This should have been done long ago. MS gave hardware to schools to sway them to go M$ Apple should be giving gear away as an investment into the end users too.
Re:about time
by
Idarubicin
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Apple doesn't have forty billion in the bank. And MS isn't trying to sell hardware in addition to software.
-- ~Idarubicin
Re:about time
by
OmniVector
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
my highschool had TONS of apple machines, and we even got more after i left. Not to mention the vocational school i went to after highschool had even more?! macs. i'm sure apple has given schools hardware discounts as well, otherwise they would have never gotten imacs over pcs.
then again, i remember talking to the sysadmin one day only to hear him ranting about the difficulty of administrating nt4 as opposed to the mac machines.
-- - tristan
Re:about time
by
EvilAlien
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
MS isn't trying to sell hardware in addition to software.
Maybe that is why Microsoft's business model, as repulsive as it may be to some, is much more successful than Apple's?
Re:about time
by
thanasakis
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
MS isn't trying to sell hardware? What about the x-box? I think that microsoft is trying to enter the hardware market as a serious competitor. What they don't know is that controlling the hardware market isn't as easy as controlling the software market.e.g. their usual tricks won't apply here.Apple tried to block 3rd party manufacturers and where did that get them. If you have a doubt ask IBM (or sun). IBM wasn't able to control the pc which she had invented in the first place. These companies have learned their lesson and are now moving to the software side of the force. MS is going to have a hard time in the hardware market...
Re:about time
by
Gyorg_Lavode
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
My mother is a 7th grade teacher and owns a TI notebook. The school she is at uses macs almost exclusively. When she got the book, it came with OS9 and the first OSX. OSX at that time was so buggy that the person incharge of the school computer system told her not to use OSX and instead stick with OS9.
I see this move as apple trying to convince those educators who bought an apple under OS9 or OSX / 9 to upgrade so that the students coming out of the schools are tutored in OSX helping to foster the OS.
Microsoft dosnt need any money, they create it. Giving away software licenses that they can set the price to allows them to create money as part of the settlement for many lawsuits.
-- Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive.
Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
Re:about time
by
benedict
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I think Microsoft is probably pretty well aware that the dynamics of hardware markets are different from those of software markets. They're not exactly ignorant of microeconomics over there in Redmond.
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Apple used to be the standard for educational institutions from K-12 and up. Back in the day it was all about Apples. The geeks in their late 20s and 30s should remember those days well, Apple IIc and IIe were the desktop machine available in the computer labs. They only "recently" got replaced by Windows boxes... Apple had the crucial education market locked up, and were in the faces of many of us growing up.
It didn't do them much good. Whether it was features, price, compatibility, overall usefullness, or some Evil Microsoft Trick, Apple lost this market.
I agree wholeheartedly. I furthermore believe that Debian should try giving away their OS for free to educational organizations as well, to provide an incentive of some sort for trying it. This really should have been done long ago! Wait...
--
true && more || less
Re:about time
by
Choachy
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Actually, Apple has done some very nice things for some local schools around here.
A Georgia middle school that my girlfriend teaches at won a grant from Apple several years ago, which provided the school with 750 iBooks and an airport network to cover the entire campus. Each student and teacher is given an iBook, which all now have OS X, for the school year, unlimited 'filtered' network access at school, and 3 hours of dialup access yer week from of campus. This is in addition to several iMac labs at the school.
This is in an average to low income area as well.
I wish something like this were available to me when I was in middle school.
Is it really that much more succesful though? Apple makes something like a 15% profit margin on every machine it sells. It has survived practicaly unscathed through economic downturns and contrary to popular belief at the time, survived through the 90's. They are currently growing, still innovating and are the only other OS to succesfuly hold out against Windows (linux is free, it won't go away, ever). Despite many power shifts, bad mistakes and large debts they have somehow managed to stay in business all these years. So tell me, why is Apple unsuccesful?
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Unfortunately not all technology administrators are bright. At a highschool I worked at, one of the guy in charge of technology had us take an inventory of the number of computers that would be nessesary to do that summer's expansion. He told us that with the exception of the art department (which fought tooth and nail for some very nice G4s) all the new machines would be Dells because they were cheaper for the school to purchase. This makes sense only if you don't take into account that the day before, he had been complaining to us about how the new Microsoft licensing scheme was going to bankrupt the tech budget and how he wished there was something other than windows to use (linux doesn't cut it in a highschool, these kids have enough trouble figuring out the difference between using IE on a PC and IE on a mac). The whole situation was even more ironic because the week before he had been compllaining that in the past year, the machines that had been in the shop the most were the new Dells that we had been sent on a trial program. Despite the fact that all of us could see that the Dell package was going to be bad news, all he saw was the low low price on that contract.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Yeah it is fine, because no one is a mac user be default. Anyone who uses a mac, uses one by choice and is therefore not locked into the mac. If a mac user wanted to switch to PC (for whatever reason) it would simply be a matter of reselling their mac and software to someone else, since macs have great resale value. However, most computer users, and espesialy students, have only known PC all their lives (or if they've known mac, they've known the shitty setups the schools use). So by furthering their exposure to one and only one platform, they are being further locked into that platform.
Think about it this way, very very few mac users bitch about being locked into Apple, but you can always find a windows user who complains about being locked into microsoft.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Are they..
by
403Forbidden
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Are they just giving away the upgrade or the entire package? If it's the whole OS that's a pretty good deal... heck I'm betting it will sway a lot of people who are thinking of buying a new PC into buying a Mac.
How long till we see the switch ads saying "I got my Mac OS for free... Apple is so nice and 1337"
I got WinXP, Frontpage, OfficeXP, and Visual Studio from MS for being a college student, why didn't we hear about this?
Re:Are they..
by
IamTheRealMike
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Are they just giving away the upgrade or the entire package? If it's the whole OS that's a pretty good deal... heck I'm betting it will sway a lot of people who are thinking of buying a new PC into buying a Mac.
How does that work? If they give you the OS for free, can you go to a shop and buy a cheaper Mac? I was under the impression that the cost of OS X is included and not optional. The only people who would benefit from this are those who already have a Mac with OS X.
Re:Are they..
by
haunebu
·
· Score: 4, Informative
They list the system requirements as:
*Mac OS X v10.2 system requirements: A minimum of 128MB of memory and one of the following Apple products: Power Mac G3 or G4, iMac, eMac, iBook, and PowerBook G3 or G4. (The original PowerBook G3 and processor upgrade cards are not supported.)
Note that a previous version of Mac OS X is not listed, so it must be the full package. Woohoo!
Re:Are they..
by
fermion
·
· Score: 4, Informative
As far as I know, there is not 'upgrade' to jaq. Everyone has to foot the $130 bill for the OS. It does not appear that Appled is asking for any money from the schools. They only want proof you are a teacher and a school delivery address.
I do not think you got WinXP and extras for free. Your school likely paid a very significant licensing fee for the right to distrubute the software to all faculty, staff, and students. This fee was in turn paid by you through fees, and, if a public institution, through public taxes. I would say you got an incredible deal, but it was far from free.
Or, as has been mentioned here before, the school was forced to license the software for everyone to avoid the dreaded BSA audit.
-- "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide."
Orphan Black
Re:Are they..
by
benedict
·
· Score: 4, Informative
OS X runs fine on G3-based machines, even some of the older ones. Sometimes you have to add memory though.
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
G3's and OS X is a pretty bad mix... It's like windows 98 of a pentium 100 mhz machine...
Hardly.
I've been running Mac OS X since beta on my six year old Beige G3/300 which has 256MB RAM and was running off the original ixMicro 3D video card. Once I hit 10.1.5 things ran quite smoothly, although things will slow down if I'm playing MP3s over NFS. (My 10/100 NIC and SCSI hard disk are both sitting on the PCI bus, along with the video card.) I was able to run dual monitors one off the Rage II and the other off the ixMicro just fine.
I recently upgraded to a RADEON 7000 PCI so I get better dual monitor support and can play some 3D games at low resolution.
This is my primary workstation and I am often running ~10 applications including Photoshop, OmniWeb, iChat, Mail, iCal, iTunes, BBEdit, XFree86, Terminal, etc. Things work wonderfully.
Re:Are they..
by
furballphat
·
· Score: 5, Informative
OS X "Jaguwire" requires a 3d video card with T&L engine (ie, Nvidia geforce1 or ATI radeon +)
Then how come I'm writing this on 10.2 with an ATI 128?
I got WinXP, Frontpage, OfficeXP, and Visual Studio from MS for being a college student, why didn't we hear about this?
Because you lying sack of shit, you have to return it all when you graduate.
(See http://wss.yale.edu/msdnaa/ )
Someone should mod you flamebait, asshole.
-- When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
Re:Are they..
by
madcow_ucsb
·
· Score: 3, Informative
According to the MSDN-AA faq:
Do students need to uninstall the software at the end of the course?
No, students are allowed to keep the software they have installed, but they may not check out or download additional MSDNAA software unless they continue taking courses from a member department. Regardless, they are still bound by the terms of the MSDNAA license agreement.
Re:Are they..
by
teslatug
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Are you sure it's not a good deal? Have you looked it up?
"The membership will run from July through June each year and will cost $799 (USD) per department per year to join. The program was designed to run concurrently with the standard academic year."
List of software:
* Visual Studio Professional
* Microsoft Project Professional
* Windows XP, Windows 2000, and other Microsoft operating systems
*.NET Enterprise Servers: Windows servers, SQL Server, Exchange Server, Commerce Server, BizTalk Server, Host Integration Server, Systems Management Server, Sharepoint Portal Server, and several others
* Microsoft Visio Professional
* MSDN Library (updated quarterly), documentation, technical articles, and code samples
* Software development kits (SDKs), betas, new releases, and updates
* Development tools for Windows CE
* Professional technical support for the program administrator that includes unlimited setup and install support and 4 regular support incidents
* Technical support newsgroups for faculty members
* Regular CD-based software shipments with updated software
Are they just giving away the upgrade or the entire package? If it's the whole OS that's a pretty good deal... heck I'm betting it will sway a lot of people who are thinking of buying a new PC into buying a Mac.
Um... no. This won't entice anyone to "switch." If you buy a new Mac, it's going to come with Jaguar anyway.
This is only useful for people who (a) already have the hardware and (b) didn't consider Jaguar to be worth the upgrade price.
The University of Texas system (state-wide) has a deal with MS where students are able to buy MS software dirt-cheap. I picked up a copy of Visual Studio.NET and Office XP for $30 each and Windows XP for $10. These aren't crippled versions either, they are the professional versions. At that price, it just doesn't make sense to pirate it. I'm sure there are plenty of other universities with the same deal.
Q. What happens if I leave Yale?
A. Under the EULA you must sign you agree to immediately remove any of these products from your machine(s) as soon as you lose your status as a member of student, staff, or faculty. Please note that this is not a Yale requirement and no one at Yale can grant an exception.
STFU.
-- When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
"I got WinXP, Frontpage, OfficeXP, and Visual Studio from MS for being a college student, why didn't we hear about this?"
I don't know if you were misinformed or what...Gnutella is not made by Microsoft for distributing their software. This also means they don't hand out mp3 and pr0n.
Before someone tries to refute my "lasts longer" statement. Please, don't compare emachines and $400 gateways and compaqs to eMacs. They aren't competitors. the price difference is far greater than 2x.
How are they not competitors? they are aimed at the low end low price market for each of the respective companies? Just because Apple tends to use decent parts in theri machines instead of the crap that goes into the low end PCs doesn't make it unfair to compare them, it just means the PC makers need to put better hardware in.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
OS X runs fine on G3-based machines, even some of the older ones.
I just upgraded a "conference room" Mac at work--an original "Beige G3" (first generation) to 10.2. $500 beefed up the hardware as far as the old platform would go, but I could have done it with less. The ol' G3 is now a G4 550 with 768 megs of RAM, a 20 gig HD and a Radeon 7000 PCI Mac edition. The OS runs pretty smoothly... not as smooth as new G4 hardware, but not bad considering the age of the original hardware.
Remembering one of the major markets
by
NiKnight3
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
It's great to see that Apple is still promoting their role in the educational market - that's where I started off with Macs. Learning with them at school, especially with their first experiences with computers, can really help people decide which OS to use in the future.
Take Maine, for example, where every 7th and 8th grader gets an iBook. A lot of the concerns about that program have come regarding the teachers' and parents' concern with having to learn the new hardware and software. Glad to see Apple is giving teachers a chance to stay on the front lines of the OS.
Re:Remembering one of the major markets
by
NiKnight3
·
· Score: 3, Informative
There's some information at the Apple page for the project and at the MLTI site (Maine Learning Technology Initiative).
I believe there are about 34,000 laptops at a cost of $34,000,000 (that's from memory).
I'm a teacher.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
I'll take one.
What? You doubt that I am a teacher? Well, come here and I'll teach you a lesson or two.
But, wait... it gets better
by
battis
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
The best part of the giveaway is that Apple is finally handing out some training software (for what it's worth -- totally sight unseen) for OS X. Having just dealt with transferring my mother and several friends from the old Mac OS to OS X, I can safely say that some training and support will be _VERY_ welcome.
Hardware Costs
by
rogueuk
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
The teachers still need to buy the hardware from Apple to run this though right? Can you get a new Apple computer without the OS installed? If not, then this kinda doesn't help new users much
Re:Hardware Costs
by
singularity
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
1) Teachers are already eligible for discounted hardware (just like almost any major computer company, Apple has educational discounts).
2) Most of this is going to be for the teachers that have an original iMac sitting in their classroom (or their house) that is still running MacOS 9.1 (or even 8.6) on it. No, this will not bring in new users directly, but an argument could be made "Well, if we buy new Macs, Apple might keep us with up-to-date operating system upgrades for free in the future."
-- - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
Re:Hardware Costs
by
benedict
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Apple's not forcing this stuff down anyone's throat. I agree with you that people who run schools should weigh the costs and the benefits. But that's their responsibility, not Apple's.
I think it's pretty clear that this is meant to boost OS X at the expense of OS 9. I don't see why that would put a bad taste in your mouth.
If you're just saying that this shouldn't be viewed as philanthropic, then I agree wholeheartedly. If I ran the IRS, Apple would be allowed to write off the cost of the materials, but not the retail value of the software.
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
***Or maybe Apple is trying to both show how nice their new operating system is as well as show how slow the teacher's current hardware is. With one stone they convince people to transition to OS X and they convince people to buy new hardware (or push for it in their budget if it isn't a personal purchase)***
windows has this auto built, no need to install newer os to get the once blazing fast computer to act like it had stuffed a bottle of valium up the re****. (and no need to tell this doesnt apply to 2k/xp, it does, the reg system gets pretty clogged up after doing dozens of installs of stupid software and cleaning it needs 3rd party products unless you're hc and use regedit for that..)
-- world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
colleges left out in the cold
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
i went down to my university's computer store and the guy there is a big machead like me. i asked him about getting jaguar, since i'd heard several answers to the question of how much the upgrade would really cost, ranging from free to 20 to 70 to the full 120. he said apple yanked their old committment to higher education faculty of a 1 dollar upgrade forcing the faculty to pay the standard educational price of 70. i wonder if this k-12 thing will extend to the universities at some point.
How does this fuck you over?
by
wirelessbuzzers
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Although I would be extremely frustrated in your situation, I don't think that Apple has "ripped you off again." Presumably you thought the upgrade was worth it, otherwise you wouldn't have bought it. I fail to understand how giving other people freebies "fucks you over." Unless those other people are competing with you. Which, unless you have some unusual circumstances, they are not.
-- I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
Re:How does this fuck you over?
by
IamTheRealMike
·
· Score: 2
Although I would be extremely frustrated in your situation, I don't think that Apple has "ripped you off again." Presumably you thought the upgrade was worth it, otherwise you wouldn't have bought it.
False logic - lots of business have just upgraded to Windows XP due to some fillip of the new licensing regime rather than because they thought it was worth it for instance. If you decided that 10.1 did everything you would ever need and didn't want to upgrade, as time passed your computer would become more and more obsolete, incapable of running newer apps that took advantage of new features added into later versions.
How many people still run Windows 95, even though 98 had few compelling reasons to upgrade (except perhaps real usb support)? The answer - not many. Even Microsoft doesn't support 95 anymore.
Re:How does this fuck you over?
by
IamTheRealMike
·
· Score: 2
No, the logic was correct. You're just an idiot. It was 'worth it' for them to upgrade rather than to completely move their operation over to another OS that didn't have these licensing problems.
That's exactly my point. Whether an OS upgrade is "worth it" often has little to do with the OS itself, and is more to do with how painful would it be to get left behind, how easy would it be to switch to another OS etc. MacOS is not really any different from Windows in terms of licensing, hence all the bitching and moaning about the price of 10.2 - those people clearly didn't think that remaining on 10.1 for ever was really an option.
so..
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Linux has been doing this since its inception.
Eligibility...
by
singularity
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Do I qualify? To qualify for the "X for Teachers" program you must be a K-12 teacher at a recognized school (Public, Private, Catholic, Bureau of Indian Affairs) and you must agree to have software delivered to your school address.
I always love these descriptions. Define "teacher." I work at a residential high school as a resident counselor. True, the name "teacher" is not in my title. However, my job description (as written by the state of Illinois) involves teaching students.
Border's refuses to give me a discount on books (even when purchased for programs with students) because they claim (at least my local Border's) that the discount only applies to people that work in a classroom.
I work with very technology-aware students (I work at a the Illinois Math and Science Academy) and, as a big geek, I am often discussing tech issues and comparing computers with students.
(An upcoming program I am putting together will discuss recent copyright debates that are ongoing, for example).
I think that Apple would want nothing more than for me to have a copy of Jaguar to show off to the students.
And Apple might very well send me a copy of Jaguar, who knows...
Of course, being the good little geek, I pre-purchased an educational-discounted copy and got it before it was available retail. That was $75 out of my pocket that I am guessing Apple is not going to reimburse.
I have to wonder how many teachers have already purchased Jaguar.
I might take them up on the offer and give one of the copies to a student.
FYI: Illinois Math & Science Academy (IMSA) is a very famuous state funded honors high school.
IMSA is almost certainly qualified.
--
---
"Don't anthropomorphize computers. They hate that."
Re:Eligibility...
by
MaximumBob
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
With all due respect, resident counselor at IMSA is NOT a teaching job. I think the most accurate thing I can come up with is "academic support."
Unless they've substantially changed RC's jobs in the last few years, there's really no educational purpose to giving him free software, nor does it serve the marketing purpose I imagine Apple has for this.
Yes, Apple may have an agenda but the bottom line is schools are getting free shwag. It's always good to see and I wish more companies would follow suit both in and outside the tech industry. It's also good to see that kids will get more of an opportunity to be exposed to more than just Windows.
The bigger problem is having school districts reponsibly spend the extra money they will save.
Yes, Apple may have an agenda but the bottom line is schools are getting free shwag. It's always good to see and I wish more companies would follow suit both in and outside the tech industry.
So you're for the type of school privatization that we're seeing in the UK then, where companies pay for textbooks, buildings, teaching materials in return for students using only branded stuff, and only being able to buy new stationary etc from one location?
I'd think it's pretty easy for local authorities to turn a blind eye to corporates giving schools free stuff, only to later find that their budgets are now dependant upon corporate aid.
The bigger problem is having school districts reponsibly spend the extra money they will save.
That is a huge problem. One of the local schools near where I live just finished spending $12 million to upgrade the sports complex. Astroturf football field, bigger stadium, clay running tracks, etc. The best part is that they've always had a parking problem and they built a bigger stadium where the parking lot used to be and didn't build any more parking. Doh!
Is that really how it works in Britain? That's a bit odd when you think how the British tv system worked for so long; No commericals, citizens pay an annual fee. Commercialization of schools seems much more insidious. But with many budgets being tapped these days, where else are they going ot get the money?
Thankfully, no, not yet. It's been talked about a lot though, and a few experiments have been done. I believe one or two "failing" state schools have been taken over by a company, and that sort of thing has indeed gone on. The schools got new buildings (schwag), but had all sorts of conditions placed upon them.
Note that New Labour isn't really left wing at all, they have privatised pretty much everything they possibly could. We still pay for TV because the BBC is far too big and popular to change now.
That's what I'm worried about in a way - these companies seem to be using schools as a kind of playing field for their products. If their products didn't involve any other conditions I'd be fine - no problems with giving out free textbooks etc as long as no favours were expected later. The main problem I see is that a proprietary platform by definition has conditions attached, namely that in future you will be under pressure to upgrade when discounts may not be available, and that it's hard to stop using them etc etc.
Disney sends free "shwag" to my mother (a 3rd grade teacher) -- whatever piece of crap movie they are hyping she gets a care package -- *lots of* disney themed learning software (pocahontas, dalmations, etc), complete sets of mc donalds affiliate toys to give to the kids, books, etc.
Of course because the school shes at has an equiptment budget of 1000$ a year (for *all* of your expenses), shes happy to have software and toys to give the kids.
But of course the kids rush right out and see the movie -- exactly what disney wants...
So my question to you is -- Is disneys manipulation more, less, or equally evil compared to apple ?
My parents are both teachers, but I'm not about to put OS X on their Performa 5200... Not only do they need an Apple computer, they need a relatively new Apple computer.
I remember the 5200; it's slowly migrated away from my desk to the attic; I imagine it still works, but I absolutely despise the 603e processor they stuck in it; the 6840's seemed so much faster. Not to mention that I remember seeing one on ebay for a whole $50. And that was at the end of the auction.
There is a juvinile aspect to your argument, that is common when someone on Slashdot contrasts an action by Microsoft, with one by another player - such as Apple or Corel.
There is a magic concept at work here: CONTEXT
What makes an action by MS reprehensible or not, is not the actual sequence of events, but the context in which they occur. This is in fact, the determining factor about anti-trust law. A legitimate form of promotion by one entity becomes a prohibited leverage of dominance in the market by a monopoly player.
MS has been determined - in unquestionable legal language - to be a Monopoly player.
Now, make your crack - is MS the Shoe, Top Hat or the Scottie Dog...
-- "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Re:wash repeat...
by
DrMaurer
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
This isn't the worst of it.
Occasionally, I substitute teach, so I don't think I'm qualified for Apple's give-away, so.
But, from what I've seen, the worse of this advertising stuff is the Channel 1 network.
In exchange for free TVs in every room (and the cable infrastructior [sp] along with it), the school agrees to broadcast this news program into the school rooms.
The actual content of the Channnel one network is supposedly news, but it's biased, heavily, but I suppose that it's hard to keep bias out of news. I mean, just by choosing which stories to cover you've got bias.
CNN's Anderson Cooper and MTV's Serena Alschule (however you spell it) got their start at channel one. It also allowed for a lot of schools to have the means to make their own news shows, some of which were basically some kid reading in monotone the events of the day and the sports scores, along with the cheesy Video Toaster graphics.
But they (Channel 1) pay for it by showing about 4 segments of 4 ads in about 15 minutes to a very specific and very captive audience.
But I remember this stuff back when I was in school. I remember that they had thousands of ads that students were forced to watch, mostly involving OXY cleansers and Pepsi.
Vaguely depressing, because they had the demographic they wanted and the kids had to watch, sometimes there were quizzes based on the content of the show. (Of course, depending how the student cared about his/her grade.)
There's your advertising in schools for you.
At least my school had a pepsi and a coke machine, for choice, you know. They turned them off before first hour started, though my experiences show that the availability has little effect on the students themselves in the classroom. It's more likely the location and the towns' economic situation.
To try and push this into vaguely on topic-ness, I haven't seen an Apple (other than a few Apple IIs [even still]) in a school I've taught at or attended since my college's graphic design lab.
-- Dan
Its Called Keeping the Edu Market
by
jeramybsmith
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Apple once owned the edu market but nowadays it actually has to compete. Now, a teacher with a lab full of os9/osx.1 computers from a year ago wont be able to get budget moey to buy the jaguar upgrades. So apple is offering free jaguar to keep them happy. Jaguar is what osx.0 _should_ have been. Don't assume its just a bugfix upgrade.
-- Never overestimate the end user.
-jeramy b. smith
AND.. The campain you never heard about;
by
eddy
·
· Score: 2, Offtopic
It's all about consistency. You can have the most amazingly creative design but if it doesn't hold up the whole way through it breaks down in the mind of the consumer [...]
This is ironic, the Gates Foundation gave a $1 million grant to fund the project in Maine... Gates (Bill) gives money to Maine to buy Macs? I just thought that was slightly amusing...
(btw, check the site
for refference, it's on the right)
What's the difference?
by
KFury
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
With Jaguar, Apple's never made a distinction between an upgrade and an OS purchase. Everyone who has a machine that can run Jaguar already has a version of the Mac OS, so what's the difference between calling it an upgrade or not?
Everyone who has a machine that can run Jaguar already has a version of the Mac OS, so what's the difference between calling it an upgrade or not?
No. Plenty of G3 based iMacs and towers were sold before OS X did anything resembling ship. And given enough memory, they run it quite nicely, thank you.
"Everyone who has a machine that can run Jaguar already has a version of the Mac OS, so what's the difference between calling it an upgrade or not?"
No. Plenty of G3 based iMacs and towers were sold before OS X did anything resembling ship. And given enough memory, they run it quite nicely, thank you.
I said all Macs that can run Jaguar already have a version of the Mac OS. I didn't say they had a version of OS X.
Give the gift of X
by
bobdotorg
·
· Score: 5, Informative
I did this for my mom about 10 minutes after Apple made the announcement. I felt authorized, given that I'm her sysadmin.
Go to: http://www.apple.com/education/macosxforteach ers/i ndex2.html
fill in the zip code of the school of your favorite teacher, and then enter their name and email. OSX will be sent to them. Takes 90 seconds.
P.S. This was announced days ago. What took it so long to make/.?
-- __
Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
This is a very good thing
by
davisshaver
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I am a 8th grade student at a Middle School who is running the yearbook team. I am the sole user of a G3 with the 21 inch CRT display. I love the computer for what it is, and I am even gladder now that I can ask my advisor to order Jaguar from that site for me. Right now the G3 is crashing twice a week, and i want to have some more peace of mind, espcially so I do not have to upload the pictures and templates every night.
THANK YOU APPL!
-- "What we have here is a failure to communicate"
The Warden, Cool Hand Luke
Re:wash repeat...
by
DrugCheese
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Oh yes Channel 1, thanks for the flashback;)
Yea that was a VERY bias news cast now that I think about it. Good thing I have a strong will.
*Grabs a Pepsi*
-- *DrugCheese rants*
Really a deal for someone in subsidized housing.
by
fmaxwell
·
· Score: 2, Flamebait
There are counties in the U.S. where the starting salary for teachers qualifies them to live in government subsidized housing. Few such teachers can afford to blow $1,200 or more on an iMac.
Here's a wild idea: Apple could price their computers such that an entry level iMac costs what an entry level Intel-architecture PC does. They could stop trying to be the Bang & Olufson of computers and build machines that teachers and students could readily afford. Not only would that get teachers and students on board, but also make the machines more appealing to the public at large. Instead, Apple seems to be doing just the opposite by integrating expensive LCDs into their entry level iMacs and not selling an entry level machine sans monitor so that consumers can go to Best Buy and purchase a cheap 15"-17" monitor.
Re:This sounds familiar
by
Xtifr
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
isn't giving away a product for below the price you'd normally charge (except in special circumstances) market dumping, and as such illegal?
IANAL either, but no, giving something away is not illegal in general, although it can be under specific circumstances. Donations to schools are, I believe, generally covered under "charity", and far from being illegal, probably even qualify for a tax write-off.
From what I recall, it wasn't the integration of IE with Windows that landed Microsoft in court originally, it was their practice of giving it away for free in order to get an advantage over Netscape.
MS was violating the terms of their earlier consent decree, where they had agreed not to try to put potential competitors out of business by bundling new stuff with the OS. Remember, the rules are different for a monopoly, and even more different for a monopoly that repeatedly violates anti-trust laws.
I'm no fan of Apple, I wouldn't switch on a bet, and if you gave me a Mac, I'd wipe off that OS/X junk and install Debian in a heartbeat, but Apple is clearly doing nothing wrong here.
I would think that even teachers would be able to afford $800 for a low end Mac at home, but Apple has been giving Macs to schools for free for years.
-- A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ...
by
ImaLamer
·
· Score: 2
Maybe they load it up on their machine running MacOS 9 and see how ______ it is and they write a letter to the principle saying that every class should be with a Mac.
Maybe it's just a tactic to get mindshare. Get the newest, freshest OSX out there and viola! everyone in class will "switch".
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
And in a related story...
by
fmaxwell
·
· Score: 5, Funny
...Bentley is offering all K-12 teachers free 19" 5-spoke split-rim titanium bolted alloy wheels with and Pirelli P-Zero tires with the purchase of any Bentley Arnage T!
No, I'm not slow, dull, and unmotivated. But wait, I'm an education major! How could that be? I must be some reject from the math department, right? No wait, I remember why I went into teaching: it was because I valued helping others more than making money. Am I motivated? Hmmm... I dunno, I guess the fact that it worries me that if I don't perform well as a teacher, I could be hurting the abilities of hundreds of students to perform well in math.
You're way over generalizing. I know plenty of "regular" physics, chemistry, ECE, EE, CS, and [insert your major] majors who are completely unmotivated, are as slow as molasses, and really didn't take much away from high school. They aren't stupid, per se, they just don't care. I'll grant that some teachers aren't the sharpest, and some of them were probably referred to teaching because they weren't very successful in other areas. But the majority of the rest of us that feel a calling to help students, partly because we saw such horrible teaching in the past, don't fit your description.
And I believe Apple has a program for home schoolers as well. I'm not sure about this specific deal, but you can read more about Apple's home school connection here:
http://www.apple.com/education/k12/homeschool/ Matt Fahrenbacher Senior in Mathematics and Education University of Illinois @ Urbana-Champaign
-- James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
I am disappointed that this program expires in December. If I were a teacher and wanted to buy a Mac, it would make the purchase much more attractive if I were given free upgrades for the life of the machine.
As many people note, Macintoshes are not cheap machines, and may be out of the price range of the average teacher(and do not tell me it is out the price range of all or most teachers, because I know that that statement is false). Apple is also losing market share in the education market mostly due to better marketing by Dell. By offering teachers free OS, they reduce future uncertainty over cost, give then a reliable simple OS, and free them from the MS licensing nightmare.
If Apple were to give away the OS to teachers, that would help a lot, and would not cost them a lot. An apple will generally last through 2 to 3 major upgrade cycles, which may be a couple hundred dollars lost to Apple. That seems a small price to help convince millions of teachers to make their next computer a Mac.
BTW, one issue sometimes brought up but not often fully discussed is the licensing of software to schools by MS. For many people the cost of the computer is only a small part of the total IT cost. Buying software can easily get to be 2/3 of the cost over the life of the machine. Part of the reason that MS is gung ho to force schools to license MS software is so that the software will appear free to the end user, thus artificially reducing the cost of the wintel machine, and increasing the number of student who will buy wintel machines. Although MS also licenses software it makes for the Mac, there is far more 'free' software available for the PC. I have known several people who would have and should have bought Macs, but bought Wintel machines because of the 'free' software.
-- "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide."
Orphan Black
Most teachers I know use macs. We had one teacher at the highschool I worked at who bitched and moaned when we first set him up with an iMac. At the end of the year, he had been promoted to assistant principal at the school and the office he moved into had a PC. The day after he moved in, he called us in to get rid of the PC and bring back his mac. Last I heard, he was seriosly considering buying an iBook.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Re:So Jobs wants to corner the NEA market...
by
elphkotm
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Even more politically incorrect than that observation will be this question: I don't suppose Jobs will be interested in the millions upon millions of American parents who have taken to home schooling their children - or will he?
I believe Apple has a program that gives discounts to homeschoolers... The same discount they give to teachers. So if you're in the market for Apple hardware, homeschool your kids for a couple months:).
--
<Amanda`> I just went out to the parking lot in my bathrobe to exchange warez CDs.
Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
Pemdas
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
But the numbers just don't work. From Apple's website, I would want a 2-processor 1Ghz G4 Powermac, 17" LCD, 512MB of memory, 80GB hard drive. Pretty reasonable specs.
That computer would cost me over $3000. Looking over at Dell's website, a similary configured PC, which a better video card, and a 2 Ghz P4 instead of the 2x1Ghz G4's, would run me about half that.
Some specifics that jump out at me: Apple wants $400 for 512MB of PC2700 memory. Dell wants $200. I can get the appropriate module from crucial for $170, so Apple's markup is well over 100%.
The LCD is similar; apple's 17" LCD display runs $1000. Dell will charge me $500. I can get a nice samsung model for about $590 online.
I really, REALLY like what I've seen of OS X, but I won't pay 100% premiums on hardware just to be able to run it.
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
benedict
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Don't be an idiot. You can use your Crucial RAM and generic LCD screen with a Mac. I just bought 256 MB of RAM for an old iMac for the princely sum of $42 -- from Crucial.
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
mithras+the+prophet
·
· Score: 2
The towers are widely agreed to be a terrible deal. I wouldn't buy one either.
However, the iMacs, iBooks, and Powerbooks are much more competitive, with perhaps a zero to three hundred dollar markup relative to PCs, but plenty of other benefits to offset it.
As for the displays, well, you're free to use any other display you want with your Mac. But even Cnet agrees that they're the highest-quality displays you can get (and they generally hate Macs).
I agree with you on the components thing though. Apple needs to get the extra-memory-and-drives markups back in line with reality.
-- four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
JoshWurzel
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I have to know...which fantasy world do you live in where you have to buy everything from Apple? The only people I know who pay that 100% markup are people who honestly have nothing better to do with their money and so much constraint on their time that they can't be troubled to search around.
Don't want 512 from Apple for $400? Fine, buy it elsewhere. Don't want to pay $1000 for an Apple LCD? Fine, buy one elsewhere. Suddenly your $3000 machine is $2500. And why do you need dual-GHz for OS X? It runs fine on my dual-800, and fine on my roommate's dual-500.
Switch to a base dual-867, and we're down to $1700 plus tax.
Quit yer bitchin and do your research.
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
TeddyR
·
· Score: 2
How about this for a markup...
HP 4000 printer memory... HP wants over $400.00 for it when Kingston sells the equiv. for $36.00...
http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/configurator/mod el sinfo.asp?SysID=+5325+&distributor=0&submit=Fi nd
[I know its not a fair comparison... but since the Kingston model has a lifetime warrenty... etc.... and WORKS.... so who is really at the disadvantage here]
--
--
Time is on my side
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
MoneyT
·
· Score: 2
Ok, to start, even if you don't believe the 2x faster Mhz Myth bit that Apple claims ( and I don't) there is a definate difference between mac and PC processors, and not just in the Mhz rating. The dual 1 Ghz bit seems a bit steep for your system requirements.
Second, you would be crazy to buy a memory upgrade from anywhere except a third party and install it yourself. Apple Dell gateway will all over charge for extra memory. No suprise there.
I have yet to see (except in some really really expensive models) an LCD screen that rivals the one's Apple uses. Seriously, go to and Apple store, play with the LCDs there, then go to a PC store, the difference is incredible.
Not only that, but again, you need to factor in the bits and pieces that Dell isn't giving you (firewire, gigabit ethernet, check the speeds on the super-drive that dell gives you if you get one, the Apple one is generaly a better spec one than most of the PC companies are selling) and which OS does the Dell come with, and what about M$ office (yes Apple works doesn't quite compare, but it sure beats the hell out of notepad).
Also, I see Apple only wanting $200 more to upgrade the dual Ghz from 256 to 512.
I'm not saying the Mac comes out cheaper. In 90% of the cases, the towers are horrible deals. But their laptops compete.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Re:Boy, would I like to run OS X at home...
by
MoNickels
·
· Score: 2
Listen, the only Mac users who buy directly from the Apple sites are those who already get discounts, or those who are very uninformed (like you, apparently).
Long-time Mac users DON'T buy directly from Apple. First, we don't want to pay sales tax. If I order from Warehouse.com, I don't. Second, we don't necessarily insist on having an Apple-branded LCD or RAM. We save hundreds there. Third, we like to get the freebies from the online vendors: extra ram, the floppy drive, the low-end inkjet printer.
Now it is true that some of the very high-end specifications are only available on the Apple site, but I believe those high-end machines are only marginally better. The savings of not buying directly from Apple are a better choice.
Plus you would be surprised how often the line "Is that the best price you can give me?" cuts the price even just a little bit more when you're on the telephone with a mail order or online vendor. Apple does no such thing.
--
Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect
Double standard? Yup.
by
JonTurner
·
· Score: 2, Flamebait
Yeah, but everytime Microsoft gives away/subsidizes MS software to Schools/Universities the whole Slashdot world erupts into riot. The cries of "Monopoly!" and "brainwashing students" and "conflict of interest" are plentiful.
Now Apple decides to give away their next-gen OS and everyone here thinks that's a great gesture.
Double standard? Definitely. Hypocrytical? It sure looks like it.
Re:Double standard? Yup.
by
Incongruity
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Yeah, but everytime Microsoft gives away/subsidizes MS software to Schools/Universities the whole Slashdot world erupts into riot.
Seems to me that the only time that such action on Microsoft's part really brought about a major outcry was when they offered to do such as penalty/in settlement for what the government and many/.'ers deemed monopolistic practices. Now that is a completely different situation than the one that is currently at hand with Apple.
Apple is not offering to give away their software and a bunch of hardware because they've had charges of unfair trade practices leveled against them. Apple is clearly trying to win the hearts, minds and screens of teachers, and thus students, but how is that different from anything that any marketing ploy ever does?
So in a way, you are right, there is a similar motivation between what Microsoft offered to do and what Apple is doing but the reason that your point doesn't stand up, in my opinion, is that the context of their actions is different. Apple is doing it simply as a marketing scheme, Microsoft did it as an attempt to get away without any stronger penalty for the charges brought against them. Therefore, in light of the dramatically dfferent contexts of the two cases, it seems to me that the differential reaction by the/. masses is completely understandable and justified.
-tcp
Re:Double standard? Yup.
by
jweatherley
·
· Score: 2
(BTW, I think I might be slightly wrong about the OSX Jag requiring a T&L engine, but it does require a 3d video card (I think the rage128's work) anyone know more?
I guess you're going on about Quartz Extreme here. If you want Quartz (the graphics layer) to be accelerated you need an AGP graphics card with >16MB of RAM (ideally >32MB). Jaguar will run without this though. It just won't be as fast when you start putting half a dozen transparent terminals on top of the DVD player.
I hope the 7 K-12 teachers that can afford an Apple enjoy the upgrade.
Actually, Apple offers educators pretty decent discounts on all of Apple's hardware and software. For example, the lowest price Macintosh for educators is a iMac G3 for $750. The lowest price Mac for non-educators is an eMac for $1099. The same eMac for educators is $999, almost a 10% discount.
The eMacs offer Firewire, USB, ethernet, a 17" flat screen monitor, nice speakers, a compact form factor, and they are very durable. Sure if you buy some no-name, do-it-yourself pc you can get a computer cheaper, but these prices are pretty good for a pre-built, quality machine. On top of all of this you get MacOS X, tons of great free software such as iTunes and iMovie, and the ability to run almost any software written for Linux or other Unix-like operating systems. Not a bad deal at all.
Apple has an interesting pricing system. From the page you linked, we learn that it costs $799 with 128MB, $874 with 256MB and $1024 with 512MB, and for $40 you can "get twice the RAM".
Re:wash repeat...
by
donglekey
·
· Score: 4, Funny
shows, some of which were basically some kid reading in monotone the events of the day and the sports scores, along with the cheesy Video Toaster graphics.
Re:Pathetic Sellings Points
by
LMariachi
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Tell me once again why these applications matter to me and the millions more like me?
I guess they don't. Better write a lengthy post on Slashdot about them.
Homeschoolers Need Not Apply
by
JonTurner
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
http://www.apple.com/education/macosxforteachers/i ndex2.html "You must be a K-12 teacher currently employed in a public, private, or charter school to qualify for participation in this program.
This offer is limited to eligible K-12 teachers and is not available to resellers, institutions, home schools, non- teacher K-12 school employees, preservice/student teachers, or higher education faculty (including college of education faculty)."
I'm really quite surprised at this snub. Apple has always had a very positive history of supporting homeschoolers, even offering institutional discounts to HS'ers. Until now, I suppose.
Thanks for nothing, Apple.
Re:Homeschoolers Need Not Apply
by
ianscot
·
· Score: 2
Apple has always had a very positive history of supporting homeschoolers
A history for which you're rewarding them with your enduring good faith in return, seemingly.
Out of curiosity, how does someone who home schools work things like tax exemption? Do you have to get it all back in April every year, or what? Do you have any ID that certifies your status as a home schooler? I'm not trying to explain this Aplpe thing away, just asking.
I was in an Apple store on saturday; someone was trying to get an educator's discount on something with no real documentation, and I wondered how that worked. Sure seemed like the employee was trying to do right by the person.
-- "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
Re:Homeschoolers Need Not Apply
by
JonTurner
·
· Score: 2
>>Apple has always had a very positive history of supporting homeschoolers
>A history for which you're rewarding them with your enduring good faith in return, seemingly.
Yes, I'm disappointed. Like the majority of Slashdot readers, my loyalty can be bought. Unlike most/. readers, I admit it.;)
"Out of curiosity, how does someone who home schools work things like tax exemption? Do you have to get it all back in April every year, or what? No, there are no deductions whatsoever. Every dollar spent on textbooks, supplemental classes at the University, field trips, equipment (software, calculators, lab supplies), etc. comes directly out of our family budget. There is no "reimbursement" or tax break of any sort available to us.
Do you have any ID that certifies your status as a home schooler? I'm not trying to explain this Aplpe thing away, just asking. "
Every state is different; some are much more controlling than others. My state has nothing in the way of ID cards, etc. Generally, proof of membership in a homeschool-related organization such as the HomeSchool Legal Defense Association (HSLDA.com) or a copy of the Notice of Intent which declares the homeschool to the state Department of Education is sufficient evidence for retailers that yes, you're a homeschooler.
If you can't figure out why easy-to-use, effective and free movie and image editing software isn't good for education you're totally pathetic. There are numerous stories at the Apple site, testimonials from ACTUAL teachers detailing how Macs are making a difference in their schools...so STFU.
You ask why the applications should matter to you when you don't use any peripherals? Maybe they don't. But to rant about email servers and forget that students can pick up a hell of a lot from the tools given to them is just lame.
Can any teacher get this upgrade or must they actually own a Mac? Becuase think about it this way, a school employs 80 teachers and most likely doesn't have 80 Macs but doesn't want to buy 30 copies for their lab. If all 80 teachers get a copy then the School now has 80 liscenses of Jaguar. Upgrading the lab is no longer a problem.
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ...
by
usr122122121
·
· Score: 2
write a letter to the principle
Don't you mean the principal?
Ah, the irony of it.
--
-braxton
Re:Pathetic Sellings Points
by
benedict
·
· Score: 2, Offtopic
iTunes is useful for anyone with CDs and some hard drive space who wants to turn their computer into a smart jukebox.
I guess that's not you, but it doesn't require iPod, digital camera, or video camera.
I think it's good for kids to create stuff, and they like to do that sort of thing. So digital editing for schools makes a lot of sense to me. My fifth-grade class performed The Mikado, and I imagine it would have been pretty cool if we could have filmed it and made a DVD from it. I think kids should know that DVDs don't have to be made by Hollywood, they can be made by people too.
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ...
by
benedict
·
· Score: 2
> Other than preventing their current K-12 teacher > customer base from eroding, I can't see what > this will gain them.
I think that's exactly the point of this promotion.
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
The law against dumping is intended to protect against unfair competition, generally of the foreign variety.
Who but Apple sells operating systems for the Mac?
--
Ben
"You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Re:Uhh, wait a minute ...
by
PythonOrRuby
·
· Score: 2
Actually, I think there's quite a bit of principle in standing up to the starched-suit, Windows-devoted, businessmen hordes who typically govern K-12 schools' buying decisions and recommending Macs.
Kids don't need to help Bill Gates rule the world, and they don't need to become experts on Word features they'll never use that'll be obselete after MS' next release.
They need creativity and problem-solving skills. They need basic tools that are a means to an end, rather than an end. Apple provides such tools and as such their computers are the right choice.
I hope the i386 port is on the CD!
by
teknikl
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
I'm a high school computer science teacher teaching PASCAL, C++ and Java - using Linux of course. I'd *like* to switch (or at least DEMO) for the kids to see that Unix is now underlying a retail desktop OS. But I've got a room full of Intel PC's.
And every Mac you can buy now comes with Jaguar on it already. So I guess I'm wondering, "Whats the Point, Apple?"
That's twice as good in most categories compared to the Imac (right down the number of mouse buttons).
[Insert standard "Mhz Myth" argument here] [Insert standard "One Button Like God Intended" rant here]
Also, you forgot to factor in the labor involved in building and troubleshooting the computer. Most teachers would have to hire somebody to do this. Since this is a one-off build (I know if you're making dozens of the same computer you can do it faster, since you only need to troubleshoot once), assume four hours at $25/hour to build and troubleshoot. Since most teachers add Windows XP Home for $186.99, and Office XP Standard for $416.99, and you're looking at a total of $1,508.96 for your system.
Anyway, you're missing my point. My point is not that low end Macs are a better deal than low end PCs (they probably aren't). My point is that there are low end Macs which are affordable on a teacher's salary.
-- A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
i am a seventh grade teacher
by
b17bmbr
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
apple needs to do something about the hardware. it is just too expensive as far as schools are concerned. it is an example of being pennywise and pound foolish, but my district sees a dell for say $600 and an imac for say $850, and they'll choose the dell every time. plus, most district people, like mine (ARGHHHHH!!!) can't even spell unix.
i bought an ibook a couple of weeks ago. it has 10.2. i love it. but the problem is more hardware than software. a few years ago, schools began moving toward PC's, and os x is just not going to work.
-- My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
preaching to the conveted
by
job0
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Not sure how much this will help Apple. This is one of their biggest markets already and they already lots of special deals already for educators on hardware and software. Maybe they should have gone for colleges as well but I guess the marketing dollars wouldn't stretch that far.
Where were you in the 80's? There was a time when any class that had a computer had an Apple. The AppleIIe and AppleIIgs were about the only thing around schools then, because Apple dumped them at rock-bottom prices and got students hooked.
Re:It doesn't matter what they give for free
by
Gilmoure
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Try Pinellas County School board/system.They are not exclusively Mac but the main school board building has a lot of them around. Across the county, Macs are in schools in varying degrees. The lowest percentage are in high schools, though there are some high schools that are about 90% Mac. Another high school tech person told me his school had no Macs. He just didn't support them. The teachers in that had them did their own support, except for warranty repair. Then they called us (Apple authorized repair shop).
This county also has a city (Largo, FL) that is run with minimal windows machines. They are primarily Linux with a handfull of Macs in city hall. Wouldn't believe how scared the linux guys are of the Macs. Swore that there was no way to hook them up to the network and ended up getting the Macs their own dsl line. Weird!
-- I drank what? -- Socrates
Why they're doing this
by
Gilmoure
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Apple's doing this because there are a lot of iMacs out there that can run OSX 10.2 but were bought before hand. Anyone playing with previous versions of OSX were likely told by their tech specialist (usually media center/Librarian with yet another job to do for the same money) to pass on OSX until Apple got it more usable. Even with copies of 10.2 floating around schools (I do warranty repair at several county's schools) they're not about to go and risk thousands of $$$ for a version of OSX that might not be up to snuff. Hence, the give away.
Apple's not hoping to push hardware sales with this; any new Macs will come with 10.2 on it. They just want people to get away from OS9.
-- I drank what? -- Socrates
Re:Why they're doing this
by
chuckles1335
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
for apple's plan to gain users by getting them hooked in schools, they need to have the computers be better than the PC's everyone has at home.
Before OSX they didnt do that, i just graduated from high school, and until my senior year i hated macs, because i was always using the old crappy ones with old software, then i tried OSX, on a new Imac and am planning on buying a Mac (wont be able to for a while).
Apple is doing this because having schools use pre-OSX Mac OS is bad for apple, because students will all think macs suck if they are stuck using old software.
Apple vs MS
by
TDDeYoung
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Apple gives away the OS to teachers, thereby strengthening its position in schools and education (post HS is iffy). MS wanted to force schools to buy site licenses, IIRC. Who will win the public's hearts?
Actually, the lowest priced Mac for non-educators is the 15 inch monitor iMac G3 for $799 at Apple's online store. However, I used to work in education, and the discounts available to me were more in line of $50 off a roughly $2000 machine. I can see them selling the eMac with more of a discount though, since that line was initially targeted only to the education market.
Re:Really a deal for someone in subsidized housing
by
Gilmoure
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Here's the price for a classic iMac for K-12 educator personal purchase. Snow 256MB SDRAM - 1 DIMM Keyboard/Mac OS X - U.S. English iMac 600MHz 40GB Ultra ATA drive CD-ROM drive Mac OS X and Mac OS 9 Harman Kardon speakers Apple Pro Keyboard Apple Pro Mouse
Subtotal $789.00
All new Macs come with OSX 10.2. The free offer of 10.2 to K-12 teachers is to enable them to install it on the Macs they already have (both school and personal), not push new hardware sales. Think about it before entering bash-Apple mode.
-- I drank what? -- Socrates
Missing the point COMPLETELY
by
moosesocks
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
I'm not sure that you all are understanding this correctly.
Apple is giving away OSX to TEACHERS, not schools. There is quite a big difference here; the teachers get a copy of it, and can do whatever the heck they want to with it.
This does NOT mean that Apple is giving OSX to schools for the use in classrooms, labs, etc. Microsoft's products for K-12 teachers/students are licensed so that they are for (educational) use by the teacher or student, but not the school, as sepearate (more expensive) versions exist for schools. The copy of the software belongs to the teacher, and unless it's being installed on a computer which is property of the teacher, it's a copyright violation (and rightfully so - the school is essentially "stealing" the software from the teacher). I'm sure apple has a similar clause in their agreement. Still, I think it's a great offer.
Besides, isn't product placement one of the most effective forms of advertising?
-- --
If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
Presumably, Apple is trying to boost OS X use by teachers, so that more students will be exposed to the OS and thus will use it when they grow up. So why is Apple not offering this to home schoolers?
Home schoolers only directly school a few students each, but they interact with hundreds. For example, we belong to a home schooling association in Ft. Worth, which has about 200 students total. These people get together, and they talk - a lot! - about how they educate their children. These parents/teachers will sell (by which I mean convince to buy, though occasionally there is trade also) curricula, tools, local programs and the like to each other, based on how much it helps them. If Apple were to offer a homeschooling teacher this deal, they would be reaching as many people as they would through a public school, and people very dedicated to educating. Throw in sample educational software (which they should do with public school teachers as well) and their chances of growing their market go up dramatically.
On top of this, in many states, home schools are legally private schools no different (except in number of students and which building they are housed in) than any other private school. (This is true in Texas, for instance.) I don't really understand Apple's reasons for excluding homeschoolers from this program.
-- --
Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
The likely motive(a highschooler's perspective)
by
Kaboom13
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I'm a high school senior right now. Being a geek, I help out a lot with our school's highly overworked IT people. I've seen a large resistance throughout the district to change over to OS X. These people don't like change. Change requires retraining teachers and changing infrastructure. Its a great effort just to teach most teachers how to check their email. Now when we change to OS X, a lot of things are going to be done differently. Apple has probably seen this resistance in action. Apple has shown they want to completely get rid of classic as soon as possible. To smooth this transistion it makes sense for them to give it away along with training materials. It will also help cash strapped districts create a homogenous OS enviroment. OS X runs a little slow on older g3s, but it runs it fast enough for most educational purposes. This is a sound business and PR move for apple in my opinion.
Giving educational institutions a break
by
Morgahastu
·
· Score: 3, Interesting
It seems that apple has always had a strong connection with schools until I started working at a college. Apple barely offers any deals to colleges. Even if you go for a student discount (and spend about an hour filling out the forms) you'll only get about $50 off a new macintosh (too bad they don't tell you that BEFORE you fill out the forms).
How is apple supposed to expect support from the developer community or the student community when no one is being trained on using macs in school (other then graphics design people)?
The only people I know who know anything about macs are the graphic design people who will probably never own a mac because they will be supplied one from their employer.
Apple should really try and get the techies into macs at school. For example, a local college here offers a 3 year "Computer Systems Technician" Diploma and not once do any of their students touch a macintosh.
Graphic designers won't be developing software for your macs Apple.. clue in.
A company can declared to be a monopoly in one market while having plenty of competition in another (ie. Windows 95% desktop, ~35% (?) server). Apple holds about 20% of the education market which means that Microsoft can't be said to have a monopoly in that market. The difference, of course, is context.
Monopoly power is considered pernicious, especially when leveraging a Monopoly in one area, to try and extend itself in another.
This is the fundamental argument about Netscape. MS had desktop dominance, and used it to achieve browser dominance.
One needn't have a monopoly in one given area, to provoke a legal need for restriction on one's activities in another.
Ironic how you gave that helpful explanation of context, yet failed to understand it completely.
I wonder if you have any basic understanding of the existing legislation, and the rationale for constraints that have been sought on MS behavior... It appears you are more pleased by being contrary, than by thinking a little.
-- "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
Re:Really a deal for someone in subsidized housing
by
fmaxwell
·
· Score: 3, Informative
You are quoting prices on an grotesquely underpowered, outdated machine on which OS-X crawls. It doesn't have any way to write to removable media, so how is the teacher supposed to back up her data? "Sorry class, but I lost all of your grades in my spreadsheet because my hard drive died. I had no backup because for $800, my iMac didn't even come with a floppy drive, much less a CD-R/W."
Now compare that price to a modern, low-end machine from, say, Compaq:
Presario 6300US Minitower 128MB RAM Windows XP Home Edition Intel Celeron Processor 1.4GHz 48X CD-Rom Drive 40GB Hard Drive Floppy drive (3..5") Keyboard Mouse (with more than one button and a wheel)
And that price is just what the general public can get by walking into CompUSA today. A little shopping or an educators' discount would have turned up an even better price. For $250 less than the outdated "classic" iMac, the teacher gets a much faster machine (a 1.7ghz Celeron will spank a 600mhz G3 according to any respected, independent benchmark such as Spec), a larger monitor, a floppy drive, and more bundled software. In addition, she gets a machine that is much more expandable should she ever wish to put in a better video card, CD-R/W drive, DVD drive, etc.
So please stop with the Apple fanboy routine. The iMac line is grossly overpriced -- especially for most teachers' modest incomes.
eMac is only $949 at Harvard
by
good+soldier+svejk
·
· Score: 2, Informative
The cheapest Wintel Desktop they list is a Compaq EVO D510 2GHz P4 256/40GB CD at 1,149.00. The Compaq has more RAM and a three year warranty but inferior display/graphics combo and no firewire.
They also offer amazing specials on Apple products. When the second generation TiBook came out I got a first generation one for $1,700. I also got an iPod for $230 back when they retailed for $399.
-- It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man
I was interviewed on Channel One once - the topic was media coverage of war in Kosovo. The interviewer was really cool and seemed interested in my perspective, but I couldn't help thinking she was baiting me for something. When I saw the videotape of how she edited it I understood. They managed not only to take my words out of context, but to give the impression that I was saying almost exactly the opposite of what I intended. What I had said was critical of the US media; most of this was edited out, and it was made to look like my sole purpose was to bash Serbian media coverage.
Re:Never so expensive as "free" stuff
by
wadetemp
·
· Score: 2
Apple Talk is turned off by default in 10.2. Show me a network have to use Apple Talk (with modern macs and modern printing hardware... without which running OSX would be idiotic anyway) and THEN you can bitch.
-- "Teachers leave us kids alone..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
Re:Never so expensive as "free" stuff
by
DiscoOnTheSide
·
· Score: 2, Informative
Rutgers University for one. 30,000 users, covering all three campuses of Newark, New Brunswick, and Camden as well as the 5 sub-colleges that make up RU NB. Its not the main use and its mostly legacy as modern macs can do without it, but it's still there churning away, just as it has for years. How do I know this? I work for RU's Resnet. So cram your whiny BS.
Don't wanna read about Apple stuff? It's a simple option in your account.
The real reason that Macs tend to remain in institutions for 4+ years is due to the fact that MacOS machines stay functional for a long a** time;). Mac developers typically support older Apple hardware for quite a while since the hardware/software that they are developing for is incredibly specific. Moreover, Apple has a smaller market share it really makes sense to support as many macs as you possibly can... even 4 year old G3s.
I find it somewhat funny that I can walk into something such as a music studio and still find a ton of old Mac Classics sitting next to dual G4's. When your dealing with multimedia tasks such as midi Mac classics still just "work"... and work incredibly well at that.
People rarely want to keep a Wintel box around for more then 3 years. You get desire to migrate a lot sooner. (and by "migrate" I mean "huck that slow, difficult, outdated POS out the window")
I used to work in a campus IT dept, and I fail to comprehend why anyone in their right mind would want to spend thousands of dollars on Wintel computer labs. I guess people simply like to purchase what they know. Mac labs last longer (especially in multimedia labs), they are more secure, they have the same damn productivity software, they require a much smaller IT dept, software licenses are not a royal pain in the butt, kids can comprehend how to use the desktop workspace faster, teachers can admin class networks and netboot machines with virtually no training, etc etc etc. I'm also fairly sure Apple gives institutions a fairly nice price break when they buy in bulk.
I'm all about white box PCs if your going to stick linux on them and set up as word processing machines or library terminals. That's a smart low maintenance move. But for the love of god, keep those things out of the media labs;)
-- "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
Re:It doesn't matter what they give for free
by
MoneyT
·
· Score: 2
hmmm, the school district I worked at was almost the exact opposite of your picture. Teachers didn't copy any software, infact they didn't even get the discs, if they wanted somethign they brought it to us and we checked the licences and then did the installs. The school was so paranoid, we couldn't even install NT on the machines we had just finished building untill the new licences came back from M$, despite the fact that we had sent the order out, we were just waiting for confirmation.
The school board at the district did not use macs, in fact the board of ed was pushing to have PCs (lower initial cost don'cha know). This was caused a minor uproard amongst teachers. At the highschool it was a roughly 60-40 split, with heavy support for macs from the art department and the music department (but since when has a highschool cared about them?). At the middle school it was nearly 90% support for macs, only some of the new teachers fresh out of college didn't like the macs. At the elementary school it was 100% support for the macs.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Think about it. Take a look arround you at kids. Almost all of them are walking bilboards for one brand name or another. The sony headphones, the ambercrombie and fitch shirts, the Lee jeans, Nike shoes, Fubu jackets, the list goes on and on. Budwiser shirts, DKNY, Weezer etc etc etc. Kids are already used to seeing ads everywhere they look. What difference does it make if there are pepsi posters arroudn school, and Apples in the lab? Kids are either sheep or make their own decisions. Either way, it won't matter what we do.
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Re:Linux Free for K-12 Teachers
by
MoneyT
·
· Score: 2
There isn't a single k-12 teacher I can think of save for computer science teachers that could install, run or even download and make an immage of the linux CDs. That is why linux being free isn't news. That and because linux has always been free, so the norm is not news
-- T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Too bad it's only the USA
by
fantomas
·
· Score: 2
'Nuff said. Would have been nice to tell the school where my brother teaches in Manchester, UK. Or to contact my friend who is working with local schools in Cambodia.
Nah, they like giving away money
by
pommiekiwifruit
·
· Score: 2
After all, they had to come to an arrangement with Apple records when the macintosh got sound capabilities, so I guess now Infogrammes' lawyers (who own the Atari and Jaguar trademarks in the context of computers) are rubbing their hands with glee.
Second, a USB floppy drive runs $30, and the Compaq POS here has no FireWire, no CDRW, a lower-end version of the OS, no bundled software other than IE and Outlook Express...there's not much comparison. It stinks on ice.
ALSO, you could quote real prices--how much are these stupid rebates? Most are $199 for the computer, so looking at that I'd guess $50 for the monitor, which puts us back up at...a little over the cost of the G3 iMac today.
Your trollish defenses? It has more than one button on the mouse. Whoopie--you can buy a mouse with 100 buttons for your Mac, if it turns your crank.
Other big selling point? This teacher, who has little money and time, can buy and install DVD players, video cards and assorted crap. I know that's what most teachers I know do--they are constantly upgrading their low-end hardware.
No it does not. Here are Apple's own specs since you seem unable to navigate the web on your own.
Second, a USB floppy drive runs $30 and the Compaq POS here has no FireWire
A firewire card runs $20 -- and most people have no use for it. Oh, I see, if an iMac is missing something like a floppy, then that should be viewed as an 'inexpensive upgrade opportunity', but if the Compaq is missing something that costs less (and that most people neither need nor want), it's a POS.
Since you decided to get petty about ports, I will point out that the classic iMac does not have a parallel port, audio line in, serial port, or video connector (making monitor upgrades essentially impossible). Every one of those is a lot more valuable than Firewire for most people. Even more important than the iMac's lack of ports is the lack of expansion slots. The person who purchases the Compaq can add a SCSI card, Firewire card, USB 2.0 card, 802.11a card, RAID controller, TV tuner card, video capture card, etc. The iMac user has no such expansion opportunities.
no CDRW
Neither does the $789 "classic" iMac. So now the Compaq PC is a "POS" because it lacks something that the iMac also lacks? I will also point out that the CD-ROM drive in the Compaq is a 48x unit while the one in the G3 iMac is a 24x unit.
a lower-end version of the OS
For which there is far more software than for the Mac OS. Tell me what limitations Windows XP Home has that will impair the average home user.
no bundled software other than IE and Outlook Express.
Preinstalled software on the Compaq includes:
Microsoft Money 2002 Microsoft Works 6.0 office suite Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia Deluxe Intuit Quicken Financial Center/ Quicken 2002 RealNetworks RealOne Player Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 Norton Antivirus 2002 Coloreal Color Management software
Next time, do some research so that you don't make an ass of yourself.
ALSO, you could quote real prices--how much are these stupid rebates? Most are $199 for the computer, so looking at that I'd guess $50 for the monitor, which puts us back up at...a little over the cost of the G3 iMac today.
Are you too stupid to successfully get a rebate? What a "mornon" (to use your word)! Since you are apparently too challenged to use CompUSA's web site, the computer has a $50 rebate (not $199, as you suggested) and the monitor has an instant rebate -- so that even you could get it. So much for that pathetic argument.
It has more than one button on the mouse. Whoopie--you can buy a mouse with 100 buttons for your Mac, if it turns your crank.
So what? The machine costs $800 and doesn't come with one.
Other big selling point? This teacher, who has little money and time, can buy and install DVD players, video cards and assorted crap. I know that's what most teachers I know do-- they are constantly upgrading their low-end hardware.
If you would take your head out of Steve Jobs' ass for a moment, you would realize that it's a lot cheaper to upgrade a PC than to buy a whole new machine.
This is why I hate debating with many Mac users.
I initially said that the $1200 price of a modern iMac was too high for many teachers to pay. Then a Mac fanboy posted that there was an educator deal that offered the "classic" iMac (G3) for $789. When I compared that to what was available from Compaq (at CompUSA), you flamed me and claimed that the iMac has a CD-RW drive -- when the ones that have that are the new iMacs that start with the $1200 price tag to which I initially referred. So when comparing on price, we should assume $789, but when comparing specs, we should use the $1200 iMac?
I took the time to research what I wrote, looking up specs on the iMac and the Compaq before posting. You shot back with your flame (calling me a "mornon") in which you made incorrect assertions, illogical arguments, and for which you apparently did zero fact checking.
That's odd. I used to work in a K-12 (mother still does) and I work at a Unv now. At $2000, the discount is about $250.
I got a really good discount about 5 years ago. I signed up as an Apple's developer. At that point and time all Apple developers received steep hardware discounts. I bought a new 8600/300 w/ Applevision 1710, Color StyleWriter 4500, and a P166 PC Card (@ $826) with an incredible discount. Paid for the membership and the monitor.
I hate to break it to you, but OS X is so slow on the G3 that you might as well not bother.
Not at all. Time to drop your FUD. I just recently aquired a used 400 Mhz G3 PowerBook with 256MB RAM, and things are running on it quite well. iTunes, iCal, Mozilla, AOL, etc all at once. I've even been doing a lot of remote work with OroborOSX running apps from my Linux box remotely, including Mozilla and full-bore developer stuff.
(I'm quite interested in looking into Rendezvous also, given that it's a Zeroconf implementation.)
Re:but here's 2 problems with that
by
mughi
·
· Score: 2
1) unless the macs are relatively recent, they can't run os x.
Well... considering that the original iMac is from 1998, and can run OS X with only a $17 ram upgrade, I'd say that's not too bad. It's nowhere near the cost of getting PC hardware up to running the latest version of MS Windows.
2) unless they already have a mac with os x, they won't want to learn it.
Unlike many other OS's, there's not a lot to learn. The apps pretty much run as-is, and the OS itself is simpler if anything. And this comes, among other things, from first-hand experience with upgrading grandparents from OS 9.
plus, it will require upgrading/changing the servers, etc. PITA.
Have you actually looked into this? Jaguar has support for "old-school" services, plus all the newer ones like nice Windows networking. Rendezvoussimplifies things, and Jaguar includes other nic such as USB printer sharing.
At least homeschoolers get the discount...
by
alispguru
·
· Score: 2
We're homeschoolers, which is why my copy of Jaguar cost $69 when I bought it last August. Free would be better, of course, but Apple does give homeschoolers a break.
Anyone know if MS or {Dell/Gateway/HP} makes a similar effort?
This should have been done long ago.
MS gave hardware to schools to sway them to go M$ Apple should be giving gear away as an investment into the end users too.
comment directly in my journal
Are they just giving away the upgrade or the entire package? If it's the whole OS that's a pretty good deal... heck I'm betting it will sway a lot of people who are thinking of buying a new PC into buying a Mac.
How long till we see the switch ads saying "I got my Mac OS for free... Apple is so nice and 1337"
I got WinXP, Frontpage, OfficeXP, and Visual Studio from MS for being a college student, why didn't we hear about this?
It's great to see that Apple is still promoting their role in the educational market - that's where I started off with Macs. Learning with them at school, especially with their first experiences with computers, can really help people decide which OS to use in the future. Take Maine, for example, where every 7th and 8th grader gets an iBook. A lot of the concerns about that program have come regarding the teachers' and parents' concern with having to learn the new hardware and software. Glad to see Apple is giving teachers a chance to stay on the front lines of the OS.
No, This is like Microsoft giving away Windows XP to use on your Windows 98 machine.
I know many teachers who have old iMacs and couldn't justify paying the price for Jaguar. Now they can.
So are they trying to get better grades or something? The "Apple for the teacher" thing was out of style years ago.
Brings whole new meaning to giving the teacher an apple.
me thinks this is more for teachers' individual machines. not school labs. nice troll, btw
I have a shitty sig!
I'll take one.
What? You doubt that I am a teacher? Well, come here and I'll teach you a lesson or two.
The best part of the giveaway is that Apple is finally handing out some training software (for what it's worth -- totally sight unseen) for OS X. Having just dealt with transferring my mother and several friends from the old Mac OS to OS X, I can safely say that some training and support will be _VERY_ welcome.
The teachers still need to buy the hardware from Apple to run this though right? Can you get a new Apple computer without the OS installed? If not, then this kinda doesn't help new users much
i went down to my university's computer store and the guy there is a big machead like me. i asked him about getting jaguar, since i'd heard several answers to the question of how much the upgrade would really cost, ranging from free to 20 to 70 to the full 120. he said apple yanked their old committment to higher education faculty of a 1 dollar upgrade forcing the faculty to pay the standard educational price of 70. i wonder if this k-12 thing will extend to the universities at some point.
Although I would be extremely frustrated in your situation, I don't think that Apple has "ripped you off again." Presumably you thought the upgrade was worth it, otherwise you wouldn't have bought it. I fail to understand how giving other people freebies "fucks you over." Unless those other people are competing with you. Which, unless you have some unusual circumstances, they are not.
I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
Linux has been doing this since its inception.
I always love these descriptions. Define "teacher." I work at a residential high school as a resident counselor. True, the name "teacher" is not in my title. However, my job description (as written by the state of Illinois) involves teaching students.
Border's refuses to give me a discount on books (even when purchased for programs with students) because they claim (at least my local Border's) that the discount only applies to people that work in a classroom.
I work with very technology-aware students (I work at a the Illinois Math and Science Academy) and, as a big geek, I am often discussing tech issues and comparing computers with students.
(An upcoming program I am putting together will discuss recent copyright debates that are ongoing, for example).
I think that Apple would want nothing more than for me to have a copy of Jaguar to show off to the students.
And Apple might very well send me a copy of Jaguar, who knows...
Of course, being the good little geek, I pre-purchased an educational-discounted copy and got it before it was available retail. That was $75 out of my pocket that I am guessing Apple is not going to reimburse.
I have to wonder how many teachers have already purchased Jaguar.
I might take them up on the offer and give one of the copies to a student.
- (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
That is either a very funny idea or just plain trolling
What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
Yes, Apple may have an agenda but the bottom line is schools are getting free shwag. It's always good to see and I wish more companies would follow suit both in and outside the tech industry. It's also good to see that kids will get more of an opportunity to be exposed to more than just Windows.
The bigger problem is having school districts reponsibly spend the extra money they will save.
My parents are both teachers, but I'm not about to put OS X on their Performa 5200... Not only do they need an Apple computer, they need a relatively new Apple computer.
There is a magic concept at work here: CONTEXT
What makes an action by MS reprehensible or not, is not the actual sequence of events, but the context in which they occur. This is in fact, the determining factor about anti-trust law. A legitimate form of promotion by one entity becomes a prohibited leverage of dominance in the market by a monopoly player.
MS has been determined - in unquestionable legal language - to be a Monopoly player.
Now, make your crack - is MS the Shoe, Top Hat or the Scottie Dog...
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
This isn't the worst of it.
Occasionally, I substitute teach, so I don't think I'm qualified for Apple's give-away, so.
But, from what I've seen, the worse of this advertising stuff is the Channel 1 network.
In exchange for free TVs in every room (and the cable infrastructior [sp] along with it), the school agrees to broadcast this news program into the school rooms.
The actual content of the Channnel one network is supposedly news, but it's biased, heavily, but I suppose that it's hard to keep bias out of news. I mean, just by choosing which stories to cover you've got bias.
CNN's Anderson Cooper and MTV's Serena Alschule (however you spell it) got their start at channel one. It also allowed for a lot of schools to have the means to make their own news shows, some of which were basically some kid reading in monotone the events of the day and the sports scores, along with the cheesy Video Toaster graphics.
But they (Channel 1) pay for it by showing about 4 segments of 4 ads in about 15 minutes to a very specific and very captive audience.
But I remember this stuff back when I was in school. I remember that they had thousands of ads that students were forced to watch, mostly involving OXY cleansers and Pepsi.
Vaguely depressing, because they had the demographic they wanted and the kids had to watch, sometimes there were quizzes based on the content of the show. (Of course, depending how the student cared about his/her grade.)
There's your advertising in schools for you.
At least my school had a pepsi and a coke machine, for choice, you know. They turned them off before first hour started, though my experiences show that the availability has little effect on the students themselves in the classroom. It's more likely the location and the towns' economic situation.
To try and push this into vaguely on topic-ness, I haven't seen an Apple (other than a few Apple IIs [even still]) in a school I've taught at or attended since my college's graphic design lab.
Dan
Apple once owned the edu market but nowadays it actually has to compete. Now, a teacher with a lab full of os9/osx.1 computers from a year ago wont be able to get budget moey to buy the jaguar upgrades. So apple is offering free jaguar to keep them happy. Jaguar is what osx.0 _should_ have been. Don't assume its just a bugfix upgrade.
Never overestimate the end user. -jeramy b. smith
Apple is serving every xbox developer too! ;-)
Belief is the currency of delusion.
This is ironic, the Gates Foundation gave a $1 million grant to fund the project in Maine... Gates (Bill) gives money to Maine to buy Macs? I just thought that was slightly amusing...
(btw, check the site for refference, it's on the right)
With Jaguar, Apple's never made a distinction between an upgrade and an OS purchase. Everyone who has a machine that can run Jaguar already has a version of the Mac OS, so what's the difference between calling it an upgrade or not?
Kevin Fox
I did this for my mom about 10 minutes after Apple made the announcement. I felt authorized, given that I'm her sysadmin.
h ers/i ndex2.html
/.?
Go to:
http://www.apple.com/education/macosxforteac
fill in the zip code of the school of your favorite teacher, and then enter their name and email. OSX will be sent to them. Takes 90 seconds.
P.S. This was announced days ago. What took it so long to make
__ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
I am a 8th grade student at a Middle School who is running the yearbook team. I am the sole user of a G3 with the 21 inch CRT display. I love the computer for what it is, and I am even gladder now that I can ask my advisor to order Jaguar from that site for me. Right now the G3 is crashing twice a week, and i want to have some more peace of mind, espcially so I do not have to upload the pictures and templates every night. THANK YOU APPL!
"What we have here is a failure to communicate"
The Warden, Cool Hand Luke
Oh yes Channel 1, thanks for the flashback ;)
Yea that was a VERY bias news cast now that I think about it. Good thing I have a strong will.
*Grabs a Pepsi*
*DrugCheese rants*
There are counties in the U.S. where the starting salary for teachers qualifies them to live in government subsidized housing. Few such teachers can afford to blow $1,200 or more on an iMac.
Here's a wild idea: Apple could price their computers such that an entry level iMac costs what an entry level Intel-architecture PC does. They could stop trying to be the Bang & Olufson of computers and build machines that teachers and students could readily afford. Not only would that get teachers and students on board, but also make the machines more appealing to the public at large. Instead, Apple seems to be doing just the opposite by integrating expensive LCDs into their entry level iMacs and not selling an entry level machine sans monitor so that consumers can go to Best Buy and purchase a cheap 15"-17" monitor.
isn't giving away a product for below the price you'd normally charge (except in special circumstances) market dumping, and as such illegal?
IANAL either, but no, giving something away is not illegal in general, although it can be under specific circumstances. Donations to schools are, I believe, generally covered under "charity", and far from being illegal, probably even qualify for a tax write-off.
From what I recall, it wasn't the integration of IE with Windows that landed Microsoft in court originally, it was their practice of giving it away for free in order to get an advantage over Netscape.
MS was violating the terms of their earlier consent decree, where they had agreed not to try to put potential competitors out of business by bundling new stuff with the OS. Remember, the rules are different for a monopoly, and even more different for a monopoly that repeatedly violates anti-trust laws.
I'm no fan of Apple, I wouldn't switch on a bet, and if you gave me a Mac, I'd wipe off that OS/X junk and install Debian in a heartbeat, but Apple is clearly doing nothing wrong here.
I would think that even teachers would be able to afford $800 for a low end Mac at home, but Apple has been giving Macs to schools for free for years.
A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
Maybe they load it up on their machine running MacOS 9 and see how ______ it is and they write a letter to the principle saying that every class should be with a Mac.
Maybe it's just a tactic to get mindshare. Get the newest, freshest OSX out there and viola! everyone in class will "switch".
Get your Unix fortune now!
Apple is giving away Jaguars?
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
...Bentley is offering all K-12 teachers free 19" 5-spoke split-rim titanium bolted alloy wheels with and Pirelli P-Zero tires with the purchase of any Bentley Arnage T!
No, I'm not slow, dull, and unmotivated. But wait, I'm an education major! How could that be? I must be some reject from the math department, right? No wait, I remember why I went into teaching: it was because I valued helping others more than making money. Am I motivated? Hmmm... I dunno, I guess the fact that it worries me that if I don't perform well as a teacher, I could be hurting the abilities of hundreds of students to perform well in math.
You're way over generalizing. I know plenty of "regular" physics, chemistry, ECE, EE, CS, and [insert your major] majors who are completely unmotivated, are as slow as molasses, and really didn't take much away from high school. They aren't stupid, per se, they just don't care. I'll grant that some teachers aren't the sharpest, and some of them were probably referred to teaching because they weren't very successful in other areas. But the majority of the rest of us that feel a calling to help students, partly because we saw such horrible teaching in the past, don't fit your description.
And I believe Apple has a program for home schoolers as well. I'm not sure about this specific deal, but you can read more about Apple's home school connection here:
http://www.apple.com/education/k12/homeschool/
Matt Fahrenbacher
Senior in Mathematics and Education
University of Illinois @ Urbana-Champaign
James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
As many people note, Macintoshes are not cheap machines, and may be out of the price range of the average teacher(and do not tell me it is out the price range of all or most teachers, because I know that that statement is false). Apple is also losing market share in the education market mostly due to better marketing by Dell. By offering teachers free OS, they reduce future uncertainty over cost, give then a reliable simple OS, and free them from the MS licensing nightmare.
If Apple were to give away the OS to teachers, that would help a lot, and would not cost them a lot. An apple will generally last through 2 to 3 major upgrade cycles, which may be a couple hundred dollars lost to Apple. That seems a small price to help convince millions of teachers to make their next computer a Mac.
BTW, one issue sometimes brought up but not often fully discussed is the licensing of software to schools by MS. For many people the cost of the computer is only a small part of the total IT cost. Buying software can easily get to be 2/3 of the cost over the life of the machine. Part of the reason that MS is gung ho to force schools to license MS software is so that the software will appear free to the end user, thus artificially reducing the cost of the wintel machine, and increasing the number of student who will buy wintel machines. Although MS also licenses software it makes for the Mac, there is far more 'free' software available for the PC. I have known several people who would have and should have bought Macs, but bought Wintel machines because of the 'free' software.
"She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
Even more politically incorrect than that observation will be this question: I don't suppose Jobs will be interested in the millions upon millions of American parents who have taken to home schooling their children - or will he?
I believe Apple has a program that gives discounts to homeschoolers... The same discount they give to teachers. So if you're in the market for Apple hardware, homeschool your kids for a couple months :).
<Amanda`> I just went out to the parking lot in my bathrobe to exchange warez CDs.
That computer would cost me over $3000. Looking over at Dell's website, a similary configured PC, which a better video card, and a 2 Ghz P4 instead of the 2x1Ghz G4's, would run me about half that.
Some specifics that jump out at me: Apple wants $400 for 512MB of PC2700 memory. Dell wants $200. I can get the appropriate module from crucial for $170, so Apple's markup is well over 100%.
The LCD is similar; apple's 17" LCD display runs $1000. Dell will charge me $500. I can get a nice samsung model for about $590 online.
I really, REALLY like what I've seen of OS X, but I won't pay 100% premiums on hardware just to be able to run it.
Yeah, but everytime Microsoft gives away/subsidizes MS software to Schools/Universities the whole Slashdot world erupts into riot. The cries of "Monopoly!" and "brainwashing students" and "conflict of interest" are plentiful.
Now Apple decides to give away their next-gen OS and everyone here thinks that's a great gesture.
Double standard? Definitely. Hypocrytical? It sure looks like it.
The eMacs offer Firewire, USB, ethernet, a 17" flat screen monitor, nice speakers, a compact form factor, and they are very durable. Sure if you buy some no-name, do-it-yourself pc you can get a computer cheaper, but these prices are pretty good for a pre-built, quality machine. On top of all of this you get MacOS X, tons of great free software such as iTunes and iMovie, and the ability to run almost any software written for Linux or other Unix-like operating systems. Not a bad deal at all.
Sapere aude!
Apple has an interesting pricing system. From the page you linked, we learn that it costs $799 with 128MB, $874 with 256MB and $1024 with 512MB, and for $40 you can "get twice the RAM".
shows, some of which were basically some kid reading in monotone the events of the day and the sports scores, along with the cheesy Video Toaster graphics.
I still had fun doing it you insensitive clod!
This Wiki Feeds You TV and Anime - vidwiki.org
I guess they don't. Better write a lengthy post on Slashdot about them.
"You must be a K-12 teacher currently employed in a public, private, or charter school to qualify for participation in this program. This offer is limited to eligible K-12 teachers and is not available to resellers, institutions, home schools, non- teacher K-12 school employees, preservice/student teachers, or higher education faculty (including college of education faculty)."
I'm really quite surprised at this snub. Apple has always had a very positive history of supporting homeschoolers, even offering institutional discounts to HS'ers. Until now, I suppose.
Thanks for nothing, Apple.
If you can't figure out why easy-to-use, effective and free movie and image editing software isn't good for education you're totally pathetic. There are numerous stories at the Apple site, testimonials from ACTUAL teachers detailing how Macs are making a difference in their schools...so STFU.
You ask why the applications should matter to you when you don't use any peripherals? Maybe they don't. But to rant about email servers and forget that students can pick up a hell of a lot from the tools given to them is just lame.
Can any teacher get this upgrade or must they actually own a Mac? Becuase think about it this way, a school employs 80 teachers and most likely doesn't have 80 Macs but doesn't want to buy 30 copies for their lab. If all 80 teachers get a copy then the School now has 80 liscenses of Jaguar. Upgrading the lab is no longer a problem.
Ah, the irony of it.
-braxton
iTunes is useful for anyone with CDs and some
hard drive space who wants to turn their computer
into a smart jukebox.
I guess that's not you, but it doesn't require
iPod, digital camera, or video camera.
I think it's good for kids to create stuff, and
they like to do that sort of thing. So digital
editing for schools makes a lot of sense to me.
My fifth-grade class performed The Mikado, and I
imagine it would have been pretty cool if we could
have filmed it and made a DVD from it. I think
kids should know that DVDs don't have to be made
by Hollywood, they can be made by people too.
Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
> Other than preventing their current K-12 teacher
> customer base from eroding, I can't see what
> this will gain them.
I think that's exactly the point of this promotion.
Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
The law against dumping is intended to protect
against unfair competition, generally of the
foreign variety.
Who but Apple sells operating systems for the Mac?
Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
Actually, I think there's quite a bit of principle in standing up to the starched-suit, Windows-devoted, businessmen hordes who typically govern K-12 schools' buying decisions and recommending Macs.
Kids don't need to help Bill Gates rule the world, and they don't need to become experts on Word features they'll never use that'll be obselete after MS' next release.
They need creativity and problem-solving skills. They need basic tools that are a means to an end, rather than an end. Apple provides such tools and as such their computers are the right choice.
I'm a high school computer science teacher teaching PASCAL, C++ and Java - using Linux of course. I'd *like* to switch (or at least DEMO) for the kids to see that Unix is now underlying a retail desktop OS. But I've got a room full of Intel PC's. And every Mac you can buy now comes with Jaguar on it already. So I guess I'm wondering, "Whats the Point, Apple?"
Hmm, any M$ emplayees sneaking around Slashdot? If so I think you've found your new slogan:
"Think 'even more different' ".
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
That's twice as good in most categories compared to the Imac (right down the number of mouse buttons).
[Insert standard "Mhz Myth" argument here]
[Insert standard "One Button Like God Intended" rant here]
Also, you forgot to factor in the labor involved in building and troubleshooting the computer. Most teachers would have to hire somebody to do this. Since this is a one-off build (I know if you're making dozens of the same computer you can do it faster, since you only need to troubleshoot once), assume four hours at $25/hour to build and troubleshoot. Since most teachers add Windows XP Home for $186.99, and Office XP Standard for $416.99, and you're looking at a total of $1,508.96 for your system.
Anyway, you're missing my point. My point is not that low end Macs are a better deal than low end PCs (they probably aren't). My point is that there are low end Macs which are affordable on a teacher's salary.
A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
apple needs to do something about the hardware. it is just too expensive as far as schools are concerned. it is an example of being pennywise and pound foolish, but my district sees a dell for say $600 and an imac for say $850, and they'll choose the dell every time. plus, most district people, like mine (ARGHHHHH!!!) can't even spell unix.
i bought an ibook a couple of weeks ago. it has 10.2. i love it. but the problem is more hardware than software. a few years ago, schools began moving toward PC's, and os x is just not going to work.
My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
Not sure how much this will help Apple. This is one of their biggest markets already and they already lots of special deals already for educators on hardware and software. Maybe they should have gone for colleges as well but I guess the marketing dollars wouldn't stretch that far.
This should have been done long ago.
Where were you in the 80's? There was a time when any class that had a computer had an Apple. The AppleIIe and AppleIIgs were about the only thing around schools then, because Apple dumped them at rock-bottom prices and got students hooked.
Try Pinellas County School board/system.They are not exclusively Mac but the main school board building has a lot of them around. Across the county, Macs are in schools in varying degrees. The lowest percentage are in high schools, though there are some high schools that are about 90% Mac. Another high school tech person told me his school had no Macs. He just didn't support them. The teachers in that had them did their own support, except for warranty repair. Then they called us (Apple authorized repair shop).
This county also has a city (Largo, FL) that is run with minimal windows machines. They are primarily Linux with a handfull of Macs in city hall. Wouldn't believe how scared the linux guys are of the Macs. Swore that there was no way to hook them up to the network and ended up getting the Macs their own dsl line. Weird!
I drank what? -- Socrates
Apple's doing this because there are a lot of iMacs out there that can run OSX 10.2 but were bought before hand. Anyone playing with previous versions of OSX were likely told by their tech specialist (usually media center/Librarian with yet another job to do for the same money) to pass on OSX until Apple got it more usable. Even with copies of 10.2 floating around schools (I do warranty repair at several county's schools) they're not about to go and risk thousands of $$$ for a version of OSX that might not be up to snuff. Hence, the give away.
Apple's not hoping to push hardware sales with this; any new Macs will come with 10.2 on it. They just want people to get away from OS9.
I drank what? -- Socrates
And we all know what animal is the Teacher's Pet.
Apple gives away the OS to teachers, thereby strengthening its position in schools and education (post HS is iffy). MS wanted to force schools to buy site licenses, IIRC. Who will win the public's hearts?
Actually, the lowest priced Mac for non-educators is the 15 inch monitor iMac G3 for $799 at Apple's online store. However, I used to work in education, and the discounts available to me were more in line of $50 off a roughly $2000 machine. I can see them selling the eMac with more of a discount though, since that line was initially targeted only to the education market.
Here's the price for a classic iMac for K-12 educator personal purchase.
Snow
256MB SDRAM - 1 DIMM
Keyboard/Mac OS X - U.S. English
iMac 600MHz
40GB Ultra ATA drive
CD-ROM drive
Mac OS X and Mac OS 9
Harman Kardon speakers
Apple Pro Keyboard
Apple Pro Mouse
Subtotal $789.00
All new Macs come with OSX 10.2. The free offer of 10.2 to K-12 teachers is to enable them to install it on the Macs they already have (both school and personal), not push new hardware sales. Think about it before entering bash-Apple mode.
I drank what? -- Socrates
I'm not sure that you all are understanding this correctly.
Apple is giving away OSX to TEACHERS, not schools. There is quite a big difference here; the teachers get a copy of it, and can do whatever the heck they want to with it.
This does NOT mean that Apple is giving OSX to schools for the use in classrooms, labs, etc. Microsoft's products for K-12 teachers/students are licensed so that they are for (educational) use by the teacher or student, but not the school, as sepearate (more expensive) versions exist for schools. The copy of the software belongs to the teacher, and unless it's being installed on a computer which is property of the teacher, it's a copyright violation (and rightfully so - the school is essentially "stealing" the software from the teacher). I'm sure apple has a similar clause in their agreement. Still, I think it's a great offer.
Besides, isn't product placement one of the most effective forms of advertising?
-- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
Presumably, Apple is trying to boost OS X use by teachers, so that more students will be exposed to the OS and thus will use it when they grow up. So why is Apple not offering this to home schoolers?
Home schoolers only directly school a few students each, but they interact with hundreds. For example, we belong to a home schooling association in Ft. Worth, which has about 200 students total. These people get together, and they talk - a lot! - about how they educate their children. These parents/teachers will sell (by which I mean convince to buy, though occasionally there is trade also) curricula, tools, local programs and the like to each other, based on how much it helps them. If Apple were to offer a homeschooling teacher this deal, they would be reaching as many people as they would through a public school, and people very dedicated to educating. Throw in sample educational software (which they should do with public school teachers as well) and their chances of growing their market go up dramatically.
On top of this, in many states, home schools are legally private schools no different (except in number of students and which building they are housed in) than any other private school. (This is true in Texas, for instance.) I don't really understand Apple's reasons for excluding homeschoolers from this program.
-- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
I'm a high school senior right now. Being a geek, I help out a lot with our school's highly overworked IT people. I've seen a large resistance throughout the district to change over to OS X. These people don't like change. Change requires retraining teachers and changing infrastructure. Its a great effort just to teach most teachers how to check their email. Now when we change to OS X, a lot of things are going to be done differently. Apple has probably seen this resistance in action. Apple has shown they want to completely get rid of classic as soon as possible. To smooth this transistion it makes sense for them to give it away along with training materials. It will also help cash strapped districts create a homogenous OS enviroment. OS X runs a little slow on older g3s, but it runs it fast enough for most educational purposes. This is a sound business and PR move for apple in my opinion.
It seems that apple has always had a strong connection with schools until I started working at a college. Apple barely offers any deals to colleges. Even if you go for a student discount (and spend about an hour filling out the forms) you'll only get about $50 off a new macintosh (too bad they don't tell you that BEFORE you fill out the forms).
How is apple supposed to expect support from the developer community or the student community when no one is being trained on using macs in school (other then graphics design people)?
The only people I know who know anything about macs are the graphic design people who will probably never own a mac because they will be supplied one from their employer.
Apple should really try and get the techies into macs at school. For example, a local college here offers a 3 year "Computer Systems Technician" Diploma and not once do any of their students touch a macintosh.
Graphic designers won't be developing software for your macs Apple.. clue in.
This is the fundamental argument about Netscape. MS had desktop dominance, and used it to achieve browser dominance.
One needn't have a monopoly in one given area, to provoke a legal need for restriction on one's activities in another.
I wonder if you have any basic understanding of the existing legislation, and the rationale for constraints that have been sought on MS behavior... It appears you are more pleased by being contrary, than by thinking a little."Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
You are quoting prices on an grotesquely underpowered, outdated machine on which OS-X crawls. It doesn't have any way to write to removable media, so how is the teacher supposed to back up her data? "Sorry class, but I lost all of your grades in my spreadsheet because my hard drive died. I had no backup because for $800, my iMac didn't even come with a floppy drive, much less a CD-R/W."
Now compare that price to a modern, low-end machine from, say, Compaq:
Presario 6300US Minitower
128MB RAM
Windows XP Home Edition
Intel Celeron Processor 1.4GHz
48X CD-Rom Drive
40GB Hard Drive
Floppy drive (3..5")
Keyboard
Mouse (with more than one button and a wheel)
CompUSA Price: $400 after rebate
Samsung SyncMaster 750s 17-inch monitor: $140 after rebate
Altec Lansing 220 2.0 Amplified Speaker System: $30
Grand total: $570
And that price is just what the general public can get by walking into CompUSA today. A little shopping or an educators' discount would have turned up an even better price. For $250 less than the outdated "classic" iMac, the teacher gets a much faster machine (a 1.7ghz Celeron will spank a 600mhz G3 according to any respected, independent benchmark such as Spec), a larger monitor, a floppy drive, and more bundled software. In addition, she gets a machine that is much more expandable should she ever wish to put in a better video card, CD-R/W drive, DVD drive, etc.
So please stop with the Apple fanboy routine. The iMac line is grossly overpriced -- especially for most teachers' modest incomes.
The cheapest Wintel Desktop they list is a Compaq EVO D510 2GHz P4 256/40GB CD at 1,149.00. The Compaq has more RAM and a three year warranty but inferior display/graphics combo and no firewire.
They also offer amazing specials on Apple products. When the second generation TiBook came out I got a first generation one for $1,700. I also got an iPod for $230 back when they retailed for $399.
It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man
-James Baldwin
I was interviewed on Channel One once - the topic was media coverage of war in Kosovo. The interviewer was really cool and seemed interested in my perspective, but I couldn't help thinking she was baiting me for something. When I saw the videotape of how she edited it I understood. They managed not only to take my words out of context, but to give the impression that I was saying almost exactly the opposite of what I intended. What I had said was critical of the US media; most of this was edited out, and it was made to look like my sole purpose was to bash Serbian media coverage.
that slogan manages to be even more grammatically incorrect than the original!
yellow dog?
Apple Talk is turned off by default in 10.2. Show me a network have to use Apple Talk (with modern macs and modern printing hardware... without which running OSX would be idiotic anyway) and THEN you can bitch.
the battleship
"Teachers leave us kids alone
Rutgers University for one. 30,000 users, covering all three campuses of Newark, New Brunswick, and Camden as well as the 5 sub-colleges that make up RU NB. Its not the main use and its mostly legacy as modern macs can do without it, but it's still there churning away, just as it has for years. How do I know this? I work for RU's Resnet. So cram your whiny BS. Don't wanna read about Apple stuff? It's a simple option in your account.
Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
Bullshit. I have yet to see a single person show me a TOL PC for $1000. So would you care to step up to the challenge?
T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Two things
1) This would be a special case since a) it's only going to k-12 teachers and b) as I read it, it's the single user version
2) This isn't quite product dumping because if you own a mac, chances are you're probably already using mac OS, meaning this is just a free upgrade.
T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
The real reason that Macs tend to remain in institutions for 4+ years is due to the fact that MacOS machines stay functional for a long a** time ;). Mac developers typically support older Apple hardware for quite a while since the hardware/software that they are developing for is incredibly specific. Moreover, Apple has a smaller market share it really makes sense to support as many macs as you possibly can... even 4 year old G3s.
... and work incredibly well at that.
;)
I find it somewhat funny that I can walk into something such as a music studio and still find a ton of old Mac Classics sitting next to dual G4's. When your dealing with multimedia tasks such as midi Mac classics still just "work"
People rarely want to keep a Wintel box around for more then 3 years. You get desire to migrate a lot sooner. (and by "migrate" I mean "huck that slow, difficult, outdated POS out the window")
I used to work in a campus IT dept, and I fail to comprehend why anyone in their right mind would want to spend thousands of dollars on Wintel computer labs. I guess people simply like to purchase what they know. Mac labs last longer (especially in multimedia labs), they are more secure, they have the same damn productivity software, they require a much smaller IT dept, software licenses are not a royal pain in the butt, kids can comprehend how to use the desktop workspace faster, teachers can admin class networks and netboot machines with virtually no training, etc etc etc. I'm also fairly sure Apple gives institutions a fairly nice price break when they buy in bulk.
I'm all about white box PCs if your going to stick linux on them and set up as word processing machines or library terminals. That's a smart low maintenance move. But for the love of god, keep those things out of the media labs
"Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
hmmm, the school district I worked at was almost the exact opposite of your picture. Teachers didn't copy any software, infact they didn't even get the discs, if they wanted somethign they brought it to us and we checked the licences and then did the installs. The school was so paranoid, we couldn't even install NT on the machines we had just finished building untill the new licences came back from M$, despite the fact that we had sent the order out, we were just waiting for confirmation.
The school board at the district did not use macs, in fact the board of ed was pushing to have PCs (lower initial cost don'cha know). This was caused a minor uproard amongst teachers. At the highschool it was a roughly 60-40 split, with heavy support for macs from the art department and the music department (but since when has a highschool cared about them?). At the middle school it was nearly 90% support for macs, only some of the new teachers fresh out of college didn't like the macs. At the elementary school it was 100% support for the macs.
T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
Think about it. Take a look arround you at kids. Almost all of them are walking bilboards for one brand name or another. The sony headphones, the ambercrombie and fitch shirts, the Lee jeans, Nike shoes, Fubu jackets, the list goes on and on. Budwiser shirts, DKNY, Weezer etc etc etc. Kids are already used to seeing ads everywhere they look. What difference does it make if there are pepsi posters arroudn school, and Apples in the lab? Kids are either sheep or make their own decisions. Either way, it won't matter what we do.
T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
There isn't a single k-12 teacher I can think of save for computer science teachers that could install, run or even download and make an immage of the linux CDs. That is why linux being free isn't news. That and because linux has always been free, so the norm is not news
T Money
World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
'Nuff said. Would have been nice to tell the school where my brother teaches in Manchester, UK. Or to contact my friend who is working with local schools in Cambodia.
After all, they had to come to an arrangement with Apple records when the macintosh got sound capabilities, so I guess now Infogrammes' lawyers (who own the Atari and Jaguar trademarks in the context of computers) are rubbing their hands with glee.
First, the G3 iMac does come with a CDRW.
Second, a USB floppy drive runs $30, and the Compaq POS here has no FireWire, no CDRW, a lower-end version of the OS, no bundled software other than IE and Outlook Express...there's not much comparison. It stinks on ice.
ALSO, you could quote real prices--how much are these stupid rebates? Most are $199 for the computer, so looking at that I'd guess $50 for the monitor, which puts us back up at...a little over the cost of the G3 iMac today.
Your trollish defenses? It has more than one button on the mouse. Whoopie--you can buy a mouse with 100 buttons for your Mac, if it turns your crank.
Other big selling point? This teacher, who has little money and time, can buy and install DVD players, video cards and assorted crap. I know that's what most teachers I know do--they are constantly upgrading their low-end hardware.
First, the G3 iMac does come with a CDRW.
No it does not. Here are Apple's own specs since you seem unable to navigate the web on your own.
Second, a USB floppy drive runs $30 and the Compaq POS here has no FireWire
A firewire card runs $20 -- and most people have no use for it. Oh, I see, if an iMac is missing something like a floppy, then that should be viewed as an 'inexpensive upgrade opportunity', but if the Compaq is missing something that costs less (and that most people neither need nor want), it's a POS.
Since you decided to get petty about ports, I will point out that the classic iMac does not have a parallel port, audio line in, serial port, or video connector (making monitor upgrades essentially impossible). Every one of those is a lot more valuable than Firewire for most people. Even more important than the iMac's lack of ports is the lack of expansion slots. The person who purchases the Compaq can add a SCSI card, Firewire card, USB 2.0 card, 802.11a card, RAID controller, TV tuner card, video capture card, etc. The iMac user has no such expansion opportunities.
no CDRW
Neither does the $789 "classic" iMac. So now the Compaq PC is a "POS" because it lacks something that the iMac also lacks? I will also point out that the CD-ROM drive in the Compaq is a 48x unit while the one in the G3 iMac is a 24x unit.
a lower-end version of the OS
For which there is far more software than for the Mac OS. Tell me what limitations Windows XP Home has that will impair the average home user.
no bundled software other than IE and Outlook Express.
Preinstalled software on the Compaq includes:
Microsoft Money 2002
Microsoft Works 6.0 office suite
Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia Deluxe
Intuit Quicken Financial Center/ Quicken 2002
RealNetworks RealOne Player
Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0
Norton Antivirus 2002
Coloreal Color Management software
Next time, do some research so that you don't make an ass of yourself.
ALSO, you could quote real prices--how much are these stupid rebates? Most are $199 for the computer, so looking at that I'd guess $50 for the monitor, which puts us back up at...a little over the cost of the G3 iMac today.
Are you too stupid to successfully get a rebate? What a "mornon" (to use your word)! Since you are apparently too challenged to use CompUSA's web site, the computer has a $50 rebate (not $199, as you suggested) and the monitor has an instant rebate -- so that even you could get it. So much for that pathetic argument.
It has more than one button on the mouse. Whoopie--you can buy a mouse with 100 buttons for your Mac, if it turns your crank.
So what? The machine costs $800 and doesn't come with one.
Other big selling point? This teacher, who has little money and time, can buy and install DVD players, video cards and assorted crap. I know that's what most teachers I know do-- they are constantly upgrading their low-end hardware.
If you would take your head out of Steve Jobs' ass for a moment, you would realize that it's a lot cheaper to upgrade a PC than to buy a whole new machine.
This is why I hate debating with many Mac users.
I initially said that the $1200 price of a modern iMac was too high for many teachers to pay. Then a Mac fanboy posted that there was an educator deal that offered the "classic" iMac (G3) for $789. When I compared that to what was available from Compaq (at CompUSA), you flamed me and claimed that the iMac has a CD-RW drive -- when the ones that have that are the new iMacs that start with the $1200 price tag to which I initially referred. So when comparing on price, we should assume $789, but when comparing specs, we should use the $1200 iMac?
I took the time to research what I wrote, looking up specs on the iMac and the Compaq before posting. You shot back with your flame (calling me a "mornon") in which you made incorrect assertions, illogical arguments, and for which you apparently did zero fact checking.
I got a really good discount about 5 years ago. I signed up as an Apple's developer. At that point and time all Apple developers received steep hardware discounts. I bought a new 8600/300 w/ Applevision 1710, Color StyleWriter 4500, and a P166 PC Card (@ $826) with an incredible discount. Paid for the membership and the monitor.
You had me at EHLO
That's commercial? Anyway, they're not a serious
enough competitor to successfully bring a dumping
action. They'd be laughed out of court.
Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
I'm sorry I called you a mornon.
Apology accepted (assuming that you were expressing regrets at the term and not simply the spelling.
I do think if you try and win your arguements w/o so much bile, you'll get further.
You will find that I am a far more pleasant person when I am not called a moron in the subject of a message.
On my single processor 600MHz G3 iBook.
Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
Not at all. Time to drop your FUD. I just recently aquired a used 400 Mhz G3 PowerBook with 256MB RAM, and things are running on it quite well. iTunes, iCal, Mozilla, AOL, etc all at once. I've even been doing a lot of remote work with OroborOSX running apps from my Linux box remotely, including Mozilla and full-bore developer stuff.
(I'm quite interested in looking into Rendezvous also, given that it's a Zeroconf implementation.)
Well... considering that the original iMac is from 1998, and can run OS X with only a $17 ram upgrade, I'd say that's not too bad. It's nowhere near the cost of getting PC hardware up to running the latest version of MS Windows.
Unlike many other OS's, there's not a lot to learn. The apps pretty much run as-is, and the OS itself is simpler if anything. And this comes, among other things, from first-hand experience with upgrading grandparents from OS 9.
Have you actually looked into this? Jaguar has support for "old-school" services, plus all the newer ones like nice Windows networking. Rendezvous simplifies things, and Jaguar includes other nic such as USB printer sharing.
Despite our rocky start, you're okay by me.
We're homeschoolers, which is why my copy of Jaguar cost $69 when I bought it last August. Free would be better, of course, but Apple does give homeschoolers a break.
Anyone know if MS or {Dell/Gateway/HP} makes a similar effort?
To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.