Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Security Keys Changed

anth writes: "A couple a months ago we discussed some reverse engineering of the Xbox which discovered the security code. The last paragraph of this letter from Nvidia says MS changed the code, and that they had to write off chips with old code as a result."

72 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Guess Nvidia didn't read the EULA by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Funny

    MS has the right to update and fix any software bit automaticcaly. :P

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Guess Nvidia didn't read the EULA by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 3, Informative

      > About time they returned some of their ill gotten gains to the consumer. ...except that it's actually going down the toilet, not back to the consumer.

  2. Cat and mouse by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At some point the technology is just going to progress to the point that these silly hacks are not worth the time nor the money.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Cat and mouse by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      Well, first off, you should change your name to ObliviousGuy...

      Why?
      A. Someone's ALWAYS got the time. (these are geeks)
      B. Someone's ALWAYS got the money. (not all the geeks lost all their $ in the dot-bomb implosion.)

      'nuff said.

    2. Re:Cat and mouse by shepd · · Score: 2

      Yah, exactly.
      That's why even after 3 card swaps, hundreds of ECMs, mind boggling amounts of destroyed cards, DTV is still hacked by people. I mean, they just gave up giving up, right?
      Hacks will always exist, and you can save more money by giving up after being hacked the first time -- the people buying your tech to pirate your programming, or in this case games, are just not the customers you need to take care of. Consider selling your hardware at a profit to avoid being burned by pirates (what a concept!)
      Spend the money where it counts -- on paying customers!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Cat and mouse by God!+Awful · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Hacks will always exist, and you can save more money by giving up after being hacked the first time -- the people buying your tech to pirate your programming, or in this case games, are just not the customers you need to take care of.

      Yeah, that's basically what they told me in prison: "I'm going to anally rape you whether you like it or not, so you might as well sell your body for some cigarettes."

      -a

  3. blamed by mmThe1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We never blamed Xbox.

    Yes, Microsoft is the one. I never blame Windows or Visual Studio.

  4. Hrmmm... by vofka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Surely the nVidia Lawyer types should have seen this kind of thing coming, and keeping that in mind, should have built a clause into their contract with Micro$haft stating that they would receive a certain acceptable minimum notice of a Code-Change, so that the manufacturing losses (and hence financial losses) were minimised?

    Hindsight, it seems, once again has 20-20 vision!

    --
    Disclaimer: I meant what I thought, not what I wrote! What? You can't read my Mind? Oh dear!
    1. Re:Hrmmm... by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The lawyers probably would have seen had the glaring dollars signs from the sales people not blinded them. The Desktop GIANT planting an order 6 million + chips? Even if the lawyers saw it anything they said would have been drowned out be the cash registers.

      The odd thing is that their tech guys didn't spot this. After all why should the graphics ship have the code hardcoded in it?

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    2. Re:Hrmmm... by geirhe · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The odd thing is that their tech guys didn't spot this. After all why should the graphics ship have the code hardcoded in it?
      Power consumption.
      Speed.
      Ease of programming.

      The reasons for putting things in microcode or hardware are not hard to see if you are an ASIC designer.

    3. Re:Hrmmm... by geirhe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      really. duh. hard coded means you can't change it. so why didn't the engineers notice they would have to throw out any fabricated chips if Microsoft told them we ain't accepting that particular hard code any longer?
      This is not what I answered. I answered a question about why one would put things in hardware.

      Pointing out errors like this is not hard after something has been broken. Doing it up front is way harder. I suggest you try doing a 10Mgate+ design sometime, and try maintaining control over the possible tradeoffs of speed (whatever) against a possible specification change in the future. This time around, Nvidia lost the gamble. Shit happens.

  5. I doubt the key has changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I doubt they changed the key as it would be hacked just as easily as the last one. What they've probably done is changed the encryption method to make it harder to do so.. I mean if you're going to scrap a whole lot of chips, you better do it right.

    1. Re:I doubt the key has changed by martissimo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that would be pointless, the MIT guy didn't even attempt to break MS's 128 bit RC4 encryption in the first place.

      their weakness was that the data actually travels un-encrypted along a high speed bus on the mainboard for a very short run, and is checked after that run for a 32 bit "magic number" at the end of their plaintext stream... that is the spot he watched, he made a lil device that plugged into that bus and read the data as it streamed unencrypted.

      unless they encrypted traffic on that bus it would be totally pointless, and the MIT guy who did the research also points out all the complications that doing so would cause (latency, power consumption, reliability)

      his research (pdf warning) really is a good read if you havent gone through it yet.

    2. Re:I doubt the key has changed by topham · · Score: 2

      They just have to change the key. The encryption method is considered quite good (the problemis, they can use any encryption method they want.. it wasn't cracked anyway!)

      Only a small group of people can recover the information from the bus, as such they are the only ones who can mod the new Xboxes. Unlike the old one where everyone and their dog had the keys... etc.

      I suspect that is the theory they are going with, right or wrong.

    3. Re:I doubt the key has changed by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If it is just a key change, they would have been better off if they had used one-time PROM cells inside the chip to hold the key. Then, the key could be set as the last step before the box leaves the factory. No need to throw away chips.

    4. Re:I doubt the key has changed by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      If it is just a key change, they would have been better off if they had used one-time PROM cells inside the chip to hold the key. Then, the key could be set as the last step before the box leaves the factory. No need to throw away chips.

      Chances are that is the way they do it. The chips they're tossing were likely already burned in anticipation of MS's next order. Can't undo a PROM.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  6. My heart weeps by jmd! · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that we will be taking an inventory write off in Q2 related to the amount of Xbox MCPs that were made obsolete when MSFT transitioned to a new security code (by way of the MIT hacker) and excess in nForce chipsets that we built in anticipation of higher demand of Athlon-based PCs.

    O poor monopoly powers. Entire chip lines and console plans changed by a lone MIT student.

    I love it.
    1. Re:My heart weeps by kubla2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, entire branches of the Linux kernal, and various other software projects, like Apache, are changed as a result of security exploits.

      The ever-so-subtle distinction between your observation and that of the original posting is that when security holes force rethinkings and reworkings of applications and protocols in the Open Source world, there isn't an entire great big monopoly suffering, just some geeks losing sleep reworking code... as opposed to thousands and thousands of stock holders all of whom are wringing their teeth and gnashing their hands in hopeless, helpess despair as one whipper-snapper post-grad at MIT all but destroys their hopes and dreams of infinite wealth and world peace and dogs and cats loving each other... and god dammit I just can't go on for the shame...

  7. This is a nice move from Microsoft by JFMulder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If for the software this changes nothing (and probably does, after all, the games must still play on the console), it probably changes something in the MOD chip. So that means that the new XBOX that is shipped will not be compatible with the old mocdhips. The result? MOD Chip installers will have to thrown away their old supply of mod chips to make new ones, unless there's a simple way to change the keys in the MOD chip. This is surely going to hurt the mod chip companies who will have to throw away their old mod chips and buy new ones. If Microsoft keeps changing the keys in the hardware often enough, the mod chippers are going to run in a lot of troubles determining which mod chip is needed for which XBOX. This is a brilliant move.

    1. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by SN74S181 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anybody have the code from the MOD chips in downloadable form, so we can evaluate it for ourselves? Usually it's just some PIC embedded controller or an FPGA. There should be a site where the code can be downloaded for free and people with the tools can make their own Mod chips.

      Or are the Mod chips protected by 'security through obscurity' and hardware locks? If so, isn't that kind of ironic?

    2. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Usually you don't publish your MOD chip schematics, to prevent exactly that. They're not terribly worried about reverse engineering, as if you could do the job, you'd probably profit more from reverse engineering the xbox instead ;). So yea its security through obscurity, but they're not going for a secure modchip really. Just one that they alone can sell to the masses.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      There are config bits that prevent that. The PIC dies even have a metal layer over the copy protect config bit from deliberate resetting.

      PIC security isn't the best, they can all be breached with a few different techniques, supposedly with a few hundred dollars of parts and labor. Sometimes people use some special method of overloading the Vpp pin so that the bond wire overheats and melts - that wire is needed in some of the bypass methods.

    4. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by Wumpus · · Score: 2

      FPGAs are reprogrammable.

      Not by end users. I suspect that the equipment to reprogram them costs more than an xbox

      Idiot.

      Love your sig.

    5. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This strategy never stopped people hacking the PS2 (why does slashdot cover's M$s XBOX more than the PS2?)
      In fact, installers like the occasional change. It helps them move old hacked console stock (well, at least in the case of the PS2, where a hacked console usually remains a hacked console). Next, it increases the price of the new modchips to unbelieveable levels (another source of income) and, lastly, increases the price of older, cheaper to hack consoles.

      Yay! M$ helps pirates make more money again! Woohoo! What do you think will happen next? They'll price their games outside the reach of the expert buyer just like they did with Win XP Professional and M$ office Professional to ensure more piracy?
      This is almost as intelligent as when Homer J. Simpson decided not to buy the $0.50 washer from the plumber.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    6. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not by end users. I suspect that the equipment to reprogram them costs more than an xbox

      Actually FPGA's are normally programmed using EPROM's. Most FPGA's these days are actually static RAM cells, which are programmed at power up by reading data from an EPROM. EPROM burners are pretty cheap...

      But in any case, FPGA hardware is ridiculously cheap. Go to fpgacpu.com and see for yourself - a 300,000-gate FPGA environment complete with programmer and s/w for ~$170 US. If you want a cheaper one, you can get 150k-gate ones for ~$120 US. Considering that a 32-bit CPU is ~20k-gates, that's pretty good :-)

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    7. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, more likely it'll provoke contract disputes or legal actions from nvidia, who doesn't want to have to throw out chips it's already made. If microsoft keeps this up, they'll never get nvidia to lower the price.

      Is there really a big xbox game pirating scene?

      This is all silly anyway. I remember when I was younger (under 16) I used to "pirate" video games. Of course back then that meant a 1-300k download. Probably took just as long though. As soon as I was old enough to have a job, and money I stopped doing it, and started actually paying for the games I wanted. It seems to me that beyond basic anti-piracy efforts, companies are wasting money on copy protection. The people that they stop can't afford the games anyway, and the "software pirates" that can afford the games tend to be the people who will use the money to break the new protection rather then purchase the game. It would be interesting to see a study that looked for a correlating revenue increase when a new copy protection scheme comes out. More importantly, how much cheaper would my games be if I wasn't shelling out a SafeDisc 2 royalty for every one of them?

    8. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by Wumpus · · Score: 2

      That's good to know. Those things used to be more expansive.

    9. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, MTV hasn't meant Music Television for more than a decade now. It's been Marketing Television ever since...

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:This is a nice move from Microsoft by ruiner13 · · Score: 2

      I'm sure there are enough unsold original Xboxes in the channel to allow all the mod chips to be sold, if people want them. All this would mean to the mod chip people is that they now (or will, once this one gets cracked too) have two products to sell instead of one. Seems like a good deal to me. I really doubt the mod chip companies are gonna just toss the old chips, it's not like M$ is gonna force people to return their first gen boxes because of their hardware oversight.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

  8. Do they learn their lesson by jsse · · Score: 2

    Even a close partner such as Nvidia could be fscked up hard this way, I wonder people would still trust other proprietary security control by MS.

    A slight changes in code could do such a damage, no wonder why MS want to push DRM and Palladium. :)

    1. Re:Do they learn their lesson by Badanov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe Microsoft is getting ready to get into the video card/chip manaufacturing business and their logical first step would be to hose Nvidia.

      --
      Dawn of the Dead
    2. Re:Do they learn their lesson by jsse · · Score: 2

      I see it now...let's say:

      1. MS partners with Nvidia, helps crashing their major competitor(goodbye voodoo)
      2. MS crashes their close partner Nvidia by destroy their entire product line(blame the damn MIT studnet!)
      3. Seek more partnerships

      With DRM/Palladium, replace "Nvidia" above with any other company name, repeat.

  9. geek girl by t_allardyce · · Score: 5, Funny

    "My girlfriend and I spent friday night in the lab together"

    Oh man :( i wish i had a girlfriend like that. actually... i wish i had a girlfriend lol.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:geek girl by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's time like these there should be a "+1, Pitiful" as a moderator option. Or, -1 maybe?

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:geek girl by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

      Well if your talking about choosing between an XBox or a girlfriend then i want the latter. a kilo of crappy MS'ised electronics that i could put together myself (PC) and in a sexier case anyway just doesnt do it for me. But hanging out in an electronics lab doing things that in many places are illigal, with a nice girl is a real turn-on :)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  10. OpenXbox - PC - Bioxx by nesthigh · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wonder if this will have any affect on this soon to be realeased product. It's supposed to be bios upgradable.

    Have a look here: Open Xbox - PC - Bioxx

    Odd that it's just now coming out, eh? ;-)

    Next

  11. When will they start blaming Microsoft? by Restil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The next time they have to write off inventory because of a needed security change. Sure, hackers might not be the best friends to that contractual agreemnt NVidia has going, but at some point, they're going to get tired of writing off inventory and flushing money down the toilet just because Microsoft doesn't want people using the Xbox for ANYTHING but an XBox.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  12. Random observations. by secondsun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This really sucks for Nvidia. They had the Xbox chips ready to go and MS, instead of using up the current supply and then transitioning, forces Nvidia to scrap the line and go with their newly resecured chips.

    An analagy to this would be if MS upgraded our operating system in the run of the night and billed us for it; even though we did not consent for them to do this.

    What is really funny is that modding consoles does no damage to the companies bottom line. MS makes money from developer fees, developers make money from the games they sell, and hackers get to have fun and maybe download a hacked game. (this assumes they have a dvd burner, which many don't). By doing this MS has made the XBOX look bad to hardware devlopers [who loose when they have to scrap technology], software developers [wouldn't want MS to change something games rely on], and the tech elite[who don't like MS anyway].

    Of course this really doesn't matter much when it comes to Xbox sales and games. As the old sayings go, the games speak for themselves. Too bad the Xbox family lacks vocal cords.

    Secondsun

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  13. Actually, they blame AMD. by brianlmoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    excess in nForce chipsets that we built in anticipation of higher demand of Athlon-based PCs..

    Never mind that the nForce was hype that never really beat out older motherboards.

    1. Re:Actually, they blame AMD. by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2
      The nForce makes a quite decent value system. It has a decent quality chipset that can be paired up with some DDR and an older Athlon, to make a nice cheap system that actually has decent video performance (especially for an onboard video chipset!).

      It was never really meant as a performance board, but instead as a value board that had decent performance. As long as you don't expect it to run like the newest Geforce4s, it does a great job as an economy market board.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
  14. not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Modchips cost $5.
    29F040 chips loaded with a proper .bin work fine.

    dunno how much money im loosing here....

    And when the next xbox rev. is hacked, and the next chips costs $5 as well, everyone will be laughing, because we all know Microsoft can't create a secure system if their lives depended on it

  15. It works for them. by Martigan80 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a great tax write off for them, just think of what they can claim per chip, and the R&D cost.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  16. Re:News for Felons. Stuff that's illegal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is a huge threat of terrorism in America, the land of the free, right now and you folks are not helping by spreading this illegal material around.

    First off, Lets get a "few" things straight.

    1. I go out and work my ass off everyday to get money to buy things like CDs, Video Game Consoles, DVDs, DVD Players, etc....

    2. I now OWN these items that I have purchased. I am told I can't copy my CDs, rip my DVD's to make a "backup" copy and burn it to a CDR media. Also, I am not allowed to modify any hardware that I own.. (Which by the way it sounds like to me.. That since I bought a computer that runs at a clock speed of 1.4GHz I am not able to overclock it to 1.6Ghz if I want to because it was sold to me as running at 1.4GHz, I dont like that.)

    3. Soon if all of this DRM crap goes through I will not beable to install anything that is not approved by certain companies (i.e. Microsoft). Meaning I can't install Linux on a computer that I purchased with Microsoft Windows on it. Even though I OWN the damn thing. I won't beable to add new hardware as I want to, I will have to call Microsoft to let them know I changed my hardware configuration (Windows XP does this now).

    When I BUY something, I like to know that I own it and can do anything to it I want. If I want to take it out back and beat it to a pile of junk (Office space senario with copy machine). I should be able to, If I want to change a few settings in the hardware, I should be able to. It is MINE. I PAID for it. I am NOT renting it. If I want to rent something I will go to Blockbuster, or go look for an apartment.

    You dont rent your car do you? Atleast with a lease you have an option to BUY it after the lease is up. This is like "insert favorate car manufacturer here" saying you CAN'T change your exhaust on your car that you bought from us, even though you own it now, Oh yea BTW that factory radio you have, you are NOT allowed to put that in either. When you get a flat tire, YOU will put on said brand of tires or we will sue the crap out of you. Do you like being told that crap? I know I do not like it.

    So please explain to me how this is "illegal", or any part of "terrorism"? Please also feel free to explain how this is "the land of the free", if I am not able to do any of the above.

    - br0ken

  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. This came out last week by warmcat · · Score: 2

    It has already been discussed by people active in looking at the X-Box here, including a comment by bunnie, the original Hacking God. The current feeling is that until they stop using a commodity CPU, whatever they do can be worked around in greater or lesser time.

  19. Re:What the heck did they sign? by topham · · Score: 2

    It is very likely it was spelled out in the contract that Nvidia would take that portion of the risk.

  20. Re:does not make sense...? by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 2

    You're absolutely right. They can't break the existing installed base of games or consoles. So, all this is doing, is changing the way the hardware transmits the encyption electrically, forcing a re-design on the mod chip makers. Normally this happens when you do a board redesign, which is normally done when you can make the things cheaper, and is normally a carefully planned part of the cycle.

    It's possible they've combined a couple of chips, and the savings from the redesign have outweighed the cost of dumping unused parts.

    I reckon NVidia are just trying to avoid drawing attention to poor sales.

  21. Isn't it obvious? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everybody's commenting about how all the parts of this story don't add up, that these megacorps wouldn't make such obvious blunders, or handle them so crudely. Hmm. While the old "follow the money" trick may not directly apply in this case, it's close enough.

    What is the upshot of this incident, once you filter out all the distractions?

    1) Hacker bypasses DRM-type security
    2) Company "forced" to retool/change security
    3) Direct, demonstrable monetary losses

    They need to set precedents that exposing obvious security gaffes (unencrypted signal on the bus in this case) leads directly to major financial losses. Makes future prosecutions much easier.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Isn't it obvious? by TonyZahn · · Score: 2

      exposing obvious security gaffes ... leads directly to major financial losses.

      I'm sure someone will argue this, but the truth of the matter is that having obvious security gaffes leads directly to major financial losses.

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
  22. Re:News for Felons. Stuff that's illegal. by shepd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Illegal doesn't equate to immoral. However, you seem to have those confused in your mind.
    It is immoral to do physical harm to others. Many of us consider guns (most especially handguns) to be nothing more than a device intended to cause physical harm to others. This is immoral.
    A device like a modchip is not intended to do physical harm to others. When I use a modchip, does Bill Gates bleed? Nope.
    If you can't see the difference between a device that causes physical harm to someone, and a device that causes absolutely no physical harm to someone, you have a morality problem, and are part of the problem, not the solution.
    You aren't one of those people who go around telling people that "Guns don't kill people. Death kills people." Are you? Because if you do, you're the nutcase.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  23. Buy More XBoxes! by tyler_larson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...If you don't like Microsoft.

    Remember, it costs Microsoft $300 to make an XBox, but they sell it for $200. That's why:

    1. The hardware is so good considering the price
    2. They're losing so much money on it
    3. They don't like the idea of people hacking the OS in any way
    4. Keeping the system totally proprietary is more important to them than even the survival of project
    They intend to make money on the games, not on the box itself. They're paying for 1/3 of the box, so they want to keep tight control over what you can do with it.

    For reference for those who question the numbers, I got them from a MS programmer: Their employee purchase plan allows them to buy software at a Huge Discount. Their is no discount on the XBox; though they jokingly say you can buy it at cost if you really want to.

    --
    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea...."
    RFC 1925
  24. that doesn't make sense by RelliK · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Remember, it costs Microsoft $300 to make an XBox, but they sell it for $200. That's why:

    The problem is that Microsoft already spent $300 to make an xbox. They lose that money no matter what. If you buy an xbox they will get $200 and partially recover their losses.

    In short, Microsoft loses $100 on an xbox if you buy it. They lose $300 if you don't buy it.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
    1. Re:that doesn't make sense by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Who said manufacturing costs where $300? That's a dream, it surelly is below $300. That $300 figure includes R&D costs. So the more people buy it, the closer they will get to break even.

      People missinforming on this subject are helping Microsoft. Unless they can probe the $300 stand for just MANUFACTURING costs, which I bet is lower than that (and it's all COMODITY HARDWARE, except the feture cripling plugs).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  25. Scrap a whole bunch of chips by dpilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aahhhh, but Microsoft didn't scrap a whole bunch of chips, nVidia did. Isn't that a slick way of sticking someone else with the cost of your mistakes? I'd be curious to know the volume procurement agreement between the two, and why the heck nVidia got stuck with excess inventory when the product was working correctly as designed. I would expect that when a customer error like the encryption/key issue forced a re-rev, the customer (in this case, Microsoft) would have been stuck with the inventory as well as the NRE (non-recurring engineering) fees for the rev, itself. This is tempered with the issue of whether nVidia had built to-order or built ahead. The latter nVidia would be stuck with.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Scrap a whole bunch of chips by ranulf · · Score: 2
      I would expect that when a customer error like the encryption/key issue forced a re-rev, the customer (in this case, Microsoft) would have been stuck with the inventory

      Unless nVidia had already produced more inventory than had been sold at that point. It's common for things like this to be sold as x thousand units per day for y days. If they had excess capacity at the plant, they would have used it rather than turning the fab process on and off (it's usually easier to leave a factory running producing excess products than repeatedly stop-starting).

      Usually, this is good for them as they can than have the factory producing something else until the surplus has been nearly exhausted before changing back.

      I guess MS had a clause where they had to give a week or whatever notice of a chip rev, but by that point nVidia may have already massively overproduced the obsolete chips.

  26. Re:News for Felons. Stuff that's illegal. by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Ok, I'll bite.

    It is immoral to do physical harm to others. Many of us consider guns (most especially handguns) to be nothing more than a device intended to cause physical harm to others. This is immoral.

    Police officers carry handguns. In the commission of their duties, they injure, and sometimes kill suspects (like that rapist in California who was about to kill 2 kidnapped girls.) By your definition, would police officers not be immoral?

    Some soldiers carry rifles. In the commission of their sworn duty (to defend the country from enemies, foreign and domestic) they kill and injure enemy combatants, under order from their superiors, which go all the way up to the president, who is elected by the american people. By your definition, would not every american citizen thereby share in that "immorality"?

    If someone was going to beat the living shit out of me because I was (insert race, sex, religion, or chosen lifestyle here), and I decided to take exception to this by defending myself and doing physical harm to my attacker, would I not be immoral by your definition?

  27. Re:Labeling circuits by Fesh · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but these days the "fix" is usually replace the entire board or in some cases even replace the entire system. I wouldn't think that it's cost effective in any way to try to repair PCBs in this day and age.

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  28. Ban logic probes! by k98sven · · Score: 2

    It's the only way to stop these hacker-terrorists.
    Of course, banning this one malicious tool is not enough,
    we also need to ban oscilloscopes, multimeters and everything capable of measuring an electrical current.

    For ordinary computer users, this means:
    Under linux, run "shutdown now"
    Windows users are asked to run a program.

  29. Re:News for Felons. Stuff that's illegal. by Fttynick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "There is a huge amount of terrorism going on in America"

    More like America "Bush @ Co." are terrorising the rest of the world with this new found "Agenda"...

    You poor troubled American..

    Regards

    More and more concerned world citizen (Sydney, Australia)

  30. What happen by jsse · · Score: 2

    to those 200,000 unsold XBox stocked in Japan? Landfill? ;)

  31. There must have been another reason by herbierobinson · · Score: 2

    I can't believe they would scrap that many chips over something so stupid. There must have been some bug in the chips that they needed fix and this saves face...

    --
    An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
  32. oh yeah by nlh · · Score: 2

    and it did wonders for their stock price, too. What...$20 to $9 in about a week? Yeah, great tax write-off.....::rolleyes::

  33. Re:Just goes to show by fferreres · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe it's also a marketing move. The can claim all the extra stock was not sold due to the need to replace the hardware.

    Ie: "it's not we couldn't sell it. We have to ditch the hardware because of piracy. All money lost due to piracy, DoD please help is, they are destroying the industry!"

    So they turn an error in they part into something that can help them strategically. This is just a posibility, but with MS you never know (with Windows, they never did a reversion like this. Remember the bug in XP cds, they just release it on schedule even though the shipped version already had security bugs. They just solved them after release)

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  34. Re:X-Box vs. geek girl by SkyLeach · · Score: 4, Funny

    You guys really don't have grilfriends do you?

    Compared to the EULA which comes with most females, M$'s EULA might as well read "do anything you want, anytime you want, any way you want".

    Let's start with the basic rundown. The standard-issue female comes with a EULA which you "sign" without ever getting to read it. Any use whatsoever (even just looking at said female for very long) is considered signing. You are never allowed to read the EULA, but it will be referred to many times. Even should you abandon, leave or loose your female much of the EULA will remain in effect, and any parts of it can be re-enacted at her choosing at any future date. Even when you are given small glimpses into what this EULA might contain, it is usually encrypted and encoded in a format most males find completely confusing.

    I would quote some of the more haneous parts of the female EULA, but my female's EULA promises dire concequences should I do so.

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
  35. Re:What the heck did they sign? by fferreres · · Score: 2

    Simple: Microsoft OWNS Nvidia (And if it's not them directly, it's some investor deep in MS or MS shareholders pockets)

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  36. Re:News for Felons. Stuff that's illegal. by m00nun1t · · Score: 2, Informative
    You don't OWN Windows XP in the way that you OWN your car. You simply have a single PC LICENSE, which conveniently comes with some install media.

    Some goes for the vast majority of commercial software.

  37. Re:X-Box vs. geek girl by pgpckt · · Score: 2


    Seriously, you need to post the EULA for girls! This knowledge needs to be known! If not you, if not now, then who and when?

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
  38. 29*F*040 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    If the modchips are indeed 29F040 chips, that means that the EXACT same chips, even the "old stock" modchips will work.

    That F means flash - Take old stock, stick it in the burner again, you have current up-to-date modchips.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  39. Re:X-Box vs. geek girl by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

    Ok, can you answer me this then: why is it that girls always seem to go for the most irritating, cocky asshole jerks there are.. like say.. you? these guys don't respect them, cant even say 'i love you', cant have a conversation that doesnt involve [insert major sport here] or lara crofts tits, are crap in bed (3 minutes lol), and complain all the time about how much they're being tied down.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  40. I can't really answer that in depth... by SkyLeach · · Score: 2

    Girls do like guys who are jerks. There are all different reasons for this, and it really depends on the girl herself. To severely overgeneralize, they do it because they are insecure.

    As a guy, you should see a woman who continues to date an asshole as a person with some pretty hefty issues they need to deal with internally.

    I used to think just like you do about this subject, but then I got through puberty and moved on.

    "cocky asshole jerks there are.. like say.. you?"
    This is an outward sign of your biggest inner problem: testosterone. You aren't really in competition against every other male on the planet. Stop trying so damned hard and women will stop sensing this severe character flaw and actually start paying attention to you.

    Take my words and use them to enrich your life, or use them to make you a bitter recluse... it's up to you.

    --
    My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so :-p
    1. Re:I can't really answer that in depth... by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2
      "What we need to do is round up all this bitch girls (cheerleaders) and all these asshole guys (jocks) and just stick them in some sort of mega-death-camp thingy... lol"

      Like highschool?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  41. How are emus a hassle? by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I consider SNES9X less inconvenient than having to fight with my 10 year old SNES every time I want to play Super Mario World, but if I could get the exact same game without the hassle of either an emulator

    How is an emulator any more of a hassle than a native PC game? It's easy. Just install snes9x or visualboyadvance, let it associate itself to .smc (super nes) or .gba (gba), and set up the joypad bindings. Then put in the disk containing the copy of Super Mario World that you ripped from your cartridge (Super Mario World, Super Mario All-Stars+SMW, or Super Mario Advance 2) and play on.

    In fact, it's usually easier than native PC games because you only have to configure the bindings of four emulators (NESten, SNES9x, DGen, and VBA) rather than every single game in your collection.

    However, on the other hand, owners of copies of some titles aren't so lucky:

    Only the total purists would care enough about the slight differences

    You call the complete corruption of graphics and resulting unplayability of NES "Klax" on anything but LoopyNES a "slight" difference from the hardware? Last time I checked, the Klax hardware (Tengen Rambo mapper) is not very well emulated.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?