Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Dilemma, Privacy, Chess

Slashback tonight with updates on Deep Fritz, the interaction of Microsoft service packs and privacy laws, and the view from the shuttle tank-cam, and a depressing update on the Nissan squatting case. Read on for the details.

Front-row seats. zer0vector writes "The previously mentioned camera that was attached to the external fuel tank on Atlantis gave some great shots of launch this afternoon on NASA TV. During the feed, it looked like the ejection of the solid rocket boosters damaged or obscured the camera, leading to a fuzzy image during the fuel tank separation stage."

SkyNet has not yet achieved consciousness. DrEnter writes "According to this Yahoo article, Vladimir Kramnik has defeated 'Deep Fritz' (apparently the world's most powerful chess computer) to take the lead, 2.5-0.5 (the first game was a draw). You can find out more details at the contest site."

Damned if you do, but also if you don't. cybaea writes "A recent article in InfoWorld argues that the latest Windows 2000 and Windows XP Service Packs may be illegal for health care providers under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. To make matters worse, not installing the Service Packs may also be illegal. Damned if you do, damned if you don't ..."

Dad, please switch to a real operating system. It's still spreading. deego writes " An e-mail-borne computer virus that lets crackers control infected Windoze machines remotely continues to spread and constitutes the most severe attack this year. The worm, known as W32.Bugbear, or I-Worm.Tanatos, infects computers that use Microsoft's Windows operating systems. It was first spotted a week ago and has spread to dozens of countries. Article here."

Please sit down first. calib0r writes "CNN.com is running an article on the most recent events dealing with the nissan.com lawsuit. Salon.com ran an article about this a few months ago. More information can also be found here."

35 of 340 comments (clear)

  1. Big surprise about Hipaa by Brento · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just about EVERYTHING is illegal under HIPAA. I've never seen such ridiculously stringent specs. If you want a good laugh, check out www.hipaacomply.com and read through the technology FAQ's. Even faxing is restricted.

    --
    What's your damage, Heather?
  2. I have a dilemma by Burritos · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do I get privacy while playing chess on the internet while making sure I don't get the bugbear virus?

    1. Re:I have a dilemma by TotallyUseless · · Score: 4, Funny

      use a camera attached to the shuttle to look down and make sure no one is peeping in the windows of your house!

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
  3. What a deal... by LaDanserie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kramnik gets $1,000,000 if he wins, $800,000 if he draws, and $600,000 if he loses. I knew I wasn't spending all that time on Yahoo! Chess for nothing...

    1. Re:What a deal... by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      The people behind Deep Fritz are paying him to go down in the 4th.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:What a deal... by targo · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is actually $1m-$700k-$500k.
      But the interesting fact is that for Fritz these numbers are $500k-$300k-$0(zero).
      I guess that even though computers are getting close to humans when playing chess, humans are still way better negotiators ;)

    3. Re:What a deal... by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is that a lot? Tyson got $17 million for losing.

  4. Chess by MutantEnemy · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's laughable to say that Deep Fritz is the strongest computer programme - Deep Blue (that defeated Kasparov) evaluated 200 million positions per second compared to Deep Fritz's 3-4 million. Deep Blue was running on an IBM-made supercomputer. Fritz isn't.

    --
    Grr! Arg!
    1. Re:Chess by cbv · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yea, that's why Fritz won the Computer Chess World Championship in 1995 against Deep Blue. SCNR.

    2. Re:Chess by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First off, I believe Deep Fritz has beaten Deep Blue head to head.

      Second, the program and the computer it runs on are two different things even if they are closely tied together. In fact, I'm kinda surprised Deep Fritz doesn't run on a more powerful computer. I would imagine that if it scaled well to 8 processors they would at least be able to scale to 16 or 32.

    3. Re:Chess by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's laughable to say that Deep Fritz is the strongest computer programme - Deep Blue (that defeated Kasparov) evaluated 200 million positions per second compared to Deep Fritz's 3-4 million. Deep Blue was running on an IBM-made supercomputer. Fritz isn't.

      Deep Blue has been broken up and sold off in bits. It was not so much a computer as a temporary assembly of parts. So Deep Fritz would be the strongest living chess computer. After all we don't expect Kasparov to beat dead grandmasters.

      I think that it is time to introduce weight categories like they have in boxing. So neither competitor would be allowed to weigh more than 1000 pounds. Otherwise the game is a bit like watching an industrial robot beat the crap out of Mike Tyson, OK so it might be fun to watch but it is not real sport.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    4. Re:Chess by Jouster · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Deep Blue (that defeated Kasparov) evaluated 200 million positions per second compared to Deep Fritz's 3-4 million.
      Let's run with your comparison of computing power based solely on number of evaluated positions per move.

      If evaluating a chess position takes 150 units of processor time, and eliminating a position from consideration takes 1 unit of processor time, we shouldn't prune the decision tree at all! Never mind that as we get a little above a dozen moves into the future, we are considering (and tracking in some sort of memory) more moves than there are molecules in the universe. Posh! All that matters is the number of moves evaluated.

      Also:
      1. Kramnik defeated Kasparov.
      2. A supercomputer from ten years ago is compressed into a $2,000 box under my desk as I type this.

      Jouster
    5. Re:Chess by MutantEnemy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm, and why would the person who's about to play Deep Fritz want to claim that Deep Fritz is really strong? :)

      --
      Grr! Arg!
    6. Re:Chess by damiam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So? Kramnik can only evaluate three moves per second, and he's kicking Fritz's ass. Moves per second has very little to do with how good a player is.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  5. Great... english is the only language in the world by pVoid · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the Nissan case:

    But Uzi Nissan, whose family name is also the name of a month in Hebrew and Arabic[...]

    "We've always seen this case as protecting the Nissan brand and not about money," he said. "What we are saying is the word Nissan by itself is our registered trademark and we're the only ones with the right to use the name Nissan by itself."

  6. Re:Great... english is the only language in the wo by beebware · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It gets better - Nissan Motor has registered the domain name nissancomputer.com which they'll "give" to Nissan Computers if Nissan Motor get given the nissan.com domain name. Now, if they've brought nissancomputer.com with the express purpose of squatting on it for exchange of monies, services or goods (for example, a domain name) - surley that's a blatant case of cybersquatting by Nissan Motor?

  7. Nissan vs. Nissan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Nissan Motors wanted to have an exclusive name, they should have made one up.

    They took an existing word (in 2 languages, nonetheless) which also happens to be a surname. Now, they can't expect exclusive rights over that name.

    1. Re:Nissan vs. Nissan by sulli · · Score: 5, Informative
      In Japanese, it means "Made in Japan." Other Japanese companies (e.g. Nissan Stainless) also use the name.

      Now it's not the same word as that used on other products to mean "Made in Japan" (that word is kokusan, "made in our nation") but it is definitely somewhat generic.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  8. A couple corrections to the article... by Jouster · · Score: 5, Informative
    Just a few quick things to throw in:
    1. Bugbear actually uses one of forty different subject lines. It also sometimes throws in some random data, just for fun.
    2. Bugbear is a descendant of Badtrans, a nasty but not particularly widespread virus from earlier this year. The keystroke logger seems to have been borrowed bit-for-bit (at least in the copy I isolated and analysed).
    Jouster
  9. Bugbear by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no way to save users from themselves. If a sizable part of the population need to use computers, there will always be a significant number of those who do stupid things from them. These problems will continue no matter how secure Windows becomes. These problems will occur on any software platform that is simple enough for the general population to use.

    Actually, with a certain class of user, Windows' automatic updates make Windows more secure than Linux. Amoung windows users, that class is rather large. We may see less of the Code Red Viruses, but the Shoot Yourself in the Foot Viruses will continue.

    Linux does have one advantage though. It is intensely hard to install programs for Linux. It is so complicated that it is very hard to automate. And as long as users have to install viruses by hand, and download the correct libraries to get them to run, you can be sure that Linux users won't have to worry much about a Linux virus spreading like wildfire across the net.

  10. Nissan.... by BrodieBruce · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Prior to my hearing about this case, if you had asked me

    Can I register a domain name SomeCompany.com and then do the following:

    • Talk about how much I dislike the company
    • Feature ad banners for sites related to that company
    • Talk trash about the management of the company
    • Post numerous comments on the low quality of the company's products (thereby "diluting their image")

    My response would have been, "damn right, freedom of speech..."

    But now, I'm just confused.

    What did he do that violated any laws?

    He's paid $2.2 million in legal fees. It's not like he had a choice about showing up in court to defend himself.

    Now Nissan motors can take his domain name after all the legal bills? And if not, he'll be ordered to give them financial reparations for "diluting their brand name?"

    1. Re:Nissan.... by chriso11 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe the U.S. Constitution should be changed to something like:
      "We, the Corporations of the United States (and other countries), in order to have a more perfect customer base, establish commerce, insure domestic profits, provide for our CEOs, promote the use of tax shelters, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

      --
      No, I don't trust in god. He'll have to pay up front, like everybody else.
  11. camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does it annoy anyone else that NASA spent $750,000 on the technical equivalent an X-10 webcam?

    And it failed! I mean, what the hell?

    Private space enterprises deserve to eat NASA's breakfast, dinner AND lunch once they get started.

  12. Re:Bugbear by Psx29 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The problem that bugbear exploits was patched back in march. Only retards are susceptible

    That is a ridiculous statement! If you read through all the things listed maybe you would realise some people _can't_ install microsoft's patches because of there EULA requirements.

  13. The most worrying thing... by SmileyBen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the scariest part has to be that they let a Windows operating system anywhere near brain surgery....

    1. Re:The most worrying thing... by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would you prefer Linux? Immensely stable but they keep having to re-administer the anasthesia because you keep waking up while your neurosurgeon reads the FAQ?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  14. SRB Debris by kzinti · · Score: 5, Interesting

    During the feed, it looked like the ejection of the solid rocket boosters damaged or obscured the camera...

    That can be a problem for the crew too, or used to be. Each SRB has rocket motors that separate it from the external tank at around two minutes MET. Debris from these motors can get on the forward orbiter windows. Not too many years ago the shuttle flight software was changed - a "window washer" mod - to fire the FU RCS jets for a few seconds at SRB seperation to keep the windscreen clear of debris.

    Just thought you'd be interested to know...

    --JIm

  15. HIPAA vs. MS by Kefaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believe Clark has the right idea
    "...the health care industry needs to go to Microsoft with a joint NDA (nondisclosure agreement) and indemnification agreement, requiring Microsoft to hold their HIPAA-compliant customers harmless should patient information be leaked via this mechanism."

    Not a prayer that MS would agree, but it will be interesting when they get pulled into court the first time a provider claims it was the update and MS forced them to allow it.

    The regulatory oversight may do more to open MS software than the DOJ. Logic, reason, and innovation are not the watch words of these organizations. Regulations were passed, comply or be destroyed.

    It is hard for me to decide who I want to win. MS or the regulators...

  16. licensing agreements by Parsec · · Score: 5, Interesting

    We've been told at my University that we (as system administrators) can go ahead and click the "I accept" on any Microsoft service pack or hotfix, our licensing agreement with M$ overrides anything they put in a EULA.

    Microsoft could actually wind up violating their own agreement if they take action not specified in the big license.

  17. Re:Deep Fritz by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That said, even while as a programmer I'm somewhat rooting for Deep Fritz, as a fellow man I can't help but be in awe of the fact that Kramnik is able to think better than a machine that "thinks" millions of times faster than him.

    Why? I can, for instance, look at a picture of my wife and identify her as my wife in a fraction of a second. The best image-recognition software in the world can't reliably do even that simple task.

    I'm not the least bit surprised to see a human beating a computer in a complex activity like chess, and that's with lots of handicaps in Fritz' favor (it doesn't have to analyze an image of the board in order to determine where the pieces are, for instance). The amazing part is not the human beating the computer, but the computer beating the human (which won't happen in this case, but it's getting close).

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  18. Re:Give me a break... by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, he might actually have a spine (or independant wealth), and wanted the domain more than the money.

    This strikes me as no different than the McDonalds (the junk-food chain) vs McDonalds (the family owned restaurant that predates the fast food chain) a while back. The bigger business considers itself more important, and has the money to throw at lawyers to make that delusion a reality.

    If *you* had a family domain, and some company offered you what you consider a pittance for it, how would you feel? Would you consider yourself an informed "hardball" player? Would you "cackle with glee" at your great luck in having a valuable name?

    It really disgusts me that companies consider themselves more important than individuals. It disgusts me even more that the legal system mostly agrees with them. Neither of those comes *close*, however, to the disgust I feel about actual individual *humans* who agree that companies have more rights than everyone else, and actually criticize other humans for standing up for what few rights we have left.

  19. Deep Fritz vs Deep Blue by Optical+Voodoo+Man · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I read this article over at USNews.com about Deep Fritz. It said that Deep Fritz did beat the same Deep Blue that beat Kasparov, but a stripped down, castrated version of it. The article claimed:

    Press releases touting this week's match boast that Fritz has beaten both Kasparov and Deep Blue. The win over Kasparov came, however, in a super fast kind of chess, where computers have a decided edge. And Fritz didn't really beat Deep Blue-it beat an early version of its software running on slower hardware.

    Do I think that there is an added value to better algorithms and pruning methods over pure computational firepower? Sure, but you need to keep in mind that now that Deep Blue has been disassembled, there is no way to get an honest, head to head comparison.

    As if it matters, I still get my but kicked by good old GNU Chess.

  20. Re:Great... english is the only language in the wo by Cato+the+Elder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since neither Hebrew nor Arabic is written with Latin characters, I find the "it's the name of a month" argument rather weak. Furthermore, the owner of www.nissan.com is incorporated in the United States, where "Nissan" cannot be considered a common word

    As far as the "waiting until 1999" argument goes, it sounds like Nissan is claiming he didn't infringe until 1999 when he started linking to car sites, meaning he was generating revenue based on visitors who were looking for www.nissanmotors.com.
    I think this argument holds water.

    However, the remedy the company is asking for is way out of proportion. Nissan Motors should be granted an injunction against www.nissan.com being used to adverstise cars.

  21. Entire Shuttle video here by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Quicktime from space.com (6.7 MB)

    Just the tank camera, no cutaways, all the way from launch to SRB seperation.

    Play it fast (hold the frame advance button down) for another cool view of the whole launch in about 15 seconds.

  22. Re:Great... english is the only language in the wo by sasami · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since neither Hebrew nor Arabic is written with Latin characters, I find the "it's the name of a month" argument rather weak.

    Erm... if you want to take that tack... "Nissan" in Japanese isn't written with Latin characters either.

    ---
    Dum de dum.

    --
    Freedom is not the license to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought.