Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Grow Human Thymus From Stem Cells

knight_23 writes: "The Herald Sun reports that Australian researchers have grown a functioning thymus from stem cells. The thymus is a small organ that is critical to the immune system. Human trials could begin within two years."

85 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Cool by tsa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool! Maybe I'll live long enough to get my own new heart!

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Cool by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "That'll bleed when my heart beats."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  2. Isn't this... by RoundTop-VJAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

    one of the parts that is affected by HIV? also, if this can be done..think of all those "bubble boys" that have reduced immune systems. This could be a VERY good thing.

    --
    RoundTop

    1. Re:Isn't this... by mess31173 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They already fixed the bubble boy.

      So I don't think that that would be a practical application. Probably a better application would be for people with abnormalities or defects of the thymus.

  3. yes, but... by TweeKinDaBahx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will that new liver/lungs I wanted for christmas be plug and play compliant?

    1. Re:yes, but... by rhost89 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, one thing that will never change is that plug and play will allways be plug and pray :)

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
  4. cloning and genetic engineering by Jacer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's sad.... all the resrictions imposed upon advancements of science are a result of conseratives fearful of playing god, the uneducated massess control the politicians with their ideas, or lack of rather. a preist says it's wrong, they say it's wrong, politicians say it's wrong, so it is wrong, right? wrong! i'm for any medical advancement that saves the lives of people, but i guess my $0.02 is worth the same as the twits i disagree with...

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:cloning and genetic engineering by tgibbs · · Score: 2
      It's got nothing to do with the technology per se, but the possible killing of children who have no say in the matter.
      Give me a break. Embryonic stem cells come from an undifferentiated ball of cells. No brain, no nerves, no senses. An embryo at this stage has about as much in common with a human being, medically and scientifically speaking, as dandruff. Now some people believe that there is a magic, undetectable "soul" in that ball of cells. And some people believe that cow in the stockyard might be their dead grandmother. I wouldn't deny either the right to their beliefs, no matter how absurd they might sound to the nonbeliever. But when they start demanding that we stop medical research that might rescue real, thinking people who are desperately in need, it is time to draw the line.
    2. Re:cloning and genetic engineering by debrain · · Score: 2

      Introducing killer bees and African Lady Bugs were also in the name of science. Just $0.02 from the other side of the coin.

    3. Re:cloning and genetic engineering by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      but the possible killing of children who have no say in the matter.

      I don't think that any bioethicist, researcher, or doctor has ever advocated killing babies for their stem cells. What the right wing has done is prohibit the harvesting of stem cells from aborted fetuses because they would rather have sick and crippled people suffer than run the dreaded (to them) risk of having something positive come from an abortion.

    4. Re:cloning and genetic engineering by tgibbs · · Score: 2
      The DNA in this "undifferentiated ball of cells" is unique. That's the problem for conservatives.
      What's so special about unique DNA? Every sperm and egg has unique DNA, and any pair contains enough unique DNA to make a unique baby. Besides, would you argue than an identical twin--who doesn't have unique DNA--is somehow less of an individual or less of a human being than a singleton?
  5. But can they... by papasui · · Score: 2, Funny

    Grow John Bobbitt a replacement penis?

  6. Little FYI on the THY: by damu · · Score: 5, Informative

    The functions of the thymus were not well understood until the early 1960s, when its role in the development of the body's system of immunity was discovered. Beginning during fetal development, the thymus processes many of the body's lymphocytes, which migrate throughout the body via the bloodstream, seeding lymph nodes and other lymphatic tissue. The main cells undergoing this processing are the T cells, a heterogeneous groups of cells essential in protecting the body against invasions by foreign organisms. If the thymus fails to develop or is removed early in fetal life, the immune system cannot develop completely. Normally, by the time the infant is a few months old, the immune system has sufficiently formed so as to function throughout life. However, further growth and development of lymphoid tissue still depends on intervention by the thymic cells. After the initial seeding process, the thymus releases a hormonal substance that stimulates further growth of lymphoidal tissue, although such a substance has not yet been isolated.
    dam()

    --


    Useless sig.
    1. Re:Little FYI on the THY: by aswang · · Score: 2

      The new thymus won't necessarily affect existing immunity, as mature T cells hang out in the blood. (And immunity normally wears off anyway since T cells have finite life spans.) The bigger problem is that, unless the stem cells from which the new thymus are derived from are perfect HLA matches with the existing immune system, graft vs. host disease is likely to occur.

    2. Re:Little FYI on the THY: by aswang · · Score: 2

      The thymus is only really necessary for the maturation of T cells which takes place in early life. T cells are actually continuously produced by stem cells in the bone marrow. Once mature, T cells generally reside in the peripheral blood and in lymph nodes. While the thymus does secrete cytokines that promote lymphoid proliferation, there are other organs/tissue types like lymph nodes and bone marrow that can also supply the necessary substances.

    3. Re:Little FYI on the THY: by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 2

      I've read other research which seems to suggest that many peoples' allergic reactions are due to an immature immune system (possibly due to an "overly-sterile" environment while growing up which doesn't challenge the immune system enough to make it mature). Perhaps the thymus is "going into hibernation" in many allergy sufferers before it has fully matured the proper T-cells? If so, would it be possible to "fix up" our malfunctioning immune system by temporarily reactiving the function of our thymus?

  7. Umbilical Stem Cells by Yoda2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is too bad that more hospitals aren't allowing the donation of umbilical stem cells (stem cells collected from cord blood). They are largely an untapped resource and are usually considered PC even in the most conservative camps.

    1. Re:Umbilical Stem Cells by lobsterGun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even though the hospital may not support fetal stem cell donation, that does not stop you from banking the cells yourself. There are commercial services that will bank these cells for you for a resasonable fee. ViaCord and CBR are two such services.

      I chose CBR for my son. I pray that he never needs the cells, but if he does, they will be there.

    2. Re:Umbilical Stem Cells by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      Funny, adult stem cells seem to be plentiful in fat and have been coaxed into transforming themselves into many other types of cells.

      Embryonic stem cells will always be genetically different from you and will be subject to attack by your immune system unless they're in immune isolated areas (eyes, gonads) or you take immunosuppressants which means big bucks to the pharma companies for the rest of your life.

      I'd rather have a bit of liposuction and use my own.

  8. Best quote... of DEATH! by Dirtside · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Without a functioning immune system you get a disease called death," he said.
    This sounds like one of those quotes from sensationalistic sci-fi pulp novels... "He found himself in a world of mayhem... and death!"

    Not that that's a bad thing, mind you. I just hope we don't end up with giant killer thymuses (thymi? nah) rampaging through downtown Cleveland. Again.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Best quote... of DEATH! by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2

      wow, the guy that said that is the same guy that grew the thymus? I would think he would know that death is a condition, a state of being, not a disease. Though I can see how he was trying to be humorous (I sure hope).

    2. Re:Best quote... of DEATH! by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      Wouldn't death technically be a syndrome?

      The difference between a syndrome and a disease is that a disease is a health condition with a clearly identifiable cause while a syndrome is a set of symptoms which define the health condition without a single cause on which to place the blame. Thus a cold is a disease because a viral infection can be identified as the cause.

    3. Re:Best quote... of DEATH! by why-is-it · · Score: 2

      wow, the guy that said that is the same guy that grew the thymus? I would think he would know that death is a condition, a state of being, not a disease.

      Wouldn't it be more correct to define death as a state of non-being rather than a state of being?

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    4. Re:Best quote... of DEATH! by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

      I was a little disappointed by this and other quotes, which are kind of humorous but also sound somewhat more like marketing-speak than the statements of a dedicated scientist at the cusp of serious medical and ethical issues. "Going weak in the knees", "disease called death", "fountain of youth", "missing link/final piece"... these are all rather flamboyant statements, and in some cases rather hard to substantiate. What has been achieved does sound very impressive, but the article leaves me wondering about whether there is a lot of hype in this case for the purpose of obtaining further funding, getting lucrative contracts, or perhaps even self-gratification?

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    5. Re:Best quote... of DEATH! by Ravagin · · Score: 2

      (thymi? nah)

      We-eelll... it comes from a latin word, theoretically, so thymi is the "proper" plural. On the other hand, that word is from a greek adjective, "thymos." So who the hell knows.

      (dork dork dork, aiee)

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    6. Re:Best quote... of DEATH! by g4dget · · Score: 2
      Not all Latin words ending in "-us" have a plural of "-i"; for some the nominative plural is "-us" (long "u"). And "thymus" comes from the Greek, not Latin anyway. For "virus" and "thymus", "viruses" and "thymuses" are the only acceptable plurals in English anyway.

      If you start attaching Latin plurals to English words, you better be prepared to use the cases correctly, as in: "Less than a century ago, scientists discovered the viros. And per viris, they will be able to perform gene therapy. The genomes virorum are generally small and easily manipulated." Let's just stick with the English endings, OK?

  9. What next? by pc_plod · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come back and tell me when they can grow a Shakey's Pizza

    --

    Help the scientists free the world from the evil curse of the dracula
  10. Wrong focus? by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems that the Herald Sun's article is focusing on how great the thymus is, and all the nifty things it can do -- when the real breakthrough is the fact that they GREW A FRICKIN' FUNCTIONING ORGAN FROM STEM CELLS. Jesus Christ! Move this tech over to the heart, liver, kidneys, whatever, and NOW you've got the "holy grail of immunology". Yeah, I realize it's a lot of work to do something like this, and requires specialized effort and development for different organs, but if the basic technology works... ay caramba.

    Maybe I'm missing something, and this isn't as big a deal as I think it is... but if it is...

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Wrong focus? by tshak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good post. I really hope that we find a cure for AIDS and many of the cancers that we have. However, I think we spend way too much money on said research, and not enough on preventative research. For example, it is commonly known that many cancers are caused by bad diet, radioactive exposure, and toxic chemicals (many found in pesticides, plastics, cigarrettes, and other polutants). AIDS is also most commonly spread as a STD. These are all solveable problems with the right plans and cultural changes in place. Again, I really hope that we find cures for as many cancers as possible, and a cure for AIDS, but in America we focus way too little on prevention.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:Wrong focus? by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      They've already grown and transplanted functioning bladders to. The reason why this is less exciting then one would expect is that these organs are of a relatively simple structure: either just a big bag, or a clump of similar cells. Making them was just a process of either inducing them to divide correctly, or in the case of the bladder, growing it on a simple lattice. That's nothing like what it would take to make the cells form a functioning heart, or a lung, or a liver.

    3. Re:Wrong focus? by Dan+D. · · Score: 2
      Move this tech over to the heart, liver, kidneys, whatever, and NOW you've got the "holy grail of immunology"

      Leave it to a software guy to claim the fix of the problem is to upgrade the hardware underneath! :) What a kludge this "human" software must be... (I'm not even going to mention the security concerns with all its open ports!)

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
  11. Superior Alternative to Transplants and Synthetics by SirKodiak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From science fiction, the impression I always got was that the way handle the failure of a heart was either going to be transplant from a donor or the use of synthetic organs (e.g. artificial hearts). This seems like a more impressive technology, allowing the body to grow its own replacement, and a more natural one, by eliminating the risk of rejection of artificial substances or organs grown in a different body.

    I did find some of the quotes from Professor Boyd somewhat melodramatic, though: "Without a functioning immune system you get a disease called death,"he said.

    Still, an amazing discovery. Good luck to those doing cutting edge medical research.

  12. politcal debate by redtoade · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before we get 100 posts telling us that stem cell research is being held up by whacko Chrisitian right wing bible thumpers...

    May I remind you that there are hundreds of Sci-Fi stories (books, TV, movies, etc...) debating the creation of an UNDERCLASS! Whether this be robots, animals, races or CLONES!!!

    Space - Above and Beyond (FOX TV) "Tanks," human clones and "AIs"
    Star Trek TNG: Data/Lor. And those stupid mouse looking robots that could synthesis their own tools.
    Asimov I, Robot: self-explanatory
    Max Headroom: body harvesters
    Brave New World: alphas.

    Any others? Feel free to add a few if you can think of them... I don't have time (I'm at work) to list all of the ones that I can think of, so please help out.

    Anyway, I hate the idea of stem cell research. And I'm a self-proclaimed atheist. It's only a matter of time before somebody connects "test tube baby" technology with "cloning" technologies and grows their own stem cells from human fetuses.

    Isn't this the creation of an underclass of humans whos purpose it is to serve the higher classes?

    1. Re:politcal debate by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So because you saw on TV a show where clones where treated as slaves we shouldn't grow new livers for people who are going to die without one?

      The hell?

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:politcal debate by SirKodiak · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Isn't this the creation of an underclass of humans whos purpose it is to serve the higher classes?
      That's the issue of how the stem cells are procured. As mentioned in this comment there is a method of getting stem cells that doesn't rely on creating a brave-new-world style underclass.

      Simply creating new organs in existing human beings (or mice) in no way creates an underclass.

      It seems like the solution is not to outlaw stem cell research, but to ensure that procuring stem cells is done in an ethical manner. Differing opinions on what constitutes an ethical manner is what makes this such a sensitive subject.
    3. Re:politcal debate by gilroy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Isn't this the creation of an underclass of humans whos purpose it is to serve the higher classes?

      There's no reason it has to be. The beuaty of stem cell use is exactly that you can induce particular organs without having to grow the whole organism. That is, we decant a thymus from the vat instead of cloning and growing a whole new human (a la Parts: The Clonus Horror -- I shudder as much at the movie quality as the idea!).


      So this is actually much less class-warfare-ish than straight cloning-and-harvesting. The real ethical hangup seems to lie in the source of stem cells... the best grade appears to be embryonic, which naturally raises red flags with a large number of people.

    4. Re:politcal debate by gilroy · · Score: 3, Informative
      I am far from a biomedical expert, so I'm going on my impression from news reports and other sources. For example,

      What are the ethical issues involved?

      Currently, the best source for stem cells is a human embryo. But using human material, such as aborted fetuses, in research is a contensious issue because it can be construed as the sacrifice of human life for scientific progress.

      source

      and

      Even if much of the potential of adult stem cells is realised, there are circumstances where they are unlikely to be useful.... The isolation and growth of adult stem cells have to date proved very difficult. Stem cells generally represent a very small proportion of cells in adult tissues. Unambiguous identification is difficult as their presence in a tissue or mixture of cells is generally inferred from a research observation rather than indicated by any specific biochemical marker which might aid their purification... Current understanding of the potential of adult stem cells for redifferentiation is still very limited. Although many studies suggest that such processes occur, there is often a degree of ambiguity... In their natural location in the body adult stem cells do not exhibit great potential for differentiation into new cell types but have evolved to give rise only to specific cell lineages.

      House of Lords report

      and

      While adult stem cells hold real promise, there are some significant limitations to what we may or may not be able to accomplish with them. First of all, stem cells from adults have not been isolated for all tissues of the body. Although many different kinds of multipotent stem cells have been identified, adult stem cells for all cell and tissue types have not yet been found in the adult human. For example, we have not located adult cardiac stem cells or adult pancreatic islet stem cells in humans. Secondly, adult stem cells are often present in only minute quantities, are difficult to isolate and purify, and their numbers may decrease with age. For example, brain cells from adults that may be neuronal stem cells have only been obtained by removing a portion of the brain of epileptics, not a trivial procedure.

      Stem Cells: A Primer


      This is not to say that the matter is cut-and-dried, but rather, to indicate that there is solid reason for suspecting that stem cells will need to be embryonic to be (fully) useful; and hence, the debate (which was my actual point).
    5. Re:politcal debate by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
      it's ignorant to frame this debate in terms of conservative v. liberal.

      I would go even further and say it's ignorant to frame any debate in terms of conservative vs. liberal.

      'Course, then all we'd do is debate, and we need an uneducated populace to dig ditches for us to shit in, so that'd never work. 1/4 :)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:politcal debate by canadian_right · · Score: 2
      Why in the world would anyone go all the expense and bother of cloning to create an underclass when normal reproduction works just fine? In case you didn't know, slavery is alive and well still. Women and children are bought and sold in many countries. People willing to enslave others do not care where they get their slaves.

      Clones do no pop out of vats as fully formed adults ready for the factory or prostitution. Clones need to be implanted in wombs, carried to full term, nursed, fed, educated, and raised just like any other child. You cannot tell by looking at a person that they are cloned. Cloning will not be an economically feasible way of enslaving anyone for a long, long time.

      The problem with human cloning is that there is evidence that clones are 'born old'. That clones will age faster, and may suffer from ofther defects. Creating a human clone would involve hundreds of failures which isn't ethically acceptable to myself.

      And, this article was about growing organs from stem cells - not cloning.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  13. Mr. T-cells. by herrd0kt0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    quote:
    "The thymus produces, educates and distributes special white cells called T lymphocytes (T-cells) which help to control the immune system and fight infection.

    But T-cells are destroyed when cancer patients undergo chemotherapy and also by the AIDS virus. The cells are also suppressed in people who have had organ transplants."

    this is a significant problem that is one of the biggest factors leading to disease in immunocompromised patients. the reason why they're also suppressed in patients with organ transplants is that they require immunosuppresant therapy, so that they own body doesn't reject the donor organ.

    in a nutshell, your body doesn't like non-self things. if there's a non-self thing in your system, say, someone else's liver, your immune system will flip out and demonstrate Real Ultimate Power.

    what's needed is some sort of component that can be introduced into the body that can aid the immune system intelligently. something that resists destruction by chemotherapy, and something that is "smart" enough to know what to attack, and what to leave alone. T-cells don't do this.

    nanotechnology offers this. i know it's going to be years from now, but i hope that scientists will be able to shrink Mr. T into an injectable form. These Mr. T-cells will seek out and berate questionable cells and foreign bodies and beat them down, if necessary.

    some genetic work may be needed to strengthen its intelligence such that the Mr. T-cells don't kill everything in sight.

    "what's all this jibba-jabba bout chemo?"
    "i pity the immune system who ain't got no T."

    1. Re:Mr. T-cells. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2

      If memory serves, part of the job of the thymus is to eradicate lines of T cells that react against the body's own tissue. In which case, we could imagine an artificial thymus saying "Ok, boys, here's what the transplant looks like. Everybody who wants to destroy it, die without descendants now".

    2. Re:Mr. T-cells. by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      Or, you could just take some stem cells from your fat (fat's full of stem cells) and grow the requisite organ(s) so that you no longer need any immunosuppresants or have any worries about rejection.

      Wouldn't that just be much simpler and cheaper?

  14. Re:Stem sells? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

    It's obvious that our corporate culture has even infected slashdot...

    The scary part is: "Stem sells" is probably just as valid.

  15. I'll be impressed when.... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2

    I can get this system to grow me a new steak whenever I want. Mm-mm - fresh biotech in the oven!

    (Yes, I know it probably wouldn't taste as good as range grown cow, thank you Mr/Ms. "I don't get sarcasm".)

  16. No, but... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, but with a few of these in vitro-grown thymuses (thymii?) implanted in your body, you'll develop a Wolverine-like super immune system and live to be a bitter, violent 150-year old amnesiac super hero.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:No, but... by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or else die of a bizarre autoimmune disease that the doctors have never seen before...

  17. Applicable or theoretical? by rector · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is definitely a greate advance in the biological science. But it will take at least 5-10 years to make it practically useful. And all the claims about prospectives sound like a story about a PhD student who wanted to prove the applicability of his puerly theoretical thesis on descrete maths: -The present thesis is on descrete maths. Descrete maths is applied in synthesis of conatat element schemes. The latter are a model of relay circuits. And relays are used in various agricaltural machines, which are of a great use.

  18. Re:Suck on that, Mr. Bush... by syntap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can you say that without knowing the type of stem cells they used, or even if they were embryonic where their source was? InspectorZero has InformationZero to base the comment on because the article doesn't give it.

    Oh, and the sweetest day will be when you need new skin or lungs, and because US law doesn't allow the importing of exported Chinese prisonor farmed parts you won't be able to get it.

    See how stupid you sound?

  19. Pineal & adrenal gland next on the list by infonography · · Score: 2, Funny

    Think of the commercal uses, Pineal gland extract sales to Vegas Gamblers and cheap pure adrenochrome. man, just think now we don't have to kill people just for some. ****

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  20. Re:The thymus shuts down after puberty? by herrd0kt0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    basically, there are T cells and B cells (i won't even get into the Mr. T-cells in this post-- though i've mentioned them in another post). the precursors for these are made very early in life, either in the fetal liver or yolk sac, or later in bone marrow.

    these precursors differentiate, or "grow up" in the thymus. basically, they're "taught" how to work. hmn. i just re-read your post. i'll cut to the chase:

    tons and tons of each type of cell precursor are made. the typical lifespan of T-cells is thought to be in the period of months to years. "memory" T cells, in particular, are thought to have very long lifespans in the range of "many" years.

    it is important to note that production of precursors does _not_ halt: they are constantly produced in the bone marrow. also, the thymus doesn't poof entirely-- it maintains function, though it shrinks tremendously in size as we get older.

  21. Re:immunity is fountain of youth? by Telecommando · · Score: 3, Funny

    The world doesn't need a fountain of youth.
    What we need is a fountain of SMART.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
  22. Re:Suck on that, Mr. Bush... by GigsVT · · Score: 2

    Bush allowed stem cell research to continue, he banned public money from being spent on it.

    It was a smart move. He got to basically end the debate over stem cell research, letting the anti-stem-cell people think they had won, all the while real research can continue in private industry.

    I'm not a conservative, but I think he handled this one pretty well. (Of course, as a Libertarian, I am all for ending government handouts of any kind).

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  23. band-aid solution by tps12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know about this. The immune system is a complicated beast. It involves tens of organs, hundreds of enzymes, and thousands of cells, all acting in harmony to maintain the health of the whole. You can't just throw thymuses at the problem and expect it to go away. We need to look for a more holistic solution, attacking the root problem rather than patching the symptoms.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  24. Nuclear weapons save lives. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    The US could drop some nukes on afghanistan and save US lives by obliterating every last afghan, but people are against it... Why? Because it comes at a tremendous cost.

    We must proceed with caution with such powerful technology as cloing and stem cell projects.

    It's not necessary to allow companies to harvest babies for stem-cells when they're doing fine with what they've got. If we don't put limitations on people they'll abuse their power. It's human nature.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  25. Re:The thymus shuts down after puberty? by thesnowdog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your understanding of T cells is correct. However, T cells mature from the basic stem cell in the thymus during childhood. Without a thymus (or a dysfunctional thymus), the body will not have any fully-functional T cells. This results in a vulnerability to devastating viral infections that you or I would fight off in about a week.

    Krishna

  26. "Human trials could begin within two years" by gonerill · · Score: 2

    Hmm. Does this mean that in 2004 they'll put the thymus inside someone to see if it works, or that in 2004 they'll start trying to grow a whole human?

  27. Just think of the possibilities by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    Maybe medical technology will progress to the point where the spam mail and web pop-ups relating to "Ancient Sudanese Techniques" to "enhance your masculinity" will actually no longer be spam, merely factual advertisment.

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  28. don't think so, at least not yet by chainsaw1 · · Score: 2

    As with everything, patchwork systems don't seem to ever run as well as the origional. You can go out and buy a beat-up 73 station wagon and restore it, but when you are done can you ever honestly say you fixed _everything_ broken on it and _every_ system has been restored to factory-fresh capasity?

    --
    - Sig
    1. Re:don't think so, at least not yet by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      As with everything, patchwork systems don't seem to ever run as well as the origional. You can go out and buy a beat-up 73 station wagon and fill it with dat tapes and hard drives, but when you are done can you ever honestly say you _increased_ your bandwidth over traditional fiber's capacity?

  29. Re:Impressive by Stonehand · · Score: 2

    When it's ill-considered action that's not rationally justified by a situation, that's when. Acting without thought is often a far worse option than waiting and considering.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  30. Misplaced modifier? by doorbot.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    The thymus is a small organ that is critical to the immune system. Human trials could begin within two years.

    Human trials of what? An immune system? So the un-authorized trials of billions of people over the last hundred thousand years are invalid (pun intended)?

    In any case, I definitely agree; this "immune system" scientists have been proposing definitely needs more clinical research before we can allow one to be used on real people.

    By the way, exactly who owns the patent on it?

  31. Cloning and genetic engineering--Good or Bad? by quasi_steller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I dissagree with you. I am by no means against technology (after all why would I read slashdot all of the time?) but that doesn't mean that I believe that we humans should dive into every technology that we develop.

    The problem with technology and humans is that humans have a knack for doing more harm with a technology than good. To say that genetic engineering is only good is being very ignorant of humans' knack for doing harm. Don't get me wrong, not everybody is going to use these technologies for evil, but all it takes is another Hitler (who did plenty of expirements with genetics himself) to come along and figure out how to use genetic engineering to control many people.

    Bill Joy (the chief computer scientist at Sun Microsystems) wrote an article in Wired Magazine that opened my eyes to the dangers of tecnology. I believe that every person who believes that genetic engineering is good (which it is in some cases, such as saving lives) should read this article. It can be found here.

    --
    ...interesting if true.
    1. Re:Cloning and genetic engineering--Good or Bad? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      I invoke Godwin's Law. YHL. HAND!

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    2. Re:Cloning and genetic engineering--Good or Bad? by canadian_right · · Score: 2

      If we are able to gentically modify ourselves into a sperate race that usurps our current position at the top of the food chain then we deserve whatever happens to us. I would only be sad if we wiped out all intelligent life, not if we helped the next step in evolution along.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  32. I just can't wait... by benfoldsfan · · Score: 2, Funny

    until they can grow my wife larger breasts.

    1. Re:I just can't wait... by zulux · · Score: 2

      until they can grow my wife larger breasts.

      Skip the wife! Grow your own bio-breasts and you can fondle them all day!

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  33. Once again, SF gets there first by devphil · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I think at some point, if it isn't already happening, people will start taking larger chances with their bodies and health, because of this insurance policy.

    A number of Larry Niven's stories in his future history "Known Space" cycle touch on this point, but arrived at a reverse conclusion in some cases: because people lived longer, they took fewer chances.

    Even Hollywood will give you examples of this, although usually they look at it from the other end: "I've only got to live, so I'll go do something heroic which will probably result in my death, but big friggin' deal because I'm about to die."

    The extension of that line of thought predicted by many SF authors is, "I've got three centuries of good livin' in front of me if I don't fuck it up, so why risk it all doing something possibly dangerous, like mountain climbing, deep-sea diving, or attempting to cross the street in downtown Chicago."

    (The SF-aspect of the stories usually involves activities that we would think of as typical being perceived, in the brave new world, as "something possibly dangerous".)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Once again, SF gets there first by Ravagin · · Score: 2

      Known Space also provides incentive to advance organ-growing technology. I'm thinking of the organlegging black market and especially all the "Flatlander" stories. Veeery interesting.
      (I believe it is China that takes the organs from people they execute - not necessarily with permission)

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    2. Re:Once again, SF gets there first by Saeger · · Score: 2
      because people lived longer, they took fewer chances.

      That only makes sense for as long as we're unable to "backup" our minds while being stuck in one body.

      Ultimately, we'll shed our fragile wetware bodies in favor of cyborg and then entirely robotic shells, and maybe even eventually cast away any remnant of a shell, and live as a "God" in a virtual world of our own creation.

      That's my goal anyway. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:Once again, SF gets there first by devphil · · Score: 2


      One of the "killer B's" (the name given to Bear, Brin, and Benford) has just published an SF novel in which we can make expendable bodies. I plan to drive to the bookstore and purchase it as soon as I get the car fixed.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    4. Re:Once again, SF gets there first by Suidae · · Score: 2

      mm, galaxy express: 999, I saw that after regaining conciousness after a heavy acid trip. Talk about the day after, damn.

  34. Re:Agenda of the Bush administration... by dbrutus · · Score: 2

    bzzzt! Nobody's talking about banning adult stem cell research. That's just made up propaganda. Cloning is not the same as stem cell research.

  35. Re:But can they grow replacement penis? by DickBreath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Grow John Bobbitt a replacement penis?

    Okay, I'll bite. (Actually, I don't bite.)

    Forget about replacements. How about spares? Or extras? You know, redundancy. Or maybe just additional size?

    Or maybe now all those SPAM messages will come true!

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  36. This is ALMOST useless by Invicta{HOG} · · Score: 2

    There is no role for the thymus in the adult human. I wonder who they are going to do trials in - DiGeorge patients (22q11 deletion - often athymic). I can't imagine many parents allowing someone to install a new thymus in their kid...but I guess some people are desperate. I doubt that this will work at all.

  37. Re:The thymus shuts down after puberty? by spiro_killglance · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Possible consequences: loss of your immune response memory. It seems like lymphocytes retire there and protect you from the stuff they were good at killing in their youth. If you replaced your thymus, you'd probably be susceptible to chicken pox (and worse) again if it wasn't done very carefully."

    That could be a very good thing. Because in
    auto-immune disease (MS, arthiritis and many
    more), the immune system has learned to attack
    the wrong things and busy causing you pain or is
    even killing you.

  38. Re:Remember... by spiro_killglance · · Score: 2

    Yeah right. Of course I need the prospect of
    ten years of delibrating weakness followed by
    obvilion to make my days worth living (not). The world isn't any more meaningful because we mortal, just sadder and scarier.

  39. "Big abortion"? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Is that like "big tabacco"?

    Anyway, the important thing here should be how to improve peoples lives. You're not a doctor, so shut up. I say let people do research to determine what's actualy better.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:"Big abortion"? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE!

    2. Re:"Big abortion"? by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      No, I'm not a doctor, I'm just married to one and have discussed the issue with her in all the gory details. Screw off.

  40. T cells by aswang · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are at least three types of T cells: Th cells (helper T cells), Tc cells (cytotoxic T cells), and TDTH cells (delayed-type hypersensitivity T cells). The existence of Ts cells (suppressor T cells) has been postulated but is apparently still controversial. In addition, Th cells are further subdivided into Th1 cells necesary for cell-mediated immunity (primarily targeting viral infections and tumors) and Th2 cells necessary for antibody production. T cells and B cells are both lymphocytes, which are a different lineage of white blood cells than macrophages.

  41. Re:Hey you, Karma whore, it isnt slashdotted by Jailbrekr · · Score: 2

    awwwwww, is the karma whore unhappy to read the truth?

    Either add constructive commentary or lurk.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
  42. Mechanism? by aswang · · Score: 2

    What I wish the article had discussed is how thymic transplants would actually help in treating HIV infection or in preventing transplant rejection.

    Since T cells are initially generated in the bone marrow, a new thymus wouldn't have much of an effect with increasing T cell populations. Furthermore, even if you could somehow boost T cell numbers, what's to prevent the virus from infecting these new cells?

    With organ transplantation, reject happens most rapidly when HLA haplotypes between donor and recipient aren't perfectly matched, and a new thymus wouldn't really do much to solve this mismatch.

    On the other hand, I can easily see how this new development can help children with SCIDs or congenital thymic hypoplasia/aplasia.

  43. Reference, please. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    fat's full of stem cells

    That's quite an extraordinary claim. Would you please back that up with a reference of some kind?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Reference, please. by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      Sure, no problem

      http://www.whitaker.org/news/guilak.html

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid_1 80 9000/1809322.stm

      http://www.nature.com/nsu/010412/010412-6.html

  44. Argh, typo by devphil · · Score: 2
    "I've only got to live,

    Gah. What I typed was "I've only got <some short period of time> to live," but I typed the angle characters directly instead of &lt; so they got interpreted as an HTML tag and dropped.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)