Slashdot Mirror


US Geeks Recycle GNU/Linux Boxes for Ecuador

An anonymous submitter writes: "According to this article on Salon, geeks involved with Indymedia are recycling 300 GNU/Linux boxes to send to independent media activists in Ecuador. The machines will be used to create free public computer labs across South America, networked with donated wireless 802.11b cards. Anyone wanna chip in to help cover the shipping costs?"

22 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. FreeGeek in Portland does something similar. by Spy4MS · · Score: 5, Informative

    They make Linux boxes out of donated parts and volunteered time. They also recycle monitors, motherboard parts and steel.
    Please be gentle

  2. mean slasheditors by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    For shame! Slashdotting these poor good samaritains!

    Couldn't you post links to the RIAA or something?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  3. Shipping? We Don't Need No Stinking Shipping! by UNIBLAB_PowerPC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's an idea: these folks should talk to their local Air National Guard unit. I've worked with medical missionaries in the past who went to Ecuador for a month (imaging blogging over a 9.6 modem connection over AOL -- only provider we could hook up with -- it wasn't pretty, but that was mainly user error and I digress). These physicians managed to purchase/gather enough supplies and talked the Alabama Air National Guard into shipping everything down in a week or two in advance. Of course, I don't know how to pull those kind of stings, but I know it has been done in the past for medical missions so I guess this effort might differ in the eyes of non-techies, who don't believe that information technology is as essential as proper medical care. I'd chance a guess that pilots are like us in a way they'll look for any excuse to do what they do best. ;-) Good luck, though!

    1. Re:Shipping? We Don't Need No Stinking Shipping! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is these leftest freaks think the ANG and other military personel are all baby killers. These people are left of left of left. They are as extreme as the militia groups everyone wants to go after..

      --
    2. Re:Shipping? We Don't Need No Stinking Shipping! by tmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hardly think the US Military is going to want to get involved in shipping computers to people who fancy themselves revolutionaries and who want to get the computers over there so that they can better coordinate their riots and protests. Medical missionaries these people are not.

  4. Humanitarians by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow this reminds me of an old Jay Leno bit about humanitarian efforts to give Christmas toys to starving kids in the third-world:

    Child: "Kalimba eat potato?"

    Humanitarian: "No, Kalimba *play with* potato! See, you can put eyes, ears and mouth on the potato!"

    Child: "Kalimba eat potato?"

    Humanitarian: "No, no..."

    That's about all I remember. It was hilarious, but I can't find the whole routine on the web.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Humanitarians by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Informative


      Ecuador does not need food. It is the largest banana exporter in the world. It is a hugely agricultural nation which is not suffering from droughts, etc. Ecuador does need infrastructure. These computers are part of that needed infrastructure. They need to leap beyond agrarian subsistence farming to get the country out of its economic hole.

      What can accelerate this change? Education for sure. Books, schools, etc. How about a computer and internet connectivity? We've got a lot laying around here gathering dust. Probably more so than textbooks written in spanish.

      I've visited Ecuador several times. Once I was helping some women at a library set up a VCR and TV that was recently donated by some wealthy Ecuadorians (I was a friend of the donors). The women working in the library were nicely dressed and educated pretty well from what I could tell with my limited spanish. They were the Ecuador equivalent to minimum-wage office workers in America.

      When it came time to put the batteries in the remote control, I realized the value I was bringing to the VCR-TV-setup project. These women had never held a remote control. They needed some batteries (2 X AA), which they also had no experience with. I gave them a dead AA from my walkman so they could take it to the local shop and make sure they were buying the right size (with money provided by the donors). When they returned with the batteries, I had to explain the pictures inside the battery compartment so they'd understand how to install the batteries in the future.

      I guess I am relating this anecdote so people can better understand the technological chasm that seperates people around the world. Sure, booklearning is a key part of a third-world country's development. At the same time, these free computers are going to help as well.


      Seth
  5. Hey, I've got a better idea by unicron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about we sell our boxes on ebay, and then send the money to make sure some kids down there eat tonight? I'm aware that these boxes aren't meant to be some poor child charity but this is easily the stupidest shit I've ever heard regarding acts of kindness.

    And another thing, semi off-topic, regarding charity. Why is it that people ooh and aww and feel their heart sink when Sally Struthers shows them pictures of starving orphans in some god-forsaken place, but then the next day can be found in a Dillards parking lot mortified that a homeless kid almost touched their Lexus?

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  6. Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are already a couple of posts here with people griping about how "all this effort" is mis-directed and should be spent on "domestic" kids.

    Its never ceases to amaze me how quick so many people are to critique an act of charity.

    Somehow kids are more deserving because they happen to be closer geographically/politically/culturally?

    Some guys at some location which happens to be in our country have for some reason chosen to help some kids at some other location which is not within out political boundaries. Should they be slighted because they haven't first helped everyone in their neighborhood/city/state/country?

    If you think there's someone out there who needs help who isn't getting any try this... help them. That's what these folks here did.

    1. Re:Amazing by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm all for any kind of charitable act, but there is a point here. We really *should* be taking care of our own first. I don't want to criticize anyone who's spending their own time and money to help someone less fortunate, but take a look around your home. It's the same way I feel about governments sending millions in "aid" money to foreign country when there are people literally starving in our streets. I'm sure there are schools in the U.S. who could use this donation just as much as people in another country. But kudos for doing it in the first place.

      --
      do not read this line twice.
  7. Re:must have uninterruptible power supplies by gampid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah we have tried to include UPS's but the problem is that by the time they get donated they are often bad. We don't want to send down a UPS which will break and then we leave people with a toxic waste problem they can't deal with cleanly. Unfortunately we were able only to send a few UPS's in the container.

    --

    The power of technology is manifest in how it is applied within the social matrix.
  8. There's the people, and there's the country by cheezycrust · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Being anti-semitic means you can't live with Jews. This is a difference with hating 'Israel', or more correct, the Isrealian government.

    I strongly disagree with the Israelian government, but I have no problem with Jews - you see? I can hate Bush, but have no problems with Americans.

    --
    Teenagers these days don't have as much sex as they want each other to think they do.
  9. more info by akb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Also check out this video interview with one of the organizers.

  10. Computers and Anti-globalization by z_gringo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article,
    Anti-globalization activists in Oakland, Calif., are recycling old machines, loading them with free software and shipping them off to Ecuador.

    Doesnt something seem wrong with that sentence? How do they "ship them off" without support companies like UPS, FEDEX, DHL or whatever. Dont they all hate those companies?

    Also, why are they against free trade? Its hard to get a feel for what these people stand for, and why. They say they are defending poor people, but how? Wont the isolation they seem to want, keep the poor people poor?

    That being said, I think that more computers in south america is great. I dont know how this particular group came upon this idea however. Also, the article is a bit short on details, as to where the computers will be housed, and maintained etc.. It also goes on to explain that some will form a wireless network in Quito, but the rest will go to small towns.. How are those computers going to be useful?

    It all sounds like a great idea, but I really dont understand these people.. I think they do more harm than good to the very people that they say they want to help..

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:Computers and Anti-globalization by lysurgon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, why are they against free trade?

      Anti-Globalization != Anti-Free-Trade

      Of course, that's assuming by "free trade" you really mean, "fair and mutually beneficial commercial relations that do not result in the exploitation of one party by another," and not "corporate imporialism/hegemony."

      People who oppose "globalization" are generally greatly in favor of international dialogue and cultural exchange, but oppose commercial and cultural dominance/exploitation.

      Incidentally, sending computers and other communications equipment to a needy country, if done correctly and followed through on, is actually a far better initiative in terms of improving local conditions than sending the same dollar amount of food. There's a general tendency in foreign aid and foreign charity to create a state of dependence rather than foster indigenous production, commerce and enterprise. Give a man a fish vs. Teach a man to fish, etc etc etc. That's what communications and technology can do.

      The bottom line is that "These People" don't trust extra-national corportate interests to improve the conditions of third world countries and seek to improve the conditions there by fostering more robust local economic conditions rather than a state of international dependence.

  11. Re:Huh? by SPosselt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As for the *DEFINITION*, as you put it, you might want to look it up, some other time before you troll.

    As for the rest of your nonsense, you should consider the possibility that some people might disagree with the Israeli oppression of the palestineans as well as the palestinean terror.

  12. Watch out with labels by cheezycrust · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think you can place a clear label on Indymedia, link you can't place a clear label on all open software users. We aren't all commies, and we know that.

    Indymedia is so heterogenous, that you need to judge individual projects, like this one, if you want to decide to support them or not. They don't have leaders that make up big plans, they are more like lots of local groups that do what they think is good.

    And maybe you haven't read the other comments, but Free Geek is supporting this action - so helping them could also mean helping this project ;)

    --
    Teenagers these days don't have as much sex as they want each other to think they do.
  13. Three Points by cybermace5 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Point 1: These computers are not going to poor underpriveleged kids, these are a bit off-the-edge activists with some fringe anti-American tendencies.

    Point 2: No matter who they're going to, 300 computers is insignificant. Many medium-sized businesses are getting rid of old computers in these numbers. And since these computers aren't going to help poor kids in schools learn technology, it has no effect. Not newsworthy. I've personally disposed of hundreds of computers, and I'd always put a nice package of freeware on the hard drive before sending it away.

    Point 3: The only reason this is happening, is to get some good press. This isn't a "helping a child" story, or a "rejuvenating a country" story, or anything like that, but that's how it is being reported. I'd like to see how many millions of dollars of financial support our government spends in the same country, yet totally goes unreported and uncredited.

    --
    ...
  14. Geeks getting into development by electroniceric · · Score: 3, Informative
    I am profoundly glad to see the merging of techies with global development.

    As a note of caution:
    My own experience doing this (built a computer lab in Nicaragua) sort of thing suggests that these folks will run into many political and economic complexities in the places they go to install computers e.g.:
    • Computers tend to end up in homes and offices of well-connected people who tend have electricity and a place to put a computer
    • Often they molder away unused for lack of some kind of hardware or software fix
    • When you start asking how to robustly improve the welfare of a lot of citizens, it becomes a lot less clear whether donations simply improve the lot of a couple people, or are a band-aid, or really do something. No matter what, changing the fabric of a society takes years and years, a kind of progress us internet-speed twenty year-olds don't have much experiencew with.

    In any event, I hope everyone involved will learn a lot from the process and it will motivate more geeks to get involved with those who have much less than themselves (not the least of the reasons being that it makes you happier).
  15. Re:All about image by GypC · · Score: 4, Funny

    All women have hairy armpits except those Americans that shave them... oh, and whores in other parts of the world.

    What's the matter with you? Are you some kind of pedophile that can't cope with a post-pubescent woman's natural body?

  16. Re:Confused leftists play into globalization's han by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I normally try to convince anti-globlization activists of the merits of globalization whenever I can, this time I will hold my tongue. How can plugging a third world country into the internet be seen as anything else but furthering globalization?

    I think you're confused.

    'Anti-globalization' activists aren't against greater communication and information exchange. Indeed, many are anarchists that would like to see all borders fall and all imposed limits between various peoples disappear.

    They are, however, generally against the consolidation of global economic power among a power elite who socialize costs while privatizing benefits. At the moment, globalization seems to be more about extending Western economic power and authority than really improving the lives and freedom of all people.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  17. Re:Now... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Given a choice between being an American, and having a good understanding of history, economics, languages, and the difference between not being able to afford recent technology and not being able to eat, I'll take what's behind door number 2.

    It's not that all Americans are this clueless - it's just that the attitude betrayed by the parent post is particularly irksome. Americans are resented for their cultural and political hegemony, not because everyone else is starving.