Internet Cafe Fined for Letting Users Burn Downloaded Music
prostoalex writes: "EasyInternetCafe, an international operation with cafes in major Western European cities, is fighting the attempts of British Phonographic Industry to fine it for letting customers burn the downloaded music to CD's. It managed to lower the original fine of 1M British pounds to GBP 100,000 so far."
And if you're going to give people the ability to do something illegal, you've got to at least make an effort to intervene.
It's like handing a kid some candy and saying, "here, don't eat this".
How many Euros is that? Oh wait...
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
If you jaywalk, we will fine the owner of the streets you jaywalk on. Yeah right. Morons.
Oh, I see, this is one of those, "punish the tool maker because the tool can be used to comit a crime".... On that note, I demand that the courts have everyone else executed because they might otherwise murder me -- people can do that, ya know.
In a similar vein, I noticed my local Target store offering a service to copy video tapes to DVD. Since I have a lot of VHS tapes taking up a bunch of space, this would be a great thing for me were it not for the fact that they charge some US$35/tape for the service. But, what burned me was their note that "copying copyright material" is illegal. Ever hear of "fair use" dweebs? Even the DMCA doesn't apply here since there is no access protection on a videocassette (macrovision is part of the VCR).
You could've hired me.
Seeing as the computer/burner/net connection is functioning basically as an appliance here, shouldn't they perhaps go after the person who actually did the bad deed? Isn't that a bit like suing the laundromat if someone runs someone elses kid through a permanent press cycle?
nwp
Why should their liability be any more than a photo-copy place "allowing" you to make illegal copies? The Kinko's around here have signs warning about illegal photocopying, but that appears to be the extent of it. Since there are plenty of legitimate uses for a computer with CD burner, I don't think that the cafe should be held liable.
While I agree it should be fair use to backup one's VHS tapes to DVD, you're way off on Macrovision. It is very much in the tape-encoding, specifically so they wouldn't have to force manufacturers to adopt their technology. For a complete explanation of how it works, check out here.
I thought it said British Pornographic Industry. You ever notice that even though a lot of people steal pr0n, the porno industry never freaks out about it with the whole "We're losing billions!" schitck.
A day without sunshine is like, you know, dark.
Just look around on google, you'll find that lots of "independant" porn sites, who use stolen images, get shut down all the time. It's just so easy to automate the process of setting up new servers on free-hosting services, that the porn people can keep ahead of playboy's lawyers...
Why would an internet cafe have cd-burners at all? How many people actually go to these places to download an iso of linux or use the burner for any other legal reasons? The internet cafe owners obviously knew what they would be used for, and deserve whatever fines they got.
GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
British Phonographic Industry
A Phonograph?
So, they're still unaware of USB pocket drives...HEHE
SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
I thought this was related to internet cafe fined for letting users burn but thankfully not.
HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
I didn't know the "phonographic" industry
had the authority to levy fines on anyone?
what contract did the internet cafe have with
the phono industry? I thought fines/judgements
could only be extracted by criminal cival courts?
So tell me why the cybercafe should be the only party involved in this "litigation". There are many legitimate uses for cd writers. At least here in the U.S fair use allows copying one's own music albums.
Personal family images may be on the web e.g. your nephew's summer camp pictures. (not copyrighted commercial images)that you wish to print up for old auntie Esther.
Many people use cybercafes because they lack access or fast access at home. So a lot of use could be totally legitimate.
But back to my main point: Accepting that illicitly grabbing music was a primary use how is that the burner's manufacturer is not also equally culpable? They know what's going on. Shouldn't they be in the fray here. Defending the many legitimate uses of those wonderful burners. And pointing out that (at least here in the U.S.) a royalty "tax" is collected on blank media. [is that not correct?]
do read janis ian's thoughts about the music biz at her web site. Change is in the wind!
Have you seen where you can get an image 'printed' on a cake. They use edible dyes in an ink-jet type device. They wouldn't even put a picture of Angela Anaconda on a cake for me because the woman there had 'seen this on TV' I couldn't believe it!
Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
I Hate \.