Slashdot Mirror


Heads-Up Wearable Display

selfsealingstembolt writes "Looks like the guys at NASA are trying to combine some existing technologies into a wearable computer. At the moment it is designed as headset combined with a small box to wear at your belt or so. The interesting part is, that they are looking for new technologies at outside sources (companies, educational institutions, ...). The design is still subject to change, but the general idea is great."

49 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. Ugly, Ugly, Ugly by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why can't they make these things look more like a nice pair of sunglasses rather than a Techno-Cowlick?

    1. Re:Ugly, Ugly, Ugly by Shayde · · Score: 4, Informative

      The best set of augmented vision stuff is done by Don Papp (http://www.aeinnovations.com). He's pretty well known in the wearable computing circles.

      He's the only one I've seen that has put a HUD optical device behind a pair of sunglasses WITHOUT making you look like some sort of mutant. The problem is the display is small, (landscape piece of paper at a range of 4'), and is not quite VGA resolution (400x300 or therabouts, monochrome only).

      What folks have to think about is what they really want to display on their glasses. A true design should allow -some- information to the user, but not totally engross them visually. A one line text display can relay an ENORMOUS amount of data - considering the baseline is zero (some data is a vast improvement over no data).

      Couple a display with audio cues and a prompting system, you won't exactly be chattering on a high volume IRC channel, but you could get GPS location information, notifications of events (*bing*! - Ah, an event in the network. Let me see what happened...), etc etc.

      Augmented reality is -the- application for this stuff. Being able to drive your car, and have your display mark out other cars, or show you where a turn coming up is, or point out hazards at night - or even show you there's a car in your blindspot. Mmm. How about showing you how far your tires are from the curb while you're parking? Ta heck with VR. Enhance whatcha got!

      --
      Event Management Solutions : http://www.stonekeep.com/
    2. Re:Ugly, Ugly, Ugly by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Because they CAN.

      Thad Starner who worked with Steve Mann bact at MIT has used a nearly invisible HUD built into his glasses for almost 3 years now.

      lookie here
      http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fac/Thad.Starner/

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Um.. by klocwerk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The design is still subject to change, but the general idea is great.

    Yeah, it's a great general idea, but it's CERTAINLY not a new one. wearable computing has been around for how long now?

    That said, it's great that it's getting some government funding, as that seems to be the only way to get something going in these lean times lately. And the display unit looks to be a new design, perhaps a new idea, but they say nothing useful about it in the article.

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  3. Heh... by BJH · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    "It's kind of like having your computer with you all the time," said Devereaux.

    Well, no shit Sherlock! I thought that was the point of a wearable computer...

    1. Re:Heh... by 2g3-598hX · · Score: 3, Funny
      "It's kind of like having your computer with you all the time," said Devereaux.

      I'd like to see them try to wear it on a plane....

  4. Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by Astrorunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not the "cool" factor -- really, it isn't. You wear a wearable computer on the subway to work, and you deserve to be beaten down.

    It's not the portability factor -- palmtops can provide a reasonable amount of punch too.

    There are some niche uses -- say you're a mechanic -- it would be handy to have schematics right at your fingertips, er, eyeballs.

    But more often than not, a wearable computer is really a wearable invitation for a well deserved ass kicking.

    Admittedly, the article focuses on the use of wearable computers by astronauts and such, but as for use by the common man on a daily basis outside niche markets, its not going to happen.

    1. Re:Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by aegilops · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Couldn't agree more about the inviting derision / theft / 'ass kicking' aspect, but I think we should remain a bit broad-minded about potential future uses.

      Given that they will eventually make them as innocuous as, say, glasses (either normal corrective ones or Matrix-style RayBans) and perhaps get around to using wireless comms so you don't have the tell-tale (and rather ridiculous) umbilical cord trailing down from your ear to some main unit, I can think of some useful future applications if they integrate with GPS.

      Ever been out on the streets looking for something or someone? Imagine a discreet heads-up navigation aid. I'm not suggesting anything so fancy as face recognition nonsense or whatever (e.g. for security people tracking faces against known offenders) - that can wait. But a simple integration of GPS with a pair of smart sunnies could easily result in - 'turn left here for a shortcut to the nearest public Gents' and so on.

      Aegilops

    2. Re:Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by Maran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes and no. Walking around with an eyepiece on, wires trailing everywhere, and a honking great box on your hip is asking to be mugged, yes.

      But if you integrate the display into a pair of glasses, make the box smaller and go wireless, no-one needs to know. As for data input, most people are now used to seeing people typing a text message on their mobile pretty much anywhere.

      Besides, we shouldn't let cool technology be ignored because we'll get ridiculed for using it in public, should we?

      I was going to make a gratuitous comment about how using a sex-toy in public would get you some strange looks as well, but I'm not sure that's the best comparrison to make...

      Maran

    3. Re:Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by msheppard · · Score: 3, Funny

      To the question "Why do we need wearable computers anyways," I would answer with the question, "Why do we need computers anyways?"

      And to the "well deserved ass kicking" comment I would note that the subway might not be where someone would use it. I can imagine it could be used anywhere a laptop is currently used, with less threat of theft. On a train, on a plane, on a boat, with a goat. I have a compuater, Sam I am, and I recieve spam where ever I am.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    4. Re:Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by Mechanik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I want a wearable computer for privacy reasons. I take a commuter train for about an hour one way to and from work, and like to work on stuff (specifically, I'm working on a novel in my spare time) while I'm on the train. In fact, I even have a Visor Prism + keyboard that I used to use to this end.

      Note, I said that used to use it. Fact is, when you pull out a laptop or whatever on the train, it seems everybody wants to look over your shoulder at what you're doing. They especially like to pry it seems when you are using a PDA + keyboard, because they don't seem to be all that common yet.

      When I'm writing a horror novel with graphic violence in it, the last thing I want is someone looking over my shoulder so that I have to explain why I'm writing about people getting hacked to itty bitty pieces. This made me uncomfortable back in the day, but since 9/11, I wouldn't dare work on the thing on an airplane, lest I get accused by some brainless stewardess of being a terrorist or something.

      If I had a wearable however, no one would be able to see my screen but me. I could write my book/play quake/surf porn/whatever, and no one would be the wiser. I could even work on sensitive corporate documents/code without having to worry about being so easily spied on.

      Now if only they weren't so expensive :-(

      And yes, I have seen other solutions to this problem, i.e. overlays for your screen that either only transmit the screen's contents when viewed at a certain angle (i.e. straight on), or that require you to wear special polarized glasses to see the screen. However they seem a little too obtrusive for me. If you look at your neighbour's laptop, and all the screen shows is a bunch of locks and chains (like this product), then you're probably going to either start asking them questions, or start wondering what they're looking at that is so secret. With a head mounted display, you'll probably think they're too weird to be bothered asking them questions :-) That and apparently the screen protectors don't work so good in the type of lighting conditions one would find on the train.

      Not that the current generation of head mounted displays aren't far too obtrusive as well, but at least with a head mounted display, I could get a virtual screen size of 21" or so with a decent resolution, rather than a piddly laptop display, or even worse, and even more piddly PDA display with a crap-ass resolution.


      Mechanik

    5. Re:Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      "What a maroon!" - Bugs Bunny

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    6. Re:Why do we need wearable computers anyways? by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
      Ummm, well I normally work at a desk these days, but it would still be kind of useful for maintenance people to have these things. This is one iof the reason that the military are interested, very portable repair manuals.

      I suppose I would quite like to have somthing like this for personal navigation ïf it were unobtrusive. I don't like wandering around with a GPS in my hand and a street map is often problematic. Otherwise, I would prefer something like this to my pocket pc for notes, schedules etc, because it should be less obtrusive (in time).

  5. is this the way of the future? by tps12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This stuff is kind of cool to read about, and I definitely think it qualifies as "News for Nerds," so I'm glad to see it here. However, I don't think we will ever see so-called "wearable" computers really take off.

    Consider the average computer user, Joe Sixpack. Mr. Sixpack doesn't ask for much out of his 56kbps (or, these days, even DSL or cable) connection. He reads email and checks sports scores through yahoo, types up the annual Christmas newsletter in Word, and maybe plays a few low-intensity games. He is not interested in "augmented reality," and has no reason for wanting any more power than can be had in a $200 generic PC.

    I think we've reached the point where personal computers are as powerful as anyone really needs. Mainframes and servers will continue to improve in certain niches (especially as we see more stuff like the Final Fantasy movie (hopefully with that same hot chick from it)), but for the vast majority of desktop users, CPUs in the GHz range and 256MB of memory are more than enough.

    Furthermore, people largely feel antagonistic towards their computers. The computer is a tool, a dangerous tool that often fails. People have them for the things (email, the web) that are considered essential in modern life, but they are a necessary evil at best. Yes, there are a few nerds (most of whom are probably reading this site, actually) who express physical love toward their computers, but they are an inconsequential minority. The idea that anyone would want to strap a computer to their face is right out of science fiction, with the emphasis on "fiction."

    Like it or not, "wearables" just don't appear to be in our future.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:is this the way of the future? by Rhombus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Like it or not, "wearables" just don't appear to be in our future.

      Replace "wearables" with any contemporary technology, and someone probably said that 10 years ago.

    2. Re:is this the way of the future? by woobieman29 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I think you're missing the point here....

      'Wearable Computers' are not about having a more powerful computer, just as portable phones are not about having a more powerful phone (web access, text messaging etc notwithstanding). The idea here is simply one of convenience, and access to computing resources wherever you may happen to need them. Consider the example of an online train schedule: When do you think you would get the most value out of accessing this site - when you're at home in front of the computer, or when you're out at the pub trying to figure out when you need to finish off that beer in order to make the last train home? I personally will be one of the first adopters of such technology when it becomes workable. getting driving directions while in the car, checking prices online while shopping in a real life mall, checking up on the kids and their babysitter via an X10 type camera in the house.... For me I think that this would eventually end up becoming the machine that I use the most.

      Like it or not, I think you may have to get used to the idea of "wearables".

      --
      \/\/oobie
    3. Re:is this the way of the future? by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2

      Joe Sixpack, Joe Public, Joe User -- all the Joes follow where the technology leads if the technology is adopted by the techies and this has always been true. That same line you're spitting out was said about television, radio, automobiles, trains, levers and wheels.

      Interestingly enough, this is one of the main reasons Linux is continuing to gain in the marketplace; it's where the techies are and all the "slowbies" will follow along eventually.

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
  6. Oh Great... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now those geeky enough to splurge for such a device can look even more "approachable" to women.

    Can you imagine? Keep the "How to Talk To Women" e-book on your display as you peruse the club scene. That'll do the trick.

    1. Re:Oh Great... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh right, just don't get your love tips from Slashdot.

      "Density has brought us together..."

    2. Re:Oh Great... by Rhombus · · Score: 4, Funny
      Can you imagine? Keep the "How to Talk To Women" e-book on your display as you peruse the club scene. That'll do the trick.

      Actually, I'm imagining a modern take on the "Cyranno de Bergerac" story, where a socially inept nerd uses this wearable system (equipped with a cell modem) to communicate with his socially adept friend whilst he tries to hit on chicks. The bar scene might go something like this:

      Nerd: I see a hot chick standing alone at the bar. I'm going in.

      Friend: Roger. Try to compliment her looks.

      Nerd: Roger. (To woman at bar) "Good evening. You have a very nice ass."

      Friend: NOOOO! You moron! Abort! ABORT!

      (Link suddenly broken as chick at bar breaks VR glasses with right cross.)

    3. Re:Oh Great... by samantha · · Score: 2

      Add in some video input with filters to note whether the person you are talking to seems interested or not. You know, pupil dilation,
      skin temperature, pulse rate...

  7. Bzzzt... But thanks for playing by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll wait until the model that doesn't block the vision from one of my eyes. I'm kind of keen on that whole depth-perception thing.

    Why not project onto the inside of a partially-reflective sunglasses lens?
    Seems like great technology, but it's hamstrung by a fairly simple interface issue.

    No, I will not imagine a beowulf cluster of these things

    1. Re:Bzzzt... But thanks for playing by Ioldanach · · Score: 2
      Why not project onto the inside of a partially-reflective sunglasses lens?

      That's exactly what I've been waiting for, too. Of course, at this point I'd be happy with anything that a) has a reasonable price tag ( $500), b) doesn't look like I'm wearing a fighter jet flight helmet, and c) gives me a useful resolution (at least vga). With that, I'd go wearable *very* quickly. (I.e., as soon as I could save the funds.)

    2. Re:Bzzzt... But thanks for playing by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      They are available, but it's a development kit as opposed to a go-out-and-buy-one product.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  8. Why re-invent the wheel? by zaren · · Score: 4, Informative

    Xybernaut already has wearables for sale. They've already got contracts with branches of the U.S. military, so swinging a deal with the space jockeys shouldn't be too hard.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  9. fps by prof187 · · Score: 3, Funny

    this looks like something that should be used to frag an opponent.

    The voice- activated wearable computer allows easy, real-time access to ... people ...


    Hmm, "attack co-worker with rocket launcher".

    --

    My other sig is an import.
    1. Re:fps by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      I guess that would give a whole new meaning to the term "going postal" wouldn't it...

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  10. I could never take something like that seriously.. by Scrab · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd always end up walking round going.. "We are the Borg. Lower your shields and surrender your ships........" In fact - I think I'd buy it JUST for that reason. But then that's just me..... :D

    --
    RoseColor red={0, 0xffff, 0x0000, 0x0000};VioletColour blue={0, 0x0000, 0x0000, 0xffff};find / -name *mybase*|chown you
  11. I don't know about you people... by SkyLeach · · Score: 4, Funny

    but I don't want to be a gargoyle.

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  12. Critical issue by Kakarat · · Score: 3, Funny
    Devereaux and a small team of engineers have been working on the electronic aspect of the wearable computer for three years; however, they have yet to figure out one critical issue--what should a wearable computer look like?

    They can send a man to the moon, then can even build a tiny personal computer, however the most critical task to trying to figure out what it looks like? Hmmmmm...

    --
    "I bet I'll get blamed for this." --Mayor Quimby
    1. Re:Critical issue by matt4077 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I want them to make it look like old jeans. That way, managers and politicians will never have a chance to wear it and nerds will finally rule the world.

  13. The inevitable step by The_Shadows · · Score: 4, Funny

    With wearable computers comes wearable porn.

    "What do you use your computer for?"
    "Oh, data entry, keeping track of appointments, records, all that and more. What about you?"
    "Portable porn. Check it out! It's hands free!"

    1. Re:The inevitable step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gives new meaning to "Heads Up Display" eh?

  14. have you ever used... by paradesign · · Score: 3, Insightful
    an r zone?

    you thought playing the virtual boy was disorienting.

    how do you expect to be able to reach a usible ammount of contrast on a semi translucent screen? im minority report, who would want a clear monitor. it would suck if your were running around fragging and people just kept walking behind your screen, talk about distracting.

    long story short, if its not a HUD or something, keep it opaque, if it is a HUD make it translucent.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  15. Re:I could never take something like that seriousl by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Or just walk around zombie like wearing a Windows T-shirt....

  16. Re:Existing Projects... it plays doom!!! by paradesign · · Score: 2
    from the gmate page
    Games - Riversi, Galaxa, Tetris, Poker, DOOM , etc

    thats gotta be one strange gaming experience.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  17. those with spare cash by bigpat · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those of you with spare cash.

    Emagin has a developer kit available to make your own wearable displays.

  18. Need expands to fill availability by GuyMannDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not the "cool" factor -- really, it isn't. You wear a wearable computer on the subway to work, and you deserve to be beaten down.

    I'm sure we would have thought the same thing several years ago about portable phones. Yet I see those bloody things (rather, I hear them) all over the place.

    Admittedly, the article focuses on the use of wearable computers by astronauts and such, but as for use by the common man on a daily basis outside niche markets, its not going to happen.

    You make a reasonable point here about no absolutely necessary reason for people to have a portable computer but how is that much different from today's cell phones? I always roll my eyes skyward when people tell me about how essential a cell phone is for today's lifestyle. There are plenty of times I've heard a cell phone go off in the movie theater. And while I've struggled to keep from throwing tomatoes at those morons who feel the need to chatter on their cell phone while grocery shopping, I'm not promising I'll hold off indefinitely. But of all the times I've overheard people gabbing on their cell phones (and there have been many such times), I cannot for the life of me remember one conversation that struck be as being essential to carry on at that moment.

    I'm sure I'm inviting a slew of angry replies to this and probably some Troll or Flamebait mod points, but my point is that cell phones have florished in spite of the fact that the majority of people using them do not have a vital need for them. Rather, their "need" has simply been invented because the technology exists. So will it be with wearable computers.

    GMD

  19. Design for the End-User? by Eightlines · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personally, I thought this article was presenting nothing new, or spectacular till I realized what was meant by the summary posted on the main page. What is really interesting about the article is that the JPL group is looking to outside resources to develop its applications. As a designer I find this very inspiring. To be selected for a project working with those engineers would be a fantastic opportunity. On top of that the JPL gets to recruit new people in a slightly different field which they would have had no previous experience. Whether or not this device looks good, its still important to maintain a connection with the end-user of the application. Face it, not all engineers have been capable of doing this! Involving the organization with outside organizations such as small business or educational facilities can only be a good thing.

  20. Consider the options by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

    You can get a set of glasses (Model EG-7) with a prism built-in so there is no bulky object hanging in your field of vision. There is a bump on the side of the glasses for the screen itself, and a wire runs down behind the ear, easily concealable under a shirt.

    You can already walk down the street with an earphone/microphone on, because you probably have a cellphone.

    You can use a Twiddler for input, along with speech (maybe in the future). Perhaps soon we will have a Bluetooth Twiddler, allowing you reduce the number of wires.

    In fact, incorporating Bluetooth would be a great way to improve the portability/functionality of your wearable. Connect to your cellphone with Bluetooth instead of using a cable or having a separate cell modem. Connect to a printer (Bluetooth or 802.11 for this application) and print something out on your way to the meeting. Your microphone/speaker could be Bluetooth, so there are even fewer wires (though the battery/communications module is a little bulky still).

    With some dynamic networking you could have your system use Bluetooth to the phone while you weren't in range of a wireless network, and switch automatically, setting up NFS/VPN/SSH/etc connections as the network conditions change.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  21. Complaints a comin'.... by sbeast702 · · Score: 3, Funny

    People complain enough about having to carry laptop cases with a strap over their shoulder, I can't wait to see what they have to say about wearing something ON THEIR HEAD...

  22. Re:Undetectable device preferable by zaren · · Score: 2

    Did somebody say sunglasses?

    Professor Mann has had sunglass-mounted gear for years (well, except for the battery pack, HD, and other controllers), and they eventually ... unfortunately, they eventually got him in trouble.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  23. Re:I could never take something like that seriousl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or lie on the floor in a Tux t-shirt saying "they've promised to write drivers for my legs by 2008!"

  24. Re:I'll never understand this by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The wearable offers you what you can't get out of a PDA. Instant access.

    The PDA has an appointment book, but if you want to check it, you have to pull it out, open it up, turn it on, go to the appointment book, and then look at the days. This takes time. A wearable is already on, you just have to bring up the appointment book. The alaram feature reminds you when a meeting is going to happen. Your wearable could keep your next 2 appointments in view, and with GPS and access to MapQuest or something similar, could tell you about how long it would take, with approximations for traffic.

    Pulling out your PDA and trying to take notes in Graffiti is painful - it's very hard to keep up with a conversation. But with a wearable, you can type instead of write. Bringing a keyboard may not be an option, but a Twiddler allows you to type quite quickly with one hand, far better than Graffiti, anyway.

    Imagine access to financial reports at the meeting with the boss without a laptop. Imagine in-view access to directions as you look for a client's office. Imagine sending someone an e-mail when you remember to do it. Imagine updating your to-do list while on the phone on the subway, without fear of dropping something. Imagine making changes to the database while the meeting is going on. Imagine never worrying about forgetting the CD you burned becuase you have the data with you. Imagine never worrying about someone else using your computer and messing up your settings.

    If none of these things interest you, how about: Imagine reading slashdot during the meeting. Imagine reading slashdot on the subway. Imagine looking for new jobs while during the new policy meeting. Imagine being able to correct people by getting actual data at your fingertips. Imagine watching the Simpsons while you stare at a monitor covered with Excel sheets. Imagine organizing your MP3 collection during business hours. Imagine EverQuest.

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  25. Why Not Take It Further? by InspectorZero · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If I am to take your argument to its logical conclusion, I would have to ask how many "essential" conversations do you have at your MUCH more necessary home phone? Why do you even have a home phone? Why can't you wait until you SEE the person face to face to talk to them? Ask yourself, would you be as angry at those "morons" at the grocery store if they were talking to their spouse who was walking with them? What is your objection really?

    It's all about convenience - hardly anything ever invented has been pure "necessity." The wheel and the aqueduct are convenient inventions, but are by no means necessary. They're at least as "annoying" as cell phones - lord, those wheels are noisy rumbling down the road... and those aqueducts! What an eye-sore!

    But all of these things, cell phones included, improve our lives more than just superficially - cell phones can be used to call your sorority sisters... or to call for an ambulance. If the benefits, both for convenience and for improving quality of life, didn't outweigh the annoyances that accompany a technology, it wouldn't survive.

    All that musing aside, the bottom line is that, while you're at home denying the march of technological progress, I'll be e-mailing and calling my friends using my portable hardware and meeting everyone at the movie theater. To each his own, I guess.

    --

    ------------------------------------
    Spiral out... keep going.

  26. Dude.... by MenTaLguY · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you want leg drivers, write them yourself.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  27. The reason is.. by DigitalDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The reason is quite simple - as in any computer product, most of the time all money is spent on technology and advertising, leaving no money for proper visual design. Some big companies, such as Apple and Sony actually spent time and money making sure the product looks good.
    Oh, and many technical managers are good at mechanics/development process and lack visual creativity that professional designer have; but in most cases that would refuse to agree to that and think they know better.

    --
    http://dtum.livejournal.com
  28. Biggest problem with wearable video by jhines0042 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The biggest problem with wearable video is the fact that it moves with your head and can cause vertigo.

    I want a head mounted display that lets me decide if I want the display to move when I move my head or if I want the display to stay where it is while I look at other things....

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  29. Watch, Walkman, Glasses, pacemaker, Hearing Aid? by gnugnugnu · · Score: 2

    I loathe the rude behaviour of some mobile phone users, but i tend to believe these people would be just as inconsiderate even if they did not have mobile phones. (I would advocate the use of mobile phone jammers if members of the Emergencey Services could still be gauranteed reliable communications).

    But more to the point i like the notion of a head sup display embedded in a pair of sunglasses, and many people already carry around mobile phones which are in effect wearable Computers (more powereful than a Kray supercomputer from the 70s). If you are going to have a chunky digital watch it may as well be a Dick Tracey style Linux powered video camera (as featured in Linux Journal and featured on slashdot previously).
    The walkman/diskman/minidiskplayer/mp3players/hearing aids that people carry around can and will be adapted to have more features like supporting FM radio and dictation. On of those pen sized scanners (with dictionary and machine translation, nifty) might come in handy too.

    The geeky stupid looking wearable computers might not catch on but the existing electronics many of use carry could become a lot more integrated and usable, i have little doubt this stuff will catch on just not in the cheesey and ugly implausible ways suggested by most Science Fiction.