Slashdot Mirror


In Space, No One Knows You Read Vogue

Chad Coffman writes "Salon has quite the story up. It seems Russian astronauts are trolling for supermodels as passengers for their space program." I guess Tito nor Shuttleworth were cute enough for Valery Korzun. May I suggest Courreges or Gaultier for space-suit designer? I'll leave the weight allowance jokes as an exercise for the reader.

38 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Not only the Russians troll ! by Krapangor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hereby I troll for Natalie Portman in space !
    Naked and pertified of course.
    This would be rather expensive, because a pertified Natalie Postman is heavier than a non-pertified Natalie Portman, even naked.
    But I think it's worth the money.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  2. Nothing to see here... by Abstrakt · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the article:
    • He quickly added: "But this is a joke and we will be very happy to receive any space tourist. They're very welcome here."
    1. Re:Nothing to see here... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Note though that the cosmonauts are permitted to express a sense of humour. If a US male astronaut had said the same thing, he would be carpeted on his return.

    2. Re:Nothing to see here... by Garg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, a US male astronaut would've asked for a porn star...

      Garg

      --
      Garg
      Alumnus, Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters
    3. Re:Nothing to see here... by Slashamatic · · Score: 2

      They would have thought it - but if they said it like the earlier poster said, they probably wouldn't get to fly!!

  3. Trying to join the million mile high club.. by Ezza · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. with a supermodel!

    --
    I'm a perfectionist but I'm trying to cut back.
  4. only real news i saw by martissimo · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    NASA said the other gyroscopes were working fine and that the failure would not affect the station's navigation and control. But the bad unit will need to be replaced, and the soonest that can happen is early next year.

    they have 5 gyroscopes that they consider "major components", yet it will take em till next year till they can fly one up?

    what, they dont have any backups ready to go for critical items and have to manufacture it first?

    great planning

    1. Re:only real news i saw by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With five gyrosocopes in operation on the station, it stands to reason that the backups are already up there. No need for a warehouse full of extras down here.

    2. Re:only real news i saw by gilroy · · Score: 2
      The limiting factor, likely, is room on a Shuttle or Soyuz to lift the thing to orbit. Trajectories are very mass-sensitive and have likely been worked out. Plus the next few supply runs are probably already carrying important components.


      If the system is similar to that on Hubble, they only need three gyroscopes to remain fully functional, and can get by with only two. So there's not the sense of urgency you seem to feel.

    3. Re:only real news i saw by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

      After taking the grad class "Satellite dynamics and control" I feel im qualified to answer this question. In order to fully control a satellite such as the space station, you only need 3 gyroscopes for three axis control (X,Y,Z). And in a tight situation you could get away with two if they were in the right position (to do a 3-1-3 rotation for example) The other two gyroscopes are there to give you more control authority, and more torquing power, but if two of them fail, youll still be able to control how the station is oriented. The reason why its taking them a year to replace the thing is because they are essentially replacing a backup. If they lose another gyroscope they will definetly pick up the timetable, and if they lost two more they would have to abandon station until they could get it fixed.

      --

  5. supermodels by InsaneCreator · · Score: 4, Funny

    It seems Russian astronauts are trolling for supermodels as passengers for their space program.

    Why would supermodels have to be passengers in the space program? They can easily fly up there to the space station, like their mentor, the superman! I've never seen him pay for a seat in the shuttle! :)

  6. I am trying by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 5, Funny
    Trying to bite back some quip about Russians
    attempting to get the most bang for their bucks.


    Guess I failed. Sigh.

  7. Re:The ultimate in weight loss schemes... by flewp · · Score: 2

    Who needs to puke up to lose a little weight on Earth, when you can puke up and lose it all going into space? :)

    They'd be better off not eating at all. Afterall, puking could shoot them in the opposite direction and smash their head into something.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  8. Sounds pretty natural... by danamania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apart from all the jokes, in such an isolated environment it sounds pretty natural. Humans aren't completely isolated creatures from other humans, and for most of the population the company of someone of the opposite sex - just hanging around the place - is a wonderful comfort regardless of being supermodels. Keeping each other mentally stable in such a long term trip sounds as important as having leet space skillz :)

    So where do I apply?

    a grrl & her server

    1. Re:Sounds pretty natural... by Mittermeyer · · Score: 2

      Cordwainer Smith's short story Nancy is about exactly this topic- if a crewman gets too whacky Out There he can push a button.

      He is told beforehand that pushing the button will wash out his career but he can do it. Our hero's fellow crewman and pet die, and he gets wonky, so he pushes the button. His perfect woman appears and keeps him happy throughout the voyage. She is of course an entity built from his mind that helps him function at a minimal level.

      Once he makes it back Nancy disappears (since she's part of the ship's safety equipment, never to run again. He is not only ruined for space, but for being involved with anyone else, because he's already experienced the Perfect Companion and is left with the feeling that she could pop up at any time.

      --
      ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  9. Models IQ may be a problem... by arivanov · · Score: 2

    I just have that silly scene from 007 "The man with the Golden Gun" with whoever the B girl was at the time pressing the solar plant controls with her butt.

    It stays in front of my eyes and does not want to go...

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  10. Re:gee, by arivanov · · Score: 2

    I do not think that anyone will let _that_ model (S.C.) anywhere close to a spaceship. Her movies are a sufficient demonstration of her intelligence.

    El Macferson - more likely. But she is not in the business any more so she does not count.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  11. Because supermodels are "cheaper" by AtomicBomb · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems Russian astronauts are trolling for supermodels as passengers
    It makes good sense. In terms of payload, probably you can send 2 supermodels for same weight as Tito.

    ATTN NASA:
    Maybe sending me up the space is not such a bad idea. (A gnome shorter than 5'3" who can use both micropipette and computer program. )

    1. Re:Because supermodels are "cheaper" by snake_dad · · Score: 2

      Sending you up might spark some protests...

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  12. Re:in space... by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2, Funny
    I don't think anybody needs a bra in zero-g.

    If you are built like a supermodel, no-problem. I can envisage that a more normally shaped woman may suffer from problems due differential changes in direction. Some ladies (insert your favourite XXX link) may even knock themselves out when unrestrained.

  13. Nevertheless by Subcarrier · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...pound for buck, you could ship two supermodels into the orbit for the price of one.

    That's what I call a good proposition, everybody is happy. ;-)

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  14. Re:Porn in Space? by bojanb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um, didn't they already make a zero-G porn movie? I think it's The Uranus Experiment.

  15. Has sex happened in space yet? by spongebob · · Score: 2

    I am not sure... Most of the female astronauts have been married or just downright plain-jane... I think I might have to double bag it for the bragging rights!!!

    1. Re:Has sex happened in space yet? by BWJones · · Score: 2

      Has sex happened in space yet?

      I do recall that there was in interesting "NASA can neither confirm nor deny" report in response to this question a couple of years ago. Sorry, no links.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Has sex happened in space yet? by Tablizer · · Score: 2


      Do you mean with a partner?

  16. The problem.... is the center of gravity. by Rahga · · Score: 2

    Regular women have had little problems getting adjusted with space travel. The problem, when you start looking at Supermodels in space, is that you must discriminate between two different, distinct types of supermodels: the waifs and the chicks with augmented breasts.

    Waifs are popular amongst engineers... their light weight mean that you can fit heavier, more practical cargo on board that would normally be sacrificed due to launch considerations.... stuff like Mah Jongg sets, a kegerator, and Russian millionaires (which are, ironically, the reason Supermodels are being considered for space travel).

    Those with augmented breasts must be discriminated against, no matter the behest of the millionaires. Intra-craft space travel would be nearly impossible to manage.... The fact of the matter is that in space, even with the relatively wightless environment, a human body will spin around it's "center of gravity". The effect of spinning to the left or right is still unknown, because we are not sure how silicon implants will react to such an environment. However, it is bound to be far less disasterous than a top-bottom spin. This is best simulated by throwing a hammer through tube of computer equipment. A model's feet will probably not survive the trip, and mental damage is inevitable if the feet get hooked on a loose computer or cargo crate.... Fortunatley, it is questionable if such mental damage of a supermodel is a valid concern, at least until said models age to their 23rd year.

  17. Brains and beauty by geoswan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone who makes a crack about brains and beauty never occurring in the same person should look into the life of Hedy Lamarr. Oh, there a pictures too. Ms Lamarr was one of the patent holders of an important ww2 patent. She also sued Corel for using an uncredited likeness of her on the cover of one of their flagship software products.

  18. Question to super model: by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    technician: how many Gs can you take?
    super-model: I only wear one string at a time.
    technician: huh? oh, never mind.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  19. Cindy is getting older... by bubblegoose · · Score: 2

    This would help with any sagging problems.

    A win-win situation.

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
  20. Re:in space... by Slashamatic · · Score: 2

    I don't think it needs zero-G, some ladies have enough problems jogging w/o a high-tech sports bra.Super-models are generally not so well endowed so they wouldn't have this problem.

  21. Re:MODERATION ON CRACK ! by Slashamatic · · Score: 2

    Um, Natalie a super model? Perhaps the moderator was too inflexible. However, humorless and inflexible moderation has been far too frequent recently. As you say, many of us can correct during M2.

  22. THIS JUST IN: Kate Moss by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2

    Supermodel and ersatz space tourist Kate Moss today was killed during launch. She would have been the first supermodel in space.

    A NASA spokesman said, "Apparently, the g-forces were too much for her bony, underfed frame and she was ripped in half by the pressure."

    "It's just as well, because I don't know how she would have survived a week with those horny, lecherous astronauts on the ISS. Either way, she would have been ripped in half."

  23. Re:Contents Under Pressure by RelliK · · Score: 2
    Perhaps it will allow us to design the perfect breast.

    Aha! Have they asked Britney Spears yet?

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  24. What a crock... by billmaly · · Score: 2

    Sad that the very mention of "Supermodel" gets this kind of coverage. I've read this excuse for a story in like 6 different places...the guy made a joke, that's it. Cindy Crawford is not going into space.

    Then again, maybe the story is a Russian beaurecrat (sp) actually making a joke!

  25. Two questions by bperkins · · Score: 2

    Has any one else noticed that this is actaully an AP news wire, not a Salon article?

    Is any one else irritated by the use of the phrase "quite the" in the submission?

  26. Astronaut in training says that ... by vieux+schnock · · Score: 2, Informative
    Canadian Astronaut
    Julie Payette - and a hot chick may I add :-) - answered that.


    In a television interview, she was granting a journalist a formal visit of the Space Station (grounded, in one piece before being dismantled and put to space or a life-sized model, I don't remember), and the jounalist did ask about the possibility of sex in space. She said that serious studies about it have been done but hinted that the only way to have sex in space, is to have one partner tied up


    Funny.

  27. Alternative title by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    "In space, no one can hear you cream."

  28. This jumped out from the article... by X86Daddy · · Score: 2, Funny
    They also reported a loud, growling noise inside the space station. (emphasis mine)

    They think it was a broken gyro... You see, principal filming can't begin until the babes arrive... then the creature will kill everyone, in ones and twos:


    Begin Scene: Korzun and Crawford in space-hot-tub (n/m the whole gravity thing) giggling. A slight scraping sound is heard...

    Crawford: Did you hear that?!

    Korzun: Aw, it's nothingks...

    There is a "loud, growling noise."

    Camera zooms on Crawford as she screams in terror.