Slashdot Mirror


Rosen, Valenti Warn Colleges About P2P

fini writes "The RIAA and MPAA just sent a letter to 2,300 colleges or so, asking to crack down on P2P. Juicy nugget: 'Not only is piracy of copyrighted works illegal, it can take up a significant percentage of a university's costly bandwidth.' Also mentioned, some quasi-FUD on security issues. Six higher-ed honchos also sent a concurring letter. From the RIAA website, here's the story and the letters (PDF only). Mentioned as examples of model policies: Drake University, UNC Chapel Hill and University of Michigan . Interestingly enough, there is no threatening 'or else' stuff in those letters. Not yet..."

57 of 367 comments (clear)

  1. 2300 letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is this considered spam?

  2. not yet by Raiford · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ... Wars often begin with a conspicuous absence of threats

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    1. Re:not yet by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That would be true, but do you really think colleges will fight this? Verry few really care that much about freedom. Faced with a one-easy-step solution (DRM? Palladium? some magic *AA black box?), I'm fairly confident they would use it. And can you blame them? A lot of colleges are struggling for money, saving on bandwidth and lawsuits would help immensly. IANAL but I believe they don't filter for the same reasons ISPs give uncensored usenet access -- They arnt liable if they dont filter any, but filtering some shows that they can and are willing to. (or some such law).

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:not yet by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      American colleges are a hotbed of socialism and left thinking. Everything is a slippery slope to them, and they'll fight back.

      I'm just tired of the 1:1 correlation Valenti et al put between P2P and piracy. There's plenty of public domain stuff out there. Last time I used a P2P app it was to collect some Christmas music for a party my wife threw. None of it was copyrighted to my knowledge.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:not yet by thogard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      University legal departments are the only ones with enough resources to take on the RIAA and win. Keep in mind that out of a typical university budget, about 5% goes to teaching, 5% for building, 10% goes to special expenses (labs, computers), and almost all the rest goes to administration. Every sub-department under admin is fighting to prove its good for the univerity even though 90% of them could go away and the student and teachers could cope just fine. If you think those ratios are bad, check out the ones for your local public school.

    4. Re:not yet by aronc · · Score: 5, Informative

      There's plenty of public domain stuff out there. Last time I used a P2P app it was to collect some Christmas music for a party my wife threw. None of it was copyrighted to my knowledge.

      While I completely agree that p2p piracy (last time I used it was to get some music by a friend who distributes that way) it is, alas, more than likely that those songs were indeed under copyright. The musicial composition itself is most probably public domain but the particular recordings might not have been. Remember, if it was recorded after the early 20s it is still under copyright unless it either lapsed through neglect or was intentionally placed into the public domain by the author/artist.

      --

      jello.
      aka aron.
    5. Re:not yet by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There is a simple reason they didnt threaten ... Think about 2300+ colleges, if each college gave $5,000 (a drop in the bucket compared to normal legal fees each year), they would have a pool of 11.5 million dollars to litigate with.

      Alternatley, the RIAA could never sue 2300 schools simultaneously. And could never afford to be sued by that many entities. Im sure they couldn't afford to be sued by 10% of the schools.

      The RIAA can't beat 2300 colleges at anything. Their absolutle only hope is to pick on a single poor but well known college and beat them in court to set precident. Which is exactly what I expect to see soon.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    6. Re:not yet by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4
      State Universities won't fight this. In case you haven't noticed, the economy's in the shitter and state legislatures are looking for places to cut. Getting the uni involved in a big, expensive public lawsuit is not a good way to keep the legislature off of their backs. They will comply. If they don't feel like it, a few nasty calls to the chancellor from the govenor's office will fix that.

      Plus, they can use this as an excuse to cut back on bandwith purchases and save a few bucks. They'll get way fewer complaints than if they cut back on perks for the football team.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  3. New info for Colleges... by theBraindonor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't _every_ college that provides high-speed internet to students already know this!?

    Sounds more like they are sending letters to colleges as a message to somebody else. Not the administrations, not the students, that's for sure.

    1. Re:New info for Colleges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll guarantee you the letters didn't go to the sysadmin parts of the colleges. More likely the letters went to the various Presidents and Boards of Trustees, because those are going to be the ones that will ultimately make the decisions here. I seriously doubt that the letters also included the various ways p2p can be used, other than the music copying parts. "Drug trafficking is done with cars, so you should stop driving, or we'll sue you on behalf of all the drug-related deaths that occur." Any letter not sent to the sysadmins qualifies as FUD, and it's in this light that the xxAA cartels are the pirates. They're using their girth to pick the battles they think they can win, rather than fighting any battle they might lose.

  4. Re:First Post... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now back on point... many times before has the subject of P2P programs in school been posted. AND, in the comments were the several aproaches that the schools have made to combat them, from straight out blocking the ports, to throttling the ports, and to sending notices to the people using the most bandwidth. This allows students to continue to use the internet for recreation (to a point) while allowing usable speeds on port 80. If the RIAA wants to tell schools "Stop it!" then they should without comming out with all these excuses and reasons. Especialy if there are better ways of addressing them then cracking down on students.

  5. Where are our refunds??? by coupland · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Though she's as bad as the rest, Courtney Love had it right when she asked how much she, as an artist, would be getting in refunds due to RIAA awards against MP3.com and similar services. If her balance hasn't been positive due to these offensive attacks then we can only assume this is only about fat, bald bureaucrats at the RIAA. I'd love to proven wrong but...

    1. Re:Where are our refunds??? by nhavar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm confused about why Courtney Love is as bad as the rest. Every interview and statement that I've ever read of hers chastized the record industry and points out the failures and fraud that occur. Is she bad because of her music? Because she's branched out into other areas? Because she's a business woman? Because she wants to profit? Can you elaborate on your statement?

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  6. No doubt charged to the artists by thumbtack · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cost of which will no doubt, be charged as "operating expenses" to the webcasting royalties they are collecting, before the artists get a dime. The only thing the RIAA and their members are adept at is spending the artists money to guarantee that they never recoup.

  7. Re:Hilary Rosen, Jack Valenti by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 3, Funny

    No

  8. Ahh.... by di0s · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...but little do Rosen, Valenti, and the rest of the Consumer Control Cartel know that most college students trade amoungst themselves. Such was the case at my school and my friend's school.

  9. P2P is the next killer app. by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before everyone goes off on P2P:

    Right now there is a major server-side bandwidth shortage. It's expensive to run a major web site. There is a client-side bandwidth glut. It's cheap to browse the internet.

    The server-side bandwidth cost means is very hard to host significant content for low cost, especially if you start to get popular. This hurts web content for everyone.

    The solution? P2P-type networks. Move that client-side bandwidth over to the server side. Why should someone download a web page or file from a single server when they could download it from the last ten people who viewed that same page or file? Sending every web page you visit on to another person (or 5 people) does not incur a significant rise in the cost of you connection. Sending a web page to a million people a month from one server does.

    And when P2P starts to open up the web for everyone, there are going to be a lot of people who are going to be pretty sorry that they were so narrow-minded that they made it easy for colleges, cable companies, and phone companies to restrict bandwidth for P2P networks just to save a few dollars.

    1. Re:P2P is the next killer app. by kenthorvath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because as we all know, single server sytems are already somewhat insecure. Can you imaging the havoc that will be unleashed if you give 100,000 users the ability to serve out, say, slashdot's or cnn's web pages? This would certainly put a damper on any "trustworthy computing" that you may have hoped to have.

    2. Re:P2P is the next killer app. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yeah, there's a little company named Akaima, and a dinky opensource product named squid that beat P2P to the punch a long time ago. Akaima can solve the problem from the server end, and squid can solve it from the client end. P2P doesn't have to optimize web page delivery, it's a solved problem. Maybe not widely deployed, but anybody can solve it pretty trivially.

      Okay, now P2P to solve multi-cast routing of streaming live content like movies and audio broadcasts so if 50 people on a single ISP are watching a football game broadcast over the internet live efficiently that's cool. Web pages are trivial. ISP's, businesses, colleges, have all solved this problem for the end consumer. Shit, you can't go to www.yahoo.com anymore without hitting an Akaima server. All cable modem providers in my area use transparent squid proxies to speed up web browsing.

      If P2P's big goal is to solve a trivial problem solved by the HTTP 1.1 spec, in conjunction with a couple of Open Source products, plus a couple of large business, I'd say P2P is about 3 years behind the times....

      That said, P2P has some cool applications and will solve some cool problems, I don't think Web pages is one of them.

      Kirby

    3. Re:P2P is the next killer app. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Akaima has caching servers in on every backbone provider. You should never ever, cross the backbone when getting data from a site that has an agreement with Akaima. This is done, because Akaima will run their DNS server, and will serve you a different IP address for a web site to direct you to a akaima server site very close to you, thus keeping you near the "cheap" client bandwidth you talked about on your original post. The net effect of that, a whole slew of people who only move upstream 3-5 steps, instead of all the across the internet. Saving an incredible about inter-backbone bandwidth. You pay them Akaima some money, and they deal with the bandwidth issues. Oh, and a user never hit your site. So you need a nice dinky connection to feed Akaima your data when you change it. They have economy of scale, and are very proficient at the problem. Most bandwidth that doesn't leave a backbone provider is cheap. They have lots of internal bandwidth as a rule. The end user gets the content much, much faster, and the traffic on the internet is smaller. Oh, and your content only has to be sent to Akaima when you change it, and your done. So you've got a pretty good chance of fixing up the problem.
      Akamai doesn't do anything about bandwidth. It just stores information in its network closer to the end user.
      So after reading this closely, how do you propose to save bandwith other then getting the content closer to the user? Getting the content closer to the user is the holy grail of P2P isn't it?

      Squid solves the problem either by setting the brower up to use it as a proxy, or by setting up the a router to your upstream provider to transparently re-direct traffic to port 80 to a local squid server. So if anyone on your downside link attempts to hit the same page twice, you'll have no traffic leaves the network. Now your upstream ISP does the same thing. Now the upstream provider to them can do the same thing. The upstream provider from them can do the same thing, all the way to the backbone providers. So essentially, you pass thru various levels of proxying servers to get the content you want. Ummm, this sounds like a lot of Web Servers clusters passing around pages from other servers near them so you don't have to go to directly to the site. Which I'll bet money is paraphrasing your ideal P2P setup for web page delivery. Deployment of squid servers located on every Tier 1,2, and 3 bandwidth providers would look precisely like your P2P solution unless I miss my guess. This would mean when you asked for content, you'd only go upstream to the place it has been close to previously.

      It's identical the caching layers in a CPU. First you look in the L1 cache, then you look in the L2 cache, then you go L3 cache. Now you look in RAM, if it isn't there you look on disk. If you've got HSM (heirarchical storage management), you look on tape.

      How does this make a site cheaper... Well Akaima is cheaper then enough bandwidth to serve the pages yourself (if your big enough). It's cheaper, because you don't need nearly the bandwith, and Akaima already is huge, thus having economy of scale so they turn a profit on it, while saving you money.

      Assuming everyone runs a Squid Cache at the various levels as described above, you'll only get 1 hit per page on your website ever until the cached copy expires on your backbone providers Squid Cache. You have the 11 backbone providers talk directly to each others squid caches. When provider A wants a page from provider B it asks the squid cache of provider B, the squid cache goes to your site gets the page and caches it. From now one, anyone who wants your page will get it from the backbone provider who routes you onto the internet at large. Stop and think about it, you could be getting viewed by ever slashdotter in the world, and see a single hit.

      As long as the core caches have enough disk, so you don't get flushed out, you only need enough bandwith to do just that. That's it. You only need enough bandwidth to ensure that your pages can get to the core squid cache quickly enough for the first view not to die of bordom, and that's it.

      Of course you run a pretty dull site, beings that you only have a static site. It doesn't work for dynamic content that depends on user level information, but then again neither would P2P.

      Actually, I'm not enough of a squid expert to say that for certain. You might get 11 hits per page, one for each backbone provider now that I think about it. Still not an overwhelming amount of traffic.

      Now it's time to talk reality... The backbone providers don't want to do that.... It'll save you money, and cost them money because you pay them. However, there is nothing to stop a group of people running clusters of Squid caching servers to do this for themselves. So it's doubtful it'll ever get deployed. It however is a solved problem.

      As an aside, bandwidth is expensive because it's expensive. Running a website will *ALWAYS* be expensive. The core providers will always charge a premium price for it because they are providing a rare service you can't get from very many people. They charge a premium price because you'll pay it,and nobody will offer it to you for less. It's that simple... Build all the tools you want, and running a site will still cost the same amount.

      Kirby

    4. Re:P2P is the next killer app. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      But here is what I meant by glut. Most people's connections (with exceptions), broadband or dial-up, are silent most of the time. They don't pay any more whether they use that bandwidth or not.
      Ummm, just out of curiousity, do you have any idea WHY client side bandwidth is cheap, and why server side isn't? If your basing the premise of your P2P services off this idea you'll completely violate all of the economics of bandwidth reselling. If you are saying you want to use spare dialup bandwith, and spare cable modem bandwidth to serve pages you've downloaded to other users, you'll drive the prices of consumer bandwidth to the price of server bandwidth. Why do you think so many bandwidth providers complain about P2P applications.

      ISP's oversell capacity. Last I heard it was something like 5-10 to 1 on high quality ISP's. They over sell capacity by a lot. This over selling is why they can sell it to you cheap, because your only paying for 1/5 to 1/10th of the cost of the bandwidth. That's why getting a cable modem is cheap, and getting a server hooked up at 1/10th the speed is more expensive.

      So I'll say it this way... If you're trying to use spare bandwidth from users to serve pages to other users, especially if they are off your local ISP, you will ruin the good thing we have going. We get bandwidth cheaper then we should as a consumer precisely because the content providers pay so much, because an average end user doesn't use that much bandwidth. If you break that up, you realize you'll get to pay server prices for your bandwidth right?

      If your structuring your P2P that way, it'll be a killer app. It'll kill the pricing scheme of consumer bandwidth.

      Kirby

  10. Re:And this nugget is 'juicy' in what way exactly? by dh003i · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bandwidth which students deserve due to them paying absurdely ridiculous tuitions ranging from 15 - 30,000 dollars for a good university.

  11. my college by jon787 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Our tech person actually said that don't care what we do as long as they don't get any letters about us from the RIAA/MPAA attack dogs. So I got the file sharing type stuff running but it is restricted to the college's domain.

    --
    X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    1. Re:my college by the+gnat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was told something similar a few years ago when I was one of the student support staff at my alma mater (a larger private university). The IT director said the administration got letters from the RIAA all the time reporting student computers distributing copyrighted files, and asking for the student names and contact info. The university's response was to contact the student personally, make it very clear that they were not to do this or else they'd lose their network connection, verify that they'd removed copyrighted material from public view, and then reply to the RIAA that any problem that might have existed was resolved. No admission of wrongdoing, no personal information- they handle it internally and tell the RIAA to bug off.

      This is by far the most sensible policy. The net admins have better things to do than monitor the network all the time, and the administration has no desire to turn over its students to entertainment lawyers. All they care about is keeping a well-ordered network, where students don't clog the T3 and don't get lawyergrams sent to the President's office. Students have in fact been thrown off the residential network for violations, but I don't think anyone's been in trouble with outside authorities.

  12. The next big thing by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long until someone finds a way around the commercial filters software? All it would take it to make p2p traffic look like "legit" (http, ssh, etc) traffic. Packet shapers target by port. So how long until someone figures out a way to use the software to cut right around that?

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:The next big thing by Stonehand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple solution:

      Cap all outgoing traffic from the dormitory networks, regardless of port or protocol. This would drastically cut down on out-of-campus users downloading from servers in the dorms (the largest part of the problem), while leaving non-dorm machines (cluster workstations, research labs, office computers, et al) untouched.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  13. I'm a student at UNC by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tried submitting a story similar to this to /., but I kid you not -- we in the local LUG were threatened with ARREST for protesting when Hillary Rosen personally came to speak to praise us for our policies.

    No one was for it after we were told that by one of the CS teachers, and the protest was dissolved.

    It was just like when Bush went to Ohio State , except it was for a rich corporate billionaire, not just post 9/11 presidential security!

  14. Re:And this nugget is 'juicy' in what way exactly? by dh003i · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh please, its not a few students downloading MP3's hogging bandwidth from the rest who only use it to look up research articles.

    It's EVERY STUDENT who's downloading MP3's. Thank god for that.

    Fortunately, most college students are pro file-sharing. Since college students will shape the future, we can at least look forward to a less draconian future where everything isn't controlled by a few big paranoid information-nazi's like the MPAA and RIAA.

  15. Opposite by Bobulusman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm at Cornell University right now, and interestingly enough, the administration has seemed to be doing the exact opposite, relaxing their guidelines.

    The first week, we had take an online class where we learned that if we got caught sharing, we would have community service and stuff.

    Then last week, they basically send an e-mail saying that they didn't care if we downloaded stuff, as long as we didn't upload stuff. I'm too lazy to go and check the e-mail, but I believe it gave directions on how to turn off uploads in KaZaA. Weird.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  16. Re:Hilary Rosen, Jack Valenti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lesbians need Hilary Rosen as a role model the way gays need John Wayne Gacy.

  17. "Juicy nugget"? by tunah · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Juicy nugget: 'Not only is piracy of copyrighted works illegal, it can take up a significant percentage of a university's costly bandwidth.'

    Juicy? It *can* take up a significant percentage of bandwidth. Bandwidth *is* costly. The copying of copyrighted works, according to current concensus, *is* illegal. Even if you don't agree with the illegality of it, how is the fact that the RIAA believes copying is illegal surprising or revealing?

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
  18. Re:Perfect People To Tell... by dvdeug · · Score: 5, Interesting

    College is where people are taught to turn off their minds and subscribe to politically-correct orthodoxy

    Outside of college, I haven't found a whole lot of people who think, or really know the details of any orthodoxy. For the first time in my scholastic career, I had a history class that went beyond "We had a revolutionary war in 1776. We had a civil war in 1860. Abraham Lincoln was president. The good guys won both wars." and actually asked you to think about stuff. I've talked to people both on the far right and the far left and everywhere in between. Most people at high school didn't care enough to be right or left, beyond the "Republicans good; Democrats bad!" level. Yes, I've heard stories of political correctness being forced on people at universities, but it's not at every one, and even at those universities, you'll find an amazing diversity of opinion if you actually talk to the students and teachers.

  19. ancient chinese proverb by carpe_noctem · · Score: 4, Funny

    "A journey of a thousand lawsuits begins with a single letter."

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  20. Phynd by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 5, Informative

    www.phynd.net is a great solution to P2P. I'm sure the RIAA and MPAA will hate it just as much as P2P, but both colleges and college students love it. Here at UConn, someone has kindly donated the use of their Linux box to run Phynd, which scours the network and catalogs all types of shared files (not just mp3/ogg or movies). In a college with thousands of on campus residents, this saves hunge amounts of internet bandwidth [money] by keeping file sharing traffic entirely on campus. The students are happy because there are almost never any dead links, and files transfer at full speed.
    Before this was implemented, P2P programs tied up HUGE amounts of bandwitdth. UConn was forced to administer a bandwidth quota per student, but fortunately that's only for off campus traffic, not local traffic.
    But the best thing about it is that the students solved the problem all by themselves. And UConn loves it because it's saving them vast amounts of money.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    1. Re:Phynd by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with Phynd is that it uses SMB (Windows) file shares. There's absolutely no connection between getting and sharing---remember, what made all the P2P apps work was that by downloading, you also (usually) uploaded.

      I'm also at UConn, and I've seen the problems with Phynd... people leech like crazy and don't share. This leads to heavily loaded servers (especially when ten people think it's a good idea to try to directly play AVIs off of a remote machine) who say "fuck it" and stop sharing.

      A localized P2P tool (properly configured GnucleusLAN, for instance) wouldn't run into these problems. I'm trying to set up an on-campus gnutella network. Drop me an email if you're interested.

      --grendel drago

      --
      Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  21. University Policy by brsmith4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know about some of the Universities that some /.'ers attend, but I would like to give an account of how mine handles p2p stuff. For obvious reasons, I would like to keep the name of the school anonymous. I work for my school's computer department on Linux clustering and research oriented computing. I have been with the department for about 8 months (almost since I started school). One thing that I really like about my school is how our network admins handle p2p. We have no 'real' policy on it. Basically, we leave it up to the users to determine what is right and wrong. There is a reason for this. We consider our network resources to be 'public domain'. They are paid for, in part, by the university endowment, but mostly it is paid for by tax payer dollars.

    Now, since the government of my state has not placed a ban on p2p networks of any type, we are in no position to deny our users the right to use them. We are, however, allowed to throttle their traffic so that more of our bandwidth goes to university-related causes. Really, our department tries as much as possible to turn a blind eye to the p2p situation. We don't want to impede on our students abilities to use the internet in the way they see fit. The university will not, however, back a student who has been busted by the RIAA for illegally possessing copyrighted material.

  22. A little case study by Vadim+Makarov · · Score: 4, Interesting
    About half of this collection of Russian anthems originated from now-defunct Napster. I believe that the collection is now one of the largest, and linked to by many researchers.

    If my university prohibited Napster, as some othes Scandinavian schools did, the collection would probably have never started.

    Worse than that, I would never know first-hand what P2P is. This is about academic freedom: you should be allowed to test whatever darn new thing is out there, for whatever reason, otherwise the school lags behind. What you use it for, is your responsibility, of course.

    Oh yes, I'm first-hand aware of the associated headaches (cleaning up the lab computers from those pesky money-generating add-ons that pop up an ad at the timing-critical phase of your data acquisition :-).

    --
    17779 eligible voters in a district, 17779 'vote' as one. This is Russia.
  23. My Alma Mater told RIAA to shove it by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The RIAA tried this crap a few years ago. Most of the Universities they contacted politely told them that it's not their job to enforce Federal law, and that they had no intent to try to put the technology in place that would prevent P2P networking. I know my Alma Mater was one of them, so I'm very interested if they will change their mind this time, keeping with their rapid and steady descent from a top notch university to just another sea of politcal correctness without any hint of quality education. After all, they'll be too busy playing Internet Cop to bother teaching anybody anything.

    Deep down, the RIAA knows that it has absolutely no hope of forcing this upon universities, which is why these letters are absent any cease and desist language. They're just going to run it up the flagpole and see who looks.

    The final word should be here that it is the job of the Executive Branch of the Federal Government to enforce Federal law. No other entity, whether state or local, has the jurisdiction nor obligation to enforce the CFR. If distributing copyrighted material is a federal crime, then it's the justice deparment, and no one else, who has the power to indict. Civilly, I find it hard to believe that the RIAA would be able to prove that distributing a song cost them any money. What downloader is going to take the stand and testify that he/she would have bought the CD had they not been able to download it? I sure wouldn't. In fact, I would testify that the ability to "try before you buy" has led to my purchasing several CDs that I normally would not have even known about, let alone bought.

    Every single Borders bookstore allows you to listen to a CD, in CD quality, and in its entirety, without any inhibitions, before you buy it. Does that not constitute illegal distribution, i.e. allowing someone to listed to copyrighted music without paying? Why isn't Borders being served? How is this different than P2P, save the portability of the music?

    1. Re:My Alma Mater told RIAA to shove it by mr.+methane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A few years ago, P2P was a minor network application which paled in comparison to the deluge of traffic from people downloading off the web. Web traffic grew wildly for several years, but is limited by several factors, including the ability of a person to sit there and view content they've downloaded.

      Even the most ambitious web surfer who plays online games will be hard-pressed to average more than 250kb/s over a 24-hour average. A typical end user, browsing popular sites and sending emails, will be far lower. Networks are built on these assumptions.

      P2P kills this. A modest, unattended workstation suddenly can burn up 2-3mb of bandwidth, around the clock. A typical school with 2,000 students will normally get an OC3, probably billed on the basis of an average of 60-70mb/s. Cost of that will be roughly $20k a month.

      Now, 10% of the students discover P2P. Even with some of that traffic staying on-net, they will still be looking at spending an extra $40,000 a month to support the MP3 habits of a couple hundred students.

      Yep, the RIAA is heavy-handed, and would be more than happy to see anything with more storage than a 3.5" floppy banned. They're not going to get their way.

      But the people who run the networks -- colleges, businesses, and cable companies -- look at the alternatives:

      1. Buy $650,000 of new networking gear plus $300,000/month in bandwidth, and implement monitoring to comply with occasional court orders.

      2. Ban any computing platform capable of P2P (i.e. linux) from network connections unless the user is willing to pay for usage.

      Faced with a quote from Cisco for a 300-pound router on one side of the desk, and a petition demanding continued access to pirated software, I would rather tell the kids to go buy a CD than explain my capital budget request to the board. :-)

  24. Think about why the RIAA did this... by scubacuda · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Seriously, think about why the RIAA is targeting colleges.

    Colleges shape the way generations think. If they simply sit back and allow millions of students get accostomed to d/ling MP3s, then they have an uphill battle to fight later. They are scared to death of a new generation thinking there is nothing wrong with this.

    Most of us here on the boards fit in the 20 to 50 year old category. We at least remember what it was like to have to *buy* a cd! Think about the impact of those below us who will grow up in a culture where, if you want an album, you download it and burn it yourself.

    From the RIAA's point of view, it's easier to send a watered down "cease and desist" letter rather than rethinking ways to relate to this new demographic.

    1. Re:Think about why the RIAA did this... by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Informative

      We at least remember what it was like to have to *buy* a cd!

      Slashdot lame reply response (TM) almost kicked in here. I was about to say "Hey, I still buy CD's. In fact, I've bought CD's of bands I've found through P2P networks!", but then I realized, No. No I haven't. The last CD I bought was Reel Big Fish - Cheer Up!, which came out late last summer. I buy about a CD every 6 months.

      Yeah, I don't buy CD's anymore, unless they're from a band at a show - Now that's something I have done - gone to a show of a band I found on P2P. But, you know, fuck the RIAA.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:Think about why the RIAA did this... by octalgirl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This can't be the first time they have addressed higher Ed directly, but it seems they are a couple of years too late with this dialogue. They should have jumped on this a long time ago before a generation of P2P users gets so accustomed it becomes 'they way things are'. Overall I'd give this letter a C+. They lose points for being late and not creating a forum with goals of a positive outcome - that means working with schools to create an educational opportunity so that some of these students might actually come up with a way to deal with these issues. Thus they lose points again for focusing on discipline and censorship over education. It's good to form a non-threatening and somewhat informative communication between parties to settle a dispute. Yet there are subtle inaccuracies and hype dotted throughout.

      "Of course, P2P technology is exciting and holds great promise as a means of legitimately distributing works --it is the misuse of this technology by entities such as KaZaa, Grokster and Morpheus that causes problems for digital networks."

      Sure P2P holds great promise - as long as it's reserved for them to make $$ and no one else. If they would have only permitted Napster to license their catalog they could have worked toward a solid legitimate use of P2P. To take an opportunity to communicate constructively then use it to bash the 'Evil P2P companies' is a bit much. The KaZaa's do nothing more than provide a service; it's the end-users who may misuse the technology.

      I have always believed that the way to deal with P2P successfully is through a solid education and understanding of the technology and discuss solid cases of how it can be used for legitimate and non-legit uses. What better place to do this but at University? Yet nowhere do these letters discuss educating the students. They focus instead on seeking out the evil doers and ignorant fools who would create an 'insecure' network .

  25. No. Ban all p2p by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No! The pirates would still pirate and legitimate research and game playing would be compromised. Must students just put alot of mp3's in the download queue and just walk away. Browsing the web is different since you actually have to sit down in front of your system and stare at the hourglass. Not to mention time is valuable for the student and they should be able to get information as quick as possible. If I pay for Ethernet access in my college tuition then I better get full Ethernet access and not a 28.8 speed connection. Pings can go up way into the thousands on a busy day from what I heard.

    Packet shapers are bad because they lower the priority of anything that is not http. Ftp is useless, shh is useless even email with large files can take awhile since only http is optimized. They also do not address the still legal problem of filesharing because no matter how slow the connection becomes, students will still pirate.

    The only solution is to ban p2p. I am sorry and I no this sounds unfair but its not right that I can not use the college's ethernet access for legitimate purposes so someone can steal mp3's and porn. Its true that alot of public colleges with limited resources have ethernet connections that if you lucky will let you download at 5/k a sec! If you play quake3 today, you will notice all the guys with high pings are not really modem users anymore but rather college ethernet users. Its true. All thanks to p2p. You have packet shappers and kazaa to thank for your lousy performance.

  26. To make more money? by cryptor3 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well if this whole thing is to make more money off us, at least they're finally thinking long-term, because I'm in college, and I sure as heck don't have any money to buy their stuff right now!

  27. Early Electrical Grids by shoemakc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The whole situation reminds me of when electrical grids were just being set up, however metering was not widespread and the available meters crude.

    Eventually when the technology improves, the system will have to move to a "pay what you weigh" billing scheme just like all of our other utilities.

    I mean, let's face it. Internet access is becoming a utility, just like electricity, water gas, etc. Why then should it not be billed by the gallon, kW or whatever just like any other utility?

    I know it sounds aweful to the all-you-can-eat salad bar culture, but it's probably inevitable.

    -Chris

    --
    --an unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys--
  28. My experience with suspected "copyright violation" by crimsun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked for a couple networking depts on campus during my undergraduate "career" at UNC, among which was ResNet. I've learned a _ton_ during my years at UNC, and I continue to learn at work and in external studying. I worked with some truly great people in ATN and computer science, namely my bosses in ResNet and the security folks.

    Early in my college stint, one of my Red Hat machines was hacked literally minutes after I ifup'ed eth0. Needless to say, I took an immense amount of heat because that computer was subsequently used as a waypoint to launch a DoS. What a turning point. Those who've interacted with me since have known me to be extremely critical of standard security procedures at universities; I've been very outspoken in pushing the use of strict ssh2, strong passwords, forced password expiration, keeping current with application and service updates, reading and generally being security-conscious, and other what I consider security essentials from an administrator's viewpoint. I say this because most students don't care about the difference between ssh2 and telnet; they just want to check their email and download mp3s.

    Which brings me to my second point. During my junior year, I was part of one of the first large OpenNap networks. Although the particular server I operated had the enable_share parameter disabled, the nature of the network setup allowed information transfer over the entire network and thus anyone--even on a host with sharing disabled, like mine--could retrieve search results for a song search. The RIAA wasn't too happy (I don't doubt this was discovered through napigator), and in the end I had to sign a number of documents promising I would never infringe copyrights again, use excessive network resources, etc. This is despite the fact that I was operating a completely legal OpenNap server--my boss at ResNet affirmed that I wasn't sharing.

    What this goes to show is that universities with _competent_ security and copyright-aware folks will throw up a safety net for you _if you're doing the right thing_. The EULA for ResNet at UNC and various links already cited in the posting above make explicit the methodology of dealing with suspected copyright violation. While I wasn't happy at the time, I have to acknowledge that UNC gave me a lot of support for which I'm grateful. The basic point is "don't do any stupid, and you won't regret it." If however, the RIAA decides to chase you down as they did me, as long as you're within your proper use, you should be ok.

    I've heard separate stories about mistreatments on separate protests, but those are unfortunately not things for which I can vouch.

  29. Re: Perfect People To Tell... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative


    > For the first time in my scholastic career, I had a history class that went beyond "We had a revolutionary war in 1776. We had a civil war in 1860. ..."

    Yeah, a good class would get the dates right.

    > Yes, I've heard stories of political correctness being forced on people at universities, but it's not at every one, and even at those universities, you'll find an amazing diversity of opinion if you actually talk to the students and teachers.

    Teasing aside, the main point of your post is certainly correct.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  30. When I went to college... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny


    When I went to college the really high-tech people were running 1200 baud dial-up to BBSes.

    Ahh, for a Commodore 64, a 1670 modem, and nibbleterm. Those were the days, my friends. Now every college weenie has KaZaA and thinks they're hot stuff. I don't think I paid for any software ever for the C-64, and most of it was swiped at 300 baud or at file sharing parties - we called them GT's (Get Togethers). I don't think I got the 1671 until 1986.

    And we used to Phreak MCI and Sprint by hand.
    Of course there was the day that the FBI came knocking at my door...

    Music sharing? Albums recorded to cassette tape.

    Kids today just don't get the finer points of stealing. It's all about instant gratification now. I say, cut the cord and take away their high-speed internet. Let 'em P2P at 300 baud over POTS like we use to. ;)

  31. Some colleges like it by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend of mine is a professor at Lewis and Clark college in Portland, OR, and he tells me that they purposefully do not block P2P of any kind. They consider this sort of a student recruitment tool. It does tend to clog their network on Friday and Saturday evenings when students are busy downloading MP3s and pr0n, but their response to the issue is to add more bandwidth to the Internet.

    As far as they're concerned, it's one of the costs of doing business as a college these days.

  32. think a little by joenobody · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Interestingly enough, there is no threatening 'or else' stuff in those letters

    Duh. If a college employee hasn't yet learned to read between the lines, they're not long for their job. College, as a business, have more intrigue and politics than a junior-high school girls' clique.

    --

  33. VALENTI!!!!! by sinserve · · Score: 3, Funny

    Valenti needs to stop behind that "businessman" persona and start getting real. I mean, what
    kind of self respecting Sicilian threatens others with the law?

    Valenti, come out of the closet and start busting some balls man. These freckled white kids
    need to see what descipline is suposed to be. Show these motherfucking little bastards WHO is
    the daddy.

    The RIAA needs its own army of made men to do business.

  34. Re:Perfect People To Tell... by trotski · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, come back, proud Canadians
    To before you had TV,
    No hockey night in Canada,
    There was no CBC (Oh, my God!).
    In 1812, Madison was mad,
    He was the president, you know
    Well, he thought he'd tell the British where they ought to go
    He thought he'd invade Canada,
    He thought that he was tough
    Instead we went to Washington....
    And burned down all his stuff!

    And the White House burned, burned, burned,
    And we're the one's that did it!
    It burned, burned, burned,
    While the president ran and cried.
    It burned, burned, burned,
    And things were very historical.
    And the Americans ran and cried like a bunch of little babies
    Waa waa waah!
    In the War of 1812!

    Now some hillbillies from Kentucky,
    Dressed in green and red,
    Left home to fight in Canada,
    But they returned home dead
    It's the only war the Yankees lost, except for Vietnam
    And also the Alamo... and the Bay of... ham.
    The loser was America,
    The winner was ourselves,
    So join right in and gloat about the War of 1812

    --- The Arogant Worms

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
  35. I agree on bandwidth by chazzf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work tech support for a small midwestern liberal arts college. We've got a 6 megabit outgoing. We had the subnets for KaZaa, WinMX, etc blocked. The first week of classes the connection was great. Then word got out that Morpheus was still working. Within a day the outgoing had slowed to a crawl. I like p2p as much as the next Slashbot but darn it, the network can't take that kind of abuse. We continue to allow LAN file sharing and AIM file transfers because they don't suck bandwidth, but the major p2p apps are just too wasteful...

    ~Chazzf

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
  36. If that music was recorded in the last 90 yrs..... by Dr_Marvin_Monroe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It sure prob. is copyrighted!....and NO THERE ISN'T PLENTY OF PUBLIC DOMAIN STUFF....

    Even if you are getting that music off a defunct "K-Tell" record from "Disco-77" you bet it's copyrighted....and Jack still says you gotta pay "K-Tell" for the right to use it....even if K-Tell isn't around anymore, you gotta pay him and his cousin Vinny.

    Think it's hard now....think down the DRM road where the access is controlled "per-play" rather than "I have the album"....as soon as the consumer looses the right to "hold the album/rights to listen".....it's all over....

    Think about it, that's where EULA's have been going with "revokable liscense agreements" and the rest of it. You no longer have the ability to keep using something that you bought, even if you still have the media.....time expired!

  37. ppft ... -spray- by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Funny

    Outside of college, I haven't found a whole lot of people who think, or really know the details of any orthodoxy.

    Um, I live in a college town. I burst out with a guffaw every time I hear someone make a connection between being a college student, and thinking or being intelligent. I can't help it.

    Just make sure I don't have a mouthful of soda if you're going to say something like that :)

  38. P2P has legal uses.. by nolife · · Score: 3, Insightful
    For the last week or so I have been leaving a machine with KaZaa Lite running non stop.

    Even though I am capped at 128kbits upload, people have still managed to pull between 500MB to roughly 750MB a day from it. Only amature car/street racing videos and the psyche iso's. NO illegal material at all. The RIAA/MPAA can kiss my ass. P2P has a purpose and I am using it in that manner.

    What about FTP, usenet, IRC, IM's? The list goes on and on. Maybe the RIAA/MPAA should skip the middleman and complain to the retailers that are selling computers to students. That would solve the copyright and bandwidth problems.

    5 step process for outdated business model, if you can't beat 'em:

    Lobby lawmakers

    Use PR money for FUD

    Manipulate the numbers

    Modify your business plan

    Join them

    They are running out of options!!

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  39. Re:"Lapsing Through Neglect?" What's That? by aronc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get off it. There never will be anything like "copyright lapsing through neglect". Neglect by who? For how long? How measured?


    Probably not again, but yes, there used to be. Original provisions of copyright called for a 14 year term when you registered a copyright (neglect to register == no copyright) and renewable once (neglect to renew == no more copyright). As I said in my previous reply there, this sort of system was still in place until fairly recently. Automagic copyrighting of anything and everything anyone does is not how it has always been.

    The excuses for theft conjured up by music pirates are just as venal and self-serving as the RIAA's excuses for using copyright to enforce a middleman's monopoly.

    If you want to fight the concept of copyright itself, come out of the closet. If all you really want is free music, stay in the closet and keep your mouth shut.


    A) I am not a music Pirate. I am, or was, one of the RIAAs better customers. Between my wife and I we own nearly a thousand CDs.

    B) I do not wish to fight the concept of copyright itself. As Lessig, and most other modern minds interested in this debate, I feel that at it's heart copyright is a good idea. Allowing an author/inventor/artist to benefit directly from their creations is good for society. However as our copyright law has been written by big business interests and rubber stamped by congress the balance between the creator and society has gone far, far away from what it should be. So I am, and have been, coming out of the closet in that regard for years.

    --

    jello.
    aka aron.