Slashdot Mirror


Systemax to Offer 'Hot-Rod' PC

Professor_Quail writes "C|Net News reports that PC maker Systemax is going to be offering a new line of PC's aimed at gamers and performance enthusiasts. The computers, priced at approximately 3-4 thousand dollars, are touted by the company specifically for their overclocking performance; the DoubleX line comes equipped with a water-cooling system and dual hard drives configured with RAID-0. The systems will be sold through the company's TigerDirect subsidiary."

170 comments

  1. Another Slashvertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad we cost them money when we /. their servers anyway.

  2. Dont buy tiger direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are EVIL(tm)

    FP?

  3. Isn't that like Alienware? by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 1

    Yes, I realize the high-end gaming systems fetch a hefty profit margin, but isn't Alienware the standard retailer for such systems?

    I think reputation has a lot to do with sales success, so it may be hard for Systemax to break into Alienware's marketshare. The watercooling option is definitely a step in the right direction; I'm pretty sure no system retailer has attempted such an offer.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
    1. Re:Isn't that like Alienware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Vooodoo is still the best insaneo computer dealer. Also Falcon Northwest is very good. But honestly, anybody who spends 4000+ dollars for less than 2000 dollars worth of equipment is a fuckin retard. And when you buy in the bulk that the custom OEMs do they are making a pretty profit.

    2. Re:Isn't that like Alienware? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Ok i dont see how this article is news. As you mentioned companies likeAlienware already make hot-rod pc's. But now everyone and their uncle are mkaing a hot-rod pc. Just because systemax is in it now doesn't mean anything. I think that the market is about to become saturated with these companies and we will see some of them kick off, most likely the new ones without a name in the business.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  4. +1 insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What can I say? I'm bored.

  5. Fast by OneShotUno · · Score: 1
    In its labs, Systemax claims, it pushed the 2.8GHz Pentium 4 to more than 3GHz and also cranked up the Athlon XP 2200+ chip, which runs at 1.8GHz, to 3GHz
    Really?
    1. Re:Fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3GHz Athlon vs 3GHz Pentium 4. Knock down drag out fight, TKO P4, AMD wins.

    2. Re:Fast by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      They're not politicians. Why would they lie?

      Oh wait, they're PC manufacturers.

    3. Re:Fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, man! They're proudly stating that they got at least a 7% overclocking out of a P4.

    4. Re:Fast by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      That's probably just a stupid cnet error. They probably meant 2 ghz. 3 ghz athlon xp (rated at 1.8 ghz) is beyond ridiculous.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    5. Re:Fast by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      They probably meant it can be overclocked to 1.8Ghz which gives it an equivalent PR rating of around 3000.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Fast by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      I don't think so... i thought the 2200's were 1.8 ghz. I remember the 2600's did break the 2.0 ghz barrier.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    7. Re:Fast by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a moron.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then via steps in with their less then sucking chipsets, slows down amd during an ide transfer, and intel wins. or perhaps playing some audio in win2k with a geforce2+ on a via chipset and amd goes down for the count.

      and of course intel could just knock the fan off the amd cpu, we all saw what that leads to.

    9. Re:Fast by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

      solution?

      Nvidia or SiS chipset for the Athlon!

  6. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I would *never* buy a system from Tiger Direct. My work used to buy stuff from them a lot and they really suck.

    1. Re:Yeah, right by texaport · · Score: 1

      Your work used to buy stuff from them a lot and they really suck. My work used to sell stuff to them a lot and they really suck. What do you expect from a company carrying the same line as "Home Shopping Network" ...

  7. Erm, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Water-cooling has not been shown in tests to give statistically significant improvements in cooling vs. a high-end fan and heatsink (the primary advantage of water-cooling is it is quieter, but that isn't a performance issue), and overclocking is primarily a way for tinkerhead geeks to get more mileage out of old processors.

    The hard drives are a nice touch, but any slashdot reader could build a system whose perfomance equals this overpriced iron and have enough left over for a hooker, a bottle of Courvissier, and a pack of Sheiks. The primary market for these bells-and-whistles systems will be late adopters with more money than brains and a tendency to be easily distracted by "the shiny".

    1. Re:Erm, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      enough left over for a hooker, a bottle of Courvissier, and a pack of Sheiks.

      What are these? Some sort of new hardware? I'm familiar with MoBos, DDR, HDD, EIDE, ATA133, SCSI, OpenGL, USB, IEEE1394, 802.11[ab], Linux, BSD, etc. but have never heard of these new technologies. Please tell us what they are and how to use them. I think my dual-Athlon full-server tower has some room left even with the Peltier coolers.

    2. Re:Erm, no. by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1
      overclocking is primarily a way for tinkerhead geeks to get more mileage out of old processors.


      Depends on your definition of "old". FWIW, the two oldest procs I own (K6-2/300 and P3M-1ghz) are *not* OCed and the newest (P41.6@2.4) *is*.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  8. Evaluate Tiger Direct on your own by Crazieeman · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Evaluate Tiger Direct on your own by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      http://www.consumeraffairs.com/computers/tiger_dir ect.htm .

      doesn't look too good.. but then again, if you're a performance enthuasist would you pay 1000-2000 extra for something worth 100$-200$. watercooling can be had for 100$ and 400 will get you vapochill/mx3-eva type cooling(and the raid hd's and other stuff isn't worth it even unless you're unable to read, in which case buying a computer isn't very useful)..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Evaluate Tiger Direct on your own by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      Pretty funny. I ordered one item from Tigerdirect which I had to cancel because it was out of stock even though their support people were pretty sure it was.. well, a month later and I gave up.

      That was about a year ago and I'm still getting the catalogs. What a waste of money printing and sending a catalog to a consumer that will never use their service [again]

      I actually do read the catalogs to see what's new and stuff and I saw this Symetac system for about 3k. It didn't seem that bad until I realized the flat screen monitor wasn't included. What a rip.

    3. Re:Evaluate Tiger Direct on your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All those vendor ratings are scewed negative.

      A disproportionate number of people only bother to rate a company when they have something to bitch about.

      .....they just need to normalize the data... :-)

    4. Re:Evaluate Tiger Direct on your own by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [looks at ratings] Yup, that's typical for 'em. I always advise people to run away screaming and buy ANYwhere else. They are the Fry's of catalog merchants.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  9. Price spectrum by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anybody else see the irony in comparing THIS machine to the $199 Walmart/Lindows/AOL machine?

    $199 to 'three or four thousand dollars' is quite the spread for two items that, at a certain level, are more alike than different.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Price spectrum by OffTheRack · · Score: 1

      How about comparing this machine to a $199 PS2 or $199 XBox? Is it really that much better for action game-play?

      Seems like a tiny niche market -- folks with too much money and too much time to think about how they spend either.

  10. fluff by painehope · · Score: 1

    2,800 USD for this thing? you could buy all the components for approximately 1000, it doesn't even mention dual processors, which I would expect for this kind of money, and I imagine the only part that would be any trouble to assemble is the water-cooling system. the only reason i would pay for this is maybe the warranty factor, but you could buy components retail w/ a 3 or more year warranty and still come in well under that figure.
    though I might be talking out my ass for the newer P4's, since I haven't been CPU-shopping in a few months.

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    1. Re:fluff by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      Water cooling is not very easy... Can easily damage your circuits. Even if there is no leaks condensation can be a huge problem. If they cand do it safely then this is an excellent product for those that can't or don't have the time to. Also please don't spread this B.S. about $1000 dollars for the same things. It's simply not true when it comes to pc's. Usually you'll get cheap no name parts and you still won't get there.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    2. Re:fluff by octalc0de · · Score: 0

      you could buy all the components for approximately 1000

      CPU [P4 2.8GHZ S478 512K NW 533FSB] = $523
      Innovatek Water Cooling = $200
      Graphics Card [XTASY GEFORCE4 TI 4600 128M] = $388
      Memory [512MB RAMBUS ECC 800MHZ] = $277
      Memory (512 MB) = $277
      P4B533E i845E DDR 533FS S/R/L/FW/U2 (mobo) = $163
      Hard Drive [WD 120.0GB 100/7200/8MB] = $186
      2nd Hard Drive [WD 120gig] = $186

      We're looking at $2200 w/o the CD-ROM drives and the monitor. This is of course, the P4 configuration, which supposedly will go for around $4000. You still save, but it'll still cost you money [that could be spent on something else; such as a gaming system].

    3. Re:fluff by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Funny

      the only reason i would pay for this is maybe the warranty

      How do you even begin to attempt to warranty a system which you blantantly overclock beyond the cpu's normal parameters.

      joe schmoe: "hello tech support, my 2.8ghz overclocked to 3ghz is fried"

      tech support: "Why did you overclock it?"

      Joe: "Because that's why I paid 4k dollars for an l33t system that I probably could have built for myself for 100 bucks."

      Tech support: "Yeah.. I'm going to have to ask you to not call us again."

    4. Re:fluff by painehope · · Score: 1

      sorry for the late reply, but I just saw this, and the approximate 1000 dollars isn't BS :
      ~130 USD case : Cooler Master case
      ~30 USD for a good ATX power supply, I'm not going to quote this one
      ~140 USD ASUS VIA chipset motherboard, supports DDR333 and DDR266, most Athlons and Durons, pretty damn good motherboard, supposedly not hard to overclock ( I haven't done it, but I do own one of these things and it is nice ) : scroll to bottom of page
      ~120 for a Athlon 2[0-2]00+ not a 2200, but close
      ~150 USD for brand-name DDR333 RAM : middle of the page
      ~250 USD for the Geforce4 Ti4600 : towards bottom of page
      let's say another 200 for the CD-RW ( which will probably be a CD-RW/DVD drive ) and DVD drive, and then ~ 200 for the disk, which is almost certainly going to be using the onboard RAID that comes on the higher-end AV7333 motherboards ( since they don't mention an additional RAID card ), so that bring us to :
      approximately 1300 USD, padding a little bit for cabling. when you include the fact that you will probably want to buy this from your local reputable PC vendor ( to avoid long-distance warranty hassles), add %10, for about 1450 USD, which is still 1000 under their cheapest system.
      i was off by a bit, but not much. of course, this means you have to put it together yourself, and we should probably throw another 100 dollars in for fans, heatsink, and thermal paste, but it's all brand name kit, and provided you know what you're doing and are willing to spend the 2 hours assembling it and the hour getting the cooling right, you just saved yourself a 1000 USD.
      this isn't to sound like an asshole, I just don't like being told I'm spreading B.S. about something I know fairly well. Been putting these damn things together since I was 8 years old, and plan to be doing it when I'm 80.
      late.

      --
      PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  11. hotroding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Overclocking? Who cares by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would anyone bother overclocking with today's processors? The clock increase gained by it will be surpassed in a few weeks by a new processor release anyway, which is a testament to how ineffective it is these days. It's about % gain, man. Maybe in the days of the old Celeron 300 chips, where you could more than double your clockspeed, at the expense of processor life, this was effective, but I can't see there being any financial reason to do it now.

    --

    --sdem
  13. $1000 at NewEgg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    will give you 90% of the experience of some absurd $3000 pc.

  14. Why post this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "News" like this seems more like an advertisement. Are they an OSDN company? :-)

    1. Re:Why post this? by tangledweb · · Score: 1

      Does the fact that this story got posted have anything to do with the banner ads they have been buying on slashdot?

  15. Where do these guys live, the past? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    "But gaming is moving more into the mainstream now, so we think it's a market we can capture.

    Despite some good PC titles, gaming has been trending towards consoles, which cost $200 each. Even with green lights and water cooling $4000 is just way to much. You can still buy systems, which you could pop the latest motherboard in with a faster Athlon or P4 and play fast enough for less than $1500, fully kitted with DVD/CDRW, and all. Maybe they're targeting the rich kids, you know, the ones who never get invited to LAN parties.

    "If you don't let me play, I'll take my server straight home!"

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Where do these guys live, the past? by octalc0de · · Score: 0

      gaming has been trending towards consoles

      Yes, the games have been trending towards consoles. People can buy computers for $200 (walmart), but they're really crappy for games. Some people, however, choose the PC over Consoles as it's upgradable, they can issue patches, and it becomes a competition.

      With a (Gamecube/X-box/PS2), you can't upgrade it to do better graphics (at least not easily). With a gaming computer, you can take it around and brag how you upgraded it and get 450 fps on the new game. Nobody could beat that, bringing in a new competition.

      Put it this way, it's the "rich people's console". I live in a rich neighborhood, where people buy all three systems PLUS a gaming computer, just for the sakes of competition. "Hey, I'm richer than you are!" seems to be a hidden message in these.

    2. Re:Where do these guys live, the past? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus christ on a fucking diesel crucifix: the $200 refers to the PS2 and XBox. You're about as sharp as a fucking cue ball.

    3. Re:Where do these guys live, the past? by octalc0de · · Score: 0

      the $200 refers to the PS2 and XBox

      I know. I was also comparing those systems to a low-end computer.

      You're about as sharp as a fucking cue ball

      Obvious troll, but I'll bite.

    4. Re:Where do these guys live, the past? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      You are making a couple of mistakes here.

      One is that gaming is moving towards the console. If that was true then the x-box being the closest to a pc would have selled like hot-cakes. It didn't.

      Two is that $XXXX is to much, it all depends on what youre income is.

      Three is that you presume pc games are mostly played by kids when in fact the average age hovers around 30 and many older people are starting to pick up games as well.

      Four is that everyone is willing to spend the time building their own system. For some people the extra cost is easily offset by the ease of getting it out of the box.

      Youre response sound a bit like you are jealous of people that would have the kind of money to buy this. Get over it. And if you can build the same system for less, well then open youre own bussiness and compete with them.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    5. Re:Where do these guys live, the past? by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      Was this a troll, well, maybe not, but I'll address a few items...

      One is that gaming is moving towards the console. If that was true then the x-box being the closest to a pc would have selled like hot-cakes. It didn't.

      Yes, games have moved to the Console, more consoles sell than ever before and I can't find anywhere near the number of game titles for PC's that I can for Consoles. The notable exception is there are some much higher quality games for the PC's than you can play on consoles, but in shear numbers Consoles win. Don't confuse the Likeness to PC's of the Xbox with what should come out for it, it's hardly an open platform, with Microsoft willing to defend exclusive rights of development (i.e. DMCA smackdown for reverse engineering, etc.), thus they get a cut of ever title, same way Sony and Nintendo work.

      Two is that $XXXX is to much, it all depends on what youre income is.

      No, $4K is in excess of what's needed for a high performance gaming PC. I've been pricing parts to build my own (not particularly for gaming) and $1000-1500 is plenty. What they offer is the same as Gucci does, you can buy a handbag at Kmart or buy a Gucci, they both function equally.

      Three is that you presume pc games are mostly played by kids when in fact the average age hovers around 30 and many older people are starting to pick up games as well.

      Didn't say anything about kids as the predominant market for games, even I know better than that and I'm pretty stupid at times. The PC with all the lights and gewgaws is most likely to appeal to the less initiated, whereas the more experienced gamer, particularly those with DIY connections save their money for games, not buying glitz.

      Four is that everyone is willing to spend the time building their own system. For some people the extra cost is easily offset by the ease of getting it out of the box.

      You can buy a pretty high end PC right off the shelf from Dell, CompUSA, Circuit City, etc. for much less if you don't want to build. $2400-4000 (4000 being the one with the 240+gig of drives and liquid cooling) Read any magazines lately? The prices I'm seeing reflect some resepectable horsepower at a reasonable price. Just slap in your 128Meg graphic card and you're off and running.

      Youre response sound a bit like you are jealous of people that would have the kind of money to buy this. Get over it. And if you can build the same system for less, well then open youre own bussiness and compete with them.

      I'm sometimes jealous of people who have more money, but I'm rarely so of people who flaunt money or blow it stupidly.

      Now, if you'd have actually RTFA you would have seen I'm not alone in my opinions:

      Sean Aryai, a marketing director at Systemax could be quoted verbatim as of 10 years ago.

      "It's hard to fathom that there's a large audience out there for (Double X), particularly in today's market," said Toni Duboise, an analyst with ARS. "But, on the other hand, it could appeal to those kinds of buyers who look at Sony and Apple...and those people who are willing to spend more on a stylized version of a PC."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    6. Re:Where do these guys live, the past? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      You an excellent point with the bag. You don't just pay for the price of the material that goes in. Sure it may be hard to understand why people spend more money then is stricly neccesary but that is they way of the world. A plastic bag from the supermarket performs the same function as that gucci back you mentioned. The same goes for pc's, a no-brand performs can do the same as a dell for less and a dell can be made to do the same as this system for less. Then again I think dells are overpriced. You certainly are not trying to convince me that dell has got the wrong business plan?

      I myself would not by such a machine then again I the only completed computer I ever bought was a C64. The reason I disagree with you is because of an argument I had with someone over water cooling. I had spend money on buying parts from klaxx and he was oh but you could have gotten a radiator free from the local junkyard. Like you, he seemed unwilling to simply accept that I was willing to trade extra money for convinience. Getting a machine tuned with watercooling may be worth it to some. Just like getting a tuned machine from alienware may be worth it for some.

      You can quote people who don't see it but the simple fact is that history has shown that people are willing to pay more for something even when they can it cheaper. Just ask alienware if they are still in bussiness. They are? Then they must have people willing to pay more for parts they could more cheaply buy elsewhere. Same reason IBM still sells servers at prices way above the sum of their parts.

      At end you quote someone who says it all. Most people will not buy such a machine. Some will. If the second group is big enough, they will profit if not, they will not. Lets see in a year if they still offer this line.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  16. two stupid to spell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the two-stupid-to-spell-correctly department

    1. Re:two stupid to spell by Crazieeman · · Score: 1

      Too also means also too.

      +1 Redundantly funny

  17. Falcon Northwest by Agent+00p · · Score: 1

    These guys Falcon Northwest have been doing this for a long time ...

    --
    when the shit hits the fan, it is not equally spread
  18. Thanks for the warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already knew about the utterly shitty TigerDirect, but know I will be certain to avoid Systemax! (As if I'd need someone to build me a computer.)

  19. sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    god you trolls make me feel sick today...

    do you think talk about abusing a handicapped perso is funny?!

    1. Re:sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you think talk about abusing a handicapped perso is funny?

      I found it funny.

    2. Re:sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, it's you who's being abusive and segregating here. Your post implies that you think that handicapped people should not have sex, or if they do, they should do it with other handicapped people.

      What the hell makes you think the original poster is "abusing" the woman when he says he wants to make her feel good by giving her "good orgasms"?

    3. Re:sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind a little abuse myself...

    4. Re:sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do not we want kids having sex with adults? because kids are not equal match to an adult. there's always abuse. now, do you think a handicapped woman and a healthy man are an equal match? thought so...

  20. Better ways to spend money: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.redcross.org

  21. build your own by asv108 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The systems they will be offering for 3-4 grand, could probably be built for less than $2,000. A high end system is where people can save the most money rolling their own. With all the online guides and books available for PC building, just about anyone can build a pc a in day, its really not that hard. I started building them five years ago, and now I'm building budget systems on the side for friends and relatives, padding the price by at least $200 and still beating Dell's prices on their low end systems, but not the ultra low end.

    1. Re:build your own by octalc0de · · Score: 0

      See my post here for a detailed price scan.

      They can't be built for less than $2000, but they can be built for cheaper. One of the main reasons? support. Support costs money. A telephone rep just sitting there all day. Even paying him/her at minimum wage, that still factors in when you've got thousands of reps.

      You'll save money by building your own, but you're in for a headache if one of the parts is defective (like my motherboard's memory slots). I thought it was the memory being defective... *twiddle thumbs*, but no, it wasn't. After 1 week, I finally just exchanged both. Now I'm waiting for the parts to arrive, and I'm out a computer (for now).

    2. Re:build your own by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate that (RE: Your sig). It is too easy to start negative until you get a couple positive posts.

    3. Re:build your own by lingqi · · Score: 2

      maybe you are right -- but you have to admit there IS such a market out there. they are probabbly trying to compete with the likes of alienware and falconNW -- and last i heard they were still selling systems. but what's questionable is that if their brand rocognition (plus tigerdirect's iffy-ness) will allow them to hit the jackpot to their intended market segment.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    4. Re:build your own by abdulla · · Score: 1

      I used to do that with my father when I was 7, the problem with that being, especially when it comes to friends and family, the support side included, even when it has nothing to do with the hardware you supplied to them, your implicitly required to fix every hair-brained problem of theirs, no matter whos fault it was, its hard being harsh to people who are close to you, I'd recommened never having such dealings with friends or family.

  22. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by sm0kes · · Score: 1

    People don't overclock necessarily to gain performance, it just happens to be a general inherient benefit. It's done because it's a hobby that fuffils a person's interest in some way, be it challenging, cool, or interesting. To take something and run it it faster than it's intended is a 'geeks' way of fun (perhaps even their way of living on the edge ... i'm not a geek). This is similar to any mechanic or rice boy that modifies their car not necessarily by dropping new components into it, but tweeking for better performance..

    You're right when you say how ineffective it is these days in a monetary vs performance % gain ... but then again, how many people really push their 2.8 MHz P4 to it's limits?

    These boxes are most likely going to be aimed that rich kid with lots of money, that lacks the desire to learn to do it themselves.

    Just a thought ...
    Just a thought...

  23. Gamers need Raid 0? by AX.25 · · Score: 1

    Isn't that a performance hit in the disk department?

    --
    What is pirate software? Software for inventory of stolen treasure?
    1. Re:Gamers need Raid 0? by Fembot · · Score: 1

      Raid level 0 allows two disks to appear as one large disk effectively. Provided it is implemented in hardware a performance increase should be noticable, since for every 2bits written each drive only has to write one bit (and reading/writing a hdd is slow). (thats a slightly simplifed explination, and assumes there are only 2 disks in the array)

    2. Re:Gamers need Raid 0? by MattRog · · Score: 2

      No, RAID0 is faster than a single drive. It can stripe the reads and writes to spread the I/O over each disk. The problem is that it provides no redundancy in case of a disk failure (you've lost everything at that point!).

      Another advantage is that it makes your two single drives of size N each look like a single drive of size N * 2. This was a big advantage back in the days of the all-common 9GB SCSI. If you had a 40GB movie file you were working with it was inconvenient (or impossible) to partition it up. Merging 5 x 9GB drives into one logical device was great, but with single-drive capacities reaching several hundred GB RAID0's single logical drive is not quie as useful.

      Provided it is done via hardware and not software, of course. :)

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    3. Re:Gamers need Raid 0? by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 2

      Er. The rule of thumb with RAID0 is that you not only add up the transfer rates, you also add the seek times.

      So depending on the type of access, RAID0 can be slower than a single drive. If you're primarily working with small files (e.g. Windows installation), the transfer rate may not outweigh the increased seek time.

      YMMV of course. The only RAID I trust for boot volumes is RAID1 - RAID0 is fine for data, assuming you're working with large sequentially accessed files, and you back everything up on a constant basis. RAID 5 is probably a safer bet, with distributed parity and the ability to have live spares online and spinning to make up for any hardware failure.

      --

      Moof!

    4. Re:Gamers need Raid 0? by AX.25 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. Brain hadn't had any coffee yet. Hopefully, it will be done with hardware.

      --
      What is pirate software? Software for inventory of stolen treasure?
    5. Re:Gamers need Raid 0? by MattRog · · Score: 2

      Right, but I think the assumption (the one I made at least) is that most hard-core gamers would be working with few large-files, right? I am thinking of the FPS which traditionally have HUGE (several hundred MB to a GB!) .pak files with all the junk in it.

      I would think the large-file benefit would outweigh the many small-file hit. I used to recall that Adaptec Ez-CD Creator (when it was called that) would do benchmarks on small and large file disk I/O. The actuall performance of the system was somewhere in-between. I would suspect it would be the same with your typical gaming system. Faster than a single drive but not as fast as if you had all large files.

      I would never use RAID0 because as I stated a bad drive would hose the entire system. RAID1 is the way to go for low-budget RAID.

      RAID 5 (10/01 et al) requires too many disks to be a consumer-grade RAID solution, really.

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    6. Re:Gamers need Raid 0? by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 2

      Yes, and no. Jedi Knight 2 contains a few thousand files, only a few of which are extremely large. These few files are the levels (and movies), but I'm not sure how loading a level (into RAM) faster is worth the risk. I think VM ends up behaving like small files, because small chunks of data are written into and out of it all the time.

      RAID5 requires 3 disks. The problem is you write off 1 disk for parity (OK, parity is distributed across all disks, but a drive's worth of space), so the space advantage is virtually nil vs. a 2-drive RAID0 solution. You just pay for an extra disk and peace of mind. Of course, I haven't seen a hardware RAID5 IDE controller, so...

      To be honest I haven't farted around with RAID0 since 4GB drives were the largest you could get your hands on. I think a current-tech 3-drive RAID0 array would have a faster seek than one of those drives. So it's possible that the seeks are so quick these days that even after adding a few it's still fast enough.

      I think the only RAIDs in major use these days are 1 & 5, and variations on the theme ("RAID 50" scares me). RAID0 isn't really used except for temporary circumstances.

      BTW, I had a drive fail in a RAID0 array. Back up early, back up often. I only lost a few hours of work. I can't imagine what would happen to someone who didn't have a tape drive.

      --

      Moof!

  24. This is a good thing ! by Krapangor · · Score: 1

    People buying computers like this for so much money are helping are starving industry and help to get over this stupid recession !
    If you are a patriot american you should buy one, if you are non-american you should buy one nevertheless.
    A strong economy is good for everyone and makes much jobs and very much wealth.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:This is a good thing ! by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying that I should help out the economy buy spending more money on a single purchase, that buying all the parts separately and building it for less than $1000?

      I wish I knew where money grew on trees, that would help me help the economy!

      --
      | - | - |
  25. linux gaming rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm just nice to put linux on, along with UT2K3 for nice fast smooth gaming. Let the games commence. falvious linuxgaming.co.uk

  26. Re:Sad day ... Stephen King dead at 55 by khuber · · Score: 1

    knock this crap off. it was stupid the other ten million times too

  27. Overloaded Market? by sleeperservice · · Score: 1

    As the article states, they're entering the market niche already occupied by Alienware and Falcon Northwest. While I wish them the best of luck, I can't help but wonder if there's enough business to go around.

    After all, gamers (those who play more than solitaire on the computer) are a subset of computer users. Gamers who need great performance (fps++) are a subset of that group (since many of the most popular games don't need ninja machines).

    Of that group, Gamers who can't already build their own ninja machine are a further subset. And, there again, you're looking at a further subset who want a machine tricked out with lights and suchlike.

    So basically you're marketing to Gamers who aren't technically saavy enough to build their own computer, but who play the most resource-intensive games, have a lot of money to buy these computers and also want lights and transparent panels, etc....

    They're also targeting "high-performance enthusiasts", but I think, really, that this is even a smaller group. Most people who are really into high-performance can, and already do, build their own computers. Most, not all, but most. In my opinion.

    Then there's the whole RAID 0 thing. RAID 0 stripes data across the 2 drives, and is very useful for tasks that require the movement of large amounts of data quickly, like video editing. In my opinion, no game gets any useful benefit whatsoever from RAID 0. Sure, on map change your Counter-Strike level may load a half a second faster than anyone else, but my Western Digital Special Edition (with the 8Mb cache) loads them within a couple of seconds, so I don't see what's to be gained here. A red herring, if you will.

    Why? Because there's a major drawback to RAID 0. If one of the drives fail, the data is lost for both, since it's "striped" across both, with no parity bit to tell the array how to rebuild the lost data. Double your risk for a speed gain you're unlikely to see unless you do lots of video editing.

    I hope their support line is ready for angry calls....

    Still, it's a neat rig. But, it's a niche market. Very niche.

  28. Uhhh by 0xA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Overclock the CPU and setup a raid 0 so you basically halve the mtbf on the logical volume?

    What's the warranty, 12 minutes?

    1. Re:Uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't halve the MTBF. It will stay close to the original. Assuming both drives have the same rating. That being said, I'm doing market research atm before buying a new computer, and I'm trying to find a reasonable (non enterprise) RAID5 IDE controller or tape drive that can backup 300+Gb without using an insane amount of tapes.

      Sigh, nothing has presented itself so far.

    2. Re:Uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont be an idiot. get a ICP Vortex RAID-5 controller and a SpectraLogic AIT-2 tape library or even a single AIT-2 drive since your backup needs are small.
      An ICP Vortex+disks+box+psus will set you back around $5000 and the AIT-2 drive (sony or some other good brand) $7000.
      so for less than $14K you have a good solution which can backup 50GB/tape (tapes are real cheap too) and store it on a fast USCSI RAID-5 array with 256MB of ECC cache.

  29. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 1
    Just FYI, I have a Celeron 300a @450 and a dual Celeron 333 @500. Still in use. Still going strong.

    Meanwhile, two VP6s with dual PIIIs running at rated speed are dead.

    Hardware seems to be getting less and less dependable as we push the envelope on speed and heat.

  30. YHBT YHL HAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

  31. We do read other news sources, you know... by brooks_talley · · Score: 2

    ...What's with all of the C-Net and Infoworld stories showing up 2-3 days later on /.? It's not news if a major news outlet has had it on their front page for *days*.

    -b

    1. Re:We do read other news sources, you know... by Isosonys · · Score: 1

      Your right its not News. Its a paid ad.

  32. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    You're absolutely right. In the old days you could get some noticeable peformance gain in Quake when you overclocked your cpu. However, in my experience, the system wasn't very reliable.

    These days, it pays to get a mid level cpu and spend the extra cash on the video card.

  33. fools and their money by khuber · · Score: 1
    Why would you pay 3-4 grand for a dubious quality system from TG?

    It is so easy to get a custom built system with better components at a decent price.

    I personally don't believe overclocking is worth the hassle, risk, or expense. Your super duper unstable overclocked box will probably be obsoleted by a normal system in a month.

    Here's how to buy a computer: pick a reasonable price/performance point. Don't get screwed out of your money for that last 3% of performance. Keep the difference and replace your computer sooner than you could have if you'd wasted your money on the overpriced top end.

    -Kevin

  34. water cooling for games by dankelley · · Score: 1
    "This machine is so powerful we needed to plumb in water to cool it," used to impress visitors to the lab.

    Times change.

    There used to be this game called chess that required little more than a candle and a keen mind.

    1. Re:water cooling for games by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      Call me anal but wouldn't you need a chess set as well? Unless you are of course really good and can play in youre head in wich case you can scratch the candle.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    2. Re:water cooling for games by dankelley · · Score: 1
      Check.

      One of my buddies can play multiple games at the same time, remembering the boards in his head. So the candle is optional for him. Me, I have trouble remembering which way the little horse is allowed to jump!

  35. Why do you need a $3,000+ PC? by Tikiman · · Score: 1

    Quake III and WC III run fine on computers with a single processor, non SCSI non RAID hard drives, moderate amounts of RAM, and a decent video card. There simply are no games out there to justify spending so much, and by time a game does in fact appear, the cost of the advertised system will have dropped tremendously.

    1. Re:Why do you need a $3,000+ PC? by Myxorg · · Score: 1

      Have you played Morrowind? I've Got an Athlon 1800 w/ gygabyte 333 board, 512 MB ram, Gforce 4 ti 4600, and my frame rates are barely adequate. I'm talking 20 frames sec in outdoor scenes with lots of detail.

      Game seems to be mostly CPU limited, and I think poor programming decisions are to blame for the bad frame rates. But it is an awsome game, but It would be so much better with like consitant 60 Fps.

    2. Re:Why do you need a $3,000+ PC? by Tikiman · · Score: 1


      Have you played Morrowind? I've Got an Athlon 1800 w/ gygabyte 333 board, 512 MB ram, Gforce 4 ti 4600, and my frame rates are barely adequate. I'm talking 20 frames sec in outdoor scenes with lots of detail.

      I have the same problem with Anarchy Online - but Morrowind is available on the X-Box which is not spectacular hardware. The availability of better equipment should not mean that game programmers can ignore efficiency.

  36. Beware of Tiger Direct by Danta · · Score: 1

    Read what others have to say about their experiences with Tiger Direct before you place any orders: Consumer Affairs

    1. Re:Beware of Tiger Direct by Blahbbs · · Score: 1

      Every company will have some complaints levied against it. Especially one that does a lot of business. Granted I am but one voice, but I've ordered a number of items from TigerDirect over the years and never had any troubles with them. I've never ordered anything as large as a PC from them, however.

    2. Re:Beware of Tiger Direct by Danta · · Score: 1

      You're right. But since they made it to the Rogue's Gallery of consumeraffairs.com, I think that the complaints about them must have trespassed some acceptable limit.

  37. rich yuppies and performance 'enthusiasts' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    kids with money to burn will most likely enjoy buying these because they are 1337. They not only are new, but can theoretically offer superior performance over the other 'chumps.'

    However, I am curious how much of a dent this will make into the crowd that builds their own systems, not just because they enjoy doing so (because they often do) but because it is cheaper and they get the final word on the configurations (meaning a trully customized and optimal system). There are those that would not quit building their own system, because it is in the building not really the end result that they see the pleasure. Howerver, I refer to those that while sharing some of the enjoyment of building the systems themselves, they really want a cheap but kick ass system that has all the components THEY want.

    On the other hand, if this place were to offer their own version of a bare-bones kit (including the water cooled system) then that might make it even more attractive.

    Now me? I am interested in the tweak for less ability that many hobbiest builders (and pros for that matter) employ to bring mid range systems above the stock release of the highest. Some components (like the AMD Duron) while released as low end and thus cheaper are in reality a lightening fast system awaiting a little bit of love. With the proper care, one can make those outperform a chip that (and subsequent chipset and memory) that is often 2-3 times the cost of the tweaker chip and supporting components.

  38. Are l33t gamers deaf? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm perceiving my modest 1GHz Athlon desktop as sounding like a vacuum cleaner. I dare not envision how the monsters in the article would sound. Who would like to shell out $4K for a machine sounding like a jet engine warming up? Do these gamers live far into the woods, where they can crank up their 900 watt speakers in order to hear anything in a game like Thief (where the audio clues is most important)? Or did they accomplish the same thrashing of their eardrums by using head phones on maximum volume? How else can they stand the noise?

    What fun is a "super gaming rig" if you can only stand sitting near it for 15 minutes?

    Personally, I'd rather pay a premium for a quiet machine. I'd pay as much as 50% extra to get a silent desktop. Until some progress is done on the noise arena, I'm sticking to my silent IBM laptops. For me gaming on a PC is dead and will be until the manufacturers start taking this problem seriously.

    --
    In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    1. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The computer featured in the article is water cooled.

    2. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      And that makes them quiet?

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    3. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      Read the article, that is why they have water cooling. The major problem with most of their competition is that you are 100% right. Sure you may have a gazillion frames to make the farm mission in Mafia really smooth but where is that damn 747 taking off? Can't help but feel it spoils that 30's atmosphere.

      As for gaming being dead to you, I am sure the hardware manufacturers give a damn. Gaming is not yet seen as their major customer. Despite the fact that only games require the latest and fastest in hardware.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    4. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

      True, I did not read the article. I've read about 50 of them in the last year and was assuming (wrongly in this case) that this one stated what the other 50 had. My mistake.
      Regarding your observation of the fact that games are driving the industry. I second that, but there is also one other thing. Java development.Not long ago, I had to purchase one of IBM's most powerful laptops available, just to meet the minimum req. of 1 Gig memory and 1 GHz processor for J2EE development. This machine will have a life span of 6 months before it'll be sent for destruction. Running huge frameworks on top of application servers eats memory and CPU like nothing besides games and 3D/ video processing. I'd estimate most consumers of powerful workstations are gamers. In second place Java developers and then far behind 3D and video specialists. These few are the only suckers which HAVE TO upgrade all the time.

      Quite frankly I'm starting to get fed up with the argument "But hardware is cheep".

      --
      In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    5. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that makes them quiet?
      >>>>
      Quieter, yes.

    6. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Personally, I'd rather pay a premium for a quiet machine. I'd pay as much as 50% extra to get a silent desktop. Until some progress is done on the noise arena, I'm sticking to my silent IBM laptops"

      There are some manufacturers who are targeting customers like yourself.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/35/25470.ht ml

    7. Re:Are l33t gamers deaf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use water cooling for my Athlon 2000+. This eliminates the (very noticeable) noise of the CPU fan and extra fans that were needed inside of the case before. The 9db pump is so quiet you literally can't hear that it's even on unless you stick your ear to it or have absolute silence in the room. The problem is that the power supply still needs a fan. The box is now quieter than the former dual P3 550 (with no water cooling), anyway.

  39. raid 0? by tps12 · · Score: 1

    What is the point of raid 0? All it does is square the probability of your new extra-big drive failing.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:raid 0? by guacamole · · Score: 2

      Indeed. If I had two hard drives and a RAID controller, I'd rather mirror them than stripe..

    2. Re:raid 0? by archen · · Score: 1

      My exact sentiments when I started my job at the place I work now. Less then a week since I'd gotten there and one of the computers with critical data (running a striped configuration noless) kicked the bucket. One drive, good, one drive bad. Try sending a raid 0 pair to data recovery sometime. You're lucky if you get them back with a post-it note that says "ha ha, good one!". Considering the distrubing number of IDE hard drives I've seen fall over dead in the last year, I would only do a mirror or raid 5 (which needs at least 3 drives and is more complicated to set up).

    3. Re:raid 0? by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The point is twice the hard drive performance. Of course failure is a concern (doubling the failure rate), but given the high reliability of modern hard drives and the ability to backup actually important data (i.e. not applications) on a CD-R, it seems viable.

    4. Re:raid 0? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
      ehm, how exactly does it make you drive more like to fail?

      Raid 0 is striping. Wich means it spreads the data over the disks. This makes for faster writing and reading. Granted if one of the disks fail then you have lost all the data. Because now two disks contain all of youre data the risk of loosing youre data increases. Not the risk of the drive itself failing.

      So the point is extra speed, handy for games, at a slightly increased risk of losing data, not a big deal for games.

      It is called a trade off. You might not like the trade others do. vi VS emacs wars are pointless.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    5. Re:raid 0? by tps12 · · Score: 1

      Right. The risk of the logical drive failing, or the risk of losing all of your data, is squared. And what kind of game is disk-bound? I understand about trade-offs, but in this case it makes no sense.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    6. Re:raid 0? by ShootThemLater · · Score: 1
      An alternative is a comibation - RAID 0+1, striping and mirroring. You get both speed and redundancy, although you obviously get to use only 50% of your physical storage.

      I tend to recommend this to people with intensive I/O requirements in preference to RAID 5, particularly if there is a lot of writing (due to the interleaved parity information, RAID 5 is less hot at writing operations for large files).

      That's for clients though, who can easily afford the $$$ for proper RAID arrays, unlike me. I'm about to build myself a new home machine and RAID is an option, but I have no idea how good the IDE RAID controllers are (I don't want to try software RAID).

  40. Not what you'd get at systemax... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Battlefield and UT2k3 don't even come close, either... A $600 comp will easily run those at 90fps+

    Doom3 will not run like that on anything today, btw.

    And as it's been said before, the whole system could be built for about under $1400 at newegg, and if you went down to your local PC shop for someone to put it together, it would probably cost $100 at the most.

    If you spent $3000 on a PC, just max it out with top-of-the-line products, then buy an entire TERABYTE, or more, of hd space. Believe me, it can be used easily with broadband if you're a power downloader/ripper.

    Besides, overclocking sucks -- it's like driving 80MPH in a 75MPH zone speed-wise, except it gets you in a lot of more trouble. Unless you have one of those 300A/1.5As that magically double themselves, of course...

  41. Potential Market by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

    Ok, we've all establised these systems are overpriced for what they offer. And that the only people who would be interested, are people who want watercooling, and a clear side.

    Does anyone see the problem here?

    The case is designed for LAN parties, etc, as is the spec.

    But anyone who goes to LAN parties, or anything like them, generally knows a bit about computers, enough to avoid this computer.

    so why would anyone buy one, unless they had enough money (so we can rule out a lot of people) who thought they were keen enough to validate this spend, but don't know what they are buying?

    1. Re:Potential Market by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Every hobbyist industry has the silver spooners that want to be a part of the group, but doesn't want to "waste" the time or effort. I suspect that the people who would buy a "riced out" computer of that sort is largely of that type.

  42. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Noehre · · Score: 1

    Funny, I just overclocked a 1.6ghz P4 to 2.13ghz with the retail heatsink and fan.

    It hasn't been rebooted in nearly 2 months.

    Now compare the price/performance difference between a 1.6ghz/400FSB P4 and a 2.13ghz/533FSB P4.

    Looks like a bargain to me.

  43. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by danimrich · · Score: 0

    The irony is, that people who'd spend 3000-4000$ on such a system could very well afford new processors whenever they think it's necessary.
    I think this system is most suitable for boasting.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  44. 3-4 thousand dollars? by vidnet · · Score: 1
    In a year, it'll be a thousand.

    In two years, it'll be two hundred.

    In three years, you can trade it for a chokolate bar if you want to drag the thing home.



    It's the curse of Moore (or blessing, if you didn't buy it right away).
    .

  45. Re:Sex in a wheelchair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you just take her to bed?

  46. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by sailor420 · · Score: 1

    I would. A $145 1.8a overclocked to 2.6-2.7 on stock voltage (or very close to it) with the retail heatsink/fan? Thats a damn good deal-about $300 savings at the least.

  47. This reeks of dumbass... by sailor420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I see this as fundamentally flawed.

    Most of the same enthusiasts that this is aimed towards, especially those needing/desiring watercooling, are going to do it themselves. They could build this system for $1500.

    Not to mention the fact that they would do it anyways just out of the sheer enjoyment of tinkering with their machines.

    Plus, they get to pick exactly what parts they want, not whatever the company decides to put in there.

    There is the issue of a warantee, being able to send it back if it blows up... But is this worth the extra $1500-$2000? Absolutely not. You could build an entirely new system for that price.

    1. Re:This reeks of dumbass... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Just rooted thru the Sept. ComputerUser ads (mostly from local clone shops) -- comparable systems are advertised therein starting at about $1100. For $2200 in clone dollars, you can get a dual-processor honkin' server-class machine with every bell and whistle.

      And it's nowhere near as likely to be DOA as anything from TigerDirect.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:This reeks of dumbass... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Not to mention the fact that they would do it anyways just out of the sheer enjoyment of tinkering with their machines."

      I know quite a few gamers that like high performance machines, but never want to open a box. I know, I'm the sucker that has to build them.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  48. YES, true, so why would they bother ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Competition is so hard, and it goes against the tradition.
    After all, look how bad it turned out for AMD, nVidia, Via, Sony, even Microsoft (and Linux) to try to compete when there was already a dominant marketshare "owned" by someone else.

  49. Re:Sex in a wheelchair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm sure she would appreciate having a good lay, but are you determined to pursue the relationship any further?

    Handicapped people are afraid of being rejected and often carry the burden of an entire history of rejections. Please don't add to that burden.

  50. LAN Parties by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1

    If someone brought that thing to a LAN party, trying to show it off, and said they spent $4000 on it, they would be LAUGHED OUT of the LAN party!

  51. ahh again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yet again we have another story posted at least 2 days ago on news.com.com and them nicely mirrored here at crashdot.

  52. Re:Sad day ... Stephen Khuber dead at 55 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer khuber was found dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

  53. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

    ... and then we overclock the video card!

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

  54. YES! This is the speed I need. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1

    And with my current affliction with strategy games, that should make my copy of Moonbase Commander, Brood War, and Zeus run at a blistering 7 hojillion FPS.

    Honestly people, we need to tell these people to patch the retail release IN THE BOX BEFORE I GET IT, and not worry so much about setting three programmers to really solve the "problem" with that pesky realistic-looking-liquified-guts-sliding-down-the- walls effect that is so damnably elusive.

    Well, I for one want gameplay. Most people do. That is why right now my wife is having an affair and is about to leave me for an Italian plumber from the mushroom kingdom. You should hear the answering machine messages. Half of my caller ID logs come from the Koopa kingdom.

    Really people. Get a grip. Its almost as though game companies hire a bunch of obsessed nerds and then forget their target market, purpose of the game, most people's systems requirements, and their budget releasing some crap into the world that... oh.

    Nevermind.

  55. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1
    Why would anyone bother overclocking with today's processors? The clock increase gained by it will be surpassed in a few weeks by a new processor release anyway, which is a testament to how ineffective it is these days.


    You're ignoring the money factor. It's not a matter of "let's push a brand new bleeding edge chip to a speed they won't match for 'a few weeks'", it's a matter of "let's buy a slightly older chip which can be clocked up to better performance and save some money which can then go to a better video card/faster hard drive etc."

    My main question about this article is how they plan to warranty a system that they encourage overclocking on...
    --
    if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  56. Couldn't have stated it better mystelf. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Well put man.

  57. Price for state-of-the-art by Traa · · Score: 2

    I am one of those gamers that spends about that amount of money on the latest hardware. Yes, 3-4 thousand dollars to build a computer for gaming. I do that about twice a year. It's a hobby, both the gaming and the box-building. I do have other hobbies (and work) so at some point I might be tempted to 'upgrade' the easy way and just shell out the $$ instead of building it myself. Most of the 'work' in building these machines by far is the research. Having a company claim to have done the research to build a gaming system sounds like an interesting attempt at the least.

    I can asure you that $3000 is easily spend on:
    - Intel 2.8GHz at roughly $550
    - Latest graphics card, currently the ATI 9700 family for about $400
    - NEC 21" monitor for $800 (I actually bought a Sony 24" for $2000...Not a good buy)
    - 2*512 DDR PC-2700 from Crucial for $360
    - Adaptec ATA RAID for $390
    - 2*100Gb IBM HD for $240
    - Motherboard, sound, mouse, other perifirals $500

    we are at $3240 without any games to play

    yeah, these choices are not the cheapest solutions. You can save about 50% of the price giving in only about 10% performance. I'm just telling you there is a (small) market for these systems.

    Anyway, back to CounterStrike at 1 BILLION frames per second ;-)

    1. Re:Price for state-of-the-art by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you buy a new monitor twice a year?
      looking back on you post, I think you might be kidding.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Price for state-of-the-art by Traa · · Score: 2

      your right, I don't buy a new monitor twice a year. Maybee one every 18 months.

      I did however buy a Sony 24" for $2000 replacing my old Cornerstone 21" ($2500). Just didn't want to brag beyond belief in my original story.

  58. Talk about unfounded assumptions by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Let me tell you something, my friend. I'm a college student at Roger Williams University, living in the Cedar freshman hall. The room across the hall from me, and the one next door, are both quads occupied by extremely attractive, cool women who are - ahem - not neccessarily conservative socially. But instead of talking with any of the many attractive women on my floor,
    I'm posting to slashdot. What does this tell you?

    That said, if I want a top-notch prebuilt gaming system, I'll save a grand or two and buy alienware.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:Talk about unfounded assumptions by seann · · Score: 1

      That you have a girlfriend who doesn't like you commuting with ladys?
      You poor dude.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Talk about unfounded assumptions by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      You! Drop and do twenty pushups NOW! Next get in the shower and wash your hair. Next go OUTSIDE and walk somewhere. (Not to a computer store)

      When you get back, say hi to the nice co-eds and look them in the eye when you do so.

      Repeat as necessary until you get a date.

    3. Re:Talk about unfounded assumptions by strictnein · · Score: 2

      That said, if I want a top-notch prebuilt gaming system, I'll save a grand or two and buy alienware

      Or build it yourself and save even more =)

  59. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by nomadic · · Score: 2

    The problem with overclocking are the overclockers themselves. "Yeah, I'm really sticking it to the man!" "They're trying to defraud us on these chips!" "That's how they get you, dude, they underrepresent the chips true speed so they can rip you off" Gah, it's just so pathetic.

  60. Re:Yeah, right - I second that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They, TigerDirect, are not on the up-and-up. We had a deal with them to sell our product based on information presented by a TigerDirect sales manager and most of what he said was not true. And now we are not getting paid as per our agreement.

    I wouldn't purchase from them OR SELL THROUGH THEM unless your money came for free.

  61. $3000 PC vs $200 Console by rlp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why would anyone pay three thousand dollars for a PC to play games?? Earlier this week - Slashdot ran a thread about PCs Losing Out as a Gaming Platform?. Game companies are developing for consoles first. PC games typically involve an hour or more (if you're lucky) of patch / configuration hell vs. load and go with console games. Soon most consoles will support broadband and multiplayer games. They might be able to sell a $3000 box to a business for CAD applications, but as a gaming box; high end PC's are dead.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by Jimmy_B · · Score: 2
      Why would anyone pay three thousand dollars for a PC to play games?? Earlier this week - Slashdot ran a thread about PCs Losing Out as a Gaming Platform?. Game companies are developing for consoles first. PC games typically involve an hour or more (if you're lucky) of patch / configuration hell vs. load and go with console games. Soon most consoles will support broadband and multiplayer games. They might be able to sell a $3000 box to a business for CAD applications, but as a gaming box; high end PC's are dead.
      I don't have moderator points today; if I did, I would mark this a troll. You can't compare a $3000 PC to a $200 console on price because they're entirely different things; the hardware in a console is several generations behind the hardware in the PC, and PCs do many (non-game) things that consoles don't. As for your claim that PC gaming is losing out to console gaming, well, people have been saying that for at least five years and it's never been true. And any game that involves "an hour or more (if you're lucky) of patch / configuration hell" is defective. Spend ten minutes while the auto-updater runs, set up your controls (or just use the defaults), and go.

      That consoles will "soon" support broadband and multiplayer is irrelevant, firstly because it has been "soon" for some time now and has never really materialized, and second because consoles lack keyboards, and therefore automatically lose the very important social aspect of online gaming.

      The only justification I can see for a serious gamer NOT having a high-end PC is that middle-end PCs run current games well enough. Howver, this will cease to be the case when ID releases the next Doom, and serious gamers use up the performance cranking detail settings anyways.

      IHBT. IHL. HAND.
    2. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by rlp · · Score: 2

      OK Jimmy B - let me address the points you made:

      1) Can't compare consoles vs. $3000 PC's because PC hardware is more advanced and PC's are multi-purpose. Well, of course you're right on both counts. However, I'm comparing a console with a $3000 PC being marketed as a high-end game machine. Sure, it might be great as a Web server, super as a file-server, build engine, etc. but the company building it is targeting it specifically for gamers. So, sure it can be used for other things, but that's not the way the manufacturer is positioning the product.

      2) Any game that involves an hour or more of patching / configuration is defective. Again, I agree with you. However, it's been my experience that in the rush to get products to market, game companies frequently ship defective products. When testing PC games, game companies have to deal with a combinatoric explosion of different hardware and software configurations, with consoles - few (frequently one). Furthermore, with PC games, companies can get sloppy - knowing that gamers can always be expected to download the patch(es). With console games - they need to get it right the first time.

      3) Broadband for games has been coming "real-soon-now" for a long time. Without keyboards, players miss the social aspects of the games. Console makers have announced broadband and multi-player services which are coming "real-soon-now". I believe them - from the perspective of a console maker, they promise increased demand for their consoles and games, but most importantly, promise an on-going stream of revenue (subscriptions) for the company. Consoles are sold at a loss, games make money but are a one-shot deal. Subscription fees for multi-player gaming are virtually pure profit once the servers are in place. I trust that Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo will follow through on broadband - as it's in their own self-interest. As for a keyboard, there's no reason that the console makers could not add a keyboard or even a microphone (VoIP) to existing consoles.

      Please don't get me wrong - I'd love to own a high end PC with lots of processing power, memory, and RAID disks. It would be a great development box. Just a little hard to justify as a game mahine.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    3. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by amokk · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this is outright wrong.
      We aren't talking about Linux PC gaming where you have to almost have different kernel configurations for every single game that exists... Rather, we are talking about Windows PC gaming where you put the CD into your drive, click "Install" when it autoruns, wait 5 minutes, and play the game.

      Also, high-end PCs aren't even close to dead. Notice all those games coming out recently that require top-notch hardware? Well, guess what? Those wouldn't be selling if people didn't have the hardware to run them on...

      Also, with many of the high-end PCs, it's not possible to build them yourself for 1/2 the price. It just isn't. Price out a PC with all the current high-end gaming-oriented software and then compare it to an offering by Alienware (or any similar company). The price differece isn't that much.

      Sure, you could build that "gaming PC" for $1000 but it's going to suck in comparison to those speficially designed by someone that actually knows what he's doing (whether this be an indivdual gamer or any number of different companies).

      My PC's current "worth" is about $4500 (CDN) ("worth" meaning the retail cost of the parts. Yes, I'm aware that I could not possibly hope to sell this to anybody for the same amount) and I challenge any cheapass sub $2000 "gaming pc" to even try to outperform it. It won't.

      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
    4. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a $500 pc puts a console to shame.

      consoles suck.

    5. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.)Arguing the existance of a market for expensive "gamer" PCs vs consoles, is not the same as arguing PC vs consoles.

      a.)Obviously there is a market for expensive PCs, else people wouldn't be buying them.

      b.)PCs have historically always had new technologies before consoles, which makes them an interesting platform. I'm currently playing using a 3 year old PC it is _still_ capable of higher resolutions that the consoles on the market today (including Xboxs HDTV modes). But I digress.

      c. Most people will already be buying a computer for various purposes, the difference between buying a computer and a console, or buying a better spec'ed computer is as large a difference.

      2. Again several points:

      a. The majority of patches for PC games are for correcting multiplayer bugs and/or security problems. Something that has yet to be handled on a wide scale on consoles.

      b. Consoles are moving towards having local storage (eg Xbox), I'd expect future games to start having patches.

      c. The flip side is of course, that on the PC you end up with a playable game. On the console the bugs don't get fixed, even if there are less of them. (Having played quite a few PS2 games, bugs can be just as annoying as on the PC).

      3. And yet no manufacturer has done it, despite promises. Sega is the closest yet. I think you are missing the flip side to the subscription problem. Why should console players pay subscription fees for games when PC owners don't? Wasn't cost a reason for them to buy the console in the first place? Besides who wants to pay for broadband without the benefit of the extra abilities of a PC and then we end up right back at 1.c.

      How many people buy a (2nd)PC _just_ for gaming.

    6. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by Jimmy_B · · Score: 2
      I'm comparing a console with a $3000 PC being marketed as a high-end game machine.
      That doesn't mean that people buying it will use it exclusively to play games. You're counting the full $3000 price, when you should be counting the difference between that price and a mid-range computer.
      Again, I agree with you. However, it's been my experience that in the rush to get products to market, game companies frequently ship defective products.
      As a frequent dabbler in beta, demo, freeware and otherwise expected-to-be-bad software, I have to say that my experience is quite to the contrary. Back in the dark DOS when games had to interface directly with the hardware this was certainly true, but today they only deal with abstraction layers. It is true that companies can be somewhat sloppy because of patches, but (a) this is going to happen with any multiplayer console games, for the same reason, and (b) this allows for faster releases and thus a time advantage in games over consoles.
      Subscription fees for multi-player gaming are virtually pure profit once the servers are in place.
      As opposed to multiplayer PC games, which are (with the exception of MMORPGS) never subscription. This eats up more of the price difference you were arguing in point (1). As for the keyboard, there certainly is a reason why console makers won't add one: they don't want to turn their consoles into general-purpose PCs, and most people don't have furniture setups suitable for keyboards around their consoles.
    7. Re:$3000 PC vs $200 Console by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      My PC's current "worth" is about $4500 (CDN) ("worth" meaning the retail cost of the parts. Yes, I'm aware that I could not possibly hope to sell this to anybody for the same amount) and I challenge any cheapass sub $2000 "gaming pc" to even try to outperform it. It won't.

      And if that's what makes you happy -- that's great.

      Meanwhile, I'll happily be playing $2500 worth of games that I can afford because I didn't waste it on hardware that I didn't need to play them.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
  62. Wait, wasn't that.. by randomErr · · Score: 2

    Wait, wasn't that the HOT Rod and Hot Wheels PC offered with the Barbie PC?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  63. my fault by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Okay, my bad. Shoulda pointed out the lack of a gf.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  64. some of this, already done by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    The hair was shaved off for convenience, and I bike/walk everywhere I go. It's the "Say hi/look them in the eye" part that's hard. :-)

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:some of this, already done by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      Just look at the bridge of their nose. They can't tell you aren't looking them in the eye, and it saves you the difficulty of actually meeting someone else's eyes. Easy...;-)

    2. Re:some of this, already done by ColGraff · · Score: 2

      That is a really good idea. Thank you very much. You know, that's also a cool idea for public speaking - do you do that for a living/hobby?

      --
      I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  65. First put in an Athlon, by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 1

    That will take care of the HOT part of the Hotrod pc. As for the ROD part, just install anything from Micro$oft, you'll be sure to get the rod from them!

    --
    | - | - |
  66. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by realmolo · · Score: 1

    The "overclocking saves money" thing is false.

    What does it take to successfully overclock? Good fans. More of them. Heatsinks. Et cetera.

    You end up spending more on cooling devices, negating any savings.

    Besides, overclocking fucks things up. And it's for hopeless dorks.

  67. AlienWare by CBNobi · · Score: 2

    I cringed when I saw the name TigerDirect. They're the ones who make crappy advertisements on PCWorld magazine.

    AlienWare does a similar thing, but I've heard much better things about them than this Systemax company - they've been tagged the Cadillac of computers.

    Not to mention, a high-end machine costs, at most, around/less than $3000.

  68. Barbie PC...get 'em while they're lukewarm... by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Heh, want a Barbie computer? They've got 'em at PC Liquidator. Warning: this is basically an i810 with no way of upgrading the video. Which means good luck trying to play games on this puppy.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Barbie PC...get 'em while they're lukewarm... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      wow, thanks.
      I was just thinking about getting something that can run my kids software, (2,4).

      it seem to me this will play game geared towards the under 8 crowd just fine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  69. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 4, Informative
    I have to agree with you here. My old BX-6R2 based box finally bit the big one at a LAN party. It started life as a Celeron 300A overclocked to 450.

    With a 50% increase in clock speed, overclocking was well worth it. Even when I spent almost as much on my cooling solution as I did on the processor ($55 for former, $65 for latter). It let me build a system I was happy with for 2+ years at an unbeatable price.

    Later, I went to a 800MHz Celeron. Just as I was considering pushing it to a 1.8GHz Celeron through an upgradeware upgrade, a fellow LANner managed to snap two capacitors off my motherboard and fry the whole box. (Don't ask how - and no, he's not going to pony up).

    I just didn't see the point in upgrading my box except with processor b/c I was maxed with 1GB of RAM and the box performed (almost) flawlessly. Need ATA-133, pop in a card. Yeah, I only had AGP 2x, but I held my own fraggin' with a low-end GeForce2. If it hadn't been for the accident, I wouldn't have upgraded.

    Now I'm the proud owner of a Shuttle SS51G-based system. With a DVD-burner, a smokin' WD 120GB drive, and a GeForce4 Ti 4600 w/VIVO. I wanted to wait for the Athlon/nForce2 based systems to come out in October, but I had a dead box and couldn't really wait. Being an old-school overclocker, I decided to see how far the CPU would go:

    I started with a stock 2.4GHz rev B Pentium 4 and cranked it up to 2.52GHz. Went a tad higher, but had to clear CMOS and start over. When I benchmarked the system at different speeds, there was negligible difference. Why make the extra heat? Bah.

    My system absolutely smokes. I'm extremely happy and if current trends continue, I won't feel the need to replace this box for another 3-4 years. And the size is perfect for toting to LAN parties. Now I just need a sweet LCD monitor without tracies....

  70. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are a fuckin idiot who doesn't even know how to unlock an athlon. so please don't let your finger write checks that your body can't cash. go check out something like www.hardocp.com thats Hard Over Clockers Paradise. read a few pages there before thinking you have any fuckin idea about overclocking.

  71. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Greyjack · · Score: 1

    My NEC 1550M that I have hooked up to my SS51G (w/Geforce4 4400, same WD 120GB HD, etc) works pretty slick. Response time is *very* good; close enough to a regular monitor that I really don't notice at all, at least not in the UT2003 demo or BattleField 1942.

    That said, when I'm at home, the 15" LCD is only my auxiliary display--still using my 19" trinitron as my main one. Want an 18" LCD though :)

  72. Neon lights and... by freeBill · · Score: 2

    ...a window in the case.

    I have a feeling this is not aimed at the /. crowd. How many geeks would put a neon light inside a overclocking box so hot it needs water cooling?

    To paraphrase Robin Williams: "Double XX boxen are God's way of telling you you have too much money." The target market is the same as the average Wall Street cocaine dealer: Guys who want to impress their friends with their electronics purchases (but limited to those with gullible friends).

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
  73. Doing a little analysis... by geekindustries · · Score: 1

    Say they project selling 100 of these a month for $3000 with a $1000 cost to them. To put it formally w/ business jargon:

    Fixed Costs
    $100,000 / Month (i know...this is very rough!)

    Average Sales Revenue
    $300,000 / Month

    Average Gross Profit Per Sale
    $2,000

    Average Gross Profit Percentage
    67%

    Break Even Point
    $447,761

    Which means, to break even (using current costs) they must sell $447,761. Seems like a losing venture to me.

    --
    Hard work usually pays off over time, but procrastination pays off now.
  74. Re:Erm, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Which tests? I was under the impression that water cooling a peltier was far superior than blowing hot air over it, and yes I've been reading the [H]ardforums for a few years, too.

    2. don't undervalue the noise-reduction. Ever heard a 7000 RPM fan on a copper CPU heatsink? Personally, I cannot stand it for a minute.

    3. These are not built for you; they are built for the people who buy little badges that say "R" to replace the "H" on the back of their little car and large-bore aluminum kazoos to undo the work of their muffler. OK, maybe those people would prefer their fans to be heard over all the other PCs at the lan party...

  75. Re:Overclocking? Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On which planet are they like this? Go get beamed up or something. Anyway, all that empty talk is surely better than the environmentalist anti-capitalism protestors who actually burn tires.

  76. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Each of these cults correspond to one of the two antagonists in the age of
    Reformation. In the realm of the Apple Macintosh, as in Catholic Europe,
    worshipers peer devoutly into screens filled with "icons." All is sound and
    imagery and Appledom. Even words look like decorative filigrees in exotic
    typefaces. The greatest icon of all, the inviolable Apple itself, stands in
    the dominate position at the upper-left corner of the screen. A central
    corporate headquarters decrees the form of all rites and practices.
    Infalliable doctrine issues from one executive officer whose selection occurs
    in a sealed boardroom. Should anyone in his curia question his powers, the
    offender is excommunicated into outer darkness. The expelled heretic founds
    a new company, mutters obscurely of the coming age and the next computer,
    then disappears into silence, taking his stockholders with him. The mother
    company forbids financial competition as sternly as it stifles ideological
    competition; if you want to use computer programs that conform to Apple's
    orthodoxy, you must buy a computer made and sold by Apple itself.
    -- Edward Mendelson, "The New Republic", February 22, 1988

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...