Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla 1.1 Hits The Street

asa writes: "Mozilla 1.1 has arrived!. This release has many new features including full-screen mode for Linux, Mac MathML support, a redesigned JavaScript Debugger, new window icons for the different Mozilla applications, view selection source, display HTML mail as plaintext, and much more. Along with all the new features, Mozilla 1.1 also contains many improvements to performance, stability, standards support, and web site compatibility. You can get Mozilla 1.1 by visiting the mozilla.org releases page or directly from ftp at ftp.mozilla.org. Now that 1.1 is out the door, the focus moves to 1.2 alpha, and beyond. If you're confused as to how all of these releases relate to each other, be sure to check out the Mozilla Roadmap and the community hub over at mozillaZine.org."

51 of 583 comments (clear)

  1. After installation... by snake_dad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the radial context menus or the mouse gestures. Look at edit->preferences->navigator->internet search, and edit->preferences->advanced->Scripts&Plugin s. And finally take a look at the preferences bar to quickly enable or disable certain options. These are always the first things I install with any new Mozilla, release or nightly.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    1. Re:After installation... by ivan256 · · Score: 3

      The radial menus would be okay if they used text instead of icons. With the iconic menus it takes forever to figure out what to click on when I want to use a feature that I dont use typically.

      They should take note from games that use radial menus. They all use text.

  2. Mozilla has good karma. by bjornte · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been a Moz 1.0 user since it was launched, and I've been very pleased with it. Many nice touches, like tabbed browsing (try ctrl-shift-clicking), banning images from ad-serves, anti-popup and so on. Best of all, it manages all the security routines my internet bank throws at it.

    Having downloaded Moz 1.1 the difference is not so great, as expected. Some minor bugs have vanished, like the frequent paralyzation of the http-input field.

    In general, there is nothing IE can do for me that Moz can't. And Moz is just... a smoother ride. Plus it's got good karma. Recommended.

    1. Re:Mozilla has good karma. by Aanallein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hitting the checbox in: edit, preferences, navigator, tabbed browsing: "load links in the background" will make opening tabs in the background the default action - no need to even bother with the shift key anymore.

      Other nice touches for tabbed browsing: Try dragging a plain text link - http://www.mozilla.org - to an ampty area of the tab bar (if you have many tabs open: near the close button) - this will open a new tab with that link. Dragging the link to a tab itself will load the link in that tab.
      Middle-click on a tab in the tab bar will close the tab.
      Dragging a bookmark from the personal toolbar onto the tab bar will open that bookmark in a new tab.

    2. Re:Mozilla has good karma. by mikeboone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been using Mozilla almost exclusively for a couple months now.

      The only thing I miss from IE is the auto fill-in when entering data in a form. That saved me a lot of typing. Mozilla's fill-in seems to only work on some pages, and then it only remembers one answer. IE lets remembers all of my answers to a single field.

      Other than that, I love Mozilla.

    3. Re:Mozilla has good karma. by astrosmash · · Score: 4, Informative

      The only thing I miss from IE is the auto fill-in when entering data in a form. That saved me a lot of typing. Mozilla's fill-in seems to only work on some pages, and then it only remembers one answer. IE lets remembers all of my answers to a single field.

      Have you tried "Edit->Fill In Form" from the main menu? That's where Mozilla keeps all of your saved form info. It works reasonably well most of the time, but it's not exactly intuative.

      I remember reading somewhere that work was underway to make form auto-filling more intuative, similar to what IE does, but I don't know if any work has actually been done or not -- it may have just been talk.
      --
      ENDUT! HOCH HECH!
    4. Re:Mozilla has good karma. by AntiTuX · · Score: 4, Informative

      type this into your textbox:

      chrome://communicator/locale/wallet/index.html

      Fill in your form, and go whoopass :)

  3. Re:Not complaining, but gave me two crash messages by snake_dad · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ctrl-pgup, and ctrl-pgdn under windows. ctrl-t for a new tab, ctrl-w to close one. Or use mouse gestures or piemenus.

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  4. Re:Not complaining, but gave me two crash messages by Aanallein · · Score: 4, Informative
    i wish you could switch between tabs by keyboard shortcut!
    ctrl-pageup and ctrl-pagedown do this. See the keyboard shortcuts.
    And indeed, those shortcuts aren't really handy if you want to use a mouse, but I personally have quickly grown used to them. Who needs a mouse anyway? :)

  5. Coverage for other browser projects as well by jukal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is great, that Mozilla progresses and that Slashdot supports the work by directing traffic to their site. But I really hope that /. could give other and new browser projects coverage as well. Many of them have innovative ideas, and potential, and probably would not mind a few more volunteer developers. Slashdot is in great position to give these too the needed momentum. Why don't you release an article about one of them today already?

    1. Re:Coverage for other browser projects as well by Plug · · Score: 5, Informative

      While I'm the first to say that monopolies are bad, I like the fact that the OSS community has banded together enough to make something of the scale of Mozilla, instead of being tied up in lots of little sub-projects.

      I like the fact that Galeon exists, that K-Meleon exists, that Chimera exists - and because they're all based on Mozilla, they're all as good as each other at rendering web content. If they all started as projects from scratch then none of them would be anywhere _near_ as good as they are now.

      Instead of a million ICQ clients out there that implement 80% of the functions, if we had one decent ICQ library that all the clients used, then they could all use that library (Yes, I know there a couple of libs that are getting there - there weren't when I looked a couple of months back.)

      I think it's a great thing that there is a standard library (Gecko) for rendering web pages that other projects can implement and build on. While I don't want to suggest the stifling of competition, I don't want to see people wasting time developing an alternative to something that is the best there is, and that they can just grab and use.

      With the addition of calendaring, Mozilla is almost in a position to take on the IE/Outlook combination. Who would have suggested that a year ago? Mozilla is more than just another in the sea of browsers.

  6. Re:Not complaining, but gave me two crash messages by Aanallein · · Score: 3, Informative
    But before it even finished starting it gave me to error messages about some DLL. Then enigmail is complaining at me too.
    Enigmail does indeed not work anymore - but a new enigmail build is released for each milestone (currently the last one is still for 1.1 beta), so I expect to see a working version within the next day or so; the developer(s) should definitely have been aware of the problem for several weeks now.
  7. Thought you guys would like this by dcstimm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thought you guys would like this:-) http://linux.darylstimm.com/mozilla1280.jpg

  8. But Mozilla still has some weaknesses by norculf · · Score: 5, Funny

    1.1 is still a very immature version, compared to the Internet Explorer family of technologies, which is currently in version 6.x and still being improved daily.

    When will Mozilla feature speedier web browsing, and better integration with best-of-breed Microsoft products such as MSN messenger and Outlook XP?

    A theme that more closely matches the award winning Windows look-and-feel would also be helpful.

    1. Re:But Mozilla still has some weaknesses by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can simulate the MS experience (this is a platform-independent tip, BTW) by closing down your browser half way through an important task. I recommend halfway through online banking (works for me). Also, try altering your firewall to allow some moderate security breaches. You'll soon feel right at home.

    2. Re:But Mozilla still has some weaknesses by SmileyBen · · Score: 5, Informative

      So long as you're happy to use tabs to hold your news sites (which most people love after about three days usage):

      1) Open each site in a tab.
      2) Click Bookmarks | Bookmark this group of tabs.
      3) Place resulting bookmark on your personal toolbar.

    3. Re:But Mozilla still has some weaknesses by snake_dad · · Score: 3, Informative
      A theme that more closely matches the award winning Windows look-and-feel would also be helpful.

      A theme that more closely matches the award winning Windows look-and-feel. :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  9. Re:so for the idiots... by Aanallein · · Score: 3, Informative
    Can I "update" Mozilla 1 to 1.1 w/o the obligatory uninstallation of v1 then installation of v1.1...
    then follow with the time consuming preference settings?
    You still have to uninstall 1.0 before installing 1.1 - or at least install 1.1 in a different directory than 1.0
    However, uninstalling 1.0 doesn't remove your profile - all your preferences will remain and can be used with 1.1 without any problems.
    Just make sure not to switch back and forth between 1.0 and 1.1 while using the same profile...
  10. That funky graph by Zaffle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just want to know what program they used to generate that funky milestone graph. Anyone know?

    --

    I use to have a funny sig, but slash cut it off, and I forgot what the punchline was.
    1. Re:That funky graph by asa · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just want to know what program they used to generate that funky [mozilla.org] milestone graph. Anyone know?

      I used a combination of Paint Shop Pro and the Gimp. I'm actually interested in finding some kind of CVS graph program that would generate a picture like this from CVS data. It obviously wouldn't be able to predict the future but it should be able to build an image of CVS activity (branches, checkin volume, tags, etc). I have tried in the past to take some cvs measurements and use checkin volume to determine the thickness of the branch lines but it was just too much effort. If something like that could be done programatically I'd be as happy as a pig in shit. :)

      --Asa

  11. Re:That's cool... by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're also simultaneously working on a 1.0.1 branch. Mozilla 1.0.1 RC2 was released a time ago (while they were working on 1.1 as well), and is still the current 1.0.x build. Mozilla 1.1 does NOT succeed 1.0.1, as evident by the "RC 2" status. 1.0.x is simply a separate branch for stability, while 1.1, 1.2, etc is for new technology and features. I'm pretty sure they'll go on with a 1.1.x branch even after 1.2 is released as well.

    In other words, it's not as simple as the Mozilla team moving from 0.9.x to 1.0 and proceeding to 1.1 and 1.2.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  12. Re:Download From Gnutella by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

    magnet:?xt=urn:sha1:M3UDEZTSE2UK7C6BC2EYF5VFN6N3DB SJ&dn=mozilla-win32-1.1-installer.exe&xs=http%3A// 12.240.86.81%3A6346/uri-res/N2R%3Furn%3Asha1%3AM3U DEZTSE2UK7C6BC2EYF5VFN6N3DBSJ&xs=http://ftp.mozill a.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.1/mozilla-win3 2-1.1-installer.exe&xs=http://archive.progeny.com/ mozilla/releases/mozilla1.1/mozilla-win32-1.1-inst aller.exe&xs=http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/i nfosystems/WWW/clients/mozilla/releases/mozilla1.1 /mozilla-win32-1.1-installer.exe

    Web Wars - Episode I: Attack of the Hyperlinks

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  13. Re:Great The best browser ever!!! by cscx · · Score: 3, Troll

    When Mozilla uses standard Windows form controls for items such as the browser location drop down list that handle an initial mouse swipe focus like every other browser and text box behaves in any other Windows program, then I'll consider switching.

  14. Re:That's cool... by BZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There aren't the resources to do it. There aren't even the resources to do the two branches we're doing, really.

  15. Obligatory Godzilla Comparison by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Mozilla 1.1 Hits The Streets"

    Presumably [in a Internet Cafe] in Downtown Tokyo?

  16. Re: That's sarcasm, right? by Antity · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a way to open tabs "in the background":

    Preferences->Navigator->Tabbed_Browsing->Load_li nks_In_The_Background

    (Space inserted by Slashcode.)

    --
    42. Easy. What is 32 + 8 + 2?
  17. Re:Tab bar issues in Mozilla 1.1 by Aanallein · · Score: 5, Informative
    why do tabs now have to close left to right, prey tell?
    Because this allows for hugely more efficient browsing if you follow more than one link per page.
    Imagine googling for a specific subject. You open the first five links and keep the results page open for further searching if by some strange impossibility the first five results werent what you're looking for. So now you hit ctrl-pagedown to go to the next tab, which has the first search result. You quickly glance over the page but it isn't what you were looking for. ctrl-w closes the tab.
    Now with the old behaviour, the tab to the left would be focused. But you don't want that tab! You want the next result. So you have to manually focus the next tab again (oh, bother). And when you close that one, the same friggin first tab focuses and you once more have to manually go to the next one...
    With the new behaviour however, the tab to the right gets the focus - when you're done with the first search result and close the tab - the second search result shows. And when you're done with that one, the third one shows. No other actions needed than closing tabs.

    Imagine the use of this for reading forums, or archived mailinglists, or... well, everything that consists of a collection of links where it matters in which order you read them. Yes, it is somewhat disconcerting to see the behaviour change like that when you were used to the old way - but change is good! Give it a few minutes, really try to see the use of it, and you'll almsot certainly come to see that the new way to do this is a vast improvement.
  18. Re:Not complaining, but gave me two crash messages by Aanallein · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't think it's ever been ctrl-tab. Maybe in multizilla - but not in mozilla. ctrl-tab has been used for switching the focus between frames/location bar since at least the 4.x days, and this is not going to change.

    However, as you mentioned, everything is configurable. In this case, you need to create a file called userHTMLBindings.xml in the res/builtin/ directory and edit it according to the instructions found here.

  19. Dynamically enable/disable plugins by Quixote · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm looking for a feature (that others have requested too) that will allow me to dynamically enable/disable a plugin (Hint: Flash ads, or stupid Java tickers). I know I can just muck around with the plugins directory, but that is more of a permanent change. It would be nice to have a dropdown menu about all of the plugins installed, and enable/disable them like that; or you could bind some hot keys to enable/disable specific plugins.

    1. Re:Dynamically enable/disable plugins by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try Jesse's Zap embeds bookmarklet. It's not perfect but I've come to depend on it. Just add the bookmarklet to your personal toolbar and whenever you visit a site with an annoying flash ad or java plugin just bonk on the personal toolbar link and the plugin gets zapped.

      There are lots of great bookmarklets at Jesse's site. Take a look around and give some of them a try. I couldn't get by without them.

      --Asa

  20. Re:Not complaining, but gave me two crash messages by mr3038 · · Score: 3, Informative
    And it [shortcut to change between tabs] used to be ^tab, but they changed it. I don't know why.

    See Mozilla keyboard navigation. See also Mozilla bug #103796 (no direct linking to bugzilla.) Basically only windows had standard shortcuts for stuff like that and it happened to be CTRL+Page Up/Down and the moz dev team decided to copy it. CTRL+TAB was decided to be used to navigate between frames. However, for me changing between different tabs is more important action than changing between different frames with keyboard. What's the simplest way to swap those shortcuts? Can I add something to user.js or is it something harder? Usually I use mouse gestures for the tab switching...

    --
    _________________________
    Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  21. Wrong forum, but I'll ask anyhow by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How do I change the various keyboard-shortcuts?

    Comming from [browser], it'd be easier to set up the keyboard shortcuts you're used to, than having to get used to a new set.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:Wrong forum, but I'll ask anyhow by re-Verse · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Customizing mozilla page is also very useful. You can change nearly everything from there.

      Customizing Mozilla

  22. The Only Thing Else I Want by Quila · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Please, please, please can I have the ability to rearrange the bookmarks live as in IE, rather than going to the bookmark editor every time.

  23. Re:Tab bar issues in Mozilla 1.1 by Aanallein · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bug requests for a pref on this have been shot down before (for example bug 131037), but if you submit a new bug where you clearly explain the way you're browsing and why in that scenario the new closing method is undesirable, you might have a chance. Don't go into a lot of options - only request left-to-right versus right-to-left with a hidden pref.

    You can also just fix the behaviour yourself. If you only try a new mozilla version every few months it'd be worth it. I'm asuming you use windows for the following - if you use linux you should be able to figure out the differences yourself:
    In your mozilla/chrome directory (note: mozilla itself, not the profile) there's a file toolkit.jar - backup this file and then unzip it in its current location - so you have subdirectories chrome/toolkit/content/... Open the file tabbrowser.xml in your favorite text-editing program (notepad should do) and locate the line:
    else if (index == this.mPanelContainer.childNodes.length - 1)
    this should be on line 761. Edit it to:
    else if (index > 0)
    save and rezip to toolkit.jar. Make certain the directory structure is the same as it was before - so all content in the zipfile is located in a subdirectories with content/ being the first subdirectory.
    Run mozilla and enjoy tabs that close from right to left. If somehow this doesn't work (most likely a problem with how you zipped the archive) restore the backup and try again.

  24. Download from giFT/OpenFT by RPoet · · Score: 3, Informative

    mozilla-i686-pc-linux-gnu-1.1.tar.gz can be had from giFT/OpenFT. Hash 41f7588955a35a0bafa63426eae04dc8.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  25. Re:Modular updates .. That would be a charm .. by BZ · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use the net installer.

  26. Mozilla theme by weird+mehgny · · Score: 4, Informative

    Get this theme. Very, very smooth and clean. Several amplitudes better than the default theme. It's surprising that Mozilla doesn't come with this supplied as a standard...

  27. Source code tarball?! by Rev+Snow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Could they make it any harder to find?

    I've clicked around forever and still
    can't find a simple *.tar.gz form of
    the 1.1 source code release.

    1. Re:Source code tarball?! by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla/releases/mozill a1.1/

      If it's not there yet then it's not done yet. Check back later today.

      --Asa

  28. easy to fix! by Felipe+Hoffa · · Score: 5, Informative
    Remember its open source, you can adapt it to your own needs.

    Just take the file piemenu.js in mozilla/chrome/radialcontext/content and change this line:
    this.labelTrigger= setTimeout("PieMenu.prototype.act.showLabels();", 900);
    The timeout is fixed in 900 by default, you can make it lower.

    While you are there you can find a lot of options, just don't be afraid to try.

    Fh
  29. Re:Before uninstallation... by cjpez · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's under the preferences somewhere . . . Just uncheck "Use Radial Thingamajiggers" or whatever. It's not quite the same thing as uninstalling, but it does the trick.

  30. Re:Look for 1.2beta tommorow! by asa · · Score: 3, Informative

    At this rate you should save your bandwidth, and look for 1.2b tommorow night!

    Actually, not quite that soon ;-) and not 1.2b. Mozilla 1.1alpha, however, is right around the corner. Expect to see it sometime in the next couple of weeks.

    --Asa

  31. Re:That's cool... by asa · · Score: 3, Informative

    it took them forever to reach 1.0 (although the 0.9 releases were already really good), but now they're releasing a 1.1 after only a short time

    We branched for 1.0 around April 09. That day we began work on 1.1. Mozilla 1.1 was finished on August 26. That's more than 4 months of development.

    We branched for 1.1 around August 05. That day we began work on Mozilla 1.2. We should be seeing a Mozilla 1.2alpha pretty soon.

    --Asa

  32. Re:Is this version more buggy? by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    Clean install doesn't touch your bookmarks and if you installed your plugins into your profile directory you'd be able to hold onto them (or just back up your plugins dir. if you're reading slashdot you should be able to do that).

    --Asa

  33. Re:shouldn't be modded as flamebait by asa · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, you do have to click and click and swipe.

    If this is your big gripe about Mozilla then you're gonna love 1.1 because it works as you'd expect now.

    --Asa

  34. Need integration with external e-mail by KjetilK · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm running Opera, Mozilla and Konqi every day on my box now, and I really can't decide between them. Opera is a bit unstable and unfree, Konqi doesn't have tabbed browsing (will soon), and lacks a few other nice features too.

    Mozilla lacks something very important: It doesn't work smoothly with KMail which is my mail program of choice right now.

    Mozilla really needs to integrate well with other applications. Most importantly, it really needs a way to launch an application when users click on a mailto-link. This is bug 11459.

    Also quite important is that you can launch Mozilla and have it open a new tab (not window) from other applications. This is Bug 104204.

    I would encourage everybody to join in to get this working! :-)

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  35. Re:Mozilla Quicklaunch by Bonker · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some components, such as the HTML renderer, are *never* swapped to disk because they are used to render parts of the desktop, especially under XP. Of course the memory footprint for these compenents is 'hidden' under the umbrella of Kernel memory.

    Moz 1.1 sits in about 32mb of ram under normal conditions. This can swell or even double if you've got a bunch of tabs open or are loading a huge, graphically intense page. Also, ram allocated to plugins like Flash, etc.. is listed as still belonging to Mozilla, so that figure can rise dramatically, depending on the webpage.

    Windows 2000, for comparison's sake, sits in about 64 mb of ram. XP has a footprint that's about 128mb wide, but a lot of that does get cached out... especially the multimedia components that are otherwise active all the time. Since Winnt4 without IE 4 or 5 will comfortably operate in 16mb or ram or less, I can only assume that most of the ram needed for Win2k and Xp are used by services or components related to Intenet Explorer, Media Player, and in some cases, Office.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
  36. Re:Mouse gestures - misleading by Leto2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Go to "Edit / Preferences / Advanced / Mouse gestures" and de-select all modifier keys (Ctrl, Alt, Shift). I have my mouse gesture button set to the right button, so all I need to do for "back" is "right button + left", which works great. If you hold down the right button without moving / gesturing, you'll get your normal context menu.

    --
    <grub> Reading /. at -1 is like driving through Cracktown in a convertible that is stuck in 1st
  37. Re:The only thing mozilla needs now is.......... by David+Gerard · · Score: 3, Informative
    What happens is that the performance is improved incrementally. 1% faster here, 2% faster there. Things that hurt performance 3% get backed out almost immediately. And so on.

    What this means over the course of a year or so is a smaller, faster browser. Mozilla 1.0 was better in every way than Mozilla M18, but was much faster and actually had a smaller memory footprint.

    Developers are looking out for bigger performance wins, but the incremental approach is producing results without stability tradeoffs.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  38. Re:A requested feature by little ol me by bluephone · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try PrefBar over at XULplanet. It has exactly what you're looking for.

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]