Slashdot Mirror


Batteries Powered by Leftover Food

Lazyhound writes "Technologists at the University of the West of England in Bristol have come up with a cheap, organic battery that can run on household leftovers, and be manufactured for just £10." There's also a New Scientist article. The New Scientist would like to point out that they broke the story, and the BBC followed up.

80 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel idea by sirinek · · Score: 3, Funny


    I bet you could power a HUGE beowulf cluster (sorry had to) if only you could harness the gas from everyone eating taco bell. Now theres something to do if you have leftovers. Sort of a gas/electric hybrid, watch for Honda's next innovation. Should be interesting!

  2. Wow! by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 3, Funny

    On a leftover Twinkie, you could get power forever!

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  3. This will be messy by cpt.haddock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nice invention, but nowadays batteries are used mostly in cell-phones, PDA's, etc. With the trend of miniaturising these, I can already see the mess, trying to pry sticky leftovers in my cell-phone :(

  4. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by bmongar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why? We are exposed to harmful bacteria all the time, almost all of us have e.coli in our intestines. That is why we wash our hands after going to the bathroom. Or after hadeling raw hamburger or chicken. Just make sure people know that they will get a tummy ache if they eat the stuff.

    --
    As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
  5. It brings tears to my eyes. by fractalk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Now snif, snif, I can finally take that road trip with only a laptop and 200 liters of soda that I always dreamed of!!

    if only they make a satellite dish that works on pickled weiners...

  6. clarification needed by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    i think i already know the awnser, but the article says "Chemical reactions inside the cell strip electrons from the hydrogen atoms to produce a voltage that can power a circuit.

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.


    so does the e.coli eat it's excrement (hydrogen) and produce electricity? i'm guessing it's the cell in the battery that does this...

    secondly - let's sterilize the hell out of our current landfills, and introduce this bacteria to them! same thing goes for our mouths - no more cavities!

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  7. Re:Ideal by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dunno about carrots, but with sugar cubes, fruit and a little yeast, you'll get something with power in a few weeks, fer sure! Maybe the carrots are to stop you from going blind?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  8. Finally by ksplatter · · Score: 3, Funny

    Moms Can't yell at Kids anymore for not eating their dinner. I can see it now.

    Boy: "Mom I don't want to eat my dinner!"
    Mom: "Fine son well at least refresh the batteries in my Vibrator"
    Boy: Sure Mom!!!

  9. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by GnomeKing · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sort of a gas/electric hybrid, watch for Honda's next innovation. Should be interesting!

    Honest dear - if I stop farting in the car, we'll never make it there by 8pm!

  10. "Power hungry" ??? by Tord · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guess this gives a whole new dimension to the words "power hungry equipment"...

  11. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    Sigh ... E. Coli gets such a bad press it's unbelievable.

    Most strains of E. Coli are harmless in normal concentrations, and indeed live in your gut without causing any problems at all. Students at universities/colleges worldwide use it in concentrated culture all the time without any special precautions. Only E. Coli 10571 (iirc), a weird mutant strain, poses a food poisoning risk.

    Bob

  12. At last! by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally i have use for all pizza slices all over my desk. Must be a godsend for geeks.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  13. Re:I don't get something -- by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, they don't want more refinement, they want less. As in you stick the raw sugar beets or sugar cane inside.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  14. Potato clock by (trb001) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember wiring potatoes into a clock I had as a kid, so this really is nothing new. The ability to harnass food is grand and all, but the food gets pretty smelly after a few days.

    --trb

    1. Re:Potato clock by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Sorry, this has nothing to do with the potato clock at all. The energy for a potato clock doesn't even come from the potatoes. It comes from the electrodes "dissolving" into the potatoes. The electrodes are consumed in the process.

      The article describes a microbial fuel cell that is totally different.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  15. Interesting by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 2, Troll

    1 W = 1 J/s. 1 kcal = 1 Cal = 4000 J. Therefore, if I want 3 kW of power continuously (which is about how much an average US home uses), I would need to feed my HomeStomach(TM) Generator less than 3/4 Calorie/second. My suggestion is to stock up on Tic-Tacs.

    1. Re:Interesting by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Further extrapolation:
      40W bulb * 8 hours = 40 J/s * 8 hr = 1,152,000 J
      50g sugar * 4 Cal/g = 200 Cal = 800,000 J
      Aren't they off by a factor of 2?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  16. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by Megane · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sort of a gas/electric hybrid, watch for Honda's next innovation.

    So that's why they call those big tailpipes on the backs of sticker-laden Hondas "fart pipes"!

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  17. Re:I don't get something -- by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2

    I guess what I was trying to get at was that I would probably pay for a model that ran on refined sugar right now. I don't care about waiting for other foods, refined sugar is good enough for me if it can run my laptop.

  18. From the article... by OpCode42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Inside the battery, which is the size of a personal CD player, a colony of E.coli bacteria produce enzymes which break down carbohydrates and release hydrogen.

    I dont know how comfortable I would be with on eof these in my home...

  19. no more gasoline by alexc · · Score: 2, Funny

    woo hooo we can now get rid of the internal combustion engine!

    1. Re:no more gasoline by JimPooley · · Score: 4, Informative

      There has been a case recently in the UK of people running their Diesel cars off cooking oil thus saving 40p per litre. Police set up a 'frying squad' to sniff out cars which smelt like mobile chip shops, and local supermarkets rationed sales of cooking oil.

      It's quite ingenious, though highly illegal...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    2. Re:no more gasoline by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      It's quite ingenious, though highly illegal...

      Why the hell is it illegal? This must be a UK thing. I can't imagine this flying in the US.

      If I had a car that I could run off of cooking oil and save money in the process, I'd do it, laws or no laws. Talk about the public outcry if they started busting people for not using gasoline over here.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  20. So when does the time machine come out? by Uttles · · Score: 2

    Ok, so they can turn food into power, now all I need is a delorian that goes back in time and I'll have a perfect life!

    --

    ~ now you know
  21. Two important questions... by Noryungi · · Score: 2
    From the article:

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Two questions:

    • What's the price of 50g. of sugar? Is it less than the cost of producing the same amount of energy with a conventional power station?
    • 40W of power is how much in terms of computing power? In other terms: how long would 50g of sugar power the average laptop?


    This being said, this is truly interesting!
    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Two important questions... by theskov · · Score: 2, Informative

      50g sugar is about 5 cents.

      50g gives 40 watts for 8 hours = 0,32 Wh. Where I live that's about 7 cents worth of electricity.

      But the really interesting part is of course how it compares to conventional means of disposing garbage. And I'm pretty sure that 0,32 Wh of portable electricity is quite a lot better than the power output from burning 50g of sugar (or placing as part of a large smelly pile...)

    2. Re:Two important questions... by JimPooley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the price of 50g. of sugar?

      I can nip down the supermarket and buy a bag of sugar for 54p (0.54GBP). This bag contains 1Kg of sugar. So 50g. of sugar would cost under 3p.
      So threepence worth of sugar would keep my 40 watt light bulb on for eight hours.

      If electricty is charged at 6p per Kw/h (can't remember exactly, not got electricity bill on me) then the cost of lighting that 40w bulb is just under 2p. So there's not a lot in it!

      However this is mere nitpicking and missing the point entirely. At the moment they're using sugar in the prototype. They intend to refine the bio-generator to use first carrots rather than pure sugar, and move on household waste. STUFF YOU THROW AWAY and is therefore worthless. At that point, the running cost is effectively zero.

      So not only would this reduce the amount of rubbish thrown away by the average household, but it also reduces environmental damage done by power generation.

      Just don't throw your old antibiotics in it!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:Two important questions... by asavage · · Score: 2

      You could buy sugar in bulk for much cheaper, and It probably doesn't need to be as high quality as table sugar so money could be saved on refining. But yes the whole point is to be able to throw garbage food into this instead of a compost, garborator, or even worse the trash.

  22. Re:Using myself to fuel the car by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm. I like the idea.

    I have no idea how this could work, but imagine uh nanobots or something that ran around your body using your fat for energy, and doing something useful, like uh strectching the muscles and whatever else nanobots do.

  23. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by bhny · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the Czech Republic children are given E. coli to help prevent allergies.

  24. The engine will run on carrots?! by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    Team leader Chris Melhuish told New Scientist magazine said that although the new MCFs run on sugar cubes, the team aims to move on to carrot power.

    Great... no matter what color car I buy, it will eventually turn orange.

  25. 50 grams - 40 watts????? by snatchitup · · Score: 3, Informative

    Scientists say 50 grammes of sugar would keep a 40-watt light bulb lit for eight hours.

    Let's do the math. 50 grames = 12 1/2 servings. Or, 12.5 * 15 = 187.5 C (That's big C calories or really kilo-calories).

    40 watts * 8 hours = .32 Killowatt Hours.

    A KW Hours costs about .06 here. So we're talking about 2 penny's worth of energy.

    A round cylindrical sugar container of the coffee area variety has 567g's so were talking about 1/10 of a thing of sugar which costs about $.50.

    So, the sugar costs 10 cents but the same energy produced by a power plant costs .02 cents.

    So, when the greens step up the argument of, big business is squashing new alternative energy sources, maybe there's sound economic reasoning on the part of the neysayers.

    1. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by greenhide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about you, but I can get a 2 pound -- oh hell, let's call it one kilogram to make the conversions easy -- for about a buck. So, each gram costs $.001. Fifty grams, then, costs 5 cents, not fifty cents.

      I don't know where you're shopping, but you're paying too much for sugar.

      It gets even better when you buy it in bulk. Also, consider that you would no longer necessarily have to use sugar that was intended for human consumption. With that in mind, I'm sure there's probably "waste sugar" -- maybe its discolored, maybe it got contaminated in some way -- that still is suitable for the battery. That might be cheaper.

      Also, don't forget that the ultimate goal is to use leftovers, not pure sugar.

      Finally, you're using the traditional "free-market" technique of *not* looking at *all the costs*. Continuing to use traditional power plants running on oil means that we're constantly having to defend our "interests" in the middle east, spending billions and billions of dollars on military equipment and personel. This military intervention is what keeps our oil prices low. Thus, part of that cost has to be figured in to the cost of the electricity, and at that point the sugar wins hands down, I think.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    2. Re:50 grams - 40 watts????? by Dynedain · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally, you're using the traditional "free-market" technique of *not* looking at *all the costs*. Continuing to use traditional power plants running on oil means that we're constantly having to defend our "interests" in the middle east, spending billions and billions of dollars on military equipment and personel. This military intervention is what keeps our oil prices low. Thus, part of that cost has to be figured in to the cost of the electricity, and at that point the sugar wins hands down, I think

      Yes! Invade Hawaii!

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  26. The potato clock is a different deal... by Nino+the+Mind+Boggle · · Score: 5, Informative

    The potato clock is just a battery, not a fuel cell. You stick two dissimilar metals into any electrolyte (such as the juice in a potato) and you get current. Heck, with one of those kits, you could stick the electrodes into your mouth and generate current.

    On a related note, because the amalgam fillings in your mouth contain two dissimilar metals (silver and mercury), and saliva is an electrolyte, you could conceivably power your cell phone with your fillings. I am NOT making this up, there are documented medical cases where galvanic reactions involving amalgam fillings have been observed, e.g.: "Dr. William Cheshire, a physician at the Mayo Clinic, reports on a case where a woman's trigeminal neuralgia (tic douloureux) was traced to a galvanic reaction between an amalgam filling and an adjacent gold-alloy crown. Consumption of tomatoes and other acidic foods produced intense jolts described as being like those of an 'electrical battery'." (The abstract is here.

    --
    ------ "Darn floor. Big bite." (Koko the gorilla's best attempt at explaining the experience of an earthquake.)
  27. Other movie Reference by uberdave · · Score: 2

    Yes, Mr. Fusion was the first thing that popped into my mind, followed by the robot powered by slugs, followed by the Matrix. The microbes are not going to care whether the leftovers are pizza, or people, right?

  28. Finally, It has a use by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 3, Funny

    I now finally have SOMETHING to do with my moms MEAT LOAF

    --
    --JonnyBlog
  29. Real men of genius by Mantorp · · Score: 5, Funny



    Today we salute you Mr.regardless-of-topic-lets-post-beowulf-cluster-r eferences.

    Without paying any attention to the story at hand you stay true to your mission of spreading the gospel of the Grendel slayer.

    Grendel slayer

    Be it virus spreading lego men, Jon Katz fanclub winamp skins, or coffee grinders running Red Hat...
    running Red Hat
    ...you can imagine them all in multiplicitous clusters.
    clusters baby
    So next time you're browsing slashdot ignore all the posts blasting Python, Perl or patent lawyers just set the threshold to -1 and do a search for the hero of the Geats, then think for a minute Geats and Gates? Is Beowulf a prophecy?

  30. waste removal by cowtamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hate to point out the obvious, but how will you remove the digested food from the battery?

    (Of course, this is not a problem for backyard generator type of systems, but might be for your laptop)

    1. Re:waste removal by malkavian · · Score: 2

      Fear when you hear the words on the train..
      "Damn, my battery's crapped out again!"

  31. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by crashcane · · Score: 5, Informative
    The strain you are speaking of is actually E. coli O157:H7, also known as Enterohemorrhagic , E. coli (EHEC).


    I also think it is a bit of stretch to say that this is a "weird mutant strain" since there are plenty other types of E. coli that can cause diarrhea via food poisoning (including the closing related Enteropathogenic E. coli. Incidentally, O157:H7 doesn't seem to hurt adult cattle too much, it just seems to have a really bad effect inside us (particularly children and elderly).


    Brian.

  32. Third World fuel by bryguy5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The benefits of this are enourmous in a place like Papua New Guinea where subsitance farmers don't really have a true cash economy and as such don't have any way to adequately pay for kerosene or "zoom" - motorboat fuel as I like to call it. Solar is to expensive, but fruits and vegitables are really cheap and plentiful.

  33. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by hughk · · Score: 2

    E. Coli is extremely well used as a research and teaching tool. It makes me cringe when I hear the press talking about it as a cause of food poisoning. Certain strains as you say are definitely not nice but without a friendly strain of E. Coli, we wven have a problem as the gut can more easily be colonised by nastier strains.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  34. Re:Prior Art-Driving to work everyday 4 over an hr by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    -Quote- I've been running my fridge that way for years now! -/Quote-

    That is exactly how I run my car too... Half eaten sandwhich over here, some chips on the seat, open soda cans between the seats, etc.

    I still cant figure out why I can't have a second date with a chick tho. Go figure?

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  35. cash from the trash by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

    I think what you're missing here is the notion of efficiency. Ostensibly, the ElectroStomach is producing usable energy from what would otherwise be trash. So the cost isn't a factor, since you'd already purchased the fuel to begin with, and were only going to throw it away.

    If you imagine how much food goes down garbage disposals or gets dumped into landfills, there's conceivably millions of kilowatt-hours worth of power being lost. Reclaiming that power would be revolutionary.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  36. Re:We have the infrastructure now!!! by Maran · · Score: 2

    Suddenly, all that "important septic tank information" spam I get is just another variation on "make money fast".

    Maran

  37. Re:Could the Colis be outcompeted? by joshsisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They would probably sell granules like the ones they sell for septic tanks, to "refresh" your battery.

  38. Eco tax evasion? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

    Will the British government bust people who use these batteries for evading the UK's fuel tax? They are busting the drivers of "grease cars." The oil mafia will crush alternative fuels at every turn, and they have governments in their back pockets.

    --
    How ya like dat?
    1. Re:Eco tax evasion? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Actually I think you'll find that the fuel tax goes into the economy (and pays for road maintenance, etc) and NOT to the oil companies, and one of the reasons it's so high is to try and persuade people to use public transport more - which is a good thing...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    2. Re:Eco tax evasion? by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying that the fuel tax itself is a bad thing, or that tax revenue is handed to the cartels, but using the fuel tax as an excuse to squash the pioneers of alternative fuels is absolutely doing the bidding of the oil cartels, who won't tolerate any competition. The UK could tax cooking oil used as fuel, instead of busting people who use it. I suspect that the fossil fuel cartels won't like bio batteries any more than "grease cars." It may take the oil wells running dry before alternative fuels are taken seriously.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  39. Ever notice.. by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    the Y-shaped flux capacitor looks like a flushing toilet? Doc got the idea when he hit his head on one.

  40. 146% efficiency??? Something smells funny here!!! by endoboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their numbers contain a little of the stench usually associated with products containing Ecoli---

    -lets do a little math...

    The article claims 8 hours @ 40 watts from 50 grams of sugar: 40watts=.04kW :: .04kw*8hours=0.32kWh=1152kiloJoules

    according to the domino box in my hand, 4grams sugar=15 Calories, so the sugar contains 12.5*15=187.5 Calories :: 187.5Calories = 785 kiloJoules

    So-- they claim to be getting 1152kJ output for a 785kJ input???? 146% output is impressive, but not likely.

  41. Don't leave things over by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    If you have leftover it simply means you cooked too much!

    Sure this is a good idea, but it only uses the energy in the food - i.e. all the time you use to cook it, decoration etc. are still completely wasted efforts. I'm sure the battery would still work if you put the "raw materials" in it i.e. eggs, meat, vegetables, sugar, grain etc.

    Cooking it then feeding it to a battery instead of eating it just makes no sense to me. Unless they make a battery with a sense of taste.

    1. Re:Don't leave things over by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      They are wasted energy, but not wasted efforts because the chicken - seed - plant - sun chain occurs naturally and does not require any human effort.

      You have to do something (i.e. cook) to waste the energy to make leftover food. Now that's wasted efforts.

  42. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by BluBrick · · Score: 3, Informative

    Absolutely - ignorant media hype at work again. The pricks almost always get science wrong. The worst thing is that so many people fall for it.

    The real reason that Escherichia Coli gets such bad press is a mere side effect of that it's such a common and incredibly populous inhabitant of a healthy human intestinal tract. That's what makes it such an excellent indicator of untreated sewage content.

    When you're investigating possible sewage pollution, there's no point beginning with looking for the rare stuff that's dangerous in needle & haystack concentrations. No, you're better off counting the numbers of something that you're guaranteed to find, and extrapolating from there.

    Of course, the media then jumps to the conclusion that, because a high E. Coli count probably means Really Bad Things are in the water, E. Coli itself becomes a Really Bad Thing.

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  43. Efficient? by photon317 · · Score: 2


    They gave a rough figure of 50g of sugar powering a 40W light bulb for eight hours.

    40W x 8hrs = 0.32 kWh
    50g * 2.204623 = 0.110 lbs
    Cheap bags of sugar at netgrocer are $0.66/lb.
    0.11 lbs * $0.66 = $0.073
    1/0.32 = 3.125
    $0.073*3.125 = $0.23

    So by my rough calculations, if you bought bags of sugar to feed the fuel cell for house power, you'd be paying $0.23/kWh, which is significantly higher than I pay for electricity here in Texas.

    Their currently technology only uses pure sugar. They're working towards carrots they claim - but I would imagine the efficiency can only decrease from the raw sugar efficiency per dollar unless the fundamentals of their technology improve.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  44. Re:stinking tech? by Gonarat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I imagine they will build the device so the actual reaction chamber (artifical gut?) would be enclosed. The hydrogen gas generated by the bacteria is converted to electricity and water vapor. Assuming rotten food is used, there will be waste from that. This leads me to the (obvious) question -- what kind of solid waste will this system produce and how will it be removed from the unit? We all know what the solid waste output from humans and animals is, so will the solid waste output from this unit be similar? I can see it now -- cleaning up dog crap, changing the litter box, and cleaning out the "organic battery" crap! I csn see it now -- "Honey, I got to take the car out to take a dump!"


    Oh well, if the price is right, I guess I can handle disposing of a little more crap...

    --
    Beware of Sleestak
  45. Re:Filed under brilliance for... by timeOday · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's why I prefer conventional batteries...

    nickel-cadmium, lead-acid, nickel metal hydride, carbon-zinc, lithium... ummmm, it makes my mouth water.

  46. Mandatory ex-wife joke by r_j_prahad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well that means my ex-wife will never have to worry about having a dead battery in her car ever again. She's got enough MacDonalds french fries stuck in the seat crack to crank the engine for *days*. And still have enough Joules left over to light Las Vegas on Christmas Eve.

  47. Re:That's nice and all.. by greenhide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, the advantage might be that currently most people don't compost, as they have no reason too. Food scraps make up a decent amount of landfill waste, but it's all mixed in and can't be separated out.

    However, if people had a incentive for composting, they would put all of their waste into the battery located in the back of their house, say. While not all of the scraps would be gone, it would probably decay much more quickly than it would in a landfill, and it would generate some electricity.

    Waste management crews could pick up the waste once it had been decomposed, filter it, sanitize it, and sell it as a fertilizer or soil filler.

    The improvement is that chemical batteries actually add to our trash volume and these might reduce it.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  48. I can see it now... by MrIcee · · Score: 2
    Med Centers for batteries...

    NURSE: I'm sorry, there's nothing we can do.

    OWNER: But my laptop was just fine a few minutes ago? What happened?

    NURSE: Your organic batteries have food poisoning.

    OWNER: Oh my lord... what can I do!?!?

    NURSE: Nothing... he's dead now Jim.

  49. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    harness the gas from everyone eating taco bell.

    So, theorectically, a Slashdot Meetup could be used to combat rolling blackouts.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  50. Re:Flux Capacitor by wraithgar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, the flux capacitor is a real thing. The term was borrowed for the movie cause it sounded cool. Obviously the real one isn't related to time travel ;).

    It was the point of many jokes for the quarter of my electronics class when we dealt with capacitors and inductors.

  51. Read the article by delphi125 · · Score: 2
    Team leader Chris Melhuish told New Scientist magazine said that although the new MCFs run on sugar cubes, the team aims to move on to carrot power.

    "It has to be able to use raw materials, rather than giving it refined fuel."

    I think you missed the point. At present, they probably do add water to the sugar. But they are aiming to process household wastes (carrot peels, sewage) rather than refined sugar (a pure carbohydrate like, er, petrol/gasoline).

  52. Re:Flux Capacitor by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

    The drawing that they used for the capacator was for the time travel one, not the real world one. Guess I should have been more specific.

  53. liquifying tool. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    They'd probably sell you a liquifying tool. Probably a cheap miniature blender.

    They could give them away as sort of a promotion... "Buy this battery pack and we'll throw in a Fuelizer(tm) for free!"

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  54. Re:Use in remote places by grimsweep · · Score: 2, Funny

    The nice part about this battery is, 'What happens if it runs out?'.

    Simple. I have no idea about plants, but I imagine woodland creatures are bound to have some degree of the appropriate susbtances in them.

    Gives a whole new meaning to the concept of an 'Energizer Bunny'.

  55. Read Moonbase. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    Isaac Asimov's Moonbase is a story about nanomachines, their uses, and the violent public backlash. (Those people were called "nanoluddites")

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Read Moonbase. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Doh! And they were sitting on my desk at the time...

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  56. Re:many a person has pondered the food-to-fuel ide by sirinek · · Score: 2

    *laugh* too true. I'll bring it up at the next meetup here.

    And I just *love* your sig. Easily in my top 3 favorite Slashdot sigs. ;)

    siri

  57. Big deal, I already do this. by zerofoo · · Score: 2

    I've been making hydrogen and sulfur for years now....especially on tuesday morning after Monday Night Football, beer and nachos.

    They should just make a device you fart into...that would be much more efficient.

    -ted

  58. Re:Huge implications by GooberToo · · Score: 2

    Umm. Wouldn't juicing take out most of the sugar? After all, when he said carrots, I immediatley assumed the purpose of using carrots was because of their high sugar content.

  59. Re:Huge implications by archeopterix · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This has more meaning then you might think for the economy. The idea that a country will not have to import oil any longer to maintain its power systems / gas requirements is just as important as the savings for the individual from not having to go to the gas station.

    Too optimistic - we don't even know if a battery produces more energy than it is needed for its manufacturing, let alone smelting a thousand tons of steel without turning a continent into a carrot monoculture.
  60. Re:Great for UPS!!!! by Myco · · Score: 2

    Easy -- make the dough out of grains genetically engineered to absorb iron from the soil.

  61. Re:Yes! Invade Hawaii! by Dynedain · · Score: 2

    My joke was based on the fact that Hawaii is now a state (as of 1959) unless of course you are pushing the agendas of groups like The Hawaiian Kinkgom.

    Fact: *ALL* of the U.S. was 'taken' from the indigenous peoples by 'invaders'.

    Sugar production is one of the things Hawaii is known for. Now, while I could have said "Lets invade Louisianna" it wouldn't have been as funny, because far less people know that Louisianna is a large sugar producer.

    It was a joke that was not meant to offend anybody. I didn't make any kind of derogatory remarks towards any culture or ethnicity, so don't try to play Political Corrctness games.

    There are plenty of groups claiming that the U.S. (and/or Canada and Mexico) don't have sovreignty in a particular region of the Southwest, Pacific Northwest, Florida, Texas, Vermont, and a whole slew of other places.

    Now, how can you judge me of being unaware of history from 1 line of text? Research indicates George Washington most likely didn't have wooden teeth...but it makes for some funny jokes.

    You accuse my comment of being trollish, but yours is what exactly? If I hadn't already commented in this discussion I would use my moderation points to mark you down.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  62. I do love the BBC by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    I love that the picture in the article is a plate of leftover food... like we don't know what leftover food looks like.

    Then again, considering how much we Americans eat, maybe we don't know what it looks like, and the pic's just a favor done for us Yanks across the pond :)

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  63. Re:Carnivorous Robot by Fesh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Heh. This is how that'll go down...

    A Light Snack (C)Stephen Notley

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  64. Let's go to the tape by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

    Doc: Alright then. Let's get the Delorean and get ourselves back to the future!
    Marty: (casually) Oh Doc, I tore a hole in the gas tank. We'll have to patch it up and get gas.
    Doc: (Freezes in place) You mean we're out of gas?
    Marty: (still casual) Yeah, no big deal, we got Mr. Fusion, right?
    Doc: Mr. Fusion powers the time circuits and the flux capacitor. But the internal combustion engine runs on ordinary gasoline; it always has. There's not going to be a gas station around here until some time in the next century. Without gasoline, we can't get the Delorean up to 88 miles per hour.
    Marty: So what'll we do?


    The power source for the hover conversion is implied to be gas, but, hey, we need a new branch for physics for the hover technology anyway.

    And no, I found it on Google.
    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Let's go to the tape by stud9920 · · Score: 2

      But what's a flux capacitor anyway ? I thought fluxes were supposed to be inductive, not capacitive...

    2. Re:Let's go to the tape by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      I thought fluxes were supposed to be inductive, not capacitive...

      Yeah, sure, stationary relative to the nearest major mass they are, but when you get up to 88 miles per hour, then you're gonna see some serious shit.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)