Slashdot Mirror


Korea World Leader in Broadband/Technology at Home

bozoman42 writes "67% of Korean Internet users are connected to broadband, some at 32Mbps! In fact, according to the Guardian Article, Korea is leading in nearly all walks of a modern high tech life. But there may be downsides. (Especially as covered here last week.)"

21 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. Slight rewording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband. There's a big difference there, and it's very impressive. I'll bet that 67% of Mexican Internet users are connected to broadband, and it's around 0.1% of their population.

    1. Re:Slight rewording by plone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article said that 67% of Korean HOUSEHOLDS are connected to broadband, not 67% of Korean Internet USERS. That means that 67% of the homes are wired with broadband. The actual percentage of population of people who have access to broadband is therefore much higher than 67% since Households usually constitute more than a single person.

  2. Maybe the "free" market ain't all that by release7 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Last week, they published a report highlighting a number of Korea's advantages. These include the government's vision and commitment...

    Ingredients for happy society:
    Add: one ounce of capitalism, one ounce of socialism, a pinch of communism

    Not everything in the world is black and white, especially when it comes to determining which "ism" makes the greatest number of people happy.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  3. Why is this shocking!? by prichardson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is not shocking due to some basic differencews between the US and South Korea.

    1)The South Korean government is encouraging technological growth, while the US is still realing from P2P networks and people exercising free speach.

    2)South Korea is relatively new, like Europe and Japan, South Korea recently (relativel) rebuilt its industrial base. The US has NEVER had a serious conflict close enough to home to neccesatate major rebuilding. This means that our stuff is old compared to theirs.

    So you see, it is not only explainable, it is logical that South Korea would lead the US, and the rest of the world, in the people having cool toys and making cool tech toys.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "P2P and free speach [sic]."

      Why are these always used in combination? Pirating products is not free speech.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Why is this shocking!? by Joey7F · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is P2P and Piracy always used in combination? Don't equate a technology with a behavior.

      --Joey

    3. Re:Why is this shocking!? by tshak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is not shocking due to some basic differencews between the US and South Korea.

      You forgot:
      3) South Korea is smaller then the average US state and therefore very easy to wire for broadband.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  4. Weird world of Korea by Ektanoor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is some strange paradox here. Korea in fact is two Koreas. They started just in the same line and nearly with the same problems but today they seem to make a difference like Earth and Moon. We have the North with its rich resources but backward economy, its hunt for nukes, militarisation and lack of Internet (probably with exception of some bureaucrates). And we have the South that was considered to be more poor in resources, but which, in the end, is becoming the top technocratic country in the world. Yes, the South was also highly militarised and had nukes from the US. But the same went for the North with USSR.

    I just wonder what will happen when someone will try a real reunification. What will happen when a North, which still cannot give up its dependency on someone else, with an economy in shambles and one of the biggest armies in the world meets a South which a big part of the world depends on, an economy that gives envy to anyone and carrying a more pacifist mood than ever?

    North - What do you mean by "using Internet"?
    South - What do you mean by "not using Internet"?

  5. Re:But there may be downsides... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Fortunately, the Mexicans or Texas do not have weapons of mass destruction or have interests to invade my country and possibly use them. Former President Clinton called the North Korea/South Korea border the scariest place on Earth.

  6. Re:Multiplayer games are HUGE in Korea. by keyed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are two reasons why there are real life beatings because of the multiplayer games: 1. They take the games very seriously. 2. Korea's a densely populated and relatively small country (compared to the US) so they can physically meet the person they're playing with/against. I'm sure that there are people in the US who would do this, but it's kinda expensive to catch a plane to go beat up some other kid. Not everyone can get a wad of cash like Jay and Silent Bob ;) I remember reading an article on this and the police had a term for these beatings, an "offline PK."

  7. So what? by Omkar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In urban India (where I'm unfortunately banished), the internet has become just another method of communication. Access is taken for granted. his despite the average computer here is a pentium1 with hardware sold under false pretenses. Broadband is unheard of. Most people access the internet at cybercafés How does pervasive broadband access measurably improve on this situation? Sure, flashy content is enabled, but I don't think anything fundamentally changes.

  8. Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by wyndigo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Japan launched 3G phones first, and broadband is equally prevasive here. Obviously, the author didn't check their facts. I probably just sounds better to say Korea, which has a back water image for some reason, than to compare to Japan. Still its more accurate to say large parts of asia (taiwan, korea, singapore, japan) are now significantly ahead of the west as far as being wired goes. Its easy here because due to population density the last mile problem disappears.

    --wyn

    1. Re:Korea sounds more sensational than Japan by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      are now significantly ahead of the west as far as being wired goes.

      Can we watch the lingo here? Everyone seems to be saying... 'Because the use of technology X, this other country is better than us'. The fact is, cynicism is a good thing. The fact that Koreans, Japanese, et al., ar willing to spend great gobs of money on hi-tech devices and services does not say that they are doing better than anywhere else.

      I think the total number of people with internet access (period) could be used as mark of technological advancement, but that's because there is a great deal of information available online. Just because Koreans can now watch streaming video, and play UT on big pipes, does not make them better off. In fact, their tendency to irationally spend money seems to make them much worse off IMHO.

      The same could be said of cell-phones. The coverage of cell technologies might indicate the communications level of a country, the number of Gs only means that people are willing to pay more for toys.

      Before anyone mentions how useful technology can be for some, we are talking about the populous here. You know, the people that spend $600 for an iPaq so they can have a battery-sucking MP3 player with a color screen... The people that pay several-hundred dollar cell-phone bills, so they can talk to their friends while they are driving to work.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  9. We need that here, by HanzoSan · · Score: 5, Insightful



    It would improve the social enviornment in the USA, and give kids a place to go.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:We need that here, by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It would improve the social enviornment in the USA, and give kids a place to go.

      I live in the USA and they have a couple near my place. I haven't done any studies but it seems like a bunch of humbug teenagers smoking and drinking, and in practical terms is the same environment as an arcade - which I wouldn't really view as good or bad.

      I think the reason a place like that exists is I live in a Chinatown. Non-asians maybe don't like going to public computer places, or arcades, because it's more economical just to use their computer at home.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  10. Re:But there may be downsides... by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad.

    North Korea is much like a homeless person desperately committing violent crimes on street corners: They have nothing to lose. That is the reason why much of the world is fearful of NK with nukes: Israel, the UK, Russia, the US- All have "something to live for", so to speak, so their nukes largely are retaliatory. Mutually assured destruction, if you will. North Korea, on the other hand, seems like the kind of nutbar country that would take action knowing full well that it would be obliterated: What's there to lose?

    If you're looking for a great example of anti-Americanism, I would hardly consider North Korea a good choice: A despotic, shithole of a country where millions continue to starve to death while the leadership builds giant monstrosity of buildings in a desperate attempt to portray itself as a successful nation.

  11. (OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That is the reason why much of the world is fearful of NK with nukes

    You do realise that there is only one nation which has actually used nuclear weapons in war - and its not any of the countries in the so-called 'axis of evil'.

    If you still don't know the answer, visit this site

    Tim

    --

    Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    1. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by RestiffBard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am well aware that the United States is the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons in was. Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We do remember that. Trust me. There is a shitload that the United States has done that I'm not totally copacetic with. There is also a shitload that I'm totally thrilled about and proud of.

      Why is it that when people try to down the United States they forget instantly all the good shit we've done?

      I figure we should get mege kudos for ending ww I and WW II. So next time someone reminds me that the unites states eneded ww II with two nuclear bombs I'll remind them that we did exactly that. ended those wars.

      fuck did anyone forget that with out the united states Germany would most certainly be what we call europe now?

      are we about to start a war in Iraq? No. We're going to finish one. Do I like bush? hell no. Do I hate Saddam? yeah, I kinda do.

      sorry. got pissed off.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    2. Re:(OT) Re:But there may be downsides... by jxs2151 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The one sure way to get marked "Troll". Disagree with some long-haired, leftist freak extolling the virtues of North Korea and other repressive regimes while bashing the very guaranteers of their 'right' to speak freely.

      Imagine a world without the US, assholes.....I mean really imagine, not just imagine what Chomsky tells you it will be like but really imagine a world run by Hitler and Stalin and Kim Il Jung. Prefer that?

      Troll my ass, go back to Internet school and learn what troll means.

  12. Re:Shows effects of US intervention too.... by maw · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Your conclusion may be true, but your reasons for it are suspect.

    You assume that the only reason North Korea is the way it is is because it's a "communist" country. That may be the case, but it may also be the case that they are they way they are in a reaction to events and people around them.

    In other words, would they be in the same situation if they had been left alone? Maybe, but it's hardly given.

    --
    You're a suburbanite.
  13. Re:But there may be downsides... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [i]I think its great that North Korea doesn't adhere to America's demands. Not doing so doesn't make them bad. [/i]

    No, I think the mass starvations, dicatorship, killings, recruiting from orphanages at the age of 6 for SF troops, terrorist bombings of jetliners, kidnapping of foriegn citizens, and sending death squads into South Korea is what makes them 'bad'.