Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla Jumps on 'Lean Browser' Bandwagon

fader writes "Following in the footsteps of fast (and often fantastic) wrappers around Gecko (the Mozilla rendering engine), Mozilla has just released their own lightweight browser, Phoenix. Only Phoenix will still use XUL, the cross-platform markup language used for the current Mozilla interface. Will it still be fast enough to overcome the final gripe about Mozilla, namely that it's just too slow?"

33 of 579 comments (clear)

  1. I timed it by Publicus · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you allow Mozilla to load itself into memory for faster startup times (only fair considering IE does it without asking) you'll find that you can get a page loaded faster with mozilla.

    I tried it using both browsers on the same site with my machine at work. The difference was on the order of seconds...

    IE is junk compared to mozilla. Also, the Orbit theme rocks! Take a look here.

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    1. Re:I timed it by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can leisurely launch IE and visit a webpage before Mozilla launches. I mean, I can hit start, run, type in "iexplore", load the default page, click on the location bar, type in my page and load it -- all before Mozilla launches.

      Mozilla is the only application I have ever known under Windows to regularly produce the "This application has stopped responding.." window just because it is taking so long to shut a window.

      Once it is up and running it is fine. Windows will swap it out, and it takes a good half-minute to pull out of swap, but otherwise it is fine.

      Despite this pitiful performance on every Windows 2000 (or NT) platform I have tried(it doesn't do this to me on Linux, and doesn't do it nearly as badly on Win98.), I still use it as my primary browser.

      Trust me, it is not my machine, nor is it the dozens of other machines I have tried it on. My Win2k system is the fastest machine I have.

    2. Re:I timed it by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've never had the "this application has stopped responding" with a 1.0+ version of Mozilla. I do get it all of the time with Internet/Windows Explorer. Odd that.

    3. Re:I timed it by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 2, Informative

      I view ASP pages in Mozilla all of the time. Just so you know, ASP is something that the server processes, which then sends you a page that is rendered in your browser.

      How is Mozilla keeping you from viewing ASP pages?

    4. Re:I timed it by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Trust me, it is not my machine, nor is it the dozens of other machines I have tried it on.

      /me types this into Mozilla 1.0.1 on Win2K

      The only time I have to wait for anything on my Win2K box (Mozilla included) is when it's spun the hard drives down due to 3 hours on inactivity. With quick launch, the limiting factor in getting Mozilla on the screen is my video card, and I have a Geforce 4 Ti 4200. If I had to guess I'd say it taks 3-4 frames to come up at 1600x1200x85Hz. Granted, my machine is a little faster than most,(Dual XP1800+ w/1GB RAM) but even on older hardware, quick launch should bring up mozilla before you can get your mouse from the start menu to the address bar. It sounds to me like your probelm is that you've got like 128Mb of RAM, and a slowass hard drive, and all your system memory is being used by the OS. (Win2K uses ~100MB of memory on my system without anything loaded right after boot.)

      If you include page loads in the timing between IE and Mozilla, it's no contest. Slashdot is loaded practically instantly in Mozilla, and takes seconds to render in IE.

      You've only tried really low end Win2K boxes, haven't you?

  2. Re:Gripe by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Mozilla IE Theme looks pretty much like IE to me, and I'm using IE regularly.

    Of course won't solve the shortcut problems and if it's not customizable by editing some file (anyone know?), then I hope the Mozilla team will have that in 1.3 or so.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. Just installed and tried it... by Elledan · · Score: 3, Informative

    It feels... smoother than Mozilla, loads pages a bit faster (or at least doesn't hang for nearly a second when switching between apps while the page is loading), and it uses fewer resources:

    Currently Mozilla (1.1) is using 32,852 kb of RAM, while Phoenix (phoenix.exe) is using 25,188 kb. This without any additional tabs/windows open.

    There's only the fact that many, many preferences are not accessible yet (although many are enabled by default), but that is to be expected from an 0.1 release.

    I'll definitely be keeping my eyes on this project :)

    --
    Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
  4. Posting this with Phoenix by Petronius · · Score: 1, Informative

    and it rocks!!!

    I just downloaded the app for Win and took it for a spin. Very stable. Very fast. Reminds me of early versions of Opera.

    Go lizzard! Go! Kill the round blue 'e'!

    --
    there's no place like ~
  5. Screenshot by Jodrell · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a screenshot of Phoenix (mirrored here), if you're interested (via Google).

  6. Tried it. by DeadSea · · Score: 5, Informative
    They cut out a lot of the Mozilla's best features to make a smaller browser. There is a note in the prefs under advanced saying "your favorite features will be here soon".

    Gone:

    • Themes. This browser has yellow buttons that look pretty good but a bit bright. You can go in the prefs and rearrange the buttons with drag and drop or choose small icons.
    • Ability to block popups without disabling javascript.
    • Fine grained cookie management. No more "alert me" and "remember this decision".
    • Sidebar
    • Chatzilla, Mail, Composer
    • Site Navigation Bar

    Still there:

    • Bookmarks and bookmarks manager
    • History
    • Javascript Conole
    • Download Manager
    • Search plugins
    • Tabbed browsing
    • Cache

    Since my computer is fast enough and has enough memory to run Mozilla, I don't notice that Phoenix loads faster. An older computer with less memory would probably be a better test. Since my favorite privacy features are missing, I have no intention of switching, but if it runs faster on older computers I would recommend it for that. (Please try it on something slow and report.) It might also be appropriate for somebody who wants "just a browser" because of the lack of other applications. The lack of these applications seems to only save a couple megs of download, again I'll take the full featured Mozilla.

    1. Re:Tried it. by mwa · · Score: 5, Informative
      There is a note in the prefs under advanced saying "your favorite features will be here soon".

      Just for grins, I copied my Mozilla prefs.js over the phoenix version. Theming doesn't work, but the proxy and tab preferences do and it appears to ignore onLoad for popups as well. Apparently, the Edit preferences ability is not done, but using the prefs.js does.

    2. Re:Tried it. by fermion · · Score: 2, Informative
      Chimera also has a limited GUI to set preferences, but the preferences may still be there.

      Many of the preferences are listed on customization page. To edit preferences, quit the browser, edit your prefs.js file, save it, and restart the browser. Using these preferences, I can set pop up, cookie, window permissions, and other options.

      I will agree with critics that say the average user, and even the average programmer, is not capable of reading through the examples and manually setting preferences. But those who can are freed from slow and viral browsers.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  7. Proxy settings by repvik · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're behind a proxy, don't even bother downloading Phoenix. It doesn't have *any* proxy settings whatsoever.

    Think I'll stick with Opera still.

  8. Re:Good timing by cetan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Phoenix is based off of the 1.0 branch of code. You're already at 1.0 as far as mozilla is concerned. They call it 0.1 for the projects purposes.

    --
    In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
  9. If you want a fast browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Use Dillo:

    Dillo

    It's not perfect, but it is extremely fast, and very useful. It even got a mention on Linux Today:

    Linux today article on Dillo.

  10. Re:Proxy settings by KoopaTroopa · · Score: 2, Informative

    I had this problem as well. I couldn't authenticate with my company's Microsoft Proxy server.

    Go to Sourceforge (or it might be Freshmeat; one of the two, but I'm in a hurry) and search for NTLM. NTLM is the authentication scheme used by this proxy. There should be a listing for some sort of NTLM proxy server there.

    Download this proxy, set it up appropriately (it's simple; read the directions) and point your browser to go through your local proxy. The proxy will do the authentication for you.

    It's written in Python, so you'll haveta have that installed. Other than that it is no-hassle and can be useful for other programs (Winamp mebbe?) that you might want to grant access through a passworded firewall.

    Hope this helps.

    --
    Sharpies don't just sniff themselves.
  11. Re:Proxy settings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you modify the prefs.js file, you can set proxy settings. But it doesn't just scream that on the download page, does it?

  12. Re:Gripe by benwb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm at home right now so I don't have a windows box in front of me, but I'm pretty sure IE will find next by hitting F3

  13. This is version 0.1, *not* 1.0 by TomatoMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is not a finished product by any means, although the /. story says it's "released." It's the FIRST release, version 0.1, missing many features; 0.2 is in development now. Also, there's no mac version yet.

    --
    -- http://frobnosticate.com
    1. Re:This is version 0.1, *not* 1.0 by jacobito · · Score: 5, Informative

      There will be no Mac version. The Chimera project fills that niche (with a Cocoa UI, to boot).

  14. Re:I recently "made the switch" by Luyseyal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Eh, I'm not sure if your Windows shortcuts will be the same as my Linux ones, but here goes...

    1. cycle tabs: ctrl+pgup, ctrl+pgdown. Auto Reload: (not sure. you can do it in Galeon.). Close tab: ctrl+w. No clue about the XP group feature. Is it anything like window groups in Enlightenment?
    2. no idea
    3. yeah, Galeon allows you to rearrange the menu bars. Moz doesn't appear to on first glance. For stuff like the Google bar, you don't really need the Google bar since the Location bar will fwd the request to Google and open the results in a new tab.
    4. IE-specific code: no it's not fixable. If we cede control of standards to Microsoft, Moz will forever be playing the catch-up game. It would be helpful to have a quickie option to make the browser lie and say it's IE, just like Opera.
    5. No idea how MIME is handled on the windows builds.
    6. Edit, Preferences, Privacy & Security, Master Password. Customize to your heart's content. RE: autofill, I wonder if this is an IE bug where it autofills stuff it's not supposed to cache. Not sure.
    7. One reason why I don't use em. :)
    8. Isn't that an option in the Windows installer? If not, seems like it should be.
    9. There's another post on how to fix this. You'd think this would be an installer option...
    10. My understanding is that IE lies about its memory usage. It also can cheat and use undocumented APIs and other tricks to make the kernel favor it.

    so anyway, I hope this helps, even if just a litttle...

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  15. Re:Gripe by DrXym · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe it used to, but nowadays it opens their search sidepanel. The IE online help lists no shortcut for doing a Find Again which is a pretty lame omission if you ask me. And this is typical all the way through IE and OE.

  16. Opera beta by Anders · · Score: 2, Informative

    In somewhat related news, Opera released a new beta version of their browser last night, Norwegian time. It has many new features, including improved anti-alias and Java handling. The "hidden" distribution place is here. Incidentally, native FreeBSD builds are provided for the first time.

  17. Re:Adding proxy in prefs.js doesn't work? by Eagle7 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ok, got it, you need to make sure you have:

    user_pref("network.proxy.type", 2);

    or

    user_pref("network.proxy.type", 1);

    depending on if you want auto (2) or manual (1).

    --
    _sig_ is away
  18. Re:Standalone or component in new "Mozilla Suite"? by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 2, Informative

    >But in the GUI world, there isn't any piping metaphor because output is nonstandard. Because of this you also can't `` it. So there's no real way to pull little applications
    together in an easy fashion.

    Nothing really prevents you from using pipes in a GUI application. Maybe shared memory is a better fit.

    But in the case of Mozilla, The browser does not need to communicate with the mail reader or anything else.

    The obvious solution is to have the independent applications be independent executables.

    Netcape and Mozilla was blind to the obvious, causing such things as galeon to form.

    This has been my main complaint from Netscape 0.9 to mozilla/Netscape 7.

    There is a patch to allow one to specifiy another mail reader. And another patch to only compile the mailnews application. But this is a real pain to do such a thing.

    There should be at least 4 code trees ( and 4 separate releases). Mozilla GUI libs, Mozilla core libs, Mozilla browser, and mozilla mail/news. Splitting the released libraries up even more would better, as it promotes better separation, sharing and competition (open source).

    The "new" Unix way is to have many shared libraries used by many executables. You install the Mozilla core libraries, then Galeon on top of that. Then install the Mozilla GUI libs, then install the separate Browser and Mail executables on top of the GUI and core libs.

  19. Re:Mozilla's Biggest Problem -- Poor Branding. by mr3038 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Mozilla needs some marketing oriented types instead of more nerds.

    Ever heard of company called "Netscape"? Mozilla isn't meant for end users. Quote:

    Mozilla is an open-source web browser and toolkit, designed for standards compliance, performance and portability. Mozilla.org provides binaries for testing and feedback.
    (emphasis mine)
    --
    _________________________
    Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  20. Re:My complaint about Mozilla... by leoboiko · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a reason for the red color. Initially he was green, but then they received a love letter from Toho's (Godzilla owner) legal department.

    And Mozilla mascot is cool. You should see OpenBSD, *that* is a stupid mascot.

    --
    Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
  21. Ever heard of "security"? by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since there are new security exploits appearing for IE almost every month/week/few hours, unless you cripple the browser by turning off all scripting/java/activeX controls etc, you're likely to end up with a virus or shitload of marketing crap all over your harddrive eventually.

    I still use it, and have now added entries in my local DNS server to block out links to gator etc as I got sick of uninstalling their redirect garbage.

    Besides which, MS is the beast, as we all know and using their browser just encourages them...

    1. Re:Ever heard of "security"? by naChoZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another good way of protecting yourself from ads and bad javascript and the like is a free little app called Proxomitron. Because it's a proxy based app, it works with both Netscape and IE nicely. Since I tend to use both when I'm on a windows box, I find it makes my browsing much much cleaner.

      --
      "I can be self-referential if I want to," said Tom, swiftly.
  22. Re:Gripe by Tekai · · Score: 5, Informative

    next try, i think theres a bug in the comment system code, preview as plain old text killed my link although i noticed my mistake and set it to HTML Formatted. Here is the url: http://www.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html#keys

  23. Re:Proxy settings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I copied my entire prefs.js file from Mozilla 1.1 to Phoenix and it does use my proxy settings.

  24. Re:XUL is holding back Mozilla project by rycamor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong. There are many more at MozDev, as well as links to other Mozilla/XUL sites. Also Komodo , a commercial product was written with Mozilla. Activestate is actually making money with this.

    O'reilly is taking this seriously. Maybe they know something you don't ;-)?

  25. Re:Gripe by mh_tang · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually with my IE6.0, hitting F3 opens a search pane on the left side of the browser. If you want to "Find Next", the keyboard shortcut is Ctrl+F.

    So much for consistency.