Slashdot Mirror


Bogus Harry Potter Book In China

elveu writes "Chinese Harry Potter fans have been blessed with the fifth book early -- only it's not the real one. The title translates to 'Harry Potter And Leopard Walk Up To Dragon.' The story has Harry getting turned into a fat hairy drawf and being void of his powers."

59 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Barry Trotter, anybody? by stevey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is completely different because it's a parody - but it amused me:

    The first chapter is available online - and is hugely funny..

  2. This is what the REAL books look like in Chinese by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Informative
  3. What'll Really Leave J.K. Rowling Mad... by IronTek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bet you this thing, sadly, is going to become some sort of rare ultra-expensive collector's item stateside in the very near future... ...and this is a shame. I for one don't read the Harry Potter books, but even I have respect for J.K Rowling and her story (not referring to Harry Potter here)...so to turn something as fake as this "new" book is quite the shame, and I think I'd be upset if I were Ms. Rowling.

  4. Collectors item by tsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This will be a good collectors item.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  5. fat hairy drawf... by Wiseazz · · Score: 4, Funny

    and being void of his powers

    They turned him into Newt Gingrich?

    --
    My sig sucks.
    1. Re:fat hairy drawf... by discstickers · · Score: 2

      I was thinking more along the lines of Cowboy Neal. =)

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
  6. The Sixth Harry Potter book soon to follow... by mrsam · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Harry Potter, and the Wrath Of The Troll", wherein Harry Potter is turned into a slashdot editor that can't spell.

    1. Re:The Sixth Harry Potter book soon to follow... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be more magical if it was a Slashdot editor that can spell?

  7. Publ. FAQ on upcoming Book 5 by ancarett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the Bloomsbury website:

    "JK Rowling is happily writing the fifth Harry Potter book and we will announce a publication date once we have received the finished manuscript. As soon as we have any more news about the publication date we will update this area."

    It's also well known that the fifth book will be titled "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix." Book 4, "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" was published in July of 2000. 2 years and counting. . . no wonder the fakes are emerging!

    --
    ancarett, historian and zombie gamer
    1. Re:Publ. FAQ on upcoming Book 5 by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a wheel of time fan, no sympathy for them!

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  8. Figures this is newsworthy by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Troll
    Lets see ...

    The entire country is blocked by a huge firewall censoring the entire internet. All forms of news and entertainment media are controlled by the government. The country is ran by a one party dictatorship. People have minimal human rights. More than 60% of the country is impoverished.

    But yes, let's focus on the fact that there's a bogus Harry Potter book floating around in China, God knows that's more important.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by Textbook+Error · · Score: 2, Informative
      The entire country is blocked by a huge firewall censoring the entire internet. All forms of news and entertainment media are controlled by the government. The country is ran by a one party dictatorship. People have minimal human rights. More than 60% of the country is impoverished.
      Sounds like America in 10 years time - if you disagree, you're not a patriot... Did you know our poverty rate was currently at around 14%, with 25% of all women living below the poverty line? See here.
      --

      Nae bother
    2. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by agentZ · · Score: 2

      Perhaps it's a cover message for text based steganography? It would be the perfect way to hide a message: A lot of people are reading it, obfuscating the recipient of the message, and it looks inoccous enough to slip past the radar screen of everybody. Maybe there's something encoded the spaces? Or maybe a pattern to the characters? Who knows...

    3. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by oliverthered · · Score: 2

      They also remove human rights from 60% of the world.
      And keep them impoverished
      And fighting each other
      and......

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      If I'm reading those statistics correctly, they basicaly say that almost all poor people are female?

      Doesn't make sense to me...

    5. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      Well, if you're in the buisiness of making up statistics, you could consider every housewife below the poverty line since they have no direct 'income'. Of course, things like this are only useful if you're trying to use your 'statistics' to further an agenda.

      Wheeeee!

    6. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Ah, that's probably it... good thinking.

      Nice example of how statistics can be so misleading :-/

    7. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Let see:
      - Huget firewall=FBI carnivore.
      - Control of entertainment media=Disney and its senator minions.
      - Ran by one party dictatorship=Bush administration.
      - Minimum human rights=DMCA and other bills against terrorism.
      - 60% of the country empoverished=lots of workers from other countries are under minimum wages.

      For one minute, I thought that you were referring to the US. Phew! I'm glad that you were talking about China.

      PPA, the girl next door.

      --
      -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    8. Re:Figures this is newsworthy by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      If you really insist, I'll slam-dunk you with a nice bit of research.

      First, when I want to quote Census Bureau records, I actually go to the Census Bureau, which his link does not.

      From there, I would ask that you scroll down a bit, and look at the number in the column that represents female, total, all races, percent. What number do you find there? To save you the excercise, I'll put it here for you: 12.5%.

      The number from the poorly named "great"-grandparent quote is 24%. This warped number is for African-American females. It is a sad number, and says untold volumes about remaining racial problems in this country, but there is little to gain by distorting facts completely by claiming that 24% of ALL American women live in poverty.

      See, the reason myself and that other guy were making fun of this clown is because he claimed: Sounds like America in 10 years time - if you disagree, you're not a patriot... Did you know our poverty rate was currently at around 14%, with 25% of all women living below the poverty line? Anyone with the ability to think, and do simple math can see that this cannot possibly be true, since there are roughly the same number of men as women, and this would then mean that only 4% of men were below the poverty line. There were classes in school to get you to avoid obvious mistakes like this, called critical thinking. For the record, 10% of men are below the poverty line, more than double what Textbook Error would have you believe.

      Also please note, that the quoter of these claims is a troll. A brief look into his posting history should make that clear. As for jcpr.org, and their erronious faq, I have no idea what got into them. Perhaps we should write them a nice little note. Also, the total poverty rate is under 12%, a notable difference from 14%, but jcpr is quoting from 1997 records. For the record, they are one of the groups that I must conclude has an "agenda".

      I'm sorry if I was a little harsh on you, but I feel you were needlessly sarcastic. You're probably a very nice person, though, and thought I was being overly mean to the poor troll. If it helps, just remember - 74% of statistics are completely made up. ;)

  9. Fan Fiction Popularity by totallygeek · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think it is funny that fan fiction can become more exciting than the canon storyline (from the author). Look at the craze over Fett with Star Wars. Can you imagine the popularity of a story about Yoda or the birth of the Jedi?

    1. Re:Fan Fiction Popularity by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Then again, when the "offical" star wars plot includes shit like thiswho can blame them?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  10. Globalism, culture, and franchise by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't see it that way. For one thing, it's not piracy - she didn't write this book (I don't read Chinese, so I couldn't tell whether they attributed the book to her or not, but in any case, it's an original work.) In Mexico, you can find a lot of street-artisans who make paper-mache versions of Tweety-Bird, Bugs Bunny, Spider-Man, and the like, and create an informal visual culture based on images that were otherwise completely imported. This is a way of adapting to the fact of being completely overwhelmed by culture industries from overseas.

    I think of this as a combination of a fan-fic and street-level gray-market good. It's the adaptation of a local culture to a global one, and I think it's vital. After all, just who did Disney pay and ask permission from to use the characters in Mu-Lan, or the Lion King, or any of the other non-Western cultural figures that they freely profit from?

  11. Re:Harry Potter by elveu · · Score: 2, Informative

    but harry dosn't have a thing for ginny. he wants Cho the seeker for Ravenclaw.

  12. Titles by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Funny

    'Harry Potter And Leoard Walk Up To Dragon.'

    In other news, the fake versions of the sixth and seventh book will be titled "Harry Potter Slay Dragon", and "Harry Potter Steal Dragon Treasure".

    The manuscripts were discovered when buyers found that each only contained 2 pages of text, and a lot of blank pages.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Titles by JCCyC · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news, the fake versions of the sixth and seventh book will be titled "Harry Potter Slay Dragon", and "Harry Potter Steal Dragon Treasure".

      The manuscripts were discovered when buyers found that each only contained 2 pages of text, and a lot of blank pages.


      Harry: What happen?
      Teacher: Someone set up us the spell.
      Harry: Crystal ball turn on.
      Teacher: It's you!
      Dragon: How are you gentlemen?
      Dragon: All your magic are belong to us.

      to be continued...

  13. BBC Report by jt007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The BBC also has a report about this here

    --
    I never apologise, I'm sorry but that's just the way I am - Homer
  14. fanfic by Fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

    And peopl eon the internet have been able to read unofficial version of Harry Potter stories for free.

    --
    -no broken link
  15. Harry Potter fanfiction by Bonker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read the article at another source, but am left wondering how the content of 'Leopard Walk up to Dragon' is any different than the reams and reams of bad Harry fanfiction available on sites like Fanfiction.net.

    While it's being sold as Rowling's work, that is the only crime I see being committed, unless the publishers want to stamp out all original Harry fiction in the name of 'protecting their copyright'. Even the most zealous of intellectual property holders, Paramount, doesn't do a thing to inhibit the vast, vast legions of Trek ficcers and slash writers because they know exactly badly they'd alienate their fan communities. Lucas doesn't either. In fact, SW stories flourish on sites like theforce.net.

    I imagine that 'Leopard Walk up to Dragon' is probably a fanstory that got snapped up by an unscrupulous pirate publisher. The real author is probably not getting the credit he or she deserves for being so dedicated as to write a novel-length fan story and the legitimate Harry Potter publishers are going to make everyone's lives miserable because of it.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Harry Potter fanfiction by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      While it's being sold as Rowling's work, that is the only crime I see being committed, unless the publishers want to stamp out all original Harry fiction in the name of 'protecting their copyright'.

      Not protecting their copyrights, but exercising their copyrights. The individual author of a novel creation (like Harry Potter and the various books he's in) has the lifelong right to decide who can and who can't "copy" that creation, including allowing a publisher to print the books in exchange for money, or allowing fans to "copy" parts as a derivitive work for PR benefits.

      The sad part is, though, that J.K. Rowling's going to catch as much heat as Metallica did for trying to protect her IP rights. Thank you /., thank you Microsoft.

  16. I'd like to write one too. by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have often thought of writing Hairy Pothead and the Sorcerer, Stoned, about Harry's dissolute adventures with controlled substances and the resulting degradation of his hygiene whilst at university.

    1. Re:I'd like to write one too. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* I have often thought of writing Hairy Pothead and the Sorcerer, Stoned, about Harry's dissolute adventures with controlled substances and the resulting degradation of his hygiene whilst at university. *)

      Most would find the newt-sniffing scene rather disturbing.

  17. Oldest Technique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When Miguel de Cervantes was taking too long to publish the sequel to his masterpiece, Don Quijote, some industrious person came out with a fake version as well. It's always happend, and always will

  18. People seem to be taken for granted.... by cyberon22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... that this book is poorly written. Direct translations from any language usually sound horrible. Chinese-English translations are particularly difficult because many language constructions in Chinese just don't have English equivalents. The same goes for English text simply translated into Chinese.

    So while the article linked above mocks the book on the basis of its first sentence. I'd be curious to know if the author (who is seemingly a native English-speaker) has read the original Harry Potter books in their Chinese translation. Is this one really worse???

    Frankly, I'd imagine that if this thing is selling as many copies as the author claims, it's either because it's well written, or because it's fooling a lot of people. And if it's fooling a lot of people, that probably means it's well written. Either that or Rowling needs to get some better English-Chinese translators....

  19. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    > she's only a pied piper for simpletons that
    > haven't read any real literature since twelfth
    > grade.

    That's why her book was ideal for making into a major motion picture.

  20. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A word of advice to people over fourteen (esp. males): Never recommend Harry Potter books to anyone, and never freely admit having read them. Doing so, (1) reveals your lack of intellectual sophistication, (2) hints at your inability to read books from start to finish (unless they are "For Dummies..." or nine-year-olds, and (3) makes you one of those annoying asswipes that insists that everyone read the all-seeing, all-knowing work of infinite philisophical importance that is the last book you managed to complete (mostly).

    Actually the books are very sophisticated intellectually. The sophistication is generally lost on American readers however who are unaware of the cultural and litterary references that Rowling ads in for the amusement of older readers.

    For example Hogwarts Castle is a parody of Mallory Towers. The use of Magic as a substitute for technological mod cons is a homage to the Flintstones.

    This simply carries on a long tradition of British Children's works, The Lion The Witch and The Wardrobe is an allegory of the New Testament. The Harry Potter series as a whole is an allegory of a series of works by Foucault. The Dumbledore character is an anegogical reference to Derrida. The Dursleys are of course a reference to Proust.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  21. Some excerpts ;) by Juhaa · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Harry doesn't know how long it will take to wash the sticky cream cake off his face,'

    'For a civilised young man it is disgusting to have dirt on any part of his body.

    'He lies in the high-quality china bathtub, keeps wiping his face, and thinks about Dali's face, which is as fat as the bottom of Aunt Penny.'

    'He keeps wonder what it is to be man when he grow up then Ginny can be wife and have two children as directed by the Queen Lizerbath II'

    'The soap bubble go up then flop down next to the now dead soap bubble.'

    'Harry wave his thumb and flies in his magic stick which he wave at bubble, bubble turn into TV and he watch BBC where there is a show about how to capture his uncle Black'

    'Harry is not happy'

    'Harry looks down and see he is man now, but he grow not tall, maybe if he play basketball he might but in England Harry only play soccer, that till Harry in school then he play his favourite sport'

    'Harry turn TV into bubble then say prayer to Jesus before walking to kitchen where Aunt Penny is angry with Harry again'

    'Aunt Penny look at Harry and scream'

    AUNT PENNY : 'HELP HELP It's the man from Austin powers, help help!'

    'Harry look puzzle and rub his scar then look in mirror'

    'Harry sees mini me, Harry feel heart break into one piece' ...

  22. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It amazes me that someone can try to relate the Harry Potter series to Foucault and Derrida, accuse an entire nation of being unsophisticated, and still manage to spell "literary" incorrectly.

  23. Not only that... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    ...but, judging from that title, also doesn't know how to use commas. :-)

    RMN
    ~~~

  24. The real title by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    (* The story has Harry getting turned into a fat hairy drawf and being void of his powers." *)

    Perhaps they should have called it, "Harry Gets Married".

    1. Re:The real title by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Perhaps they should have called it, "Harry Gets Married".

      Or, "Harry Dates Jennifer Ringley".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. Damn.. by davidsansome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Overpeer's at it again!

    --
    -- Wibble
  26. what concerns me by lingqi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    is not that there is a book and what not, but as the story has pointed out:

    This is a case which we are aware of and, as with all piracy matters throughout the world, take this issue extremely seriously.

    i am sorry, HUH? piracy matters? wtf does that have to do with this? This is more like infringement of copyright of the Harry Potter name, but there are other people writing fan fictions -- the only thing this author is guilty of is probabbly the fact that he pretended to be Rowling, but throughout the story it appears that he did not try to do that anyway, nor does people really think that he is Rowling because of the difference in writing style etc; so it just boils down to that a fan-fiction got published and we are taking it *way* too seriously because Rowlings believes it's taking away some of her money. good grief people.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  27. The story revolves around... by agrounds · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haryy's quest to continue to find He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named as he journeys across the wild and exotic backdrop of rural China. Along the way he encounters the loveable but stern Master who takes him in and teaches him Leopard-Style Kung-Fu, the only Kung-Fu capable of beating the Voldemort's Dragon-Style. Armed with a quarter staff and the ability to make feathers float, he resumes his quest only to finally meet up with Voldemort against the oft-used-but-still-unappreciated-backdrop of the Great Wall. They challenge each other, make feathers float, then begin the fateful duel. Hilarity ensues. This book has dubbbed speech, or you can choose the subtitle option, where the english shows up at the bottom of the book as a footnote.

  28. Where would someone come up with the idea... by Nindalf · · Score: 2

    ...of a fairy hat dwarf, anyway?

    Anyway, it would be well worth reading if he slew the dragon, took its treasure, then later uttered the line, "Though I badly needed to hire a wizard to change me back, I spent my reward on ale and whores."

  29. Chinese Harry Potter 7 by guttentag · · Score: 2
    Just wait until China gets an "early release" of book seven: Harry Potter and the Deadly Wang Ba

    Back Cover Summary:

    Harry's back for his final year at Hogwarts, but something's not right -- once again. Students who slip out at night to visit wang bas in Hogsmeade are dying in mysterious fires. When Dobby the house elf warns Harry not to go to the wang ba run by Voldemort, Harry has no choice but to dust off his invisibility cloak and investigate. Will Harry survive this last book of the series?
  30. terminology by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
    A spokesman for the Christopher Little Literary Agency, which represents her, was quoted as saying: 'This is a case which we are aware of and, as with all piracy matters throughout the world, take this issue extremely seriously.'

    since when is faking something 'piracy'??? is the FBI going to look for money 'piraters' now, and can i buy a 'pirate' rolex on canal st.?
    this 'pirate' thing is getting completely out of hand, it seems like the new definition just boils down to: 'someone who does something a media exec doesn't like'.

    excuse me while i put a patch over my eye and change the channel during the commercials...

  31. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

    Actually the books are very sophisticated intellectually. The sophistication is generally lost on American readers however who are unaware of the cultural and litterary references that Rowling ads in for the amusement of older readers. For example....The use of Magic as a substitute for technological mod cons is a homage to the Flintstones.

    Re-read those sentences over and over again until you realize how ridiculous they are.

  32. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Harry Potter series as a whole is an allegory of a series of works by Foucault.

    You mean Foucault the philosopher who writes about how social institutions are just power structures used as a means of social control? Not likely.

    That Flintstones bit was weird enough, but this is just silly (Assuming that I understand you correctly -- the grammar in the sentence I quoted is horrid!) If you actually believe this (which I doubt) then let's hear some details.

  33. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

    It's a parody of critical theory that amuses only those who know so little about critical theory, that they might actually think that the satirical gun was loaded. It wasn't.

  34. Re:They used her picture on the back of the book.. by SEE · · Score: 2

    after all, she's only a pied piper for simpletons that haven't read any real literature since twelfth grade.

    Only those who are both insecure and pretentious are as desperate as you are to insult other peoples' tastes. So fuck off, twit.

  35. Perpetual copyright on Peter Pan by yerricde · · Score: 2

    After all, just who did Disney pay and ask permission from to use the characters in Mu-Lan, or the Lion King

    DisneyCo pirated two movies from Japan. "The Lion King" is "Kimba the White Lion". "Atlantis" is "Nadia: Secret of Blue Water".

    or any of the other non-Western cultural figures that they freely profit from?

    Actually, some of the Western characters that Disney uses are still under copyright. Take Peter Pan for instance. Peter Pan is still under a limited form of copyright in the United Kingdom and will be forever, or at least until the hospital that owns the copyright goes out of business. No, this isn't Bono Act pseudo-perpetual copyright; it's the real thing. DisneyCo will get a dose of its own medicine when it tries to bring Return to Never Land into DVD Region 2.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  36. Can't anyone recognize parody? by shimmin · · Score: 2
    A spokesman for the Christopher Little Literary Agency, which represents her, was quoted as saying: 'This is a case which we are aware of and, as with all piracy matters throughout the world, take this issue extremely seriously.'

    Although parody doesn't survive translation well, from the quotes given in the article, it sure feels like this is nothing more than a parody, like Barry Trotter and I'm sure some other less famous ones.

    And, as all good slashdotters should know, parody is fair use under almost all nations' copyright ordinances. So why is this a piracy issue?

  37. screw her by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    She'd be right to be mad if (1) this was successfully passed off as her work in the West, which won't happen, or (2) if this was direct piracy of her work, which it isn't. Under the circumstances, if she gets mad about it, she's just whining about the fact that she's popular enough that people want to parody (or build upon) her ideas. If you can't take the heat, don't become a famous writer.

  38. Re:Let me guess...the villain must be... by Disevidence · · Score: 2

    I prefer the Gold Box Pools (both) and Curse to NWN. Gold box rocks.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  39. other derivations I'd like to see by sacrilicious · · Score: 2


    Harry Potter and the Mysterious Centerfold
    Harry Potter and the Unnecessary Suppository
    Harry Potter and the Hookah of Fire
    Harry Potter and the Magic Stock Options
    Harry Potter and the Tryst with Oprah
    Harry Potter and the Special Master
    Harry Potter and the Brown Barking Vapor

    .

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  40. Journalists ignorant of how translation works by AndyChrist · · Score: 2

    The writing in the Chinese book is not quite up to the standards which have made Rowling the most popular children's author of her generation.
    'Harry doesn't know how long it will take to wash the sticky cream cake off his face,' the book begins.

    'For a civilised young man it is disgusting to have dirt on any part of his body.

    'He lies in the high-quality china bathtub, keeps wiping his face, and thinks about Dali's face, which is as fat as the bottom of Aunt Penny.'


    The book is in CHINESE. I'm sure it reads better in the original. Chinese grammar does NOT directly correspond to English, so the awkward phrasing found here is purely a creation of the person who translated this passage to English.

    OTOH, it's a weird simile, and not having read the original books, I don't know if that's consistent with Rowling's writing style.

  41. Followed quickly by the 7th Book... by RasputinAXP · · Score: 2

    "Harry Potter and the Troll of Reading Comprehension," wherein Harry finds that despite all best efforts, people still forget that italicized text is supplied by submitters, not editors!

  42. God forbid... by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

    ...any criticism should leak into your airtight Colorado biodome.

  43. Prove it! by SPYvSPY · · Score: 2

    While the Harry Potter-readers are oh-so-eager to push that crummy schlock (much like the Danielle Steele-readers, the John Grisham-readers, the Tom Clancy-reader, etc.), the anti-faction haven't said anything at all about what we read. In fact, I've read all of the above (which is how I know it sucks). What doesn't suck? I'm partial to Nicholson Baker for intelligent fiction, Ian M. Banks for my pet-genre sci-fi, and the my secretary has just this moment dropped the new Granta on my desk.

    Please don't take this opportunity to tell me what you read. I'm merely making the point that you're wrong about the anti-faction and porn-mags.