Slashdot Mirror


Phoenix Project Considers A Name Change

Magpie writes "Recently Blake Ross, a developer of the Phoenix web browser, has made a post on the Mozillazine forums looking for a new name for the project. Apparently the people over at Phoenix Technologies decided that the name interferes with their trademark since they make an 'internet access device .'" Maybe they could start with this list.

140 comments

  1. Ho-ho! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ho-Ho/ Ho-Oo
    The name for the Japanese phoenix

    Come on, wouldn't that sound great? "Yeah, you Run Internet Explorer 7.2, but *I* run "Ho ho oh-point-nine".

    1. Re:Ho-ho! by Monsieur_F · · Score: 2, Funny
      Another Japanese bird:

      Pheng
      Giant Japanese bird who could eclipse the sun. Known to eat camels.


      So that's why there are no more camels in Japan !
      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    2. Re:Ho-ho! by aridhol · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would that conflict with the use of Perl in CGI pages?

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    3. Re:Ho-ho! by VenTatsu · · Score: 1

      Only partialy.
      It will delay the display of the page for a few hours to a day, and when it is displayed it will be brown and smell bad. Basicly it will make pages generated with Perl fell like they were generated with ASP.

  2. "Geoduck"? by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Reasons:

    1) It's pronounced "gooey-duck" which not only is reminiscent of "GUI" but is also non-intuitive, perfect for a Linux app.

    2) The "duck" part is another bird.

    3) The geoduck is a very large, slow creature. Much like Phoenix, despite their claims.

    1. Re:"Geoduck"? by ChadN · · Score: 0

      geo is pronounce jee-oh, not gooey.

      gee, Oh!

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    2. Re:"Geoduck"? by weeerdo · · Score: 0

      http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Diction ary&va=geoduck

    3. Re:"Geoduck"? by ChadN · · Score: 1

      aw crap. Next time I'll shut up.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    4. Re:"Geoduck"? by dhall · · Score: 1

      I see this name... I'm almost tempted to ask they call it a Pikachu like name. =)

      Hydra, the many headed wonder.
      Chimera is taken by the Mac/Moz derivative.

      Or to break from the Greek Mythos, and go Norse:
      Fenris, the wolf "held down by the unbreakable bonds"
      Odin, Thor, Tyr, Baldur, Bragi, Sif (all easy to type).

      To follow Egyptian Mythos, Ptah, Seker, or my personal favorite, Thoth.

    5. Re:"Geoduck"? by grytpype · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Also one of the oldest animals in the world, geoducks can live as long as 146 years."

      Gee, we sure are learning a lot about gastropods today!

      link

      --

      - Have a picture

    6. Re:"Geoduck"? by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      i vote for Hydra, it's all about tabbed browsing anyways right?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    7. Re:"Geoduck"? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The one thing geoducks are good at is digging, I am trying to remember how fast they dig, it was something like 7th grade Washington history class, but I think it could dig itself into the sand at a rapid rate, however a google search informs me that my teacher lied, they merely retract their long necks into the sand. I have heard that they make good eating, but its my opinion that anything that looks that much like a banana slug should not be eaten.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  3. Has anyone thought of.... by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Minizilla?

    Microzilla?

    Nanozilla?

    Picozilla?

    --
    Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
    1. Re:Has anyone thought of.... by AndyAMPohl · · Score: 1

      Femtozilla? OK... Now that one should be reserved for future zillas for sure...

      -Andy

    2. Re:Has anyone thought of.... by tommten · · Score: 1

      well then.. why not chinzilla :)
      a small and cuta animal vith big ears and a fluffy tail :)

      http://www.etc-etc.com/chin.htm //tommten

      --
      - I choked on the red pill and now I'm stuck in limbo
    3. Re:Has anyone thought of.... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Son of Mozilla.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  4. Before it gets slashdotted... by phreaknb · · Score: 1

    Note: I removed the explanation of each bird so it would not be too long.

    Alicanto, Anka, Ba, Bennu, Feng-huang, Harpies, Heloha, Ho-Ho/ Ho-Oo, Hyrcinian birds, Karshipta, Melatha, Nunyanune, Pegais, Pheng, Phoenix, Poua-Kai, Roc/ Ruc/ Rukh, Shang-Yang, Simurg/ Senmurv, Skyamsen, Stymphalian Birds, Thunderbird, Tlanuwa, Ziz

    1. Re:Before it gets slashdotted... by Kris_J · · Score: 1
      Of the list in the parent I vote Roc.

      My personal favourite if it has to have wings is Seraphim.

      Or you could just spell Phoenix differently: Fenix. Nah, sounds like an operating system.

      Or how about Bennu, the Ancient Egyptian phoenix.

    2. Re:Before it gets slashdotted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here are more details about each of the choices:

      http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Labyrinth/6262/p ho enix.html

      I personally like Thunderbird, but unfortunately, that's taken.

  5. Even better! by Thomas+A.+Anderson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mini-Mo

    --
    Personally its not God I dislike, its his fan club I cant stand (bash.org)
    1. Re:Even better! by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2

      ...Mini-Mo...
      I wonder where my glove will go...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    2. Re:Even better! by Mig · · Score: 1
      MiniMo

      Hey man!, this one is really good.


      I like it!

      --
      http://thecaveats.net
  6. How about ... by one9nine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tucson? Yuma? Flagstaff?

    1. Re:How about ... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      Yucca?

  7. Nice catch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Have fun putting out the flames in your hair when anyone from the Pacific Northwest reads your "informative" post.

  8. Some names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    River
    What Moz should have been
    Ashes
    Don't blame us for the rendering problems
    Tucson
    You will never see a 1.0 release
    Two guys in a basement
    Need donations

  9. Christ, what bullshit by dh003i · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ya know, I get sick of this crap. This is exactly why trademark laws as they currently exist are bullshit.

    The Phoenix browser will not be confused with things produced by Phoenix Technologies. And the Mozilla developers certainly didn't name it Phoenix to take advantage of the wide name recognition (sarcasm here) of Phoenix Technologies.

    Trademarks should only come into issue between competing products which are the exact same type of product (i.e., two different web browsers).

    Another case of companies getting in the way of progress.

    1. Re:Christ, what bullshit by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Trademarks should only come into issue between competing products which are the exact same type of product (i.e., two different web browsers
      Duh, they already do. Your trademark only applies over your industry as defined by common knowledge. There is an exception for very popular names, in which trademark applies over all, but this is not the case here.

      Here we have a computer software and hardware company named Phoenix vs another bit of software named Phoenix.

      "Wahh! I should be able to release my McDonalds Panini because when you think about it it's not actually burger!"

      "This is type 6 washer screw -- don't they understand this computely different to a type 4 washer screw??"

      And so on, with distinctions that only people in the industry know, and therefore not being the kind of distinctions that trademark law bothers with.

    2. Re:Christ, what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you fail to explain how people won't mix them up. If you can, then good for you. Share what you know with the rest of us.

      Also, intent in intentionally naming something similar to an already trademarked name is a non-factor in these types of disputes.

      The reason Pheonix Tech is bitching is because sooner or later, people will try going to them for help with the browser, simply because they see they are a tech company. Doesnt matter if they (the company) are in the browser market or not. Being in the tech market makes them close enough.

    3. Re:Christ, what bullshit by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Oh please, there's a huge difference between an internet browser and whbat Phoenix Technologies makes. There's nothing listed under Phoenix Technologies' Products or Solutions that even resembles an Internet Browser. In fact, most common users wouldn't even know what the stuff is that Phoenix Technologies sell. However, its widely known what an internet browser is.

      Trademark should only apply to the very specific type of product that you have. Industries are huge places, and its absurd to speak of trademark violations when talking about a browser violating the trademarks of (say) an OS. There should be no exception for popular names.

    4. Re:Christ, what bullshit by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only a geek would remember or care for the differentiation that you're making, which is why it doesn't count.

    5. Re:Christ, what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, you've officially confirmed yourself a zipperhead

    6. Re:Christ, what bullshit by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Oh please. You know, I think you've responded to me before, because I've heard that exact same thing. The general public is aware of the different between an internet browser, and e-mail program, and a chat program.

      Even if not, why should law be based around the stupidity of the masses? Trademark law is bullshit and should be reformed.

    7. Re:Christ, what bullshit by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
      Oh please. You know, I think you've responded to me before, because I've heard that exact same thing.
      Yeah, because I'm only the only one that says it *rolls-eyes*

      You've demonstrated that you're not one to speak for the general public. You're completely out of touch.

      Trademark law _in this case_ is quite sane.

    8. Re:Christ, what bullshit by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There is no difference between an internet browser, an email program, and a chat program, to a lot of people. They use AOL which wraps it all up in one piece. And isn't there now some MSN abomination that does that same thing??

    9. Re:Christ, what bullshit by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      That's stupid. Eventually almost *all* companies will be "in the tech market".

    10. Re:Christ, what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then explain how a coal mining company provides product to the tech market. or how a grocer does. or a banker. or construction company.

      like the other AC said - you're a zipperhead. learn how to unzip your head and look at the world from someone else's eyes.

    11. Re:Christ, what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hate to feed a troll, but you *really* need to look at the world from outside the geek perspective.

    12. Re:Christ, what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attention Sir!!

      We must inform you of this most urgent message:

      -BEGIN-
      You are a Wanker.
      -END-

      Thank you.

      --Wanker Information Services

    13. Re:Christ, what bullshit by dh003i · · Score: 2

      The general public has never even heard of Phoenix technologies. Before this article, most of us on /. have never heard of Phoenix technologies. For those who have, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to distinguish between an internet browser and whatever it is that Phoenix makes. The mozilla developers chose the name Phoenix for their browser, having never heard of Phoenix technologies. Why should they have to change it because Phoenix technologies is whining? The simple fact is that the Phoenix web browser is more commonly and widely known than Phoenix Technologies.

      No, trademark law does not make sense in this case. Its just a way for corporations to divide up the dictionary amongst themselves. Goliath beating up on David.

    14. Re:Christ, what bullshit by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      The general public is aware of the different between an internet browser, and e-mail program, and a chat program.

      Just because they dont make the same software doesn't mean their name isn't theirs. Were they around before the browser? I assume so (these are the people who make Phoenix BIOS?).

      To most people, the Phoenix web browser sounds like it is made by a company called PHOENIX. Regardless of its quality, you dont want someone else's product to be confused for your own. That sort of thing confuses people, and is why there is trademark law in the first place.

      Even if not, why should law be based around the stupidity of the masses?

      To most people, the Phoenix web browser sounds like it is made by a company called PHOENIX. Regardless of its quality, you dont want someone else's product to be confused for your own. That sort of thing confuses people, and is why there is trademark law in the first place. Joe Average isn't going to spend the time researching to verify a product is really made by who they think it was. Generally the first impression is as far as they go.

      So does Phoenix Technologies have a right to ask/demand they change the name? Sure. Hopefully they were nice enough to send a friendly letter rather than simply a "stop or we'll sue you" threat.

    15. Re:Christ, what bullshit by King+of+the+World · · Score: 2

      Look you idiot, read the post

  10. Hey Phoenix Technologies by RedWolves2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Suck it!

  11. Just change the spelling a little... by Sherloqq · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... to, say, Feenyx / Feenics / Fienix or something.

    Just don't start a Hukt on Feenics marketing campaign.
    That might not "fly" too well, if ya know what I mean...

    --
    Have EVDO, will travel.
  12. hmm... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mothra?
    Pterodactyl (sp)? Pterry?
    Ostrich?
    Emuzilla?

    1. Re:hmm... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      hehe...I like Mothra!!!

    2. Re:hmm... by chris_mahan · · Score: 2

      My vote for Mothra too..

      You can even say: This browser is one Mothra!

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  13. I think they should call it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OmniWeb Explorer/Navigator Opera

    what do you guys think? It describes the function as well as the fact that it's a kind of performance by a group of people.

  14. IE Killer! by rlowe69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmmm ... Mozilla is short for Mosaic Killer, right? What would Internet Explorer Killer be?

    Exiller
    Exilla
    Expilla
    Explilla
    Explolla
    Ex plorilla(*)

    *possible Trademark infringement (ie. they may be catching on at this point)

    --
    ----- rL
    1. Re:IE Killer! by diesel_jackass · · Score: 2

      Well for that matter it could be Mozillailla.

    2. Re:IE Killer! by rlowe69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lame replying to my own post I know but I just had an idea. Follow my progress ...

      Explorer Killer
      Explorer Killa
      Exilla
      Xilla
      Zilla

      So you end up with Zilla. If Zilla's not enough browser for you, get Mo'Zilla. ...*cough*

      --
      ----- rL
    3. Re:IE Killer! by Paul+Burney · · Score: 0, Redundant
      So you end up with Zilla. If Zilla's not enough browser for you, get Mo'Zilla. ...*cough*

      Along those lines, maybe Phoenix should be Less'Zilla.

      --
      <?php while ($self != "asleep") { $sheep_count++; } ?>
  15. Re:Quality reading skillz! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geoducks are foul.

    Now abalone, that's something I can sink my dick into.

  16. adept... by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

    asshole
    dweebs
    employed by
    phoenix
    technologies

    so the adept browser.

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  17. Simurg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I liked Simurg, from that list. Agent of goodwill from the gods, or something like that.

  18. New name by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    How about this for a name: "Boycott Phoenix Technologies because they are such fucking bastards Internet Browser."

  19. Continuing the trend by Incon · · Score: 1

    How long before Stallman suggests GNU/Phoenix?

    1. Re:Continuing the trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really don't have a clue, do you?

  20. Phoenix Foundation? by CatWrangler · · Score: 3, Funny

    MacGuyver isn't using that one anymore. Damn, I am a geek.

    --

    ---
    When you come to a fork in the road, take it! --Yogi Berra--

    1. Re:Phoenix Foundation? by Louis_Wu · · Score: 2
      Yes, but has Richard Dean Anderson used "Phoenix Foundation" in Stargate SG-1? If he has & you can tell me all about it, you're Slashdot's "Geek of the Week".

      . . .

      I like that. "Geek of the Week" It rolls off of the tongue.

  21. names by zogger · · Score: 2

    browzilla

    surfnix

    fred's browser

    YABWWAHTOF --yet another browser when we already have tons of them

    northgone--no really,this'll help obfuscate netscape evidence

    XbrowzX --why, it's da rulez you need an x in there someplace, just because

    interbrowznavplorerzilla

    We*B*browzin

    yomomsendmoney.browz

    coca ~ cola ...no, wait....

    they can use my name, call it browzogger, I don'tcare

    OK, these are from my friend plantlady on irc

    speedzone

    pumper

    gadabout

    hopper

    1. Re:names by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      How about the hummer browser, referring not to the car manufacturer but to the act... ;)

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:names by zogger · · Score: 2

      --hummer is cool, let em keep guessing though

      "Introducing.... the HUMMER BROWSER--go ANYPLACE on the olde intarweb, and have LOTSA FUN while ya do it"

  22. Mothra by Kris_J · · Score: 1
    Mothra is the obvious choice, now that someone has mentioned it. Thing is, Mozilla is already under attack by the owners of Godzilla -- I can't imagine that Mothra would be any safer than Phoenix.

    How about a Tick reference: Arthur

  23. phoenix.net by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

    was the name of their ill-fated BIOS based spyware product. It was ahead of its time, apparently.

  24. I've got it! by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

    viZilla

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  25. My vote is for by KewlPC · · Score: 1

    Since Mozilla is a mixture of Mosaic and Godzilla IIRC (hence the logo), Phoenix should change its name to some permutation or combination of Gecko (the rendering engine used in Phoenix and Mozilla) and Mothra (like Gozilla, Mothra is an icon of classic Japanese monster movies):

    Gethra
    Geckra
    Mothro
    Mothreck
    Geckzillathra
    etc.

    1. Re:My vote is for by frawaradaR · · Score: 1

      Motherfucker?

      --
      frawaradaR anahaha islaginaR!
    2. Re:My vote is for by riggwelter · · Score: 1

      Since Mozilla is a mixture of Mosaic and Godzilla

      Actually, Mozilla is short for Mosaic Killer, the beast came later to fit the name.

      --
      Listening for the sound of the coming rain...
  26. Geocities and Slashdot by mfos.org · · Score: 2

    You mad fool, don't you know Geocities and Slashdot don't mix!

  27. From the list... by Da+VinMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I vote for "Anka".

    It's just like Phoenix, only it can carry off elephants (read between the lines here). ;+)

    According to the list:
    Anka
    Arctic mythical bird that was said to carry off elephants. It was also believed to live for 1700 years and, like the phoenix, had the ability to burn and renew itself.

    --
    Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
    1. Re:From the list... by psavo · · Score: 2

      Ankka means 'Duck' in Finnish, but why should anyone care..

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:From the list... by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2

      Noooo! Please not Anka! That is "Duck" in Swedish.. Sounds terribly silly! ;)

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    3. Re:From the list... by bkhl · · Score: 1

      Also, "anka" means "duck in swedish.

    4. Re:From the list... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      I can already see trademark infringement suits from a host of Finnish companies...

  28. I was thinking something close. by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Suzaku. I like Suzaku better.

  29. X-Men by breon.halling · · Score: 2

    Just call it Jean Grey



    That was the worst thing I've ever posted! ;)

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
  30. How about HALCYON by Bytal · · Score: 1

    A mythical bird that brought peace and calmness to the sea. Staying with the mythical bird naming I think this would be a pretty nice name for a browser that could bring peace and calmness to the browser world :):):). Maybe not peace....

    1. Re:How about HALCYON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A halcyon isn't mythical - it's just a kingfisher. The myth was that it calmed the sea.

  31. why not by kraf · · Score: 1

    mozillai

  32. Holy frug... by grytpype · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >Maybe they could start with this list.

    That's actually a good suggestion. Some of those names are pretty bitchen... I especially like:

    Tlanuwa
    Cherokee name of a great magical hawk. According to the Natchez it's feathers were made of metal.

    --

    - Have a picture

    1. Re:Holy frug... by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like an aeroplane to me..

  33. Need. Moderating. Points. by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1

    Best. Comment. Evar.

  34. Atlantis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should call this browser "Atlantis." Named after another gigantic object that disappeared without a trace and is now all but forgotten.

  35. Newt! by jon787 · · Score: 1

    Come one name the thing Newt. Newt is a small lizard, mozilla.... well you get the idea.

    --
    X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
  36. Anka by Thornae · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I vote for "Anka".

    I second that vote. As well as being a cool mythological bird (like a cross between a phoenix and a roc), it's got a nice phonetic equivalence with "anchor" (as in <a href=etc>).

    --
    |>
    Here be Dragons
    1. Re:Anka by Da+VinMan · · Score: 2

      I thought so too. I was thinking more along the lines of "Ankh", like from the Indiana Jones movie. Nice subconscious message of being invaluable.

      Incidentally, I went over to MozillaZine and I didn't see a way to get this idea seen without getting buried in the pages upon pages of posts (no moderation system? /. has spoiled me.)

      Anyone know where to go with this?

      --
      Please mod this post only if you think others should/n't read this. I have enough ego^H^H^Hkarma. Thanks!
  37. My suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sparrow" , it's light and fast, good-natured, consumed little in the way of resources and can fit in just about anything.

  38. May sound lame... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

    ...but what about "Mozilla Lite". Because that's it. Everybody who has even heard of Mozilla (and I know many IE users who did) might want to try it then - even though it has a low version number. Because they somehow now that it is, in fact, Mozilla - but lighter. Brand recognition, right?

    1. Re:May sound lame... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      After submitting this one I suddenly thought "Lite? What kind of word is that anyway"? Babelfish can't translate it to German... can someone please explain why many projects have the term "lite" in them? I'm a bit confused.

    2. Re:May sound lame... by frawaradaR · · Score: 1

      Chimera, Galeon, Phoenix... they are all Mozilla Lite. Dunno how smart this diversification is until the incredible beast has been killed.

      Anyways, no need to change name. Apple Computer is not related to the Abbey Road Apple. Buying Nokia to your car? Then you are buying tires, not cell phones.

      --
      frawaradaR anahaha islaginaR!
    3. Re:May sound lame... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Chimera, but Galeon does not use XUL - Phoenix does. I'd say Galeon is more of a browser using the _Gecko_ engine only, while Phoenix has little own code. Right?

    4. Re:May sound lame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a commone mispelling of the english word "light" used by marketers. usually used to describe foods with lower fat/caloric content. "Bud lite" is watered down beer (lass calories), etc.

    5. Re:May sound lame... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      Okay, I thought so. Yet I ask myself who started using the mispelled version...

    6. Re:May sound lame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nononono. People will just say "Mozilla Lite ?, Damn no, I want the real one!"

    7. Re:May sound lame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't you get fat if you use the real one?

    8. Re:May sound lame... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      That's okay :) As long as they really want Mozilla, why not...

    9. Re:May sound lame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Marketese for "light", indicating that something isn't as fully-featured as the more packed "heavy" version.

    10. Re:May sound lame... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The Nokia is or was the same company, they were an old finish industrial that happened to get in at the ground floor of the cellular wave. And I think there was a lawsuit between Apple records and Apple computer.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  39. Come on vote this up insightful by TuringTest · · Score: 1, Troll

    Zilla is a very good name! Both for how it sounds and for advocacy.

    I was worried about the Phoenix name - now i had just convinced my friends to use Mozilla, i have to tell them to change to Phoenix instead.

    But if the new name is Zilla, well - half of the work is already done! 8)

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  40. GNP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    GNU Not Phoenix

  41. HA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brausemeister

  42. LiteZilla by TuringTest · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Everybody knows what Kazza Lite is, a bloated down (?) version of the same thing. Keep consistent - do the same with Mozilla.

    The "-zilla" bit should be kept for advocacy. I was worried about the Phoenix name - now i had just convinced my friends to use Mozilla, i have to tell them to change to Phoenix instead.

    BTW "Zilla" is a very good name! Both for how it sounds and for advocacy. If the new name is Zilla, well - half of the work is already done! 8)

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  43. Velociraptor? by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    "swift robber" or something

    plus, has that dinosaur theme

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  44. Pterodactyl by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    bird-like *and* dinosaur

    1. Re:Pterodactyl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there is already a firewall called Velociraptor.

  45. How about... by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

    How about changing it to: PhoeNIXED

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  46. Mod parent and grandparent up by aridhol · · Score: 1

    Since I have no mod points, I'll have to vote with a message. I agree with the name Zilla.

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
  47. Troll??? by TuringTest · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    8( Am I a troll? One of those pesty hairy creatures? Snif snif! 8'(( I've never felt so insulted.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  48. Check out what the USPTO says about it... by Max+Hyre · · Score: 2

    To be told more than anyone but a trademark lawyer would want to know, check out the USPTO's trademark page, or their FAQ.

    The question of ``trademarks for competing products'' is addressed in Trademark Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual , which lists all the different categories which will be considered for registration, from `Abacuses' to `Wholesale travel agencies'. (What, no zippers? :-) They've got five (5) subcategories of `Computer cursor control devices'---go look it up.

    The one that looks closest to Phoenix, the browser, is

    Computer software for accessing information directories that may be downloaded from the global computer network

    With that background, we can now check out Phoenix(the bozo)'s site.

    Their full name is Phoenix Technologies, giving absolutely no clue as to what they actually make or do. We find mondo marketing buzzwordmanship (``Connect with Phoenix Technologies for Strategy2003'' ``undisputed device-enabling and management software leader'', &c.). The divisions listed on that front page are

    OEM/ODM
    System Builder
    Distributor/Reseller
    Software Developer
    Digging deeper reveals: Sonofabitch!, they're the Phoenix BIOS people, gone all upscale and gooey.

    Searching on ``Phoenix Technologies'' turns up three entries. two of which are still in use (``live''), with serial numbers

    Both are our pals', and both descriptions specify ``all sold to original equipment manufactures.'' The second one adds user manuals into the mix. As mentioned in an earlier post, there's a claim for ``interpretation of page description languages'', which I suspect means the BIOS can phone home for upgrades from a web site. It certainly doesn't sound like a general-purpose browser.

    (The raw entries (not the links above) also include:

    Disclaimer NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "TECHNOLOGIES" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
    Too bad they didn't add ``Phoenix'' to it.)

    Thus, they build stuff no normal human would ever go looking for, so only a geek would have to ``care for the differentiation'', which is why it counts. Any conflict between the two Phoenixes is purely in the minds of the greedy.

    That said, of course, ramming it down their throats in a court of law is a lot more costly than a name change. However, if they could find a lawyer to write a letter pro bono, it might be enough to do the job.

    I certainly hope the browser folks give the letter a try.

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
    1. Re:Check out what the USPTO says about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.phoenix.com/en/products/firstview+conne ct/default.htm

      From the site: "Providing industry-leading, standards-based support such as HTML 4.0, CSS 2.0, DOM 2,0, Javascript 1.4 and Flash 4 with a small code size, FirstView Connect was designed specifically for the emerging Information Appliance market and is ideally-suited for adding new value to both traditional and next-generation digital devices."

      In short: It's a small-footprint web browser. <sarcasm>Gee, that's *totally different* than the Mozilla project's Phoenix, which is a small-footprint web browser.</sarcasm>

    2. Re:Check out what the USPTO says about it... by Max+Hyre · · Score: 2
      AC writes:
      http://www.phoenix.com/en/products/firstview+conne ct/default.htm

      From the site: "Providing industry-leading, standards-based support such as HTML 4.0, CSS 2.0, DOM 2,0, Javascript 1.4 and Flash 4 with a small code size, FirstView Connect was designed specifically for the emerging Information Appliance market and is ideally-suited for adding new value to both traditional and next-generation digital devices."

      In short: It's a small-footprint web browser. <sarcasm>Gee, that's *totally different* than the Mozilla project's Phoenix, which is a small-footprint web browser.</sarcasm>

      Hrmmm...that does add a bit to the mix. But their words are ``designed specifically for the ... Information Appliance market and is ... suited for ... digital devices.''

      They're embedding the thing---a very different operation from building an end-user application for a general-purpose computer. (Would you consider embedding Phoenix? :-) Now the interesting points are:

      • Their trademark says nothing about the HTML, &c., part of their output
      • They call it FirstView Connect, not Pheonix, the embeddable browser
      • When did Phoenix-the-browser start up vs. when did Phoenix-the-company start making HTML-enabled embeddable goodies?

        Google finds nothing for ``firstview connect 1'' (or 1.0), the earliest to turn up is 2.0 in a Real Networks press release dated 1 November 2001.

        Phoenix-the-browser released 0.1 all of two months ago (September 2002), but there's a reference to a (likely unrelated) ``Phoenix browser'' dated 6 January 2000. (It's about half-way down the page.) If anyone has cause to gripe, it's those folks!

      I still claim there's zero point zero chance of the products being confused in the minds of their customers, in either of the two completely-separate target markets. And trademark protection is supposed to be about confusion and mis-perception, not attempted ownership of a word.

      --
      I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
    3. Re:Check out what the USPTO says about it... by luserSPAZ · · Score: 1
      They're embedding the thing---a very different operation from building an end-user application for a general-purpose computer. (Would you consider embedding Phoenix? :-)
      I don't know, would you?
  49. Obvious? by budalite · · Score: 2

    I kept waiting for someone to say it, but... so here it is: Less-Zilla?

  50. "Fenix" is taken by yerricde · · Score: 1
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  51. that's taken too by yerricde · · Score: 1

    a[...]d[...]e[...]p[...]t[...]

    Adept Technology Inc. might get upset about that one.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  52. how about by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

    How about:

    Earth Browser
    Wind Browser
    Fire Browser
    Water Browser
    Spirit Browser
    Stone Browser
    Star Browser
    Aurora Browser
    Tree Browser
    Ocean Browser
    Land Browser
    Hill Browser
    Field Browser ... and I could go on...

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  53. Lesszilla. by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Nuff said.

  54. Fire-Bird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    another name for a phoenix :P

  55. Prometheus by sgtsanity · · Score: 1

    Brought Fire to man. An added bonus is that it starts with a P, and they could use the "She's on Fire" tune from GTA3/Scarface.

  56. there is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Charzilla
    Floatzilla
    Doublezilla
    Slashdotzilla (slashdot claims trademark infring..)
    Bloatzilla
    UnitedBrowser for UnitedLinux :/
    YAWB yet another web browser
    AllYourZillaAreBelongToUs
    Penix
    TuxZill a
    KaZilla
    etc........

  57. Please, not hydra!! by bytesmythe · · Score: 2

    "Hydra" would be the name for a browser that not only made it impossible to disable pop-ups, but opened them on its own.

    Every time you closed a window, two more would open before you could blink. ;)

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  58. no geek names by jdkane · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I say, forget the birds. A bird name and a dinosaur mascot don't make sense together, unless you are commenting on evolution (and that's just a theory).
    Also forget the "...zilla" because too many zillas already exist. People will be confused between Mozilla, Ghostzilla, This-zilla, That-zilla, not to mention the term "Mozilla" is included in every browser identity string. However Phoenix is the browser you want to target to the common user if you are competing against IE. So give it a fresh name.

    If you are going to keep the dinosaur (mozilla) pictorial reference then at least consider something more sensible like dinosaur names in order to target this browser in a meaningful way toward non-geek users. Or even change the mascot! .. if that's allowed by the License. For those who have pre-conceived negative ideas about Mozilla browsers, this might move them over to Phoenix based completely on its features rather than association.

    Over the last couple of months I have switched over to Phoenix from IE! (The exclamation mark indicates that I am very surprised because I never thought it would happen). I think this represents the first time (for myself) that another browser has been comparible enough to the broad functionality and ease-of-use of IE, such that I can finally switch over without feeling I am missing something. Mozilla/Phoenix is a great piece of work. The fast startup time and lack of UI complexity in Phoenix (compared to Nescape 7 or other Mozillas) was just the icing on the cake that I needed to finally go the Mozilla-based way. Microsoft had better get tabbed browsing soon or else I might never use IE again.

    Bring this great browser into the mainstream with a unique name that people will remember.

  59. The Browser that says Neeh by selectspec · · Score: 2

    Ickypickypitang.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  60. Mozookie of course! by turgid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mozilla, mozilla,.. ..and Mozookie (or should that be Mozuki?) I'd have thought that would have been the unanimous first 300 suggestions, but maybe our cartoons were different in Scotland?

  61. Possible names by VistaBoy · · Score: 1

    I've got a couple good name suggestions:

    SmallZilla
    TinyZilla

    but i think the best one would be LessZilla, you know, instead of MO zilla, you'd have Less.

    1. Re:Possible names by moduc · · Score: 1

      NullIE Taking from the theme of NullSoft

  62. Ever work in tech support? by selan · · Score: 2
    If what you're proposing would be allowed, I'd still make sure that no one else in my industry is using my product name. Differentiation is a Good Thing.

    If it's within the same industry, people will get confused. Trust me on this. If you've ever had to handle tech support calls from irate users demanding support for a product made by a different company, you know how frustrating that can be.

    "I'm sorry sir, but you'll need to contact Widget Internet. We're Blodget Technologies."
    "But it says here on your web site that you provide support for Widget."
    "Sir, if you're having problems with your Internet service, than you need to contact your service provider."
    "That's not you? Your web site says that you provide computer connections."
    *sigh* "I'm sorry for the confusion, sir. The Widget that we support is a product that connects two computers, but that's a very different thing from an ISP like Widget Internet."
    etc., etc.

    1. Re:Ever work in tech support? by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Your idea of how the law should work is based around the misconceptions of the ignorant, which is absurd.

      You think that two companies shouldn't be allowed to have names that sound alike, such as "Widget" and "Blodget"? This is nonsense.

      Trademark laws are supposed to exist for the benefit of consumers. More often than not, they work against consumers, and allow big corporate interests to split up the language among them. Coca Cola once threatened to sue a book-seller for putting the quote, "It's the real thing" on back of the book, as a promotion for it. Yes, I'm sure that the average consumer would go out meaning to buy a Coke and buy a book instead. This type of non-sense is all too typical.

      With regards to this specific case, no one has ever heard of Phoenix Technologies. I'm from NY and I've never heard of that company in my life. I doubt there are many other net-goers who had heard of it prior to this /. story. Yet, many of us had heard of the Phoenix, the Mozilla-based web browser. Perhaps Phoenix Technologies should change its name, as it isn't as well known as Phoenix.

      Why should we all have to change the way we refer to a software program because some company no-one's ever heard of before has a fit? If bothered with this trademark non-sense and tried to make sure that no-one had a trademark on a name before we named a software package something, we'd never have names for any software packages.

      Like I said, trademarks should benefit the consumer. Many of us have come to know Phoenix (Mozilla) by that name. Now Phoenix Technologies wants them to rename it. That will only confuse people who want to download Phoenix (Mozilla). So, how is this helping the consumer?

    2. Re:Ever work in tech support? by selan · · Score: 2
      You think that two companies shouldn't be allowed to have names that sound alike, such as "Widget" and "Blodget"?

      No, I was suggesting that people will contact the company called "Widget" about a product called "Widget" even if the product "Widget" is made by a company called "Blodget". I guess this wasn't clear enough from the dialogue, but I guarantee that many people who've worked in the tech support trenches have had conversations like that.

      Like I said, trademarks should benefit the consumer. Many of us have come to know Phoenix (Mozilla) by that name. Now Phoenix Technologies wants them to rename it. That will only confuse people who want to download Phoenix (Mozilla). So, how is this helping the consumer?

      Um, isn't that the point of trademarks? To protect the name that consumers have come to know a product by?

      Anyway, it's most likely the Phoenix Technologies people are annoyed because people have been going to their site to download Phoenix, or calling their tech support line for support. I like the Phoenix browser and it's a pain if they have to change the name. My point was that it's better to have a unique name, regardless of trademark laws.

    3. Re:Ever work in tech support? by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Yes, the point of trademark laws is to protect the name consumers have come to know a product by. Thus, it should protect Phoenix (Mozilla) before Phoenix Technologies, as most consumers know of Phoenix (Mozilla) but have never heard of Phoenix Technologies.

    4. Re:Ever work in tech support? by selan · · Score: 2
      Yes, the point of trademark laws is to protect the name consumers have come to know a product by. Thus, it should protect Phoenix (Mozilla) before Phoenix Technologies, as most consumers know of Phoenix (Mozilla) but have never heard of Phoenix Technologies.

      Huh? Are you actually saying that the USPTO should award trademarks to the more popular|bigger|more powerful guy regardless of who had the product name first?

      Try substituting the name of your favorite Big Corporation for "Phoenix" in that statement and see if you still agree with it. Just for fun, lets try, oh I don't know, "Warner".

      Thus, it should protect Warner (Time Warner) before Warner Technologies, as most consumers know of Warner (Time Warner) but have never heard of Warner Technologies.
      How does that sound now?

      So let me emend the previous statement: the point of trademark laws is to protect the name consumers will come to know a product by. That makes more sense, since names are usually trademarked when they are first used, before anyone has heard of them.

  63. their motto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    phoenix my trademark then I'll nick his.

  64. Suggestion go small go dinosaur by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    /.
    The smallest dino discover so far is the MicroRaptor at 18cm and may or may not have had feathers.
    I like the micro part in that it definatly ties in with computers, and it ties in with the Phoenix Project goal of small.

    Of course there's nothing wrong with Slashzilla ; )
    I just feel that the whole zilla thing has had it's day, and Sony could get nasty about it again with little notice.