Slashdot Mirror


Sony Ericsson Makes a tri-band GPRS modem

prostoalex writes "Sony Ericsson announced their new PCMCIA GPRS wireless modem, capable of delivering 57.6 Kbps. It is tri-band and works in 900/1800/1900 MHz range, which led Sony Ericsson to imply that the card will work in 160 countries, providing an always-on Internet connection. Currently only Microsoft operating systems (starting at Windows 98) are supported. No exact price information on official site, but the PC Pro article above quotes 200 UK pounds. The manufacturer also runs a contest for those who would rather get one for free."

58 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. Portability! by natron+2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally I can lug my PC Case around with me to the mall and always have a connection to slashdot!

  2. so when by Multiple+Sanchez · · Score: 5, Interesting

    will they manufacture a wireless modem that is "always on" in 160 countries, but bumps it up to high speeds when I stroll through a Ricochet zone or a community 802.11b hot spot? Never? The Jetsons promised me way much more than this. Come on -- chop, chop -- make it happen.

    1. Re:so when by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is a good idea but consider this:

      Which does a service provider make more money on?

      1. A phone that can use other networks like 802.11b, Bluetooth, etc... which won't earn them money, or...
      2. A phone that *always* uses their network and as such will *always* earn them money for your traffic.

      Personally, I agree with your point but I know myself that #2 will probably happen. I would love a PDA, especially, that can roam between Wired Ethernet, Bluetooth, 802.11b, GPRS, CDPD, etc... to get the best connection. But it's just not in the best interest of the service providers. Oh well.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    2. Re:so when by trynis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually you can do this yourself. I did it a year and a half ago. It's called vertical handover, and I did it between 802.11b and bluetooth. I wanted to do GPRS as well, but I had no access to such hardware at the time. It's quite easy to set up using MobileIP and some clever programming. There should be more advanced solutions available now, I think.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    3. Re:so when by Ford+Fulkerson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which does a service provider make more money on?

      How is this relevant, Sony/Ericsson is a mobile phone manufacturer. They don't provide the network access. All theyr'e interested in is makeing a modem that you'll rather but than whatever Nokia is shipping. Putting this kind of functionality into the modem will definetely make that happen.

      Also, I know for a fact that Ericsson have done a lot of reseash into mobile phones that automatically use normal digital DECT wireless phone networks available in many workplaces, when available. So no conspiracy with the service providers here.

      --

      Somewhere in the heavens... they are waiting.
    4. Re:so when by dago · · Score: 4, Insightful

      maybe ericsson is also a big mobile network equipment supplier ?

      for the DECT+GSM, they were one of the few (with SAGEM) to make a dual standard phone. Unfortunately, both discontinued their product some years ago.

      in fact, DECT could be far worse for mobile phone operators than 802.11. It's quite easy to make an ad-hoc network of dect phones ... do you really thing that any supplier or service provider wants that ?

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    5. Re:so when by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

      "Luckily mobile phone manufactures makes phones to the end users instead of service providers."

      Are you sure? I have a C35 (siemens) which the first selection on menu is "Internet", in fact WAP. Do you think its because of a chance?

    6. Re:so when by hymie3 · · Score: 2

      Actually you can do this yourself. I did it a year and a half ago. It's called vertical handover, and I did it between 802.11b and bluetooth. I wanted to do GPRS as well, but I had no access to such hardware at the time. It's quite easy to set up using MobileIP and some clever programming.

      The source code required for this is slightly larger than the margins in the comment box allow for. The actual coding is left to the reader as a trivial programming exercise. </sarcasm>

  3. Barrier in Europe: Cost by Denito · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thoughts from a GPRS user:

    I have a Handspring Treo phone here in Denmark, and it works great with GPRS. However, the cost (around 20c US / Mb) adds up quickly..

    Coverage is fine and it is very usefull. But untill providers give unlimited use plans, this is very cost-prohibitive.

    1. Re:Barrier in Europe: Cost by Cyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1USD/5MB sounds like an amazing rate. Everywhere I've heard is the opposite, you end up paying about
      5USD/1MB.

      You sure you didn't mean KB or something? then it would be much worse and I'd understand you - but personally I'd be happy to pay $1/5MB (given my options now, though naturally I'd be happier with unlimited).

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    2. Re:Barrier in Europe: Cost by Denito · · Score: 2, Informative



      Indeed, I cited the wrong rate above, as I lost a zero on my Kroner -> Dollar conversion..

      it is about 3 USD per Mb. That's why it's cost prohibitive.

    3. Re:Barrier in Europe: Cost by TheSync · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In the US, Sprint PCS Vision offers unlimited CDMA 1xRTT data even in their $30/month plan - BUT they only guaranteee unlimited free data only for three months. You can buy on a month-by-month basis for $10 more per month to avoid getting locked in for a year. It seems kind of silly to me for them to only have unlimited for three months.

      T-Mobile is selling the Danger Sidekick with unlimited GPRS data for $39.99 with 200 anytime minutes and 1000 weekend minutes. But they only guarantee unlimited data for one year.

      Verizon Wireless "Unlimited Express Networks" gives you unlimited CDMA 1xRTT data for $100/month, no hedges.

  4. Who wouldn't by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 5, Funny

    The manufacturer also runs a contest for those who would rather get one for free.

    Who wouldn't rather get one for free?

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  5. Price Listed on site. by A+Commentor · · Score: 3, Informative

    So on the contest site (sonyericsson.com), in the rules it states that it's a EUR 399 value

    The prize consists of one Sony Ericsson GPRS PC Card Modem, GC75, which has a recommended retail price of EUR 399.

    --

    Looking for any old 8-bit Heathkit/Zenith software/hardware - http://heathkit.garlanger.com

    1. Re:Price Listed on site. by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

      Now that is a real rip-off... amazing I say, amazing price. You can have a full feature phone with that,with gprs and bluetooth etc. amazing price.

      e.g. the Nokia 7650 with built in camera and mms, of course gprs is=$250!

  6. Re:One more thing... by SealBeater · · Score: 2


    What si the security like with this thing, it works in the 900Mhz range, I know alot of 900Mhz phones that are easily tapped with cheap equiptment. I hope Sony has thought this through.


    Personally, I hope they haven't. Maybe that's bad, but it's true.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
  7. Re:But why.. by jeremyacole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heh. Either you're trolling, or you completely miss the point. Try taking your cable modem to another country... or even accross town. Try using it from the local coffee shop. Nope. Didn't think so.

    This is seriosly cool stuff. I wish (WISH!) that GPRS (or even good GSM coverage) was available in the USA at large. I'm still stuck with my TDMA phone until they get better coverage.

  8. bandwidth by asv108 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With At&T, I pay $5 for every 2 megs of bandwidth used. If I buy this card, it would cost me $15 just to download all the porn spam I get every morning. Unless the bandwidth costs get reasonable, I won't buy it. What happens if I accidently click on a goatse link? Can I send someone an invoice?

  9. Why arn't we using Bluetooth by The+Evil+Twin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I've been reading about how in the UK everyone is using bluetooth enabled devices. This device becomes a perfect example of a "why do we need this?" product.

    The way things should be:
    - Most notebooks come with bluetooth.
    - you have a Bluetooth enabled GPRS phone.

    Done.. there is your internet connection.
    Intead, for us stuck here in North America. We get CDMA, and no bluetooth to speak of (except as an option on some high end notebooks). Sure we can buy an adapter for the notebook. But no phones.

    --
    --- tracer.ca
    1. Re:Why arn't we using Bluetooth by radish · · Score: 2

      Who needs bluetooth? I've been doing exactly that for years with the power of Irda!

      I admit that BT can give faster speeds, and doesn't require line of sight, but for simple "check your email from laptop" it's so easy and works just fine. I use my mobile from my laptop, Palm and sometimes PC (when my landline dies, which it does sometimes).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Why arn't we using Bluetooth by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
      So I've been reading about how in the UK everyone is using bluetooth enabled devices. This device becomes a perfect example of a "why do we need this?" product.

      Uhhhh, no. That is, I'm afriad, a bit of a fallacy. Yes, we have bluetooth phones here (and the odd headset - which costs a fortune and makes you look an idiot, hence low take up) but if you think we're all using these devices then I'm afriad you're wrong.

      At the moment there are two Nokia phones (7650 and 6310i), one SonyEricsson and probably two others of other makes. This isn't much.

      I actually have a theory that Bluetooh won't really start to take off in the UK until Nokia starts supporting it on every single phone.

      At the moment they're only putting it into high end mobile phones. Out of the 9 phones they've announced 3 have bluetooth. Whilst this might not sound that bad, one of those is a 3G phone, one of those is a communicator and the other is their top of the range model.

      Granted I don't expect the new budget 2110 to have it, but considering the chips are cheap, available and low power - it would make more sense to stick them into all phones.

      After all, text messaging didn't become popular by being put on only the most expensive phones. Yes, there was interoperability issues too, but if you want people to use new technology, you can't price it out of the range of the masses.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    3. Re:Why arn't we using Bluetooth by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      Intead, for us stuck here in North America. We get CDMA, and no bluetooth to speak of (except as an option on some high end notebooks). Sure we can buy an adapter for the notebook. But no phones.

      You're not trying hard enough. I have T-Mobile in Boston. I have a Nokia 6310i phone. I have a 3800 series iPaq. I regularly read Slashdot from my iPaq while on the tram home from work.

      I actually really like the idea of this PCMCIA card, as my thinkpad doesn't have bluetooth, and the Belkin USB-Bluetooth adapter I bought for it absolutely breaks Win2k. (or maybe I just need a new Thinkpad... hmm...)

    4. Re:Why arn't we using Bluetooth by radish · · Score: 2

      I have done, and as I said in my post, BT gives a "no line of sight" benefit, which is certainly useful. But hardly revoloutionary...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  10. I think the Nokia D211 is much cooler by adrianm · · Score: 3, Informative

    GPRS, HSCSD, and 802.11 all in a single PC Card
    (http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,1522,,00.html? orig=/ phones/nokiad211)

  11. Wonder if it's really Windows-only by Des+Herriott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If it's like other PCMCIA GPRS cards I've encountered, it might work under Linux/BSD/etc. - simply appearing as a serial device to which you send AT commands (and thus available to run pppd on).

    The Windows-only sticker may just refer to some cutesy control centre applet which will (obviously) only run on Windows. Every modem needs its own control centre on Windows these days, it seems.

    1. Re:Wonder if it's really Windows-only by Des+Herriott · · Score: 2, Informative
      I should have done some more research :-) Yes, it looks like it will work just fine on a Unix-type OS. It does indeed appear as a regular serial device.

      Check out this link (and the followups to it)

    2. Re:Wonder if it's really Windows-only by chrestomanci · · Score: 2

      Probably not.

      Moshe Bar (Of open Mosix fame) recetly wrote a byte column on how he got his GPRS phone talking to his laptop while on his honeymoon in the Italian alps.

      What his new wife thought about it was not recorded.

      I hope this helps.

    3. Re:Wonder if it's really Windows-only by Surak · · Score: 2

      There's a True Geek (tm) for you. Working on getting his GPRS phone on his honeymoon instead of having sex. Now you know why there are so many single geeks. :-P

  12. Anonymous Surfing? by SealBeater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is interesting. According to the article, you can swap out the SIM card on the modem. Two immediate options occured to me. One, cell phone theft is a problem in Europe. This can lead to people swiping a cell phone, grabbing the SIM card and doing whatever needs to be done anonymously via the Internet. I'm sure everyone can use their imagination. Second, and perhaps more interesting, there are various services that will purchase or provide SIM cards that are (more or less) anonymous, so you can make phone calls that are not traceable to you. These pre-paid SIM cards are rechargable. This could be a help if you had one in a climate where you needed to make sure something you posted on the web, for example, would be far more difficult to trace. Very exciting. Brave new world.

    SealBeater

    --
    -- Its survival of the fittest...and we got the fucking guns!!!
    1. Re:Anonymous Surfing? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you could always do this.. of course you can switch the sim card on the modem, how else were you going to get your sim card in it? and being what it is(basically a gprs phone without phone look options). and this is hardly the first one of these to hit the market even, several solutions exist yet, but they dont do triband afaik like this.

      provider/phonenumber locking per phone is medieval, something you hear horrorstories from nmt days.

      and gprs doesnt do anything 'new' to this, not in this modem or anything. you could always use the 'data' mode of the gsm phone to post things with these. for hmm, 9 years already?

      and as somebody mentioned, very few of these precharged providers provide gprs, but that is non issue anyways as long they provide some way to make data calls.

      they could use the wap/gprs-modem portions of the phone itself even if the sim card was epoxied in every phone.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  13. Re:One more thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    900 MHz is also European GSM range. They cannot be easily tapped with cheap equipment.

    Also note, when they are talking about triband, they mean 900/1800/1900 MHz, GSM only.

  14. Nokia Cardphone by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 5, Informative

    Also, compare it to the Nokia Cardphone. Works with Linux, too :-)

  15. Re:One more thing... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    **** 900 MHz is also European GSM range. They cannot be easily tapped with cheap equipment.

    Also note, when they are talking about triband, they mean 900/1800/1900 MHz, GSM only.****

    i'd mod you up, gsm, not nmt/whatever.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  16. It has happend if you buy Nokia by chrestomanci · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the D211
    http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,4879,1449,00.ht ml

    It is a wireless PCMCIA conectivity card, which supports both GPRS and 802.11b

    There are even linux drivers avalabe to to download. (I don't know if they work)

    It has been out for a couple of months.

    The main downside is that it only supports dual band opperation, so I guess american readers are out of luck.

    The other downside is that switching between GPRS and 802.11 is not automatic, though you could probably put together a script to make it so.

    I dare say it is rather expensive as well.

    1. Re:It has happend if you buy Nokia by chrestomanci · · Score: 2

      There is also an American version called the D311.

      http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,5184,2022,00.html

      It works on american GPRS frequences, but is otherwise very similar.

  17. Re:Well... by Arker · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's not a phone, that wouldn't be news, I've got a tri-band GPRS phone in my pack. Plug it in via firewire... anyway this isn't a phone, it doesn't do voice, data only, it's a PMCIA card dedicated GPRS modem. And you're right, it's expensive, mind you the nice thing with GPRS is that you don't pay for time connected, just bits transferred, so if you filter your mail on the server and browse with lynx you could keep constantly up to date relatively cheaply. GPRS service in Europe runs around 20 cents a megabyte IIRC, depending on where you are of course... anyone know about the US? it would definately get expensive fast if you don't take steps to keep your bandwidth usage limited.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  18. Not so new... by sheriff_p · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Turns out with my T68, Bluetooth dongle, and iBook, I already have a tri-band GRPS phone that works with a stable operating system...

    --
    Score:-1, Funny
  19. So What? by kitsook · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why not just buy a gprs phone? then use infra-red to connect your notebook/ppc to the phone?

  20. It won't fly in europe. by alecbrown · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They keep coming out with this cool technology but price it out of reach. My T39 Ericsson mobile phone has been able to connect via GPRS and my laptop's IrDA port for a year now, never done it though because my network providers (O2) costs is extortionate in my opinion, I stick to GSM dialup at 9600 bps to download my email when I am on the move. These mobile telcos shoot themselves in the foot.

    Three years ago they were pushing WAP hard but then made it expensive to use, so no-one used it in Europe and all the techie press (including slashdot) said it was a dead and cr@p because of the small form factor, where are the WAP sites now? Slashdot's WAP site seems to have gone (eh Taco?). In South Korea they made WAP and GPRS affordable, and everyone used it, there are lots of sites and both technologies are considered a success.

    The really strange technology success (for the telcos) is txting, they thought no-one would be interested so they bundled it as a cheap feature, and everyone used it. If they make GPRS cheap and put useful things on WAP (such as TV guides) then everyone will use it.

    £rd generation mobile technologies will also fail unless these telcos learn this painful lesson.

  21. Re:Missing country option, again?!?! by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
    Personally I get really offended when such a wide variety of countries are supported but my beloved home country of Ecuador is not.

    Missing options:

    I'm from Ecuador, you insensitive clod!

    CowboyNealia

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  22. In praise of smarter markets by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We must quietly respect the gentle extension of market share on the part of the Big Guy. No whining, no complaints, no trolls: manufacturers are flooding the market with products that are only going to work with the Master System.
    The reasonable thing to do is refuse to purchase these products until a reasonable selection of drivers is available for them.
    Also, try not to by new boxes incorporating inflexible hardware.
    Smarter markets are the key to a better future.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  23. Already Been Done by GuyZero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gee, too bad there's already the same thing... in Compact Flash.

    http://www.shoppingpda.com/product/rtm8000/rtm80 00 .asp

    GSM/GPRS, Tri-band, data, earphone jack for voice calls, supports PDAs & Windows - oh, and it's only $283 USD. Cheaper too.

  24. I can't wait until this tech is invisible. by sstory · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When this tech is invisible, I'll be able to buy a laptop, and it will just be online. No worrying about cards or areas, it'll just be omnipresent connectivity.

  25. Ummm... by rcs1000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    All European cell-phones have removable SIM cards. Many, although most users don't realise it, have built in modems.

    The Nokia 7xxx and 8xxx, plus the Ericsson R520, T28 and T68. By using either IR or Bluetooth, you can attach these phones to a laptop, and can then use an anonymous Internet account (like Freeserve in the UK.)

    Indeed, I have been using this method (except for the Freeserve bit) for about four years now to access the web when I am travelling. It's not quick, but it's super useful.

    Contrary to this posters' opinion, most criminals won't use stolen cell phones for Internet access. It's slow and clunky, and there are still ways to find who posted the hypothetical email message...

    (1) Trace email message to ISP.
    (2) Dredge ISP log to find phone number and time, duration of call.
    (3) Contact cell phone company that carried the call, discover IMEI number of the cell-phone.

    Now if anyone uses that cell phone again... you will know. You can track which cell they are in, etc. Complicated, but theoretically possible to catch the person you want.

    Thx,

    Robert

    --
    --- My dad's political betting
  26. Who needs a computer to find food? by T1girl · · Score: 2

    Seems like a great product that could be very useful to travelling businessmen, and even just vacationers looking for a good place to eat.

    Finding food while travelling is one of the most basic instincts - even the most primitive hunters and gatherers managed it. I've been on many trips and vacations and never found it necessary to do much more than "follow my nose" to find something decent to eat. Most "travel guides" seem to steer you to over-priced tourist traps, so I would need some other motivation to take another expensive gizmo along on a vacation.

    In most of the world there is no such thing as a doggie bag. -- Prof. Kelly Brownell

  27. Re:One more thing... by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is GSM, it's encrypted. It's crackable in reasonable time, but it's certainly not "easily tapped with cheap equipment". This is nothing new, remember GSM has been around for years. I have never heard of anyone tapping GSM transmissions (publically anyway), whilst it used to be common place with *shudder* analogue cellphones.

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  28. cdma 1x cards already available by gyc · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the U.S., at least, you can already purchase a CDMA 1x PC Card for $200 that will get you speeds over 100kbps.

    1. Re:cdma 1x cards already available by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      tell me mr. anderson, what good is a cdma card unless you have service for it?

      the point is that it's triband, and even though it's not the first one.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  29. Motorola P280 by rit · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a Motorola P280 (purchased last year) TriBand GSM Mobile which does the same thing. It's access is via t-mobile here in the states; it came with a serial cable which plugs right into the phone - the phone is a full 56k modem which when plugged into serial port is addressable as a standard modem - no special software required.

    It also handles GPRS modem, which does require special "iStream" software ( dunno what voicestream calls it now that they rebanded to t-mobile) and only runs on Windows.

    It has all the same features of the above mentioned modem, but it also is a phone.

    I paid about $300 for it in January, so it's probably more affordable now.

    They have an i280 now also that is same phone PLUS bluetooth.

    I love the Motorola bluetooth car kit....

    1. Re:Motorola P280 by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2

      Unfortunatly, it wouldn't work with some providers in the USA - ATTWS doesn't use Circuit Switched Data, thye only use their very expensive GPRS service.

    2. Re:Motorola P280 by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      I was able to get a GPRS connection through my P280 to my Mac over IR, so it's not Windows-only. Finding the right modem script is impossible, though.

  30. Re:Always on? by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    You pay for bytes on GPRS, not being online. Just like some of those corparate lines.

  31. If you really need it by Arker · · Score: 2

    With At&T, I pay $5 for every 2 megs of bandwidth used. If I buy this card, it would cost me $15 just to download all the porn spam I get every morning. Unless the bandwidth costs get reasonable, I won't buy it.

    Youch, that's a lot more expensive than it is here (Sweden) IIRC. That said, if you really need the portable connection, there are ways to minimise the bandwidth needed. Filter your mail on the server, use an IMAP client (mail.app on mac, mutt on *nix, pmail on windows all work alright for this) and set it to only download headers automatically, wait till you request the message to get the body, wait till you request attachments to get them... and browse with lynx. Or at least turn off image loading. Do all that and you'll cut your bandwidth usage tremendously.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    1. Re:If you really need it by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2

      It's not really as bad as you think.
      Sprint, for example, offers reasonably priced (well, sort of) unlimited plans (as does Verizion). AT&T just has high prices.

      BTW: Both Verizion and Sprint use CDMA; not GSM; however, CDMA is actually a tad bit faster than GPRS.

  32. Re:One more thing... by Ilgaz · · Score: 2

    Tapping a GSM? um, its possible, with $100k equipment and a cool supercomputer like Cray or some Sun high end.but I think its easy to tap a ISP,e.g. bribing them.

    GSM has encryription, a REAL high level of encyription.

  33. Not a big deal.. by MikeFM · · Score: 2

    So get this card and a WiFi card and configure your computer to change over to the WiFi network when possible. Something similar to how dual-band phones work. The project to implement an open (free as in speech and beer) wireless phone network is designed in such a way.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  34. Range by Myuu · · Score: 2

    funny, you can get the service in 160 countries but you cant get it in farking north dakota

    --

    forget it.
  35. Nokia 6310i by magi · · Score: 2

    Why buy a modem card? Why not a cell phone and a cable or Bluetooth? It's almost as convenient and much more multi-purpose.

    6310i is tri-band, has GPRS, Bluetooth, and all the standard phone stuff. And works perfecly with Linux. I'm quite happy with it, except when I have to reboot it occasionally to get the GPRS working.

    With Bluetooth, any Bluetooth-cabable system can use the cell phone as a GPRS modem right from your pocket. For example, I have a Sony TRV-50 video camera that has Bluetooth, web browser, and e-mail client. Theoretically, I could use my cell phone as a modem for the camera. Ok, not in practice, I haven't gotten it to work yet.