Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.1 Alpha1 is Here

navindra writes: "A brand new alpha of the breath-taking KDE 3.1 development branch has been announced. This release sports everything from wonderful new eye candy to tons of popular new features including new and exciting "easter eggs" (aka bugs) just waiting to be discovered. Remember, this is not a stable release -- those of you concerned with stability should use KDE 3.0.2, whereas those of you who want to help KDE 3.1 be the best KDE ever should use this alpha. Kudos to Dre for writing the announcement and to the tireless Dirk Mueller for coordinating this release. Party!" On a related note, pAlpha writes: "Over the past years a large amount of myths has built up around KDE. Recently Aaron J. Seigo released a page about the KDE myths and facts." Good for convincing the boss.

121 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. Maybe but I doubt it by sheepab · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can they improve upon the best? Honestly....can they?

    1. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by sheepab · · Score: 2

      I think the moderators took that wrong, or I posted it wrong, what I MEANT was that KDE 3.0 already kicks major ass, and here we are with 3.1 I just dont see how the best can get better.

    2. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Informative
      I just dont see how the best can get better.

      At this point, at least for the 3.x series, it's mostly 'tweaks' for improved useability, more standards compliance, and so on.

      I update my copies of the current KDE CVS a few times per week, though I only occasionally compile and install from there (once every few weeks). I just like to watch what's being updated.

      Last few times I updated the core KDELIBS CVS, for example, I noticed more updates to the html and ecma/javascript code. KMail has had a lot of individual updates...you get the idea. I can't honestly say I know how SUBSTANTIAL the changes have been, but I can at least spot when a section that I use frequently has had updates. so that if I get curious or run into problems in that area (something that hasn't happened to me in some time) I know to try an update...

      I notice a bunch of the less "core" utilities (e.g. K3B, the video transcoding utility) have been moved from the core libraries to a new area ("KDEEXTRAGEAR", if I remember correctly). I need to check out that module too, now...

    3. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

      "I think the moderators took that wrong,"

      Don't fret. The editors (for the most part) are morons.

      "or I posted it wrong, what I MEANT was that KDE 3.0 already kicks major ass, and here we are with 3.1 I just dont see how the best can get better."

      It graphically rocks. However, it also sucks balls. All these people that says that X-WIndows is sucky and such.... Well, window managers like this are your problem. KDE uses non-standard messages to the X-server and therefore slows down overall performance. Look at TWM. With basic apps, it's tremendously fast, even on a 233 p2. YOu could add in gtk+ and still have it snappy.

    4. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2
      on a vanilla Red Hat 7.3 install

      There's your problem. Red Hat does everything they can to *not* support KDE on their distro. Use one which works better.

      I ran KDE on RedHat and Mandrake for years. Recently, I moved to Debian, and what is nominally the same release of KDE runs at literally twice the speed.

    5. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      lets take it point by point:

      * I don't see it getting crashed. If you can compile KDE 3.1 alpha - please do, and report crashes to bugs.kde.org
      * try to run your app with artsdsp: artsdsp xmms
      * you can compile kdebinding and switch from KHTML to KMOZILLA on the same window - it's in the "View" menu on Konqueror
      * if you want to look like XP - please give more details.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    6. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      Actually, xmms comes with an Arts output plugin. Has for a while. Works great.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      The "dotted line" is a button to tear off the menu, one of the best features.

  2. KDE keeps getting better by cxvx · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been using the cvs version ever since I heard that konqueror supported tabbed browsing :)
    Now I'm no longer using mozilla, since it doesn't start quite as fast as konqueror and the tabs where the only thing better about it (that and the antialiased fonts in konqueror look much better).

    There are lots of (small) improvements in the kde code that make the whole environment a real joy to use.
    Kde 3.1 is a great thing to look forward for.

    --
    If only I could come up with a good sig ...
    1. Re:KDE keeps getting better by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      Konq does look better than Mozilla. The version of Konq in KDE 3.0 is slooow, though. Slower than Mozilla. I have an Athlon 600, 256MB of RAM. Amazingly, Mozilla opens new windows faster than Konq, and seems to use less memory. I remember when the opposite was true.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:KDE keeps getting better by cxvx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know, but the binutils 2.12 solves part of the linking problem by prelinking.

      Just today, the objprelink programmer, Leon Bottou, posted on the kde-dev mailinglist, stating that the objprelink option is no longer necessary. When using the newest glibc, binutils and gcc, you already get large speedups.

      You can find more info on objprelink here.

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
  3. Mmmm... by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Mmmm... Eye candy and easter eggs...

    (drools)

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  4. not to be a wet blanket, but... by krog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is Slashdot the place for alpha announcements?

    i'm sure there are plenty of KDE fans here and all, but this isn't even beta yet. if Slashdot announced every alpha release of every decent-sized Open Source project... Oh wait, they do.

    1. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      yes.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Soko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ummm... Hi there.

      You do realise that /. is frequented by folks who know what "it's an Alpha version" means, yet will still download and try it? Ya, them "geek" types.

      There's a lot of these folks here, too. This translates to lots of knowlegeable, quailty testers for the KDE team. Quality testers == a quality product for the rest of us. Knowlegeable testers == help for the KDE people in fixing bugs. /. therefore does the community a service when they announce new developments on major OSS projects, by pointing the right eyes to the source code.

      BTW, I think it's cool that the only major browser without tabs after KDE3.1 is released will be IE. The Galeon folks should be proud.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    3. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The Galeon folks should be proud.
      Somewhere in Norway a man is crying.
    4. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      From my experience - I had installed Red Hat 7.3 with KDE 3.0 and I used it, but I missed the tabbed browsing (I open about 16 tabs on Konqueror on avrage) so I compiled KDE 3.1 Alpha and I'm using it already for about a week.

      My impression so far - stable as a rock already! I removed my old KDE 3.0 RPMS and getting all my stuff with KDE 3.1 alpha - and it works! didn't see any crashes so far..

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    5. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by mandolin · · Score: 2
      is Slashdot the place for alpha announcements? (...) if Slashdot announced every alpha release of every decent-sized Open Source project.. Oh wait they do.

      Not to be glib, but I believe you just answered your own question.

    6. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Desktop = Windows?? With that definition of course you'll reach the conclusion (which is the premise anyway)....

      Also, under Linux most things are developed after common standards unlike Windows, which are propietary non-standards.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    7. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Soko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't used Opera in a while, but IIRC it had an MDI interface, not true tabs.

      Apologies if I was mistaken.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    8. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      The standards KDE apps follow?

      KDE Standards.

      The standards Gnome apps follow?

      KDE Standards.

      The common standards that should make them use the same clipboard?

      Being discussed already I think

      The common standards that should allow to define a set of icons you want to have on your desktop and when you switch from KDE to Gnome, they are still there?

      Use one or the other! They are NOT complementary. Same as with Windows, OSX, OS/2 and every DE

      The common standards that make them use the same start menu?

      Use one or the other! They are NOT complementary. Same as with Windows, OSX, OS/2 and every DE

      The common standards that make it so simple to write a configuration program that can be used with every distro - after all they are all called Linux, so what?

      Valid point :) (though beign addressed)

      The common standards that allow having to configure one aspect of the system at a single place instead of two or three (what was it, fonts?).

      Well, mostly everything is configured at one place, the diversity comes mostlyfrom frontends (except when using different stuff like lpd or CUPS)

      The common standards that allow setting a "default browser" in one single central place? Did I miss anything?

      It's already there for Gnome and KDE!

      Your complaint seem to be more that there are multiple possibilities or too much variants of everything to have standarized products. The point is valid! But that does not mean Linux is crap.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    9. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Linux is choice. Once you have _chosen_, then it can be anything you had wanted it to be (depending on previous choices).

      For a company making a software app. it can be a trouble (for support especially) since many people can run different stuff.

      But from a users perspective well, you can have a decent grass playground with NO sand whatsoever. Granted, you'll have to tidy it yourself once you screw it :)

      I don't me to contradict you, but the problem is i am very tidy, and have chosen a lot (meaning have to discard a lot so to keep the thing "windows wise" consistent).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    10. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      It is caos. Unless you don't want to selfmaintain the system (and just use redcarpet, rpm2date or the suse updater).

      So yes, the directory structure is a mess (completelly agree). I'd love to see everything moved to /system, except for the /home dir.

      It's complicated (too much legacy). But the user doesn't need to see/understand all that mess. At least, that's how I think! Only his home dir is relevant.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    11. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      I don't think I agree with everything you said. For example, you can't hide the fact that permissions per users, and having different users do different stuff are usefull (and complex). You may not need it yet, but you will at some point. Everything in your home dir is your, so mama shouldn't know. But if they want to delete /sbin, they will find out they can't and that's good.

      I mean, you can use Lindows, but I don't think it's usefull. For he 2.6 or 2.8 kernel they will be trying to finegrain the "root" user concept. So you don't always need to be root for lot of stuff.

      Regarding the .whatever files, I preffer that system than to hide everything in the Registry or in GConf. Why? Because I can really backup my users data and config, and if want, i can take a look at what's there. Maybe everything could have been placed under a ~/.config/ so as to not mess the home dir.

      As for the frontend stuff, it pretty much depends on ho the frontend is done. If the core part is not really meant to be frontended you can have a problem. Core app should take into account that they may need to be frontended. I mean, it would be close to have an interface to EVERY program. Where ONE frontend would be a command line utility and there could be other frontends (differet commandline, a KDE GUI, a GTK GUI, a Gnome gui). That alone would be a great adition.

      There are some apps that deal with this sucessfully. For example Xine has completely separated the GUI stuff from the core program, and you have a lot of "quality" frontends.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  5. Myths About KDE by LordYUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Over the past years a large amount of myths has built up around KDE..."
    Number one of which is: KDE does NOT stand for "Killer Dog Eaters"
    :P

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:Myths About KDE by krmt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure that it originally stood for Kool Desktop Environment. I think now the official position is that the K doesn't stand for anything, but I think that they're just covering up the dumb idea to deliberately misspell cool :-)

      I've also read that they chose K because it was the first letter after L, for Linux. I believe the former more than the latter though.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    2. Re:Myths About KDE by krmt · · Score: 2

      You're right. My mistake, but the idea is still there, whether or not you believe it.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    3. Re:Myths About KDE by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I for some reason thought it was "Kommon Desktop Environment" (what with the use of "k" in front of everything and using it in place of "c" or "q"). Perhaps it means KDE Desktop Environment, because we could always use more recursive acronyms (presumably it would be pronounced "de", as the "k" is silent).

    4. Re:Myths About KDE by Oestergaard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      KDE stands for:
      (The) Kalle Dalheimer Experience ;)

      (See http://www.kde.org/people/kalle.html)

    5. Re:Myths About KDE by zdzichu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I head that at the beggining they tried to reassemble CDE - desktop environment popular on unix workstations.

      --
      :wq
    6. Re:Myths About KDE by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, they polluted everyone's thinking and now people insist on naming their KDE software with Ks. Of course, if someone writes something it's their right to name it Stinky Dog Poop if they want. In fact, that might be preferable to the "K" thing. I've seriously thought of writing a script that will tr/[kK]/[cC]/ the name of every program and every reference to those programs.

      Maybe I'm just need mental help.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
    7. Re:Myths About KDE by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      I always thought it was a pun on "CDE".

    8. Re:Myths About KDE by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 2

      Great, except for that fact that I spend 90% of my time in Linux doing development.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
  6. Alpha menus & drop shadows by Eagle7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I looked at the screenshots, and the transparent menus and the drop shadows on the menu look really nice. I'm curious - are these KDE application things? Are they part of the windows manager that comes with KDE? Are they QT? And will they work over everything, or will they only work when QT menus are displayed over QT aps?

    Just wondering if it is possible to have such nifty eyecandy work with my 95% GTK+/Sawfish environment, or if I would have to switch to the KDE environment to see this features.

    --
    _sig_ is away
    1. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes, in other words it is bullshit fakery

      Um. Pardon me, but how else are you supposed to render translucent objects? You always have to calculate the final result somewhere. If you have a card and driver combo that supports it in hardware via XRENDER, it does it there. If you don't, it emulates it in software (you can force it one way or the other via the Control Center). Other than hardware or software, where else is it supposed to be rendered? By amish stained glass sculptors sitting on a three legged stool next to your monitor?

      --
      Evan "Ya, Mister Godwin, that looks good. I'll have the next menu ready for you in about three hours, sure enough".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Paladin128 · · Score: 2

      You have to have all the KDE Libs installed, but you do not have to be running KDE to take advantage of the eye candy. You will have to configure it with the KDE controll panel, but you can keep on using whatever other environment you wish.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    3. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What happens if the underneath changes when the menu is up?

      It changes. You can put a movie underneath it and watch the movie through the menu. Well... assuming your video driver supports it. The fact that there are no available video drivers that support this feature is due to the newness of this capability in X.

      bullshit fakery being passed off as the real thing - the KDE project in a nutshell.

      Hang onto your copy of KDE 3.1. When the driver for your videocard supports the new extension, watch a nice DivX and pop a menu over it. Maybe you'll understand the concept of a new API definition requiring the upgrade of existing drivers.

      It's a bit like if Doom III comes out running on OpenGL 2, and your video card only supports OpenGL 1.x, and you run around screaming "Doom III doesn't really work. It's all bullshit fakery - Id Software in a nutshell."

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  7. KDE Usability by krmt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aaron J Siego also started up the KDE Usability Project, in order to spearhead work on improving the KDE UI. I was following the list for quite a few weeks, until the traffic grew too substantial to keep up with. But according to the 3.1 alpha release notes, some of their intial work, including work on Kicker, is going to be included in the new release.

    This is a wonderful thing. From reading the list, I know that they've painstakingly thought through the work they've done, modeled and remodeled, discussed and argued all the little details to get things as good as they could. Progress has been slow for that reason, but it is substantial, and over time I think it'll bring KDE's usability to something we can all really be proud of.

    Features are nice, but I think improving the usability of KDE will help everyone in the long run.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:KDE Usability by stilborne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      well, to be fair, i didn't "start up" the KDE usability project. it just wasn't very active before i and a few others descended upon it and decided to get some actual reports written and some actual coding done.

      i believe jono started the project and others such as chris howells were involved early on.

      the time and effort of everyone who took the initiative has resulted in more and more of the KDE developers and users (along with some new devels and usability people) getting on the list and getting involved.

      it's fun to be part of something positive and intense as it unfolds ...

      AJS

    2. Re:KDE Usability by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      In trying to explain how usability must be improved everywhere, and how kde should focus on its exclusive features,

      if you looked at my other posts also mention alpha channeling, genie effects, and motion blur, i mention how lindows and others should fund enhancements to xfree, i mentioned how after xfree is improved kde should focus on improving kdes usability not just by adding eye candy but by making it useful.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:KDE Usability by krmt · · Score: 2

      Either way, as near as I can tell, you guys jumpstarted the project, and it was a badly needed thing. I feel bad that I can't follow the mailing list any more (you guys just generate way too much traffic for me :-) but I'm glad you're all doing the work that needs to be done. It's really the next major step for KDE, and I'm really happy that you guys are working on it. Linux will make it on to more desktops, and it will be because of projects like this one.

      Now if all developers really start to pay attention beforehand, things will really start to improve :-)

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  8. ** Sigh *** by BranMan · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately Aaron Seigo didn't make his KDE Myths a single FAQ style page but a cascading set of pages. Can someone mirror them before they are slashdotted out of creation?

  9. Sweet! by friedmud · · Score: 2

    Have been looking forward to this - thought it was going to be a while before we got it. Nice to see they are still making a lot of progress after the 3.0 release.

    PS: keramik kicks a$$

    Derek

  10. Re:I would just...... by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    How about a new /. feature that only provides links for people that are logged in and have posted at least one message in the last week.

    Of course the screen shot is only of some new drop shadow support for menus. It's kinda funny that so many geeks are trying desperately to view a darkened border of a couple pixels around a menu.

  11. Nothing original by d3xt3r · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I know that copying is the best form of flattery, but this is getting ridiculous.

    KDE 1 - 2 were attempts to copy windows UI with some small differences.

    It now appears that KDE 3.1 is going for the Appple OS X Aqua look. Look at the screen shots. The task bar looks like the OS X dock and they even called it Qwertz.

    I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?

    1. Re:Nothing original by reaper20 · · Score: 2

      I find the OSX/XP-like look not as appealing as the classic looks myself, and I do agree with you.

      But, you can always change it. I do find it interesting that with the newest development of any major desktop environment, window manager, or application, one of the first things that always gets ported is an OSX/XP looking theme.

      Someday, E17 will come out - and someone will do an OSX for E and Luna for E theme too. Check out the stats on theme sites, those themes are popular, so its natural that the developers would cater to the users.

      I don't like them either, but at least we have a choice!

    2. Re:Nothing original by LMCBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?


      What's the point? Freedom, for starters. You get a first-rate GUI without sacrificing Freedom. Isn't that worth celebrating, even if the GUI is not totally "original"?

      Besides, why is it necessarily desireable for a GUI to be completely original? It's been said often before, but I guess it bears repeating. Most modern GUI systems look very similar. They all use "windows", "menus", "icons", "buttons", and "desktops". Does this mean that no one can think of anything new, and it's all about "A copied B copied C copied D! Shame on A, B and C!" ? Perhaps. But it's also possible that the Desktop metaphor just makes sense and it works well. Would you rather KDE make a completely new computing paradigm, even if it meant it was harder to use? Just for the sake of being "different"?

      Besides, KDE offers plenty that Win/Mac don't, besides Freedom. Themability, for one. You claim to "love" KDE, and yet it seems you don't understand that the way your desktop looks is largely up to you in KDE. You can make it look very similar to WinXP, or very similar to OSX, or not really like either. The person who took those screenshots chose to have a panel that looks like the OSX dock. Others have an XP-like panel. Mine looks like neither. KDE gives you the freedom to build a desktop that suits your needs and style. How is that copying either OSX or XP?

      I guess I shouldn't even bother...there will always be naysayers. I remember when they were saying "KDE will never be as good as Windows or Mac!". Now it's "Ok, KDE is just as good as Windows/Mac...but it's not BETTER, so what's the point?!"

      Indeed, what's the point?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:Nothing original by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      you wrote: "I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?"

      The moment that KDE will be radically different from Mac OS & Windows - thats the moment you'll start loosing people who wants to use Linux and came from Windows world. It's pretty hard to teach a newbie an entirely new window manager and/or desktop enviroment.

      Try taking a kid who used only windows and give him Window Maker. See what he tells you.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    4. Re:Nothing original by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      I agree with you on this one..

      However - we're talking different things here - a person who gets a Linux distribution from his friends and installs Linux + KDE to learn/experiment VS. your example - to buy a whole new machine...

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    5. Re:Nothing original by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      I know that copying is the best form of flattery, but this is getting ridiculous.

      I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?


      Yeah. I agree.

      I bought a new Honda, and you know what, the controls had nothing original. The steering wheel, gas pedal, brake, lights, wipers, etc. were all in the same old boring place. Nothing new but just eye candy.

      I was really disgusted. I know that copying is the best form of flattery, but this was just a transparent attempt at a ripoff of General Motors user interface for automobiles.

      I love automobiles, and I love Honda, but unless they offer something original, something that GM and Ford don't, then what's the point?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  12. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Right click on the clipboard icon and uncheck "Enable Actions"

  13. How to install from source? by BigumD · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty new to linux, and I have no idea how to install this if I wanted to. Can some one point me to a site that would have a step-by-step for something like this?

    --
    --The space between my ears was intentionally left blank--
    1. Re:How to install from source? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2

      don't want to put you down, but since it's an alpha release it's not likely to have precompiled packages yet. this means downloading sources and compiling by yourself, wich is not a trivial task.

      a step-by-step isn't likely to happen too, since the parameters for compiling might change from one distro to another.

      basically:

      download sources
      expand the tar.gz files
      locate a file called README or INSTALL
      follow the instructions on them

      this probably involve solving dependencies (updating other stuff that KDE needs to run such as openGL, QT, etc.), setting up environment variables, telling the configure script where it's suposed to install the binaries, etc.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
  14. My favorite new things: by friedmud · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the 3.1 feature plan:

    KRfb:
    NEW IN KDE: VNC-compatible server to share KDE desktops
    Remote Desktop Connection (KRdc):
    NEW IN KDE: VNC-compatible client


    Now you don't have to have a seperate instance of KDE running with the vncserver - you can share your CURRENT desktop just like you can with Windows and vnc. This is mucho cool - I will use it often!

    Derek

    1. Re:My favorite new things: by aminorex · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can do this with any X desktop, using x0rfbserver.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:My favorite new things: by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      They're not trying to invent something new here - the great thing with this feature is that it's MUCH easier for end user to use without getting the headache of security (it's secured, expires after a period of time, etc)

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    3. Re:My favorite new things: by friedmud · · Score: 2

      But I don't want to use "x0rfbserver" - I want to use my nvidia server so I can have accelerated graphics - or are the 2 not mutually exclusive (and if not - how does that work?).

      Derek

  15. Re:Installation still a chore? by pivo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree, I prefer KDE over GNOME (but I use both) installation is the one thing that GNOME does much better than KDE. I whish they'd make it easier to update, something on the order of RedCarpet.

  16. Re:clip board popup by Satai · · Score: 2

    The Klipboard manager (Klippy? I can't remember) is quite configurable... I got irritated with it doing that every tiem I was in Mozilla (very rarely, mind you) and looked around - there's a section of the configuration where you can define different window classes for it to ignore. I did that, and haven't been happier...

  17. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by Roadmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll agree that the new KDE *THEME* seen on the screenshots looks a lot like WinXP, but keep in mind that it can be made to look like almost anything you want.

    Also, I disagree with "every body knows that XP was just a pretty GUI". Compared to Windows2000, perhaps it was; but most consumers weren't using Win2k, but Win9x. And WinXP is insistently aimed at home users too, touting new, unheard-of features like STABILITY (whoaaaaaa) and stuff like that. WinXP mixes all that stuff.

    Finally, WinXP's prettyness can be argued with; i think it looks childish and dumb, but that's just me..

  18. Debian by jchawk · · Score: 2

    Is debian ever going to have an official package? Did I just miss something? Seems like I've been waiting forever.

  19. New Look by Ween · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After looking at the new screenshots, I can honestly say that this will be the first KDE which I will not have to alter the look of significantly from the default install. This will mean good things for people unaware of kde-look.org and other enhancements that are 3rd party to kde. KDE will finally look very polished and professional (if not a little bit over the top like XP .. but definately far more attractive than XP).

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
  20. Re:Installation still a chore? by tjansen · · Score: 2

    Yes, the project is called Kalypso. It is far from being usable though.

  21. Mirror of screenshots site by idiot900 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've set up a mirror of the screenshots site:


    http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/users/tom/kde31alpha/

    Enjoy!

  22. Re:Desktop sharing? by tjansen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is fully VNC compatible and supports the latest codecs.

  23. Fresco by extrasolar · · Score: 2
    "Um. Pardon me, but how else are you supposed to render translucent objects?"

    I think he means like this.

    1. Re:Fresco by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      "Um. Pardon me, but how else are you supposed to render translucent objects?"

      I think he means like this [fresco.org].

      Okay, very nice. Now, how does that render translucent objects *other* than using either hardware or software?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Fresco by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      I think you are, perhaps intentionally, misunderstanding the spirit of the statement. If you are seriously uncertain, you can email me at klh@wildapache.net .

  24. Evolution of Software by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am already starting to see comments in this thread like "feature X is just a ripp-off of product Y", who decided to put in feature Z, I hate it", etc. I just finished reading Survival Is Not Enough, by Seth Godin, who is a former Executive at Yahoo, among other things. These complaints are features that really should be applauded instead. Which criticizm is good, just the fact that a feature is similar to something else another product has is not bad.

    Much of the book has to do with the evolution of products suchs as web sites and software. Evolution happens in software just like in life forms. Much of the book pushes the idea of making as many "mutations" in a short time with as little money as possible. Let the bad ones die, keep the good ones. If another product has a feature that works well, why not use as much of the basic concept as possible. Image what the word processor world be like to day if none of the publishers used features other software had already implemented. Cross polination in evolutionary terms. This is along the lines of the tabbed browsing in Konquer, and the "Qwertz" toolbar thing.

    The rant about the stupid KDE clipboard function? I admit, I don't use the feature either. Is it bad it was put in? No. As many "test" features as possible should be put into the public view to see which are good and which are bad. The good features will stay, the bad will be phased out. These "mutations" of the core are what helps create innovative features. Who knows, someday a desktop envirnment might be considered horrible if it doesn't have whatever the KDE clipboard thing does. (I don't even KNOW what it is supposed to do, which may be more the problem.)

    These are not bad, and in my mind should be encouraged of both the Gnome team and the KDE team. As many people here know, innovation happens much faster when there are competing technologies, and not just a big monopoly in any given market.

    -Pete
    (Book link is an affiliate link...I read the book and liked it. I think you will too.)

    1. Re:Evolution of Software by peterdaly · · Score: 2

      You can use Windows instead if you so desire. It seems to have a much more conservative approach to innovation and a much more mature GUI envirnment than Linux.

      -Pete

    2. Re:Evolution of Software by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      I am already starting to see comments in this thread like "feature X is just a ripp-off of product Y", who decided to put in feature Z, I hate it", etc.

      It gets worse. They clearly ripped off the idea of displaying characters on screen from Xerox! Remove it - now!

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  25. question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    Looking at these new screenshots, I can see that the KDE developers are improving the look/feel of KDE recently, which is very good because frankly I found it rather ugly.

    One thing that keeps from from giving KDE much attention is a small pet peeve of mine. The task list, I absolutely hate task lists, it's absolutely the the epitome of bad interface design. You have a horizontal list of application names, which are variable sizes, and the more you have the smaller they can be... ugg, disgusting.

    So, my question is, does KDE have any type of drop down task switcher, a la MacOS Thanks

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
      Interesting, any way to make this a drop down menu, like in Gnome? Sure would be nice.

      Thanks though, I'll give that a try next time I check out KDE.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    2. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Yes, There is an icon box - type Kicker extention very simmilar to the one in E, I was using it for a while. It shows only the icons of the open windows, and can be set to be transparant. I forget th enam eif it.. but just go through the kicker rxtentions and it is there somewhere. And you can simply remove the task list, it is just a Kicker applet.

    3. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Personally, although I run KDE, I still like the gnome system manager. It runs with no problems under KDE, as long as you have gnome libs installed too.

  26. KAudioCreator by IceFox · · Score: 4, Informative
    As many of you know kde2->3 was not much for eye candy and was more underneith and even then was mainly bug fixes. 3.1 was the first time that developers got to put up new stuff. One of the least known new items is KAudioCreator which is a ogg/mp3/everything audio ripping tool. From the website:

    KAudioCreator is an audio file creation solution for kde. It allows you to use whatever encoder you wish to encode your audio files while providing a comfortable gui. KAudioCreator also provides a job control system so you can see what files have succeeded, failed and stop or cancel jobs as the application progresses.

    Screenshots!

    and for those kde 2 users I have back ported it to kde2 and put it on my webpage. -Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  27. Re:The best of the best! by Khalid · · Score: 2

    If you are running Redhat just use apt-get (apt for rpm) have a look at http://freshrpms.net for instance, otherwise, there is urpmi for Mandrake, up2date for redhat and so on. Installing rpms with dependencies is now very easy thanks to these tools.

  28. Re:KDE keeps getting better or is that bigger? by pdqlamb · · Score: 2

    How much memory does it take to run KDE nowadays? It seems to be keeping pace with Winblows (NTM) as a prime example of bloatware.

  29. They need OSX like eyecandy by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    Alpha Channel / Transparency

    Genie effect or equally impressive effects.

    They seriously need to get 4-5 developers working on a project with just THAT specific purpose, of improving the eyecandy in KDE. OR maybe someone like Lindows can fund development of xfree86's render extention.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  30. More Eyecandy by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    We need more eyecandy if KDE is supposed to ever be better than OSX or even XP, better icon animation (its a good start but improve on it and make it more useful)

    Alpha channel, so we can have a alpha channeled kicker and panel

    Some cool special effects, like genie effect or even motion blur,

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:More Eyecandy by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



      Only programmers care about processor cycles.

      Most desktop users who just run word and a webbrowser, they dont care about processor cycles, they arent compiling code.

      So waste? waste is what programmers who have to save their precious little CPU cycles to compile their little kernel a few minutes faster care about. Not someone whos just surfing the web downloading mp3s and chatting.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    2. Re:More Eyecandy by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      Some of us like wasting processor cycles that way.

      I think this should be optional, btw. Linux is Linux whether it's running on an 8MHz 386 with four megs of RAM or a 3Ghz Pentium 4 with four gigs of RAM.

  31. The "Keramik" look works with 3.0, as well as 3.1 by Queuetue · · Score: 2

    If you're just after the eye candy, you can download a srpm of the keramik theme here:

    http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=219 3

    or a tarball here:

    http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=219 4

  32. KDE project I never want to see by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2, Funny

    The PaperKlip.

    This is a software agent that determines what kind of task you're trying to do, pops up, and provides "helpful" advice. Like the MS Office Paperclip agent, the advice isn't that great, and it's a HUGE burden on resources. Unlike the MS Office Paperclip agent, it provides "helpful" advice for the ENTIRE KDE project.

    Mandrake users will love it; Debian users will want to destroy the author on sight. The author will show up to LUG meetings with a fake beard and sunglasses.

  33. What Eye Candy? OSX kicks its ass by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    I'm sorry but KDE has a long long way to go before impressing anyone with its eye candy.

    why even bother showing off eye candy when its just drop shadows or anti aliased fonts,

    The animated icons was a good start, they should improve that so for example you can take a gaim icon or instant message icon from your desktop and put it on your panel somewhere and when you get a msg it animates, or when its on your desktop and you get a msg it animates.

    When you put a Cd in the CD drive, the CD icon should appear and begin to spin, to animate whats happenining. Basically they should let our actions influence the animations, more so than just a random animation when you put your mouse over it. Maybe an animation when you actually click it, or if you modify a folder somehow like lock or unlock it, the animation should occur with the lock being slapped on the folder.

    Animations is something that OSX and XP does not do, so why not improve that?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  34. What KDE stands for by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    KDE stands for: (The) Kalle Dalheimer Experience ;)

    ghobe' bIlughbe' ji-bIlugh Klingon Desktop Environment

    naDev tlhInganpu' tu'lu' yaj'a' majQa'

  35. They NEED to also enhance their icon animations by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    First, we should be able to set the max framerate of the animations.

    Second developers should be able to create animations so programs illustrate our actions.

    You put a CD in your CD rom and its a game CD, you should see maybe a little light or flash on the desktop which turns into a little spinning CD, if the game programmers wrote an animation for their icon, the doom CD could have an animated icon of the devil or whatever.

    Or you could set it up so when you run a program the icon animate.

    When you burn a CD a spinning burning CD animation could appear, why would this be useful? someone who doesnt know a damn thing about computers could look at that burning spinning Cd icon and know what the computer is doing without opening up any programs.

    Animation is what seperates OSX from linux, the genie effect, alpha channeling, that extra level of overkill eyecandy is what people want and need for ease of use.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  36. awesome backgrounds by gregfortune · · Score: 2

    I can only see glimpses of the backgrounds in the last 6 screenshots, but they rock! Any one have any idea where I can grab them (besides checking out the KDE tree...)????

  37. Even, what about improving icon animation by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    IF you say its a video card issue, how about improving the animated icons, I'm not talking about going overboard, but allowing the user to decide the frame rate, allowing our actions to decide the animations of an icon, so an icon can have several diffrent animations, cd icon should have a music cd animation, a burning cd animation for burning, a game cd animation, a dvd movie animation, so anyone who doesnt know computers can understand what is going on by looking at the icon animate.

    I'm talking about improving the animation in terms of frames per second,, doing that would do alot for eyecandy and ease of use, if its done right.

    Xfree can support this, people have the ram to do it, and the cpu power but if they dont, they should be able to decide the frame rate just like the decide the icon sizes.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well, this is an issue totally unrelated to X or video drivers - it's easily doable, but...

      they should be able to decide the frame rate [ of the icons]

      Who? The creator of the icon can do that right now - the icons are MNG files (the animated form of PNG files), and they have a framerate set inside them. What you want is for the desktop user to be able to override that? I suppose it's possible, but I for one just don't see it as a desirable feature.

      As for having several different animations based on status, there has been some talk of that (Mosfet at one point discussed it, and he's got some code for animated widgets written, but not, afaik for animated icons). While a developer might suddenly write it, I'd think that to do it right (maybe a .desktop file with scripted dcop calls?) would entail enough time to a stable product that it's unlikely to appear in the very near future. The framework is there, but there's not much demand from the application authors for such an ability.

      The fact that it's getting down to such minor details ("I want to globally set the framerate on the animated icons") shows that it's a mature desktop. (Incidently, if you *really* want to change the framerate, you can always open the icons in an editor, change the framerate and save them... Me? One of the first things I do on a new KDE desktop is turn the animations *off*. They bug me... and there's a nice, easy setting for that in the Control Center)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      Who? The creator of the icon can do that right now - the icons are MNG files (the animated form of PNG files), and they have a framerate set inside them. What you want is for the desktop user to be able to override that? I suppose it's possible, but I for one just don't see it as a desirable feature.


      But I the user cannot set the frame rate.Whos computer will be rendering these frames? Mine. So why shouldnt I decide the max amount? If i can change my icon sizes and my screen resolution it only makes sense.

      Theres not going to be demand from application authors because application authors cant demand something thats this new.

      Its kinda like how the industry didnt demand peer to peer until after napster was made. You have the technology, now we need some ways for developers to take advantage of it, then the demand will come, not from developers but from the users who will then create developer damand.

      Kinda like alpha channel, developers dont care about that its the users who demand that.

      Yeah KDE is mature, we arent even debating that, the problem with KDE is, while its mature, its still not at the level of OSX. OSX still has it beat in terms of ease of use, eye candy etc, to beat OSX it needs animated icons, SVG icons, alpha channel, and great usability and functionality, If KDE developers focus on the small details (which is what KDE lacks right now) KDE could be competiting with OSX in about a year.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      to beat OSX it needs animated icons, SVG icons, alpha channel

      Done, done and done. All three are part of the 3.x series release... these features are at the "they work" level, and are still getting polish each minor release (SVG support is brand new with this upcoming release).

      But I the user cannot set the frame rate.Whos computer will be rendering these frames? Mine. So why shouldnt I decide the max amount?

      You *can* - on an icon by icon level. Can you even set the global animation speed of icons in OSX or XP? I'm sorry, but I really don't see why you would want to. But it's a really really minor thing - I've checked, and there *is* a value that controls minimum interval of animation to prevent an icon with a interval value of zero from killing performance. It's set to a very low (non zero) value. If you really wanted to, you could set up a slider in the Control Center to set that value... but...

      IMO, that starts cluttering the Control Center with minutae that isn't necessary in the default KDE installation. Now, if you want to write a panel for the Control Center that edits that, you can easily release a "TweakUI" or "PowerTools" style package that adds stuff like that to the Control Center - one that I use adds a Matrox specific panel that lets me set all sorts of Matrox G4x0 specific settings. A Matrox specific panel would hardly be of use to the users in general... but I like it. I'd personally class your request as something like that. Easily done, but useless clutter except for those few who really want to control every variable on their system. In which case, an addon panel of PowerUser UI settings that goes into the Control Center makes much more sense.

      --
      Evan "Need I add that these are all just my opinions?"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  38. SVG icons by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2

    Wasn't KDE 3.1 supposed to bring SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) icons / wigets? That'd be so shweeeet...

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    1. Re:SVG icons by tjansen · · Score: 2

      SVG icons are supported. But there is no SVG icon set ATM.

    2. Re:SVG icons by yobbo · · Score: 2

      The connectiva crystal icon set will be SVG icons, and the developer Everaldo intends on having the icon set finished in time for conclusion in KDE 3.1

      In the mean time you can see a non installable preview here:

      http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=240 8& PHPSESSID=e0b34b211f0ee114b78ea85bf80b4bf2

  39. Re:VNC with compression? by tjansen · · Score: 2

    The server uses libvncserver which has a quite complex history, but supports TightVNC. The client is based on TightVNC's clients, but with many new goodies.

  40. Up-to-date KDE 3.02+ for Red hat 7.2/7.3 by Nailer · · Score: 2

    If you don't want to ride the cutting edge on your work desktop, I'd suggest those of you running Red Hat should install apt and add the following to your sources.list:

    rpm http://www.math.unl.edu/linux/redhat/apt 7.2/i386 kde3

    This guy has packaged KDE 3.02 for Red Hat 7.3, but more to the point, also a bunch of useful apps from apps.kde.com, including KRFB (the desktop sharing app) and, IIRC, the samba / nfs right-click file sharing Konqueror plugins.

  41. Re:The Plan by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
    I'm not trolling, but I find it sad that everyone has to copy Windows (Microsoft copied Apple, which copied Xerox, blah, blah).

    Until you actually suggest a new paradigm yourself you are absolutely, most certainly, beyond a doubt, trolling.
    Those in glass houses yada yada...

  42. Copying Microsoft again by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    This seems to be another case of copying Microsoft again. They've bundled a remote desktop viewer tool, and now KDE has it. Why can't people integrate some of the cooler stuff before MS? Yes, you could do some of this before, with much setup, but it's going to be point-and-click, and MS beats people to 'point-and-click' implementations usually.

    Here's something I've seen people BEGGING for in Konqueror and Mozilla - file upload progress bars in the browser. How much do we want to bet that MS will put that in IE7, THEN konqueror or mozilla will implement it poorly 6 months later?

    1. Re:Copying Microsoft again by tjansen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm... i started krfb before I knew the Remote Assistance feature in WinXP. But when I saw it I got a number of ideas from RA, no doubt.
      The question is: dont you want a feature anymore just because MS implemented it first?

      One of the reasons why MS gets the cool stuff first is because KDE still needs to catch up. Many people claim that Linux/KDE is already competitive, but that isnt true. There are many things that Windows has and Linux/KDE doesnt, so be prepared to see even more copied features before KDE gets the big features that Window lacks.

    2. Re:Copying Microsoft again by fferreres · · Score: 2

      How can you call this copying Microsoft when it has been available years before they included the "feature". I mean PCAnyware and the likes...

      Come on, they implement things as they see fit, when they like it and of course, everyone can contribute.

      You've see some people begging for file upload progress bars in the browser? So? I've seen hundreds if not thouthands of people begging for different stuff. The thing is doing them, and doing only the ones than make sense.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    3. Re:Copying Microsoft again by spitzak · · Score: 2

      I think the point is that they copied the GUI from MicroSoft. Of course you could do this years before MicroSoft thought of it by using VNC and typing the right cryptic thing on the command line on both machines, but nobody thought to make this user-friendly until they saw MicroSoft do it. That is what the original poster was saying.

    4. Re:Copying Microsoft again by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      *I* do, but I think many people don't - BECAUSE it's MS. I agree, it's not competitive with MS or Apple yet. Nice? Yes. Closer than a year ago? Sure. But no cigar yet.

    5. Re:Copying Microsoft again by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How come that everytime Microsoft copies a something it's OK, but if KDE copies something it's evil?

      What about tabbed browsing?
      What about multiple desktops?
      What about opening new browser windows with the MMB?
      What about themes!
      What about scrollbar-jumping?
      What about the Alt-modifier key for faster window-manipulation?

      MSFT copied often enough and is now clearly lagging behind KDE in the GUI area because they still have a lot to copy to catch up.

    6. Re:Copying Microsoft again by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      Dunno what the scrollbar thing is.

      Themes suck - they impact consistency.

      Tabbed browsing is good.

      Multiple desktops mean less to me than consistent cut/copy/paste between apps. Having highlighted text auto-copied to the clipboard (overwriting what I had put there myself intentionally) SUCKS.

    7. Re:Copying Microsoft again by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Dunno what the scrollbar thing is.

      If you would have KDE installed you could click with the middle mousebutton on a scrollbar and you would know.

      Having highlighted text auto-copied to the clipboard (overwriting what I had put there myself intentionally) SUCKS.

      It sucks even more listening to complete morons bitching about features they don't have to use.

      If you use your sacred Wintendo Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V you will never know that there is another clipboard.

      If you don't like Themes, don't use them, goddamnit.

  43. Re:The Plan by spitzak · · Score: 2
    I'll suggest a change that would make Linux much superior to Windows because it will allow programs to use multiple overlapping windows:

    DON'T RAISE WINDOWS UNLESS THE USER CLICKS ON THE BORDER!!!!

    By this I mean:

    1. When the user clicks in a window, give it the focus, but DONT RAISE IT.

    2. (less obvious but NO modern window managers do this) When the user raises a "child" window, DO NOT RAISE THE PARENT!!!! This is the real killer that makes it impossible to have overlapping windows of any substantial size.

    3. Provide a way to move windows around without raising them. For instance, why not the way X window managers worked for a decade before people starting thinking copying MicroSoft was kool: if the user drags the border, move the window and DO NOT RAISE IT, if they click they can raise it. Modern window managers seem to be unable to do this correctly, the KDE I am using cannot do this unless you turn off all ability to raise the windows.

    I really really wish some of these people would do this. I do not believe it will "confuse" the amateur user, and it would allow some user interface designs that cannot be done with Windows. Mostly it would allow a single object to be controlled by 2 or more large "views" that overlap on the screen in different windows.

    On another point, please test everything under point-to-type. If a program grabs the focus it should warp the mouse to point at it (after first making absolutely positively sure you really really really want to grab the focus).

  44. Re:Drop Shadows by spitzak · · Score: 2
    The trick for the drop shadows only works if the window will not be moved and there will be no change to the display below the window until it disappears. For this reason it is only good for pop-up (and pull-down) menus, and perhaps for tooltips.

    What really is happening is the window is somewhat larger than it looks, it includes a bottom and right edge that have been painted with an image that looks just like what is behind it plus a shadow.

  45. Plan acccomplished! by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 2

    Linux IS 2/3 superior to windows according to your criteria or rather KDE is.

    All hints apply to KDE-3.0.2, KDE-3.1a1 is still a little too flaky (usable, but annoying at times).

    To get number 1:
    Kcontrol->LooknFeel->Window Settings
    Set "Inactive inner Window": Left mouse button to "Activate and pass click". (Default is "Activate, Raise and pass click".)

    OK I have no idea about number 2

    To get number 3:
    Alt+Leftclick on the window moves it in kwin without raising it.

    --
    Moritz
    1. Re:Plan acccomplished! by spitzak · · Score: 2
      Yes it is true that most X window managers have a way to turn off click-to-raise, which certainly is better than Windows. I have my KDE configured this way. It would still help if this was the default, however, so applications could assumme it!

      Number 2 is the real killer for me however. It makes it impossible to have a modal window that stays on top and still allow an application to have overlapping main windows. Every single modern X window manager, and Windows, and OS/X, have this annoying behavior. I think this could easily be fixed but the designers are sheep and are scared to death of being different.

      On my KDE alt+left does nothing, however I did notice that the right mouse button pops up a menu that has "move" on it and that moves the window without raising it. Still not as nice as old fvwm behavior, in my opinion.

  46. Re:VNC with compression? by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 2

    Don't know about the VNC client (if there is any, it would be cool to be able to enter "vnc://password@111.222.111.222" into Konqueror, for sure) but the VNC-server that's in KDE 3.1 was released for KDE2 and KDE 3.0 as "krfb", and it worked pretty well--I'm running it on my laptop right now. Google for "krfb" and you'll find it.

    --
    Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
  47. Re:The Plan by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    1. When the user clicks in a window, give it the focus, but DONT RAISE IT.

    This exact feature was the reason why I switched from Windows to KDE1 back in 1998.

    Now you have demonstrated that you have never used KDE, what was your point again?

  48. Re:So basically by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    Bashers have problems distinguishing "have to" and "be able to"

    Just because you are able to recompile the kernel doesn't mean you have to.

    Just because you are able to update KDE/Linux every month, doesn't mean you have to.

    Just because KDE can look like OSX doesn't mean it has to

    Got my message? Well, probably not, whatever.

  49. Re:Drop Shadows by spitzak · · Score: 2
    The reason you can't do this is X lacks any way to find out what the other application tried to draw on the obscured portion of the window. All such drawing is clipped and thrown away by the X server.

    If you ignore changes, you could in theory allow the window to drag by remembering the entire screen initially and continuously redrawing the shadowed part. But I think the "real" edge would quickly become visible because the changing image would not be in sync with the window movement.

  50. Misnamed :( by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Here, I had my hopes up that something like CoolEdit had come to Linux. There are no professional wave editors for Linux.

    KRipAudio would've been a nicer name.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  51. Re:clip board popup by platypus · · Score: 2

    I don't know if you're a developer, but maybe it's an idea which hasn't been discussed.
    The developer's dilemma .... it's been rehashed on a bunch of lists (KDE included) many times .... do you enable all the cool stuff (at least in the first release it's there) so that people can learn about it and start using it, or do you disable it by default and run the risk that 90% of the people who would be helped by it never find out that it exists.

    Take a look at open office. When I first started the (beta) version of OO and wrote something just for getting the feel of it, it suddenly capitalized the first word I typed.
    At the same time, a light bulb was shown down right on the screen.

    "Arrgh,", I thought, "so the adapted the annoying everytime-I-have-to-search-half-an-hour-to-disable -that shit autocorrect functions of word and the same kind of annoying assistant stuff"

    Wrong. When I klicked on the bulb, a help page was shown to explain what just happend (auto-correcting) and what it is. It also asked me if I wanted to use that in the future or not, and showed where to configure it at a later time.

    That's great! Show all features on first use, but also explain them and make it easy to disable them right after the first occurance.

  52. Re:Kde developers by 10Ghz · · Score: 2

    Didn't that start from a post by a KDE-developer where he complained Israels policy regarding palestinians? So disagreeing with Israel = Nazi?

    And weren't there some anti-black comments found in Debian? They were put there by one of the devels. Does that mean that Debian is racist?

    And what about socialism? It's just a political/economic system, just like capitalism is. It's not evil, just like capitalism is not evil.

    Last time I checked, we still have freedom of speech

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  53. Re:Amy Grant by IceFox · · Score: 2

    Well I pretty much went to the library and grabbed the first 50 cd's that they had (the limit) and used them as test material. _A_my Grant as you can see would be in that pile.

    But yes that is in fact one of the reasons why I wrote it. I wanted to be able to rip 30 cd's and have them just "encode" overnight. Encoding takes that longest time always. Thus I made a job control system where it will create jobs of ripping and encoding automaticly. So other then setting up the cd info you just have to click rip.

    -Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  54. Re:So basically by RatFink100 · · Score: 2

    I can distinguish between those two concepts just fine and I'm not a 'basher'.

    I was commenting on the default theme and toolbar configuration - as displayed in the screenshot.

    For many that will be "the look of KDE"

    If the KDE developers wanted to establish a dramatically different look and feel from those other OS GUIs they would have done so in the default setup. They obviously didn't.

    As I said - if that's what you like then fine.

  55. Re:So basically by rseuhs · · Score: 2

    And if you don't - that's fine too. There come several styles in the default configuration.

  56. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Macka · · Score: 2

    > Is it me or does this look too much like OS X Aqua??

    It's you. Go buy a pair of glasses.

    This new theme looks nothing like Aqua. It is finally a comprehensive window & widget theme that matches WinXP and Aqua for looks, but is uniquely identifiable as being KDE.