Slashdot Mirror


Do You Know Where You Live?

An anonymous submitter writes "Thanks to GPS, it seems quite a few people are discovering they don't live where they thought. Prior to GPS, state, county and city borders were part law, part measurement, and part guesswork. Now, they're able to go back and discover where actual borders should be, and it's making many people unhappy. Some familes in Rhode Island are finding out they may actually live in Connecticut. Each state, county and city wants as much land as possible, because it means more tax income. The people caught in the middle simply want to know where they'll send their kids for school."

155 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. Borders by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    NOOOOOOOoooooooo...

    I'm Canadian!

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    1. Re:Borders by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe we could use GPS to get back the portions of Alaska that stretch down our west coast!

      Idiocy at it's best.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:Borders by enrayged · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...at least you didnt find out you are mexican...

      Oh great, here comes INS...

    3. Re:Borders by Kwikymart · · Score: 2

      I used to live right on the Candian-American border (in Canada). The American part was just a little penisula that was totally cut off from the rest of the US. Anyway, the "official" border extended 15 feet into what should have been Canadian territory. So, the Americans had a bit more land than they should have. Overall if you take into account the whole border, I think Canada wins out and gets more space than it should just because they surveys that were taken were just not accurate enough.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    4. Re:Borders by rlowe69 · · Score: 3, Funny


      NOOOOOOOoooooooo...

      I'm Canadian!


      Welcome to the fold, eh! Want some poutine, ya hoser?

      --
      ----- rL
    5. Re:Borders by Medevo · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read history, in about 1900 Canada and the USA were fighting over Alaska (and those coastal regions). Since Canada was still pretty much a British colony the British and Americans formed a group of 5 (2 Americans, 2 British, 1 Canadian) that heard arguments from both sides, and were to vote based on the arguments. In the End the British decided to vote for the Americans to help improve relations (this is one of many times the British sold of Canada to create favors for themselves).

      Medevo

    6. Re:Borders by topham · · Score: 2

      Point Roberts?

    7. Re:Borders by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I'm Canadian"

      It like an american - but without the gun.

    8. Re:Borders by 2Bits · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

    9. Re:Borders by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Redundant unfunny Simpson's quote:

      "Why should we leave America to visit America Junior?"

      --
      Why not fork?
    10. Re:Borders by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I feel sorry for you because you just called Molson a real beer. While I will grant you that perhaps all Molsons are better than BudMillerCoors, none of them are real bears as far as I am concerned. Oh, they do contain alcohol, but light lagers such as these bare very little resemblance to a good beer.

      Surely Canada has many microbrews that make good beer, no? (or should I say eh?)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    11. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      You mean better then the American english?

      I think the English (From England) by definition speak English better then the Canadians.

      --
      ~ kjrose
    12. Re:Borders by paladin_tom · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ahem... may I as what you consider a real beer?

      Yes, you've used "eh" correctly. It's most often used to transform a statement ("American beer tastes like cow piss.") into a question ("American beer tastes like cow piss, eh?").

      However, if you replace "no" with "eh", you should remove the "Surely". Otherwise you're mixing "British aristocrat" with "Canadian lumberjack", in a way that nature did not intend.

      --
      #define sig "Every social system runs on the people's belief in it."
    13. Re:Borders by Zone5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Interesting opinion. Have you ever tried *listening* to one of the british trying to speak their own language? It's obvious that at one time they spoke the queen's english, but that is no longer the case. Canadians do in fact on average speak a more 'pure' dialect of the english language than do the english people themselves.

      If one were to accept the premise that the shifting of a language over time in its homeland remained the accepted standard for that language, wouldn't welsh and manx both be considered alive and well, and stunningly similar to common english?

      --
      "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
    14. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      You gotta love the fact that the greatest boost to our National identity came from beer commercials done by Molsons.

      I still get a kick out of that. Perhaps, Chretien should begin doing 'I AM' commercials, so Paul Martin doesn't take his job. :-)

      --
      ~ kjrose
    15. Re:Borders by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      Hear hear -- please, do tell. I'd love to know if your tastes run up to something like, say, Theakston's Old Peculier* or Monteith's, as opposed to the standard fizzy anaesthetized brown stuff.

      * And before you even sniff at my spelling, yes, that's how they spell it. So sod off.

    16. Re:Borders by cmallinson · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

      Why would americans pretend they're from Toronto?

    17. Re:Borders by arnex · · Score: 2

      I used to work at a radio station with this guy, where the rumor went around that he was a cousin of Matt. I couldn't help but think that, if the rumor were true (and, no, I never bothered to just ask him), Homer must have been based at least partly on him. See the photo to judge for yourself.

      Strangely, I recall him having less hair. And saying "d'oh!" a lot.

    18. Re:Borders by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I resent that!

      I love well-planned and carefully choreographed violence too!

      I'm sick of the stereotypes!

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    19. Re:Borders by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      Damn, you're joking! Where? We were just in Boston, and are actually seriously considering moving there. Regardless, we're definitely coming back -- and we need to know where this is! It's not tap, I suppose?

    20. Re:Borders by wdr1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it's like an american, but without pretending that you are the center of the universe.

      Or rather, it's like being an american, but without BEING the center of the universe. ;-)

      -Bill

      --
      SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
    21. Re:Borders by topham · · Score: 2

      If Cretien did "I AM CANADIAN" commercials I'd declair myself anything but...

    22. Re:Borders by Rolker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why did the quebecois have to steal the "poutine" name from a traditional Acadian dish? Don't they have any creativity? Here's a real poutine!

    23. Re:Borders by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Actually, Old Peculier is one of my favorite beers, and I regularly get it at the grocery store. When I am not drinking my own brew, I usually like most micro-brew IPAs (I am a hophead junky) - right now I am trying a Steam Pumper IPA made by a brewery in portland (I forget their name).

      I also like most of Deschutes' beers, Idaho Brewing Company's, Moose Drool, Guinness, some of Red Hook's products (not their hefeweizen, though), Tablerock (local brewery) Hopzilla, Dr. Hops, etc. I basically like to try any microbrew I can get my hands on.

      Beers I don't like: bud, miller, coors, ranier, hamms, fosters, labatts, etc.

      Basicaly I don't like most of the filtered down, crystal clear, sorry excuses for beers. After you charcoal filter beer that many times to get it so clear, they lose a lot of flavor, and the hops are pretty much nonexistant in the mass swill beers.

      I always like how sometimes I see things like "imported Hops" on boxes of Michelob, etc. Like they are special. I can go buy imported or domestic hops anywhere... now if only i could taste the imported hops they put in... :)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    24. Re:Borders by laserjet · · Score: 2

      God, I would kill for Old Peculier to be on tap at any bar. Unfortunately, most bars only have the big beers, so I stick to brewpubs and such where I can get good beer.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    25. Re:Borders by ArcadeNut · · Score: 2
      "eh" is not a word. It's Canadian Puncuation!

      For example to ask a question:

      Lets go to a movie, eh?

      To state a fact:

      We're going to the movie, eh?

      To express emotion:

      That movie sucked, eh!

      I'm almost Canadian, I'm from Alaska!

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    26. Re:Borders by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Who burnt down who's capital building buddy!

      The British burned down the American's. Did they get the Capitol Building or was it just the White House and miscellaneous other buildings? (Not that any Americans would know, since they aren't taught about wars they didn't win.)

    27. Re:Borders by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      history says otherwise. Americans have tried to invade Canada twice. Both times the invading armies were forced to retreat.

      Canada also occupied the Michigan peninsula for a period during the War of 1812.

    28. Re:Borders by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      At least get it right.

      "My parents moved here from Canada, and they think I'm slow, eh?"

    29. Re:Borders by vinnythenose · · Score: 2

      Actually Canadians speak (on average) the most "neutral" english. It's the most easily deciphered by other english speakers (regardless of dialect).

      As a result we're somewhat in demand for radio and announcing and such in other nations. I don't know how much in demand, but as I understand there is one. Especially for some internation outfits.

      Whether we speak "pure" english, well, that's a debate that could last forever. Consider languages change constantly over time, no one can truly speak a "pure" english.

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    30. Re:Borders by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Hi, I'm an American.

      In the War of 1812, the USA managed a classic example of sophmoric diplomacy. France and England were having a trade dispute, we refused to take sides, and we wound up going to war with England over it.

      The English army, not fighting the french at the time, was able to put its skilled troops to bear on the USA. The result was a rather humbling war, that included the burning of the White House. The elementary school tales focus on how the First Lady (I don't remember her name) saved as many artifacts from the fire as she could; most of these, IIRC, are now either in the Smithsonian or back in the (rebuilt) White House (which, according to legend, was painted white only after being rebuilt; prior to this, it was simply the "Exectuive Mansion.")

      The War of 1812 finally ended when the Federal Government and England were able to come to terms over their trade dispute. Due to the abyssmal packet transmission time of sailing ships, the greatest American victory of the war took place after the war was actually ended.

      As for other "Wars that we didn't win," Congress has been rather lax in actually declaring war. To the best of my knowledge, the USA has had the following "real wars."

      American Revolution: Won
      War of 1812: Lost
      Civil War: Won
      Spanish-American War: Won
      "The War with Mexico": Won
      World War I: Won
      World War II: Also, won.
      Korean War: Stalemate
      Vietnam War: Lost
      Gulf War: Won
      Conquest of Afghanistan: Won

      Pretty good record, if you ask me.

      AFAIK, the Vietnam war wasn't actually declared by Congress, but Congress gave their tacit approval by granting the President "War-making powers." In a simliar vein, the war in Afghanistan, being part of the Congressional Decree telling the president to "take the necessary steps", counts as a declared war.

      Ambiguous, ongoing crusades (War on Drugs, War on Terror) minor military escapades (Invasion of Panama, "Antiterrorism", Somalia, Yugoslavia, Iraqi No-Fly Zone), and extended periods of conflict (Cold War & Manifest Destiny) are hardly what we would consider "Wars." I guess the best way to judge what is and is not a war would be the involvement of the public, and not simply military action.

      Of course, we're the single strongest country in the world, and the last time American Soil (one of the 50 states) was attacked and *not* followed up by a successful war was the War of 1812, which was largely our own dumb fault.

    31. Re:Borders by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

      Actually, you can't really say you "won" the civil war, because if the confederates "won" then you would also be able to say you "won" the civil war, since the US would be run by the confederates.

      Vietnam was always a "military action" officially by the states, only the rest of the world acknowledged it for what it really was, a war.

      I wouldn't consider the Gulf War really won, more of a delay actually. If it was won, there wouldn't still be problems with Saddam, IMHO.

      WWI and WWII were won by most of the western world, and the states entered both wars incredibly late (especially WWI). In a weird twist, WWII sorta evolved into the Cold War though with Russia and the States, so I could see an argument form that it wasn't won until just recently.

      Also, the American Revolution has the same effect as the Civil war. If the British won, then what is now the states could still say they won because they would be British loyalists. As well, the States would've likely have eventually seperated smoothly like Canada did.

      Personally, I consider the Korean War a loss for the States by just the fact that they didn't accomplish the objective they wanted, while north Korea was able to maintain it's communist regime.

      I have studied Modern World History with a mildly Eurocentric perspective (1800-now, Mainly in Europe) so I may be inaccurate on some of the finer details of the american wars, but from what I can see, the Americans have a less successful record in the end, but then again, the Americans have also fought more wars then the Canadians.

      Canadian Record

      1812 - On the winning side
      Boer War - On the winning side
      WWI - On the winning side
      WWII - On the winning side
      1945 - onwards, all UN actions, not wars. Canada tries to avoid fighting in outright wars. But, hey, we got great peacekeepers. :-)

      I will admit though that the states has a very powerful military establishment right now, and that is both good in the fact that it can protect the country and bad in the fact that in history large armies led to general unrest and instability when times got bad since they still had to be fed and paid. So, it's a good and a bad thing to have a good establishment. :-) I have an interesting journal entry on Defence Budgets if you look at my journal, you may like it.

      --
      ~ kjrose
  2. Whew by Tri0de · · Score: 2, Funny

    Glad to find out I *DON'T* live in San Francisco after all, couldn't take another one of those summers

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  3. Buckaroo Banzai by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wherever you go, there you are!

    --
    >
  4. great! by jeffy124 · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe that can solve the India-Pakistan problem....

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  5. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by topham · · Score: 2

    Your either trolling, or overly paranoid.

    I have a GPS receiver. Note, I said RECEIVER! It doesn't transmit anything.

    Kinda fun to use on commercial airliners too! (I have an interesting trace of a recent trip, its only partial but shows us flying in anything but a straight line. (We were avoiding some rough weather).

  6. Doesn't Matter... by Free+Heel+Skier · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'm always in the State of Confusion.

  7. Related problem by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Informative

    I used to work in the Oil-n-Gas business (petroleum, not Taco Bell) and that industry is grappling with the same question about well spotting -- the exact surface location of a well. Historically, they are identified via footage calls from a known location (e.g. 354' N, 287' E of SW corner of such-n-such)
    While the state agencies would love to have nice, precise lat-lon coords, the property owners often refuse access to the survey crews because an accurate survey may show that the property line is incorrect, and Farmer Smith never really owned the well, it's on Farmer Johnson's land.
    The real financial impact can be huge.

    1. Re:Related problem by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:
      the property owners often refuse access to the survey crews
      It amazes me people can refuse access. Even if you believe in the virtual sancitity of private property you own, until the survey is done, you don't know you own it. Couldn't the state argue that, to know where your "denial" begins, they need to get on your land anyway?

      For that matter, say Farmer Johnson thinks the well is on his land. Can't he grant access for the survey team to walk the perimeter of his land, and then see where the well ends up?

    2. Re:Related problem by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Most states have laws that if you are allowed to encroach on someone's land as if it were your own for X amount of years, it becomes yours.

      For example, I was recently buying a house that wasy too close to the back of the lot, but there was a fenced off 50 foot back yard even though the lot only went 15 feet off the back of the house. Since the landowner being encroached upon hasn't demanded they remove the fence, in several years, that land might become part of the other lot, and the original landowner will have no recourse.

      I'm sure these laws will get their test with this new development.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Related problem by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Blockquoth right back atcha:
      It amazes me people can refuse access. Even if you believe in the virtual sancitity of private property you own, until the survey is done, you don't know you own it. Couldn't the state argue that, to know where your "denial" begins, they need to get on your land anyway?
      In some parts of the county (Mississippi, to be precise) the state survey crews have been greeted by shotgun-toting farmers (ranchers? I've not spent a lot of time in MS) when the survey crews come to call. When I say they are refusing access, I don't mean some lawyer in a suit, I mean a very simple, literal (and effective!) refusal. In a very rural setting like this, the survey crew isn't going to get a lot of support from the local sherrif, and the state law enforcement has better things to do.
      For that matter, say Farmer Johnson thinks the well is on his land. Can't he grant access for the survey team to walk the perimeter of his land, and then see where the well ends up?
      In many cases, this is exactly how the state (dept of revenue in some places, dept of environmental quality in others) is getting the job done. Doesn't always work though, there may be several wells along the property line, some on each side. It's an agrarian Prisoner's Dillema!
      What's always been funny to me is that the state agencies that care about well locations don't care at all about property lines. One of the most effective efforts involved establishing fixed points for differential GPS, then sending backpack-sized receivers in with the well maintenance crews. It's a nutty industry all around.
    4. Re:Related problem by maeka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let a surveyor (try to) clear this one up.

      Adverse possession is the term for the situation. It's entirely up to the decision of the courts, but a few things they take into account are:

      1. The encroachment must be open and known to both parties.
      2. Intent of the original deed does hold weight
      3. Platted land (i.e. lots) is almost never subject to adverse possession - boundaries were set forth in the original plat, (you'll see your deed most likely referring to lot #x of So-and-so's subdivision in Plat Book y)
      4. Who pays taxes has little if not nothing to do with deciding the argument. The auditor is not the recorder. Auditor's map boundaries ALWAYS close, even if they have to force it, they are not always precise to the recorded legal description of a parcel.
      5. The time period for adverse possession is usually 50 years.

    5. Re:Related problem by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In a very rural setting like this, the survey crew isn't going to get a lot of support from the local sherrif, and the state law enforcement has better things to do.

      The state law enforcement has better things to do than arrest someone for open threatening or assault with a firearm? Damn, but i'm staying the fuck OUT of that state.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:Related problem by pod · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't want to know what state YOU live in.

      The described situation is called trespass. If someone can't be on your land without your permission, or can be removed by you if you so wish, you can use necessary force to remove them. Out in the middle of nowhere this usually means waving around a rifle or a shutgun.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    7. Re:Related problem by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

      I live in a state where you don't screw with perfectly legitimate state workers for the sheer purpose of being an asshole, nor do you greet someone at the door with a shotgun (so sayeth the parent post) without having gone though more peaceful methods

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:Related problem by xdroop · · Score: 2
      The state law enforcement has better things to do than arrest someone for open threatening or assault with a firearm?

      Suddenly those Canadian jokes at the top look a lot less funny, don't they.

      Unless you are (like I am) Canadian, in which case they become fucking hilarious!

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    9. Re:Related problem by foobar104 · · Score: 2
      I know this isn't quite as hip as quoting The Simpsons, but I for one would like to hear what the Coen brothers have to say on the subject.
      Bang! A rifle shot kicks up dust in front of the men.

      CHILD'S VOICE
      Hold it rah chair!

      The front of the farm house shows only a harshly shaded front porch and a dark screen door.

      The screen door swings open and a child emerges on to the porch and steps down into the sunlight, holding a gun almost bigger than he is. The grimy-faced boy, about eight years old, wears tattered overalls.

      You men from the bank?

      PETE
      You Wash's boy?

      CHILD
      Yassir! And Daddy tolt me I'm to
      shoot whosoever from the bank!

      He pokes his rifle at the three men, who raise their hands.

      DELMAR
      Well, we ain't from no bank,
      young feller.

      CHILD
      Yassir! I'm also suppose to shoot
      folks servin' papers!

      DELMAR
      Well we ain't got no papers.

      CHILD
      Yassir! I nicked the census man!

      DELMAR
      There's a good boy.
      (Proper screenplay formatted foiled by the cotton-pickin' sos-n-sos who wrote the dang-burned lameness filter.)
  8. 3G phones by Jedi+Paramedic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I believe that Sprint's (and other manufacturers') new third-generation phones come out soon - many of them are bundled with GPS capability.

    It's touted as a convenience (calling assistance and saying "find me an ATM") and/or safety feature (Calling Cell 911 with "I've just been probed by aliens and have no idea where I am, come save me!"), but I wonder how soon marketing people (and Big Brother) will get a hold of the info... "Hm, this person spends 10 hours a week at supermarket A, let's SMS-page him with sale announcements for our client, supermarket B!"

    *shrug*

    --

    That's my purse! I don't know you! -- Bobby Hill
  9. GPS accuracy by Kobal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We're currently having issues at work with that silly GPS, as it's nowhere nearly as reliable as we'd need when it comes to field use. You know where you stand, but you can't quite know where most of the limits are supposed to be, thanks to the napoleonic era cadastre that is still used. So, while getting the data to map again, the surface we get for a given plot can be wildly different from what was previous declared, with no way to know which is right. So what good are precision tools when you still have to rely on your eyes and ancient maps?

    1. Re:GPS accuracy by topham · · Score: 2

      Complicate question, as the whole thing is based on statistical probablities. But, I can get a reading, right now, in the open that within a minute is probably accurate to less than 10 meters. Further samples will generally give back more accurate results.

      It is possible on some low-end units to get accuracy less than a meter, but requires external data and software to process. (I've tried, but the data I have access to won't get me that level of accuracy in my area).

    2. Re:GPS accuracy by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

      Well for surveying, you can place one receiver at a known point, and then have it tell the other receiver it's error and then relative to the first point I think they can get down to centimeters IIRC.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:GPS accuracy by topham · · Score: 2

      Yes and no, your correct, except consumer grade equipment cannot get that accurate.

      Consumer grade equipment does not generally give out the necessary data to be merged with another unit necessary to correct for the error. Garmin units produce some of the necessary data when some undocumented functions are accessed though the serial port. But even then, my undertsanding is the Garmin units cannot generate the data at the resolution required for less than about half a meter accuracy.

      (Garmin produces units which can do better, but I would not classify them as consumer grade, they are much more expensive).

    4. Re:GPS accuracy by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Yes, you are very correct. Anyone that has looked at an old plot of land that is in metes and bounds can see this. They all go off a given landmark, but they are not 100% exact.

      There is now software that can help plot your land on a map from metes and bounds, but it is too bad they still use this ancient system when GPS is available.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  10. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by topham · · Score: 2

    From Garmin's website "The 24 satellites that make up the GPS space segment are orbiting the earth about 12,000 miles above us. They are constantly moving, making two complete orbits in less than 24 hours. These satellites are travelling at speeds of roughly 7,000 miles an hour. GPS satellites are powered by solar energy. They have backup batteries onboard to keep them running in the event of a solar eclipse, when there's no solar power. " About GPS

  11. use common sense... by bje2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i can see where this could matter to states or municipalities in terms of tax revenues, etc...but when it comes to interfering with people's lives, common sense should be used...for intance, if a kid has been going to a school in one district for a while, then they find out that the family actually lives somewhere different (becuase of a redrawn line), let the kid stay in his old school...make it some sort of grandfather clause...the other things, such as taxes, etc, that's fine...they don't directly effect your day-to-day life...and if the two disputing parties want to sort out who collects taxes and what not from you, that's fine me...of course, i can already see the problem arising where a student goes to school in township A, but his family pays taxes that support schools in township B...i didn't say it was is perfect, but every effort should be made to not interfere with people's daily lives becuase of some poorly drawn boundry line many, many years ago...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:use common sense... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Informative

      such as taxes, etc, that's fine...they don't directly effect your day-to-day life

      You must not have a job yet.

      There is also a lot more than taxes or schools involved that directly impact peoples daily lives. State laws can vary greatly. I'm in the middle of my state. But what if I lived near some other state and suddenly things I own are illegal (I've got a rifle that would fit this easily in some places)

      This is a pretty big deal and I think what will have to utlimately happen is people will need to move if they really don't want to live where they really live.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:use common sense... by Zapman · · Score: 5, Informative

      The problem with this is that both RI and Conn. are planning on sending taxes to these residences, and BOTH expect to collect. If they don't they will take these people to court in either RI or Conn, where they will be guilty.

      What do you do in that case? It certainly will impact you, especially if one state is a tourism state (collects lots of revenue from sales tax) and the other is a property tax state.

      --Jason

      --
      Zapman
    3. Re:use common sense... by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

      But where does that funding come from to pay for the kid's schooling? Property taxes. No state is going to want to take a decrease in their property taxes without the associated decrease in students. So a change in tax structure will affect everyday lives. The money to pay for that kid's education doesn't just appear out of loopholes, and it would cost more to transfer the money between states than it does to send that kid to school.

      And what happens when the parents have another kid? Does he/she go to the same school or to one in their "new" state? How long does it get grandfathered? One generation? One continuous family line? Does it stick with the property? If so, then give the property to the state where the people are using the tax money.

      And there's more than just taxes to fund schools...you also have roads, sewer, zoning issues, etc. etc. etc....

      Part of why the US isn't a true democracy is because the majority typically overules the minority. So, by correcting state lines, some 50 people out of a combined population of a couple million are affected....an extremely small minority that probably won't notice much of a difference anyways.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    4. Re:use common sense... by hyperizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the other things, such as taxes, etc, that's fine...they don't directly effect your day-to-day life...

      What about the elderly lady whose amublance service (that she presumably pays for with her taxes) would be switched to a town much farther away? It's a situation that shows how important these borders (and your taxes) can be...

      And what about voting districts? What if you're suddenly unable to vote for the school board for your child's district?

      In the Southwest, water rights are a big issue. I wonder if GPS has been making any changes to who gets to water their crops.

    5. Re:use common sense... by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Nice reference. Let the Mighty Ducks all teach us a very important lesson!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:use common sense... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Part of why the US isn't a true democracy is because the majority typically overules the minority.

      No, that's democratic--majority rule.

      We're not a TRUE democracy because the minority is protected from the tyranny of the majority. It's better this way.

    7. Re:use common sense... by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      And hopefully countries will do the same thing. They will make the laws in such a way that living in a country is like choosing a certain OS over another. This (should) promote laws to be more lawful, or beneficial so people *want* to live there.

    8. Re:use common sense... by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Actually, in a true democracy everyone must agree in order for an action to be taken, not just the majority.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  12. No surprise by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Funny

    In writing the manual for some civil engineering software back in the 80s, I found that there are some very oddly laid-out survey markers out there, especially in the plains states. The client explained that most of these were laid in the mid-19th century, which was the peak period of American alcohol consumption.

    rj

  13. well... by Auckerman · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I suspect in the cases sited, which used rivers to determine boundries, you will see the old common law agreements sticks. When you are measuring within a few feet to find a spot that moves (a few yards) with the seasons, on both sides of the border no less), you're new "accurate" measurement has little value and one is still stuck with simple common agreement.

    Would be an easy case to present, and keeping common agreed boundries is a no brainer. If one starts using fixed points on boundries, who's to say a narrow river that is used as a boundry will not just move entirely into another state or county...imagine the implications for water management...

    No rational person wants that.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:well... by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 5, Funny
      No rational person wants that.
      True; but we're talking about lawyers and politicians....
      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    2. Re:well... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it were my choice, I'd change all current records to the real coordinates of the previously accepted borders, therefore records are now accurate, nobody has to be bothered by changing schools, tax arrangements, addresses etc... If anyone complained I'd say "Well, if it really matters that much, you should have done your own damn survey, just in case!". Seems pretty sensible to me, but...

      No rational person wants that.

      ...it's not about what rational people want. It's about what lawyers and state governors want!

      Ali

    3. Re:well... by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Insightful
      This is GOVERNMENT. It won't happen.

      Almost every time political boundaries need to be altered (for representatives), these people don't move the border around a few houses, they rewrite the entire map to best suit their own agenda. Legislative Redistricting causes this problem (known as Gerrymandering) in elections again and again and again ALL OVER THE USA.

      You are right about no rational people wanting it. There are many rational people who have offered ways to restructure boundaries that offer the biggest human benefit and lowest government cost. These ideal solutions segment the groups by physical boundaries and population density. But government is not a rational entity.

      There are countless smart was to divide it up. Clusters of people should rationally be served by the same set of government. People between clusters should be separated by distance to the clusters and other boundaries (hills, rivers, roads). In dense population areas, map the location of a current road, or a side of the road, as the boundary -- not the line between where two rivers meet and where another river enters a lake bed.

      And of course after two counties or states go to court fighting it out -- costing millions of taxpayer dollers -- They will put out big press releases saying either "We saved tax money by moving these buildings outside of our county!" or "We increased tax revenue without increasing taxes!", overlooking the fact that they wasted millions in the process.

      frob.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    4. Re:well... by gCGBD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using rivers isn't always clear either.
      Take the case of New Hampshire vs. Maine
      Which, after centuries of dispute was only recently resolved by the Supreme Court.

      --

      O=='=++
    5. Re:well... by ckedge · · Score: 4, Insightful


      GPS Coordinates, I'd imagine that they don't account for continental drift, eh?

      One inch a year adds up over a century or two. So by default you can't use precise GPS coordinates, unless you account year by year for all the plate movement.

    6. Re:well... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are some gotchas there. In the Southern California earthquake of 1971 (think that's the right year) much of the San Fernando Valley moved three feet. The legal costs of keeping property lines fixed to coordinates would have been atrocious (I'll swim in my end of the pool if I damn well please, pal...); as it was, they just let the property lines move with the land.

      rj

    7. Re:well... by delphi125 · · Score: 2
      GPS doesn't: it is based on WGS84 (World Geodetic System 1984).

      Having said that, Europe for example has a different system, ETRS89, which is almost the same as WGS84, but takes in to account continental plate movement.

      More details at http://www.gps.gov.uk/additionalInfo/coordinateSys tems.asp

  14. Very Easy Solution by unsinged+int · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just make a 51st state that includes Everyone Living on the Thick Black Lines of the US Map. Think of all the interstate commerce with all the states they'd border! Oh, but wait, what about the people living on the border between the new Border State and the other states? Let's create another...ouch. **Brain implosion**

    1. Re:Very Easy Solution by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, but wait, what about the people living on the border between the new Border State and the other states? Let's create another...ouch. **Brain implosion**

      Wow...Infinitely recursive bureaucracy! Maybe this is how we can fix those nitwits in Congress!

      I mean, most of them have hairpieces, so they wouldn't fall prey to the old robot trap of "Lather-Rinse-Repeat"...

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:Very Easy Solution by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

      Don't we already have that?

  15. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by bje2 · · Score: 2

    there was an episode of West Wing where that happened...Donna (Josh's secretary) found out that where she had grown up in Minnesota was now considered Canada because of a border change....it ended up she was grandfathered in as an American citizen, and had to take some stupid american history or something test to make it offiicial...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  16. Re:orbit 12,500 miles?? by hubie · · Score: 2

    Yup.

  17. Old Land by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I bought a piece of peopery in Surry County Virginia a few years ago. I had a hell of a time because the recorded deed goes back more than a hundred years and refers to chops in trees for markers and distances measured in chains.

    Most mortgage companies wouln't touch it without a recent survey. I finally found a farm credit company that would give me the mortgage. I've had the road frontage surveyed but I still have to survey the other 60+acres. Researching the sale was quite an education.

    I could go down to the city office and pull up three different aerial surveys of the area, but no land surveys. Reaally sad because the county taxes me on 40 acres and acording to the surveyer I used for the frontage, I probably have 80+ acres.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Old Land by nolife · · Score: 2

      My county has all their property records, real estate transactions, tax information, buyers, sellers, satellite photos, coordinates etc all available online.... On one hand it is very convenient to look at your property and values, on the other its scary to think that anyone in the world that is online can too.

      The Prince William County mapper is here. For an example you can search by "address" for 8091 COUNSELOR. I live off of Bristow Road, haha. The tax information is available via link after finding an address. You can do all kinds of strange searches like adjoining properties, school boundaries, road paths, recently sold houses etc...

      The site is normally slow so I doubt it can handle /. It is a cool thing to play with and browse around with though. I don't know how updated it is, my pool has been in for almost 2 years and it doesn't show up in the photos.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  18. Reminds me of Four Corners.... by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last year, I went through Four Corners - for those of you not up on your US geography, Four Corners is the point at which Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah all meet, being the only place in the US where 4 states meet.

    I was struck by the arbitrariness of this location - it was nothing but a meeting of fictional lines on a map. There was no magical property of this location - c was still 3E8 m/sec (to 1 significant digit), 9.8 m/sec^2 acceleration, no majestic peaks, poles, or pyramids rising from the ground. Save for a decision made by a bunch of beaurcrats there was nothing special about this location.

    This article strikes me the same way. Due to a complete non-event (the changing of a line on a map), people's lives are going through upheaval.

    So we are able to more accurately define these imaginary lines. Why do we need to change the location of the border - why not just more accurately define existing practice. Look at a map of Kansas - the state USED to be a simple rectangle, until somebody decided to use the river to define the northeast corner. Now we have the silliness of "Kansas City, Mo!"

    It just seems so wasteful!

    1. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by gilroy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:
      there was nothing special about this location.
      What is special about Four Corners is exactly that there is nothing special. The mid-US states are amazing in the political undertone. Look, those borders were drawn by some guys with a pencil and straightedge. No natural fortification. No concern for defensible borders. No historical or trade mandates. What a wonderful thing to break free of that mindset! Those lines were drawn for administrative convenience only.
    2. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by n-baxley · · Score: 2

      To confuse matters, there is also Kansas City, KS right accross the river!

    3. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by forkboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've never been to Four Corners, but I've been in 4 states at once....denial, disarray, confusion, and panic.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    4. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by TWR · · Score: 2
      Why is it more depressing for a "suit" to decide a border than it is for people to die over it? Go pencil pushers on this one...

      -jon

      --

      Remember Amalek.

    5. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it more depressing for a "suit" to decide a border than it is for people to die over it? Go pencil pushers on this one...
      -jon



      Not easily defendable for one thing, always nice to have logical reasons for placing a boarder someplace. That is actually the line that kind of ticked me off, boarders should be placed in logical locations, not just willy nilly.

    6. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

      Well, if you live in Europe (specifically the Balkans), that imaginary administrative line is a cause of civil war. No way I'm going to allow that to govern me. These borders are stupid.

      --
      Revolution = Evolution
    7. Re:Reminds me of Four Corners.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2
      That is actually the line that kind of ticked me off, boarders should be placed in logical locations, not just willy nilly.

      I agree! Just last month, we had three guests staying in our house. One day, two of them were in the guest bedroom and one slept on the couch in the den. The next day, two slept on the floor of the office and one stayed out all night. The next day, everything changed again!

      I agree that boarders should always be placed in logical locations!

      ;-)

  19. What, no grandfather clause? by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And if not, WHY not?

    how would this be any different than cities/counties/whatever annexing land like they do now?

    Borders change all the time - maybe not usually in a state border situation - but certainly often at lower government levels.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  20. Re:Little to late by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

    The comparison is of no value. The dispute between the Palestinians and Israelis involves much much more than the location of borders. It involves the creation of a state and the relationship between that state and Israel. Your fears are misplaced.

    More accurate means of surveying are good. That we can be more accurate and do so w/less resources and effort is also good. As the population of the world increases I would imagine that the demand for such services will grow as well.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  21. Re:What if they figure out the Canada-US border by Kwikymart · · Score: 2

    It is not news that the Can-US border is inaccurate. That has been known for decades upon decades. Though the border was most likely stated where it was in a treaty or something similar (I dont feel like doing research), it not matching up to the actual physical location means nothing. When they establish the border it is set in stone and it doesn't matter where it actually ends up.

    I understand that this is a joke, but people changing countries is just not going to happen :)

    --

    Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
  22. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by queequeg1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Than obviously you haven't had to work with a lot of surveyers. Without any intention of maligning that industry, I can say that surveyers are as prone to error as any other profession. In the course of checking legal descriptions for clients, I have run the descriptions through computer programs that plot them and have found some of the craziest plots imaginable. In one case I found a closure error of over 5 miles - the legal description described a big open-ended U. And while a mere meter or two might not be all that bad out in the middle of nowhere, much smaller distances (even a few inches) can become very important in downtown metropolitan areas.

  23. Established borders should stay in place. by n-baxley · · Score: 2

    If a border has been agreed upon for 160 years it should be left alone. The markers their basing the new lines on seem to be doubtful and sometimes movable! Wouldn't it be better to use the established borders? It sure would save a lot of headaches and "wasted" tax payer money that would be spent straightening this thing out.

  24. geography by Jonavin · · Score: 2

    What about plate shifts etc.. the relative distance between two points on Earth does change, even if it's only a little bit.

  25. For all you non-Rhode Islanders by RadioheadKid · · Score: 4, Funny

    First off, c'mon RI is so small anyways, just let them have a little more land. You know that little chunk that Massachusetts has along the top of CT, I think CT is still pissed off about that and taking it out on RI.

    The other amusing thing is this quote: "It bothers me giving up my low-number license plate with my initials on it." It's kind of a hobby, maybe even an obsession, of some people in RI to try and get a low number (or as they say in RI "low numba") license plate, for example if you had w-12, you would be all the envy in the state. License plates are typically two letters and three numbers in RI.

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by jc42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      > You know that little chunk that Massachusetts has along the top of CT, I think CT is still pissed off about that ...

      Well, I always thought that was a tab so that Massachusetts wouldn't just slide out to sea.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by Siva · · Score: 2

      don't we have that whole one letter and 3 number thing too, but without the '-' in between? seen a lot of those lately...

      i remember seeing the license plate '7' once when i was in HS. i believe that was the one that then-governer Sundlun "obtained" for his wife. i love this state...

      --

      Keyboard not found.
      Press F1 to continue.
    3. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      First off, c'mon RI is so small anyways, just let them have a little more land.

      "It's not the size, it's how you use it."
      -- The new state motto of Rhode Island.

    4. Re:For all you non-Rhode Islanders by RadioheadKid · · Score: 2

      Along those same lines, the real state motto is Hope

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  26. Potential Benefit by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2

    This may be a stretch, but some people affected by this discovery may benefit from the confusion. If you are in this situation and were arrested/convicted by the state that you weren't really in at the time, it is possible--though IANAL & YMMV--to have your conviction overturned due to lack of jurisdiction.

    I'm just throwing that out there because a lot of people with DUI, indecent exposure, drug possession, etc... run-ins from their teen & college years will have an unfair disadvantage for the rest of their life because of the fanciful association potential employeers make between a police record and future job performance.

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:Potential Benefit by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2
      If you where [sic] getting wasted all throughout college fair odds are you were not learning (or at least retaining. :D ) as much as the next applicant who managed to stay at least a bit more sober. . . .

      Doesn't seem to keep anybody from becoming President, right? Ergo, it shouldn't matter in a job interview.

      --
      "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  27. The earth is moving too by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Not only are borders inaccurate, but the earth moves too. For exampe the San Andreas shifts two inches a year- sometimes in violent jumps all at once. This adds up to 16 feet in a century.
    Boundaries based on waterways are prone to sfting also.

    GPS is used a research tool to observe earth shifts on a minute scale.

  28. Big deal by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    When my home state was still a territory, the river that separates it from one of its neighbour states changed course. That boundary dispute is still in the courts more than a century later.

    So those of you who think you've recently moved, don't rush out and buy new stationery just yet....

    1. Re:Big deal by handorf · · Score: 2

      Which state boundry are you talking about? I know Kentucky and Indiana have a bit of this going on, but I wasn't aware of any others.

      --
      -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
  29. RI Surveyors by electric_yak · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to work for a surveyor in RI, and this situation doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Surveying is really more than just right-angle trig, it also involves a careful assesment of existing markers, the path of previous surveyors, and "known-good" boundaries to measure from (ones whose choice will be accepted by a court). In a rural town like Hopkinton, there are no good comprehensive plans to reference-you have to search back in the title records (in some cases, back to the 1640s) when "legal deed" could be as vague as "my property is five rods by the Old North Road on the west, five rods by Farmer Joe's land to the North, seventeen-hundred cubits by the land of Cooper Ptarmigan III in the east, and finally five rods bordered on the south by the property of the Widow Fenimore, now deceased, to the Old North Road and the point and place of beginning."

    The rest of the properties in town are similarly well-described, which means you have to start your measurements further away from the actual property you are concerned with, in some cases, starting in New York would be a good idea:) The local governments tax property on the assessor's best guess of how much land you own, so there is no incentive for accurate public land data. Hell, the City of Providence can't even prove where it's own north border is-most of the markers are gone and the records are non-existant.

    Oh, and one final thing: until GPS receivers have 1/100" precision _and_ accuracy, don't expect measurements taken using one to stand up in court-adjudicated property dispute.

    1. Re:RI Surveyors by Alioth · · Score: 2

      "Oh, and one final thing: until GPS receivers have 1/100" precision _and_ accuracy, don't expect measurements taken using one to stand up in court-adjudicated property dispute."

      Or that the systems used to determine the location are the same. I'm wondering if this whole mess is started because the old records are not using the same lat/long system as the new ones. GPS generally uses the World Geodetic System 1984 as a datum for lat/lon coordinates - anything using any other datum could be as little as feet to as many as miles off what the WGS 84 says a location is.

  30. same in Oz over postcodes by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Here in Sydney. People get into A big hooha when suburb boundaries are updated/corrected/change & they end up with a less exlusive postcode. Take the leafy Northshore suburb of Wahroonga, some claimed their properties were devalued $40,000 because of the change from the Wahroonga postcode to the Turramurra postcode.

  31. reminds me of my cambodian/laotian/thai friend by 2Bits · · Score: 2

    Yeah, human-drawn artificial border line is a big mess, and can have a very negative impact on people's life.

    I had a friend at college who could really tell his country of birth. It all depends on the season and the result of the guerilla war. He was born in a village in the Golden Triangle (the border of Cambodia, Laos and Thailand). He would be cambodian or laotian and thai citizen, depending on who controlled the area. And when the drug warlord controlled the area, he would be stateless (in a no-man's land, and had to pledge allegiance to whoever controlled the area).

    1. Re:reminds me of my cambodian/laotian/thai friend by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      You don't need borders for that zanyness. German law defines citizenship by the mother, whereas the belgian one defines it by the father. So, a belgian woman I know had a first son from a german, then had a second from a french. Since France defines citizenship by the place of birth, both sons cannot have any citizenship at all! (They currently have UN passports).

  32. No need for GPS, just ask the IRS by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    They'd be able to track you down in the middle of Antarctica.

    RMN
    ~~~

  33. Re:It would be an excellent PR thing by Dynedain · · Score: 2

    wouldn't happen.....there are buildings built arround the country that straddle state lines. Meaning the owners must split their taxes proportionately between two states. A certain resort with the pool on the border of California and Nevada comes to mind

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  34. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

    You had it right on up until the end. Four satellites are enough for any receiver regardless of clock type. You need three if you have a disciplined atomic clock available to the reciever.

    Also, if you have an atomic clock and can make an assupmtion about your altitude you only need 2. Early GPSs on Navy submarines used that trick, since subs always carry (multiple) atomic clocks and since they could only get a GPS track on the surface their altitude was always 0 MSL. They could surface or get to periscope depth and get a super-accurate position fix in just 3 or 4 seconds then dive again.

  35. Grandfather Clause... by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Is there a way you can just be exempt from the new borders and cite the original declaration of land ownership from when you bought the property?

    --

    ~ now you know
  36. More significant for country borders by kiwimate · · Score: 2

    I remember reading a newspaper article a few months ago about a town that straddles the US/CDN border. The article discussed specific people, such as a lady who lives on the US side but works on the CDN side (or the other way around), or neighbours who live across the street from each other and are in different countries.

    The article then discussed some of the ramifications of this, especially in light of September 11. Before that, people were fairly relaxed about "crossing the border". Now, however, they can't afford to take such things lightly.

    Moving more on topic, the article pointed to in the story mentioned a certain Iva Crider.

    Iva Crider, 78, has more serious concerns. She and her husband built a house near the border 60 years ago. She'd always considered her house -- and five chicken coops -- in Rhode Island. The North Stonington survey would bump her into Connecticut.

    "It's a shame. I'm a mile from the Hopkinton town hall, the post office, the police, two miles from the ambulance," says Mrs. Crider. "If they put this house in Connecticut, I'll have to sell. I can't go 15 miles [to town]. I'm in a wheelchair. After 160 years, I think they should just leave it alone."


    This is someone who is facing her whole life being turned upside down for the sake of what must seem to her like purely arbitrary definitions.

    Unfortunately, there's no simple question. Jurisdiction demands that these questions be defined precisely (especially in such a litigious society as America; what police officer is going to want to risk getting caught in a jurisdiction battle over disputed boundary lines when he is responding to a violent crime which may require him to draw his sidearm?). And simple politics demands that politicians protect their territory, valid or invalid, sensible or insensible.

    1. Re:More significant for country borders by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      I remember reading a newspaper article a few months ago about a town that straddles the US/CDN border. The article discussed specific people, such as a lady who lives on the US side but works on the CDN side (or the other way around), or neighbours who live across the street from each other and are in different countries.
      That's Rock-Island & Derby line, located on the US/Canada/Québec/Vermont border.

      The opera house (bottom of the page) is built accross the international boundary; an actor during a play will cross the border several times... And a nearby bar has the pool table smack on the border...

      A street runs astride the international boundary, and no one seems to object to the surveillance cameras that have been there for more than 20 years.

      To end such zanyness, both the US and canadian governments passed a law prohibiting building less than 6 feet from the border (but there are a few common customs houses, though).

  37. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

    correction... that's more than US$250,000 per square metre. Yes, I was off by a factor of 10^3 before.

  38. Can you imagine... by Xeriar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this was not the U.S., but just a hodgepodge of 50 or so countries?

    And they go to war, not for land, not for mineral or 'natural' resources, but for fucking (pun intended) -people- and the taxes they represent.

    Why can I see this happening?
    Somewhere, on some planet or continent even more boneheaded than ours, this has, or will happen...

    1. Re:Can you imagine... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 2
      If this was not the U.S., but just a hodgepodge of 50 or so countries?

      You know ... you're surprisingly close, the US is a Republic of 50 hodgepodge states, each with it's own government that looks out for its own best interest.

      Why can I see this happening? Somewhere, on some planet or continent even more boneheaded than ours, this has, or will happen...

      Or even worse ... what about those people that go to bed Americans, and wake up one day Canadian, eh? AARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  39. 54-40 or fight? by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    Well, at one time you folks wanted it all, and at one time, you folks didn't want parts of MI or WI... Make up your minds!

    (Actually, I'm not so sure where this fabled "inaccuracy" would come in, since the Canada/US border follows the 49th parallel through most of the countries, and bisects the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway for most of the rest of it.)

    1. Re:54-40 or fight? by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      Well, at one time you folks wanted it all, and at one time, you folks didn't want parts of MI or WI... Make up your minds!

      Well, I guess I'll take it, if nobody else wants it (except for the icy bits, unless they hold oil or gas). I'll pay you a US dollar and Canadian dollar so the contract will be nice and legal, even in that pesky internantional court thingy the UN wants to be settin' up. Please send me an address so my boy Col... -- uh, Secretary Powell -- can mail the contract to y'all.

      Sincerely,
      G.W. Bush

      P.S. Y'all have 30 days to vacate the premises.

      --
      That is all.
  40. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by karnal · · Score: 2

    I don't think my magellan for my palm v has an atomic clock.

    What I do think is that every satellite probably just transmits their time in a signal, and judging on when you get that signal, you can re-assemble where you are - I don't believe the unit even has to worry about time, other than "time between signals".

    --
    Karnal
  41. Fuzzy boundaries! by TekkonKinkreet · · Score: 2

    Never happen, but it's fun to think about. Throw a blur on those black lines on the map. "Well, you appear to live 70% in Israel and 30% in Palestine, please split your taxes, votes, political leanings, religious doctrines, prejudices, and so on accordingly."

    My take: people live where they think they live. For tens of thousands of years, people have defined places using prepositional phrases. Now we can use coordinates, great. But if the numbers conflict with those definitions, it's the numbers that need adjusting.

    Oddly enough, this is germain to my germaine to my half-baked, nowhere-near-ready-for-public-consumption personal project, which involves trying to represent places both with GPS coordinates and phrases like "down by the riverside".

  42. It's happened, people by Greedo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Between 1820 and 1842, the boundary between Maine and Canada was disputed.

    In 1903, the border between Canada and the US along the Alaskan "pan-handle" was finally decided.

    In 1925, a treaty with the UK clarified the boundary through the Lake of the Woods (Minnisota), resulting in the transfer of a few acres between countries. US residents in this area actually wanted to secede from the US at one point due to fishing regulations.

    Several towns straddle the New York/Quebec border, where the border can run through a library. That page also mentions that many people in the region have dual citizenship because they were born in the States.

    So, it ain't that much of a joke.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  43. The Continuing Search for a New Authority by guttentag · · Score: 2
    The survey used military satellites to locate two 19th-century boundary markers, six miles apart. Then, on a computer, the survey team plotted the markers on a detailed map and connected them with a straight line -- correcting the slightly distorted border established by an 1840 survey.
    If the survey team was hired by the town in Connecticut, the team has an incentive to skew the findings. It's not difficult to do by "correcting" the time your receiver thinks it is, and if ever contested in court it could be excused as a simple mistake. "My watch must have been a few minutes fast, your honor." A survey team hired by the Rhode Island town could set their watch back a few minutes to get favorable results.

    Of course, articles about GPS always highlight the fact that they are "military satellites" up front to suggest to the reader that some official military operation was involved. The WSJ article even calls GPS "new technology" -- which is really stretching the idea that "new" is a relative term. I used the same network of military satellites, "new technology" and a $100 device that runs on two AA batteries to drive from San Francisco to the Grand Canyon last year. Doesn't sound quite so official now, does it?

    Neither team's findings would change the fact that the border established between the states 160 years ago was based on observations on the ground, not GPS. It would take an agreement between the two states or a drawn-out legal battle before the U.S. Supreme Court similar to the case that resulted in New York and New Jersey splitting Ellis Island right through the middle of an existing, historic building. Ellis Island was arguably more important financially to the states than a handful of houses, and I suspect the Supreme Court would rule that the indigenous residents of those houses have a greater right to choose their state than a bunch of abandoned buildings.

    On the other hand, Connecticut and Rhode Island could always go to war over this. Yeah, let's do that. There's nothing good on TV tonight anyway.

  44. You mean? by aengblom · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe these "surveyors" are that bad. I mean it's not as if the states aren't all different colors! I live in central PA so it's all green. New Jersey, as we all know, is orange! Perhaps we should get some non-color blind folks out there to define the borders!

    Hint: Black line=new state!

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:You mean? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      Hint: Black line=new state!

      I think part of the problem is that the black lines have faded too much. I can hardly even see them anymore. They must have been painted a while ago. Maybe we need to hire somebody to repaint them?

    2. Re:You mean? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2

      whrere in central PA?

      I mean, I live in Jersey Shore, PA. Lycoming County. Those surveyors were off by A FEW HUNDRED MILES.

  45. Portable GPS by arnex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article: The receiver, which typically is portable, calculates its distance from the various satellites and triangulates to determine its own location within an inch.

    Uh, is there really such a thing as a non-portable GPS receiver?

  46. This all sounds VERY familiar... by schon · · Score: 2

    Hmm.. border disputes, Rhode Island... where have I heard this before?

    Oh, yeah - Family Guy!

    Man, talk about life imitating art..

  47. Re:Borders (Simpsons, eh?) by MarvinMouse · · Score: 2

    Not only that. There are a lot of Canadian Connections in the Simpsons.

    check this:
    http://ccr.ptbcanadian.com/simpsons/

    This site goes through all of the episodes and lists all of the Canadian connections in the Simpsons.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  48. Re:Big Brother Rant by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
    There's even people who VOLUNTARILY have their children fingerprinted for government files, "just in case" something happens. WTF? As if the government's knowledge of your wherabouts and identity isn't one of the most hazardous propositions there are!

    I agree with most of what you said, but I think you have the details of the fingerprinting thing wrong. They fingerprint your kid, and then hand you the print cards in case your kid turns up missing. They don't keep a copy, you (as the parent) do, in case the unthinkable happens.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  49. Different technology for high-accuracy measurement by Fencepost · · Score: 2
    Most receivers use what's called "code phase" processing, which can be accurate down to about a meter.

    For surveying and high-precision positioning they switch to "carrier phase" processing, which is both more expensive and can be accurate to less than a centimeter.

    More information on Magellan's site

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  50. East Chicago by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Illinois can frickin' have it! Bad enough to have to admit that Gary is in the same State that I live in. Come on!! Let's clean up Indiana!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  51. Re:/me puts on a tinfoil hat by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
    Well, here it is on slashdot 8-)

    All superheterodyne receivers have some miniscule level of IF leakage. For a typical FM radio, it's at 10.7 MHz. TVs are at 45 MHz. AM radios are at 455 KHz. For commercial gear, it could be 30, 45, 70 or any other freq (or freqs) the designers choose. Many receivers have several IFs, therefore several possible 'transmit' frequencies.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  52. Not a big deal by eples · · Score: 2


    The people caught in the middle simply want to know where they'll send their kids for school.

    Send 'em where you always sent 'em before.

    It's like when the electricity goes out and the traffic lights stop working - don't panic, it's not the end of the world.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  53. Re:This Just In... by wizzy403 · · Score: 2

    I always knew there was something odd about that side of my family...

  54. Do You Know Where You Live? by NorthDude · · Score: 2

    No... And what's my name? Who are you!?! Where am I??? Arrrgggggg!!!!

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  55. Sure, I do. by yzquxnet · · Score: 2

    They came out and surveyed the land and pounded stakes in the ground at the corners of the property. That's my land. I don't care if it moves over time. Or shifts from the earths plates moving. Everything inside those markers is mine.

  56. In Surry by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    You go down to the courthouse and dig through a room of really old books. Last time I was there I talked with the librarian(?) and he mentioned that he was trying to figure out how to scan in all the documents so they wouln't have to be handled so much. That, he said, would have to be done out of his own pocket since the county didn't have the budget to do it.

    If you ever get a half-day off from work you should take the ferry from Willimsburg to Surry. You can eat lunch at the Virginia Diner(be sure to eat some hush puppies) then walk across the street and look around the courthouse. Its kind of neat to read all the old legal papers.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:In Surry by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      You go down to the courthouse and dig through a room of really old books.
      In a disused lavatory, with a "beware of the leopard" sign on the door...
    2. Re:In Surry by willybur · · Score: 2

      Whoa, your comment and signature both talk about the same thing! And I just read that book about 2 weeks ago.

      --

      --
      "Everybody wants a rock to wind a piece of string around." - They Might Be Giants, "We Want a Rock"
  57. Calvin Quote by pandemonia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Calvin: [Daydreaming]

    Mrs. Wormwood: Calvin! What state do you live in?

    Calvin: Denial!

    Mrs. Wormwood: I guess I can't argue about that...

    --
    -mz
  58. GPS is informative by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

    GPS is informative.

    A few years back (when I lived in San Jose) I got ahold of a GPS unit and a marine navigation software package (Cpt something).

    The nice part of the package was that you could fire up the GPs unit (and since it was for marine navigation) it would plat your course over time on a map.

    Well. This was too tempting.

    So, (in my house) I set up the antenna and unit and began to plot my course.

    Well. Hey, this was around the time of the recent earthquake in Oakland around 1992 or so, but still, my place is not going to move, right?

    Wrong.

    My place moved. Over a day or so, plotting my movement, my place moved as much as a quarter mile or so in several directions. No, I did not notice any more earthquakes during that time.

    And, no, I do not think the military had their satelites set to the 10 meter or better resolution. But, a "quarter a mile".

    Nice cruise is all I could conclude.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
    1. Re:GPS is informative by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

      A quarter mile is kind of harsh, but I could see that happening on that vintage of a GPS if it was having problems getting a lock on 4 satellites. Low signal strength, especially indoors, or interferrence can cause the receiver to go into a degarded accuracy mode. Usually the receiver will indictate this by displaying a estimated error or figure of merit number.

    2. Re:GPS is informative by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

      Oh I agree.

      But, we are talking about a 1992 vintage or so.

      Of course, the interesting thing was the particular software would plot the sequencial readings on a map. You see, this was a marine software package so the course of your "boat" was important, right?

      Well. It was important. And, if you were trying to figure out how close you were to the California coast line it would be just fine. But, when you know your "boat" is not going anywhere, what you plot over time is simply the inaccuracy of the GPS, etc.

      The quarter mile error was about the worst. But, one eigth to a sixteenth occured in just about all directions. It was one hell of a ride if you "believe the instruments". And, of course, I had military training that taught you to believe the instruments over your own assessments. Well. Usually that is fine.

      I would love to try the same experiment today. Marine software would try to plot your course over time for navigation purposes. The other stuff out there just tells you where you are now (supposedly) and does not give you any capability to doubt its accuracy.

      And, of course, since satellite are flying around all the time they can alter the accuracy of their information as well. As far as I know, the GPS satellites are not geosyncronous. They actually move around the place (our planet).

      So, if you are in one place (such as a fixed building) you can easily test the accuracy of their system. And, the marine software nicely plots it. Of course it is disburbing if you falsely conclude your place is moving around.

      --
      NexuSys - Linux support by the best
  59. Re:A brewery in Portland by laserjet · · Score: 2

    I just got home and looked. It is "Fire Station 5 Brewing Company". A damn good beer, not a issy IPA like a lot of them are.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  60. Lines aren't quite straight by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    The borders in this part of the country are almost precisely aligned with major lines of latitude and longitude. Which can be fun if you have a GPS and are on a road heading directly towards (or away) from a border.

    But if you get a very large-scale map, you'll see that the lines aren't quite straight. There are small jogs, just enough to include a mining claim or spring or other natural resource. It makes you wonder what sort of backroom deals occured to make sure that property was in Utah instead of Colorado, etc.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  61. Re:Super-GPS? by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

    It's not easy to get that accurate. Or cheap either. It requires a very expensive GPS theodolite rig. When these things first showed up, they didn't work in real time either. You had to dump a bunch of observation data a computer and combine it with obersvation data from a special base station receiver (that had to be placed on a surveyed spot) and let it finish the number crunching before you would get usuable location fixes. Those first units were claiming sub-centimeter accuracy, don't know how well they delivered though.

  62. Re:Doesn't sound right... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2

    Or, given that the source is MSNBC and they, like most journalists - print, web, and broadcast - must target audience with the collective average of a sixth grade education, it is possible that such details were ommited.

  63. What is the difference? by teetam · · Score: 2
    I come from a country where people in each state speak a different language and are sometimes very different from each other.

    I can never understand why the border between states in US would be so controversial. After all, what is the difference between one state and its neighbors? Same people, same issues and the same two political parties fighting it out.

    Makes me curious, are there any neighboring states which don't get along very well? Any states that fight over water or any other natural resources?

    --
    All your favorite sites in one place!
    1. Re:What is the difference? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Same people, same issues and the same two political parties fighting it out.

      You've obviously never been to New York, or California, Nevada, Texas, or Florida.

      Some of the states are *very* different than their neighbors. Different tax levels, different levels of government, different *laws*... in some ways, moving from one state to another can be as different as moving from one country to the next.

      Makes me curious, are there any neighboring states which don't get along very well? Any states that fight over water or any other natural resources?

      I imagine that there are. But since we've got the Feds, they fight with lawyers and not their respective "National Guards" or State Police.

  64. Everything old is new again by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    This gem is probably from sometime in the century before last:

    Surveyor: Do you own this farm?

    Farmer: Ayuh.

    Surveyor: Well, we have some news for you. We took a survey of your property and it turns out your farm isn't in New Hampshire after all.

    Farmer: 'Taint?

    Surveyor: No, we resurveyed the border and found out that your property is actually on the Vermont side.

    Farmer: So you're sayin' mah fahm is in Vermahnt?

    Surveyor: Yes, that's what we're saying.

    Farmer: Good. Nevah could stand them New Hampshah wintahs.

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
  65. That was worth noting by Auckerman · · Score: 2
    "They can't use common law because Louisiana is the only state based on French Civil Law rather than English Common Law."

    I actually thought of this, strangely enough. But I think it's not relevent. Within Louisiana, they are well within their rights to use Napolianic code to setting common disputes, but a case about state borders, is for the federal courts, which is based off English Common.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
  66. Treaty Freaks and Surveying Anomalies by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2

    Check out Point Roberts, WA to see an example of an outcome of treaty-making without good surveying. The outcome of the war of 1812 caused the Americans and British to firm up borders. Finally, in 1846 the border between the US and what is now British Columbia was established at 49 degrees North. Apparently they didn't realize Point Roberts would be an isolated outpost of the US!

    Apparently the border markers along this part of the world were done with 1800's technology, and the generally accepted border in the area is about 300m too far north. So there is some strip of "Canadian" territory being "occupied" by Americans just south of Vancouver. This is an academic joke because both countries have since agreed that the border stands where the markers are. However, the State of Washington, until fairly recently, had officially defined the border as 49 degrees North, and a number of court cases for crimes committed in this 300m strip, notably illegal fishing just off-shore, were thrown out due to lack of jurisdiction!

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  67. Accuracy of GPS receivers by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    My GPS receiver is accurate to about 15 feet. So, I can't tell if my property line has moved for at least 150 years. But since my zoning mandates a minimum of 400 feet of road frontage, it doesn't bother me that much. Folks crammed into cities or suburbs like sardines (why is it never anchovies?) would probably be more concerned.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  68. Re:Big Brother Rant by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
    I have no problem with you choosing not to have your kids fingerprinted - if I had kids, I wouldn't, either. All I wanted to point out was that all of the fingerprint programs I've heard about do not keep copies of the prints. It'd be just as easy to 'print your kids yourself, and squirrel them away.

    PS - I want some of that 'probabe cause' you mentioned! 8-)

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.