Slashdot Mirror


Tattoo To Monitor Diabetes

infonography notes that the "BBC is reporting about using tattoos to monitor the state of a diabetics' health. While TV's the Invisible Man series had this, this is actually real. Designed by Gerard Cote, of Texas A&M University they are made of polyethylene glycol beads that are coated with fluorescent molecules. Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos."

202 comments

  1. hmm is this slashdot news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember ppl sitting on your ass all day can give you diabetes :/

    1. Re:hmm is this slashdot news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Type 1 Diabetes has no link to activity, fitness or diet. In fact, Olympic Swimmer Gary Hall, Jr. developed it a few years back. Type 1 also hits most of its victims early in life, making it a longer term disease. It's also more serious, because unlike most type 2 diabetes, a type 1 does not produce any insulin and MUST take it in order to continue living. A type 2 can go for years without proper treatment, a type 1 can go a day or two (if they're lucky).

    2. Re:hmm is this slashdot news? by huh12312 · · Score: 1

      Darn...I mean great now I have a reason to get a tattoo

  2. This should really be a great thing by Slashdotess · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My father has diabetes and I don't want to get it myself, I hope with the new generation of genetic research we'll have more of these stories on slashdot.

    1. Re:This should really be a great thing by djupedal · · Score: 0

      The 'story' isn't on /.
      It's on the BBC, and if you spend your time wishing and waiting for this or any other news to show up on /., you risk dissapointment.

    2. Re:This should really be a great thing by tgma · · Score: 1

      Amen to that - my father also has diabetes. One thing that I've been on the lookout for is the Glucowatch. I've seen it advertised, there's a site that says that it's coming real soon now, but then, it's been saying that for over a year. IIRC, the idea is that the watch can measure blood sugar by measuring the conductivity of the skin, which is a good geeky application. Has anyone heard any more about this? It was last heard of in FDA testing.

    3. Re:This should really be a great thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a great thing. I always wondered what Herve Villachez was doing nowadays. I'm glad he's helping out with diabetes.

    4. Re:This should really be a great thing by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been hearing about thise glucowatch for the better part of 12 years now. I work in the glucose monitoring industry, and this story has been popular for years. Every recent mention of I have seen shows that the precision is still poor, and you still need to perform daily finger-stick tests to calibrate the watch, so if you're looking to get away from sticking your finger, the glucowatch won't solve your problems.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    5. Re:This should really be a great thing by NekoFever · · Score: 1

      I agree. My Dad's diabetic and I'm at risk of getting it as I get older, being able to check my glucose levels without finding a restroom and pissing on a paper stick is a definite good thing.

    6. Re:This should really be a great thing by mumkin · · Score: 2

      I don't believe that they claim the GlucoWatch should be used as an accurate point-sample meter, but rather as a continuous monitoring device to indicate trends. Theoretically it lets you know the approx rate at which your glucose is rising/falling so that you can take the appropriate measures. The utility of the device probably depends on your personal diabetes management strategy -- whether you control your meds, or just your food, etc.

      I have been told that its method of sampling tends to leave scar tissue behind, but I have no first hand (wrist?) experience of the product.

  3. You know, it's a strange feeling.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. to see Microsoft ads on /.

    VS.NET

    Never fails to surprise me. It's like Osama buying ad slots in between president's speeches.

  4. How, exactly...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a small, tuxedo'ed midget going to help me with my diabetes? Administering insulin tests, or what?

  5. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean that everyone with diabetes will have the same exact tattoo? sure, its a scientific breakthrough blah blah blah, but that would really suck.

  6. all the easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to round them up?

    For treatment, of course. ;)

  7. Great by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1

    Now the glow in the dark bleeding heart "Mom" tattoo will be a fad. Oh well. Better than "Winger"

    --
    "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
  8. Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have any tattoos... I don't particularly want any tattoos, but if it means no more finger pricking (which really sucks, and after a while makes your fingers look like a mess), I think I'd consider it. The cost of finger pricking is also quite expensive, as a box of 100 test strips can cost $50+ (and depending on what you follow, you may test up to 7 or 8 times a day).

    My only real concern is that I hope they have some sort of long term treatment/cure worked out in a few years (Cloning, transplants, machines, etc) and I wouldn't really want this tattoo for life. I know some tattoos are easier to remove than others, and I'd want to know about this one. The tattoo really only addresses one issue anyway: the monitoring. The insulin injections would still be required in some form.

    P.S. Don't get this disease. It sucks.

    1. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by topham · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the insulin injections could be changed to pill forms, etc, -if- the monitoring was more frequent (to the point of rediculous with the current tests).

      Not saying it could or would, just thinking that a more active test could potentially lead to alternative treatments which are difficult, or useless in the current environment.

    2. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by Jacer · · Score: 2

      I too am diabetic, or atleast I was from age 16 to 18. Some time in June of this year my pancreas started to produce insulin of it's own. While I know (as much as I may want it to be) this isn't permanent, I know that i wouldn't want a tattoo for life.

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    3. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's neat. If your pancreas is able to produce some insulin, some doctors (Dr. Bernstein most notably) recommend a strict low carb diet to preserve what little pancreatic function remains. By not stressing the pancreas and the remaining islet cells, some of his type 1 patients have been able stay off insulin or larger doses of it anyway.

      His website is http://www.diabetes-normalsugars.com/ and his book is really worth reading. He's a long-time type 1 diabetic himself.

    4. Re:Hrm, as a juvenile diabetic... by gorilla · · Score: 2

      There are two reasons that insulin can't be taken as a pill. The primary reason that insulin can't be taken as a pill is that insulin is an enzyme, that is made from protein, and our digestive system breaks down all proteins to their consitutant amino acids. If the protein isn't broken down to amino acids, then it can't pass through the intestines into the body, the molecules are too big. You have to bypass the digestive system, meaning injections. The second reason is that insulin has to be very carefully regulated, either too much or too little causes problems. Pills can't be adjusted to that level, because the digestive system causes a delay between taking the drug and it entering the system. So, it's basically impossible for insulin pills to be manufactured.

  9. Handy... by Richy_T · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now when a diabetic goes hypo, the words "feed me sugar" can appear across their forehead.

    Or, remembering a particularly traumatic experience when a friend went hypo, perhaps the words "fuck you" to save them the bother of saying them themselves (yes, I know a hypo diabetic is not in their right mind).

    Rich

    1. Re:Handy... by Yorrike · · Score: 1

      Other diabetics tell people to fuck off when they're hypoglycemic too? Sweet. I thought it was just me ; )

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:Handy... by woodja · · Score: 1

      Ya, low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) can do some pretty strange things to your mind. From what I've been told and observed, you become less 'human' and primal instincts kick in when your blood sugar goes low. Sometimes when I'm programming and I go low, I just start saying "shit, shit,..." to myself. You have trouble thinking so you just want to tell everyone off until you get enough carbs to get back to normal.

      A continuous method of monitoring blood sugar levels could certainly help put an end to these low sugar sessions and could certainly save me from future embarrassing situations.

    3. Re:Handy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great idea! where do i sign up?

    4. Re:Handy... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      Yes indeed.

      My sister-in-law has passed out from low blood sugar several times in the last year. Before each episode, she said something akin to "Fuck off!".

      Nowadays, when she says "Fuck off!" we force her to sit down and measure her blood sugar.

      Of course, sometimes she has perfectly normal blood sugar, and has a perfectly legitimate reason to say "Fuck off!", and us saying "Are you feeling ok? Perhaps you should stick this sharp needle in your finger and experience some pain, just to alieve our fears" just makes her angrier...

      But still, she completely passed out on me twice now, and each time we either had to force sugar into her convulsing, drooling mouth or stick a big needle into her quaking leg to counteract the effects of the insulin. It's scary...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    5. Re:Handy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also know a diabetic guy who told me to fuck off when he went hypo too.
      On the other hand. He usually tells me to fuck off even when he's not hypo.

  10. Wha? by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 3, Funny
    Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos.
    "Oh, c'mon, Mom, just get a tasteful little rose somewhere..."
    --
    "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
  11. How long would this last? by ndnet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds like a great idea, and I know many people (my grandfather included) who would prefer this to the finger pricking fun on a regular basis. However, it does raise a couple of questions.

    1) How long would it last? Since it ISN'T absorbed into the cells, how long could the fluorescent dye, if you will, stay in the "interstitial fluid"? Would you need a new tattoo every month? year?

    2) How much will it cost? The method doesn't really sound that expensive, except for the watch-like device. But will HMOs pay for it? Medicare?

    3) How reliable is it? There are some diabetics who are very sensitive to sugar differences. Howa accurate can this be? Does it compare favorably with strips?

    1. Re:How long would this last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) How much will it cost? The method doesn't really sound that expensive, except for the watch-like device. But will HMOs pay for it? Medicare?

      If it's less than about $1500 a year, then it'd be cheaper than strips for me and my insurance company.

    2. Re:How long would this last? by Yorrike · · Score: 2
      If I had to get a new tatoo every month, or even every week, it'd beat the hell out of ripping tiny little holes in the tips of my fingers.

      Trust me on that one.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    3. Re:How long would this last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      2) How much will it cost? The method doesn't really sound that expensive, except for the watch-like device. But will HMOs pay for it? Medicare?

      Maybe you could get a sponsor if you tattoed "Feed me Thisandthat Sugar(TM)" into your forehead.
    4. Re:How long would this last? by mwcjr · · Score: 1

      As a diabetic I can say that I would definitely prefer a monthly tatoo over pricking my finger 4 or more times a day.

      Also, insurance companies that take a long term view to their customers all want to track blood sugar better in diabetics. It's cheaper to provide supplies, education, etc., than it is to provide for the numerous health problems that can stem from ill-controlled blood sugar.

    5. Re:How long would this last? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      Might I recommend that you try the new Softclix lancet device? I hate sticking my finger as much as the next guy, but if I have to, I prefer to use this model. It's not painless, I won't kid you, but it's the least painful I've found.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:How long would this last? by Bob+C.+Cock · · Score: 1

      As someone who has a tattoo I would imagine that as long as the tattoo were kept out of the sun it could last at least 30 years. However the article doesn't mention anything about the dissapation of the polyethylene glycol beads. My father also has diabetes and I would love for him to get a tattoo instead of using the finger pricking method, only so I could return all the grief he gave me when I got my tat :)

    7. Re:How long would this last? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Depends- if its conventional tattoos- thats just many little holes ripped into your skin in one compresed session, while introducing a foreign fluid to it. Beleive me- tattoos are sore.. And for days not minutes...

      However - were it to last for a month or a year- then it is definately worth it for the matter that it could be a clear indicator not just to yourself- but to others as well.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    8. Re:How long would this last? by PickPacket · · Score: 1

      Try the Freestyle, then you can have tiny little holes in your forearm. I've been using it for about 2 years, pretty painless. Strips are $90 per 100 though, which would not be happening if I didn't have insurance.

    9. Re:How long would this last? by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

      take it from the son of a diabetic. pricking your finger and taking care of yourself is much preferred to the neuropathy that can develop if you don't. course once you have neuropathy you don't have to worry about pricking your finger cause you won't be able to feel it anymore.

      remember, prick your finger, never finger your prick.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  12. Likely? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos."

    Score 1 - "Whaa?"

    Sorry, I just have to wonder what part of his ass the poster pulled that out of.

  13. I'd like Linux Tattooed on my butt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because that would be cool!!
    Don't you think, guys? guys???

  14. Barcode by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    And, as an added side feature, the barcode pattern of the tatoo can assist if your child is ever lost or stolen. Hand and forehead options available!

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  15. Gimme! by mindriot · · Score: 5, Informative

    If this is actually working, I'd happily volunteer to be the first to use it... I think the advantage is not that it's pain-free. I couldn't care less about pricking me in the finger. The real problems with conventional systems are

    • You are dependent on an electronic device and test strips. You have to carry it with you at all times (or should at least), and I could move around much more freely if I did not need to take with me and look after my glucose tester.
    • The test strips have to be bought regularly (I use between three and five per day), and they're not exactly cheap. It's also a pain because, at least in Germany, I have to get a Doctor's prescription each and every time I need to buy new supplies. Some sort of subscription would really help here. I am diabetic, and I will be for probably the rest of my life, so why the need to get a stupid prescription all the time, instead of having some sort of token that entitles me to buy my medication whenever I need to?
    • Nothing could be of more help than a continuous measurement. That way, for example, I could immediately tell if my food had more carbs than I expected and I can react sooner.

    Also, while devices for continuous measurement are out there, I don't expect them to be really comfortable, and I'd still depend on a device that I have to look after. So if this tattoo proves to be working, I'd be more than happy to use it.

    Oh, and a question -- this polymer stuff reminds me of those materials used in modern hard-to-forge banknotes (see here for instance), is that a similar material?

    1. Re:Gimme! by garcia · · Score: 2

      they want you to have a prescription so that you have to constantly be checked by a Dr. in order to get your meds/items. That way you are forced to visit and pay up (at least in the US where we don't have nationalized healthcare).

      I have to take prescription meds for high blood pressure, same thing. Every 6 months, check to see if the meds are working the way they should, and refill for 6 more months.

      It's a pain in the ass.

    2. Re:Gimme! by Yorrike · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The case here in New Zealand is you must get a prescription, but after that, the test strips are effectively free. I've been dreaming of a watch that'd constantly tell me my blood sugar since I was a boy.

      Don't dispare, there's some interesting treatment in development here in New Zealand that's cured a few Type 1 diabetics (like me), by using pig isolete cells encased in polymer tubes that are implanted in the abdominal area.

      Really great stuff, but New Zealand's government is full of crack pots who think that such implants could introduce a retro virus - so the recipiants of the implants have been in Mexico and the Cook Islands so far (they're actually curing people).

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    3. Re:Gimme! by x136 · · Score: 2
      I think the advantage is not that it's pain-free. I couldn't care less about pricking me in the finger.

      Heh, that's you. I hate it. I'd love a non-invasive testing method, continuously monitoring or not. (I know I'd test a lot more, too.)

      The real problems with conventional systems are
      • You are dependent on an electronic device and test strips. You have to carry it with you at all times (or should at least), and I could move around much more freely if I did not need to take with me and look after my glucose tester.
      • The test strips have to be bought regularly (I use between three and five per day), and they're not exactly cheap.


      Well, you'd still need some sort of device to translate the intensity of the glowing tattoo into a number. It'd still be a vast improvement, though. No more lancets, no more blood, and no more of those expensive test strips (IIRC, they're like US$50 for a box of 100 if your health plan doesn't cover the cost.)

      Imagine the cool devices that could come out of this. Maybe a watch that constantly monitors the sugar level, and can be exported to a computer, maybe with software that analyzes the data and suggests changes in your insulin doses... Okay, I admit it. I'd be happy if it did nothing but make it unnecessary to do a finger stick test. :)

      As has been said by many others so far, sign me the hell up.
      --
      SIGFEH
    4. Re:Gimme! by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1
      Every 6 months, check to see if the meds are working the way they should, and refill for 6 more months. It's a pain in the ass.

      Your doctor and your HMO don't make any money on these kinds of visits. They require them because if they didn't, you might develop more serious problems that would end up costing them a lot more money.

      In the US, if the doctor and HMO want you to visit the doctor on a regular basis, it's because they think it will cost less in the long run. Otherwise, if you're healthy, they'd rather you never went to the doctor.

      It sounds like you don't like the fact that you've got a serious, chronic medical problem, and as a result are at a higher risk than most people for developing other serious medical problems. Welcome to the club.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    5. Re:Gimme! by Yorrike · · Score: 1
      As has been said by many others so far, sign me the hell up.

      Hell yeah, death to lancets and those Softclix bastards. Gimme ink!

      I know it's likely to be nothing more than a dot of polymer, but if you could get a pattern, what would you get? I'd lean towards a tux tatoo - that'd be cool.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    6. Re:Gimme! by garcia · · Score: 2

      Considering that it costs me $50 per visit, I don't see how it is helping me. I don't see the need for 6 month checkups when the prescription won't change for years, possibly decades.

      Fuck the HMOs and the Dr.'s. I don't see why I should have to pay a dime for either my visit or my prescription. 60 pills should not cost $38. It just shouldn't.

      I feel like I am buying Ecstacy.

    7. Re:Gimme! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Plus in the paranoid post-9/11 US, you can get in trouble for carrying your kit on a plane. (Hasn't happened to me yet, but did to a friend).

      On top of that, if I get this, I don't have that stupid Sharps container lying around, that I have to dispose of as hazmat waste!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Gimme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've cured diabetes in rats using a similar technique here in Canada. This tattoo thing is being used on rats too.

      Geez, rats have some of the best healthcare in the world!

    9. Re:Gimme! by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      The government may be full of crackpots cross-species virial infections have happened before, and pigs are a good source.

    10. Re:Gimme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look around on the ground for strange colored pebbles and swallow those, it won't cost you nearly as much. Unfortunately it won't work, either. In the process of making medicine more effective we've also made it more expensive.

      Anyway really, it could be worse. I take anti-rejection meds. A month of those is like $2500 to my insurance company (I end up paying something like $100 a month out-of-pocket for the whole regimen, and lots of people end up paying much more). May seem like a lot to you, but it's still the cheapest way to prevent me from being dead. Luckily for you there are a lot more people with high blood pressure than there are organ transplant patients, since the research cost is subsidized over many more people. (Lucky for me too, since I have to take blood pressure reducers in addition to my other drugs.)

      I'd be ecstatic if I only had to see the doctor twice a year. Besides, you probably don't even know about all the health problems that high blood pressure tends to cause. If you went that decade without a checkup by a doctor, you might find yourself more like me.

      Take your own opinions with a grain of salt.

    11. Re:Gimme! by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 1
      Considering that it costs me $50 per visit, I don't see how it is helping me.

      You're in a high-risk group. Experience and simple economics have taught HMO's and doctors that monitoring high-risk patients more closely than low-risk patients pays off in the long run. Whether it "benefits" you is beside the point. If we wanted we could say that you are benefitted by being monitored more closely because of your higher risk factors, but from your perspective it might be preferable to go without monitoring and show up in the doctor's office only when you realize that something has gone wrong. But from the HMO and doctor's point of view, that is not a very cost-effective way of handling you.

      It's too bad your office visits cost so much. Mine are $15. But it sounds like I have a lot more prescriptions than you.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    12. Re:Gimme! by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I think the reason it's done is because they decrease money that would be lost on the people who would not take their drugs correctly and get money from the people who don't need to see them.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    13. Re:Gimme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are to take my opinions cum grano salis, not the other way around.

      I know what HBP leads to. My grandmother had it, my father has it. Grandmother survived several heart attacks, my father (55) has survived one which killed a good portion of his muscle.

      I think you should learn to think before you assume.

    14. Re:Gimme! by Myco · · Score: 1
      60 pills should not cost $38. It just shouldn't.

      I feel like I am buying Ecstacy.

      Wish I knew where to get ecstasy that cheap. Damn.

    15. Re:Gimme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't see why I should have to pay a dime for either my visit or my prescription. 60 pills should not cost $38. It just shouldn't.

      Consider yourself lucky that your condition is treatable at all--people used to just die.

      And why shouldn't you pay something for prescriptions and doctor visits? The purpose of insurance is to ensure that you can afford necessary medical care, not to make medical care absolutely free.

    16. Re:Gimme! by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Yes but no one would find out without rigorous testing- and there are many diabetics who would be willing to volunteer as test subjects. As long as they are watched carefully for these retrovirus's and other possible adversity then the kinks could be ironed out, and could well provide a reasonable future solution for certain types of diabetes.

      You know- I know some diabetics to whome the watch concept and something like this are virtually their holy grail. Myself I am midly hypoglyceamic and have to watch my sugar levels through careful diet. Otherwise I tend to pass out or go into hypermode. If I could glance at the tattoo and know what the status was I would be a lot happier than knowing it when I begin to feel dizzy and on the brink of dropping.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    17. Re:Gimme! by pythorlh · · Score: 2
      I've been dreaming of a watch that'd constantly tell me my blood sugar since I was a boy.

      There is such a watch. Glucowatch. My mother has just recently gotten one, and it does pretty well. There are alarms for sugar too high, too low, or just changing fast and you really aught to check it. Sensors are good for 12 hours straight. Unfortunately, the website says pick US or Europe, so it may not be available in New Zealand. :(

      --
      Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
    18. Re:Gimme! by rodgerd · · Score: 2
      Yes but no one would find out without rigorous testing- and there are many diabetics who would be willing to volunteer as test subjects.


      Be that as it may, take a look at the most prominent cross-species disease jump: Scrapie -> BSE -> vCJD. In humans, vCJD takes 10-20 years to manifest; even a 5-10 year controlled study may not find a disease. And vCJD, worrying though it is (especially to people like me, who live and ate meat in the UK in the early 80s), is at least reasonably difficult to contract; we're not talking an ebola or influenza style pandemic here. If we got a 1918 style flu strain out of trials, it wouldn't matter how well conducted they were, we'd be in big trouble, unless the people in the trial feel like living in isolation conditions for years.

      The tattoo, on the other hand, looks really cool - although I know some people are a little concerned about the materials used, I'd hazard a guess that any ill effects are lower than the problems caused by inaccurate monitoring.
    19. Re:Gimme! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Most of the Diabetics I know should get a Demonic Face in a normal tatto ink, and then make the eyes and mouth this stuff, that way when they go Hypo the demon eyes will glow and you know to get the hell away from them until they deal with it.
      Preferably this should be right on their forehead so we don't miss it and accidentally speak to one of them...

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    20. Re:Gimme! by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      I also live in the uk, and ate meat in the 80's. I've no ill effects yet(all though insanity may be debatable ;-) ). But really I have just been lucky so far-and my meat intake was fairly low-being the only meat eater in a vege household.

      Surely if there was some form of transferable pathogen, then extensive blood sampling and testing(nothing diabetics arent used to) would find them and quickly deal with them. The ideal solution would be to find a synthetic system that could do the same. And I admit I would be a whole lot more comfortable with a synth system than pig-bits. Indeed many ops, transplants would be better done if synthetics were to catch up. Given the time and cost it takes to find a human donor, and the risks involved in pig bits(remember there are already people walking around with pig-heart tissue) - then it would be a very reasonable investment to furthar research into prosthetic parts, their efficiency, longevity, stability and ease-of-installation. In theory- maintenance shouldnt be an issue - as the ideal systems would come with a lifetime(thats 120 years not a poxy 25) guarantee. Like oxidisation proof materials etc.

      Anyway- most of this is a stepping stone towards succesful stem-cell research. Though I wonder if humans will ever get into designer prosthetics-for non-medical reasons. Dr Warwick could start us on that path. How many slashdotters would be happy with becoming cosmoniks?

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  16. Caffeine by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

    Now all I need is a tattoo to tell me when I've had too much coffee...

    --
    My sig sucks.
    1. Re:Caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you crazy? You can never have too much coffee!

    2. Re:Caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a tattoo that shows when alcohol levels go dangerously low risking hangover?

    3. Re:Caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, when your arms are jumpin' around so fast that it looks like a tattoo pattern, then you know it's time to cut down to regular espresso for the next hour :D

    4. Re:Caffeine by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

      Now all I need is a tattoo to tell me when I've had too much coffee...

      There is such a level?

      ..brings shaking cup to lips..

      Never!

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  17. Sounds cool, sign me up by jonabbey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds like there's a lot of details left to be worked out, but if something like this could serve as a continuous blood glucose diagnostic, I'm so there. Having been an insulin dependent diabetic for the last 13 years or so, a continuous blood glucose monitor has really been the most important missing piece to the whole puzzle.

    Sampling my blood sugar once or twice a day is far too infrequent to get a sense of how my blood sugar rises and falls over time. Having a monitor that could record my blood sugar levels even every five minutes would be fantastic. Make it able to sample every five seconds and hook it up to an insulin pump, and you've got as close to a cybernetic cure as one could hope for.

    Being an insulin-dependent diabetic is like driving a manual transmission car.. very workable, but you have to do a lot more work, and you have to know what the engine and gears are doing. If it's still too early for a cure, having a really good tachometer would be the next best thing.

    And having an intelligent cyber-tattoo would be just too cyber-punky for words. Sign me up.

    1. Re:Sounds cool, sign me up by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      ...and we all know that any database can be fed through a graphing program and output to a webpage. Fuck webcams, I want streaming blood sugar monitors.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:Sounds cool, sign me up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, don't diss manual transmission cars. I have grown quiet found of them, there is really something to heal-toe downshifting coming off the freeway. But they can be a bit of a pain in the city, and even worse when you have half Racing Engine that needs you slip-in 1st Gears.

    3. Re:Sounds cool, sign me up by jonabbey · · Score: 2

      Okay, well, imagine a manual transmission car that you are only able to shift four times a day. ;-)

    4. Re:Sounds cool, sign me up by BovineSpirit · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy. You are constantly listening to the engine, the road etc and adjusting the controls to suit. What would be cool is if a senser built into the car constantly monitored the tatoo and warned you if you were getting low and needed to get off the road. The opportunites for branding are scary. Stuff Nike swooshes, now the name of your preferred soft drink just appears when you need it.

  18. Just like Henry Rollins! by cdtoad · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Yes! Now I can have a BIG ASS SEARCH & DESTROY tattoo on my back that pops up when I need to up my glooooocose. I'll be Punk Rock & Healthy!

    --
    when they ban enctryption only criminals wi$21*J *#JF$%!@#$':
  19. Cool, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it run Linux?

  20. What I need is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a tattoo for my wife that indicates she has a headache.

  21. the marked by skydude_20 · · Score: 1

    great, now we'll have a culture of marked people and not-marked people. there will be social upheaval, there will be two powers in the world, that composed of only the marked and only of the not-marked. they will fight wars for generations across interstellar space.....

    cool, when can I get mine?

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
    1. Re:the marked by Jack9 · · Score: 1

      like the sneeches. except the stars are on the bellies of sneeches.

      --

      Often wrong but never in doubt.
      I am Jack9.
      Everyone knows me.
  22. Royalties by Jack9 · · Score: 1

    So according to recent articles regarding anime power armor and military proposals, the script writer for "the invisible man" (or appropriate pre-Scifi channel individual to first think of it), are owed money because it was their idea?

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  23. Pain free? by Tigris666 · · Score: 1

    The article states that it would be great for diabetics because it makes testing pain free.

    I'm thinking that most diabetics are probably used to it? I can't say, as I'm not diabetic, but maybe some diabetics out there can speak of their pain from the needles? Do the finger pricks still hurt or are you immune to the pain after so long now?

    It also isn't totally pain free in that you still need a needle for the insulin itself. That and the fact that you have to get the initial tattoo, which is probably going to be a fiar bit of pain compared to a finger prick :)

    --
    Kids, you tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try. -- Homer J. Simpson
    1. Re:Pain free? by Yorrike · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've been a type 1 (insulin dependant) diabetic for 19 years (since I was 3) and no matter what anyone tells you, it still hurts. You do get used to it, but it's pain I'd rather avoid, all the same.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:Pain free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The needles and lancets are pretty small gauge these days, so if you know what you're doing, they generally don't hurt too much... but you do feel them, and you do hit bad spots on occasion. If you test using your fingers often though, they just get completely scarred up. Not the most attractive thing in the world. Plus, it's just a general pain in the ass to have to do it.

    3. Re:Pain free? by jonabbey · · Score: 2

      The biggest thing is not being able to have a continuous readout, but the pain and hassle is not to be ignored, either.

      And you'd be amazed at how many test strips an insulin dependent diabetic can go through..

  24. What the hell? by Winterblink · · Score: 1
    Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos.

    I HIGHLY doubt this will change parents' attitudes towards their children getting a skull or a big frickin dragon wrapped around their arm. I think as a medical tool, a doctor is not going to give some ridiculous design, more like a small shape (dot, square) located somewhere that can be covered easily yet accessible to the patient to view.

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
    1. Re:What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rediculous design, like the brightly coloured plaster casts used nowadays, could be a "selling point" to children. That said, the ones used in radiotherapy are small things, barely visible unless you know where to look. Small could be cheaper too.

      Apparently tatoos can be quite painful to "install" (I escaped fortunately, where I'm having radiotherapy they can't miss). If it has to be redone often that can be a problem.

    2. Re:What the hell? by Winterblink · · Score: 1
      The rediculous design, like the brightly coloured plaster casts used nowadays, could be a "selling point" to children. That said, the ones used in radiotherapy are small things, barely visible unless you know where to look. Small could be cheaper too.

      Yeah, and will the painful and expensive removal be a selling point to the parents? Or to the person when he/she has reached a mature age and has a stupid looking Pikachu tattooed on them?

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:What the hell? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Or to the person when he/she has reached a mature age and has a stupid looking Pikachu tattooed on them?

      Ah, but by then Pokemon will be retro chic - 30somethings at parties will discuss episodes religiously, and whether anyone remembers the time charmander whopped jigglypuff, and just how gay was James out of team rocket?
      All crappy kids TV shows become a 30something cult, given time...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  25. It says... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    De diabetes, boss! De diabetes!

  26. a few more benefits by exhilaration · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is cool - I thought of a few more benefits:

    1) This would make it far easier for the patient's loved ones to measure their glucose levels. A mother would be able to check a child's glucose level in the middle of the night without waking him/her up. I can also imagine a coworker saying, "Dude, your glucose looks a little low - maybe you should go eat something." :)

    2) Even without a bracelet or necklace identifying the patient as a diabetic, emergency personel could quickly see the patient's gluocose levels. If a diabetic is laying on the side of the road about to enter a coma, saving a few seconds could be critical.

    Personally, I like (1) - it would be a huge quality of life improvement.

    1. Re:a few more benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, I'd hate #1. I don't want anyone else on my case... it's bad enough with dealing with people over it. I realize people mean well, but I'm very well aware of what I'm eating and what I'm not, so they should just leave me the hell alone.

    2. Re:a few more benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your glucose is low, wouldn't you become easily agitated? so them telling you that your glucose is low, wouldn't that just make you more agitated?

    3. Re:a few more benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it does happen that way.

    4. Re:a few more benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed. Most importantly though, diabetes dehumanises you enough. The last thing we need is something else to make us feel different.

    5. Re:a few more benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you get a fake one, people will give you free candy :)

  27. Excuse to get tatooed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey just cure it. Why bother with tatoos. The folks here are University of alberta developed a cell transplant that cures some forms of the condition. Transplanting a few cells easier and rejections not as bad

    1. Re:Excuse to get tatooed? by EchelonZero · · Score: 1

      Not quite true. The procedure you're refering to, known as a islet transplant, is still in the extremely experiemental phase. While it shows great promise, the main problem associated with islet transplantation is the auto-immune reaction. The drugs used to suppress this reaction have horrible side effects and for most, make the cure worst than the disease. Genetic research such as stem cell development may someday allow diabetics to use their own cells for transplanation. Assuming Bush doesn't completely ban it, or lead us into World War III- I guess it wouldn't be very useful if no one was around to use it....

      I'm *really* looking forward to this- I've wanted to get a tat for awhile, but decided against it until I found with meaning--boy would this be the meaning I've been searching for!

      For those who don't know (I'm sure all the diabetics here are familiar, or should be), the "Islets of Langerhans" as they're known, are the part of the pancreas that produces insulin. A type 1 diabetic is someone whose islets (or beta cells) have been destroyed or are not functioning. A type 2 diabetic has decreased sensitivity to insulin- their body still produces it, but their ability to process it is greatly diminished.

      I'm almost 22. I was diagnosed with type 1 right after my 20th birthday- there is no history of diabetes in my family and I was in excellent health. Just something to think about for all the jaded and ambivalent folks out there...not to scare you or anything :)

    2. Re:Excuse to get tatooed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sucks to be you.

    3. Re:Excuse to get tatooed? by derch · · Score: 1

      I've wanted to get a tat for awhile, but decided against it until I found with meaning--boy would this be the meaning I've been searching for!

      My advice - design one with meaning, but not too much. It's only a mark and won't reveal as much about you as you might think. People will read their own stories into your tattoo(s), which usually is a good thing.

      Really, relax about it. You will have it the rest of your life which is all the more reason to *not* put too much meaning into it. Meanings, beliefs, and perceptions will change as you grow older.

      Instead, might I suggest getting something that marks this part of your life. Then in a few years, get something else. Read up on 'travel marks' to get better understanding of tattoos in Western culture. (I'm assuming you're Western from how you talk about Bush and your first tattoo.)

  28. What I have done. by sbence · · Score: 1

    I was on a long flight. Blood sugar was bouncing (high/low), a little sick. Didn't want to burden the people around me with my info and did want to set the stews off. I went to the restroom and wrote with a black bic pen (in the mirror), "Diabetic". Also, the "Hi. Im a diabetic" greeting card you put in your wallet falls apart 6 months after you get it. The medi-necklace breaks easy.

  29. Wouldn't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The insulin would either get digested or not enter the blood stream in sufficient quantities.

    1. Re:Wouldn't work by woodja · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod up an AC post. But this is correct. The insulin would get broken down similar to protein. Insulin needs to be absorbed into the body . There is some talk of a nasal spray, but this causes a lot of unpleasant side affects and isn't very reliable. The same goes with insulin patches and other similar devices. Development is occuring, however, for some kind of artificial pacrease pouch that gets inserted under the skin every year and genetically produced cells that can produce insulin and be placed in the bloodstream.

      It is nice to see that all the research money going into Diabetes is slowly showing some results. Hopefully they will all help make my life as well as millions of others with Diabetes better.

    2. Re:Wouldn't work by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

      Islet cell transplants are reporting great success in Mexico, where teenagers with the cells transplanted into their bodies are able to live without any insulin injections.

      For those that don't know, it's not the pancreas that creates insulin, it's tiny cells inside the pancreas called the Islets of Langerhans that produce insulin. These cells can be removed from recently deceased people, treated with a series of enzymes and other biochemicals to leave just the Islet cells which can be safely injected into a diabetic (usually into the liver) where they release insulin into the blood stream.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  30. That Tatoo sure is talented by bubblegoose · · Score: 2

    De plane, de plane boss!

    I thought Tattoo was only good for monitoring incoming planes, now he can track diabetes?

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
  31. HEY THERE G.I. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five dolla me sucky sucky!

  32. Re: About Lingam Gnosis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I work with Tim Follows, the guy who played Ponyboy on the short-lived "Outsiders" TV series from the mid-80s.

    He's just a normal guy, although he looks vaguely familiar in the way that former sub-celebrities tend to.

    Once in a while one of the temps or a new person will start asking him lots of questions about being on a TV series and the whole actor's life. He always let's them down easy: "That was a long time ago. It seems like another life".

    Once in the breakroom he said to me: "You know, plants get their carbon from carbon dioxide. That means every tree was once pure air. Think about that shit."

    Sometimes I like to think Tim Follows can levitate.

  33. Diabetes and American Indian and Alaska Native Wom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diabetes and American Indian and Alaska Native Women

    What is diabetes?

    Diabetes is a disorder of metabolism---the way our bodies use digested food for growth and energy. Most of the food we eat is broken down by the digestive juices into a
    simple sugar called glucose. Glucose is the main source of fuel for the body. After digestion, the glucose passes into our bloodstream where it is available for body cells to use for growth and energy. For the glucose to get into the cells, insulin must be present. Insulin is a hormone produced by the pancreas, a large gland behind the stomach.

    When we eat, the pancreas is supposed to automatically produce the right amount of insulin to move the glucose from our blood into our cells. In people with diabetes, however, the pancreas either produces little or no insulin, or the body cells do not respond to the insulin that is produced. As a result, glucose builds up in the blood, overflows into the urine, and passes out of the body. Thus, the body loses its main source of fuel even though the blood contains large amounts of glucose.

    Is diabetes a health problem for
    American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) women?

    Type 2, or Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus, affects roughly 16 million Americans. For American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/AN), both women and men, the incidence rate of type 2 (or adult) diabetes has reached epidemic proportions. Overall, 12.2 percent of AI/AN women and men over the age of 19 have been diagnosed with diabetes. For AI/AN women, the incidence rate is higher at 12.6 percent, compared with 10.2 percent for men. Specific tribes have much higher rates. For example, 50 percent of Pima Indians in Arizona who are between the ages of 30 and 64 have type 2 diabetes.

    The following chart shows the incidence of diabetes by age among AI/AN women compared to non-Hispanic White women.

    Prevalence of Diagnosed Diabetes-United States, 1997
    (per 100,000 women)

    Age Group (in years)
    AI / AN Women
    Non-Hispanic
    white women

    20 - 44
    4.1
    1.3

    45 - 64
    21.7
    5.1

    65 and older
    24.6
    11.2

    20 and older
    10.6
    4.5

    Age-adjusted prevalence
    12.6
    4.0

    Sources: Data on American Indians/Alaska Natives from the 1997 Indian Health Service Patient Care Component file. Data on non-Hispanic Whites from the 1995 National Health Interview Survey.

    Are many AI/AN women dying because of diabetes?

    The death rate for the AI/AN population due to diabetes is about 2.7 times the rate for the general U.S. population. And researchers have suggested that this rate is actually even higher. At present, only deaths that list diabetes as the underlying cause are included in this mortality rate. This rate does not include the many deaths in which diabetes is a contributing cause. The death rate for AI/AN women has increased 550 percent over a 30-year period, reports a study conducted in New Mexico. This increase in women's mortality rate from diabetes is more than twice that of AI/AN men.

    Why are AI/AN women so susceptible to diabetes?

    Diabetes has two main causes. One cause is genetics, which means that the disease tends to reoccur in the same population as people marry and have children within that population. Following that logic, full-blooded subpopulations (such as the Choctaw Indians) have the highest incidence rates of diabetes. The exact genetic causes of the disease are not yet known, but insulin resistance, which is common in Pima Indians, seems to play a part. Also, Pima Indian children are more likely to develop diabetes if their parents also developed diabetes at an early age.

    The second cause of diabetes is lifestyle patterns. Obesity is a major risk factor for diabetes. Obesity has become a problem with the Pima Indians, and obesity rates in AI/ AN populations (as in the general U.S. population) have been rising in recent decades. The lifestyle of the AI/AN population has changed. The common diet is now the Western diet, with high amounts of fat, and many individuals get little physical exercise. These lifestyle patterns contribute to obesity and are a direct risk factor for diabetes. In Pima Indians, who have a 50 percent incidence rate of diabetes, 95 percent of those with diabetes are overweight.

    How does diabetes affect AI/AN women during pregnancy?

    Pregnant AI/AN women with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of having babies born with birth defects. These women are also at risk of developing toxemia, a condition that endangers the lives of both the mother and the infant.

    Diabetes that shows up in pregnancy is called gestational diabetes. This form of diabetes is more common among certain AI/AN tribes than in the general population. Gestational diabetes increases the baby's risk for problems such as macrosomia (large body size) and neonatal hypoglycemia (low blood sugar).

    Although the blood glucose levels of women with gestational diabetes usually return to normal after childbirth, these women have an increased risk of developing gestational diabetes in future pregnancies. In addition, studies show that many women with gestational diabetes will develop type 2 diabetes later in life. Follow-up studies of AI/AN women with gestational diabetes found them to have a high risk of developing subsequent diabetes: 27.5 percent of Pima Indian women developed diabetes within 4 to 8 years after pregnancy, and 30 percent of Zuni Indian women developed diabetes within 6 months to 9 years after pregnancy.

    A child with a mother who had diabetes during pregnancy has a very high risk of becoming overweight or obese and developing diabetes at a young age. The exposure to the mother's high blood sugar in the womb contributes to this risk. Longitudinal studies of diabetes in Pima Indians have shown that adult offspring of women with diabetes during pregnancy have significantly higher rates of diabetes than adult offspring of women without diabetes. In fact, 45 percent of the adult offspring of Pima Indian women who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes prior to their pregnancy developed diabetes by age 20 to 24. In comparison, only 1.4 percent of adult offspring of women without diabetes during their pregnancy went on to develop diabetes by age 24.

    The strongest single risk factor for diabetes in Pima children was exposure to diabetes in the womb.

    What other complications of diabetes exist in AI/AN women?

    Serious complications of diabetes are becoming more prevalent in American Indians and Alaska Natives. The most prominent or concerning are kidney (or renal) failure, amputations, blindness, and heart disease. Ten to twenty percent of all people with diabetes develop kidney disease, and the rate of diabetic end-stage renal failure is six times higher in AI/AN populations. The amputation rates are three to four times higher in AI/AN populations than in the general population. And diabetic retinopathy (which includes all abnormalities of the small blood vessels in the retina of the eye) occurs in 18 percent of Pima Indians and 24.4 percent of Oklahoma Indians.

    Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and fatal coronary events are often linked to diabetes. However, these deaths would not be included in the mortality rates for diabetes because diabetes would be considered a "contributing" factor.

    Infections, including tuberculosis, are of particular concern to both American Indians and Alaska Natives who have diabetes. A study of Sioux Indians showed that their rate of developing tuberculosis was 4.4 times higher if they had diabetes than if they did not.

    How can AI/AN women manage diabetes?

    Type 2 diabetes is usually treated by controlling diet, increasing physical activity, testing blood glucose levels at home, and, in some cases, taking oral medication or insulin or both. Approximately 40 percent of individuals with type 2 diabetes require insulin injections.

    For more information...

    You can find out more about diabetes in women by contacting the following organizations:

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    http://www.cdc.gov

    Indian Health Service
    http://www.ihs.gov

    National Women's Health Information Center For Your Heart
    http://www.4woman.gov/HHS

    National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
    http://www.niddk.nih.gov

    Office on Women's Health : American Indian/Alaska Native http://www.4woman.gov/minority/index.cfm?page=Amer ican_Indian

    American Diabetes Association
    http://www.diabetes.org

    Source: NWHIC; May 2001

    Click to Close Print Version Browser Window

    © 2001 Gourmet Connection

  34. Tips to Control and Maintain Blood Sugar for Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taking control of diabetes has many benefits. Keeping your blood sugar (also called blood glucose) levels in the normal range can make a big difference now and in the future.

    In the short run, you will:

    Feel better.
    Stay healthy.
    Have more energy.
    Prevent the signs and symptoms of high blood sugar such as: feeling very thirsty and tired; urinating often; losing a lot of weight; having blurred vision; and having cuts or bruises that are slow to heal.

    In the long run, you will:

    Lower your chances of having diabetes problems such as eye disease, kidney disease, and nerve damage.
    Enjoy a better quality of life.

    There are many steps you can take to control your diabetes for life. Follow this three-part action plan to get your blood sugar under control:

    Know your blood sugar numbers. Get a complete picture of your blood sugar control with the hemoglobin A1c test and the finger-stick test using a blood glucose meter.
    Reach your blood sugar goal. Make healthy lifestyle choices with the help of your health care provider.
    Keep your blood sugar under control. Create a plan to stick with your self-care goals and manage setbacks.

    Tips to Control Blood Sugar

    To Start

    Test your blood sugar. Ask your health care provider when and how often.
    Keep a record of your blood tests, medicines, and daily events. Review the record with your health care provider.
    Take your diabetes medicine as prescribed.
    Eat foods to control your blood sugar. See a dietitian to create a meal plan that is right for you.
    Get physical activity. If you haven't been active, start slowly. Good activities are walking and swimming.
    Check your feet for cuts, blisters, red spots, and swelling. Call your health care provider right away about any sores that won't heal.

    To Keep in Mind Along the Way

    Stay at a weight that is right for you. Ask your health care provider what you should weigh.
    Treat low blood sugar quickly with special tablets or gel made of glucose.
    Don't smoke. Talk to your health care provider about ways to quit.
    Learn more about diabetes and diabetes self-care. Ask your health care provider to suggest a dietitian and a diabetes educator to help you manage your diabetes.
    Seek support from family and friends or join a diabetes support group. Call your local hospital or health department to find a support group.

    To Do With Your Health Care Providers

    Write down your questions and take them with you to each visit.
    Ask for a hemoglobin A1c test at least twice a year and know what your test result means.
    Ask for regular blood pressure checks, cholesterol tests, and other blood fat tests.
    Have your feet, eyes, and kidneys checked at least once a year or more often if you have problems.
    See your dentist at least twice a year. Tell your dentist you have diabetes.

    Tips to Maintain Blood Sugar Control

    Set Goals You Can Reach

    Break a big goal into small steps. If you plan to increase your physical activity, start by taking one 5-minute walk three times a week. Then try walking longer or more often.
    Make changes that you can stick with for the rest of your life. If you want to lose weight and keep it off, be active and limit portion sizes. Don't just go on a "diet."

    Create a Plan to Deal With Diabetes

    Think about all your reasons for staying in control of your blood sugar. Make a list and post it where you see it often.
    Figure out what can tempt you to slip up when it comes to blood sugar control. Decide now how you will handle these events next time.
    Reward yourself for staying in control. Rent a movie, buy a plant, or spend time with a friend.
    Ask for a little help from friends and family when you're down or need someone to talk to.

    Manage Setbacks

    Admit that you've slipped. Learn what you can from it.
    Don't be too hard on yourself. A setback is not the end of the world.

    Source: NDEP

    Click to Close Print Version Browser Window

    © 2001 Gourmet Connection

  35. Re:Diabetes and American Indian and Alaska Native by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People of these ethnicities should go back to their more natural, non-western diet. Excess carbs are causing this problem, and going to low-carb helps many people with type 2 diabetes a lot. Many are even able to get completely off medication.

  36. Some possibilities for easier use by Goonie · · Score: 2
    What about tattooing a "reference chart" next to the actual sugar-sensitive tattoo as a rough guide, so that you could monitor major changes by just glancing at the tattoo? Maybe even arrange it so that certain segments glow as threshold levels are reached (kinda like a battery gauge type of thing)?

    Or, even, tattoo it to your wrist and have a colour sensor in your watch that started bleeping if your sugar levels changed too much.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  37. Tattoo? by goodhell · · Score: 1

    I dunno, I saw the title and immeadiately thought of a little guy saying "De blood sugar, de blood sugar!"

    Speaking of which .... need to eat.

  38. Heh, by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Tattoo To Monitor Diabetes"

    Look boss! The ... uhh.. Shit. Can anybody think of a diabetes related word that rhymes with 'plane'?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh, by orakle · · Score: 1

      Pain? Like the pain from a needle?

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; grep; mount; fsck; yes; more; fsck; umount; make clean; sleep
    2. Re:Heh, by way2trivial · · Score: 0

      Look boss! I need sugar cane!

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:Heh, by bbc22405 · · Score: 1

      Look boss! The ... uhh.. Shit. Can anybody think of a diabetes related word that rhymes with 'plane'?


      I'll come up with a rhyme for "plane", if you can find a way to change "Fantasy Island" to "Islets of Langerhans" without harming the Neilson ratings for it...

    4. Re:Heh, by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I'll come up with a rhyme for "plane", if you can find a way to change "Fantasy Island" to "Islets of Langerhans" without harming the Neilson ratings for it..."

      I'm not going to get a +1 Funny with this thread, am I?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Heh, by Louis_Wu · · Score: 1
      Pain? Like the pain from a needle?
      To the death!

      No, to The Pain.

      I'm not quite familiar with that one.

      I'll explain. And I'll use small words

      ...

      Enough quoting The Princess Bride, I'll just go watch it again

    6. Re:Heh, by mirnav · · Score: 1

      "Cane"? As in sugar?

  39. Factors That Affect Glucose Meter Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Factors That Affect Glucose Meter Performance And Making Sure Your Meter Works Properly

    The accuracy of your test results depends partly on the quality of your meter and test strips and your training. Other factors can also make a difference in the accuracy of your results.

    Hematocrit.

    Hematocrit is the amount of red blood cells in the blood. Patients with higher hematocrit values will usually test lower for blood glucose than patients with normal hematocrit. Patients with lower hematocrit values will test higher. If you know that you have abnormal hematocrit values you should discuss its possible effect on glucose testing (and HbA1C testing) with your health care provider. Anemia and Sickle Cell Anemia are two conditions that affect hematocrit values.

    Other Substances.

    Many other substances may interfere with your testing process. These include uric acid (a natural substance in the body that can be more concentrated in some people with diabetes), glutathione (an "anti-oxidant" also called "GSH"), and ascorbic acid (vitamin C). You should check the package insert for each meter to find what substances might affect its testing accuracy, and discuss your concerns with your health care provider.

    Altitude, Temperature and Humidity.

    Altitude, room temperature, and humidity can cause unpredictable effects on glucose results. Check the meter and test strip package insert for information on these issues. Store and handle the meter and test strips according to the instructions.

    Third-Party Test Strips.

    Third-party or "generic glucose reagent strips" are test strips developed as a less expensive option than the strips that the manufacturer intended the meter to be used with. They are typically developed by copying the original strips. Although these strips may work on the meter listed on the package, they could look like strips used for other meters. Be sure the test strip you use is compatible with your glucose meter.

    Sometimes manufacturers change their meters and their test strips. These changes are not always communicated to the third-party strip manufacturers. This can make third-party strips incompatible with your meter without your knowledge. Differences can involve the amount, type or concentration of the chemicals (called "reagents") on the test strip, or the actual size and shape of the strip itself. Meters are sensitive to these features of test strips and may not work well or consistently if they are not correct for a meter. If you are unsure whether or not a certain test strip will work with you meter, contact the manufacturer of your glucose meter.

    Making Sure Your Meter Works Properly

    You should perform quality-control checks to make sure that your home glucose testing is accurate and reliable. Several things can reduce the accuracy of your meter reading even if it appears to still work. For instance, the meter may have been dropped or its electrical components may have worn out. Humidity or heat may damage test strips. It is even possible that your testing technique may have changed slightly. Quality control checks should be done on a regular basis according to the meter manufacturer's instructions. There are two kinds of quality control checks:

    Check Using "Test Quality Control Solutions" or "Electronic Controls".

    Test quality control solutions and electronic controls are both used to check the operation of your meter. Test quality control solutions check the accuracy of the meter and test strip. They may also give an indication of how well you use your system. Electronic controls only check that the meter is working properly.

    Test quality control solutions have known glucose values. Essentially, when you run a quality control test, you substitute the test solution for blood. The difference is that you know what the result should be.

    To test your meter with a quality control solution, follow the instructions that accompany the solution. These will guide you to place a certain amount of solution on your test strip and run it through your meter. The meter will give you a reading for the amount of glucose in the sample. Compare this number to the number listed on the test quality control solution. If the results of your test match the values given in the quality control solution labeling, you can be assured the entire system (meter and test strip) is working properly. If results are not correct, the system may not be accurate--contact the manufacturer for advice.

    Manufacturers sometimes include quality control solution with their meter. However, most often you must order it separately from a manufacturer or pharmacy.

    Some glucose meters also use electronic controls to make sure the meter is working properly. With this method, you place a cartridge or a special "control" test strip in the meter and a signal will appear to indicate if the meter is working.

    Take Your Meter with You to The Health Care Provider's Office.

    This way you can test your glucose while your health care provider watches your technique to make sure you are using the meter correctly. Your healthcare provider will also take a sample of blood and evaluate it using a routine laboratory method. If values obtained on the glucose meter match the laboratory method, you and your healthcare provider will see that your meter is working well and that you are using good technique. If results do not match the laboratory method results, then results you get from your meter may be inaccurate and you should discuss the issue with your healthcare provider and contact the manufacturer if necessary.

    Source: FDA

    Click to Close Print Version Browser Window

    © 2001 Gourmet Connection

  40. Cosmetic purposes? by Flarelocke · · Score: 1

    This sounds like subdermal phosphorescence as discussed in Otherland and other novels as a next generation rebellious self-mutilation.

    In other words, like tatoos for the '70's and earrings for the '80's, phosphorescence will be for the future.

  41. Flourescent tattoos by FCAdcock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Flourescent tattoos are not safe

    As a professional tattoo artist, and a liscensed one to boot, I am regularly asked if I can/will do the new flourescent tattoos, and I always give the exact same answer. "NO!"

    In 20 years, I may, but right now, while there have never been any long term tests to see if these tattoos will cause bodily harm, I refuse to put flourescent ink in anyone. There have been no tests to aprove the flourescent inks for permanent cosmetic use, so no one is certain that these inks are safe. Every bottle of ink in my shop comes with about 20 pages of paperwork documenting that the inks have passed years of medical testing, and have been found safe. The flourescent inks do not come with this paperwork, so I refuse stock those inks.

    Think about it, things that glow usualy come with warnings saying not to ingest, that means it's not safe. When you put ink in your skin, it does the same thing as if you swallow it.

    --
    --Forest C. Adcock--
    1. Re:Flourescent tattoos by nervous_twitch · · Score: 1
      I doubt they would deploy this into regular medical use if it was going to harm the person in any way. I'm sure they have tested (or are going to test) this stuff for toxicity to humans before they start using it. I know you may be a licensed tatoo artist, and know about the dangers of putting something under your skin, but I'm sure these scientists know those things as well.

      If I were you, I'd say the same thing to anyone who walks in my shop looking for a "cool new thing" to show off to their friends, but don't scare people from this idea, which could conceivably help many diabetics.

      As a side note, I believe (don't quote me, please) that most blacklight fluorescent inks are safer than the "light-charged" type. That might be a solution... the user could just carry one of those handheld mini-blacklights and check the tatoo every once in a while, and the inks would be safer.

      --
      Trees everywhere, and not a forest in sight.
    2. Re:Flourescent tattoos by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      Come on...tattoos are all about rebellion and being different. Now that tattoos have caught on, it's not enough to just have a tattoo. Frankly, the current inks in use are rather dull...getting a tattoo isn't as enticing as it used to be. Vivid colors will attract new ensure the tattoo trend keeps going strong. They didn't always have 20 pages of documentation for tattoo supplies, that's the invention of a self-serving government regulatory agency. Or do you not think tattoos were availible before the latter 20th century? ;)

      I thought I'd also take this chance to give a link to a good list of tattoo artists, if you happen to be in the San Francisco Bay area.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Flourescent tattoos by FCAdcock · · Score: 1
      No, I don't think that tattooing has only been around since the 20th century. It is the second oldest profession on earth (next to prostitution.), and I realize that. What you fail to see is that like everything else, even tattooing changes and evolves with technology.

      A "self-serving government regulatory agency" had absolutly nothing to do with the 20 pages of paperwork, and documentation that comes with my ink. That is the invention of the ink company that I use. There are no rules that say the inks even have to be tested, that I know of, and yet the company that I use not only tests their inks, they also provide artists with documentation of those tests, so show the artist that the inks are safe.

      How are the inks in use today dull? They are brighter than any other inks ever before, they will NEVER fade (with the exception of white, yellow, and red, which will fade in sunlight), and are safer than they have ever been.

      Final words:
      Tattoos are about rebelion, sure, I'll give you that. But it's hard to rebel anymore when you die from skin cancer...

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    4. Re:Flourescent tattoos by FCAdcock · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that these inks are dangerous, don't mistake me. All I was trying to say is that I don't know that they are safe. In my shop, I will not use anything that I do not know that it is safe, and have documentation to prove that it is, indeed, safe.

      The flourescent inks in use today by many artists are not "glow-in-the-dark", they are blacklight responsive inks. There are no inks to my knoledge that truely glow in the dark. Those I know for a fact to be unsafe for use in tattooing.

      The inks that they are talking about using for diabetics are not the same inks that are being used in these trendy "glowing" tattoos. I have not fully read the article, but I do not believe that this ink is out on the market yet. If I read that it is, in fact, safe, I will stock that ink, and will use it. But not until it passes givernment tests (anything developed for use on Diabetics would have to pass FDA and state medical board tests to be used. Much like cosmetic inks used to cover scars after surgerys.)

      Then again, I'm not most tattoo shops. I actually care about my coustomers, if they weren't there, I wouldn't have a job. I have a very large, and very devoted clientel, who have come to know me as a very safe, clean, and professional artist.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    5. Re:Flourescent tattoos by Effugas · · Score: 5, Informative

      I actually looked into this myself some time ago. (I was doing some research on some rather brainfucked abuses of inkjet printers.) Yes, you're absolutely right that raw fluorescent ink fails pretty spectacularly over time. Not only does sunlight (with its massive UV1/UV2 dosage) bleach the fluorescent tats down to a ugly yellow stain, but it apparently becomes quite...err...itchy over time.

      Not pretty.

      However, some massive new work is being done with encapsulating various forms of bio-active chemicals (the bleached ink molecules are enough to spawn an itch reaction) within various types of polymer chains. Some pretty interesting stuff is being done with encapuslating approaches...a really elegant breast cancer treatment works as follows: Take a potent anti-cancer agent (poison, to be blunt) and attach it to a non-toxic, heat-sensitive polymer, such that the combination of the two remains non-toxic.

      Inject the combo into the bloodstream.

      Take the patient, and dip her breasts in water hot enough to separate the polymer from the toxin. Now watch as two things happen:

      1) Only the breasts reach critical temperature, so only they might be exposed to the chemo, and
      2) The blood vessels in the breast will expand, and those sections with the most blood vessels will receive the highest dosage of the chemo. Those sections are usually tumors.

      From what I can tell, it's pretty tricky to design the polymer that is stable at 98.6F and unstable at 105F -- any hotter, and you're doing damage with the heat alone! Creating arbitrarily stable non-toxics is comparitively much easier. That's what it sounds like they're doing here -- they're taking a molecule with a useful function (fluorescence), attaching it to something that prevents it from reaching toxicity, and linking the expression of fluorescence to the level of insulin surrounding the molecule.

      It is likely a useful side effect of this will be generically functional fluorescent ink, replete with quite a bit more than the 20 pages of paperwork you're used to.

      Yours Truly,

      Dan Kaminsky
      DoxPara Research
      http://www.doxpara.com

    6. Re:Flourescent tattoos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great! So, before I get this diabetic tattoo thing, I can demand to see someone's breasts, as proof of viability?? ;)

    7. Re:Flourescent tattoos by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Is regular white ink blacklight responsive? I'm curious & you sound like you would know.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:Flourescent tattoos by Eccles · · Score: 1

      The flourescent inks in use today by many artists are not "glow-in-the-dark", they are blacklight responsive inks.

      Maybe fireflies could be harvested for their organs, and diabetics would blink when their sugar levels are off?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    9. Re:Flourescent tattoos by FCAdcock · · Score: 1
      Yes, and no.

      Tattoos are in the 3rd and 4th layer of skin, so to respond to a blacklight, they must be exposed to a light that can penetrate both the first and second layers (for some reason, it's easier for light to come OUT rather than go IN skin {don't ask me why, all I know is that it IS.}), so you need a really strong black light. And even then, it's usualy not much reaction.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    10. Re:Flourescent tattoos by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thanks, man. So I'll have to wait a little longer for a safe "club" tatoo, I guess...

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  42. Obvious next step... by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The obvious next step is to vary the type of material being used linearly across the tattoo itself, turning it into a "glucose meter".

    As an interesting aside, could this method be used to produce tattoos that were more easily removable as well?

    I think I would want this to be removable, particularly when stem cell research finally cures diabetes once and for all, and you are left with a legacy tattoo.

    -- Terry

  43. Detecting dangerous glucose levels? by Patik · · Score: 1

    "Whoa, the room's spinning and I'm about to faint, but my tattoo is still red so I must be okay."

    1. Re:Detecting dangerous glucose levels? by Yorrike · · Score: 2

      Then you, sir, are drunk. : )

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    2. Re:Detecting dangerous glucose levels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but he has a very good point. At least deserving of a +something, Insightful.

      No amount of indication is going to help if you're too far gone to understand the warning. Yet more evidence that a cure is what's needed, not another lame "yea, this way, it doesn't hurt as much until your liver shuts down".

  44. In Related Developments... by The+Beezer · · Score: 1

    the same group will also be marketing tongue piercings that double as thermometers and eye piercings that monitor for glaucoma.

  45. Public service anouncment by joew · · Score: 1

    I know this is slightly off topic but while we are discussing Diabetes, The symptoms should probably be mentioned.

    Ten warning signs which should send you to your doctor:

    1. Abnormal, intense thirst
    2. Frequent urination.
    3. Extreme hunger.
    4. Sudden, unexplained weight loss.
    5. Slow-healing cuts, bruises or skin infections.
    6. Recurrent infections.
    7. Blurred vision.
    8. Unexplained weakness and extreme exhaustion.
    9. Genital itching or impotence.
    10. Sweet-smelling breath.

    you never know the kidneys you save may be your own.

    1. Re:Public service anouncment by djupedal · · Score: 0

      Let's see....I have at least six out of ten and I was just tested and I don't have diabetes.

      What does that mean?

    2. Re:Public service anouncment by another_twilight · · Score: 1

      Depending on which 6, probably depression or a stress disorder.

    3. Re:Public service anouncment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means you'll be suing for malpractice in 2 years.

  46. so many diabetics! by neoptik · · Score: 1

    Wow, so many type-1 diabetics. Is there a forum somewhere for type-1 diabetics who are interested in /.-y things? I'd be interested in joining one if such a thing existed.

    -Thom Covert
    thomc@nospam.mit.edu

    --
    I dont have a .sig just yet.
    1. Re:so many diabetics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention spambots! He meant to say:
      thomc@mit.edu

    2. Re:so many diabetics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Type 1 diabetes is one of the most common diseases (I've got it to and right now I'm looow waiting for my favourite food joint to open)

    3. Re:so many diabetics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also be really interested in finding a forum of this type. After 14 years as a type-1 diabetic I have yet to meet a single other person sharing my affliction (apart from diabetes camp). Most of the usenet groups concerned with diabetes seem to be filled with type-2 diabetics.

      I also agree with the previous poster about some kind of token system for purchasing testing supplies. It's not like the diabetes is going to go away, so why can't someone get a lifetime prescription for the supplies they need.

    4. Re:so many diabetics! by neoptik · · Score: 1

      I think the general reasoning behind that would be to ensure that all diabetics are seeing endocrinologists on a regular basis. People's needs can change, and often, it takes a real endocrinologist to figure out how to deal with those changes. Just a thought. Anyway, if you all e-mail me regarding such a forum, I might be able to put one together on one of the freebie hosting sites.

      -Thom

      --
      I dont have a .sig just yet.
    5. Re:so many diabetics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wouldn't say that. It's not even anywhere near as common as type 2.

    6. Re:so many diabetics! by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      I believe the ratio is something like 20:1 (it was like 90-95% type 2, the last 5-10% type 1, at least I think thats what I read a few days ago).

  47. biopolymers by sstory · · Score: 1
    biopolymers like this are really going to be big, have huge applications. soon they will be easy meniscus replacements for knees, and artificial livers built on polymer foams will be awesome.

    Better living through chemistry, man.

  48. s/glucose/opiates/ by DrVeg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This really has great medical potential, but I can imagine similar developments of the future used for other purposes. Being able to monitor bodily chemicals could be extremely valuable, but also subject to unexpected uses.
    As condition of your employment, you agree to a permanent tattoo that indicates drug use.
    Or,
    The court orders you to get a drug-monitoring tattoo and scan it by your home internet-connected device every 6 hours.

  49. I'm glad... by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    that the little fella finally got a decent job. He was so crushed when Mr. Raurk gave him the boot.

  50. Tattoo To Monitor Diabetes by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1

    Well, good! I'm happy to see that the little fart is doing something useful with himself, after that failure with his StayFree Mini-Pads.

  51. Anybody remember this? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

    I remember reading a while back about a "needle" that was created using a process similar to etching computer chips. Basically, it consisted of numerous tiny needles in a grid (10,000 to a square inch or something), which reach deep enough into the skin to enter the capillary system, but not deep enough to trigger the nerves and register pain.

    I thought this device would have great application in both glucose testing and medication delivery, but haven't heard anything abou it lately. Does this sound familiar to anyone?

    --
    Someone you trust is one of us.
    1. Re:Anybody remember this? by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      Apparently pain isn't something researchers are concerned about.

      My greatest health fear is becoming a diabetic and having to inject myself, test my blood, etc. Needles and I do NOT mix.

    2. Re:Anybody remember this? by CokeBear · · Score: 2
      Sounds like the predecessor to the HypoSpray on ST:TNG.

      Are we there yet?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    3. Re:Anybody remember this? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      Well, testing your blood is not a walk in the park but as far as I'm concerned it hurts less than the electrostatic shocks I get on a regular basis at the local grocery store. In fact you can generally set the lance so that it doesn't cause pain at all (at least I was able to).

      That's why I thought this etched needle sounded like such a great idea. If you can get into the skin with one of those, say, hooked to a watch/computer you could be monitoring your blood on a constant basis, delivering insulin as your body needs it, and probably do all kinds of groovy things. And all without the needle phobia that haunts a lot of us. (I'm type II diabetic on oral medication but it's only a matter of time. I'm hoping I can keep it under control until research gets to the point where I don't need to worry about having to go to injections.)

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    4. Re:Anybody remember this? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

      Pain isn't a problem. The needles are short, and sharp and you are injecting insulin into fatty tissue around your abdomen usually (although I also use my thighs at night). As long as you don't use the same needle for too long (i.e making it blunt) then you don't even feel it.

      As for finger-pricking, same rule applies, don't use the same lancet (skin puncturer thingee) too long and it doesn't hurt at all.

      When your injecting 6 times a day like myself, you get used to it pretty quickly :-)

      Times have changed from when you had to draw insulin into a hypodermic from a vial.. now we just dial the amount, jab, press and go :-)

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  52. Change attitudes? hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that the tattoo IS what it always appeared to be... a circuit drawn on the body... i would think that people would flee from tattoo parlors. No, thank you, i wouldn't like to have some kind of circuit-implant drawn on my body, even if it is a tasteful little rose.

  53. I thought Tattoo was dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Da Plane! Da Plane!

  54. This could be the next best thing for monitoring.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long does it take a palestinian whore to make a bomb?

    9 Months!

  55. RE: Tatoo by olrik666 · · Score: 1

    Has long as it's not on the forehead, I'm all for it.

  56. No thanks! by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

    Notice the diabetic in the picture has a large, red tattoo across her forehead. If it takes one of THOSE bloody things to let people know when I'm having a sugar fit then forget it.

    </sarcasm>

    --

    Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    1. Re:No thanks! by lapse · · Score: 1

      The mark on her forehead isn't a tattoo, it's
      a Hindu mark of the sort known variously as
      tilaka, bindi, bindu, or pottu. These marks
      have religious, philosophical, and cosmetic
      significance. The article states that the BG
      monitoring tattoo is best placed on the arm or
      body.

    2. Re:No thanks! by Flakeloaf · · Score: 1

      Okay lapse, now go back and read my comment. Pay extra-special attention to the tag at the very end of it.

      Thanks for the lesson though; I never really did know what the proper name for that marking was (though for the record I do know what it's for).

      --

      Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

  57. At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I will download goatse.cx and have it tatooed! No need to spam anymore.

  58. Close but no cigar. by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

    I am a type one diabetic, who doesn't test levels any where near as much as I should. While I can clearly see that continuous blood glucose monitoring would be a god send, it's not quite what we need.

    Now if we could combine continuous monitoring with an insulin delivery device, in such a way that the monitor controls the delivery, that would be pure heaven.

    Imagine, insert an insulin and mabe a glucose cartridge every week or so, the monitor tells the device to deliver insulin when it detects a rise in glucose, and tells the device to deliver glucose when the glucose levels drop to hypoglycemic levels.

    You could do anything you want, safe in the knowledge that your diabetes management device would keep your levels within not only safe, but healthy levels.

    No more worrying if your late with dinner, or early with dinner - the glucose and insulin doses will even it out, want to go for a run, just go - the glucose will make up the shortfall if needed, want to veg out on the couch, by all means - the device wil just supply a little more insulin to cover your lazyness. It'd be like having a superislet (islet's are the cells that produce insulin for you non-diabetics).

    I think the delivery is the easy bit, you could just strap a small device with a needle to your arm or something. The monitoring is the difficult bit, from what I know of the current continuous monitors they are neither accurate or infact particularly continuous.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    1. Re:Close but no cigar. by Myco · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The really cool part is if these were cybernetic implants, and you could slap the replacement cartridges into your wrists just like Spidey's webshooters.

  59. New insulin to go along with it... by Crackez · · Score: 1

    My doctor just switched me from Humulin Lente to a new type of insulin called Lantus. It's a Basal insulin that works over a period of ~24 hours. It has no pronounced spike in it's effectiveness, and it seems to be working pretty well... The only problem is you can't mix it wirh regular, but since you take the shot at night before bed, how often do you take regular at that point in time? After 12 years of being insulin dependent, since i was diagnosed at age 9, this is one of the better things i've been able to try out. If this tattoo works as it's claimed, and it can be accurate, then it would work wonders at controlling my bloodsugar, which it desperately needs. I just cant wait to get a tattoo of Beastie on my arm...

    1. Re:New insulin to go along with it... by mwcjr · · Score: 1

      It is possible to combine Lantus with Humalog. I'm a type II diabetic, who just recently converted from the pills to insulin for controlling my glucose levels. I was diet controlled for 3 years, but after a significant move 2 years ago I started to lose control. I've been taking different combinations of pills (all three types of medication) to regain control to no avail. I take Lantus every evening and then use the Humalog Pen for all meals. After only one week on the combination of Lantus and Humalog I'm in much better control and will probably be back in complete control within 6-8 weeks. My physician and I are trying to establish a good base level with the Lantus, and then ues the Humalog to control spikes resulting from eating. Once we establish how my body reacts to the different types of insulin I'll be able to track the carbs in my meals and use the Humalog appropriately. It's unbelieveable how diabetes has effected my life. Anything that allows me to track what is happening with my body and control it better is a Good Thing.

  60. Oral Insulin is Coming by mumkin · · Score: 2

    the pills people take today aren't really insulin... they just help your body use the insulin that you do produce, or coax more out of you. they only work for people who have relatively functional pancreases.

    real oral insulin instead of insulin injections/pump would be a major breakthrough, and there is much work in the field. There seems to be some very promising work on this at Purdue, which may be related to the current Nobex clinical trials. Israeli researchers have a line on it, too. Shots may well soon be a thing of the past!

  61. Cool Tattoo Idea by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

    If you can see this, feed me donut

    OTOH I should not be giving Cowboyneal any ideas.

    --
    badness 10000
  62. Cosmetic applications by Myco · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, first of all I'd really hate to see people just getting a boring old meter on their arm. I mean, it doesn't really matter what shape the thing is in as long as you can read it, right? So get a funky spiral or make it part of a larger design or something.

    What would be even cooler would be to start seeing this technology, and "adaptive tattoos" in general made available to the general populace. The ability to have tattoos that change their appearance depending on physiological conditions would open up new worlds of expression. Anyone who's read Nylund's "Signal to Noise" will remember the character Panda's always-changing eyelid tattoos. Very cool.

    1. Re:Cosmetic applications by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The ability to have tattoos that change their appearance depending on physiological conditions would open up new worlds of expression.

      The Japanese had this in their traditional body art for many years until recently. It's a white ink that is almost transparent on pale skin, but becomes quite distinctly visible when the skin is blushed. IIRC, it was traditionally applied to women as an erotic decoration. When the woman was especially aroused, her skin would blush and her tattoo would light up like Las Vegas.

      This particular tattoo ink is now extremely unpopular and may even be illegal because of its major downside - it's a lead-based pigment.

      Perhaps this guy can shed more light on the topic.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:Cosmetic applications by BluBrick · · Score: 2
      D'oh! That submit button is just too close to the preview button ;)

      I meant this guy.

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  63. I don't like it by blisspix · · Score: 1

    the private shouldn't become public. While it would be good to see my hubby's BGLs, I don't think he'd want his boss to see. It's only his employer's concern if stress is raising his BGL (which it invariably does).

    All ambulances carry testing kits. Most take less than five seconds these days. I don't see the point of a tattoo. What, are we going to go around branding everyone who has a medical condition?

    Just as bad are those chips you can get that catalogue every ailment you've ever had. Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I wouldn't want that information falling into the wrong hands, and I doubt that a microchip is going to be of much use if I fall ill in a jungle somewhere.

  64. Come on! by mirnav · · Score: 1

    My plea to the scientific community - find a similar use for piercings, man! I've had it with the paranoia and all the planning that goes into hiding my (nipple) piercing from my family & the more bigoted friends...

    1. Re:Come on! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Couldn't scrape up the cash for that second nipple?
      I'm kind of surprised there is any stigma left to piercings considering how many people I see with 6 or more...

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    2. Re:Come on! by mirnav · · Score: 1

      Couldn't scrape up the cash for that second nipple? I am not sure it is a great idea to let the piercing propagate over each of my bodily protrusions and make me beep at airport controls. Besides, do you have any idea how much it hurts???

  65. Diabetic surprises by jellyfish_green · · Score: 1

    My situation was similar - surprised by a Type 1 Diabetes diagnosis at age 25, a few months after the major lifestyle change of moving to Ireland, getting a mobile phone, cooking my own food. No history in my family. Good health, even skinny.

    As a brother-in-law said, there's never been a better time to be diabetic. Thanks to insulin treatment, it's mostly an inconvenience; 100 years ago, it would be an agonizing life of sickness and early death.

    On that cheery note, I'll start pricing tatoos.

  66. The real question now is..... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

    ....can you get it in the shape of a tight-ass snake?

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  67. how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like all commercial solutions to chronic medical conditions, it will cost exactly as much as they think they can get away with. That number is determined by the cost of developing and implementing an actual complete cure, minus a little, as a margin of safety.

  68. manual transmission?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to me, it feels more like peddlin' a 4x4!!

  69. Yet another reason to go self-employed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then, I can demand that all the females are hooked up with masturbation-monitoring tattoos. Wet a finger, instant endorphine-spike!! Add a location monitor, and you have a horny female locator!!! ;D

  70. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Likely this will start to change the attitudes of parents who have been resisting the urging of their kids to get Tattoos.

    what to keep their kids from going with the crowd and acting like mindless sheep and getting tattoos?

    only a un-origional follower does what everyone else does... so go get a tatto you un-origional wannabe!

    be origional..... try not looking like a freak.

  71. Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by ldopa1 · · Score: 2

    Polyethelene Glycol is the major component of antifreeze, if I remember right...

    Weren't we always told not to touchor drink the stuff as kids?

    --
    The Dopester
    "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    1. Re:Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by InfraredEyes · · Score: 1

      No. The monomer ethylene glycol is in antifreeze and it is indeed poisonous. The polymer (i.e. many monomers combined into a macromolecule) known as polyethylene glycol is highly inert and has been used for years in a wide range of medical applications including timed-release drug delivery, without adverse effects.

    2. Re:Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by ldopa1 · · Score: 1

      Okay, thanks for the correction. I really wondered about that. You seem to know your stuff. I didn't have a tub of anti-freeze in the garage or I would have checked...

      --
      The Dopester
      "Yes, I'm a Karma Whore, but I'm doing it to pay my way through school."
    3. Re:Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Anyone else notice how nicely today's pagetag meshes with this thread? Being this:

      "Did it ever occur to you that fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing? Or that we drive on parkways and park on driveways?"

      Slashdot is reading your minds, kids :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Hmm.Anti-Freeze in the skin.. Healthy? by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      It also has a sweet taste - which is why you should keep it from pets and small children - and is an ingredient in ice cream!

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
  72. Ingap peptide by john_marks · · Score: 1

    One of the most interesting advances in the last few years is the use of the INGAP peptide to stimulate the production of beta cell production. It turns out that a Type I diabetic continues to produce the necessary beta cells that would replace those that have already been killed off by the body. So the question is how do you get the body to produce more of these cells than it destroys via the auto-immune response? That is where the INGAP peptide comes in, boosting the production of beta cells from stem cells.

    The tests have passed the preliminary human trials and have ramped up to a trial of 300 or so diabetics earlier this year. So far no side-effects have been seen and positive reduction of insulin dependance has been recorded.

    Of note another group is looking to block the auto-immune response to allow natural stem cell production to replace the damaged cells.

    I am heading into my 20th year of Type I diabetes and the INGAP group is one of the few to have gotten past initial FDA Phase 1 trials. Perhaps in 5 years a daily or weekly pill may be all that is needed to control this condition. Until then it is Lantus and multiple daily BG tests using the Freestyle reader and some fast acting humilin to bring high BG levels down...

    JM

    --
    Your global village idiot!
  73. Another advantage of widespread bg monitoring... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 2

    ...is that the benefits of a low-carb way of life would become more widely demonstrated, as would the idiocies of the low-fat fad.

    In addition to the realization of just how much nutritional disinformation we are being fed by the popular media, we would see widespread consciousness-raising in regard to the deleterious effects of unnatural substances in our diets (sugar, grains, trans-fats, etc). The relative benefits of various types of exercise would be more readily apparent, and immediate feedback would encourage more healthy lifestyles.

    There is already ample evidence that one of the major keys to a long and healthy life is the reduction of the amount of insulin your body needs (others include wearing seat belts, avoiding violent crime, getting ample sleep, avoiding environmental poisons, not taking gratuitous risks, not smoking, etc.).

    One can only hope that some better way of doing this can be found. Since current bg monitoring is done by IR absorption/transmission, I would think that a small IR reflector could be implanted, perhaps just under an artery or vein in the arm near the skin's surface. Then a monitor could use this to directly read bg (perhaps with occasional calibration with other methods) using a short IR burst.

    Other things I'd like to be able to measure (inexpensively) in real time: Insulin level, HD/LD/TG, ghrelin (and its recently-discovered agonist, which doesn't have a popular name yet), white cell count, seritonin, and DHEAS. Might find some other items worth monitoring, to add to that list. Gathering a large amount of data on these things might result in a quantum leap in real knowledge on a subject that is now characterized by 'research' that consists largely of:

    1) Writing a conclusion based on current biases,

    2) Collecting data artfully chosen to support that conclusion,

    3) Submitting the 'research' based primarily on the pre-conceived conclusion for review by people with the same or similar biases, and

    4) Getting published in a journal of some mutual admiration society.

  74. Hide that tattoo by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    Put it somewhere where it can't be seen or you'll get endless wisecracks about "Gee Bob, you're a little cranky. Looks like your blood sugar is a bit low, eh?"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  75. Tattoo is too boring by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    They should install a little flag that pops out of the top of your head like a turkey thermometer. *POP* "Low blood sugar, time to get a snack!"

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Tattoo is too boring by Myco · · Score: 2
      Could be distracting. I would not want that happening during sex, for instance.

      ...or would I? Hmmm...

  76. He's WHAT??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I personally think he should stay on Fantasy Island and continue to help our Mr. Roarke. I mean, this is obviously a step down on the ladder...

  77. Re:Another advantage of widespread bg monitoring.. by occamboy · · Score: 1

    I agree with most of your post, but...

    If "unnatural substances in our diets" cause "deleterious effects", then why has life expectancy increased by 30 years in the last century? Note that antibiotics and other medical advances only account for a fraction of that time.

    Maybe the unnatural substances in our diets are not so bad for us.

  78. Re:Another advantage of widespread bg monitoring.. by hlh_nospam · · Score: 2

    "Life expectancy" over the last century is a misleading average, which includes, among other things, two global wars in the first half of the last century. *Maximum* lifespan has remained fairly constant, while infant mortality and death of women during childbirth has declined. Various medical advances do in fact account for most of that improvement. The remainder is mostly from changes which make driving and working safer (divided highways, workplace safely rules, etc).