Slashdot Mirror


Automakers to Make Diagnostic Codes Available

Rubbersoul writes "As reported on /. a few months ago independent auto repair shops are a bit tense about not having access to car computer diagnostic codes. Well it seems that now the auto makers will share these codes after all. According to an article at CNN the codes will be available to all professional mechanics as well as amateurs working out of their garage at home. Good to see the auto makers came around on this one, even if it did take Congress to help a bit."

55 of 185 comments (clear)

  1. A big Deal by Tadghe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a pretty big deal since it's pretty tough to figure out what's going on on computer controlled engines otherwise.

    This is a bigger deal because it means that people publishing the codes will no longer face the prospect of being sued for posting it and means that, in this case at least, the auto makers (with pressure from congress) decided that public good out weighed copyright law.

    --
    Bugs Bunny was right.
    1. Re:A big Deal by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      [It] means that, in this case at least, the auto makers (with pressure from congress) decided that public good out weighed copyright law.

      It's more likely that they believed that, had they not done this, congress would have found a way to open it forcibly in the interest of free trade or something.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:A big Deal by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually the auto makers have always had much incentive to release the codes. But their relationship with the dealerships has kept them from doing that. The dealerships of course make LOTS of money from diagnostics, not the manufacturers.

      But the dealerships start to be at opposition with the manufacturers when warranty claims are made. Perhaps they got too much opposition and sowered the OEMs a bit too much!?

  2. Cheaper? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Under the agreement signed by the Automotive Service Association, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, the automakers agree to make the service information available on the Internet by Aug. 31 at a "reasonable price."

    Which means that private mechanics will charge more to analyze the codes since they have to pay a "reasonable price" which negates:

    Some automakers felt more comfortable giving the information to their dealerships, which must keep the data confidential under franchise contracts. That often meant higher costs to consumers, since dealer labor rates tend to run $10 to $20 per hour higher than independent shops, according to AAA.

    Unless, of course, someone creates something like carwarez.com

  3. Block Exemption Changes in Europe by goul · · Score: 2, Informative
    I would expect to see this sort of information more readily available throughout Europe too. At the end of September 2002 the existing Block Exemption expires in Europe.

    This means a number of major changes in the industry including the right for independent motor dealers to buy directly from manufacturers (as franchise dealers do now), and for them to have the right to the information required to service these vehicles at a fair price.

    Some more info on this is available here.

  4. Cool by papasui · · Score: 2

    Now when my wife makes me go fix the car I'll actually know whats not working, instead of randomly hitting parts with a wrench until a part breaks.

  5. This is a Good Thing (TM) by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been a recent trend in mom'n'pop (well just pop usually) mechanic stores fading away because of big companies sucking up all the businness. Ever seen those commercials that compare Joe Blow mechanic to a big time Jiffy Lube or NTB buff? Notice how the mechanic is portrayed as a greasy hungover hobo, and the friendly neighborhood WalMart-of-cars mechanic is clean cut, muscular, educated, and reviewing what appears to be a concise list of repairs with the client. I'm not against corporations coming to town on a political level, but it stinks to drive out in the country and seeing mom'n'pop stores taken over. And with all of the computer chips and advanced parts requiring really expensive tools to fix, it's nice to see something to go against that trend and empower the small guys again ;)

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  6. I'm not sure I follow... by FakePlasticDubya · · Score: 3, Informative

    What is new about this? The OBD and OBD II standards have been around for a long time... you can go out and buy a tool that will interface with your car and show you the codes... You can even get a cable that lets you hookup a laptop the sensor port.

    The OBD-II Homepage
    OBD-II Codes

    --

    "We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it" -- Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I'm not sure I follow... by Regul8or · · Score: 2, Informative

      SAE defind trouble codes are only defined to mean something within a certain range. There are manufacturer specific trouble codes that they can make mean whatever they want. Those are the codes that we don't know the definition of.

    2. Re:I'm not sure I follow... by denzo · · Score: 2

      OBD-I and OBD-II are the Federally mandated codes that auto manufacturer must make available to any standard reader; this is mostly for emissions-related fault codes, and doesn't cover other components of the car that may not have a direct effect on emissions. The point is that an owner may have some mechanical or electrical problem with their car, which might not be diagnosable by an independent shop due to proprietary codes, and the car would then need to be taken to a dealer to make the diagnosis and repair.

  7. This is not source Code. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are Diag Codes not Source Code. These will not give you information to put Linux on your car. They give information like Code 2453 Means Sencor 4 is malfunctioning. So opening the code help the machanics not the hacker. They are not saying how the Onboad computer is working just giving you the information on what is wrong. It is like a help book for windows error messages. With know all the window error message numbers it helps you possible fix the problem with the Os but not nessarly hack the OS.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:This is not source Code. by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

      Actually its just like windows error messages. When my fuel pump is failing on my 95 Blazer with the bass ackwards OBDI...It always reports o2 sensor errors but never lean fuel or anything else that would suggest fuel pump.

      As in windows the codes require a bit of "interpretation." ala the Book of Daniel...

  8. NO by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    Diagnostic codes are read only. They will not be releasing any modification codes I am willing to bet.

  9. Re:Hack your car by rich22 · · Score: 2

    The diagnostic codes are designed to help mechanics troubleshoot problems on automobiles. With the level of sophistication used in modern cars, it is hard to diagnose the cause of the most common of problems by conventional means. For instance, let's say your car is using way too much gas. Perhaps your Air Temperature Sensor is on the fritz, and is telling the ECM that it is 20 below zero. The computer will compensate by richening the air/fuel mixture, and the results will include fouled out spark plugs, black exhaust smoke, etc. 25 years ago, that meant "the carbeurator is floodin'". Now it means a sensor needs changing. The ECM codes help you figure out which one.

  10. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article The fault or diagnostic codes, which appear on a handheld computer that the mechanic attaches to the vehicle to designate the source of trouble...

    This is describing the OBD-II (onboard diagnostics) codes. OBD-II is required on all new vehicles sold in the US since 1996. The protocol is open, but manufacturers would add additional information that they did not disclose to outsiders. Throttle position, fuel flow, intake temp, etc were all easy to decode but other codes were proprietary.

    And, yes, I am one of the people interested in this :-) Planning on hooking up a decoder to an old Grid PalmPad and using one of the programs on SourceForge to continuously display the data and log it to the network I am adding to my '96 Jeep Cherokee.

  11. Next to Useless by dnoyeb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As someone who works in the industry on the engineering side I am very familiar with their "codes."

    The codes will be USELESS to a mechanic. A mechanic needs a "TOOL." A mechanic is not a programmer or engineer. He will still pay $300 for the tool to read the codes. he will still pay $100 per 'module' for each car's codes he wants to read.

    He can do that now. So the hope is that more tools will be developed and that will bring the cost of the tools down.

    Don't confuse this with any ability to modify anything. These will be read only idiot codes like "o2 is out of range" or "Low Voltage."

    It still takes a good mechanic to find the problem and often, VERY DAMN OFTEN, the codes are simply misleading the mechanic when his nose and ears have already given him the answer.

    1. Re:Next to Useless by fisgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed: the biggest advantage will be a general price reduction, hopefully.

      While the codes are generally useless to a good mechanic, the ability to reset them on many models is the tough part. Among others, BMW was notorious for this. I haven't worked on one for a while, but the "service reset tool" was DOD expensive, and a total scam.

    2. Re:Next to Useless by ONOIML8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who works in the industry on the fleet mechanic side I have to disagree.

      The OBD-II codes have been around and they are helpful for the most part. What has been needed are the non-standard manufacturer specific codes.

      I wish I could purchase a good scan tool that would work on the major brands for $300. With software, leads, and adapters for domestic only I think our Mastertech package was over $2,800. That's domestic only, no imports, and it is never current. I'm just now getting updated for 2002 model year vehicles.

      You are correct that it still takes a good mechanic to find the problem. A good mechanic stays current with his training. Todays mechanic is not a programmer, but he is a technician.

      Using the scan tool to read diagnostic codes won't tell the mechanic exactly where the problem is. He has to know the systems well enough to understand what the on board computer is telling him. The ability to read the real time data stream is important too, maybe even more important than knowing waht the diagnostic codes mean.

      It is important to understand how the on board computer arrived at the diagnostic code. You have to know what test is run, how it is run, and what the conditions for the test are. If you don't have that information then you are correct, the codes will be misleading.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  12. There is a Tool Call AutoTAP and OBDII scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Diagnostic trouble Code so called DTC are avil online for long time. check out http://www.autotap.com for detail on their software and OBDII codes. Autotap is not just for Trouble Codes, you can use it to monitor 1000's of parameters in Real time!! from how much air/fuel your car consuming, how far you have your throttle down, what gear are you in, what's your temptures etc etc.

    I have all the Codes for my Grand Prix GTP.

    Yes A lot of people mod their cars, reprogramming the PCM or ECU can give you more HP and remove speed limiter etc.

    I'm one of those guy who tweak on the cars, i'll be setting DTC's left and right, i just use autotap and look up the code and do the necessary correction to fix the problem.

    Sometime friend who have Service Engine Soon light on their late model car I tap in and check out the code (Which cost $75 at the shop) so we'll get idea on the problem with the car before we take it to the shop.

    There are palm size code readers and scan tools also.

    Look for multiline, serial gauges that coming out in a few month that let you monitor various parameters of your OBD II car and they're reprogrammable too with serial interface. :)

  13. GNU Automake by huhmz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am i the only one who though for about .8 seconds that the article was about GNU Automake?

    I best cut down on the wine I think...

  14. OBD is an interface standard by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Informative

    On Board Diagnostics is a tool. You can read the codes with the tool.

    What the codes mean is the point.

    1. Re:OBD is an interface standard by fred911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      MOD PARENT UP!!

      Seems the feds figured that if they "required" every vehcile manufacture to use the OBD-II physical interface, they would all be standard.

      Sad thing is most manufactures pin out on the interface is different.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:OBD is an interface standard by pll178 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you buy the OBDII reader and a factory service manual you have enough information to understand what the code is and how to fix it. You can buy factory service manuals from www.helminc.com. These two resources are indespensible for a DIY mechanic.

  15. Re:Hack your car by MxTxL · · Score: 2

    Yes, and that's fine for people doing trouble shooting and tune-ups... but it also allows street racers and other performance minded folks to pump up their air-fuel mixtures and screw up emission controls. With the wrong settings, it's also conceivable if someone doesn't know what they are doing to cause engine fires with all the associated hollywood-type explosions.

  16. Read the article.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That has nothing to do with this. You know the Check Engine light that people never have checked out? Thats the car's internal diagnostic system giving you a heads up that something's fscked up.

    Believe it or not, that actually has a good bearing on if something is wrong with your car. People who fix their cars at home (or the car tuner) actually likes to look up what caused that Orange Light of Death, but from most car companies (most being the American ones) the code it displays is kept secret from small garages or individuals.

    This allows the do-it-yourselfer or the entrepreneur garage to repair their vehicle with the aid of the vehicle. Score one for the little guys.

    1. Re:Read the article.. by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That has nothing to do with this. You know the Check Engine light that people never have checked out? Thats the car's internal diagnostic system giving you a heads up that something's fscked up.
      One of my parents' cars had a constantly lit check-engine light. You know what it meant? The check engine light was broken. Cost to fix? Over $500 (they had to tear apart the entire dash, then there's parts, wires, sensor(s), re-assembly of dash, inspector to ensure they don't tinker with the mileage, etc..)

      There's a reason they're called "idiot lights", you know. :)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Read the article.. by Vinum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of the Simpsons...

      Marge: Homer! The check engine light is on!

      Homer: Ohhh no! The tape I put over it fell off. ....

      Or something to that effect. Either way, it is highly probably your mechanic charged your $500 and did some fancy work and just disconnected the check engine light. It happens all the freaking time.

  17. Corps are shafting us again by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny
    This situation is like if you had a car and they kept the specs closed so that you couldn't figure out how to...

    ... wait -- no need for a car analogy on this topic.

    Never mind.

  18. Re:We already had access to the diagnostic codes.. by billstr78 · · Score: 2

    Me Too! Once I bought the $60 factory published repair manual, the codes and an easy method of having the car cough them out was right there in the book. The book paid for itself after having to replace two timing belts, a water pump, rotor and oil pump. D@mn 200,000+ mile cars.

  19. Re:Hack your car by Regul8or · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it does not allow them to do this with access to trouble code information. Tweaking modern day computers has already been accomplished with modifications to the engine's running paramaters through external chips and repogramming of PCMs. People's engines don't just catch fire because you chipped it and it now make 10 more horsepower. Engine fires occur, for example, when your cooling systems fails because you neglected it. Or, better yet, an unprotected electrical circuit such as the one I know morins like to put into their bumping sound system.

  20. Is this news? by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    I wasn't aware that manufaturers WEREN'T releasing those codes. While BMW uses a funky doodad to reset the oil usage timer, both my Corvette and PT cruiser can ofer up trouble codes via the dash display AND all of those codes are documented on the net.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Is this news? by autechre · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Yes, it is news. No, auto makers such as BMW and Volkswagen were not releasing the diagnostic codes. This made it impossible for non-dealer repair shops to diagnose a variety of problems on newer model cars.

      My father is the supervisor of the auto shop at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and he was very concerned about this, as they certainly don't want to have to outsource any repairs on their fleet. These days, much of the work in diagnosing car problems involves hooking up a computer to the car and asking the car's computer, "OK, what's not normal?". It's not quite that simple; you still have to know what you're doing in order to figure out what's wrong (not like a dialog box pops up and says, "Mass air flow sensor bad. Replace? Y/N).

      Anyway, I spoke to my father today to make sure he had seen this article, and he said that basically the auto makers have said, "We promise to release the specs if you don't pass a law saying we have to do so." He doesn't really trust them, but is hopeful, and will wait and see.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  21. Re:... This isn't new by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA, the codes have been avalible to dealerships, this means your local chain (quaker, jiffy lube) or your local mechanic still didn't have acess to them, so you'd either have to go the the dealership and pay their higher prices, or go to your local mechanic and pay more because it would take longer to figure out what was wrong, btw, IMO going to a dealership is throwing your money away ussually, free estimate, they told me it would cost $115 (parts and labor) to replace a seatbelt and a window roller handle thingy, i went to a junkyard, payed the guy about $20 and took the half an hour to replace them myself

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  22. Re:Hack your car by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

    That's clearly a troll - but either way it should be pointed out that the engine control computer doesn't really do much of anything that would put anyone at "risk". The steering and brakes are, at their core, not reliant on the computer to function. That's because other things (like dead batteries and running out of gas) could also disable the computer. No one's gonna "blow anything up" by tweaking the car computer - unless they're doing something else as well...

  23. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by cscx · · Score: 2

    OBD-II is required on all new vehicles sold in the US since 1996. The protocol is open, but manufacturers would add additional information that they did not disclose to outsiders.

    Sounds like what Microsoft did to Kerberos...

  24. Re:Just keep on driving by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    I had a Subaru with a chronic check engine light problem. Two mechanics (one operating out of the Subaru dealer and one non-dealer) told me that (on Subarus anyway) that quite often the vague "service engine" light indicates a failure in emissions control or some other non-critical part, and unless the failure is causing a loss of performance or your car to just plain not work, that quite often it's not worth worrying about. (And even with my failed emissions control systems I still passed all emissions testing with flying colors... so I think quite often the non-critical part that's failed is the light itself...)

  25. This is old news... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    "Enter "GLYCERINE" as a code, then press L1 for a nitro boost."

  26. Re:Hack your car by ez76 · · Score: 2

    Increasingly, higher-end vehicles are coming on the market with steering, brakes, throttle, etc. that are completely controlled by electronic sensors and other "drive-by-wire" technologies.

    Hopefully said systems have a Lithium battery back-up that's more reliable than my PalmPilot's.

  27. new mini-ITX car project? by phorm · · Score: 2

    I think this could definately pave the way for some cool mini-ITX projects (see previous slashdot article). I'm not sure how exactly these diagnostics run though, or what information they provide.
    I think in some systems you can get (and maybe set) your fuel-to-air ratio, which controls how rich your car is burning gas and to some extent power. Turbochargers are based on providing extra air flow allowing for more gas to also be mixed in.
    Even if you can't stat your car on the fly, it would be quite cool to have the onboard PC able to do something other than play Mp3's.

    I'd like to wire one into the speedometer and gas gauge, then have it calculate milage based on speed and the current fuel/air ratio.

    Checksum error. Now terminating system: brakes - phorm

    1. Re:new mini-ITX car project? by bergeron76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We're actually working on something like this already. We'll see if we can't integrate this into the dashpc project. We're working with the guys at freediag and hopefully they'll be able to help us integrate the ODBII codes into the dashpc codebase.

      We'll probably end up recording all the codes into a public mysql db that can be queried or integrated into the core code.

      This would allow the UI to display the EXACT problem ("Your 3rd spark plug from the left is firing oddly - please check") instead of just "check engine". Very good news indeed.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  28. Re:Not all that significant.. by John+Miles · · Score: 2

    That's not really fair to say. The service manuals for the fifth-generation Corvette give you practically everything but the ECU's source code. I don't know about GM's other vehicles but would guess that's a company-wide practice.

    The truth is, most manufacturers were already on board with this policy.

    --
    Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
  29. Diagnostic code list: by MrEd · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hey, I got a sneak copy of the universal error code manual... check it out:


    CODE 0000-FFFF:


    YOUR CAR IS BROKEN. BUY A NEW ONE.

    --

    Wah!

  30. Re:Hack your car by JesseL · · Score: 2

    Have you got any examples of production vehicles that have drive-by-wire controls for anything other than the throttle and transmission? The article that you pointed to only mentioned throttle control in current vehicles.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  31. Re:Guess What? by toast0 · · Score: 2

    FYI- a car mod being illegal doesn't stop it from happening.

  32. New product idea by interociter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    OK, here's an idea. Since the diagnostic codes are available, how about an on-board computer that monitors and logs engine data: avg MPH, mileage, temperature, daily usage, etc. The data could be downloaded to a laptop via a USB port, analyzed, and archived.

    Imagine: you're doing the monthly check, and discover that your mileage has suddenly dropped 10%. Even before something goes wrong, you could take it to a garage and give them strong diagnostic data.

    When the time comes to sell the car, you can provide a day-to-day profile of the car's history: every oil change, fillup, and repair automatically logged. Real examples of winter vs summer and city vs. highway performance.

    Seems to me that the technology is already available, and some of the functions are already in place. All that really needs to be done is for someone to hack together an interface. Any takers?

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
  33. In-dash access by mikewas · · Score: 2
    Our old Toronado had a touch screen in the dash. It took a 3-finger exercise to enter diagnostics mode, the GM version of ctrl-alt-del, but then you:
    1. had access to the engine diagnostics codes
    2. could override/modify some things (e.g. shut down one injector, select Canadian shift regime)
    3. had a summary screen that showed engine & transmission status
    4. let you access the body computer (e.g. heat, A/C).
    I had hoped that was the coming thing, but they charged too much for the touch screen. The dealership was forthcoming with info on the codes, or you could buy the service manual at a reasonable price.

    Too bad. A great car, still looked good, my wife loved it, I could work on it, but we couldn't get parts to keep it on the road any more.

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  34. Not So! by EXTomar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Go to ebay and buy a scan tool. You see the engine light on your car go on. Even if you have the tool and plug it into your car's computer it only spits out an error number and a little extra information. What does it mean? No one knows....except for the car makers who want to charge you money for the manual.

    This is the same stuff Free Software Philosophy seeks to fight: closed systems that take rights away from the user. You bought the car....why can't you figure out what is wrong with it on your own if you choose to do so? Why do automakers want to keep your property a secret from you?

  35. I much don't care... by defile · · Score: 2

    I mean, my car is a lease. If there's any trouble whatsoever it goes back to the dealer for servicing. In fact, it's in their best interest not to fuck the car up since they have to cover repairs under warranty, and they have to buy the car back at the end of the lease. So long independent mechanic, I barely knew thee.

    Although I'd probably be mad if I tinkered with cars in the same way I tinkered with computers and didn't have the open source equivalent.

    1. Re:I much don't care... by GMontag · · Score: 2

      n fact, it's in their best interest not to fuck the car up since they have to cover repairs under warranty, and they have to buy the car back at the end of the lease.

      Huh? If they mess the car up and it lowers the value YOU are on the hook for that amount. They had a set buyback value and mileage in your lease, if it is worth less and/or has more mileage, YOU pay for that, not them.

  36. Happening in Europe; EU standard EOBD by damieng · · Score: 2

    This is also happening here in Europe now that the EU have provided a standard called EOBD for all newly-developed cars which is actually the OBD-2 system which has been available for some time.

    This months issue of Elektor Electronics has full details on the interface, with next months issue presenting a do-it-yourself EOBD diagnosis adapter. They also do an OBD-2 to RS232 adapter for those geeks wanting to play using their laptop in true "The Fast 'n The Furious" style.

    --
    [)amien
  37. Don't just keep driving... also, flip a switch. by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't just keep driving... also, flip a switch.

    The Chevy Sprint and Geo Metro and other Chevy cars of that vintage had a blinking "check engine" light, which would go on automatically as soon as you hit 30,000 miles, and each 30,000 miles, after that.

    This was a result of a single-pole, double throw switch in the odometer. There was also a single-pole double-throw switch inside the fuse area (below and two the left of the steering wheel). In other words, a standard two location three-way switch assembly.

    The "corrective" action for the blinky light was to bring the car into the dealer, pay them a lot of money for "scheduled maintenance", and whatever engine parts they happened to have an excess of in inventory in their parts department that month.

    And for them to toggle the position of the switch in the fuse holder, to turn off the blinky light until you'd gone another 30,000 miles.

    Hooray for blinky lights that get people to spend money at the dealer!

    -- Terry

  38. Re:Will it have hidden commands like the R2D2 robo by ColaMan · · Score: 2

    Don't laugh about it - one of GMH's vehicles (with an automatic transimission), if you do a sequence like "Ign on - select 1st - Ign off - select Drive - Ign on" it will default to a particular transmission mode that you can't get by pressing any of the knobs or buttons in the car.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  39. Re:We already had access to the diagnostic codes.. by swschrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    uhhh, what you get with a commercial tool is almost always the international standard codes, occasionally manufacturer-specific drivetrain codes. with very few ($2000 and up range) exceptions do you get the "chassis codes" for traction enhancement controls, transmission/engine crosstalk codes, and so on.

    you still are not going to get them free, but they will be availiable in updates some day before we all die to professional test readers.

    presumably this will also include the equivalent to the "mode 4" international code for the wacko ones. "mode 4" is also known as "reset," turns out the $$$ light on the dash.

    wanna check out scanners, including build-your-own, try

    http://www.batauto.com/technical/scaninfo.shtml

    and for code lists for specific cars, try

    http://www.batauto.com/technical/

    and click what you want. as usual, you get what you pay for, no deposit no return, use at your own risk, etc. etc.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  40. You folks just aren�t getting this by judoMan · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is an awful lot of ignorance in this thread. Check what the domestic and import manufacturers' actually agreed to (from http://www.asashop.org/legis/agreement.htm):
    Automobile manufacturers hereby commit to make available, by August 31, 2003, emission and non-emission-related service information, training information, and diagnostic tools in the same manner and to the same extent as specified by California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations for emission-related systems and components. This means that 1) the same service and training information related to vehicle repair will be made available to independent repair shops either via the Internet, or in the same manner and extent as it is made available to franchised dealerships and 2) the same diagnostic tools related to vehicle repair that are made available to the franchised dealers will be made available to the independent repair shops. These will be made available at a reasonable price consistent with the guidelines provided in CARB regulations. The service and training information and manufacturer tools will be available to independent repair shops without the need for them to return to a franchised dealership (to the extent allowed by law).

    Do you understand? This is huge. Huge, huge. This is indeed the "opening" of the closed information source. It's as if MS agreed to open *all* proprietary informational resources (private KBs, training, diag tools, etc.) that were previously used only by their premier tech support reps.

    Now will most mechanics avail themselves of this? Heck no. Most don't know or care how to truly troubleshoot; there are easier ways to flag hours that don't involve trying to convince a skeptical customer that you're not ripping them off.

    But to those who love troubleshooting, this is manna from heaven. Take codes for example. An earlier poster said they were useless. If all you had was the description of the code, that's a correct statement.

    However, if you also knew the exact criteria the PCM needed to see before throwing a code (this knowledge will be one of the takeaways from this act), you could then use your understanding of the proprietary system (a second takeaway) to straightforwardly troubleshoot and fix it.

    Make sense? This is a hallmark day for savvy techs (or rather, August 31, 2003 will be <grin>).

    Cheers,
    -jm

  41. Old news no? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
    On Dodge Neons, turn the ignition key on/off on/off on/off (don't engage the starter), and it will flash a diagnotic code on that idiot "Check Engine" LED. Most Chilton-type books list the codes for each car.

    That Check Engine light was the most annoying thing! When was it lighted, I'd never know if it was signaling 30 seconds to warp-core breach or just a glitched oxygen sensor aft of the catalytic converter. The damned "owner's manual" was pretty vague about it, like "Check Engine: Check Engine". Garages can plug into a port, get it in text, then make "expensive engine repair" noises.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.