyway...

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    7. Re:Overclocking cost? by (outer-limits) · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Bell Curve is a well known societal phenomenon in which those with power justify there need to keep those lower down on the power scale without power. Drastic measures to fix this include sending in suicide bombers to blow up those at the top of the bell curve.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    8. Re:Overclocking cost? by HamNRye · · Score: 2

      So, you're a power user (need for faster computer) and you never use more that 256 megs of ram?? Increasing the FSB might yield good performance, but at the severe costs of stability. Not to metion there are quite a few gotchas to running RAm at faster that designed speeds.

      Now, using such minute mounts of ram, and boasting the need for a 3.4 GHZ processor, perhaps you are doing some really intense compiling?? (Still couldn't hurt to have X-tra ram)

      You are obviously not running Windows, or the memory leaks alone would have you over 256 in a heart beat. 2000 and XP both can suck up 256 MB RAM on boot. They swap alot of that out, but that degrades performance. Please don't tell me you spend all of that to get the CPU overclocked and still use Virtual Memory??

      Now, most overclockers are Gamers. Gamers can benefit from better drives and a raid controller more than a fast CPU. But, they also would find 256MB RAM to be restrictive too.

      I personally think you don't know what you're talking about, and probably have no earthly idea what kind of RAM your machine uses. Now, you can come back and tell me you're running Linux, console only and need that 3.4GHz CPU for Seti-A-Home, but that just mkakes you a sap.

      Also, if you really run a *NIX and don't use more than 256 MB RAM, why not use that 500 Bucks to get yourself a real computer. Refurbed RS/6000's and Sun Ultra's, Sun Blades, O2's, etc can all be found at great prices, and should outperform any Intel shitbox on the market.

      My analysis, save the 500 Bucks and get a Raid, or some fast drives, Cable Internet, or any of 100 things that might get your tasks done faster. But the Overclockers out there have become nothing more than MHZ freaks who like to boast about "How many MHZ they can squeeze out of a P4 2.2". And if that's the case, save up for aq 29-36" monitor. that really wow's 'em when the visit the Geek Kingdom.

      But hey, give me some of the ways you actually use your computer. Maybe you do really need that 3.4GHZ with 256MB ram. I would love to hear how having more than 256MB won't help. (All of mine at home are 512 or greater.)(Yep, even the old Sparc 20)

      ~Jason

  4. wow... by mosch · · Score: 2
    it requires a special kind of retard to buy one of these. a 2.2ghz Xeon is only $350, and there's somebody who thinks it's a good idea to spend $500 to chill it?

    whoever it is who's buying these, can i sell you my new super-conducting speaker cables, and a liquid nitrogen supply contract?

    1. Re:wow... by danamania · · Score: 2

      Yes... it takes a special kind of user, and someone who's particularly obsessed with overclocking is that type - perhaps they have multiple machines they just want to run for a while to 'see how it all goes'. There's also the use in overclocking the fastest chips at any time, as opposed to the article's testing of a more mainstream one. As a potentially revolutionary product in the field it's in, a cooler of this type is going to be expensive - and if a success will drop in price

      Personally, anything that promotes this kind of obsessive behaviour I find quite reassuring. It means it's all the more likely that my OWN little obsessions will be catered for :P

      Having said that - omg $500US is insane!!

      a grrl & her server

    2. Re:wow... by danamania · · Score: 2

      I hope by "insane" you mean cheap! :)

      I say 'insane' from a non-overclockers point of view... Probably in the same way as I'd be called insane when y'see what I paid for some absolutely archaic piece of hardware. Opposites in practice, but it's all the same fun :D

      if not THE fastest, desktop machine in the world. THAT is the appeal of overclocking.

      That was my point :). If you enjoy it - all the more excellence in your life!

      a grrl & her server

    3. Re:wow... by mosch · · Score: 3, Funny
      winning the fastest desktop in the world competition is like winning the 'most luxurious kia' award.

      the funniest part is that most O/C'd systems have drive subsystems that are far from top-of-the-line, and overall system performance would be helped more by fixing that part of the system.

    4. Re:wow... by dboyles · · Score: 2

      winning the fastest desktop in the world competition is like winning the 'most luxurious kia' award.

      You're just jealous of my underbody neon light setup.

      --
      -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  5. Re:well by neksys · · Score: 2, Informative

    The server isn't actually down - it's just that they've configured mysql to only accept a certain number of connections (I think 10 is the default). Keep reloading - you'll get in.

  6. as listed on amazon.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    other customers who bought this item also bought:

    2500' suspension bridge: $19.65
    pet rock (polished granite): $14.95
    enron stock: $87.23

    --m

  7. Slashdotted already? by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

    It's 1 am here (2 am east coast, 11 pm west) and this place seems to be down. At least, I keep getting an error message about a failed mysql connection. Anyone with the page in their cache want to post it here?

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by micahjd · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's probably an advertisement... In a few hours they'll come back online, and print something along the lines of "we wouldn't have gotten slashdotted if we were overclocking our Pentium 75 to 8gHz using this new cooler!"

      --
      -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2
  8. overclocking is a social phenomenon by Moosifer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Overclocking has become a modern-day, geek equivalent of spending 5,000 hours working on some old [insert venerable American car type here] when you could just go out a new Acura NSX for less than your time was worth, and get way more chicks.

  9. $500 may not be too much for a cooling system by Sancho · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people would be out of their minds to pay $500 for a fan/heatsink, but $500 for a cooling system may not be out of line. I don't know just how much cooling the CPU would bring down the total system temp.. probably by quite a bit.

    The reason for this is that there are some cases/places where the ambient temperature may be too high for a computer with a normal fan.

    For example, Texas, in the summer, when the AC goes out (or if there is no AC to begin with.)

    Most people would just say, "Hey, turn off the computer then." That doesn't work if you're away :)

  10. It's not about cost-effectiveness by SKYY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That device is not marketed for your average user--it's aimed at the people who make overclocking CPUs and hardware their hobby. Sure, you might mock the stamp collector or the model train builder for spending thousands of dollars a year on things you would consider 'crap', but do they care? No. So what if the stamp collector spends $300 on a mint-condition stamp from the year 1917--it's to support HIS hobby, for HIS enjoyment, not yours. All the same--so what if the overclocker who buys a $130 Pentium 4 1.6A and a $500 phase-change cooling box (still a bit overpriced for a R-134a compressor, IMHO)? For him, that $500 is well-spent if it lets him clock his 1.6 GHz chip to 2.8 GHz. He doesn't care what the person who is content running a PII 400 MHz chip thinks.

  11. Direct links and a quote by vrmlguy · · Score: 4, Informative
    The cooler...
    ...being installed...
    ...and attached to the CPU.

    Good things

    As you can see the MX-EVA3 can take care of some very high heat load. It is by far the best extreme cooling solution on the market today. I've used all sorts of cooling to get to the top and I was under the impression that my 220 pelt and chilled water cooler was bringing my chip to its limits. I was wrong.

    With the MX-EVA3 you can eliminate the use of pelts, extra power supplies and water. Now you use just one simple evaporator hook up.

    It also is pretty good for space. It fits under your case so all you're doing is adding about 9 inches to the height of your case. As far as the noise level it is very tolerable for any Xtreme Overclocker. This can only be written up as a good thing.

    Bad things

    I'll start with the instructions. They are very good for condensation proofing but that's about it. There are no instructions for adjusting the Digital Display as far as setting the boot temperature or setting what ever it is you can set with the 4 buttons on the Digital Display. This would be nice to know.

    They have no recommendation on moving your 4 AMD CPU tabs which in my opinion is a critical must.

    Mounting is a bit tough but if you take your time you can get it right. It's always a scary moment when it comes to risking frying your CPU. I'm sure the Intel 478 mounting may be a lot easier.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  12. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    listen, i'm extremely drunk right now. why aren't you? it's fucking friday night, for fuck's sake. why the hell aren't you at a club?!?!

    I could ask you the same; getting drunk in your room alone isn't cool!

    --
    It's been a long time.
  13. Re:hey! by great+throwdini · · Score: 3, Funny

    what's wrong with hitting the bottle alone, though?!

    These words from your site:

    Winners Circle is a new Operating system that shall be unique in several ways. It shall be a multitasking operating system built specifically to run under dos. It shall multitask by comand, not by timeslice, as windows does. This should make the operating system run faster and with more stability than windows 95 or 3.1

    [...]

    This is also going to be written entirely (as far as I can code - I already know my mouse code shall be assembly) in QuickBasic.

    Uh-huh. Oh, yeah. Feel the burn ... of QuickBasic!

  14. Re:$500 by Erik+Fish · · Score: 2

    Because some people have more money than brains?

    Seriously, practical overclocking is currently dead. It died when my Celeron 533 running at 824 (and even the 533's that could hit 1GHz) stopped cutting it for the latest games. The price/performance ratio advantage that overclocking used to give you simply doesn't exist with current hardware.

    My brother boasted to me the other day about how his video card can be overclocked in software and it doesn't void the warranty. Hello? This isn't overclocking, it's the manufacturer underclocking to sell more units to people who are so far into the rice boy mentality that their mind shuts down and their wallet opens up when they see the word "overclock".

  15. Other cpu cooler uses? by BingoBoingo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I hook one of these things to the bottom of my Jolt Cola can? -Bingo

  16. Re:$500 by Elbereth · · Score: 2

    Most overclockers just do it because it can be done. They don't really care about price/performance, although they will sometimes claim that as a benefit of all their time and money spent (wasted?) on overclocking.

    I don't really see much point in it, since I'm only interested in price/performance. I can find much better solutions than overclocking (usually, switching software or CPU architecture).

    If someone wants to create the ultimate desktop system, I'd suggest investing in server technology rather than pushing consumer technology to its limits. You can get some really cool stuff off ebay for pennies on the dollar... too bad that there's nothing really pushing consumer technology to its limits, except for benchmarks.

  17. scary by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 4, Funny

    It would have been better to call it the MX-EVA2 (Asuka's) , since the EVA3 is the black one that goes a bit mental and strange.

    graspee

  18. Central Cooling? by new500 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    . . .

    At work, people I know are more interested in the water cooling scene, hoping one day for quieter machines. . .

    But now, with an external *piped* cooling device on the market, we're just waiting for the advent of building facility CPU cooling ducts, just like the air - con.

    Yup, rent new office, bring in desk, plug CPU into cooling duct (obviously with your case and machine coming standard with a nice clean bit of plumbing), connect cat5 (or fiber, come on this is an _ideal_ office :) and go . . .

    Final thought, is there any reliability gain to be had from using such a cooler and _not_ overclocking? Okay, I could probably answer that one if I tried, but it's breakfast time and I'm hungry . . .

  19. WHAT do you expect ? by AftanGustur · · Score: 2
    Don't you recognise the big black thing inside ?

    It's a freon pressure pump (likely not pumping freon though) and if you ever 'looked-inside' your parents refridgerator with the help of a screwdriver and a few 8-12mm keys, you have already seen one exactly like this. Although this one is likely to function better that your parents frigo after your 'autopsy'

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  20. Re:LOL by garglblaster · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, for $500 you can get a decent refrigerator (that has more cooling power)

    Simply put the whole of the PC inside!

    --

    perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

  21. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    We all start somewhere. That paticular page is several years old now.

    BTW, language is largely irrelevant. Quickbasic provides the means for low level hardware access, and for the most part, it's so goddamned slow, it forces any coders who actually want to get anything done in that language to learn heavy optimization techiques. I'd say that's not too bad for a language I just picked up one day because it actually had well documented graphics routines(something which is very important for the first few programs I wrote). It's also good because what you can and cannot do in it remains extremely constant. When I tried setting a pointer to 0xA0000000 in C, only one of 5 compilers I tried would let me without giving me an error message, and only that same one would let me write the ASM code to set the video mode.

    Hell, my current project still uses it (Quest for a King), because I don't feel like porting thousands of lines of code to C. On the other hand, look at my code. It's fast(for QB), it's all very low level, IMHO it's fairly well structured, and it all works. That's more than I can say for a large number of beginners projects coded in C.

    Two things puzzle me, however. First, why did you respond to an AC with something from MY site? Secondly, what does WC have to do with people getting drunk alone?

    --
    It's been a long time.
  22. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    Sorry, the acronym of the system I mentioned on that page. I ended up coding it, but all does is manages several DOS windows at a time in real-mode. Having several dos-windows open at once comes in handy when you are trying to set up a 9x system, but haven't got the GUI running yet.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  23. Re:hey! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

    Maybe you don't, but I mention it whenever someone asks the question "What did you use to make your game?".

    --
    It's been a long time.
  24. Re:Most of these people don't need fast disks by mosch · · Score: 2

    next time you come up with a reason why O/C'ing is a better desktop performance enhancer than say, a RAID card and a striped mirror, please make it at least a wee bit plausible.